WEBVTT - Leading Off August 14th, 2024 (Ep. 885)

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What's up, friends, that welcome into Leading Off right here

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Pros. I am the Welsh, that is the Bubba.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>We're thuying it all over the place, and we're excited

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to be doing it with you guys here today, right

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>here on Leading Off, where we're talking about massive home

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>run outputs, massive explosions. I looked by the way, I

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>believe there were seven starting pitchers that gave up five

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or more earned runs yesterday, just absolutely through the roof.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We also had some prospect ups. We get to talk

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>about some of that, which I'm excited to do. But

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of course we want to tell you guys. Leading Off

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Bet three six five. You

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>guys can check it out. Leading Off is the promo

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>code bet five to get one fifty in bonus bets

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>only over at Bet three sixty five. You can do

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>it today, get in on the action. There's a gambling

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>problem called one eight hundred bets off or one eight

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred gambler promo code Leading Off. Do it today, Kay,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>see Bubba in the house once I can find the

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>marker there, Buba, what is up? My brother wearing the

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Peoria Havelina's hat which very apropos. I received the af

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the AFL schedule yesterday, so I know where all the

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>games are and all the craziness. So uh, hat tip

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to you for the Arizona Fall League representation.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one of my favorite hats from last year. I

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 2>had to get a Scorpions one too, because those are

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 2>pretty sweet. They didn't have the size from my big

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>dome this past year, but yeah, looking forward to it. Man,

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be out there and seeing you in

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple of months, which is crazy. So always a

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 2>fun way.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Hat size. Are you over seven and a half?

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>This one is a seven. I go anywhere from seven

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and three quarters to an eight to an eight. Bruce Bochi,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Bruce Bochie type.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>You're a Juice Williams type of guy. I remember Juice

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Williams Illinois. Yeah, you are a Bruce Bochie type of guy.

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a strong seven and a half and

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>then I think sometimes hair depending. I can even rock

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a seven and three eighths, that's the thing. So just

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>had you know, as everybody knows they want to exc.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any hair to worry about. It could

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>be in a lot of trouble.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Yeah, you would be rocking the Bruce bochiness of it.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>All.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, let's get into action, Let's get into all of

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it here, Let's get into Juan Soto. When are we

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>going to stop letting Joe do in perpetuity home run bets,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>especially for the best players. I think we should. We

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>need to do like a draft or a wheel where

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>we spin it and we don't allow someone like Juan

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Soto or Aaron Judge to be in perpetuity because, by God,

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he might end up taking this whole soucker down. He

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>might take this whole soucker down. Juan Soto yesterday three

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for four, three homers for RBI in Tuesday's win over

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox. I also saw a stat someone put

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out that it was like career hits of Oneo Cruz

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ninety two career homers of Juan Soto

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ninety two, which and they're like the

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>same age practically. Wan Soto so continues to defy the odds.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that was his first three home run.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Game of the year. Bubba, Yes, it was yeah, first

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>of his career, our career, Yah, his career, first of

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>his career. So yeah, he's ridiculous what he's doing to

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>get a fat stack of cash at the end of

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>this year. And on Bubba and the Bloom last night,

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>we did barrel percentage in K percentage. Guys, one soda

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 2>this year has a higher barrel rate than strikeout rate

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 2>on the season.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that for real? Hold on, I'm going to list that.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he has a higher barrel Was this Aaron, Yes,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>a bloom board Aaron. Judge is the only other one

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to do it. Bloom didn't tweet it out yet. He

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>might have tweeted it out this morning, but yeah, Judge

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 2>is also on that list. And last year the only

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>player to do it was Ronald 'cuon.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I almost cursed. I'm gonna be honest with you, I

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>almost cursed here. That wouldn't have been good. Twenty point

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>two percent barrel rate for one sodo fifteen point four

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>percent k rate. Here's another one. Many times have you

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ever seen a guy I mean, I guess it's probably

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>one and the same. But his barrel rates also higher

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>than his walk rate. His strikeout rate and walk rate combined,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not like combined combined, But that's an absurd,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>absurd number. And would you say only Ronald Acunya had

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a higher barrel rate things.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Last last year? Last year was a Kunya was the

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>only one? Yeah? Wow? And right and right now Judge

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>is the only other one with Soto this year, and

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Corey Seeger and show He Tany are like two percentage

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>points away, so we almost have four guys.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>See this real quick? Do you think there was a

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>bet that was out like a month ago or so

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>where it was Aaron Judge versus the field and it

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>was for MVP. Sorry, and I saw that and I

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was always tempted to, you know, play that field marker.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that Aaron Judge is the unanimous MVP

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>over onon Sodo? Because I would almost argue, like what

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Sodo has been doing, he should be the one. I know,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like Judge, you know the home run totals are going,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know, man. I look at what one

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Soto's doing and I feel like that's the MVP of

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this team.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you because if you look at it, when

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>one Soto's going, the Yankees win. When Aaron Judge goes,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Judge just goes. So that's kind of how it works.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm with you on that one. I actually have

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a bet with Ryan preseason bet because they're drafted next

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>to each other. I took Soto, he took Judge. They're

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>basically the top two players on any player raider you

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>see right now. So pretty fun stuff. That is pretty fun.

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous. By the way, I wanted to put these.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>These made me laugh. Jim not a seven and a half.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a ten in Jim's Thank you Jim, and Sabo

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Bubba is going to bankrupt a high school team with

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the with the trying to get those helmets, those some

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 1>big helmets.

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>You should have saw that helmet and those pads. It

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 2>was a thick look going around campus.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you think a man? This is the tough question.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Where is Soto in the in the ranks of next year?

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Like do you think he is one, two, three? Like?

0:05:58.279 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>How does that line out for you?

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because we started talking about that last night

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>because next Wednesday we do our two early Draft champions draft,

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>which everyone makes fun of us for. Yeah, and we

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 2>figured it's wit Judge and I was totally o Tawny

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 2>top three and then you have like your bets and

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Soto right behind him, it feels like bets Soto, Ellie,

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a so he's I'd say Soto is a top

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 2>five six player right now in my opinion. Everyone harps

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>on the stolen base issue, but dude, the four of

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the categories, he just destroys him.

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's gonna put up he might put up

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>forty something Homer forty five, forty two, something like that,

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>three hundred average. He's got one hundred runs already.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's already.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous. That has to be leading. I don't know

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's there's something to be said that, Like he

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>might be number two, like he might.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Be like I think Wit is kind of you take

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>him over Wit.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, who's number one?

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Well you have Wit? You have show? Hey?

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, showy? Was they gonna show? Hey? No, no

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>show Hey?

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Number one?

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Wit too?

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>And Judge. So it's between him and Judge.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>What you're saying, Yeah, I'm in I think you can

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>go either way. I'm like Soda in that regard, like

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that's fair.

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna argue that.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe like head to head, Judge just

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for what he can do for Homers in a given

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>week roto, maybe Sodo roto.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's fair because I had had to

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>head Judge could single handily whin you a week, like

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>play a third of the season at least, yeah, at

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 2>least where Soda might long term.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, we got a Soda over Judge. This

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is always a really interesting one retro saying this wait

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for MVP, but also that Judge and Sodo cancel each

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>other out. There is kind of something to that when

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>two teams have two great players. Kind of the conversation

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we had at one point about Otani and Mookie Bets

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and that, like they were so good and then like

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you throw Freddy Freeman in there, that might hurt a

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>guy like Otani, But I don't know. I think I

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think they all kind of come to terms with like, oh,

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be one of those Yankee guys because

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the ridiculous season. But one Sodo season just continues

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to get ridiculous, and I am it's very unfortunate. As

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking, I got the home run board and

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>just a gross thing to look at. Speaking of the

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Yankee zo, it's not all beautiful. Aaron Boone told reporters,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I believe this was like the beginning of yesterday, jazz

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Chism been diagnosed with a left UCL injury. Oswald Perraza

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be called up in replacement. This is

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the worry man, you know, in all of the like,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, the biggest beneficiary at the trade deadline

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is jazz Chisholm. I said that, and I want to

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>say it might have even been Bogman. I don't know

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>if Joe did it. You know, Joe might have actually

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>also said this, and maybe he was the primary one.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But you got to worry about the injury history with

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>jazz Chism, and you're just kind of like, well, it's

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a short time period, it's two months, and then Jazz

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>comes out absolutely hot, and then it happens. The injury bug,

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like he I called him a year and a half ago,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>called him the modern Gian Carlos Stanton. As far as

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just he is an injury plagued player. There's always something

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.599
<v Speaker 1>that's going on. This UCL injury. I hear UCL, and

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I assume this might be the year. I don't think

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they've given anything designation of it or anything like that.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But absolutely devastating for fantasy people too, because jazz was

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>taking another step with the Yankees.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was. He got the injury or tweaked it worse,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess diving headfirst into home plate. So that's always fun.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, that's how he plays though, that's where

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the a lot of the injuries come from. But yeah,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 2>taking things to the next level. They have not ruled

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 2>surgery off the table. They're gonna do a few more

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>tests to see. Being an offensive player not a pitcher

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>so much. Can he just do the rehab situation. But yeah,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not good either way. I have a hunch he's

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>done for the season or too, So that's no good.

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>His highest batting average of any given month was this

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>month in August with the Yankees. He had had a

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>couple two seventy months, but he was hitting homers. He

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>was stealing bases again too. He had nine in July,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he had four in four and essentially thirty eight at

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bats this month. I mean, he really was taking a

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>next step and that one's that's a pretty brutal blow.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Brutal blow for the Yankees too, and everything they're trying

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to put together. We will Praza do anything for you. Yeah,

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>your nay.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I keep an eye on him. He's actually started hitting

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 2>over the last month, he's looking a lot better. So

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>if you look at a season stats, they're not great.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>The last month closer to three hundred, little power, little speed,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Probably not anything except deeper formats at this point in time,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>but just keep an eye on him. That could be

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>a late season stream.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>One big pickup for a lot of people. And the

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>guy we talked about so much on this show, Junior

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Cameronaro Junior camerera official debut. I think this was did

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we get the new I don't remember if we even

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on Monday. I think it might have

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>happened right after, which is totally unfortunate, especially now that

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the Tuesday Thursday shows, so we didn't

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>get time to talk to you about it. But it

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>did officially happen. I would say a mixed debut in

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of a little bit where I think things could go.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Where he hits, he gets a single, puts up a

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>one sixteen point three Max TV on that single, other

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>three at bats, three strikeouts. So backtrack a little bit.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I just did Prospect one and we were talking talking

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like me and Tim Kinnak were talking about the call

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>up and kind of the insanity of it and trying

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand it, because I will still say this like

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this right now is the period where, like everybody would

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have real baseball on fantasy, you would look

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>back and you would go, what are we doing? Why

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>did he not come up any earlier? We completely lost

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>the season for him. But then now we're also and

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this is more of the real life thing. He's also

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>going to lose his prospect eligibility, so like, why are

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we doing this? I figured something out on the fly.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to point out. It doesn't really mean

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot to everybody here, but I figured something out

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on the fly. When I did Prospect one, which is

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>releasing today, I remembered that September the days on the

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>roster do not count toward your eligibility because there are

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>two Yeah, I forgot about this and I remembered it live.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>There are two factors to losing your prospect eligibility for

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a hitter. It at bats and it's days on the roster.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So if you looked at the call up, you're like

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>forty five days on the roster. He's gonna max that out. No,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>he's not, because as soon as September hits, those days

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do not count towards losing your eligibility.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Hey, the math eighte math in on this one.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>So he has like, let's say he had thirty four

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at bats last year, that was call it fifteen days, right,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say that there's only eighteen more days since

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>his call up or seventeen. That's not forty five days.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So now all they have to do is not have

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>him go one hundred and thirty eight bats to end

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the season and he doesn't lose his prospect eligibility. So

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Sebel says, I'm lost a repeat one last time. To

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lose your prospect eligibility, you have to be on the

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>major league roster for forty five days or have one

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty at bats. The days would be gone

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>since he just got called up, except per ten September

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist. So now if if the team doesn't have

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>him have one hundred and thirty at bats, he will

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be prospect eligible for next season. This isn't really fantasy

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>relevant outside of you guys that maybe have fantasy leagues

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that you can hold prospects under if they're still prospect eligible.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But I have not been able to understand why would

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they bring him up right now, when you're getting almost

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing out of him and you're going to lose his

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>prospect eligibility, he might not lose his prospect eligibility if

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>they have him sit games, and three strikeout games might

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>be a reason that they maybe play him two out

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of three days. So if he doesn't have one hundred

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and thirty played appearances, he can still be a rookie

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>next year. So just I wanted to unload that. I

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's obviously confusing. It's a weird, stupid baseball

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>rule that September days on the roster do not count

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>towards your prospect eligibility.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Why, I have no idea.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>All of that said, you saw the good and you

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>saw the bad of Junior Camonaro. Everyone's going to roll

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>him out. He's obviously a must pick up at this point,

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but I am not sold a that he is going

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to play every single day and B that it's really

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be massively fantasy relevant. You're going to see

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>some of the pitch recognition stuff with those strikeouts, but

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>one sixteen also shows you the pure raw power bubble.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, the talent's great. Now you clarified so

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.599
<v Speaker 2>many questions I had because I had we had this

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 2>long discussion last night, like what are they doing? They're

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>going to lose the perks to all this. It made

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>no sense. So they're like part of me and you

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>don't have to know the answer this obviously is if

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>games don't exist in September, then why do they have

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>bats exist in September? Like that doesn't make any sense,

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Like we can't it's that's bizarre world. But that's it's

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>an old up, So there you go.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It's an old rule to the forty man remember in

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>September when forty mans and all the guys would come

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>up on the roster. So it was a rule that

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like the teams wouldn't be penalized with their players if

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>they're just sitting on this this raw. Yeah, and I

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>don't and it they never changed it, so that's viable.

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So like I know, it's it's a way. I'm just pointing,

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a way for the race they manipulate. Manipulated loophole.

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It is a definite loophole. Yeah, and you know they're

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna find that loophole. But you know, pay attention to

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what J Junior Camenaro's games games used or actually are

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and a great sign to the pure raw power one

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen is there. Let's see how he adjusts. We know

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>adjustments have been kind of up and down. Speaking of

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>another prospect, James Wood four for five double in an RBI,

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>three runs scored yesterday. All three of Wood's hits were

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>one oh two point five or harder, which is very impressive,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's now up to a two eighty three bat

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>batting average with a two seventy OBP. The free James

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Wood campaign has worked out very well, and James Wood

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>has been the prospect you've wanted to own really from

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the onset. He's the only one that has kind of

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>maintained that Jackson Holiday is back. Obviously, Cam and Aro

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a disappointment because he hasn't got called up.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But James Wood is the guy next year, mister Casey Bubba,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>James Wood or Junior Cam.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll go James would. I believe Camon Arrow is pretty

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 2>darn solid, but I'll go James Wood on this one.

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I love what I'm seeing here and he keeps getting better.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned like the improvements last sixteen games, nearly hitting

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>four hundred sixteen run score thirteen rbiyes a couple of

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>home runs, four steals. He's doing it all, so I'll

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>take that.

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel bad for even like I just broke the

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>chat's brain. Did Yeah, everybody's brain.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Trying to it looks like Charlie from Always Sunny right

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>now trying to put the board together.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Sabo said, my GPS sent me to a cliff, Like everybody,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I just broke everybody's brain with that. All I was

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you is if there's a really smart

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>person in the Rais organization, this is why they did

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it here. Because they found the loophole of how to

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to manipulate and hold him hostage. They can continue

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Another rookie, Zebbie Matthews, who we talked about.

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Zebby has been a pickup for me mentioned I saw

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you tweet about this stat. I talked about this on Monday.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But seven walks in the minor leagues all year, I

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>don't care what level it is. Well and Irony, we're

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about it in a second. It's I mentioned

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's George kirby esky yesterday, but it's that same idea

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of a guy that can hit high nineties with a fastball.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He commands really well. He does not walk guys, and

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of due to that command, he gets higher K numbers.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That's who Zebby is. Well. Zebby went out and had

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a really solid outing, two earned runs over five innings,

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>struck out five, did not walk anybody. I'm gonna pull

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up his other metrics here, but why don't you talk

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to me what you thought about Zebbi because I think

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>even though the rookie pitchers are really volatile, he was

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of a must pick up for me just based

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on his arsenal.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it was outstanding that the arsenals, like

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 2>you said, is a lot of these rookie guys, there's

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>volatility in the command. That's just kind of what we see.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>We're not seeing that with Zebbi throughout the miners. And

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 2>you got the quick jump high aaa as you've probably

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>discussed as well. But seeing him do it against a

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Royals team that's hitting well, he struck out Bobby wit

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>for crying out loud like that's pretty good STUF. So

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm very intrigued with Joe Ryan essentially out for the season,

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Chris Paddock still is barely throwing a baseball. There's room

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 2>for David Festa and Zebbe Matthews to coexist for a

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks if not the rest of the season.

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm very intrigued by that potential out there.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and looking at his stuff, this is interesting because

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this is this is how I think that this is

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the type of guy. How he's going to get away

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with stuff. On his fastball. He had fifteen swings against

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the fastball, only one whiff, So I don't see this.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>This is not going to be one of the like

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be looking for other stuff because the

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>inverse he had eleven called strikes on the fastball, so

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>it was a atrocious whiff pitch, but csw percentage you know,

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>shout out to fast and pitcherless thirty two percent. That

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was the second best of his pitches. So the overall

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>value when you put in called and strikes, the fastball

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>gets it done. It was a low percentage slider with

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent with right but thirty eight percent on

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the cutter. And you know, he maintained all his zone stuff.

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>He actually had a really low in zone swing percentage

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on pitches. So I think that part has to do

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with like them not knowing and having a pitch mix

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on this guy, but he kind of kept you know,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>fastball in the zone, kept the secondaries out of the

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>zone through a little bit of a curveball in there.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just a lot to be positive about.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that I would probably keep rolling out there,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pick him up if he's available. I thought that start

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was a really good one. A bad start was my

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>boy George Kirby, who was obliterated for eleven earned runs,

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>thirteen hits, three and two thirds of an inning. But

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I would be fascinated to know if

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like a DFS contest was messed by this or something

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>like that. But they then ruled later an error which

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>took away I believe five of the earned runs. Yeah,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>five earned runs. It took away. And I saw Scott

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>White tweet this that he's era in one day went

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>from three to one to three seven down to three

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>four when it was fixed, like BP pup up. That's

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>how much it changed. Kirby got absolutely obliterated, and unfortunately

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he's good for like two of these a year. He's

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>good for like two of these outings every single year,

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's no rhyme or reason when it's gonna happen.

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Why it's gonna happen. But he was absolutely destroyed. There

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was a Grand Slam in there, thirteen hits. Jake Rodgers

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>were gonna talk about in a little bit, and let's

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>see the fourth would have left, and yeah, they were

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about this is a note on rotal World. Was interesting.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Was like like even the Grand Slam wouldn't have been

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a home run in a lot of other places. So

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>it just he gave up just some poor hits, some

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>poor luck in there, and he just gets locked out

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for like two or three games a year.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's it's pretty wild how these great pitchers all

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 2>have these hiccups, and it just stinks that it happens

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>in mid August this year. If you're trying to go

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>for a championship, it's when you least needed this to happen.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of disappointed too. I mean, I was clearly

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a really big Kirby guy, and I was like in

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>a good spot with that three to one era. You know,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he could have finished out the It's gonna be really difficult,

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>impossible to finish under a three era at this point.

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be one of those middling years. But I'm

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I'm not super big into the whole. Like

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>if you extrapolate and take you know, two start but

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know sometimes with some guys it would be interesting

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you take away two starts, what does it end up looking? Like?

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>The only problem is how, like how do you account

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>for pictures that that do this? Like is that built

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>into that pre draft value of not giving them upside?

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it's impossible to predict, Like why was this the

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>start where he got obliterated in Is there any special

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>way outside of just maybe dropping them down a spot

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>or two for these I'm trying to think of the

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>other guys that do this. I feel like Logan Gilbert.

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Say, it's what they do in Seattle basically yeah, so no,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a you can you can either drop him like

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a ranking or two or in reality, this is one

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>reason why I like Roto. I know you're head to

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 2>head guy, but just you know what you're gonna get

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>for the full season stats. These are his full season stats.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 2>You're it's kind of baked into the projections and whatnot

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 2>of what you're expecting from him. So in the end,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 2>he's still a low three e er, a guy with

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>a phenomenal whip good strikeouts and you're gonna be happy.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you think what do you think the percentage is

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right now of people roado versus head to head? And

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's changed over like this is say

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the last five years, Like do you think, yeah.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I think there's been meaning there's probably more Roto coming

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 2>over the last few years. But I still think it's

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 2>heavy head to head people because most people that play

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 2>fantasy baseball game from fantasy football, we know that whole story.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So I and and most people play on Yahoo, CBS,

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>ESPN compared to you know, I live in the NFBC

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 2>world where it's all roto, So I'd still imagine it.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd say it's at least sixty sixty five percent head

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>to head, maybe more, but I think it's I gine

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty large number still.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So then do you think over the last five years,

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ten years, it's moved to a little like the percentage

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of it's going higher in favor of Roto, but it's

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>still head head.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think it probably Okay, it's probably seventy five

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to eighty percent head to head at one point, and

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just slowly shifting. But we probably kind of getting

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 2>close to the you know, not moving much more point.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd be very curious chat if you guys have any

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>opinions on this or anybody watching after the fact, you

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>can do it on the YouTube. As always, we check

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>them out, so interact on the YouTube. I'm curious. I

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was going to disagree with you, but then I realize,

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>like points leagues are head to head and points leagues

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>are very prominent, have always been kind of the og

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of things. The thing that does happen is I think

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>once you've experienced base spend fantasy baseball more, you become

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a cry baby, and then

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you need rodo. I like rotos and stuff like that,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've been killed by it, but we know that

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>roto is the crybaby format of like, oh I was

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the best all year and I lost in the playoffs

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 1>variance This is crazy, but like you become more jaded

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to it and you gotta play ROTO. I play a

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit more ROTO now, but head to head probably

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is I think you actually might be right. I wanted

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to go in and disagree. Now I'm thinking that you

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>might be right that it was ten years ago way

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>more head to head and it's moved into more roto

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because I also think fantasy baseball that's the growth period.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just like you break into fantasy baseball, you play

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>some form of head to head probably points, then you

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>play longer and then roto kind of takes you over.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 2>And that's with more and more projections being used in

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 2>fantasy baseball that caters to a roto audience compared to

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 2>a head to head audience. So I think that's more

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>of a thing.

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is interesting, Walkee said. My fear is that

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>roto is climbing because we're losing casual players who only

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>want to play head to head. Yeah. Maybe, And I

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think that is something if you want to if you

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>want to look at like the grand scope of all

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>of it is, fantasy baseball is very complicated. It can

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>be very complicated, and finding the best ways to make

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it easier. DFS really was the potential for that. It

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch on. Yeah, DFS baseball did not catch on enough.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It is finding easier formats, and you know, football continue

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>even though they they were so simplistic, they're adding in

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>little complexities that people are loving more. Now everybody plays

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>super super flex. Superflex is to what standard to PPR

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>used to be if you know what I mean, everybody

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>played standard, then they went to like half PPR PPR superflex.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Is that popular now? Baseball hasn't found a way to

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.959
<v Speaker 1>like accommodate that, you know, de emphasize. Yeah. Yeah, they

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>need to be less complex. And I guess the argument

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>would be that's like a head to head to a

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>format or something.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of ideas that have been thrown around,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>like monthly leagues or this, that or the other kind

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>of change things up. In the end, do what you enjoy?

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy sports should be fun? Yeah? Would you enjoy it?

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Should always be fun. That's the most important thing. I

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>would say that for me, the thing that we did

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>being Bogman where we played the first half rot o

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we redraft and play a second half head

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to head. I think that's could be a really fun format. Yeah,

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know John mentioning that contest, I think that's

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>been a big help. I also, this is the last

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>thing I'll say on it. This is totally just like

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>mind dump of stuff, but I actually believe that baseball

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>betting could be a way, once it's simplified for people

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to have a little bit more for I know not

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody likes to bet and stuff like that, but understanding

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like playing ner fees or some props, that would be

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a way for people to kind of get reinvested in.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's a very very good point wonky about you know,

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>if Rodo is going up, that might be the death

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of the casual player, which you don't want. Nobody wants that.

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's do some three up and three down carry Carpenter

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>three for five, two homers and three RBI. We lost

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter for like the whole season leading up to now.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you tell me, Bubba, could he quietly be

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those players that we just see so little

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>of in the back half of the year that's going

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to come at absolute dirt cheap next year that you're

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to target because he was quietly like a

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>good player last year, just missed a bunch of time.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>This is what you want to see because he's probably

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a full time job again next year. Are

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you going to be in on the carry carpe under percent?

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I hope he goes under the radar. Riley Green's coming

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 2>back next week. It's gonna be a crowded outfield. Maybe

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Carpenter doesn't play every day the rest of this year

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>because of the previous injuries. I'm all about having him

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 2>sneaker because he got Parker Metals hitting well. Like, it's

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>actually crowded in Detroit right now, so I'd be all

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>for it.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's one of those guys like the Joe won't

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>remember because Joe left us.

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Which, by the way, back to your opening segment about

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 2>home runs, I thought it'd be present to win a prize,

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 2>so like he should get booted from this that the

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 2>chat should be able to pick his guy every day,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 2>not him.

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is he'll be back, Like I think

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he'll be here for the last episode, so like he'll

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>show up.

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>We'll then hit thirty five home runs on Friday of

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 2>the last day of the year and figure it out.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly all right. Who else we had? This is

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>so funny. On my note, I wrote the stat not

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the player, but I know it was Jake Rogers with

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers, who was three for five with a homer

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 1>and seven RBI. He was the decimator of George Kirby

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and my boy Michael King. There's been a w this year.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael King six innings ten K's It was a little

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rough start, but Michael King has a

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>low three ERA and he could play around. He could

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>mess around and get a sub three ERA. This year,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts have been there been one of the big beneficiaries

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the padres. I also think he's one of those

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>guys that is not necessarily being value to what he

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>truly is. I don't think I think people have that

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>taste of early season Michael King and stuff like that,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and he just puts up some big ones, some not

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>great ones. Seth Lugo four innings, seven earned runs. Dude,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the three downs should be called the Colin Ray. I

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>guess every year, I feel like we have a guy

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just like consistently on it. Colin Ray is always

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on this. Six innings, he gave up seven earned runs.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And why I kept him on this because I wasn't

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>going to give up four homers. I mean, those are

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the type of guys you want to target in the

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>home run contest. When Colin Ray is up, look at

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the other team he's playing and who the home run

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hitters are, and target Colin Ray. And then Ryan McMahon

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for four with four strikeouts. I picked him Bubba because

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>since he has not if you remember he's gonna get traded,

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna get traded, then the Rockies are like, nah, we good,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna hold on to him. He's such a superstar,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he's the best. Since not being traded. The beginning of August,

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he is hitting one oh five and has only two

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>games with a hit. To be fair, those are both

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>multi hit games. But he has two games this entire

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>month where he has a hit and he just put

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>up the old golden sombrero.

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been a rough, rough go for McMahon of open.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just a couple of weeks slump because he was

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>having a very very good season, all Star season. Some

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 2>might say, so, yeah, it's not great right now. And

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>he did that in your backyard, so it must have

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>felt good. You got some air conditioning for free. Yep.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well there are so many articles out here so

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>funny Chase Field. It's one hundred goa jillion degrees out

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out here and it's a lot of air conditioning. They

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>should do a better job. It's been for what a reason.

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of human and Jordan Montgomery has absolutely been

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>doing the like I don't want to have an I

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give up make any excuses for my

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>poor performance, but it's really humid. Well, he's gonna go today,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>probably get lit up by the Rockies. But like it

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>actually has been. And now like the Arizona Central, they're

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like writing article like they're writing articles about it. Like

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just wild about all this. So we could use

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>some more wind power for sure. Another quick quick follow up.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>The chat's still going about this. This is interesting. Lee

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>said he stopped playing non keeper leagues, and that's actually

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>something I would really be interested to look at. I

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>would bet you the percentage of keeper leagues per sport

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is higher in baseball. There's more physical football because there

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are a jillion more football people playing. But I would

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>say the amount of people that are playing, if just

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a pure percentage of players, I would think keeper leagues

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>are higher in baseball than they are, dynasty keeper leagues

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>than they are in football. Would you kind of go yeah?

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>With the prospects surge over the last probably three, four

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 2>or five years, and you noticed, analyst wise, how many

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 2>more guys are covering prospects, dynasty leagues are going through.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>The roof, especially if you differentiate keeper to dynasty because

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there are definitely lots of football people will

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>play like, yeah, they'll play like two or four keepers.

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But I would say a pure dynasty, I would say

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>dynasty is not even close. I would bet there's like

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>one percent, zero point five percent of fantasy football players

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>play dynasty, which is a primary keep everything. Where I

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>would bet baseball there's like five to ten percent or

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Keepers different because a lot of there's

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of keeper formats in football where you keep

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>one or two or something like that. Again, just kind

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of fun conversation. Injuries could tell Marte by the way

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the number one second baseman agree or disagree case above

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in next year, the number one second basement in fantasy.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I can go number one yet.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 2>He's having a heck of a year.

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But God, say, guy, you're going I don't know.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I really have to look. I don't want to throw

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 2>anybody out there. He's he's definitely in the conversation, is

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 2>what I'll say. Like, Mookie Betts sounds pretty cool to me.

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 2>At second base, he doesn't count.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't count. He's right fielder. Now is a short stop.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>MOOKI doesn't count without Mookie.

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I cant Tell's pretty close by. I remember in

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>recent years some analysts I know from Arizona talking about

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the inconsistency of his power, the injury concerns he has.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 2>So are we still like he's all good?

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>To that person, He's good, He's amazing, he's the best.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>He's the second in nl MVP odds. Arico. Arico got

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>killed a little bit on Monday because he brought that up.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>He said Altuve over katell Chat didn't like it, and

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>then he runs He ran a pole. The eighty three

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>percent was Katel Marte over O Twove. It was like

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred votes. That was like four hours then. So

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, I think that's I think

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that maybe answered it. But the whole point is low

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>grade ankle sprain and he's gonna avoid the il, which

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is really great. That was according to Tory Lavello. Other injuries. JD.

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Martinez was removed from Tuesday's game against the A's with

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a left elbow contusion. X rays came back negative for

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>any fractures, so he's currently day to dayvid Al Bruhan

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was removed from Tuesday's game against the Phillies with a

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>right ac joint spring. That doesn't sound good. Bobaschett is

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to resume baseball activities within the next week. Those

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>activities could be anything, so hopefully we see him pretty soon.

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Justin Verlander is going to make another rehabit a start

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday at Double A Corpus Christy. I would assume

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the last one and then that would line

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>him up for Tuesday of next week, Tuesday Wednesday, something

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. So that's my assumption. They could throw him

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>out for one more I suppose. Dan Hayes from The

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Athletic reports that the MRI on Byron Buckston's right hip

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't reveal any structural damage. Dude, I feel like we

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have like Dodge, We're like Neo and the Matrix. With

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Byron Buckson. This year, we're like whoa injury? Whoa injury?

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Just we have avoided every serious injury, and there's been

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like four of them.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this year it's been pretty rough. In this morning,

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 2>they said he's out again. If he has to miss

0:33:57.880 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>a few more games, they'll go to the IL just

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to let him fully. But they're hoping to have him

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 2>back this weekend. So it's just no major injuries like

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you're saying with Buckston, which has been nice.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Christian Walker's resumed some baseball activities though not that

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks have missed him. All they've done is win games,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and all they have had is an amazing josh Bell,

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take a big old w on pick him up,

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. Me and Joe were kind of going

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>back and forth about that. I was like, pick him up,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and he has been awesome. And then finally Yoshinobu Yamamoto

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>through forty pitch bullpen session on Tuesday and is looking

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to pitch to live batters on Friday, and I'm assuming

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be with the major league team, which

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is lining up for him to come back maybe at

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>some point in September, which I know everyone would be

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>very very excited about. Get excited because we're now talking

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about some best bets of the day with not Joey

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>p It's our other bald friend. It is Casey, Bubba

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Welsh. We're gonna give you our best bets

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Bubba has been pretty hot on here.

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if Tyler Fitzgerald makes it, because that's a

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Bubba special. Best Bets of the Day, brought to you

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>by bet three six five and Betting Pros. All right, Bubba,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what do we got? We got? We do? Okay, I

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't even.

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Learn with some prop bets as usual going for some

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>high plus odds. So let's have some fun here. One

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Soto red hot. You wanna go over a half an

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 2>RBI at plus one forty. His run prop was like

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 2>minus two to twenty five his total bases. This is

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 2>the only plus money prop really for one Soto, So

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll take my chances there at over a half an

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.959
<v Speaker 2>RBI against a bad pitching in Chicago. Give me Alex

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Bregman over half an RBI at plus two ten regular

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 2>the hottest hitters in baseball, and you have Zach Lytle

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 2>who has not been good, so I think Bragman could

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>be fun in the middle of that lineup. And then

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Fitzgerald over one and a half total bases at

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 2>plus one forty. I'll continue to take plus money on

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 2>some pretty sweet odds for Tyler Fitzgerald, who went deep

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>again on Tuesday night. He gets homes for Atlanta on

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday plus a beat up bullpen, so I'll take my

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 2>chances at Fitzgerald's plus one forty.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I had actually almost put that on mine. I was

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the total base is on Fitzgerald. I think

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it was fred Dinger was just like, Hey, we need

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>some Marico in here. Rico text me. It was funny.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>After Monday, he was like, dude, He's like, what a

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>duo we are. He's like three and oh on my

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bets and you hit your home run call and I'm like, yeah,

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but I was going three on my bets, so I

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>don't care. I don't care about being right about Corey

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Seger getting the home runs. I care about being right

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on the bets. He was three and oh, you guys

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>have both been hot. You're not jaded by the year

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>at all, so you're going at it definitely good. I'm

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>not a big RBI better guy, but that's why they

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>give such great odds. But they give great odds. I

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>really like the Tyler Fitzgerald one where I'm going to

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>go with it today. I'm going with first a Nurfee.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go with Cleveland and Chicago Tyne and Alex Cobb.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>This one is actually pretty good. Odds minus one fifteen.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Both of these teams hit that like fifteen and below.

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Cleveland is like right at like the fourteen

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen as far as what they score in the

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>first inning. Chicago, I believe is down in the twenties.

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's like a marker I'm always looking for, is

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, decent pitchers with offenses that don't score inside

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the top fifteen of first run innings or first inning runs.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So Cleveland and Chicago no run first inning minus one fifteen.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get into the total based market. This

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>one was one of the top total base bets over

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on betting Pro's prop cheat sheet. Give me Alec Bohm's

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>going up. I believe against Edward Cabrera one point five

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty. Did not have a hit in his

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>last game, but I believe he has. It's four of

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>his last six games he has this marker. He has

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like four doubles in his last six game. This is

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good matchup. Liked Alec Bohm and liked the

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty. And finally, I'm got to tell you

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I teetered around this one, but I'm going with it.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I am taking an under strikeout marker, and I am

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>going under four point five strikeouts for Jordan Montgomery. It's

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>risky because the Colorado Rockies are the biggest strikeout team

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in baseball, like twenty eight percent overall. They're striking out

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last thirty days to a round thirty two

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>percent against lefties in general. But Jordan Montgomery is so bad.

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>He's just so bad. He has struck out. If I

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>have this correctly, I believe he has only struck out

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>more than four three times all season, maybe even two,

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was against the White Sox, the Reds, and

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Reds again. It's like two or three times

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>all season long. He sits in those markers. He just

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>has not been consistent. Also, it's super humid here. I

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know he's been inconsistent. I'm going with the under.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>It's risky because of how much Chicago strikes out, but

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not risky because Jordan Montgomery is one of the

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>worst strikeout guys. And it is plus one twenty five.

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>They're really hitting you. You got to make a decision

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>minus won sixty eight on the over, so they really

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna get to five plus money on the under.

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm betting the under because Jordan Montgomery doesn't get the strikeouts,

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think, do you dig that?

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I want to add to that real quick. I

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 2>like that a lot. For two reasons. They said that

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 2>he might go short and have Ryan Nelson come in

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 2>behind him, which could help you. Yes. And second I

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>was actually wrote him up for something last night. Over

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Montgomery's last four starts, it's like twenty three and two

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 2>thirds innings and it's like twelve k's and eleven walks.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 2>He's been atrocious, absolutely horrible. So I think that's a

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 2>very very enticing one.

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what's really funny too, it's a who's actually

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gone up to it's plus one thirty five I see

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. So I'm taking it that piggyback is really important.

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised. I think they should inverse it. I

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>think Ryan Nelson should start out and then they should

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>go to Jordan Montgomery because he complains about how hot

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it is. But they're going the inverse. So if the

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>short inning goes in, I think that works out well.

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Montgomery under four and a half. Alec Bohm total

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>base is over Cleveland Chicago. Nurphy Bubba has got the

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Wan Soto RBI over Bregman RBI over and Tyler Fitzgerald

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.240
<v Speaker 1>over one and a half total bases. Lots of plus

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>money in there for you guys to have fun and

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you do with our best bets of the day,

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bet three sixty five and the

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros and the betting Pros and the Welsh and

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. Babba, home run call. I think you've been

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty hot at this as well. I've talked to Joe

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>about this, Arico. If you guys were playing all season long,

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>you would probably be up on this board because this

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to gross everybody out, and I wish you were.

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 2>That's Joe Piece of Peeples Friday. Now here we're gone.

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He's moving up the board. I know he's moved up

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the board. I believe I'm at thirty now. I think

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the number. Thirty three is the very bottom. Jim

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Poppin is on there. Joey p is tied first or

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he's at thirteenth with thirty five. Homers Wonky one spot

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him with thirty six at twelve. South African

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>g and b Trot now have the lead el scale

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think has had it all season long, so this

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>is a big change. They must have had Sodo. Hell,

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>scale's down at forty one. We've got Larry at forty

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the top four. I am officially, as Fred Dinger says,

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I am at thirty. So I am still getting close,

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just not quite there. Buba, what do you

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>got today for your home run?

0:40:58.000 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to keep picking on zach Lda like I

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 2>said with break Been, so I'm gonna go with yord

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 2>On Alvarez. Dude is just heating up in a big,

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 2>big way, and I think I, oh'm a little apology

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 2>for the grey godin comments last time I was on

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the show. So uh, yord On Alvarez and say it

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 2>goes deep in Tampa today.

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I'm going to go with the Rafaeld Devers.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Rafael Devers. It's a really good pitching matchup.

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.879
<v Speaker 1>God dang, I had it. I just didn't write it down.

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Who are they going up about Boston? That is a

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 2>great question.

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh, well, now Boston is going up against This is

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>just going to kill me. I wanted to give the

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>stat right, I should have wrote it down, but I'm

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a big dumming Oh Texas and the pitching matchup, which

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I cannot remember it.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh, is it too much yet? It's official, but it

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 2>could be wrong.

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Dane Dunning. Ding Dunning just head bullpen game. But

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Dane Dunning also has a horrible set up there. Dane

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Dunning has a two point five home run per nine

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>give up right now. It's one of the highest of

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 1>any pitcher today. Robbie Ray has it but short stints.

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I really like that potential matchup of guy that's giving

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>up around two plus homers per outing to Rafaeldevers in Boston.

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Give me Rafael Devers on my home run call today

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and get me on that mode. Please, please, please please.

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys got more well find us on the podcast

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and on the YouTube. YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you're subscribed on the podcast side on your

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast app. You can leave comments and stuff on

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube. We can check those in. You can get

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in live every Monday, Wednesday Friday twelve thirty pm Eastern.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We got Joe Rico back on Friday. And if you

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>want more Fantasypros dot com slash chat, get into the

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>free discord. You can make your home run calls. You

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.760
<v Speaker 1>can have so much fun and you can even upgrade

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 1>to Premium a little bit if you won't. Thanks so

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>much for hanging out with us. Fine Bubba at b

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>d Intrich on the Twitter, you can find me at

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>is It the Wells. You guys have a fantastic one

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>and we will talk to you next time right here

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on leading off by friends, Thanks for listening to the

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. If you love the show,

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the best freeway to support us is by leaving a

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros,

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 2>slash Fantasy Pros MLB