WEBVTT - Lots More on the Ongoing Mess That Is Intel

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I am worried about Intel, No, for real.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We're recording this on October first, So I'm worried about

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>some other things. But sure, sure, no.

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty to worry about in the world. But like,

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm worried about.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Intel specifically, because it's all nice to talk about industrial

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>policy and we're going to build these you know, build

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 3>out all these industries, et cetera. But here we have

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>one of the true industrial giants, one of the flagship

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 3>companies of the United States getting a lot of support,

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>are leading company in the field of semiconductors, which is

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 3>a major strategic priority for the US, and they do

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>not seem to be doing.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Well at all.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 2>The stock is absolutely dismal. They're cutting jobs.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>If this is the flagship company like them and Boeing

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>loomed very large in my head about I guess what

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I would say is like, I don't know if corporate

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>rot is too strong of a word, but yeah, like

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>corporate rot.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Not to add to your anxiety, but did you also

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>see some of the headlines coming out of North Carolina

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about quartz sand.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know what that's all about.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of an interesting one. So after Hurricane Helene,

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a town called Spruce Pine where apparently most of

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the world's supply of pure quartz sand comes from, and

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that could have an impact on the production of semiconductors.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So we get to I guess we get to unveil

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the bullhorn for the bullwhip effect. Again.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 2>We're not doing this. Apparently we are doing this again.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I did a deadlift.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>One two, Jimmy okay, uh barges.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>This isn't after school Special, except.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I've decided I'm going to base my entire personality going

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the US.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Where's the best costa?

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>These are the important question? Is it robots taking over

0:01:58.760 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the world?

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>No, I think that like in a couple of years,

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the AI will do a really good job of making

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the odd Launch podcast And people say, I don't really

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>need to listen to Joe and Tracy anymore.

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>We do have touching, the perfect welcome to lots More

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>where we catch up with friends about what's going on

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Because even when Odd Lots is over, there's always lots

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>more And.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 2>We really do have the perfect guest stacy, what's going

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.279
<v Speaker 2>wrong until.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 4>What's not going wrong? At Intel? Right now?

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 5>They're in a tough spot, right, I mean they are

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 5>embarking on a very risky and capital intensive strategy. I

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 5>say embarking, but frankly they've been along on the strategy

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 5>for quite a few years.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because CEO Pat Gelsinger came in in twenty twenty one,

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and so we're like at least three years into what

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>is supposedly an embarkment on a new strategy. And if

0:02:58.280 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I just look at the stock price, it's lower than

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>was in twenty fifteen.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, in fact, you know it's I actually look, I

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>launched on the stock in June of two thousand and nine.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 5>I think it was fifteen dollars and ninety four cents,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 5>so fifteen or sixteen years ago, and it's.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Not that far off of there. Now.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 5>It's had a bit of a balance in the recent weeks.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 5>We can talk about why, but in general they're in

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 5>a tough spot. Yeah, I mean the biggest issue that

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 5>they're having, and we can argue, is the.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Strategy the right one or the wrong one. That's a

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 4>discussion we.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 5>Can have, but it might be the biggest issue is

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 5>just the core business that was supposed to support them

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 5>as they rolled that strategy out is no longer really

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 5>sufficient to support it anymore.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 4>But they maybe too far along their path to stop. Right.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 5>The whole idea was, you know, we're gonna be doubling

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 5>down on manufacturing.

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 4>We're going to building lots of factories in the US

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 4>and everywhere else.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 5>We're going to be building up a significant third party

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 5>foundry business to make parts not just for ourselves but

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 5>for other third party customers as well. We're getting a

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 5>lot of external funding to do this, and you know,

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 5>eventually we'll get there and it's going to be great.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 5>But that the problem is that the you know, these

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 5>things are very you know, intensive, like they cost a

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 5>lot of money, and because of the deterioration that we've

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 5>seen in Intel's core business for a variety of reasons,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 5>the macro's not been great. You know, they were over

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>earning as many were during COVID and and that bubble

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 5>is popped. They're still losing share in many of their

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 5>key markets. They've completely missed the AI revolution, which is

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 5>one of the few areas of semiconductors today that's actually

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 5>really on fire. And they effectively have nothing to show

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 5>in that as and and those markets are starting to

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 5>eat into some of the core stuff that Intel does.

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 5>That core business doesn't doesn't really support that the path

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>that they're on anymore, even after the subsidies and and

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 5>frankly doing some other things that are probably not you

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't want to do if you didn't have to. They've

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 5>been selling parts of some of their factories to private

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 5>equity and getting cash for that. But even after all

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 5>of that, you know, it's still costing them like a

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 5>bunch of money that they don't really have anymore. They

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 5>put out some targets recently that sort of showed a

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 5>path to you know, a better companies, but in twenty thirty,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 5>it's twenty twenty four.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Right now, that's a long ways away.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of wood to chop between now and then,

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 5>even if they can manage to execute on that.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 4>So they're in a tough spot.

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So we are speaking with Stacey Raskin, who is of

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>course the semiconductor analyst over at Bernstein. We've spoken to

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>him before. We also have McKenzie Hawkins, who is our

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>colleague here at Bloomberg. McKenzie, how existential are the next Oh,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, let's see October, November, December, next three months.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>For Intel.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 6>This is a crucial stretch for Intel, in part because

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 6>it's a crucial stretch for the Biden administration. The company

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 6>is the single largest beneficiary of this massive US effort

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 6>to resource semiconductor manufacturing through Call twenty twenty two Chips

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 6>in Science Act. They're in line to receive eight and

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 6>a half billion dollars in grants for projects across four

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 6>US states for commercial partners. They're also supposed to get

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 6>three billion dollars to make chips for the Pentagon and

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 6>eleven billion dollars in loans, not to mention twenty five

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 6>percent tax breaks on their US investments. There isn't really

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 6>a fear that the broader SEPSTY program will go away

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 6>after President Biden leaves office. But Intel's been negotiating this

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 6>award package with officials in the Biden administration for well

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 6>over a year now. It's not yet finalized, and they

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 6>really want to prove two officials that yes, we need

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 6>to sign these documents. We want to get money out

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.559
<v Speaker 6>the door, ideally by the end of this administration, because

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 6>who really knows what will come after January, and they're

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 6>all trying to do that before they really really prove

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 6>in the technology stack on which these awards are premised.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Stacy two questions in your when you think of Intel,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 3>how important is the aid from the US government to

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 3>its future? And when you think of the US government,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 3>how important is Intel to the policy objectives of the

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 3>United States.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 5>They're clearly both important. The aid from the government is

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 5>helping them. And by the way, I will say, I

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 5>don't think they're in a critical situation from a cash

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 5>standpoint right now, partially because of some.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 4>Of those government funds.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 5>So if you add up what they've just done, some

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 5>of the were structuring that they've just announced, the CAPEX cuts,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 5>the op X cuts, the suspended dividend, they suspended their

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 5>dividend right, the governmental funds both from the tax credit

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 5>as well as the grants of those rolling as well

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 5>as some of those private equity funds. It's something like

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 5>forty billion dollars of incremental cash that lends on the

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 5>balance sheet like through the end of twenty five of

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five, versus not doing anything at all. So

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 5>like again, I think their cash position is okay because

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 5>of this stuff. I don't think they're desperate. It's partially

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 5>be due to those government funds. I will say, however,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 5>to get those grants, it's not like they don't get

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 5>an eight and a half billion dollar check like they're

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 5>milestone base. They have to do the projects and build

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 5>them out and hit the milestones and then that money

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 5>get gets apportioned. But that money is important in terms

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 5>of like how important is Intel for the for the

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 5>government's efforts. I mean, it's clearly very important. Although I

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 5>will say, you know, if if the goal is really

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 5>to get a ton of leading edge manufacturing capacity built

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 5>in the US, you could argue if the government was

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 5>only goal oriented, maybe picking Intel as their champion was

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 5>not the best way to go. There are other players

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 5>that you could have encouraged, who whether they're all building here,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 5>but you could have encouraged, for example, somebody like a

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 5>TSMC to build a lot more here than they're doing.

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Now that being set, we're not just goal already.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Other like politics is a huge piece. It's not politically

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 5>viable to do something like that. Intel is the only

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 5>US based company that can even hope to build out

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 5>a leading edge footprint, and so I understand why they've

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 5>been named the national champion, but I mean, it's just

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 5>given the issues that they're having, it does sort of

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 5>throw the eventual success of the program, especially especially around

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 5>the leading edge side, into a little bit of a loop,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 5>like we'll have to see how things go for them.

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 6>And you think it's important to remember here. Intel is

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 6>the largest beneficiary of the Chips Act, but definitely not

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 6>the only one. The US is in line to give

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 6>more than six billion dollars to TSMC, the unambiguous industry leader.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 6>There's also more than six billion dollars lated for Samsung,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 6>which is building leading edge capacity in Texas. But Intel

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 6>is really important one because the Pentagon has decided that

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 6>we need an American company to make cutting edge chips

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 6>for military and intelligence purposes. They've had early conversations about

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 6>buying those chips from foreign owned foundries that are on

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 6>US soil. It's crucial that we're having TSMC building three

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 6>fabs in Arizona, and that was a commitment that the

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 6>US government got from them with the carot of these subsidies.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 6>But Intel, I mean, Gelsinger kind of hinged his entire

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 6>turnaround plan on this US manufacturing expansion was a major

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 6>lobbyist pushing for the Ships Act, riding the coattails of

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 6>that subsidy program. And yes, you know this says really

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 6>high political stakes for the Biden administration and for industrial

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 6>policy writ large. You know, I think it's a feature,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 6>not a bug of the program that Intel hasn't gotten

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 6>any money yet. As Stacy mentioned, these are milestone based awards.

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, companies will get a tranch of money and

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 6>they have you know, first wafers out of their facilities.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Look at a trants of money when facilities are completed.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 6>But for a company that is, you know, not acutely

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 6>running out of cash, but not in a great financial

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 6>position like Intel, it really matters when that money actually flows.

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 6>And the US government is still vetting the viability of

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 6>these manufacturing plans in the first place before they're willing

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 6>to sign a final agreement. All they've announced is a

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 6>preliminary award.

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there a viable alternative to Intel? I get the

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sense that maybe there isn't.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there are three companies in theory that can

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 5>do leading edge semiconductor manufacturing global It's TSMC, Samsung, and Intel.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 5>And of those three, only really TSMC is hitting out

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 5>of the park in terms of executing to their roadmaps.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Like Intel, cole is having problems and again we can

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 5>talk about their roadmap and where that may be going,

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 5>but they've been having issues and Samsung as well as

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 5>also having issues, Like this stuff is not easy, Like yeah, I.

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Always Samsung by the way, by the way, by the way,

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 3>on the day we're recording this October first, Bloomberg reporting

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>some substantial layoffs at Samsung and they're losing some shared

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>to competitors like Skhnix, et cetera in certain lines. So yeah,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>just to talk about it's not just Intel having the struggles. Okay,

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 3>keep going, Yeah.

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so it's the stuff is hard to do. Again,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm always amazed that any of it works at all.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 4>But to McKenzie's probably one of the three.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the administration has said they want an American

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>company to do this, and so I guess I'm wondering, like,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are there ways that they could structure something with TSMC

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>or Samsung or does it have to be an American company,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in which case it seems like Intel is the only option.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if if you want an American company to do

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 5>this stuff, they are the only option. It may be

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 5>helpful to talk about their roadmap. So Patt has talked

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot about what he calls five nodes in four years,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 5>and according to Intel, they're executing, although if you kind

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 5>of look at it, it's kind of kind of questionable.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they're delivering what they're calling seven animeter today

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 5>in volume. That's the old what they used to call ten.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 5>They are now starting to ship Intel four animeter. It's

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 5>a single product that's called Meteor Lake, and in fact

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 5>is it's a client PC product. It has a tiled architecture.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 5>There was one tile on there that's on Intel four

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 5>and the other three tiles are made it actually outsourced.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 4>They made it TSMC, and.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 5>The margins of that product are not very good and

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 5>it's actually it impacted their margins in the most recent quarter.

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 5>They're getting ready to now to ship another client product

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 5>which is called Lunar Lake, which actually from some of

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 5>the ben shorts looks like a decent product, but it's

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 5>one hundred percent outsource. There's no Intel technology and process

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 5>technology and it all it's all made at TSMC, and

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 5>they've talked about that further impacting their margins as we

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 5>go into next year. The big one and I think

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 5>the one that Pat is kind of betting the company

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 5>on it is what's called eighteen A.

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 4>So there were two flavors. There was a twenty eight.

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Process that was supposed to come out with a product

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 5>called arrow Lake that they have canceled. So the five

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 5>nodes in four years of the canceled they're going to

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 5>jump straight.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 4>To eighteen A.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 5>Their characterization of that is an eighteen A is so

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 5>good they don't need twenty get twenty eight, So I

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 5>guess we'll have to see eighteen A in theory is

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 5>when they start bringing volume back from the foundries back

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 5>into their own fabs, which in theory is supposed to

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 5>make their cost structure better. And if you think about

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 5>the dream case that they laid out, the idea was,

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 5>we do this, we bring all this stuff back. It

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 5>makes our margins better because the cost are better because

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 5>we're now internal. It's a better process, so we can

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 5>take back market share and we can charge more for

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 5>our product because we can design better products. And it

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 5>gives customers like lots of confidence that things are going good,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 5>so they're confident to put a lot of volume with us,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 5>and we grow from there. And they talked about hitting

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 5>the manufacturing business kind of hitting break even around twenty

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 5>twenty seven and then growing to like very sizeable amounts

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 5>by twenty thirty, so that.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 4>That's the dream. It's all riding on the success of

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>eighteen A.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Many of the sort of you know, kind of like

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 5>supply change ets and channels that can pick up for

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 5>eight and right, they're kind of mixed at best, I

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 5>would say. On the positive, they just announced Amazon as

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 5>a customer, and I guess Amazon was willing to have

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 5>their name attached to it, so I guess that's good.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't look like it's a high volume part.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 5>I think it's going to take time for this to

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 5>ramp and I guess we're just waiting around and seeing

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 5>and that's probably about how long they have. You know,

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 5>in theory, eighteen A is supposed to be here next year.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 5>They've got a low volume server part called Clearwater Force

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 5>that launches in the first half of next year. Panther Lake,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 5>which is a higher volume client product, launches in the

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 5>second half of next year.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I guess it'll be volume, real volume in twenty twenty six.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 5>So you got about a year a year and a

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 5>half to see whether or not they can actually manage

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 5>to make stuff in a cost effective manner for themselves

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 5>on eighteen A and then we'll see if that drives

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 5>volume or not. But that's about how long they have

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 5>I think twelve months, maybe twelve to eighteen months, and

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 5>then we'll see if this works or not. But at

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 5>this point we don't know.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 6>And you know, Intel's ability to secure major customer commitments

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 6>is of course a really key metric for US government

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 6>officials that are trying to evaluate the viability of there

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 6>should we be giving them eight and a half billion

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 6>dollars of tax payer money for commercial manufacturing. I mean,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 6>they already have three billion dollars set aside for the

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 6>Pentagon as a customer. But if you talk to anybody

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 6>in the chip industry, the Defense Department is a really

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 6>difficult customer. Foundaries that have been in a secure Pentagon

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 6>supply chain in the past of struggle to make a

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 6>return on products manufactured. Those fabs and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo,

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 6>in many ways, her legacy and her image and her

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 6>the kind of main purpose of her department is riding

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the success of this program, and therefore,

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 6>in part on the success of Intel not in a

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 6>whole She's been calling up chip makers and saying, would

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 6>you consider using Intel fabs? She asked in Vidia, she

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 6>asked AMD to consider manufacturing at Intel's ohio facilities, and

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, in Vidias in the earliest stages of evaluating

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 6>whether that's a possibility. AMD is happy with their current supplier,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 6>which is TSMC. And so you know, as much as

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 6>the government really wants intels to succeed, the industry wants

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 6>intels to succeed, even TSMC does. Intel's a four to

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 6>five billion dollar customer of TSMC's. The custom comments just

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 6>aren't there right now, and.

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 5>There can't really you can't anything infirment. So you know,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 5>if they can deliver, yeah, right, So I think anyone

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 5>that wants leading edge is going to evaluate them, like

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 5>why wouldn't you, Like you want second sources, you want

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 5>geographically secure supply. But I mean, if they can't deliver,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 5>they can't deliver. If they can deliver, they can And

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 5>that's what we're waiting for. Throwing whatever money you want

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 5>to throw at it, it isn't going to solve that problem.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 3>This gets back to like some of our first ever

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 3>episodes that we did on semiconductors years ago. We're just

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 3>about this basic challenge that like it's brutal to get

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 3>hot yields. That there's all these processes and if you

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>get it, if you get every process at ninety nine

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>point nine to nine percent, right, that still doesn't get

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>you the yields that you need to get. And so

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 3>their strategy is like, Okay, you're building for this product,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 3>you're building for this end consumer, you're building, you're doing

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in house, and then there's execution and the big question

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>mark is just this execution question and we just still

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we don't know this. This again, even under the

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 5>best of circumstances is very difficult. You know, they're going

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 5>through a lot of other turmoil right now. So they

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 5>have clearly in the midst of a big layoff. Yeah,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 5>they're actually like canceling some of these projects. So remember

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>they weren't just trying to build in the US. They

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 5>had a big Germany project with other subsidies that they

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 5>just paused. They had a packaging plant in Poland. I

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 5>think they just paused. So they don't need the capacity,

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 5>right and they don't have the money.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 4>To pay for it. Even with the subsidies.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot of like other like internal turmoil

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 5>that is going on there right now while they are

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 5>still trying to execute on everything else that they have

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 5>to do.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Like it doesn't make it easier.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, this is an intensely cyclical industry, right and

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, when we think about what does you know,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 6>Intel's success or failures say about the design of US

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 6>industrial policy, you have to remember the ship sacked. Biden

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 6>signed the ship sacked two years ago. That was sort

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 6>of at the earliest stages of the AI boom, and

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 6>were there were maybe warning signs about Intel, certainly, but

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 6>not kind of the flashing red light that we see now.

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 6>And so government officials not known necessarily for being super

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 6>nimble or having to evaluate that in real time. We

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 6>had a lot of preliminary announcements earlier this year. We

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 6>saw basically a multi billion dollar announcement a week in

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 6>March and April, and markets change, company dynamics change. And

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 6>I think the challenge is that, you know, there's a

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 6>sort of lack of understanding even among folks who pay

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 6>attention to this sometimes in Washington, about whether the money

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 6>has actually gone out the door. It hasn't but the

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 6>public is expecting that. Intel is expecting that. I mean,

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 6>the state of Ohio is investing two billion dollars in

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 6>Intel's Ohio facility. Those plans are contingent on getting money

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 6>from the US government, but officials also have to evaluate,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, if a company, you know, Intel or anybody else,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 6>isn't able to execute on the timeline that we set out,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 6>at the scale that we set out, at what point

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 6>do we start talking about other options of where to

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 6>spend this money. Thirty nine billion dollars set aside for grants,

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 6>that's a lot of taxpayer dollars.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I just remember, the first time we ever had Stacy

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>on was back in twenty twenty, which is kind of

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a blur for me. But Stacy, you were bearish on

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Intel even back then. In fact, I think like the

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>title of the episode was something like, why the US's

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>number one like semiconductor company is doing terribly something like that.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, in twenty twenty four, is there anything that

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>would that you could possibly see that would induce you

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to be bullish on Intel? Like what would they need

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to do to prove their business case?

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, so they gave some targets. But like

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 5>I said, which we're twenty thirty, my biggest takeaway from

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 5>that was from those presidents was come.

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 4>Back in twenty thirty. Right, call me twenty thirty.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 5>But if you sort of if I sort of started

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 5>to articulate some of that dream thesis earlier, but if

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 5>you think about it, you know it was, like I said,

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 5>they execute on the new road maps, they take market share,

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, they build out their foundry business.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 4>And if you look at the targets, and again I'm

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 4>going to refrain from.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Giving like investment conclusions on this podcast, but just factually,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 5>what they presented for their twenty thirty model had them

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 5>doing roughly one hundred billion dollars in total revenues, roughly

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 5>sixty billion on their product groups, forty billion on their

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 5>foundry manufacturing side. Of that forty billion, twenty five billion

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 5>was internal revenues.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 4>What they're actually doing now, by the way, is they.

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 5>Are charging their internal groups effectively a price to use

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 5>the manufacturing base. So the internal does have to buy

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 5>the wafers from the internal manufacturing when they're using and

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 5>the net revenue nets out at the end. But you

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 5>had forty billion in foundry twenty five billion internal and

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 5>fifteen billion external, So it'd be if you nit up

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 5>the twenty five billion, it would be seventy five billion

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 5>in total revenues. The company's doing a little over fifty

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 5>right now, maybe fifty billion. That fifteen billion in external

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 5>foundry revenue would be double what Samsung does in foundry

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 5>revenues today.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 4>So it's pretty big.

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 5>But if you start to run numbers and then they

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 5>give some margin targets, you start to run numbers like that,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 5>it looks like a good it's good. Like they're they're

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 5>generating cash, they're making profits, right, and that would be

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, that would be a scenario where where things

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 5>could be great, right. I think on the other side

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 5>of it, you know, I get a lot of calls

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 5>these days unlike the breakup value, Like what would it

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 5>be would it call?

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the qualcot, Yeah the QUI.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about that because that was in the news recently.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 5>There was a newsflow that suggested Qualcom may be interested

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 5>in buying them, and we run the numbers on it,

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 5>as I want to do, and look, I can argue

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 5>for Qualcom potentially, you know, there's there's a diversification strategy

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Qualcom's revenues are if I have the licensing and it's

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 5>eighty percent handsets, and there's a diversification story there for Qualcom,

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 5>but it is slow going. And you know, Intel, if

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 5>I just look at the product side of it, you know, look,

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 5>if you just slap them together, you'd have a company

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 5>that was I don't know, a third handsets, a third client,

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 5>maybe fifteen percent data center. You'd have some auto in there.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 5>It would look more diverse and have more and more drivers. Right. Issues,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 5>I can't make it work if the fabs go along

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 5>with it, oh right, And that's the problem because it's big.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 5>If you stock or qualk them, it would be massively deluded.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 5>And you start adding even a little bit of cash,

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 5>the leverage gets to tow untenable levels. And so now

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 5>to get back to the breakup, these says, this is

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 5>my biggest issue with it. Intel is clearly prepping to

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 5>split the company between products and manufacturing at some point.

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 5>They've separated out the financials and they've even put it

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 5>in an independent subsidiary. The issues right now, the foundry

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 5>cannot stand on its own if if they were to devestigate,

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 5>goes bankrupt immediately, it's losing twelve billion dollars a year

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 5>and it's got one customer, right Intel. So that's not

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 5>viable until they build a third party business, and that

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 5>still becomes questionable.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Can they build that or not.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they can just sell the factory, say

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 5>to TSMC or somebody like. I don't think TSMC wants

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 5>to run them. Right again, they're losing a bunch of money,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 5>and TSMC's process flow is completely different, I think hypothetically,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 5>and this gets to the regula, you could just you

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 5>scrap them, right, you sell the tools for whatever there were,

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 5>but maybe that covers your restructuring and you go a

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 5>whole to outsource stand So this is what AMD did,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 5>like effectively back from twenty eight to like twenty fourteen.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 4>That was sort of where they ended up.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 5>My issue with that is, at least right now, I

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 5>don't think that's politically vital.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've just given all the conversations we've been having,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 4>and so that's the thing.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 5>I don't know those fabs unless they can build the mountain,

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 5>actually build those businesses they're in income. This is one

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 5>could if you were but that it's maybe there's you know,

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 5>maybe there's value to break up. But I think you

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 5>have to destroy the company down locked. I don't think

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 5>we're ready to do that right now.

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 6>And to the point about political viability, that raises a

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 6>really important question of you know, it is the Commerce

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 6>Department and Secretary of Gena Raimondo's priority to get these

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 6>fabs up and running in the US. The minute that

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 6>we start talking about in acquisition, that gets kicked over

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 6>to anti trust folks. And we don't know that Lena

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 6>con that's see will have the same priorities as Gino Raimondo.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 6>It's a really really interesting test. And you know, right

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 6>now there's obviously been a lot of news about Qualcom.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 6>We also saw ARM make an approach for Intel's design

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 6>business and until said no. But ARM wasn't even interested

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 6>in the manufacturing operation. And it's hard to see you know,

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 6>anybody who's been working on the Chips Act interested in

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 6>any type of acquisition that wouldn't see Intel move forward

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 6>with its US factories. But who wants to take on

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 6>one hundred billion dollars worth of manufacturing investments on American

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 6>soil that don't seem likely to turn a profit.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 3>This is the problem. The main thing we want in

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>this country is not advanced chips. We want the ability

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 3>for American companies to be able to produce advanced chips,

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and there's no way to just sort of financially engineer

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 3>your way out of investments that aren't delivering on that.

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Like we can talk about all kinds of combinations, we

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 3>can talk about all kinds of whatever, but they're right, like.

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the core problem that money can't see.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 5>What you would need is somebody to go in and

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 5>capitalize these ascid This is kind of what AMD did

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 5>back back in two thousand and eight. You know, they

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 5>sold their factories to the Middle East, Tabu Dhabi, to

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 5>the bottle of them, but they were bleeding, right, this is.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Actually what formed global founderies. Say Global Founderies actually.

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Only profitable day because they gave up on the leading

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 5>edge and AMD actually like ditched them and they went

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 5>whole hogged at TSMC back in the days. But that

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 5>was the path they had, like a deep pocketed investor

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 5>who apparently didn't really care about making decisions that were

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 5>necessarily economically motivated.

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean clearly right now.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 5>It's like you were just to see something like with Intel,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 5>you need something that like investor levels would be one

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 5>or two orders of magnitude higher than what we saw

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 5>back then with AMD and their fabs, you know, ten,

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 5>fIF fifteen, or twenty years ago.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know, like where would that come from.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Like I've had people suggest, oh, the government could do it,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 5>but I mean, the government's already funding them, like they

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 5>don't have any other.

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Like dollars that are allocated.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 5>And I've had people suggest, oh, Intel's customers could do that,

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 5>but if in those customers were interested in supporting, they

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 5>could put foundry volume there. They don't need to like

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 5>buy out the manufacturing and support the manufacturing assets, like

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 4>This is what I meant when I talked earlier.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 5>I said, I, you know, they're the business as it

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 5>stands doesn't necessarily support the path along the strategy, but

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 5>they may be too late and maybe too late for

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 5>them to stop what they're doing.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 4>This is kind of what I meant, So I kind

0:25:59.400 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 4>of stuck.

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So I know, we've been focused on the problems at Intel,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but I joked earlier that we might have to get

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the bullwhip bullhorn back out because of what's been happening

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina how seriously should we take those headlines?

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean so.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 5>For those of you that don't know, spruce primee is

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 5>one of the largest global sources something called high purity quartz.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 5>High puriody quartz is used to make the crucibles that

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 5>hold the silicon melt that are used to make silicon

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 5>wafers for semiconductor manufacturing. The way you make silicon wafers

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 5>by the ways, you have a big cauldron effectively of

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 5>melted silicon. You dope it with all with specific amounts

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 5>of impurities to get the properties you want, and then

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 5>you touch a little piece of single crystal silicon to

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 5>this molten silicon and you start to pull it up,

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 5>and you rotate the crucible as you're doing this, and

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 5>you pull out this effectively a big inget. It's called

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 5>a bull of silicon. Who think can be I don't know,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 5>twelve or fifteen feet high at the end of it.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That sounds so satisfying.

0:26:55.600 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 5>Actually, it's called the Sharalski process or the CZ it's

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 5>really really cool, and you can control the diameter of

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 5>this bull via the pull speed and the rotational speed

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 5>of this cauldron. And then they slice this thing up

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 5>and they make silicon wafers out of it. So the

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 5>high purity court to the ultri purity courts from Spruce

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Pine and a few other places used to make the

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 5>quartz crucibles that holds the milk, and it is one

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 5>of the largest sources. And the area just got pounded,

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean be inundated by Hurricane Helene.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>So the method is named after Polish scientist Jon Scheralski.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 2>God, there really are a lot of.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Steps in semiconductor manufacture. The crucible.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is just to make the wafers by the

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 5>process been around for over one hundred years.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Like it's a pretty remarkable Anyways.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Mckennessee lawyer here, we're about to wrap any questions as

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 3>a journalist, anything you need to ask Stacy.

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 6>Oh gosh, I mean the big question is doesn't even fail?

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 6>What do they have to do to not fail? And

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 6>when we think about, you know, large, what does this

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 6>policy need to look like to not justic scene and

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 6>tell about to saying the ecosystem overall? Stacey, if you

0:27:57.960 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 6>had to design a ship sacked too, what would it

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 6>look like?

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Oh? Yeah, I mean first just done, Intel, Like I'm

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 5>not gonna knock them. I think their biggest mistakes were

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 5>not necessarily the strategy.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 4>And we can argue with strategy yes or no.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 5>But their biggest mistake I think was coming in and

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 5>I mean when look when Pack got there, he kind

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 5>of sounded more like a cheerleader than the CEO. I

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 5>mean it was the AMD's in a review mirror, and

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 5>he had these ludicrous targets that they were hiring to.

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, he should have come in and said, look,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm so happy to be back get intell, but like

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 5>you're gonna have to be patient.

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be a slug.

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Wait till twenty thirty.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 5>I have to fix yeah, And it was always it

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 5>took ten years to break it.

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Why would it take less than ten years to fix that?

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 4>It was always going to take the twenty thirty.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>En I'm tempted to put this in my performance review.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Wait till twenty thirty and see.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 4>That's talked lately.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 5>He wished that he took like harder actions on costs

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 5>and everything earlier.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Clearly they should have done that right.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Instead, he went on a hiring spreel, you know, like

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 5>headcount was up twenty one thousand employees in the seven

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 5>quarters after he took the job, and then they had

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 5>to lay off. Then they started hiring again. Now they're

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 5>doing a bigger laugh. It's demoralizing. So those are clearly

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 5>mistakes above and beyond. Again, we can talk about the

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 5>strategy or not, but I certainly would have recommended they take.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 4>A harder line right right when they got there.

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 5>In terms of the Chip to Act itself, I'm not

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 5>going to say it's not successful. So the dollar amounts

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 5>aren't actually that. They're thirty nine billion dollars for manufacturing.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 5>Plus you know, the tax got to probably be as

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 5>big or bigger, you know, over like five years for

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 5>the whole industry. Is actually not that big, but it

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 5>is stimulating a lot of other incremental investment. And like

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 5>the majority of the actual dollars that eventually will get

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 5>spent or not coming from the Chips Actor, It's coming

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 5>from the companies themselves, I mean, as it should so

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 5>as a mechanism to stimulate like domestic investment in SEMIS,

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 5>I think it is a success. Could we use more sure,

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 5>although you have to even talk about its cyclical industry.

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 5>You have to think about what's the right time in

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 5>place to spend these dollars and in terms of like

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.959
<v Speaker 5>betting on Intel, what was a national champion. I mean

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 5>that may or may not have been a good idea,

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 5>but again, I don't know what choice they had just

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 5>given the political realities of what they're doing. It's again

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 5>I won't knock them, and it's a good first step.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 5>I just helped the wear with the political warrelhol is

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 5>there to continue again. We've got an administration change coming up,

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 5>and who the heck knows what's going to happen.

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, but I hope they can continue with this.

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Lots More is produced by Carmen Rodriguez and dash El Bennett,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 3>with help from Moses Onam and kil Brooks.

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Our sound engineer is Blake Maples. Sage Bauman is the

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Please rate, review, and subscribe to Odd, Lots and Lots

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>More on your favorite podcast platforms.

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all our

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>podcasts at free by connecting through Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I just realized it's Stacy, Tracy and McKenzie. Oh you're

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the odd one out show. Joey