WEBVTT - Biden Drops Out and CrowdStrike Plunges

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 2>From Marhard We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, Nbon. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline.

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Hyde and Ed luved Love.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 4>From Bloomberg's London headquarters in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming up in the next hour. Markets entering uncharted

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 4>territory as President Biden drops out and passes the baton

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 4>to Kamala Harris, who in tech will support her and

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 4>what it means for companies and crypto.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Blushares of CrowdStrike plummet again is analyst Sandy alarm after

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>last week's widespread outages and gearing up.

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>For big tech results Tesla, Alphabet and more prepared to

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 4>kick off earning season for the Magnificent seven.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Vers As checking on these marks, Ed.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 4>We are having a much better day than we did

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 4>from last week. We are up the most since June,

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 4>in fact, so more than a month that we've seen

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 4>such outperformance on the NASDAT one point three percent high

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>after the worst week since April last week. But we

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 4>have to hone in really on the market impact of

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 4>the news over the weekend.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's get to the outlook for the twenty twenty

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 3>four presidential election. It took a turn this weekend as

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Biden announced his exit from the race, endorsing Vice President

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris to be the Democratic nominee. Bluembost Katie Lyons

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 3>is in Washington, d C. I think the most logical

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 3>question to ask is what happens next, because President Biden

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris is not definitive necessarily, though

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>it was an important moment.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 6>It certainly was, and especially considering that it was followed

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 6>by the endorsements of many other Democratic leaders to be

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 6>a former President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 6>members of the House, in Senate, even key governors that

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 6>were seen to have been potential other contenders for the

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 6>nomination aside from Harris, have now come out and endorsed.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 5>Her, including today JB.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 6>Pritsker, the governor in Illinois, or Wes Moore, the governor

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 6>of Maryland. That is in addition to the number that

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 6>we saw come out in support of Harris in the

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 6>immediate aftermath of Biden's announcement in the last twenty four hours.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 6>The other thing that we should note is that she

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 6>does have a money advantage. Not only does she have

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 6>access to the hundreds of millions of dollars in what

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 6>was the Biden Harris campaign war chest, something that other

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 6>candidates would not have the same accessibility to. We also

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 6>saw in the seven hours in the aftermath of her

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 6>announcing that she does intend to, in her words, earn

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 6>and win the Democratic nomination, we saw fifty million dollars

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 6>in grassroots funding raised, the best day ever for Act Blue,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 6>which is a key Democratic funding aggregator. So certainly it

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 6>does seem that the party is very much getting in

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 6>line behind Harris. But Edgar absolutely right. Nothing is a

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 6>done deal yet. We still have to get to that

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 6>convention which begins four weeks from today in Chicago on

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 6>odds nineteenth, where the delegates are going to have to

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 6>decide who they're casting a vote for, knowing ninety nine

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 6>percent of them were pledged for Joe Biden, who is

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 6>no longer seeking reelection.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Important screen that we're looking at right now, Kaylee Reid Hoffman,

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>key person in technology, is one of the key Democratic donors.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Will this ultimately galvanized to think some of those that

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 4>we see in our community and technology and what will

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 4>they be looking for in any way in a change

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 4>in direction of policy, or is it more of the

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 4>same when it comes to Biden.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 6>Well, certainly, Reid Hoffman was one of the first yesterday

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 6>in the aftermath of this announcement to come out and

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 6>endorse Kamala Harris. Other big funders like George Soris have

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 6>also come out for her, but notably, a number of

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 6>donors have suggested to Bloomberg that they don't necessarily want

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 6>this to be a coronation, that they want some kind

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 6>of process to play out for Harris to actually earn

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 6>the nomination or give someone else a chance to and

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 6>what could theoretically be a contested election in terms of policy,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 6>that is really what Kamala Harris is going to have

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 6>to define for herself. We will hear from her for

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 6>the first time to the cameras since all of this

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 6>went down yesterday at eleven thirty am Eastern time. We'll

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 6>she'll be speaking at an NCAA Sports Day event at

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 6>the White House. So those remarks just about half an

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 6>hour from now, and it's going to be about the

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 6>ways in which she tries to differentiate herself from Joe

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 6>Biden expressed that perhaps in not all areas there will

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 6>be exact policy continuity, given that that is an attack

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 6>line we're already seeing from the Republican Party suggesting that

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 6>essentially a Kamala Harris presidency would look very much like

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 6>a Joe Biden presidency and that for everything. Republicans have

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 6>faulted the Biden administration for their suggesting that Kamala Harris

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.119
<v Speaker 6>not only was there for it, but enabled President Biden

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 6>to take all of that action. So it's going to

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 6>be a question of how Kamala Harris may decide to

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 6>differentiate herself from the man that she has served as

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 6>vice president for the last three and a half years.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 6>And when it comes to technology, it's also worth pointing

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 6>out that it's not just Democrats that need to be watched.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 6>Jade Vance, the vice presidential nominee on the Republican side,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 6>have been highly skeptical of big tech. In particular, he

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 6>has been supportive of competition in anti trust efforts under

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 6>the Biden administration, including the praise he's had for FTC

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Chair Lena Kahan, And of course there may be some

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 6>alignment with the Democrats in those areas.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomber's Calie lines, thank you, let's get reaction from Silicon

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Valley and the Democratic Party. Steve Wesley is the CEO

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Wesley Group, but also a former California State

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Controller CFO and in two thousand and eight co chaired

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Barack Obama's campaign in the state of California and as

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>back to Biden. He's also been a delegate at eight

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Democratic conventions. He joins us now from Menlo Park, California. Steve,

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>good morning to you.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 7>Your reaction in.

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>The first instance to President Biden endorsing Kamala Harris as nominee.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, first, you've got to give Joe Biden credit.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 9>It's an extraordinary act of selflessness for him to step

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 9>down having won the nomination and to do what he

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 9>thinks is right for the country, to basically say I'm

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 9>going to step down. It's time to bring in a

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 9>new generation and to throw things open. Now he's endorsed

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 9>Kamala Harris, but there's still going to be a process

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 9>and what would see now, I think is quite exciting.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 9>Everybody in the world is watching what's going to happen next.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 8>There's going to be some.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 9>New blood in the Democratic Party. Is it going to

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 9>be Kamala Harris, who's terrific or is it going to

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 9>be someone else? And I think there's going to be

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 9>at least one, maybe two other people that come into

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 9>the race. I think it's going to add a lot

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 9>of excitement to the race. I think it's going to

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 9>mobilize Democratic voters. Everybody's going to be tuning into the convention.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 8>It's just what she wants.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>If you're a part Steve, you are in a large

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>group of Silicon Valley or technologists, DEM donors and backers

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 3>who are doing the math, and you're trying to calculate

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>who can win against Trump vance.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 7>Do you think that Kamala Harris can win.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 10>She's a known entity, she's got high voter ID, she's

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 10>an articulate presenter, a former prosecute she will do very

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 10>well in the debate, and she fire her she's all

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 10>over high energy.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 8>But there are other candidates like that too.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 9>I think the one who is most mentioned, Discretion Whitmer

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 9>of Michigan, will see I'm guessing who knows what. I'm

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 9>guessing there'll be at least one other candidate in the race.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 9>And I think it's just what the Democratic Party needs

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 9>is to eject some new blood to run against a

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 9>seventy eight year old candidate who seems to be fuzzy

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 9>on a lot of the issues. I think it's a

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 9>big opportunity for the Democrats, a lot of energy.

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Everybody's going to be watching, Steve, what about the opportunity

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 4>to finance the Democrats right now? How much do you

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 4>think this is going to inspire well more of Silicon

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Valley to start speaking out about who they endorse them

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>with their money.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, look, first, there's going to be enormous amounts of

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 9>money that come in on both sides. In terms of

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 9>Silicon Valley, I can just tell you right now, Silicon

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 9>Valley has gone roughly eighty twenty for Democrats over the

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 9>past two or three or four elections.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 8>I think it's going to be the same this time.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 9>If you look at the current administration's support of the

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 9>Chips Act, the Infrastructure Bill, the Inflation Reduction Act, the

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 9>largest green energy stimulus in the history of the planet,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 9>Nobody other than by could have gotten this stock market

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 9>historic highs, unemployment historic lows. And if there's one thing

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 9>at Silicon Valum and the business in general, really looks

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 9>for its stability, I think the Democrats have provided that

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 9>I don't think anybody could say that that is mister

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 9>Trump's strength.

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 8>So we'll see how that involves.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 9>But I expect Solicon Valley to go strongly for the Democrat,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 9>whoever it is.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Steve thus Far a man you know well, having been

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 4>on the board of Tesla, having supported.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 5>El on Us companies in the past.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 4>He's given forty five million a month, we understand to

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a pack that supports Trump. Whereas we look to the

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 4>previous full screen and read Hoffman was the biggest donor

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 4>previously with a twenty five million dollar check. How do

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 4>you see those sorts of numbers adding up. Will there

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 4>be someone who can match that sort of huge, huge

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>gift that we see coming from the world's wealthiest man.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, Look, there's going to be huge amounts of money

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 9>that come in on both sides. But there are a

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 9>lot of people Ms Gains and Bezos, many of the

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 9>wealthiest people in the world are strong Democrats, and I

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 9>think you're going to see equal many match, if not

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 9>more coming in on the Democratic side. And again with

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 9>the Democrats are provided over the last four years, historically

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 9>high stock market race, historically low unemployment. I mean, this

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 9>is a good story to campaign on. And if you

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 9>can wrap all that together with a strong new candidate,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 9>whether it's Tamala Harris or someone else, I think that's

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 9>a winning package for the Democratic Party.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 7>Steve.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 3>A criticism of President Biden's term in office has been

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>his attitude toward and lack of engagement with Elon Musk

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 3>in the context of electric vehicles and space as well.

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you expect Kamala Harris or whoever the Democratic nominee

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 3>ends up being to change policy there.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 8>Not for a moment.

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 9>I think the Biden administration has been a champion not

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 9>only for green energy, but to stimulate this boom and

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 9>electric vehicles. And the great news is, not only are

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 9>electric vehicles becoming cheaper every year, they're creating huge jobs.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 9>Battery plants ev plants being built around the country in

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 9>blue and red stags. But for the first time this year,

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 9>you're going to see evs, a parody for control of

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 9>combustion engine vehicles. This is something that's wildly popular, especially

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 9>for young people. Biden administration and I think any of

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 9>the Democratic nominees are going to be strongly in favor

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 9>of the new green economy and the fifteen million jobs

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 9>that the administration is creator over the last four years.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 9>I think Trump may be the odd guy out to

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 9>be holding on embracing introlock combustion engine vehicles at a

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 9>climb when they're less popular than.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 8>They have been in the past.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Steve, great to catch up with you.

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for your time today, Steve Wesley,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 4>CEO of the Wesley Group.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 7>Let's talk more about CrowdStrike.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 3>Carro is just pointing out in the session the stock

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>down almost eleven percent. It fell eleven percent Friday following

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 3>its botched patch or software update that caused an outage

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 3>impacting eight point five million Microsoft Windows PCs around the world.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 3>A number of firms downgrading the stock after the outage

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 3>real quick on a two day basis, Caroline, It's a

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 3>stock that's facing its biggest two day drop on record.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think you and I were wondering Friday, how

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>does this have legs? How severe is this? And the

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 3>industry is talking about it. Let's get the latest and

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 3>bring in Sanjay Merchandani, CEO of Convolt Cyber Resilient Solutions provider.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Stock continues to have reaction, Your industry continues to have

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>reaction as well. What's the lasting effect of the outage

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 3>we leave.

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 11>You know, we live in an extremely interconnected world right now,

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 11>cloud devices, servers, and.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Croudstrike is a popular technology.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 11>We use it as well, and so when something like

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 11>this happens, there is a long tail and it.

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Has to be you know, it has to be cleaned up.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 11>The lessons here and the fix for the most part

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 11>was fairly manual, so it took time. It wasn't a

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 11>complicated fix, but it took time, and I think we're

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 11>coming out of it.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of learnings that we're also getting

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>out of this process.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Sandra, did you have any cause for concern ahead of

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 4>this about prior updates that crowd strike could run? Then

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 4>there might have been anything that would signal that such

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 4>an event could occur.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 11>They're a security company, you trust, You tend to trust

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 11>security company and the you know, and so there was

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 11>no there was nothing before this specifically about crowd strike

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 11>that would be of concern. What is always of concern

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 11>when you have a large number of patches and a

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 11>large number of connected systems and dependencies is your ability

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 11>to really stage a patch test it in your particular environment.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 11>Because no two environments are the same and then once

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 11>you know that you've got it working where you need it,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 11>to push it out. Now, with security, the window that

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 11>you have between a critical patch and your ability to deploy.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>It is very, very small, and so you tend to

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>trust more and push faster.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 4>We have heard from across industries, particularly from the airline industry,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 4>the Delta CEO coming out and apologizing because still today

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 4>there are issues that are affecting their ability to serve customers. Sanjay,

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to business continuity, what could a company

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 4>like Delta have done to prevent the fallout that we

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 4>now see was two thousand and five h plus cancelations

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 4>on Saturday.

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, Caroline, it's it's about resilience.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 11>And people use the word resilience instead of a broad way,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 11>But for us, it's about business's ability to get back

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 11>to life, regardless of the catastrophic event.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It could have been human error in this case, possibly

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>human error.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 11>It could be malicious, it could be internal external malicious,

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 11>it could be a natural disaster. So what we do

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 11>is help our customers build a capability, build a platform,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 11>build a muscle through repeated testing and scale so that

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 11>in the event.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>That something goes sideways.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 11>You've tried and tested the ability for your business to

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 11>come back to life. And I think, I think everything

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 11>we've got going on as enterprises, not enough time is

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 11>spent on practical capabilities of resilience and more. Sort of

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 11>you tend to lean on on the academic thought process. Yes,

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 11>we've got this list, we've done this, we've we've written

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 11>this up. But how much of your enterprise have you

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 11>actually tested with a deep degree of confidence?

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we try to enable our customers to do.

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Sanjay I wrote in my Tech Daily column this morning

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 3>about concentration risk, the idea that so many corporates and

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>government entities relied on CrowdStrike, but also that eight point

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 3>five million computers it was the most critical of computers

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>that were impacted. How could have that been mitigated or prevented?

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Think of it as a warning shot.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 11>We've all been sort of sitting back and saying, Okay,

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 11>so what does my fleet look like, what do my

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 11>servers look like?

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>What does you know? What are my users working with?

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 11>And it almost makes you take a step back and say,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 11>we need to have a very calculated mix so that

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 11>you're not over reliant or over dependent on any one environment,

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 11>because that's part of resilience.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is exactly part of resilience.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 11>And I think for everyone this weekend's been a bit

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 11>of a wake up call to say, Okay, where am

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 11>I overdependent or don't have enough control or it could

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 11>be more resilient. And I think that you know, for

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 11>all the negative outcome of something like this, the positive takeaway,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 11>if you can is let's go back and make sure

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 11>we're very calculated about how we build out the enterprise landscape.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The av a man.

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 4>List analyst getting more calculated on what their price targets

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>are in the company in Sanjay Merchant and is saying

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 4>getting more calculated or using as well, CEO of Convolt,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 4>we really appreciate your perspective on CrowdStrike. Coming up, we're

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be joined by Michelle Grider, CEO of CRACK

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Institute for Tech Diplomacy over at Purdue for her read

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 4>on the impact of.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 5>China US relations on the tech sector.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 4>And I'm also looking as we go to break on

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 4>a share that you need to keep an eye on,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 4>down some six percent. Verizon comes out with its earnings

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>operating revenue missed Animal's estimates a few people basically upgrading

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 4>their wireless equipment. Total operating revenue thirty two point eight billion,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 4>less than one percent from a year ago, up less

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 4>than one percent from a year ago, and a bit

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 4>of a miss when the market wanted to see some

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 4>week overall growth, asking some actural games in wireless filone customers.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 5>Though this is Blue Meg technology.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Take some profit on the AI boom. That's the message

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 3>to investors from Morgan Stanley, who lowered their view on

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Asian and emerging market tech names and cut KEYAI chip

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>names like TSMC from.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 7>Their focus list.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 3>The call triggered a rough session for tech in Asia,

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>trading overnight, top of mind for the firm, tougher US

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 3>curbs on tech sales to China, and a red hot

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 3>AI market that might have got too hot. So the

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 3>first time ms has downgraded the sector since his overweight

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>call in October of twenty twenty two. Let's get the

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 3>perspective of Michelle Geider.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 7>She's the CEO of the.

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Cruck Institute for Tech Depotacy at Purdue, an organization dedicated

0:17:55.000 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to accelerating the innovation and adoption of trusted technology. Going story,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 3>but it is not going away. The United States with

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>its current administration limiting China's access to key semiconductor technology.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 3>In the context of China, how long and sustained will

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 3>that policy be things ed?

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>This is turned from being at first a Trump administration

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>policy toward China to Abide administration policy toward China, and

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it's becoming clear now that this is the American policy

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 2>toward China. There's a lot of bipartisan consensus from the

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 2>US Congress as well, and not to mention many of

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 2>our partners and allies across the world. So there has

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>been tremendous volatility and uncertainty with regard to the political election, even.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Just over the past ten days.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a CEO of a tech company, the

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>one thing that you can be certain of, the one

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>thing that will be stable, is going to be American

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 2>policy toward China when it comes to our own tech

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>security and our economic competitiveness.

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 5>Is it the right policy, Michelle.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's start with the ultimate end goal, and the

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>ultimate end goal is that the United States and our

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>partners and allies across the world have to have competitiveness

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and superiority when it comes to technology, because whoever leads

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in technology is going to dictate the values and the

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>standards and the regulations that oversee our militaries, our economies,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the financial system, our culture, and the information space, and

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>so the imperatives for the United States and our partners

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 2>and allies to lead in technology. That means we have

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to innovate faster, smarter, and better, and we have to

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 2>make sure that our companies are not contributing to China's

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 2>ability to beat us in technologies like artificial intelligence.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Michelle Nvidia, for example, is off session highs but up

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>significantly this morning. There were reports that it's preparing a

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 3>specific product that would be within the bounds of current restrictions.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 3>That seems such an interesting policy. How severe do you

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 3>expect the reaction from the administration of the policy sides

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 3>be if corporate it's elect to do that, just to

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>adjust their product so that they're within codified rules.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Like this, this is sort of the new reality that

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>we're in here in twenty twenty four and then through

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty forty four, which is that companies and governments have

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to be working closely together to ensure that companies are

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>able to be competitive and ensure their business success at

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the same time that they're contributing to and not working

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>against US and allied national security. That's what tech diplomacy is,

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what the CROC Institute is focused on, and it

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>really is a new requirement for this contested technological and

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical space. So we're seeing that push and pull between

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>companies and governments, But the long term trajectory of this

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 2>is that companies need to be acting in the national

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 2>security of the United States. There's a way to be competitive,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a way to make money, and there's also a

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>way to ensure that we're advancing national security.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 8>So this is a and scenario, not.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>A one or the other.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Michelle, you mentioned allies, and much of recent report has

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 4>been focused on how the administration is going to lean

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 4>on the Dutch, the Japanese. How will that differ between

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 4>a Trump versus potential Harris.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Look In the previous administration, one of the things that

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the founders of the Croak Institute had focused on was

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>building a historic clean network to secure five G that

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 2>included sixty countries and two hundred telecommunications companies.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 7>That worked together across.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>All of our countries in order to secure five G

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and make sure that we are only using trusted vendors

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 2>that ultimately stopped Huawei in its tracks from becoming the

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 2>dominant global five G provider. That has continued in this

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>administration and whatever the next administration and into the next

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. Really the imperative is for the US and

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 2>all of our allies to.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 8>Be working together.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And we had talked about chips at the very beginning.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Here you see a lot of the same trajectory from

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 2>our partners and allies when it comes to chip. The

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 2>EU is focused on government subsidies to advance their chip

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>self sufficiency. The same thing with Japan Korea. Many of

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 2>our partners and allies are on the same path.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Michelle Geider, CEO of the Kark Institute for Tech Diplomacy,

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 4>have heard you. We thank you so much this blombog Techology.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to bloembogo Techology. I'm Caroline Hyde in London

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 4>and I'm.

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Ed loved Loo in San Franciscoing Sure, as the sun

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 3>rises and sets, Carro, there are financial markets to talk about,

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and then as.

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Like one hundred coming off of it's highs.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, Ed, we're just up by seven tenths

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 4>of a percent, best move since July.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 5>The tenth. But look, we're in the green and that's

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 5>not where.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 4>We were last week, worst week that we had on

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 4>the NASTAG. More broadly, since April, we're seeing CrowdStrike pulling

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 4>to the downside almost thirteen percent actually now trading even

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 4>more significantly than it did on Friday when we first

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 4>learned of the outage that was sparked by an upgrade

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 4>that went horribly wrong for CrowdStrike and eight and a

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 4>half million device users. We keep an eye on that company.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 4>We also keep an eye on digital assets now. Actually,

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 4>we did see spike higher amid the political news and

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 4>trying to digest ultimating what a Harris versus Trump, and indeed,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 4>if it does remain Kamala Harris leading and vuying for

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 4>the nomination for the Democrats, what would that mean for

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 4>crypto Actually, the crypto market is kind of thinking that

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 4>it's better chances still for Trump, who is a pro

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>crypto candidate. We're up three and a half percent, but

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 4>notably we're just a little bit on the downside today.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 7>Let's take a look.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.959
<v Speaker 3>At who in the digital asset world might benefit the

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 3>most from a potential second Donald Trump term in office

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 3>and who might lose the most Let's break it little

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 3>down blue Verhali Bassex here.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean there are.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually two layers to it, right that in the moment,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 3>the market kind of saying, well, we think Trump is

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 3>the more likely outcome, but at the same time he's

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the more pro crypto candidate, and trying to make sense

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 3>of that on an asset class that trades twenty four

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 3>to seven has been quite a lot of fun for you.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 12>Well since early June. You just think about the rise

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 12>that bitcoin has seen after it was in an early

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 12>summer slump. Remember you and I about a month or

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 12>two ago, we're talking about how difficult it was for

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 12>this cryptocurrency to get out of that slump. But now

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 12>we're in a position where, yes, on the hopes of

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 12>a more friendly president here to the crypto industry, you

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 12>have seen Bitcoin rise something to the tune of ten

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 12>percent since when early kind of indications here of Biden

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 12>losing some steam when you saw him address the public

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 12>in different ways, and certainly even more so when he

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 12>stepped down from the nomination yesterday. But you also had,

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 12>for example, the likes of many bitcoin minors surge even

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 12>more than bitcoin itself, and a lot of people This

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 12>is a really interesting one here too, because remember it's

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 12>not just the presidential rhetoric that we're talking about here,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 12>it's also this idea that you may expect an approval

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 12>of an ethereum filing this week and those ethereum spotytfs

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 12>to trade as well. So yes, has Gary Gensler under

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 12>the Biden administration come down very hard on the crypto community. Absolutely,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 12>has it left an overhang on crypto related stocks, particularly exchanges. Also,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 12>has the Biden White House overturned bills, that bipartisan bill

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 12>in particularly that would have changed the way crypto has

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 12>accounted for. Also Yes, But then again you have seen

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 12>also pivotal moments in the bitcoin industry and new record

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 12>highs under the Biden administration as well. So a little

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 12>unclear here as to how much more pro crypto Trump

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 12>would be than the Biden administration.

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 4>And of course whether or not it will be Harris

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 4>who Harris would be accompanied by. But Shanani Molbroney, I mean,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 4>have we ever heard VP Harris speak particularly about crypto?

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Have we haven't sort of tried to Gana ultimately you've

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 4>spoken to Mike Novelgrats and the like.

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 5>He really was pushing for this change of the god.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 12>He was pushing for the change of the guard. But

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 12>I think also just as interesting here, Caroline, is this

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 12>idea that he wants to see a race. He is

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 12>one of the billionaires that did speak to Bloomberg about

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 12>the idea that she's going to have to win that

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 12>ticket going into that Democratic National Convention.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 5>In mid August.

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 12>He did not flat out say she should have it

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 12>on day one, and so there is more support for

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 12>Kamala Harris. And remember it's not that the Trump administration

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 12>is all in on crypto as well. Remember Jake Clayton

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 12>was Treasury sorry Security is an Exchange Commission chair under

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 12>a Trump administration, and crypto did face some hurdles in

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 12>that time as well.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 5>If you remember, the other thing.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 12>Under a Trump administration that would come under very significant

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 12>concern is an idea of a central bank digital currency,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 12>this idea that the government itself could surveil payments in

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 12>a broader way. So it's a nuanced view here, and

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 12>there are still a lot of holdouts in the crypto

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 12>community that don't say the Republican Party is the only

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 12>one for crypto, though it is leaning that way of late.

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Shanata basek always twenty four seven for us as well

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to crypto, we so appreciate it. Let's

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 4>speak to someone who's deep within the crypto ecosystem about

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 4>political change, but also that ETF that we're all llwing

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 4>to go live this week might be she's with a

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 4>CEO a bit go and you'll read on this ultimately

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 4>whether there will be a sudden clearer path for regulation

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to crypto if we did have Trump,

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 4>or indeed if we did.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 13>Have Harris, Well, we're going to find out really soon,

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 13>aren't we. Harris is a little bit unknown so far

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 13>in terms of what her individual views are, but for

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 13>the most part, I think she's probably going to echo

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 13>what Biden has done. And while people are focused a

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 13>lot on whether or not this is a party issue,

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.479
<v Speaker 13>I think what it's really about is who are the

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 13>heads of the various agencies. The regulators have tremendous power here,

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 13>and I'm talking about you know, not just the SEC,

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 13>but also the FDI C and the OCC and to

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 13>a lesser extent, you know some of the I R

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 13>S and the FTC. Obviously, Secretary of Treasury is huge.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 13>So whoever's in those seats greatly dictates what happens. And

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 13>let's be realistic here, Crypto, while a very important issue,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 13>is not the biggest issue for most political political minds,

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 13>So you know they're going to be picking those seats

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 13>based on other factors, and yet who they put into

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 13>those positions can turn on or off crypto leg a

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 13>light switch.

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Mike, one of the voices quoted in the Bloomberg News

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin rap talks about how if Trump is elected to office,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>theres an asset class crypto becomes more investible. Is that

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 3>because of what you just said about regulators, that if

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump comes to office with a clear pro crypto stance,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the market kind of follows suits.

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 13>Well, Trump has been very clear in certainly in the

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 13>last six months now. You can go back to twenty

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 13>nineteen and he had a different view, but you know,

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 13>he's consistent now. And I think what's happened is he's

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 13>actually learned the market has evolved by four years. We've

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 13>got tremendous infrastructure that we did not have four years ago.

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 13>So I think he is ready to help make you know,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 13>a crypto and avestable asset, and frankly, regardless of which

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 13>political side you're on. You know, digital assets crypto are

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 13>about money for the people and about freedom of choice. Now,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 13>these are two virtues that both parties of spouse to

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 13>be in favor of. However, you know, some political leaders

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 13>tend to lean more towards give the power to the banks, right,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 13>So I think there's a real challenge of there's a

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 13>there's a fight going on behind the scenes for power,

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 13>you know, kind of in the financial institution system, and

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 13>are you going to give that to the banks or

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 13>are you're going to actually open it up with freedom

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 13>and let people decide. So Trump has definitely said the

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 13>latter Biden put in people that were more in favor of,

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 13>you know, kind of the existing banking system. And that's

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 13>the question that we have in front of us, is

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 13>you know what's going to happen next.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess the joy of crypto markets is it trades

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty four to seven. And just like everyone else, I

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 3>was looking at bitcoin over the weekend, is the political

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>headlines here? Do you read much into the minute by

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 3>minute move when a news event like this past weekend happens.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Does the market tell you anything about popular sentiment?

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 7>It does?

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 13>I mean, you always have to take away a grain

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 13>of salt. It's really hard to read the tea leaves

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 13>and not a trader. I think some people put too

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 13>much emphasis on small term, short short movements. But no,

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 13>we do see pops, you know, when people are seeing

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 13>a more positive outlook. And I think right now, you know,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 13>the Trump administration, if you were to come in clearly

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 13>signals are more favorable approach to crypto, and we'll see

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 13>what happens if it's anything else. But you know, of

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 13>course Biden and then Harris by kind of by proximity

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 13>would also likely be putting in the same types of

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 13>candidates and will probably look pretty negative for crypto.

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 5>Mike.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 4>This weekend, we're anticipating Trump to speak at a big

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.959
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin conference over in Nashville, likely to be seeing some

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 4>more money coming from the crypto ecosystem into his own

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 4>coffers for fundraising.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 5>What about the people you speak to about.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Whether they're going to be making money or donations to

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 4>a Harris led Democratic Party.

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 13>Look, I've been a single issue voter. I think a

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 13>lot of crypto people are, I mean BICCO. Where we

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 13>stand in the ecosystem, I think actually our clients expect

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 13>us to be this way, So we're really looking out

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 13>for how do we make digitalized it's better. We do

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 13>think it is systemically important for the United States to

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 13>be competitive in financial markets that we have solid digital assets.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 13>So in general, Look, there's still a lot of momentum

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 13>behind Trump. Prior to Trump coming in and really declaring that, hey,

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 13>this is an important issue.

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 8>For America's future.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 13>You know, the current administration didn't seem to have any

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 13>inkling that that was true at all and has been

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 13>punitive on the good news side, Look, I don't think

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 13>this is Republican versus Democrats. Seventy one Democrats voted for

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 13>the FIT twenty one bill. I mean this is a

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 13>bipartisan approach. So well, there's a few people in each party,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 13>maybe a little bit more in the Democratic Party, but

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 13>a few that don't like crypto. In general, this is

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 13>good for America, it's good for people, it's good for freedom.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 13>Every politician should be standing up right now for bitcoin

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 13>and digital assets.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 3>You have to talk about Vance JD Vance. Then if

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.959
<v Speaker 3>you're going to talk about regulation, party versus party, do

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>you have a clear sense of his attitude toward the

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 3>cryptocurrency markets.

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.719
<v Speaker 13>Well, good, good news, there is I mean his proximity

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 13>to Silicon Valley, has you know, past relationships with founders

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 13>Fund Peter thiel And and the others. He understands technology

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 13>just a heck of a lot better than the octogenarians

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 13>that have been running the show here in America for

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 13>the last few years. So I think it's refreshing to

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 13>have somebody from the younger generation. I mean, remember of

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 13>the you know, millennial millionaires out there, one hundred percent

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 13>of them own bitcoin.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you.

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 13>Want to talk to the younger generation, they obviously want

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 13>to have a conversation about bitcoin, and and I think

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 13>jd Vance hits that a lot better than the than

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 13>the elder folks do.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>One idea in a Trump presidency from a regulatory standpoint, Mike,

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 3>is to hand responsibility back to the States on a

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 3>number of issues. I'm not saying that there is any

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 3>certainty or even reporting that crypto would be caught into

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that basket, but do you see that being a point

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 3>of tension a state bite state policy toward crit so

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 3>currency markets and consumer adoption versus a sort of federal level.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 13>Look, Look, partly, I think that'd be great. I've been saying,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 13>you know, We kind of have a Thomas Jefferson versus

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 13>Alexander Hamilton thing going on right now when it comes

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 13>to crypto, and you've got one for the Fed power

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 13>on the Hamilton's side and the other one for the

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 13>state's federation Jefferson. However, you know, America as a political

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.959
<v Speaker 13>and economic system has a lot of federal ties. So

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 13>even if you are a state chartered bank, remember you

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 13>probably are carrying FDIC, which is the Federal Depository Insurance, right,

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 13>So the federal insurance is very difficult and has definitely

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 13>been told to lock out crypto. So whether you're a

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 13>federally chartered institution through the OCC or a state chartered one,

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 13>you're probably looking an FDIC and the Federal Reserve, the

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 13>fd I C has tremendous power over all of those banks.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 13>So anyway, I would I would like to see more

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 13>competition across states to get all this stuff going. However,

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 13>remember there's federal hooks everywhere.

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Mike Belchi bitgo CEO and co founder, thank you. You're

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 3>looking at live pictures from the White House. That is

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 3>the championship teams of the National Collegiate Athletic Association gathering

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 3>at the podium, we await Vice President Harris, who's due

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 3>to deliver remarks very quickly. Go out to Washington, DC.

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Kaylee lines and you know, we talked about it.

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 3>They're the focus of policy, one candidate versus another.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 7>And what Harris may or may not say.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I mean this will be the first introduction

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 6>to Vice President Kamala Harris is not just the Vice president,

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 6>but as a Democrat seeking the nomination just in a

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 6>matter of weeks from now. This is her first official

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 6>event since announcing that she does intend to win and

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 6>earn that nomination.

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 5>This is going to be a very.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 6>High profile for her, and I would point out this

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 6>is not the only time that Harris will be at

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 6>an event today. She just tweeted or posted on x

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 6>that in this first full day of our campaign, in

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 6>her words, she will be heading to Wilmington, Delaware to

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 6>say hello to the staff in headquarters. She says, one

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 6>day down, one hundred and five to go. She says, together,

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 6>we're going to win this, and we're going to hear

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 6>her in just moments as she walks now onto the

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 6>stage at the White House at this NCAA Sports Day event,

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 6>of course, not something that was intended to be a

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 6>campaign event, but given the events of the last twenty

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 6>four hours, is very much becoming one. As we await

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 6>the Vice president to give remarks after this first speaker.

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we do anticipate, and all to be said, I mean,

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 4>when they are already signed up to make speeches, recauding sport,

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 4>recording in a competition, how much do we think she

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 4>really can jump in the future policy making that she's

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 4>already thinking around, Well.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 6>This isn't likely to be a speech that is going

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 6>to outline everything that she would like to do politically

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 6>as President Caroline. But of course, with only one hundred

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 6>and five days until the election, in just a matter

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 6>of weeks until the Democratic Convention in Chicago, which begins

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 6>August nineteenth, she frankly cannot afford to miss any opportunity

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 6>to plead her case as to why she should be

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 6>elevated from Vice President of the United States to President

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 6>of the United States. And given that this is the

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 6>first time she will be addressing cameras directly, not just

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 6>putting out statements in the written form to announce her candidacy,

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 6>to say that she doesn't tend to earn the Democratic nomination,

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 6>She's likely not going to go without saying that. But

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 6>of course, because the event is not a campaign event,

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 6>this is happening on the White House lawn as we speak,

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 6>it is likely to not be as steeped in policy

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 6>as that otherwise could have been, and many strategists have

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 6>spoken with in the last twenty four hours suggests that

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 6>Harris is probably between now in the convention beginning in

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 6>mid August, going to have to do some kind of

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 6>formal announcement of what her policy platform will be and

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 6>how it could be differentiated from Joe Biden, knowing that

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 6>Republicans are already on the attack trying to tie her

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 6>directly to the policies of this administration, given that she

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 6>has served this administration as Vice president for the last

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 6>three and a half years.

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting as a technology show, we've obviously been trying

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 4>to gone a the interest from social media users, whether

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 4>they be in China, and it feels as though thus

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 4>far the Chinese community and government doesn't see much of

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a tone shift coming from Biden passing a baton over

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to Kamala Harris in a view that indeed she would

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 4>still be unlikely to beat out a Trump that seemingly

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 4>also ringing out in the crypto marketers. We're just speaking

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 4>what about donors here at the moment. I know we

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 4>spoke about it briefly, Kaylee, but has there been any

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 4>new update about support coming from a monetary perspective.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, the donors continue to pour in.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 6>Act Blue, which of course is an aggregator of democratic donations,

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 6>had fifty million dollars raised from grassroot donors in just

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 6>the seven hours after Biden's announcement. In Harris's subsequent announcement

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 6>that she was seeking the nomination, are understanding is those

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 6>are continuing to roll in and that figure is taking higher.

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.720
<v Speaker 6>We also have seen a number of high profile donors,

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 6>including rereied Hoffman, of course well known to the technology industry,

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 6>who came out to endorse Harris. George Soros has done

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 6>the same. Others, according to our reporting at Bloomberg, are

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 6>still remaining on the sidelines for now, as many are

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 6>not eager to see what could be an anointment, if

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 6>you will, or an actual coronation of Harris without a

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 6>full process here, but the Vice President is now at

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 6>the podium, so let's listen to her words.

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 14>To support these extraordinary student athletes, and it is good

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 14>to be here with so many leaders, including of course

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 14>members of Congress, members of our administration, and are extraordinary athletes.

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 14>Our President Joe Biden wanted to be here today. He

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 14>is feeling much better and recovering fast, and he looks

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 14>forward to getting back on the road. And I wanted

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 14>to say a few words about our President. Joe Biden's

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 14>legacy of accomplishment over the past three years is unmatched

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 14>in modern history. In one term, he has already yes,

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 14>you may laugh, in one term, he has already surpassed

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 14>the legacy of most presidents who have served two in office.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 14>And I first came to know President Biden through his

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 14>son Bo. We work together as attorneys general in our states,

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 14>and back then, Beau would often tell me stories about

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 14>his dad. He would talk about the kind of father

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 14>and the kind of man that Joe Biden is. The

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 14>qualities that Bau revered in his father are the same

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 14>qualities that I have seen every day in our President.

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 14>His honesty, his integrity, his commitment to his faith and

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 14>his family, his big heart, and his love deep love

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 14>of our country. And I am first hand witness that

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 14>every day our President Joe Biden fights for the American people,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 14>and we are deeply, deeply grateful for his service to

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 14>our nation.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 5>And so with that on.

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 14>Behalf of our President and doctor Biden, I am honored

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 14>to welcome all of you to the White House to

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 14>celebrate the achievements of these great athletes. Every one of

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 14>them is a national champion. A national champion in America,

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 14>tens of millions of people play a sport as a child,

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 14>and the best of the best grow up to become

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 14>national champions. Here today we have seven undefeated teams, eleven

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 14>repeat champions, and twenty first time winners. Up about you all,

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 14>Some of you have represented our nation on the internationals.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 3>That was Vice President Kamala Harris speaking publicly for the

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 3>first time since President Biden ended his reelection bid and

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 3>endorsed Vice President Harris to be the Democratic nominee. Let's

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 3>go back to be based Katie Lines in Washington, d C.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I was listening intently to what Vice President

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Harris was saying. I think a lot of it was

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 3>noted already in the statement she put out Sunday.

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 7>Your analysis, Kayley.

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, interesting that she chose not to speak about her

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 6>own qualifications to be president of the United States, now

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 6>that she has declared that she does intend to earn

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 6>the Democratic nomination, but instead to begin her remarks at

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 6>the White House in her first official event since all

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 6>of this went down yesterday, to talk about Joe Biden's legacy,

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 6>describing him as having in one term, saying that the

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 6>audience could clap for this, he has already surpassed the

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 6>legacy of most presidents who'd served two terms in office,

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 6>talking about honesty and integrity and faith. Deeply grateful, she said,

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 6>for his service to our nation. So she's not necessarily

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 6>making this about her today. She is talking about Joe

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 6>Biden and the legacy he will leave behind, knowing that

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 6>he is going to be a one term president in

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 6>his decision not to seek re election, and even as

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 6>he has suggested he would like to see the baton

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 6>or the torch passed to her, she didn't take this moment,

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 6>at least initially, to plead her own case and treat

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 6>this like a campaign event. She moved right from talking

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 6>about Joe Biden's legacy to commending the athletes who are

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 6>gathered on the stage behind her. It's an interesting choice

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 6>and does suggest that perhaps she's going to save most

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 6>of the campaigning for a later event. Again, I would

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 6>remind you she just announced a few minutes ago that

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 6>she will be heading Wilmington, Delaware later today to meet

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 6>with the campaign headquarters there. As she notes, there's just

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:26.720
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and five days to go until the election,

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:28.720
<v Speaker 6>and then.

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 4>As and when President Biden is fully recovered able to

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 4>be back in front of cameras, what do we expect

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the relationship to become like over the next few months.

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, Joe Biden, in his statement announcing he wouldn't seek

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 6>reelection yesterday, said that he does think it's in the

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 6>best interest of the party in the nation to focus

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 6>solely on continuing out the rest of his term and

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 6>his duties as president. To me, that does suggest that

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 6>he may not be super active in the actual ongoing

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 6>presidential campaign, But ultimately that's likely a decision that would

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 6>be left to Kamala Harris or whoever is a top

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 6>the Democratic ticket to what extent they want to attach

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 6>themselves to Joe Biden and have Joe Biden campaigning on

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 6>their behalf, knowing that there will be a Republican effort

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 6>to tie Kamala Harris directly to the policies of the

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 6>Biden administration, suggests that she is essentially just a continuation

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 6>of the same. You could see how she may want

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 6>to distance herself a bit from that. It of course

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 6>remains to be seen. Joe Biden just days ago, as

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 6>we all know, was talking about returning to the campaign

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 6>trail when he recovers from COVID this week, and all

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 6>of a sudden his decision had very much changed, as

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 6>he backed out suddenly yesterday. So we know that things

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 6>are evolving in real time. And it looks like the

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 6>Vice President has just wrapped up her remarks without saying

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.280
<v Speaker 6>much about her candidacy whatsoever.

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 4>Maybe later in Wilmington. I know that you'll be ontel

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 4>of that. Kaylie Nines, We thank you so much. Meanwhile,

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 4>coming up, we get back to tech and what to

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 4>expect from this week's earnings.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 5>This is Brumbag Technology.

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's look ahead to this week's tech earnings what to expect,

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 4>starting with SAP today Germany, Spotify, Google, Tesla reporting tomorrow.

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Ran Dostellica is with us to run us through well

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 4>whether we can live up to some valuations.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 15>Ryan, Yes, absolutely, that's the key question. This quarter, a

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.720
<v Speaker 15>lot of Magnificent and seven companies are expected to deliver

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 15>a deceleration in earnings. Earnings will still be pretty strong.

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 15>Growth will still be pretty strong, but slower than we've

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 15>seen in past quarters. And given how much these stocks

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 15>have run up so far this year, even with the

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 15>recent fultility we've seen in this sector, that's the key question.

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 15>How much are these companies able to justify how much

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 15>they've moved.

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:43.439
<v Speaker 7>Up this year.

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday gonna be big, Alphabet Tesla. Is there a calendar

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 3>second quarter story across all of tech you're watching, Ryan.

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 15>I think the main issues are going to be how

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 15>much of these companies going to continue spending on their

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 15>AI initiatives and what kind of return on in investment

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 15>are they seeing from these persitions. I think Alphabet's going

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 15>to be particularly important with that, We're going to be

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 15>watching how star of the cloud business is there, and

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 15>then more Brawley, We're just going to be looking to

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 15>see what the state of the digital advertising market looks like.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 15>We already saw some of that from Netflix last week

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 15>as they talked about their ad here, but I think

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 15>for Alphabet and then Meta next week, those are going

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:18.879
<v Speaker 15>to be the key focuses. How much are they've seen

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 15>from the benefit from AI, how much they spinning on

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 15>it and will that be enough? Kind of justifies doctor

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 15>that the Bold up pretty strongly.

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 4>This year, in particular in video Ryan, so great to

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 4>get your perspective, Roan Vestelica, We appreciate it now. That

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 4>does it for this edition of bluebour Technology. A lot

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 4>of earnings to anticipate.

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 3>There for Ed you start the week with a presidential race,

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 3>earnings and the biggest outage in history.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 7>Makes for a good show for recapping on the podcast.

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 3>You know where to find it Terminal, Apple, Spotify, iHeart

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Caroline's in London this week I'm in San Francisco. It's

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 3>an amazing week to tune in learn about what's going

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 3>on in the world of technology. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>On the