WEBVTT - 1146 | MLB Trade Deadline Mock Trades With ESPN's Paul Hembekides 

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>The Times record.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Bring we will sue you.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 3>To thank Tom's the Gunner.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome Flaming hang Out.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the Just Baseball Show. It is Thursday, July

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 3>twenty third. That's arm Late and that's Paul Hem the

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Ketis and I am Peter Raffle and today a mock

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>trade episode. On yesterday's show, arm Jack and Fink, they

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>did a deadline prime or bring it up? Really the

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>top fifty potential deadline movie again at this deadline. But

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 3>here Hembo and I we ranked ten stars that we

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 3>think are likely going to get traded, and both of

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>us have a mock trade and we're gonna throw it

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 3>over to Arum and he's going to decide who's got

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the best one. And it's all brought to you by

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>bet MGM. Did your home run bet come up short?

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to this MLB no Sweat home run token, you

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 3>don't have to worry if your bet didn't clear the fences.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Just activate your token when you bet on any player

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>to hit a home run in any MLB game, and

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 3>if that player fails to go yard, you'll get your

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>stake back in bonus bets. Remember to use code just

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Baseball on bet MGM, because again, if your first pick loses,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 3>you get it all back at bonus bets up to

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>fifteen hundred bucks. Hembo, you and I have been texting

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>all morning, all yesterday, and really over the past week

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>because we cannot be more excited for this episode.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. My wife is currently away on assignment

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>for work, so I've got three girls under the age

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of four for like five days. I have spent an

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>irresponsible amount of time preparing for this, considering the responsibilities

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>that I have at home. But the only thing that

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>matters is that we win here. I mean, I'm not

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>looking to compete. I'm not going to win. An arbiter

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>arm over there who's looking like just so to my

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>ore in the mid nineties, is gonna take that job.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Really seriously, I can assure.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 4>You, I'm just here for equitable trades. That's all I

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>care about, is just equitable trades.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>As as the fanos on top of the throne, the arbiter,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 3>explain how you're going to judge our trades, because you're

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>not just choosing the prospect package that has better prospects.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Because if Heimbo and I were to make those trades,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 3>we would just overpay for everything so we could win

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 3>this quote unquote episode. How are you going to be

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 3>judging our mock trades?

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm just gonna pick the trades where I

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 4>know both fan bases are going to be mad. But

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>now I think it's one where that if I was

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 4>in the GM seat of either side, I would painfully

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 4>say send it in and like grip.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>My teeth and do it right.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's it really comes down to, like

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 4>what should the asking price? What's a fair asking price

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 4>for this player on the big league side? And was

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>that asking price met do I think? And which was

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 4>closest to that? And you know, maybe some of that

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 4>will be skewed where I may value you know, a

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 4>prospect a little bit more, and that's the fun part

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 4>of it. The other side is where I want to

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 4>make sure we get like even, and I'll probably throw

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>in some calibration questions is our value of these big leaguers?

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 4>But I think that's important too, like how much are

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 4>we weighing control with certain guys? How much are weighing

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 4>which I thought was great in the last episode, how

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 4>much these guys have to get paid, like treks Google's

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 4>salary for the rest of the year is not something

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 4>that you can just gloss over. Because he's really good

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>at pitching. It matters.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's all things that definitely want to bake into

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the equation.

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>And let's say that both of our packages are tied.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Will you then will the type breaker be your favorite fit? Like,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>for example, if you like the package with said team

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 3>just a little bit more, even if the prospect returns

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>are equal.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll go fit and likelihood.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 4>If you're giving me like a Brewers deal that will

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 4>never happen, I might. I might just end up not

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 4>making the cut if it's like if it's a Brewers

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 4>deal versus a Preller deal, going to lean towards the

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>pre Er deal.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 3>And hembo, You and I discussed this too offline. We said,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's a lot of trade deadline podcast episodes.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people cover the trade deadline, and a

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of people do it really well, but you don't

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of all, right, you think that this

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>guy's going to get traded, Who is going to get

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>traded and to who, and really narrowing it down to

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 3>what we think is going to be a likely package

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 3>for these ten guys at the deadline. And again, these

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>ten players, not only on Jeff Passon's article, are they

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 3>forty percent or higher likelihood to get trade, but we

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 3>think it's probably closer to sixty percent. And every player

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 3>here is good. So we're not just thrown around random names.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>These are ten stars we really think are going to

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>get traded.

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm, for all intentsive purposes, pretending to be the

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 2>GM of all thirty teams across baseball over the next hour,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'm confident that I'm going to win this whatever

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it is, quote card contest, whatever we're going to call it, let's.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Call it a cool card contest. All right, let's break

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 3>straight into it, and we're going to start at the

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>very top. Terrek Scooble mock trades for Trek Scooble, Hembo.

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 3>You are our esteemed guest, our friend, So of course

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the first mock trade for Terrek Scooble goes to you.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm sending Tara Scooble to the Tampa Bay Rays. That

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>might surprise a lot of people within the side of

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>my voice. But if not. Now, when Steo Epstein once

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 2>famously said, we know the system has become absolutely stacked down, there.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>You know that the American League is clearer right now

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the path to winning it than it's been for many,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>many years. And this is a club that's only won

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>it twice in its history. It has a clear path

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>they're doing so right now. They've loaded up in the draft,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 2>most recently drafting Grady Emerson. They made out like a

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 2>bandit last year when they traded Shane Bosse. My package

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>as as follows, it's a loaded package. They're going to

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>send Cooper Fleming, and they're going to send Brody Hopkins

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 2>to Detroit in exchange for Tarrett schouble In. What was

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, probably you could consider the least Rays like

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>move that you could ever make. But like I said,

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I think time is of the essence, and given the

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>fact that they're operating from a position of strength, that's

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>what I'm sending into our arbiter.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 3>So I like it hard not to like the Rays

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 3>because I have a couple players on this list headed

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 3>to the Rays. I think we're all aligned that the

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Rays are going to be one of the most active

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>teams at this deadline. They got money to spend, they

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>got a new owner, They're atop the American League East.

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I like what you said, Heimbo if not now went,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 3>and they're in a great position to pounce on a

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 3>guy like Tarek Scooble. But another team that is in

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe a better spot to go get Trek Scouble is

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the LA Dodgers. And it's obvious, but sometimes the obvious

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>answer is the right one. And my package is Headler

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 3>by Zayr Hope, one of the four elite outfield prospects

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 3>on the LA Dodgers that they would not feel if

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>he were to go. Obviously incredible prospect, But when you

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>look at the current Dodger situation, I think they're okay

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>if they only have three elite outfielders and then you

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>give up Emma Sheen, who's an MLB ready arm right

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 3>now can slot directly into the Tiger's rotation has always

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 3>had really good stuff bounced in between the bullpen and

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the rotation for the Dodgers, and that's mostly because the

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Dodgers are just so freaking good. And I understand you saying, well,

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 3>did the Dodgers really need to do this? Look at

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>how good their team is right now. The Dodgers' rotation

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>with Tyler Glass now on the shelf and Blake Snell

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 3>on the shelf. It's not as daunting of a rotation

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>as we might be used to, or if you haven't

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 3>been watching Dodger baseball recently, you might not have realized that.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of Yoshinoba Yamamoto, Justin Robleski, Emmett Shean, Roki Sasaki,

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and Eric Lauer. So I'm not saying they need a pitcher.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Dave Roberts even came out and said, we don't really

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 3>need anything. We might be sellers over buyers, and I

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>agree with him. However, in this deal, even though it's

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>an overpay, they don't feel it. And if the Dodgers

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>truly want a three P you get Trek Skouoble good Night,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and all it costs is Emmett Shean and one of

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 3>your four elite outfielders. I think this might even be

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 3>a stronger package than what the Rays could give him.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>But Arum, you're the arbiter.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 4>You tell me so, I think both of these are

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 4>like fair packages here and in previous years I'd say, well,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>obviously the Dodgers are more likely to do this like

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 4>no way the Rays do it. But for all the

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 4>things that Hemba laid out, I think it's important to

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 4>note that also the financial aspect is not as much

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 4>of a factor for the Rays, I think with ownership

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 4>and the message that they want to send generally speaking

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 4>as well. And I think when you're just looking at

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 4>what we've got as my video.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Just goes out, I have no idea what happened there.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 4>But when we think about it from that lens, I

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 4>just I think it's a tough gauge because the funniest

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 4>part is are I can't decide if the Dodgers are

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 4>playing koy right now and just deciding that they don't

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 4>want to set the market, or if it's one of

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 4>those situations where they actually just don't want to make

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 4>that kind of move like they because anytime you make

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 4>this trade, it's going to be a model defying move,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 4>right Like it's always going to say not worth it,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 4>not worth it, not worth it. And I wonder if

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the Dodgers this is the one time with where they're

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 4>at position like in terms of where they're at, that

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 4>they don't want to defy the model. At the same time,

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 4>we haven't seen the Rays really do this do this in.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>A little bit now. And I go back and forth, but.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I think this is a tiebreaker of likelihood, and with

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 4>the way and the messaging that we're hearing from the Dodgers,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 4>unless it's all like a trick, like they don't want

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 4>to set the market, they're just saying this, I think

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 4>the Rays are more likely to do it. And if

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 4>the Rays make this trade, Brody Hopkins is the most

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 4>frustrating pitching prospect for me in baseball right now. He's

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 4>either six perfect with ten k's or he walks six.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 4>But the upside there is so amens. He's already in

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 4>tripa A. Fleming is a hit first, left handed hitting infielder,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 4>which I think is the number one addiction of this

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Tiger's front office in Scott Harris. So I think I

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 4>know that's why I had both threw him in there.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Shean is gonna hit ARB next year, but I think

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 4>they would love to throw him in there and have

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 4>him in the rotation the Tigers. But they're also in

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 4>a spot now where it's like you're trying to find

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 4>a spot for a couple guys that are really throwing

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 4>the ball.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I go Zire Hope doesn't.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Totally fit what they typically like, but he has been

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 4>destroying the ball and I think they need an outfielder

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 4>or left in a hitting outfielder in the fold there

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 4>would help a little bit more.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This is probably the toughest one.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going to answer before you answer, Hambo. I

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>think we did a good job here, because you can't decide.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 3>It's like pick it between, you know, a really good

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>New York strip and a really good Ribbi. It's what

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>are you more in the mood for? In the mood

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 3>for a little bit more fat on your steak or

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 3>you want to go a little bit healthier, a little

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 3>bit leaner ar them.

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go with the one I actually think

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 4>is more likely, which is crazy, and it's the Rays.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm going to go with the Rays on

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 4>this one, but it's also because I want to see

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 4>the race makes splash. But I think the Dodgers messaging

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 4>is just unless it's all bullshit, I just don't see

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>him doing this.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Question for you real quick. In the two players from

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the Rays and the Dodgers, what package do you think

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>is better? Just in a vacuum.

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>In a vacuum, it's it's the Dodgers package.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you think you think the Dodgers if the

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Tiger said, we want zay R Hope and Emma Shean

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 3>instead of what the Rays and the Dodgers wouldn't feel that.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>You still think.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 4>It's more I don't think they're gonna you know, I

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>always I kind of reject the like wouldn't feel that

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 4>thing the more I've thought about it, because it's like,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>of course you feel it.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good player.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 4>So if you're giving up a really good two really

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 4>good players for a rental, no matter how many you have,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 4>you could have a hundred of them. You could have

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 4>moved them for something else. So I think the Dodgers

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 4>package bad better. But I also think Scott Harris may

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 4>value Fleming just as close as Hope, who knows and

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 4>and the upside of Hopkins as a guy that hasn't

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 4>even started as big League clock yet could be more appealing.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Or Harris may just want to plug in a guy

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 4>into the rotation next year, but he'll be an RB already,

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 4>So that's one of the only other drawbacks too.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Hambo takes a one to zero lead you he go there.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 2>The whole point was the watch rum just twist himself

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and not for the last five minutes and still not

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 2>feel confident in his answer. So we did our job

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>there for sure. So as far as off, we both

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>won the Terror Schooble trade.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Should we take a draw? Now you won, arm picked you,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 3>you won. It's one zero hembo that we move over

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 3>to Michael Waka. Not quite Trek Scooble, but a damn

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>good pitcher. And he's pitched to a mid to low

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 3>threes era and it feels like for the last decade,

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and he comes with one and a half years of

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 3>control and a club option in twenty twenty eight. So

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think necessarily that he's going to have like

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be cheap to go get a Michael Waka.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 3>I know the underlying metrics aren't great, but he has

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>some postseason success under his belt. Like, this is a

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 3>really good sound pitcher is on the older end, but

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 3>any team would be I think jumping for joy to

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 3>bring Michael Waka in hemball. Throw it over to you again.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>You're going first, my friend, the package mock trades for

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Michael Waka.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying Michael Waka to the Chicago Cubs because Michael

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Waka represents every single thing that they need in their rotation.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Namely consistency, namely durability. I don't view him as a

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>frontline starter. I view him more as a mid rotation

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>starter based upon those two notions, his consistency and his durability.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>He's among the very best mid rotation starters in all

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>of ball and there's nothing that the Cubs need right

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 2>now more than average, if not slightly above average innings eating.

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what he provides. I don't think that the

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>market is going to be that hot for him. Candidly,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the industry views him as being much

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>more than what I just described. But look, desperate times

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago call for desperate measures, and he's someone that

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>you could absolutely pencil in the start Game three of

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>a postseason series. The package is this, I'm sending two prospects.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sending King Kepley, a twenty two year old center fielder,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sending Caleb Wing, a nineteen year old right

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>handed pitcher. It's going to be a two for one

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Chicago to Kansas City as the Royals do whatever it

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>is tearing down that they do here before the deadline,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 2>which of course is absolutely necessary considering the way that

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>their season has been tanked.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>When you look at this package, I'm gonna value Michael

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Waka a little bit higher than you are. And that'll

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 3>that's why it's good that Arms here as kind of

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>that balancing act. But again, Michael Waka just continues to shove, Like,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 3>how many more seasons of a mid three cra eating

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and seventy two hundred and eighty innings do

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 3>we have to see before we call him at least

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a really solid number three in a playoff rotation. And

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I think for a really solid three in a playoff rotation,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have to give up a little bit more.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 3>And I would also say the Braves might need him

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>even more than the Cubs do. I was shocked to

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>see this that innings from starters on both the Cubs

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 3>and the Braves. Brave starters have thrown less innings than

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Cubs starters have this year. The Braves are in desperate

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>need of a guy to solidify this rotation. Because you

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 3>have Chris Sale at the top, that's awesome. We're still

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 3>waiting on Spencer Schwellenbach. Strider is hurt and I don't

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 3>really know what the update is on him. And after

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>that it's Waldrop, Ranaldo Lopez, Martin Perez. I think the

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Braves desperately need a guy who can routinely give them

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>six innings of two to three run ball, and I

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to cost number one Owen Murphy, who's

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 3>already been up to the Big league's twenty year old

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>first round pick in twenty twenty two. He's a really

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>solid prospect. And then Alex low Diese, twenty two year

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 3>old in a ball having a good season. He was

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 3>his second round pick in twenty twenty five. So that's

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 3>my offer. I think it's steeper than Hembo's offer, but

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I think Michael Waka deserves it, so arm you're the arbiter,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>does he deserve it?

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Couple of Michael Waka things. I think his contract's fascinating.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>This is the most expensive year that you'll have of

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 4>three years of control, or I guess two more after this,

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 4>so two and a quarter, and then it's fourteen mil

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 4>next year, which I mean you're getting him for eight

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 4>million less than the qoh no problem, and then fourteen

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 4>million the year after that. He does hit a lot

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 4>of incentives that'll probably end up driving him closer to

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 4>fifteen sixteen million because they're all innings based incentives, but

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 4>great thing, sign up for it. I have one problem

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 4>with him post package, and this might be me over valuing,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 4>kind of like the state of the Org. But the

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Cubs have eight thousand hitting prospects and they have two

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 4>I think really.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Relevant pitching prospects at this point.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 4>One is Jackson Wiggins, who's been banged up most of

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the year, and the other is Caleb Wing. And Wing

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 4>is striking out what thirteen fourteen per nine. He's still

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 4>at the lower levels, a lot of time to figure

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 4>things out. But I do wonder like you trade I mean,

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 4>obviously you have the guy you just drafted in Kaid

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Townsend as well, and that helps. But entering the draft,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 4>that's where you stood. Do you want to trade a

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit of that pitching depth with for a vet arm.

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>He is controllable and so maybe that would be worth

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 4>it for them. I don't know. I love King Kane Kepley,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think he would fit. I could glove out

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 4>there and his power would play out out there. And

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he's one of the most underrated prospects in baseball.

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Great defender. I think he's already got forty five bags

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 4>this year in eighty three games, he's only been caught

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 4>four times. Sneaky pop, really fun player. I'm trying to

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 4>think too of what the Royals would want here, and

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't see this as a team that I think

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 4>with where they're at, I don't know if they want

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 4>guys that are further off. I do wonder if they

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 4>want guys that can kind of help them a little

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 4>bit more quickly, because I imagine maybe they feel like

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 4>they're not as far off as the record may suggest.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Where do you stand on that, Henm, But what do

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 4>you think the Royals feel right now about where they're at?

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Maybe going into twenty seven?

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Somewhat delusionally, I think the Royals are teetering on an

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Angels like sort of worldview of themselves, which I think

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>is very dangerous and very damaging. I personally see a

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>system that is devoid of talent, not just at the

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 2>lower levels, not just at the upper levels, but in

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the big leagues two like this is in my judgment,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>if you were to just stack surplus across organizations, they're

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be in the bottom third for sure, if

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>not even worse than that. I don't see much talent here.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think this team is much closer to a full on,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>full fledged rebuilder, at least reset than most people realize. Yes,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>we remember fondly than making the playoffs a couple of

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>years ago. Yes, we all love Bobby Wood Junior and

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen from CAGs, what we've seen from Carter Jensen.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 2>But it's a roster that doesn't make much sense now

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>because they're young bats. They're veteran arms that are somewhat

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>expensive that aren't that wiffy. Many of those pitchers are

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>out performing their peripherals because the ballpark is so friendly.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not right now a big fan of where

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>this organization is, and so I think what they should

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 2>be doing is operating under the assumption that we're going

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>to build out our roster for the twenty twenty eight

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 2>and twenty twenty nine season, not try and microwave any success.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:48.719
<v Speaker 2>But that's just my two cents.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you wholeheartedly. But do you think that

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it will do.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's much less likely than what I just said,

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>because I think they have a few of themselves much

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 2>closer to the team that hung the Yankees in the playoffs.

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 2>A couple of seasons ago, which to me is totally

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a distant memory.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Other funny thing, I think I side with Peter a

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 4>little bit about Waka being a little bit more valuable,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 4>But EMBO's package was actually so like savvy, like upside

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 4>prospect guy rankings haven't caught up yet that I actually

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 4>think the packages were pretty much the same, like they're

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 4>pretty equitable. However, I think the Royals delusion makes this

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 4>a more likely Peter package here, where they're gonna say,

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 4>let's plug Owen Murphy, which I hate the fit by

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 4>the way, Owen Murphy in a verty fastball in that ballpark.

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to overlook that.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 4>They're going to say, we've got a right hander that

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 4>we can plug right into our rotation immediately, and he's

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 4>going to help us next year as well. And we

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 4>get an infield bat that we can maybe develop a

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 4>little bit more as well, so we bolster the system

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 4>and we get a guy that can help us this

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 4>year with six years of control and next year, I

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 4>should say, with six years of control.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I think they look at your lower.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Level prospects, Embo and say we're too close to competing

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 4>for that.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Timbo I won this one but at what cost? Because

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 3>what Aram just said is like Peter's trade is dumber

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 3>exactly with what the Boils are going to do. Like

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>you you out intelligence to me, And I'm like, I

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 3>use that because that's not even a word. You outdid me.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you saying you out intelligence to me is

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>just perfect for so many reasons there. I think arms right,

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I think generally speaking, I think generally speaking, they view

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>themselves much closer to the top of the mountain, for

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 2>lack of a better term, than they actually are. And

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I think some of the scuttle that you've heard clean

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>out of the reporting to suggest like they'd only move

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Waka or Lugo if for a king's ransom demonstrates the

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>fact that they feel that way that they could be

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 2>back into things next year. Guys, the American League is

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>quite literally as weak as it's been in thirty years.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>If you're not going to be competitive in twenty twenty

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 2>six up until a couple of weeks ago with Bobby

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Whit playing at an MVP level, Let's be honest, guys,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you're really not that close. And let's not pretend here

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 2>that this is the Milwaukee Brewer system that's brimming with

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>young talent ready to explode next year. This is a

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>two or three years away situation in Kansas City.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 4>I hate to inform you, yep, I think you're right,

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 4>but I think Peters is the realistic swap here. And

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 4>he plugs right in for Randy Dobnack potentially, So you

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>know that's a team that's close to competing.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>This is actually one of my worst wins of all time.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I literally got a win because of number all Right,

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 3>let's go over to Freddy Peralta. Mock trades for Freddie Peralta.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 3>This one was tough hembo because again he was traded

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 3>for Brandon Sprote and Jet Williams from the Brewers of

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the Mets this offseason, the Mets saying getting close to that.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 3>So this is really a gauge on how do you

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 3>value Freddie Peralta. So mock trade number one goes to you.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>This is really a gauge of can you get more

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 2>for Freddy Peralta?

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Right now?

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Then you're gonna get for a fourth round pick, which

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is approximately what the Mets would receive in return, because there,

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of course a taxpayer if they were to give him

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the QO and he were to walk arm correct me

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>if I'm wrong, but that's not gonna be all that

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 2>palatable of a player either, which is why I think

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that they are likely to move him, because you can

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 2>probably do at least a little better than that, given

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the number of buyers on the market. Yeah, I'm sending

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>him in his three million dollar contract to Arizona for

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the season. I mean, we know he's

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 2>not pitching well right now. It's a true talent era

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 2>somewhere between four and a half and five. Maybe they

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>can squeeze more life out of him. Maybe they can't,

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>but they desperately need the innings. I'm gonna send over

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Yenceel Luis, a twenty one year old shortstop boy I

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>know very little about, but I watch a little bit

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>of video and know that he's blocked by Tommy Troy

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 2>and Casey Cunningham and JD.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Dix.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure there's an obvious place for him to

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>play in that organization. Maybe the can Mets can make

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 2>something of him, and maybe Freddy Perolta can catch lightning

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>in a bottle and give the Arizona Diamondbacks a dozen

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 2>good starts and try and push their way to the wild.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Card, another player that I think Hambo you and I

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 3>are valuing a little bit differently. Arm of the trade

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 3>from the Brewers. How many cents on the dollar is this?

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>How much is this? Ew?

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to account for Tobias Myers as well, but

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 4>this is like thirty twenty twenty cents on the dollar,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 4>fifteen cents on the dollar.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I like Freddy Perlta has not pitched well.

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Like everything that Hembo said I get, I understand, but

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, it's Freddy Peralta, Like

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 3>you got to have some hope that he can bounce

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 3>back in some meaningful way and maybe pitch to a

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 3>four ERA down the stretch, and maybe he could give

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>you a good postseason start. Like maybe I'm fishing, But

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 3>it's just hard for me to give up on a

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 3>guy like Freddy Peralta. It really is. It's not like

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 3>my trade is huge either. I understand that he's a rental,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 3>but I want to send him over to the Chicago

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Cups an arm. You already said that they have a

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>glut of offensive prospects and long and James Treanto's these

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>are two guys we've kind of floated in deals in

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 3>mock trades for the Cubs for a while now, just

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>because they're both blocked. Jonathan Long is twenty four year

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 3>old who has put up great offensive numbers at every stop.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 3>It's a first baseman completely blocked by Michael Bush. James

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Treanto's if he wasn't blocked by Nico Horner before, he's

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>certainly blocked by Alex Bragman. Now, I just don't know

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 3>where these guys are gonna play. And Trianto seems like

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 3>a fine offensive piece. I feel like he's more of

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>a bench bat. But at least you have two guys

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty four years old, solid offensive prospects who could potentially

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>help the Mets. Now, I feel.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Like this is.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Sixty cents on the dollar fifty cents on the dollar,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's where I think I'm valuing Freddy Perlta right now.

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But the question goes over to you areum, how do

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 3>you value Freddy pearlta.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting.

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I think this is one of those where like in

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 4>a vacuum, probably slight overpay and eye land somewhere in

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 4>the middle. Think a little bit more than Hembo, a

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 4>little bit less than where you're at Pete. But this

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 4>is a Cubs team that, like they just brought up

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Treanto's coincidentally, they called him up today. I don't think

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 4>it's to go play, you know, prominent big league role

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 4>is just gonna plug in because he's already on the forty.

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He's already on the forty, though, is the point.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And I believe Jonathan Long has to be added to

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 4>the forty after this year. Weird wrinkle though, because we

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 4>might have the Rule five draft canceled. That was what

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 4>we had last time. But I don't know if a

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 4>team's going to make a decision based on that, like, oh, well,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 4>we don't have to protect him. I think you're still

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 4>gonna be worried and saying we might have to protect

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 4>this guy. And it's something that you consider because the

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 4>Cubs are already pretty stockpiled with prospects on their forty

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 4>man as is, so I think they'd probably like to

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 4>clear a couple of spots, whether it's gonna be the

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 4>future forty man or or this year. And I think Treanto's,

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 4>to your point, is his blocked as can be if

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 4>they're not gonna move Matt Shaw, especially like very very

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 4>very blocked there. I almost think with Hembo's package, like

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 4>if the Mets really like then maybe it's different. But

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 4>the Mets version of the QO, because it would be

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 4>like a fourth round pick, is as you like, it's

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 4>pretty worthless at the same time, so it is still.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Better than the QO.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 4>But I think somebody that is going to be desperate

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 4>and offer up a little bit more than that and

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 4>beat that package. And I think a Cubs team that

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 4>can trade a forty man prospect that's been blocked and

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 4>another guy that has no path that swing it well,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 4>and you think about the fit for the Mets, you

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 4>go trade Mark Vantos and you bring in Jonathan Long

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 4>and Long can go play some first base, and they're

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of looking for their guy at first base anyways,

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 4>and at worst, you know he's a short platoon guy.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 4>Forty plugs right in next year, and Treonto's plugs right

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 4>in next year as well, So it's kind of this

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 4>now and later move.

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I side with with Peter here.

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 4>I think I think Peralta, even despite the struggles, is

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 4>more valuable than a guy that had probably put it

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 4>like ten the ten range in an average diamondback system.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Have both thoughts on this, and that's a lot to

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 2>give up for five era, Freddy, that's a lot. It

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 2>is a lot for him. He's gonna get his tits

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>lit at regularly field that heginues to pitch like this, guys.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's gonna be a lot like like Shoda

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>in some of those starts where he's trying to hump

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>it at the top of the zone and he's not

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 2>beating you to the spot and that ninety three is

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 2>winding up into the basket. So I won't be surprised

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 2>if some team overpays. But for that package, I think

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cubs can likely or find a better starting pitcher

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 2>down the stretch run than Freddy Peralta, who's just to

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 2>me not remotely reliable in in a playoff context.

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, the thing I think, oh real quick,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>just the.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Wind blows in more wriggly than I think people give

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 3>it credit towards. It seems like when there is wind,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>sixty five to seventy percent of the time the wind

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 3>is blowing in. That's why Showed is having a pretty

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 3>damn good season. Yeah, but he does have those years

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 3>where or those arts where he gives up nine homers.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But Freddy is a guy who maybe a trade to

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the Cubs could invigorate him a little bit more when

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 3>he's going up against the Brewers in the playoffs. He

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>also has really good numbers throughout his career at Wrigley,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 3>so that's another good sign he's comfortable in this division.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Like if there was a bounce back spot, I do,

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>and the Cubs are really good at developing pitching. I

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 3>think that this could be really good. It's maybe a stretch.

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I think they're good at developing pitching. I think this

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 3>could be a good landing spot if Freddy were to

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 3>bounce back pitch a little bit.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I also just like I don't think trans has had

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 4>a much better year this year. I don't think he's

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 4>very valuable at the end of the day, and Long

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 4>is the first baseman that has to hit. So I

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 4>think these guys, like for other teams that are in

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 4>more rebuild rebuild mode, I'd rather have the lower level

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 4>prospect that has higher upside. But I think with where

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 4>the Mets are at, they may rather have these upper

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 4>miners guys that they can plug in sooner rather than later.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 2>You think, Arizona, do you think Arizona is a decent

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 2>enough match if I if.

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I, I I love and that was the thing is

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I think if the package was a little bit better,

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 4>even though I know it's like I I trying to

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 4>and I could be wrong here, this could be this

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 4>could be faults on the arbiter. One of the hardest,

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 4>I would say, one of the most difficult players assess

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the trade value of going into this deadline as if

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 4>he has one or two good starts. I think it's

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 4>enough to tease a team to say there he is

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 4>right yea, and in compare it to like another rental

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 4>reliever with similar a rental starter with with similar numbers,

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 4>like Brady Singer has similar numbers right now, I don't

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 4>even think it's close, so you'd rather have down the stretch.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 4>But it's also an indictment on him that I'm mentioning

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 4>that Brady Singer has similar numbers.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So how do you value this guy? I think it's

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really hard.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 4>I love the Diamondbacks fit though, because I think I

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 4>think they don't want to give up any anything crazy,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think there's gonna be a controllable starter

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 4>that will work with them in terms of a trade

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 4>package unless something really unique comes comes up, and I

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 4>think they still will want to do something enough to

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 4>where they can add a starter that could hopefully turn

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 4>it around and take that shot. Like Hazan's not risk

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 4>averse at all. So I do love the fit. But

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 4>if it was like JD. Dix, like someone like Sean

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Don who was said in the comments, I decided with you.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>So I'm taking a two one lead. We got to

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 3>move through these mock trades a little bit quicker. We're

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 3>already thirty minutes in and we only got Hembo for

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 3>an hour. We got seven deals left, so we're gonna

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 3>take our first break here from Hampton Farms, and then

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 3>we got seven more mock trades on Deck podcast. Pe

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Can we hear from Peanuts?

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Some peanuts show up for batting practice. Hampton Farms.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Super extra large peanuts show up for the home run

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 4>derby the Roasted Big for bold flavor and a crunch

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>that won't quit.

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>They come in four unique flavors, simply.

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Salted sweet honey, hot honey, or cracked pepper and sea salt.

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Bigger size, Bigger flavor, made for sharing. Take twenty five

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 4>percent off your super extra large Peanuts order at Hamptonfarms

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 4>dot com with code just Baseball. That's one where just

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 4>baseball at Hampton Farms dot Com for twenty five percent off.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Next man up Lukewaver mock trades one and a half

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 3>years of control for Weaver. I think, outside of Mason Miller,

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 3>who we are going to do a mock trade for later,

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 3>is the best reliever available. And he's not a rental right,

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>and he's it's a pretty good contract too. I think

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be pretty damn valuable. Hembo, you're mock

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 3>trade for Luke Weaver. Yeah, I don't see it quite

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 3>that way.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little bit lower on a lot of these guys,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it seems than you are, mostly because it's seventeen million

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 2>dollars across the next two years, which, given how well

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 2>he pitches, of course, and what you expect from him

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 2>down the stretch and next year, is more than a

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 2>good value, you might say, But there just aren't that

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 2>many teams that I think that would be willing and

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>eager to take on that entire contract, just based upon

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 2>what we know about reliever volatility in some of his

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>own individual volatility. All that being said, I'm sending him

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 2>back to the Yankees, who obviously have a comfort and

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>a familiarity with them, a team that I think does

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 2>really need an eighth inning guy that they can really

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>rely upon before handing the baseball to David Bednar. We

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>know that Brian Cashman is one who likes to pick

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>up relievers with years of control. This is obviously a

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 2>perfect example of that. I'm going to build a package

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 2>here around Henry Lelane, that twenty two year old lefty

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>of theirs, who's six foot seven. I'm not quite sure

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 2>if that's enough to get this done, but he's someone

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>whom I view as as having these amount of upside

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 2>based on the body, based on the trajectory, of course,

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and potentially someone that David Starns can dream on. Meanwhile,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>they can take on that entire seventeen million dollar contract

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>across the next two years, hand in the baseball in

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the eighth inning, and feel fairly good about doing so

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 2>anytime that they do so.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just think I value Luke Weaver a little

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 3>bit higher than you, and arguably a lot higher. I

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 3>think he is among the handful of the best relievers

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 3>in Major League Baseball. I really do. I think he's

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 3>been phenomenal this season, and I think he's been asked

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 3>to do a lot in this Mets pen. He's coming

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 3>in every situation you could possibly imagine. And this is

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>also a continuation. This isn't Luke Weaver who is now

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>having a good season. Luke Weaver has been one of

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the better relievers in baseball now over the past what

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 3>what is it? Arm three seasons.

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Free with a little bit of turbulence last year, but

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 4>still like the underlying was good and yeah, fine, Air.

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that the Yankees are a great fit. I

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 3>think they'd have to give up more, especially because this

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 3>reliever market it's pretty weak. There's not a lot of

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 3>top end guys that these teams can go after. And

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 3>when I look at every single reliever trade that ends

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 3>up happening at the deadline him. But what's our reaction, Well,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 3>that's an overpay. Well, that's pay Well, they're all overpays,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 3>like we just we got to get used to it.

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like in free agency when a guy gets

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 3>way more money than we thought, and then so does

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the next guy. These guys are just more expensive. I

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 3>think Luke Weaver is gonna get the Mets the top

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 3>one hunderd prospect at the end of all and let me,

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 3>let me explain, my, my, my. I talked to Ryan

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Finkelstein and that's what he was expecting. And then I

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 3>pitched this player over to Lyle and TJ of the

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Marien Layer podcast, and they both said, they're a little

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 3>bit lower on this guy, but he is still quote

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 3>unquote un arms top one hundred. And that's Zara Montes

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 3>for Luke Weaver straight up. Now you look at lazarro

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Mantes and you say that guy could lead major League

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Baseball in homers, but there's a reason arm that he

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 3>ranks eighty four on your top one hundred. Doesn't have

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 3>much of a position, and he's striking out thirty one

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 3>percent of the time in the minors. He strikes out

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 3>so much, so you have the upside of a guy

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 3>who could at thirty to forty homers, but you also

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 3>have the downside of a guy who's never going to

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 3>make enough contact to be an everyday guy. But you

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 3>have that high end tool, which makes him again a

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 3>borderline or end of the top one hundred guy. I

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 3>don't think the Mariners would feel it. He's a great piece,

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 3>but Luke Weaver is perfect for the Mariner's bullpen comes

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 3>with a year and a half of control, like I said,

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and after Munos, the rity that has to do a

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>lot of the work in the Mariners bullpen is Bizardo,

0:35:54.880 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 3>who's good but not great, and they have two solid lefties.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 3>But a righty reliever like this goes right behind Munos

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 3>sets this bullpen up so well. Maybe it's an overpay,

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 3>but I thought to myself, every reliever trade feels like

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>an overpay to me, and both our Mets guy and

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 3>our Maritors guy loved it, so I'm presenting it to them.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 4>So I was just on the Marine layerpod explaining why

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I think Las Monts is one of the most overrated

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 4>prospects in a really long time, and Mariners fans in

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 4>particular seem to have levels of delusion with him, and

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I feel bad because I wanted to succeed.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd be really good.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 4>There's a ton of power, but like to fifty eight percent,

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's gotten up to sixty percent contact rate in

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 4>the minor leagues, which would mean he would need to

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 4>improve his contact right in the major leagues to be

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 4>like at the barrier of entry. Even for the most

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 4>powerful of power bats, right, So that's where it's interesting.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, it's been interesting how much the

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Mariners have held on to allow Monts to this point,

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 4>So like, do you hold on to him to this

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 4>point and then at triple A trade him for a

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 4>reliever that you still have to pay anyways, is the

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 4>interesting point. And we talked about it in the last episode,

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 4>and I thought, I've kind of waffled back and forth

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 4>on what the value of Luke Lever could be because

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 4>I think as a reliever he's one of the best

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 4>that you're going to be able to acquire at this deadline.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, like.

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Thirteen million dollars next year, plus you know whatever else

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 4>you're taking on this year. You had the exact number, right,

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 4>how about was it fourteen total or fifteen total?

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 2>So you're taking about I've got seventeen million from this

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>day forward across the next two years. I mean, that's

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 2>that is a pretty penny, even if you're paying for

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>someone who you trust implicitly in the identity.

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 4>That's my only concern is I'm just trying to think

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 4>how many teams are going to just line up to

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 4>take that on.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder about the optics.

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 4>As funny as that is, but the way the Mariners

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 4>have packaged Lazaro Montes to their fans is this where

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 4>you cash in? Is this where you do it? That's

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 4>where I have a little bit of doubt. I love

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.879
<v Speaker 4>Henry Lallane. I think he's he's really interesting and and

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 4>just getting healthy has been huge for him. Positionless slugger

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 4>or left handed pitching that who's in Triple A or

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 4>left handed pitching prospect at the lower levels.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>This is like a crazy.

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Brain twister, and I think he's I think the value

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 4>somewhere in between these these two packages. But because the

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 4>last one, like I almost think you you went to

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 4>brain blast here, Peter, and I think it's just it's

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 4>overwhelming me. I'm going to go with the lower level

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 4>upside arm and and go with the keeping Luke Weaver

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 4>in New York where he clearly likes being and and

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go with HIMBO on this one.

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Love it too too. Let's move over to Robbie Ray Rental.

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 3>You get him for the rest of the season, but

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 3>he's putting up an awesome year one hundred plus innings,

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 3>low three z Ra underlying metrics might not love him,

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 3>but he's a rental good picture staple, right, kind of

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 3>like Michael Waka just comes with less years of control.

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 3>He can get you a bunch of strikeouts, you can

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>start a playoff game. You feel good about Robbie Ray.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 3>Hembo mock trades for Robbie Ray.

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you sent Michael Wakat to Atlanta. I'm sending Robbie

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Ray to Atlanta. He's got nine million dollars remaining that

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you owe him, and I think I think we're going

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 2>to get fairly creative here. Yes, I agree with you. You

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 2>trust him in a playoff context? Do you prefer if

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>he starts game three for you? If he has to

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>start game two, you feel decent about it, so long

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>as jord On Alvarez, of course, is not on the

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.479
<v Speaker 2>other end. The peripherals obviously not great, but good enough,

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>like you said, to feel good about that situation. We're

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna get a interesting though with this package, and I'm

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 2>dying to see how our arbiter reacts to it. What

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do here is present a scenario in which

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>the Giants are effectively going to buy prospects from the

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Braves and Here's what I mean. The Braves are gonna

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 2>send Sean Murphy in the thirty six million dollars that

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 2>they still owe him. They also have a fifteen million

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 2>dollar team option in twenty twenty nine. So that's his

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 2>side of things. There's sending Sean Murphy to the Giants

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 2>in addition to John Heel who's a twenty year old

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 2>shortstop and Briggs McKenzie, a nineteen year old left handed pitcher.

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a three for one Robbie wait right, excuse me,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Robbie Ray a rental going to Atlanta to be their

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>number two or number three starter. In exchange, you're going

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to absorb a pretty underwater contract at this point. Maybe

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Buster Posey wild like to have an adult in his

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 2>catcher room, and they're going to take on a couple

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 2>of prospects that are it sounds like you're awfully intrigued

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 2>to hear me say the names allowed.

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Is this also an like when you're theorizing this, Is

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 4>this a clear up room for the Braves to make

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 4>another move as well?

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily, but this is a move for the Braves

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 2>to do. Is have some financial flexibility to get rid

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Sean Murphy contract, whom they've held on to

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 2>for much too long. But Buster Posey does all sorts

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of erratic things. I think this is a scenario in

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 2>which he's going to get himself a couple prospects and

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 2>be willing to take on a contract when he has

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 2>no catcher in the organization right now because he gave away,

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 2>because he gave away Patrick Mayley to Cleveland for very little,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 2>for reasons that are still unbeknownst to me. Ultimately, it's

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 2>a very bizarre trade, and it's not the kind of

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 2>thing that you know, we're gonna send Robbie Ray for

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a player or two in the minor leagues. Who's gonna

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 2>watch our match our model? Excuse me, I wanted to

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 2>get creative here. I think the Sean Murphy contract is

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of a wild card that the Braves could play.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 3>So I like that idea, and I think the Sean

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Murphy wrinkle is fascinating. Mine is much more standard, but

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not for a standard team. I've Robby Ray going

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 3>over to the Chicago White Sox, and we've talked about

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox that they should be buying with control.

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 3>But I also think you could flip that narrative on

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.439
<v Speaker 3>its head and say, well, you'd have to trade away

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 3>some pretty damn good prospects in order to get players

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 3>with control. So is it such a bad idea to

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 3>fill a big need for the White Sox and not

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 3>trade away any prospects of note in doing so. So

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I really looked at the Merrill Kelly trade from twenty

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty five to the Rangers. It's like a veteran guy

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 3>who you trust. Underlying metrics aren't gonna love these guys,

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 3>but they're solid. So that's kind of the blueprint that

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I used from the Chicago White Sox. So yours is

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 3>much more creative. Mine's pretty straightforward, and it's these three prospects.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 3>You got David Sandlin, who's twenty five years old, has

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 3>been up to Major League Baseball. You got Kyle Lodez,

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 3>who's a twenty two year old, decent season in High A,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 3>who's a third round pick in twenty twenty five, and

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 3>arm you're gonna have to help him.

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I will on the edge of my seat for the Javier.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's mcgillion.

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.919
<v Speaker 3>Mcgollion. Let's go with the guyant, twenty year old ten

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 3>ops and high a good runner, solid power. I actually

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 3>worked with our guy, Elijah Evans, the host of the

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Future Socks podcast, is a great job covering the White Sox,

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 3>and he felt this was a fair deal in exchange

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 3>for Robbie Ray.

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 4>This is where it's interesting. So the Braves, So the

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Braves will love Briggs mackenzie. No guy, Now, do they

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 4>want to attach Briggs McKenzie in his salary?

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Dumb? Is my concern.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 4>The other thing though, is I don't know if the

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:09.280
<v Speaker 4>White Sox want to trade prospects period for a rental

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 4>like even and I know that these aren't like huge

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 4>pieces or anything like that.

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Elijah did say that they'd theoretically be open to it,

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:22.280
<v Speaker 3>but you're right, I think it's like, that's not the answer.

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>To the question. There's seven over five hundred.

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 4>There's seven over five hundred now, and like if you're

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 4>if you're having around seven to ten over five hundred

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 4>at the deadline in this state of the American League,

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe the plan changes a little bit for guys that

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, at the end of the day are not

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 4>going to Sanduin could be one that you regret when

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:43.720
<v Speaker 4>he's in a sick, high leverage reliever or whatever.

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But like I don't know. I don't think it's as

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal.

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 4>I want to give Himbo so many creativity points, so

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 4>because I think that's a brilliant trade.

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I My only problem with it is that he attached a.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Guy that, by all indications is one of the favorites

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 4>in this Brave system that they've been super careful with,

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of had the baby gloves on, just rolled him

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 4>out there. I've been really impressed with what he's been

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.839
<v Speaker 4>doing early on here, and you know, the Braves are

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 4>like the classic how do they get this guy? Where'd

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 4>he come from? Mackenzie has the potential to be the

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 4>latest example of that. He also has the potential to

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 4>walk too many guys, But so far this year looks

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 4>pretty sharp. I don't think they're going to attach him

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 4>in a salary dump, as creative as that is, and

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 4>so I'll go with the rental standard Peter trade here

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 4>because I think that's ultimately the most likely.

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>But I love what he did there.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 4>I think if Hembo attached somebody other than Briggs Mackenzie,

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 4>I think he has me.

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 3>So I have three wins. One is for being stupid

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and the other one is for being boring. So in

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 3>my head, I'm still technically down to the war, but

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 3>the scoreboard does read at the current moment three to me, Hembo,

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 3>we got about fifteen sixteen minutes left with you. Let's

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 3>go straight to Mason Miller, just so we make sure,

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe that we could talk about Mason Miller. Mason Miller

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 3>mock trades. Three and a half years of control. You

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 3>get him from ages twenty seven, which he is right now,

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 3>up until his age thirty season. You shortened the game

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 3>to eight innings for the next three and a half

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 3>seasons with arguably the best reliever that we've seen since

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Mariano Rivera. Now, of course you got a roll to Chapman.

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 3>You got Craig Kimberle in his prime, you got Kenlee

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Jansen in his prime. Potential Hall of famers. Mason Miller

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 3>might be more talented than all of them. The numbers

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 3>speak for themselves. He's given up twenty one hits and

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 3>forty plus innings this year with seventy eight strikeouts. He's

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 3>given up four runs this year, zero blown saves. He's

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 3>blown seven saves in three years. Not much else to

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 3>say Himbo, what are your mock trades for Mason Miller.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I hope Arham is prepared with his airbag to adjudicate

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 2>this one. But I'm setting Mason Miller to Milwaukee. I'm

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 2>sending Mason Miller to the Milwaukee Brewer. He's under team control,

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 2>like you said, through the twenty twenties, and they're one

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 2>of the few teams in baseball that could afford it,

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and much more importantly, afford it responsibly. My package is this.

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna send josh Adam, Jeeski, Praylan Payne, Bishop Letson,

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and Salfrielick in a four for one from Milwaukee to

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 2>San Diego. And the reason why they're doing this, the

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 2>reason why they could justify doing this, because ultimately this

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 2>is not a model breaker. Teams like these, as you know,

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 2>guys are much less inclined to do splashy things at

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 2>the deadline because they're often accompanied by the rental and

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 2>teams that operate in this market can't afford to do

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>deals like that for rentals. But when you're dealing with

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 2>someone that can impact four pennant races and like you said, Peter,

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 2>change the math in every game in series that you play,

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 2>this is a justifiable thing for Milwaukee to do. If

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you talk to people that cover the Yankees and oppose

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees back in the late nineties, they talked about

0:46:57.160 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 2>not only the dominance that Mario Rivera demonstrated a ninth then,

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:02.839
<v Speaker 2>but the fact that he changed the math. You had

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to prepare to win the game an eighth inning against

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 2>the yank and eight innings against the Yankees, and that's

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>what you're gonna have to do when you play the Brewers.

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Imagine handing the ball from Jacob Mizarowski to Mason Miller

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in Game six of the NLCS with Kyle Tucker shaking

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 2>in his boots in the batter's box. That's what's at

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 2>stake here. This is something that they can do, and

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't have the ability at the trade deadline to

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 2>get five people to improve their roster so much so

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to overtake the Dodgers from that standpoint.

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 2>But he's a win probability swinger, and what he can

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 2>be in any playoff series is a complete and utter

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 2>math changer. So do I think it's likely? Certainly not.

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 2>But this is a system that is so good that

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 2>you could say that it's gluttonous, almost so good that

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 2>if you don't act right now, you might appreciate the

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 2>value of.

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Some of these people.

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 2>So look, you're gonna be able to retain the top

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 2>five guys in your system, but you're gonna give up

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a bunch and get Mason Miller for the next three

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 2>plus years.

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Man. It's that combination of I absolutely love the fit

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's a banger trade, and then in

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.439
<v Speaker 3>my mind goes, no way the Brewers do it. It's

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 3>just because the Brewers are the Brewers. Now, like I

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 3>hope you're right, that is a cooler trade than what

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to bring up, especially because the one that

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I brought up we've already posted online and Yankee fans

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 3>want nothing to do with it, which is exactly why

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 3>it's probably in the ballpark of what the San Diego

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Padres are going to need now. They came out reported

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 3>we need at least two top one hundred prospects. Here

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 3>you go George Lombard, let's part with him, and of

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 3>course Carlos Legronjey and then you got that flyer of

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Spencer Jones and MLB Ready outfielder. I think the debate

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 3>is is he MLB Ready even though he's been in

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Majriague Baseball, did not exactly put up great numbers. You know,

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 3>he's a first round pick. I think some people probably

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 3>still think he has potential, but he is the clear

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 3>third option. In this trade. You get a top twenty

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:58.879
<v Speaker 3>prospect in baseball per ARM, Carlos Legronjey recently ranked number

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty four by ARM. It's pretty damn good package. And

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 3>with the Yankees, I know the fans don't want to

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 3>give up on George Lombard, and I think he could

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 3>be a really, really solid player. But at the end

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of the day, how many of these top prospects that

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 3>have been promised to Yankee fans that both Brian Cashman

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and the fans don't want to trade, how many of

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 3>them have panned out. Let's have a real honest talk.

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 3>Meet the Yankee fans right here, and you say, well,

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't want a reliever. You're getting the best reliever

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that you've had since Mariano Rivera. And that includes Clay Holmes,

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 3>who had a bunch of really solid seasons as the closer.

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 3>That includes a role as Chapman who's had awesome seasons

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 3>as the Yankees closer. They were their best was in

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the mid two Zra Mason Miller has a zero eighty six.

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Mason Miller has ascended with the A's he was on

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the Chapman Holmes level. He's ascended into something that you

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 3>can't even put into words. You get to end games

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 3>by the ninth inning. For the next three and a

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 3>half seasons, you pair Bednar, and I think the Yankees

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of need a relief pitcher badly, and a high

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:08.479
<v Speaker 3>leverage one. Because I think about this, I think Paul

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Blackburn and Brent Headrick have had great seasons those year

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 3>seven and eight guys in the playoffs. I know for

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Nano Cruz is great too. I need a name. I

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 3>need a Mason Miller, David Bednar. You don't have that

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 3>much time left with Judge and with Cole Freed was

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 3>throwing ninety eight. Let's go do it, Mason Miller to

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees for these three it's gonna hurt, but good.

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna have to overpay a little bit.

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.839
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead on follow up questions for each of you. First, Peter,

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 4>do you do you actually think the Yankees would do this?

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Because you mentioned you have your reliever for the next

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 4>three and a half years, who plays on the left

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 4>side of the infield for the next six.

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, Brian Cashman wanted to trade for Ryan McMahon, he

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 3>can have that. He loves Volpi, so I bet if

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:54.319
<v Speaker 3>you asked him he'd be like, this is a good

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 3>left side of the infield. We both disagree, but if

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 3>you ask Cashman how many times has he defended this

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 3>left out of the infield? And he loves Jose Cabierro,

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 3>so we agree.

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 2>But I mean m to answer your question for Peter,

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the answer to that question is going to be Xander Billgarts.

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 2>If they do something like this, the answer to your

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 2>question is Xander Billguarts because they're.

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Also losing Jazz, so they have no no infielders nobody.

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think they're holding onto Lombard for dear life.

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I don't know. If there's a world

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>where they move them, I might.

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 2>How close is that's Kilbya.

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>He's played six four games this year.

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 4>He came back like first game back from a hammy,

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:37.399
<v Speaker 4>or so they say, and then yeah, left the left

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 4>again and we haven't seen him. So the guy hasn't

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 4>even played. He's played twenty something games. A low Ay,

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 4>that's it.

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and there's nobody.

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Else, so it's awesome. As Mason Miller is real quick.

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 4>The package from the Brewers again it was.

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 2>It was Adam Schevsky, Braylan Payne, it was Bishop Left,

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Bishop Watson, South sal is gonna be there, or you know,

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Ramon Loreano Flyer. I hope they can turn them into.

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 1>That so optically.

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Can a J Peller do it without getting one of

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 4>the Brewers top five prospects? I think so when it's

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 4>the best system in baseball by a mile, maybe one

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 4>of the best systems ever.

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 2>It's an awfully good system. I want to just share

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:22.359
<v Speaker 2>for you a quick exchange I had yesterday VIAT text

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 2>with podcast p who talked me out of my what

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:28.359
<v Speaker 2>he's describing in our chat as OG package, my OG

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 2>package before I was dissuaded by whatever Brewers propaganda you

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 2>had planted in my in my phone yesterday was Louis Pana,

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Bishop Letson and South Freelick. And he taught me off

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 2>that ledge based upon conversations that you've had with their

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 2>farm people. And perhaps you're right, and perhaps they love

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the kid. But that was originally my package and instead

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of three for wanting it I'm four for wanting it,

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 2>knowing full well that that might not be enough to

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:56.240
<v Speaker 2>land Mason Miller.

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm torn because I think I don't see how

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 4>the Yankees can do this, But I also think the

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Brewers would have to give up a little bit more.

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna side, though, with with the Brewers package here

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 4>because I just think that the bulk of it is

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 4>so crazy in the amount of talent for guys that

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 4>I know Prower would love to add to this system,

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 4>I think would be hard to deny.

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, three to three. Now, let's go over to

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Spencer's steer. And this is an interesting one. Got two

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 3>and a half years of control, He's cheap, He's been

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a solid hitter right, He's about ten percent above league gaverage,

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 3>can provide some power, can play a bunch of different positions,

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 3>albeit not all that well, but can play a bunch

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 3>of different positions. Humbo will throw it over to you.

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Who needs a right handed bat who can kind of

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 3>play everywhere?

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Seattle does it sounds like I like this player more

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 2>than you do. I'm sending him to Seattle in exchange

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.359
<v Speaker 2>in a one for one for Michael Arroyo. It might

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 2>sound awfully expensive. If you're a Mariners fan, you're probably

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 2>shouting me down from the mountaintops right now. But Spencer

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:00.360
<v Speaker 2>theear is going to be someone who Jerry Depoto's model

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I think really favors. You mentioned the position versatility, the

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:07.399
<v Speaker 2>platoon versatility, the controllable nature. He's almost like a poor

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 2>man's Brendan Donovan in that sense, and I think Michael

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Arroyo candidly is blocked. It's gonna be a really tough

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 2>time for him to find himself playing time. And I

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 2>think what they would hate to do is run the

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 2>same play that they ran with Harry Ford by retaining

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 2>him for it. Let's be honest, probably a year two long,

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's a straight up one for one. Spencer'st year

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 2>for Michael Arroyo.

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think the main reason I might just be

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 3>a little bit lower than you, and maybe my package

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 3>might not even be that much lower than you. That's

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 3>why I'm curious what arm thinks, yeah, is he's got

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:39.280
<v Speaker 3>a six forty seven OPS against right handed pitching this season,

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 3>and he's got a six to eighty ops on the road,

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 3>two numbers I don't love, but to be fair does

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 3>come with all those years of control. He's still relatively young,

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 3>and he could play a bunch of different positions. So

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the Phillies need a bat like that, your

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.839
<v Speaker 3>Phillies right hand a bat. We were talking with Ryan

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Howard at the lid's event. What did he say, right

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 3>handed bat. It's like the most important thing. And I

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 3>think Steer is that guy. And these three prospects, I'm

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 3>really curious what you think. We're starting off with Dante Nori,

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 3>who was first round pick in twenty twenty four. Is

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 3>his speedy, you know, lefty outfielder. He's on the smaller side,

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 3>He's twenty one, looks okay, it's like a pretty good player.

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Cody Bauker again, third round pick in twenty twenty five,

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.319
<v Speaker 3>Rdy low slot, good strikeout to walk ratio and high

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a though at twenty two. And then Raylan Heredia who

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:31.240
<v Speaker 3>strikes out a lot, but he's got some juice arm

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Which package you taken.

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:40.720
<v Speaker 4>So I'm taking the Arroyo package. However, however, I think

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:42.840
<v Speaker 4>there's a couple wrinkles here that are important.

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:43.280
<v Speaker 3>One.

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 4>The Mariners, by all accounts, I think like Arroyo more

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 4>than they like last Monts, and they like Arroyo, I think,

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 4>to potentially be the air apparent in left field. I

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 4>think Arroyo might even end up being their short platoon

0:55:57.560 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 4>guy as soon as this year.

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 1>They've got I'm up in trip Away, He's playing left field.

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 1>They love this guy.

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 4>They've been asking him to play different positions all over

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 4>to try to find a way to get that bat

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:07.800
<v Speaker 4>in the lineup, and anyone I talked to in the

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Mariners organization just just won't stop gushing about this guy.

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think they would be more likely to move

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 4>a Lass than an Arroyo. And I think for a

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Royal with like right, they're gonna lose Randy. I think

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:22.399
<v Speaker 4>they're looking at a Royal is the guy that could

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:24.799
<v Speaker 4>play left field for them, you know, next year, and

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:26.839
<v Speaker 4>potentially even fill in this year. So I think they

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 4>might see that as they might look at a Royal

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 4>and say, this guy could just be Spencer's steer for us.

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 4>And I know that's a bold and ambitious but with

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 4>the way they talk about him, I think that's how

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 4>they feel. So a little bit of conjecture there, but

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I've been it's all I've heard when it comes to

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 4>a Royal, And again, he's really picked up this year

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and he's finding more comfort and left and can plug

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 4>in second if you ever needed it, so at least

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 4>gives you and third if you really needed it as well,

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 4>so it gives you similar versatility.

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with Peter's package here.

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't love the package overall, but I think with

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the Dante Nori is so Nick Crawl coded with TJ.

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Friedel and all these other left handed hitting outfielders that

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 4>don't hurt the ball very hard or whatever, like, I

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.120
<v Speaker 4>think it fits. The bill Backer's a fun arm to

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 4>throw into the fold. Could end up being a nice

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 4>relief piece for you too, and I think that's probably

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 4>closer to the value.

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So I go team Pete here.

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.760
<v Speaker 3>So we got three players left, and Hembo is nice

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 3>enough to grant us ten more minutes thank you, because

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 3>we still have three guys left, but one last message

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:30.480
<v Speaker 3>from our friends at Hampton Farms peanuts. Three players left,

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and I want to start with Luisa Riaz because I

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 3>think Luisa Rise is a pretty straightforward conversation. Hembo, you

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 3>get him for the rest of twenty twenty six, has

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 3>made improvements defensively. He's hitting three twenty and that's basically

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:48.240
<v Speaker 3>what you get right from Louis a. Rias. So give

0:57:48.320 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 3>us your mock trade.

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm sending him to Boston. I'm gonna watch him Wade

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Boggs baseballs off the Green Monster for the last few

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 2>months of the season, and it's a one for one

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 2>for Jan Valera, a twenty year old right handed pitcher

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.760
<v Speaker 2>who is going to inject some life into the Giant system.

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they're just going to go eight just in

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 2>terms of aggregating talent said decent enough live arm and

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Luis Ariz is someone that you can dream on,

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 2>at least a little bit in that ballpark. I can

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 2>imagine Craig Breslo buying into his OAA bump at second base,

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 2>though I view him as a lot more of an

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 2>average or ordinary second baseman, but he's certainly passable now

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a straight up run one for one, and selfishly, I

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 2>love to see Luisa Rise bop the baseball in that ballpark.

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 3>So this is where I go over to the Tampa

0:58:27.800 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Bay Rays, and I love the fit with Tampa for

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 3>a few reasons. Number one, I love the idea of

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the nine hitter being Chandler Simpson and your leadoff hitter

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 3>being Luisa a Rias, and then you hand it off

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 3>to your three boppers and Yanni Diaz, Junior Camenaro and

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Ronda. I just feel like that's good baseball, Like

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 3>when Chandler Simpson is in the nine hole and you

0:58:47.160 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 3>have this contact oriented guy who could do a bunch

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 3>of hit and runs. Just feels so raised to me.

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:54.280
<v Speaker 3>And when I consider they're right side of the infield,

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 3>you're not moving off Yanni obviously, but Richie Pelasio's you

0:58:57.080 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 3>can kind of play anywhere, and it's not like he's

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:00.880
<v Speaker 3>having a great season. And I think the Rays do

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 3>need a bat. I like the deal for a pitcher.

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to be one of the more

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:09.040
<v Speaker 3>active teams of the deadline, so maybe my package is

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit stronger for Riots at the end of

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the days. Is that like a three win season or right?

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:59:14.880 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I had Michael Forett, who is writy with good stuff,

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty two year old in Double A Army ranks twelfth

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 3>on your top twenty Rais Prospects on Just Baseball dot

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Com and Brailer Guerrero who's a twenty year old in

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 3>A ball and I was reading you right up on him.

0:59:30.840 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Strong eggs of velos plus power, but kind of average hit.

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 3>I think this would be a solid package in order

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 3>to get and go for it.

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 4>So quick quick clarification two for those in the chat

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:47.920
<v Speaker 4>not picking the favorite, like the best package. If I

0:59:47.960 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 4>were trading Spencer Steer, of course that would have been

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 4>a Royoes. It was the most realistic what we think

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:54.959
<v Speaker 4>could happen. That's why we thought Arroyo was too much

0:59:55.400 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 4>and that the Mariners wouldn't do it. Just to clarify

0:59:57.120 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 4>for the chat quickly here though, I actually like I'd

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 4>I'd rather have one Vllera than those two. And Michael Ferrett,

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:04.800
<v Speaker 4>like a lot of people like yeah, ro I used

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 4>to love and then I watched him swing and missing

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 4>the Arizona Fall League. I think eighty five percent of

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 4>the time, poor guy has not been able to stay

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 4>healthy and it's just been tough. But it would be

1:00:13.240 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 4>a fun flyer as a secondary piece. I like that shout,

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 4>but I look at the Red Sox. I think a

1:00:18.160 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of teams would be very apprehensive to trade a

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Vollera for a rental, but I don't think in this situation,

1:00:23.360 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 4>with how this team is played and a GM that

1:00:25.280 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 4>or Pobo that really wants to hold onto his job

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 4>now and looks like he will, but to really sprint

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 4>through the finish line here. I don't think he's gonna

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:33.120
<v Speaker 4>mind trading a pitcher when he spawns him. You can

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 4>say whatever you want. I've said everything I've wanted to

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 4>say about the guy in charge there, Craig Breslow, but

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:41.440
<v Speaker 4>I cannot take away what he does with pitching the

1:00:41.520 --> 1:00:42.120
<v Speaker 4>upside there.

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Giants would love to add an arm

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like that.

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 4>They need more arms in that system, even after adding Flora.

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I think I like the Valera swap straight up, just

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 4>with the upside and what he brings to the table himbo.

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if arm is doing this on purpose,

1:00:55.480 --> 1:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>but we got two left ands tied four to four.

1:00:57.320 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>We got ourselves a high ball game, were crushing it.

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's move over to Clay Holmes, probably just for the

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 3>rest of this season. He does have a player option

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>next year, but I'm assuming he'll opt out, so I'm

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of treating it as a rental. How did you

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>treat it? What's your mock trade for Clay Holmes?

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Kind of like a rental, another straightforward one that we

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 2>don't need to spend too much time on It's about

1:01:18.560 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>a five million dollar responsibility the rest of this season.

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm sending him to San Diego. I think aj Preller

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>might try and have his cake and eat it too

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>an off excuse me, a trade deadline in which he

1:01:29.040 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>can trade Mason Miller and recoup a bunch of assets,

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>as we've discussed already, but also kind of head for

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the possibility that his big three just kind of bangs

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously for the last few months of the season in

1:01:39.520 --> 1:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>exchange for Ty Harvey. Ty Harvey is a player that

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I wrote that a nineteen year old catcher who's blocked

1:01:44.640 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>by Ethan Sallas. It's a one for one swap. I'm

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>sending Clay Holmes to San Diego.

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think the As soon as the words

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:55.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't think going to buy came out of my mouth,

1:01:56.000 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I was like, they can lose the next five games,

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and I still think Preller is going to be creative.

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Padres should be, you know, in

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:04.919
<v Speaker 3>the bucket of teams that could potentially go for him.

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I went with a fit that I sneaky love, and

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>that's Clay Holmes to the Rangers. Because the Rangers are

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>atop the American League West. I feel like they are

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the forgotten team in Major League Baseball right now. They're

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:21.439
<v Speaker 3>not great, but they're atop the division. And Chris Young

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 3>has always been aggressive. He always makes the move where

1:02:23.800 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 3>you're like, whoa, they came out of nowhere. When the

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Rangers continually do this. They made the trade for McKenzie Gore,

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>and because they made the trade for Mckensi Gordon, it's

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>not going all that great. I think they need a

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:36.360
<v Speaker 3>really solid pitcher. But if mackenzie Gore catches fire down

1:02:36.400 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the stretch, maybe Clay Holmes is your quasi bullpen fourth

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>starter and they could really use kind of a bullpen

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>armor two as well. So I really love the fit

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 3>with Clay Holmes in Texas. And this is my package.

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Jose Corneil, who he's been injured. He's got bad results

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>so far, but he's got stupid stuff. I was watching

1:02:57.200 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 3>some of his highlights on YouTube stuff. But again, that's

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>why I'm throwing over to arm as the arbiter. Winston Santos,

1:03:05.080 --> 1:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>another one twenty four year old guy in Triple A.

1:03:07.240 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Three good pitches with good command, and you have Malcolm Moore,

1:03:10.000 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty two year old catcher in double A seven ninety

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 3>one ohps some power, first round pick in twenty twenty

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.280
<v Speaker 3>four arum Our arbiter. What do you think?

1:03:19.280 --> 1:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I like the Rangers fit more.

1:03:20.880 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the package is a little steep, and I

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 4>also think Hembo's is a little light. So now I'm

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:30.800
<v Speaker 4>just stuck in between. It's been a bad year for

1:03:30.880 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Santos though I love this stuff. Corneelle has just been

1:03:34.000 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 4>frustrating a little bit, and the Rangers have done a

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:39.160
<v Speaker 4>good job with their arms of late.

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Moore, I.

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 4>You don't want to move your first round or that quickly,

1:03:43.200 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>but like he just I think he kind of just

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 4>is what he is at this point. Even though it's

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 4>been a better year, it's got to be bat driven,

1:03:49.600 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>repeated high a and still kind of just finding his

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>foot in a double.

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot to give up, though I'm gonna go.

1:03:58.120 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with the Peter package here on this

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and though I like to fit more, and I think

1:04:02.320 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 4>I think for an arm that it really depends what

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 4>he looks like when he comes back. But I think

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 4>if he looks half decent is going to require a

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 4>little bit more and it's a good bio opportunity for

1:04:11.640 --> 1:04:13.400
<v Speaker 4>the Mets on a couple of arms that they just need.

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>You know what, Hambo, did you factor in injury concerns

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>at all to your package?

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to know. I mean, if he comes back

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and like you know, lou Bob just hit a four

1:04:22.640 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>D and fifty one foot bomb, so all of a sudden,

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Dave Dombrowski, remember he existed, so we want to trade

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>three of his five best prospects for him. The same

1:04:29.040 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 2>thing could happen with Clay Holmes. And if he comes

1:04:31.240 --> 1:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>out and shoves and looks great. The thing that makes

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>him so palatable, as you guys know, is you can

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>trust him in two different ways. You can hind in

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the ball in game three of a series if he's great,

1:04:39.480 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 2>or in the seventh inning of a series if he's great.

1:04:41.600 --> 1:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's certainly a package too. Light mine is if

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:46.600
<v Speaker 2>he looks like him. We have no idea if he's

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 2>going to look like him.

1:04:48.040 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Rehabs start today, by the way, okay today in triple

1:04:51.640 --> 1:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>A for Clay Holmes, so good sway me on this, well,

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 4>we could retroactively, we can change it, just like they

1:04:57.280 --> 1:04:59.280
<v Speaker 4>need to give Armando gal Raga's perfect game.

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We can change later and reassign the winner.

1:05:02.680 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I like, just like that, just like that, But as

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>of now it is five for me, so Hembo. We

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>end with Mickey Moniac and Mickey Moniac interesting profile because

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:16.280
<v Speaker 3>you look at the numbers at home, he's got an

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>OPS over one thousand. On the road ops under seven hundred,

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>but he does supply a lot of power. He's got

1:05:21.800 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 3>a year and a half of control. This is one

1:05:25.320 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>which could swing either way. How do you value Mickey Moniac?

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Mock trade goes to you.

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a fairly palatable contract too, especially if you like

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the player even a little bit. Only eight million dollars

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:38.920
<v Speaker 2>through next year. There's one team that I have circle

1:05:39.400 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that needs an outfielder desperately and has for years, and

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the Houston Astros, who, let's be honest, they can't

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>afford any of the high powered arms that they really

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>need at this deadline because their system has been so

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>gutted over the last few years. I think the very

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>best that they can do is a package that rhymes

1:05:55.640 --> 1:05:59.600
<v Speaker 2>with this, like a middle of the back end of

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the lineup type guy who can play in the outfield

1:06:01.840 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple positions and fake it. At least, it's a

1:06:04.120 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>fairly hitter friendly ballpark down there, so you're not expecting

1:06:06.640 --> 1:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>him to fall off a cliff like you would if

1:06:08.120 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>he traded him to, say Seattle. The prospect that I

1:06:11.000 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 2>wrote down Arham is Ethan Pecko, twenty three year old

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:16.280
<v Speaker 2>right handed pitcher in Houston who's look one of their

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 2>best guys. But they don't have that much to choose from,

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 2>so I think they swing and miss when it comes

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to the starters on the market because they just can't

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 2>afford them. Then I say they pivot to Mickey Moniac,

1:06:25.720 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>who immediately becomes someone who improves their outfield considerably.

1:06:29.320 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I like to fit with Houston. I also like to

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>fit with Cleveland. I've talked about how they need more power,

1:06:34.200 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, p d Halpin and center, Daniel Schneman and Wright.

1:06:38.400 --> 1:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Even Stephen Kwan is not having a good offensive season.

1:06:40.840 --> 1:06:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I think they need an influx in power and you're

1:06:43.000 --> 1:06:45.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of hoping that it can translate from cors Field

1:06:45.760 --> 1:06:47.600
<v Speaker 3>over to Cleveland. Kind of reminds me of when they

1:06:47.640 --> 1:06:51.040
<v Speaker 3>dealt for Lane Thomas. Like that type of move where

1:06:51.320 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 3>does come with a little bit of control. They feel

1:06:53.600 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>like he's a little bit of an underrated bat. Here's

1:06:56.600 --> 1:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the package, and again arm tear this one up if

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:02.720
<v Speaker 3>you want. Wellbin francisca twenty year old been up to

1:07:02.760 --> 1:07:05.280
<v Speaker 3>high A seven eighty seven ops, good hit tool, good runner,

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Watson power and Daniel Spino, the twenty five year old

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 3>loads of potential, has just dealt with a ton of injuries.

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a home run swing of a prospect,

1:07:14.960 --> 1:07:16.720
<v Speaker 3>and I think Vickey Moniac is kind of a home

1:07:16.800 --> 1:07:20.640
<v Speaker 3>run swing, both literally and figuratively. What do you think

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>about this package?

1:07:22.360 --> 1:07:24.400
<v Speaker 4>That one's interesting. I think Francisco is a good BiLaw

1:07:24.400 --> 1:07:26.440
<v Speaker 4>opportunity as a prospect. Guy that was a borderline top

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 4>one hundred guy for US and then just really hit

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 4>a wall, dealt with injuries last year, has been better

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:34.480
<v Speaker 4>this year. Espino a hard thrower at altitude. You know

1:07:34.520 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 4>they just traded Halverson the guy back in make sense

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:39.680
<v Speaker 4>is it?

1:07:39.760 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Was it just Peco Hembo.

1:07:41.560 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>For one, A straight up swap.

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You're not throwing low perfdo in that or something.

1:07:45.640 --> 1:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean what I wanted to do here was not

1:07:47.560 --> 1:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>get too cute and basically provide you the foundational piece

1:07:51.040 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>could it be a two for one. Should it be

1:07:52.400 --> 1:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a two for one? Probably, But there are any number

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of ancillary pieces for a lot of these. What I

1:07:57.680 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do was just find sort of like an

1:07:59.160 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>anchor prospect for each of these trades. In this case,

1:08:01.760 --> 1:08:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that's I think the best that they can do.

1:08:04.080 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 4>So Peco came back from a little bit of an

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>injury and has been really I think solid this year.

1:08:08.160 --> 1:08:11.480
<v Speaker 4>By by the numbers, I like the Astros fit more.

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I think they're just more likely to do this. But

1:08:16.320 --> 1:08:19.120
<v Speaker 4>you're giving me the baseline prospect, are we assuming low

1:08:19.160 --> 1:08:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Braffido is in here or not sure?

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's I'm fine with that. I mean I

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't send it over, but yeah, I mean this is

1:08:24.960 --> 1:08:26.479
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a two for one and a lot of these,

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:28.479
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of these deals that I put forth

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 2>were just sort of the anchor prospect, and there's gonna

1:08:31.479 --> 1:08:34.639
<v Speaker 2>be ancillary stuff. There's gonna be paydowns, like for example,

1:08:34.720 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>if if Cleveland wanted Mickey Mo, they'd be like haggling

1:08:37.280 --> 1:08:39.559
<v Speaker 2>over tens of thousands of dollars, you know, in his

1:08:39.600 --> 1:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>contract last year because that's how they roll. But ultimately,

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I think Peco will call it Loperfido or something that

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>rhymes with that going back, which is probably going to

1:08:47.280 --> 1:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>happen and would inevitably, but ultimately he was the anchor

1:08:49.840 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>prospect that.

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I landed on well and quickly.

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:56.120
<v Speaker 4>The Astros made like a small little deal to clear

1:08:56.200 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 4>up a little bit of room. Right, they trade mccullors

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:01.519
<v Speaker 4>to clear up about a million and a half two

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:03.840
<v Speaker 4>million dollars so that they can add a player that

1:09:03.880 --> 1:09:09.000
<v Speaker 4>will cost about four million dollars at this deadline and

1:09:09.160 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 4>stay under the CBT. That would be Mickey Montiac, plus

1:09:12.920 --> 1:09:15.200
<v Speaker 4>they would plug him in for next year. I like

1:09:15.320 --> 1:09:18.960
<v Speaker 4>the team fit with the Astros, so I'll go Dana

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:20.719
<v Speaker 4>Brown desperation move.

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Five to five and even But I'm honestly I'm going

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:26.639
<v Speaker 3>to give you the win, Hembo, because going back, two

1:09:26.720 --> 1:09:28.799
<v Speaker 3>of my wins are because I was stupid and boring.

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:31.599
<v Speaker 3>You never got any of those comments. So I think

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Hembo wins, even though it's a tie. Tie goes to

1:09:34.520 --> 1:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>the guy who's not stupid and boring.

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:38.599
<v Speaker 2>Look, I just watched soccer for the last two months.

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I went from like the soccer of two c's to

1:09:41.760 --> 1:09:44.559
<v Speaker 2>man this Canaan infielder lose midfielder lose this says depth

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>so badly in the span of like two months. So look,

1:09:47.160 --> 1:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine with the draw. I feel good about our

1:09:49.000 --> 1:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>packages more than anything else. I felt like nothing that

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>we put forth was outrageous like the Median Internet Trade package,

1:09:54.920 --> 1:09:57.439
<v Speaker 2>and thus I feel the exercise was very much worthwhile.

1:09:57.680 --> 1:10:00.559
<v Speaker 3>Real quick arm as we say goodbye, we your favorite

1:10:00.560 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 3>package of the whole thing.

1:10:02.120 --> 1:10:05.080
<v Speaker 4>What's funny is I think your your value proposition on

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:08.799
<v Speaker 4>the Yankees package with with Mason Miller was as sound

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:10.839
<v Speaker 4>as possible. And that's the one I might loose sleepover

1:10:10.920 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 4>and be like I should have went, should have.

1:10:12.479 --> 1:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Went with Peter on that one.

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:16.479
<v Speaker 4>I just can't fathom the Yankees doing it, and that's

1:10:16.520 --> 1:10:19.439
<v Speaker 4>what really skewed me. But I also loved just the

1:10:19.479 --> 1:10:22.320
<v Speaker 4>both Mason Miller packages, I would say, because the amount

1:10:22.360 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>of talent that just went to them on the Brewers

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:27.360
<v Speaker 4>deal too was like holy crap. But it's also not

1:10:27.400 --> 1:10:31.000
<v Speaker 4>their top guys, Like it was such a fun conversation there.

1:10:31.320 --> 1:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I would just go with both Mason Miller packages.

1:10:33.160 --> 1:10:34.639
<v Speaker 4>And that's why I really hope he does get traded,

1:10:34.640 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 4>because yeah, it's gonna be so fun talking about what

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:39.759
<v Speaker 4>those pat what that package might be Embo.

1:10:40.040 --> 1:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Those were our mock trades. Thank you so much for

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 3>all the time, and you even gave us additional The

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:46.960
<v Speaker 3>time just flies by when we're talking. I know that

1:10:47.160 --> 1:10:48.760
<v Speaker 3>we had two more players that we had to cut

1:10:48.800 --> 1:10:51.479
<v Speaker 3>before the episode. We could go for hours and hours

1:10:51.520 --> 1:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>and hours. Such a good friend to us. Thank you

1:10:54.720 --> 1:10:56.880
<v Speaker 3>so much again for coming on plug anything. What are

1:10:56.880 --> 1:10:58.640
<v Speaker 3>you working on? You're always working on stuff.

1:10:58.360 --> 1:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Always working on something plenty more to the coming weeks.

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>But I don't recall having any more fun than I've

1:11:03.160 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>just had with you guys. It's awfully fun to do it.

1:11:05.320 --> 1:11:08.080
<v Speaker 2>We actually get to now see like the trades. You

1:11:08.120 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>guys can you know, blast them out on social however,

1:11:10.360 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to see what people thought of it. But I think

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>what I would finish by saying is that was the

1:11:15.200 --> 1:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of exercise that gms themselves are doing. It's not

1:11:18.320 --> 1:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>any different than the stuff that you and I have

1:11:19.840 --> 1:11:22.160
<v Speaker 2>done over the last few days. I've been around enough

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 2>front office types we'll call them, to know that they're

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:28.240
<v Speaker 2>actually not, you know, rocket surgeons. They're not all that sophisticated, right,

1:11:28.439 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 2>and so a lot of the math and calculus that

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>you and I were doing here over the last few

1:11:31.960 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>days to present these packages the exact same exercise that

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:37.599
<v Speaker 2>GM's are doing. That's what makes this stuff so fun.

1:11:37.640 --> 1:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I very much enjoyed doing it in arm I think

1:11:39.360 --> 1:11:41.799
<v Speaker 2>you did an awfully good job at arbitrating the process.

1:11:42.040 --> 1:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

1:11:42.720 --> 1:11:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking that compliment. I don't even know if you

1:11:44.439 --> 1:11:46.200
<v Speaker 3>mentioned that. I'm kind of like a GM. That's how

1:11:46.200 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna do absolutely at thirty first team in Salt

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Lake City.

1:11:50.000 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna be running those guys.

1:11:51.439 --> 1:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>We'll take that out. We'll take over Salt Lake City soon.

1:11:54.120 --> 1:11:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Thank you everybody who joined the Just Baseball Show. Best

1:11:56.479 --> 1:11:58.559
<v Speaker 3>way to support the show smash the like button and

1:11:58.640 --> 1:12:01.479
<v Speaker 3>subscribe button. Whatever you listen into your podcast, leaving a

1:12:01.479 --> 1:12:04.200
<v Speaker 3>five star review is the best way to support. If

1:12:04.240 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>you want to join our discord, Hembo's in there and

1:12:06.479 --> 1:12:09.639
<v Speaker 3>we could talk all the trades that you could ever want.

1:12:09.720 --> 1:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Special shout out to Podcast B for brilliant producing. Once again,

1:12:13.080 --> 1:12:15.439
<v Speaker 3>a special thank you to Hembo for coming on from

1:12:15.520 --> 1:12:18.280
<v Speaker 3>arm Laighton. I'm Peter Roffle. See you tomorrow, same time,

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:21.560
<v Speaker 3>same place, one thirty pm Eastern. With that, thank you

1:12:21.560 --> 1:12:22.000
<v Speaker 3>every much.