WEBVTT - Core PCE Data Cools , Trump Conviction

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecar playing Android Auto

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 3>We want to go to Ala Sabos. I've done him

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. He's CEO of Compass Diversified. He's

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>joining us from California and he has a portfolio of

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 3>companies that he invests in a lot of them are

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 3>retail and a lot of them are in other sectors,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>so we can kind of get to all of them.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>And he's a great person to talk about retail but

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>also infleetion. That PC data kind of right in line

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 3>with where we were expecting it, So nothing moving the

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 3>needle either way. When it comes to the fed Alias,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 3>it's great to see you again. It's been a while.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's just start with retail for a second. What is

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>your read on the consumer right now?

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, good morning, Alex. Nice to see you as well.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're seeing the consumer and I hate to

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 4>continue to say the same thing, but we're seeing this

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 4>bifurcation where the more affluent consumer continues to spend and

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 4>spend if there's products that they want or services that

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 4>they like. And the you know, more inflation impacted consumer

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 4>on the lower end is having to make real choices,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 4>and so that trend continues. But what I would say

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 4>we've seen, you know, kind of in the more recent

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 4>few months is just a steady weakening of kind of activity.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Our industrial business has seen a little bit of a

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 4>step down. The consumer business is growing quite rapidly, but

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 4>is starting to slow a little bit from where it was.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 4>So I think the consumer is starting to weaken, and

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 4>we saw that with the you know, kind of retail

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>sales data which fell on a real basis today.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>So Elias, a lot of folks are saying, when when

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 5>you look at the consumer out there, there's, boy, there's

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 5>at least two types of consumers out there, the ones

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 5>that are maybe asset rich and they're benefiting from the

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 5>rise in the stock market, the bond market, you know,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 5>real estate, and those that aren't that are really filling

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 5>the brunt of inflation. Do you see that in kind

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 5>of your companies that you invest in.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Paul, we you know, in the companies we invest

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>in mostly skew towards the more affluent consumer, and so

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>those are more balance sheet rich customers that we have,

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 4>and we've seen just really robust shopping patterns continue with

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 4>that consumer subset. We have a small portion of our

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>business that is more at the lower end and goes

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 4>through the mass market, and for the last couple of years,

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 4>that business has really been under pressure and we're seeing

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>that consumer you know, have to make choices, and so, yeah,

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 4>there is a real bifurcation. And right now being at

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 4>the affluent end is where the market is holding up.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, all I ask, what's the inflation and the supply

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 3>chain issue when it comes to retail. Where is it

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 3>now versus say, where it was a year ago?

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, year ago, Alex, our inflation was principally coming from

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>well it's coming from multiple places, but principally from labor,

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>and there was a terrible imbalance between the demand for

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 4>labor and the supply of labor. You know, fast forward

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 4>to today, we're actually starting to see that reverse. In fact,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>I just came out of all of our board meetings

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 4>about three weeks ago with our ten subsidiary companies. Nobody's

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 4>complaining about labor problems anymore. You know, we're seeing wage pressures,

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of elevated a little bit, maybe up

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 4>fifty basis points from historical norms. You know, if you

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>went back a year ago, that was two to three

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred basis point. So you know, we're seeing those labor

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 4>pressures really subside right now. Where there are some pressures

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 4>on inflation gets more to distribution costs, so warehousing, transportation.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 4>But in general, Alex, if there's one thing I would say,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 4>our view on the street is that inflation is probably

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>following faster than what we even saw on today's report.

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 4>And I say that because we have customers that are

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 4>asking us now for price to concessions. We're doing the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>same with our suppliers, and we're seeing just easing of

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>pressures across the board. So I think the trend in

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 4>inflation is going to be down and down pretty significantly

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 4>as the year up folds.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 5>So Elias, I know you you're firm, your compass diversified

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 5>focuses on three verticals branded, consumer, niche, industrial, and healthcare.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.239
<v Speaker 5>Where are you seeing some of the best opportunities these days?

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would say the best opportunities, Paul, are in

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 4>consumer you know, what we've seen is the more defensive sectors,

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 4>especially healthcare and where we invest as critical outsource services.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Those have really attracted a lot of demand and so

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of trades that are happening there, but

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 4>there are very elevated prices in the consumer business inside.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 4>What we're seeing is the choppiness of consumer earnings coming

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 4>out of the pandemic has led a lot of financing

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 4>partners to exit that part of the market, and we're

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 4>not seeing private equity be as active. So we're seeing

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 4>good deals come in consumer.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 6>We closed on.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 4>A great company called the Honey Pot in January of

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 4>this year, and so this is a perfect opportunity and

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 4>market for us because competition is you know, pretty much

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 4>exited the consumer space right now, or it's you know,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 4>very weak compared to where it's been, and that means

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 4>pricing comes down as supply of deals comes back into

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 4>the market.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 3>What about industrials, niche industrials, what does that mean for

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Alias Sable right now?

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, mostly or mostly alex we're working in the industrial

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 4>tech side, so you know, think of things that are

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 4>helping with green energy and you know, other technology enabled

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>industrial processes. You know, the industrial business. This pricing is

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 4>actually quite high there too, believe it or not, on

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 4>the M and A side, and we're seeing some weakening

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 4>in some of the order books. So it's a little

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 4>bit confounding to us how pricing could be up as

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 4>high as it is with the economy showing some weakness

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>and that directly impacts industrial. But you know, I think

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 4>where we are, which is more in the industrial tech side.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 4>You know, we think that stays in the United States,

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 4>and that is going to be something that grows, especially

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 4>with government policy changing and you know, a lot of

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 4>the advent of AI in the in the you know,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 4>computing business. I think that's going to drive more manufacturing

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 4>here and we're going to be able to do it

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 4>pretty efficiently, especially in the higher tech industrial space.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's just real quickly, I'd love to get your

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 5>perspective here. What's the financing market the capital markets like

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 5>for a company like you'res looking to make acquisition, can

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 5>you fancy your deals here? Obviously rising interest rates makes

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 5>it a little bit tougher.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So, Paul, we're a little bit different in that

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 4>we are a publicly traded company and when we acquire

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 4>we finance at the holding company, not at our subsidiary levels,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.559
<v Speaker 4>and so the markets have been, you know, fairly open

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 4>to us and have been, you know for the last

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 4>couple of years. You know, we have bonds that publicly trade,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 4>and the pricing on those bonds have come down. They're

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 4>still up from where we issued in twenty twenty one,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 4>but we issued sort of at the peak of the market.

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 4>So the capital markets remain very much open for us.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 4>We've been able to raise capital both in the debt

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 4>markets and on the equity markets to fund our acquisition programs.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 4>I would say in terms of the M and A markets,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>where you have single asset LBO financing, we're starting to

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>see that market come back as well, but it is

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 4>coming back with higher pricing, and so it creates a

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 4>competitive advantage for us in our financing structure. But we

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 4>are seeing financing come back into the middle market M

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 4>and A space.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>ALIAS thanks a lot. We really appreciate it. I love

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that you can hit on all the different industries and

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>have a great window into the capital markets. Liasabos, CEO

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 3>of Compass Diversified. That ticker on the NIC is COODI

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>joining us from California. Interesting, right, I mean particularly with

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the industrials, like the order books are a little soft,

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>but pricing is still strong, like and dislocations. But interesting

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in the inflation read that we're actually going to see

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>inflation continue to come down. That could the FED be right?

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, maybe the Fed does actually have a soft landing.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean that would be them.

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Thirty Alex Steel alongside Paul So we need. This is

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We bring you all the top news

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>in business and finance through a lens of our amazing analysts.

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>They cover two thousand companies in one hundred and thirty

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>industries worldwide. We also tackle the big topics in the

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 3>world that we all have really big questions on, and

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 3>one of them is commercial real estate. We're all waiting

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>for that shoe to drop. Some shoes have dropped. We

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 3>get the news over the last week that s read

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Barry Sternlick's reat is going to pause redemptions, very similar

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 3>to what be redid a few years ago. And where

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 3>are we in that cycle and why are we seeing

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>that now? Well? Joining us for his insight, which may

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>be a little counterintuitive, is Scott Reckler. He is CEO

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and chairman of our x R Commercial real Estate in

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 3>New York. How you doing, Scott, I'm doing well.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me, Thanks.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 3>For coming in. We really appreciate it. When I hear

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>a headline that s Reed is halting redemptions, that makes

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>me think, oh my goodness, Ciri is going to be toast.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 3>What's happening?

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 6>What do you see?

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know, and Barry's been very vocal

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about this for a while, right, which is that there's

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>been a day of reckoning coming and it's someone been

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>delayed last year as the Federal Reserve got a little

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more dubbish in their tone that people thought maybe

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates were coming down. But I think the industry

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is now going through it's five stages of grief and

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they've gone past the denial and are now at acceptance

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and so a recognition that rates aren't going to come down,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not going to be some saving grace

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and so they have to deal with these challenges. So

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>now the banks, the institutions are busy, you know, taking

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate marks, taking the appropriate reserves, and now we're

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to start going through the process.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 6>It's a big problem.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Right There's a trillion dollars of debt that's coming due

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this year, two trillion dollars over the next three years.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And most of this debt has been financed that, you know,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>unofficiently interest rates that are not normal interest rates right there,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates that are much lower for the last ten

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen years that aren't going to come back. And

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to have more normal rates. So we

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have to go through a reequitization. Means that there's going

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to be pain on the equity side, pain on.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 6>The death side.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You saw today there's announcement about US Pensions having to

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>take more write offs on the commercial real estate. We've

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>seen you know, more banks having issues. I think that's

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen as well. So we're just in the

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>beginning now of facing this challenge and it's gonna be

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to work its way through through this

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>year and into next year.

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 5>All right, So let's just say I've got a building

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 5>in midtown wherever a part of that two point two

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 5>trillion dollars that's coming. I go to my bank, the

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 5>interust rate's much much higher. The value of my property

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 5>is thirty forty fifty percent lower. I don't know something

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 5>along that magnitude. You only loan to value fifty percent.

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Someone's got to get there.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 6>Right, is exactly right?

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I think, and again this is different

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>than like the two thousand and eight crisis. Right when

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight came, there was this injection of

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>capital that really sort of lifted all values. Right, In

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this case, we have a structural period between the interest rates,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and then some types of properties aren't going to be competitive.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So you referenced an office building today, right, and then

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that commentary office not only has the revaluation because of

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, but people use office buildings differently, and some

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>buildings are going to be competitively obsolete. So you have

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to pick the spots correctly, and then you have to

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>face that reality. So the bank has to adjust its loan,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the equity has to write off the equity and inject

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>new equity, and you have to pick which buildings are

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be successful in this post pandemic world. I think,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the other piece of this is multifamily, which

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think to me is more of the Achilles heel

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.119
<v Speaker 1>for the broader regional bank because there's a heavy concentration

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of multifamily in the regional bank around the United States.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They have something like fifty to sixty percent of their

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>book of business as loans, and those loans, even if

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>just from an interest rate, even if credit is good,

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is underwater today, right. But now you also have new

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>supply coming into the market. So there's going to be

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years of headwinds on that multi family

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>market that I think is gonna put a lot of

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>pressure on these regional banks going forward.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 3>So when there is pressure, are you a buyer? Are

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 3>you a seller?

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 6>What do you do? Yeah?

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't I think you these are could be a

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>generational moment of time to be a buyer, right, and

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so we're active in the market.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 6>But you need to be very selective.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 6>It's not just about having the capital.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to have the capabilities to choose which are

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the properties that are going to be successful. You need

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to bring down the basis so you're not going to

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>do this and think values are going to come back.

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You're not doing this on a bet that interest rates

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are just going to fall and everyone's going to do well.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>So you have to find a way how are you

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>going to create value? And you really can't be necessarily

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to time the tap or the bottom.

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>So, we had a company that we sold in January

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of seven, and you know, we didn't know it was

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the top, but it felt frothy, right, so we sold it.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>We came back in the market of August of nine.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't know where we were in the cycle. It

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just felt like the right time to enter. So moments

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like this is where you want to start entering before

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the all clear signal is sounded. But you have to

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be very selective, but know that there's a lot more

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>trouble to come that's going to create more distress in

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the system.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 5>Scott, do we have a housing shortage in this country?

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 5>And if so, how did we get there?

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we definitely have a housing shortage in this country,

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>and it really it began to transpire after the last

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, right. You ended up being a situation where,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the ability to build new housing became more challenging.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>People more conservative. So there's you know, estimates about six

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>million units of shortages of housing in this country. And

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>now you know, because of what the low rates during

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, you've had this incredible amount of people buying

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>homes financing long so existing home sales aren't trading.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 6>So we have this weirder nomaly.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Will interest rates are up, Housing prices have stayed strong,

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and the market it hasn't really weakened in that regard,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and so you know it's going to exacerbate the problem,

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>right because now if you have less construction as we

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>get to two twenty twenty six, you're going to have

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>less housing today than you have the demand for housing.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>So when you're getting the feeling that you know there's distress,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>it's time to buy, even though they'll be more distressed later.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>How do you get that feeling? Like is there a

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>screen that you look through to make sure like okay,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 3>not that property, but yes this property and if they're

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>like right next to each other or something like, how

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>does your brain work with that?

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Scott, No, I think you've got to be very concrete

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and have you know then screen is a good word, right.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We have formulas so like in for office as an example,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we called we created something called Project Kodak,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and we said, some buildings are going to be digital

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be successful in the post pandemic world,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and some are going to be filmed and they're not going.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 6>To be successful. And we said, okay, we want to

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 6>invest in digital.

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And we put the whole the other criteria as to

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what is digital and those are the the properties that

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>are digital.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 3>What is digital?

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So digital are buildings like this Bloomberg building right which

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>are you know, don't have places where people can collaborate people,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to come to work because you can

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>engage with people. They're in good communities, they're easy access

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>from public transportation, and so that that is something that

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately will be successful of attracting people. And so you

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>need digital buildings, but they still may have broken capital structures.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So our objective on investing is identify the digital buildings

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with the broken capital structures, invest in them, fix the

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>broken capital structures. And when you do that, you see

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the leasing. Like last year we least two million square

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>feet of space. This year, you know, so far we

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have a million and a half square.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 6>Feet of the leases out right.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you have the right building with the right

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>capital structure, there's a lot of tenants that want to

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be there.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, I keep just stuck in my head from

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 5>maybe eighteen months ago a Bloomberg News article came out

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 5>and looked at Third Avenue, Manhattan between right where we

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 5>are today fifty eighth Street and Grand Central down to

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 5>forty second Street. Virtually you could write that whole part

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 5>of Manhattan off. And that shocked me, because you've got

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 5>some iconic buildings there, the Lipstick Building, just for example,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 5>what do you those aren't most of them are not

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 5>A buildings. I've learned that term AA plus maybe there're

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 5>be and c. What do you do with something like that?

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, So this is really where you need to start

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about adaptive reuse. Right, if a building is going

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to be competitively obsolete and it's an office build and

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>what are the alternative uses? And so we as an example,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we're in the process of converting five office buildings to multifamily.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 6>Really and I hear that's hard. It's right.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Some don't work, right, So you need to find ones

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>where you have the right type of footprint and the

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>right location so you can efficiently you know, adapt those floors,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and so that's something that is important.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 6>But there's two caveats of that right. One is the

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 6>value that you.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Need to be investing in that building needs to be

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>almost the equivalent of land value, So you need to

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have the capitulation of value coming down to that in

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that mix there. And then the second you need incentives.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And so we're fortunate in New York the state just

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>passed a tax incentive that about ninety percent of the

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>tax that you normally pay is deferred for thirty five years.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't pay it for thirty five years, so if

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you go through that process. So public policy can help

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>get that done. And that's something that I think is

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be help accelerate this transition.

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 5>That's fascinating stuff. I mean, real estate's always a fascinating business,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 5>but especially now. I don't know how these guys are

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 5>doing it.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I love that Kodak one that's might get that use that.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 5>We're going to use that if we'll give you a

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 5>full attribution. But Scott Reckler, he's a CEO and chairman

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 5>of our XR. We're talking real estate here. Lots of opportunities.

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 5>I'm starting to hear more and more people come in

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 5>here and say, you know, selectively, we think there's some

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 5>time and some opportunities to make some acquisitions. So we

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 5>appreciate checking in with Scott.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am on Affle Car Playing and broun

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Ballax Stale, Paul Swiney, We're live here on a Bloomberg

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Interactive Brokers studio. We're streaming live on YouTube each at

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 5>night over YouTube dot com and search Bloomberg Podcast and

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 5>that's where you'll find the video feed. Of course, the

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 5>news of the last twenty four hours, Former President Trump

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 5>found guilty in the hush money case. We've been talking

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 5>about it all day.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 6>We will bring you more President.

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Former President Trump is scheduled to speak at eleven am

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street time. We will bring that to you when

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 5>he does speak. The question now, I think for a

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 5>lot of folks is now what happens? And for that

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 5>we're going to check in with Robert Mints, former federal prosecutor.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 5>He's now a partner at the firm Macarter and English.

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 5>He joins us from beautiful Princeton in New Jersey, home

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 5>of hogy Haven via zoom. So anyway, best Hoby shop

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 5>in the world, hogy Haven, just say laying it out there,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 5>we never had it. We'll go no blue remote there, Robert,

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 5>thanks so much for joining us here. I guess the

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 5>question on everybody's mind here. Robert is given these convictions

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 5>thirty fourth felon accounts. Well, former President mister Trump, will

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 5>he go to jail at all?

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, that really is the big question here, and that's

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 8>the decision that is going to be made solely by

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 8>the trial judge. The way it works in York and

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 8>everywhere else in a criminal case, the jury is the

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 8>finder of fact. They ultimately determine guilt or innocence, and

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 8>we know in this case they convicted the former president

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 8>on all thirty four accounts. Now, the question of sentencing

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 8>is entirely up to the judge and it could be

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 8>anywhere from a probationary sentence to up to four years

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 8>in prison or other possible terms and conditions home confinement.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 8>There could be a lot of different things the judge

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 8>could do here, but it's a very weighty decision. And

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 8>a very difficult decision for this judge to decide what

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 8>is the right thing to do here, given the gravity

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 8>of this case, given who the defendant is here, and

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 8>given the that the defendant in this case, I think

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 8>we're not going to see former President Trump coming in

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 8>on sentencing day and expressing remorse.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 4>For what he did.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 8>Those are all factors that the judge will consider in

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 8>fashioning his sentence.

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 3>How does a judge come up with a sentence? How

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>does that work?

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 8>Well, typically what a judge does is he or she

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 8>will look at the way similarly situated defendants have been

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 8>treated in the past. So people who have been convicted

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 8>of the same type of types of offenses, do they

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 8>typically go to jail? If so, for how long In

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 8>this kind of case, it's a record keeping case. Usually

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 8>for a first defender, they will not be jail time.

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 8>But there's also other factors that the court will consider

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 8>the age of the defendant. As I mentioned earlier too,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 8>whether the defendant expresses remorse, acknowledges that they committed a crime,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 8>that they've done something wrong. And I think the judge

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 8>will also take into account, at least in some manner,

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 8>the fact that there are other pending criminal cases out there,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 8>and also the way in which former President Trump conducted

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 8>himself during the trial. As you remember, the judge imposed

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 8>a gag order that he was found in contempt several

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 8>times for making statements that the judge found to have

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 8>crossed the line. All of that may factor into this,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 8>and the judge will have to decide does he or

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 8>does he not send former President Trump to jail, If so,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 8>for how long.

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of where I wanted to go, Robert. We're

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 5>waiting comments from former President Trump at eleven a m

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 5>from Trump Tower. So my question is is he still

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 5>subject to the gag rule because it doesn't appear that

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 5>he's going to hold back on any commentary about the

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 5>judge or the trial itself.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's a great question, and I think it's a

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 8>little bit unclear, but generally probably not. Because the gag

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 8>order was really imposed so that former President Trump would

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 8>not make comments that might have affected witnesses or might

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 8>have affected jurors. None of that really is relevant at

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 8>this point. The case is over, there's been a conviction,

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 8>So I think we're going to see former President Trump

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 8>speak freely. I don't think we're going to see the

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 8>judge in any way react to those comments unless it

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 8>gets very personal with court personnel or with the judge.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 8>But otherwise I think the judges is going to let

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 8>it go, but he will be watching. And I do

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 8>think those issues on statements that are made by former

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 8>President Trump may ultimately factor into his decision about whether

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 8>or not to send former President Trump to jail.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 6>And if so, for how long.

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 3>If this trial had been held in any other state

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>but say California or New York, would it have gone

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 3>any differently or would it be reasonable to have expected

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 3>this outcome in the majority of durors and trials.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 8>You know, that's a great question and obviously impossible to answer.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I do think we saw a fairly diverse

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 8>jury in the sense that you had people from various

0:22:55.480 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 8>backgrounds socioeconomically, people who were from different parts of the city.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 8>So there was some balance to that. And you do

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 8>have to remember that both the prosecution on the defense

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 8>played a role in picking this jury. They were able

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 8>to exercise what it's called peremptory challenges, which means to

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 8>strikers who they did not want on the jury for

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 8>whatever reason, and so they both jointly ended up picking

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 8>this jury. But you're correct in that there is a

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 8>jury pool the limited number of people that you'd find

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 8>in Manhattan, And the question is would they be any

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 8>different than a jury pool in some other state. The

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 8>answer is, we really don't know. The reality is that

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 8>probably is different from state to state. But that happens

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 8>in every criminal case across the country, no matter where

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 8>it's tried, whether you're in federal court or state court,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 8>there's going to be a difference, perhaps, for example, if

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 8>you try the case in Florida, or if you try

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 8>a case in New York. Then even within a state,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 8>for example, if you try a case in Miami versus

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 8>in the northern part of Florida, you may find different

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 8>jurors there. So that does happen all the time. But

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 8>bear in mind that jurors are instructed, and if we

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 8>assume they follow the instructions of the Corps, they are

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 8>supposed to simply put all their biases aside. They're supposed

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 8>to make a decision based solely on the evidence that's

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 8>presented to them during the process of the trial, and

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 8>that's how they make their decision. But obviously they bring

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 8>their backgrounds, they bring common sense to it, and jurors

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 8>are different, So it is quite possible that as this

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 8>case has been tried in some other part of the country,

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 8>there might have been a different result.

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 9>Hey, Bob John Tucker here real quick, just got a

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 9>less than a minute left. Has Trump now violated the

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 9>pre trial conditions of release in the Georgia case?

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 8>That's a good question. I don't actually know the answer

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 8>to that. The fact that there's a conviction here and

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 8>whether that how that may play into his terms of

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 8>release in other states. It is something that those judges

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 8>may consider, but I don't think it's going to ultimately

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 8>affect his conditions of release. I don't think you're going

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 8>to see anything more stringent being imposed upon and based

0:24:58.240 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 8>upon this conviction.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>So my final question for you, why do we have

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to wait so long to get a sentencing here? Like

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 3>it just seems to prolong it in all the angst

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 3>in the political sphere.

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's really not unusual for the time between a

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 8>conviction and a sentencing to be at least a couple months.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 8>In federal court is often even longer than that because

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 8>what happens is there is a report that's prepared by

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 8>the court system they ask all kinds of questions about

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 8>the defendant, the background of the defendant. And this is

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 8>an unusual case. Obviously, everybody knows who foreign President Trump is,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 8>they know his background. But it's going to be treated

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 8>like any other case. And so it has to go

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 8>through the same processes and procedures that any other defendant would,

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 8>and the report has to be prepared. The defense has

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 8>an opportunity to submit information, and this is generally how

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 8>long it takes, at least a couple months before actual

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 8>sentencing after the conviction.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 5>Robert, thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate it.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 5>Robert Mints. He's a former federal prosecutor. He's also partner

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 5>now with McCarter and English. Joining us from Princeton, New Jersey.

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>androyd Otto with The Bloomberg Business. You can also listen

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg. Eleven thirty.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 5>Former President Donald Trump speaking at Trump Tower in Middon

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 5>and press conference in response to the finding being found

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 5>guilty of.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>For thirty four accounts, thirty four.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Counts of felony. So again some of the typical response.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 5>I guess we would expect he's calling this a sham

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 5>and kind of being railroaded, so not certainly supporting.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 6>What is going on.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Let's go to Joe Matthew right here, he's co host

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 5>of the Bloomberg Balance of Power. Joe, I guess nothing

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 5>new in the comments from former President Trump.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 6>What are your thoughts here?

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 7>No, this is a pretty much rehash of the stump speech,

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 7>to be honest, although he's going deep now, all the

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 7>way back to January sixth, whether he attacked the Secret

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 7>Service in the car. He started with the border, which

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 7>was interesting. Of course, this was built as a press

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 7>conference on his conviction. Yesterday, he's still in over a

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 7>half an hour, has not taken one question. He's just

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 7>going off the cough on a list of grievances. The

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 7>one thing I'll point out here you can fact check

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 7>this stuff all day long, is that when he gets

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 7>into as he said, quote, this is all done by

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 7>Biden and his people. This is done by Washington. This

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 7>is a state case. You guys are sitting in New

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 7>York and it actually has no direct connection to the administration.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 3>Or Washington, meaning that it's a right, yes, understood. So

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 3>what else really stands out though, in terms of what

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 3>we can then expect in that campaign trail as we

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 3>go forward, and this is being used as a political

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 3>pinball within that well.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 7>I think we've seen it already. Political prisoner is how

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 7>he's billing himself, retribution towards how the campaign began. And look,

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 7>if this comes down to a jailhouse call into the

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 7>Republican convention in Milwaukee, and we don't know if that's

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 7>going to be the case or not, he will probably

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 7>find a way to spend that to his advantage. I mean, look,

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 7>he's been selling mugshot t shirts for months and months now,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 7>making money on it. So this is someone who, as

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 7>we see here in the process, he's making people laugh

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 7>the way that he's making fun of Joe Biden. But

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 7>the questions that we have are about the long term

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 7>corrosive impact that this could have, particularly on independent voters,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 7>suburban women and folks who are looking now at a

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 7>convicted felon. And we'll see what happens after he meets

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 7>with his probation officer and is eventually sentenced.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 6>So, Joe, I guess yeah, you.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Raised the political question is what the impact will be

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 5>on I guess just folks that are not in either camp,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 5>some of those moderates, that people in the middle. Have

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 5>we seen any polling on that, Joe.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 7>We have, and some of it is right here at Bloomberg.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 7>We were asking in January in our Bloomberg Swing state

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 7>pole what a conviction would do or an incarceration, and

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 7>we did find within single digits the number of folks

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 7>who said that they in fact would change their vote

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 7>on that. But it's different when it's hypothetical. We didn't

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 7>even know what trial we'd be talking about then, And

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 7>there are posters in the field right now who are

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 7>going to have an interesting look at what we see here.

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 7>You could actually see a pop, almost a post state

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 7>of the Union, in this case, a post verdict pop

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 7>for Donald Trump. But does he keep that also fundraising?

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 7>This does not seem to be bothering the mega donors

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 7>who are gravitating toward Donald Trump, as well as the

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 7>small dollar donors. As I mentioned before he started here,

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 7>thirty five million dollars raised online since the beginning of

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 7>this whole thing, since the verdict less than twenty four

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 7>hours ago. They crashed the win red system that Trump

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 7>uses to raise money last night. You couldn't even get

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 7>on that app to raise money for a while if

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 7>you wanted to. So this has been a mobilizing event.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 7>Let's see where it goes days and weeks from now.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually, this is a great point that you made

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 3>that when you guys did the polling in terms of

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 3>if Trump is convicted, will people still vote for him?

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>That didn't specify which conviction. I think I missed that detail,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 3>meaning that maybe the Georgia election case a conviction, they're

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 3>very different than a hush money trial.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, I guess that's true. I think the idea of

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 7>convicted felon right when we think about the rhetoric or

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 7>just sort of the aura that that brings. It's not

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 7>a good thing not to mention someone incarcerated. That's just

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 7>a different look too if you're someone behind bars. Not

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 7>that either would keep him from running on a legal level.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 7>But so this is kind of the unknown. He's dealing

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 7>with the cards. He's been Dealty's good at that. Joe

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 7>Biden has been pretty good at staying out of it.

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 7>Outside of his one decision recently to send Robert de

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 7>Niro to the Lower Manhattan Courthouse. I'm not sure what

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 7>else they have up their sleeve right now other than

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 7>to let Donald Trump keep talking. I think that's Joe

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 7>Biden's strategy as we speak.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 5>And Joe, I guess we had some conflicting legal opinions

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 5>today as to whether former President Trump is still under

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 5>the gag rule. He seemed to say clearly in his

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 5>remarks that he believes he is.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.479
<v Speaker 7>I talked to criminal defense attorney Robert mcwherterer about this.

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 7>He said that technically, yes, this trial is technically not

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 7>over until sentencing. So therefore Judge murshawn could in fact

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 7>enforce the gag order if he wanted to. And I'll

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 7>remind everybody that we're waiting to hear from the Supreme Court. Still,

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 7>the fact that this is done now brings us to June,

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 7>when we could get a ruling on this presidential and

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 7>expect to this presidential immunity claim. That would then potentially

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 7>unlock the next trial, that's the January sixth trial with

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 7>Special Counsel Jack Smith.

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 6>That could be a.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 7>Very major game changer for this campaign, and it would

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 7>likely coincide with the final throes of the election. Imagine

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 7>a world in which that trial was happening when the

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 7>election took place, or in fact, was held between the

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 7>election and the inauguration. Could we have a president elect

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 7>on criminal trial and federal trial here in Washington. All

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 7>of these remain questions and distinct possibilities.

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 3>So we have the benefit. I've talked about this for

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>just half an hour. You're going to be talking about

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 3>this for three more hours today as you did yesterday

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>for three hours. What are going to be your questions? Like,

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 3>how do you walk this forward now? And there's so

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 3>many things we don't.

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Know these are This is the moment I think they

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 7>get granular. What are the next steps here for Donald

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 7>Trump's defense? What is that appointment? What is his first

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 7>meeting with his probation officer going to look like?

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 6>What will be the venue?

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 7>What is the Secret Service talked about with New York

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 7>Corrections officials about a potential incarceration. We heard Nick Ackerman,

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 7>the former Watergate prosecutor, talk about a presidential suite potentially

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 7>being built at Riker's Island. But I also want to

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 7>know about the jurors. There are a couple of folks,

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 7>including our own Eric Larson and his team at Bloomberg.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 7>Mark Caputo's another one at the Bulwark, is going to

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 7>join us at noon to talk about who these people

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 7>actually were, what they were going through. Now that we

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 7>want to reveal identities, but what did these Americans experience?

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 7>What were their expressions, what did they hear, and what

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 7>might have gone on inside that jury room?

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 6>Those are all questions I.

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Have, all right, Joe, thank you so very much. We

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 5>appreciate it. Joe Matthew, he's co host of Bloomberg Balance

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 5>of Power, joining us from the Washington DC Bureau. And

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 5>as you mentioned, Alex, he's gonna be he and his

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 5>team will be spending a lot of time looking at

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 5>this in this landmark court case from yesterday. Then some

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 5>of the comments from the former president today, who is

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 5>just finished speaking, so he's walking away from the lectern

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.239
<v Speaker 5>there so interesting.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Android Outo with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Thirty Big Take story today related to the news of

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 5>the day regarding former President Trump. Wall Street billionaires rush

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 5>to back Trump. Verdict be damned. A growing number of

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 5>financial elites are throwing their weight behind Trump, who's found

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 5>guilty in the first criminal trial of a former US

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 5>as an entry Naa Rajen joins just one of the

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 5>reporters on that story, Senior finance reporter Bloomberg News, joining

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 5>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. What is behind?

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 5>What did you find in your reporting tree about what

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 5>some of these billionaires or what are they thinking? Is

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 5>they think about supporting former President Trump at the next election?

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 10>In some ways, it's not a surprise, but in some ways,

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 10>in many ways, it's extraordinary. In almost any other generation,

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 10>any other era, any other candidate, you would have assumed

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 10>that there will be this entire crowd of supporters that

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 10>will be looking to distance themselves from this individual. In

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 10>this case, most of Trump's deep pocketed donors are actually

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 10>rallying around him and using this guilty verdict as a

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 10>rallying cry to get more support for him. And that

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 10>has been the trend that we've seen. Those who have

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 10>been trumped backers and have stood by him through all

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 10>these years, continue to stand by him. Those who have

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 10>been reluctant travelers don't seem to be getting swayed by

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 10>the verdict, and in fact they're using it as an

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 10>opportunity to more people into the Trump fold, and that's extraordinary.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 10>A lot of what they're attacking is is what they

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 10>claim is the misuse of the legal system. These are

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 10>titans of the industry. These are people who've used the

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 10>legal system, the bedrock of capitalism in this country, in

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 10>some ways to build grow a quie accumulate wealth. These

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 10>are the very same people who look at this verdict

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 10>and suddenly have a number of grave concerns about the

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 10>carriage of justice or what they call miscarriage of justice

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 10>in this case.

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 3>So in my world, the first kind of turn was

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Harold Ham, billionaire owns cnnental Resources, right, and he supported

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Nicki Haley, and he was saying he was not going

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 3>to support President Trump because he just felt like he

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>just said he wasn't electable. And then slowly, as the

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.919
<v Speaker 3>momentum couldn't pick up for a moderate like a Nikki Haley,

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 3>if we'll just call her a moderate that eventually the

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 3>rhetorics started to turn. And I'm wondering how many are

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 3>similar like that on Wall Street, where in terms of electability,

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 3>in terms of likability, in terms of focus, they don't

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>want President Trump, but because they weren't able to rally

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 3>the support behind a moderate, I were seen as a moderate,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 3>they have no choice. How much of it is that

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 3>versus an actual support.

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 10>That's sort of a very interesting point. And I'd like

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 10>to actually point to two important voices in the story today.

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 10>One of them Dan Lufkin. He's ninety two today, but

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 10>he is one of the co founders of DLJ. He

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 10>therefore had one of the most prominent positions in the industry.

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 10>And here's a man who comes out and says, look,

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 10>Wall Street has never been known and this is important

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 10>the way he frames it. He says, Wall Street has

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 10>never been known for its values. Is there a willingness

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 10>to support Trump if it looks like he's on the

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 10>right track. Yes, he says, I'm not proud of that,

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 10>and I'm not part of that either, because he was

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 10>a Nicki Hayley supporter, and he's definitely staying never Trumper.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 10>But he's saying that is definitely visible. And we have

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 10>Whitney Tilson, former HETG fund manager ran a two hundred

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 10>million dollar hatch fund, who says the industry does attract

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 10>its own crowd of opportunists, and that sort of extends

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 10>to Trump's backers in the upper rungs of the business

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 10>community who've come out publicly right now. And his point

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 10>is they've concluded Trump is going to win. They don't

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.240
<v Speaker 10>believe this is a dead heat. They are pretty certain

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 10>and convinced themselves that Trump is going to win come November,

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 10>and if he is the next president, then it is

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 10>in their self interest to support him early. And you

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 10>can't discount that logic.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, what I see in your story is, you know,

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of self made billionaires, Steven Schwartzman, Harold Lutnick.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 7>What I don't see.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 5>Is corporate CEOs, the CEO of Coca Cola or Procter

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 5>and Gamble or something like that that probably says something

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 5>as well. I mean, if I've got my billions, I

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 5>don't really care what people think. I can maybe be

0:37:58.920 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 5>more open with who.

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 10>Just yes, absolutely. But at the same time, I will

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 10>also point out that a lot of these corporate CEOs

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 10>were loud and vocal in twenty seventeen. In August twenty seventeen,

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 10>after the white supremacist rallies in Charlottesville, Virginia, they were

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 10>loud and vocal after jan six, twenty twenty one. What

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 10>you have seen, in some ways is in a historic

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 10>moment like this, right first have a former president to

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 10>be tried in the for sort of in criminal counts

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 10>to be found guilty. You would have thought that there

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 10>would be more in the upper rungs of the business

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 10>class so would be able to come out and point

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 10>that out. But they are choosing to remain silent or

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 10>at least don't want to express an opinion, and their

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 10>silence in this case speaks as much as their comments

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 10>in some of the previous instances.

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm glad you brought that up, because something that

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 3>we saw back in twenty and sixteen is it was

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 3>silent supporters that people voted for Trump on Wall Street

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 3>in particular, but no one said anything, and that that

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 3>was in us why polls were so wrong and why

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 3>I caught everyone else so off guard. Is it something

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 3>the same way, like, hey man, I make a lot

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 3>of money and I want lower taxes straight up, I'm

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 3>going to vote for Trump, but I can't say excel

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 3>lose clients.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 10>And some of those who are backing and kind of

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 10>also making that point publicly. But yes, in twenty sixteen,

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 10>there was a I think it's fair to say, at

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 10>least on Wall Street, there was a lot more stigma

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 10>in being able to come out and openly say I

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 10>back Donald Trump. Doesn't feel like that so much in

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty four.

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 5>All right, so we haven't heard from JP. Have you

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 5>heard from Jamie Diamond, CEOs or Brian moy in a

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 5>hand you know, anything like that from Big Wall Street?

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 10>Not particularly, But it is interesting that yesterday Jamie Diamond

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 10>was sort of the star attraction at this JP Morgan

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 10>alumni event. This this is held at the Morgan Library

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 10>every year. It's a bit of a tradition among the

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 10>JP Morgan crowd. And a couple of years ago he

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 10>did create quite a bit of a stir where he

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 10>went on this sort of expletive laid and tirade against

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump. That is Jamie Diamond, the Dean of Finance.

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 10>This was back when m Jansick was still top of

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 10>everyone's mind. Yesterday they're meeting a mere two hours after

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 10>this guilty verdict, and Jamie doesn't even reference it to

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 10>a tangential question about politics and the outlook. He talks

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 10>about the need to respect the seventy four million voters

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 10>who voted for Trump because they must have seen that

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 10>he had done some good things. All fair points, but

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 10>again interesting to note what he's choosing to remain silent

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 10>on at this moment versus what he was vocal about

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:29.919
<v Speaker 10>just a couple of years ago.

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 5>All Right, Sree, thanks so much for jourinning a Shrinana Rojen.

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 5>He is a senior financial reporter for Bloomberg News. Journey

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 5>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. The Big

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Takes story of the day. We love the Big Takes

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 5>stories so well, deeply sourced and reported, lots of COO

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 5>graphics for people like me, Wall Street billionaires, Rush Tobac

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 5>Trump verdict be Damned is the headline on that story.

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, Wall Street has following the money.

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:56.439
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, spotder Pye,

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 2>week ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 6>The iHeartRadio app.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 2>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal