WEBVTT - Ercot’s Extremes: Weather, Solar and Bitcoin

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switch on

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the B and EF podcast. So, as the saying goes,

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>everything's bigger in Texas, and for the last few years

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that has also included swings in extreme weather conditions. When

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>storm Jury hit the state in February of twenty twenty one,

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Texans rushed to heat their homes and the demand for

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>electricity outstripped supply, sending prices soaring to nine thousand dollars

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a megawatt hour and causing blackouts At a critical moment. Urkott,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the state's grid operator, brought in reforms to avoid the

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>issue persisting, but from late June of this year, a

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>heat wave once again caused electricity prices to a times skyrocket.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So what makes Urkut and these price fluctuations so unique?

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>And as we prepare for more extreme weather, how might

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the state, as an independent energy island of sorts adjust?

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>To explain what we might be able to learn from

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this unique market. In today's show, I get to speak

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>with benf's head of research for North America, Thomas Rowland's

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Rees and BNF's US power specialist Natalie Mandy Bratta. Together

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we discuss Urcot and how it operates the Texas grid

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and what this means for electricity prices. We also discuss

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas's growing renewable energy rollout and where solar fits into

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the equation, and finally, Bitcoin in Texas and how it

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fits into grid flexibility. As always, if you like this podcast,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>if you subscribe, you'll receive an update on future episodes,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you give us a review, it'll make us

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>more discoverable by others. But right now, let's jump into

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the conversation with Tom and Natalie about Urkott. Natalie, thank

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us today.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much. Shanna, it's great to be here.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And Tom, thank you for coming on.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Switched on, Thank you so much for having me.

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So, Tom, you've been with the business as long as

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I have, which is, you know, since before we were

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a part of Bloomberg. And for those who are listening now,

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought we would have this moment where I was

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about saying, Tom, welcome back to the show today,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But actually you haven't been on with me, and you

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>were on one of our initial pilot episodes, which I

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>believe may not have seen the light of day. So

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you're hoping to realize in today's show.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, firstly, I hope that we can give an entertaining podcast.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Then I think that so long as I'm not too boring,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>we should be able to do that because we're going

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 4>to be talking about URKOT, the Texas power market, which

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 4>is like the Wild West of power markets. Everything is

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 4>just maxed out in URQUT. It's one of the most

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 4>interesting things that I've had the opportunity to study in

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 4>my varied career at BNFS.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So I'm really.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Hoping that we can convey why it's so interesting, why

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 4>it's so extreme, and also maybe to make a little

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 4>bit of a defense of ERCOT, because you know, one

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 4>of the things we'll talk about is it's kind of

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>fashionable to dunk on ERKOT because it's so extreme and

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 4>it's Texas. Everyone loves to say, oh, those crazy Texans

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 4>with their crazy power market, but it's actually been functioning

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>reasonably well lately in very challenging conditions, and I think

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 4>that's a story that is worth telling well.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And I bring up the fact that you haven't been

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show yet because I almost couldn't believe it

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>when you said it, because you're one of my favorite

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>people to talk to about some of the more interesting

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>things that we are covering. So one of the reasons

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we decided now was the right time to delve in

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>again into this very fascinating market had to do with

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this recent wave of extremely warm weather across parts of

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the US. But we're going to talk specifically about Texas.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what happened and kind of the knock

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on effects to the grid.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So, in early June, the weather forecasts started really

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>shooting up to I'm now in the US and I've

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 4>completely converted to speaking in terms of fahrenheit. I'm a convert, so.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a convert to celsius. So now I'm gonna have

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to calculate it on my phone while you're talking.

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 4>So basically, what I've learned is the reason fahrenheit works

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 4>is that anything above a hundred is like super hot.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>And for about two months now, Texas has had temperatures

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 4>that are above a hundred during the day, and so

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 4>that is really when you're in the times when heat

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>starts to affect infrastructure, it's it's not safe.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's been very extreme.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 4>And to put this in context, in the US and

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>a lot of other power markets around the world summertime

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 4>and the sort of the hottest day of the year

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>is what they all plan for because that's when air

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 4>conditioning demand is at its highest, and so it's when

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 4>electricity demand is at its highest. So the combination of

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 4>a sustained period of heat and that has then led

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 4>to record power demand means that URKOT has really been

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 4>getting put to the test over the course of this summer.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>And you'd reference that our cuts are particularly interesting. But also,

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>let's say unique power market, So can you explain what

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is it that makes it different from let's say, other

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>states in the United States.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 4>There's a couple of things that make it different. One

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 4>is just generally across the United States power markets, the

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 4>regulatory structure is a lot more varied, and you can

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 4>see a lot more of hybrids between regulated and liberalized markets.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Actually URKO is the least regulated, which of course everyone says, huh,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>typical Texas, But actually being the least regulated means that

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 4>it most resembles a European power market in that generation

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 4>is competitive and retail is competitive, and actually having competitive

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 4>retail is somewhat rare in the US. But also is

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 4>that it is an energy only market, which means that

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 4>all of the incentives for say, plants that just are

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 4>there for that hottest day of the year are not

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>through things like capacity markets like you see in other

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 4>markets like PJM or in GB in the UK, but

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 4>it's all through a mechanism where it just says, oh,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 4>on those days is designed to have prices go to

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 4>really extreme levels so that those plants can make their

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>money in the space of a couple of hours a year.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 4>That makes it viable for them to stay online. But

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 4>that means that it's it's quite volatile, and it's quite

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 4>People sometimes describe it as a casino because if that

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 4>day where prices explode doesn't come, then those plants don't

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 4>make enough money. And if you get more of those

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 4>days than you need, then those plants make way more

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 4>money than they need. And ultimately the cost is passed

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 4>on to consumers via the competitive retailers.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>And then I.

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Suppose the competitive retailers have this challenge of how do

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 4>we offer the best deal whilst managing this risk.

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of why Texas is so interesting.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 2>I'll just add on the last point you had about

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the energy only market. The mechanism that Urcott has are

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 2>these scarcity adders, and those are happening in real time.

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>So when reserves drop a certain threshold, Urcott adds to

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 2>the power price to incentivize more power plants to come online.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>I think a coworker compared it to Uber surge pricing,

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and I say, the other uniqueness of URCOT that people

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>remember is that it's an island grid, so it's not

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>connected to the eastern or western connection, so when supplies

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>are low, they can't rely on imports from neighboring balancing authorities.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>No ability to buy or sell any access capacity or

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>required capacity.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Correct And just.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 4>To put it in context, Natalie, what does say the

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 4>power price on a typical day and how high can

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 4>it go when we have these extreme prices.

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd say probably between sixty e eighty dollars per megawat

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and a typical day. But on these extreme days, for example,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>on June twenty, we saw prices go to a close

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of five thousand dollars per megawatt, and just on July

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 2>thirty one, we saw prices to twenty three hundred and

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 2>fifty dollars.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for retail customers like you and me?

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 4>That's a really interesting question because it is the job

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>of the retailers to manage this risk and offer customers

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 4>a deal that is palatable. So from a customer's point

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 4>of view, they should just see that their energy provider

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 4>offers them a deal for certain period of time and

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 4>a price by magwa hour, and those energy providers have

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>to go into the market and procure their energy and

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>manage this risk, and you know, the deal they offer

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 4>customers is kind of a reflection of can they make

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 4>a slight profit of while managing this risk. The reason

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 4>I say it's interesting is because everything was so unregulated

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 4>in Texas and they had competitive retail, which is somewhat

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 4>unique in the US, although it's kind of commonplace in

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Europe and men. There was a lot of innovation and

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 4>one of the very innovative ideas was a retailer called

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Griddy who said, you know what, rather than just say

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 4>offering customers are fixed tariff, why don't we say let's

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 4>just give them exposure to wholesale power prices. I either

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 4>hourly market will meet that using a smart meter and

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 4>build them for it, and they'll just pay us a

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 4>monthly fee. And you know, you run the numbers and

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 4>this would say, like in twenty sixteen, they were saying this,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 4>you run the numbers on look, look at how wholesale

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 4>prices have been. That'll end up working out cheaper for

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 4>you if you're okay with taking on that risk. I

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 4>guess we're going to get on to talking about winter

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Storm Ury in February twenty twenty one, when the lights

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 4>went out but prices went to these high levels. That

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 4>deal worked out extremely badly in that set of circumstances,

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 4>and it was because no one anticipated that something like

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 4>winter Storm Ury would happen, and so these customers half

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 4>the time they didn't have any power, and then when

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 4>the power was on, it was costing ten thousand dollars

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 4>per megawat hour or something like that, and they were

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 4>ending up with bills that were tens of thousands of

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 4>dollars that they couldn't possibly pay. And there are a

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of defaulting and financial pain happening off the back

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>of this. So, in answer to your question, retailers are

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be innovative, supposed to manage the risk, there

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>have been some missteps along the way.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>We did a podcast back in twenty twenty one after

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Storm Mury which was this extreme cold front in Texas,

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>which also did cause extreme prices and actually had some

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really terrible consequences. What do you think between then and now,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>between Storm Mury so extreme cold and now we're dealing

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>with extreme heat, how has the grid innovated, how has

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it changed, how is it adapted? And how is the

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>story different this time around?

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I think there are too answer to that. The first

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 2>one is the retail one, if you want to tackle

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that time, and I can talk about Urkard broadly.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I mean, I suppose on the retail side, I

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 4>don't think. I mean, Nanati can correct me if I'm wrong.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that there has been any the major

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 4>reform apart from there's just a lot more caution. So

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone in their right mind is either

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 4>signing up to or selling contracts that expose customers to

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 4>hourly wholesale prices, because everyone saw how badly that went

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty one, so it's it's maybe just a

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 4>little bit more conservative now, and perhaps that's not a

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>bad thing. I know we talk a lot about retail innovation,

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 4>and that's part of the rationale for having competitive retail

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 4>in both Europe and Texas, but maybe sometimes too much

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 4>innovation is too risky, and so my understanding is that

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 4>it's maybe a little bit more conventional in the way

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 4>that they are are hedging the risks and then billing customers.

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Urkat has introduced a few changes since Winter Storm Mury.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 2>The first is like short term market changes, the major

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>one being during Winter Storm Muri, your price is went

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 2>to nine thousand dollars per megawatt. That was the system

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>cap for their scarcity adder. They reduced that to five

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars per megawat, which is why we saw price

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>is around that level this summer. The scarcity adder also

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>kicks in at a higher reserve level, so it's more conservative. Basically,

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>prices will increase at a higher level than before to

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>try and get power plants to come online. They've also

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>added more ancillary services, which is another reliability service that

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Urcott has. But they've done a whole study to improve

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 2>long term market design. The major one that passed earlier

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>this year is called a performance credit mechanism. It's a

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>capacity like payment. So as we talked about before, other

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>markets have capacity markets that procure enough supply over a

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>certain number of years. Orcott has famously been an energy

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>only market, but is trying to introduce this new payment

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that is more predictable and can be another revenue to

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>power plants other than these extreme price fikes.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>See the other thing I would say, though, that has changed,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 4>and maybe you don't say Urcott has changed this. It's

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 4>just something that has changed generally is that there's a

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.239
<v Speaker 4>huge amount of solo beein to the grid. So typically

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 4>these price spikes, apart from February twenty twenty one, which

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 4>was an exceptional set of circumstances, typically you're expecting these

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 4>price extremes, this lottery as we describe it, to happen

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 4>during the summer and when the temperature is high, i e.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 3>During the day all day.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, there's so much solar being added and still being

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 4>added in Texas, it's enough now that we're at a

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 4>stage where for most of the day you can rely

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 4>on solar generating enough to meet that high demand, and

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 4>so these price spikes aren't going to happen and won't

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 4>be necessary. And it's only now during a more limited

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 4>time window that during the late afternoon when the solar

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 4>generation is ramping down but it's still hot that you

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 4>still have the possibility of these price extremes. And so

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 4>while while solar doesn't completely eliminate this dynamic, it certainly

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 4>reduced the probability of it and made it maybe a

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 4>little bit more healthy and restricted, I suppose.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So between this cold snap which happened in twenty twenty

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one which really impacted the gas pipelines and wind power,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we now have this additional solar that's been coming online

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>over the past several years that's really creating or evening

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>out the access in summertime. But as you point out rightfully,

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>these spikes do tend to happen in terms of demand

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the afternoon till late afternoon, often as the sun

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>is setting and people are heading home returning home after work.

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And my question really has to do with with all

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of this renewables roll out in Texas, are we also

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing storage or are we seeing grid flexibility being built

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in What are the mechanisms in place in order to

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>meet that late afternoon peak energy demand.

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Solar actually generates during that late afternoon peak of six pm,

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>but it's we are now seeing that peak net demand,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>which is demand minus renewables, happen when solar comes offline.

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Eight to nine pm, so that more predictable renewables waiting off,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 2>more solar waning off could cause price spikes that happened

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>later in the day. That what we've typically seen, which

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>has been driven by demand in people coming home.

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>And to your question around storage data, that is creating

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity for storage. It's a very well defined time

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 4>window where high prices are expected. You know, we've seen

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 4>it in California that solar gets built and then storage follows.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing the same happening in Texas. It's maybe at

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 4>an earlier stage, but yeah, we are expecting in the

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 4>next few years now a substantial amount of storage to

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 4>get built in Texas to complement the solar.

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Another show that we previously did, which we probably should

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have also featured you in tom was one that was

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>around servers and as a potential source of flexible capacity.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And this brings me to another point around well, certainly

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>something that puts a lot of demand on servers, which

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is bitcoin mining. There's an interesting connection here to Urka,

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come to that, but before we go there,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about well, bitcoin mining and why

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is it so energy intensive and require so many servers?

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 4>So that's a good question because in a way, I

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 4>understand very well the impact that bitcoin mining has on

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 4>the energy system, but I'm certainly not a bitcoin expert.

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 4>But the way bitcoin works is that the system is

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 4>built around that you create new bitcoins by solving complex

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 4>computational problems, and you get rewarded with bitcoins for doing that,

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 4>and you also, in doing so facilitate processing of transactions

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 4>in the bitcoin market, and over time, the amount of

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 4>energy required to create every bitcoin increases, the idea being

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 4>that eventually all the bitcoins that are possible to be

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 4>created will be created, but at that point in time,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 4>it will be really energy intensive to create a bitcoin.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Now I know that when I say, oh, it's very

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 4>energy intensive, everyone has a sort of a knee jerk

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 4>reaction and says, that's so bad, that it's so energy intensive,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 4>And I actually just want to maybe temper that a

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 4>little bit. If you have, say, servers that consume a

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 4>megawatt of power, and it costs barely any energy to

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>produce some bitcoins, then you're just going to produce more bitcoins.

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 4>The fact that it's more energy intensive just means that

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 4>you're still going to run your server the same amount,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 4>you'll just get less bitcoins from doing it, And actually

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 4>that means you're more likely to switch off when power

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 4>prices are too high, which is normally when fossil generation

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 4>is happening. So Bitcoin gets a little bit of a

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 4>bad rap for being so energy intensive, and I sometimes

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>think that maybe misses the point a little bit.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But there is this flexibility element just built in inherently

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to the way the market functions.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you only get that flexibility element because it's

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 4>energy intensive.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's back up still one more, which is is

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin very common in Texas? Like what's the connection between

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>er cut and bitcoin.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to let Natalie give you the numbers, although

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 4>I know what they are, but I will just anecdotally

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 4>tell you.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll just anecdote.

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Because I feel like she found out these numbers, but

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 4>I'll anecdotally tell you when she was working on the

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Erko market outlook and she told me, oh, Tom, oh,

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin is a big factor in Texas, and I was thinking, oh,

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 4>that's nice, a nice little side story, and she told

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 4>me the numbers, and I was My first reaction was like, Natalie,

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 4>I think you might have got your units mixed up

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 4>because the numbers were so unbelievable. But Natalie tell us

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 4>what those numbers are, and I will just say she

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 4>hasn't got her units mixed up.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Urkott has about two gigawatts of bitcoin mining capacity

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>online that has sprung up in the last year or two.

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Baseload demand in Urcott is forty five to fifty gigawatts,

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>so that's not sensitive to temperature. So assuming bitcoin is

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>running around the clock except during the stressful grid hours,

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>that's about two to three percent of Urcott's basedload demand.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, what does it look like going forward? And is

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas a growing market for bitcoin miners.

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Urcott has its own like large load Interconnection Q,

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 2>similar to on the renewable side of Interconnection Q, except

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>for these large loads, and it has about thirty seven

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>gigawatts of these they're most likely duplicate projects and not

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 2>all of them will come online, but we did here

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 2>enough create a project database based on company announcements, and

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>there could be five to six gigawatts in the next

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 2>few years.

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, when you first looked at those numbers, Tom certainly

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>told us what his initial reaction was when you brought

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>them to him. But when you stumbled upon this you

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>know or didn't stumble upon when you researched this particular

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>heart of Texas's energy grid. What was your initial thought.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was an interesting thing to track since there

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of news articles of bitcoin mining flocking

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to Texas and a lot of politicians welcoming them into

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 2>their towns and cities. So we wanted a way to

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>quantify how big of an impact this was, which is

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>why we had to track in on a project a

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 2>project basis and found those massive numbers. And the other

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>thing that was hard to ignore was the amount of

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 2>demand growth that happened last summer. So the previous demand

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>record are caught was seventy five gigawatts set in twenty nineteen,

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 2>and that that held until last summer, and it broke

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 2>the demand record close to a dozen times and reached

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty gigawatts, So that's six gigawatts of peak demand growth.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Is quite rare in other parts of the US to

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 2>have so much load growth, so we wanted to try

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>and measure how much of it was the bitcoin that

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 2>was adding to this tremendous load growth.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So we do know that servers generally do pose an

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for flexibility within an energy system, and I believe

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that you also came across some really interesting examples of

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>where that has happened, specifically with bitcoin. Can you elaborate

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on some of those.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Last July, there was another heat wave in Texas and

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>prices also exploded, and based on quotes and what we

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 2>modeled demand, we saw that around one hundred and fifty

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars per megawatt, based on what the bitcoin price was

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 2>at at that time, was about the break even price

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin. So if anything above it, it made economic

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>sense for these minds to shut off. And that's broadly speaking,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these minds have different efficiencies.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Did many of them take advantage of it?

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think they pretty universally took advantage of

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 4>it because either they have demand response agreements in place,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 4>but if they're exposed to wholesale power prices, it makes

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 4>no sense for them to mine bitcoin at a loss.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 4>And I suppose this kind of speaks to just why

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 4>this is interesting to me, even if I'm not interested

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 4>in bitcoin. Is one thing that makes bitcoin unique as

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>a load, and this is different from other servers, is

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 4>that you can switch it off instantly because effectively, bitcoin

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 4>miners they're trying to randomly guess the answer to a problem,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 4>and periodically they'll hit on the answer and get rewarded

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 4>with some bitcoin and overtime. This averages out into quite

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 4>a sort of easy equation for them to say, how

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 4>much money do we make for every megawa hour we consume?

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 4>But what that means is when the price of power

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 4>gets too high that it's not worth it for them,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 4>they can just switch off instantly. It's not like say

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 4>AI servers or any other kind of server where there's

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 4>ongoing operations that are happening that you can't just switch

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 4>computers off. With bitcoin mining, they really can just instantaneously

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 4>just pause their operations and just wait for the right

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 4>time to switch them on again. So it's kind of

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 4>the ultimate source of flexible demand.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>There was one example of a bitcoin company, Riot Blockchain,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>last July when there was heat waves. They made nine

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 2>point five million dollars from curtailing their operations and selling

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>electricity back to Urkot, which is more than the five

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 2>point six million that they sold that month.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost, well, not quite, but nearly double what

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they would have made if they actually did their core business.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So speaking of a core business, that one might even

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>think is quite synonymous with Texas when we think about

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the oil and gas industry. It's been there for some time,

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and they also have some impact on energy consumption. Would

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you be able to explain whether or not this hazard

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe has not been impacting any of the price bikes.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so oil and gas production out in the Permian,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>which is in the far west region of Texas, has

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 2>tripled them in that region. However, as arcot as a whole,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 2>it's quite low percentage of total energy demand.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So even though it's tripled in the Permian basin, it's actually,

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>just to break it down, not that big of a

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>deal because the overall demand for the total grid is

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>not a big deal.

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's less than ten percent. I believe most of

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the demand comes from the cities in central Texas.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, when do the hottest parts of the year really

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>hit Texas? Because you mentioned that this heat wave that

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>came through was in June, which really is what spurred

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>our conversation. But we're not through summer yet, So what

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>does August look like? Does it have a late summer

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in Texas in it? Should this be something that we

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>should continue to be watching quite closely.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think this heat wave has been unrelenting. So

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 2>in mid June we saw extreme temperatures and Arcott issuing

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 2>a weather watch to customers, and in mid July they

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 2>also issued another weather watch for the extreme heat. August

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 2>has typically been when we've seen these really high power

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>price spikes. Last summer, August cool down compared to April

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to July. So perhaps we could see that that trend

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 2>again of cooling, or we could see even higher temperatures

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>and prices hitting in August.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll definitely be watching the weather. And as we look

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>into the future, you know you'd noted that solar really

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>does occupy this very useful space in the way that

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>electricity is consumed in Texas. Do we forecast that there

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>will be additional solar broad online and that'll continue to

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be a really popular solution for their grid.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Definitely, we see about four to five gigawatts of solar

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>coming online year over year.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So we've come to this section where I don't do

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it on every show, but sometimes I ask some questions

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>that are watcher ignore because you guys are the experts,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and I want to know what things are you keeping

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>closer to the ground on and what sort of things

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are you potentially ignoring for the time being and will

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>resurface in the future as they come up. So I've

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of them for you. In the watcher

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ignorer category. You had noted that it looks like solar

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be increasingly popular or continue to be

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>popular going forward. How about wind?

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Ignore? Oh am, I just am I supposed to give

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>more than just saying that. I thought it was just

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 3>really I want to.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I like that though, that was so clear that you

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't even hesitate for a second time.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that wind. There's already so much wind in Texas,

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 4>and so it will continue to be an important part

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 4>of the energy mix there. And sure there will continue

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 4>to be wind being developed, but it's just getting eclipsed

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 4>by the rate of which solar is being added. So

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I know that we all associate, well we don't all,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 4>but those of us who look at these things associate

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Texas with wind. But I think it's going to be

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 4>more and more that the market is defined by solar,

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of more similar to say California in that regard.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, next, watch or ignore. It feels like the elephant

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>in the room to me, for what is an island

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>grid interconnectors.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's hard to say watch or ignore because I

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 4>feel like what I would say watch because it it

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 4>would benefit so much from it. But I would also

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 4>say ignore because I'm not sure if I actually see

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 4>it happening given the politics around it. I don't know, Natalie,

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 4>you may know more on this than I do.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think when Better O'Rourke was running for governor,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that was one of his policies he wanted to do,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>was to connect or cut to other grids. I'm on

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a similar stance in which it would totally change ERCOT

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>if it connected to the rest of the country. But

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I also don't see that happening anytime soon.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I think there's two factors at play. One is is

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 4>that at some point, if Texas is really interconnected to

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 4>the wider system more broadly than it would have to

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 4>come under the jurisdiction of FIRK, the Federal Energy Regulation Commission,

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and politically Texas wants to remain independent in as many

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 4>ways as possible. So that's one thing, and the other

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 4>is just to generally, in the US, it's hard to

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 4>build transmission lines, even if you have all the political

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 4>will that you could possibly ask for there's so many

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 4>different barriers in sort of terms of regulation, politics, you face.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 4>So it's just that's kind of like the cavalry that

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 4>is never going to come.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So interesting that you say that, Tom, because the show

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's going to follow up next week is actually going

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to be about transmission lines.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 3>Oh cool, so we will get to that.

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Watch this space.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>They might have a different perspective.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're not talking specifically about Arcott, but we will

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the challenges and really the necessity

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>of transmission lines for building out any energy infrastructure. Okay,

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So last in the watch or ignore space, we talked

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier about demand response in a very real way when

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it comes to bitcoin and servers. Are you watching or

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>ignoring demand response and maybe other forms in other companies

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>A watch ooh, a simultaneous watch.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. An elastic demand is kind of the fundamental part

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of power markets. So the fact that we're getting a

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>sizable amount of demand that is price sensitive is a

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 2>very interesting dynamic that has developed an Arcot. It's hard

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 2>to know how much more of these minds are going

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 2>to come online, especially with recent news of bitcoin, but

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 2>beyond bitcoin mining and just generally larger load being responsive

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>to the men and creating that flexibility in the grid

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>with renewables will be a very big thing to watch.

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I co sign all of that, and I

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 4>think that it's not just interesting from a Texas or

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Aircot point of view, and it's not even interesting necessarily

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 4>from a Bitcoin point of view. It's that because you

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 4>have this rapid infusion of flexible demand in air coop

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 4>whilst at the same time a lot of renewables are

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.239
<v Speaker 4>being added, there are lessons that we can learn that

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 4>can be applied when we think about the future of

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 4>the energy transition, where it's not necessarily Bitcoin, but there

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 4>might be other forms of flexible demand. And it's just

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 4>the sort of the responsiveness, and as Natalie says, the

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 4>price in elasticity is, we see it in so much

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 4>more of a real time and responsive way in AERCOP

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 4>that it's a little bit like a science lab. So

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 4>you don't have to agree with urcot's market design or

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Texas politics, but at least take an interest in what's

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 4>happening in ERKOP because I think that there are some

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 4>important lessons for other markets about how to go about

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the energy transition that can be learned, and that flexible

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 4>demand that bitcoin is providing is a big part of

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 4>that lesson.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an excellent final thought to end on.

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Natalie Tom, thank you very much for joining me on

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the show today.

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having us.

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Jana.

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg n EF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>LP in its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>should it be construed, as investment advice, investment recommendations, or

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a NEF should not be considered as information sufficient upon

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in this recording, and any liability as a result of

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this recording is expressly disclaimed.