WEBVTT - Surveillance: Record Jobless Claims with Porcelli

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Phone. Again.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm pleased to say is David Kelly of JP Morgan

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management, Lead Chief Global Strategist. David always great to

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you in a round about one hour

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half. We're going to have some dreadful data

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>in the United States for America. It won't surprise many

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>people that it's ugly. It will be ugly. But how

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>should we be thinking about some of these data points

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>as they come in through the next couple of weeks. David, Well,

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we should not overreact to them. What we've

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they are going to be ugly. I mean, we could

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>get two million new unemployment claims that would be three

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>times the highest number we've ever scene. That could be

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>followed up by another few weeks of similar things. So

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the unemployee rate could quickly go above ten

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>percent UM. Ten point eight percent is the highest that

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen since the Great depression. We could we could

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hit that. That's all pretty ugly, But look at what's

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in terms of government action here to try

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and take the sting and the pain out of this.

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the release build of the Senate just passed

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>earlier this morning will provide the ability for a lot

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of workers to to get past this period and be

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>able to pay their rent and pay their their bills. Um.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think the idea is to rehold the economy

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and suspended animation until we get control of this virus.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And we will eventually do that. I mean, that's the

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>other thing. It's it's a long time, you know, A

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>year seems like a long time to wait for a vaccine.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But when we get a vaccine, this thing is done. Um.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not endless, um, but it is obviously painful

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the interim. Let's think a little bit more deeply

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>about that particular package. There as some people out there

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that it won't prevent a recession. While it's not

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>designed to prevent a recession. It's about limiting the damage

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and building a bridge through this very very tough time

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and over some very troubled waters. So two big objectives

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for a plan like this prevent more defaults and obviously

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>limit layoffs. Do you think it can do that? Well,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure there's actually gonna limit the layoffs. I

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it may for some companies because there is obviously

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this in which there's small business loans

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>which you're which essential you get, um, you can you

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>can the read small business grants, you can use them

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for payroll. So I think that may actually limit some

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>layoffs and they may have some impact on the unemployment rate.

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But as you say, I mean, you know, I regard

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of as night quill for the social distancing recession,

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, we don't actually have something that's

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>going to cure the common Code where we can reduce

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>its symptoms. And this is the way of reducing the symptoms,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the painful symptoms of recession. Um, we'll have to see

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on the layoffs, because it works two ways. Yes, we've

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>given incentives to small businesses not to file front employment

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>or the layoff workers. But actually that's six hundred dollar

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>payment um per week on eployment benefits that actually gives

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>an incentive to workers to actually get laid off. I mean,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>the average unemployment benefit being paid in January five dollars.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Now you're saying it's going to be nine five dollars

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a week. That's basic a thousand dollars a week, fifty

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>two dollars a year. There are an awful lot of workers,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly these uh these industries that are most effectives. We

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't making anything like fifty two dollars a year. So

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it actually technically makes sense for them to say the employee,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for keeping on the books, would

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you mind firing me please so I can connect these

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits the next four weeks four months and then

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and then let's talk David Kelly brilliantly said, and this

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>goes you know, Lindsey Graham of the Carolinas was talking

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about this as well, which is the incentives in the

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>perverse incentives and the constructive and that we're setting up.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What is your reading on the history of this wall

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of money and what it does to the incentives of

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a nation. Well, I think I mean, at least it's

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>temporary because you know, you want you want to prevent hardship,

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you send out a check to people in cash, um,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know at the start, that does help. But there

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is there is some perverse incentive there. And you do

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>want people who can work work from home or work

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>remotely or whatever. You know, as you say you're gonna

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>do yoga instruction over the internet, fine do it. You

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have an incentive to say, well, I can't do

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is because I have to go down to claim unemployment benefits.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are some problems in it. I

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>understand the creaky system. This is the only way they

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>could actually get the money out fast, and I get that,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 1>but there is there is that problem. And and also

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, all this cash, it's not actually going to

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>stimulate economic activity because what are you gonna do with

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the money? I mean, what can people do that all

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the fun stuff in life have been closed down. So

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna sit on it. But that also

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>means that when the virus, when we have a vaccine

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and people can actually spend the money, we're gonna have

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a real surgeon economic activity. I have a huge problem

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with this, folks. And so much of this is anecdotal

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>incomes from you know, the experience along the way. How

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is it a a David Kelly a zillion years ago

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on a Livia blanch Yard still it up and put

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up a chart and he said, look, there's been a

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>huge drop here in nominal GDP and real g d P.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the glide path back and someday out there we

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>get back to normal. Can we just assume that X

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>number of quarters or years out everything gets back to

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>normal and the government basically gets to lower the depth

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't cured in the heart of this crisis. Well

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we could. So the first part. Can the economy get

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>back to normal? Absolutely? Once you know, they may be

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>slightly different companies. There will be some companies that die

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in there some companies that's that will be born. But

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>once we have the old clear here on the disease,

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this economy will want to get back to full employment.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think it can do that now, whether the

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>government has the discipline to fade to fade out all

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>these these things and take the hard choices which it

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't taken to this point. I mean, remember in the

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>last few years before this, we were running a boom

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>economy and we ran up a depit to almost five

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of GDP, which is utterly reckless. So we do

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that in the best of times, Do we really think

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have the splene to Washington to

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>cut the depth afterwards. I'm pretty skeptical of that. So

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy and get back to normal, But I don't

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>think that's Washington is going to be disciplined, John, Tom,

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you say yeah that many times I ask you, we're

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>going to ask a question, you can ask you a question.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just joined David Kelly. John, I'm getting used to

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this working at home. I bet you are, and I'm

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sure ever one of the studio I was getting used

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to it too. It might not want your home, they

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>might want to keep you there, David. Great to have

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you with us on the program. Key of JP Morgan

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. Let's bring a temple Sally shown. We NBC

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets chief US economist Tom We knew the number

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to be bad. There's a lot of economic

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>pain behind that economic statistic. Walk me through how we

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>should be processing a number like that in the weeks

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to come. I mean, let let me first start by saying, honest, see,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we thought that there was a risk and that we

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>could be even worse than that. Um, you know, we're

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we're we're trying to I's we're in a period where

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the standard economic data that we all like

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to look at, economists like to look at. UM. You know,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not really gonna be very helpful right now.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're trying to find sort of you know, let's

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>call it alternative data that that we can sort of

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>scour to try to get a sense for you know,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>how how how the backdrop is UM evolving on a

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on a live basis. UM. And you know, one thing

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we found was this this sort of interesting piece of

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>data from something called home Base. UM. The whole home

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Base is basically a company that that allows UH small

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>businesses to to you know, manage schedules and etcetera, etcetera. UM.

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And so when when when we were looking at that

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>recently UM. And the great thing about this data it

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>actually comes in daily UM. And when we were looking

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at that data, I mean that that data really started

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to scare the heck out of us. I mean we

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we literally thought that you could see a five to

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ten million claims number today. UM. So so three million UM. Honest,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think relative to expectations, UH is is actually pretty modest.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, you know, I think that's the futures

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are even responding to it. I mean futures are taking

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>back some under decline. So, um, look, I think the

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>reality is as we go forward on a go on

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a go forward basis, you know, I think that this

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is just the beginning of claims remaining incredibly elevated. Um. Again,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that will like this home base, I think

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are are are really indicative of some real payment labor

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>back drop, Tom Persolle, what is the average income of

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>those three points three million people? What kind of jobs

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>are those? You have a some rough statistic of what

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the average take home pay is of all this? Well,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what what I would say. What I would

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>say is this if you look at you sort of

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 1>where some of the again, if we if we were

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>just using this, I mean, I'm giving these guys this

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>free plug, you know, if we keep on using this

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>home base. Um, I think it's really interesting if if

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of where where the really big

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>declines came from, some of the really big declines came

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and see what we would define a sort of more

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the lower income areas. So you know,

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>food and drink, um, you know that saw some very

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sizable declines. Um, personal care saw some very sizable declines.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>So right now. I think it's very easy to make

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the case that a lot of the jobs that are

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>being lost are in the lower income spectrum. Tom. One

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that we've been talking a lot about is the

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>speed of this happening and the speed of the response

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or lack thereof, in terms of trying to prevent companies

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>from laying people off to start with. And perhaps one

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>way to read this number is the layoffs have already

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>begun to such a degree in mass that there is

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a question how much is reversible At this point, we

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are expecting the bill to pass in Congress shortly. But

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective, given the fact that we're seeing the

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>layoffs already taking place in a mass way, how concerning

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is it that this damage is irreversible in the short term? No,

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I I I yeah, I wouldn't take that that that

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tapped on this. I would say that if in fact,

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I would even take the opposite view. I think if

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you actually you can seem the massive amount of layoffs

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>straight away, and then you can start to plane out

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on on some level. Right, So the question then becomes

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>how long is social distancing going to remain in place? Um,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, the degree which it is in place

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, and and and that's where this is

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a very time sensitive conversation, which again I think it's

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>an idea that is being is elusive to a lot

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of folks. So if this goes until the end of April, right,

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say, you know, extreme social distancing in the United

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>States goes to the end of April, um, you know,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>then it's really easy, you know easy, then you can

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>actually come to a reasonable conclusion on what sort of

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>growth is going to be um, you know, and and

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>so again this is really illustrative. So so just bear

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with me for a second. So right now we're looking

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>for you know about let's just end say round numbers

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent decline in Q two growth. And that's

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>assuming that severe social distancing basically starts to come to

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>an end towards the end of April, you know, sort

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of beginning of May. If we slide that out, we

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>slide out social distancing, extreme social distance to the to

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of May instead, then all of a sudden,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>O minus ten becomes minus right, So do you see

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the time center. So there's sort of a sliding scale

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on this, and that's why I say time sensitivities is

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>critical because if all of a sudden, you know, uh,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know Dr Fauci or or um uh, you know,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the other folks that that are talking about

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, if all of a sudden they say, hey,

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the numbers are starting to um stabilize. Um,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're getting toward the peak. Once you get

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>toward the peak, whenever that might be, that's when you

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you can actually start to have the conversation of Okay,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>now we can talk about how we're going to reopen things, um.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And so to me, that's that's that's a critical part

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>part of this conversations all about time. So if all

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden that happens in the next handful of weeks, UM,

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>then I don't think this necessarily has to keep on

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>going south. I think you can actually get some stabilization.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>To be clear here, then you can't really have a

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>second half call until we get to the end of April.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Would that be fair? I mean, well, I have to

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have a second half call getting a really clear look

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>at the outlook. Yeah, Jonathan, I think you're you're hitting

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>the nail on the head. It's really difficult to know

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>what the second half is going to be until we

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>all know what what social distancing and the degree to

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>which we are willing to take that UM is going

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to look like UM. But right now, again, if if

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>our view that you know, this is basically an end

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of April beginning of May UM issue, then you know

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you can easily have a rebound in in the second

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>half of the year. Can we just talk about where

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got to in the space of a month, Tom,

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It is absolutely remarkable. We started this month with FED

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>funds in and around where once seventy five, and we've

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>cut down a hundred and fifty basis points. We've got

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Quee helicopter money and an initial jobless claims print three

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>four or five million that some people think we might

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get in the coming weeks as well, in the space

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of waste. Tom, Yeah, it's been dramatic.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>And again, I think the others have tried to make

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this point, UM, including us and and and I'll try

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to make it again. I think what we have to

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind is that you know, this is something

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that that we're forcing, right, We're forcing this right, We're

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we're we're making people stay home. I mean, it's it's

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it has a critical idea. You know, if this was

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a stand you know, standard recessions are are very different

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>than than than what we're living through right right now. Um.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is something in a lot of ways

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because of social distancing. You know, we have we have

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>created a dynamics obviously for our health. I mean, it's

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>something we obviously need to do. Um. So again that's

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>why I say it depends how long that goes on

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for because you can unwind it. Um, It's just this

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>a question of time. The longer it goes, the more

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>damage you're gonna you're gonna leave in its wake. Yeah. Well,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Tom Vinnydale Juda is making a really good point. Hats

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>off to the state agencies for processing all of these

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>claims and the idea that you know, all of these

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>people did file to receive unemployment benefits and they are

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be receiving some income in very short order.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there any silver lining in that that you can

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>take away? You mean, meaning what the fact that they're

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be receiving their unemployment insurance benefits. I mean

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that that basically is long that it's not a huge

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>disruption completely to the point where people won't be able

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to afford food unless you live on the Upper east

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Side next to Tom. I mean, you know, far be

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it for me to um to to you know, judge

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>how other people are going to deal with any situation

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not here to do that. You know, I'm

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that this is going to be extremely painful for

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for some people, and some people will be able to

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>endure it. I'm just fine. You know that that's for

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>other people to comment on. But what I would say

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is it's very clear given some of the plans that

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have been coming out of Washington d c UM that

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously individuals are focused. I mean, they're going

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to upsize unemployment insurance claims, uh, the the amount that

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get. They're also going to extend out the

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>period over which you get unemployment insurance claims. So there, there,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot, there's a lot being done. Chairman Palm

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and NBC earlier this morning speaking to Main Street Tom

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for Sally Tom, we've been critical of the chairman in

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the past. Your take on his performance and the Federal

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>reserves moves over the last couple of weeks, it's not

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>need to see some signs of success. Yeah, No, Jonathan

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a fan. I like what they've done, um,

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'm i'm I'm obviously not talking about

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is today's show appearance. Um, you know, I mean in

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just terms of the bigger the programs up there laying

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>out there, I think that they were aggressive. Um. You know.

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>They they didn't wait. Um, they had a lot of

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>these teat up already because of the the financial crisis. Um,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and so they just started unloading. I mean in a

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways. It was funny in a lot of ways.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>They put that these some of these programs so quickly. Um.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I got a phone call from from one of our

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>front end traders and they said, hey, we don't know

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>what the settlement instructions are for one of these programs. Um.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Because the programs were just coming out with in mass

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and so quick, um that some of the data weren't

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>um easy to find. So I'm I'm a fan. I

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of what they have put a lot

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus in place between monetary and fiscal authorities. And

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and again, if we're right that this thing can actually

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if we can start to see easing, not not a

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>completely going away, but in easing and social distancing UM

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>by the end of April beginning of May. UM, there's

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so much stimulus in place, and I think calling for

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty a pretty good rebound in the second half

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a year. It's not a stretch what in the second half.

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Quite clearly, the FETES objective would be to provide some

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>stimulus for recovery, but in the media term, it's to

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>provide some easy to financial conditions and to really target

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with market functioning ill market functioning. Tom. Some

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of the problems of last couple of weeks, have they

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>eased a lot a little bit. What's your assessment of that?

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, my my assessment speaking with some of our

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>traders is that they're they're starting the process of easing. UM.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>There's there, there's no question about that. That That doesn't mean

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that the problems are gone, but you have to start

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>somewhere UM and and the somewhere as things things seem

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to be getting better from a from a liquidity perspective, UM,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not that they're they're they're they're completely healed, but

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they're they're starting the process of getting better. Top of obvious.

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>My best to you in the team over obviously anti

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you and yours as well. Tom always great to get

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on this program or just cough a lot.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go this is important. I had a lot of

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>really good emails about coughing. And the good news is

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they brought in a nurse. Surveillance brought in a nurse

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and she's from an island self of Manila for one

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the tribes, the Manyan tribe, and it's I'm drinking

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>some teeth. It's absolutely undrinkable. I mean, dr Leslie vinjer Murray,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>would this teeth it's got it's got in its stuff

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Central Park reservoir and what's kidding? That's it's

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>why your coffee totally drink up any something stronger than that.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>This morning, let's bring in lens of Leslie Vinja Murray

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Showery Channel House head of US in America's program, Leslie.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic to catch up with you. The Senator grink on

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a bill with this guy through the house with these

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>oh absolutely, you know. I think there was a question

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of whether it would go through without anybody needing to

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>come back. It looks like that's not going to happen,

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like they will vote tomorrow morning. It

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>will go right through and UM the President Trump will

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>find it office. Is an extraordinary package comes out an

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary time. UM. There have been a lot of concessions

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>on both sides have been up. It's bipartisan, you know,

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the lessons of two thousand and eight. But

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats have drawn that have and they've used to

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>push for oversight of that money that's going to be

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>used to you know, to give loans two small and

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>medium sized businesses to to you know, think about helping

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the airlines industry. The woul have been incorporated into UM,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>into the package. So I think we're seeing a lot

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a lot of concessions because people recognize

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that there needs to be a response to an economy

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that's basically being shut down by this pandemic. Dr Vin Jamura.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>A lot of eyes are on the United States, in

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>part because it is the becoming quickly becoming the epicenter

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus, and also because it is the world's

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest economy. There is a question about calling it a stimulus,

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that that is inaccurate. This is an effort to plug

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of the whole. How much of the whole

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>will this plug if this is it, if this is

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus, if you want to call it that that

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we get, how much does it sort of stave off

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the decline? Well, look, we can't answer that question until

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we have some sense of how effective the response will

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>be to dealing with the real problem, which you've rightly noted,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is the health crisis caused by this pandemic. And so

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have a push on testing, on ventilators,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>on coordinating the product and distribution of protective equipment that

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we need in the hospital desperately in New York, in California,

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of the United States, if that response

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do what it needs to do in a timely way,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>then of course the economic question is going to come

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>right back to us, because it's a it's a result

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of of America's drive to actually deal with um, the

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the pressure on our hospitals and the pressure on our

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>communities and the people that are you know, staying home

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>not because they don't have jobs, but because businesses are closed.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk also about the state response, but

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>his New York State has come out and slam the bill,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.239
<v Speaker 1>saying that it was completely inadequate. The amount that was

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>attributed to New York. Uh, they're basically saying that this

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>virus is not hitting all regions evenly. What's your sense

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of that in terms of how much the support was

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>skewed toward different interests, toward different groups or is it

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of a very fair look at the virus, it's

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>impact and how to stop some the decline look. I

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>think the first thing to note is that it is

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary package. We have never seen anything like that.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And the focus on direct cash payments to people who

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are out of work, the focus on unemployment, the focus

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on getting supporting businesses so that they can keep people

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, not turning up every day, but they don't

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have to get rid of their jobs. That if they

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>do that the loans will be you know, forgiven. As

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there's oversight. This is all extraordinarily important. Of course, there

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>were lots of interest pushing for different things. We saw

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the size of the package double and you know, virtually

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>double over the course of you know, several several days.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>New York State isn't a difficult position, and the need

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for the medical equipment is the number one concern, and

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not only the money for it, but actually get firms

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>directing them to put their effort into manufacturing those those

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>products and distributing them in a way that is cognizant

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at a very different needs. Right now across the country.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>The trend, the trend here, the ramp up of this

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>fiscal support is tangible. John has mentioned that, of course,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>folks over the last number of days, Leslie vin Ja

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Murray's with us with Chad a mouse. Leslie, you're maybe

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the most qualified person I can imagine, working out of London,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of understanding the social differences of how politicians are approaching

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this in America versus in Europe. What's the major distinction

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic debate among politicians in America versus what

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you observe on continental Europe in the United Kingdom. Well,

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there are two things. You know, Europeans,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's sweeping generalization, but it does hold

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>true have been more committed to national health systems, to

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>UH responses that are coordinated from the center. UM And

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in some ways you can argue know America coming closer

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to Europe, it's moving to the left, moving closer to Europe.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And questions of unemployment, unemployment insurance. But the big difference

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>still is that we are seeing a federally driven response

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>responsiveness in the in the U S. And that's very

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>different from what's happening in Europe and Europe it's coming

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>from the center. The States, the fifty states you know,

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>across the United States are taking very horrent policies that

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>driving resources. They're making good decisions about medical responses, so

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that we don't see a central response in the same

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>way in the US yet. But I think that's going

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to change. It's gonna have to change. Dr Benjaburry, thank

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Let's Sevenjaburry is with Chatham House joining

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>us from Maine right now. Karen Mills her service to

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the nation to President Obama is the twenty three administrator

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Small Business Administration. We're thrilled she could Jonas

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the shadow of Bowden College, UH this morning. Karen,

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being with us. It is

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>truly an unprecedented moment because of those three point three

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>million claims and the many more to come. So many

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are linked in and tied to small business. What do

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>we need to do for small business? What is the

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>urgency given the shock of this statistic, Well, I would

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>estimate that more than half of those three point three

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>million jobs that we saw lost in the last week

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>or two are from small businesses. And the reason is

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that small businesses have very low cash buffers, and if

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they have twenty six days of cash on hand and

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to shut the doors, then they don't have

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>any choice. There's nothing coming in and in three weeks

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll be dead. So they need to let their employees go.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, half of the people who work in

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this country own or work for a small busines nous,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>So on a normal day, that's half the jobs. But

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I bet it's more than half of the three point

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>three So, karenly, given what we know from some press

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>reports coming out about the Senate of fiscal stimulus plan,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what's in that plan for small business? Well, the good

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>news is that there is a lot in that plan

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for small business. In the fiscal crisis in two thousand nine,

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we actually lost one point eight million small business laws

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of jobs in the first quarter of two thousand nine

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and I had to jump up and down in the

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>White House to make sure they're paying attention to small businesses.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But not so today, everybody has figured out that this

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is a crisis. There's three hundred and forty nine billion

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars with a B for loans to small businesses, which

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>will be forgiven if they are used to pay payroll

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and rent and UH interests on loans. So I think

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the bill has it right which get money into the

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>hands of small businesses to keep them solvent. That the

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks is the period where you can get loan forgiveness,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>so they're planning on at least eight weeks in this bill, Karen,

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The Small Business Administration is sort of like that final

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>scene in the movie of Raiders of a Lost Arc

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>where they go into you know, the cavernous building and

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out where the arc is and all that.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>There's there's an implied bureaucracy here. Give us the true

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>story of the bureaucracy of the Small Business Administration in Washington. Well,

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is government, so it does not turn

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on a dime. It's more like an ocean liner. But

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it does know how to get money out to small businesses.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And the trick here is that it actually uses three

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of American's banks. So there's two questions. Can the

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>banks get going quickly and can the s b A

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and try inasury make it easy enough to push that

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>money out. Usually there's a whole bunch of gating issues,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and this bill takes a lot of them away. I

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think somebody was smart in that room when they were

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>writing it, because they're removing impediments. I'm I heard Steve

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>miniche and say this should be a streamline process in

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a week. But frankly, I'm worried, and I'm worried about

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the banks. They need to do some things on their

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>end to get the money out, and I'm worried that

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they won't be motivated to do it quickly enough for

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the small businesses. So, and Karen's interesting, So give us

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. Hearing you had experience with the two thousand

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>two nine recession, how bad do you think it's going

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to be for small businesses here over the you know,

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the next several months and throughout the year. Well, it's

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be terrible because their business just went away. And

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>as we said, like individuals, they have very little reserved

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So if we can keep them solvent for the period

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>of time that they're closed, then we have a chance

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of bringing them back or most of them back. And

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the good pieces of this legislation is that

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>actually covers sole proprietorships. There's twenty four million of the

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty million small businesses are just one person who runs

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a business and that's their livelihood. So they are eligible

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to pay themselves through these loans and have it all forgiven.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think if we can keep people going, then their

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>business can come back when demand comes back. Nothing the

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Fed can do to stimulate the economy is going to

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>work until these businesses can open their doors. So it

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>depends a lot on whether it's eight weeks or longer. Karen,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Karen mills with us of course

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>formly with a small business Administration greatly appreciate her ability

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be with us by today. Thanks for listening to the

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.