1
00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:06,320
Speaker 1: The process was a sham um. I don't think you

2
00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:10,399
Speaker 1: can look at impeachment hearings without getting the documents. That's

3
00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:12,840
Speaker 1: House would have to get the documents, and the Attorney

4
00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:17,799
Speaker 1: General is shielding documents. So that was one of the

5
00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:20,160
Speaker 1: presidential candidates that came out over the weekend. That was

6
00:00:20,200 --> 00:00:25,000
Speaker 1: Amy Klobucher demanding either more investigation or outright impeachment or

7
00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:28,760
Speaker 1: resignation from Brett Kavanaugh, one of our Supreme Court justices.

8
00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:31,640
Speaker 1: A whole bunch of the candidates piled on with that,

9
00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:33,760
Speaker 1: based on a New York Times story that came out

10
00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:37,640
Speaker 1: over the weekend. I'm not sure I've seen a more

11
00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:43,839
Speaker 1: naked parade of ridiculousness impeachment, you know, except the previous

12
00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:48,320
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh go around. Impeachment calls came from Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren,

13
00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:55,520
Speaker 1: Beattell Rourke, Julian Castro, among others. Molly Hemingway is not

14
00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:58,680
Speaker 1: only the co author with Kerry Saverino of Justice on Trial,

15
00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:01,000
Speaker 1: the Kavanaugh Confirmation in the Future of the Supreme Court,

16
00:01:01,040 --> 00:01:03,200
Speaker 1: but she is the person who apparently single landedly went

17
00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:07,120
Speaker 1: through the book and uh and first exposed It's notable exposed.

18
00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:10,440
Speaker 1: It's notable flaws over the weekend, and Molly joins us. Now, Molly,

19
00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:13,800
Speaker 1: how are you great? Good to be here with you. Well, thanks,

20
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:16,559
Speaker 1: it's it's great to talk to you again. So, when

21
00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:20,880
Speaker 1: you got word of this New York Times story, take

22
00:01:20,959 --> 00:01:23,360
Speaker 1: us through your day, what how did you react? What

23
00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:27,640
Speaker 1: did you do? Well? As you know, as I talked

24
00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:29,399
Speaker 1: with you before when I was on the show, My

25
00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:32,839
Speaker 1: co author Carrie Saberino, and I wrote Justice on Trial,

26
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:35,840
Speaker 1: which is this definitive book on what happened during the confirmation.

27
00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:38,839
Speaker 1: So we were interested in what this book would say,

28
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:40,440
Speaker 1: and we saw what they put out in the New

29
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:44,080
Speaker 1: York Times and it seemed very flimsy. But I also

30
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,119
Speaker 1: just read the book and noticed that they didn't include

31
00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:52,080
Speaker 1: a major important piece of information in their article. So

32
00:01:52,120 --> 00:01:55,160
Speaker 1: the article is about how someone heard from someone who

33
00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:58,120
Speaker 1: talked to another person about a supposed incident, and so

34
00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:01,080
Speaker 1: they say this should have been investigated. It's unclear why

35
00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:03,640
Speaker 1: they think it rose to the level of needing investigation,

36
00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:06,440
Speaker 1: even if it were true. But in the book they

37
00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:10,600
Speaker 1: reveal the alleged victim, such as it were, says she

38
00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:14,040
Speaker 1: has no recollection of any such incident. They kept that

39
00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:17,399
Speaker 1: out of the New York Times. This story went viral yesterday.

40
00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:20,840
Speaker 1: It led every evening newscast. Everyone said, there's a credible

41
00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,399
Speaker 1: new allegation against Brett Kavanaugh. It turned out it's not credible.

42
00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:27,200
Speaker 1: It's also not new. It didn't even rise to the

43
00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:31,400
Speaker 1: standard last year of Senate Democrats taking it seriously. Um

44
00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:33,600
Speaker 1: Apparently it was told to a couple of Senate Democrats

45
00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:35,919
Speaker 1: and they were willing to share all sorts of ridiculous

46
00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,680
Speaker 1: stuff with for being further investigated. I will remind you

47
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:43,960
Speaker 1: of the alleged rape boat in Rhode Island, the nationwide

48
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:47,720
Speaker 1: crime spree that that the judge Kavanaugh was supposedly engaged in.

49
00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:51,880
Speaker 1: Those things were taken more seriously than this claim. So

50
00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:55,200
Speaker 1: it's not new, it's not credible. The alleged victim says

51
00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:57,920
Speaker 1: she has no recollection of it, and yet our media

52
00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,520
Speaker 1: not just went wild there continuing to go wild over it,

53
00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:05,239
Speaker 1: and they are encouraging Democrats to call for impeachment based

54
00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:08,520
Speaker 1: on nothing. This is why Carrie and I wrote the book,

55
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:11,040
Speaker 1: because we wanted to have the definitive history down, because

56
00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:13,920
Speaker 1: we knew the media would try to reimagine everything and

57
00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:16,040
Speaker 1: come up with new things to make it sound like

58
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:19,280
Speaker 1: what happened last year wasn't as ridiculous as as it was.

59
00:03:19,919 --> 00:03:21,919
Speaker 1: And uh, and that's why we got all those facts

60
00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:24,200
Speaker 1: down and kind of laid out what their game plan is,

61
00:03:24,280 --> 00:03:26,720
Speaker 1: which is exactly what we're going through right now. I

62
00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:29,280
Speaker 1: read the New York Times book review every Saturday night.

63
00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:33,440
Speaker 1: Did they review your book about Kavanaugh? The only mention

64
00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:36,160
Speaker 1: in the New York Times of our book, which again

65
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:39,480
Speaker 1: based on more than a hundred interviews with Supreme Court justices,

66
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:43,480
Speaker 1: high level people in the White House, senators, people close

67
00:03:43,480 --> 00:03:46,120
Speaker 1: to the blasi Ford family, people close to the Kavanaugh family.

68
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:48,520
Speaker 1: The only mentioned has been when they admit that it's

69
00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,240
Speaker 1: a best seller, so they put it on their best

70
00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:53,520
Speaker 1: seller list. But they have never reported on our bombshell

71
00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:57,520
Speaker 1: news that we've broken, um, you know, even stuff that's

72
00:03:57,560 --> 00:04:01,160
Speaker 1: not particularly political, such as how Justice Kennedy retired, or

73
00:04:01,160 --> 00:04:04,000
Speaker 1: what the Kavanaugh family was going through as they were

74
00:04:04,080 --> 00:04:06,840
Speaker 1: going through the nomination process, or the fact that Leland

75
00:04:06,920 --> 00:04:10,560
Speaker 1: Kaiser does not believe her friend, which we reported first

76
00:04:10,640 --> 00:04:13,960
Speaker 1: got no mentioned. By the way, this book from these

77
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:17,919
Speaker 1: New York Times reporters also admits that, but they say

78
00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:20,800
Speaker 1: that they don't believe her that they don't care that

79
00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:23,880
Speaker 1: she doesn't believe her friend. Their gut tells them to

80
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:27,640
Speaker 1: believe um, Christine Bladiford, even though they found no evidence

81
00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:30,040
Speaker 1: in support of her allegations. I'm not exaggerating by the

82
00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:33,159
Speaker 1: way they literally say their gut tells them to believe

83
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:35,400
Speaker 1: her in the absence of evidence. What the heck is

84
00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:38,800
Speaker 1: in this book? I mean that's some thin gruel. I

85
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:41,000
Speaker 1: mean that's using a Karta paint to try to paint

86
00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:44,839
Speaker 1: your entire house. Men, You are spread that thin. I

87
00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:47,240
Speaker 1: saw someone say it's like they got a big contract

88
00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:49,400
Speaker 1: to come up with all sorts of dirt about Kavanaugh,

89
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:51,920
Speaker 1: failed to come up with any dirt, but turned in

90
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:55,880
Speaker 1: a manuscript anyway. So it is it's a lot of saying, um,

91
00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:58,760
Speaker 1: it's it's a lot of gossip, s marring and and

92
00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:04,080
Speaker 1: anonymous claims, but nothing even really salacious. The only thing

93
00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:06,920
Speaker 1: that you could even kind of call new, which isn't

94
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:09,280
Speaker 1: new because it came out last year to Senate Democrats,

95
00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:13,040
Speaker 1: is this mysterious claim from a Clinton attorney that's denied

96
00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:16,360
Speaker 1: by the alleged victims. We're talking with Molly Hemingway, who

97
00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:18,880
Speaker 1: wrote the book Justice on Trial. The Kavanaugh confirmation in

98
00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:21,760
Speaker 1: the future of the Supreme Court, and she pretty much

99
00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:24,960
Speaker 1: single handedly forced the New York Times to alter their

100
00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:27,279
Speaker 1: story that they ran over the weekend and uh and

101
00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:29,719
Speaker 1: delve into their social media and change some things around.

102
00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:33,320
Speaker 1: You know. My to me, the lasting headline out of this,

103
00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:35,520
Speaker 1: I think Kavina will be fine and it'll settle down

104
00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:36,960
Speaker 1: and it will be one of these two day dust

105
00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,440
Speaker 1: ups um, partially because you set the record straight. But

106
00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:44,480
Speaker 1: the lasting impression to me is the New York Times

107
00:05:44,560 --> 00:05:48,160
Speaker 1: is just willing to do anything. We need to have

108
00:05:48,279 --> 00:05:50,719
Speaker 1: some news outlets out there that we we all trust

109
00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:52,760
Speaker 1: and believe in, at least some we all know that

110
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:57,440
Speaker 1: they're politically slanted. But man, this it's eroding even already

111
00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,440
Speaker 1: my lack of respect for the New York Times. It's

112
00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:02,400
Speaker 1: not just the New York Times, though you saw that

113
00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,440
Speaker 1: the Washington Post took this false story and ran with it.

114
00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:07,920
Speaker 1: They're trying to buttress the claim and they're kind of

115
00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:09,919
Speaker 1: just moving past the fact that it's all based on

116
00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:14,560
Speaker 1: a false premise. Major broadcast media lead their news shows

117
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:17,279
Speaker 1: with it last night and this morning, even after the

118
00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:19,840
Speaker 1: correction was made to the piece. It is not just

119
00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:22,960
Speaker 1: the Times. The Times is particularly egregious, but we have

120
00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:28,039
Speaker 1: actual corruption riddled throughout our corporate media and it needs

121
00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:30,480
Speaker 1: to be so. I don't wish I had a good

122
00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:32,839
Speaker 1: answer of what needs to happen, What people need to

123
00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:36,159
Speaker 1: stop falling for anything UM that is being put out

124
00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:39,080
Speaker 1: that does not have corroboration. They need to demand more

125
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,280
Speaker 1: of people. They need to convey just how frustrated they

126
00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:47,159
Speaker 1: are with these media folks who just run wild and

127
00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:50,520
Speaker 1: have no concern for the truth. Well, ironically, I think

128
00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:54,720
Speaker 1: some of our formerly respected, most respected media outlets are

129
00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:57,400
Speaker 1: pulling down their pants and saying, look at me, look

130
00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:00,279
Speaker 1: at me. So one of the comments on your Twitter

131
00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:02,000
Speaker 1: feed that I really enjoyed, and this ring is so

132
00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:05,240
Speaker 1: true in my life, people, I deal with UM and

133
00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:08,240
Speaker 1: talk to you about politics. It was John who commented

134
00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:11,960
Speaker 1: that the Kavanaugh railroad is the most politically clarifying event

135
00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:13,960
Speaker 1: in my life and is why is The New York

136
00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:16,920
Speaker 1: Times seems intent on reminding us I will crawl over

137
00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:19,920
Speaker 1: broken glass to vote for a guy don't particularly like

138
00:07:20,520 --> 00:07:23,520
Speaker 1: next year. Jack and I were discussing this earlier. I

139
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:27,080
Speaker 1: don't think the left understands how they are driving people

140
00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,920
Speaker 1: uh into being Trump voters, well, there is a problem

141
00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:33,920
Speaker 1: with them being in an echo chamber where they all

142
00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:37,680
Speaker 1: reinforced themselves. And I think what's interesting is all of this,

143
00:07:37,960 --> 00:07:41,240
Speaker 1: the Kavanaugh situation but also the Russia hoax, are the

144
00:07:41,320 --> 00:07:44,320
Speaker 1: result of people being unable to accept the fact that

145
00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:46,960
Speaker 1: they lost an election, and so they break all sorts

146
00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:50,960
Speaker 1: of norms and procedures and ways that we have of

147
00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:54,480
Speaker 1: interacting with each other, all in an attempt to oust someone,

148
00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:57,000
Speaker 1: whether that's Trump or Kavanaugh. I think what was so

149
00:07:57,120 --> 00:08:00,800
Speaker 1: clarifying about the Kavanaugh experience was that we're as with Trump,

150
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,080
Speaker 1: you could say, I don't like it, but he seems

151
00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:05,320
Speaker 1: to be a kind of, you know, kind of character.

152
00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:08,680
Speaker 1: With Kavanaugh, this is a guy who spent decades establishing

153
00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:12,200
Speaker 1: probably one of the best reputations of any man in America,

154
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:15,720
Speaker 1: who has friends who are willing to do anything for

155
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:17,480
Speaker 1: him because of what a good friend he's been, how

156
00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:20,120
Speaker 1: well he has treated women. To see that they would

157
00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:24,120
Speaker 1: do this even to this man was so clarifying that

158
00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:27,160
Speaker 1: it wasn't you know, it's not about whether Donald Trump

159
00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:31,120
Speaker 1: is has an ambiguous moral morality or whatever. This is

160
00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:34,520
Speaker 1: about the desire to destroy people who are politically on

161
00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:36,439
Speaker 1: the other side of you, and there was no way

162
00:08:36,480 --> 00:08:38,199
Speaker 1: you could look at what happened and come up with

163
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:41,160
Speaker 1: a different conclusion unless you were part of that far left.

164
00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:45,280
Speaker 1: Molly Hemingway and Carrie Savorino's book is Justice on Trial,

165
00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:48,079
Speaker 1: the Kavanaugh Confirmation, in the Future of the Supreme Court. Molly,

166
00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:50,600
Speaker 1: it's always great to talk. Thanks for the time. Let's

167
00:08:50,640 --> 00:08:57,280
Speaker 1: do it again soon. Thank you. Thanks, that's amazing. I just, uh,

168
00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:03,400
Speaker 1: you know, I'm in media. I unders and how desperate

169
00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,240
Speaker 1: some media sources are. They've got to get eyes in

170
00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:08,280
Speaker 1: here as they've just got to and they've got to

171
00:09:08,320 --> 00:09:12,840
Speaker 1: do it today. But everybody going wild over a story

172
00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:17,079
Speaker 1: this thin, even as Molly pointed out, after it's been

173
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:20,800
Speaker 1: largely debunked. I mean, that's a testament how desperate they are.

174
00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:27,960
Speaker 1: It's sad, man, They're literally pulling down their pants Strong

175
00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:28,640
Speaker 1: and Getty