WEBVTT - Valhalla Insights, Rory Diagnoses, and Other Lessons Learned from the 2014 PGA Championship

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a frid.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg Friday, Frida Egg,

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Brian Egg, Frida Egg, Bride.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>hump course. Welcome to the Friday Egg Golf Podcast. I'm

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Morrison, and today we're talking about Valhalla Golf Club.

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Rory McElroy, and we're looking back on

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some details of the twenty fourteen PGA Championship, which we

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think will really inform and illuminate what might happen this

0:00:55.600 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>week during the twenty twenty four PGA Championship. Here to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>discuss all of that with me is Joseph Lemania. Joseph,

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>how you doing, Garrett?

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great. I love talking major championship golf with you,

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 2>so I'm really excited to do this.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So we both watched the final round telecast of the

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen PGA. We used our we used our inside

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>media connections to get a hold of this video because

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>it's actually not available publicly. Maybe maybe it should be

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe just throw that up on YouTube. It would be

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>cool to have it. But in any case, we got

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch this telecast and mainly we were looking at

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it to collect some observations about the golf course, how

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>certain holes played, what kind of playing style. Valhalla tends

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to prefer all that kind of stuff. But just to

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>give people that the high level summary of what happened

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on that Sunday in twenty fourteen, the tournament basically came

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>down to a four way duel between Rory McElroy, Ricky Fowler,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Phil Mickelson, and Henrik Stenson. Now I had forgotten that

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Stenson was so involved in this final round, but he

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>was actually tied for the lead at one point on

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the back nine. In any case, that the big drama

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was between Rory, Ricky and Phil. Ricky and Phil were

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in the second to last group. Rory was in the final,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>pairing with Bernard Weisberger. Poor Wisburger was pretty much dropped

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>from the coverage by the back nine, even though he

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't like play that poorly until the final several holes,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he wasn't truly a factor. But Ricky

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and Phil made a big charge on the front nine,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>really exciting stuff from them in kind of the middle

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>stretch of the front nine, whereas Rory faltered a bit.

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>When Rory was standing in the tenth fairway, he was

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>actually three shots behind Ricky and two shots behind Phil,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But then Rory eagled that par five the tenth hole.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Ricky and Phil kind of stalled out for the rest

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the back nine, and Rory made a couple of

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>birdies and they finished in the dark on eighteen, with

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Rory playing his first and second shots up into Ricky

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and Phil. It appeared to me that Ricky and Phil

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>were kind of okay with him hitting his drive up

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>into them, but the second shot was a point of contention.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Famous ending to this tournament, it was nearly dark, there

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>had been a rain delay earlier. That's why they were

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of pushing darkness as they were playing eighteen, and

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Rory won by one shot over Phil, two shots over

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Stenson and Ricky. So in all this Joseph and all

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of Sunday action from twenty fourteen, were there

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>any moments that jumped out at you, Gared.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you did a great job setting all that up. Admittedly,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>when I watched this, I was kind of looking for

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>more of how the golf course was playing than like

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>specific moments. I think the main things that I will

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>take from watching that telecast Phil the whole scene on

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>eighteen is infamous and it was really fun to relive that.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I do think it was a bit absurd that Phil

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and Ricky had to let Rory hit his second shot.

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Into totally totally I am on I am on Phil's

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>side here me too.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was completely ridiculous, and I think the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>drama of Phil having a chance to hold out his

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>shot for eagle and that being interrupted significantly with Rory's

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>approach shot into eighteen, and then Phil steps up after

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Rory hits the approach shot and nearly holds it was

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I really respected the way that he gathered himself to

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 2>hit an unbelievable chip shot, So that was one of

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 2>my biggest takeaways.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Ricky ended up free putting right. He seemed

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>rattled by it all. Both Phil and Ricky were really

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty classy about it and didn't take the bait after

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the round two express their displeasure. But Phil had a

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>long conversation with the rules official on the eighteenth green

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure to the effect of what the hell is

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>going on here? And I get it, you know, But

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, from Rory's perspective, he's thinking, if

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't hit up this second shot, I'm probably not

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to finish today. It seems like the weather forecast

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>also wasn't good for Monday, so who knows when Rory

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>would have hit those final shots, and he would have

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>had to keep that kind of mental intensity and focus

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>going for another potentially couple of days, and that would

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have been a very difficult position for Rory. But it

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>was totally puzzling. I think it was just a bit

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of a clusterfuck, and nobody knew what was going on,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>including the rules officials. So as far as moments for me,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean just this three way duel. I mean, Stenson

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.119
<v Speaker 1>was involved, so, but he was a couple of groups

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead and so he was definitely being covered by the telecast.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>But the true duel was between Ricky and Phil in

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the group ahead and Rory kind of waiting on every

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>shot behind them, watching everything they did. And the telecast

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>showed this really well at a couple of moments, and

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it was clear that, you know, Phil and Ricky were

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting buddy buddy about it. A lot of

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fist bumps and you know, congratulating each other on good

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>shots and things like that, and there was Rory and

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the group behind kind of you know, I think he

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>was getting frustrated by it, and in fact, actually he

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>admitted afterwards that he was annoyed by the way that

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they were carrying on with each other. And on the

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>back nine he just locked in and absolutely blitzed that. Well,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't blitz the back nine, but he did what

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he needed to do. He had an eagle and two

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.119
<v Speaker 1>birdies on that back nine when everybody else was sort

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of stalling out and making a bunch of pars. But

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I loved the particular moment on the sixth tee when

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>there was there was a big backup on the sixth

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 1>tee and Rory arrived after playing some pretty poor holes

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the opening of his round and watching Phil and

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Hull putts and chip in and do all this stuff.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Rory arrived on that tee and did not say hi

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to Phil and Ricky, did not talk to them, sat

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>off to the side and waited for them to play.

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And there have been descriptions of this scene, most notably

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>by Shane Ryan and his books Slaying the Tiger, and

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the scene was awkward, and we saw a little bit

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of it on the telecast where there was actually this

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>great shot which started on Rory kind of sitting off

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to the side of the tee and there was a

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>zoom out and in the foreground Ricky was revealed kind

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of sitting there, you know, standing there with an awkward

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>expression on his face as Rory sort of stared them

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>down forfar. So there was some tension between these players.

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Ricky and Rory are are friends. Rory and

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Phil clearly, I don't think have ever really seen eye

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to eye, you know, there's a little bit of juice there.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So really really fun final round overall.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I think part of what you're hitting on is one

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest takeaways from watching this, which is the

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 2>it was a different Rory McElroy in twenty fourteen than

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the Rory McElroy that we watch weekend and week out

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>ten years later. I think the free flowingness of his

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 2>game is clearly a little bit different, and even though

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>he looks confident right now coming into this tournament, there's

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a different swagger to the way

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>he was playing that final round in twenty fourteen than

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>anything I can recall him playing recently. You know, I

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>do think part of this story there is that Rory's

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 2>length advantage and the way that fit golf courses ten

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 2>years ago is different than today, and he's a little

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 2>constrained as part of how easy it's gotten to swing

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the driver and how far the golf ball goes is

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the advantage he had in twenty fourteen was just bigger

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and perfectly at Valhalla and let him free wheel. And

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that's evident from watching the coverage. So both

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe with some of the behavior and the way that

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 2>he was, I think there's more of an alpha to

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 2>Rory in twenty fourteen, both the way he swung the

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>golf club and maybe some of those moments like you're alluding.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>To, absolutely, and this is kind of what happens with people,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Rory and I are kind of close

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to the same age. He's five years younger than I am,

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, ten years ago he was a

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>young man, you know, very much on the upslope of

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>his life, you know, going towards the apex. This turned

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>out to be kind of be the apex twenty fourteen

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for him, but of course he didn't know that at

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, and we didn't know it, and there was

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a kind of freedom and hopefulness in the way he

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>played golf, like he was just going to keep getting

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>better and better and better. And that has gotten you know,

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been taken away from him necessarily, but he

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>has lost a little bit of that confidence and hopefulness

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about his golf game. And that's kind of what happens

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>when you get older. You mellow out a little bit

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and you lose some of some of that edge that

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>allows you to do incredible things when you're in your

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mid twenties. And so that's the Rory we saw here.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>The real reason, Joseph, that we watched this round, though,

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was to get a sense of how this golf course

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>played in twenty fourteen and how it might play this year,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>ten years later. I think that we saw that the

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>game is different now, but it's sort of like a

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just a more extreme version of the game that was

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>being played at Valhalla in twenty fourteen. Distance had really

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>started to get out of control then, and the way

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw Rory playing that golf course is probably the

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 1>way that we're gonna see a lot of golfers play

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the golf course this week, So as it relates to

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the course, what are some of your big big thoughts there?

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Gary, I've there's a chance I'm wrong about this,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 2>but I feel fairly certain we are on pace given

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the weather conditions this week and the lengthening of the

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>golf course, the way it sets up, like, I think

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>we're projected to watch an extreme version of a major championship,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>one that is about as friendly to big hitters as

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>a setup can be.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>An extreme version of a PGA Championship, especially right.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I mean an extreme version of any golf tournament. Like,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I think this is going to be as much like hitters,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>only you bombers bomb away, and a part of that

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the soft conditions and the ways

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>that the golf ball just isn't gonna roll. And so

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I think what's instructive about watching that twenty fourteen PGA

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Championship was that the conditions were similarly wet, and I

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 2>think the I think it's gonna play a lot like

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it played in twenty fourteen. So I agree with you

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>that the game has changed. We will talk later about

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 2>some of the players that that favors. But I think

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>we should set the expectations here, and other people are

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>saying the same thing. But we might watch an extreme

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>version of bomb and gouge golf this week.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>What is it about this course that favors that style?

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, one the obvious point is the sheer

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>length of the golf course, and it's been lengthened since

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, so you're gonna have so many driver six iron,

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>driver five iron. I mean, Tiger has already talked about

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>this week, has already talked about it this week that

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 2>there are certain holes he hit like driver wedge to

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 2>one when he played this I believe he said in

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, and now I mean he hit driver five

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 2>would and part of the reason the moisture is a

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>huge part of the story here. Coming out of the rough,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>even you're gonna have shots that when they land on

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the green, they stop and you're gonna be able to

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>hold the green even from the rough. The fairways are

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>also gonna play much wider in these types of conditions

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>because the ball just hits and sticks immediately, so you

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 2>don't have to worry about controlling the ball. As much

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>and hitting something down the center of the fairway that

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 2>rolls and ends up on the right edge or the

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>left edge of the fairway. It's pretty much hitting and sticking.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's something that people should kind of

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 2>burn into the back of their brains before this tournament starts,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>because that's what you're gonna see.

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Here's something that Justin Thomas said earlier today. We're recording

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this on Tuesday. Justin Thomas said about Valhalla, for the

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>most part, if it's a par four or five, you're

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>just grabbing a driver when you get to the tee

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're just hoping you hit the fair way and

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>then you're probably going to hit somewhere between a five

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>and an eight iron into the green. That pretty much

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>sums it up. That is so much of this golf

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>course where you hit it as far as you can

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>off the tee and it's all carry distance, right because

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, the ball is gonna stick and hold

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>even though the fairways have been regrasped with Zooija. We've

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>seen the weather forecast for this week. It is going

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to be wet, and so you hit the driver and

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to have a fairly long approach for

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>these guys, it's not going to be a bunch of wedges.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It might be more wedges for some of the longer players,

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but most of the field is going to be really

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tested with their mid to slightly shorter irons. And that's

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the golf course, right And this is a PGA Championship

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>golf course these days. This is the style of golf

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>course that the PGA Championship has gone for. And I

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but not my favorite type of

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>golf course to watch Thursday through Saturday. I think it's

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty sleepy. But then when we get

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to Sunday, we're probably going to get a bunched up

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>leader board and it's probably going to be a bunch

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of players that we know about. Because the players that

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we know about, the top ten players in the world,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to be the players who thrive on this kind

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of golf course, who hit it really far and are

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really good with their mid to long irons. We're going

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to see those players in the mix more than likely.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>If they show up with any kind of chipping and

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>putting form, that's who's going to be there. And so

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of sets you up for an exciting Sunday,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>even if the three days leading up to that are

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not as exciting.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, A lot of things to react to you there, Garrett.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 2>The only thing I would quibble with a little bit

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>is that there actually are a couple opportunities out there

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>on the golf course to hit less than I think

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the stronger points of this golf course,

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 2>even though I'm not a huge fan of it in general.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 2>There are a couple t shots that, especially if it

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>were firmer, the three wood versus driver decision that players

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 2>would have to make is kind of interesting, Like the

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Ninth Toll is an example of that. But again, with

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 2>it being wetter, we're not going to see as much

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>of that. To your point about the style of golf,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>this is my least favorite style of golf to watch,

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>where the golf ball just isn't rolling at all. Everything's

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>hitting and sticking. It's all kerry distance. I guess the

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>exception or my least favorite would be if this were

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>more of a wedge fest. But at least here there's

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be long iron play, which to your point,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to bring a lot of these long hitters in.

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, we're probably going to see a leaderboard on

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Sunday of some of the top players in the world

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of really long hitters, right your Brooks,

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Bryce and Scotty Rory. So from an entertainment perspective, I

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>think Sunday could get pretty interesting, even if the golf

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 2>shots themselves aren't that interesting. One tournament that I wanted

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to throw at you, Garrett, and I'm just curious for

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 2>your reaction to this. I admittedly this is a golf

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>tournament that maybe a lot of people don't remember, and

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I only remember it because I have personal connection to

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. But this Valhalla reminds me more than

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>any golf course of Crooked Stick, which is another Midwest

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 2>golf course long and in twenty twelve they hosted the

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 2>BMW Championship there. Leading into that week, it rained all week.

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 2>It was extremely muddy. And only really remember that because

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I was at the tournament. The final group that week

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 2>was Rory, Phil and Tiger. And you just talk about

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 2>long hitters not always the most accurate. It's interesting the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 2>way that that leaderboard kind of paralleled to twenty fourteen

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>PGA Championship. Not Tiger wasn't involved, but Lee Westwood finished

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>high on the leader board at the Crooked Stick tournament,

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and I believe in twenty fourteen he was the first

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>round leader. A lot of parallels in how that golf

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>course is going to play. I think this is just

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 2>a very clear hit it long. You don't have to

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>be the straightest driver of the golf ball, and then

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 2>you're firing six and seven irons in that stop on

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 2>a dime on the green. So I thought that was

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>an interesting tournament to reflect upon because both some of

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the names line up, and also the style of play

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>is so similar that you have like a Robert Geragis

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 2>in the top five at Crooked Stick who was just

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a bomber that didn't have much short game or wasn't

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 2>the best potter. So I think that's what we're going

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to see.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of surprising to me. So I'm not nearly

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as familiar with Cricket Stick as you are. Obviously you,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I believe played the course a lot when you were

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid, and so so what about cricket. It's a

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Pete Die golf course. Normally we would think of Die

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>championship golf courses as being in a different mold than

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Valhalla in terms of the play style that they most favor.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>So what about cricket Stick is kind of similar to

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Valhalla to you.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a lot of it has to do the

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>width of missus and how much it penalizes you. There's

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of shots at Crooked Stick where you can

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of take trouble out of one play on one

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>side and then just bash driver and if you miss

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit and you're just in the rough, it's

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 2>not that big of a deal, especially if the greens

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>are receptive and you can hold something coming into those greens. So,

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think what's really interesting about that golf course.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Not to make this a full blown discussion of cricket stick,

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 2>but John Daily, Dustin Johnson, and Rory McElroy are some

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of the champions there in the most high profile events,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>some of the most high profile events that have been

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>hosted there over the last you know, thirty years. Those

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>are bombers. And it can be counterintuitive sometimes when you

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 2>see a course that is there is some thick rough

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 2>and there are some trees, even though there's not a

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>ton of trees at Crooked Stick in particular, but it

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 2>does lend itself to that kind of bomb a lot

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of the t shots you can just aim somewhere in

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>bash Driver.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into some specific holes at Valhalla. You know,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>when you were watching the Sunday telecast, did any holes

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>stand out to you as being interesting on the one

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>hand or just representative of the golf course on the

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>other hand.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a lot of browny par four's and

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>like ripping five irons into greens.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, second hole at Valhalla, I feel like is

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>probably a good example of what players see a lot

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>at that golf course. Right, it's a converted par five.

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>It plays as a part four for the pros, it

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>plays as a par five for the members, And yeah,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that hole just is all about hitting your drive as

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>far as you can so you can have a reasonable

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>mid iron into that green.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably teeing you up here, Garrett, and you have

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 2>both more informed and probably stronger opinions, more important takes

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>on the golf course.

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>So I'll leave some of this to you.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think the fourth hole at Valhalla, it's one

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that I'm sure you're eager to talk about, but I

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 2>think from watching the telecast, that's one that even though

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a short part for where you're hitting driver wedge

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 2>or you know, maybe three would, but I think especially

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>in these wet conditions, you're going to see a lot

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.239
<v Speaker 2>of driver. To me, that was pretty indicative of what

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see this week, where you can blast

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 2>something up there pretty close to the green. The angle

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to be coming into that green with

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 2>really doesn't matter, especially when it's wet, And I think

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.959
<v Speaker 2>something interesting about these kinds of conditions or that when

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you're hitting a wedge, spin control on wet greens is

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a pretty big factor. And sometimes when you're coming out

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 2>of the rough, if you have a good lie in

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the rough, that SHOT's almost easier a sixty yard shot

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 2>out of the rough when you have a fine lie

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and you don't have to worry as much about if

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 2>it were really firm, it would be different, but it's not.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So the ball just kind of stops and maybe rolls

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a couple of feet. That's such an easy shot that

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 2>I think you're going to see a lot of that,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>in particular on the fourth hole. So I don't know

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 2>if you have any other comments on the fourth.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But with Rory, we saw Rory Landon's some kind of

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>almost casual water and have to hit a wedge out

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of that and it didn't check up the way he expected. Yeah,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the fourth hole, I mean, it's one of the few

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>holes at Valhalla that produces different strategies off the tee

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because there are two basic sections of that fairway. There's

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a short section of the fairway from the tee and

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a long section of the fairway. And to get

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to the long section of the fairway, you have to

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hit a longer club and you have to carry a

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>bunker and kind of thread it between that bunker on

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the left and another bunker on the right. I may

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have my right and left mixed up. You're right, you're right.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>If you clear the bunker on the left, but leave

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it a little out right, you might get an app

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the bunker the right.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, So it requires a little bit of precision

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and a little more length obviously to get to that

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>section of the fairway and have the shorter shot into

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the green. Then on probably one day of the championship,

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the PGA is going to set it up as driveable.

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>They did that in twenty fourteen on Saturday and pretty

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>much which everybody went for the green in that situation.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't much of a choice, but it was

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a driveable par four. The thing about the whole that

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is lacking a little bit, aside from the shaping, which

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is awful looking, there just totally awful looking. We can

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about that if you want, but the shape, just

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the ascetics are so so bad. The thing that's lacking

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 1>about the whole to me is that the green is

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just not all that interesting and the surrounds of the

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>green are not all that interesting. And one common characteristic

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>among the greatest short par fours in the world is

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that really interesting things happen around the green because of

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the contouring of the green, because of the nature of

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the surrounds, there's always something going on with a great

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>short or drivable par four that is on another level

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>around the green. The fourth green, as far as I

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>can see, is pretty simple at Vallha. It's not all

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that contoured. There aren't many really terrible misses around the green.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>There's not much of that danger, right. The thing about

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>great short part four is that there's some threat. If

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you miss in the wrong place, you're absolutely dead. You

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>can make double bogie almost nob but nobody made double

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>bogie on the fourth hole in the twenty fourteen PGA Championship.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was one double bogie out of the

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>entire field during all four days. So it's just missing

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that element. And so it could be kind of a

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>cool hole because there are different strategies off the tee

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that you could adopt, but it doesn't really follow through

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>around the green.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I think core to this conversation both in twenty fourteen

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 2>and how it's going to play this week are the

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>conditions and given how what it looks like it's going

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to be in soft, I think you're crazy if you

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 2>don't send it up there somewhere around the green or

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>leave yourself like fifty sixty yards unless you have some

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 2>crazy wind or that shot sets up terribly for you

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 2>like that. That's one where you're sending it. But I

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 2>think to your point of not having the like terrible

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 2>misses around the green and it not being penal in

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 2>certain locations, short sighting yourself just isn't gonna be that

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>big of a problem this week. And that was one

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of my biggest takeaways from watching that twenty fourteen telecast.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Probably the best example I can point to is the

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 2>sixth hole. We can talk about that whole if you

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>want Phil Mickelson. I don't know exactly what club he

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 2>had in some kind of long iron into the approach.

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's like two hundred and twenty five, two hundred

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and thirty yards something like that. On his approach shot,

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little less, and he hits this hard rope

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't cut back for him, and it just stays

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>right of the green instead of bouncing into a bad

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>spot like taking a hard bounce, it lands in the

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>fairway near the green and just kind of stops. It

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 2>rolls a little bit, but stays in the fairway. Not

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 2>only does it stay in the fairway, but then his

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>chip shot isn't that difficult. It's doable because the greens

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>are soft and he's hitting from the fairway. Like that's

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to see this week. You're just going

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 2>to see so many instances where you wish maybe there

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 2>was a little bit more of a penalty for missing

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong spots. But you're gonna be able to

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>get up and down pretty routinely because the greens aren't

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 2>that sophisticated or contoured, and the conditions are going to

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 2>be so soft.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I mean, there's just a lower priority on

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>accuracy all around, and I should mention, like we're talking

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>about design, we're talking about setup and conditions. Something that's

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>great about Valhalla is the crowds and we saw that

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty fourteen tournament. Louisville is a great city

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and the crowds really come out for a PGA championship

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that's held at this golf course, and so we can

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>expect that to be a really wonderful aspect of this tournament.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>That was missing last year at Los Angeles Country Club.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Will noticed it missing at the US Open. That is,

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>people notice that that element was missing and it made

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a difference. And so it's going to make a difference

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that Louisville's going to come out for this tournament and

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be hopping out there. So I should

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>mention that, let's get back into design. Any other holes

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we should touch on. Should we talk about number seven,

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the double fairway part five? That's one that probably people

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to notice.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was going to just quickly add within that

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>same vein, I think another strength of Valhalla, this isn't

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 2>all negative. I think another strength of Valhalla is that

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 2>there are certain holes that have distinct character to them,

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and that people if they watch from Thursday to Sunday,

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.719
<v Speaker 2>they might be informed enough that already by Thursday they

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 2>know what some of those holes are like six, seven, eighteen,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>But especially by the time Sunday rolls around, I think

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>they'll It does a pretty good job of showing of

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>ingraining certain holes into your head and under. Some of

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 2>those holes have a lot of character, even if maybe

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 2>we would take issue with some of the design, Like

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 2>people are going to know what to expect, and I

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 2>think that is a strength of a from a television perspective.

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to talk about seven, six or seven,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I think those will be two holes that viewers should

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>be pretty tuned into.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so six is basically a forced layup followed by

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty long approach, Like we're talking two hundred and

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty to two hundred and forty yard approach uphill across

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a river. That green was moved way back for the

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen Championship. It used to be more of a

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>short iron over the river to a green that was

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty close. So now it's kind of a funky hole

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>where you have a layup off the tee because there's

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>only so much fairway that you can use you can't

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>vomit on this hole, and then you have a pretty

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>long approach, and so it's a little bit awkward, but

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at least we get to kind of see a long

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>iron right. We get to see players try to execute

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a longer shot from the fairway, which is more and

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>more of a rare sight these days. It's not to

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>say it's a good hole, it's really not, but you

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>know there's one positive of it. And then seven is

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a par five where you can choose between kind of

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>an island fairway but not really an island because you

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>can miss it and not be in the water, but

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an island dish fairway on the left and a more

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>conventional fairway on the right. And the fairway on the

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>left shortens the hole significantly gives you a better chance

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of going for the green. And two, the green is

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>closely guarded by water on the left side, there's a

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>bunker kind of short right of the green that also

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of narrows that gap, and so you get an

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage for going for the fairway on the left. And

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty fourteen championship, we saw some players going right.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We saw more players going left, but there was certainly

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a spread. There were choices that were being made. It

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't obvious where to play. What would you expect this year, Joseph, Like,

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the choice off that tee, do you

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see more of a tilt towards

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one or the other, the safe option versus the risky option.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're gonna see a lot of people go down

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the fairway on the left, And if.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>That's good, that's kind of what I thought, Like, I

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see any reason not to if you're long enough right.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate the hole. I think if you changed

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 2>like a couple things about it, it would probably play

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better from a risk reward perspective. I

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 2>think in this case the reward is tilted a little

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>bit too far in favor of going down the left

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that left fairway, Especially in soft conditions, Garrett, it's easier

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>to hit that fairway on the left, and it's easier

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to hit something into the green that stops you. Don't

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you as long as you carry the water, your ball

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>is gonna end up in a fine location. Going down

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the left fairway shortens the hole by like a good

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 2>forty yards. Another shot I have in my notes from

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 2>watching that twenty fourteen telecast. Rory goes down the left side,

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't hit a good approach into that green, and leaves

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>himself in kind of a bad spot just right of

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the green, a little kind of pot green side bunker there.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 2>But he's able to get it up and down even

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 2>despite being short sided, because he's able to put some

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>spin on it and the conditions are so soft. Given

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 2>how soft these conditions are going to be, going down

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>that left side is going to be a really good

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>option unless there's some kind of wind that makes it

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>really uncomfortable, and something I would watch for as a spectator,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>even if if you're just watching practice rounds or golf

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>channel coverage leading up to the tournament. How playable is

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 2>that rough that's just a little bit left of the

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 2>fairway on the left fairway, because golfers are gonna favor

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the left side of that left fairway. Sorry, a lot

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of left here in this description, but there's a creek

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.479
<v Speaker 2>that runs along the right side of that left fairway,

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 2>so you need to favor the left side a little bit.

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Especially if that rough is playable down the left side,

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna be fine hitting out of it. And getting

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>something to stick on the green, so you're gonna see

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of guys go that way.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think the right side is too treacherous right

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for the safe op. It's really heavily bunkered. The second

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>shot from the t shot landing zone, the second shot

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that you hit the layup is really awkward, and the

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>green is pretty heavily guarded from that angle. So it

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>would be one thing if like just that it were

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a smoother path over there on the

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>right side, And it would also be a little bit

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>different if the tea were relocated to the right so

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that the safe option were right in front of you.

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But the place where the championship tee is makes the

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>left option seem easier because you have to play at

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>an angle way out to the right to that right

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hand fairway from the championship tee in order to get there,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and so it just seems simpler as long as you

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>can make the carry and have some kind of confidence

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to hit the fairway on the left,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty obvious that you play there. So I

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>agree that the risk reward equation of that hole really

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>seems tilted toward playing to the left, especially in wet conditions.

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So a little bit disappointed, But to the whole's credit,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw a variety of strategy in twenty fourteen, So

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's something that I'm missing about it. Maybe we'll

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>see some of the same stuff this year, but I

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of doubt it. I think the game has changed

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to a degree that we're just going to see players

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of adopting mostly the same strategy on that whole.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was going to say.

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 2>The game has changed a lot since twenty fourteen, so

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>just golfer's general approach to course management has changed enough

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think unless conditions are pretty funky, you're

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>going to see everybody going down the left. And like

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 2>you said, if it were really firm and baked out,

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>then maybe you would need to go down the right

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more to bounce something up to the green.

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>And if you couldn't hold anything from that left fairway,

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>like it was so firm that especially if you were

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 2>in the rough you were dead, you might see a

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit more going down the right. But when it's soft,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's pretty clear where you need to go,

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked a lot about the front nine. I think,

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me, most of the interesting holes to

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about, not necessarily the best holes on the course,

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but the ones that I feel most compelled to talk

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about are on the front nine, And so that's kind

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 1>of why we focus there. But when you're thinking about

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the closing stretch, let's say the last four holes at Valhalla,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>what do we get there?

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the main note I have is going outside

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 2>of that a little bit. The fourteenth hole, I think

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 2>is a huge note coming into this tournament because it

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 2>are three well, and it was two hundred yards and

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, and now it can be stretched back to

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 2>two fifty and no alterations have been made to the

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 2>green or anything. It doesn't Jack Nicholas, the architect of

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 2>this golf course, sounded from an interview I read with

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Links magazine a little bit disappointed to see this tea

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 2>moved back, and he thinks they should play from that

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 2>forward tea.

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a perfect example of why this is a

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bomber friendly golf.

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Course, because if they play it at two fifty, it's

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a fairly small target for coming from that distance, and

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the guys who can hit something really high and who

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 2>are hitting less club into that green like a Rory,

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 2>like a Bryson. Great example of why they have such

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 2>a big advantage. So that's honestly the main note. I

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 2>have the closing stretch geared. I don't know if anything

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 2>stands out to you. The sixteenth hole is a really

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 2>bomber friendly hole that kind of weaves right and you

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 2>can take it over trees. That is the play that

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 2>I would advocate, especially in soft conditions, like fire that

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 2>driver if you can, if you have the height and

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the firepower like Rory did in twenty fourteen, like rip

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 2>it over the trees down the right.

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So and that's what Rory had that made that hole

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not dangerous to him, whereas it was dangerous to Phil

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who made a bogie on that hole. And that was

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the decisive moment. I mean, Rory didn't burdy the hole,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>but he had an opportunity to, and he was so

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>locked in with his driver that I don't think there

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>was any way that he was ever bogging sixteen. He

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>had a nine iron into that green. A lot of

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>other players at the time were hitting long irons and

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>hybrids into the green, and that just gave him such

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. That was really why he won that tournament

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because he had that kind of advantage with his driver.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see more players playing that hole the way

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that Rory did in twenty fourteen, just bombing that driver

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>up there. They'll have a short iron into the green.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>This used to be a long part four. But this

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is where the game has has evolved to. This is

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>this is why we're dealing with. It's unbelievable, but yes,

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a short part four for Rory now because

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he can hit his driver three hundred and fifty yards

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>if he goes full out at it, if he has

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>no reason to hold back. That's how far he's hitting

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>his driver. Maybe he'll have a wedg end of the

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>green this year. I don't know, but you know, this

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:46.879
<v Speaker 1>used to be a long part four. They changed the green,

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's always kind of been a long part four.

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety six and two thousand, this was clearly

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a long part four, one that players were really challenged

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to get home in two on and now it's just

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>totally different. You can't make a hole long enough for

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>players these days, and this is one of the best

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>representations of that now. As far as like general observations

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>about the closing stretch at Valhalla. Fourteen through seventeen are

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all pretty difficult golf holes, and there are also holes

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that don't have I don't think a lot of variants

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>in terms of scoring. I don't think we're going to

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>see that many double and triple bogies on these holes.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to see that many birdies

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on these holes. And for that reason, I think it's

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty uncompelling finish to a championship golf course because

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what we like to see, at least a little bit,

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is some variety, some opportunity, some danger, some places where

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the championship can swing by two or three shots on

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a single hole.

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you. I think it's difficult for

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of golf courses to create a lot of

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 2>volatility and scoring when the the course is damp like

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be. But yeah, yeah, it's super

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.479
<v Speaker 2>bomber friendly. That's a huge thing to keep in mind.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of a product that is super bomber friendly. Bushnell rangefinders,

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're wow friendly, you know. I mean,

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're probably friendly to everybody, even if you're

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not a bomber. This is going to be a useful product,

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but I needed a segue, so you know, leave me alone.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Bushnell makes great rangefinders. These are industry leading rangefinders. Here,

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the good stuff. So new from Bushnell is

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the pro X three plus. This is the most powerful

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>precise laser rangefinder to date. All of the market leading

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>innovations that you've come to expect from the number one

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>rangefinder and golf are in this thing. This is the

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>rangefinder that's trusted by ninety eight point six percent of

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour players and in fact, this week get the

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>PGA Championship, we'll see the one tournament per year that

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>rangefinders are actually allowed, so players are going to be

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>able to put their their Bushnells to use. This new

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pro X three plus rangefinder offers a new thing. Basically,

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the pro X three plus shows you wind speed and

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>direction in the display. So that's that's kind of a

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>big thing. Judging win can be can be a tough.

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough part of the game, and this new

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>rangefinder starts to give you some insights into that. In

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>addition to this new feature, the pro X three plus

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>offers pinseeker with visual Jolt. I love this feature. Because

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it gives you a lot of confidence that you've actually

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 1>locked on to the flag. It gives you a locking

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>slope switch. This is it's legal for tournament play when

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the slope mode is disabled, so it gives you you know,

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be caught with slope on accidentally,

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and so this allows you to be confident that you

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have slope off in the right situations. The pro X

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>three plus great product from Bushnell. To learn more about

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this new range finder, visit Bushnell golf dot com. All right, Joseph,

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about Rory McElroy watching the

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen PGA Championship. What are some things that you

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>saw from Rory that impressed you.

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we hit on this a little bit,

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 2>like he's definitely playing in that tournament with a certain

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 2>swagger and a certain confidence that I don't want to

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 2>say it's been completely absent, because I think at times

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in recent memory he's had a similar level of confidence.

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.760
<v Speaker 2>And he describes himself as a better, more complete player

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 2>today than he was back then, which I think there's

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 2>some merit too, but I think that just the bigger

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 2>point is this is as good of a setup for

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Rory as he's gonna have all year, and that ability

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 2>to freewheel with driver a lot and it lands a

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 2>yard away the rough, but it stays in the fairway.

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Like that's a huge advantage where he has here versus

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>somewhere like Pinehurst. So I think he'll try to channel

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 2>some of that energy he had in twenty fourteen. There

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 2>are just more golfers in the world now who can

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 2>keep up with him, so the advantage is a little

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 2>bit smaller there. I didn't I don't have a ton

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of notes from the way he played in twenty fourteen

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>other thanse he was swinging the club really well in

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the golf course set up like pretty ideally for him.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It just seemed like he could bring his C game

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and he still would have won this tournament. And he

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of did on the front nine. Like he did

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>not play well on the front nine in twenty fourteen,

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he was won over, which for him on that golf

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>course and those conditions not very good at all. I

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>think he was bothered by the slow play. He seemed

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.959
<v Speaker 1>to be getting frustrated. He wasn't great on the front nine,

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>but he did exactly enough on the back nine to

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>win the championship. But none of it seemed like a stretch.

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 1>None of it seemed like he was playing saying really

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>beyond his average ability. You know that eagle that he

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>made on the tenth hole, he necked that three wood

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>going into the green, and Peter Alice actually called this

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>out on the telecasts, but once the ball rolled up

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>onto the green and within ten feet of the pin,

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he kind of apologized, But he shouldn't have apologized. That

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was not an intentionally shaped shot. Rory hit that ball

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on the neck, but he was. He turned out fine,

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and he made eagle on that hole. It just, you know,

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>he was so in command of that golf course. He

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>had such an advantage that it just seemed like there

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was nothing that anybody could do. And Phil played brilliantly

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on that day, but he started three behind. How are

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you going to catch up to Rory when he's playing,

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>when he's hitting his driver like he hit it in

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen on this golf course, it just doesn't seem

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's possible. But as far as like things that

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:59.919
<v Speaker 1>have changed about Rory, we've criticized Rory before for being

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of overly aggressive and maybe too cute. With his

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>shot shaping and his ways of trying to get at

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pins and things like that. Did you see any of

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that from him in on this on this Sunday? You know,

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think he's going to like approach the golf

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>course differently now than he did then?

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 2>I think, fortunately for him, you can do You're gonna

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:25.479
<v Speaker 2>be able to do a lot of that this week

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and play pretty aggressively. The main issue I tend to

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 2>have is that he hits I think some unnecessary like

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, a five iron with thirty yards of curve

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 2>on it that I just feel very confident he should

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 2>not do. And with the absence of wind this week, like,

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I really don't think you need to do any of that.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I would like to see a lot of moonshot seven

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 2>irons that are anywhere between, you know. I mean, he

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 2>can get pretty aggressive. He might hit a few to

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>six feet, but like a lot of them, hitting a

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of greens to eighteen feet and rolling in some

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 2>putts is probably going to be the recipe. Like in

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the twenty fourteen final round, you're talking about how he

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 2>was had such a big advantage and kind of cruised.

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>He got hot on the back nine and that's how

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 2>he won. He missed a couple of putts on the

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 2>back nine.

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes he did. He did yeah on eleven specifically, Like

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's stuck it pretty close on eleven and he missed

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that putt.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 2>So that's the thing. Like, I think he's gonna have

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 2>so many opportunities this week and other golfers who also

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 2>hit it long that you can be really aggressive off

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the tea. You can be pretty aggressive. I wouldn't be

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 2>overly aggressive, but you can be a little more aggressive

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 2>here than most courses into the greens because short sighting

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 2>yourself just isn't as big of a problem and you

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 2>can kind of stick it. It's not going to bounce

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 2>into a bad location. So I would expect an aggressive

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 2>rory that if he's making pots, he's right in the mix.

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So when you're thinking about course fit for this

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>week and players who fit this style of play, who

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at.

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's gonna be a ton of surprises here.

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I think your long hitters, maybe there are some. I

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 2>think long hitters who you have some long shot potential.

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 2>I think there's gonna be a lot of discussion around.

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>There's only a few golfers who can win. I actually

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 2>think that there are some long hitting outsiders that'll have

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 2>a chance. But the main name that comes to mind

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 2>for me that I think is just a smash course

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:22.959
<v Speaker 2>fit is Bryson, and he's getting some steam coming into

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 2>this tournament. It's not a sleeper, but I think the

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 2>way that this golf course fits Bryson, it's a pretty

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:33.879
<v Speaker 2>dream scenario for the big golfer here. And I think

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe an underrated part of Bryson everyone's aware of, like

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the meticulous approach he takes to his game and the

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>way he calibrates his yardages. But I think especially with

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 2>there being some moisture and how that impacts when there's

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of water between the club face and

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the ball, like nobody takes care of those variables as

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>well as Bryson does and figures it out on the range.

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 2>So I think when you have all these factors coming together,

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 2>it's really good spot for Bryson to Shambo. How about Brooks,

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a good setup for Brooks. It just it feels

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 2>like the PGA Championship is almost Brooks's French Open to

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 2>rough in Adal like course after course, you know, maybe

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Southern Hills wasn't perfectly suited to him. He could have

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:23.399
<v Speaker 2>won there if he had been had been playing well,

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 2>for sure, But Okill, I mean, you couldn't have come

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 2>up with a better course for Brooks Koepka to win on.

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think the same is true I Valhalla. It's

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna be wet, the rough is going to be high.

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 2>This is Beth Page Black, this is o Kill, this

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>is a PGA Championship golf course, and it just seems

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 2>like it's absolutely tailor made for him. He won on

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Live recently, but that doesn't even really matter to me,

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 2>because Brooks can show up at this kind of tournament

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and he'll he'll just be in contention on Sunday almost

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 2>no matter what. I feel so confident about this now,

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 2>whenever warning to the audience. I'm a notoriously terrible predictor

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 2>of golf tournament outcomes, but this just seems obvious to me.

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 2>This is such a brooks Keptka golf course, such a

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Brooks Kepka forecast. Yeah, in the last ten years of

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the PGA Championship, Brooks has six top tens. I believe second,

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 2>I believe the second best number there is for top

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 2>tens and for Brooks, three of those are wins, so

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 2>nobody's been better in PGA's It's a great setup for him.

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I just it's also a great setup for Scotti Scheffler.

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's also a great set up for John Rohm,

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 2>who nobody's talking about. But John Rahm could absolutely win

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 2>this golf tournament, right, Ludwig, Bryce and Rory like a

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of names who could get involved here. I don't

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 2>even think it's crazy that Phil Mickelson. I don't know

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:56.280
<v Speaker 2>that he's gonna win, Garrett, but I think the chances

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of Phil finish, the chances of him finishing in the

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>top fifth teen, I think are fairly high.

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's kind of crazy, but uh yeah, I

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>mean this is well, let's talk about that. Why is

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this such a good course fit for Phil? Specifically because

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he has top ten in every PGA championship at Valhalla.

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>He was t eight in nineteen ninety six, he was

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>t nine in two thousand and of course he almost

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>won in twenty fourteen, So why is this so good

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>for him? This golf course? And Phil's a long hitter.

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't hit it the most accurately, but he's a

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 2>great long iron player. I think Phil's approach to a

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 2>golf course like this is generally pretty intelligent, and I

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 2>guess a big thing Garrett that almost wanted to mention earlier.

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're gonna hear a lot on the

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 2>telcast like driving accuracy, driving accuracy, driving accuracy, and they'll

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 2>talk about how thick the rough is and why you

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 2>can't be in there. That's true, you don't want to

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 2>be in the rough, but it's how the ball gets

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 2>there is a huge piece of the puzzle here, and

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the fairways are just going to play so much wider

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 2>this week with the rain that Phil's as long as

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 2>he's hitting it remotely straight, like he's gonna give himself

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 2>a lot of opportunities. I don't think he's hitting the

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 2>ball well enough to seriously contend, but if he finishes

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.239
<v Speaker 2>tied for ninth or something like that, it wouldn't shock me.

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think the answer to the Phil

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>course fit question is that if you have a golf

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>course where accuracy off the tee is relatively deemphasized, it's

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:37.720
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be a good fit for Phil. Augusta National.

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Many other courses we know to be great fits for

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Phil Nicholson. Phil is so good at every aspect of

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the game basically aside from strictly driving accuracy, that if

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a golf course that takes that a bit

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the equation, he's just going to have an

0:49:55.440 --> 0:50:00.720
<v Speaker 1>advantage because he's extraordinary in his iron play. He's long,

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 1>He's obviously a great chipper. He's a great chipper out

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of rough, you know, like he's also a great chipper

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>off off of short grass. But I've seen him do

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>magical things out of greenside rough in his career. He's

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just really really good at that stuff. One name I

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of wondering about, and I think that this

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is Vahall is a good fit for this player, but

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about his current form and whether any

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of that's going to work out for him this week.

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But Victor Hoveland, if this were last August, wouldn't he

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be the favorite going into this tournament? I mean, putting

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>aside the fact that he was the best player in

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the world at that moment, this course would have really

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:48.399
<v Speaker 1>seemed to suit the Victor Hoveland of late twenty twenty three.

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Really well, you've got rough around the greens and so

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, the chipping woes are maybe not as significant,

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and then you have everything else about the golf course

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>which would seem to suit Hovelin' Styf totally.

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Victor Hoblin's an interesting name coming in this week because

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 2>there's not a lot of confidence in him, so he's

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of become a sleeper, and he was arguably the

0:51:10.760 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 2>best player in the world at the end of twenty

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty three or in the fall of twenty twenty three. Personally, like,

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a ton of confidence in the state

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.399
<v Speaker 2>of his game. It sounds like mentally like he might

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 2>be battling some swing demons, and.

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it sounds like his full swing is kind of

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not in the right place right either.

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, So if it was just the short game argument,

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe you could get behind it a little bit more.

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:36.359
<v Speaker 2>But I think when he's battling some full swing issues too,

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 2>there are just too many talented golfers that I'd put

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 2>ahead of him. But no, Garrett, there are a lot

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>of golfers like that this week that wouldn't shock me

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 2>if they get up into the mix way more so

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 2>than at Augusta. Like I think, justin Thomas, right, that's

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 2>an interesting name. This week, who has shown he played

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 2>well at Kuaile Hollow last week, some of the Midwest

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.919
<v Speaker 2>and the local ties. I think that gets a little

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 2>bit overblown. But Justin Thomas is hitting the ball farther now.

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.879
<v Speaker 2>I think he just changed to a driver that gives

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 2>them a little bit more distance. Like he's somebody at

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 2>least have to consider.

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then you've got the kind of perennial Major championship,

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:17.800
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen, top twenty guys like Will Zalatorus, Xander Schaffle,

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Cantlay. You know, I'm not necessarily backing any of

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>these players to win, especially Schafle and can't lay until

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>they show me that they can do something on Sunday.

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I may I'm maybe not super confident in them, but again,

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a golf course that suits them pretty well. And you

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>know we're mentioning all these names. Here are players who

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>could do well. There are a lot of players who

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 1>are probably not going to do well this week. Right

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>unless they have an extraordinary week, they really have no chance.

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's a lot of the field, right Yeah.

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you don't have a lot of distance,

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have to put lights out.

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And chip probably really good long irons.

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean you're gonna have to make some

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:03.439
<v Speaker 2>you have to make a lot of fifteen to twenty

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 2>five footers. I guess the one name Garrett throw you

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 2>that think is gonna play poorly. Not to make this,

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 2>not to dump on somebody, but I think this is

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 2>a really bad setup for Jordan Speed. Not only some

0:53:14.040 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of the ball striking issues we've seen recently, but I

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 2>don't think this is the type of setup you want

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to have a wrist issue and some of the chopping

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 2>out of wet rough That feels like a bad scenario

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 2>for somebody like Speed.

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, any final thoughts about Valhalla or this upcoming championship.

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we've we've gone through some stuff

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're kind of excited about, but in general, you know,

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe not the the kind of venue, the kind

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of championship that really gets us going.

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we're headed for an extreme. My favorite

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 2>type of golf is the where there's a lot of

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:56.319
<v Speaker 2>intrigue when the ball hits the ground, and we're headed

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 2>for the polar opposite of that. Basically, I think the

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 2>redeeming qual is that it's a lot of long irons

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 2>versus a soft wedge fest, but this is going to

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 2>be I think about as bomber friendly of a setup

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen in recent memory. So that's where I

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 2>would set people's expectations. I'm still excited for the tournament.

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot on the line, but it's not a

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 2>style of golf that I think is particularly compelling. So

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of where I land. How about you, Garrett, Yeah,

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree with that. I think, again, to go

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 2>back to the point I made earlier, this is a

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Sunday appointment viewing kind of tournament. I mean, any major

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 2>championship is on Sunday. But I think that the silver

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 2>lining here is that this is a golf course and

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a set of conditions that will make it

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 2>likely that will have a close final round battle between

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 2>golfers that we know about recognize as great players. And

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 2>that is a great thing. That is something that shouldn't

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:59.240
<v Speaker 2>be discounted. And frankly, courses like Hoylake, the Old Course,

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Old Course worked out really well in

0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:04.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two with a cam Smith Rory McElroy duel,

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but you know that could have been a championship where

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 2>we saw a number of different outcomes that might not

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 2>have been as entertaining on Sunday Pinehurst number two, we

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 2>could be depending on how firm they get it out there,

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 2>we could see a repeat of a Martin Kimer type

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 2>just running away with it on Sunday.

0:55:23.719 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>About Augusta, Yeah, I mean seriously, we haven't had a

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>super close Augusta tournament recently, even though they've been really compelling,

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, my own preference is to be

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>able to watch great golf shots at an interesting golf

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 1>course four days of the championship. That's what I like.

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But I realize that not everybody shares that preference. There

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people who actually prefer the golf

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:55.239
<v Speaker 1>course to potentially be a little softer and slower and

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more bomber friendly, so that you get this kind of

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.799
<v Speaker 1>closely packed leader board with your Brooks Kopka's and your

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Rory McElroy's and your Bryson de Shambos battling it out

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday because they are the only ones who can

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>go really really low on this type of golf course

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:17.279
<v Speaker 1>with these types of turf conditions. And I get that.

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I get that, and I'm looking forward to Sunday I

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just like golf shots more. I like golf courses more.

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I like Thursday through Saturday, and so I don't think

0:56:30.000 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get as much of that this week.

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And I could be wrong, and I'm open open to

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>being surprised. I hope I am surprised, but I think

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're looking at. I agree. All right, Joseph,

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you for coming on the pod. As always, we

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>will reconvene after this PGA Championship to talk about how

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>either right or wrong we were in this podcast. A

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:53.959
<v Speaker 1>delight to talk to you is always. Have a great week.

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Garrett. It'll be fun. Let's see

0:56:57.040 --> 0:57:10.280
<v Speaker 1>how it goes. This episode of the Frida Egg Golf

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Podcast was produced by Matt Ruschius. If you enjoyed the

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Weeds discussion that Joseph and I just had

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast about golf course design and architecture and

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:25.200
<v Speaker 1>its relationship to competition, if you like that kind of stuff,

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you would really enjoy Club TFE and the

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>content that we're doing in there on a daily and

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>weekly basis. Go to the Frida Egg dot com slash

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:39.240
<v Speaker 1>membership to see everything that's offered with clubtfy is not

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>just content, but you know, if you're into this kind

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, clubtfy is the place for you. Thank you

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>very much for listening, and we'll be back again soon.

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, back again right after the PGA Championship for

0:57:52.560 --> 0:58:19.640
<v Speaker 1>another episode. Dot