WEBVTT - Surveillance: Inflation Pressures With Dutta

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferwell and Lisa Brownwitz Jaily, we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Well, what we

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>need to do, John and Lisa is remain calm on

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>radio and television. Right now, we welcome Neil dot Ahead

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of US Economic Research, Renaissance macro research. Neil, you are

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the king of transitory. Why is six point x per

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>cent inflation transitory? Well, I don't know that I'm the

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>king of transitory yet, Tom. I mean, we have been

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>telling clients that that inflation is going to be getting

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>worse before it gets better, and um, you know, today's

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>inflation data has been so it vindicates that. I mean,

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at this, this is actually

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>somewhat worse under the surface than it is on the surface. Um,

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I'm looking at my Bloomberg obviously shelter,

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, look, we still got a beat despite

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>no contribution from airfares. Air airline fares were actually a drag.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to see how that keeps up. Considering, um,

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the travel situation which is beginning to heat up.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at search interests for flights, uh,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there's increasing demand for travel. So it's it's unlikely that

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that we see a repeat performance on that front going forward. Um.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I still think there's a decent amount in

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline for use car and truck prices to keep

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>going up. Um. But again, the big, the big story

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is here is rental inflation, and it's and it's and

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's firming. So UM, I do think that the FEDS

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>still has a story to tell. So it's not so

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>much what the lation is doing. Obviously that's important, but

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>really it's what's the FED going to do about it? Um?

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think Powell, um, it's not ready to do

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>something about it. Yeah to Q one, Nail if you can,

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Sorry to jump in, but I think this is important

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when we get to Q one, and as I listen

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to you, it seems to be getting broader and stickier

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>when we get to Q one. If we're still in

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>this position, and unemployment, as Jim Pallada suggested, could drop

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to a three handle. How do you think communication evolves

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>around that? From your perspective, you're understanding of the reaction

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>function of the FED. Well, I think that that will

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>keep the door open for rate hikes starting in the

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>second half of of next year. I mean, remember that

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED is a very slow moving entity, right, and

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>their institutional constraints. I mean, think about what Powell said

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>last week. I mean, you know, you had folks like

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Waller and soon to depart corals talking about how, well,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>if the next two inflation prints or firm, we may

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have to shift the timeline for rate hikes. Um, you know,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe even hinting at speeding up the tapering process. Powell,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think effectively put the kabash on on that talk

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>last week. So they've kind of locked themselves in to

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a steady pace of tapering I think over the first

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>half of next year. So you know, look, we're talking about,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially substantial acceleration and employment activity between now

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and the end of the year. Obviously inflation is firming,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing an acceleration and nominal growth and guess

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what the FET is still buying right, So, um, So

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it just tells you how slow moving the fete is

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>um And look, I mean I think that labor supply

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to come up, and I think the FED

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>will have a good story to tell and they'll they'll,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they'll continue to stick to that. But

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the risk, of course, is that there's more

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of an abrupt shifting policy. Sometime later night, steer Neil.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's say the data continues to come in like this,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and the fact it feels like it needs to hike rates.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>How high can rates go given where the economy is,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>given how much debt we've incurred. Well, so that's the issue, right.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Li says that if you look at the pricing in

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the forward market, I mean, the curve is so flat.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So basically, if I'm interpreting the market correctly, it's, you know,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>let's hike twice and then be done, which sort of

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>raises the question like why hike at all? Like so

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't, um, you know, to me, the back end

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of the curve looks very misspriced. Um, because there looks

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>to be, at least in my mind, a significant amount

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of momentum in the in the in the economic situation,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, demand is running very very strong, and it

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>still continues to run strong, and you know, you mentioned

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>about how real wages may slow demand. That's unlikely in

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>my view, because aggregate incomes are surging, right, So it's

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not just about what people are making on each our work.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>It's about how many people are working, how long they're working,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and also they're hourly earnings. And if you up the

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some product of those three things, I mean, that's growing

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>like ten percent, So that's a rough proxy annualize, So

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a rough proxy phenomenal GDP. So now we need

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to think about what's going to be the distribution of

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that growth. I mean, is it going to be you know,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>six percent real real activity and maybe four percent inflation?

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be seven percent real activity and

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>three percent inflation? What I can tell you at a

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>minimum is that the FED is going to be having

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to revise up their inflation estimates for next year. And

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we've been seeing is that

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they've you know, when you look at the median expectations,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they've always been sort of just expecting inflation to slow

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>down to two percent, right, So it's just sort of

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this mark to market exercise. There hasn't been this kind

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of capitulation from the FED on the inflation story. And

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect that in December, and I wouldn't expect

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it in March either, because, if anything, the composition of

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the of the farm C is going to change. I

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think Biden is going to put people in there

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that are going to adopt a more hawkish response function

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to the data that's coming in. Neil Love catching up

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>with you, the perfect guest to talk about this with

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Neil down to that every nice on smacro research. Right now,

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>we will pause, and this is a wonderful interlude into

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>cp I and all that we cover here. Jeanne Plan

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of BMP perry Ba USA. He's an acclaimed

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>world class sailor, but far more he has carried forward

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the heritage of b MP Parry Ba from Roland Garrows

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty years ago, where it's safe to say he

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and his bank brand and own the sport of tennis. John,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the only equivalent, see I know, is what Barclays did

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in Premier League years ago. Jean, if you have had

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a bang up year in the branding of tennis, what

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>will b MP Parry BA do in two thousand twenty two?

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>How do you carry for the open in Indian Wells

0:06:55.240 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and bring it into your banking business of next year. Well, Tom,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>John and Lisa, thank you so much for having me

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Um and Tom, you definitely follow and

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>no tennis extremely well. You mentioned Indian Wals, which we

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>managed to you know, really host in one, which we

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>could not do in twenty and it was an amazing

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>way to send the message at work, back back in business,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>back with clients. And as you said, the bank is

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>has tennis in its DNA and the plan is to

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>having Indian Wells in twenty twenty two in March. This

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is you know, spring season opener and hopefully this time

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>full capacity a lot of fans. And you know, the

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>values of tennis fits pretty well the value of the

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>bank going forward. Uh. We you know, it's a it's

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a global sport. The bank is a global bank. It's

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all about sportsmanship, you know, personal improvement and really uh,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's it's a sport that you can really

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, develop and and and uh and follow around

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. And this is this is why we like

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the game, Johnny. If let's pick up on that line

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, the bank is back. The bank is back,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the employees back at the back on the trading floors,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>business is usual. Can you help me understand how things

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are revolving at the moment, how things are normalizing in

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your business, your bank. We are absolutely, John, we are

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>really you know, uh, asking and more specifically, you know,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>incentifizing our staff to come back on premises. You know,

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to acknowledge that the digitalization of our economy

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, you know, as allower us to stay

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in business, to stay connected, including today, by the way,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I love I love being in the studio. I look

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to being back in person with you hopefully you know,

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in the months to come. But having said that, nothing

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>replaces the in person relationship and connectivity. It's very complicated

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to convey companies values digitally. And this is what we

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do on the His coast, you know, in the building

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, well here in mid town Manhattan, we now

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>have over thirty percent for staff back on premises on

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a rotational basis obviously, uh. And we're targeting for by

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>your hand and hopefully early in two. We are trying

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to make the office attractive or we're designing of frauds

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>to make the time effective. Um. You know it has

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>We have to provide value for employees to enjoy being

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>back on premises, and management is a refocused on it.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>They want to be paid more. You know that you

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>can say the bank is back, we will care about

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this business. I care about this industry. You care about

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>this industry. It's great to see people on trading flaws again.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if something's got lost with this younger generation,

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be a part of it. In

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the same way, how are you grappling with that? Does

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the price get it done well? It's uh, it's one

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of the major challenges and concerns. There is a tremendous

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>competition for talent. Uh and it's already by the way,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>within the banking industry. Competition comes from outside of the

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>banking industry. UH. And it's in some very targeted areas

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you're rightly mentioned, you know, in corporate banking, the juniors.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's in leverage finance as well. Whether it's such a

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>high demand, I can tell you. It's in some you know,

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>new technology areas as well, such as cyber and AI.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's in retail. We have a retail bank in

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Retail as well is experiencing some tensions

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of uh, you know, a strong competition for

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>some positions. How do we deal with it? Listen, first

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, as you said, you know, it's about remaining

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>competitive in terms of compensation. That is absolutely critical. But

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not only about compensation, john it's uh, it's working

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>for a company that has a purpose. I believe that

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the mp PI BAT or focus on CSR on sustainability

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is quite compelling. It's acknowledging the fact that some of

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>our staff, particularly the younger generation, is looking for flexibility

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and the new ways of you know, digitizing. The business

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>is probably there, and we have to make the workplace

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>attractive and people coming back here. It has to be

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for a real value, Johnny, especially as you expand again

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, I do wonder how you compete

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with the likes of JP Morgan and the oligarchy of

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>US banks at a time when everyone wants a piece

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of the US dynamism. That's very true. And you know,

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for a bank like BNP PIPA, which is a leader

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in the EUBO zone and as you know, Lisa, we

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have a fairly large platform in the United States. We

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>have a diversified business model. We have a retail activity

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or wholesale activity. We have fourteen thousand people in this country,

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning contributing to the workforce here. But to be successful

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>as a US bank owned by a European leader, you

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be very targeted and to get a piece

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of the dynamism in this country of this, by the way,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing recovery that we believe will continue into a twenty two.

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You have to be targeted. You have to really realize

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what kind of value can provide to clients. And this

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:12.479
<v Speaker 1>is what we've done. With our wholesale activities and retail activities.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We we can be quite effective with US clients who

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not only have a business model in the United States,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but who are becoming much more international and benefiting from

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the U s cross but European expansion that we see

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>happening as well. In one and twenty twenty two, Johnny,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>if you forgive me, because only have sixty seconds left

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on the clock, we get some inflation data in American

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about five minutes. What's your take from the companies you

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>serve you finance, what are you learning understanding? What are

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you learning at the moment about the price pressure in America. Well,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost, I'm learning that, you know, they are

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really very optimistic about you know, the expansion only the

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>recovery we face here, which is carry which will carry

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you out in a carry on in two. And I

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>see them investing. I see them, uh, you know, positioning

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves for more capex investment and obviously trying to hire. Uh.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Inflation is a concern for sure, but we believe that

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with um, you know, the supply chain disruptions will we'll

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>probably you know normalize opput in two uh and uh

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that they should. It's that's not the biggest concern, particularly

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>with such a g D pickles that we're experiencing in

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Johnny, thank you, sir. As always it's

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>going to catch up. A privilege, a pleasure. Johnny philly

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on there the BNP paraboun USA CEO right now, and

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a joy. He's a gentleman and this is

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>always a joy, and that he's running an airline and

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>actually is familiar with the cockpit. He's a former gentleman

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from Colorado Springs and outside Dallas, Texas. Scott Kirby joins

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>US now the chief executive officer of United Airlines. I

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>don't want to ask a snirt question, but I think Scott,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes to the pressure you face with COVID and vaccine.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Could Aaron Rodgers fly out at Green Bay this morning

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on United Airlines? I have no idea where Aaron Rodgers ploye,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but at the moment, uh, there there's we have a

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>requirement frire employee. Uh and we got nine nine point

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of employees. Yeah. I'm really glad you have

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that done. And if you fly international, you've gotta have

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to be vaccinated in most geographies. But what

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>about domestic right now? Are you checking? I mean United

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is lead on this, folks. Let's be direct about it.

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is your experience running American and all the

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>other responsibilities you've had. What do you do with passengers

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>right now? Domestically in America? There is not a requirement

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>domestically for vaccines. There is a requirement, of course to

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>wear a mask onboard airplanes. And the airflow on airplane,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, literally is the best if you're going to

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere indoors. And our view has been on this

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>point at and the administration has already said this, and

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with them, which is the best way to

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>get people vaccinated is frictional trans transactions every time you

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>go to a restaurant, every time you get on a

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>airplane or a train or a bus or a subway.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But to do it through work and then you do

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it once and you get a high percentage of the

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>population vaccinated. And that's really the most efficient way. And

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of course that's what we did at United as well. Scott,

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>how much resistance did you face from your employees to

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>these mandates? Well, you know, we got ninety nine point

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and uh, you know, there's so many of those people,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>uh started off unvaccinated or did not want UM to

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to have the mandate. Ironically, a lot of them actually

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>had been vaccinated, but they just didn't They objected to

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the requirement. But um, But the good news is we

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>were open, honest, and transparent. We started started talking to

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>our employees about it in January, and so when we

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>did it, it wasn't a surprise. It didn't come out

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of left field. We were firm. We never waffled about it.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It is always about safety, that's what it was. You know,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I literally have written a letter to the families of

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>every employee that lost their lives to COVID and when

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you know it feel you feel it. Um.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I felt it, and that the second time I started

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>writing a letter again in July, after the delta variant

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>kicking up, you know, I walked around and talk to

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife and call our teams. Said, we're doing it, um,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's about saving lines. Scott looking ahead to the

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the pandemic, because it does feel like we

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are getting to a place where we can talk about that.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>How much will prices of airfares be higher? Simply because

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there is such a debt overhang, there is such a

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>lost year, a lost era feels like of travel. Well,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, ultimately I think prices, you know, by the

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>time we're getting the next summer, I guess I'm guessing

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back to two thousand nineteen levels. Uh and

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll go up based on kind of our

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>cost input. You know, fuel is a perfect example. When

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>fuel goes up, airline tickets up, and when people goes down,

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they tend to come down. Um. And you know, the

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>good but the good news is most airlines and particularly

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>United you know, got much more productive using technology and

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.719
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, and so our core cost structure. We at

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>United think that we can be ten percent larger than

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>we were before with the same level of employment, and

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so some of that is gonna is gonna help mitigate

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>any increases. But my guess is we're gonna be getting

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>back to kind of two thousand nineteen levels by this

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>coming summer. If you're just joining us Bloomberg, Greece. Scott Kirby,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive officer of United Airlines, Lisa brand Woodson

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Kane. Mr Kirby Lansing, Michigan, is looking at Delta

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in American and not looking at United this morning. I

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>believe you pull out of eleven smaller towns today. Is

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this some form of reversion to monopsony or monopoly within

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the airline business that we don't have competition into some

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of these smaller towns. Uh, not at all. This is

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>simply the economic reality of Frankly, you know, not enough

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pilots in the country, and with not enough pilots, you know,

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>flying small regional jets just gets to be impossible in

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>your choices. If you're only gonna have enough pilot do

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>you want to fly to London or do you want

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be landing and we're gonna fly to London and

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's as simple as that. Did you do this

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in conversation with the other domestic carriers? Was this an

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>organized plan to be sure to two airlines say we're

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>left in each town? Absolutely not. That would have been illegal,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't do it. Now Robert Crandell's listening down

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. Question, Scott, I do wonder your conversations with

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>other executives how much you hear about business travel coming back,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>how much you're adapting airplanes to an era without the

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of business class that you used to have. Well,

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm in uh. It used to be a

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>year and after it as a minority of one, and

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it's still a minority today. But there are a lot

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>more people that agree with say, which is I think

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>business travel is gonna come back. Um. We see all

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of anecdotes, and particularly once people start traveling, they're

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>getting back to traveling. I'm here at right now, and

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it is so much more impactful being here in person

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>than it would be doing doom meetings. You know everything

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the magic happens at dinners or at

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a happy hour, meeting someone for a drink, that's where

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>things really happen. You get to know pi where you

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>build relationships, and that is human nature hasn't changed. Technology

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is great, but just like video conferencing didn't kill business

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>travel back in the eighties when Bob Crandell was worried

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. Uh, it's not gonna kill it now. One

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>final question. Lisa is really focused in on this s

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>f OO is c d G. She wants to take

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the seven Dreamliner. How bad are you getting killed on

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fuel costs for Lisa to go first class s FO

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to c d G. Yeah, well, you know, fuel prices

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>are up. There are biggest there are biggest cost in

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but um, but we're glad to be getting back to

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>flying from San France to Paris and all the other markets. Uh.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And love welcoming the customers on board. And I can

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you having phone for International in the last week there,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody on board is excited, employees, customers. If it's palpable

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>when you get on board of the International fly, do

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you call Muhammad Larian like at the end of every

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>month and thank him for flying United? Dr Larry and Cambridge.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>He only flies United. He like literally won't go unless

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you know he goes there. Well, I I will now

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that you told me that. I think one of our

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>other biggest flyers secretary carry last night, because we have

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of those. Uh yeah, Scott Kirby,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, greatly appreciate it. Right now, the

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO they're ringing a bell for Scott Kirby the the

0:20:55.520 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the pandemic. Perhaps we are who we are,

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>David Rubinstein. This is a star football player whose career

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ended early, and this is someone who was ever framed

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>by the horrific mining accident of Farmington, West Virginia in

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Who is Joe Manchin And what do the Washington

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>elite not understand about him? Well? I think they don't

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>understand that he is in a state that's heavily Republican,

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and though he's a Democrat and he was Democratic governor

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, the state went for President Trump overwhelmingly, and

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>therefore I just don't think you can expect him to

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be doing whatever the Democratic Party leadership wants. He is

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat and he's not going to switch to being

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a Republican. But he's very independent and he's not dependent

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>on the Democratic leadership for his power base. Do you

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>since David, and this is after the election, to be

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>unfair that he is in close conversation with Democratic moderates

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>who are shell shocked. Yes, absolutely, Um, I think he's

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>saying to them, and I think he believes that the

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>election in Virginia showed that you can go too far

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to the left, and that's what he thinks probably happened

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia. So what he's trying to do is to say,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to have some of these policies that

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>are spending a lot of money. We shouldn't, he believes

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>very strongly, and not giving people more what he would

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>call handouts or more gifts from the government in his view. Uh,

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and really we should pay for some of the things

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>that we are paying that we're trying to get through legislation,

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and right now we're not really paying for it. And

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't favor increasing taxes either. He would favor not

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>having these programs. But he is a very personable person.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I've known him for a long time. Uh, he's very intelligent,

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he's very engaging. He just happens to have a views

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that are a little more conservative than Democratic Party leadership,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit more conservative then maybe some other

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>people in Washington would like him to be. But he's

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>reflecting his constituency. Remember it's a constituency does a very

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican and Uh he could probably win as the state

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>if he if he switched to a Republican, which is

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to do, he could probably get elected as

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a Republican. He's very popular, but he's also trying to

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>reflect the views of his state. David. Does he enjoy

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>his power. I've met very few people that don't enjoy

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>their power in Washington, d C. So I would think

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he probably does enjoy it. He doesn't run around saying,

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>look how powerful I am. But when you are as

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>powerful as he as he is, and I don't think

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen a person who's not in the leadership,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not the majority leader, a minority leader, have as much

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>power as he has. He has much more power now

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to affect the outcome of major legislation than anybody I

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>know other than a majority leader or a minority leader

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or the Speaker of the House. Enormous amount of power,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think he probably does enjoy it. Why would

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he not? Does he plan to use it? Just launch

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>into something else politically? Say President Uh to be realistic

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. I don't think that's that that can happen.

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and he wouldn't say that it can happen. Remember,

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>he's now, I think, in his early to mid seventies,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and while that's young for some presidents, you might say, Um,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he would not be about that attractive to the Democratic

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Party UH primaries in my view, because he'd probably be

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>too much of a moderate to do when in the primaries,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and I therefore think it's unrealistic. Um, he is not

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>likely to run again for governor in my view. I

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>think he's pretty happy in the Senate, So I think

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he's going to stay in the Senate. UH. If he

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>runs re election, he will be up in two years,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and he hasn't announced yet whether he'll run again. I

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>suspect he will, but he hasn't society yet. David, you

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have studied and indeed live, the path from Mr Jones

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to Mr Welch to Mr m l and on to

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what we have now with Mr Kupp at General Electric.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on the end of GE as we knew it, Well,

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a sad situation for American corp life. You might

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think about it that way, because this is one of

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful companies in the world for a long time,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and when Jack Welsh was running it, it seemed to

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>be the most impressive company in America. And now the

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>company is being broken up. Larry Colp is a very

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.239
<v Speaker 1>talented executive. He did a terrific job at Danaher and

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of years, if his conclusion is the

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>best thing to do is to break it up to

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>unlock value, I think he's probably made the right decision.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's unfortunate, but you know, time moves on, and

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>no company can stay as big as as g was forever.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And it really had to make some change that it

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't make changes quickly enough, and that's why they now

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have to do what they're doing. And David, do you

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>think that in ten twenty years we're gonna be saying

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about Amazon? There very few companies that

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>stay at the top of the world for as long

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as the g E did. Amazon could be one of them.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But Amazon is still a relatively young company. But there's

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that there's gonna be more companies coming along

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't heard of that are going to be

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the dominant companies uh in the world. In a few years.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>For example, twenty years ago, who heard of Amazon, tesla Um?

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Even Apple wasn't that big a deal then, or Netflix.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So the world changes. That took one of the great

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>things about capitals, and you can start a company and

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a few years you can make it a very powerful company.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has in pretty good shape though. I think there'll

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be around for quite some time though. David Rubin saying

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, greatly appreciating and peer to peer conversations.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Look for that tonight with a timely conversation with the

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Senator from West Virginia, John on this guest. We've got

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to start with CPI Wednesday, but there's a whole lot

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>going on that Robbo Bank is truly expert at TAK.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton and I think the overwhelming story still

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is to try and understand what the incoming data means

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for the fence next move. Let's start that with Jane

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Funny right now, head of FX Strategy at RAMA Bank. Jane,

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>can we begin there what the incoming data CPI this morning, payrolls,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>last week, the ice M actually mean for the federal's

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>eve gun into next year. Well, to be honest, I

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to answer the question of whether or

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>not a transitory is gone des by looking at to

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>today's data. I mean, yes, if it comes in a

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>lot weaker than maybe some of the less inflationary among

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>us are going to just to say, you know what,

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>this is transitory. But I think more of the answers

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have got to be in the wage inflation because it's

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>only when we see wage inflation. If we don't see

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>wage inflation, that will be able to tell whether or

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not there are those second round effects. You know. When

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I think it's going to be really

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>quite thematic for for the currency markets certainly going forward

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>over the next over the next six months, or maybe

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>even beyond, is the fact that not all labor markets

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>are the same. They are very different. You have more flexibility,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in the US probably going to have more

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>wage inflation, and yet that's not going to be a

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>pattern that we see elsewhere, and that is going to

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>be really important in trying to judge interest rate differentials

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and effects going forward. Jenny's you understand better than most

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>most things are solved in economics with the calendar. Just time,

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>let it pass. For the Chairman of the Federal Reserve,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much time is on his side, and

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>how you balance what we're seeing on wages which picked

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>up still below inflation in America, but wages picking up

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time the participation rate in America is

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not How do you balance those two things, Jane, Well,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly the problem. In the US. You have a

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>very flexible labor market. The participation rate has dropped. People

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have fallen out of the labor market, and therefore you're

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to have or we've seen wage pressures as firms

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>scowring around trying to find labor. Now you go to

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a country like Japan, it's not the same sort of

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>labor market. Firms tend to hoard labor. You don't have

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>firm scowing around trying to find workers because they already

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have them. And that's probably a situation more work into

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>what we have in Europe too, So at Legard for instance,

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that remaining quite davish, expecting that inflation is going to

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be more transitory. Well, maybe the answer to that maybe

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the differences in the labor market. Similarly, you can you

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can see differences in the labor market in Australia too.

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>They haven't had the same reactions in the US. So

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in the US, yeah, we're potentially going to see an

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rate hike. We think at the end of next year,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe around December. Obviously some people thinking it's going to

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>come earlier. But that's not going to be necessarily the

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>same dynamic that you see elsewhere for those of you

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on radio, and you can see it clearly on TV.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Jane folio is at the Rabble Bank London desk. That

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is a desk of the Netherlands. And what's important here

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>John and Lisa with the inflation argument is Robbo Bank

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is absolute ground zero for the food industry hedging in

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. They own it from forward. Jane, you have

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a view of food inflation like not one single person

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked to. What do you observe it, Robbo Bank

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about food inflation, hedging and speculation dynamics right now? Well,

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I we take that back into energy

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and awful lot of food companies like it, well sort

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturers have big factories and energy but picularly in

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Europe parts of Asia has been a real problem this year.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So an awful lot of people trying to hedge that energy,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>trying not to pass those costs onto the consumer. But

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they are probably coming. So we are seeing that sort

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of inflation coming through. And this is this is why,

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of course central banks or various central banks are going

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to be going to be cautious, because even if wages

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>go up, if you've got food inflation or energy inflation

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going up by more of a pace, you're still going

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to have real wage depreciation. And that's not the sort

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of thing that's central banks high interest rates into. So

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this whole dynamic is really quite complex and really quite fascinating,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to be the situation next year.

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So some more volatility. I think at the short end

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of the curve Gene, why isn't the dollar stronger given

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the back draft you just laid out, I think there's

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good news in the price. So for instance,

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>if we go back to June, I think June for me,

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the done FMC was really interesting because that's when we

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>saw that big movement in the dock plots of various

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>f WEGM seen was relative too much. That's when we

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>began to see this dollar rally. Now, the dollar really

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>has been on the front foot. It's been rallying, you know,

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>since June. It's it's it's it's gained ground. And I

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think at this point in time, there's a lot of

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>news in the price. And when you've got a lot

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of good news in the price and in terms of

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the fair et cetera, well you know, how much more

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>can the dollar go. You're also looking at a situation

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>where we see risk appetite, certainly for US stocks really benefiting.

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So you've got the dollar gaining and risk appetite for

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for stocks gaining too. And I think perhaps that's not

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a natural dynamic, and perhaps that's something which has has

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>has maybe forced some of the bullishness out of the

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>US dollar as well. You said it, Jane, what a

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating moment this is. It's great to explore it with

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>your Jaane Farley There, Ramma Bank, it's a different Disney

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>John and you know, I guess they're waiting for Mandalorian

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and streaming and a John. Did you watch Mandalorian? I

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>did not. Yeah, it's it's you know, it's cappy. It's

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like there and we're all waiting for it. Okay, should

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk to an expert? We should probably think we

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>should do that. Michael Michael Nathans and joining a senior

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>analyst at Marfat Nathans and with Craig mafat Definitive. Here, Michael,

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about Disney on this conference call

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fear they have over the streamers. I've got

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Culver City over five hundred thousand square feet,

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>doubling employee count to three thousand something, Netflix with three

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand square feet. They've got a million square feet

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in l A. How scared is Disney about the new

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 1>streamers joining them in l A. I don't think Disney

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is scared about competition. I think Disney is gonna be

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>focused on how can they accelerate their growth because in

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of quarters has been a slowdown at Disney.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Plus I don't you know, I think there's enough room

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for Disney probably to win, and they need to talk

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to us about what they're seeing, why there's a slowdown,

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or whether they're gonna do about it. Okay, what are

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they gonna do about it? I mean Disney is here,

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>They're coming out of a pandemic. They get x thousand

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>people at Shanghai Disney. You know, COVID and Shine and

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>all that. What does your crystal ball see or is

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it like a massive opportunity coming out of the pandemic

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to buy pandemic affected Disney. You know, we're neutral, truly neutral,

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think the stock last year more than compensated

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for the streaming opportunity in the park recovery, and for

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the past twelve months or so, it's it's just been

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>trading water. Our thesis is that to spend a lot

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>more money on content. Maybe that's to your Appling and

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Netflix point, that there's so much great content available that

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the only way you get stub to this point is

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>by spending more money and content building awareness, trying to

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have a breakthrough head. Disney has done a great job

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gang in this level. In order to grow further, they

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>need a lot more content. Um, you know, they have

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a flywheel spinning faster. They don't then they've

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>done so far. They've also got to consolidate what they own.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And Michael, now you're focused on this, how did they

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>leverage Huluk? What do you make spanking them to do

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in the coming months? Courts Okay, so Hulu is a

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>JV between them and Comcast. In two years, they have

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the right to buy it back. Rethink they'd be smart

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to buy back sooner and try to create a more

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>unified Disney bundle. You know Who's on its own Apple

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Island and Disney Plus has allen. You put him together, um,

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and you create one single application where you can get

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Who and Disney Plus UM and basically try to push

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.479
<v Speaker 1>more people to the bundle than's Disney and Who plus

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus and Who. They have to buy it from

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Comcast UM. I'm sure they're talking to them now about it.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be cheap to do it, but

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they need to. Basically, we've find we've had the research

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is at Disney Plus has done. It's not well penetrated

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>amongst older viewers. It's done a great job among kids,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>families and fans of their content. But for the older

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>viewer that's not a Disney Disney fan that wants gen

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>entertainment content need to do more and putting it together

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>with Hulu more closely probably could drive penetration. So we're

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>expecting something in the next two years before actually the

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>timetables up to try to consolidate the position. It is

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this for a biggest slice for Bigger Pie or Michael.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Could that be in a hate this term the Netflix killer,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>but could that be something that hurts Netflix if the

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>likes of Disney can diversify the content slate beyond that

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>narrow demographic you described. Yeah, So our our view is

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 1>like Netflix is a base a based consumer choice, but

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>as time goes on, what you're seeing is more people

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are adding more services on top of Netflix. Our Netflix

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>nesis you know we've been running on the stock is

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that content is not monopoly, that it's impossible to have

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly position and content and the competition and Tom

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about you're talking about to us impacts Netflix is

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the time spent in Netflix, Netflix, the price and power,

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe the cost of doing business. So ultimately more competition

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I would think would have some negative packed on Netflix's

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>ability to raise prices and to compete. But in the

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>past twelve to fifty months, the pandemic has really slowed

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 1>down the ability to compete because you can't. You had

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a good two months slowdown with no content is produced,

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and Netflix had a massive advantage. So for us, the

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>next one to two years will be a catch up

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>on spending for all these companies that couldn't compete during

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Michael, when you talk about the fact that

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus hasn't really penetrated the older individuals, the older households.

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Are they fully penetrated with the younger households with those

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that have children? Lisa, obviously no. You know, Netflix is

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>about penetrated across the board. Disney added best penetration rates

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about so there's room to go amongst you know, the

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>core demo, So there's definitely room to go. But then

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as we show, it drops off dramatically, So yeah, there's

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>upside going to the core, and then they have to

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 1>expand past the corn. That's what we want to hear about,

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and there is cultivate endings a little bit later, Mark,

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>before you go, what was meta about? We haven't spoken

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 1>since then? What was that about? What are you telling?

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>What is that? Exactly? By the way, we have a

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>buying Facebook right exactlete. What's meta about? Meta is about

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a world in which Facebook could, um try to have

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>more control live or not over the world they have

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>now right where it's it's it's a it's a universe

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>where there will be commerce, they'll be communication, um, there'll

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be games, and Facebook's trying to basically have a leading

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>position in that world. We've done some Mark on this

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>recovery the gaming industry. We think gaming will lead, and

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that Facebook actually have a position they

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>want to have in this business. The other thing, Jonathan,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is it was a way to take the turn of

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>investment dollars, classify it and we can now separate that

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>from the core Facebook earnings number, and we can say

0:37:57.880 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to you and everyone else, look how cheap Facebook is.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It's meta. If you ever met a no value at all,

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>which we do, the core business is actually a lot

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>more properly you think. But yeah, we'll talk to you

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in three to five to ten years about meta um

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and we don't evaluate at all. But it's helped us,

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, clarify the valuation. I look forward to it.

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a world Tom where regulates us like us politicians.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to sit around a table with us in

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>sharra drink. Michael Nathan said thank you, sir. Michael Niceton

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>said a muffit next and said thank you very much.

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg.