WEBVTT - Kiplinger's Housiaux on Candidates and Social Security (Audio)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the Radio, plus Molobile Act and on your radio.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie plot To dial the SMPNAZDAC all declined. Today's

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks were retreating from records as a tumble in the

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>price of crude sinks energy shares. West Texas Intermediate Crude

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>down two point six percent. Drop there of one point

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to a dollar fourteen to forty three oh five of

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>barrel on West Texas Intermediate Gold down six tenths of

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>one percent, falling eight ten the ounce the thirteen fifteen.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>We are minutes away from getting latest numbers from Texas Instruments.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Moments ago, we heard from Gilead Sciences it lowered its

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>net products sales forecast for twenty sixteen, sending the shares

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lower and late trading Gilliad down about four and a

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>half percent. SMP down six to drop there are three

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>tenths of one percent to down down seventy seven the

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>dropped there of four tense of one percent. I'm Charlie Pelt.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>That's a Bloomberg business flash. You're listening to Taking Stock

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with Bim Fox and Kathleen Hayes on Bloomberg Radio. The

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic National Convention getting underway into Philadelphia. What role will

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>social security play in the debates that will be hearing

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this week? There's a big push to try to get

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>younger voters to the polls, but we know that it's

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>many times it's older voters that are the most faithful.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Can anybody touch the third reel of politics in a

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 1>way that we'll get them votes? Are they all going

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>to hold back? Join us now? Matthew Hoosier, he's a

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>reporter for the Kiplinger Letter, and he's been writing about

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this very issue, suggesting that while Hillary Clinton and Donald

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump could both make some proposals in all likelihood, they won't,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at least not when it comes to cutting Social Security. Matthew,

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>welcome to taking Stock. Hi, thanks for having me so

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so far. What have we heard from Miss Clinton and

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump on this issue? Well, uh, Mrs Clinton has

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>suggested that she wants to expand social Security benefits kind

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of following her party's moved to the last In particular,

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>she wants to expand them for caregivers, people who left

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the workforce for a period of time to take care

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of a loud when our family member and therefore weren't

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>able to access the Social Security system. Um So, she

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to make sure they're going to have a secure

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>retirement and to do that. To pay for that, she

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>would ask high income earners to pay um a little

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>bit more into the system in order to make that work.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And Donald Trump has also pledged not to touch Social

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Security benefits. His goal is to basically make the economy

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>better and therefore have more workers paying into the system,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully that will help ease the funding shortfall that

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Social Security is currently projected to face here in the

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>next couple of decades. Matthew, to you give us some

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>detail on social Security, because it is not just the benefits.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>One third of retirees receive almost all their retirement income

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>from the system. Two thirds received more than half from

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Social Security. But yet there is also the Social Security

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Disability Insurance Trust Fund. Tell us about that and whether

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>that is also on the table to be debated because

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that's expected to run out of money certainly. Um So,

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that obviously, as you mentioned, is a much more immediate problem.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Um And Uh, Ultimately it works in the same way

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>as the retirement fund does in the sense that it's

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>funded by worker contributions in PAYWORL taxes. Uh. And obviously

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>last at the end of last year, you had Congress

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>work at a deal that basically tacked took money from

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the retirement fund in order to um keep the disability

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>funds solvents um for up through I believe eighteen And

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>um my, my assumption is our our assumption here at

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that keeping it is that ultimately Congress will end up

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>having to act on that here the next couple of years, however,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on most of the discussion in the campaign season is

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be focused on the retirement program because that's

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>um the aspect of the Social Security program that voters

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>are really really passionate about and really care about. At

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>this point, Okay, with Donald Trump pledging not to touch

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Social Security but close the funding gap by pretty more

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>jobs and therefore you people have to pay more payroll

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>taxes and that will that will offset this deficit. How

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fast would the US economy have to grow? How many

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>more people would have to be in the labor force

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>working to come close to that? Boy, I'll tell you

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what I am. I am not unfortunately a trained economist

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so I did not was not able to do any

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>calculations in that, or was not able to find anybody

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>who had done any sort of concrete calculations on that.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So I could not. But broadly, is there any and

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean who who who out there agrees that, yeah,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just faster economic growth would help close the gap? Or

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is this? I have not known to anybody who's any

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like very reputable economist who has supports or who thinks

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that that would ultimately work. Matthew, Sorry to stay in

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the weeds here, but um you know, you talked about

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>this reallocation between the Disability Insurance Trust and the Old

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund. They've been doing that

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for years. But the Survivor's Insurance Trust Fund, if all

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the problems are put onto that, then won't that

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>just hasten its own shortfall? Um So that would be

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>assuming that, uh, ultimately that nothing is going to be

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>done about about the funding shortfall. However, we do anticipate

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that at some point before um, you actually get to

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the point where the Social Security program is unable to

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>UM fund all of its various liabilities, sometime before then,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Congress will find a way that sounds like a hope

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>as much. I mean, not that that's bad, but I

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mean that does sound like more of a hope than

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>anything that's based on practical knowledge. It is it is well,

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly a hope. UM. The reason that UM,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess we would put it like that is just

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress tends not to act unless it absolutely must UM.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we don't anticipate seeing any sort of major

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>action on social security in the next four years, with

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the exception of something done to help fund the disability funds,

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>which will probably just be similar to the last fix,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're moving money from the retirement's account into the

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>disability fund. So if I'm somebody relying on my social

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>security UH, in large part from retirement, what what should

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I be worried about? We're not worried about, UM. If

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you're relying on it currently. UM. If you're lying at

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it currently, you shouldn't have to worry about too much.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>None of the major changes that are being proposed are

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>going to come into effect, um obviously in the next

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>four years, and we don't we don't think, and probably

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not within even if they were to come into effect them,

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they would not affect current social Security recipient. Thanks very

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us and giving us that view on

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>social security. Matthew Hooser is a reporter for The Kipsinger

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Letter based in Washington, d C. I'm pim Fox. My

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>co host Kathleen Hayes. This is taking stock are thanks.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank your producer, Reggie basil Our. Thanks also to Sam Lana,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>our producer. Coming up. The Democratic National Conventional kicks off

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. And this is Bloomberg coming up Bloomberg

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Law brought you by ben Zel Bush. Introducing in the

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>world's most technologically advanced vehicle, the new twenty seventeen Mercedes

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Best Eat Class Sidan at ben Zelbush to find the

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Way you drive at ben Zelbush, America's premiere auto dealership

0:07:59.080 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in Englewood, New je