WEBVTT - This Is The NYSE's Plan To Win More Direct Listings

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd LODs podcast.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Halloway. So, Tracy, you

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>know how people talk a lot about how big financial

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>institutions and financial and financial stocks in particular, just like,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I haven't really done very well lately. It's been a

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>long time sort of a seeming permanent state of slump. Yeah.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to forget in when we have

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>all these headwinds for the banks, like loan losses, um

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>credit provisions, building up, things like that. That even before now,

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there was this big debate about whether we were in

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a secular or a cyclical downturn for banking and especially

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>investment banking. Right, you had all these new rules that

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>came in after the two thousand eight financial crisis, and

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of talk about whether or not

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>banks could ever get back to the days of making

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>big money. Yeah, that's exactly right. Even prior to this year,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at sort of the main financial

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sectors of the SMP, lots of questions about financial companies

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>business model in an era of mediocre growth, very low

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, Like there's just this has been a sector

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that people haven't been into for a lot. Yeah, and

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of course ultra low interest rates don't really help on

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the lending side either. So yeah, it feels like there

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>have been well, there has been a decade of challenges

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for banking. But okay, so, but also what I said before,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a lie because, uh, not all

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>financial companies have struggled over the last decade, and some

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>are doing phenomenally well. You're gonna have to narrow that

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>down for me. So are you talking about non bank

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>financial companies? Yeah, So basically there are other parts of

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street besides the big banks that are killing it.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And so if you look at say the last decade

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>company like Goldman sax uh stock you know, pre dividends

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is only up over the last decade. But some of

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the other sort of infrastructure parts of the business, UM

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>exchanges doing phenomenally well, and ICE, the parent company of

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange, they're up. Other big in

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the uh sort of exchanges platforms, index providers doing phenomenally well.

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk about financial is not doing well,

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about banks. But actually a lot of parts

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street really are have been on a phenomenal run. Yeah,

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. And of course you've had a

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you've had a pretty good year for trading revenue because

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of market volatility, and now you've

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>had a big boom in bond and debt underwriting as

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>well because everyone's rushing to issue. So yeah, there are

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the banking system that are doing well, and

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the non banks of course, up until I keep caveating this, Wait,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your caveat so that it's not just this's a

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>brief period that we're talking about the Yeah, so today

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be talking about one aspect of I

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>guess what you would call Wall Street that is doing

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>phenomenally well, one interesting business, one other thing, Tracy before

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we before we get to our guests. Um, this has

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>been a quite a year for public offering. Yes, even

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>aside from traditional I p o s, we have seen

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of SPACs, for instance, a new type of

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>public listing or a new way of going public without

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>actually going through the I p O process. So it's

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>been an interesting time in equity capital markets. Yeah, it's

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>super interesting because in addition to I p o s,

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we've had the spack boom, and we also have this

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of emergence of direct listings, which is companies saying, note,

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna start trading our shares on the exchange

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and the market will set the price and we don't

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>need to do the traditional I PO road show. And

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know this is a also a growing area of yeah,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>area of new public listing. So today we're going to

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about the exchanges and that in particular. I'm very

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>excited about our guest. We are going to be speaking

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>with John Tuttle, Vice Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange,

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is a fourteen year veteran of the exchange. Uh he

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>works on all areas of capital markets, I p o S,

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>SPACs and direct listing, so sort of a fascinating person

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the nicetiest role and all this. So John,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us. Great to be

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with you guys. So it has been I mean, is

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>that fair like this to characterize like there's a lot

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of excitement these days about public markets. It feels like

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in a way that we haven't seen in a while. Yeah,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree, and you know we are we're in

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter now, but I'll you know, I'll give

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you these two points. August was the busiest month we

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>had in over a decade in August. You know, when

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to new equity issuance I p o s

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and August is traditionally this one of the slowest months

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and September of this year was the

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>busiest month for I p o s in the over

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>two hundred year history of the New York Stock Exchange.

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So the market is open. It's open for new equity issuance,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that come in the form of I p o s,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>SPACs or direct listings. So can you talk to us

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that third option direct listings because

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>my understanding is that even though there's a lot of

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about that, we haven't necessarily seen that many in

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>recent years. In fact, I guess the most famous direct

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>listing that I can think of is um Spotify, But

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a few years ago. So what's going on

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>there and why the excitement over this particular route to

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>public markets? Yeah, really, if you take a look back

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>over the past four years, we created more pathways to

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the public markets than had been created in the previous

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>two to three decades. The direct listing was one of them,

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>So you're right, the first one was a few years

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>ago in April of eighteen with Spotify. Barry McCarthy, the

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>CFO Spotify, is really an independent thinker. He helped pioneer

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>this process. Someone we are proud to work with uh

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in in creating a new pathway to the public market.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And as we expected, you know, would be a slow start,

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>but now you're starting to see the uh the slope

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the curve rise. So we had one in two

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, one in two thousand nineteen with Slack, and

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>then we had two on the same day in September

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>with palat Here and Asana. And it might be helpful

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just to take a step back and describe the differences

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>between a direct listing and an I p O, because

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>sometimes parts of them get conflated. But an I p

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>O is the most well worn path to the public markets.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's been around for a long time. A company hires

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>an investment bank and other advisors to sell shares into

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the market, and they're going to raise capital that can

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>use to grow and expand their business, launch new products,

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tap into new geographies, and they conduct you know, they

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>file an S one if they're a US company, they

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>file an F one perspectives if they're non us issuer,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and then they go out and they talk to institutional

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>investors market the transaction, and the night before they're listing

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>on the New York Stock Exchanged, they get together and

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they say, okay, we agree to sell our shares for

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this price. Well, that's where they're sold to the institutional investors.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not necessarily where the stock is going to open

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the next day. And so what happens after you see

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the bell ring and the price discovery on the trading

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>floor take place is the beginning of secondary trading. And

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>when that happens, that's really the market valuing this company,

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a small group of bankers and other advisors, who,

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are the best in the world at

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what they do. But there's still a dislocation. It's not

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the most efficient pricing mechanism for an offering, and so

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you see a stock open at maybe percent and in

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>some cases recently over two higher than that I p

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>O price, which is referred to as quote unquote the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>pop um. Sometimes people want the pop most of the

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>times they don't want that big of a pop. Now,

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a direct listing is a little bit different because every

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>company goes public for different reasons. There's a variety of reasons,

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>including that raising capital, liquidity for their shareholders, for their

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>employees and other investors, having a share currency that they

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>can use to conduct mergers and acquisitions down the road,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to be branding as well, or even just things further

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>down the list about credibility. If your software company and

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you're listed on the public markets, your clients, no, you're

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to go out of business overnight and leave

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>them high and drive. So in a direct listing, the

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>priorities are a little bit different for these companies. These

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>are companies that want the benefits of being a publicly

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>traded company, most of which I just enumerated, but they

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need to raise capital at the time of

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>their listing. So if you think about Spotify, they had

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>cash on their balance sheets. Slack had raised I believe

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>close to a billion dollars in the private markets prior

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to their listing. Same with palant Here and Asana, and

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't want to come to the market raised

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>capital at a arguably higher than necessary cost of capital

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>being exemplified by that pop, and they said, is there

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a new pathway to the market. So so we worked

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>with Spotify. We worked with the SEC and other stakeholders

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to create this direct listing pathway and so now now

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know this is an option for companies. Like I said,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we started slow, we're seeing more companies planned for them.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, in every conversation I'd have with CFOs and

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>company founders, this is always a topic and we're going

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to see more of them as we go into one. Now,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>it's also an important distinction to make between the IPO.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>That bank also helps you set up your road show.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>They provide stabilization activities, so they helped support the stock

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's early days. That doesn't happen in a direct listing.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>There's no underwritten offering, no no shares are being sold

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to the public. So really you're relying on the NYC

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>S market model. You're relying on the company to meet

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>with investors as well as part of this public debut.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>In planning for the public debut, you know, before I

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was gonna ask you a sort of question about the

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of the direct listening, but before I do it,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>before I forget, do you think that like in the

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>road show, the sort of informational services that the banks

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>offer where they introduce a new company to perspective investors

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>has become less necessary. I'm just thinking about, like with

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and all different ways of sort of doing

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>research and getting information out there, is that particular aspect

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the going public, the sort of the introduction aspect,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>is that declining in terms of its necessariness for companies

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>when they go public. It is changing and that is

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a fact. There's no way we're going back to the

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen style road show where a company's management

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>team gets on an airplane, flies around the world or

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>across the country, and back to back meetings with institutional investors.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We saw during that there are new tools, so whether

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it be video conferencing, teleconferencing, etcetera, where you can have

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>meaningful interactions with investors and not have to get on

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>an airplane to do it. So that is a when

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we talk to the companies that have gone public, you know, look,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll be the first ones to tell you there's

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing like a face to face interaction, whether that's with

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a customer, with an employee, or with an investor. But

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to coming to market, the efficiency uh

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're able to have by conducting the quote unquote

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>road show virtually is well received, and I don't think

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going back to the ways of twenty nineteen and prior.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a related question before we go into the

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>details on direct listings. But all of the criticisms of

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the I p O process, the idea of the bank's

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>charge big fees, and the idea that maybe the stock

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>gets miss priced in some way or the company is

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>effectively leaving money on the table when they get the

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>big pop on the first day of trading. You could

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have made any of those criticisms over the past um decades, certainly,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even beyond that. What's changed recently so that

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know people are talking more about the direct listing

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or this back process. What was the catalyst for this

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>current conversation. Well, I think there's been a pent up

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>demand for new pathways to the public markets that are

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>arguably more tailored to meet the companies objectives. So again,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the I p O is a well worn route. A

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies will take that route and and and

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like the process, even though it may result in arguably

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>less efficient price and than you would have through other routes.

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But for companies that again didn't need to raise capital

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time that they're listing, either because they had

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>cash on their balance sheet from operation or they were

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>able to get investment in the private markets. They have

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a new pathway that's more tailored to meet their objectives.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Companies that want certainty of execution and want their public

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>entrance to be more akin to an M and a

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>transaction than the traditional I PO now have this spack

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And now we're even working to combine the best of

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>some of these where we filed with the SEC last year,

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>received approval from the staff and are just waiting on

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>final sign off from the commissioners to bring together the

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>direct listing with a capital raising component as well. So

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>there are more pathways to the public markets now, that's

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>why you see companies more actively pursuing different routes. Now,

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I should also make a point but that there's been

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>innovation within each one of those pathways. So some of

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the frustrations companies had or institutional investors had around things

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like the lock up or the allocation process are all changing.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at some recent IPOs, instead of

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the traditional one day lock up period, you've seen some

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>companies incorporate more dynamic lock up periods so if there

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>are certain thresholds or trigger points that are met, certain

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>events happen. When it comes to uh, the ability to

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sell more shares to the public or employees, a will

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>sell more shares. One of the criticisms by some investors

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>about the direct listing was that there was no lock

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>up period, and they thought there was not enough control

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>over the float and who had who had access to

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>selling shares. So so with Palace here they incorporated a

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lock up period. So not only there are more pathways,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but there's more innovation within each one each of those

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>pathways as well. Tok to us about that the combining

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the direct listing of the capital rays. So as

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you set it up, most of are the direct listings

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that have happened so far. We're companies that had enough

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>capital or raise enough capital, didn't need to get any

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of that I p O cash. Now you said this,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you have staff level approval for combining the two. What

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is the issue there? And once it's sort of fully

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>unlocked or once it's sort of fully allowed, how many

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>more companies just sort of uh, do you think that

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>opens up the interest if they can also raise cash

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>from a direct list. Yeah, we're we're excited about the

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>direct list in plus capital raise, and it just highlights that,

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we've been leading a lot of this

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>innovation in the capital markets because of how we trade stocks,

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>our market model, the things we're able to do with

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange. Now, before I get to

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that point, one thing I would say is that if

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at and it helps in in in explaining

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>why the direct listing plus capital raise is so interesting.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>If you look at some of these recent technology i

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>p o s, there has been a very small public flow,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so less than ten of the company being offered in

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>an i p O. Now, if it's an exciting company,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a consumer facing brand and enterprise tech company, or or

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a company coming from a sector space where there's going

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of investor demand, when you're only

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>floating a very small percentage of the company, you you

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>encounter a supply demand uh dislocation, and so there's not

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>enough supply coming into the market. There's overwhelming demand. And

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what's leading to this quote unquote pop. What we

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>saw at the direct listing is that you have a

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>much much, much bigger public float that's out there. Spotify

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed of their shares to be trading in their in

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>their direct listing. What that that was you had more

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>robust price discovering, more buyers and sellers could come together,

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and that ultimately lead to more liquidity and more efficient pricing.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at um, if you look at Spotify,

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Slack and Talents, here three out of the four direct

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>listings that have come out, those three they're opening trade

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>stand among the top ten largest opening trades in the

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>history of US capital markets. That's because you had liquidity,

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you had price discovery. You also had the ability for

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>investors that normally would have had to wait days to

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors to start building a position without running up

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the stock, to be able to build a bigger position

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>more quickly because you had that liquidity. So, after those

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>direct listings and the performance we saw from an exchange

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>standpoint in a and and by all meaningful metrics, less volatility,

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>more liquidity than you had in a traditional I p O,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we started talking to market participants so that companies, banks, investors, regulators,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>others and said how can we improve this. We realized

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>there was strong demand. We're saying, hey, we would love

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate the ability to raise primary capital or fresh

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>new capital for the company as part of the direct listing.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So this was not a solution in search of a problem.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>There's demand in the marketplace for this, so we worked

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC and others to to file rule changes

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>with the exchange. All our rules have to be all

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of our rule changes have to be blessed by the

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>SEC and go through a very rigorous vetting process to

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>allow for that to happen. So what we have proposed

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>UH is for if a company wants to pursue a

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>direct listing and include a primary capital raise, they will

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>file their registration statement just like they will with an

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I p O. They will disclose the number of shares

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to sell, they will disclose a range at

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>which those shares will be sold, and then that they're

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>willing to sell those shares, and that whole block of

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>shares will need to trade at one price, one time,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's the opening auction of the n Y s C.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's one moment in time that will

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>be the primary capital race, but it's going to be

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>raised at the market price. So it's again it's contrary

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to an I p O, where you have again people

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>who are very good, uh at at at their jobs

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>setting the price, but oftentimes there's a huge dislocation between

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the price they're setting in what markets actually value it.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You're going to open your stock and raise capital at

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the market price. Mhm. Since we're on the topic of

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the SEC or since you mentioned it, there are people

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>out there who make the argument that I p O S.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not just about the pricing process and

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the due diligence of the banks, but it's also about

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>certain protections for new investors. What happens to those in

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the direct listing process, and what do you say to

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>critics who think that this is basically a regulation light

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>way for companies to go public. Look, there's there have

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>been some criticisms of the direct listing, but oftentimes those

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>come from the folks that are being disrupted along the

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>way and in the process. So these companies are filing

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in a prospectus with the SEC so an S one

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or an or an F one registration, there's still subject

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to the rigorous requirements to be listed on the New

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange. They're still subject to the ongoing regulations

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Stock Exchange. In the SEC so

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a different pathway to the public markets. It disrupts

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>some folks that have been involved in the process and

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>getting resistance along the way as a sign that, from

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>my perspective, that we're doing something right. M You know,

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you use the term market model a couple of times

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>in your description of how you operate. What does that

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>mean specifically when you talk about the power of the

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>NICECS market model? H can you describe that term a

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more? Yeah? Absolutely, and and uh and happy to

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit more into market micro structure. But

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the New York we love, our our listeners love that stuff.

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I know this is the right audience, so so I'm excited.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So the New York Stock Exchange operates a market model,

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so how we trade your stocks, and it's differentiated for

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not only any other domestic exchange, but any other global

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>exchange and well as well. So what does that mean.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>It means that at the very base layer in the

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>United States, there's something that's uh any exchange in the

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>United States, there's something called a competitive market maker system.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So the exchanges incentivized market participants to quote in a

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.719
<v Speaker 1>company security. There's no obligation to do that. But if

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you show up, you are incentivized. Now, that's table stakes

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in the US market. On top of that is what

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we layer on and it's called a designated market maker.

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>So every company that's listed on the New York Stock

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Exchange interviews the market making firms and selects the firm

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that they want to represent them. That's in addition to

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>all those competitive market makers that are quoting in the stock.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But they're designated market maker has an obligation to be

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on the bid and the offer of that stock at

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>all times. They cannot step away on election day or

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>when there's market wide volatility or some sort of single

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>stock event, so they have a regulatory obligation to be there.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>They have an obligation to be setting the best quote

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace a relatively high percentage of the time.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And they have to layer interest so meaning put put

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>orders in the order book above and below the price

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to help damp in volatility. Those those those are obligations,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not voluntary, and that results in no matter how

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the data, stocks to trade on our

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>market trade with narrower spreads, less volatility, more depth in

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the order book, which can ultimately help lower company's cost

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of capital. Now, how that helps in a direct listing

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or in a complex transaction is you know, you have

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you have the market model, you have best in class technology,

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and you have human judgment all coming together at one place,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so you get that certainty of execution. You know, companies

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>want to de risk when they're coming to market, and

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's one of the reasons why twenty four twenty

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>five largest ideas have put their trust in that model.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>The direct listing, you don't have an underwritten offering, you

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>do not have a stabilization agent there helping support the stock.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So having that designated market maker when you're coming out

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>into the market with those quoting obligations helps provide superior

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>market quality, helps you come out of the block strong

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and helps build investor confidence because the last thing you

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>want to do is open the stock at the wrong price,

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have it start whip sawing and impact investor confidence and

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and just have that that um that bad market quality

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>amplified even more. Sorry, can you talk a little bit

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>more about the allocation process in a direct listing. So

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in a traditional I p O, the banks go out

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and they sound out various types of investors and they

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>asked them how much of the stock they might be

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in and at what price, and they helped to

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>build the book around that. But how does the actual

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>allocation work in the direct listing? Like who is able

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the shares? Yeah, really good question and it's

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>also something that we're we're proud to see the SEC

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote in our in the approval order for a direct listing.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Plus camplies that that what we're proposing with the direct

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>listing and ultimately direct list of the cawplories is a

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>more democratized process, more democratize access to the marketplace. And

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so you nailed it with the With an I p O,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a company works with their bankers, They go out, they

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>do a road show, they talk to institutional investors, they

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>build an order book, they play shares with those investors,

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and then secondary trading begins on the n Y s C.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>In a direct listing, the company actually does much of

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the investor education. So they'll do an investor day. Uh,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>they'll talk with investors about how a direct listing works.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>There's they're limited in in some of the things that

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 1>can talk about. They can't really build a book and

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>then on day one, you know, the stock is free

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to trade for the current shareholders. For anybody out there

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the whether they be institutional investors or retail investors

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that that uh, you know, aren't current investors, they're able

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to buy into those shares, so that there there really

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't an allocation process. The only difference I would say

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is that for a direct listing, one of the requirements

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is that a company has to have currently has to

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have a fairly distributed private shareholder base. In an I

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>p O, you don't. And so the reason is the

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>n y s C and the SEC have rules saying

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that prior to a company going public or two commencing

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>trading on the NYC, they have to have at least

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>four hundred round lot shareholders around loot shareholder meeting holds

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred shares and that helps ensure sufficient

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>liquidity on day one. So on an i p O,

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the underwriting bank will talk to a bunch of investors

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and they'll place the shares with more than four hundred

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>investors and meet that distribution requirement. In a direct listing,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>because you're not allocating shares, you need to make sure

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that you have at least four hundred shareholders prior to

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>your listing So for companies like Spotify, Slack, palat Here, Sonda,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they had fairly robust private market trading in their stock

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and that coupled with employee ownership, met that four hundred

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>round lot threshold. But that's the currently the most meaningful

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>difference between the allocation process and distribution criteria between an

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>IP on a direct listing. Now, speaking of a palanteer,

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that was the most recent one, or I think actually

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they elicted on the same day as a sauna um.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But Morgan Stanley was involved in the Palanteer direct listing.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Explain to us the role of banks. So even though

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't an I P O H, Morgan Stanley wanted

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the big investment banks did have some role to play.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>What is that role for a direct listing? Yeah, great questions.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>So since there aren't underwriters, the role of the banks

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and the banks will always have a role in the

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in all of these pathways to the public markets. But

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the role of the banks was to serve as a

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor, so capital f capital a official role. Morgan

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Stanley and others served in that capacity. Morgan was the

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>lead on those transactions and they they did multiple things

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>when they helped advise the company I'm preparing for a

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>direct listing be when it came to the execution of

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the transaction. Two things happen in an I p O.

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the bank works with the with the company

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to establish an I p O price. Since there is

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>no I p O price in a direct listing, we

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have to established what's called a reference price now prior

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to trading commencing. There's always a reference price in the

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>IPO s I p O price on a typical day,

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the price the stock closed the night before. But

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in a direct listing, we need to establish this reference price.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>No shares trade hands, uh, no transaction takes place. It's

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just a price at which we can input into our

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>system so we can begin accepting orders and where market

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>participants can start thinking about building a book around. And

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so the role of the New York stackaches. We consult

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with the company's financial advisor to help establish that reference

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>price the night before, and then once trading begins, the

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>market maker who I spoke about the designated market maker,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>That market maker will consult with the financial advisor before

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>opening the stock for the very first time. So the

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>underwriter plays a slightly different role and that's as a

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>as a financial advisor in a direct listing. I have

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a different question about the Palenteer direct listing. So from

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what I remember, well, you were talking about how one

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits of doing a direct listing is that

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to have the lock up period that

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you would have in a traditional I P O process.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think Palenteer did away um with that, or

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they opted to have a lock up period even though

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they were doing a direct listing. Why did they do

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that exactly? If you know that's supposed to be one

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits of of going this route to public market, Well,

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>good question, Tracy, and and and you know, companies go

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>public for different reasons. They picked different pathways for different reasons,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and then within those pathways they can innovate how they choose.

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Earlier direct listings did not necessarily have a lock up period,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>some thought of that as a benefit. Now Palatier said

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to have one, and so they had the

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>ability to put one in there and it did not

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>adversely impact their transaction whatsoever. So for then it was

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>important to have that lock up period. You know, I

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to speculate too much on specifically why they

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>did that, but they did have the option to do that,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just as how in an I p O you have

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the ability to And companies are now working with banks

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to modify that traditional eight day lock up period to

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>put in more kind of dynamic lockups where again, if

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a company needs a certain share price or trigger UH,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it'll trigger the release of sharff for trading, so something

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that tracys earlier. And that was about standards, and as

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out that even a company that goes public

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>through direct listing, they still have did SEC standards and

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>S one and the n y c s own regulations.

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Are there conflict of interest rules or anything set up

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>such that there is no incentive on the teams who

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are doing your team doing direct listings versus the sort

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of more regulatory side of the n y C, so

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's no um, there's no getting around anything. Basically, Yeah, absolutely,

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So the the n y s C and other exchanges

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in the US are what are called self regulatory organizations,

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we have an independent regulatory function that reports

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to an independent committee of our board of directors, so

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>their work is completely independent from that of the business side.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>That is meant to completely eliminate conflicts of interest, so

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no pressure the business side can exert over the

0:30:54.920 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>regulatory side. And is there any tension emerging or conflict

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>between you and the banks? I mean, as you mentioned,

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley did have a role in palant here. But

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously this process does cut out what is a you know,

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an important point of part of revenue for the investment banks. Uh.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there any pushback on them or any banks like, oh, well,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna have our companies list on the n

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>y C anymore if the n y i C is

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>directly competing against us, Like, I'm just sort of curious

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about that relationship and how the emergence of this business

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for you changes those partnerships actually strengthened partnerships with the banks,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And I would say the banks will always find a

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>find a role in these type of transactions and helping

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>their clients. Now, early on, yes, when we started floating

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the direct listing with Spotify, we did

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>receive some resistance from banks saying, what are you doing? Well,

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, why are you you know this? This makes

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>no sense, this is risky, why would you do this?

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And then what we saw though is a handful of

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>bank banks leaned in and said, well, wait a second,

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this is what my client is hoping to achieve. This

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is their goal. I want to help them achieve it.

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And in helping them achieve their goal, well, my economics

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>may be slightly different than they would be in a

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional I p O. I'm building a long term relationship,

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm going to be the bank that come

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>back to when they do a following offering to the

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>market when they need when they need advice around M

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and A or other important transactions. And so I want

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a good partner. And so you saw a

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>number of banks lean in early on and UH and

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>realized that hey, this is this is gonna be a

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>new pathway to the public market. We see this as

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to help our clients in different and further

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>differentiate ourselves from other investment banks. So you saw them

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lean in, and after the successful transactions that took place

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with Spotify, slack now Palace here in Hassana. On top

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, you seem pretty much every bank focus on

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the direct listing. Their clients are asking them about it.

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you're gonna be a good banker, you better

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to provide good advice to your clients. So

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the banks lean into this now. Where there

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was some initial resistance at first, they've come around to it.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And again the economics are a little bit different from

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>an I p O. But for those that participated in

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the early transactions, while you did not get a piece

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of a gross spread or the underwritten offering, they were

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>paid an advisory fee. And so while there were fewer

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>banks on the cover for the Spotify UH perspectives than

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they would have had should they take in a traditional

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I PO, those banks received a bigger piece of a

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>smaller pie and were able to build a new business

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. But you're talking mostly about the banks corporate clients.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>What happens to their investor clients on the buy side,

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>because you know my understanding in the IPO processes that

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>banks were always trying to juggle the needs of those

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>two groups of people. On the one hand, you have

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the company that's actually going public and they want to

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>maximize their proceeds, so they probably want to sell their

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>shares relatively high. And then you also have the investor

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>clients who probably want to buy into an I p

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>O at a low price and see that first day pop,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the banks might be uh, not necessarily

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>losing the investor clients, but like certainly the investors aren't

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>getting what they used to get from the banks, which

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was allocation into an early I p O. Yeah. So

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things on that there. And there's a

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of different views on this, but I would say

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking for high quality long term investors,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to shy away from you for a

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>direct listing. A couple of things there. One is, many

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>of these investors think your Fidelity t row Wellington, they've

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>already crossed over and we're private investors in the company.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So they built a position there and are not banking

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on getting a pop to meet their overall portfolio performance

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>targets for the year. Number two is when you look

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>at some of the more recent tech I p O

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>s over the past let's say two to three years,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes these companies are floating a very very very small

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>piece of the company sub ten percent, So when you

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>actually allocate that out to institutional investors, they're not getting

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that meaningful of a position, and so that pop, you know,

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>while yes it is a pop on that security and

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a return on that single investment overall for that portfolio.

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many basis points it would be,

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>but probably diminimus. They're actually focused on building positions and

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>companies where they have convictions. And so why I think

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the direct listing is fascinating is because when you have

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>more float out there from day one, when you have

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>true price discovery and not this kind of artificial supply

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>demand and balance that all of a sudden you had

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>eight days the lock up release, a bunch of new

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>shares come onto the market, and now you start finding

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the actual market price for the shares. When you have

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of pure price discovery, if you are

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>an institutional investor, you have conviction you want to build

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a position, you can do it much more quickly and

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with much less impact on the share price than you

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>would in a traditional I p O. Because if you

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have sub ten percent of a company's offering out there

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're a big institutional investor trying to build your

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>position because they're so little supply the market, you're gonna

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be running up that stock as you build your position.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So with the with the direct listing, a lot of

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>those institutional investors are actually benefiting from having that increase

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in liquidity. Now, sometimes in an I p O you

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>hear them talk about, oh, we have to allocate to

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a certain percent of hedge funds because we know they're

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>going to flip it overnight and provide liquidity. Yeah, I'm

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>fine with getting rid of that. But when it comes

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to institutional investors, a lot of them actually like this

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>process better than the traditional IPO. So let's some big

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>picture for a second. Uh, there's just been a handful

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of direct listings, and of course there's been way more.

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>There's still way more traditional I p O s. This

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 1>year there's been an incredible spack boom, so they're way

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>more of those two in terms of sort of the

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>equity capital markets at the New York Stock Exchange. A

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like how big is direct listing is? Now?

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>How big could you see it getting as part of

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a share of the total business? And then what is

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the business model for you? Like, what is you know,

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>investment banks take several percentage points in a traditional I

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>p O. What is the revenue model look like for you,

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>uh in a direct listing? And how big do you

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>see this business uh getting or just as getting as

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a share of overall UM. Yeah. So the direct listing

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is you're going to continue to see more of them

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and whether that's four in one or

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 1>eight or more, you'll see that number increased from from

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>from where we are today. We think it's important because, look,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a differentiator for us. We mentioned the market model earlier.

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>We're uniquely positioned to execute these types of complex transactions,

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so we we think they're very interesting. From an economic standpoint,

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there's not much difference at all between this and I

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>p O or any other type of listing for US,

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and that holds true for other exchanges as well. So

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we UH, We're focused on this because it's a differentiator.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a new pathway to the public markets. We're providing

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a product or service to our clients that is more

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>tailored to meet their objectives and help them be successful.

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So we continue to see it being part of the market.

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We continue it will be an increasing part of the market.

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Do I think it will go on the same trajectory

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that SPACs have gone on this year? No? Uh, and

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>SPACs accounting for roughly or so of the the overall

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I p O proceeds raised this year, UH, no, I

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see that happening, but we we will continue to

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>see this be a product that a lot of companies

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>consider and ultimately select going forward. Just just to be

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>clear on something you said, Um, are there more fees

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for you? Is there more revenue when a company does

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a direct listing versus a normal I P O or

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is that not a Is it not a major difference?

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not a major difference. So we still receive revenue

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the same way from these from these companies. How confident

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are you that the SEC is going to approve the

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:57.919
<v Speaker 1>direct listing with capital raising proposal? Reasonably confident? Because look,

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the team that's down there has done a very good

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>job at the SEC. This is my personal perspective. Uh.

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Jay Clayton as chairman has made capital formation

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and innovation in the capital markets a pillar of his

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>agenda down there. You've seen it come in different forms,

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it be with direct listing one point oh, which

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw a Spotify and Slack which was under the

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>current leadership's tenure at the at the SEC, or with

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>this new process the directlessing plus the capital raise. Now

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, not to get too far into the kind

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of regulatory procedures that go along with rule changes at

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. But you know, we went through a very

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 1>rigorous process for two forty days with the SEC walking

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>through the direct listing with Capital Raise, talking with the

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>staff from Trading and Markets, Corporate thin the different departments

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>within the SEC, and ultimately in the staff's approval order,

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>which was done through something called delegated authority. And that's

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just a way of saying that the commissioners have delegated

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the decision to the professional staff or the expert staff,

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that they approved the direct listing, and they said they

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>went other way to say two very important things. One,

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a more democratized process so allows more people, more

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>access to more opportunities. And be it's more efficient pricing

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>than the traditional IPO. So a industry trade group called

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Council of Institutional Investors petition for our approval to

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>be reviewed and approved by the by the five commissioners

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>at the SEC. We're just awaiting that right now, and

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be ready to go. No matter what pathway,

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>companies have to the public markets, having access to capital

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>that you can use to fuel growth, so offensively or

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 1>defensively in periods of time, like we saw in late

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Q one and Q two where companies were starving for

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>capital and they were able to come to the public

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>markets raise it at market rates. It's nice to hear

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>uh many folks in the marketplace, many participants again talking

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about the benefits of the U S public markets, both

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>for companies and for investors. John, that was a great conversation.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot and really appreciate you joining us. Yeah.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I hope once the world gets back to normally you

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>can come down here for the next direct listing and

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>see it live. Yeah, that'd be fun. I'd love to

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.479
<v Speaker 1>do that, all right, Thanks very Thanks John. That was great.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I really like that conversation. You know, it's funny. I know,

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like John was being diplomatic or maybe

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>completely uh straightforward. But it's hard for me to imagine

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't going to be a source of increased

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>angst the fact that some of this traditional imp O

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>money might be going away in direct listings, especially also

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>when you compare like I said at the beginning of

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the stock prices, like the exchanges are still doing very

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>well at a time when the major banks are kind

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of stagged it. Yeah, although I don't know, I say,

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>never underestimate the bank's ability to find new ways of

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>making money. Um, the only thing sort of standing in

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>their way, I guess is regulation on that point. But

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder if you could get a more interesting

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>response from some of the banks, like maybe altering the

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I p O process itself so that you don't abandon

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it completely, but maybe you do something that's more similar

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to an auction process, where you know, you you blast

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 1>out prices to a bunch of investors at one time

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and then put it through some sort of automated system.

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that process is similar to that in

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. So I don't know, I think it's

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see this fight or the

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>scrum over public markets and developed between the banks and

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges. Yeah. No, I mean it's it's definitely true.

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there's now there's so many different models.

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>The IPO model obviously with just still a huge the

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:03.479
<v Speaker 1>back model, this model, this model, plus the capital raise.

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I remember like a two thousand, like twenty

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>years ago, you had the first sort of experiments with

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>things like auctions and no pops and stuff, And I remember,

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Google tried to go or they did try

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to go public in an unusual way. Yeah. But but

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>now it feels like perhaps some of these early ideas

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that never quite got off the ground seemed to be

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 1>maturing and ready to go, and we can actually start

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to compare and contrast the different uh the most efficient

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.359
<v Speaker 1>ways and the best ways for companies to go public. Yeah,

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I also found John's points about getting more

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of a float more liquidity out of a direct listing.

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was interesting. But I have to confess

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that as a former fintech reporter, part of me is

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>just really jaded, and every time I hear someone say

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the word disrupt a particular process or disrupt the banks,

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I immediately just think regulatory argage, trage. So much of

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.879
<v Speaker 1>disruption is basically regulatory arbitrage, And I think that gets

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the questions we're asking John about whether or

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not this is basically a way to avoid some of

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the red tape around the traditional I P O process.

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think those are valid points, and I don't think

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the end of that conversation. Yeah, I'm sure

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>regulatory arbitrage or just sort of the patchwork of regulation

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is an important part of it. But the other thing

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to me is that you know one of the huge

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.399
<v Speaker 1>themes for a long time and you think about tech

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 1>when you said fintech is over my mind, when it's

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>just like network effects and the sort of the big

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>index providers, the big exchanges, our networks, and so there

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is a sense that regulation aside that these companies continue

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to sort of extract value from the ecosystem overall or

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>find ways that they can build up their business or

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>build them vertically or horizontal horizontally. I don't know which,

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just the exact one I'm looking for right now, one

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of those two, but that the sort of whether it's

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in tech, Facebook, Amazon, Nicey, Nas Deck, etcetera, there all

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like sort of these very central infrastructure players in any

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>industry finding the way to sort of make more money

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>while the peripheral players finding it harder. Yeah, you don't.

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 1>You don't seem very compelled about it. You're like whatever,

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to chack fully. It's fine. No, it's just

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>like what I probably changed the subject. That's fine, we'll

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about it. So okay, Yeah, let's just

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. I don't wanna because after you leave

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>me hanging like that. Let's let's just write this up

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really bad. Okay, I promised we will talk more about

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it later. Okay. This has been another episode of the

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisn't Thought.

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 1>our guest on Twitter, John Tuttle, He's at j R Tuttle.

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levie at Francesca Today,

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts under the handle

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>AD Podcasts. Thanks for listening.