WEBVTT - LSU! Clemson! National Championship Preview!

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Solid Verbal.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for day Edith State is that? Whoo whoom? And Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and Tye welcome back to the Solid Verbal. Boys and girls,

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>my name is ty Hildebrand, joining me as always over

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there and beautiful NYC my man. The one and only

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Dan Rubensteiny's back, sir, how are you?

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm good. This was sort of a surprise twos cruise.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 3>We didn't plan on doing this specific episode as a

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 3>twos cruise, but I gotta tell you with I don't

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 3>know what we're comparing it to the Queen Mary, the Titanic.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully hopefully not the Titanic, hopefully.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Not the tell Well, maybe somebody may be the Titanic

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in this game, but I don't know what it is.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Because today's show is dedicated to the National Championship matchup

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>between LS you and Clemson, and I guess Matt Rule.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Leaving for the Caroline.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know we're actually gonna spend time talking about that,

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 3>but my heart is beating.

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>My blood sugar feel super out of watch. You said

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>when we connected up that you were feeling a little

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>bit of a blood sugar spike. I don't know.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I just I do feel a good amount of excitement

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>about this matchup. That is that is honest to God,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the truth you're.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Getting the I am.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I enjoyed watching both of these teams. I think probably

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>LSU more so this season because of their the games

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 3>they actually played and the opponents that they had. But

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>it was a pleasure to watch both of these two

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>teams in the UH in the semi finals. But I

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 3>just I also, I don't know. I mentioned this on Twitter,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>but I got even more excited watching There's a YouTube channel.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>It's run by a guy named Murph Baldwin.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I sent this to you. Yeah, yeah, I think it's

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>top Billin. He's coming on in the offseason. He doesn't

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>know it yet, but we're gonna invite.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't know it yet, but he does a fantastic

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>job doing x's and O stuff with college football. So

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 3>if you like that sort of thing with video, top

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Billin is the move to make. But that got me

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>even more excited about this matchup. So here we are tie, Here,

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>we are are here, We are welcome.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>One.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome all now if you're just joining us for the

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>first time. Yeah, I'm Ty, He's Dan. We did three

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>episodes every week all throughout the season. We had Tuesday episode,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the one that dropped on Tuesday, we called the Twoes Cruise.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Normally we would do Sunday and Wednesday. Sunday we'd recap

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday or I guess Thursday we would drop the show.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>We would preview the coming week's games. But nestled in between,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we had a little show we called The Twoes Cruise,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which of course was cheesy in that it was very

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>nautically themed, but we committed, we fully committed Marty Smith

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>style to the bit right and alas we could think

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>of no better time to do another Twos Cruise then

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on this very special occasion. It is the bull Barge, right,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're calling this. It's sort of an abbreviated

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Two's Cruise.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's an abbriev all. I don't know how long

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the show's gonna go, but yeah, we're still sticking with

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 3>the bull Barge. And I suppose we have a sound

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 3>that we do like if you want to play it now.

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, now, DOCR New Orleans for the National Championship. If

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 2>you believe in the Bye Bengals, she's exit fur Side.

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 2>If you believe in Domos Boys, he's exit Starbard.

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Dark Horn. There's the Dark Horn. So it

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of those fun matchups where both are the Tigers.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be cheeky about it and pick

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers to win, mm hmm, by all means, go

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for it. We're gonna do our best here over the

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>next forty five minutes or so to cover as many

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>angles as we can. We're gonna do so in as

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>fun a way as we can, in as nautically themed

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the way as we can, because the last we need

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to stick with our twos cruise theme.

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>If for only one more episode, Yes, can we I

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 3>think this is an old radio term, but can we reset?

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I want I want to start from the beginning because

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>these two teams have had very different paths to this point,

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 3>neither better nor worse. But I want to start here.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 3>What was your opinion of each of these teams preseason

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and how much, if at all, did that opinion evolve?

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Well? The LSU one is is far easier because headed

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>into the season I was very skeptical, very skeptical that

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all this rigamal role we heard about on the offensive

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball was going to prove legit. And

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe my point when we previewed the sec West

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>back in like August whenever, it was was just that

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>how many times have we heard this before that LSU

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to revamp its offense. We had heard time

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and again that they know they have the talent, they

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>know they know that's the one missing piece they need

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to modernize, need to modernize, right, And certainly there was

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of skepticism when at Orgeron took over

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>that he would be the man to kind of lead

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>LSU through that revolution on offense and get them to

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the promised Land. And well, here we are, Yeah, here

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we are. It's clear that they've found the right people

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>to do that. They've clearly got the right quarterback to

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. Being so we won the highs bin, They've

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>got a running back, they've got a good cast of receivers,

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good line, So it's all there. On the

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>offensive side of the ball. I never had a doubt

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about their defense. Maybe that's something we'll get into a

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit more as we talk about the matchups. Specifically

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Clemson's offense against this defense, but the offensive component on

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>LSU's side was specifically what I had the most skepticism about.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Clearly that has been proven wrong, and good for them

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that it has. Yeah, I'm trying to figure out.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I am right there with you and that you're like, Okay,

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>we've heard this before, that they're modernizing, that they're trying

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to evolve their offense, and it probably took me until

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 3>that Florida performance to fully come around. Not that I

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>always pick them this year, because I probably should have.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 3>They went undefeated if I wanted to be one hundred percent,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 3>But the fact remains that you're just like, Okay, well,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I get it. They did it against Vanderbilt, they did

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 3>it against Texas, they did it against Utah State. But

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 3>that Florida win the way they separated themselves later on

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>in that game from the Gators. I think they dropped

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>forty on a good Florida defense at home and then

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>responded even with a pseudo clunker the next week at

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Mississippi State and a letdown spite you understand that they

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 3>still won that game by I think twenty plus points.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>They won another uneven offensive performance against Auburn, but they

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>won their clunkers and then the rest of the year,

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I think they scored what forty plus, Maybe they came

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>just short of forty against Georgia, but separating themselves from

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 3>both really good teams like Georgia and I think A

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and M is an okay team, but completely demolished them

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>getting past Alabama the they did with Tuas still on

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the team, or to a still starting at quarterback, albeit hobbled,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>still able to slice and dice that LSU defense that game.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>I just I came away so impressed and wanted to

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>think that there was just going to be a down

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 3>week where the new offense just didn't click, And you know,

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe there were those weeks, but the fact remains, I'm

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 3>still much more impressed with what they did before the

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma game, right because I don't think both with what

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the Oklahoma defense was or really was not this year,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>how they played against LSU. I don't think that is

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the most important takeaway game from the Tigers, but just

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>for them to be at this point, to be led

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 3>by this offense, to be talking about the overshadowed LSU defense,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>it's such a new way of talking about this program.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>That I'm thrilled to have underestimated this team going into

0:07:58.400 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the year.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am as well. I'm looking back on my

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>notes when we did our SEC preview, and this was

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in late August. The question I had for you on

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>LSU was just that they went nine to three, won

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fiesta Bowl over UCF, and they had a really

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>good year last season despite an offensive line that drastically underperformed. Yeah,

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they basically had to remix their offense on the fly

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to account for it last year. As we entered the

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen season, how confident were you that the position group,

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>specifically again offensive line would be able to improve. It

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>has improved, no doubt about it. The offense as a

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>whole has drastically improved.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I know we have a question later on where we're

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>going to talk more specifically about about that line. So

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go too deep down that rabbit le,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>but let's shift gears if we could, to the Clemson

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Now, sure, Clemson clearly came at this

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>from a much different standpoint, being so they haven't lost

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the game in two years? Yeah, well I guess now

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. Now they haven't lost the game in two years,

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but prior to this season, they were defending national champions. Obviously,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>an incredible performance twenty eight point victory over Alabama in

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Championship that was on the heels of a twenty

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>seven point victory over Notre Dame in the College Football

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Playoff semifinal. Trevor Lawrence had burst onto the national stage,

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe in a way that he hadn't prior to either

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of those games. Being so, he was incredible and unstoppable

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in both of those playoff performances. Entering the season, Clemson

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>was a prohibitive favorite, maybe not to win the national championship,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but certainly to be in the game.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That was the conversation, Alabama Clemson, come and fight me.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>If you don't think it's one of those two teams.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was Alabama Clemson. Everybody else? Have these two

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 3>teams separated themselves with as well as Ohio State and

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Georgia have recruited in Oklahoma constantly in the playoff conversation,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>are we you know in the way that the NBA

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of became a evelnd Golden State for what was

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>it four straight years? Like some it had become a

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 3>bit of that where Okay, what are we talking about here?

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Is this a sport that is now whittled down to

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 3>these two halves?

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>The talking points on my side of the Clemson argument. Yeah,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's not really an argument because we were both

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all in on Clemson. We didn't think they were going

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to lose during the regular season or in the ACC

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>title game to whoever they played like. We knew this

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was going to be the cream of the crop in

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the ACC. But we also knew that they were going

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a smidge thinner than their twenty eighteen version,

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at least on defense, because they had to replace four

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>incredible defensive linemen, their top three linebackers, five of their

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>top six tacklers. They also had guys like Hunter Renfro

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and Mitch Hyatt gone from their offense. For most teams,

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot to replace. You can't recover from that

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in one season, but it's way easier when you've got

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence, Traves, c E. T. T. Higgins justin ross.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>The line has been pretty good for them, despite the

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>fact they lost a key contributoring Mitch Hyatt. So it

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was just like, to what end is defense going to

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bring this team down? Knowing full well going into the

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>season that the ACC isn't going to be the strongest

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of conferences, right, and.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>We had seen Clemson defenses of yr you know, lose eight, nine, ten,

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 3>eleven starters whatever. I don't know if they lost eleven

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>starters in a year, but a majority of starters and

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>bounce back as if nothing had changed. And that's, you know,

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 3>partially due to the fact that there's just crazy continuity

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 3>on this coaching staff that Brent Venables has been around forever,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they play their twos and threes so

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 3>much in these blowouts that it's nothing new for a

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 3>guy to start because he's getting thirty forty snaps a

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>game as is. So it is quite impressive to see

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 3>what Clemson on defense, losing what they lost and to

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>not miss a step. Granted, the ACC was not having

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>itself a year this season, no, so it was fully

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 3>it was almost impossible to say, well, this Clemson defense

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 3>hasn't missed a beat because outside of the North Carolina game,

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 3>they didn't play a team that scored more than twenty

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>against them. And it wasn't fully a surprise given where

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 3>NC State fell to, given what Wake Forest looked like

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>late in the season, Florida State, Louisville, these teams were

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 3>not built to score with Clemson, so that wasn't fully

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a surprise. And then when we saw Ohio State score

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 3>what twenty three, Yeah, that's when you're like, Okay, there's

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 3>something going on with this defense, especially when they start

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 3>out scoring fourteen to sixteen points whatever and not able

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to do much after so so after that, so I

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>just man an incredible, incredible year for Clemson on both

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 3>sides of the ball, even with some the slow start

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 3>that I think Trevor Lawrence had. We saw it sort

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>of culminate with what he looked like early on in

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the Louisville game, but he threw those you know, that

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 3>grip of passes. It's been just lights out impossible from

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Clemson on both sides of the ball.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So as we turn the corner now and steered directly

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for this game, we have on January the thirteenth, at

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>eight pm on the ESPN Family of Networks between LSU

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen and oh and Clemson at fourteen and h

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>let me steal a little bit of your thunder. I

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>know you had this topic planned a little bit later

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the show but Clemson is actually the lower

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>seeded of the two teams. They are the defending national champions. Yeah,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>we know that because of that playoff seating, and maybe

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because of Dabos Sweeney's comments along the course of the

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>season here that he has tried to fashion them as

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an underdog. Yeah.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's always what he does, even when they're,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, fourteen point favorites. Stil say, nobody believes we're

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 3>really fourteen point favorites. That's just nonsense.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, they are the legit underdog. They're

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a five and a half point dog headed into the

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>football game. We know Clemson's a fun team to root for,

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>it's never short on personality. But can you fully subscribe?

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you fully subscribed to the notion that Clemson is

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a real true underdog going into this game? Oh?

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, they are an underdog. Inasmuch as so

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>much attention has been poured on LSU because it's a

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 3>better story right now, it's a news story. There's something

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 3>novel about this program that could never get it together.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>On offense, hiring a young dude to be paired and

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Joe Brady with Steve Bensminger, the older, more grizzled coordinator.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So they have this.

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>He's a passing game coordinator and he's there to sort

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>of help out with everything. It clicks, it works. Joe

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Burrow is just an assassin. These receivers are out of control.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Randy Moss's son is there at tight end. The line

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 3>comes together. Clyde Edwards alaire when nothing is really fully

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 3>working all the time with the passing game. There he

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 3>is to hand the ball to and he's local to

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.479
<v Speaker 3>what Baton Rouge in Louisiana. I just there's the novelty

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 3>to LSU has shined a spotlight on. I guess the

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Tigers in Baton Rouge that there's nothing. It's easy to

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 3>overlook Clemson because they're not a new story. This is

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 3>not an excited we've seen Clemson on this stage. So

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 3>it's sort of like a forgot about us kind of

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 3>situation where Dabo can say, well, I guess we're not

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the sexy new thing anymore. I guess everybody's forgotten about us.

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 3>And while it is obviously cliche to say nobody believes

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in us, we're the underdog. That sort of thing can

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 3>work in a brain escusually a nineteen year old brain.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it can work as a motivational device if you're Dabbosweeney,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it, if you're trying to get your

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>team up for the game, as if there's going to

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be any trouble getting them up for the national championship.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying to you and I specifically, I can't

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>convince myself that there're any kind of underdog here. H

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe five and a half points is what Vegas says, Right,

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they haven't lost a game in two years, but twenty

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>nine and zero last two seasons. I went back in, Look,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they've lost like three games in four years. That is

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not an underdog story. I don't care how you try

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to paint it. So I am excited for this game.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not necessarily looking at it in terms of underdog

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and favorites. In that storyline, it to me goes out

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the window because Clemson has been a powerhouse in college

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>football for the last at least five years running.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 3>But this year's team specifically, do you feel like there

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>is an underdog element to the fact that, yes, they

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 3>have the struggle against North Carolina, but also we didn't

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 3>really see them tested after that we didn't really see

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>them against great competition until Ohio State, and there is

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>just more data. It's on LSU maybe no matter how

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 3>long it's been since they've lost. I mean it's been

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>a while since Northdakota State too.

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>There is a difference between undercovered and underdog. Sure, undercovered,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you could certainly make a legit case for that, right

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>being so they're in the acc being so, like you said,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>there were flashier stories around college football that maybe garnered

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more attention. But underdog, no underdog's a

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>tough sell for me.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I mean, I think the biggest killer in this

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 3>game is still LSU's offense.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with you. I would agree with you.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 3>That to me already means that, Okay, we're looking at

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 3>the best single thing in this game being what Joe

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 3>Burrow is able to do with the ball in his hands.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 3>The Heisman winner, the guy who won the Heisman pretty

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 3>much out of nowhere over the presumed favorite or one

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 3>of the presumed favorites, and Trevor Lawrence going into the season.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 3>So there is that idea of supplanting the obvious champion

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 3>in Clemson, the idea that LSU has established itself because.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Of this offense.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 3>As what again, I think we both believe to be

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 3>the best single thing in this game that could change

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Clemson's defense, I have no doubt in my mind is remarkable.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>They are on all three levels. They are very very good,

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and they are stout, and they are deep, and they

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>play with an insane amount of focus and care. So

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 3>that to me is why Clemson is the underdog simply

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>because Joe Burrow wears purple and gold. Let me Paris

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Marshall and Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase of course, the

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 3>blittnikof Award winner wear purple and gold.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>That is why. Let me let me round out this

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>discussion and turn the corner and actually go into this

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>game just by saying that, I think LSU is probably

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the easier team to root for, being so they are

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>newer to this football game, Yeah than Clemson. Yeah, even

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>though Clemson is technically the underdog by five and a

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>half points.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think people are always going to

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>love the story more than they are the repeat. I mean,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>for as much success as Clemson has had, Clemson is

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 3>not a decades long spotlight team like I think going

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>back to when Nick Saban was at LS sort of

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the modern era where I think there

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 3>is a bigger and wider familiarity with LSU football, given

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the personality of less Miles, given all the NFL players

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 3>that have come through there the last twenty years, as

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 3>opposed to this latest five to seven year run from Clemson.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 3>So I think John Q public has an LSU story

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 3>awareness more than Okay, I understand the Clemson has become

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this elite machine, So I think there's that element to it.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It is the College Football Playoff National Championship presented by

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>AT and T. They played in New Orleans. Yeah again,

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>LSU fourteen to zero, a five and a half point

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite over the Clemson Tigers. So as we now look

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>head on into this football game, the obvious question is

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>whether an elite Clemson defense can slow an elite LSU offense,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and conversely, can a really good LSU defense slow. I

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>would still say an elite Clemson offense are very good.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Sure all they're amazing. When you pop the hood on

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>both of those scenarios and look at all the advanced stuff,

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you could zoom in on a few things that are

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>very intriguing. To be honest, most of that stuff favors Clemson.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can take that at phase value if you want,

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's perfectly reasonable, or you can add the extra

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>layer to it and ask does it matter?

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 2>Captain Toy wants to know.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter?

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Dan?

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>That was such a good transition. You're just such a pro.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Does it freaking matter? Clemson has a good pass rush.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's different than it was last year, but statistically, very

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>good pass rush, very good sacrate. LSU was just okay

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>at protecting Joe Burrow, the Heisman Trophy winner. That would

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>seem like a big advantage for Clemson. But will it matter? Dan,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm yelling into my microphone. Why do you say they're

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just okay at protecting I'm looking at I'm looking at

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>advanced stuff. I'm just looking at numbers. Okay, sacrate that

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Okay, Statistically they're kind of in the middle. Okay,

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that would seem like a big advantage for Clemson. But

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>will it matter? We saw teams try to pressure Joe

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Burrow all year. Nothing seemed to face them. Will it matter? Yeah?

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I LSU took on Georgia and their incredible defense and

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 3>it didn't seem to matter. You know, he flushed him

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 3>out of the pocket. He made plays pretty impressive.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan, Clemson is the best pass defense in America. Yeah, statistically,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the best LSU's seen all year. Will it matter?

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>LSU hung sixty three on Oklahoma. Even if you slow

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>them down, they're still putting it hill. That was sixty three.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>That was scoring fifty and a half. Yeah, right, even

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if you slow them down a little, it's still what

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty five forty points on the board.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Will it matter? You get the drift here? Yes, I

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 3>get the drift. I'm waiting for you to ask me

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>for an answer. I'm just yelling here. I know you are,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>and I love it. The big question that is hidden

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 3>inside your question is what will the back of Clemson's

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>defense look like to make the front of Clemson's defense

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>look even better in their pursuit of Joe Burrow Because

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 3>that back end just with what they're able to do

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 3>in concert with the Brent Venables defense that they run

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 3>and how well they can disguise, how well they can

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>run with receivers. We saw them do an incredible job

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 3>with Ohio States receivers implementing that true killer big play

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>that is going to make the front of their defense

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 3>and how many different things players like Isaiah Simmons and

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 3>Tanner Muse can do to disrupt and confuse. That, to

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 3>me is the better question of will it matter? And

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I think ultimately it will matter. I don't know if

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 3>it's going to decide the game, but it's going to matter.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, will it matters. So we've got a whole list

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of bullet points here, yeah, that we wanted to go

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>through and determined. Well, I'm not going to be so

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>cynical that I'm going to sit here and say that

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>none of this stuff is going to matter. I think

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ls's offense by and large is so good that a

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of it won't. But certainly some of this will.

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 2>It has to.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's do it first and foremost. Dan Clemson probably

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>prepared a lot more for LSU than they did for Oklahoma, right.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine. So, yes, the advanced scouting probably heavily

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 3>leaned toward LICO LS.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You probably had to split up their advanced preps. So

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the question would be how much does that how much

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>does that matter? How much does that factor in here?

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's interesting, but I don't think it matters.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Brent Venables is so good on the fly

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 3>at diagnosing and communicating that to his team that ultimately,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's anything that LSU can do

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that will catch them off guard that they haven't seen.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>But the skill lies in their ability on the fly.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 3>So no, I don't think it matters.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Fully, I would agree with you, and I would add

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the point of Alabama and Clemson. What we've seen from

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>them amid this incredible run preparation has certainly been very important.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>We hear about it all the time as we watch

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>college football, and the dedication in the hours that assistant

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>coaches and head coaches put in on this, the adjustments

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>almost matter more. Yeah.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 3>By the way, if you haven't read it, and they're

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 3>not a partner of ours anymore right now, Andy Staples

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 3>and Bruce Feldman wrote pieces with Clemson and or I

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 3>guess regarding Clemson and LSU speaking to opposing coaches who

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 3>coached against them this year anonymously. But a lot of

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 3>really cool insight if you really want to deep dive

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>this game.

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think it matters, but I think adjustments are going.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 2>To matter more.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Another bullet point, Joe Burrow has not had to

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>go wired to wire on a stage quite like this, has.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>He No, and Trevor Lawrence has Now, it's not Joe

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Burrow's fault that LC was so incredible against Oklahoma that

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 3>he really hasn't been in this pressure type of situation though.

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 3>SEC Championship against Georgia, you know, playing Alabama, playing Auburn,

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 3>playing Florida the way, those are huge stages. This is

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 3>just something different. This is non sports fans, This is

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 3>non college football fans. This is in the Superdome, which

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 3>is again I don't think it's on our bullet point list,

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 3>but I think that's interesting because LSU has sort of

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 3>recently played in a national championship at the Superdome and

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>it didn't goes super well.

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. I think it's.

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think the stage matters as much as

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the opponent, so I'm going to say ultimately it doesn't matter.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, there was a semi final back on

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>December twenty eighth where Joe Burrow threw for seven touchdowns

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in one half. Yeah, I'm not sure the stage is

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a real issue here. Oklahoma though, Oklahoma, that's a good

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me add another one in here. It's not on

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>our list, but you brought it up. Is there a

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage? Sactly. I'm trying to figure that out.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Does that MA try to figure out if there's a

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>home field disadvantage that could play into this as well. Oh,

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 3>you're going to reverse jinks, it will sort of. I

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 3>think it's nice to go away. I think it's nice

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 3>to get locked in. I think it's nice to, you know,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 3>take that sort of business trip mentality where you're away

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 3>from distractions. You are you know, you're in a hotel

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 3>doing your run through. It's not just taking a bus.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 3>And I understand they're probaly, I'm sure they're going to

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 3>be in a hotel in New Orleans for days and

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>days leading up to the game. But there is a

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 3>different element of not going away. And I'm positive the

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Superdome is going to be very LSU friendly.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>What is what is? I just wonder if that's added pressure.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your bet for first college football media member to

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>tweet out? It's like seventy thirty in favor of LSU

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>down here. Oh yeah, people love the purportal. That feels

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>like a Danish dot tweet at maybe eight oh two. Wow, Yeah,

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that seems right, all right? Next one. Okay, so Clemson,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe Stu Mandel I could see Stu could do that.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely his two thing. Clemson has started slowly against

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the quote unquote good teams on their twenty

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen schedule.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, North Carolina, Louisville, Texas A, and m Ohio State

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 3>slow starts, quick start against Virginia.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I go a step further that a fair share of

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>their close calls in each of the last four regular

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>seasons have come against the better teams on their sched

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So the Auburns and Louisville's, NC State, Texas A, and

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>M's pitt U NC this year. Like it's not just

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the vacuum of the twenty nineteen season, it's been

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>a recurring theme. It has not mattered much. Will it

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>matter here?

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 3>I think it will matter, yes. And it looked like

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 3>it was going to matter against Ohio State, and they

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 3>ultimately couldn't convert a number of opportunities they had in

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the red zone, you know, plays in which it looked

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 3>like they were going to score or get very close

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 3>to score. And I don't know that Clemson can get

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 3>away with that two games in a row. I agree

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>with petition this good. I think I agree with you.

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say, yes, it will matter. I'm going

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 3>to say yes, it's going to be very difficult to

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>be poised early in the Superdome with this kind of crowd,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 3>no matter how LSU themselves look. I just think even

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 3>with Trevor Lawrence playing on the stage, it'd be impossible

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 3>not to have a little bit in the way of butterflies,

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the way of getting your head

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 3>on straight until you can sort of figure out your

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 3>time and place. So I'm going to say it will

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 3>matter that the slow start is going to is going

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>to be something that Clemson, even if they pull it out,

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 3>will be something that they come to regret putting themselves

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 3>in a position with next one.

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Dan.

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we talked about Joe Burrow not being on a

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>stage quite like this. What about coach Orgeron. It's true,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we know Dabosweeney's been there. He was there last year,

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He's been there I don't know how many times now

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years. But coach Joe is

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at home. That'll help. But he hasn't quite managed a

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>game like this, He hasn't been on a stage like this.

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>As a head coach, no timeouts and going for it

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 3>on fourth down and you know, figuring out if you

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 3>should spike it with fifty two seconds left before halftime

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 3>or just keep his foot on the gas. I don't

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 3>know the last I mean, I do know the last

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.239
<v Speaker 3>time they played a game that came down to it.

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>That was Auburn, right, yeah, I guess now Alabama came

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 3>down to it. Yeah that was back in Alabama.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah Alabama, sure.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 3>But yeah Auburn in Alabama. That's incredible. Opponents, teams, defenses, whatever,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 3>But this is certainly different. They had Alabama, I think

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 3>in tusk looser, right, yeah, on Auburn at home. So

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 3>challenge is all the same. But I don't think it matters.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it matters because I think the team

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 3>is so squarely locked in on that the gas being

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 3>pushed at all times. We saw it at the end

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 3>of the Texas game and what week two on the road,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 3>where they could have just tried running it and punting

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 3>it into sort of hoping for the best to run

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 3>out the clock, and they didn't. And that was the

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 3>continued theme that this team is here to be aggressive.

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think they're always going to air on the

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 3>side of aggression. They have that identity built into their

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 3>DNA at this point, So I'm going to say maybe

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>early it matters a little, but ultimately, over the course

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 3>of four quarters, if they lose, they lose. But I

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's going to be because of game management.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 3>And because I agree is too big, I would completely

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 3>agree with that. Took the words right in my mouth. Yes,

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>another one here. You're gonna have to explain this in

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a little more detail because you came up with these

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>LSU pretty late in the year, keeping track of mobile quarterbacks,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>dealing with mobile quarterbacks. What what examples are you referring

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to here for our listening audience. The official SEC West

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 3>quarterback of the of the solid verbal John Reese Plumbley

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 3>ran all over the LSU defense and that's just situationably, situationably,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>situationally somewhat understandable. That was the week after BAMA their

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 3>second consecutive game on the road, and I, you know,

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I feel about the double roads, but there is that

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 3>element of okay, we can pick on the middle of

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>LSU's linebacking cores a little bit sidelined to sideline, and

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 3>we saw, you know, Sam Allinger moved the ball some

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>in that Texas game. They Kellen Mond was completely stifled.

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 3>And he is a mobile quarterback.

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I get that.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 3>And obviously Jalen Hurts ran some but ultimately not in

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>a difference making way. But there is that element of

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, Grant Delpit was heard and when he showed

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 3>some of that. The injury effects was not great in

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the open field tackling. But okay, hold, they give up points,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 3>they give up yardage. You can run on them. Some

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 3>you can run on them. But we're talking about mobile

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks here. Would you classify Trevor Lawrence as a John

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Reese Plumby kind of runner. I think he's better. He

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 3>ran in a sixty some id yard touchdown against Ohio State.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 3>He is a dual threat quarterback in a dual threat offense.

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 3>You would classify him as a running quarterback. I would

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 3>classify him as a quarterback who is able to run

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 3>at a high level. Not Lamar Jackson, not Johnny Manziel.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 3>But he is able to pick up third and eight's

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 3>with his legs. He is able to turn a four

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>yard run into a thirty one yard run. Yeah, I

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 3>would say his athleticism is absolutely an aspect of his game,

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and those are two threats, passing and running.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So yes, dual threat plumbly ran the ball more than

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty times, and it's a different aspect, but yeah, over

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>half of his starts this year. It's a much much

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>different system. Trevor Lawrence, by comparison, ran it sixteen times

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in that semi final against Ohio State to a great avail,

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>very good over what six and a half yards to carry,

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so clearly very effective.

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that includes sex, but yeah, nonetheless,

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 3>very fun game is part of very offense.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was the first time that I can remember,

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and Clempton fans might lampoon me for this, but that

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was the first time I could remember using Trevor Lawrence

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in that capacity.

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and no, I mean they're not going to run

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 3>him against No Wake and NC State that way.

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But he's very He's very athletic. He can do it

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if he has to. I just he strikes me as

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>much more of a guy that they like to keep

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in the pocket and utilize his arm.

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a different offense, and it's a rich rot

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 3>offense for all miss but Trevor Lawrence against I'm saying

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 3>it's North Carolina. He had eleven carries. This may include

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 3>sacks against Louisville ten carries Ohio State's sixteen carries. Generally

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 3>he's under He's single digit carries against the UH not

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 3>meat of their schedule if I'm being kind. But yeah,

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 3>back to the days of Chad Morris and Taj Boyd

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and Deshaun Watson and Kelly Bryant, all these guys, they

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 3>are told, you know, so you keep the ball on

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.240
<v Speaker 3>this sort of option when you see this and here's

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 3>a draw here near the goal line. Here's a draw

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 3>here on first and ten. We saw in that the

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 3>final drive that the run game, the quarterback run game,

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 3>was part of Clemson. So if it's part of the game,

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 3>part of that offense, then it's part of the offense.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is a huge threat. I think

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they were able to use it effectively against Ohio State.

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying it as something that matters a whole

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>lot here. I think it matters all right.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Clemson is going to have success on the

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>ground with Trevor Lawrence, maybe not Travis etn He's struggled

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 3>against some of the better defenses Clemson his face and

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 3>has kept some game closer. But I think Trevor Lawrence

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and his ability with his legs is going to be

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 3>a not insignificant factor.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, Daniel, Here's something that we talked about earlier.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>We teased we'd be talking about later. The LSU offensive line. Yeah,

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is it vulnerable, particularly on the edges? And does that matter?

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 3>My answer is yes, they're vulnerable. My answer is also yes, Clemson,

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 3>while they don't have the world beaters up front, that

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 3>allowed Brent Venables to be crazy flexible in the back

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 3>end of their defense like they had last year even

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 3>without Dexter Lawrence in the playoff. I think the athleticism

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 3>at linebacker, I mean Isaiah Simmons is they might be

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the best defensive player in the country. The flexibility, the

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 3>variety of looks that Clemson can throw at LSU and

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 3>LSU's front, I think it's going to matter. I think

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Joe Burrow is going to be forced into some uncomfortable situations,

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 3>which has generally not bothered him, but I think it's

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 3>going to have an effect on this game. Clemson's ability

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 3>to confuse and get home a couple times in key

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 3>moments against LSU. Yeah, yeah, I think it matters too.

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 3>And we know that Brent Vivennables is very creative. He

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 3>comes up with ways to generate pressure. The larger question

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 3>is will that pressure matter for Joe Burrow, who's been

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 3>very good in the face of pressure all year. Well,

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 3>they did. They had some trouble with Auburn. Auburn threw

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 3>like a weird three to one seven defense at them,

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 3>And maybe this is something else we can get into

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>with another one of these bullet points. But Clemson is

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 3>not going to be able to get home with their

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 3>front four like they have been able to do, like

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>we saw, you know, just the best defenses of the

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>past one hundred years of football. The fewer guys you

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>can get home with, the more just the crazier from

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, Miszoo's defense with Craig Kulangowski. Alabama's recent defense is,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Auburn's recent defense is Washington when they went to the

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 3>playoff almost never blitzed. Clemson doesn't have that ability. But

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I think you're right. I think what Brent Vennables is

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 3>able to do with confusion and stunts and slants whatever,

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna matter. I think LSU's offensive line

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 3>is good. I just don't think it's incredible.

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree with you, okay on that one.

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's do one or two more. You seeing you on

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>here that you want to make sure we cover.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Here was one thing I was curious about. I don't

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 3>even know if it's a doesn't matter, but it's just

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to figure out if somebody had experienced

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:40.760
<v Speaker 3>succeeding against either one of these offenses or defenses. And

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 3>as we've seen in years past, sometimes these guys will

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 3>go to the facility very quietly and consult. Kevin Steele,

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>the Auburn defensive coordinator, looks to me to be the

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 3>only person who's actually succeeded against recent Clemson and this

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 3>year's LSU. Now, obviously Auburn didn't play Clemson this season.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 3>Obviously there's the overlap of I think both of these

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 3>teams played Texas A and M, and both of these

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 3>teams shut down.

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and m's offense. But the Kevin Steele thing

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. I looked.

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see him do any interviews or I don't

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 3>think anybody that I could find has written anything using

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 3>what he is, what he's been able to do at Auburn,

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 3>both in shutting down Clemson with both the Shaun Watson

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and Kelly Bryant and what he did this year in

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 3>holding LSU to twenty three points. But I wonder, because

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Steele was both at LSU and at Clemson, I

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 3>think he's on better terms with Coach O because I

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 3>think Dabo. I mean, they called it not a firing,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 3>but it was. It was not a great end to

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Steele's tenure with Clemson. After the Orange Bowl against

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 3>West Virginia, I wonder if there's some Kevin Steele whispering

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 3>to Coach O about the Clemson offense. I wonder Dave Randa,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 3>not that Dave Randa isn't capable himself, and we haven't

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 3>even talked about the LSU defense. I wonder if there's

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 3>something going on.

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I kept stealing anything else here.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we didn't mention the LSU defense. That's sort

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 3>of the one thing we haven't mentioned. And talking about

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Clemson's offense and Trevor Lawrence, and we didn't mention his

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 3>targets and those offensive weapons. But the LSU defense has

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 3>allowed points this year. I think they're pretty drastically improved

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 3>from where they were mid season as they've gotten healthier,

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 3>especially as some of the freshmen like Derek Stingley, has

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 3>gotten a really good amount of important experience. But the

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 3>fact remains, outside of the dual threat thing, they've allowed points,

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 3>they've allowed big plays, They've been thrown on, they've messed

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 3>up in big situations, they've been run on, both by

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks and otherwise. Is there Does LSU's season of uneven

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 3>results on defense matter to you against an offense is

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 3>talent to disclaim absolutely?

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, absolutely absolutely, And it's part of the reason why

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of points in this game. Sure,

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably a shootout. I think we see

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>points in this game. I think both offenses are so good,

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so good that neither defense is going to have an answer, right,

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So I favor a lot of points here. But specific

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to l s U, absolutely it matters, definitely.

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 3>So I guess, can we can we play? I don't

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 3>know if this is a game, but I asked you

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to rank the outcomes. Do you want to do that

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 3>now or do you want to we could close?

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Thing?

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Is this a dive deep sound play the dive Deep

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're still deep.

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Dive Captain time, Lieutenant damn, you have clearance? Dive deep?

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that fine? Bomb underwater?

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It might be some sort of underwater ghosts.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Who how does this work? So I there are six

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 3>pretty obvious outcomes in this game. Well they're sick. There

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 3>only are in this game. It's either one of these

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 3>teams winning, small, medium, or big. So I would imagine

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 3>like if you go back to the was it twenty

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 3>twelve Notre Dame Alabama? Yeah, the most obvious blowout would

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 3>have It was impossible to think about Notre Dame blowing

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>out Alabama if they're going to win, it was going

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to be ugly with you know, led by defense winning

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 3>the game, you know, seventeen thirteen something like that. So

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 3>the most likely blowout that year was Alabama. Right to

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 3>you before we get in, The most likely blowout is

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 3>who over who?

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:43.720
<v Speaker 1>In this game? Most likely blowout is Whoever?

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 3>If somebody wins this game forty two to twenty, who,

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 3>would you be more surprised or less surprised however you

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 3>want to word it?

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>To see as the victor, I would be stunned if

0:41:55.480 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>LSU blew out Clemson. Wow, Okay, And I say that

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 1>because I was stunned last year when Clemson blew out Alabama.

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Just didn't see a blowout coming.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 3>So one point less than what Clemson beat Notre Dame

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 3>or one point more one point more, yeah, right.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>The Notre Dame's differential. Yeah, So I guess, just with

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, I would be much more surprised if

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>LSU did it than if Clemson did it, because we've

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seen Clemson do it against a really good opponent.

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I went back and forth on this. I think you're

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 3>probably correct because in order to blow a team out,

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it has to happen on both sides, and I think

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Clemson has the ability to both shut down and take

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the other defense to the woodshed. So I think that's

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 3>probably right. But I also don't think it's the most

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.439
<v Speaker 3>likely outcome. I know it Ison is blowing out.

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So what is the most likely outcome for you?

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Then?

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So if we think of it in terms of LSU

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>by a small margin, what do we consider a small margin,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a medium margin, and a big blowout margin?

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So I have eight points are fewer so one possession

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 3>game as a small margin, and then medium I have

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 3>nine to fourteen, and then large if you're winning fifteen plus.

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I know fifteen and sixteen are two possession games, but

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty You see a final score of thirty five

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 3>to twenty, You're like, that's a very comfortable win.

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so both teams by a small, medium, or large margin.

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Which team do you think is most likely to win?

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And by what margin?

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 3>I have the most likely margin as LSU small, as

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 3>do I? I have that as the most likely margin,

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 3>LSU winning by eight or fewer points, because even with

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Clemson as the more seasoned, more complete team, I'm still

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 3>going to roll in with the thing I believe the

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 3>most in, and that's the LSU offense and how impossible

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 3>and futile it seems for defenses to stop as talented

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 3>as Clemsons is. They also fell behind sixteen nothing to

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 3>another excellent offense, and that's an excellent offense in Ohio

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 3>State that I don't think is as good as LSU's.

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, i's my answer. I agree with you on

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 3>LSU small. I think if I'm betting, I bet the points,

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I take Clemson plus the points.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of history there. Clemson's been on this

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>stage before. If you're telling me that this game comes

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>down to a field goal, comes down to the last

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>second play, It's back and forth. Joe Burrow's got the

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ball in his hands. He wins by four. That makes

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense to me. What does it make

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sense is ls minus anything. I would take Clemson plus

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>five and a half and I'd be happy to be wrong.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Just don't bet your life savings on it. But that

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>being said, I think LSU wins, and I think LSU's small.

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I think that's the most likely outcome here.

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I have LSU small number one, I have

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Clemson small number two okay, and then I number three.

0:44:55.040 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I actually have Clemson big okay. Because of my continue

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the clear most concerning thing is the LSU defense, as

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 3>strong as they are at various points in that defense,

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 3>I think from what we've seen, you know, with them

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 3>against Alabama even early on, and I don't think this

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 3>matters all that much, but Texas did score on them.

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that is that is my answer that things

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 3>like last year can get out of hand with. I mean,

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the best defensive back in this game is still probably

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 3>aj Terrell, just the best and most seasoned lockdown defender.

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 3>To me, I guess it depends on how you classify

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Isaiah Simmons because he plays a little bit of everything.

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 3>But I think there is that element of Clemson comes

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 3>out a little more comfortable because of where they've been

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and jump out to an early lead, and LSU was

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 3>a little bit rattled and a little bit pressing and

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 3>playing from behind like they haven't been able to do,

0:45:56.880 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 3>and it just it goes from bad to worse. So

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I think I agree with you in that a Clemson

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 3>blowout is more likely than an LSU blowout. So that's

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 3>my number three. Let me ask you this. The over

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 3>under here is sixty nine and a half. Yeah, would

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 3>you go over under that? So that's like a if

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 3>my quick math works out, that's like a thirty seven

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 3>to thirty two type score in favor of LSU. Yeah,

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 3>if it's right on there, nobody really scoring forty if

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 3>it's you know, adheres to that five is spread five

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 3>six points for.

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The record, Just so you know, LSU put up forty

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>eight point nine points per game, which was first in

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the nation, and Clemson forty five point three, which was

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 1>fourth in the nation.

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 3>And Clemson's defense I don't think allowed a team to

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 3>score more than twenty. North Carolina scored twenty. Everybody else

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 3>was like.

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Twenty three in the playoffs, but beyond that, no, yeah,

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry.

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 3>During the regular season, yes, twenty three in the playoff

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 3>against Ohio State, which holding to Ohio State to twenty three.

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Holy wow. I think I'm inclined to take the over. Yeah,

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be too. I think shootout, I think I

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of points, and you know, to my

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>earlier point, I see a back and forth game. I

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>do think LSU wins because of that offense. Usually I

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>don't like to pick base solely on offense, which is

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>probably why Clemson ends up winning. But it never take

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the under. It's not fun at all. It's not fun

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to take the under. I see a back and forth game,

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. I could definitely see a scenario

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>where LSU gets one extra possession and they score, And

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, I make second most likely LSU medium.

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>My order is LSU small, LSU medium, Clemson big wow

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:50.800
<v Speaker 1>or medium more likely.

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 3>That Clemson is just so very clearly better than they

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 3>are barely better.

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, I'm gonna go out on a limb. Wow.

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I like that LSU small, LSU medium, Clemson Big, Clemson medium,

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Clemson small, And I think the least likely outcome here

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is LSU big because of that Clemson defense. See, I

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have LSU big at number four, okay, and then LSU

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>medium and then Clemson medium. I have LSU big because

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we know what that looks like. This is not something

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to form out of the ether. We know

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what happens when Joe Burrow is supremely confident in what

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a defense is trying against him and what his own

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>team's counter punch is or yeah, they have no ability

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to stop us. Now, Oklahoma's defense is nowhere near Clemson's defense.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But the heights of LSU's offense to me, says, if

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they're clicking and they figure out this Clemson defense early

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and they have the counter punches, if it's Joe Brady

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>versus Brent Venables and Joe Brady has all of you know, whatever,

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>he's stacking receivers like he does or running the option

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>routes like he does out of the slot, there is

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a world in which LSU.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.720
<v Speaker 3>We've seen it recently. We've seen them pour almost fifty

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 3>on Bama. Now, granted's not Alabama's best defense of the

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 3>last decade. But we've seen a world in which LSU

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 3>just pours it on a team offensively, and it's a

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 3>healthier LSU defense. Again, I'm they're the most concerning element

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 3>of this game. It's still a really good defense, very

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 3>good deal Rashad Lawrence. Inside, it's still Claven Chase, and

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 3>on the edge it's still Derek Stingley and Grant Delpit.

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 3>This is a team that can turn over a team.

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 3>This is a team that can stack pick sixes in

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 3>short fields. There is a world in which LSU wins

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 3>this game forty five to twenty six or something like that.

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So my next question here, we got to give

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 1>our picks of the week as we bring it home

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>here on our final preview show of the twenty nineteen

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty season. Give me a final score, give me

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a prediction, and tell me why.

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 3>So, if my least likely out come is LSU small,

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.280
<v Speaker 3>that would make sense for me to take LSU small.

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take LSU to win the game forty

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 3>one to thirty four. Forty one thirty four. I think

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 3>they're a touchdown better. I think it's back and forth.

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe there's a special team situation that changes things.

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I know LSU in the uh what the kick coverage

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 3>game hasn't been amazing when at least when teams have

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 3>been able to return the ball. I think there's a

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:37.319
<v Speaker 3>special team situation that changes the scope of things. I'm

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:42.280
<v Speaker 3>hopeful that Clyde Edwards Alaire is fully healthy and recovered

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 3>from his hamstring issues. Otherwise I've become a little bit

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 3>more worried because he was that keycog against Alabama. But

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 3>there's something about Clemson that I'm not fully there with

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know why. I don't know if it

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 3>was the start, I don't know what it was against

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State where they needed some things to break their

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 3>way to come back, and I think it's a little

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 3>bit more difficult against this LSU offense. So forty one

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:11.799
<v Speaker 3>thirty four in one of the all time great national championship.

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Games, I think it's going to be an amazing football game.

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be a lot of points. I've

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 1>got LSU winning at the gun forty five, forty two, again,

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. Joe Burrow, Joe Burrow has to

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lead the LSU Tigers down the field to score in

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans to win the national championship.

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.800
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea why we think this Clemson defense

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:39.720
<v Speaker 3>is gonna give up so many points, But I honestly

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 3>think Joe Burrow is what he's done this year. It's

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 3>a generational performance. So let's put it this way. If

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 3>anyone's gonna do it this year, it's gonna be Joe Burrow.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I think a lot of points uncharacteristically, so for

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Clemson defense. Maybe I'm nuts, which is entirely possible

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from doing this all year. But I've got lis you

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>by three on taking Clemson plus the points, and I

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>agree with you that there may be a special team

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 1>situation here. It's the only thing, one of the only

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:15.200
<v Speaker 1>things that jumps out on paper as a pretty big

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>disparity between LSU, which has been pretty good on special

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>teams by and large, and Clemson.

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Man, we've gotten this whole show, not even talking about

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 3>t Higgins and Justin Ross and Travis y Ten and

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 3>their ability. I mean, they've won the National Championship. We've

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 3>seen what Justin Ross is able to do on a

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 3>stage like this. Ah Man, what I just the receivers

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.399
<v Speaker 3>in this game. I'm not going to go through year

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 3>by year to look at the receiving course from what

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 3>we've seen, I remember Oregons was very beat up. But

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the I mean, if you're going Justin Ross T Higgins,

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Jamar Chase, Justin Jefferson, Terris Marshall. I know Clemson doesn't

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 3>have a world beater at tight end, whereas LSU has

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of a matchup Nightmare and Thad Moss at times.

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 3>But what if you like receivers, if you like receivers

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:05.840
<v Speaker 3>on corners, this is this is pornography, ty, Yeah, I

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 3>can't wait, and like we can talk about the fact

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:13.240
<v Speaker 3>that you know Clemson's secondary and I mentioned Tanner news earlier,

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe he's a weak point. I'm curious to see if

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 3>LSU can generate some mismatches in the slot against Tanner muse.

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious to see what Clemson's able to do with

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:27.399
<v Speaker 3>their receivers against an LSU secondary that I mean, they're

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 3>they're painted on receivers every week. Sure, this is I

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 3>it looks to be an incredible collection of matchups outside.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know how either defense covers their opponent's

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers.

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sixteen minutes worth. I don't know how you do it.

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I really hope they each just like, really get up

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and press, just press.

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's.

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>With a safety.

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not hoping for that, but I am hoping that,

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, you get, you know a lot of fifty

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 3>to fifty moments that just the game hinges on so

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 3>many different, tiny, tiny little seconds.

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the best. I don't know how you cover these

0:54:08.440 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>receivers for sixty minutes, and I don't know how you

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 1>cover them with the constant threat of two really good

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:18.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs Edwards where Travis et totally ignoring Travis Etn,

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>who's been perpetually underrated or undercovered at least as a

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>star player for the Clemson Tigers.

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was mostly shut down by Ohio State and

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:31.240
<v Speaker 3>still managed to have arguably the biggest moment in the game,

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 3>or the maybe two biggest moments, yeah, in the game

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 3>for Shoransen.

0:54:35.000 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. We are both taking LSU Damn

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 1>by a little bit of a larger margin than I

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they cover. Yeah, you think they cover. I'm not willing

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to go there. We will be watching the game together

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on Monday evening. I am driving up to your homestead

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:55.919
<v Speaker 1>shortly after I get out of the mysterious day job

0:54:55.960 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>on Monday afternoon. We are going to convene and record

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>our recap episode early on Tuesday and drop that hopefully

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:07.359
<v Speaker 1>before lunchtime. Get that out into the college football ether

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so you can digest it on your ride to or

0:55:10.680 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>from work. Yeah, and then we're gonna hang out and

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the season that was this past I don't know,

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>five or six months.

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's our own personal rat party. That's it cool.

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll be making the solid verbal, the official dip of

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 3>the solid verbal, the chorizo dip.

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Should I bring anything? You want me to bring anything?

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you make anything that you're particularly proud

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 3>of that you think that would make a good addition.

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there will be other people watching

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 3>with us.

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you want me to make my taco dip where

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I pour on the tostito salsa? You make whatever you want? Sure,

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's delicious on top of a luscious bed

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of sour cream, cream cheese and Mexican cheese from Wegmans.

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if my body can fully handle. Okay,

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>my stomach has not been a friend of dairy recently,

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm willing to try try everything.

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll probably also get pizza. So yeah, there's gonna

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:04.879
<v Speaker 3>be a cheese factor anyway, Why the hell not.

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Follow along with us on Twitter, follow along on Instagram,

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>check out the Facebook page. Dan and I are going

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to be posting. We're going to be offering running commentary

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>at some point throughout the course of this week. I'm

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:22.319
<v Speaker 1>going to post my prop selections for the coming football game.

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:24.840
<v Speaker 1>They're not all out yet. There are a few interesting ones,

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but I want to wait until there's a more complete

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>offering before I offer my recommendations. I know everyone's on

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the edge of their seat waiting for these, but give

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit more time to try and calculate

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:36.799
<v Speaker 1>what I think the best plays are.

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're recording this obviously Tuesday for the Tues cruise,

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and we have not seen a full list of game

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and player props. I wonder, do you know who's doing?

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Is there a halftime show? I should have come prepared.

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know about the halftime show, but we

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 1>did Simpson, we did Ashley Simpson. We did make reference

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier to the broadcast and ESPN is again doing it's

0:56:57.040 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Mega cast, so of course Chris vowallor Kirk kurb Street

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to be on the call. Tom Ornaldi and

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Maria Taylor are going to be working the sidelines as

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they typically do. There will also be the Field Pass,

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:14.720
<v Speaker 1>which is going to feature our good friend Adam Amin

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 1>along with Steve Levy. They're going to have Pat mcnafee

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan Orlovsky on the field as well. There's going to

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be a coach's film room on ESPN You. They have

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 1>not announced yet who those coaches will be. Hopefully it'll

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be Kevin Steele, that'd be neat, Tom Reese would probably

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be nice. One desire there. I don't even know if

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I have it too. The Command Center will be on

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ESPN News, which is where they show you all the

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>angles and get about four different vantage points at any moment.

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:52.840
<v Speaker 1>They'll have the Data center on the goal Line Network

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Too Excited in case you're getting too excited. The College

0:57:56.840 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Shower will be the data This is the real time

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:03.800
<v Speaker 1>statsnalytics and social media commentary. And then there will be

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the hometown radio on the ACC and SEC networks. Oh

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Yeah, so they'll have the hometown radio

0:58:12.280 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>calls featuring the Clemson Tigers Network and the LS Sports

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network. I do like that.

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 3>We both picked LSU, so technically Dabo can add us

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 3>to the pile of non believers.

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:28.160
<v Speaker 1>There is a sounds of the game on ESPN Classic. Whoa,

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading this off the press release. It allows viewers

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to imagine themselves inside the Superdome. It's a little ASMR.

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's just it's like the no announcer experience, like

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 3>they've done that with NBA games.

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That allows viewers to imagine themselves inside the Superdome as

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the game presentation will feature all the natural audio from

0:58:49.840 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the stadium, including the band performances. I assume no three

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 1>D now no three D. We have a ref cast

0:58:58.240 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on the ESPN app, which is the streaming from their hats.

0:59:03.240 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>John Perry, Matt Austin, and Judson Howard provide reaction and

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 1>commentary from a referees perspective, So it doesn't I don't

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>think the hat can will be involved here.

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Can we set up a feed in which it's just

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Mama h describing the action over the phone.

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We could do that. Try that? Okay, Oh, that would

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be great.

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I've had I mean, I'm sure you've had this situation

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 3>too where you're not able to watch a game and

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 3>you're like texting with somebody furiously or on the phone

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:34.480
<v Speaker 3>like yep, nope, okay, oh oh Jason, you just have

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 3>no idea what's going on? I would love to have

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:37.760
<v Speaker 3>a mama h feed going.

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:39.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll see what we can do. Okay, we'll

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 1>figure that out. Well. Thank you to everyone out there

0:59:42.520 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in, not just for this show, but all

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.439
<v Speaker 1>season long. Yea, we will be back in short order

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to recap all this and much much more as we

0:59:50.360 --> 0:59:52.520
<v Speaker 1>head into the college football off season. Don't forget. If

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you haven't subscribed, please do so. The soliverbal will be

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>with you all throughout the calendar year, even if they're

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not playing football games. Knows, there's plenty of college football

1:00:01.600 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to discuss as we forge a head into the long

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>doldrums that is the twenty twenty offseason. Yeah. Can I

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>add one more thing? Please?

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 3>If you're going to this game, eat literally anywhere. It

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>will be very happy in New Orleans because it is

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the best. If you want specific places, I like, I

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know. There's Willie Mays for fried Chicken, There's a

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Killer Poe Boys, There's all sorts of places. Sylvain is

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 3>very very good. If you don't feel like specific like

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Cajun food, but they still have Cajun options. Bevy is

1:00:37.880 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of a little outside of all the tourist area

1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>for Poe Boys and stuff like that. But you literally

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>eat anywhere anywhere local. Don't don't do everything you can

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 3>not to eat at CPK. For I'm saying in New Orleans.

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself,

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Tie hilden Brand, We'll be back at you in just

1:00:57.000 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a few days. Enjoy the college football National Championship and

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to you soon. Stay solid, pray,