WEBVTT - U.S. Better Be Prepared For Another Strike On Syria: Stavridis

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. North

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Korea and potential negotiations with the US, we do to

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>find out that top representatives of nately CIA Director UH

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pompeio, did meet with Kim Jong un, the leader

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of North Korea, in recent weeks. Joining us now to

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>discuss I'm very pleased to say is Admiral James Servriti

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is retired US General U S. Navy Admiral and former

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>military commander of NATO. He is a current Dean of

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Flesh Your School at Tufts University and a Bloomberg

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>View contributor. Admiral stefridis thank you so much for being

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>with us. Are we being played with these negotiations? I

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>would say it's too soon to tell. Um. There is

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a possibility that there is a sincerity here, uh driven

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's face it. By financial exigencies in North Korea, UH

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he really has nuclear weapons now,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so he may feel, in all honesty that this is

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a good point for him to negotiate. I think we

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are being played if we think that he's going to

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>give up those nuclear weapons. I do not think he will.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Stefrida's Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe meeting with President

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump in Florida and Mara Lago. What do you

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think the position of the Japanese is visa VI what

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is seemingly a bilateral negotiation between the United States and

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. I think they will push very hard to

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>expand these talks rapidly. The next step should be to

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>go from bilateral, as you correctly point out US North Korea,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to four party talks to bring in South Korea and China.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>We will never solve this problem without fully integrating China

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>into the discussion. Once we make some serious progress, hopefully

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>through four party talks, then I think you have to

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>go to six party talks. That's when Japan and Russia

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>come into the equation. This is the work of a

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>year or two, and if President Trump thinks he's going

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to sit down across the table from Kim Jong on

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and walk out with the Nobel Peace Prize. That is

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. This is going to be the

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>work of at least a year of solid negotiation building

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>toward inclusion of our Japanese allies. Given the work that

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lies ahead, is this meeting premature? I don't think so.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a reason all time to

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>try a kind of uh, dramatic gesture that might crack

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this thing open and move it in a positive direction.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Another way to put it is compared to where we

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were four months ago before the Olympics, when we had

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>nuclear detonations and ballistic missiles flying over Japan and headed

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>towards Guam, this is a better place to be in.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But we should not be overly euphoric about what's ahead

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and where to understand that this is hard work negotiations

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and diplomacy or time consuming and difficult, especially with someone

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like Kim Jong un. Admiral Strafridi's I want to get

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>your view on CIA Director Mike Pompeio, since he was

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the one who traveled to North Korea last week to

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>meet with the North Korean leader. Uh, what do you

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>think of him as sort of the initial UH spokesperson

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for the US. I think it would have been a

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>very odd choice, except for the fact that he is

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>nominated and I think has a better then even chance

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of being confirmed as the next Secretary of State. Given that,

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense if if he had been planned to

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>stay at the CIA for the next three or four years,

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have been a very strange choice.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Leaving that kind of structural answer. Aside as a person,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a very good choice. He Iss high

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>emotional intelligence, UM, He's academically very well prepared West Point

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>grad first in his class there UM coming out of

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the CIA. He has a depth now in intelligence. Former congressman,

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>so he gets the political piece of this. I think

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a very reasonable choice, given that he is on

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>tap to become Secretary of State. Admiral Stevids just quickly.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>John Balton, national Security Advisor reaching out to Egypt and

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>other Arab nations in order to replace the U S

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and Syria. Is that kind of work. I think it's

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that we are going to wholesale replace the u US.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>The idea that we're going to just step away in

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>our son of friends are going to step in is unrealistic.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think the idea of building a coalition that

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>includes significant Sunni Arab states to include Jordan's Saudi Arabia,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Gulf states as well as Egypt, I think makes sense.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It will require U S boots on the ground. We're

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to just leave the region.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get a sense of what the U. S.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Relationship is at this point with its allies, with grappling

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with Syria in particular, do you get a sense of

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>how much more the US is working with its allies

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in light of what happened there. We will continue to

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>try and build the coalition in preparation for the possibility

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of another round of strikes. Let's face it, um we

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have now struck twice, but in the interim between those

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>two strikes, we've seen Assad continue to use chemical weapons

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>with impunity. I am unconvinced that he's going to have

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden epiphany like St. Paul on the road to

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Damascus and stop using those weapons. So we better be

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>prepared for another strike, and that means getting our allies,

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>partners and friends on board. The reason why I asked

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that Admiral Strafrides is because there's been so much tension

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>with respect to trade and a lot of harsh words

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between the US and allies, and I'm

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>wondering how much that plays into some of these military

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships that are required for conflicts like this. It absolutely does,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and one of the very strong arguments for UH maintaining

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>balanced global relationships is that in times of trouble, you

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>need friends and you can't surge trust. Um. You've got

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to build it a brick at a time, and when

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>you knock it down with a series of bad choices, economically,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>it does bleed over into your day to day military

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and operational relationships. Admiralst of Vitas, what is the

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>U s strategic reason for being in Syria. I'll give

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you four reasons, and I think these will call that

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to remain in Syria. The first is quite straightforward,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is continuing to destroy the Islamic State. The

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>second is we have a shared interest with the global

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>community and stopping the use of chemical weapons, which appears

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to be continuing forthwith. Thirdly, um, we have a strategic

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>challenge with Iran in that region. Who threatens Israel, Saudi Arabia,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's and other Sunni states. And fourth and finally, um,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's an enormous humanitarian crisis sin Syrian. I think we

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>have a moral obligation to be part of resolving that.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>To do that, you have to create security in the region.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give you those four reasons, and most reads,

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they're all legitimate reasons. One thing that is also at play, though,

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is President Trump's support from his base. There was a

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of pushback after these strikes in Syria, with people saying,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump, you said that you wanted to pull troops

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the US, out of Syria. Rather, why should

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>those conflicts be our cost? We should just turn our

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>focus on ourselves. How much does that factor into the

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>debate and the strategy of the US. I think it

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>will play a significant role, and it should. Um. We

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>these are national decisions and that's what leaders do. They

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ought to step up and explain why they need to

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to take the hard right choice, not the easy

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong choice. And I think that the fact that President

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump essentially reversed his position UH several days later is

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a good indicator that people like Secretary of Defense Gimattis

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and CIA Director Pompeio and others convinced him to do so.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we're gonna leave Syria anytime soon.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Point one and point two. Uh, the level of engagement

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is very different here than the hundred and fifty thousand

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>troops that we had in Iraq or the hundred and

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand troops that I commanded in Afghanistan when I

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was NATO commander. We're talking to three five thousand troops. Um,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a very sustainable commitment for the United States,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think good leaders will recognize that and seek

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to explain it to the American public. Just to wrap

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>up here, Admiral Staffridi's given the fact that you are

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the author of Seapower, the History and geopolitics of the

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>world's Oceans, the fact that you were formerly U. S.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Navy admiral, former military commander of NATO, given your vast

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>experience with the international relations on the military front, are

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you more optimistic about the sort of global outlook right

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>now than you worked two months ago. I am cautiously,

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>very cautiously optimistic. On North Korea. I think there's a

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>real possibility of negotiating our way out of what two

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or three months ago pre Olympics looked very, very dangerous

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the Middle East. I am more pessimistic

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because I uh don't see a strategic plan being laid

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>out by the administration. In simply lobbying Tomahawk missiles is

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to get us where we need to go there.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's a mixed picture. But overall, um, I am

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>very concerned, uh finally about great power politics and the

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of our relationship with both Russia and China had

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>degraded over the last three or four months. So running

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it all together, i'd say we're on a down trend

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>right now and we've got some work to do. I

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you very much for spending time with us.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Admiral James Stefridis is the Dean of the Fletcher School

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. Also a Bloomberg

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of you Calmnists joining us from Boston Home to Bloomberg

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one six on Boston, New Report in thirty in Metro West,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the South Sure and Admiral's to read This is

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the author of Seapower, The History and Geopolitics of the

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>World's Oceans, The use of cryptocurrencies not only is gaining

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>popularity when it comes to international transactions for businesses, but

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>also being used by people for retail transactions on which

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they would like to maintain their privacy. And the premier

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>online destination for adult entertainment it's called porn Hub, has

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>announced that it is now accepting anonymity focused cryptocurrency Verge,

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep current with what it describes as

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>its communities, payment preferences. And here to tell us more

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about Verge and cryptocurrencies is Justin Velo. He is the

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>founder and the CEO of Verge Austin. Thanks very much

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for coming in. Can you first tell us what is Verge.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Verge is a cryptocurrency. It's very similar to the Bitcoin

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>blockchain UM, but it's also modified. It has much faster

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>transaction time. Bitcoin has about a ten minute transaction time

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for for a confirmation of a transaction hours is about

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds UM. And we have a much higher supply

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>because we believe that it's better for distribution. The more

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the more coins we have, the better. So Bitcoin has

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>minted or will mint in its lifetime, twenty one million coins,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>whereas we will be minting sixteen point five billion, So

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we're uh, you know, we're what we

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>see as a more fair currency. Okay, So just to

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>give some perspective, the cryptocurrency has about oh one billion

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap, and it has increased quite a bit

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>over the past few months. You know. Uh, we're talking

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about pornography, which is sort of interesting because we stay

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>away from it. But it's a huge business and porn

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hub has nearly a hundred million daily users. And people

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want other people to see that they're buying pornography,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which is why there must be some interest in a

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>secret way of delivering payment. Who approached to with this transaction? Um,

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of a mutual approach. Um. I believe

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that people from we have a very very big community

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of you know, people that are very interested in the

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>coin and very excited about the project itself. Uh. So

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe that, you know, people from our community. We're

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about hundreds of thousands of people. Uh. And I

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>believe that they started initiating contact with them, probably through

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>their website, you know, saying hey, we would really like

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys to start supporting cryptocurrencies. Okay. I'm wondering though,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>what this does for the reputation of cryptocurrencies that people

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to cloak their actions and are looking

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for ways of doing so. And you know, pornography is

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>uh some people might you know, shake their head at it,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not you know, a terrorist activity, but somebody

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>could potentially use it for that. Absolutely, Um, people deserve privacy,

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in that aspect of their life. Um. And you

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the hundred million visitors a day uh statistic, which

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, But what I find more interesting is that

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's actually over a billion unique visitors a year, which

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually a double digit percentage of our population on Earth.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's uh, you know a little

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more important to look at. It's it's a very

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>common thing. And uh, you know there's still some stigma

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>around sexual preferences, uh, you know, fetishes, things like that.

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know these things, you know, if we all

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>love and respect to one another, this is none of

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>our business and we shouldn't judge each other by it.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But we live in in a time and age still

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>where people do so it's you know, it's very important

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that people have privacy, and especially online. And wonder if

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you could just describe for our listeners, how do you

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>raise the money in order to have all of these coins,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>these these artificial tokens. Okay, Well, see a lot of

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>projects that launch do what's called an i c O,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously very similar to an ipal coin offering. Yes, um,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and then there's all you do one of those No,

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we did not. How did you raise the money? Uh?

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Through the community? So you used online source like a

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>crowdfunding site and what to do? So? Yes, and it's

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's voluntary. Okay. So what has been your response

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to people that say that the coins that were created

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that fundraising effort, that many of

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>those coins either disappeared or that the money that they

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>then used to purchase these digital coins has been locked

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and they cannot get it out of their wallets. That

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it goes. It's basically like throwing your

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>money into a pot. Um. What what we've done is

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we've given some a lot of these funds for integration

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of Verge into the actual platform, the software platform behind

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>porn hub UM. But then we've also had other goals

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like we're building an iOS wallet, um. You know, we're

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>looking to get integrated into a hardware device for even

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>stronger storage of but I understand. But but my question

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is that if if there is this fundraising that went on,

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there's publicly available information that says it over eighteen million

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of these well no, they were simply moved, were right.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But were they moved with the knowledge of the people

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>who had invested? Oh? Yeah, absolutely. I think everybody knew

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>going in that these funds were allocated for specific things

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they're being used for. Oh, I'm just wondering, Uh,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what else have you thought of partnering with, I mean,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>any cannabis companies or other types of things like that.

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That that's absolutely another one, Like you know, a medical

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>marijuana industry is another one where um, you know, there's

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a stigma to it where you don't you may not

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>want your employer or some of your even friends, you know,

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to know that that's part of your lifestyle, you know.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that I was trying to get

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out earlier. I mean, it's one thing for there to

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be a stigma around sexual preferences. There's another thing to

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of have money laundering or financing terrorist activities. How

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>do you prevent that type of use from this coin? Well,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at the moment, I would say that most

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of those nefarious things that happened with currencies probably stemmed

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>from the US dollar. Um. I mean, when's the last time,

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you heard a story about US going into

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>its horrist location and uncovering palettes of cryptocurrency or finding

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>hard drives with bitcoins. We don't we find palettes of

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, shrink craft hundred dollar bills. So well, one

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest owners of bitcoin is the US government

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>from actually seizing Yeah, so so there is there is

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that activity, and basically this is a designed cryptocurrency to

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>cloak activities. You have to wonder that's going to be

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a motivation for people to use it. Sure, but I

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>think that we can see. Um, I'm similar to the

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>tour project, which is a open source piece of software

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that helps hide your IP address that was actually originally

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>developed by the US government. So I mean I think

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that's to some degree. Uh, you know, privacy is important

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in the US government recognizes that too. So interesting having

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you on. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Justin Vellow, founder and chief executive officer of Verge Cryptocurrency,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>just announcing that it is partnering with porn Hub to

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>allow people to pay for their pornography consumption with a

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>cloaked identity through the crypto asset. That's discussion. He is

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the Finance Minister of a Luxembourg. Pierre Gramina joins us now.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>And just to give some context, many people may not

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>know that Luxembourg City is one of the three official

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>capitals of the European Union. Indeed, it is the seat

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the European Court of Justice. And from that perspective,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he has an interesting look into the role of trade

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and taxes and a variety of other issues in the

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>European Union. And he joins us here in our eleven

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>three oh studios. Minister, thank you very much for beating

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with us. Appreciate it. Maybe just set for our listeners

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Luxembourg, your role and the role

0:18:55.720 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of Luxembourg which belies its size in the European Union

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because it has served as a nation that has tried

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to mediate and to help integrate Europe since the creation

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of the EU. Eure absolutely right, Luxembourg is a founding

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>member of the European Union. It was the smallest one

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of the six founding members that is today the second

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>smallest one, but being at the heart of the European

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>continent between Germany and France, and having been also the

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>victim of two world wars, we're probably the most staunch

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>advocate for European reconciliation, and the European Union has achieved

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that goal. We haven't had any war in Europe since

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the setting up of the European Combinate Steel in fifty

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>two and the European Community in nineteen fifty eight, and

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that's often forgotten, and we continue to keep that on

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>our mind and act as a mediator as a neutual

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>partner to find solutions. U. You are a neutral partner

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>also to asset managers and other investment companies that have

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>put their headquarters in Luxembourg. A lot of corporations have

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, in part because of beneficial tax treatment that

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they get for going to Luxembourg. How much pressure are

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>you getting right now from other European countries, given the

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>need to raise money and given the need to sort

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of prevent a race to the bottom with respect weakening

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>tax rules. While we've had a rough ride in the

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>past on these issues of taxation, but since two thousand

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteen the present government has changed its root in this matter.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>We have given up the bank secrecy laws. That was

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the criticisms that we were receiving. It was

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>something that was not any more accepted. It was an

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>old tradition in many countries, not only in hours. We've

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>decided to part with that and to embrace tax transparency

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and since then, obviously the pressure is far less. We

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have obviously attractive tax rates, but if you look at

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the average of taxes of Luxembourg in the O City,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we're just in the middle field. Now. I get pressure

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in my country very often that we should have lower

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>taxes than what we have now. Yes, I mean we

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>have a corporate tax rate of eighteen percent. If you

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>add municipal taxes you get at twenty six percent, So

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a decent amount. Have any companies

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>or are fund managers removed their premises for remove their

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>headquarters from Luxembourg as a result. No, because the reason

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>why we were successful was not based solely on taxation.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at what happened in the

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Brexit context, we are one of the winners short term

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that quite a few players in London

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>had to find a place on continental Europe because they

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>are losing the passport for financial services into the EU

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Single Market, and many chose Luxembourg. I mean, I think

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of American banks who have decided to beef up their

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>private bankings hub in Luxembourg. They could have chosen other places.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I think of asset management firms that have taken the

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>same decision. I think of insurance company. It shows that

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the general framework of Luxembour's attractive. We are one of

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the ten countries left in the world that have a

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>triple A rating Financially. This is important when you're an

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>international financial center. We've been able to attract Chinese banks

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to Luxembourg. Seven largest Chinese banks are in Luxembourg. Some

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have come more recently. So it shows that fortunately what

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>we were pretending that it is a full international ecosystem

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that we have that explains why we've been successful. It's

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>not only about taxes, Minister. Before you were the finance minister,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you also served as the country's ambassador to Japan and

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, also the consul general and director of the

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Board of Economic Development in San Francisco, so you have

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a global perspective about how companies and countries uh integrate

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to do business. Recently, the United States has

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>taken the position that certain types of optical component technology

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot be sold to certain Chinese companies. Is a company

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>in Boston, Acacia and also in uh San Francisco, O

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Clara optical component technology not to be sold to companies

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like z t E. What is the position of Luxembourg?

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Does it feel as if it's between a rock and

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>a hard place, because a lot of times these rules

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and regulations will make it more difficult for country companies

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>all over the world to do business with other companies. Yes,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few issues that need to be

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>covered here about your question, which is a very legitimate

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and obviously a country like mine is for open trade

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as possible, bringing down trade barriers and other obstacles,

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and and also making sure that the EU s such

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't build fences and and go to protection is to

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>So that's the general principle. Having been a diplomat I

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years, I very well know that some strategic

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>material cannot be sold to other countries, So I think

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to put this in parallel. Open trade is

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>one thing, strategic issues is another. We're a member of NATO,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>We're going to complay comply with NATO rules obviously, and

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to abide by those sorts. You know, as

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we talk about trade concerns, and know the ECB members

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>have been raising the issue that any trade skirmish could

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially slow growth. We are getting some disappointing numbers out

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of the European region today. We saw slowing inflation throughout.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this? Are we seeing sort

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of the peak of of the growth cycle in Europe? Oh?

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really a little bit earlier or

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hasty to draw that conclusion based on a few weekly

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>or monthly figures. I mean, the i m F came

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>out with new figures of growth for Europe yesterday. I'm

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>going to tend the spring meeting of the IMF tomorrow

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, and for Europe the growth is forecast to

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be three point sorry two point four percent this year,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>slightly higher than anticipate it. And it's going to be

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>three point eight percent worldwide, do mostly to a pick

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>up in international trade and a pickup of investment. And

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if I look at Europe, growth has only been back

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>since one year one year and a half, so our

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle is younger than the one in the United

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>States and then I must say, with the very accommodative

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>monetary policies that we have in the United States and Europe,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously underpinning growth and international trade in the future.

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>So I'm more optimistic, fabulous Pierre Gravenia, thank you so

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Pierre Grams, Minister of Finance for Luxembourg,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us on his way to the I m F meeting,

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>where no doubt they will be speaking about all of

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>these issues growth, trade, headwinds the like will be hearing more,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure as they meet. It has become something of

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a playground brawl that has entered the upper echelons of

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>major Wall Street firms. I'm talking about Blackstone and Goldman Sachs,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking about a deal having to do with

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>credit fault swaps related to have Nanni in New Jersey's

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest home builder here to talk about. The latest in

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this saga is Shradaratarajan, who has been covering this amazingly

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>uh and joins us now he covers all things having

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with credit for Bloomberg. So shri this out

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for us with respect to a particular lunch that recently

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>took place right and I think we've discussed this a

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit a little bit before, but really what this

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>goes back to is this sneaky, knotty trade that Blackstone

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>struck up at the end of last deal with a

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>almost bankrupt company where they get paid out on some

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>insurance like derivatives. The only problem Goldman is on the

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>other side of the trade and they're not quite fans

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of this trade. We've already seen lawsuits lapped on this case.

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone has been accused of fraud in manipulation. But at

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the same time, those guys on the other end who

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>might have to make big payouts to Blackstone want to

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure they can avert that outcome. So when Lloyd

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>blankfind met John Gray, the next head of Blackstone, and

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming it was a regular relationship builder meeting just

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about all things under the sun, how they

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>could do a little more business together, this little deal

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>came up and as you can imagine, it probably got

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a little awkward. What kind of money are we talking

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about here? And that's the amazing thing here. That company

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about as a market gap of on

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the three million what's at stake for Blackstone and Goldman

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is a decent amount of money. For Blackstone, this could

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be hundreds of million dollars and pay out for Goldman

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the losses could be would likely be south of a

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred millions, if at all. But but what's weird is

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to back down. And I guess, uh,

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>when you think you're right, when you think the other

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.719
<v Speaker 1>party is wrong, why back down? And the takeaway from

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>me is when elephants go to fight, it's the eagles

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that get trampled. Well, yeah, that's what That's what I

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>was going to ask you. I mean, how much is

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this just a chess game among people who are brilliant

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as children at chess and are still brilliant at chess,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and they want to outsmart one another and the stakes

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are just going up and up? How much is that

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really what we're watching here? That's what it truly feels

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, Like, clearly Blackstone did something which is not

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a ordinary trade. But they did they do something that

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>falls outside of the playbox. These guys get to play,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>probably not at least the judges. So far, the legal

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>argument doesn't seem to indicate that. And we will see

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>how this spanard over the next couple of months. But

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like a bit of I've been outsmarted.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I need to head back, but just sort of to

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow onto what you're saying. The stakes seem to

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be raised increasingly. They're already has been some withdrawal from

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>from government sacks on the part of Blackstone, correct. I

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>mean they've already reduced some of their business as a

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>result of this trade, right we we've certainly seen that GSO,

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the credit on of Blackstone and is the

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>principle on the opposite side of government on the trade,

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>has already cut back on some of its trading with

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Goldman sax And. And remember Blackstone is a large, massive,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>important client for all of the banks, and there are

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>some people within government who are nervous that if this

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>situation escalates further, you could see a further pullback in

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the business from them. What was the actual business that

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>went wrong with her Nanian? Yeah, it's a home builder

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and like most other companies, too much

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dead recession that got them into a lot of trouble

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>back then. Through that period, Blackstone had previously done financing

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.719
<v Speaker 1>for them, But ten years on, this is more not

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>so much more about what's wrong with the business. It's

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about how we can help you. But first we want

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we can make a good amount of

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>money on side bets that we have on the company.

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>When is this whole affair going to get wrapped up?

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I would like to think fairly soon. But that's what

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought my life. We we have some interesting day

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>key dates coming up. May first is when the company,

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, defaults on a bond payment, which is critical

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to the deal that black Stone struck up with this company.

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>After that you have a thirty day period. This then

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>goes through a trade group and the body determines who

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>who owes whom how much. And that's when this will

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>pan out. And I think it's going to get It's

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get a little bit uglier. What about some

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the other companies that are involved here, the hedge

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>funds and such? Have they pulled back from Goldman? Are

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there on the same side as gold Man? Well, some

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of them are on the same side as Goldman. There

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are some folks who have even jump sides in the

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>last four or five months. Again, like you saidly so

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this is this is as much as people want to

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>get indignant about how right is it? Is it fair

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>people also want to make money, and if they were

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on one side of the trade, they have jumped to

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side as long as they've spotted an opportunity

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to make money. Fair Okay, I think we'll just fair.

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's really about what you can prove and

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what you can do when you when you go to

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>court with the lawyers, and they'll all make some money.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much. A Street not Rag, and he is

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>our high yield debt and syndicated loan reporter. It's sort

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of like writing a soap op right in a way.

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I much appreciated the great story on the Bloomberg. Thanks

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.