WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Target, Home Depot, TX Earnings 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Business, breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Window between the peak and cunt changing super fast.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big business

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Today, well look at why home improvement has been resilient

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>at the retailer.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Home depot, and we'll discuss why the tech giant Apple

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 3>still hasn't managed to crack AI.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>But first we begin with earnings from the retailer Targets.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>This week, Target reported sales that dropped in the first quarter,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>and the company also cut at sales forecast for the year.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Target sited inclining consumer spending along with the impact of

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and boycotts.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Target shares fell after the report and raise some questions

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>over the company's ability to recapture growth after two years

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>of choppy results.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Jennifer Bartashi's Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 2>senior analyst Retail, Stables and packaged Food.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Jennifer if she was surprised by the results.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 4>None of this really was a surprise. It's really about

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 4>the degree to which it was a surprise. So sales

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 4>came in softer than expected, profit was a little softer

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 4>than expected, And it's just I think people are waiting

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 4>for Target to say how they're going to fix it.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>And you know, they came out talking about a new office,

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, to accelerate their plans. But I think people

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 4>are just waiting for something tangible that they can really

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>hold the company accountable for to reignite growth in the

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>in what they're trying to do.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>What does Target need to do specifically, because it seems

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>like I don't know it just every time I've walk

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>into a Target, it's lots of people doing stuff. The

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>shelves are in good shape. What do they need to

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>do well?

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 4>A lot of it is continuing what they've started, which

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 4>is improving their merchandise mix. You know, Target does best

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 4>when their assortment is new, it's fresh, it's relevant to people,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 4>and they've made good strides in that area. But those

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 4>types of changes take time for consumers to see and

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 4>to start to embrace, and it's just a hard environment

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>where people are still being a little bit conservative for

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 4>those changes to really create some momentum in the business.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 3>So where are they with the pricing stuff in terms

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>of their inventory, in terms of tariffs, in terms of

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 3>where they source their material.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so from a pricing perspective, you know, when people

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 4>look at value, price is one of the first things

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 4>they look at. They're fairly priced competitive, and we've seen

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 4>an uptick in the number of promotions that they're doing,

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 4>so you know, buy forty dollars of these kinds of

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 4>essentials and get a five dollars gift card. They're doing

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 4>a lot more of that kind of promotion to pull

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 4>people in. But one of the issues is that they

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 4>talk today about inventory and having to you know, adjust

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 4>and right size their inventory. And that's a little bit

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 4>concerning because that's been a topic that has It's not

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>new for Target, It's come up a couple of times

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 4>in the past few years. And so the fact that

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>they are expecting, you know, some inventory adjustments and markdowns

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 4>to weigh on margins and profit you know, for the

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 4>next quarter, is a little bit concerning that they still

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 4>haven't quite figured out how they're going to navigate that, Jen.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I know Walmart said on there recently that they would

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>pass along probably some of their terror related cost increases

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to consumers, and then President Trump came out pretty publicly

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>against that. What is Target saying about their ability to

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>take whatever price increases cost increases may come about through tariffs,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>either in their margin or passing it along to consumers.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a definitely a good topic, Paul, And you

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 4>know what they said was that price increases would be

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the last resort, but they didn't count them out. Instead,

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 4>they focused on the tactics that he needs to try

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 4>to mitigate some of the some of the pressure from tariffs.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 4>They're the same levers that every company is pulling. It's

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 4>using your scale, it's working with your suppliers, it's trying

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 4>to negotiate better you know, you know, better sourcing and

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>better prices on the on the purchasing side. So you know,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Target is certainly able to offset some of the some

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 4>of the cost of tariffs, but it would be surprising

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 4>if they can offset all of it. And and ultimately

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 4>they're most likely going to have to be some selective

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 4>price increases that get pushed through.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh what are there? What's their inventory like in terms

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>of that part and how that filters into their pricing.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so inventory has actually been getting a little bit

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>better in terms of on shelf availability and tracking through

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 4>the supply chain. It's just I think because they skew

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 4>so much more to discretionary. If there's like, for example,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.239
<v Speaker 4>in first quarter, we had some very unseasonably cold weather

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>that impact apparel sales, That impacts a lot of those things.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 4>So you know that that increases markdowns. Hopefully that's a

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 4>transitory type of thing. But they are talking about getting

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>their inventory right sized as they head into back to

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 4>school and the holiday season.

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 2>And Jen the stock seems cheap to me? Is it

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 2>cheap on a historical basis? Or how are people thinking

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 2>about valuation?

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's definitely, you know, at a discount from

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 4>it from a historical, you know, valuation perspective. But I

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 4>think part of the part of the reason that it

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 4>is where it is is that for a long time,

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>what has differentiated Target was their private label selection, their

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 4>own brands things that the quality of those brands where

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 4>people could get value and style at a really compelling price.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>In the last couple of years, a lot of their competitors,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 4>whether you're talking about Walmart or Cohal's or or or

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 4>companies like that, have invested in their private label. They've

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 4>improved the quality, They've they've become a little bit more

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 4>fashion forward, and that's that erodes the differentiation that it

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 4>has always enjoyed and part of what has catapulted their

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 4>success in recent years. So until Target gets that newness

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 4>and that assortment readjusted again to be a leader and

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a differentiator, you may see that kind of valuation discount

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 4>persist our.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Jen Bartashi's Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Retail Analyst.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg n EF

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 3>previously known as New Energy Finance. They're the team at

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg the tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 3>to power, transport, industries, buildings, and agricultural sectors.

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>This week we looked at how the cost of clean

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>energy technologies has changed. Solar and wind have been the

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 2>most competitive source of new power for a few years.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Now and for more. We are joined by Amar vasdev

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 3>v an EF, a lead levelized cost expert. We first

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 3>asked AMR to break down his research and what his

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 3>team actually does.

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Effectively. We collect cost data on recently finance power projects

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 5>and we sum that up into a metric that we

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 5>call the levetized cost of electricity. And in short, what

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 5>that is is it tells us what the long term

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 5>off take price is that project developer needs to hit

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 5>their IRR, recoup all of their costs and of course

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 5>pay back the pay the taxes.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>So, Amara, here's what I don't think people understand, and

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I did not understand it until recently, that renewables are

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the cheapest source to meet new demand almost everywhere. Talk

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to us about that.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So the cost reductions in renewable technology, so specifically

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 5>wind and solar, have been quite remarkable over the last

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 5>decade or so. And so when we look at those

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 5>projects that were financed last year and we estimate those costs.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 5>We find that either wind or soda is out competing

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 5>either coal or gas in markets that are equivalent to

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 5>two thirds of global power generation, so that includes China,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 5>includes most of Europe as well.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>But we take into a the intermittent power issue for

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>wind and solar and how does that change the cause

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>profile Like it might be cheaper to build a wind

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 3>a wind farm than a billion nuclear plant, but the

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>intermittent power of it all is an issue.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that is definitely right. It is a it is

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 5>a problem with renewables that is often cited. But there

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 5>are supporting technologies for supporting a grid that is dominated

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 5>by wind and soda, and that would be battery storage

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 5>for example. And so if we look last year alone,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 5>the cost of the typical projects fell by one third

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 5>and out to twenty thirty five, we estimate that the

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 5>cost of battery storage projects for by fifty percent. So

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 5>there are supporting technologies that pair with wind and soda,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 5>and we also model we look at these, we break

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 5>them down, and we look at the view out of

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty fifty how different power markets are likely to change.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 5>And just to put that in context, when we take

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 5>that system view, we see that there are really strong

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 5>long term fundamentals for renewables. So today wind and soda

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 5>around eight percent of generation and that increases to sixty

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 5>percent in our modeling by twenty fifty. And at the

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 5>same time, the flip side of that is with fossil

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 5>few assets, so coal and gas plants today they're at

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 5>sixty percent. By twenty to fifty they go down to

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty five percent. And what they do is they kind

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 5>of operate in a space where they support wind and

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.359
<v Speaker 5>soda as well as battery storage.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 2>So thinking just in the near term, what do high

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and maybe possible cuts to tax credits, what does

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that mean for this transition? Does it slow it down materially? Possibly?

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it is a really interesting question, and it's as

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's moving very quickly. So our team in

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 5>the US are really attracting this very very closely. And

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 5>what we can say is that the policy and tariff

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty is posing a challenge for business confidence. It kind

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 5>of impacts the willingness and investor appetite. But we do

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 5>see that there is resilient demand that deployment stays resilient

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 5>over the next ten years or so, because we do

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 5>see increased electricity demand from AI needs from manufacturing as well,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 5>and what tends to be the cheapest source of electricity

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 5>is wind and soda, so there is resilient deployment. We

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 5>did model a scenario where if tax if tax credits

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 5>were cut, the amount of wind and soda being added

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 5>over the next ten years would reduce by around seven

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 5>teen percent or so. So there is there is a

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.599
<v Speaker 5>material impact. But if we're adding new power to the

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 5>if we're adding new supply to the grid, then it

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 5>would tend to come from wind and sola.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 3>What about geothermal? The administration is definitely positive on geothermal.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 3>In speaking with the Energy Secretary here, he speaks a

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 3>lot about that as well as clean coal. What's the

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 3>cost profile like for geothermal?

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's hard for me to comment on that. I

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 5>think the configuration of geothermal changes significantly, but there have

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 5>been developments recently, and I suppose with the pairing with

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 5>the kind of coupling with oil and gas experience with geothermal,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of overlap there on the specific costs.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't comment on our Thanks to amar a Vestev

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 2>b n EF lead levelized cost Expert.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, We're going to look at why cancer risks

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>are being linked to a popular over the counter drug.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies in one

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Bidell on the terminal.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 3>From Whole Sweeting and a Malex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 3>We move next to news from the world's largest home

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 3>improvement retailer, Home Depot.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>This week, Home Depot maintained its guidance for their fiscal

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 2>year as US sales ticked up.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 3>The company said consumers are deferring larger projects due to

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 3>the raid environment, but are still taking on smaller home projects.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.479
<v Speaker 2>For more. We were joined by Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 2>US home building analysts.

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Drew for his take on my home

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 3>improvement has been so resilient at home Depot.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 6>One of the reasons why Home Improvement and Hope Depot

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 6>have been so resilient is because a large portion of

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 6>the industry has to do with that maintenance and repair

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 6>oriented work. So I think that's where they're seeing a

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 6>lot of the lift now. It's homeowners are taking care

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 6>of the things that they need to just to maintain

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 6>their home. This really isn't no, it's been a couple

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 6>of quarters now where we've heard from them that big

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 6>ticket discretionary categories have been relatively weaker. So think about

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 6>things like kitchenry models, bathroom models, flooring projects. These are

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 6>things that tend to be financed by the consumer, and

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 6>with rates as high as they are right now, it's

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 6>just become a little bit prohibitive for them to undertake

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 6>those projects. So I think in order to see more

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 6>robust growth out of these categories, which is really the

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 6>missing piece of the story, we need to see rates

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 6>start to come back down a little bit.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 2>How about tires. Is that impacting the costs of their

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 2>goods like getting lumber from Canada, for example.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 6>So we think Home Depot's pretty well positioned from a

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 6>tariff perspective. They source about fifty percent of the products

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 6>they sell from inside the US, and you know, like

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 6>a lot of other retailers, over the last decade, they've

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 6>done a great job in diversifying their supply chain. They

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 6>actually said that over the next twelve months, no single

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 6>country outside of the US is going to account for

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 6>more than ten percent of their product purchases. So the

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 6>fact that they're diversifying their supply chain should help with costs.

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 6>At the same time, given their scale the largest home

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 6>improvement retailer, they'll have the ability to push back on

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 6>some of their suppliers in terms of cost. Now, what

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 6>they said is that they're looking to generally maintain their prices,

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 6>so I think people took that as a positive. You

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 6>have to remember Home Depot sales about thirty thousand to

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 6>forty thousand products in their store. So when they talk

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 6>about pricing, they take a portfolio approach. So you may

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 6>not see them raise the price on a particular item

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 6>that was tariffed, but they look at the elasticities of

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 6>their various products and they'll take prices they need to

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 6>where they can, gotcha.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>So they're going to manage that margin. So they're not

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 3>going to sacrifice margin then.

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 6>So they actually guided to an operating margin pretty much

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 6>in line with what they were looking for at the

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 6>end of last quarter. There are a couple puts in takes.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 6>They're doing better on shrinks, so they're managing their re

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 6>tell theft a little better, which is always a positive.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 6>So they're also you know, getting some more leverage from productivity.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 6>So you know, I think pricing is going to be

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 6>a component of it, but they also have other levers

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 6>within the business that are going to help to maintain

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 6>their margins, you know, where they expected them.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Just what's home Depot do with the number of stores?

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Have they added stores? Are they fully kind of where

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>they want to be? What's the store count story?

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So interestingly, Home Depot over the last year has

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 6>actually returned to store growth, which is something we haven't

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 6>seen from them in a very long time. They kind

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 6>of have had the established footprint in the US, but

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 6>as the business has grown so much, as they've grown

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 6>their pro business, they've started to add new stores in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 6>markets where you know, populations are growing or where they

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 6>want to kind of take some of the pressure off

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 6>the existing store base to look to drive some additional productivity.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 6>So this year they're adding about thirteen new stores. They're

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 6>going to do that. I think their their plan was

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 6>about eighty over a five year period, So the next

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 6>couple of years they'll continue to add.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>To you to our thanks, did you're writing, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>US homebuilding analyst.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 3>We move next to earnings from the off price retailer TJX.

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>TJX reported a gross margin shortfall for its first quarter

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and issued for your guidance that fell short expectations.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>However, the company said it's global network of vendors and

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>flexibility on prices will help it manage future tariff pressures.

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Mary Ross Gilbert, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>senior equity analysts covering retail.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Mary for her key takeaways from tjx

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>as results.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 7>So, when I look at the results, they beat for

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 7>the quarter. They beat on the top line, you know,

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 7>for total sales, and they came in line on comp

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 7>sales comp sales being up three percent, and that was

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 7>at the high end of their guidance. The real issue,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 7>I think is the forward guidance. So when you look

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 7>at the second quarter, analysts were looking for EPs of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 7>about a dollar four and the top end of their guidance,

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 7>it's ninety seven cents to a dollar, and so I

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 7>think there's a disappointment there. But frankly, this management team

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 7>really executes. They tend to provide conservative guidance, So we

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 7>really view this as whatever guidance they put out there,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 7>we see upside to it. They certainly have seen a

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 7>strong start to the second quarter concerns around tariffs. They're

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 7>saying that they can mostly mitigate most of the impact

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to directly sourced merchandise. And then with

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 7>regard to indirectly sourced merchandise, this is where they're buying overstocks.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 7>They'll be able to negotiate. They see plenty of availability

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 7>and so they see a lot of opportunity in terms

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 7>of the buying there, and they'll make sure that they

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 7>always maintain that gap, and that gap being twenty to

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 7>sixty percent versus what you'd see a department in specialty store.

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh I know, yes, I was telling these guys that

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I'm single handedly keeping home Goods in business,

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>having to furnish a house.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 2>Who is the TJX consumer other than Alex Deal and

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Lisa MATTEI, who I know? Who is that consumer? Who

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is that customer and what's the company saying about their

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 2>their customer.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 7>So Paul gg Max's customer, you know, Marmax and Home Goods,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 7>it spans from low income all the way up to

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 7>high income. So within the Marmax you know, which is

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 7>where you have TJ Max and Marshall's, they carry brands

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 7>as high as Gucci, Fendy, Chloe, you name it, and

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 7>we see a lot of that merchandise there. They have

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 7>stores where you can walk in and you'll see these

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 7>high end handbags and glass cases, just like you would

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 7>in a department store where it's really tethered, and so

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 7>they have that as well. But then they also have

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 7>you know, more moderate brands like a Tommy hillfigure and

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 7>a Calvin Klein or Juicy Couture, even you know, at

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 7>a lower end there.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 8>So they're able to attract.

0:18:55.720 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 7>All income levels and they know how to merchandise stores

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 7>appropriately all around the country and actually all around the world,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 7>because we're seeing strength in all of their markets. And

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 7>you raised a good point, Alex. I think you talked

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 7>about home goods, and you're absolutely right. Home goods actually

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 7>led the comps. They were up four percent and so

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 7>when you look at the comps that were at Marmax,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 7>they were up two percent, so they definitely saw strength

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 7>and home goods our.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Mary Ross, Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence senior equitanaals covering retail.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 3>This week, we focused on the Bloomberg Big Take story

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 3>titled Possible Cancer Health risks are lurking in a popular

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 3>OTC drug and you can find it on Bloomberg dot

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 3>com and in the terminal.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>The story looks at the dangers of a widely available

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 2>drug for urinary tract infections that has never been formally

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 2>approved by the US government, and it's not the only one.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 3>For more. We were joined by the story's author, Anna Edney,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg National healthcare reporter, and we first asked Anna to

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 3>walk us through some of the over the counter drugs

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 3>discussed in the story.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 9>Probably the most popular one, I think a lot of

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 9>our listeners will recognize as Azo. It's an over the

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 9>counter drugs, so you can go into most any store

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 9>you know, Target, Walmart, anything like that, and and purchase it.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 9>You don't need a prescription. Your a stat is another brand,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 9>but all of these stores also make their own generic version,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 9>so it's something that is supposed to treat the pain

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 9>with your airy tract infections. A lot of people seem

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 9>to think it goes beyond that and it's actually curing

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 9>their infections. So one of the issues being that, you know,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 9>people might need antibiotics, but instead they're they're using this.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Now, what's the drug in it that is causing some

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 3>of the issues and how do we know?

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so this is the active ingredient in all of

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 9>these drugs. It's what the generics will go by. It's

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 9>called naso purdine. I may still be butchering that name,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 9>but it's an unapproved drug, which was really interesting to

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 9>me and something sort of new to me even though

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 9>I've covered these issues for a long time that I

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 9>came across. What it means is the FDA has never

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 9>formally approved this drug, so, you know, while millions of

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 9>women are using it for decades that there's never been

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 9>a true vetting of, you know, how this drug interacts

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 9>with our bodies. One of the things that a National

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 9>Cancer Institute's study found, this was back in nineteen seventy eight,

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 9>is that it caused tumors to form in rats and mice.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 9>That's never been looked at in humans because it's never

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 9>been this drug has never gone through clinical trials or

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 9>anything like that.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>That is just that statement is so insane, And Paul,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 3>just me, I'll explain to you a little bit here.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you have a UTI, it comes on really fast.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>And if you order to get medication from your doctor aginecologists,

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 3>you have to go in so they can test it.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 3>And if you're in pain and you know what it

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>is because as you've had it before, you just go

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 3>to the store, pick it up and you feel better

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 3>in twenty four hours. Like that's why these drugs are

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 3>so popular and easy to access.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 2>And what I learned and a story, and they're not

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 2>FDA approved. They are essentially grandfathered in. So if I'm

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 2>walking down the aisle looking at you know, over the

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 2>counter drugs, do I have any way of knowing what's

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>been FDA approved and maybe what hasn't been.

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think that's a really good question. And there

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 9>were multiple, you know, quotes out there from congressional testimony

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 9>and other places where FDA staff members were talking about

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 9>there's you know, there are many such grandfathered in kind

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 9>of drugs, but the agency did not give me a list,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't even tell me how many might be out there,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 9>But there is potentially you know this is this takes

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 9>a little sleuth thing. It's not that easy to do

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 9>in the drug store aisle. But there's a website that

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 9>the National Institute of Health runs called Daily Med and

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 9>people can search by drug there. I wouldn't say it's

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 9>like the misuser friendly looking piece, but if you look

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 9>for azo or you're a stat or Finazo, Piaroty in

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 9>any of those, what will come up as kind of

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 9>a disclaimer saying, you know, this hasn't been vetted by

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 9>the Food and Drug Administration, its safety is not known,

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 9>and that kind of gives you an indication. You can

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 9>dive deeper into that data and you can actually see

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 9>that it's unapproved, but just for the lay person at

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 9>least with that disclaimer, that would give you a good

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 9>idea at the top.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>So what happens then.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 8>I think that's a good question.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 9>So the FDA is they have a system where they're

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 9>supposed to have vetted these kind of very old drugs

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 9>and given them what's called a monograph. This is the

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 9>agency's instruction book. Here's how this drug should be made,

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 9>Here's how the dosing, what it should be, here's how

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 9>it should be manufactured. They have not done that for

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 9>FINASO piaroting. So it's possible that, you know, with this

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 9>increased attention, that they could decide to look into that.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 9>There's you know, they asked in two thousand and three

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 9>whether this drug should actually be prescription only, just given

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 9>the risks and that people don't often follow directions on

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 9>OTC drugs. You know, you're only supposed to take this

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 9>for two days, and you're not supposed to take it

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 9>all the time. There are companies, particularly online retailers, that

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 9>are really pushing this drug on women and girls, kind

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 9>of just to have on hand all the time.

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to an Ednie Bloomberg national healthcare reporter.

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, we're going to look at

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 3>how diversity, equity and Inclusion DEI efforts have changed at

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 3>US companies.

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 2>bi go on the terminal.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and a Malex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarclay, and Android Auto

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>This week, we focus on a Bloomberg Big Take story

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 3>titled Apple Spending Billions and still has it managed to

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 3>crack AI? You can find it on Bloomberg dot Com

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and the Terminal.

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>The story looks at Apple's continued failures to get artificial

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>intelligence right, and it discusses how this threatens everything from

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone's dominance to plans for robots and other products.

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 3>For more, We are joined by the stories author Mark German,

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News Managing editor for Global Consumer Tech.

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 2>First, ask Mark about what's going on at Coopertino as

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 2>it relates to AI.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, philosophical differences, mismanagement and the biggest thing is they

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 10>were blindsided when generative AI with chat, GPT and GitHub

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 10>launched back in twenty twenty two. November twenty twenty two.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm told Apple Intelligence wasn't even an idea back then. Why, well,

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 10>they missed the boat.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 3>But how I mean? I mean, I don't understand.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, clearly there was philosophical disagreement, in philosophical disinterest

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 10>in the topic of artificial intelligence. I write about how

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 10>Craig freederighi, Apple's senior VP of software engineering, doesn't really

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 10>believe in these multi billion dollar projects. He tends to

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 10>try to shut down or steer away from projects of

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 10>that sort, and AI is something of that nature. AI

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 10>is quite a bit messy. They're known for the very

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 10>intricate and well designed user experiences. AI sometimes with hallucinations

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 10>can take away from that. But I think they didn't

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 10>think it was going to be as big of a

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 10>thing as it became today. A lot of it fell

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 10>on deaf years years ago, I'm told. But really, this

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 10>is a company that's known for updating their operating systems

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 10>once a year. It's known as a company that focuses

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 10>on the minutia, and they missed the big picture here

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 10>with artificial intelligence, and it really is a shame. You know,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 10>the big picture here isn't the AI capabilities of its

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 10>devices today. The big picture today is the AI capability

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 10>of future hardware. If you don't have the core technology,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 10>the AI ready to go at a deep level, how

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 10>are you going to develop products like humanoid robots, smart glasses,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 10>watches in AirPods with depth sens and cameras for AI purposes.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 10>Can't do any of that if you don't have that technology.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 10>So they need to seriously turn this thing around quickly

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 10>or they're going to be in big trouble. This is

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 10>as core technology as the touchscreen.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 8>Wow.

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, first of all, how many words is this story?

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 9>Dude?

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 10>Six thousand?

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 2>This is a long, well that story, folks. So if

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't get smart on AI and Apple, you got

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to read the story. It's in the Bloomberg Business Week,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 2>It's on the terminal. I'm sure it's everywhere else as well.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Mark.

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 2>What can they do if I'm an investor? That's the

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>only question I have for Tim Cook. Can you guys

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 2>catch up and get some of that AI pixie dusk

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>in your stock?

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 10>Yes, they need to make acquisitions and they need to

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 10>up the percentage of that R and D budget tied

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 10>to AI. They need to up that percentage. They need

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 10>to allocate more of their hires to AI as well.

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 10>So they need to go big or go home on this.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think do they know that? Do you think?

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 10>Of course they know that.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, how do they go big?

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 10>You got to spend more money. AI is really one

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 10>of the only things that you can buy your way

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 10>into when it comes to this technology, right, you can

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 10>buy your way into it. You just need to throw

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 10>billions and billions at AI training. They need to make

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 10>probably some tweaks to their privacy policy. Right, they have

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 10>so many devices, They have more devices than anyone else

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 10>as a single brand of a hardware company, of any

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 10>company in the entire world, in the history of the world.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 10>But they don't leverage that because of their privacy stands.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 10>So maybe make some tweaks there to be able to

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 10>collect some more data, maybe figure out a way to

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 10>convince people to give up some of their data for

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 10>this purpose. And I think that could go a long

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 10>way for them. So spending money collecting more data.

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Is there somebody out there that they could buy, should buy,

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that would leapfrog them?

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you think they hate doing that though?

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, the problem is this philosophical discussed. I would say

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 10>to making these large acquisitions if I told you, I mean,

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 10>you know this is true, so maybe you're not a

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 10>good example. But if I said to someone who didn't

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 10>know the company as well as you too. Would you

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 10>believe me if I told you that Apple's biggest acquisition

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 10>in the history of the company was three billion dollars?

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I actually believe that.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, you believe that.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 10>Because you know that, But I think if you ask

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 10>people who didn't know that, that would be completely unbelievable.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 10>They make these small acquisitions, and in addition to not

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 10>wanting to spend big bucks on a company, they're really

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 10>poor at integrating companies. The Beats integration, integrating all those

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 10>engineers into the company, Disaster Intel, they bought the modem

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 10>unit for a billion dollars back in nineteen Disaster. What

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.239
<v Speaker 10>is it going to feel as an AI person at

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 10>Apple today if you're bringing if the company buys your

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 10>replacement to bring them in, It's not going to be fun.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 10>There's enough turf wars as it is at Apple.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So if they do then have to do it internally,

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 3>they've still not done well at that.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 10>They've got to do both. They got to make the

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.479
<v Speaker 10>equ position, They got to just deal with that. They

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 10>got to make their biggest acquisition ever, and it has

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 10>to be for AI, maybe multiple acquisitions. They have to

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 10>turn things up a notch internally as well. They're going

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 10>to be making changes. I mean, there's so many philosophical disagreements.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 10>The biggest is about chatbots. When it comes to AI.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 10>They are allergic to AI chatbots. They don't like the technology.

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 10>They don't think open ai has staying power. So you're yes,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 10>I know.

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>I made a face when he said that. You're going to.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 10>See deeper integrations with other companies. You're going to see

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 10>Google Gemini integration. I think next year you'll see Perplexity integration,

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 10>maybe some Anthropic integration, maybe some Microsoft integration. But they're

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 10>going to keep pushing and this is going to be

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 10>a multi year thing. The biggest problems they were caught

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 10>off guvernment's happened, so they had no head start on this.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 10>They're coming way from behind.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, it's amazing. It's amazing now that some people

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>would say, hey, they're rarely first phones. Oh boy, when

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>they decide to get into phones, they do it.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 10>That's the big difference. They were not first and they're

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 10>the worst, all right.

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Mark German and Bloomberg News Managing editor for

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Global Consumer Tech.

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>This week we focused on a story on the Bloomberg

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 2>terminal and Bloomberg dot Com entitled Despite Backlash, DEI Hasn't

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Disappeared at US companies.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 3>It discusses how Walmart and other large US companies have

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 3>made modest changes to their diversity, equity and inclusion efforts,

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>but most programs retained intact with minor adjustments.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 2>From where we were joined by the story's author, Simone Foxman,

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>reporter for the Bloomberg News Equality Team. We first asked

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Simone to break down what she's learned recently about DEI

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 2>at US companies.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, Frankly, I've been talking to senior executives at large

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 11>companies their corporate advisors ever since Trump's executive orders came

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 11>out on January twenty first, and the message I've been

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 11>hearing is no, Frankly, many of the programs that were

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 11>part of diversity, equity and inclusion, many of which had

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 11>frankly been around since long before the acronym even existed,

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 11>they're still there. They've had some tweaks, maybe, and we

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 11>can talk about exactly what those are, but they companies

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 11>still believe that these underlying programs the ones that will

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 11>help them recruit diverse talent as well as keep employees happy.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 8>These are largely there.

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 11>And so even at companies that have sort of tried

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 11>to send a message to their to perhapshaps the Trump administration,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 11>perhaps conservative activists, they're sending a very different message to

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 11>their employees and investors.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I think what got a lot of people's attention, including myself,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 2>was when Walmart came out and said they were going

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to scale back DEA. I mean, it'sok, a monster employer

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 2>all over the country. What did you find at Walmart? Oh?

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, even when that announcement came out.

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 11>Which was just before Black Friday, if you looked into

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 11>the actual depth of what they were talking about, sunsetting

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 11>the term DEI in favor of belonging.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 9>Ok.

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 8>You know these aren't why.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 11>The huge enormous things a racial equity training that they

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 11>had had in conjunction with a racial equity institute. It

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 11>hadn't been offered since the spring of that year, and

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 11>that was something that they said, Okay, we're not.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 8>Going to have this anymore.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 11>In fact, you know, Walmart still mentioning in its job

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.959
<v Speaker 11>postings that they want associates who are committed to diversity,

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 11>equity inclusion. Spokesman told us that they're trying to phase

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 11>out that language in posts, and some people call different names, but.

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 3>At what are the names? Like, what are the kind

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 3>of things that people are now sort of spinning out there?

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 11>I mean it depends company by company. At Walmart, supplier

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 11>diversity became supplier inclusion, for example, and there were some

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 11>small tweaks to their supplier diversity program not just focusing

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 11>on race and gender in terms of trying to find

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 11>diverse suppliers.

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 8>But they're absolutely.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 11>Still highlighting brands that are owned by women, Hispanic people,

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 11>black people, it's lgbt Q, i A plus people.

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 8>These in fact all have landing pages. So it clearly

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 8>speaks to the idea that consumers want this.

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 11>They're they're looking for brands, or Walmart believes they're looking

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 11>for these brands. So maybe that's not somewhere where they

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 11>really pull back, you know, Does that satisfy the Trump administration,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 11>conservative activists, et cetera.

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 8>Maybe maybe not. I will say one thing as well that.

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 11>Was very controversial. We're sort of demographic targets. For example,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 11>we want to double the number of women in senior

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 11>management roles by twenty twenty six. That target that, you know,

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 11>very specific target. Lawyers are advising companies that this sounds

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 11>a little bit too much like a quota, so don't

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 11>have that anymore, or if I guess the lawyers are saying,

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 11>don't have that, you know at best, you know companies

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.479
<v Speaker 11>are not having that publicly because that is a little

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 11>bit on that legal gray area not sorted out by

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 11>the court, but something even a voluntary target that lawyers

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 11>say you might want to stay away from that.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 2>But I sort remember, you know, talking about internships, mentor

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 2>programs that help marginalize groups, and maybe you know talking

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>about hiring and historically black colleges and universities. Is that

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 2>under pressure or is that going to be changing?

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 11>So those are actually two different things. One, mentorships and

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 11>internship programs have now been opened to everyone, and this

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 11>is sort of another thing that was recommended by lawyers.

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 11>Came especially after the Students for Fair Admissions at Harvard

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 11>decision HBCU scholarships. However, if you know recruiting from a

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 11>specific HBCU historically black college and university, these are actually

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 11>still getting a lot of interest from companies because there

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 11>are something that.

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 8>Is extremely legally above board.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 11>Anyone can apply to go to an HBCU and a

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 11>company can choose to hire or to have a scholarship

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 11>or internship program specifically targeted towards an HBCU, and because

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 11>anyone can go there, that that means they're definitely not,

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 11>you know, discriminating on race from a legal perspective, and frankly,

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 11>you know, among conservative groups, this is a little bit

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 11>of a bone.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 8>It's a little bit of a.

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 11>Kind of subjective controversy because these are you know, HPCU

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 11>programs are the ones that feel.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 8>Like DEI at its very.

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 11>Heart, and frankly, they were the way to try and

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 11>increase the pipeline of black managers and black engineers and

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 11>technologists and et cetera. So we'll see if there's more

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 11>at tax on those specific programs going forward. At at

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 11>the moment, that seems to be a legal area where

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, many companies are doing.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Do you get the sense from any companies that there

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 3>is a worry about going too far in the other direction,

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 3>like stripping out certain things that actually need to be

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>thought of and done.

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.479
<v Speaker 11>One hundred percent absolutely, And you know, when you talk

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 11>to a senior executive at an accounting firm was telling

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 11>me they just need accountants. They cannot get accountants unless

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 11>they are going to places where people have not been

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 11>exposed to accounting to try and encourage them to work

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 11>for them.

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 8>They don't want to make young people unhappy.

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 11>These are affinity groups. Employee resource groups still exist in part.

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 11>Maybe they're scrutiny of their spending, but they still exist

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 11>a lot because this is stuff that makes people happy

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 11>to come to work, and companies are very afraid because

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 11>the actual employment law has not changed substantially. They are

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 11>very afraid that they are going to see your traditional

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 11>discrimination suits filed by women, people of color, LGBTQ, people,

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 11>people with disabilities a right.

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Simone Foxman, reporter for the Bloomberg News Equality Team.

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>always on the blue Burg terminal

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 6>M