WEBVTT - Friday Flight - Paper Wealth, Target Date Trends, & Bye Bye Buffett #981

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Out of Money. I'm Joel.

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I am Matt, and today we're talking paper, wealth, target,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 2>date trends, and bye bye Buffett.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what, buddy, this is our Friday flight where

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to tackle the most pressing personal finance headlines

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>out there, specifically how they pertain to your wallet. Joel,

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you got to note here about Walmart. What's what's the

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>latest with Walmart?

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I want to give you a big fan I want

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 2>to give a quick I'm not not a fan of Walmart.

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Walmart. Yeah, so we've been doing more shopping there lately.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just not our you know, there's only one place

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in my heart, and it's shaped like Aldi.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>You should actually get an Aldie tattoo over your heart.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that'd be great, maybe one of these days.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So okay to two different retailer police. Then I wanted

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>to highlight here one that's consumer friendly in one that's

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>not so Walmart. And I didn't realize this until I

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 2>went in the other day. I bought some shoes from

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>my little dude online and turns out they were too big,

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>so I had to go in the store.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna hang on to them, wait for them

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>to grow into them.

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>You're right, I probably could, but I had to go

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 2>in anyway, okay, right to buy the right size, and

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 2>they the when I got there, the price at the

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 2>store for those shoes was higher than it was online,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and they wouldn't let me do an exchange. And they

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't so I could return and then I could buy

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and then if but then I was going to be

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>spending more than what I would have paid online. So

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 2>they that I was just unfamiliar with the fact that

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Walmart does not match online prices in stores, which to

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>me does not seem And I guess I would get

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>it too, because there's more third party sellers on Walmart. Now,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>if it wasn't actually sold by Walmart, it's like, all right,

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I get that, don't price match that. But if it

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>is sold in Walmart item, Yeah, if it's sold in

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>ship by Walmart, why wouldn't they match it?

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, who would match that? Who's that Aldi? Would

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many pairs of shoes they're buying

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>an Aldi, But you know, like Kate and I we

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>joke about this. Anytime there's something kind of random that

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we need, we just look at each other and I'm like, oh,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>we've just voiced it into existence, because then you walk

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>down that seasonal aisle or like I swear it pops up,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's there, Like you were recently talking about getting a

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>composter tapped into your home. I think it just means

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm just way more typical average American consumer than

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe I would like to admit. That could be. That's

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>all I go.

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>So I highlighted I highlighted a negative store policy. Let

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>me highlight a positive one from best Buy. So my

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>dad texted me and he's like, hey, I know you're

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>like where you live, they're better about picking up old

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 2>electronic items and stuff like that. Can can I drop

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 2>them off at your house? And can you ask your

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 2>trash provider to pick it up? And I was like, yeah,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 2>but you know you could take this stuff to best

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Buy instead. And when you go to best Buy, look

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 2>at their like electronics recycling page. They will take almost

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 2>anything for for free. So if you've got like my

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>dad had, like old modems and DVD players and stuff

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>lying around remotes, they'll take old TV's under a certain size.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So if you're like I've kind of accumulated a lot

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of junk electronics that's past their prime and they're not

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>you can't sell them, and you're gonna actually have to

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 2>actually pay money to dispose of them.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>See take them to best Buy. I know you're supposed

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to recycle, but I think there's a whole lot of folks, dude,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>who are out there just tossing that stuff. You know.

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably like do you ever feel that

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>way about recycling?

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Kind of can't with a fifty five inch TV, but

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you probably can with that old murder.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But could he not sell that fifty five inch even

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for like well it was maybe. I mean that's a

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>good point too, because like a no, no, here's a

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>flas screen, but like the screen just went out, you

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can't sell that.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was gonna say, I mean maybe there's some

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>tinkerer hobbyists who would be interested in that.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. What I was gonna say was that sometimes

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it is not a futile endeavor, but

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like it, like recycling, like I do regular recycling. Like

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this morning, even I was preparing some strawberries from my lunch,

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Like what did I do with a plastic strawberry container?

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Tossed it in the recycling bin, like we could know

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we're even composting actually, like we are, like we're cutting

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the little tops off and so hip we are reducing

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>our wasst and so we are doing our small little part.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But like sometimes when I think about it, I feel

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>like we are only moving the needle, like points zero

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>zero zero zero, Like I don't know, you can put

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>tons of zeros one percent, like just even in our country.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Like and when I start thinking about the world large,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>like at large, like you think about China, if you

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think about countries that are burning massive amounts of coal

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, and how does that they handle waste, I'm

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just like, man, maybe like for our little neighborhood over here,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a good thing. But I don't know, sometimes

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I get discouraged when I think about just the world

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>at large, man, and all that's going on. Oh man,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we went broad. You should still do the right thing.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I like, we are still recycling, but sometimes I have

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a hard time, I guess, get getting super excited about that.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, I'm glad you brought the policy up.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Talk about the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Now, Matt,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's certainly great that there are companies out

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>there who are processing these electronics, making sure that there's

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>not what is it lad and mercury getting into the

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>water supply and different things like that. Agree, glad that

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they're taking care of that, because I don't want to

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>be living somewhere man where those forever chemicals and whatever.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that that what they're called forever chemicals? Yeah, forever

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks forever plastics. Yeah, that's the new thing now, plastics, microplastics.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We're all eating the microplastics inside of us. It's true.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>So trying to highlight something good and bad, I feel

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 2>like we have down more of the bad path.

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Not bad.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, Okay, let's highlight something else that's good though here

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 2>because we talked what last week about the slate truck

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>that's twenty grand, which is awesome thing. Love that that's

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>good news. Well, now, not just our cars shrinking and

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>getting less expensive, but we're seeing signs that new homes

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 2>in the United States they're continuing to shrink in size.

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So I think part of that is because of negative news,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the higher cost the building, and the fact that prices

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>are remaining elevated. Builders are like, well, I can produce

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the square footage of the house that I'm building, and

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I could do just fine and make a profit, and

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonnapeld more buyers. So and we are seeing some

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>price cuts too in the housing market. We're actually going

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>to dedicate a whole lot of money newsletter to housing soon,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so please sign up for that. But yeah, some of

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the new apartment sizes are actually shrinking in size two.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>So when new apartments are being built, especially gen zs,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>they're like, yeah, give me all the amenities, but give

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 2>me a tiny box in which to stick my bed

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and I'll be fine. So I think this is a

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>good thing. I think bigger isn't always better, And in fact,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>when you think about it, bigger means more maintenance costs.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>It means higher utility bills. The five thousand square foot

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 2>house versus the twenty five hundred square foot house, Yeah,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 2>it's going to cost you a lot more money to maintain.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>We talked about secondary cost last week, Well you got

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a factor in the secondary cost of home ownership two.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>And like, I think just bigger is better mentality, maybe

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>it's falling by the wayside a little bit. Finally, I

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 2>just think being content to live in smaller quarters, it

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>just it means less money going towards housing, and more

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>money that you have to save and invest to grow

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>your net worth, to have more options when it comes

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>to work and free time. The more we tossed into

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>our homes, the less flexibility we have.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Totally agree. Yeah, I also wonder if the pendulum is

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>swinging back as well as fewer folks are working from home.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm having to go in so I'm just looking

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for a place to crash at night. For the most part,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably true.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for a minute, there was that push towards especially

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I remember my little sister living in a studio apartment.

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>That's when they upgraded, right, Yeah, and they were like,

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we can't both work from home here exactly. It makes sense.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So while we're speaking of homes, the average American homeowner

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is also rich in home equity. Collectively speaking, we've got

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty five trillion dollars in our homes thanks

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to the appreciation that they've experienced over time. And so

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if you, let's say, bought a house in the last

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen years, you have inevitably increase your net

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>worth because of that home, just because of the trend. Yeah,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it is up something like eighty percent since twenty twenty,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>so even the more recent years it has been even

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more significant. But it is really only wealth on paper,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and it can add to this thing called the wealth effect.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And let me explain that basically, you feel richer, it

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can lead to increased spending. Because of that, you spend

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more freely. But you know, the tough

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is home equity. It isn't all that liquid. And

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because we are typically beneficiaries of home appreciation right like,

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we are not necessarily working for it. I think it

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>could mean for some folks out there that it's easier

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to borrow and spend, kind of like an easy come,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>easy go sort of thing. I think. So I want

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to put this on folks radar because I want them

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to be careful of this. You want to be careful

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of this temptation. I think more than ever, it's important

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to I think the rule of thumb here is to

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>know thyself, because I do think that there are some

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>folks like I don't think about the homes that we

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>own like investment properties at all when I calculate my

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>my net worth, when I calculate some far off payout

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>amount once the homes are paid for that kind of thing.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think there might be some folks where, you know,

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>if they still got the Zillow app on their phone

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, oh, it's increasing again, that's elevating over

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>every price of use. Yeah. It kind of makes me

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think of like credit lines. Like if you are the

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of person who can handle a thirty thousand dollars

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>available credit on your credit card and you hardly spend

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on that card at all, You don't go anywhere near

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that thirty thousand dollars, maybe put like three hundred bucks

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>on it here and there, then I think you are

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>probably the kind of person who isn't necessarily tempted by

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that increased home equity. But if you are the kind

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of person who's just like, woh, they just upgrade. I

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>got seven more thousand dollars available to me. I just

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>went from twenty one thousand to twenty eight like time

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to keeping track of that, time to go out and spend.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>If you, yeah, exactly, if that's if you're that kind

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of person, I would also say be careful when it

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 1>comes to home equities. So I think there's two things here.

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I think one, don't treat your home like a piggybank,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>because if if you do, there are financial repercussions down

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 2>the line. And then also kind of going on that

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 2>wealth effect thing just because it exists. Don't let that

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 2>give you the permission right to spend money in a

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>more ridiculous way just because you're like, why, yeah, I'm

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>not bloaded, man, I got like three hundred and fifty

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>grand in home equity, so I don't need to be

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>as worried. I can be a little more profligate with

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>my spending. I don't think that's the case. Or let's

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>talk about target date funds, Matt. They just crossed an

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>important threshold. There are now more than four trillion dollars

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in assets that are held inside specifically of target date funds,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 2>and morning Star wrote an article about this and they

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>basically detailed the rise of target date funds in the

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>last couple of decades. They're also holding up better right now,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>right you have in the recent market volatility there because

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of their more balanced approach, they're not going to see

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>as dramatic of a decline typically as somebody who is

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>invested more like you and I, who's one hundred percent

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 2>invested in stocks. On top of this, z fees on

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>these funds continue to decline. Morning Stars said that in

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen they were zero point five to five percent

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>on average. Now they're point twenty nine percent on average.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>So I like that target date funds are experiencing the

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 2>same decline in fees in expense ratios that many other

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>funds have seen as competition has increased, and the big

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>low cost investment houses like Vanguard, Fidelity, and Schwab.

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Have really pushed the envelope on that.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 2>And so Vanguard and Fidelity in particular have some of

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the best low cost target date fund options. Their expense

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 2>ratio is a heck of a lot less than even

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the average. We're talking about zero point oh eight percent,

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>which is pretty darn good. And so for investors who

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.359
<v Speaker 2>like simplicity, who like low costs, I do think it's

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>it is important for us to consistently mention that target

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 2>date funds can still be a great option, particularly inside

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of your retirement accounts, because if you invest in a

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>target date fund, it's going to automatically shift the allocation

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>as you age. It's easy, PZ. It's a set it

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and forget it sort of. And I think target date

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>funds while they're not my one hundred percent favorite fully

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>optimized way to invest for really young people. I think

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>they're still like, don't let perfect be the enemy a

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>good They can still be a good option.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You're still solid. Yeah, let's talk about another investing trend.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Gold is the talk of the town these days, in

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly because of the less predictable economic conditions that we've

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>been experiencing. Actually, gold, it has seen better returns than

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred over the past twenty

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>years to think about, and it is. Yeah, it's a

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bit more of like cherry picking data, I think, but

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>still twenty here's a long term recent Yeah, I mean,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>but if you zoom out to thirty years, the SMP

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>blows it away. Yeah, you zoomed out to thirty forty fifty. Uh,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you zoom out one hundred years, dude, Like, it's not

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>even close. Over the last six months, last six months,

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, surprisingly it has done better. But the

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>question then comes up, should we all jump on this

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>gold investing bandwagon on this trend? Most experts out there

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>would tell you that gold isn't a necessary part of

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>your investment portfolio, But if you want to hold a

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit of gold. I think that can makes a

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of sense. We always talk about holding five

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>percent or less of your overall portfolio in different things

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that we think are okay, yeah, like precious metals, bitcoin,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like you just gold could be one of those you

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just love this one company and you're like, you know what,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go buy me some Warner Brothers like

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I did after we talked about Harry Potter being released,

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or did you Yeah, I mean, just like one share

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>part of your play portfolio. It's just for kicks, just

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to have time stamps. Oh this is when that happened.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know. It's just a little something that's

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fun to do. But it's worth mentioning because you're going

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>to see more headlines about gold. You're going to see

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>more advertisements specifically from gold buying companies, especially with the

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>runoff and values that we've seen. They're loaded. Then they're

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, y'all need to get in on this,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and they've got so much money come through our proprietary

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>system to buy gold because every investor needs some gold

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in their lives, and they're gonna do the hard pitch.

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We would actually prefer if you want to old some gold.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We would prefer that you stick with some low cost

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>ETFs that invest in gold specifically, like GLDM. That is

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a great option with a very small fee.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Is Costco still selling the gold bars?

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Depens on the season? Okay? Are they still selling giant

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>wheels of cheese of Parmisan? Yeah?

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess Palmagano. Yeah, I don't know what the regiano

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the gold buying season is, but yeah, I wonder. Typically

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 2>when they when they put them out there, they sell

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>it quickly. But even that, like they're.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Still selling two thousand dollars Yu steaks, I mean probably.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they put these things out there and I'm just like,

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>who the heck somebody is is buying this?

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Obviously somebody is, But I think that you're right, Like

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 2>buying it inside of a low cost ETF makes more

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 2>sense even than buying like physical gold at a place

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>like Costco, which is going to give you a better

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>deal than you're going to get almost anywhere else for

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>buying gold. And some people like I don't want to

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>stick it under their mattress or something like that, that's.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a deal.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Like, if you want some gold exposure, low cost ETFs

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>are typically the best way to go. Well, we're talking

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 2>about investing, Matt. Let's talk about the main headline this week,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the one that hits us right in the sweet spot

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>in our hearts. Warren Buffett stepping down as the CEO

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 2>of Berkshire Hathaway, did you shed a tear when.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>You heard the news? I not really. I'm like, yeah,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he's like so old.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Good for him at the age of ninety four for

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>finally like saying I mean again, it doesn't at the

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 2>end of the year, in seven months or whatever.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And maybe because I know you and I we've had

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>more conversations too, I mean, with Charlie Munger having died,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Warren Buffett earlier this year. We actually

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>had David clark On talking about the new towel of

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett. Yeah. I don't know, it makes sense. It

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>totally makes sense. He's old, he's a sharp guy.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't begrudge him this, and I actually encourage him

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>in this endeavor to like I bag work and live

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 2>out the rest of your years with I don't know,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>hopefully a little less. But apparently he's going to remain

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the chairman of Berkshire, so he's not like closing out

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 2>completely altogether. But he really is the goat and and been.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>So many of the moves he's made over the decades

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that you could highlight have been impressive. And Berkshire's returns

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about the gold versus the S and P.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Will Berkshire his company, those returns have far outpaced in

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the S and P during his investing tenure, or something

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like basically twenty percent returns versus ten plus percent returns

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>for the S and P over those many decades. But

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to highlight the fact that he

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>is an anomaly and most of us shouldn't aspire to

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 2>be like Warren Buffett. I mean, in some ways we should, right,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate his humility and his intelligence, but his frugal nature. Yeah,

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>But in other ways, it's like, don't try to do that.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I saw the stat Matt Jason's wagen the Wall

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal estimates that Warren Buffett has read more than

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousand financial statements of companies, and he said,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>that's actually probably pretty conservative. I bet Warren thread quite

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit more than that. And my question to how

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the money listeners is are you willing to do that?

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Are you, Nope, Are you going to spend your days,

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>your evenings instead of hanging out with your partner or

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>doing a hobby reading financial statements of companies. Some people

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>are gonna say, yeah, I am, because that's really fun

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>for me. Then maybe you are in the Warren Buffett

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>ilk who can and should invest in single stocks. But

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 2>for most of us normies who don't do that, then

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just a good le Hey. Index funds

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>make the most sense, and that's why, Yeah, we shall

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>also do what Warren Buffett says, not what he does.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 2>What he says to every day investors is like, yeah,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>investing most of your assets into the S and P

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 2>five hundred is going to build you wealth over time.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>You don't even need to do it the way I

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 2>did it. I love that he did it the way

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 2>he did it. I think he's passed on a lot

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 2>of great lessons to individual investors over the years, patients

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>long term thinking, the beauty of simplicity. He's just been

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>such a remarkable fixture in the investing landscape for so long.

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 2>But I think this is a good reminder to learn

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 2>from Warren Buffett and not necessarily try to mimic him.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I don't know if this is uncouth to

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bring this up, but maybe with Warren getting oh yeah,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety four years old, maybe this is a good reminder

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to review your beneficiaries if you haven't on your different accounts.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Warren has this so you know, buttoned up.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he does. But I saw a recent article

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. We haven't mentioned this on the show

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>in a while, but if there have been any major

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>life changes, make sure that you make those changes within

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the back end of your retirement accounts. Contrary to popular belief,

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>your beneficiary it actually supersedes what is in your will,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>so like you don't want the money that you've been

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>working hard to grow to be left to someone that

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe you no longer intend for that money to go

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to you. In that article they actually mentioned Heath Ledger

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and how with his unexpected death, he hadn't named his

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>daughter as the beneficiary. Instead he had left all the

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>money to like his sisters and his parents. That's like

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a you know, celebrity obviously, so it gets slightly more attention,

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's just a great example. In the end, they

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>gave her all the money, so they took care of her,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's still the kind of situation that you ideally

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>want to completely avoid.

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 2>And let's be honest, it'll make you all of forty

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 2>five seconds to log into the back end of your

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 2>account and do that. And if you don't have the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 2>right beneficiary listed and you were to pass away, like

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a man, think about the problem that you're leaving

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>your loved ones. Sure, a random other aside on investing,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Matt real quick, I saw this stat and it shocked me.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, the trump coin that got released, it was

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>widely publics.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Which one or are there multiple? I feel like, oh,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but I feel like there have been multiple

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>stories about grifting taking place front within the White House.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is something we've talked about on the show before.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin and crypto are kind of completely different things in

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of ways, and there's a lot more

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>room for to get swindled, I guess in the crypto space,

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and there is if you just invest some in bitcoin

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 2>with regularity. Turns out only fifty eight people have made

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>money owning trump coin. They've made almost a billion dollars

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>in total. And wow, over seven hundred and fifty thousand

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>people invested in trump coin, and almost all those people

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>lost money. So fifty eight out of seven hundred and

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand people made money, the rest of them lost.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a scam, yep.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 2>A lot of pump and dump style happening in the

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>crypto space. Still, beware, I stay behind my term, or

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>my use of the word grift, Yeah, because like that

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 2>is what like talk about wealth transfer. Man, this is

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>something that we hate seeing. This is regardless of whether

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 2>or not you support him, the different policies that he's

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 2>going for. I hate to see this, Yeah, and it's

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>just another reminder to hey, yeah, invest some in bitcoin

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 2>if you're so inclined, but don't mess with the rest

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of the crypto space. All Right, We've got more to

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>get to, including we're talking about social security problems and

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>how you can react. We'll talk about that and more

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>right after this.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, but we've got more Friday flight to get

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to and of course now it is time for the

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>ludicrous headline of the week, and we're going to take

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this segment and talk about credit. There's an article from

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>CNBC that I am unhappy with because the title of

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the article was I don't like seeing you unhappy how

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to raise your credit score one hundred and sixty points

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in thirty days. Well okay, so specifically, well, it wasn't

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the headline, it was what was contained within the story.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Because yeah, the headline it sounds promising, right, Yeah.

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we talk about improving your credit score all the time.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>This is something that we it's a regular feature here

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show. You don't want to ignore your credit score,

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>and especially raising your credit score this much in just

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a month. I am all four, But sadly this article

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>had some really bad advice that was mixed in with

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff. So first of all the good stuff

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>they say to pay attention to your credit score, Yeah,

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>totally true.

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>When the reports in particular two right to say, hey,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 2>if there's an error on there, you want to find it.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, there are mistakes on a huge percentage of those reports.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Consider reports says that half of folks who actually go looking,

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to find an error. So that's something that

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you can be on the look at.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Basically, the credit bureaus not so great at the record keeping,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>which is their primary.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Job on it. But in addition, so that's like a

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>small example of something that was good in addition to

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that the article said to consider hiring a credit repair company,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and also interspersed and mixed throughout this entire article. I

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was sort of like a pay to play.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It had to be sort of journalism. But you saw

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even check with you, but I assumed you

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>also saw the I'm not going to call them out specifically,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>but it was a lending I'm sorry, a credit repair company,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and they had like some charts to where it looked

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like it was a part of the story. But then

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there's also ads from the same company. There's like the

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>small grade out thing that says ad in the bottom

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>vapor sketchy. Don't like it because this is something that

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you can completely deiy. You don't need another expensive monthly subscription,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the model that most of these companies operate under.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>It like one hundred and fifty bucks a month or

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 2>something like that, right.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And like you can tell oftentimes when something's a scam,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>when there's something called gosh, like a startup fee or

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>like an onboarding those are the worst. Yeah, like a

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>setup charge and like what needs to be set up,

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>like you taking me as a customer. I don't like it,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and we've actually got an article up on the website

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with some tips to rebuild your credit score, and it

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is a much better article than the one that CNBC

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was running.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>If you've got like a question because you feel like

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.239
<v Speaker 2>your credit score is not where it needs to be,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 2>send us a question. We'd be happy to take it

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast. But just do not do not sign

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 2>up for one of these credit repair companies because they'll

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 2>take more than they give and most of the things

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 2>that they're offering to do, yeah, you can do yourself.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 2>More bad news on the credit front, Matt medical debt.

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>It might be staying on credit reports after all. Because

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 2>of these policy changes were essentially made by executive order,

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like that's the only way policy changes

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>get made these days, which just puts more power in

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the hands of the president, no matter whether they have

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 2>an R or a D by their name. But many

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of the changes that were enacted by the previous administration

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>are now subject to change, and the same will be

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>true of whoever is in the Oval office next. And

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 2>as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been downsized and

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 2>its futures in jeopardy, a judge has been asked to

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 2>vacate the rule that would have excluded medical debt from

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>appearing on credit reports moving forward, And so this isn't final,

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>but it does seem that the medical debt exclusion is

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>unlikely to stick around. And although I think the credit

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>bureaus have still basically on their own, of their own volition,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 2>said well, you know, medical debt under five hundred bucks,

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to put.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>On there anyway.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>But with this and what's happening with student loan collections,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 2>it's even more crucial to pay attention to your credit

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 2>report and credit score.

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>These days.

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 2>We're likely to see average scores I would say, dropping

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 2>in the coming years and in the future. I think

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 2>it would make sense for both parties to get the

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>legislative branch involved in writing and passing bills for the

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>changes that they want to see endure, because otherwise it's

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>just kind of kind of be this back and forth,

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 2>this whiplash of like, no, we're going to do this,

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>but if it's issued by executive order, the chances of

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that thing sticking around over the long term are just minimal.

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You're advocating for some sticky legislation, Yes, I totally agree. Man.

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So another article that was also ludicrous. So a little

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>two for one today, but this one was from USA Today.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Americans saved money in FinTechs. When money went missing, FDIC

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was nowhere to be found. This was okay. So this

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is like the opposite of the CNBC article. This is

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a you know, some good reporting that was taking place.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And this article highlighted the way that fintech banks grew

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>into these juggernauts for savers. They're promising higher rates, they're

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>promising better perks, and the rise of these cool online banks.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>That's really a story of actual fintech growth. But as

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we have mentioned before, many of these fintech banks are

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on shaky ground. And what happens inevitably when customers of

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these neo banks lost or savings, the FDIC

0:25:58.480 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they had nothing to do about it.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 2>They're like, what huh are you? Are you reaching out

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to us because like that in our jurisdiction.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 2>And so the reason for this is basically it's like

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 2>that Spider Man meme where every one's pointing and the

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>FDIC is pointing.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>That is exactly these our fault. So the company, these

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>new startups, they aren't actual banks. Instead, what happens they

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>work with FDIC insured banks through an intermediary. But still

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 1>when these banks experienced again, when these tech companies experienced issues,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the FDIC didn't do anything in order to help These customers.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Call it I'm glad you call them tech companies because

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not They're not banks. They look and feel. That's

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Though on the website market themselves like a bank,

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>they say that they are not banks, and so some

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of them. But if you just at first glance as

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a consumer, you it would be understandable that you would

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>think they were exactly But this is why this has

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>been a drum that we've continued to beat. We want

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>folks to stay away from this. We want you to

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>actually go with a real online bank, an actual company

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's been around for a minute, that has their very

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>own FDIC insurance.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's we mentioned them consistently. We say Ally, C, I, T,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Discover Capital one. Those are all online banks, but they're

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 2>fully fledged banks. They're not super cutesy and stuff like

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that with the fintech names and the extra oh, get

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 2>your paycheck two days early. They don't really have that

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of fancy stuff going on. But it's fine, Like,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 2>we don't think you need that stuff. They still pay

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>competitive rates, they keep their fees low. We love those

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 2>online banks. They're better than the traditional brick and mortar

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 2>giant banks, and you can kind of get the best

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of both worlds with them, and you're not at risk

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of losing your money like you are with some of

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>these fintech banks. I'm still curious to see how this

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 2>shakes out and whether some of those consumers who had

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 2>money with the fintech banks are going to get the

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 2>fintech fox banks. I guess what we should you call them,

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>are going to get their money back. That remains to

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>be seen.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Social Security for a second. The spotlight

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 2>is on Social Security right now. Problems seem to be

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>getting worse at the Social Security Administration. We've got staff cuts,

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>changing requirements to claim benefits, have some folks on edge

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 2>on top of that, which we've detailed this before on

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the show. We did dedicated a whole episode to it

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years back. The Social Security Trust Fund

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 2>is set to run out sooner than expected in that year.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 2>It feels like that year keeps of when the trust

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>funds gonna run out keeps getting pushed up and up,

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>so in less than a decade. That's when the trust

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 2>fund is set to expire, which has retirees worried about

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 2>receiving the benefit they're entitled to. They might not get

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>what's coming to them, what they've paid into for their

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>whole lives. So what happens if or when we reach

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 2>that point, well, benefits get automatically cut by essentially like

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 2>a quarter. So retirees and soon to be retirees they're

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>getting fearful about the solvency of Social Security. It's leading

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 2>to early claims and so instead of wait until sixty

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>seven or even later, they're starting to get that monthly

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 2>check at sixty five or even earlier. And this is

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>a personal decision. There's a lot at play in when

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 2>you claim Social Security, and the reality is that there's

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>trade offs right to claiming early and to waiting, especially

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>if you're not in great health, like waiting till seventy

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 2>if you're not doing so hot, well, I get why

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you might claim early, but a good chunk of folks

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 2>would be when you run the numbers, better off waiting longer.

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Even with this kind of increased uncertainty around Social Security.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And I also just think people in their sixties should

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>be less worried about the future of social Security. It's

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 2>people in their twenties and thirties and forties who should

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 2>be like, hmm, player impact on them planning a little more,

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 2>investing more for their own future retirement, and banking less

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>on the reality of Social Security being a major major

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 2>part of their retirement income plans.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about the specific numbers. Because the benefit

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is roughly seventy five percent higher if you wait, If

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you claim at age seventy as opposed to age sixty two,

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>those early claims are going to reduce benefits for decades

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to come, and for if you're healthy, right, if you're

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a healthy retiree, the overall amount received could be reduced

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>by up to six figures over your lifetime, essentially.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and twenty thousand dollars less in your pocket

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>because it's significant claim too early, right.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And obviously none of us out there know how

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>long we're going to But if you are in good

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>health at retirement age, if you can afford to wait,

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's still likely the best option. If you want a

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit of additional reassurance, you can consult this fairly

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>inexpensive software that's out there. There's this one called maximize

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my Social Security. If this is something you're trying to

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>really crunch the numbers on. And again, like you mentioned Jil,

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for younger listeners, it is going to impact you more

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>than if you're like sixty years old. But even still,

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be around for all of us.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to this just in a diminished fashion. Yeah,

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in some form of fashion, it's going to be there.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do think our benefits are unlikely to be

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as high as what it's saying over at Social Security

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>do like GOV.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you log in, it'll give you kind of

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a projection for what your Social Security income is likely

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>to be. I would take that with a grain of salt.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I would reduce that meaningfully into my retirement projections, like

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>something will be there in all likelihood. But the fact

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that our politicians have let it get to this point

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 2>where social Security is kind of living on the precipice

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that it boggles the mind. And there's just it's gonna

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 2>take some political will to change the future of Social

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Security so that it's going to be around stick around

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of us.

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a real issue that's going to like there are

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>some things that are worth talking about or the politicians

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>actually addressing, and there are some things that really aren't

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's just for show. This is like one of

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the real things that needs to be addressed, or's like

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it taking from a time bomb from exactly from a

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>policy standpoint, But I want to go back as well

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to the like you mentioned that the personal factors and

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the different trade offs. You got to keep

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in mind too, some of the different life goals that

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you have, because I like, I for folks out there

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>who are tapping it, who are tapping it early, right, Like,

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so so far, like we kind of we address the

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers sort of side of the equation, but like think

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>through what it is that you want to be able

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish in your life while you still have the

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to write. And so for retirees, if you're like,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, we could wait until age seventy and

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know we're going to be wealthier. Yes, you definitely will.

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's like a no brainer, right, Like anytime

0:31:58.680 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you cruach.

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 2>The numbers, waiting is always going to lead to you having.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>More a higher net worth. And so like I think

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the more important questions to ask are what am I

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>likely going to want to be able to do within

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>my retirement years or like what life goals am I

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to accomplish? What kind of impact am I looking

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to have? And I'll be like, maybe this is like

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that confession time. I'm not having

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like retirement like questions. But Kate and I we've been

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about this more and we're not talking about are

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you going to claim now? Yeah, we're not like I'm sorry,

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sir to you you need a yeah come back three years?

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh wait hell am I? Yeah? But the ability to

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>wrestle with some of these thornier issues. I think it's

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>really important because and we're not again, so we're not

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about tapping retirement, but other dollars that we've invested,

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of hard to wrap your mind around, like, Okay,

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we've been putting money into for

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. Uh, and so this is within

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a brokerage, But what do we want now what to

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>do with that money? What is that going to allow

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>us to accomplish that we may not have the ability

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to do a decade from now, two decades from now,

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>knowing that yes, by waiting, it's going to lead to

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a larger sum of money, but what are the other

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>factors that you need to take into account?

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And the game plan can change, right, So I've talked

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 2>about this on the show. When my mom was diagnosed

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>with cancer, like, the thought was, well, we will tap

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>some of our retirement funds, maybe a little bit more

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>than we otherwise would, just to be able to hold

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 2>off on taking Social Security. And the plan flipped once

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 2>my mom's diagnosis happened and it was like, no, no, no,

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 2>we're I want as many months of Social Security as

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I can get because I don't know how long I'm

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be around. And then we'll leave the retirement

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 2>funds a little more intact. And so this isn't necessarily

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 2>a cut and dry always easy to figure out this scenario.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this is like one of the hardest things

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, Like this truly is like one of

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the toughest nuts to crack. And Kate and I have

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of different conversations over the years about

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>personal finances and business and like, okay, strategy different things

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like that, but man, this is it's so difficult, and

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I get we know we're not thinking through like life

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>expectancy that like those are less the questions I guess

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're thinking about right now. But even still, like,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>am I guaranteed the ability to wake up a week

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>from now and continue along doing the same things that

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing today now? And I'm not saying in the

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>next week I'm gonna yolo durin my accounts? So you

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>got to find some sort of balance though, between yolo

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>or only looking to the long term, because that I

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like that can be just as seductive, right, Like.

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Let me build up the account balance as big as

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I humanly can. Let me guarantee the fattest social Security check.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I've run. Guess what, I've run the compounding interest calculator,

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I've run through the different glide pass and scenarios, and like,

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a really easy button to hit. And if that

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is all you're doing, the easy button is also to

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>just take social Security as quickly as you can be like,

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>let me give that money.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then you wake up five years down the

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 2>road and you're like, this check isn't as big as.

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I wish it was or need it to be. Both

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ends of the spectrum can be really easing a little

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>bit of layed gratification would have done me better. Yeah

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so now, Yeah, I think the ability for folks to

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>address these sort of thorny topics more head on could

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>lead to productive conversations not only with like your partner

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or your spouse, but even like maybe you don't you

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have a partner like you yourself to like like think,

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like spend some time thinking about this and like journaling

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to perhaps uncover some of the different Yeah, what's going

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>on the under the hood? Yeah, what else are you

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are you looking to accomplish?

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Even that social security software? Are those calculators they don't

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 2>account for that, they don't have the journaling feature included,

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 2>So you do have to take some personal stuff into consideration.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.879
<v Speaker 2>It's the numbers matter, but the numbers aren't the only

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 2>thing that matters totally. All right, Matt, that's gonna do it.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>For this episode, we'll have links to some of the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>resources that we mentioned, including that maximize my social security

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 2>link up on our website at howtomoney dot com.

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You know it. But until next time, best Friends Out,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Out,