Speaker 1: All right, Thank you, Scott Shannon, Thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Right down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number. You want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: it is eight hundred and nine for one Sean if
Speaker 1: you want to join us. Remember the guy, Hank Johnson.
Speaker 1: We were just playing Hey Joe, that famous song back
Speaker 1: in the day, Jimmy Hendrix, far better version.
Speaker 2: I can tell you that. Remember the guy.
Speaker 1: The guy that was singing that version of it is
Speaker 1: Congressman Hank Johnson, Democrat, and he's the guy if you
Speaker 1: recall talked about Guam capsizing it. Case you forgot, let's
Speaker 1: bring you back in time for kicks and giggles.
Speaker 3: I don't know how many square miles that is, do
Speaker 3: you happen to know?
Speaker 2: I don't have that figure with me, sir. I can
Speaker 2: certainly supply it to you if you'd like.
Speaker 3: Yeah, my fear is that the whole island will become
Speaker 3: so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.
Speaker 4: We don't anticipate that.
Speaker 1: We don't anticipate that. Oh my gosh, you know what.
Speaker 1: There's been some great moments in the course of this program.
Speaker 1: We are coming on the air with the news. Obviously,
Speaker 1: this battle is match between Israel and the Iranians. The
Speaker 1: AP now reporting that a meeting between Iran's foreign minister
Speaker 1: and top European diplomats. But europe is incapable, of the
Speaker 1: impotent to do anything. They're just frankly useless on every level.
Speaker 1: Putting that aside, but they yielded on Friday, yielded hopes
Speaker 1: of further talks, but no indication of any immediate concrete
Speaker 1: breakthrough anyway. This is a week after the crisis centering
Speaker 1: on the Iranian nuclear program erupted into war between Israel
Speaker 1: and hey Ron. Are our ministers of Britain, France, Germany,
Speaker 1: as well as the European Unions for OM policy chief
Speaker 1: emerged from talks at a Geneva hotel about three and
Speaker 1: a half hours after Iran's representatives arrived. Before the talks,
Speaker 1: they said in an interview that in the current situation,
Speaker 1: as these Zionists regimes attacks continue, we are not seeking
Speaker 1: negotiations with anyone now President Trump, as everybody knows, and
Speaker 1: but there could be a million reasons for this.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't have access, I'm not briefed into intelligence. I
Speaker 1: do have sources, but I'm not briefed into that level
Speaker 1: of intelligence. Nobody is, and if they say they are,
Speaker 1: they probably are not. Is you know, this all could
Speaker 1: be a headfake, This all could be just about military preparedness.
Speaker 1: This all could be about getting one's ducks in a row.
Speaker 1: And I just think anybody speculating is doing so at
Speaker 1: their own peril because you don't know the answer. But
Speaker 1: the president that dropped the mother of all bombs in
Speaker 1: the past, the president that took out Solamani on the tarmac,
Speaker 1: the president that defeated the isis calvi Fate, the president
Speaker 1: that took out Bigdaddy and associates. I'm kind of one
Speaker 1: of those people that believes him when he talks that
Speaker 1: in fact, he means what he says, and I don't
Speaker 1: think there's any indication that anyone should believe otherwise. But
Speaker 1: there's no breakthrough at all as of this hour. We
Speaker 1: have other news regarding this as well. And look, Iran's
Speaker 1: axis of resistance seems to be abandoning the Islamic Republic.
Speaker 1: I'll give it give you more details of that now.
Speaker 1: Remember the president is giving Iran up to two weeks.
Speaker 1: He's saying two it's a two week deadline, and he
Speaker 1: will decide whether or not he will get involved, whether
Speaker 1: the US will get involved militarily in the next two weeks,
Speaker 1: And that could be today, that could be tomorrow, it
Speaker 1: could be whatever now. Once again, Iran has rejected calls
Speaker 1: from Western leaders to return to the negotiating table, asserting
Speaker 1: it would not continue nuclear talks while they're under attacked
Speaker 1: by Israel. According to their foreign minister, the Americans have
Speaker 1: repeatedly sent messages calling seriously for negotiations, the minister said
Speaker 1: during televised remarks, but we have made clear that as
Speaker 1: long as the aggression does not stop, there will be
Speaker 1: no place for diplomacy and dialogue. They do this to
Speaker 1: their own peril, and Prime Minister net Yaho has said,
Speaker 1: if we don't get help from the United States, if
Speaker 1: there's not a joint operation, and that will really be
Speaker 1: President Trump's decision and his alone, that they will go
Speaker 1: it alone, and they'll do their best to take out
Speaker 1: the four Dough facility and probably at least if they
Speaker 1: can't destroy it, do as much damage and set it
Speaker 1: back as far as they possibly can. The Prime Minister
Speaker 1: of Israel, net Yahoo and his IDF chief met with
Speaker 1: top Trump officials, apparently last night. According to the Jerusalem Post,
Speaker 1: the meeting included Vice President JD. Van's Pete Hegseth other
Speaker 1: top Israeli defense officials. According to two sources with knowledge
Speaker 1: of that meeting, and also the meeting took place as
Speaker 1: the US, I don't know if Trump's even deliberating. He
Speaker 1: might be done. He might have already made up his mind.
Speaker 1: There have been reports that he approved his plan, but
Speaker 1: he's not the person that's gonna tell anybody. He's going
Speaker 1: to hold it as long as he possibly can. Now,
Speaker 1: Israeli forces have been ordered to intensify airstrikes in a
Speaker 1: new push to destabilize the Iranian regime. This was in
Speaker 1: the New York Post today. The Israeli forces ordered Friday
Speaker 1: to intensify strikes in Iran in an effort to completely
Speaker 1: destabilize the regime. As the two adversaries continue to bomb
Speaker 1: each other, we you know, into this war.
Speaker 2: One thing that is.
Speaker 1: Noticeable is that the Iranians there, they have been firing
Speaker 1: fewer and fewer missiles for a couple of reasons. One
Speaker 1: number one, a lot of their munitions have been taken
Speaker 1: out with Israeli air strikes. They own the airs, the
Speaker 1: air over Iran, and number two, the missile battery systems
Speaker 1: are being taken out. But number three and probably the
Speaker 1: more likely scenario too is they're probably running out of missiles,
Speaker 1: and there had been an effort, according to really good
Speaker 1: sources I've had, by the Iranians to really build up
Speaker 1: their long range missiles. As what I would interpret it
Speaker 1: as is their plan B, assuming that maybe the possibility
Speaker 1: existed that their nuclear sites at one point would be
Speaker 1: taken out, and the strategy there would then be to
Speaker 1: overwhelm the Iron Dome and take out Israel. That way,
Speaker 1: certainly the desire to take out Israel has not gone away.
Speaker 1: Death to Israel, death to America.
Speaker 2: But anyway, their.
Speaker 1: Forces now ordered to intensify air strikes to destabilize the
Speaker 1: Iranian regime. Look, I mean, if America from my perspective,
Speaker 1: if the President deems the number one state sponsor of
Speaker 1: terror a threat, an existential threat, not just to the region,
Speaker 1: more importantly to the United States eventually, and that by
Speaker 1: taking out the nuclear capability or any chance that they'll
Speaker 1: have a nuclear weapon, the President how many times does
Speaker 1: he have to repeat himself and say Iran will never
Speaker 1: have a nuclear weapon. I'm just listening to what he
Speaker 1: said and repeating what he said. And he's been repeating
Speaker 1: what he said when I went to the Gulf States
Speaker 1: with him, when I was in Saudi Arabia and I
Speaker 1: was in Cutter Katar, depending on how you prefer to
Speaker 1: pronounce it, both are acceptable. Abu Dhabi the UAE. I mean,
Speaker 1: at every single stop I was in the room, he
Speaker 1: said the same thing over and over and over again.
Speaker 1: He has been clear and unambiguous in what his intentions
Speaker 1: are and the idea. I find it a little bit
Speaker 1: amusing that some people think that they're going to be
Speaker 1: able to change his mind. They really don't know Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I've known him for thirty years and good luck with that.
Speaker 1: He'll listen to everybody, and if you make good points,
Speaker 1: he'll absorb them and factor that into his thinking. But
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, when somebody's the president,
Speaker 1: they're going to make the decision on their own. Some
Speaker 1: explosions now rocking. This was a report in the US
Speaker 1: Mirror that the Terranian neighborhoods where it's believed that the
Speaker 1: Supreme Leader Kamanee is believed to be hiding out. Apparently
Speaker 1: huge explosions reported in this district. It's in northern Tehran,
Speaker 1: and that's where Iranian Supreme Leader Kamanee is believed to
Speaker 1: be hiding concerns or escalating in Iran. Regarding the safety
Speaker 1: of the country Supreme Leader, I think most people in
Speaker 1: Iran would probably be happiest hell if he went away.
Speaker 1: The thing that is most I guess unnerving. The latest
Speaker 1: development that is most unnerving is now you have Gatestone
Speaker 1: Institute senior fellow. He's been a frequent guest on this program.
Speaker 1: Gordon Shang is doubling down on his warning over an
Speaker 1: alliance between China and Iran after new reports of Chinese
Speaker 1: cargo flights nearing Iranian airspace. We know this isn't good
Speaker 1: because those planes are turning off their transponders as they
Speaker 1: approach Iranian airspace, and China is now sending something it
Speaker 1: doesn't want the world to know. He's right with that.
Speaker 1: He said that with Maria Barturomo. He said it could
Speaker 1: be ammunition, it could be drones. Pretty unlikely about that,
Speaker 1: but also it could be nuclear weapons. We just don't know.
Speaker 1: I'd hate to think of that possibility. Anyway, they're flying
Speaker 1: seven forty seven freighters reportedly indicating a final destination. Now
Speaker 1: they're saying they're going to look Xenburg. They're not going
Speaker 1: to Luxembourg. No, they're going to Iran, and they're turning
Speaker 1: the transponder on the airplane off. There are still those
Speaker 1: in America, although it's a small faction if you look
Speaker 1: at the polling, you know, small, but you know, somewhat
Speaker 1: persistently loud and annoying most of the time and frankly
Speaker 1: dumb and ignorant the majority of the time. People that
Speaker 1: somehow interpret Donald Trump as being an isolationist.
Speaker 2: And it's kind of odd to me.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to understand where somehow the author, the person
Speaker 1: that is defined and written America first and the mag
Speaker 1: of movement, and nobody, nobody comes close to it. He's
Speaker 1: the author of it, the guy that did all these
Speaker 1: military maneuvers in the past, and that would be Solomoni,
Speaker 1: that would be beg Daddy, that would be the mother
Speaker 1: of all bombs, that would be taking out the isis
Speaker 1: ca Eate, And somehow they equated to isolationism. Not exactly
Speaker 1: sure where that conclusion came from, but you know, people
Speaker 1: that you'd otherwise think are somewhat intelligent, have bought into
Speaker 1: it and keep pushing it. And one of the ways
Speaker 1: they keep trying to do that is by relitigating the
Speaker 1: Iraq War. There's no doubt we were given wrong intelligence
Speaker 1: on the Iraq War. You have to take that into account. However,
Speaker 1: you also have to take into account the actions that
Speaker 1: we've been watching unfold since nineteen seventy nine, and the
Speaker 1: Iranian Revolution and the rise of the Iyatola Domini and
Speaker 1: the taking of American hostages, and then all the instances
Speaker 1: between murdering Americans in Iraq, the Marines, Barrick and Beirut,
Speaker 1: other terror attacks. You know, we are now told that
Speaker 1: we have Iranian assassination squads in the country and that
Speaker 1: during the campaign they were looking to targ get President
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump. We are told that there are known
Speaker 1: terrorists in the country. Well, Hannity, if we get involved militarily,
Speaker 1: what happens if they were already going to attack us?
Speaker 1: If they are here, they're plotting, they're planning, their scheming
Speaker 1: an attack on our homeland. And you can thank Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, Alejandro Majorcis and everybody in the complicit state
Speaker 1: run legacy media mob that echoed either the lie, which
Speaker 1: is the border secure and the borders closed, or they
Speaker 1: just turned a blind eye to what the rest of
Speaker 1: us were reporting on and the danger that was associated
Speaker 1: with Joe and Kamala's open borders. You know, over two
Speaker 1: hundred countries, anywhere between twelve and twenty million unvetted people
Speaker 1: in this country, among them known terrorists and gang members,
Speaker 1: cartel members, murderers, rapists, other violent criminals, and drug dealers.
Speaker 1: Why did they let that happen?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: The president, you know, at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: I am I'm just pretty confident that Donald Trump will
Speaker 1: do the right thing. Remember two I mean, and some
Speaker 1: people have been complaining, why is he waiting? I'm like,
Speaker 1: because he has information that we don't have. I don't
Speaker 1: know why he's waiting. He's waiting because he's doing it
Speaker 1: on his time frame.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: It is interesting. The President has put a lot of
Speaker 1: time and devoted a lot of time to trying to
Speaker 1: bring peace around the world. He has not had this
Speaker 1: success that he's wanted yet. But I'm hopeful that maybe
Speaker 1: peace in Europe is attainable. A lot of it's going
Speaker 1: to be up to Vladimir Putin. So far, he's been
Speaker 1: somewhat stubborn, obstinate. He's definitely evil. He's a murdering thug dictator.
Speaker 1: But again I blame Joe Biden. Joe Biden allowed him
Speaker 1: to amass troops and military equipment on the border. And
Speaker 1: it was asked, well, what happens to the invades? Oh,
Speaker 1: it depends if it's a minor incursion. These people are
Speaker 1: so dumb. We have a lot of dumb people in
Speaker 1: this country. Unfortunately. All right, well, I can tell you
Speaker 1: the Trump administration has begun evacuating diplomats from the US
Speaker 1: embassy in Israel. US State Department began evacuating diplomats their
Speaker 1: families from the American Embassy in Israel. So far these
Speaker 1: are diplomats deemed non essential personnel. Governor Huggaby said, I'm
Speaker 1: the last guy out. He really wrote a nice note
Speaker 1: to President Trump. And anyway, the Trump administration boosting their
Speaker 1: monitoring of possible Iranian backed cells in the US. Look,
Speaker 1: the Iranians are horrible, evil, twisted terrorists. Of course you
Speaker 1: have to think of that. But that's already been a
Speaker 1: threat because Joe Biden, a loud known terrorists in the country.
Speaker 1: You know, an alleged Iranian plot to assassinate Trump's Trump
Speaker 1: heads through the federal court as we speak. An Iranian
Speaker 1: murder for higher conspiracy targeting President Trump. It's now working
Speaker 1: its way through the Fed courts as we speak. Al
Speaker 1: I'm twenty five down to the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn our number.
Speaker 2: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: One way to save money, not sacrifice service, make the
Speaker 1: switch to my cell phone provider, a veteran own company.
Speaker 2: It's called Pure Talk.
Speaker 1: And the beauty about pure Talk is they use the
Speaker 1: same exact cell towers, the same five G network as
Speaker 1: the big carriers AT and T, Verizon and T Mobile.
Speaker 1: And the average family saves over one thousand dollars a year.
Speaker 1: That's the average family. That's a lot, right, Linda, It's incredible.
Speaker 1: Last time I thought I heard one thousand is a lot.
Speaker 1: They got plans twenty five bucks a month, unlimited talk,
Speaker 1: unlimited text, plenty of data. And you know that's real
Speaker 1: money in your pocket for the exact same service. Also,
Speaker 1: Pure Talk now is the perfect time to make the switch.
Speaker 1: A portion of every sale will go to our friends
Speaker 1: and also an advertiser at Allegiance Flag. It is the
Speaker 1: highest quality American flag. Nobody comes close, one hundred percent
Speaker 1: made in a America, hand sown in beautiful Charleston, South Carolina.
Speaker 1: They're going to give a thousand of these flags to
Speaker 1: US veterans in time for the fourth of July.
Speaker 2: Anyway, make the switch.
Speaker 1: It's simple, it's fast, it's evy easy, save money for
Speaker 1: the same service, and you're helping vets. Just dial pound
Speaker 1: two fifty, say the keyword save now, pound two fifty
Speaker 1: keywords save now.
Speaker 2: From our friends at Pure Talk.
Speaker 1: President Trump just landing in Morristown, New Jersey, and he's
Speaker 1: stopping to speak with the press.
Speaker 2: Let's listen in.
Speaker 5: One and the Congo will be doing a feat settlement
Speaker 5: probably coming in one Monday or Tuesday. We're going to
Speaker 5: be signing it up. And we've stopped the very vicious war.
Speaker 5: So that was an honor for me to be involved.
Speaker 5: I want to thank JD. Vans and for a great job.
Speaker 5: And also our Secretary of State Marco Rubio has done
Speaker 5: a fantastic job. So Rwanda long term war with the Congo,
Speaker 5: very bloody war. They're all bloody, but a really bloody
Speaker 5: one is going to be making peace with Congo and
Speaker 5: they can get on to making trade deals with the
Speaker 5: United States and other places and have a much more
Speaker 5: normal form of life.
Speaker 6: We're very honored by that.
Speaker 5: As you know, we did a very great job with
Speaker 5: India and Pakistan, and we had India in. It looks
Speaker 5: like we're going to be making a trade deal with India, and.
Speaker 6: We had Pakistan in.
Speaker 5: It looks like we're going to be making a trade
Speaker 5: deal with Pakistan, and it's a beautiful thing to watch.
Speaker 5: The Serbia Kosovo likewise, they've been fighting for years and
Speaker 5: as you know, we brought that one to a conclusion.
Speaker 6: And now we have a couple of big ones.
Speaker 5: We have Rushia Ukraine, which is making a little bit
Speaker 5: of progress, and we have Israel, and nobody really knows.
Speaker 6: What that one is all about. We're going to find
Speaker 6: out pretty soon, I guess.
Speaker 4: The Iranian Foreign mister President of the Iranian Foreign Minister
Speaker 4: this afternoon said, if the US is serious about negotiations,
Speaker 4: that you would call up Isel and requests that they
Speaker 4: stopped their airstrikes.
Speaker 7: Will you make that request?
Speaker 5: Well, I think it's very hard to make that request
Speaker 5: right now. If somebody is winning. It's a little bit
Speaker 5: harder to do that if somebody is losing. But we're ready,
Speaker 5: willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran and
Speaker 5: we'll see what happens.
Speaker 6: We'll see whatever the thoughts.
Speaker 5: Time to time, just in time to see whether or
Speaker 5: not people come to their senses.
Speaker 7: You know, European helping it all talking without.
Speaker 6: Irana, they didn't help. Now, toy brand does. Who want
Speaker 6: to speak to Europe, They want to speak to us.
Speaker 6: Europe is not going to be able to help in
Speaker 6: this one.
Speaker 4: Twenty years ago, you were skeptical of a Republican administration
Speaker 4: that attacked the Middle East country on the idea of
Speaker 4: questionable intelligence of weapons of mass destruction.
Speaker 7: How is this moment different with Iran?
Speaker 6: Well, there were no weapons of mass destruction.
Speaker 5: I never thought there were, and that was somewhat pre
Speaker 5: nuclear you know, it was there was a nuclear age.
Speaker 6: But nothing like it is today.
Speaker 5: And it looked like I'm right about the material that
Speaker 5: they've gathered already. It's a tremendous amount of material, and
Speaker 5: I think within a matter of weeks, or certainly within
Speaker 5: a matter of months, they're going to be able to
Speaker 5: have a nuclear weapon. We can't let that happen. I
Speaker 5: was very much opposed to Iraq. I was, I said
Speaker 5: it loud and clear, but I was a civilian. But
Speaker 5: I guess I got a lot of publicity. But I
Speaker 5: was very much opposed to the Iraq war. And I
Speaker 5: actually did say don't go in, don't go in, don't
Speaker 5: go in. But I said, if you're going to go in,
Speaker 5: keep the oil.
Speaker 6: But they didn't do that.
Speaker 4: What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a
Speaker 4: nuclear weapon? Your intelligence community had said they have no
Speaker 4: evidence that they are at this point.
Speaker 6: Well, then my intelligence community is wrong. Who with the
Speaker 6: intelligence community said that?
Speaker 7: You're Director of National Intelligence, Toulci Gabbert.
Speaker 6: She's wrong, President, he's in.
Speaker 8: Any way helping.
Speaker 3: The law.
Speaker 6: Is when it's landing in Iran from China.
Speaker 5: Oh, they say that they're there to take people. But
Speaker 5: I can't tell you about that. I get along very
Speaker 5: well with China, get along very well with President She.
Speaker 5: I like him, he likes me. We have a very
Speaker 5: good relationship. We'll see what happens. I can't imagine them
Speaker 5: getting involved.
Speaker 4: In versus one that you need to make on Iran,
Speaker 4: whether to strike militarily.
Speaker 6: Is this the biggest decision you will have to make
Speaker 6: this President. Well, I can't tell you that. I have
Speaker 6: to see what happens.
Speaker 5: I can't, you know, really say that it depends what
Speaker 5: the decision is. But I wouldn't really be able to
Speaker 5: tell you that now. I'll tell you in about a
Speaker 5: year from now, maybe five years or ten years from now. Therefore,
Speaker 5: we ever know about decisions.
Speaker 6: You never really knows fire wild.
Speaker 5: Any I might depending on the circumstance. Would you be
Speaker 5: very hard to stop? I will say this, it's very
Speaker 5: hard to stop. When you look at it. Israel's doing
Speaker 5: well in terms of war, and I think you would
Speaker 5: say that Iran is doing less well.
Speaker 6: It's a little bit hard to get somebody to stop.
Speaker 2: There's them.
Speaker 8: Prosper was here a former congressman back Gates throughout an
Speaker 8: interesting idea, suggesting that if if you were to broker
Speaker 8: a deal where nuclear inspectors go into both Israel and Iran,
Speaker 8: that you could win a Nobel Peace Prize and they
Speaker 8: might even rename it.
Speaker 6: The Trump Peace Prize.
Speaker 8: If you hear those, what do you think of that?
Speaker 6: Well, they should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda.
Speaker 6: And have you looked to Cogo, or.
Speaker 5: You could say, serve Meia Kosovo. You could say a
Speaker 5: lot of them. You could say, I mean the big
Speaker 5: one is India and Pakistaid. You could I should have
Speaker 5: gotten it four or five times. I should get it
Speaker 5: for the I would think the Abraham McCords would be
Speaker 5: a good one too, but they won't give me a
Speaker 5: Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.
Speaker 4: Would you support Iran being able to have nuclear earth?
Speaker 4: Would you support Iran being able to have civilian nuclear
Speaker 4: energy capabilities up to three point seven to six percent.
Speaker 5: You know, they're sitting on the top of one of
Speaker 5: the largest piles of oil in the world.
Speaker 6: I just don't know why they need that for civilian work.
Speaker 5: You know, it's one thing for certain countries to say, hey,
Speaker 5: I want to have a certain amount where I could
Speaker 5: go do clear a little bit because we need it
Speaker 5: for electricity, we need it for air conditioners, et cetera.
Speaker 5: But when you're sitting on one of the largest oil
Speaker 5: piles anywhere in the world, it's a little bit hard
Speaker 5: to see why you need that.
Speaker 8: Yeah, on our proxies, would wage terror tax against Americans
Speaker 8: targets abroad.
Speaker 6: If you order military accent.
Speaker 5: We're always concerned about that, and we have to take
Speaker 5: them out and be very strong. You're even the danger
Speaker 5: talking to me right now. Do you know that you
Speaker 5: are in danger talking to me right now? So I
Speaker 5: should probably get out of here. But you guys are
Speaker 5: actually in danger.
Speaker 6: Can you believe it?
Speaker 5: Because it's still your expectation that NATO countries spend five.
Speaker 6: Percent of their GDP on defense spending, I think they
Speaker 6: should do that. I don't think we should, but I
Speaker 6: think they should.
Speaker 5: We've been spending, we've been supporting NATO so long, many cases,
Speaker 5: I believe, paying almost one hundred percent the costs. So
Speaker 5: I don't think we should, but I think that the
Speaker 5: NATO country should absolutely what Spain decides gont them, Well,
Speaker 5: NATO's gonna have to deal with Spain. Spain's been a
Speaker 5: very low payer. They were always a very low payer.
Speaker 5: They were either good negotiators or they weren't doing the
Speaker 5: right thing. I mean, I think Spain has to pay
Speaker 5: what everybody else has to pay. Spain has been notorious
Speaker 5: for low pay. You know who else was a low payer?
Speaker 5: Just about the lowest a place called Canada. Because Canada said,
Speaker 5: why should we pay with the United States will protect
Speaker 5: us free.
Speaker 6: They haven't been right about them.
Speaker 8: Ice Ukraine, you've been making progress words a peace steel
Speaker 8: But I don't know if you know this, but Lindsay
Speaker 8: Braham and my campaign where they're on the ground in
Speaker 8: Ukraine seemingly doing the opposite, trying to provoke the Ukrainians
Speaker 8: to keep fighting.
Speaker 6: What do you think of that?
Speaker 5: Well, we're going to see, and people have to be
Speaker 5: very careful with what they say. They've got to be
Speaker 5: very careful with their mouth because their mouth could get
Speaker 5: them into a lot of trouble.
Speaker 7: One more ice.
Speaker 4: ICE has said that they're trying to arrest up to
Speaker 4: three thousand individuals a day. There are some communities that
Speaker 4: are saying they are fearful of being wrongfully detained or
Speaker 4: separating some families even if they're undocumented. Is the fear
Speaker 4: in some of these communities worth the deportations of these
Speaker 4: undocumented individuals a massiveportation.
Speaker 2: Probably.
Speaker 5: It's a tough subject because, look, we have farmers. I
Speaker 5: love farmers. I want eighty percent, eighty five percent of
Speaker 5: the farmers and I love them, and I'm never going
Speaker 5: to do anything to hurt our farmers. And you can
Speaker 5: also say the leisure business, etc.
Speaker 6: There are some businesses.
Speaker 5: Where you have a disproportionate amount of people that are
Speaker 5: the people that you're talking about. At the same time,
Speaker 5: we have to get the criminals out of our country,
Speaker 5: and we're looking at doing something where in the case
Speaker 5: of good, reputable farmers, they can take responsibility for the
Speaker 5: people that they hire and let them have responsibility because
Speaker 5: we can't put the farms out of business. And at
Speaker 5: the same time, we don't want to hurt people that
Speaker 5: aren't criminals. Most of the people that came in over
Speaker 5: the last three years under Biden, I would say probably
Speaker 5: three and a half to four years those people. You
Speaker 5: have a lot of criminals. You have a lot of
Speaker 5: I mean, we're looking at that very closely. You've had
Speaker 5: people that have worked on farms for twenty years. It's
Speaker 5: very hard to go in there and say, you know,
Speaker 5: you're coming out, but we're gonna let the farmers take responsibility.
Speaker 6: They're great people, they'll do it. They know the good
Speaker 6: and the bad.
Speaker 5: So the hard part about this is not like a
Speaker 5: normal war that where people wear uniforms. They don't wear uniforms,
Speaker 5: but we have murderers that came out of the last
Speaker 5: four years. We have murderers, we have drug lords, we
Speaker 5: have people that we don't want it. We have prisoners.
Speaker 5: They emptied out Venezuela. In many countries they emptied out
Speaker 5: their prisons into the United States.
Speaker 6: We have to get those people out. But we have
Speaker 6: stone cold murders.
Speaker 5: Eleven thousand, eight hundred and eighty eight murders. We've already
Speaker 5: gotten a lot of them out of here, but we
Speaker 5: don't want them, so we have to be careful. But
Speaker 5: I ever want to hurt our farmers. Our farmers are
Speaker 5: great people. They keep us happy and healthy in fat.
Speaker 4: Are there other cities that you're going to try to
Speaker 4: replicate what you've done in Los Angeles?
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, we did a big victory last night
Speaker 5: in the Court Court of Appeals with respect to Los Angeles,
Speaker 5: but really the country where Gavinduscombe, who's really an incompetent governor,
Speaker 5: he's just doing a terrible job between his fires, between
Speaker 5: all the houses burning down as far as fires, and
Speaker 5: now Los Angeles. If we didn't go to Los Angeles
Speaker 5: and the sheriff admitted it, he had no control, he
Speaker 5: would have lost control. We saved Los Angeles by having
Speaker 5: the military go in.
Speaker 6: And the second night was much better.
Speaker 5: The third night was nothing much, and the fourth night
Speaker 5: nobody bothered even coming. We put out that fire and
Speaker 5: we did a great job of it. He sued us
Speaker 5: for going in and for helping him. We went and
Speaker 5: helped them. Right now, you'd have Los Angeles burning to
Speaker 5: the ground largely, it would have already been destroyed.
Speaker 6: Listen to be not of a peacemaker. Do you worry
Speaker 6: that's striking a run? We change that. Always a peace maker.
Speaker 5: That doesn't mean sometimes you need some toughness to make peace,
Speaker 5: but always a pace fake.
Speaker 7: Do you win a wrong without ground forces? He said?
Speaker 8: Is imperial campaignment or ram enough or do you need
Speaker 8: ground force?
Speaker 6: But I'm not going to talk about ground forces. The
Speaker 6: last thing you want to do is ground force.
Speaker 7: Does it ron have two weeks or could you strike
Speaker 7: before that? Are you essentially giving them a two week timeline.
Speaker 6: Giving them a period of time. We're going to see
Speaker 6: what that period of time is. But I'm giving them
Speaker 6: a period of.
Speaker 5: Time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum.
Speaker 6: And do you think he puts to focus on criminals
Speaker 6: or I'm all people who are here.
Speaker 5: Should start focusing on criminals, and that's what we've been
Speaker 5: focused on.
Speaker 6: Very bad criminals. Dangerous criminals.
Speaker 5: Can see the Miller see every person who's here illegally,
Speaker 5: and he's.
Speaker 6: So nice to arrest everyone who's here illegally. Steven and
Speaker 6: I have a very good end standing. He is a
Speaker 6: terrific person. We have a great understanding.
Speaker 8: Guys, whether if there are if there is an attack
Speaker 8: on US assets, will you promise to conduct a full investigation.
Speaker 6: And make it transparent with the American.
Speaker 7: People before blaming Iran for such an attack.
Speaker 5: Well, if there's an attack, we'll know almost immediately with
Speaker 5: modern equipment who made the attack, and those people will
Speaker 5: be very very unhappy.
Speaker 7: Would you, Prime Minister?
Speaker 6: I want to get you people out of danger. Standing
Speaker 6: with me.
Speaker 4: One more, Prime Minister net and yah who said that
Speaker 4: they had the capacity to take out all of a
Speaker 4: run's nuclear facilities, So what role would the US be
Speaker 4: able to play and why would they if Israel says
Speaker 4: that they have all of the abilities.
Speaker 5: The jury said that, but they really have a very
Speaker 5: limited capacity. They could break through a little section, but
Speaker 5: they can't go down very deep. They don't have that capacity.
Speaker 5: And we'll have to see what happens. Maybe it won't
Speaker 5: be necessary, maybe it won't be this to you want
Speaker 5: to see Congress has a build and fans child transgender.
Speaker 6: Certain well, I know they're talking about it, are they.
Speaker 6: We're gonna happen. To see how it comes to me
Speaker 6: at what for Certainly it's been something I've been talking about.
Speaker 7: Also, thank you give us a previident, appreciate it.
Speaker 6: Thank you everybody?
Speaker 2: All right?
Speaker 1: That was President Trump. He landed in Morristown. I assume
Speaker 1: he's going to Bedminster and taking a wide variety of questions.
Speaker 1: Obviously in the forefront are the questions about Israel and
Speaker 1: the conflict with Israel and Iran. He said up to
Speaker 1: two weeks, obviously giving some time for the Iranians to
Speaker 1: hit some common sense. So far, they've shown no willingness
Speaker 1: to do so, even a denial today of any offer
Speaker 1: to even negotiate peace. And the President also very clearly
Speaker 1: saying that you know he prefers it. He talked about
Speaker 1: a negotiated peace with Rwanda and the Congo and other
Speaker 1: piece areas around the world. He did mention his role
Speaker 1: as it relates to Pakistan and India, but he also
Speaker 1: reiterated his major point, which is Iran cannot have a
Speaker 1: nuclear weapon. I don't know where the time goes. I
Speaker 1: really don't anyway, doctor Oz. There's so much lying by
Speaker 1: the left as it relates to medicaid, Medicare. We've got
Speaker 1: to counter this phony narrative. Cut they're cutting, they're cutting.
Speaker 2: No, they're not cutting. They're just lying for political purposes.
Speaker 1: We'll explain next in your calls eight hundred nine fourt
Speaker 1: one Shawn