WEBVTT - More States Likely To Pile On Google Post-Election: BI's Rie

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com with us now in studios

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Ponzac, Bloomberg Cross Asset Reporter. We'd also like to

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome Jennifer Ree, senior litigation analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Jen,

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>let me start with you because we got the filing

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit earlier. Google now actually officially being sued

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for anti trust. Say, you know, problems, stuff that hurts

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the consumer essentially in its search business. First of all,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the stalk isn't reacting. What's the sort of time frame

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>for how long these things can run? Oh, Bannie, these

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>things can go so long. I mean this is really

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just the beginning of a marathon. Litigation is very slow

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and in it can go for years. So I think

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know the absolute quickest where there could be a

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>district court opinion, it might be three years. That would

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>be the quickest. It's more likely to be four or

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>five years, and then whoever loses is likely to appeal.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>When you think back about the last very big monopolization

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>suit by the dj which was against Microsoft, I mean

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>from start to finish, really the whole thing took about

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years before we ultimately knew what was going to

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>happen and what the impact was. And I think this

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>won't be as long, but it will be many years.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So investors clearly aren't scared. Is the assumption that Google,

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, is not doing harms to consumer, or that

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter whether Google is or isn't, or

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>whether any of these companies will follow zeus. It's that

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>they still make lots of money for their investors, right,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think it's a number of things. First,

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>this has been foreshadowed for a really long time and

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it was expected, so it's no big surprise UM. And

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the second thing is there are some analysts,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>including Bloomberg Intelligence, UM equity analysts just under Warrell, who

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>believed that even if the worst case scenario happened and

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the company is forced to break up, it might not

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, hurt the valuation, that it could actually

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be good UM and the second thing is the third

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>thing I guess is that these lawsuits are very hard

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to win in court. The DJ has an uphill climb here,

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and it has an even steeper uphill climb if it

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>actually did seek a breakup remedy, and it's just unlikely

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be able to get there at

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. So Sarah plants like Google

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously one of the major large mega captics if you like,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly not going to have an impact on

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this particular trade. But are we seeing this particular trade

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>fade just a little bit anyway in recent days. It

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like it, especially I'm looking at the best

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>performers on a points basis right now in the SMP five,

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>your top names are Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, Procter and Gamble,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>which did report earnings today and raise its forecast, and

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>then Google parent Alphabet. So we're not seeing it reflected

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in the near term trade. I will say that year

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to date, if you look at the year to date

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>perform into some of these companies, Alphabet is at the

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the pack, but still up still a very

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>strong gain in a year that really has been precluded

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and dominated by a pandemic by a recession, so you

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can't buy any means say that that is bad. But

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as Jen said, it's a marathon. I wrote about antitrust

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>claims almost exactly a year ago for Business Week, and

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I remember analysts saying then that it wasn't a worry.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And we are a year later, we have seen some progress,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and it still seems as though analysts are saying it's

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>not a worry now when you're not seeing it feed

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>through the stock prices. One point that I want to

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>pick up that Jen pointed out too, is that some

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>analysts do truly believe that the sum of Google's parts

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>will actually be worth more broken up. When you separate

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Google Search, YouTube, Google Cloud, what is the valuation that

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>each of these fetch it. In some cases, some do

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>say that in the worst case scenario, if you want

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to call it bad, if Google is broken up, it

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean a lower valuation. Some of the headlines

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out the call that's actually ongoing. Advertisers must pay

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a toll to Google Search. Potentially, the US is asking

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the court to order Google to stop anti competitive conduct,

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and that structural relief maybe needed to cure harm. Google

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>relief may need to go beyond stopping harm as well.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>So the d o J is sort of looking for basically,

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, penalties here, maybe even a break up of

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>parts of Google jen you know, we have something like

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven eleven attorneys general on this, why these particular states,

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't change post election? You know, I don't think

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>it changes post election. But I think what we could

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>see post election is actually another suit. Um. There are

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>other states that have been investigating Google and and don't

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with the suit because they think it doesn't go

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 1>far enough and it should have additional allegations related to

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>other conducts, for instance within the ad tech market. So

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a possibility what we could see is a separate

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>group of states that could file a lawsuit that mirrors

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this and adds more allegations to it. I definitely think

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the possibility, and I think that's why only eleven

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>states joined, because are the states that clearly think this

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is the right suit, and there are other states that

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>think this business exactly the right suit. How is the

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>US going about this differently to Europe? I mean, obviously

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it's an entirely different system, and so there needs to

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be a different approach, but at the same time Europe

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>as an agglomeration of states as well in some ways,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's managed to do this. You know, I'm really

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>glad you brought that up, because this complaint is very

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to what the EU charge school with Google with

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. Now, the first thing is that the

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>way they've set it up, the states are sort of

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the countries within the EU are a bit less sovereign.

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's say in the States here, where the European Commission

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to take on something, the states are then

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the countries are then seeding that matter to the EU.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's what went on here with Google. But two

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago the European Commation charged Google with the very

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>similar allegations here and didn't see fit to seek a

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>structural remedy. You know. What they said is Google, you

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have to stop doing these things that are illegal, like

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>your exclusive agreements, or you're paying off companies to exclusively

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>install Google Search of the default, things like that. UM.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And they're still sort of working through that, But there

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>have been statements coming out of the EU that so

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>far they think that this has worked. UM. And that

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>would suggest to me it would be very difficult in

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States Court to go beyond that, well, thanks

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to both of you. Phenomenal. It's really these things. You

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>can dive into them for hours and you don't be

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>scratching the surface. There's so many lawyers I can tell

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you're working on these cases right now, and we also

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>have our own January and Sara Pansa like working on

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>them as well. Jenuery, Senior Litigation analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us and Sarah Ponzac, Bloomberg Cross Asset Reporter. What

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is New York City without the bright lights? Is it

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>someplace that people will come even if there is no Broadway?

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Or is that what really gives it its heart? Broadway,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Lincolns under Carnegie Hall, the public Theater, all of the

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>arts organizations that keeps the spirit of New York alive

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and the people here, all of the performan's artists. Let's

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bring in somebody who knows a little bit about a

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of things when it comes to New York City,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from its real estate to its theater. Is Kenneth laub Is,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a producer, real estate developer, and composer. Ken Thanks for joining.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>When you speak with your friends these days, what's the

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that most comes up among you all. I mean,

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously the pandemic and where we are in it. But

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of New York City and what gives it

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>its character, what do you all talk about? Well, let

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>me let me, for the benefit of your listeners, give

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit background. New York City is, you

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>probably know, is the coachural center of the United States,

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if not the world, and approximately three thousand jobs associated

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>directly or indirectly with Broadway communally, I'm not just talking

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about performance dresses, directors and back state people, but also

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the hotel's restaurants and the numerous other the people who

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>are at tached a Broadway for a living. You have

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty million people visit New York City yearly, that's what

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the tourists people put out, thirty million taking a show,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>come from abroad or sixty and older. That's one point

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars in revenue that comes from Broadway receipts.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess you could say easily that Broadway is

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a vital part of the New York City echo system,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about that a lot. So can you

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>know Broadway is closed until the end of May. That

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>means tourism, you know, it has to be down because

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tourists come to New York specifically to

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>see a Broadway show, and you know, they spen spend

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>their time in Times Square because that's the theater district,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and as you say, stay in hotels off the Time Square,

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and seniors all over the country come with deals to

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>visit Broadway and it's just it's wonderful, you know, And

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just Broadway. I mean, technically you could suggest

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps some of the other venues are more for locals,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but Broadways he brings people in from the outside. What

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>are Broadway producers thinking in terms of when there will

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>next to be a new production on Broadway. Well, the

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>arts are essential to the city's identity, economy, and quality

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of life. We're living through the worst cultural recession in

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>our history. It's estimated that we will have lost about

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars from cultural institutions. So you might say

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we've lost part of our city's hart and wallet. But

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't end there. There's a there's a much

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger issue that we need to touch on here, and

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that is we've heard these various dates about Broadway getting

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>up and running in the last one I had to

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>push back now to May of next year, and I'm

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not sure if that's even going to be realistic. People

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand that there are several issues here. Um,

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>let me give you some examples. The problems for theaters

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and concert halls. Starts with a ventilation systems, which in

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>many cases in the it's updating. There are cramped courters

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for artists and other workers in backstage areas, and there's

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a lack so far of federal guidance about what safety

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>measures are required. Some of these theaters, like the Blasco,

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Lys, the Huts, and others, are hundred years

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>old or more. They have narrow passageway dressing rooms sometimes

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>shared that are the size of closets, and actors who

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>do quick changes are in there with a lot of

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>other people who are helping them and assistance or breathing

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the same cubic feet of oxygen. So they're going to

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have to be new rules set forth here before we reopen.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And from what I've been told, the state and the

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>city are working on guidelines that will require mask or

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fairish coverings for all staff and businesses, will require business

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to maintain six feet of distance or more, he will

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>um end up putting in a limited visiting capacity, which

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>frankly is not a way for Broadway to make money.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>They will be exactly And that's where I want to

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>go now in the time that we have left. Because

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we all know that only the longest running shows make

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>money for their producers, right, you know, the hope is

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that you'll make your money back. But for many of

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>these shows, even as good as they are, they just

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>call so much to put on that they don't get

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't make profits for their producers. But

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, they're part of the cultural fabric.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Are their theaters that do not survive this in Broadway?

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Would you repeat that question again? Are there theaters that

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>go away? So the Shubert family, for example, do they

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>need to close some of their theaters or will they

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>all survive this. I'm not sure the answer that question

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>unless they are able to make the appropriate changes that

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>meet with the state and city guidelines and that we

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have a reliable vaccine that makes people comfortable returning even

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on a limited base, even with discounted tickets. But for example,

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so they may not have the rental problem that most

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>people have, right, they may have a thousand year deal,

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or they may own the building. Do you know what

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the situation is there? Ken, Well, I I think I

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>just answered your question. The situation is very simple. They

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>will do whatever it's necessary to get up and running,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't yet defined what that means, and they

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>will vary from one facility to another. A modern theater

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>will not have these problems, but some of the older

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ones will have considerable difficulty meeting those guidelines. So can

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>final question, because you're also a real estate mogul for

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>many decades in the city, what do you see happening

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with real estate in the center of the city. Do

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we see prices drop substantially from here for buyers? They've

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>already dropped plenty. And I think there will be um

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>some stabilization UM, probably in to the election and going

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>into the next year. But I think that uh, commercial

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate is going to be heard in a variety

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of different ways, and there will be a lot of

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>potential foreclosures UH and dead issues that will emerge. UM.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>All this has to be worked out over a period

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of time. But let me add been closing this interview

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's a there's an expression and this is applicable

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to Broadway. Charlie Chaplin once said nothing is forever in

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this world, and that includes our problems. So positive thinking

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is a prerequisite here. Absolutely can we rely on you

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for that. Thank you so much. Ken Laub, who is

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a real estate developer, producer and composer part of the

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fabric of Broadway, joining us there. And of course we

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>know that Broadway will be back. We know that we'll

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>see all of those shows again, and all those shows

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that you missed first time around, you'll just just be

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so happy to see them when it all happens again.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>All we need is a vaccine. Tropical Smoothie Cafe. It

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>began in Atlanta and it is now an eighthound of

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus fast casual franchise serving not just smoothies but

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>also all sorts of salads and drinks and wraps and sandwiches.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in the person who is CEO of Tropical

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Smoothie Cafe, and that is Charles Watson. Charles, thank you

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining my pleasure. Bonnie. Thanks for having me talk

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to us about how difficult it must be right now,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what the challenges are for Tropical Smoothie Cafe and how

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>many you've managed to keep open. Yes, absolutely well. I'd

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>say our story is actually a very positive one. Like

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>many restaurant chains, we fell off the COVID cliff about March,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and for our brand, we bottomed out in April in

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>terms of COPS sales, climb back up the sales ladder

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in May, and we went positive COMPS sales to the

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tune of twelve percent in June. So while it was

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a very tenuous and difficult time, I tell you that

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we are comping positively in and very happy with how

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>our franchisees have fought back amid deependent pandemic to serve

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>our guests. So we're actually in a relatively good space

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and expect to beat our twenty nine teen COMPS sales

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>by shifting a lot of our business to focus on

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>convenience the anytime, any place for our guests to access

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the brand through digital channels, third party delivery, our website, etcetera.

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've done well in coming out of the pandemic

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>right and you're even opening new cafes across the US,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so very much congratulations. How have you done though? When

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to things like rents, franchise e s paying

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys. I mean, have you had difficulties that way

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that you've had to sort of overlook or you know,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>make easier for franchise e s to pay their rent

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or what have you. Sure, So we've done a lot

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of work working with our franchisees and concerts to aid them.

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, through the time the p p P loans,

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>our franchise development team and our real estate team really

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>turn into PPP and rental negotiation folks there for about

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>three months and that net we've come out of it

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>um and or not having any rental rate issues or

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>any default issues because the businesses bounced back in the

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>franchisees are cash flowing. That said, everyone is expecting rental

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>rates to come down precipitously. We have not seen that.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that landlords across the country, especially in the

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>prime retail spaces that we look for, especially those that

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are in cap and drive through, they are really holding

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>onto the rental rates that they said in twenty nineteen

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and haven't come off of those. The other big challenge

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're having uh to the bottom line for our

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>franchise ease is the rapidly escalating triple net charges that

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is especially real estate taxes. In some markets,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing triple nets consistently a fifteen to twenty dollars

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>per square foot, so that's certainly a challenge, but we

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>hope that the real estate correction does come around to

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>provide some relief on those rental rates for our franchise's absolutely,

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean particularly when you see you know, new places

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that have come up for rent are obviously renting a

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lug cheaper prices in some of the large major metropolitan

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>areas at least I don't know about around the country,

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>but certainly in New York and San Francisco and places,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there are discounts on on new rental properties. Do you

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>need more PPP money? We do not. We do not.

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We're in a very very good position or franchise ease

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>or or cash flow positive. Many of our franchisees are

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>having having a fantastic year. Again, a very difficult year

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and very fraud but we've been able to come through it.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>So for our particular brand, and I don't speak for

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>all restaurant brands, because I know that there are many

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>many that are hurting and I feel for them, but

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we do not currently know. So that's that's a great

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>success story. What about your hiring and layoffs. Did you

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>need to lay off people? Did you manage to hold

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>onto everybody? Well, we actually took it took the opportunity

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to to reorganize this as we talk about the shift

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to digital and the the underlying foundational changes that are

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>happening in the restaurant business. In order to provide guests

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>with the access and the convenience and the ease that

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for, we had to make additional investments in

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>in digital properties. So we did have to restructure and

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>move some people around, but we did not have any

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>standard layoffs just to uh, just to keep our g

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and A down. Yeah. I mean, it's really interesting the

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>way you say that what we originally started off as

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a cafe enterprise almost became a real

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>estate type of enterprise. So I imagine you needed to

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>scale up in some areas or some of your employees did, right,

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And indeed, so I would tell you it's the scale

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>up for us in the technology area the business and

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>also the development area of the business. We've opened eighty

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>restaurants so far this year, and we sold almost two

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred franchises so back to your point about real estate.

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>What we found is for new development restaurants, of which

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a pipeline of over five hundred, it's actually

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the landlord's attention on doing new deals because they

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are spending so much time working out with existing tenants.

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's actually been a little bit of a headwind

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for for us as a brand that's trying to sign

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>new leases and open new locations, which is relatively interesting. Yeah,

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that's so interesting, Charles. Are you ready for more shutdowns?

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We have, you know, epitying me all just saying we're

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>headed for a difficult three to six months. We are

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>ready for it. Again. I hate to be a broken record,

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's the shift to digital. We think that we

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can we can maintain and continue to move the business forward.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>We certainly wish it on no one, consumers or anyone else.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>We're prepared for it, and we do not think it

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>will be good. We think it will be a continued hit,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>but we think that we can weather the storm much

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>much better based on the past six months of work

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we've done as a brand. We're almost out of time,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I am curious as to what your plans are.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Is this private equity of fact, might you ever go public?

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>How what will the exit look like? Oh? Good questions,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>good questions. We're currently owned by Levine Likeman Capital Partners,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>private equity firm based out of Los Angeles, fantastic partners

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of ours, and what they do with us, no one knows,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. I think I think a public option

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is certainly possible, but I think that's uh, you know,

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>three or four, five years out. All right, Well, you

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>keep us posted. I'm sure we'll be the first to know. Charles,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining on. Congratulations on the

0:19:55.280 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>success navigating through the pandemic for Tropical Smoothie Cafe once again,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>started off in Atlanta and now across the country. That's

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO Charles Watson. Back markets now, and let's bring in

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>David Kat's ce IO of Matrix Advisors. David, I want

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about the election, the outlook, the

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>VIX being close to thirty, and so on. But first

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you about Google, because we finally

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>got what we were anticipating, the d o J suits.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>The stock didn't do much, except at a certain point

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it did start to decline and now we're sort of

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a flat does an investor care about a d o

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>J suit against Google, It's never a good thing. Now,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly this is going to be a headwind for a

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>number of years. If you look back at the IBM

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>suit maybe thirty or forty years ago, or the Microsoft

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>suit twenty years ago. Uh, these things are negative and

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they definitely slow a company down. In terms of Google,

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we expected to the same. Having said that, we think

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that their prospects are very good. They're going to get

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>through this, and it is one of the cheap of

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the high priced hot technology companies. So we would use

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>any weakness to either start positions in Google or add

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>positions in Google, because we do think they We're going

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to get through this. But do understand it is negative. Yeah. Now,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>given that you're willing to two positions and even enthusiastic

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about adding two positions, should we extrapolate from not that

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's the same cross quoth stocks for you? Um No,

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>We're actually pretty wary about growth stocks. If you look

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at two thousand and twenty year to date performance, growth

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>stocks have had their greatest out performance versus value stocks

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen seventy nine. Right now, they're selling it pretty

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>excessive valuations. Investors are piling money in because they look

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>for a repeat of this and that's simply not going

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen. So we are pretty wary about growth stocks.

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's a Netflix or a Zoom or Tesla. People

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are buying them because the business prospects are good, which

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they are, but are not paying any attention to the

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>valuation on them. And we think ultimately valuation and gravity

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you're going to keep those stocks from rising at the

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>rates that they have been. So in general, this market

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>has proven extraordinarily resilient, David, Does it continue to do so?

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, whether we get stimitus or not. Is that

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that a big factor in whether we continue to

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>see the resilience. Well, we think if you get the stimulus,

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's now or a few weeks from now, it's

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. And we do think that's important for

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the economy and then ultimately for the stock market. But

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that the stock market has been

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>as resilient as it's been is both the Fed and

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the federal government have been doing everything they can to

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>stabilize the economy. With interest rates to zero, there's tremendous liquidity.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>That liquidity is flowing into the stock market. That's driving

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>stock prices higher. In addition, the first federal bailout program,

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the two point eight trillion dollars, has really been effective.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's proved to be a lifeline for smaller and mid

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sized businesses, it's a life line for individuals. UH. Credit

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>quality is still pretty good, so as long as the

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>government continues to step up, and as long as you

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have this tremendous liquidity, we're pretty bullish on stocks for

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve to eighteen months. We think the economy,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>which was in an exceptionally deep procession, is going to

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>come out of that, and we're in the recovery mode.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And it really is not how fast the recovery is,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but directionally we're recovering with zero interest rates. That's good

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for stocks. Does it matter who is the next president? UM?

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>For a lot of reasons, it does, but in terms

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of the economy in the stock market, not so much.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>We looked at the period nineteen forty six to two

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nineteen in terms of having a democratic president

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>or Republican president UH, and the results were pretty good

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for investors, which is stocks generally went up regardless of

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which administration is in UH, they did a little bit

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>better for democrats. So we wouldn't change what you're doing

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>in investing, but do take comfort that you don't have

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>to sell stocks if a Democrat wins or for Republican wins.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Stay the course, look at the long term and look

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>at fundamentals and businesses rather than who's in charge. One

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>area that's been a bit of a laggard this year,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and I know it's interesting to you, is the dividend

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>stock area. Money are still, as you say, performing pretty well.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you anticipate that what they'll grow their dividends or

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>or why is this such a curious area for you? Well,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>right now this year, momentum stocks and growth stocks have

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>done great. Everything else has been left for dead. Uh.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Dividend stocks are a key part of that left for debt.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at a lot of these companies, UH,

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been growing their earnings, they've been raising their dividend

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this year in a tremendous and deep recession, but they're

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not getting any credit for that now. The reason that

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>we think is going to be very important in two

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty one and beyond is that the fetest

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>signal that they're going to keep rates at zero for

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future, maybe another three to five years. Money

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>markets are paying zero, the tenure Treasury is paying points

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>seven eight. At some point investors are gonna wake up

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and say, holy cow, I can't get anything on my money.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Where can I go? And if you can go into

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>very slow and steady stocks that are paying you a

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>four or five percent yield, uh, with some earnings growth

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and with dividend growth down the road, we think that's

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very very attractive place for people

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to put money to work. And the key is to

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>get there now, not after they've had a great rally

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a year from now. Yeah, I mean, David, that begs

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the question, what's your return assumption? What are you looking

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>for your portfolios to return? Well, we think a normal

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>return assumption for the next three to five years probably

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>goes back to eight, nine or ten UM. Yes. Uh.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>You know you're starting from a reasonable valuation on normalized

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings and rates are so low, which makes stocks one

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the few games in town. And if stocks were

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty times earnings, we would not be particularly optimistic. But

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can buy a good portfolio stocks at fifteen

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>times earnings with zero percent interest rates. We think that's

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a good background to make money. David, always a pleasure

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>speaking with you. We always learned something new. David Katz

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>is c I O of Matrix Advisers talking to us

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there about the stock market, and we appreciate it. Thanks

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio