WEBVTT - What's Wright - NBA Playoff Reaction: Thunder to Finals, OKC ALL-TIME team? Knicks in danger vs. Pacers

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Right with Nick Wright Episode three thirty five,

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>As we have one half of the NBA Final set.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>We did Tuesday's show as if that half of the

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Finals was already set after Oklahoma City escaped in Game

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>four against Minnesota because we thought Game five might go

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the exact way it did. We will get to that.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We will also get to Demanse. I mean, I don't

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>want to step on something. You're going to be asking

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>me in a moment, but Rick Richard Jefferson, Oh, Demonse's

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>not locked in right now. We have technical difficulties. If

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you can hear me, great, If not, I'll just talk

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to myself. The Richard Jefferson, I mean American hero getting

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the what my take of the year name dropped during

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a Conference finals broadcast. More on that in a moment.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>First we'll get to what missed the cut? Demanse. Back

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in it, I thought Demons was just uninterested in what

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I was saying. Turns out he was. Look he was

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>texting furiously trying to get his audio working. But what

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>missed the cut? Today College Football twenty six cover has

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>been revealed. The Bears want Caleb to fix his body language.

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair critique and somebody want a cheese rolling contest.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>This is put that in the bucket of stories. The

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>producers wish I was interested in speaking. By the way,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he started to do this on the cheese rolling stuff,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand people are into it. I'm not into it.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand other people are into it. I should have

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>asked you guys this beforehand. Let me try this on

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>my own, on your guys in and on for our

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>people watching live on YouTube. And by the way, like great,

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe review there we go. For some reason, my return

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was all fuzzy, but now it looks fine to me. Yeah,

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on YouTube. I don't know. Are we up to

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and ten thousand yet? We gotta be close.

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna check right now, we're doing it.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe on iTunes Spotify two hundred and seven thousand and change,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>So that's good. I don't know when two fifty can

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>be expected. We'd love to get there by I don't know.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgivings, Oh, Thanksgiving.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say Thanksgiving. Yeah, No, maybe you're right.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just shooting. I'm just giving a you know, a

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>request out there. But let's get to an utterly and

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly dominant game, which is, by the way, what the

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thunder have been doing at home this entire postseason, which

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was another thing we discussed on Tuesday. Demons go ahead.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just want to apologize for being childish and

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>asking if Minnesota could have potentially came back playing around

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>with that question.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Is obvious that that was not possible.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Alsten, Oklahoma City dominated Minnesota last night. The defense was humming.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 3>All of OKC stars were looking good. I want to

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>talk about the probability of this being a dynasty. You

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>think they should hold the brakes on it or is

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 3>ODC gutting for here? Historically?

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, they are four wins away Demons from one

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>of the single greatest seasons in NBA history. Like that

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>part is that has to be There's two real metrics

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for two hard metrics for how good your seat, like

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>how good your season was, and then some softer metrics.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But the first one is how many games did you win?

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>What was your record? And they have now become the

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth team ever to enter the finals with eighty victories.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And now when we go long to long term history,

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you got to recognize that the playoffs have expanded a

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>bit and changed but a shorthand. You know, the ninety

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>six Bulls who won seventy two regular season games did it.

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The ninety seven Bulls who won sixty nine regular season

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>games did it. And the seventy three win Warriors who

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>won seventy three regular season games but did not win

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>the championship. They all did it. They all got to

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty wins before the start of the NBA Finals. So

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>check off that box. As far as you know, that's

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>really a regular season stat. It means how many regular

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>season wins did you get, But we already knew sixty

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>eight wins. The list of teams to win more than

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight games in a single season are those two

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy the seventy two win Balls, the sixty nine win

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Balls that I mentioned, the seventy three win war and

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>then one other team, the sixty nine Lakers that they

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>went on to win the championship. That's every team that

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>won more regular season games than these thunder The teams

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to win sixty eight games are also at least well,

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one of them is an all time team. The other

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one came up short to the Knicks in the conference finals.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You have the eighty three Sixers, who I'm sorry, not

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the eighty three sixers, the sixty seven sixers, the eighty

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>three sixers that were. I put them there because I

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>think they're one of the greatest teams ever, the faux

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Fox Fox Sixers, but that was not they were not

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the dominant regular season team. These teams were. And then

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the seventy three Celtics, which came up short, and then

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this thunder team. If we lower the threshold to sixty

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seven wins, then it gets a little fuzzier because you

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have some great teams and some not so great teams.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Sixty seven wins, the eighty six Celtics in the short

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on the short list of greatest team of all time, Like,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty undeniable that you've got to at least include

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>them when you are discussing who are the greatest teams

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of all time? The eighty six Celtics have to be

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on that list. The ninety two Bowls, who I actually

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think might be maybe the best of the Bulls teams

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that finished off the first three peat. There's at least

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>an argument there. The two thousand Lakers, the first championship

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with Shaq and Kobe, the twenty fifteen Warriors, which is

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the first championship with Steph, the twenty seventeen Warriors, the

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>first championship with Stephan Durant, and then a couple teams.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>One that gets kind of is a punchline, and the

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>other is an all time great team that ran up

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>against another all time great team. The punchline is the

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>seven MAVs who lost in round one after winning sixty

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>seven games. For that we believe Warriors, and the other

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>one is the twenty sixteen Spurs who just happened to

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be it. I mean that team was unbelievable. They got

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>clipped in round two by the twenty sixteen Thunder who

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then ran into the twenty sixteen Warriors, who then ran

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>into Pekee Lebron James. But so to do this quickly,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>teams to win sixty seven plus you have first year

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Steph won a title, first year Stephan kd won a

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>title together, you have the first year Shaq and Kobe

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>won a title. You have Jordan's Bulls the third time

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they won a title, and the best Celtics team of

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>all time, the eighty six Celtics. Those are the sixty

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>seven win teams plus the two with that I just

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that didn't win the title. The sixty eight win

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>teams are this year's Thunder, and then you add to

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it the seventy three Celtics not you know, at a

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>disappointing playoffs, and then sixty seven six Ers with Wilt

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>won the title, and then sixty nine win teams Jordan's

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Bowls the fifth championship, the Laker team that had the

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty three game winning streak in seventy two, the ninety

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>six Bulls won seventy two, and then the Warriors the

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy three win Warriors. So that's the company they keep.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's one kind of hard piece of data, how

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>many games did you win? The other one is were

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you blowing people out? And teams that finished the year

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>with a ten plus point differential. It is last year's Celtics,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and then the eight Celtics, Kareem's Bucks in seventy one,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the Durant first year Durant Warriors, that other Warriors team

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the first year they won the title, the Bowls a

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>couple times, and the Lakers in seventy two. The Thunder

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>beaten teams this year by almost thirteen points per game,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so they check both of the hard metric boxes. You

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>then add the kind of softer factors. How good was

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the league in that time? I think the league's as

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>talented as it's ever been. What was their path to

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the finals and to a championship? That one probably cuts

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>against them a bit. They are not going through legendary

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>opponents en route, and they won't face a legendary opponent

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>in the finals. They did, however, go through a legendary

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>player in Joker, and that was a classic seven game series.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Another kind of soft factor. Did they have an all

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>time player on their team all time? I don't know yet,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but the guy who had the best season this year

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Shae, Yeah they did. I mean, Shay was unbelievable

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season, has been almost as good in

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Would not have would not have an all time player

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>make it a better feat.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It might make it more impressive, but it's hard to argue.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about the best single seasons in NBA history.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's and I left out some of the sixty six

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>win teams, and some of the best teams ever were

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty six win teams. Lebron's Heat that had the twenty

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>seven game winning streak I mentioned earlier the eight Celtics,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>which were awesome. Those were the margin of victories. I

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Kareem's bucks that you know there are some a

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>couple Lakers teams, one with Magic, one with Kobe. Oh

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>those were sixty five, not sixty six, but it would

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>make it more impressive. Maybe demands. But when we're talking

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about who the greatest teams of all time are, and

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>if we're trying to do the hypothetical if they were

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to match up against each other, right right, you want

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say our guy can at least

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of look eye to eye with your guy. And

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if your guy is peak Wilt Chamberlain or peak Michael Jordan,

0:11:55.679 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>or peak Larry Bird, and my guy is Chauncey Billers

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and again, and I'm just picking a team that won

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the title, even though they're not in the all time

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>team discussion. That's gonna be a harder argument to make.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Shay is making an argument that he's building an all

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>time resume. It's a weird one because of how he

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>started and it was a slow progression, but he's just

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten better and better and better every single year. So

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I am okay with saying this is an all time

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>single season. I am not okay with saying this is

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>an all time team because what the other all time

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>teams had was stacked accomplishments, you know, multiple finals, appearances,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple championships, and the teams kind of bleed together. But

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>single season it's that. But that thing gets us to

0:12:55.679 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the point you were making. And I understand Pacer fans maybe,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>or Nick fans even, or like, my god, you're acting

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like they won the championship yesterday, And to that I

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>would say, no, I'm not. I actually acted like they

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>won the championship on Monday night, because to me, they

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>did that was the end of the competitive portion of

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this year's NBA season. And that's not to say the

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Pacers are the Knicks can't beat them in a game.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But when a team has home court and that team

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>beats people in the playoffs at home by fifty one, nineteen,

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>forty three, seven, thirty two, twenty six, fifteen, and thirty

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>with one loss coming on a buzzer beater, they're gonna

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>win the championship when they also are a team that

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can if it were to happen. Demon's deal with injury

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>better than any other team, and now they can't deal

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>with an injury to Shay, But nobody can lose their

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>best player. They could, but they they could lose j

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Dub or Chet and still win the championship. No much

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>less lose what I mean, go ahead?

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, yeah, I don't know. I feel like Chet

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>is such a presence. Chet losing Check probably put them.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think it would change them, but I wouldn't.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I wouldn't write them off any of these other

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>teams if they lost one of their three best guys,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you would basically just write them off. You couldn't do

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it with this team because of how deep they are.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So I have and I'm not trying to give myself

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>credit here, I am trying to reminded the audience. I

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>guess I was not one of the loud Thunder skeptics. Now.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't pick them to win the championship because I

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>thought the Lakers could beat them. After I saw the

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Lakers beat them in a game the Thunder wanted, and

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>then the Lakers play them to a tie until Luca

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>got kicked out, and I was like, Okay, I think

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers are the one team that can give them

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>real problems. Maybe Boston. But I thought the Thunder were

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate championship caliber team all year, and the moment

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers went out, I said, I think they're going

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to win the title. With all that said, I think

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the dynasty talk is so silly, and I understand folks

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>argument is they are set up so well. And I

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>will just make the point that I made on Tuesday again.

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We think think every team almost is set up so

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>well when they're in the midst of winning, and to

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which some people will reply, yeah, but those teams weren't

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>as young. That's true that the Bucks in twenty twenty one,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>or the Nuggets in twenty twenty three, or even the

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Celtics last year weren't as young. However, with the Bucks

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Nuggets, we did feel like their best player

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was in already in once they won the title, the

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>historically great conversation, and Shay isn't quite in that yet.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Like we thought, yes, this Thunder team's younger, but we

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that Giannis and Joker in that moment were a

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>tick above where Shay is in this moment. And the

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>other argument people are going to make is yes, but

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the nugget it's for the Thunder, it's all that draft

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>capital that they have, and that is true, but it's

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>also a little misleading. So the Thunder's draft capital is

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>more quantity than quality. So I'm going to go through

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it just too. And this is courtesy of real GM

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to remind people what they have, because what you're going

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to see is it's a ton of stuff, and it's

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stuff that theoretically they could use in trades.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like, oh man, that could be the

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>third pick of the draft. Okay, so this year they

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have the fifteenth pick for Miami and the twenty fourth

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>pick from the Clippers. At least I think fact check

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>me in the because I don't have this year's pulled up.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Fact check me in the doc if I'm wrong about

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this year. But they the then next year, what they

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have They have Houston's pick next season protected one through four,

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so Houston. We think Houston's going to be quite good

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>next year, So a late pick next year, and then

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they have I want to make sure I get this right,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers pick next year. So I think the Clippers

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>showed us this year that they are going to be

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at least a credible team, and so are those are

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>fine picks, but none of those appear or feel like

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>those are going to be uh, you know, lottery top

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ten picks, right, And then they have Phillies pick next

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>year potentially, and again they only get two of these,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so these are the best ones they could get Phillies

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pick if it falls outside of the top four and

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Utah's pick if it falls outside of the top eight.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>The moral of the story is next year they are

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a bunch of extra picks, and they all

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>look like they are not going to be lottery picks

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because Utah is the only team on that list that

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is likely going to be in the lottery, and Utah

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>likely is going to be able to keep their pick

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because it'll be in the top eight. In twenty twenty seven,

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they again they get the Clippers pick, and that's unprotected.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that could be good maybe, And Denver's pick, which

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>assuming Joker doesn't retire, is not going to be that good.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And in twenty twenty eight they can swap with Dallas again.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we think Dallas, now that they have Cooper Flag

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Davis is there, that that's going to be

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a top five pick. No, And then that's really I

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think they have one more Denver pick later. But again,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>unless we think Joker is going to retire. So the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>point I'm making in a somewhat convoluted fashion is it's

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff, but it's not great stuff. Now

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the argument there would be demons. Yeah, but they can

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>package that stuff for a star. And that then gets

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to to me the next interesting domino for the Thunder,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>which is, yeah, are they going to want to be expensive?

0:20:55.960 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to want to for the first time

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in franchise history, be a big luxury tax butt up

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>against the APRN type of team. And my answer to

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that question is I don't see why they would now.

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And you can say, well, they want to chick correct,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to pay it then. And you can

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, but now they've won a championship. That

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>could cut either way. Maybe you would be like, they

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>want a championship now they just want to win, win, win.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>They also want to be like, we want a championship

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>without having a super expensive team, so why do we

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>need one? And so it is a different NBA guys,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's a different NBA. Also in this regard the

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>onl like the guys who have reeled off a bunch

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are guys who are top ten all time players. The

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>one guy who is pretty consensus outside of the top

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>ten who reeled off even two is Isaiah Thomas, and

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's firmly in the top twenty, but outside the top ten.

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So Joker would have checked those boxes. Little unlucky some

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Murray's injuries, you know, Jannis could have potentially little unlucky.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh didn't have you know, this type of pick bounty though,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to be fair in Milwaukee to make up for some

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of those mistakes. And I'm not saying Shay is not Shaye.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I said all year was the MVP. But it is

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me how many people who a month ago

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>were quite convince the Celtics were about to reel off

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of championships are now convinced the thunder are

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>about to reel off a bunch of championships. And so

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I you know too long, didn't listen all time single

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>season team. Yes, set up pretty well for the future. Yes,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>going to win this championship without a doubt. Yes. Ready

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to pencil them in for multiple titles. No, So that's

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>where I land on Oklahoma City. They will be in

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the mix for years to come. But as a lot

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of teams can attest in the mix doesn't really buy

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you anything in the modern NBA.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 3>So if they were in the same situation next year,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>you'd be a little bit more at it or ready.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>To call it a dynasty. I think, oh, yeah.

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>They're back in the finals next year, because that's the

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>other thing. We haven't had a defending champ make the finals.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had a defending champ make round three since

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Durant Steph Warriors. Think about that. We haven't had

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a defending champ even come close to defending their championship

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in seven years. So yeah, if they were Hell, if

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they just get back to the conference finals next year,

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that'll be noteworthy. We haven't had anybody do.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 2>It, right, I don't see any reason.

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, Okay, so he's more likely to have

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>learned their last lesson from breaking up their last Big

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 3>three than to straight I don't want to think. I

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 3>don't think they're more players on top of.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>It, correct. I don't think are going to break this

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>crew up between now and next year. My guess is

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they run it back. But so did Boston, so did Milwaukee.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You're like, you know what I mean, Like most of

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>these TEAMSS did exactly that the defense has been great.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, what let's do some follow ups here?

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you think SGA, JAB and CHET are the best

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>trio in the league right now?

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not only demands and I should have probably

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>prepped this question a little more. It's not only that

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they're the best trio.

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there's really no other trios.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's the thing, Like, who like the other teams

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that would argue they have a trio? I guess the

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Calves like it's a it's a trio. Boston is a

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>duo with really good supporting.

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 3>That's what dat want to throw Derek White in there,

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 3>like maybe.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but yeah, but it's not you know, I mean,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Knicks are a duo. The Pacers are, in

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, a duo. Like again, I like their supporting

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>cast a lot, but to me, the trademark of a trio.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of making this up on the fly, but

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I just thought of it. It makes sense. It's where

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a real argument on who the second best guy

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is that there could be, you know what I mean

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like that some nights it's one like so the the

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Bucks win healthy are a duo. Right, and then we

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>go to the West. The Rockets, I don't even know

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if they're a like they have shingoon and a bunch

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of really nice complimentary pieces. The Lakers are a duo,

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like there is. Austin Reeves is a nice third player,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>but we know who their top two guys are.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Say it again, The Maps could end up being a

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>trio next.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Year because a Cooper flag.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they unless you want to say Kyrie is

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>getting a little older.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, remember Kyrie is going to be out.

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Next season at all.

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know, well, I mean he was out for

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>next season entirely. Well no, no, no, he's not out for

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all of next season. But I mean he tore his

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>acl you know, at with a month left in this season,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to be out at least in the beginning.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>But the Nuggets are a duo, The Clippers are a duo.

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>The Warriors are a duo that you know what I mean,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like eies. So there are no It's not only that

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder or the best trio. The Thunder might be

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the only trio. And then there's the Calves, who are

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>really a quartet because of Donovan Garland Mobley and Allen,

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't quite work. It would appear you know what.

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they are clearly the best trio.

0:27:59.400 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 2>In the league.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 3>The next one, who is okay see rooting for you

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 3>think New York or the Pacers?

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>H Well, tonight they are definitely rooting for New York

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the next two games because what they want is the

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a huge rest.

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like if I were, if I were okay see,

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I'd be rooting for New York to get to the finals.

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Tell me why. I just think it'd be an easier matchup.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 3>I think like I like the Pacers more and I

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 3>think they put up more of a fight against ok See.

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You did pick the Pacers to beat the Knicks, didn't you.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in the in the last uh our last part

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 3>said oh those Pacers and six, Well.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you might have sold them short. They might

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 1>end up we'll see if they gets the six. So

0:28:55.240 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's definite. The Thunder would rather the

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Knicks win the next two games just so it goes seven.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But I also think you're right. The Pacers are just

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they play such a breakneck style. Now that would be

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it'd be fun Pacers Thunder. That's the number one offense

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>against the number one defense. But the other reason the Pacers.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should and maybe I should be giving the

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Pacers a bigger chance than I'm giving them as I'm

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>already talking about the Thunder. Is this all time team?

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And also maybe it's bad strategy as a podcaster, because

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>then what what topics am I supposed to do the

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>days after the Thunder win the championship? I've already done

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it is the Pacers don't turn the ball over because

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Haliber doesn't turn the ball over. Yeah, and that's where

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder, you know, dominate teams.

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 3>And more liabilities on New York's defense than the Pacers

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion. So it's like, would you as the

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 3>offense on Okay, see.

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>That there's no question about all right, we should have

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>probably led with this follow up demanse.

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so last night you got a shout out on

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the broadcast. Richard Jefferson came out and said Nick Wright

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 3>said something really smart yesterday about your take of the year.

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.719
<v Speaker 3>It's an automatic, it's an automatic review. So how did

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 3>you feel about that cloud Chaser?

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, shout out, r J.

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Shout out.

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.959
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I mean, little known fact in the first

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>iteration of first Things First, Richard Jefferson was an in

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>studio guest a handful of times. Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Richard Jefferson used to come in studio with us. I

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot, Yeah, I like him a lot.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But he and I, he and I haven't like talked

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in person, probably since before the pandemic, you know, the

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not at as when I go to NBA games,

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I have tickets, not press passes, so I can't get

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>down on the floor. And you know, he and I

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously work for different companies, but I think our Jay

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. And I happen to think the Breen RJ.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Doris Booth has gotten a little too much flack, especially

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>when and now again it might be for me it's

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just a nice respite from the Reggie commentary. But I I.

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Like him on the trio him too.

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>People are wistful about Van Gundy and Jackson, like but

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Van Gundy, Jackson and Breen worked together for so long,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean that they had such a

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>rapport in a chemistry that just takes time to build.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But set that aside. Richard Jefferson bringing to a massive

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>audience the idea that hey, let guys challenge when they

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>want to challenge. And I don't think Breen initially totally

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>understood it, because Breen was.

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, oh no, I.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think Breen didn't necessarily, I mean, because RJ

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't explain it in full in that moment, and then

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he tried to explain it a bit. I don't think

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he understood that you would still have a limit, your

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>same limited amount of challenges one wrong or two maximum.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think Breen's initial reaction was, Man, we're gonna

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be challenging every play, which is why he had such

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>an allergy to it. But when you again, there's a

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sometime it's not often, it's a little often, but it's

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not always. I have an idea and I'm like, oh,

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this is people are going to immediately respond to this.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I think they're going to respond negatively, and sometimes like,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>people are going to love this, And it is really gratifying.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>In such a uh populated take landscape, where there's so

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>many people giving so many opinions at all hours of

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>every day, it's very hard to actually say something no

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>one is said and so yeah, and so the fact

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that I was able to kind of plant my flag

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on that and then have RJ publicize it to a

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>wider audience.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, Cloye, absolutely, And I haven't even played our Let

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 3>me try to see if I can get our friend

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>of the pod, Michelle Roberts, to set up a meeting

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 3>with me and Commissioner Silver to.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Just pitch a few of these ideas. All right, let's

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>go to the Minnesota side of things.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, Yeah, So Minnesota they got their butts whipped

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 3>last night in the Western Conference Finals for a second

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 3>year in a row. Do we think that this is

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 3>their ceiling that they need add any pieces? What's going

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 3>on here? Can they break through?

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Well? No, I this clearly is this iteration of this

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>team ceiling, Like that's obvious. But the way they get

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to a higher level is ant improofs. And I'm not

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 1>putting this series like on ant For as good as

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Julius was the first two rounds, he kind of came

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>crashing back down to earth in the Conference finals, which

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is a bummer. And you know, Minnesota already cleaned up

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>their book looks a bit by trading towns, like the

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>town's trade was somewhat about shaking the snow globe, But

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it was also about getting off that contract. Now they're

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in a tricky spot because I think a lot of

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>people thought Julius Randall was going to opt in to

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>his thirty one million dollars next year. Was he good

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>enough in this playoffs that he opts out and looks

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for a longer deal, and does Minnesota want to give

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that to him? I don't. Nas Reed is definitely opting

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 1>out and definitely getting money from somewhere. I think they're

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to keep both of those guys,

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>but what they do have, and then also Nikhil Alexander

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Walker is also it could heal leave That's a question mark.

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But Ant is locked, go Bet is locked, Jaden is locked,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Dante is locked. Conley has got one year left, assuming

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't. I mean, he could retire, but that would

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>just be him giving up eleven million bucks. Rob Dillingham

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 1>their draft pick from this year. You know he'll be back,

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and I like Terren Shannon another draft pick. So I

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think they are, you know, positioned fine. And I'm not

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>acting as if Aunt let him down or anything like that.

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>My point is the way they get to the next

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>step is their twenty three year old be better in

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>year twenty four than he was in year twenty three,

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and that this is this is a point that I

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that I made yesterday on TV, but I want to

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>make it again here. When Shay was Aunt's age, he

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 1>had won zero playoff games. When Yiannis and Jokic were

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Ant's age, they had never been to a conference finals.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So it I don't think it's fair to act like

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Ants anything other than ahead of schedule. I also think

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>it would be silly to act like he doesn't for

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>them to get to the next level. He doesn't need

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to improve, but he said as much after now, after

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the game, he was like, you know, basically, I'm not

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sad about this. You know what was the exact quote

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>he had? We hold on. I want to I don't

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 1>want to get it wrong because it was a very

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting quote. Ant said, I have it right here. Dusty

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>put it in our First Thing's First rundown because it's

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're talking about today. A Aunt

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>was asked, you know about how much this hurts, and

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote, I don't know why people would think

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>it would hurt. It's exciting for me. I'm twenty three.

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I get to do it a whole bunch of times.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm hurt, more so for Mike, Mike Conley, who was

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>sitting next to him. I came up short for Mike.

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>We tried last year, we couldn't get it. We tried

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>again this year. We'll try again next year. But hurt

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>is a terrible word to use. I'm good. And then

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he went on to say I'm gonna work my butt

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>off this summer. No one's gonna work harder than me

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this summer, I'll tell you that much. So that might

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be a little like athletic bravado or you know that

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Aunt does it, or maybe that really is how he feels.

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is at twenty three, compared to where

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>his peers were at twenty three, he's ahead of schedule.

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>The only person, like one of his peers who had

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>made a conference finals at that age was Luca and

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so I So, I don't think Timberwolves fans should be

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like crestfallen, like oh, we missed our shot. I do

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think that their best path forward is for Ant to

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>take a leap similar to how Shay did from all

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>NBA caliber to MVP favorite. And that's a heart that's

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a very very very hard leap to take. But that's

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the best path forward for them. NBA Finals almost here,

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and every play could be the be the one that

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>changes everything. It's the NBA Playoffs or heroes rise, Legacies

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>are built, and the action never lets up. And with

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Sportsbook, an official sports betting partner of the NBA,

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't just watch the madness, you live it. Back

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.439
<v Speaker 1>your favorite team, ride with your clutch, time killer. Bet

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>on the buzzer beaters, the breakout performances the game. I'm

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>winning threes from player props, same game parlays. This is

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>how you take your fandom to the next level. Listen,

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I picked the Knicks to win this series. I have

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in each game thought the Knicks were positioned. Well, I'm

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>not getting off that train today. Nicks minus four is

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what I am doing tonight in Game five of the

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Conference Finals. New to the game, no sweat. Download the

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Sportsbook app. Bet just five dollars and if your

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bet wins, you'll score three one hundred dollars in bonus bets.

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's really that easy. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app and

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>use code right. That's code right for new customers to

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>get three hundred dollars in bonus bets if your bet

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>wins when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings,

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the crown is yours, and of course lines and odds

0:40:55.960 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are subject to change. Gambling problem call one eight hundred

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>gambler In New York, call eight seven seven eight hope

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in why, or text hope in why, which is four

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 1>six seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help is available

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for problem gambling Call eight eight eight seven eight nine

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort in

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Kansas twenty one plus age in eligibility varies by jurisdiction

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>eight hours after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources,

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>see DKNG dot co slash b ball. By the way,

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw this at you before we get

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to Nick. Spacers demand DraftKings obviously as a look aheadline.

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>If it is Pacers thunder, what do you think that

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>line is?

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Just on the series to win the series?

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 3>No game one, game one Pacers all right?

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay? See minus eight Oh.

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say I thought you were going

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>to be far off on this because you were going

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to find it disrespectful. You're closer than I thought. OKAYC

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>minus nine. Yeah, I mean still a little like that's

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a that's a big spread for Game one of the finals.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>But it speaks the fact that DraftKings been pretty confident

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>all year long to the thunder of the best team,

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and they are they are thus far being proven correct.

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Knicks Pacers.

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 3>So you said on Tuesday you expected New York to

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 3>come in and tie up the series. That obviously didn't happen.

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:46.959
<v Speaker 3>The Pacers are up.

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Three to one. Now did the Knicks below their best opportunity?

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You think, well, when you look at see this is

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>where because I the question is for the Knicks to

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>win the championship, is this the best chance they're going

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to have had? And my answer to that question is probably,

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like I don't look at this year as like, oh,

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's wide open, because sitting on the other side of

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the bracket is a sixty eight win team that is

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>run rough shot you know, in round one, in round

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>three and you know Joker gave it, you know, gave

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>them their best shot in round two. But they really

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do look like a team that is the best team

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>in the league. So I don't look at it as

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you were in the Western Conference in the twenty

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the year the what is it the year the Nuggets

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>won and sitting coming out of the East, and by

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, I think the Nuggets would have beaten the Celtics.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But this isn't Daniel, I'm not. This is really actually

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>about Lakers wistfulness. The sitting on the other side of

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the bracket is the eight seed Miami Heat. If you're

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the West that you're like, damn, that would have

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 1>been a nice year to make the NBA finals, And

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't look at it that way. What I

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 1>do look at it for the Knicks is doing what

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they did against Boston and then not being able to

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>close the deal and at least get to the finals

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to feel very painful, but it is noteworthy

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that that is how this has gone the last two years.

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Looks like we're gonna have three years in a row

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>where a team executes a pretty shocking upset and I

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if it's shocking, but executes an upset

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the defending champ in round two and then gets

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty easily dispatched in round three. The Lakers beat the

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Warriors in round two when the Warriors were the defending champs,

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and then got swept in the conference finals. The Timberwolves

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>beat the Nuggets in round two and then lost in

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:48.839
<v Speaker 1>five in the conference finals. The Knicks beat the Celtics

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in round two and are now down three to one

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Conference finals. Particularly when it comes to the

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Knicks beating the Celtics and the Timberlves beating the nugg

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 1>it's you do feel like was there a bit of

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an exhale after winning those series and then the other

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>team jumped out on you. The question for the Knicks

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is are they going to simply run this team back

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>next year? We can discuss that more if and when

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their season ends. Well I shouldn't say if. At some

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>point this season's gonna end, but when their season ends,

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the question for me is can they win tonight? And man,

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you gotta you gotta think the Knicks at some point

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are gonna just play a really good start to finish game.

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>They haven't done that yet this series. Even the game

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they won, they were not really good start to finish.

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You also have to think or at least. I would

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think that the Knicks that MSG tonight gives and they

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't been that good at home in these playoffs, gives

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>them a little boost of energy and with the fans

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>having been so good for them all year, that they

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go out like that. And so some

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff to me is fixable in that even

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 1>after makes you have to get back on defense because

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers are going to try to run, and you

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have to take a better do a better job taking

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 1>care of the ball, and it is it's really if

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a Knicks fan, it's been really frustrating to see

0:47:55.080 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>how many opportunities they've had in various moments in the series.

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>There are there's and they sorry I sound a little

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>distracted though, because we're having slight internet issues, just so

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>our producers know, there's the there's nobody on the Wi

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Fi or anything. There's nothing that there's there's no way

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to fix what we're dealing with right now. The the

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Knicks have had I know everyone's going to point to

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Game one, and Game one was a historic meltdown. Like

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:32.359
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it in the moment, We've never seen

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>anything like it. But even outside of Game one, we're

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>yet to see them put four good quarters together. Game two,

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 1>they just they did a good job shutting down Halliburton.

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:55.399
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't shut down Siakam at all, and they let

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers jump out after it's close. Throughout, the Knicks

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>lose concentration or let go of the rope, or the

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Pacers are just better for the opening few minutes of

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, and that's how they win Game three,

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>which which the Knicks do win. The Pacers are dominating

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.959
<v Speaker 1>that game. The Knicks don't play well for the first

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>three quarters, Kat goes crazy and the Knicks steal it.

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Game four, the Pacers are in control really the entirety

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of that game. And now that the Knicks. For a

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>moment it was like, oh, man, are the Knicks going

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to do to the Pacers in Game four what the

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Pacers did the Knicks in Game one? But there's a

0:49:41.400 --> 0:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>reason that had never been done in the NBA history.

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.239
<v Speaker 1>It's very very hard to do. The Knicker yet to

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>put four great quarters together.

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Now and dealing with the Celtics team where the Pacers

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 3>are good late in these games.

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 2>It's like that's a good point there.

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Late at the end, the Pacers can take care of business. No,

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:04.360
<v Speaker 3>that's a good difference. They'll shut themselves out of it.

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 3>The Pacers will make the right play.

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is the Pacers are just going

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so fast, so consistently that late in these games they're

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:21.240
<v Speaker 1>used to it and the Knicks aren't. And so I listen,

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll go down with the ship. I'll pick the Knicks tonight.

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And then Game six becomes absolute theater to see if

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks can force a Game seven. But the it

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is when you actually demands. As odd as this sounds,

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>when you actually go back and look at the Knicks

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>this postseason, there aren't many instances of them playing four

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>awesome quarters, like the close out game against the Celtics

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:07.839
<v Speaker 1>is the one. But they listen. They blew out the

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Pistons in Game one, but they were down going into

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter of that game. Their other victories in

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that series were by two points, one point, three points

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 1>celt There are three wins against the Celtics before Game six.

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>They were down fifteen in all of them, twenty and

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 1>two of them. And so like it has been, we

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are seeing little instances of why the Nicks struggled against

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the best teams in basketball all year long, and to

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:45.720
<v Speaker 1>your point, they're now playing a team that can match

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>their clutch late and it hasn't turned out well for him.

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think the Pacers are, you know, gentlemen

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>sweep better than the Knicks, which is why I think

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks and win tonight. But they certainly have looked

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like overall clearly the better team. All right, let's go

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to Halliburton.

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, so Halliburton just went god mode the other day.

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 3>So he had thirty two, fifteen and twelve with zero turnovers.

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you believe that he could be the best player

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:20.799
<v Speaker 3>on a championship team.

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:22.800
<v Speaker 1>In today's NBA?

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I don't don't take this the wrong way.

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this version of Halliburton is substantially worse

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>than last year's version of Tatum. Like you know what,

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I like, we just saw like the that and see

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it right like they're yeah, it was very different. I mean,

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>they're dlastically different players. But I'm just saying, like when

0:52:54.800 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we're tearing out the players, I don't think this version

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of Haliburton is drastically different than the twenty twenty two

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>version of Steph. I mean they are very different players.

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's just as far as like caliber, caliber of player. Now, listen,

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>peak Steph is a totally different animal entirely. But that's

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the version of Steph that won the championship in twenty

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty two is lesser than the you know, peak Steph Curry.

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>And so in today's NBA we have we have to

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>adjust for what it takes to win a championship in

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the you know what's somebody on Twitter maybe smartly coined

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>as you know, it's not the Big Three era, it's

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>not the Superstar era. It's the weak link era, meaning

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like do you have can you consistently put out five

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>quality players, four of which can defend? And that's the

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>other problem for the Knicks is, and this was the

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>worry when you traded for Towns is what if your

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>two best players are both real minus defenders. And Halliburton's

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 1>game on what night was that Tuesday night? That was

0:54:14.719 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>an all time game. A thirty point triple double with

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 1>zero turnovers in the playoffs has had been done one

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 1>time ever and it was by Baron Davis, oddly enough,

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was to put a stranglehold on a series

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to the finals. And so it's a hurky

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:40.720
<v Speaker 1>jerky game. It's a weird game. The set shot is odd,

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's awesome and it's you know, it's why he

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>got a spot in Club Superstar was not that game,

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but his awesomeness. And we can get to that now.

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you unveiled your latest rendition of Club Superstar

0:54:56.760 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 3>and he took Donovan. You put hot Donovan, Mitchell in

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 3>and Hallean for the first time.

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 2>You took Embiid in ad out. Could you explain to us.

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Your process and how the club management goes about getting

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:09.719
<v Speaker 3>these guys in and out.

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so all right, so tell me. So, here are

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the twelve guys in and we can put the graphic

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up Halliburton, Brunson, Joker, Shay Luca, Jannis braun Steph, Donovan,

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Durant and Tatum. It's a twelve person max, So if

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to put someone in, you got to kick

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>someone out. We took out Embiid because of all the

0:55:36.680 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>injury stuff and ad for similar reasons. You might be like, then,

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how does Tatum stay in? Tatum has been so consistent

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and so durable that you know, one season long injury

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 1>does not get him kicked out like his spot is secure. Uh,

0:55:56.800 --> 0:56:00.479
<v Speaker 1>you seem to have I mean the heart. His call

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was Donovan.

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Donovan Mitchell surprised me.

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so who would you? Would you have any of

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 1>those guys in over him?

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:10.839
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was I was trying to think of.

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:21.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, Anthony Davis is the because.

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:29.760
<v Speaker 1>In line was Wimby, Cade Shingoon and Devin Booker. Wimby

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 1>is the obvious next guy in. But he's got to

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:35.839
<v Speaker 1>actually do it, you know what I mean, He's got

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to actually earn his way in, and so I I

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we did.

0:56:44.680 --> 0:56:47.280
<v Speaker 2>A good job with and all that. Yeah, I understand

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 2>how Donovan Mitchell slips in there.

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, can you hear me? Sol dem On say yes,

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got you. Okay, good, Sorry about that. My I

0:56:57.840 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 1>knocked my AirPod out of my ear. I mean, AD

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is a tough one. And the argument against Donovan is,

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight years in the league, in the playoffs

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>every year, never in round three. It's hard, though, to

0:57:12.160 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>use that as an argument to put a DN over him,

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because do I think Donovan could have you know, made

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a conference finals or an NBA finals alongside Lebron like AD?

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Did I do like whenn ad was the guy he

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 1>never got passed round one. It's a tricky spot. Donovan

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is for a guy who hasn't been deep in the playoffs,

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not a playoff dropper, Like you know what I mean?

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>He puts up huge numbers, and Brew raised the question,

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do we not have twelve superstars?

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Right? That's the other thing I was kind of but

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 2>go ahead.

0:57:53.440 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just like no good team. Was just looking around

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 3>at the teams. I'm like, who can get in over

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 3>this guy? But it's like it's a little right.

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird because the league is so deep on

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 1>really good players, but maybe a little thin on great

0:58:09.400 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>great players. Because the other argument was should Kevin Durant

0:58:13.280 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be out? And my answer to that question is he's

0:58:17.960 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 1>such an iconic player who still plays at a high

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:25.960
<v Speaker 1>enough level. I don't feel comfort He's still twenty seven

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a game, you know what, I don't feel comfortable yeah,

0:58:31.680 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>taking him out? So to me, those are the twelve

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>What are your follow ups here?

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I care to explain how Joki took Lebron's throne.

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That was an editorial choice made by the artist Jack Perkins,

0:58:49.000 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>who does a great job. You can followhim on Twitter

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at Pure Hoop and listen, I give him the lists,

0:58:55.720 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he makes the picture. I gotta tell you, I wasn't

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilled with seeing Lebron out of the throne, but I

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 1>guess jokers earned it for now. But yeah, that was

0:59:07.840 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>not I didn't trust me. I didn't I didn't demand that.

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Now I did hear that. I'm okay with Lebron being

0:59:17.240 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>moved out of the throne because he's no longer in

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the argument for the best player in the league. Mike

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>pal Simmons yesterday did a top fifteen player pyramid and

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't have Lebron on that. Now that's an outrage, Like

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that's just objectively that. Here's the thing about the Lebron

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 1>rankings that is so irritating to me. At times, people

0:59:41.760 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>keep prematurely downgrading him because of his age when we

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just saw it. He just finished sixth in MVP voting, sixth.

0:59:52.680 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 1>He just finished firmly second team All NBA. So why,

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>all of of a sudden, is he not one of

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen best players in the league. Like you, the

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is anywhere you you could fairly argue for Lebron

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to be as high as fifth and as low as

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>tenth best player in the league. But that's it. And

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the what is frustrating to me about Bill's ranking specifically,

1:00:31.080 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is the he still has Steph Curry as like the

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>seventh best guy. There's no there's there's no way to

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>look at this NBA season and say Steph was better

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>than Lebron, not by stats, not by team record, not

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>by individual accolades, not by any of it. Now you

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>can say his team made it one round further in

1:00:54.080 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, so be it that that part is true,

1:00:57.240 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's it was that, but that team also was

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and be like, well, how much of Lebron's team success

1:01:04.280 --> 1:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>this year was because they traded for Luca. STEP's team

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was sub five hundred when they traded for Jimmy Like,

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a weird one for me. But set that aside.

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Lebron obviously still superstar. Steph's obviously still a superstar. And

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's where we're at all, right.

1:01:22.120 --> 1:01:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Next, do you think that Halliburton still would you have

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>still given him a spot if he would have lost

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 3>in round one?

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>No? Now, I submitted this list before round one was over.

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I submitted this list. I took a screenshot of it

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>yesterday to send to Gianna of when I submitted this list.

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I submitted this list May seventh. So let's see where

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we were in the playoffs on May seventh. I've got

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to I can pull that up quickly. So when I

1:01:56.720 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>submitted this list, we were the games that had just

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>been played. Is the Pacers had just taken a two

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to zero lead on the Caves. Oh, so that's interesting.

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even realize that I submitted this list the

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>morning after Halliburton executed that insane comeback on the Calves.

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe I, you know, maybe I was kind

1:02:29.920 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of in the afterglow of that. But he's proven me

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>right by his performances throughout. And the other thing is

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so no losing in round one. No, but had they

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing in round two, I would have still

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>been comfortable with it. All right, go some more follow

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ups here before.

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:52.160
<v Speaker 3>So Wimby, it sounded like you had said, you said,

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Wimby's got to do. It isn't intentional him being walking

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>inside of the club, Well.

1:02:56.360 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It seems inevitable, but he's not in yet. It's the

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>second straight year he's been trying to walk in. He's

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not in yet. And I also the other thing I

1:03:04.480 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>could have done, Demons is put Paolo in line. The

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Pallo to me is he's on the same par on

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>par with Shingoon, So I could have put Polo in line.

1:03:20.760 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We just didn't. All right, let's let's do the NFL

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff another day. I'm just not into it today. I'm

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>still in basketball mode. And I'll be honest with you,

1:03:30.520 --> 1:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just in basketball mode. I know, I talked

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about it on the Pot on Tuesday. I think I'm

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>also really, really in poker mode. I am so incredibly

1:03:44.360 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>excited for the World Series of Poker. I am the

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>studying in the way I study, which is not like

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>study solvers and stuff, because I'm playing mixed games, but

1:03:56.120 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>by watching old tournaments and listening to the commentary and

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing how guys play different spots. I am we have

1:04:03.880 --> 1:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a you know, I've got my room set, I've got

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the app verified. I am. I'm so excited about go

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about going to this tournament or going to these tournaments.

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I my work brain right now is occupied

1:04:25.040 --> 1:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>by the NBA. My personal brain is oper is occupied

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>by poker stuff and uh the like the NFL OTAs

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about it someone on the TV show. But

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not dialed in on that right now.

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>If I'm being totally honest, reminder of the audience, like

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>rate subscribe review to the pod. Let's have some of

1:04:49.800 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the audience members who are watching us live. They have

1:04:52.960 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some questions. Let's go ahead and get to them.

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Producers.

1:04:56.800 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>After Demandsay said he thought James Dolan was Brew, Bruce

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 3>said on TV that he thought Bryce Young was Demonse.

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Is there beef Brewing?

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>No, there's no beef. How did that happen? Do you

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>remember this?

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it was you guys were in New Orleans.

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>You guys were in New Orleans and you were talking

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>to Brew. No, Brew was talking to Bryce Young. Oh

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>he walked by him or something like that.

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right.

1:05:22.640 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>He came up to you and it was like, I

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't know Demond was here.

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 3>It's is crazy because I've seen him in person before,

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and like Bryce Young.

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Is I feel like he's like six.

1:05:31.440 --> 1:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Six, maybe seven or eight inches shorter than you. Yeah,

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the no, that's all true. If you guys do have

1:05:38.880 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a similar look.

1:05:40.680 --> 1:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>On the virus style and the hair, facial air, skin tone.

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, but that part is true. All right, let's

1:05:51.560 --> 1:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>keep going.

1:05:52.400 --> 1:05:54.919
<v Speaker 3>Kyle says, Hey, Nick, is the reason you don't call

1:05:54.960 --> 1:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>out Brunson's defense more aggressively because you're a donegice guy.

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>No, So I I think that at times we can

1:06:08.880 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be misleading, we can be disingenuous. I guess on how

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>much we what's the right way to put it? Team

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>defense is incredibly important to winning a championship, however, and

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>individual players overall impact on your team for stars is

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so much more heavily influenced by how impactful they are offensively.

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It is why there is the All NBA Team and

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>then separately the All Defense team, because there are guys

1:06:54.360 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who might be first team All Defense who don't have

1:06:57.560 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a shot at being on the All NBA team. And

1:07:02.280 --> 1:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so I it's not Jalen Brunson is obviously a minus defender.

1:07:08.640 --> 1:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It is in my opinion, and that does put a

1:07:12.040 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>ceiling on where he can be in the overall hierarchy

1:07:15.240 --> 1:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of the league. But it is the team and the

1:07:19.640 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>coaches job to figure out how to make do with

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that our superstar is a minus defender. And

1:07:26.200 --> 1:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just I don't think it's for lack of effort,

1:07:27.840 --> 1:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for Jalen Brunson. He's just not big enough and not

1:07:30.520 --> 1:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the athlete that he would need to be the All right,

1:07:35.480 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go on to the next one.

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Platonic Zombie. F YI, you forgot the Suns with the

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>trio discussion.

1:07:42.760 --> 1:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I assume that's a joke. I mean the Sons are

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a duo as well with Katie and Booker. I assume

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a joke.

1:07:51.960 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Joshua has what a title for SGA make him the

1:07:55.200 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>best thunder of all time?

1:08:00.800 --> 1:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Kdi's got an MVP there and a finals appearance. Russ

1:08:05.280 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>has an MVP there and a finals appearance as the

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>co star. If Shay wins an MVP there and wins

1:08:14.760 --> 1:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the championship.

1:08:16.320 --> 1:08:18.600
<v Speaker 2>And finally VP, probably.

1:08:20.080 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>The I yeah, and finals MVP. I guess I don't

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>know that I'll feel that way, but I but that's he.

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would look at him that way,

1:08:32.400 --> 1:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but he probably would be. All right, let's go to Eric.

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Eric says Demond's ay, I saw you hooping on Tuesday.

1:08:40.640 --> 1:08:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Look like you at least didn't get to deput up

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>happy you got the win. What's your record? Have you

1:08:46.960 --> 1:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>played and are you ready for playoffs?

1:08:49.720 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So what's this about.

1:08:52.040 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>So I'm in a rec league or a Culver City

1:08:54.920 --> 1:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>league with a couple.

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Of my guys at work.

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh really, actually yeah, I actually got a I did

1:09:00.360 --> 1:09:01.200
<v Speaker 3>it the last game.

1:09:02.680 --> 1:09:05.479
<v Speaker 1>You got ejected from a direct league game directly game.

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:07.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they didn't even give you a warning though, Like

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 2>it was what you know, the guy.

1:09:09.960 --> 1:09:12.320
<v Speaker 3>The guy was like tugging on my arm, just doing

1:09:12.320 --> 1:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of unnecessary Draymond green Es things, and I

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:18.800
<v Speaker 3>pushed and I was like, hey man, you know, watch out,

1:09:18.880 --> 1:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and the ref was like you got to go sit down,

1:09:21.160 --> 1:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and he's like, actually, you can't be in the gym.

1:09:23.600 --> 1:09:26.439
<v Speaker 2>I was like, all right, team, and I think we're

1:09:26.520 --> 1:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>like two and seven right now I've played.

1:09:30.040 --> 1:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're terrible. This is only my I.

1:09:32.760 --> 1:09:35.599
<v Speaker 3>Played in one game before that, and then this is

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:36.559
<v Speaker 3>my second fold.

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I played in three. The second game I got.

1:09:38.960 --> 1:09:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Ejected like two minutes into it, and then this last

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 3>game I played the entire time. They've been doing a

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:46.759
<v Speaker 3>lot of losing without me, but the schedule just conflicts

1:09:46.760 --> 1:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot with like a lot done back there.

1:09:52.240 --> 1:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Team the bus first, was I supposed to lie about

1:09:55.680 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>our record doing a lot of losing without me? No,

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean it like that.

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:03.479
<v Speaker 2>I was just saying, like these games, I didn't see

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:05.599
<v Speaker 2>those losses. I can't. I don't know what happened there.

1:10:07.080 --> 1:10:11.840
<v Speaker 3>But uh, but yeah, you ejected once or twice one time, and.

1:10:12.000 --> 1:10:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so when you described misunderstood, the.

1:10:14.520 --> 1:10:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Games have been super late.

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:17.880
<v Speaker 3>They conflict and it's just like I can't like some

1:10:17.920 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 3>of these I can't make Yeah, but uh but yeah,

1:10:21.320 --> 1:10:23.760
<v Speaker 3>so every every team goes to the playoffs and we'll

1:10:23.800 --> 1:10:25.160
<v Speaker 3>be there and next time.

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, coming down.

1:10:26.320 --> 1:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have a chance to to go on a

1:10:28.960 --> 1:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Cinderella run, but no, we're are you how what? What

1:10:38.479 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>percent are you that you were pre achilles.

1:10:44.160 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 3>As far as like leaping ability and all that, I'm

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:50.040
<v Speaker 3>probably at like eighty five ninety, Like it's not all

1:10:50.080 --> 1:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the way there, but I'd say a lot of it's

1:10:51.960 --> 1:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>still there.

1:10:52.439 --> 1:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Though a lot of it's still there. And uh, and

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:57.519
<v Speaker 1>it didn't affect your shot or anything else.

1:10:58.000 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 3>No, the only thing that's really affected my I feel

1:11:00.560 --> 1:11:04.320
<v Speaker 3>like it's my broken my permanent broken finger. But but no,

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 3>it did take a little bit to get my legs

1:11:06.280 --> 1:11:09.320
<v Speaker 3>up underneath me though, like I felt like.

1:11:08.760 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm glad you're playing. Are you playing at I

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>still say where.

1:11:13.600 --> 1:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I still play at the gym, and I just play

1:11:16.040 --> 1:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>at this rec League center every Monday or Tuesday whenever.

1:11:19.479 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>But the gym that you have a membership for, I

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>still go there. That's great, Okay, great, I didn't know

1:11:24.320 --> 1:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you were playing, Eric, you go. Yeah, so you did

1:11:27.280 --> 1:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>see de monster.

1:11:28.600 --> 1:11:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was definitely my Hopefully we see you guys

1:11:31.960 --> 1:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>in the season.

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and hopefully you don't get it. Can't maximum one

1:11:36.240 --> 1:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>ejection a season.

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was so embarrassing like that, will not

1:11:40.520 --> 1:11:42.480
<v Speaker 2>have it again. I was really embarrassed.

1:11:42.680 --> 1:11:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, especially when you said it happened two minutes in.

1:11:46.160 --> 1:11:48.960
<v Speaker 3>That was important. Crazy party. I had six points, Like

1:11:49.000 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 3>it was in like thirty seconds. I scored the six points.

1:11:51.200 --> 1:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Another guy, get me out of the game. I was

1:11:53.600 --> 1:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>already annoyed about some stuff when I walked in the gym.

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>But you gotta you know basketball is an escape. Leave

1:11:58.880 --> 1:11:59.920
<v Speaker 3>that stuff out the way.

1:12:00.520 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I love to hear it. All right, Good job Blue Duck,

1:12:03.400 --> 1:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>good job Volume, Thank you to DraftKings. We will the

1:12:09.280 --> 1:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>reminder and for the Blue Duck folks and Volume folks

1:12:13.360 --> 1:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>all get the details on how we're gonna do this

1:12:16.000 --> 1:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>next Thursday. Shows from Vegas Tuesday, regularly scheduled show, maybe

1:12:21.360 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a quick show over the weekend to react. If this

1:12:24.280 --> 1:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>series wraps up on Saturday night, maybe even one tomorrow.

1:12:29.520 --> 1:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how the playoffs go, but we'll see all

1:12:32.080 --> 1:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Then heading to work to go on TV. See you

1:12:34.040 --> 1:12:36.599
<v Speaker 1>guys on First Things First in a few hours. Thank you. Also,

1:12:36.720 --> 1:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Richard Jefferson, What's right?