1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,400 Speaker 1: At the Republican Convention this year, there were a loud 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:05,960 Speaker 1: chants of lock her up, referring to Trump supporters belief 3 00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: that Hillary Clinton had broken the law when she used 4 00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:11,159 Speaker 1: a private email server, and the calls to lock her 5 00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: up continued throughout the campaign at Trump campaign rallies. During 6 00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:17,759 Speaker 1: the second presidential debate with Hillary Clinton, the candidate himself 7 00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:21,279 Speaker 1: made it very clear that he agreed, if I win, 8 00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:25,920 Speaker 1: I am going to instruct my Attorney general to get 9 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:30,080 Speaker 1: a special prosecutor to look into your situation. It's just 10 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 1: awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump 11 00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:36,640 Speaker 1: is not in charge of the law in our country, 12 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,519 Speaker 1: because you'd be in jail. But this week, in an 13 00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:41,960 Speaker 1: interview with The New York Times, the President elect said 14 00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 1: he does not want a renewed investigation or prosecution of 15 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:47,000 Speaker 1: Mrs Clinton because he does not want to hurt in 16 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:49,839 Speaker 1: the Clinton family and it would be divisive for the 17 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:52,840 Speaker 1: country with us to talk about the president elect change 18 00:00:52,840 --> 00:00:55,520 Speaker 1: of position. Our Devin Schindler, a professor at the Cooley 19 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:59,560 Speaker 1: Law School, and Paul Charlton, a partner at Steptoe and Johnson, 20 00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 1: in a four or United States attorney welcome to both 21 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:07,440 Speaker 1: of you, Devin, If you were Hillary Clinton, can you 22 00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:09,760 Speaker 1: now trust that the federal government is not going to 23 00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:12,960 Speaker 1: prosecute you in regard to the use of an email server. 24 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 1: You know, I read a recent study that indicated their 25 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 1: presidents keep about sixty of their campaign promises, And from 26 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 1: the moment that Mr Trump made these statements, I felt 27 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:26,160 Speaker 1: that this was probably one he wasn't going to keep because, 28 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:29,560 Speaker 1: among other things, it would such a terrible precedent. And 29 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 1: as we're learning, there are also skeletons in the President 30 00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: Electrump's closet. So if I were Hillary Clinton, I don't 31 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:38,240 Speaker 1: think I was ever all that worried about it in 32 00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:42,360 Speaker 1: the first place. Paul, is it proper for Donald Trump 33 00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 1: to be talking about this one way or the other? 34 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:45,880 Speaker 1: Was it proper for him in the campaign? And is 35 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 1: it proper now given that this is really a decision 36 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:52,600 Speaker 1: to be made by the Attorney general. It was wrong 37 00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:58,280 Speaker 1: for Canada Trump to suggest that his political opponent should 38 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 1: be prosecuted. It that were he to become president, she 39 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: would be incarcerated. That's inconsistent with the cornerstone ideas of 40 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:09,080 Speaker 1: our Republican offense. The way it is the Department of 41 00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 1: Justice is supposed to operate, so his most recent statement 42 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:15,920 Speaker 1: to The New York Times is a welcome one. To 43 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:20,440 Speaker 1: take back those earlier threats is the right thing to do. Devin, 44 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 1: There's been some talk that, you know, before all this happened, 45 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 1: that the Obama administration was thinking about whether President Obama 46 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: should pardon Hillary Clinton in regard to the email situation 47 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 1: at this point, and then, I don't think they've committed 48 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:39,720 Speaker 1: one way or another to what they're going to do. 49 00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:41,679 Speaker 1: Do you think at this point the president should still 50 00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:44,639 Speaker 1: be thinking about that? Well, I think the chances of 51 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:48,239 Speaker 1: partner highly unlikely because there's a series of cases around 52 00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:51,120 Speaker 1: the turn of the sensor that basically interpret president's pardon 53 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:53,720 Speaker 1: power as allowing as a part of the individuals who 54 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 1: have not yet been indicted to prosecute. But the acceptance 55 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,120 Speaker 1: of a pardon by someone who's been offered it is 56 00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:03,160 Speaker 1: an acceptance of guilt, is a mission of guilt under 57 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,240 Speaker 1: the way the pardon power has been interpreted. So even 58 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: if a pardon were offered, I'm not entirely clear or 59 00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:13,200 Speaker 1: certain Ms Clinton, Mrs Clinton would take the pardon because 60 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 1: in her mind, I'm certain she doesn't think she's done 61 00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 1: anything wrong and doesn't want to have that taint of 62 00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 1: accepting a pardon and thereby accepting responsibility for illegal acts, 63 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 1: which I believe she doesn't think she has done. Paul, 64 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 1: you said you welcomed the latest statement by Donald Trump. Uh, 65 00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:34,640 Speaker 1: there are, of course two separate issues. Are two investigations 66 00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:37,040 Speaker 1: that have been going on the Justice Department. There's the 67 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:40,320 Speaker 1: email investigation, which is the one where FBI Director Comey 68 00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,960 Speaker 1: said there wasn't reasonable evidence to to to prosecute. And 69 00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 1: there's also has been an investigation of the Clinton Foundation. Uh. 70 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:51,400 Speaker 1: Wasn't it premature for Donald Trump to come out and 71 00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:55,520 Speaker 1: and say, even on that Clinton Foundation investigation, there should 72 00:03:55,520 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 1: be no no further investigation, no charges. I'm not sure 73 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:02,480 Speaker 1: or that's what he said, or that his statements to 74 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:05,360 Speaker 1: the New York Times went that far, But even wear 75 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: one to interpret his statement to New York Times to 76 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:12,600 Speaker 1: encompass the Clinton Foundation issue. What we know is that 77 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 1: that matter is currently in the hands of career prosecutors 78 00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:20,200 Speaker 1: and career investigators at the FBI, and the recommendation that 79 00:04:20,560 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 1: both the Department of Justice and the FBI will make 80 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 1: as it relates to that investigation is the one that 81 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:29,560 Speaker 1: will likely carry the day regardless of how it is 82 00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 1: the president feels about a potential prosecution in that regard, 83 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,800 Speaker 1: and that's what's important here, the prosecute the president. The 84 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:40,920 Speaker 1: president elect Trump ought not to make personal use of 85 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,599 Speaker 1: the Department of Justice as if it were a political tool. 86 00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 1: It's not, and it is much better to leave decisions 87 00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:50,640 Speaker 1: on whether to go forward with prosecutions to the professionals 88 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:54,440 Speaker 1: who are currently there. Well, all right, then, Devin, you know, 89 00:04:54,520 --> 00:04:56,320 Speaker 1: given what Paul is saying here about the role of 90 00:04:56,360 --> 00:05:00,080 Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, regardless of what the president an 91 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,839 Speaker 1: elect has now said, we don't really know what Jeff Sessions, 92 00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:06,400 Speaker 1: if he becomes a training general or you know, would do, 93 00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:10,680 Speaker 1: and what the prosecutors and FBI agents might recommend in 94 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:14,080 Speaker 1: regard to Hillary Clinton. So is it still possible that 95 00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 1: despite what the president elected saying, the Justice Department could 96 00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,599 Speaker 1: go forward here? Well, two things. I completely agree with 97 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:24,200 Speaker 1: what was just said. But let us not forget that 98 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:27,919 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, the attorney general works 99 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:30,960 Speaker 1: for the president and we had an experience back in 100 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,840 Speaker 1: the days of Watergate where the Attorney General refused to 101 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:37,880 Speaker 1: take actions, specifically refused to fire a special prosecutor, which 102 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: resulted in the president essentially firing two attorney generals in 103 00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:44,000 Speaker 1: a row until he found a third, as followed by 104 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 1: the name of Robert Bourke, who became famous later, who 105 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:50,440 Speaker 1: agreed to take the actions at the president requested. This 106 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,960 Speaker 1: is known as the unitary executive theory for those of 107 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:55,919 Speaker 1: you who are can loggia selt there. Basically, it's the 108 00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:58,800 Speaker 1: idea that everyone who's in the executive branch at some 109 00:05:58,960 --> 00:06:01,440 Speaker 1: level works for the president it and so although I 110 00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: completely agree that the attorney general in the d o 111 00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 1: j must remain about politics, at the end of the day, 112 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,599 Speaker 1: they still work for the president. And so it is 113 00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 1: conceivable and in fact in the American's history has occurred 114 00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:15,719 Speaker 1: where the president is essentially over rule the decisions made 115 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,440 Speaker 1: by the Department of Justice and the Attorney General on 116 00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:22,720 Speaker 1: the flip side, to answer your specific question, certainly, uh uh, 117 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 1: the attorney general the Department of Justice could determine that 118 00:06:25,600 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 1: exact criminal conduct did occur in its ongoing investigation the 119 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:34,600 Speaker 1: Quinton Foundation, and therefore charges would be appropriate. Paul, how 120 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 1: concerned to you that the whole tone of this this 121 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:42,160 Speaker 1: campaign has damaged the perception of justice in America and 122 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:46,440 Speaker 1: the Justice Department. Well, Devon's right to remind us of 123 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 1: the Saturday Night massacre and the firing of Elliott Richardson 124 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:52,839 Speaker 1: and William ruckle House. But it was in that instance 125 00:06:52,920 --> 00:06:55,440 Speaker 1: I would argue, where the Department of Justice did what 126 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:59,280 Speaker 1: is right and the Nixon White House was embarrassed by 127 00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:03,080 Speaker 1: their attempts to make personal their direction of the Department 128 00:07:03,080 --> 00:07:04,920 Speaker 1: of Justice. In that instance, I have a great deal 129 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 1: of faith and the men and women who are career 130 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 1: prosecutors there and in the men and women who are 131 00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 1: career investigators at the FBI, that they will do what's right. 132 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:17,640 Speaker 1: There is no doubt a political influence with the Attorney General. 133 00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:19,200 Speaker 1: There is supposed to be. We're going to have to 134 00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:22,000 Speaker 1: leave it there. Thank you very much to Devin Schindler 135 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 1: of Cooley Law School and Paul Charton, a partner at 136 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:28,240 Speaker 1: Steptoe and Johnson. Coming up on Bloomberg law. A panel 137 00:07:28,280 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: of federal judges has issued what could be a landmark 138 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 1: decision invalidating political juryman during in Wisconsin as violating the 139 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:39,320 Speaker 1: Constitution for the first time in the United States. This 140 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:40,080 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg