1 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley. 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: We bring you inside from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:27,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. There's 5 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 1: some real oddities in the FOREGN exchange market has clearly 6 00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:35,080 Speaker 1: market participants search for information. Let's drive that forward right now. 7 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:37,880 Speaker 1: Sebastian Gallery where us with Nordia. He's known for writing 8 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 1: wonderfully dense important notes where you're like, damn, I hate 9 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:44,920 Speaker 1: this guy. I've got to read every paragraph, and we 10 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 1: do that with Sebastian uh Galli, especially oh welco. Question 11 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 1: to get the conversation started, what is your observation on 12 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:58,080 Speaker 1: currency dynamics right now? I think what you're seeing is 13 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:00,960 Speaker 1: basically a form of normalization. You're seeing, for example, the 14 00:01:00,960 --> 00:01:04,479 Speaker 1: euro appreciated against the sterlings is also being driven by 15 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:08,240 Speaker 1: exectations of negative rates. In the United Kingdom. You're seeing 16 00:01:08,319 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 1: some form of normalizations, but no great trends um if 17 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 1: you look, for example, in the margo market, the Church's theory, 18 00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: which is something people love to hate for good reasons, 19 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 1: has actually been appreciating the last two to three weeks 20 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 1: and doing actually quite well, helping the central bank over 21 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:26,039 Speaker 1: there to cut the interest rates by fifty basis point today. 22 00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 1: You could see it on your bloomwerk. Okay, this is great, 23 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:30,080 Speaker 1: and then you know Brazilian ROWL has actually had a 24 00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:34,039 Speaker 1: couple of good days versus the horrific pandemic statistics out 25 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 1: of there. But Sebastian, is there a theme that can 26 00:01:36,760 --> 00:01:40,640 Speaker 1: be identified here that it helps our listeners and viewers 27 00:01:40,760 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 1: forward over the next ninety days. Concurrency tell us something forward, Well, 28 00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: they can tell you something about the effect in the 29 00:01:49,800 --> 00:01:52,840 Speaker 1: negative industry. So if the theme of negative interest rates 30 00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:55,120 Speaker 1: in the United States is an important one, denied of 31 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 1: course by the Federal Reserve, which is close to the banks. 32 00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 1: They think the banks actually need to have very good 33 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:02,560 Speaker 1: balance sheets, and it doesn't help what we call net income, 34 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: so the ability to generate money by running down the 35 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:08,639 Speaker 1: curve um. But if it does have a negative impact 36 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:10,920 Speaker 1: on on the dollar, it's gonna be great, particularly versus 37 00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:14,079 Speaker 1: emerging markets, also versus g tents such as the euro. 38 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:17,080 Speaker 1: It could really reset the level of the dollar. And 39 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:20,720 Speaker 1: why because negative entries they hit the people um who 40 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:23,000 Speaker 1: are the most sensitive to it, which is namely the 41 00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:26,320 Speaker 1: safest type of investors, such as foreign reserves. That could 42 00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 1: be China and the likes. It happened to the euro Zone. 43 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 1: I was there with the CB. They go for negative introvice, 44 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:34,519 Speaker 1: particularly to talget these people to force him out of 45 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:37,320 Speaker 1: the euro to reduce it. It works to some extent, 46 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: not completely, but it does work, and as they start 47 00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:41,360 Speaker 1: moving at a just the level of the euro in 48 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 1: the same obviously could happen also in the case of 49 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:47,360 Speaker 1: the of the dollars. So one shouldn't neglect the fact 50 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 1: the negative industry could have a powerful impact on the US, 51 00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: particularly because it owes money to the rest of the world. 52 00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:56,639 Speaker 1: It receives a lot of a portfolio flows, sting portfolio flows, 53 00:02:56,680 --> 00:02:58,880 Speaker 1: but it actually is not in a great position, though 54 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 1: a much better position than they used to be. So 55 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 1: it's a negative in Church Chase is not a great 56 00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 1: story for fixed income in the US or risk taking, 57 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:08,359 Speaker 1: but it is a bit, but it could be a 58 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:11,640 Speaker 1: powerful one for the dollar. A wise man once told me, 59 00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:13,800 Speaker 1: and I won't confirm or deny whether it's a gentleman 60 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,960 Speaker 1: we're currently interviewing, but he once told me that when 61 00:03:16,960 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 1: an economist becomes a central banker, they have to learn 62 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:23,160 Speaker 1: to lie. Sep what are they lying to us about 63 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:27,560 Speaker 1: right now? I know nothing about lying is absolutely not sure? 64 00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 1: Carry on having having clarified it is that I am 65 00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:35,040 Speaker 1: not involved in this business. The business has central bankings 66 00:03:35,080 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 1: such as the military, is a business of lying. What 67 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 1: your objective is is to gather people around you to 68 00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:44,000 Speaker 1: create a narrative, to sell their narrative. There'll be hawks, 69 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 1: there will be doves, and some of them genuinely are, 70 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:49,120 Speaker 1: but they are in the business of creating that storyline, 71 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 1: which then drives expectations in the market. You then have 72 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 1: what you could call anchor points within the markets. It's 73 00:03:55,400 --> 00:03:59,240 Speaker 1: important people large hedge fund manager, larger fixed income guys 74 00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: and to something and they received better information than other 75 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 1: sense one of the reasons you want to be invested 76 00:04:03,640 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 1: with them. And they then drive also the narratives with 77 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:08,840 Speaker 1: their own views and they group to some extent. Of course, 78 00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:11,760 Speaker 1: the inforced the FED, and it's a very powerful and 79 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: well organized type of operations. So not all central banks 80 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:18,159 Speaker 1: are as efficient, but they are generally very very good, 81 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 1: from the PBOC in China to the Bank of England 82 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 1: which is the oldest one in the most experienced one 83 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:26,200 Speaker 1: Bunk Defalse also and and the FED and their business 84 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,520 Speaker 1: is to create the environments. If they tell you there's 85 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 1: no negative interest chase, that means they're probably considering they're 86 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:36,919 Speaker 1: working on it. And they told the Bank of England 87 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:41,279 Speaker 1: basically one of the oldest liars in central bankings. Yeah, well, 88 00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 1: it's definitely the skepticism John, that you've been showing, as 89 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:46,080 Speaker 1: you say, is you could get away with that because 90 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:50,680 Speaker 1: of his accent accent, he couldn't be that cental Chris Basha. 91 00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:52,840 Speaker 1: Let's talk about what the FED can do. Let's say 92 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:55,719 Speaker 1: they're not lying about not wanting to use negative interest 93 00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:57,880 Speaker 1: rates or not planning for it at this point, to 94 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 1: talk about the additional tools that they have on deck. 95 00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:04,039 Speaker 1: We've seen massive inflows into some of the credit et 96 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 1: f s and the hills of FED purchases in particular 97 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 1: l QD, H, y G and even J and K 98 00:05:09,800 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 1: more than a billion dollars of the past week into 99 00:05:11,640 --> 00:05:14,800 Speaker 1: each of those funds. How realistic is this? Is the 100 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:17,360 Speaker 1: FED back stopping this and how much can the federally 101 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:21,800 Speaker 1: expand in this area? A lot? I mean, never underestimate 102 00:05:21,839 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 1: the power of a central bank is one side of 103 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 1: banketor used to say, I can put fish on my bounce. 104 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:28,839 Speaker 1: She doesn't really not an issue, so never understimated. The 105 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:31,640 Speaker 1: only fish the only time when you wanna they have 106 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: said that, and the only time when you want to 107 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 1: have doubts is when inflation in rising. So when some 108 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:38,919 Speaker 1: emerging markets things are broken, for example in the meat industry, 109 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: that creates inflation. When you have constraints in the system, 110 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:44,600 Speaker 1: then they lose credibility and they're forced to act. But 111 00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:47,479 Speaker 1: if if you have low inflation, if there are there's 112 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:50,000 Speaker 1: a significant amount of slack in the environment, they can 113 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:52,320 Speaker 1: do so much. And probably what they're going to do 114 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:54,760 Speaker 1: is try to go, of course in the high yield, 115 00:05:54,760 --> 00:05:57,400 Speaker 1: but go to small and make caps with many caps 116 00:05:57,400 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 1: and the and the likes mainstream facilities. Starting in June, 117 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:02,800 Speaker 1: it probably will be increased a vastly going forward. So 118 00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:05,480 Speaker 1: that's probably one thing to look forward for. More advransious 119 00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:07,760 Speaker 1: center bacts even quite bearish on the outlook of the 120 00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:11,000 Speaker 1: economy to put pressure on the government as well as 121 00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:13,480 Speaker 1: on on the Congress to do something. But they probably 122 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 1: are also deeply concerned that they actually need to put 123 00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:18,720 Speaker 1: a much more pressure on the economy so that it 124 00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:21,240 Speaker 1: rebounds quite nicely. Sae tell him, this is the problem. 125 00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:25,760 Speaker 1: This conversation, this very conversation is basically why market participants 126 00:06:25,760 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 1: do not believe the Federal Reserve when they turn around 127 00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:30,760 Speaker 1: and say, no, the negative interest rate. And look, I'd 128 00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:32,839 Speaker 1: love to think that it's true. I hope they don't 129 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: go through with this, but there is a reason why 130 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:37,279 Speaker 1: so many investors still think there's a chance they go 131 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,040 Speaker 1: through with this till you overcome by events. I mean, 132 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:42,080 Speaker 1: that's all there is to it, you know, Obi, And 133 00:06:42,640 --> 00:06:45,800 Speaker 1: in every institution can manage the messages all they want, 134 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,440 Speaker 1: and then when the facts change, they change, and there 135 00:06:48,480 --> 00:06:50,880 Speaker 1: can be a set effects. John again, and I'm going 136 00:06:50,920 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 1: to claims, what fifty minutes away, you know, you do 137 00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:58,920 Speaker 1: a couple of months of unemployment that may qualify as 138 00:06:58,960 --> 00:07:02,280 Speaker 1: a Sebastian girl. Effects changeable. What's let's finish there, Let's 139 00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 1: wrap things up. Let's say that the labor market doesn't 140 00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:07,279 Speaker 1: snap back quickly enough. Let's say that we really get 141 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 1: this really strong disinflationary trend that takes hold. An inflation 142 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:15,480 Speaker 1: is steadily holding below where the policy rate is right now, 143 00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:19,160 Speaker 1: what's the next move at the Fed. Probably the next 144 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:21,600 Speaker 1: move is is some form of credit easing quality everything, 145 00:07:21,640 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 1: because they want to sort basically an expanding fiscal balance 146 00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:28,160 Speaker 1: from from from the government, so they basically expand to 147 00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 1: absorb it, and so that's where they need to do MBS. 148 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 1: It's going to be very slowly, not MBS, that's going 149 00:07:33,320 --> 00:07:35,720 Speaker 1: to come more with a lax so that you're talking 150 00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:38,200 Speaker 1: about six one, six months, one year, and one year 151 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 1: and half and two years down the road. Credit easing 152 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 1: basically going where the pressure is and try to encourage 153 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: people to take a credit risk and where it's very 154 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 1: difficult to take it, such as mini caps, small caps 155 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:52,960 Speaker 1: and the life far more aggressions, negative intricate. That largely 156 00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:56,240 Speaker 1: depends on the relationship between the White House and UH 157 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 1: and the Federal Reserve. So it's really a debate you 158 00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 1: really fet is essentially Republican institutions. White House obviously is 159 00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:05,880 Speaker 1: a Republican one. So on one side they have the 160 00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 1: banking system, with which they're quite close to. On the 161 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:10,720 Speaker 1: other side they are quite close to the economy in general, 162 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 1: and so they have to find some kind of balance. 163 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:15,280 Speaker 1: Negative aturey straits are are possible in the in the 164 00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 1: United States, they're probably working on them in terms of implications, 165 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:20,720 Speaker 1: as the sues did for six months, and and that 166 00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,320 Speaker 1: probably will take them in another few weeks, and and 167 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,120 Speaker 1: the debta ultimately will be a political one. There's the 168 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 1: fet is independent, but it doesn't mean that it's not 169 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:32,760 Speaker 1: easily to some extent influences in some cases. So thank 170 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:36,319 Speaker 1: you so much, greatly, greatly appreciate it this morning. Just 171 00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:42,320 Speaker 1: very very smart. Let's forget about the millions. Now, we 172 00:08:42,440 --> 00:08:45,520 Speaker 1: used to look at statistics weekly that we're two hundred 173 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 1: ten thousand, We get all lathered up. If we got 174 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 1: near two hundred or a hundred thousand, maybe two hundred 175 00:08:53,640 --> 00:08:56,040 Speaker 1: and thirty. John and I would stay up all night drinking, 176 00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:59,719 Speaker 1: worrying about the future of a fully employed America. And 177 00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:02,840 Speaker 1: now were up ten times above that two point four million, 178 00:09:03,160 --> 00:09:07,319 Speaker 1: and as Lisa pointed out presciently hit twenty minutes ago, 179 00:09:07,360 --> 00:09:10,800 Speaker 1: were so continuing claims matter and that statistic moves in 180 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:14,160 Speaker 1: the wrong direction. Stephen Roshido has been a student of this. 181 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 1: He's at missooo and his charm is chief US Economist. 182 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:23,840 Speaker 1: As he writes a shockingly interesting note, always digging into 183 00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:28,200 Speaker 1: y equals see plus I plus G plus annex. Stephen 184 00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:31,520 Speaker 1: Shudo joins us now steven the claims, but also on 185 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:35,079 Speaker 1: your general work. What's the thing that you're most studying 186 00:09:35,240 --> 00:09:39,480 Speaker 1: about the American economy? Well, I clearly the the two 187 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:43,760 Speaker 1: degree of deterioration is unprecedented, not only in size but 188 00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:47,080 Speaker 1: also on speed, given the nature of the lockdown, none 189 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,839 Speaker 1: of that should be a surprise. What I'm really looking 190 00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:53,680 Speaker 1: at and focusing on that sets this position particular period 191 00:09:53,720 --> 00:09:57,079 Speaker 1: apart from others that most of us have grown up 192 00:09:57,120 --> 00:10:02,400 Speaker 1: in is the coordination between fiscal and monetary policy UM 193 00:10:02,400 --> 00:10:06,600 Speaker 1: striving for the same end result UM. You know, back 194 00:10:06,640 --> 00:10:10,120 Speaker 1: in n seventy nine, I should say, when Paul Vulker 195 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:13,120 Speaker 1: moved us away from interest rate to money supply targeting 196 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 1: adopted monitorism. Basically, the Federal Reserve has been on a 197 00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 1: process of demand management, i e. Trying to keep the 198 00:10:20,160 --> 00:10:24,760 Speaker 1: economy from creating underlying inflation pressures, and therefore, anytime fiscal 199 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:27,720 Speaker 1: policy was employed, the Federal Reserve work to counter that 200 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:31,040 Speaker 1: because they were trying to contain demand. This time through, 201 00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 1: you're seeing a Federal Reserve take the exact opposite approach, 202 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:36,960 Speaker 1: which is, we want to expand demand. We need to 203 00:10:37,040 --> 00:10:40,480 Speaker 1: expand demand. We will do whatever it takes to amplify 204 00:10:40,559 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 1: whatever is done on Capital Hill. And they're even coming 205 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:47,440 Speaker 1: out and suggesting more fiscal policy is needed, which is 206 00:10:47,480 --> 00:10:50,720 Speaker 1: another major change in the in the dynamic, because the 207 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:54,880 Speaker 1: Fed recognizes the risk they run here is global deflation 208 00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:58,439 Speaker 1: being imported into the United States, and that's the situation 209 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:01,880 Speaker 1: they want to avoid, because once deflation gets here, it's 210 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:03,959 Speaker 1: very hard to get rid of. Nobody has been able 211 00:11:04,000 --> 00:11:06,400 Speaker 1: to get rid of it to date. Stephen, the fiscal 212 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:09,200 Speaker 1: stimulus we've gotten so far, there's been a question about 213 00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:12,040 Speaker 1: how quickly it's getting out to people. And I'm thinking 214 00:11:12,040 --> 00:11:16,559 Speaker 1: in part about the enhanced jobless benefits, and this really 215 00:11:16,600 --> 00:11:19,600 Speaker 1: comes into the numbers that we just saw the Continuing claims. 216 00:11:19,679 --> 00:11:22,280 Speaker 1: In focus is people try to gauge how many of 217 00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:25,440 Speaker 1: these unemployed people are actually receiving the money from the 218 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:27,960 Speaker 1: government that has been allocated to them. We saw a 219 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:31,280 Speaker 1: bigger than expected jump in the continuing claims now more 220 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:35,559 Speaker 1: than twenty five million people receiving those enhanced jobless benefits. 221 00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:39,040 Speaker 1: What does this mean to you about how quickly people 222 00:11:39,040 --> 00:11:42,079 Speaker 1: are getting the money versus how quickly people are getting 223 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:45,640 Speaker 1: their jobs back or not. As we see certain economies reopen. 224 00:11:46,360 --> 00:11:48,960 Speaker 1: You well, I think the problem here is going to be, 225 00:11:49,080 --> 00:11:51,560 Speaker 1: even though we can get the economy back to a 226 00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:56,199 Speaker 1: stronger growth trajectory much more quickly than I think some 227 00:11:56,240 --> 00:12:00,160 Speaker 1: people anticipate, the ability to get the labor market back 228 00:12:00,160 --> 00:12:02,280 Speaker 1: to where it was is something that is going to 229 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 1: be to take longer. Where it could take us a 230 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,600 Speaker 1: year to get back to zero on a year over 231 00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 1: year growth rate basis, so i e. The entire recovery 232 00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:15,120 Speaker 1: stretches out for over a year essentially this time in 233 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:18,480 Speaker 1: one you know, we may be looking at a labor 234 00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:23,080 Speaker 1: market that's struggling for several years, principally because you know 235 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 1: we have people will be looking to try to maximize 236 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:30,240 Speaker 1: their returns as much as possible, and the easiest way 237 00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:33,079 Speaker 1: to do that in an environment where demand picks up 238 00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:37,120 Speaker 1: is to create a situation where you control your expenses. 239 00:12:37,600 --> 00:12:40,480 Speaker 1: So therefore, the le labor market data is going to 240 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:44,360 Speaker 1: lag as it is done in every business cycle in history, 241 00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:46,160 Speaker 1: and this time it's going to be one of the 242 00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:51,840 Speaker 1: longer ones. The two major jobless recoveries were the post 243 00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:55,040 Speaker 1: recovery period um and then again the two thousand and 244 00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:57,760 Speaker 1: seven period where it took us years to get back 245 00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:00,480 Speaker 1: to where we needed to be in eventually those very 246 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:03,440 Speaker 1: low numbers that I was being talked about earlier on 247 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:05,599 Speaker 1: in the beginning of the segment. So I think this 248 00:13:05,720 --> 00:13:07,880 Speaker 1: is gonna be a long process where the economy could 249 00:13:07,920 --> 00:13:11,960 Speaker 1: get back to a more healthy environment within a year's time. 250 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:14,120 Speaker 1: I think it will take two years to get us 251 00:13:14,160 --> 00:13:17,640 Speaker 1: back to let's say, a seven percent unemployment rate, Steve, 252 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:19,960 Speaker 1: When you look at historical parallels for a moment like this, 253 00:13:20,040 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 1: how useful aren't they? There really is only one, and 254 00:13:24,400 --> 00:13:28,320 Speaker 1: even that's not a particularly good historical comparison. Uh, you 255 00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:31,760 Speaker 1: have to go back um to Jimmy Carter and his 256 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:35,680 Speaker 1: credit controls that he imposed on the economy back in 257 00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:40,160 Speaker 1: to ring out inflation in the economy. That caused the 258 00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:45,160 Speaker 1: underlying pace of economic activity dropped by ten um and 259 00:13:45,520 --> 00:13:48,560 Speaker 1: it caused a four percentage point up would jump in 260 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 1: the unemployment I should say, a two and a half 261 00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:53,800 Speaker 1: percent jump in the unemployment rate. So therefore nothing fully 262 00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:56,520 Speaker 1: compared to this. But that's the closest we can because again, 263 00:13:56,559 --> 00:14:00,280 Speaker 1: that was a government imposed tightening of credit on an 264 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:03,760 Speaker 1: economy which was much more heavily manufacturing than it is today, 265 00:14:04,040 --> 00:14:06,680 Speaker 1: and therefore it had a bigger bite on the economy 266 00:14:06,679 --> 00:14:09,680 Speaker 1: in the extistrict, and the pain was so so severe 267 00:14:10,120 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 1: that they were forced to abandon it almost immediately, which 268 00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 1: is why it's also is the shortest recession in America's history. 269 00:14:17,160 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 1: What's the partition, Steve Shooto, between big business and small business? 270 00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:26,480 Speaker 1: This is beginning to percolate about who's getting the benefits, 271 00:14:26,640 --> 00:14:30,840 Speaker 1: who's using the benefits, who's returning the benefits, who will 272 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:34,680 Speaker 1: get the next tron to benefit? Split America between big 273 00:14:34,680 --> 00:14:38,040 Speaker 1: business and small business. Yeah, and if you're gonna provide 274 00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 1: more stimulus, you have to give it the small business. 275 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:43,400 Speaker 1: The reason for it is big business has the ability 276 00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: to tap financial markets. And if you look at the 277 00:14:46,520 --> 00:14:52,880 Speaker 1: ability of the financial markets to provide financing two larger 278 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:55,680 Speaker 1: corporations that have access to these markets. You know, in 279 00:14:55,720 --> 00:14:57,360 Speaker 1: the first half of this year, we've done about a 280 00:14:57,400 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: trillion dollars worth of i G origination trillion dollars UH 281 00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 1: and a lot of it's been concentrated in the March 282 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:09,120 Speaker 1: April May period, no surprise there um. And therefore that's 283 00:15:09,240 --> 00:15:11,640 Speaker 1: reliquefied a lot of them and allowed them to take 284 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:14,400 Speaker 1: a lot of the short term liabilities they've accumulated by 285 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,520 Speaker 1: drawing down tow lines of credit. Term amount over longer 286 00:15:17,560 --> 00:15:20,800 Speaker 1: reduced the impact on their interest expense and reduced their 287 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 1: impact on the dependence on short term borrowing, put them 288 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: in a healthier financial position. It's small America that has 289 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:29,040 Speaker 1: to go to the banks, and it's small America that 290 00:15:29,280 --> 00:15:32,600 Speaker 1: is not being you know, adequately UH dealt with in 291 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:34,840 Speaker 1: this particular period of time. So I think the next 292 00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:37,760 Speaker 1: round of Stimus honestly has to continue to be focused 293 00:15:37,800 --> 00:15:41,000 Speaker 1: at small, smaller and mid sized companies and to be 294 00:15:41,040 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 1: focused at individuals, because individuals the end of the day, 295 00:15:44,240 --> 00:15:47,560 Speaker 1: we are consuming economy. Three quarters of the two thirds 296 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:50,760 Speaker 1: of the U S economy is consumer spending, and therefore 297 00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:54,320 Speaker 1: we need to make sure consumer spending picks up in 298 00:15:54,400 --> 00:15:56,920 Speaker 1: order to get this economy to pick up. So those 299 00:15:56,960 --> 00:15:59,160 Speaker 1: are the two areas where I think the next you know, 300 00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:02,320 Speaker 1: one trillion dollars should go to UH. And I think 301 00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 1: it will be at least a one trillion dollar bility, 302 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 1: maybe even more than that. I don't think it will 303 00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:09,640 Speaker 1: be the three trillion dollars Heroes Act that was advanced 304 00:16:09,640 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 1: by the House and Representative. But I think it would 305 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 1: be something along the lines of another trillion to trillion 306 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:15,960 Speaker 1: and a half, and I think all of that debt 307 00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 1: will be purchased by the Federal Reserve. Yeah, that's certainly 308 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 1: what we've been seeing, crowding out the private sector in 309 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: terms of the monetization of all of the debt and 310 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:29,360 Speaker 1: all of the deficit that the US is taking on. 311 00:16:29,880 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: I just I'm wondering what we can read into beyond 312 00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:36,360 Speaker 1: the claims Stephen, with respect to delinquencies that we're seeing 313 00:16:36,400 --> 00:16:41,360 Speaker 1: increasing with residential mortgages. We've seen it with credit card loans, 314 00:16:41,440 --> 00:16:44,680 Speaker 1: We've seen it with auto loans, and they've only continued 315 00:16:44,760 --> 00:16:48,600 Speaker 1: to increase the delinquencies and defaults at an accelerating pace. 316 00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: At what point will we see this peek out? In 317 00:16:51,760 --> 00:16:55,160 Speaker 1: your opinion, Well, to be honest, with the delinquency process, 318 00:16:55,440 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 1: um is a lagged process. So again, if you were 319 00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:00,920 Speaker 1: to get the economy back act to zero on a 320 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:04,840 Speaker 1: year over year basis by the second quarter of it 321 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,399 Speaker 1: probably wouldn't be until the third or fourth quarter of 322 00:17:08,560 --> 00:17:10,160 Speaker 1: that you would get to be at a point where 323 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:12,680 Speaker 1: you'll be glean to be very comfortable that the delinquency 324 00:17:12,800 --> 00:17:16,200 Speaker 1: rates are rolling over. Steve shad Mansour great a catch 325 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:21,920 Speaker 1: out with the set. This is the most important conversation 326 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:24,480 Speaker 1: of the day for so many of us. The whiplash 327 00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:27,240 Speaker 1: of volatility, the up to eighty on the VIX, where 328 00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:29,760 Speaker 1: we are now twenty eight, still a way above VIX 329 00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:34,240 Speaker 1: normal of twenty. It has been a shocking, shocking twelve months. 330 00:17:34,280 --> 00:17:37,640 Speaker 1: Stephen off the scene, all this before with Federated Herme's 331 00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:40,919 Speaker 1: running their equity operation. We're thrilled he could speak to 332 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:44,560 Speaker 1: us on blue chip in investment. Steve, what did you 333 00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:46,600 Speaker 1: do in the middle of March? I mean, I mean 334 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 1: you know you're you're doing this for long term. Your 335 00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:51,560 Speaker 1: idea of short term is three years or five years. 336 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:53,920 Speaker 1: What were you doing in the middle of March? Besides 337 00:17:53,920 --> 00:17:57,840 Speaker 1: looking at it Pittsburgh Pirates spring training most I was 338 00:17:57,840 --> 00:18:01,840 Speaker 1: watching Pittsburgh Spired string train anything. I uh, you know, 339 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:05,760 Speaker 1: our view was in those kinds of down dress Tom. 340 00:18:05,800 --> 00:18:08,200 Speaker 1: You know, my experience tells me you just gotta hold 341 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:11,520 Speaker 1: your fire. Now. We we went into the thing frankly 342 00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:15,760 Speaker 1: too optimistic, but we were, you know, basing our view 343 00:18:15,800 --> 00:18:19,120 Speaker 1: on the idea that the market was probably heading significantly higher. 344 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:21,200 Speaker 1: A lot of drivers of this bull market I've talked 345 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: about on your show, and then the Corona thing hit 346 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:27,720 Speaker 1: and it just came out part very very quickly. Um, 347 00:18:27,840 --> 00:18:30,760 Speaker 1: we were playing the chess game, and um, you know, 348 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:32,640 Speaker 1: I learned a long time ago, I'm not the smartest 349 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:34,920 Speaker 1: guy in this chessboard. And that's what I think. At 350 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:37,200 Speaker 1: the bears in trouble, they start to think they're smart 351 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:40,199 Speaker 1: than everybody else, and I'm looking at the same thing 352 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,080 Speaker 1: everyone else is looking at, and I'm thinking, well, the 353 00:18:42,119 --> 00:18:45,719 Speaker 1: Fed's got to do something here. So we were advising 354 00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:49,800 Speaker 1: our clients hold your ground, hang on your equity overweights. 355 00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:54,080 Speaker 1: There will be a reaction here. And so we've held 356 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,400 Speaker 1: our ground, and um, you know, we think we're still 357 00:18:57,440 --> 00:18:59,640 Speaker 1: in an up trend, you know, but what I would 358 00:18:59,680 --> 00:19:02,040 Speaker 1: call like kind of short term beer market within that, 359 00:19:03,080 --> 00:19:06,520 Speaker 1: and most importantly, Tom, what we have been focusing on 360 00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:10,240 Speaker 1: is stock picking, because I figured we can't really get 361 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:12,400 Speaker 1: this market one way or the other, but we can 362 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:14,760 Speaker 1: figure out which of the stocks are gonna win and lose. 363 00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 1: So down at the lows, everything was getting closed. It 364 00:19:18,960 --> 00:19:21,080 Speaker 1: didn't matter whether you were a winner or a loser 365 00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:25,159 Speaker 1: or something between. And that's where the real opportunity was 366 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:29,640 Speaker 1: there was just get by these winners. We know they're 367 00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:33,359 Speaker 1: going to actually do well in this environment. In fact, 368 00:19:33,960 --> 00:19:36,440 Speaker 1: in fact, many of them are actually growing their cash 369 00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 1: flow in the Corona lockdown, and in a way, the 370 00:19:41,400 --> 00:19:44,160 Speaker 1: easy part of the game now it's getting. But Paul, 371 00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:47,600 Speaker 1: what's so important about what Mr Ross says here is 372 00:19:47,800 --> 00:19:51,320 Speaker 1: it's all easy to say, I got to identify the winners. 373 00:19:51,359 --> 00:19:55,920 Speaker 1: But in that exercise you try to avoid the losers. 374 00:19:56,680 --> 00:19:59,240 Speaker 1: I think that's even more important than finding the next 375 00:19:59,320 --> 00:20:04,399 Speaker 1: Amazon exactly. Yeah, Steve, you know you mentioned it's a 376 00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:07,480 Speaker 1: game about, you know, if you can just avoid the losers, 377 00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:11,560 Speaker 1: the blow ups in your portfolio. So so, Steve, what 378 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:14,040 Speaker 1: are some of the sectors here? We again, we retraced 379 00:20:14,119 --> 00:20:17,240 Speaker 1: kind of half of that decline we saw decline peaked, 380 00:20:17,280 --> 00:20:19,359 Speaker 1: the tropic retraced, you know, maybe a little bit more 381 00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:21,720 Speaker 1: than half of that. What are some of the sectors 382 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:24,240 Speaker 1: here as you look out to maybe the other side 383 00:20:24,240 --> 00:20:27,920 Speaker 1: of this pandemic that it got your attention right here? Well, well, 384 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 1: first of all, I just want to take exception to 385 00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:31,480 Speaker 1: that that this is one of the issues people say, 386 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:34,000 Speaker 1: we've only three traced half to decline, if you look 387 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:36,520 Speaker 1: at what I call the survivors, which these companies are 388 00:20:36,520 --> 00:20:40,520 Speaker 1: gonna make it through but need the economy to be alive. 389 00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:46,800 Speaker 1: They've retested their March twenty three lows. It's only the winners, 390 00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:49,640 Speaker 1: and the winners aren't going to retest March twenty three, 391 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:52,840 Speaker 1: and so the average of the market looks like it's 392 00:20:52,840 --> 00:20:57,080 Speaker 1: only retraced half the well off low. It's the place 393 00:20:57,160 --> 00:20:59,800 Speaker 1: half decline or in the other end, hasn't gone back 394 00:20:59,800 --> 00:21:05,120 Speaker 1: to those lows. But actually the stocks that matter have uh. 395 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,600 Speaker 1: In terms of sectors, we continue to think the digitization 396 00:21:08,600 --> 00:21:12,560 Speaker 1: of the economy is a big theme. It's accelerating as 397 00:21:12,560 --> 00:21:15,280 Speaker 1: a result of this. So therefore we like tech, but 398 00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:19,680 Speaker 1: more importantly, we like companies that are utilizing that now 399 00:21:19,720 --> 00:21:23,520 Speaker 1: in the broader economy. So it goes across sectors where 400 00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:27,600 Speaker 1: we're finding companies, particularly in small cap land, that are 401 00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:32,480 Speaker 1: taking advantage of technology to take share of the example, 402 00:21:32,560 --> 00:21:37,040 Speaker 1: tele Adoc right in the healthcare space is using technology 403 00:21:37,119 --> 00:21:41,359 Speaker 1: to deliver healthcare services online. Right that's a big growing 404 00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:46,600 Speaker 1: business right now. Um, we're looking at u Pharma because 405 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:50,560 Speaker 1: we think that's another that's been a trend biotech. It's 406 00:21:50,600 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 1: accelerating now. Obviously we're even looking at this manufacturing renaissance 407 00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:58,439 Speaker 1: theme because we have a lot of companies that we 408 00:21:58,520 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 1: think are gonna okay. Right now, they look pretty beaten up. 409 00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:05,600 Speaker 1: But if this economy does come back as we expect 410 00:22:05,680 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 1: it will, and ship fits and starts, they're going to 411 00:22:09,400 --> 00:22:12,919 Speaker 1: be taking share as supply chains come back in from China. 412 00:22:13,200 --> 00:22:15,760 Speaker 1: You know, that's what's going to happen the next five years. 413 00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:18,920 Speaker 1: I don't think it matters who's the president. We do 414 00:22:19,080 --> 00:22:21,520 Speaker 1: we think? Do we think Steve about you know some 415 00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:23,480 Speaker 1: of the sectors that have just been really crushed. I'm 416 00:22:23,480 --> 00:22:26,200 Speaker 1: thinking about energy. For example, we're seeing oil come back 417 00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:30,680 Speaker 1: here um off of this historic lows uh in pricing, 418 00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:35,080 Speaker 1: negative pricing. Um. What do you think about the energy patch? Well, 419 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 1: we're not heavy there yet, we're sniffing around. I think 420 00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:42,159 Speaker 1: on the energy patch, the way I would play it 421 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 1: is to go with the real, big integrated names. They're 422 00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:50,679 Speaker 1: usually the boring stocks, but they actually are the beneficiaries. 423 00:22:50,880 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 1: You know, they've got the balance sheets and they're the 424 00:22:53,560 --> 00:22:57,720 Speaker 1: beneficiaries of the shakeout that's now happening as all these 425 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:01,399 Speaker 1: wildcatters in Texas finally find out and this is why 426 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:05,000 Speaker 1: the I think spots rowling is like the wildcatters are 427 00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:09,600 Speaker 1: finding out none of the uh the depots will take 428 00:23:09,680 --> 00:23:12,720 Speaker 1: their their supply, you know, and so they are being 429 00:23:12,760 --> 00:23:15,760 Speaker 1: forced to shut in. And a lot of those wells 430 00:23:15,840 --> 00:23:19,359 Speaker 1: can't come back up once they're shut in. So it's 431 00:23:19,400 --> 00:23:23,280 Speaker 1: the big players that have access to storage and have 432 00:23:23,440 --> 00:23:26,720 Speaker 1: balance sheets to get through this. They're going to benefit 433 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:30,480 Speaker 1: from the inevitable rebound in energy prices. It's going to 434 00:23:30,560 --> 00:23:32,800 Speaker 1: happen over the next three years. There's been no investment 435 00:23:32,920 --> 00:23:37,000 Speaker 1: in new capacity and a lot of the existing is 436 00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:40,160 Speaker 1: being shut in and if the economy comes back. I'm 437 00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:43,720 Speaker 1: not a screaming buy on these names, but I um, 438 00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 1: you can at least collect the dividend pretty safely here. 439 00:23:48,040 --> 00:23:50,199 Speaker 1: I think in the energy space I would play it 440 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:53,680 Speaker 1: more defensively, is what I'm saying. Stephen Off driving the 441 00:23:53,720 --> 00:23:56,879 Speaker 1: market higher here with Federated Army's right now read on 442 00:23:56,920 --> 00:23:59,040 Speaker 1: the screens to the morning Well Green right now, deal 443 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:02,760 Speaker 1: up points SMP for actually higher. Let me give you 444 00:24:02,760 --> 00:24:08,120 Speaker 1: those levels two nine seven to on standards six zero, 445 00:24:08,280 --> 00:24:15,399 Speaker 1: six thousand, six hundred on the data VIX under eight seven. Steve, 446 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:17,880 Speaker 1: I hate to mention this Paul twice, but I got 447 00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:20,040 Speaker 1: to do it in one show. It's just a rare thing. 448 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:23,359 Speaker 1: Robert Schiffman in the team over at Bloomberg Intelligence writing 449 00:24:23,440 --> 00:24:28,560 Speaker 1: up a credit report on one of the small technology 450 00:24:28,640 --> 00:24:33,240 Speaker 1: stocks called Microsoft. What would you like, Steve both, for 451 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:37,520 Speaker 1: those tech giants to do with all that cash? I mean, 452 00:24:37,560 --> 00:24:41,119 Speaker 1: what's do they have an obligation to do something with it? 453 00:24:41,240 --> 00:24:44,480 Speaker 1: Or is a is a conservative buttondown guy like you 454 00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:48,639 Speaker 1: comfortable that they got a jillion dollars on their balance sheet. 455 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:52,879 Speaker 1: I like the fact that they got the flexibility. Tom Um. 456 00:24:52,920 --> 00:24:55,840 Speaker 1: You know, as the market cap expands, it has not 457 00:24:55,960 --> 00:25:01,240 Speaker 1: become you know, excessive. They'll do maybe some acquisitions as 458 00:25:01,320 --> 00:25:05,480 Speaker 1: Microsoft and Google have in the areas that can expand 459 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:09,400 Speaker 1: their footprint even further. It is in that space, as 460 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:13,760 Speaker 1: you know, rich get richer environment, and that's one of 461 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:15,480 Speaker 1: the reasons a lot of the large cabin names are 462 00:25:15,480 --> 00:25:17,960 Speaker 1: doing well. But it's and even the niche small cab 463 00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:24,160 Speaker 1: names that have niche capabilities that are growing in this environment. Um, 464 00:25:24,280 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 1: that's gonna be one of the games here. I guess 465 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:28,320 Speaker 1: in the next two or three years, you're going to 466 00:25:28,400 --> 00:25:32,720 Speaker 1: see further consolidation and that's the case even in some 467 00:25:32,800 --> 00:25:38,680 Speaker 1: of these sectors we didn't talk about retail, restaurant, chains, hotels. 468 00:25:39,040 --> 00:25:44,280 Speaker 1: There's gonna be a consolidation of the winning players, and 469 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:47,200 Speaker 1: you're gonna have capacity come out of the system that 470 00:25:47,320 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 1: was already suffering going into this thing. And this is 471 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:55,600 Speaker 1: just this is just accelerating that process. Now. It's violent 472 00:25:55,840 --> 00:25:58,320 Speaker 1: what's going on. And that's the reason why you can't 473 00:25:58,320 --> 00:26:01,840 Speaker 1: be overly bullish about the economy because the creative destruction 474 00:26:01,880 --> 00:26:03,680 Speaker 1: process is going to be a little bit of a 475 00:26:03,760 --> 00:26:07,359 Speaker 1: drag here, I think in the next twelve, d eighteen months, 476 00:26:07,440 --> 00:26:10,040 Speaker 1: But if you're in the right stocks, I think you 477 00:26:10,080 --> 00:26:13,440 Speaker 1: can still do very well. See how much are that 478 00:26:13,680 --> 00:26:18,080 Speaker 1: Does a market really need another round of fiscal stimulus? 479 00:26:18,160 --> 00:26:20,600 Speaker 1: The first several rounds we got out of Washington were 480 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:23,320 Speaker 1: generally bipartisan, generally out the door pretty quickly. But it 481 00:26:23,359 --> 00:26:26,000 Speaker 1: looks like this next round, whether it's the three trillion 482 00:26:26,040 --> 00:26:28,919 Speaker 1: that the House is proposing, not going to be so easy. 483 00:26:28,960 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 1: How much does the market really need another round of 484 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:34,199 Speaker 1: fiscal stimulus? I don't think it's tom you know, a 485 00:26:34,240 --> 00:26:38,679 Speaker 1: pool rather um. What I kept saying during the crisis 486 00:26:38,840 --> 00:26:40,840 Speaker 1: was this is not a stimulus as the way we 487 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:44,480 Speaker 1: normally think about it, it's basically a bridge loan. The 488 00:26:44,480 --> 00:26:46,880 Speaker 1: economy is healthy, we need a bridge loan to get 489 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:49,639 Speaker 1: us through this liquidity crisis. So I think that's what 490 00:26:49,760 --> 00:26:53,880 Speaker 1: the first round should be characterized. It was a bridge loan. Now, 491 00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:56,359 Speaker 1: whether we use stimulus or not, it depends on how 492 00:26:56,440 --> 00:26:59,320 Speaker 1: well the bridge alone worked and how much creative destruction 493 00:26:59,440 --> 00:27:01,960 Speaker 1: is now going going to happen. But I think the 494 00:27:02,040 --> 00:27:06,400 Speaker 1: first rand of stimulus is now happening, which is we've 495 00:27:06,440 --> 00:27:09,679 Speaker 1: got all this cash piling up. The savings rate is 496 00:27:09,720 --> 00:27:13,960 Speaker 1: through the roof the so called unemployed, most of them 497 00:27:14,200 --> 00:27:18,160 Speaker 1: have been getting cash from the government. The businesses are 498 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:21,280 Speaker 1: are are pretty liquid. We're going to see how much 499 00:27:21,320 --> 00:27:23,919 Speaker 1: of this spending gets unleashed now. And I think that 500 00:27:24,080 --> 00:27:26,760 Speaker 1: itself is going to be a stimulus. And if we 501 00:27:26,840 --> 00:27:30,280 Speaker 1: get progress, continued progress on the healthcare side with things 502 00:27:30,359 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 1: like Maderna and the vaccine side, that's a stimulus psychologically 503 00:27:36,040 --> 00:27:39,679 Speaker 1: to consumers who need a reason to spend their cash. 504 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:42,480 Speaker 1: And so let's see how that goes over the summer. 505 00:27:42,920 --> 00:27:45,760 Speaker 1: And I think this is one reason why there isn't 506 00:27:45,760 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 1: a bipartisan support here. It's not as odd that we 507 00:27:48,640 --> 00:27:52,000 Speaker 1: need another big ranch of spending. Steve that's too much 508 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:57,200 Speaker 1: optimism go away. That was federated is really greatly appreciated. 509 00:27:57,160 --> 00:28:04,480 Speaker 1: A ten of it is important that we chronicle this pandemic. 510 00:28:04,560 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 1: And we're just so proud of our staff that has 511 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:10,480 Speaker 1: given us experts around the world. Jason Farley has what 512 00:28:10,560 --> 00:28:13,600 Speaker 1: appears to be a quiet job but extremely important at 513 00:28:13,600 --> 00:28:17,879 Speaker 1: the Johns Hopkins University where he drives forward their academic 514 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:22,040 Speaker 1: acuity and nursing. We spoke to Dr Farley today and 515 00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:24,440 Speaker 1: has talked about all those lights at the end of 516 00:28:24,480 --> 00:28:29,280 Speaker 1: the American pandemic tunnel, many glimmers of hope, and I 517 00:28:29,359 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 1: just want the audience to know that we do see 518 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:36,679 Speaker 1: hope on the horizon. The appearance of a calming of 519 00:28:36,680 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 1: the virus in certain locales and in Baltimore I am, 520 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:43,440 Speaker 1: and in many other locations is happening. We're seeing a 521 00:28:43,440 --> 00:28:46,040 Speaker 1: flattening of the curve. But by no means do that 522 00:28:46,120 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 1: mean we can roll back our our active participation in 523 00:28:50,480 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 1: the social distancing measures when we're out about about our 524 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:55,520 Speaker 1: life and I look at you know, rolling back to 525 00:28:55,640 --> 00:29:00,800 Speaker 1: social participation. The fact is we see social part anticipation. 526 00:29:01,240 --> 00:29:04,160 Speaker 1: Can we get away with this with the distances between 527 00:29:04,240 --> 00:29:07,760 Speaker 1: us six ft twelve feet whatever that number is, or 528 00:29:07,760 --> 00:29:10,640 Speaker 1: do we just really have to stay locked down? There's 529 00:29:10,680 --> 00:29:14,280 Speaker 1: a huge pushback. Yeah. No, you know, I think that 530 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:21,000 Speaker 1: the population is exhibiting the exact same disillusionment we we anticipate, 531 00:29:21,320 --> 00:29:23,480 Speaker 1: you know, in the beginning of any kind of pandemic. 532 00:29:23,520 --> 00:29:25,720 Speaker 1: You know, there's great science around this. We see this 533 00:29:26,160 --> 00:29:30,480 Speaker 1: heroic effort of the population to come together into to persevere, 534 00:29:31,040 --> 00:29:33,880 Speaker 1: and then that over time really gives way to this 535 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:36,640 Speaker 1: level of disillusionment where people begin to push back in 536 00:29:36,680 --> 00:29:39,920 Speaker 1: this feeling of you know, this desire to interact socially, 537 00:29:39,960 --> 00:29:42,040 Speaker 1: and we have the in the US, the Memorial Day 538 00:29:42,040 --> 00:29:45,240 Speaker 1: holidays coming up. I would just caution, you know, think 539 00:29:45,360 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 1: and plan accordingly. If you're getting together with others, you 540 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:53,320 Speaker 1: have to set strategies so that you can maintain social distancing. 541 00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:55,560 Speaker 1: By no means that if the time to bring the 542 00:29:55,680 --> 00:29:58,920 Speaker 1: entire family together at the barbecue. There's tons of data 543 00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:04,200 Speaker 1: from the CDC about family related household related when multiple 544 00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:07,840 Speaker 1: different members of different households are coming together and the 545 00:30:07,920 --> 00:30:13,240 Speaker 1: subsequent infections that ensue. There's also data about transmissions in 546 00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:17,800 Speaker 1: churches who have kind of exceeded their capacity. So again, 547 00:30:17,960 --> 00:30:22,160 Speaker 1: what the large gatherings. It's really important, Jason, and talk 548 00:30:22,200 --> 00:30:25,440 Speaker 1: to me a bit about what medicine actually work in 549 00:30:25,520 --> 00:30:30,240 Speaker 1: treating COVID nineteen. Well, in the treatment of COVID nineteen UM, 550 00:30:30,320 --> 00:30:32,760 Speaker 1: we still have, you know, the glimmer of hope reducing 551 00:30:33,040 --> 00:30:37,440 Speaker 1: hospitalization with pridensvere. Although that study did not show statistical 552 00:30:37,480 --> 00:30:42,480 Speaker 1: benefits related to its um mortality of with the drug, 553 00:30:42,640 --> 00:30:45,880 Speaker 1: there was a statistical benefit of reducing the symptom burden 554 00:30:46,080 --> 00:30:49,560 Speaker 1: and the length of symptoms and hospitalization. UM. We also 555 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:53,280 Speaker 1: have great news on the front of initial preliminary results 556 00:30:53,360 --> 00:30:57,280 Speaker 1: in recent attacks or monkeys as well as some guinea 557 00:30:57,320 --> 00:31:02,000 Speaker 1: pig models showing initial um ability of the vaccines of 558 00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:06,960 Speaker 1: the several vaccines in evaluation to produce a great antivirus response. 559 00:31:07,320 --> 00:31:09,720 Speaker 1: Now there's a long journey between the animal model and 560 00:31:09,760 --> 00:31:12,480 Speaker 1: the humans, but we do have at least some glimmers 561 00:31:12,520 --> 00:31:15,800 Speaker 1: of hope that those viruses UM that those vaccines are 562 00:31:15,840 --> 00:31:18,640 Speaker 1: helping having an impact on the virus. So all good 563 00:31:18,680 --> 00:31:23,200 Speaker 1: news is the virus mutating, No, I think UM, it's 564 00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:27,000 Speaker 1: a relatively stable virus. But we always see because viruses 565 00:31:27,600 --> 00:31:33,080 Speaker 1: replicate themselves billions and billions of copies per day. Um 566 00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:35,720 Speaker 1: that we always see a little bit of a drift 567 00:31:35,760 --> 00:31:38,760 Speaker 1: in the virus structure, so slow model changes in the 568 00:31:38,760 --> 00:31:41,040 Speaker 1: structure so that we can say that if I gave 569 00:31:41,080 --> 00:31:43,200 Speaker 1: the virus to persons BE, and they gave it to 570 00:31:43,280 --> 00:31:45,200 Speaker 1: person SEE, and then they gave it to person D. 571 00:31:45,600 --> 00:31:49,560 Speaker 1: Between A and D, we will see small changes. Those 572 00:31:49,680 --> 00:31:53,400 Speaker 1: changes aren't mutation. Their mutations in their growth that since 573 00:31:53,440 --> 00:31:55,920 Speaker 1: the word, but they're not mutations that mean that it 574 00:31:56,120 --> 00:32:00,880 Speaker 1: changes it pathogeniquity typically or changes it it's virulens or 575 00:32:00,920 --> 00:32:04,080 Speaker 1: the way in which it kills or you know, causes infection. 576 00:32:04,960 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 1: Jason Farley, the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing. Thanks 577 00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:13,640 Speaker 1: for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen 578 00:32:13,880 --> 00:32:19,200 Speaker 1: to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform 579 00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:23,600 Speaker 1: you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane Before the podcast, 580 00:32:23,680 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 1: you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio