WEBVTT - Unraveling the Mythic

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stop

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert lamp and I'm Christian Seger. Here

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>on Stuff to Blow your Mind. We talk about myths

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from lottop on mythology either, you know, sometimes it's directly

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>tied into a topic. Sometimes it's just kind of the

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>icing on the cake, you know. Yeah, you'll hear us

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>often refer to mythos a lot, like in the background,

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>especially like if we bring up topics like I don't know,

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>pop culture, uh HP, Lovecraft type stuff that we we

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>talked about often. So we're applying both myth as like

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the large general sense of the term, and then mythos

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>as like these sort of like fictional shared universes with

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>histories to them. Right. Yeah, So it's it's something we're

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>always talking about. So it seemed fitting to do an

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>episode where we say, hey, let's talk just a little

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>bit about mythology now, would Don't worry, We're not gonna

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>attempt to do a like complete overall of world myth cycles.

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>What we're hoping to do here is to, uh it,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to provide you some of the basic tools to to

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>roll through some of the different ways that we look

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at myth, the different ways that we dissect myth and

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>understand what they mean to us and what the power

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of myth really is. Yeah, this is like very much

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like a bare bones intro. And I imagine that if

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there are people out there who have done any kind

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of cultural or anthropological studies of myth before, you're gonna say, oh,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>but what about this detailer, what about this thing that

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you missed? And you know, there was only so much

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that we could fit into a one hour episode, right,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And likewise, when it comes to examples, we're gonna We're

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna not We're probably not gonna use a lot of

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>examples in here, but we are going to end up

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>using some of the basic Greek examples that most of

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>our listeners are gonna be familiar with. This is not,

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in a by any means intended to slight any of

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the fascinating cultures out there, but we're probably going to

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>draw cards from the deck that most people familiar with,

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and probably some cards from the decks that we've you know,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>built ourselves out of things that interest us. Yeah, in particular,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like I should probably just state this upfront, like I

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to the show before, you know that

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a comic book nerd. You know that I like

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>superheroes and have done research on superheroes in the past.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>In particular, like the research I did when I was

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>at a university was about mythology, rhetoric, and Captain America ironically,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>because that Captain American movie just came out. Um, And

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I have a lot of like superhero type

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>examples or pop culture examples that will probably come to

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mind as we're talking about this, but also I'm gonna

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>try to stay on target. Yeah. Likewise, I've been reading

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Chinese mythology recently, and so some of

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my examples are going to draw from that, just because

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it's fresh on my mind. But all of it is

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be intended to to to provide you with

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the tools to to go through these different ways of

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at myth and uh and you know, provide something

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that that the listeners of the show can't take with

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>them as we explore other mythologies, even as a tangent

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future. So I have a challenge for us

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and a challenge for you the listener as well as

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we proceed, Um. Let's also consider, right, this is a

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>science podcast, and as we've been we've been, we've been

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of inching our way towards this over the last

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>i don't know, two or three months with episodes like

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we Could Problems and cargo cult science and things like that.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's consider is it possible that some form of

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>science is used today as mythology for our present culture?

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Because I think that's something that there might be something there. Uh,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and if so, how is it? And then just for funzies,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>who are our scientific deities? Uh? You know, Robert and

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I have joked many times before on the show about

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>how like we're putting together was slowly putting together a

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic Avengers of all these psychedelic scientists that we talked

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about on the show. But in general, like I feel

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like there are some scientists when you refer to them,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they're referred to with the reverence that people used to

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>refer to Zeus or thor with. Right, It's like Carl

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Sagan can do no wrong or Einstein. You know, well,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they these are legendary individuals and science. And we'll get

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>into the connections between myth and legend here. As we

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>roll all right, So we'll keep that in mind, but

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>let's hit it all right. So let's start with the basics.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Just the word mythology. What does it, What does it

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>come from? Well, myth an ology, myth and logos myth

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>being the proto Indo European root move is involved. Here

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>is then to murmur and from this we get the

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Greek mythos, meaning word or story. So this is gonna

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be very important because as we go through this, you're

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>going to see that you know, and and this sounds

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like a no type thing, but there's an inherent connection

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>between myth, mythology and human language and how that defines

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>both culture and how we understand the world. Right, So

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of course it would be named after murmuring and words.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>All right. So that's the word mythology. And certainly I

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think when most when when a lot of us here

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the word mythology, the first thing that enters your mind

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is maybe just a you know, a quick glance at

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the Greek pantheon. Yeah, I think I like a clash

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Titans. Yeah, like old old gods, stories that

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>have a very human aspect to them. Um. And it's

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that it makes it difficult then

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about myth in other areas such as like,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for instance, been talking about Christianity to talk about myth.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>People here you say myth and they take it as

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>an insult because they think, oh, myth is a thing

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not true and that is just mildly amusing in

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>big budget sandals movies exactly exactly, And that's something I

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think we should try to dispel today too, is like

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that myth is is larger than just these ideas we

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>think of them today as being fictionalized stories, right, But

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Greeks and the Romans that worshiped those gods,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they were just as real to them as uh Einstein

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and Carl Sagan are to us. Yeah, and it in

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>mythology as well. Discuss here is a powerful force. And

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>even though you might you might think of Greek gods

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and whatever is just you know, mirror window dressing is

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>just something that's just aesthetically pleasing. We are all living

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in the shadows of mythology. And yet at the same time,

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the human experience cast the shadow of mythology. So keep

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it very nice to keep that word shadow in mind

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>for when we get the good old Carl Young, Oh, yes,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, So under this heading, though, is there anything

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that we can agree upon this kind of universally considered. Yeah,

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what a myth is, generally speaking about. The only

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thing we can everyone agrees on is that mythologies are stories,

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>their narratives. There's a lot of disagreement on whether those

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>narratives are inherently sacred, you know, which is to say

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they involve gods in the supernatural. Can you have a

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>myth that doesn't involve a god or god like being? Well,

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's an issue of discussion and another thing to consider here.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>This is from just the basic definition in the Salem

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Press encyclopedia is that myths are stories, beliefs, fables, legends,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever you wanna call them. We're gonna sort of slice

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that pie up a little bit later. But they reflect

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the culture of the people who write and listen to them,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>right So, and what they're often trying to do is

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>provide explanations for how the world works. Ironic, because we

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.119
<v Speaker 1>are working for How Stuff Works this is How Stuff

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Works podcast. So, uh, you know, while we provide explanations

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for how stuff works, uh, the old way of doing

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so was to say, well, the reason why that lightning

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>struck that tree over there was because Zeus was angry, right,

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>something like along those lines. Uh. So, for example, it

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was natural phenomena that human beings didn't quite understand yet,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and so they told stories of heroes that were up

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>against good and evil steaks to explain those things. So

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they explain our place in the world, or at least

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they try to write to us. It's it's that old

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like sort of very meta thing of like the stories

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are us looking at ourselves Like fiction mythology is just

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like uh, us creating an eyeball that's looking right back

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at ourselves and then trying to explain ourselves to us,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which is is a weird thing to think about. Um,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's everything from creation myths like well, how the

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>world start? How? How why am I here? Who rules

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the world? What's the afterlife? Like? Like? All of that

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff stems from mythology, and there's so many shared similar themes.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see that throughout all the things we talked

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about today, from virgin births to great floods. Uh, they're

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>constantly being reinvented and passed down. And I would argue

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>even into today's you know, a huge popular culture epics

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>of whether it's your superhero movies or your Lord of

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rings or Star Wars or whatever, we see these

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>played out in similar ways. They're uh anthropolo just in

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>cultural critics have been trying to trace these connections for centuries,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to talk about some some like key

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>points I would say in the last what like two

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred years of mythological study. But it's complicated, uh, and

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody has like a singular answer, so I kind of

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>want to dispel that right away, Like there's no this

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is how it is right there. There are certainly interpretations

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that are more popular. For instance, the etiological explanation that

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, the idea that myths are about explaining

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>what the world is and how the world works, like

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that is one that a lot of views say, Yeah,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that that is one of the powers of myth, that's

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons for myth. But there are a

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>number of different ways to look at it, and a

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>number of these different ways to look at them are

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>tied to specific um uh, specific areas of study, specific

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>academic approaches. Yeah, and like it's easy to trace that

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>back to like very simple things that we feel like

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a grasp on now, like the changing of

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the seasons or something like that, right, but at the

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>time it was explained through mythology. Al Right, Before we

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>roll into some of the views on mythology, let's take

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes just to talk about the formal features

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of prose narrative as they relate to myth, legend, and folklore,

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>because these are three terms that are often used interchangeably,

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but they really kind of refer to different things. Um. Yeah,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think to like, uh, we should point out

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that the distinctions that we're about to give come from

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a book on Chinese mythology by is it in Barrel?

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe so. Yes, Yeah, it's a book I've picked

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>up recently, and in addition to being just a great

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>exploration of Chinese mythology, it has a wonderful some wonderful

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>introductory material that summarizes some some key stuff about mythology. Yeah,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is great stuff, but it's also like, I

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>think that we should also question some of the definitions

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>too as we go. Yeah, I mean that's the that's

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing when you like something to keep in mind

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with any any of this one we're talking about mythology,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like mythology is almost a It exists outside of our

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>attempts to neatly categorize it. And so there's a and

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing too many classifications at it. But but I I

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to like this idea of just sort of breaking

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it up so it's nice myth, legend, and folk tale.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a table in this book, um that that

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>lays it out in terms of like, what's the conventional opening?

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell this story after dark? Is this scene

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as a factor of fiction? What's the setting, like the

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>attitude the principal character. So I'm not gonna roll through

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole list, but for instance, in a myth, you're

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you're generally talking about a non human character. A legend

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be more of a human character, and

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>then a folk tale can be either one. Um, A

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>myth definitely has a sacred feel to it, you know

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that the gods, superhumans, godlike entities. Legend can be either

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sacred or secular, and then a folk tale tends to

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be secular in terms of setting. Uh, myth and legend

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are just sometime in some place where folk tales are timeless. Uh,

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>as far as belief goes, myth and legend are essentially facts,

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of a that's a problematic term, but well, yeah,

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>let's address that in a second. You go, Yeah, but

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the myth and the legend as it is told it

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is real in some way, shape or form, whereas the

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>folk tale is just pure fiction, like nobody is actually believing,

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the Boogeyman, nobody thinks Johnny Appleseed I

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>actually walked all across actually with apple seeds. Yeah. So,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>so these are just some of the ideas to keep

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in mind to flesh this out a little bit. Let's

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>roll through some examples. First of just straight up myths.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think the the Greek examples that come to

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>mind most easily, probably you know, stuff having to do

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with the origin of the universe though, the fall of

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Titans, the rise of the gods, that sort of thing. Yeah,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that's like the go to I think most of us. Uh.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting, I wonder why that's the one like

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>mythological pantheon that, especially in Western culture we still like

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really gravitate too. But I loved reading stories about that

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and Norris mythology to a certain extent when I was

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>a kid. Well, those tales have been They've been told

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and retold so many times as part of Western literature

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that that they're that they've just been carried and held

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on a pedestal this whole time. One of the interesting

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>things about looking at Chinese mythology is that you don't

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>see that case. There's not there's not a homer that

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is that is retelling these things necessarily, So you have

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we have less of our tradition of the mythology being

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>upheld by the scholars throughout the ages um. In the

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian world you have Adam and Eve, the whole you know,

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Garden of Eden, that the origins of Man, the Origins

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of sin Um certainly classifies as as mythology um elsewhere

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.479
<v Speaker 1>in the world Um. Chinese mythology, for instance, there's an

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>archer by the name of Ye and shoots down the

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>extra nine sons in the sky, so that the world's

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not we don't need so many sons. So this is

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a good segue into me talking about superheroes for a second,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>because you just wrote a fantastic piece on Chinese mythology

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:15.359
<v Speaker 1>connecting to the world of superheroes. Uh, and in particular

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you wrote about a recent d C comics uh team

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>called the Great Ten that we're based on Chinese mythology.

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So listeners, I highly recommend, uh you go and find

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that piece. It's on now dot how Stuff Works dot com, right, yeah, uh,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and and go take a read because Robert does a

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>great job with that. But I will segue from that

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from Chinese myth into superheroes and into Western superheroes. I

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>will make the argument throughout this episode that, especially like

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>our big budget uh d C comics, Marvel comics, superheroes

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>are archetypes for myth in the same way as like

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Greek gods were, right, so real quick, like think

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of like pretty much every myth has like some kind

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of solar deity, right, well, that's Superman. They've always got

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>an Earth Mother, it's wonder Woman. Wonder Woman was made

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of clay in one of her origin stories. You've got

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the death Slash Underworld deity, Batman, right yeah, and then

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's always like the Trickster, the Joker. So like it's interesting,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like and I'll keep coming back to this, uh, but

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there are like paar ups like you can apply these

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>models of these archetypes across both you know, whether it's

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years old Greek Roman pantheons or modern day

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like comic books or even like I'm kind of wondering

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>with this this example of science, like who's our science Zeus?

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it Nicola Tesla mm or Ben Franklin. It's not.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been Franklin. So but you know,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>things like that to consider anyways. So that's that's my

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>spiel about comics to start off with. And I'll be

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think bringing it into yeah, an important fact to

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>night because much like the gods, what you walk around,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>say to deaths in an office space and you see

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the action figures on people's death totally in many cases

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they are superheroes. Are superhero characters? What are they but

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the the the avatars for little gods that are the amulets,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the protective presence. Yeah, and I would you know, i'd

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>also point out to that, like in our sort of

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of of how myth, legend and folk tales work out, right,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like we said myth is considered to be fact, Well,

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody actually considers, you know, Superman to be fact, right,

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Nobody thinks that he's a real person, or at least

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>most people don't. Uh. And but the caveat being there

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is that there is such an intense devotion to the

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>cannon that's within these myth myth mythologies of whatever shared

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>universe it is, whether it's Star Wars or Marvel or whatever. Right,

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but there's constant arguments about what is true and what

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is not within the canon. Uh. It doesn't necessarily explain

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>how the world works to us, but it represents how

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we think it works and how we want it to work. Uh.

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And it represents our ideologies too. Yeah, yeah, totally. I mean,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 1>it's Superman. Even though no one is gonna gets into

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of hyper real religions that we've covered

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in a previous that absolutely and that this thing that

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is certainly fictional still takes on mythological even religious uh

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>power to the individual two large groups of people. So

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if anyone out there is thinking, oh, you mentioned Superman

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and Adam and even the same breath that is insulting

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, um, I encourage you not to take it

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that way and to listen to the rest of the

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast as we explore the power of myth and I

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think I would also say watched the last two Superman

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>movies very carefully because there's a lot of christ imagery

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in there. There's a lot of him in cross like poses,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>him being back lit by the sun in the same

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>way that Jesus is back lit in certain painting. Yeah,

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of that stuff going Alright. So onto legends,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed, you know, might be sacred, might be secular,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>but you have more of a human character, there's more

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of a grounding and reality, um, though there are still

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>mythic elements to it. So in the Greek world, the

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>example that came to my mind is Alexander, the great

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>legendary figure, but definitely a real guy that existed with

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>some possible uh fiction, you know, springing off on the edge.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It still allows for big budget movies to be made

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about him, right, And it's and it's more, um, it's

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>not in like pure mythic time like it's it's it's

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>more relatable to the present. Likewise, in the Christian and

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Christian traditions, you have various martyrs. You can maybe even

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>make a h an argument for some of the apostles.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>These are definite historical figures, like st When we talked

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>about Stigmata on the Shadow before. Some of those guys

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely an example of Christian legend. Yeah, and

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>then elsewhere in the in the world. One example from

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese histor three is the Yellow Emperor who reigned from

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six to UC Definitely a real ruler, but

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of additional information he's taken on extremely

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>lifendary status. Yeah. My experience, um, living in Southeast Asia

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>as a kid too, is that Chinese mythology and legend

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is popularized in pop culture and movies and television just

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>as much as like our Alexander the Greats or superheroes

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>or Greek gods are Um, are you familiar with the

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Ones upon a Time in China series? Um? Yeah, Well

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen it, but I'm familiar with it. It's

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>this like martial arts Woushia series of movies starting Jetly,

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's ostensibly about the history of China at the time,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>although there's a lot of argument about whether or not

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been influenced by the state or not, and it's

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a revisionist history. But it reminds me

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of things like this, or like a lot of Jetly movies,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like what's that other one hero? Is that? What it's

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>called anyway, the Wuhia movies in general tend to play

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>around with these legends. They're like historical figures that they

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>make larger than life. And then finally we have folklore

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, certainly like in the Greek tradition they have

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they have their boogeyman, just as anybody else has a boogeyman.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Believe it's called the baboos. And then you could maybe

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>make an argument that a sub's fables count as folk

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>floor you know what I mean, nobody, I mean they're

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>almost like extreme folklore, like nobody's believing one of these

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>stories with these interactions between animals briar rabbit. Yeah, but

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they're but they still they carry weight, and that that's

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>um Christian tradition. You have an inherited pagan folk tales.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You have stuff about witches, there's a lot of Yeah,

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's an interesting example where fable can become something else,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to find the world for us in a way

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>that isn't necessarily accurate. Yeah, and then elsewhere in the world,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what you have vampire? Do you have fox, spirits, beast men,

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>all in that manner of of supernatural entity that it's

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>just a folk tale, you know, it's like it doesn't

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have legendary and mythic status. So let's talk about the

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like how sacred some of this stuff has to be? Right?

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Like again like sticking to Uh, that's that table of

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>splitting up myth, legend and folklore. Well, it says right

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 1>here myths are always sacred. So how sacred are they? Well?

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely hard to find examples of older

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>myths that are that are secular. Like most mythology as

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>as we experience, it is going to be sacred. But

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the comic book examples really bring to mind a possible

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>example of of of secular mythology, you know, in a

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of hyper real fashion. So um. Interesting side note here.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Often mentioned writer on the show, Grant Morrison. I don't

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>know if you're you've ever read his run on The

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Justice League of America happened. Uh. He's given many interviews

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>where he said, well, his version of writing The Justice

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>League was he saw it as, oh, this is the

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>mythological pantheon of our times, and he set it up

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so that his roster of who was on the team

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>uh lined up are typically with all of the Greek

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and Roman gods uh. And he had like this infamous

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of how that all worked out, how he chose

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>who would be on on the team. Like, you know,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you have your usuals like Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman.

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Then when you add somebody like plastic Man, like why

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is he there? And Morrison says, well, everybody needs a Dionysius. Interesting, yea,

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course Morrison also responsible for Alright. So here's

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing with with myth is we're discussing it now

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and and again. This gets down to the problems of

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>classifying it. Myth is like a narrative mold that grows

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>over our lives, and it grows over everything from big

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>cosmological questions to what's on the dinner table. So you

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>can think of it as as mold growing over a

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 1>statue of a man or a woman, and that body

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a physical symbology for our concerns. Or

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're so inclined, you can think of chakras on

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a figure. Okay, So myth grows over the heart and

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the mind that it goes over all the senses of

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the head. It grows over the sex, organs, the breasts,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the gut, It covers the dreadful scars of battle and

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the ever humor as buttocks. Uh, and is the butt

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>sacred or secular? Humans will always disagree on that one.

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>But but myth is ultimately poly functional, so it grows everywhere.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It takes on various meanings. And that's not just the

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>nature of of myth as as a whole, from you know,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>as just in general. I mean we're talking about individual tales. Uh,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that mean a host of different things. Uh. The human

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>experience exists, again, is the shadow of myth, but it

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>also casts the very shadow. So I think polly functional

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>is a good um description to keep in mind as

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we talk about all of these, because the more you

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>try and pin it down and say, oh, well, this

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>this myth is about your obsession with your mother, that

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is to limit the power of mythology to this one

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>specific thing, when it really is more amorphous than that.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we see in a lot of the

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>attempts and conflicts over what myth means over the last

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, hundred two hundred years of academic inquirery. I

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>guess is sort of like attempts to constrain it and

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>then attempts to balloon it back outwards again. Yeah, because

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you end up with say a psychologist or an anthropologist,

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>story or a historian. They're coming in. They're taking their

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>discipline applying it to mythology, and it's going to be

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the vision of mythology that fits to their

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>discipline well. And the funny thing is, too, is like

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they're human beings and they're just a subject a myth

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as the rest of us, and they want their answer

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the one answer, right Like they all think

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like young thought like his answer was the answer, and

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>so did I don't know, Roland Bard or uh, you know,

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Claude leavestros whoever, Like all these people were going

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about today, they wanted to be the ones

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>with the answer in just the same way as the

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>people who u uh talked about Zeus as being responsible

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>for storms wanted that to be the one true answer.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So we have a lot of different interpretations and one

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>individual will come back around to him at the very end.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But there is a religious study scholar and mythologist William G.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Dotty nine. He's still around, but he's retired. To understand,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>he identified no fewer than fifty definitions of myth and

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this was in the nineteen eighties. And again this is

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>due to just all the anthropologists, psychologists, religious studies, uh,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>individuals of theo theologians, etcetera, chiming in on mythology. All right,

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna take a quick break and when we

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>come back we will roll through some of these big

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas concerning the nature and power of myth. Okay, so

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Let's first talk about sort of this

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century universalistic theory approach. One of the key individual

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>visuals here Frederick Max mu There eighty three nine hundred,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>generally known just as Max Mueller, German born English philologist

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and orientalists. As the term of the was used at

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we probably wouldn't call him that, not not today, but it's, uh,

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a good description to keep in mind in

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of the attitudes towards uh uh, you know, other

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>people's belief systems and mythological roots. He argued that overtime

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>humans lost the original meanings of words such as sun, moon, thunderstorms,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the basic terms we used to describe the

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>cycle of things in the world around as planets. Yeah,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and that we gradually misunderstood them as myth figures and

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>incorporated them into superstitious and religious world views. Yeah, it's

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>no coincidence that we named all of our planets after

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>God's right. Uh. In fact, like our solar system has

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>its own sort of pantheon of characters and archetypes as well.

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>That there you go again, science the application of science

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to myth. H. Yeah. So with Mueller's in particular zs

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of language thing, this is something we're going to see

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>come up over and over again. That language is like

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the culprit of myth. It's where it all originates. Right,

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Like if we were uh without language speaking animals, feral

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>children for instance, feral children would maybe not need mythology,

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>right anymore than like a squirrel would. Uh. And it

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>goes a long way towards understanding again human cultural communication,

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>all our differences and our similarities, and especially how we

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>other other people. So I'm talking about capital, oh other

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>uh and how we understand the world in general. Right.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So uh, Muller seems to think more about nature as

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>being personified as supernatural characters, right, But he's also talking

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about language as being the step that leads us there. Right.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is a great example to kick

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.239
<v Speaker 1>off with because certainly if you took this as the

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>only explanation from myth. That would be a very limited

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding of mythology. But you consider, I can certainly see

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>where this would be a part of the overall energy

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of myth as it exists in human history. Um up, next,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the evolutionist school. One of the key

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>individuals here Edward B. Tyler, that's T. Y L. O. R.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Through nineteen seventeen English anthropologist. So he was a cultural

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>evolutionist and he saw myth as expression of primitive philosophy.

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is another example of myth as considered by

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>individuals immerged in a specific discipline. In time, evolutionary theory

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>was changing the way we think about the world. On

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the Origin of Species by Darwin came out in eighteen

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine. So there's there's another science, mythological and Darwin

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and origin. I'm not sure which superhero here, Yeah, I

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but you know, so some went in this,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Some individuals picked up on the evolution craze and they

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>went and decidedly racist and xenophobic directions with this. But

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting that the Tyler at least believed that

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.239
<v Speaker 1>human minds had the same global capability, regardless of their

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>position on what he saw as the ladder of cultural ascension.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So he saw myth is an attempt to explain the world. Again,

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>getting back to the ideology that we're talking about earlier,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>he saw it as a proto science. He also saw

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>ritual as an application of myth, just as technology is

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an application of science to exert control. So myth is

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of how the world works, and ritual is

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>our attempt to exploit that understanding for control. Yeah, ritual

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is in his sense, the application of how we're trying

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to control outcomes in a totally chaotic world that we

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to happen next. Right, there's gonna

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 1>be a storm that's gonna hit and kill my family,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it won't rain and my crops won't grow.

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna perform these rituals to try to make

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>these particular things happen. I want to change the outcomes

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of reality. Okay, And you know it's it's interesting to

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>try and like apply that to the previous theory. So

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, like this this thing we see in

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the sky, we we give it a certain amount of

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>personality and then as we reach out to it, as

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we you know, at a loss of anything else, you know,

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>amid say that the ruins of our village, we might

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>ask it for help and then therefore personify it more

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and create more narrative energy for it. And this brings

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>us to the myth as ritual school and one of

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the key individuals here Jane Ellen Harrison eighteen fifty through

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>who was a British classical scholar, linguist and feminist. Harrison

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>expanded on this notion of ritual and myth as the

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>spoken correlation of the acted right, the thing done and uh.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And this reminds me of some of the views that

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>will discuss from Mercelle Elliotti in the country here. And

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up next we have the ipeological interpretation of Andrew Lang.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>He was a Scottish poet and anthropologist lived eighteen forty

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>four through nineteen twelve. Yeah, and so you know, as

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we we mentioned this earlier, but aedeological means assigning or

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>seek to assign a cause to things. It's the study

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of causation in myth in particular, we're talking about origin stories, right,

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>how how did this thing happen? Why is it happening? Yeah,

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Lane wrote, Uh, wrote a book Myth, Ritual and Religion,

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Volume one, And this is like a number of these

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>older text is available and full online if you just

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>poke around for him. Um, but I wanted to read

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one line from it to give you sort of a

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of some of the some of the attitudes that

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>were thrown around and trying to figure out what myth

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is and what its power is. Uh. And he was

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about some Greek and um and Sanscrit writings about

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about myth. Here he says, quote, we conclude that in

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Greek and Sanscrit, the myths are relics, whether borrowed or

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>inherited of the savage mental status. Yeah. So now we're

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>getting into Uh, this is that period of time where

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think like a lot of uh philosophical thought was

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>struggling with what we now view as i'd say, quasi

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>racist territory in terms of, like, you know, whether these

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>theorists see themselves as being superior to quote unquote primitive

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>people's but then not exactly applying the same lens to

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves in terms of like how we understand culture and

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>how we use myth. Right, Yeah, it's kind of like,

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>let me, I guess is there a term for this,

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like white splain you or the colonial splain you. I mean,

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what I keep thinking of is like, and you see

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this in a lot of these guys, is the idea

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of the quote noble savage, right, Like the the idea

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that um particular primitive peoples have these two aspects of

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>themselves and once we crack the code, we can figure

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>out what makes them tick. And it's it's um kind

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of grossly elitist. Yeah, it's it's like, there's this beautiful

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>thing about your whole situation. You're blind to it, but

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I I am. I am far enough at the ladder

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that I can I can reach in there and figure

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it out for exactly. So, Yeah, there's sometimes you get

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>into that that kind of itchy area with some of

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>these especially some of the early writings on the subject um.

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Up next, we're going to briefly discuss friends bows. He

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>had this um this interesting take that was that has

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>been referred to but as autobiographical ethnography, all right, and

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that that was a description that was thrown out in

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that book I mentioned earlier by and Beryl about Chinese mythology.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>He was a German American anthropologist lived fifty eight through two,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and the basic idea here was that the specifics of

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a primitive culture can be deduced from kind of a

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>postmortem of its myths um, which you know, sounds like,

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, kind of an oversimplification and maybe and

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that's probably an oversimplification of his work, but you know,

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I can I can see the value in it. Like

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a person at a people's mythology,

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to learn certain things about who and

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what they are. Yeah. So Bois is an interesting contrast

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to Land because I think both of them are in

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this sort of weird period of time or like intellectuals

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>saw themselves as like defining quote pre bit of people's right.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, if you look into Bois,

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like he was pretty staunchly against what he called white

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 1>prejudice and racial superiority, uh, and that he didn't think

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was like the job of anthropology to sort

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of apply that mindset to other people's. But at the

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>same time, like there's it's complex, Like I think it's

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 1>too complex for us to get into in this episode,

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>especially since we're trying to tackle such a big subject

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, it might be worth returning to Bois

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>in a future episode. But just this contradiction between like

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to, as we're calling it, like white splain

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.479
<v Speaker 1>uh to these particular peoples, but then at the same

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>time like saying like, oh, yeah, I get you figured out,

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like once once I look at your rituals and your myths,

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like I know what's going on here. Yeah. Yeah, it

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>is difficult because on the other hand, you have individuals

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in a different culture with a different language trying to

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>understand individuals in another culture in a different language, and

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking about it within their own culture, within in the

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>own language, within their own discipline. And yeah, it gets

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it gets complicated pretty quickly. There's something going on here

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>too about using myth to understand the world that also

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>leads us to our fear of other people in like

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>different ways of which we can try to apply that

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and make sense of it. Uh. And I think you

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit of that here, But Bois was

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously trying to push against it all. Right. Up next

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>we have Polish anthropologist Brunus Law Malinowski lived eighty four

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>through nineteen forty two, and Uh, his whole thing was

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that that myth is a sociological charter. So, in other words,

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know what's morally acceptable within a society,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>look to their myths, which end up reflecting and informing

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>these standards. They spell out the important values, the rituals

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of behavior. Um claude. Levi Strauss, who we're gonna get

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to in a second, described this as myth is a

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>charter for social action, and then Levi Strauss expanded on

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>this view with a a structural analytical approach. The highlights

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the binary oppositions in myth that bring the reader, listener,

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>or the individual to a place of deeper meaning. So

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of narratively juggling the notions of social action

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in a way that a mere you know, a mere

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>set of rules, carbon and a piece of stone cannot. Yeah.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Levi Strauss is one of sort of the you know,

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 1>first major thinkers in the last century to do that

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>uh language application thing here, and in particular he's considered

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a father of structuralism, which we've talked about recently on

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. Some people have asked us to please do

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>an episode on structuralism or post structuralism. We might it's

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>such an incredibly complex, uh theory that I don't know

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that we could do justice to it. Well, sometimes what

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is just to dip your toes,

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we'll do that. But in the case of Strauss,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a four volume study called Mythologies. Uh And,

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>and the the idea here was that he followed a

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>single myth as it traversed from South America all the

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>way up to the Arctic Circle, sort of like how

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we are tracing the origins of cannabis in that episode

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, right, So he's tracing its

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>cultural evolution. Uh And. In particular, he has an essay.

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>He has multiple things he's written about this, but there's

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a widely read essay that is free on the internet

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if you just google it, the Structural Study of myth

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in which he says, and keep in mind this is

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>sixty years ago. Myths are interpreted in conflicting ways, right,

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So he's looking at all the different ways that all

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these other theorists are trying to interpret them, whether it's

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>through collective dreams or ritual or play or archetypes. All

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>these things that we're we've either talked about already or

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about. None of them go beyond what

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>he calls quote a crude kind of philosophic speculation. So

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he kind of looked down on them, right, But then,

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like any good academic, he was like, well, I have

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the one single answer and here um, he says, well,

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the paradox is that myth is both full of elements

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that contradict one another. Right, anything can happen in a myth,

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but the same time between different cultures in different regions

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that seemingly haven't interacted at all their similarities between their myths. Uh.

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And one of the examples he uses is the Native

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>American trickster myth. As an example, he says, well, it's

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a it's a meditation on both life and death, right,

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's symbolized by both like a raven,

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's either a coyote or a wolf.

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And those seem like they would be diametrically opposed, but

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not. And here's why. And I'm not going to

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>dive down the whole Levi Strouss thing, but you can

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>take a look. It's it's really interesting stuff. Um. He

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>also used Oedipus as an example, and he said, since

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>myth is made of language, uh, and it can't be

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>told without human speech. This is why we need to

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>apply linguistics and structuralism to it in order to understand it.

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>He takes Oedipus and he breaks it apart, kind of

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like a musical arrangement, like an orchestral a score with

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>assigned beats to it, and he breaks up those beats

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>into four columns. Uh. And through this he tries to

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>discern what a myth actually means, right, what that means, meaning,

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the etiological nature of that meaning, uh, by finding that

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth column is the universal characteristic of man. Okay,

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>so this is like his his prime answer to what's

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 1>going on with myth? Uh? And in particular, he also said,

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there isn't one authentic version of a myth, but there's

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>different manifestations, and we see this throughout all of them. Right.

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So even like in the examples of like that, I've

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>been giving modern day superheroes as being sort of mythic, right,

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Like their continuity is constantly changing, and and it's you're

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about Superman the Sun God or Superman the Reagan

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>as figure and what the Dark Knight returns? Yeah, yeah,

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, So like they're interpreted in different ways and

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>applied in different ways. So he's like, he was trying

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what the fundamental units of myths were,

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and he called them my themes, which I like because

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>if you split it, it's my theme. Um. And I

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>believe this was before the conceptualization of memes too, but

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there's there's something connected there as well. Uh. He tried

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>breaking them down in this very strict structuralist linguistic manner

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to find out what those fundamental units were, and he

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that there had to be some kind of universal

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>law to all of them. All right, so we have

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>some good material here. We have, we've were, We've already

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>rolled through a number of different ways to take apart

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the myth and figure out what it means. So let's

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about Sigmund Freud. Just a little bit about your mother. Yes,

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so Freud is mostly known for for psychoanalysis, but of

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 1>course myth was also hugely important to him. He would

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>keep all these these different uh uh, you know, mythic

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>depictions of God's just sitting around his office. And he

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>saw myths as reflections of our unconscious fears and desires.

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>So he viewed ancient religious characters as the manifestations of

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>submerged human desires, and therefore all religions is kind of

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>a mass delusion or maybe a paranoid for one of

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>wish fulfillment. This is where we get our edipal complex

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and our electric complex room exactly. And so the idea

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>here is that in these religious figures you could find

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the universal truth of the human condition. The edifice one,

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of course, is probably the big one, probably the most

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>well known one, the classic example drawn from the the

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the actual myth here of edifice Rex mythical Greek king.

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a solver of riddles that have to do with

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the human condition. So, you know, Freud dug that. But also, uh,

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the myth underlies the edifice complex, the idea that on

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm and I'm summarizing super paraphrases, super paraphrasing, but

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is like the dime store understanding of it,

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but that all children want to kill their father and

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>marry their mother. Yeah, it's the Jim Morrison version, right,

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So that that's that's kind of Freud's contribution in a

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>nutshell to our understanding of myth. Yeah. And then Freud's

0:41:54.680 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>contemporary and you know, sometime rival Carl Young had a

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>psychological explanation for everything. All these guys, man, everybody's just

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>coming up with their universal laws. I've got it figured out. No,

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got it figured out. Here's my universal law. Uh.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Willam Reich, who we talked about in a previous episodes,

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>spun out of these two guys as well with his

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:19.359
<v Speaker 1>universal law of how everything worked out. So Young he's

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all about collective unconsciousness, in particular archetypal patterns of thoughts

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and symbolism. He thought that myths were projections of the

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>collective unconsciousness that we all share. Uh. And again like

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>super dime store version of this is that there's like

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this uh, shared imaginary space between all of us that

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we're all pulling our ideas from. And it's it's natural

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to humans, right Uh. And we can't quite define it,

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:48.479
<v Speaker 1>but we're all pulling from that same space no matter

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>where we are in the world. And this seems to

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>explain why all these myths from varied locations are so similar.

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>So Young argues, well, like deities, for example, in mythology,

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>those are expressions of these universal archetypes. Uh. And so

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>it's been done with Young's work, is the psychological archetypes

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that he came up with are applied in a certain

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of literary criticism. Uh, and you can pretty much

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>apply to any story, right. Uh, it's usually very basic.

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>One of my former advisors in grad school would refer

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to it as the model fits kind of study, right

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>where you're just you're taking his model and you apply

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it to a text and you go, Yep, that works,

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, for for a lot of people,

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that's good enough. For some people they want more meat

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.959
<v Speaker 1>on the bone. But a lot of the young iun

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>criticism is done as such. So right, we've got examples

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>like the hero, the animal and the animals, the mother,

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the father, the child, the sage, the trickster, the fool.

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Right there, These are all archetypes that show up in

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in many of our texts, whether they're literary, mythological, or

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or superhero movies. Right. A really good example I think

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of how young and archetypes are applied in world building,

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and like a fictional setting is Game of Thrones, Like

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>that's like reverse engineered uh mythology there right in that

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 1>like George R. And Martin like clearly he had either

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at this or other archetypal versions of mythology and

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>said Okay, Well, when I create my religion in this world, right,

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like we've got a God of Light and then the Seven,

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>there's like what there's like Maiden, Mother and Crone, and

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's the Stranger Strange Ponification, and I would imagine

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the Stranger lignes up pretty well with the Young's version

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Shadow, and the Shadow is this immoral remnant

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of our instinctual animal past. So it's sort of like

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this weird, like dark side of ourselves that we don't

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>want to admit to, but it's always with us. It's

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>always following us, right, like our shadows to um. And

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, you can take this and you can PLoP

0:44:56.840 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it on top of like almost any story and map

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it out and it works. Uh. And in the same

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>way you can do that with Joseph Campbell's Heroes Journey,

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which is another very popularized sort of explanation of mythology

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>in the last what fifty years. Yeah, I mean it's

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it's becomes synonymous with Star Wars, right absolutely. Yeah, so

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Campbell is renowned today as a pop mythologist. Uh. And

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it's similar to, uh, there's way more to it than this.

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I we're really just diving in the shallow end here. Uh.

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in this, I highly recommend you go

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.720
<v Speaker 1>out and read more about these these theorists and these thinkers.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we're providing you with the IKEA toolkit if

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to. If you want a real Alan wrench

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for for extended use. Uh, there's a there's a different

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tool kit out there for you. We're just giving you

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, a good overview. Campbell basically argues that

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like almost every story follows this formula that he calls

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the hero's journey and it play is out and Star

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Wars is the one that everybody uses as an example

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>for this, not only because it fits it perfectly, but

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>also because George Lucas himself claimed, oh yeah, I was

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 1>influenced by Joseph Campbell, and I intentionally did all that stuff. Uh.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.959
<v Speaker 1>So he claims that he intentionally applied this three act

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>structure that breaks down into seventeen sub acts. Uh. And

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go through the whole thing here, but

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're familiar with sort of just like

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>generic uh film storytelling, it's going to be very familiar

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to you in the way that, like, you know, stories

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have rises and arcs. There's calls to adventures. Uh, there's

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>particular challenges that they have to go through and then

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to return with something. And in this particular

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Joseph campbell formula. He always says that you have to

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the the hero has to refuse to return back to

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the real world, but then they eventually do on some

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of magical flight. Uh. It's it's interesting. And when

0:46:57.480 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you again the model fits. You lay this on top

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of Star Wars and it works out perfectly, even even

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>more interesting, like you lay it on top of a

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>New Hope and it works perfectly. And then if you

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lay it on on top of like all of the

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>movies as well, the arc still works out. So okay,

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I tend to believe George Lucas that he looked to

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this quasi academic for you know, a narrative application. I

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but like when I've written fiction

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>before in the past, I've actually tried to play around

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 1>with Campbell's uh formula. Yeah I have. I have at

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>times the dipped into it for sure, because then, yeah,

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have this ultimately, which is a great

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>universal narrative arc too. I don't know which to follow

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a mythic characters. Yeah, it's it's hard not to be

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>inspired by it, or at least to look at it

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and say, all right, was this idea that I was

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking of? How do how does that match up with

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the blueprint here? For me, it was like it was

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>along the lines of like, okay, am I sticking to

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>this blueprint? All right? Like how do I break that

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit so that it's something that's the story

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't so expected? Exactly? Yeah? Alright, So next we're gonna

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>discuss Mercella Eliade, who he mentioned earlier, um and he

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was influenced by myth as ritual school of thought as

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>well as union archetype concepts. He recognized the etiological aspects

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of myth, but he saw it as a vital link

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>between ancient sacred past in the modern profane present. So

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine this bridge or even though like a time portal

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>between our modern linear experience and it's inherent terror of history,

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a big deal over him. The idea that

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, in brief that since we are experiencing time

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as this linear progression, it's all the more horrifying when

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we realize, oh well, we as as a as a

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>species keep making the same mistakes over and over again,

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're never gonna get him fixed. Uh, that makes

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>more sense in a cyclical mindset, which you would have

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>had in the in the ancient past. So imagine this

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>portal connects our modern world to an age in which

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sacred time is cyclical. This means that the meaning of

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>life is in the circle of things, and in this

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ancient age, people are one with the cosmos and the

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>cosmic rhythms, while modern humans, according to Deliade, they're connected

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>only with history. So myth is the portal. Myth is

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that that bridge that brings these two worlds together. Plus

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:20.399
<v Speaker 1>he also gets into some of the other ideas we've

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>discussed here. I just want to read a quick quote

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from his his excellent book Um the myth of the

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Eternal Return. Myth is a history that can be repeated indefinitely,

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the myths serve as models for

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>ceremonies and periodically reactualize the tremendous events that occurred at

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of time. The myths preserve and transmant the paradigms,

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the exemplary models for all the responsible activities in which

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>men engage. By virtue of these paradynamic models revealed to

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 1>men in mythical times. The cosmos and society are periodically regenerated.

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 1>So uh at my encapsulation of that would be like

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Battlestar Galactica version of all this has happened and

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it will happen again, right, that kind of thing. Yeah,

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you can summarize it as saying that this linear experience

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of reality, it works for us, but it's missing something,

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and when the terror of history begins to creep in,

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's good to reconnect, to jump in that portal and

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>reconnect with the sacred experience of reality. Well that's an

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting segue into um, two guys who I feel like

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.799
<v Speaker 1>we have to mention here there again uh connected to

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the sort of linguistic aspect, but they're also uh sort

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of along the lines of Mars Marxist philosophical thinking. Uh.

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Roland Bart is the first one, and he is infamous

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for having written a book called Mythologies. Uh and man,

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's one chapter in there that I really think that

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you would love. Mythologies is actually more about messages and

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>media than it is about myths per se. But he's

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>using Levi stress the same linguistic analysis and structuralism to

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>apply Marxist approach to myth and in particular media. So

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he's writing this in the fifties late fifties, as the

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>rise of mass media is coming on. Uh. And he

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>interprets media with linguistic terms, applying them to socio political analysis.

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think it'd be fair to say, like, without

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Bart there would be like no Noam Chomsky. Okay, Uh.

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And so he he does this, and it's interesting. He

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>finds that most of our modern myths are created by

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a ruling class through media. Okay, now again again, like

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to dive deep down that rabbit hole

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and make those arguments or or argue with them. But

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a section in there that's all about wrestling, uh.

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's uh one of the first sort of pro wrestling, right, well,

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really have pro wrestling, but they had that

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of narrative wrestling at the time that you could

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>still go watch. It's one of the first sort of

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>revelations of what we now call k fabe that I've

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ever heard or read on the sport. Uh. And he

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>basically says, look, they're pantomim ing the archetypes of myth

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in every single fight, and these are direct quotes from

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the book. He says, the function of the wrestler is

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>not to win, it is to go through the motions

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that are expected of him in the same way as iLiads,

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, history is repeating itself. We watched the

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:24.439
<v Speaker 1>wrestling match. We have expectations of what will or will

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not happen, and we experienced pleasure by seeing this enacted.

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And he says that it's enacted through three archetypical acts suffering, defeat,

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and justice. Uh. And it's fascinating. I actually in grad

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 1>school went to school with the guy who took this

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and ran with it and wrote his dissertation all about

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>modern day wrestling and mythology. Yeah, yeah, there's a there's

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:48.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of myth inet. You see it less, I

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>guess in the so the modern American models, But if

0:52:53.560 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you look too, especially if you look to the more

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 1>traditional modes of Luca Libre in Mexico, you see like

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>straight up like by the by the books, um mythological

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 1>representations in many cases, to the to the point where

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>sometimes American viewers look at it and they're like, well,

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand, Like I knew that this the good

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.240
<v Speaker 1>guy was gonna win. I knew that the the Technico

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to defeat the Rudeau, and it played out

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly like I expected. There was no surprise. That's the

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the point. Yeah, that's the myth, that's this

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>myth reenacted in the ring for you. Yeah. Uh. And

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>so then there's also Frederick Jamison and again disservice like

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a very like bare bones

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Jamison thing. But Jamison argues that myths actually attempt to

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>disintegrate history rather than repeat history, by emptying history out

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of what their original meanings were and replaced them with

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a narrative that seems like it's always been that way.

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So my example, uh, from comic books would be, so

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>comics had the comics code that tried to bottle realize

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and regulate and ignore entire aspects of American life for decades,

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 1>right like ex and profanity, which is completely cut out

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of comic book stories. So you have these superhero mythologies

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>without any of uh, like the real world that they're

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to explain within them, and these mythologies were pretending

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like that wasn't an aspect of the American community and

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>acted like it had always been that way, right. Uh

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting sort of take on it that,

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like we're constantly revising history in the same way that

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we're constantly revising our mythologies. And again, like I come

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>back to these the scientist examples, right, like we think

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of Einstein and our Einstein that we talk about, and

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Revere is kind of a fictional Einstein, right. Yeah. It

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just also brings to mind the earlier example of myth

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>as a as a moral instructional tool. So, yeah, you're

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:46.959
<v Speaker 1>changing You're you're changing the comic book mythos and then

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>using it as a way to or an attempt to say, hey,

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>this is how you live, which is there's there's no

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>well there is sex, but sure you're trying to make

0:54:55.960 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a moral stamount part of the mytholo morality of the readers. Yeah.

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>So the last one that I wanted to throw in there,

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and in particular because the thesis that I wrote when

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I was in grad school was all about Captain America

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and mythological applications to ideology and rhetoric. Uh. There's these

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 1>guys Robert Jewett and John Shelton Lawrence, and they've written

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:20.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple books about something they called the American mono myth,

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've argued that Captain America as a character is

0:55:24.040 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>indicative of this mono myth. Uh. They define it as

0:55:28.000 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>an anti democratic fantasy where a superpowered everyman saves society

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>by stepping outside of institutions to violently punish villains. There's

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more to it than that. I mean, these guys have

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>written books and books and books on this, But look

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 1>at the last three Captain American movies. That's pretty much

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>what it is, right, Uh, Captain America, even though he's

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>an embodiment of America, he's always stepping outside of whatever

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 1>institution he's part of. Right. If he's part of the military,

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>has to do something without them. He's part of Shield,

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>he has to reveal that Shield has been co opted

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:01.799
<v Speaker 1>by Hyde or whatever. If he's a part of the Avengers,

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he has to step outside of the Avengers to set

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:06.759
<v Speaker 1>things right. It's kind of like this ideal for what

0:56:07.000 --> 0:56:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the system should be, but he's not. Yeah, yeah, in

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a way. But it's also like incredibly violent and sort

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:16.799
<v Speaker 1>of fascistic as well. Uh. And so he's demonstrative this

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.359
<v Speaker 1>so much that they call it the Captain America complex.

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And much like with Young and his archetypes, you can

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:25.280
<v Speaker 1>apply the Captain America complex to a lot of pop

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>culture examples and find that exact formula playing out. Especially

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I find in a lot of our like eighties action movies,

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the Captain America complex is pretty prevalent. Like lethal weapon

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:40.879
<v Speaker 1>or total recall, the stuff like that. Like it's always

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, some strong badass who has to step outside

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of authority to get things done, you know that kind

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Uh. And it's interesting they argue that it

0:56:50.120 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 1>permeates not only our media, but our political language as well.

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:56.359
<v Speaker 1>And I would say, look at Donald Trump's campaign right now.

0:56:56.400 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why a lot of people are attracted to it

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is but because he steps outside of the institutions, right,

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.439
<v Speaker 1>or at least he claims to to save society by

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 1>punishing the wicked. I do want to say, though, like, well,

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's something to this. Their evidence is

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>only from like a few scattered, uh sources of at

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 1>least in the Captain America case. Uh. And so that's

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I wrote the thesis. I

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>did because I wanted to cover like the seventy years

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of American history that sort of goes on during the

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Captain America continuity. Uh. And one thing that's interesting with

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Captain America in particular, and I wonder if we're going

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to see this show up in these Marvel movies pretty soon,

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is he goes through these cycles where he's all of

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden apathetic about everything. Uh. And in particular, he

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>gives up his role as a national symbol because he

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:49.280
<v Speaker 1>no longer believes in the myths that define the nation

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that he believes in. Right, so he like, there's the

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 1>first big example of this is in the early seventies

0:57:55.840 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is this Captain America story that's crazy where like it

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:01.440
<v Speaker 1>turns out like the big villain behind everything is the

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States. Captain America storms into the

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Oval Office, confronts him in the in the President United

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>States shoots himself in the face. And so after that,

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Captain America is like, America, I don't believe in this

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy anymore. I am no longer Captain America. And he

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>discards his costume and his shield. If he moved to

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Canada to so he joined Alpha Fi. He becomes a

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>biker and he calls himself the Nomad and rides around

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on a bike and and is a vigilante that way,

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and then like eventually finds his faith in America again.

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Then it happens again in the eighties. It happened in

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands as well. Like this is like this

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 1>recurring storyline with Captain America and kind of from a

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian perspective, like kind of like a harrowing of hell,

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe even the idea that even the Great Savior has

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to fall and descend and then ride. Oh yeah, and

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's in the hellish thing about it too, is right,

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Like he's never allowed to die or retire. Like every time,

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like you think Captain America is dead or he gets

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>old or something, they replaced him with a new guy.

0:59:01.760 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He inevitably comes back. It just happened like to three

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago comics again, like he'd been replaced by someone

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and then and he had he had turned really old,

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>he was like ninety years old. And then you know,

0:59:12.200 --> 0:59:15.919
<v Speaker 1>some science fiction anything happened and he's back. But yeah,

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have to go through the whole cycle over again.

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, um, you know, I just want to

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>close out by mentioning William G. Dotty again. He's that

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 1>religious study scholar, mythologist. Um, he summarized a lot of

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>what we've talked we've talked about in this episode in

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what is, in my opinion, a highly effective kind of

0:59:32.520 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>eightfold view. So he said that, and I'm just gonna

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>roll him out here for you. Number one, myth as

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is an esthetic device. It is narrative literature. Okay, myth

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is a tale of God's in other worlds, it's number two.

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Number three is myths explain our origins. Number four is

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that myth is essentially mistaken or primitive science. Number five

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is that myth is a text for a right or

0:59:55.280 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>ritual that application again. Number six is that myth is

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a means to make universal ideas or truths concrete and

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligible for the average consumer. Number seven, myths are all

1:00:06.360 --> 1:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>about explicating beliefs, collective experiences, or values. And number eight

1:00:10.880 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>myths constitute spiritual or psychic expression, so that that would

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>play out well with both like the sacred nature of myth,

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but then also Young's uh collective unconsciousness, which is sort

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of a psychic expression in a way. Yeah, And I

1:00:26.240 --> 1:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think the big take com and one of the reasons

1:00:27.800 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I like like this approach is that that I feel

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of us can agree that myths are

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>poly functional. You know, they have they have various functions

1:00:37.720 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're carrying out at the same time, sometimes to

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the same consumer, to the same you know, the same

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>person that's listening to, viewing, or hearing the myth or

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about it in the back of their mind. Again,

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this, it's this weird thing because that we're all

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>living in the shadow of myth, and we're casting the

1:00:54.520 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>shadow of myth. Um. We may not think that that

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>myths play a big role in our lives, but regardless,

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about the Greek gods, uh, you know,

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the the Old Testament or just the pages of your

1:01:08.880 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite comic book, those uh, those that mythic energy is

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>very much in play in our world. Yeah. I think

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>if any lesson we can take from like this overview

1:01:18.960 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of all of these ideas about mythology, it's that there's

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>no one universal law. Like a lot of these thinkers

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>tried to say, I've figured it out. This is the

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>key to the universe, and the key to the universe

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is figuring out how these stories about what the key

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to the universe is work right and in a way,

1:01:35.080 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they're creating their own mythologies. But there are applications that

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you can you can dip into from from many of

1:01:41.920 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>these things and pull them out and think about uh,

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>anything really in modern day settings, whether it's science, politics,

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>pop culture, and you apply those and you can sort

1:01:53.600 --> 1:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of pull out the strings and go, oh, wait a minute.

1:01:56.320 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>This is like the sort of behind the scenes of

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>how society works, right, or or at least how we're

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to make sense of the world. Still, we're still

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>looking up at the sun and the moon and the

1:02:07.440 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>planets and nature and the seasons and going I don't

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really know how this whole thing works. But this answer,

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the answer I'm gonna go by, and if

1:02:14.960 --> 1:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try to control it, I'm going to perform

1:02:17.240 --> 1:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>these rituals and everything will be fine. I'm gonna see

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what Batman has to say about it, and then I'm

1:02:22.640 --> 1:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna touch back in with my my normal linear life.

1:02:26.640 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely yeah. I trust Batman every day over. Carl Sagan

1:02:32.160 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, well there you have it again.

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We're just hoping to provide you with some tools, with

1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>some different perspectives on myth in your life, in your world,

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the things that you consume. We'd love to hear

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>back from all of you on this topic. How does

1:02:47.360 --> 1:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>myth factor into your life? How do how do these

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>different ways of looking at myth factor into your belief systems,

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in your culture, etcetera. Yeah, and going forward to as

1:02:55.800 --> 1:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we cover you know, we dive back into more science

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the topics as we continue with the show. You know,

1:03:00.920 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>now we've got sort of a foundational framework for myth

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes up again when we're talking about crazy

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>space satellites or tiny bone worms that devour whales at

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom the ocean. Right, So, uh, this is a

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>nice way for us to have a framework, you know,

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>as you're listening and myth pops up in your head

1:03:19.160 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>again for a future episode as well, please let us know. Uh,

1:03:22.480 --> 1:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>let's synthesize some of this information together and learn together

1:03:25.560 --> 1:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>from it. The ways to talk to us about those

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>things are social media. Now. You can find us on Facebook,

1:03:31.920 --> 1:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on Twitter, you can find us

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on tumbler, and you can find us on Instagram. Where

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>below the mind on all of those Uh, and just

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate, I say this on every episode, I think,

1:03:42.720 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>but we don't just like post the podcast there, and

1:03:45.920 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Like we talk about what what we're working

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on outside of the podcast, whether it's writing or videos.

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>We also share all this totally bizarre science and news

1:03:56.240 --> 1:04:00.919
<v Speaker 1>information that we come across in our weekly endeavors. That's right,

1:04:01.360 --> 1:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to check out stuff to bow your

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>mind dot com. That's the mother ship. That's where we'll

1:04:04.600 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>find all the podcast episodes, including the landing page for

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this this one, which one includes some links out to

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>related content and perhaps some outside material as well. And hey,

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to us, if there is a way

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to rate us and review us, uh, do so. Give

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>us some some positive feedback, give us some high ratings.

1:04:21.440 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That helps the show. That helps the various algorithms and

1:04:24.120 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>play in a great way to support the show. We're

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on spending the money. We're on a bunch of new

1:04:27.960 --> 1:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms now so uh in any way that you can

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>help us kind of get a leg up so more

1:04:33.680 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>people will listen to it would be much appreciated. We're

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, from Google Play and Spotify. And as always,

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you can shoot us an email. G get in touch

1:04:41.240 --> 1:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>with us the old fashioned way and blow the mind

1:04:43.200 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot We more on this and

1:04:54.520 --> 1:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>basons of a good topics does it, how stuff works?

1:04:56.880 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Dot com last SEMy three ft four starts support