WEBVTT - SpaceX, Uber and the Future of Mobility

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from the heart of Silicon Valley with Ed Lavow in

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Fan Francisco.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. SpaceX's first earnings reveal

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>massive AI spending, an ambitious Starlink expansion, and Elon Musk's

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>latest bowl prediction one hundred billion dollars and your revenue

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 2>run rate by year end.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 2>We speak with Uber CEO Dara Kosra Shahi and joins

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>us to discuss the company's earnings and it's robotaxi ambitions

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and more. Robotaxi talkers were joined by the CEO of

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Zooks later this hour on a big commercial milestone for

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the company, SpaceX's first ever quarterly earning. So the stock

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>is down. This is what it looks like, on track

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>for its biggest drop since June twenty two. Okay, it

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>only started trading June twelve, but it is much further

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>below its IPO price of one hundred and thirty five

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>dollars a share. There's a lot of stories and a

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of numbers that we need to go through, but

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>today's big number one trillion dollars. That's how much Elon

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Musk expects SpaceX revenue to hit in twenty thirty. Everything

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you need to know Bloomberg's Lauren Grush covering all things

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 2>space joins us. Now, so let's go over the quarter

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>that was the numbers that we need to hear about,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>what the stories were in SpaceX's first ever earnings and

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>earnings call.

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, you know, I think it paints a pretty

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>similar picture to the one that we saw merge ahead

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 4>of the IPO. Obviously, revenue is up, but you know,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 4>it's still a cash burning business. Of the three segments,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>the one that's really the one bringing in the numbers

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 4>at the moment is the connectivity segment, that startling segment,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 4>the space segment, what they've built their business on rocket launches,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, that's that is making some gains in terms

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>of revenue, but still holding relatively steady. And then of

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 4>course the newly acquired AI segment that is really the

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 4>big source of the cash burn for the company. And

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 4>as SPACEXCFO Brett Johnson mentioned, we can expect to see

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 4>capital expenditure on par with what we saw this quarter

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 4>for the next two quarters.

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of discussion of Starship as well.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Starship of course, is central to the future ambitions the

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>company has. But what do we really learn about it?

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 2>What is it that Elon Musk and the other execs.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Said, Yeah, I feel like the more surprising tidbits really

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 4>did come during that earnings call, and a lot of

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>very big, bold claims were made about some of the.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Things we might see in the future.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 4>For instance, Starship, as you mentioned, you know, he said

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 4>that Starship would be launching once a day by this

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 4>time next year. Also, the heat shield for Starship is

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 4>essentially solved, which is interesting given that there is some

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 4>skepticism whether the heat shield design actually would hold up

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>and make it a fully reusable and rapidly reusable rock.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 4>It just a reminder, Starship has launched twice this year

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 4>on test flights, so to reach a launch a day

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 4>by next year, you know, that's an exponential increase. So,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, a lot of big claims. We'll see how

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 4>they hold up. But you know, that's what Elon is

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 4>known for. I think anyone investing in his company knows

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>that he likes to push the limit and set really

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 4>big expectations in order to challenge people to meet them.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>What were the other bits that you kind of would

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>pick out having had a night to sleep on it,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you put the business of space news that are out

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>this morning, you know, with a bit of time to

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 2>think what do we need to know?

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Sure, you know, there was another moment as well that

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Starlink would be the majority of the world's Internet in

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 4>the next few years. Again, I'm not sure about that one.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 4>I did take notice of Gwynn shot Well, the president

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 4>of SpaceX, talking about Starlink Mobile and how they actually

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 4>think that they're going to be able to acquire a

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of the customers that you know, the major telecom

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>servicers like Verizon AT and T and T Mobile have.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, that definite definitely spoke to their ambitions for

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 4>expanding that service. I think there's a lot of speculation

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 4>of you know, whether they'll have to bring in ground

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 4>based components, terrestrial components, something that she did mention. I

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 4>don't think it's out of the realm of possibility, but

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to take a lot of investment

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 4>on their end in order to make that happen. And

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 4>of course, you know, as we've seen, they're not adverse

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 4>to putting.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 5>In a lot of capex.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go deeper on SpaceX Mobile later in

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the hour. Thank you very much, Bloombergs, Laura and Grush

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>stay with SpaceX, Edison you. Deutsche Bank head of Global

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Space and Aerial Mobility joins us now. He maintains a

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>by rating on the stock, but cut the price target

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.559
<v Speaker 2>from two hundred and fifty five dollars to two hundred

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and thirty five dollars. And I want to get to

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you with you to the bit that we probably haven't covered,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>which is, in the short term, it is the business

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of cloud services, leasing, renting compute capacity to third parties

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Google Anthropy that seems to have the most momentum right now.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, And you probably noticed they announced another deal

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 6>right another customer undisclosed in the beginning of three Q.

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 6>So the cloud business, by our estimates, right it probably

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 6>can end December probably running at a forty plus billion

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 6>dollar runweight, which is obviously much higher than now in

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 6>generating the bulk of revenue. So we actually feel very

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 6>good about that trajectory.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Going into to your.

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>End, let's get to what you just mentioned, which is

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>there was a disclosure of the cloud business in the

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 2>current period. Let's listen to CFO Brett Johnson.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 7>In the first few weeks of the third quarter. We've

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 7>already contracted an additional six point seven billion dollars of

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 7>cloud services revenue over a six month period that begins

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 7>ramping starting in October of this year. We believe this

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 7>puts US on a trajectory, including contribution from Cursor, to

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 7>reach one hundred billion of ARR or annualized revenue run

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 7>rate by the end of this year.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Space X, right, there are three business segments, space AI connectivity.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>But you know Brett was pushed, wasn't he on what

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the biggest contributors to thee hundred billion AR was, and he,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I think at the end, said, yeah, this is US

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 2>leasing compute capacity.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 6>So I mean we can do some some rough math

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 6>around it, right, just as I just mentioned, right, we

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 6>can probably easily, pretty easily get to the forty. You

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 6>have other parts of AI, right, you have grock X,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 6>you have the advertising businesses as well, and I think

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 6>you put these pieces together you get probably I don't

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 6>know point five you add on Cursor, which depending on

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 6>you know, I think maybe Bloomberg has even reported on this, right,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 6>is running out at a very very fast growth rate.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 6>So you put that all together, we think you could

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 6>probably get to something like sixty billion run rate not

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 6>too far from December of nine December. So if you're

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 6>already at sixty, you need the rest of the businesses

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 6>to do to do by definition, right, something like thirty

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 6>five to forty.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>And we think that's that's achievable.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 6>And so we believe that in that one hundred billion

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 6>r And you know, obviously time will tell, but but

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 6>we feel pretty Goodson.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the research that I've been reading from

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 2>you of late, it has been on the orbital data

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 2>center side, And a big piece of technology news was

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>that SpaceX has decided to go exclusively with Nvidia and

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Vira rubin architecture. That did seem important. You know, what

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>did you make of that? And the statement that next

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>year they will start launching that orbital data design.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I think there's there's there's kind of two

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 6>angles here, right. There's the more new term you just mentioned,

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 6>which is we need to deploy some prototypes and de

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 6>point the prototypes. I would say it's not it's just

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 6>the beginning. We need to get them up there, we

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 6>need to prove it works. The real question is how

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 6>do we scale this up, and to do that, we

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 6>really need to increase the volume, reduce the cost of

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 6>solar of also of the radiator. So I actually don't

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 6>I don't worry too much about next year. Can we

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 6>deploy some prototypes. I think the much more difficult part

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 6>ultimately is the cost and scale of doing this at

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 6>gigawat level, and that's what really will be the truth test,

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 6>rather than kind of just getting like a.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 3>Couple up there.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk said that he's pulled forward his expectations SpaceX

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>hits a trillion dollars of revenue to twenty thirty from

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty one, and that there is a non zero

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 2>chance that that happens twenty twenty nine.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Are you able to model for that?

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 6>I would frame it like this, so we have a

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 6>forecast out there right that's you can see on Bloomberg

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 6>is much lower than that, and I think the way

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 6>to frame it in the context of stock is to

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 6>get a much higher stock value. You do not need

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 6>to hit one trillion by twenty thirty. If by some

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 6>chance you do, the stock is worth significantly more than

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 6>what it is right now, and certainly even versus our

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 6>price target, we're probably modeling call it more like a

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 6>third of that, and we think that more than justifies

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 6>where the stock is right now.

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at the end of the day, Ela must

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>said it trillion dollars in twenty thirty. I'm looking at

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 2>consensus on the Bloomberg fago three hundred and fifty one

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars for the full year twenty thirty.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Should we talk about Starship to end?

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, all of the future is predicated on Starship

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 2>working and it's rapid reusability. How did you digest the updates?

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess from the call, I.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Think it's basically on track with our expectations, which you know,

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 6>we're expecting that probably flies call it fifteen twenty times

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 6>next year. And if you kind of triangulate, you know

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 6>they're talking about maybe deploying one thousand, B three satellites.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 6>You look at fifty sixty satellites per launch, right, you

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 6>probably get into that realm. So we think there's certainly

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, you need to catch the second stage, you

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 6>need to address some of the heat shield concerns. But

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the operational cadence of Starship, it is

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 6>tracking roughly what we're modeling for for next year, and

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 6>you know we will see it on flight fourteen, which

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 6>is really soon.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 2>You know how that goes, Edison, you have thoish Bank.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you back on the show. Really appreciate it.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>That's Space Acts. There are so many other technology earnings.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's go through it.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>AMD third quarter sales outlook thirty point three billion dollars

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>plus or minus three hundred million, disappointing, the stockdown seven percent,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>promont s guidance, profits surging, but questions and concerns about

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the Warner Brothers Discovery deal. We're going to get to

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that halfway through the program. Disney higher as streaming and

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>parks both drove profit in the third quarter gone.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>And then there's Uber.

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Right now, the stock seems to be trading on the

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 2>outlook for gross bookings, but there was a really big

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 2>discussion about Uber's plans for its robotaxi business going forward,

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and that is where we will focus coming up. Uber

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>CEO Dara Koshrasahi joins us to discuss the company's earnings,

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>but also it's robotaxi ambitions that's next.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Take another look at shares of Uber down about six percent.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's on track for its biggest drop since November.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>The company said gross bookings for the current quarter are

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 2>expected to be between fifty eight point twenty five billion

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars and sixty point twenty five billion dollars, but that

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>figure includes rides and delivery bookings as well as driver

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>and merchant earning. So Uba said it faces some international headwinds,

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>particularly in Brazil and the next focus. Robotaxi CEO Dara

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Kostra Shaki's back with us here on Bloomberg Tech. You know,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the growth bookings outlooked like there's a number of stories

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>within it. I'd also not like at the same time,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>rider activity seems to be increasing, you know, help us

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 2>understand those two data points.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the growth bookings results that we had up twenty

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 8>two percent in the quarter were actually very healthy and

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 8>represented quarter on quarter acceleration. Mobility business was stable at

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 8>twenty percent. The delivery business actually accelerated quarter on quarter

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 8>as well. So the business continues to grow at pretty

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 8>extraordinary rates at the scale we're doing over three hundred

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 8>million trips per week. It drove really strong profitability as well.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 8>The pressure that we talked about was real in Brazil,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 8>which caused a trip slowdown for the quarter, and that

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 8>was actually about competition in the food delivery space in Brazil. Actually,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 8>we have a lot of mobility ridership that are two wheelers.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 8>We actually don't engage in the food delivery space, but

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 8>there's a big war going on in food delivery, and

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 8>that took away some of our two wheeler drivers from

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 8>mobility to delivery because they're getting paid a lot to

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 8>engage in that war. It really has no effect on

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 8>us whatsoever. So the guidance that we gave for forward

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 8>gross bookings growth is very consistent with the guidance that

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 8>we gave last quarter, and hopefully we will meet and

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 8>hopefully beat those kinds of expectations.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 2>DAR, is there anything to discuss on both like the

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>health and behavior of the consumer that you're seeing going

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 2>into the second half of this year.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 8>All signs point to a healthy consumer. We look at

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 8>both our mobility and livery business in terms of the

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 8>growth of those businesses, they continue to be healthy. We

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 8>look at like other indications are consumers trading down and

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 8>eating at more forfordable restaurants, or our eaters leaving less

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 8>tips eaters or riders leaving less tips we don't see

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 8>any signs whatsoever of a consumer slowdown, so the consumer

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 8>remains strong. And then on the labor front, actually, our

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 8>driver earnings, we've got over ten million now earners around

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 8>the world that continues to be very healthy. And in

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 8>the US, for example, driver earnings are up eight percent

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 8>on a year on your basis. So you know, people

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 8>talk about the K shaped economy, but we think both

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 8>sides of the K continue to be very healthy and

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 8>right now all signs point to the same going forward.

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's take the driver out of it for a moment

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and talk about robotaxis. You kind of explained to plan

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the year, which is to get

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>into more cities through different partnerships in different lanes, different methods.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with that.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, are you wanting to see the team accelerate

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 2>a bit on that deployment, Dara.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, definitely. So we're in seven cities already with a

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 8>number of partners and just a review. We want to

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 8>work with all of the ecosystem partners, and just like

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 8>we want every safe driver human driver on our platform,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 8>we want every safe robot driver on our platform, and

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 8>we're working with the entire ecosystem to accomplish that. We're

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 8>in seven markets now, by the end of the year

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 8>we'll be in fifteen markets, and we're on track to

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 8>be on fifteen markets. And we see, you know, a

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 8>lot of advancements as it relates to our partners. I

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 8>know you're going to have aisha from Zookson. They got

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 8>a great approval from the NHTSA to run there like

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 8>really really innovative and cool robot vehicles as well. We

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 8>got approval for a wave to start testing operations in

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 8>London as well. In Nvidia, who is a huge partner

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 8>of ours, announced the release of their Alphameo two model,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 8>which is a physical AI model as well. So the

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 8>ecosystem around AV continues to move forward, is actually accelerating,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 8>and we are helping that ecosystem accelerate through our partnership,

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 8>through investment, through data collect for a number of these partners,

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 8>and then ultimately commercialization of these vehicles on the road

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 8>in the cities in which we live.

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Dara on zookes and I'll ask I said this obviously,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>but now they can charge a fair which is a

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>first for a true robotaxi no driver controls. When does

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>that manifest on the Uber app. When will Zookes be

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>available on an Uber app in which of a city

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>with a fair associated with it?

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 8>We think later this year actually in Las Vegas, and

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 8>then we'll expand from there. And Zeus's strategy is going

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 8>to be to make vehicles available on Uber as well

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 8>as on the Zoops app as well. So we're very,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 8>very excited to work with that.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people want to understand what's happening in

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the relationship with Weimo. There was a change of plans

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>in Phoenix. But how confident are you also about sort

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 2>of renewing non exclusive contracts with Weimo. I think that

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 2>your agreements with them, for example in in Austin Atlanta

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 2>run through twenty twenty eight, and then you've got to

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>work out how to go from there.

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so the deployment in Phoenix was a really small deployment.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 8>It was less than ten cars, so that's not material

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 8>in any way, shape or form. We're going to continue

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 8>to work with Weimo. It's been a strong partnership going

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 8>forward into twenty eight as well. And you know, our

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 8>philosophy has always been we don't want to be dependent

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 8>on one partner one way or the other. Of course,

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 8>we'd love to continue the relationship with Weimo, but then

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 8>you've got partners like zoop A, wave a, we Ride,

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 8>av Ride, and then of course Nvidia as well, so

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 8>that we're not dependent on any single player to keep

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 8>driving and growing this ecosystem.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Dara, we're live on Bloomberg Television and

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio, and this is Bloomberg Tech speaking to

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Uber's CEO, and you've just said that you don't want

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to rely on any one partner. Let me put it

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 2>a different way. If we accept that weimo's kind of

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the commercial robotaxi leader in the US, at least in

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of deployments, charging a fair of the rest of

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the field. Which do you think is most competitive or

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 2>going to be most competitive against Weemo.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 8>I think there are gonna be multiple winners. I mean,

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 8>this market is so early in its development, and I

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 8>compare it to like the foundation model Space. You remember,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 8>like three years ago or two years ago, peop were

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 8>like open Ai is gonna run away with it. They're

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 8>gonna be the only game of down. Then it turned

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 8>into anthropic and Claude is you know, the best model

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 8>that's going to conquer the hall. Now you see Xai

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 8>and SPACEXAAI coming in with Grock and the combination with

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Cursor being a really great combination as well. You've got

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 8>Google coming in with Gemini. They were late in the game,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 8>but they're definitely in the game. In Vidia releasing open

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 8>source and really supporting that ecosystem. So there is going

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 8>to be no single winner here. Weamo's in the lead

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 8>now just like open Ai was in the lead, but

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 8>there are going to be many, many players as part

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 8>of this ecosystem, and we will help the ecosystem overall

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 8>commercialize because ultimately we've got the demand and we can

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 8>bring more rides to those cars and monetize those vehicles

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 8>in a way that no one else can.

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 3>So DAR really quick to drive early adoption.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it important that the robotaxi firms price lower than

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>other ride share.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 8>No, Actually, what we're seeing is pricing is super strong

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 8>and demand is super strong as well. So when you

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 8>get the product in market, it sells. It's taken a

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 8>long time, right, Like twenty percent of search now is

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 8>driven by AI av is less than point five percent

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 8>of overall trips at this point, So the adoption is

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 8>going to take time. But the product is a terrific

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 8>product and we look forward to making it available on

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 8>the Uber app really all over the world.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Ubercio, Dara Kostra, thank you very much. And again later

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 2>in the hour, we're gonna get stick with Robutaxes and

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>speak with Zoop CEO Aisha Evans to stick around for

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that coming up right now. AI safety is back in

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the spotlight after open AI and anthropics models took quote

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>unsanctioned actions by the details. Next, this is Blomberg Tech

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Ben Griffins Sit to Doen. It's cashing in on Wall

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Street's biggest AI hedge fund blow up Citadel's flagship Wellington Fund.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me search five point nine percent in July. You

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 3>know what I'm going to turn So you hire. If

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 3>it's Talking Tech, because I've lost my voice, you hire.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm hoping you there save me for a.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 9>Second, I will add, well, let's get to Talking tech

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 9>a ride away first step. Monolith Management, one of Moonshot's

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 9>AI's early backers, is looking to raise five hundred million

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 9>dollars for a new fund. According to sources. Last year,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 9>Monolith raised two hundred and eighty nine million dollars for

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 9>a fund and has since emerged as one of China's

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 9>most prolific venture backers, and Open AI and Anthropics AI

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 9>models carried out unsanctioned actions during a safety test, including

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 9>a hacking a website and trying to inject powerful code

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 9>into software. That's according to the UK government's AI Security Institute,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 9>which says it's the first time it sees quotes risks

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 9>around autonomy and deception manifest this clearly in the real world. Ed,

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 9>I hope you got some water out there.

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's try that again.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Another stock that we're watching today, by the way, Shopify

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>absolutely surging actually at one point in the session, up

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>the most since twenty fifteen. Continues to hit top line

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 2>growth above thirty percent six consecutive quarters. And that's the

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 2>direction of travel for this name.

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 2>It's one that we cover less in the e commerce space,

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 2>but it continues to have a lot of momentum and

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>is growing super fast. It is an astonishingly busy earnings

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>period and with my voice back in full force, this

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 2>is what's to come more earning. So we're going to

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 2>break down the prints from AMD, Paramount and Disney, and

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>this is how those stocks are trading right now in

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>this Wednesday session. Okay, everybody, take a breath. It's halftime

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 2>here in San Francisco, the beautiful city of don't go far.

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg Tech. This is what tech pology markets look

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>like this morning. SpaceX is the big earning story. Then

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 2>as that one hundred modesty lower, basically flat. You know

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 2>with SpaceX there's been limited ripple effect, the downward pressure

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 2>on the carriers. We'll talk about that later in the program.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of upsided Nvidia after the Elon Musk

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>name check.

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Then there's the earning stories that continue.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 2>AMD reported better than expected second quarter earnings yesterday, but

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't enough for investors who expected more given rising

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 2>demand in the sector, sending the stock lower and a

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>big focus on the outlook of sales and third quarter

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>thirteen point three billion dollars plus or minus three hundred million.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't they doing better? Blue Momsey in King joins

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 2>us to try and explain. I mean a lot of

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the call focused on what do you mean, Lisa Sue,

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 2>CEO of AMD, that the business for data central more

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 2>than double it seemed like the street really wanted specific

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>size and scope.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely.

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if you look at the forward estimates, AMD

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 11>is doing very well. Everybody thinks they're going to do

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 11>very well, but everybody kind of knows that. So when

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 11>she said, oh, we expect data send a business to

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 11>more than double, what do you mean by more than?

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 11>Do you mean sixty percent more? Then do you mean

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 11>two percent more than? So that was a lot of

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 11>what was going on on the plot.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>It's still framed in the context of like, well, what

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 2>is in Vidia doing in terms of growth and is

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>AMD closing the grap the gap? But there was also

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a technology story, which is that AMD has a new

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>generation of server design helios with four point fifty its

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>latest generation accelerator that's not shown up yet.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, there's a lot of focus on this accelerator, and

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 11>you know AMD has been out there and said, look,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 11>this is this is a product that's actually better than

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 11>what Invidia has and has coming. So the expectations are

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 11>obviously rising for that. So now it's a case of Okay,

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 11>we believe you, but when's it going to be there?

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 11>When is it going to really kick in? And the

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 11>same with the server design, could because again in Vidio said, look,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 11>we can do everything for you. We can put it

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 11>all in one server.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 3>It's easy.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 11>You just get it off the loading dot, plug it in,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 11>and away you go. This is AMD's attempt to head

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 11>that off at the pass, and we want to see that.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 3>What's the CPU story.

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 11>CPU story. There are so much demand for CPUs right now.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 11>It's what is old is new again right the data

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 11>centers are now full of CPUs. We saw huge run

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 11>up in Intel's CPU business. Obviously the expectation was that

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 11>that would happen for AMD as well. It did the

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 11>taking share, but again people want more. People put a

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 11>lot of money to work in this stuff.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloubergsy and King on all Things chips, thank you very much.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Paramounts posted a surprise surge in second quarter profits, proving

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>its cost cutting Skydance merger continues to pay off. Meanwhile,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 2>in the company's earning school, CEO David Ellison said they're

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 2>moving forward with the Warner Brothers deal.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 12>We remain highly confident that this transaction will close, and

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 12>we're preparing for basically successful combination once it does. If

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 12>you take a step back and just look at exactly

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.239
<v Speaker 12>where we are today, We received approvals from basically, you know,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 12>sixty five regulators representing sixty five countries around the world,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 12>you know, including the United States, federal government, Canada, European Union, China,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 12>and many more.

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay shares are up two percent or so. Nothing that

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 2>much to write home about in terms of size and scope.

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the story here, bluembogs. Hannah Miller is with us,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, Surprise profit. There seems to be a lot

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>of focus on what's going to happen with Warner Brothers.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, there is a lot of focus here. And you know,

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 13>David Ellison mentioned on the earnings call yesterday that he

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 13>is interested in pursuing an out of court settlement potentially,

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 13>so even though this trial is now scheduled for March,

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 13>you know, things could still change.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 2>How is Paramount's business doing, you know, like I'm trying

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 2>to think, like what's the top hits that I associate

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 2>with them. We've been through the sky Dance thing. It

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 2>seems to be like that merger and integration's gone well.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we saw strength for streaming platforms. You know, they

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 13>had a big hit with Dutton Ranch, fantastic premiere for them. Also,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 13>the UFC fight at the White House did very well

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 13>for them in terms of viewership, so they did have

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 13>some wins in streaming.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I loved all of them, Dunn, Ranch, Marshall's Yellowstone spinoffs. Right,

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and so let's see what happens with Warner Brothers, Discovery,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Hanah Miller on the entertainment beat. Thank you very much.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>There's also Disney. Disney released Learning today before the opening bell,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>impressing investors with profit surge fueled by its streaming service,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 2>but also Theme Parks shares up two and a half percent.

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Philip Securities Research and analyst Helen and a One has

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 2>a by rating on the stock and joins US Now.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of fighting talk from CEO Josh

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Damarro that Disney is doing better than its peers. Did

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>they give the data points that evidence that.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, we're seeing a really strong performance with US quarter.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing very strong experiences despite the macrons certain days

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 5>that we have. If we look at domestic park attendance,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 5>the global guest growth, and even per capital guest spending,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 5>they'll all be increasing. On a cruise side, that's all

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 5>very strong. We're seeing very health see occupancy and forward

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 5>bookings for their Disney Destiny and Disney Adventure. They've also

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 5>tried to raise their guidance to the higher end. And

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 5>for the entertainment side, they've managed to release Toy Story

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 5>five this quarter and it resonated very well with the audience.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 5>It also helped push up their customer products to the

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:17.719
<v Speaker 5>highest gross in the twenties.

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Collers, let's listen a little bit to what Josh Morris

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 2>said about the entertainment business, the streaming business, and what's

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 2>in the pipeline.

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 14>Our ability to outperform our prior consolidated fiscal Q three

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 14>guidance and reiterate our full year outlook despite the mixed

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 14>box office performance demonstrates the strength of our diversified entertainment model.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 14>Of course, I'd be remiss not to acknowledge and congratulate

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 14>everyone on this past weekend's record breaking opening for Spider Man.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting Spider Man did break records, but

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>he talks about the box office being mixed. How much

0:28:55.560 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 2>is Disney judged by those theatrical releases and success is well.

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 5>I would say Disney's greatest competitive advantage is what I

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 5>call the it flywheel, So it has one of the

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 5>strongest and most monetizable itp portfolios in the Google media

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 5>industry and support it by incredibly loyal fan base built

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 5>over the decades.

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 6>So take this quota.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 5>For example, their Toy Story five has been successful, So

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 5>the customer might watch the Toy Story fiving cinema, decide

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 5>that he likes it, and then goes on to Disney

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Plus to watch in the entire franchise and maybe visit

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the Disneyland and crews to interact with the IPS and

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 5>then purchase related merchandise. So yes, even though this time

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 5>their office is a little bit mixed, so they're a

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 5>little bit mixed on their style war and also the

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 5>live action Juana, but they're still able to escalate that

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 5>outside of theater and bring it into the IPS and

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 5>the related merchandise. So very few companies can actually monetize

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 5>their content across so many touch points, and that is

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 5>what makes Disney's business models so unique.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>There was a contribution from Parks right particularly to profit Disney.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, from a stock perspective, I think it's trading

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it thirteen times forward twelve month earnings. I'm still asking

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the question, like, is Disney a technology company focused on

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>streaming or do we still continue to model it based

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 2>on the parks and other sort of more physical businesses.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 5>I think you can't really stay there a streaming company

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 5>because they're still seeing very strong on their experiences. They're

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 5>also trying to invest very heavily for long term expansion pipeline.

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 5>So we are seeing the Valaancing area in Walt Disney World,

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.239
<v Speaker 5>the Avanta experience in Disneyland, and of course the new

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Disney Abu Dhabi. They're also trying to add more cruise ships,

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 5>find more cruise ship by twenty thirty one, and all

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 5>these additions are going to drive long term revenue for Disney.

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 5>So I think it would be a little bit unfair

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 5>to just categorize them as a streaming company. It's more

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 5>like a company that's one of its kind that has

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 5>compared with strengths.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 10>In its ip.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>It's still early days in the Josh Demorrow era of Disney,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But how do you assess his leadership at the company

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>and what he's tried to implement.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think he's the right person. He has the

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 5>exact expertise to do. I think Bob Agar before he left,

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 5>he already said that Josh is ready and he's more

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 5>than ready to bring the company in the correct direction.

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 5>I think right now Disney they've already managed to fix

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 5>so many problems they used to have, so they're and

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 5>previously now streaming as profitable. Cors have come down, parks

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 5>are still generating strong cash flow, so I do think

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 5>it's going towards the right direction.

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Josh Tomorrow in posts, it's about mid March.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>What's the next catalyst? What happens in the balance of

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>the year with Disney that you're looking at most closely.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.239
<v Speaker 5>So I think that'll be interesting for this quarter. Is

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 5>they've just announced today that they're doing a collaboration with TikTok.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 5>So that's quite interesting to me because Disney has always

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 5>been really detective of its ike usage because that's their

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 5>core competitive advantage. So this collaboration is Disney acknowledging that

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 5>customer behavior have changed, and they're trying to embrace the changes.

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean Disney plus previously they can pey mainly streaming

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 5>companies like Netflix, but now because customers they spend so

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 5>much time on screen time on TikTok, YouTube shorts, all

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 5>those short video platforms, So they are trying to embrace

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 5>the new trend as well, and I think it will

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 5>also help Disney for their engagement problem. The current problem

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 5>that Disney Plus have is users will click onto Disney

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Plus to watch a specific content that they want to watch,

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 5>and then they will close it. So unlike TikTok, TikTok

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 5>managed to convince their users to open the app multiple

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 5>times in a day. So if they're able to guide

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 5>that kind of traffic into Disney Plus, then customer who

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 5>opened Disney Plus so many times per day is less

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 5>likely to cancel.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Hello Along, Philip Securities, Thank you very much. Indeed, let's

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>try this again, Ken Griffin. Citadel is cashing in on

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street's biggest AI hedge fund blow up. Cidadel's flagship

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Wellington fund surge five point nine percent in July after

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>buying most of troubled Situational Awarenesses public stock portfolio at

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a discount. The deal helped lift Wellington's gains for the

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>year to twelve percent, underscoring Citadel's ability to profit from

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>market turmoil, while many AI focus hedge funds were hit

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 2>by the tech selloff.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay coming up Zekes.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Will soon start charging for its rides in Las Vegas,

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 2>marking a milestone for the Robotaxi company and for the industry.

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>We're going to speak with the CEO next. This is

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech. Zekes will start charging for rides in Las

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Vegas next week, marking a big commercial milestone for the

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 2>company and a first for a steering wheel free robotaxi

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 2>in the US. Souit CEO Ia Evans joins us. Congratulations, Like,

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:06.479
<v Speaker 2>this is something that I've been questioning you about for years.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 2>You're allowed to charge a fair.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, what's the plan? First?

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 15>Thanks for having me exciting starting this phase of the journey.

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 15>We start in Las Vegas next week on Monday, and

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 15>then we have San Francisco coming up. We have more

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 15>permits to get in California later this year, Miami and Austin.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 15>We'll be entering Atlanta and LA and then we've also

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 15>started testing in Dallas and Phoenix, so you can assume

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 15>the robot tax is coming. So starting now the commercial

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 15>journey and bringing what we think is this delightful experience

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 15>to customers.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 2>So there's going to be a base fair and then

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the final fair gets calculated based on the distance travel

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>on and how long it takes to get there and

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>your assurance that will pick the best, best route, put

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>some sort of dollar figures behind that. How it compares

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to jumping in an uber or a lift driven by

0:34:59.600 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 2>a human.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 15>So we're anchoring around what we call the comfort pricings.

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 15>This is known in the industry as a category of

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 15>fair one thing, that one decision we've made. It's so

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 15>early in the journey, so whatever we quoted you in

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 15>terms of the best route, that is what we will

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 15>charge you. So base fair time distance traveled. There are

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 15>some search charges, so for example, the airport is not

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 15>starting on Monday, the rest of the destinations are, but

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 15>it'll be coming online soon, so there's a search charge

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 15>for that. We're also offering some delightful experiences to the

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 15>sphere with a special autossis Vegas in Las Vegas, Yeah,

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 15>with a drop off, so there might be an additional

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 15>fee for that. But whatever we tell you we're going

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 15>to charge you is what we're going to charge you.

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 15>If we took a little longer or the route was

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 15>a little longer, we are not going to change the price.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 2>The learnings from Las Vegas, you know, I think the

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>very simple question is are people that are in Las

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Vegas and hail. Are Zookes prepared to pay for it?

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 15>Well, we were about to find out, so you must.

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Have an indication though.

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, the demand has been awesome. We've been monitoring from

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 15>customers not just how do they enjoy the experience, but

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 15>what they're willing to pay for it. So we are

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 15>cautiously optimistic that they will be happy to pay for

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 15>this experience and hopefully that will also modulate a little

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 15>bit of the way times that you see in well

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 15>as Vegas right now because it's.

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Free charging a fair is a big piece of news

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 2>because it allows you to progress commercially right beyond R

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and D. But it's not the only piece of news.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So regulators said, over the next two years, you can

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 2>deploy five thousand of the Zookes on public roads. How

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 2>do you respond to that, like, what's the ramp up

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 2>in production and deployment?

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 15>So I haven't changed measured approach, but you can see

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 15>if you're laughing, measured approach, but you can. I mean,

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 15>one of the things we're looking forward to was starting

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 15>the commercial journey, but also just starting to unleash more robots.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 10>Now they're not going to.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 15>Come all at once, will slowly ramp up the flare

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 15>of the fleet size at all locations, and we think

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 15>that five thousand is only the beginning.

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 2>For the record and the tape. I don't know which

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 2>camera the director wants to look at. I'm not laughing

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 2>at Iesha, I'm just smiling because you're always cautious. You're

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 2>always very deliberate in the timelines that you set out,

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 2>more modest than other CEOs we've heard from in the

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 2>last twenty four hours. But you know, you have utilization

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>data in lots of cities. There isn't necessarily a match

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of the supply of those vehicles to the demand right now.

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 15>We're very confident in the utilization. I mean, look, it

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 15>can't be one hundred percent because we have to go

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 15>pick up people, drop them off, go pick up the

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 15>next customer. But the industry quotes around fifty four percent.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 15>We're very confident that we will beat that and we've

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 15>seen that from customers.

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Zoos is owned by Amazon, right, how much pressure are

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 2>you under to deliver some commercial success, bring in some

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 2>real revenues and money.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 15>A lot less pressure than I put on myself. How's

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 15>that It's been a long journey. We're celebrating our twelveth anniversary.

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 15>So starting this phase. I mean, we've always said we're

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 15>here to build a business. We're here to deliver an

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 15>experience for people and frankly, to change how people move

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 15>throughout society. So Amazon is a great parent. I have

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 15>zero complaints literally, but you know a lot of us

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 15>have been waiting a long time, and so to finally

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 15>sit here and talk about building the business as opposed

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 15>to just the progress of the technology is key.

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 15>Having said that, safety, foundational and perform well, that's key.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 2>What people might not be familiar with is that you

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 2>build the zookes here in the Bay Area.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 3>You're talking a little bit about that quickly.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 15>The factory is great, it's producing. It's nice that we

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 15>used to talk about how many robots per week. We're

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 15>now talking about how many robots per day. It's cranking.

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 15>They are ready to go, and we'll start unnishing them

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 15>into these multiple locations.

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Shevn's CEO back with us on Bloomberg Tech. Thank

0:38:58.440 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 2>you very much, my pleasure.

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Some news crossing the Bloomberg terminal a few moments ago.

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Sources tell Bloomberg that hackers launched a wave of sophisticated

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 2>attacks on Wall Street firms in recent days, targeting information

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 2>systems at major money managers, including Two Sigma, Citadel, and

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Point seventy two. Several private equity firms were also targeted

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 2>as part of the assault. This again, according to sources,

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to keep tracking the story and bring you

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 2>any developments as we get them coming up in the show.

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX is taking aim at the telecoms giants. We're going

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 2>to look at the company's ambitious wireless plans.

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 16>As far as revenue, like, I'm just going to take

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 16>a very high level kind of top down the big

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 16>three in the United States, AT and T, Verizon, and

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 16>Timo roughly between them six hundred billion dollars a year,

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.439
<v Speaker 16>and I anticipate us to be able to acquire quite

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 16>a few of their customers because I think our service

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 16>will be better. We will eliminate dead zones, leveraging the

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 16>the basically the satellites in orbit.

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 2>There was SpaceX president Gwynn shot Well speaking on yesterday's

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Earning School and outlining the company's wireless ambitions. Bloomberg Intelligence

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 2>analyst George Ferguson says the connectivity business should continue to

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 2>benefit from steady growth and subscribers and expanding satellite capacity,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and George joins us now that there's a lot in that,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>but basically they said, we're going to combine the work

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 2>that they've done in satellite based connectivity starlink direct to

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 2>sell with terrestrial investments and go after the US carriers.

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 3>How did you react to that?

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean that's that's what I heard.

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 17>And so look, I'm just going to caveat thet's start

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 17>of our discussion with John Butler covers those companies. He

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 17>and I talk about it, and we've talked since the

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 17>earnings those terrestrials carriers. The discussion around it seemed pretty aggressive, right,

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 17>I think they talked about running most of broadband in

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 17>a decade or something like that. And yes, look, you

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 17>know near term when we discuss the technology they have here, right, Look,

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 17>I think the new satellites, the V three's are coming out,

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 17>they'll be better, but there's still a bunch of latency

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 17>between satellites and terrestrial stations. I really feel like their

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 17>broadband service is really one that's going to initially get

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 17>built around where there's gaps and coverage for terrestrial for

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 17>trust or providers. They've got to improve that service dramatically.

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 17>That's one of the reasons why you're seeing so much cappex.

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 10>And R and D.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 17>I think in order to go after those major carriers

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 17>and take a lot of that market share and the revenue.

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 17>I think they were pointing to yesterday, and I would

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 17>know as I sort of closed my comments initially, is that, look,

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 17>I don't think those carriers are going to roll over

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.240
<v Speaker 17>and just give all their customers.

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 10>A way, you know, to SpaceX.

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 17>So I think you have a good old fashioned, you know,

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 17>price fight on your hand. So I'm not sure that

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 17>you're going to get everything you think it's worth, even

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 17>if you go out and try to conquest all their

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 17>good points, all their customers.

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Gwen Shutwell said they will acquire those customers,

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 2>and you know that word acquired doing a lot of work.

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to the core earnings outlook thesis. SpaceX's

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>losses generally overall narrowed in part because the connectivity business

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 2>is still the cash cow.

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, agreed, But I mean, look, I was one of

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 17>the things I kind of hate to do as an

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 17>analyst is to take a look at sort of six

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 17>month chunks, But I decided to do it anyways because

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 17>there's a company that's growing so fast, and I messed

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 17>around a little bit with that, right, and so in

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 17>most of their businesses, well, I mean one first, we

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 17>know that we know that space, the Launch business and

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 17>AI both were loss making. Neither one of them returned,

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 17>you know, any type of profit. There's a lot of

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 17>R and D going in a boat with those businesses. Really,

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 17>even when you're back the R and D out of Launch,

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 17>it was a flatish business. It looks about as good

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 17>this year at midpoint as it looked last year. And

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 17>you know, look, I think the you know, the connectivity business,

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 17>they grew revenues fifty percent, they grew profit like forty

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 17>six percent, so margins you know, a little bit deteriorated.

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 10>So they they're it's a it's okay, right.

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 17>It's it's performing okay, I think from a longer term.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 17>And then AI, you know, they they they you know,

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 17>really raised a lot of revenue. I think it was

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 17>like six times or something, sorry, one point three times,

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:43.760
<v Speaker 17>but costs roads six times.

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 10>So kind of hard to win at that, so.

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, George Ferguson of Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you for your service,

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 2>looking at the numbers that does it. In this edition

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Tech, tune in tomorrow, we're going to speak

0:43:55.160 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of Western Digital after their earnings, talking data storage, hyperscoing, infrastructure,

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot more. It was a big show. Recap

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast. You know where to find it. This

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech