1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along 3 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordert. Join us each day 4 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,239 Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics 5 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,880 Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are 6 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine 7 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:31,280 Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or 8 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:33,919 Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg 9 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:37,760 Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Some FED watchers looking 10 00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 2: for two governors to descend for the first time since 11 00:00:40,080 --> 00:00:43,159 Speaker 2: nineteen ninety three, the former Send Lewis FED President Jim 12 00:00:43,159 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 2: Bullard telling us previously, I think that the Fed could 13 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 2: resume its normalization process. September would be a natural focal 14 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 2: point for that. Jim joined us now for more. Jim, 15 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:54,840 Speaker 2: welcome back, sir. Just how compelling is the case for 16 00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 2: lower interest rates today? 17 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,360 Speaker 3: I think the policy rates a little bit high for 18 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 3: the current environment, and so I do think that the 19 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:08,480 Speaker 3: Committee could set up a September rate cut at this meaning, 20 00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:12,679 Speaker 3: I think the risk for the chair is probably that 21 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 3: that gets priced in even more than it already is, 22 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:21,920 Speaker 3: and he can't preserve enough optionality going into September. But 23 00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 3: I'm sure he'll do a good job on that part. 24 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 3: So I think the committee's in pretty good shape here. 25 00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:29,680 Speaker 4: Do you think that it's good to see descent? That 26 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 4: that's actually healthy and important right now? 27 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:37,959 Speaker 3: I've always felt that sents show in some circumstances, they 28 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,160 Speaker 3: just show that there's a lively debate and that various 29 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:44,039 Speaker 3: points of view of being heard, and that can be 30 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 3: helpful to the chair. 31 00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:49,440 Speaker 5: I think sometimes you get this, we get if that 32 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:51,400 Speaker 5: gets criticized for all sides. 33 00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:53,840 Speaker 3: And sometimes when it's always unanimous, you get criticized for 34 00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:56,400 Speaker 3: that as well. Too much group think, So I think 35 00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:58,240 Speaker 3: dessense can be valuable. 36 00:01:58,480 --> 00:02:00,880 Speaker 4: A lot of people are watching today's meeting and press 37 00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:04,440 Speaker 4: conference for any clues of what type of pressure President 38 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 4: Trump seems to be exerting, at least psychologically. 39 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:08,080 Speaker 5: On the FED. 40 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 4: I wonder how much of a cloud you think that is. 41 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:14,000 Speaker 4: As a former FED member, I know you're probably going 42 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:16,360 Speaker 4: to say it doesn't factor into their mentality, et cetera, 43 00:02:16,400 --> 00:02:16,760 Speaker 4: et cetera. 44 00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 1: At the same time, the rest. 45 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:20,320 Speaker 4: Of the market is perceiving it that way and is 46 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:23,840 Speaker 4: taking everything that happens on the FMC as Oh, this 47 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:25,919 Speaker 4: person is running to be the next FED chair. Oh 48 00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 4: this person is just trying to show their defiance to 49 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:30,320 Speaker 4: the President's discussion. 50 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:32,960 Speaker 5: Yeah, I don't know. 51 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:36,200 Speaker 3: I don't think the committee pays too much attention. There's 52 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,519 Speaker 3: a lot of data, a lot of analysis. That's the 53 00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 3: way the meeting works. It's a big formal meeting, and 54 00:02:43,560 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 3: you know, I think every member takes their role extremely seriously, 55 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 3: and if they feel like the data is pointing up 56 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:55,800 Speaker 3: in one direction or another, they make the callumn that's that. 57 00:02:56,080 --> 00:03:00,560 Speaker 3: So I don't really think the theater effects that part 58 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 3: of the discussion. 59 00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 2: So, Jim, let's talk about the data and where we are. 60 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 2: By the time we get to September seventeenth, two more 61 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 2: CPI reports, two more payrolls reports. And there's an assumption 62 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:12,560 Speaker 2: right now from some that they've got to wait, and 63 00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 2: they've got to wait because they need to see the 64 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:17,160 Speaker 2: tariff pass through to consumers. How much will we see 65 00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:19,920 Speaker 2: and once they've seen it, to what degree will it 66 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:23,120 Speaker 2: hang around, to what degree will it actually be transitory 67 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 2: or will it be sticky? Jim's two CPI reports enough 68 00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:27,840 Speaker 2: to drain any conclusions on that. 69 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:33,639 Speaker 3: They're going to want to see that data going into September, 70 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:37,120 Speaker 3: and that'll be the that'll carry the day here today. 71 00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:43,200 Speaker 3: I think they'll, you know, who knows, you can always 72 00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 3: get surprised by the day. You've also got jobs reports 73 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:50,440 Speaker 3: in there, so they'll want to see that before they 74 00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:53,120 Speaker 3: make a decision, and that'll be the basic idea. But 75 00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:59,559 Speaker 3: I think the notion is that they've already put the. 76 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 5: Recalibration policy on pause. 77 00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:04,080 Speaker 3: For the first six months of twenty twenty five, waiting 78 00:04:04,120 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 3: to see what the policy would be and whether it 79 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:08,280 Speaker 3: we'd feed through to inflation. 80 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:10,120 Speaker 5: They don't really get anything out. 81 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:13,720 Speaker 3: Of that, and that's why the policy rate's sitting a 82 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:17,839 Speaker 3: little bit high compared to inflation readings and unemployment readings 83 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:18,360 Speaker 3: right now. 84 00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:20,040 Speaker 4: And James, do you think that, Jim, do you think 85 00:04:20,040 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 4: that it's fair to think that next year you're going 86 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:24,679 Speaker 4: to see some pretty significant rate cuts, not just because 87 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,760 Speaker 4: of the new FED chair, but because you think it 88 00:04:27,760 --> 00:04:31,480 Speaker 4: could be appropriate based on potentially ongoing disinflation. 89 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 5: I think it is going to be appropriate. 90 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,839 Speaker 3: And I think if they make two rate cuts this 91 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:42,800 Speaker 3: year September and December, and then they follow that up 92 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:45,440 Speaker 3: in the first half of twenty twenty six, they would 93 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:48,040 Speaker 3: start to get to the neutral rate. What the Committee 94 00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:51,520 Speaker 3: thinks the neutral rate is maybe three percent or three 95 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:55,360 Speaker 3: in a quarter or somewhere in there, and that would 96 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,599 Speaker 3: be the exact rate that you should be at if 97 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:01,840 Speaker 3: inflation continues to decline toward two SAM and unemployment continues 98 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 3: to be in the low four percent range. 99 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 2: Hey, Jim, I appreciate you as always, Sair the former 100 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 2: San Lewis FED President Jim pull that wank in on 101 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:21,640 Speaker 2: the decision. Later on the soufternoon, Jeb Amata of Newberger Berman, 102 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:26,160 Speaker 2: writing macroeconomic policy supports a self lending scenario as inflationary 103 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:28,640 Speaker 2: pressures continue to selfen, we believe the FED has more 104 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:32,320 Speaker 2: flexibility to ease policy. Jude John just now for more 105 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 2: Chack and Mornic goodcrding how much flexibility does a shaman have? 106 00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 2: Later on the southnoon, Well, he's got a couple of 107 00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:42,840 Speaker 2: his team members who are dissenting, so that that puts 108 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:44,039 Speaker 2: I think him in a little bit more of an 109 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:46,720 Speaker 2: awkward spot. But I think the FED has been in 110 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:49,320 Speaker 2: a process to normalize rates over the course of the 111 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 2: last period of time, and it got derailed a bit by, 112 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:54,919 Speaker 2: of course, the tariff announcement, So I think there's still 113 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 2: a movement toward toward that normalization process, which we think 114 00:05:58,440 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 2: they're going to be back on track on. We think 115 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:03,119 Speaker 2: think there'll probably be a couple of cuts this year, 116 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 2: not today, of course, but probably in September and later 117 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:10,440 Speaker 2: in the year, reflecting the fact that inflation, while edging 118 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:13,360 Speaker 2: up a bit, has still been under control, and the 119 00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:17,840 Speaker 2: labor market, while again solid, still showing some signs of weakening. 120 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 2: The number coming in Friday is going to be one 121 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:21,200 Speaker 2: of the lower numbers we've had over the course of 122 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:21,960 Speaker 2: the last number of months. 123 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:24,919 Speaker 4: How much just a bullishness in risk asset's predicated on 124 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:27,840 Speaker 4: this idea that there will be two rate cuts from 125 00:06:27,880 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 4: the Federal Reserve in twenty twenty five. 126 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,800 Speaker 6: I don't know that broad market bullishness has got to 127 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:34,919 Speaker 6: be driven by ray cuts. I think you have within 128 00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 6: the internals if you think about small caps, So small 129 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 6: caps I think do need to see a movement toward 130 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 6: lower rates and rate cuts, and that historically has been 131 00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:45,520 Speaker 6: sort of a catalyst for small caps to rally. But 132 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 6: I think what we've seen over the last number of 133 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:50,200 Speaker 6: months is the hard data has held up well broadly. 134 00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:53,359 Speaker 6: We've gotten some good news on taris off, of course 135 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 6: the panicky early April announcements, and I think the markets 136 00:06:56,839 --> 00:07:01,919 Speaker 6: reacted to that, and many businesses are are responding quite 137 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:05,600 Speaker 6: dynamically to this issue of tariffs in maintaining margins. We're 138 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 6: going to see a little bit of margin pressure in 139 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 6: this second quarter. 140 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:10,920 Speaker 7: The margins are still at pretty high. 141 00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:13,320 Speaker 6: Levels, remarkably because tariff's been in place for a number 142 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:13,880 Speaker 6: of months now. 143 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:16,480 Speaker 4: So it raises the question about earlier this year, how 144 00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 4: so many people wrote off the United States as being 145 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 4: the biggest loser from some of these tariffs, and suddenly 146 00:07:22,480 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 4: people are coming around to this idea that maybe that 147 00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:28,720 Speaker 4: was too fast. Do you think that sort of the 148 00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 4: FED is a side show to really the crux of 149 00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:33,480 Speaker 4: who is going to bear the brunt of it? In 150 00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 4: our US company is showing in all of these earnings 151 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:38,960 Speaker 4: reports time and again they're doing just fine, better in 152 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:40,960 Speaker 4: fact than those in Europe. 153 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:43,720 Speaker 6: I don't think the Fed's ever a side show, but 154 00:07:43,760 --> 00:07:46,200 Speaker 6: as it relates to it might be today the notion 155 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:47,520 Speaker 6: of tariffs. 156 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 7: You have three ways again go right. 157 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 6: You either put price increases to customers and they eat it. 158 00:07:52,400 --> 00:07:53,960 Speaker 6: You put a little you know, you eat it as 159 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:56,520 Speaker 6: a company, and pressure of margins or suppliers eat it. 160 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:58,360 Speaker 6: So it probably ends up being in combination that we've 161 00:07:58,360 --> 00:08:00,560 Speaker 6: seen inflation tick up a little bit. Signs of that 162 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 6: right in the last inflation report, particularly around things like 163 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:06,480 Speaker 6: apparel and home furnishings. You see the margin pressure I referenced, 164 00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:08,640 Speaker 6: and then you know, we don't really have transparency to 165 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 6: supplier income statements per se, but you know there's probably 166 00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 6: some pressure going on there as well. And remember goods 167 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:17,920 Speaker 6: are only a portion of the inflation CPI number, it's 168 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 6: not the full number. And like you referenced just before, 169 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 6: our right services have been softer than expected. 170 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 2: I think Lisa was attempting to get you to defend 171 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,720 Speaker 2: your rowight in European ecquencies. So let's be more direct 172 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:31,480 Speaker 2: the broadening defendquacy exact. 173 00:08:31,720 --> 00:08:32,320 Speaker 7: We've moved. 174 00:08:32,440 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 6: We've moved early in the year to a theme of 175 00:08:35,000 --> 00:08:38,360 Speaker 6: broadening out. Right US certainly had you know, it was 176 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,160 Speaker 6: the major driver of markets over the course the last 177 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:41,520 Speaker 6: number of years, but we did think there'd be a 178 00:08:41,520 --> 00:08:44,520 Speaker 6: broadening out, and that broadening out would include small caps 179 00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,960 Speaker 6: value non US right we're very bullish on Japan. 180 00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:48,959 Speaker 7: Europe. 181 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,360 Speaker 6: We think with fiscal stimulus, particularly out of Germany, I 182 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:55,280 Speaker 6: think is going to show improvement and the relative valuations 183 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:58,840 Speaker 6: we're attractive. So we we upgraded our developed markets outside 184 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:01,120 Speaker 6: the US, which would include of course Europe in. 185 00:09:01,120 --> 00:09:03,360 Speaker 7: Japan, so we're sticking with that. We didn't. 186 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:06,800 Speaker 6: We're not underweight US because US still has so many 187 00:09:06,880 --> 00:09:09,760 Speaker 6: competitive strengths, particularly the tech sector. 188 00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 7: If you look at this. 189 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:14,040 Speaker 6: Second quarter earnings S and P five hundred earnings, X 190 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:17,400 Speaker 6: tech will be flat text up seventeen percent. Yeah, but 191 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 6: what's zup blends to up seven whatever the number. 192 00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:23,120 Speaker 4: Well, what's Europe's tech? It's not weight loss drugs anymore. Artist. 193 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:25,040 Speaker 7: Europe is a more cyclical economy. 194 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:28,040 Speaker 6: So if you get higher nominal growth rate spurred by 195 00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 6: they have lower rates, you get some fiscal stimulus, the 196 00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:34,320 Speaker 6: cyclical nature of Europe's economy will improve, and you have 197 00:09:34,360 --> 00:09:37,280 Speaker 6: the relative value differential from evaluation to the point to me, 198 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:41,160 Speaker 6: it's not necessarily a long term, secular or strategic allocation 199 00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:42,640 Speaker 6: per se. It was more of I don't want to 200 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 6: call it a trade, but it was more intermediate term. 201 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 4: Opportunity, which is one thing that we've seen with respect 202 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 4: to the dollar, and sudden strengthening on the back of 203 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 4: some of the announcement that we've heard with the EU 204 00:09:53,120 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 4: and European Union and how the teriff agreement kind of 205 00:09:55,679 --> 00:09:57,920 Speaker 4: got tied, and suddenly this realization maybe there'll be a 206 00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 4: little pain in Europe. And I just wonder if you 207 00:10:00,679 --> 00:10:04,080 Speaker 4: see a cheapening in European assets at this point, is 208 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:06,440 Speaker 4: that a buying opportunity or is that a sign that 209 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 4: this trade is over? 210 00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 6: Well, I think I think it represents a buying opportunity. 211 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:15,719 Speaker 6: You know, we're not we're not looking for opportunities that 212 00:10:15,840 --> 00:10:17,960 Speaker 6: last a month or two right in the context of 213 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:20,960 Speaker 6: allocating into clients, so we're looking for something that has 214 00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 6: some legs to it. 215 00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:22,559 Speaker 7: We still we think there. 216 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,840 Speaker 6: I mean, the amount of fiscal stimulus that's going to 217 00:10:25,880 --> 00:10:28,520 Speaker 6: go into the ground in Germany is massive relative to 218 00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:30,520 Speaker 6: the size of that economy, in the European economy, we 219 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:31,839 Speaker 6: haven't seen that in a long long time, So I 220 00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 6: think that does have some legs to it in terms 221 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:38,679 Speaker 6: of the opportunity. The dollar took a very significant pullback, 222 00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:41,840 Speaker 6: so that's rare to see that that, you know, move 223 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:44,520 Speaker 6: that fast, that that much We still think the dollar 224 00:10:44,559 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 6: will grind lower over time, but because US hard data 225 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 6: is held up and rates have probably stayed up higher 226 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:51,760 Speaker 6: a little longer than expected, the dollar has come back. 227 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:55,200 Speaker 2: Are you expending any any adverse developments in bone markets 228 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:59,640 Speaker 2: in Europe that might hold back that I could story? 229 00:10:58,960 --> 00:10:59,880 Speaker 5: We do? 230 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:01,839 Speaker 7: You worry a bit about that? Right? 231 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:05,120 Speaker 6: You know, if you look at the fiscal situations of 232 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:08,240 Speaker 6: different countries in Europe, While Germany has lots of room 233 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:11,080 Speaker 6: to stimulate, there are other countries in the region that 234 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:13,199 Speaker 6: don't you know, from in terms of what their local 235 00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:16,600 Speaker 6: bond markets are. So we're watching that closely in terms 236 00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:21,040 Speaker 6: of the spreads in whether it's you know, Italian bonds 237 00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:23,280 Speaker 6: versus buns or versus treasuries. 238 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:24,679 Speaker 7: Or what have you. But I think they have enough 239 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:26,560 Speaker 7: room right now to stimulate. 240 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:28,600 Speaker 2: So how do you play the European story? At the moment, 241 00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 2: someone might look at this situation and say, okay, up 242 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:34,440 Speaker 2: on etf this tracks the eurostocks fifty. Is that the 243 00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:35,760 Speaker 2: way to do it? Or is there a better way 244 00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:36,160 Speaker 2: to do this? 245 00:11:37,120 --> 00:11:40,320 Speaker 6: Well, you were an active manager, so we have strategies 246 00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:44,480 Speaker 6: that manage you know, European stocks or what have you. 247 00:11:44,520 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 6: So we're looking at high quality global companies that happen 248 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 6: to be domiciled in Europe, that have flexibility. We'll get 249 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,720 Speaker 6: some benefit from a local economy being stimulated, but you know, 250 00:11:56,720 --> 00:11:59,559 Speaker 6: we're still looking for quality companies that have global. 251 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 2: Reach away of course Japan and Europe. Not on India. 252 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:04,960 Speaker 2: This just dropping from the President of the United States 253 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:07,640 Speaker 2: just moments ago. India will be paying a tariff of 254 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:10,880 Speaker 2: twenty five percent. This just dropping from the President just 255 00:12:10,920 --> 00:12:11,400 Speaker 2: moments ago. 256 00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:14,240 Speaker 4: A huge disappointment from Narentromodi, given the fact that they 257 00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 4: were looking for something closer to that nineteen percent that 258 00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 4: we saw from Thailand. 259 00:12:18,320 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: It raises this issue. 260 00:12:19,520 --> 00:12:21,640 Speaker 4: That we were talking about earlier. What were the main 261 00:12:21,679 --> 00:12:24,600 Speaker 4: sticking points that ended up with a tariff agreement that 262 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:27,680 Speaker 4: was substantially higher than the region expected And frankly something 263 00:12:27,720 --> 00:12:29,560 Speaker 4: that a lot of retailers in particular are going to 264 00:12:29,559 --> 00:12:32,200 Speaker 4: have to factor in if they move their manufacturing there 265 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:34,199 Speaker 4: and produced a lot of textiles in particular. 266 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:37,360 Speaker 2: This from the President, the statement just dropping just moments ago. Remember, 267 00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:39,440 Speaker 2: while India is our friend, we have over the years 268 00:12:39,480 --> 00:12:42,360 Speaker 2: done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are 269 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 2: far too high. The President goes on to say, among 270 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:46,959 Speaker 2: the highest in the world, and they have the most 271 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:51,800 Speaker 2: strenuous and obnoxious non monetary trade barriers of any country. 272 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 2: A twenty five percent tariff for India. 273 00:12:53,760 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 1: Yeah. 274 00:12:54,160 --> 00:12:57,360 Speaker 4: He also went on to mention Russia and saying that 275 00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:00,600 Speaker 4: India has always bought a vast majority of their military 276 00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:03,439 Speaker 4: equipment from Russia. They also are some big energy buyers 277 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 4: from Russia. Suddenly, this goes back to what we were 278 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:08,720 Speaker 4: talking about earlier. This is a key negotiating tool, the 279 00:13:08,760 --> 00:13:13,280 Speaker 4: geopolitical positioning, what the relationship is with different countries in Russia, 280 00:13:13,320 --> 00:13:15,560 Speaker 4: how much they are going to connect with China. That 281 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:18,839 Speaker 4: is all part of the tariff negotiation in a very different. 282 00:13:18,559 --> 00:13:20,560 Speaker 2: Way than it but then previous years. That's the leasis 283 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:22,280 Speaker 2: on trade. This morning, Joey's got to see you. Thanks 284 00:13:22,320 --> 00:13:34,160 Speaker 2: for dropping by. Thank you, Sir Joe Marta of Newberger, Burma. 285 00:13:35,040 --> 00:13:37,880 Speaker 2: To extend the conversation, Haidi Krebo Redika of the Council 286 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,360 Speaker 2: on FIGN Relations, Heidi, welcome to the program. I just 287 00:13:40,400 --> 00:13:42,160 Speaker 2: want to pick up on two lines that came from 288 00:13:42,160 --> 00:13:45,720 Speaker 2: the Treasury Secretary scombson we don't want to decouple, we 289 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 2: just need to d risk. Is that the more diplomatic 290 00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:51,520 Speaker 2: way of saying, we want to decouple, but we're not 291 00:13:51,520 --> 00:13:53,679 Speaker 2: in a position too until we d risk. 292 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:57,000 Speaker 1: I think you hit the nail on the head. I 293 00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 1: mean decoupling is actually I'm not so sure that that's 294 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:05,080 Speaker 1: the best final objective anyway. I mean, the de risking 295 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:08,800 Speaker 1: is really because we have vulnerabilities where we have put 296 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 1: all our eggs in one basket, particularly when it comes 297 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:15,719 Speaker 1: to Rare Earth's Rare Earth magnets and the related technology 298 00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: and some critical minerals, some other products as well, But 299 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:23,520 Speaker 1: China really dominates that space. And we're trying to de 300 00:14:23,680 --> 00:14:26,600 Speaker 1: risk in the US, but it's in our allies as well, 301 00:14:26,640 --> 00:14:29,800 Speaker 1: but it's very, very very difficult. China has the choke 302 00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:34,520 Speaker 1: hold on those particular commodities, and I think they're going 303 00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:39,560 Speaker 1: to continue to use them whether or not USTR Career 304 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 1: ever wants to talk about them ever again or not. 305 00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:45,480 Speaker 4: How much Heidi, has the US gotten more leverage when 306 00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:47,840 Speaker 4: it comes to getting some sort of coalition of willing 307 00:14:47,920 --> 00:14:51,960 Speaker 4: coalition of trade partners to work on tamping down on 308 00:14:52,080 --> 00:14:54,400 Speaker 4: the threats that some of the perceive is coming from 309 00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:56,240 Speaker 4: China right now? Do you think that they are in 310 00:14:56,280 --> 00:15:00,120 Speaker 4: a stronger position if there is yet another ninety day delay. 311 00:15:01,360 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 1: So first I think as to the ninety day delay, 312 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:06,960 Speaker 1: if it if it is what happens, I think that 313 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:10,560 Speaker 1: is the very best option right now. And the coalition 314 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 1: of the willing is, you know, to look at both 315 00:15:13,880 --> 00:15:17,680 Speaker 1: the offense and defense. The offense meaning you want to 316 00:15:17,680 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 1: be able to to make the investments in, you know, 317 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:27,080 Speaker 1: in all of the areas collectively that protect economic security 318 00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 1: from weaponization from China, the you know, the the You 319 00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:35,080 Speaker 1: also want to make sure that if you're going to 320 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 1: rattle the saber of Russian secondary tariffs or secondary sanctions, 321 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:44,800 Speaker 1: however you want to categorize them, you know that you 322 00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:48,200 Speaker 1: have to be prepared if you impose those on China 323 00:15:48,320 --> 00:15:52,000 Speaker 1: that they're probably going to, you know, reinstate some of 324 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:55,960 Speaker 1: those export control restrictions because that is literally their chow 325 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:56,760 Speaker 1: point right now. 326 00:15:57,080 --> 00:15:58,800 Speaker 4: How much do you get a sense that that has 327 00:15:58,880 --> 00:16:01,440 Speaker 4: been the crux of a lot of the discussions, particularly 328 00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:04,320 Speaker 4: with the European Union, but also Japan and certainly is 329 00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:06,680 Speaker 4: Southeast Asia, which has been a conduit for a lot 330 00:16:06,720 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 4: of Chinese goods into the United States through those nations. 331 00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:13,960 Speaker 4: How much has that been one of the main discussion 332 00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:16,800 Speaker 4: points and part of the negotiations versus just sort of 333 00:16:16,840 --> 00:16:19,240 Speaker 4: an ancillary part oh. 334 00:16:19,280 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: I think critical minerals and mirrors have been key the 335 00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:26,920 Speaker 1: all the other issues that that Secretary besn't mentioned on 336 00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:30,880 Speaker 1: over capacity that affects everybody. You know, you have both 337 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,000 Speaker 1: developed and developing countries that are feeling the brunt of 338 00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:37,880 Speaker 1: the the auto you know, the the you know, excuse 339 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:40,280 Speaker 1: the use of tsunami on a daylight today, but the 340 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:46,080 Speaker 1: sumant tsunami of of of Chinese auto exports, flooding, flooding 341 00:16:46,120 --> 00:16:51,200 Speaker 1: markets everywhere from the EU to UH to Brazil. But 342 00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:56,960 Speaker 1: I think, you know, the one caveat is that because 343 00:16:57,000 --> 00:17:01,560 Speaker 1: we have proven ourselves, unfortunately to be the most trustworthy 344 00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:07,040 Speaker 1: trading partner, and one of Trump's big objectives is really 345 00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:11,840 Speaker 1: to upend both the trading and the security system the architecture. 346 00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:13,679 Speaker 1: I think there's not a lot of trust out there, 347 00:17:13,680 --> 00:17:15,600 Speaker 1: and one thing that you really need when you're dealing 348 00:17:15,680 --> 00:17:18,880 Speaker 1: with the coalition and building a coalition is you need 349 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:21,199 Speaker 1: trusted partners. So we need to make sure that we 350 00:17:21,240 --> 00:17:24,520 Speaker 1: don't lose that trust along the way in order to 351 00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:26,919 Speaker 1: be able to implement collectively some of the things that 352 00:17:26,960 --> 00:17:30,160 Speaker 1: we want to do on economic coercion, Hadi. 353 00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:33,200 Speaker 2: It makes me think of Canada, supposedly a North American 354 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:35,760 Speaker 2: friend of the United States of America, left out in 355 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:38,600 Speaker 2: the cold. And I've been surprised. I know you are too, 356 00:17:38,720 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 2: that the two key issues really that are left on 357 00:17:40,640 --> 00:17:44,240 Speaker 2: the table put China to one side. It's Mexico and 358 00:17:44,280 --> 00:17:46,840 Speaker 2: it's Canada, and we're not hearing enough. I don't think 359 00:17:46,840 --> 00:17:49,200 Speaker 2: about what's about to happen. What do you think is 360 00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 2: about to happen? 361 00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:55,080 Speaker 1: So you know, you know, President Trump has been very 362 00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:59,000 Speaker 1: dismissive of any deal being reached with Canada, and we 363 00:17:59,080 --> 00:18:01,880 Speaker 1: traded more than nine billion in goods and services last 364 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: year with Canada. They are the country to our north. 365 00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:08,399 Speaker 1: It's not a small player. There are closest partner in 366 00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:14,080 Speaker 1: addressing many things, including our critical mineral challenge. We've you know, 367 00:18:14,160 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 1: a lot of the investments that have been really for 368 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:21,399 Speaker 1: shared economic security have been together with Canada because we 369 00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:24,640 Speaker 1: are so complementary in terms of what we can both 370 00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:29,160 Speaker 1: extract and refine and produce together for on the critical 371 00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:33,199 Speaker 1: minerals front. So I think, you know, I'm very worried 372 00:18:33,680 --> 00:18:37,080 Speaker 1: about the fact that the Canada has not been more 373 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:40,240 Speaker 1: front and center in particular, Mexico has. I think it 374 00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:44,040 Speaker 1: comes with a different set of issues. They're connected, But 375 00:18:44,640 --> 00:18:47,919 Speaker 1: you know, I think Canada in particular is one that 376 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:49,200 Speaker 1: I am truly worried about. 377 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:49,800 Speaker 7: Honey. 378 00:18:49,840 --> 00:18:52,080 Speaker 2: Do you think that's because they just haven't focused on 379 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:54,600 Speaker 2: it or do you think that's just the natural consequence 380 00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:57,120 Speaker 2: of the fact that we have USMCA and we can 381 00:18:57,160 --> 00:18:59,360 Speaker 2: renego shad it next year. Which one do you think 382 00:18:59,359 --> 00:18:59,639 Speaker 2: it is? 383 00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 1: So, I mean, it's a good question. The you know, 384 00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:06,679 Speaker 1: we do have the ability and obviously are going to 385 00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:10,159 Speaker 1: renegotiate U s m c A. But at the same time, 386 00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:16,719 Speaker 1: you know, the the feeling that that President Trump really 387 00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:19,840 Speaker 1: likes to have the the like all the cards to play, 388 00:19:20,200 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 1: and feels like Canada has very few cards to play 389 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:26,720 Speaker 1: because they haven't diversified. They're they're so tied to the 390 00:19:26,840 --> 00:19:30,359 Speaker 1: US economy and they're really trying to figure out how 391 00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:34,840 Speaker 1: quickly they can diversify their energy exports, their critical mineral exports. 392 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:39,920 Speaker 1: They have very you know, a very comprehensive political backing 393 00:19:40,119 --> 00:19:43,439 Speaker 1: for d risking from the United States right now. I 394 00:19:43,440 --> 00:19:48,120 Speaker 1: think that's unhealthy. But I do also think that that 395 00:19:48,160 --> 00:19:51,640 Speaker 1: the that the President is going to use whatever leverage 396 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:54,520 Speaker 1: he has to strike the best deal he can. And 397 00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:57,399 Speaker 1: but I do, I do, I do worry that he 398 00:19:57,960 --> 00:20:01,159 Speaker 1: is probably more likely to be conducive to working with 399 00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:06,479 Speaker 1: Mexico than he will be with Canada, and I just 400 00:20:07,320 --> 00:20:08,200 Speaker 1: I'm worried about that. 401 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:11,240 Speaker 2: Interesting, Heidi, thank you, appreciate your time. As always, Heidi 402 00:20:11,320 --> 00:20:24,359 Speaker 2: Krebi Redica of the Council on Farm Relations for the 403 00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:27,000 Speaker 2: Asum of New Century Advisor is writing, the possibility of 404 00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:30,280 Speaker 2: two descents from Governess Waller and Bowman is notable in 405 00:20:30,359 --> 00:20:34,679 Speaker 2: terms of Fed history, But policy moves on agreement. Claudia 406 00:20:34,760 --> 00:20:37,320 Speaker 2: joints us Nophimore, Claudia, welcome to the program. What kind 407 00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:39,960 Speaker 2: of agreement can we make today at the Federal Reserve? 408 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:40,959 Speaker 2: What can we agree on? 409 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 8: I think it'll be really interesting to see if the 410 00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:51,160 Speaker 8: Committee is getting more comfortable having more conviction in their 411 00:20:51,720 --> 00:20:55,080 Speaker 8: forecast that inflation may rise this year, but then you know, 412 00:20:55,160 --> 00:20:56,840 Speaker 8: come back down. So I think a lot of this 413 00:20:56,920 --> 00:21:00,880 Speaker 8: discussion on what are the risks of the persistently high inflation. 414 00:21:01,040 --> 00:21:03,360 Speaker 8: We know from Governor Chris Waller that he sees those 415 00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:05,840 Speaker 8: risks as very low, and that's why he's in favor 416 00:21:05,880 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 8: of a cut, But is the committee moving in that 417 00:21:09,080 --> 00:21:12,159 Speaker 8: direction of, you know, moderating those risks or is it 418 00:21:12,240 --> 00:21:15,600 Speaker 8: real still? Are they still very much demanding more data 419 00:21:15,640 --> 00:21:18,040 Speaker 8: to get comfortable with the idea of rate cut. 420 00:21:18,320 --> 00:21:19,280 Speaker 7: Claudia, what do you think? 421 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:21,439 Speaker 4: And it matters a lot what you think because the 422 00:21:21,480 --> 00:21:23,680 Speaker 4: som roll is often pointed to. It is we certainly 423 00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:25,800 Speaker 4: up pointed too at the end of last year for 424 00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:28,600 Speaker 4: the hundred basis points of rate cuts in the second half. 425 00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:31,639 Speaker 4: Do you see the same cracks that Chris Waller as seeing. 426 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:37,359 Speaker 8: I don't see this like I can see the cracks 427 00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:39,640 Speaker 8: that he's pointing to. Maybe don't draw as strong an 428 00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:42,439 Speaker 8: imference as he does. I do think it's time for 429 00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:46,960 Speaker 8: the Fed to really be pivoting to why are you waiting? 430 00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:48,840 Speaker 8: You know, what are you looking for? And what do 431 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:49,960 Speaker 8: you need to see with inflation? 432 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:50,239 Speaker 5: Right? 433 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:50,399 Speaker 9: Like? 434 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:54,000 Speaker 8: Focus on that as opposed to the well we can wait. 435 00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:56,200 Speaker 8: We saw a lot of discussion at the last press 436 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:58,879 Speaker 8: conference about well, the economy is solid, the labor market 437 00:21:58,920 --> 00:22:01,119 Speaker 8: is solid, so we can wait and get more data. 438 00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:05,280 Speaker 8: And I think there are sufficient signs of weakening and 439 00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:07,680 Speaker 8: some of the softening the risk and the labor market. 440 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:09,560 Speaker 8: They've been with us for a while, Like, these are 441 00:22:09,560 --> 00:22:12,440 Speaker 8: not new. The low hiring rate paired with the low 442 00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:15,040 Speaker 8: layoff rate, this is not new, and yet we do 443 00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:17,439 Speaker 8: see signs of demand so softening. We saw some of 444 00:22:17,480 --> 00:22:21,480 Speaker 8: this looking at first half GDP numbers and hiring concentrate, 445 00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:23,159 Speaker 8: like there are just a lot of signs that this 446 00:22:23,280 --> 00:22:27,520 Speaker 8: is not a labor market that will hold up, you know, indefinitely, 447 00:22:27,840 --> 00:22:30,200 Speaker 8: and so the FED needs to back off some using 448 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:32,399 Speaker 8: that as a safety blanket in terms of waiting for 449 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:35,199 Speaker 8: more data and recognize those risks are out there. We 450 00:22:35,240 --> 00:22:37,080 Speaker 8: hear a lot about the risk to the inflation outlook, 451 00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 8: we should be hearing some more about the risk to 452 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:40,600 Speaker 8: the labor market outlook as well. 453 00:22:41,040 --> 00:22:43,200 Speaker 4: There have been a number of people who have speculated 454 00:22:43,680 --> 00:22:45,800 Speaker 4: that Fed char Ja Bowell might take an even more 455 00:22:45,840 --> 00:22:50,320 Speaker 4: hawkish approach to policy, might signal that the labor economy 456 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:52,520 Speaker 4: is in a good place and that they're balanced roughly 457 00:22:52,560 --> 00:22:57,160 Speaker 4: in their mandates in order to avoid accusations of political 458 00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:00,840 Speaker 4: interference that he's getting vulloid by President Trump. Do you 459 00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:03,000 Speaker 4: ascribe to any of those ideas or do you think 460 00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 4: that that's a bit speculative. 461 00:23:07,119 --> 00:23:09,720 Speaker 8: The best way for the FED to stay out of 462 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:11,640 Speaker 8: the politics as much as it can is to put 463 00:23:11,680 --> 00:23:15,200 Speaker 8: its head down part through the data be transparent, right, 464 00:23:15,200 --> 00:23:17,440 Speaker 8: the data don't speak for themselves. We need to hear 465 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:21,200 Speaker 8: how is the FMC interpreting the data? What are they 466 00:23:21,240 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 8: looking for? Like, that's the message. He needs to stick 467 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:26,840 Speaker 8: with it. They're not going to win. The FED will 468 00:23:26,880 --> 00:23:28,919 Speaker 8: not win if it plays politics like that's just not 469 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:31,119 Speaker 8: the game that it is well suited for, nor should 470 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:33,080 Speaker 8: it be doing it. So I think we should just 471 00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:34,960 Speaker 8: get a lot more of their thinking and just lay 472 00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:37,200 Speaker 8: it out there. That's part of the transparency. That's part 473 00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:39,679 Speaker 8: of the accountability that comes with the FED being the 474 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:42,040 Speaker 8: ones that make the decisions about interest rates. 475 00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:44,679 Speaker 2: So Clodia, let's found the data. I just wonder if 476 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:48,240 Speaker 2: two CPI reports is enough between now in September to 477 00:23:48,320 --> 00:23:51,560 Speaker 2: draw conclusions about how much tariff pastory will get and 478 00:23:51,640 --> 00:23:53,240 Speaker 2: how much of that tariff past Thory is going to 479 00:23:53,240 --> 00:23:54,960 Speaker 2: stick around. 480 00:23:56,359 --> 00:23:59,159 Speaker 8: Two more CPI prints could give us information both on 481 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:01,719 Speaker 8: the tariff past through I mean the terifs working they 482 00:24:01,720 --> 00:24:03,440 Speaker 8: were through the comment. This is going to take time 483 00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:06,760 Speaker 8: and we could see you know, ever rising tariff effects 484 00:24:06,800 --> 00:24:09,040 Speaker 8: as we go into the to the September meetings, So 485 00:24:09,040 --> 00:24:10,639 Speaker 8: I mean they're gonna have to have a real explanation 486 00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:13,480 Speaker 8: of how you would cut into a rising inflation environment. 487 00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:18,600 Speaker 8: But we have also seen, you know, months of the 488 00:24:18,640 --> 00:24:21,320 Speaker 8: outside of the tariffs, look at the housing services, look 489 00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:24,720 Speaker 8: at the non housing services. We've had some really encouraging numbers. 490 00:24:25,040 --> 00:24:27,480 Speaker 8: A few more months of that, could you know, really 491 00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:31,119 Speaker 8: strengthen the case that underlying inflation set those tariffs aside, 492 00:24:31,680 --> 00:24:32,919 Speaker 8: underlying inflation. 493 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:36,000 Speaker 9: Is really moving back down to target and that that 494 00:24:36,160 --> 00:24:38,000 Speaker 9: is a really important piece and two more months of 495 00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:40,960 Speaker 9: data in that direction can can help bolster the case 496 00:24:41,400 --> 00:24:44,639 Speaker 9: for rate cut based on the inflation risks are less. 497 00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:47,400 Speaker 2: Do you think they're in a position today and through 498 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:49,880 Speaker 2: the summer to keep on saying the labor market is solid, 499 00:24:50,119 --> 00:24:52,280 Speaker 2: so we have the luxury of whiting. Can they write 500 00:24:52,280 --> 00:24:54,520 Speaker 2: that in the statement once again this afternoon? 501 00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:57,679 Speaker 8: They can write whatever they want to write in the statement. 502 00:24:57,760 --> 00:25:00,200 Speaker 8: I think it would be misguided. I mean, we again, 503 00:25:00,280 --> 00:25:03,920 Speaker 8: we have seen various pieces of information about the labor 504 00:25:03,960 --> 00:25:06,840 Speaker 8: market that point to some weakening. And also if you 505 00:25:06,920 --> 00:25:09,760 Speaker 8: are running an economy with below trend growth and that's 506 00:25:10,080 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 8: you know, focusing on consumer spending, business, fixed investment kind 507 00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:15,640 Speaker 8: of the core of it. You know, that weakness does 508 00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:18,480 Speaker 8: eventually show up in the labor market and the FED 509 00:25:18,640 --> 00:25:22,520 Speaker 8: itself it's baseline forecast so shows some weakening in the 510 00:25:22,560 --> 00:25:26,439 Speaker 8: labor market this year. So it seems completely appropriate to 511 00:25:26,720 --> 00:25:29,560 Speaker 8: at least be pointing to the risk, pointing to that outlook. 512 00:25:30,400 --> 00:25:33,040 Speaker 8: I mean, that's, you know, a very reasonable thing to 513 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:34,720 Speaker 8: be pointed out, and I think they'll be a little 514 00:25:34,760 --> 00:25:36,879 Speaker 8: flat footed if they just keep hanging on to the 515 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:40,840 Speaker 8: labor market is doing just fine, economic activities doing just fine, 516 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:43,919 Speaker 8: because that's really I think that's a pretty one sided 517 00:25:43,960 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 8: reading of the. 518 00:25:44,560 --> 00:25:45,400 Speaker 5: Data right now. 519 00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:46,960 Speaker 2: We'll see if we get that change. It's if you 520 00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:49,320 Speaker 2: have Mason time, Claudia. I appreciate it as olwise, Clodia, 521 00:25:49,320 --> 00:25:53,480 Speaker 2: sound that New Century advises. This is the Bloomberg Seventans podcast, 522 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:57,520 Speaker 2: bringing you the best in markets, economics, antient politics. You 523 00:25:57,560 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 2: can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV week wrings 524 00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:03,280 Speaker 2: from six am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the 525 00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:06,800 Speaker 2: podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and 526 00:26:06,880 --> 00:26:09,760 Speaker 2: as always on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business 527 00:26:09,760 --> 00:26:09,920 Speaker 2: app 528 00:26:13,920 --> 00:26:14,360 Speaker 4: Mm hmm