WEBVTT - Anthology of Horror, Volume 2

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hello, welcome to Stuff

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind. My name is Robert Gooley Lamb.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I am Corrosive Joseph McCormick, and we are here with

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>our producer death Nicholas Johnson. Yes, and it is that

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>time again. Uh it's it's been a year since we

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>did Anthology of Horror volume one, and so we're about

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to uh assault you with Anthology of Horror volume two,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and then guess what the episode after this is going

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>to be Anthology of Horror volume three. It's not an

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>anthology unless they're at least three volumes exactly. So yeah,

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been looking forward to this all year pretty much, Robert.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I know the back corners of your brain are just

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>full of cobwebs made of old horror anthology TV episodes.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time we get talking about this, you dredge something

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up from the void, something you saw on TV as

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid. Am I wrong about this pretty much? Because

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid, I watched a lot of

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>television and of the various joyfully weird things that were

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on television reruns or syndicated horror anthology shows. Were one

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>of the best because you never knew exactly what you

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>were going to get each episode. It's an anthology. So

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>each episode of something like The Twilight Zone or Night

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Gallery or Outer Limits or Tales from the Crypt, each

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>one is its own thing, its own world. It has

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>its own cast, its own monster or threat or sci

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>fi weirdness, and it's completely encapsulated. I love especially some

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of these are really good. Actually, the Twilight Zone I

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think is even better than a lot of people remember,

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of times it's because The

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Twilight Zone was not an hour long show, or I

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>think maybe it was in one of its later seasons

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which turned out to be disastrous. I mean, you know,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a type twentysomething minute short story. It's it's

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a good way not to get bogged down and stuff

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter with when you're not going into like

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in depth character storytelling, but you're like exploring high level premises. Yeah,

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's more it's more in line with

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly some of the short stories you you know, the

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>classic short stories you think of to say, like a

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Philip K. Dick, where it's it's really about rolling out

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a cool idea, maybe a cool twist or a shock,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but mostly about you know, to make you think about something.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh, yeah, so I I love a really great

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>episode of an anthology show. Certainly, like you said, some

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of those Twilight zones hold up amazingly. Well, we're gonna

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be talking about one of my favorites of all time today. Yeah,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but then also some of the worst examples. I love

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>one show, and this is a show I didn't I

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think I even watched when it came on, but

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Perversions of Science, it was sci fi sort of spinoff

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of Tales from the Crypt And uh, I haven't watched

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Polly Sleazy, but very like Future Smooth. Yeah yeah, lots

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of cursing, some gratuitous nudity, but like a lot of

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>these shows off tremendous talent packed into each episode, like

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>some great actors, some great directors. Um So every horror

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>anthology show, I feel like the ones that i've I

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>look back on finally are the ones I haven't even

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>seen yet. Uh, there's so many treasures to uncover. I

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>watched so many of these things. It's very specifically on

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Beach Hotel cable. This is what I remember. Yeah, it

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>was like I watched Mystery Science Theater three thousand that way.

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess basically when my family went to

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the beach, everybody else would be out in the sun

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'd be watching the Sci Fi Channel. But that's

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how you see reruns of Monsters, which is a show

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that I had completely forgotten about until you, uh, you

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sent me something about it the other day and I

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the images from the opening credits and

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh my god, Yes, that's way back

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in there, somewhere deep in the recesses of my mind.

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>This is there. I've seen it before. All right, Well,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>before we get more properly into into Monsters, I just

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>wanna tell everybody, like what the basic format here is.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't heard one of our anthorogy of horror

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>episodes before, or the creepy Pasta episodes that preceded it,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea is, uh, we're gonna grab a few in

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in each episode, We're gonna each grab one episode of

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a horror anthology show. We're gonna tell you what it's about,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>remind you what it's about if you've seen it before,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna break down some of the ideas involved.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>There you know some of the science of the thing,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever it happens to to be, even if we have

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to shoehorn it a little bit. And uh, and that's

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>where the fun is exactly. We are nothing if not

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>experts at dragging deep thoughts out of strangely shallow places. Yes, uh,

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>though again we're gonna also go to some I think,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>some rather deep waters in these Twilight zonela. So let's

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>begin with Monsters. Okay. This this ran for three seasons

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>from through nine, and I think I only caught it

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>once at like my aunt's house back in the day,

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even know if it was in syndication

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or on the Sci Fi channel after it had finished

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>its run. But today you can find all of it

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Prime. You can find a lot of the episodes,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe all of them just on YouTube. But yeah, it's

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these shows, it's a wealth of

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>talent and weirdness. I was wondering how many people were

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>hoping that this show would have disappeared into history forever,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>only to have the digital age to revive all of

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>these old things that these actors did. Yeah, yeah, possible. Possibly, Yeah,

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Because there you see some some interesting people show up

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in Monsters for instance. Uh, you know you have you

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have some great authors like Dan Simmons shows up tom

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Noonan shows up writing and directing like a couple of episodes,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Tony Shalhub shows up, Gina Gershawn, Steve you Simmy in

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>an excellent pig monster related episode that I won't spoil

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. Oh man, we were just talking about pig monsters. Yeah,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is a great pig monster episode. I gotta

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>dive in. But yeah, this show is kind of a

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>spiritual successor to Tails from the Dark Side, which one

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight I did see a lot of and was

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>traumatized times by as a child. Uh. And the The

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Monsters featured many of the same people and again an

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>incredible opening sequence, like a lot of these anthologies shows had,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in which a humorous family of monsters settled in to

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>watch TV together. I believe, right before they start watching

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>their show, the mother monster shows up with a dish

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>full of something she's been cooking, and the child monster declares,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>candied critters, Yeah, it's it's cheesy, it's great. Uh and

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>then it and then you proceed into some new story

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going to center around a monster. And usually that's

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like really cool practical effects too. So these episodes it

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>can be a little hokey intentionally. So at times the

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>music is a little weird, this kind of sense music

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that I even have trouble loving. Uh, at times like

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>synthetic saxophone music. You've got a very open heart for.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Since Yeah, but great cast, cool monster And Uh, the

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>episode I'm going to talk about today is one title

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>far Below, And the reason I was so excited I

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know they had covered this. But Far Below

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite short stories by Robert Barbour Johnson,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>who lived nineteen o seven through seven. Uh, this is

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what like a Weird Tales era story that I read

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>years and years ago, and I've just I've lived my

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>entire life up until like this week, having no idea

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that anybody had ever adapted it. So so I was

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>instantly excited and I and I said, all right, I've

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>got to cover this. So it takes place in the

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>deepest depths of the New York subway system, one of

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>my favorite places anyway, And uh, you have a you

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>have a special segment of city services that wage an

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>endless campaign against the ghouls that burrow up from the depths.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a haunting tale. The positions them as

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>workers in a dark, in human place against an inhuman enemy,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and they all are on the risk of losing their

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>own humanity in the process. So this season two adaptation

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of Far Below has a lot going for it. So

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>not only do you have Johnson's short story as the

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the inspiration for it. He was adapted

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for the screen by Michael McDowell, the screenwriter who gave

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>his Beetlejuice The Nightmare Before Christmas and, perhaps to a

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent, Thinner Two out of three ain't bad. Yeah.

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus it's directed by the legendary producer Deborah Hill, whoa

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Deborah Hill of like John Carpenter movie fame, Yeah Yeah.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Longtime collaborator and producer of John Carpenter's films such as Halloween,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Halloween to the Fog, Halloween three, Season of The Witch, Yes,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Escape from New York, Escape from l A. She also

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>produced Clue, The Dead Zone, The Fisher King, and Big

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Top Peeweek. So, but this was one of the only

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>two things she ever directed, So I was instantly you know, intrigued.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And then the cast is small but pretty fun in

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that veteran actor Barry Nelson places his character Dr Vernon

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Rathmore Barry Nelson, was he in Planet of the Vampires? Oh,

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he might have been. Maybe you can do a quick

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>look upon that. Well, I cover some of other things

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>he was in. Uh, you know, he's one of these

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>character actors that was in everything. A lot of TV

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>work back in the day, a few classic horror anthology

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>shows as well, like Twilight Zone Suspense and The Alfred

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Hitchcock Hour. But I think most people will probably remember

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>him from Stanley Kubrick's The Shining, in which he played

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Ullman opposite Jack Nicholson in the job interview scene. That's

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>correct that I was also mistaken Planet of the Vampire,

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>says Barry Sullivan. Okay, different bar There were lots like

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of Berriers back in the day.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Um So the adaptation itself is pretty fun. It introduces

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a new twist, and they opted to present the Ghoules

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which are not really referred to as such if I

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly. Uh, they present them much more like the

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>more Locks from the nineteen sixty adaptation of HD Wells

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>The Time Machine, which I think is a fine choice.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you need some sort of subterranean humanoid but

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in human creature. If you're not gonna go for like

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>what I imagine is the straight up Google, or perhaps

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the dog like uh, Crafty and Google, then

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a morelock is a solid choice. Now, I

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>want to know more about the the ghouls in the

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>story in the in the segment, are I mean, are

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they sort of the grave flesh eating scavengers we we

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know of as schools? Um, not so much. I mean,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>there's clearly an inspiration from um Pigman's model the Lovecraft story,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in which ghouls are bubbling out from the like the underworld,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>um and uh and potentially corrupting mortal minds. Like, clearly

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that was part of the inspiration. That's part of the

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>world from which the story emerges. But in in the

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>story itself and in the adaptation, it's more like these

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are creatures that are wandering up from the depths like

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we've It's kind of a tolken Esque idea of if

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we've dug too far into the earth and now these

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>things are coming up and we have to stop them

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to continue to pick off subway workers

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, vagrants and then eventually other people,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and if we don't keep them in check, they will

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>just overwhelm us. This is funny. I was just reading

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The Two Towers in the chapter where Gandalf explains what

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>happens after, you know, after he plunged down after the

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bal Raggie says, they went into the depths of the earth,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>far below where any you know, the thing that lives

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>above it is the abode of slimy things and things

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that cannot be named. Yes, and and indeed these are

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>these are some of those nameless things. So on the

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>subject of ghouls, we of course have an entire episode

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Vault about the idea of ghoules. We've talked

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>at length as well about life underground and the effects

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of human life underground, and so I don't want to

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>retread on much of that content. It's it's definitely there,

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and we love it. And if you want more subterranean

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>humans and googles, go check those episodes out. But I

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>did find a line of inquiry on this that I

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think is pretty solid. So we have an underground war

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in a great modern metropolis against inhuman enemy that rises

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>from the depths, and yet these more lockesque creatures are

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>drawn up to feed on humans, the humans that have

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>overpopulated this region. They seem to feed stone, vagrant and

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>subway workers, and would feast on far more of the

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>populace if not for the efforts of Dr Rathmore and

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>his you know, basically, the premises auditors have come to

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>check him out because his department is seems to be

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>way overfunded, way over armed, and the outsiders asking why

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do you need all these weapons, why do you need

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>all this funding? And and then the story is about

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>presenting exactly why this funding is needed. But basically, in

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>this fight, uh, the fictional characters are far below have

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>much in common with those who battle various organisms that

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we label pests in the real world. And the most

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>obvious parallel is the rat, the true citizen of the

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>subway tunnels exactly. I mean, when you go down there

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a train, they're not in your way or

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting into your stuff. You're in their world.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You're just a guest. Yeah. Now, to be sure, a

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>single rat can be a problem even in a you know,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a prehistoric, precity sense of human existence.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>And the same can be said of say, mosquitoes, Uh,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they both can spread or help spread pathogens. Uh.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The same can be said of something like the locust.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>But but all these examples of our organisms as well,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they can become an even greater problem when they are

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>imbalanced by human activity. So let's let's think about the rat.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>As biologists Ken Appland put it quoted in the Case

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>for Leaving City Rats Alone by Becca Cudmore for Nautilus,

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>rats are disruption specialists, so they thrive in disrupted ecosystems.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>They spill into unbalanced realms and carve out a kingdom

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. And he points out that the very few

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>wild animals have done this quite as well as the

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>rats in the human world without undergoing domestication. That's an

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting point. Yeah, So we we think about organisms that

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can successfully thrive at the edges of human civilization. You've

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you've got two main versions. You've got those that become

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tame and and eventually get bred by humans, like dogs

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>or our animals or even cats, which are a little

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>bit wilder versions wilder are but still definitely domesticated. Yeah.

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got the ones that are just sort of

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>destroyed by our presence, which are i'd say maybe the

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>majority of animals, and like when we change an ecosystem,

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they suffer. And then yeah, you've got this third category,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the ones we think of as unwelcome survivors in our environments. Yeah,

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>because you've disrupted everything. But this is an organism that

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thrives on disruption. It can go right in there and

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>find a place for itself. You know, all arerat needs

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is a is a is a place to borrow fifty

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>grams of calorie rich or moderately calorie rich food per

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>day and some water to drink um. And they they're

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>going to find that they're going to find an abundance

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of that in our environments. I mean, in our garbage,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in our in our you know, in our refuse, in

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the in the the leavings of our civilization, and

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for all of our domesticated minions, for all of our

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>traps and our poisons. Rats still rule cities New York City.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>In previous episodes, I think we've even talked about rat

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>societies in New York City. Yeah, there are sort of

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>separate subcultures of rats within the cities that that they occupy. Yes,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna that's indeed gonna become very important to

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>here in just a minute. Okay, the rat was already

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>perfectly evolved to do all of this. Uh, they were

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>stealing from other organisms before us. Most likely, we just

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to offer more and more to steal, creating waste,

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>disruption and hiding places everywhere we go. And of course

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we went absolutely everywhere, bringing rats in our wake. Becca

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Cudmore's article, however, deals mostly with the Vancouver Rat Project,

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>which points out that some experts identify the potential dangers

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>posed by fighting back against the rat occupation too hard.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And part of it comes down to this, to the

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>disruption of the stable rat colonies. Uh, these these stable areas,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these little little pocket civilizations that the rats have established

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in these disrupted ecosystems. These are some of the key

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>points that have been made. First of all, drive rats

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>out of one home or block and into another home

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or block, and you might be spreading rat pathogens that

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise be quarantined within this stable group. Plus, urban

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>rats have a garbage based diet, meaning that they absorb

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bacteria, and this is often place specific bacteria.

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It's tied to the building, to the people that live

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in that particular building. Drive them out and you spread

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>these particular bacteria elsewhere. You're stirring the pot right, and

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>then rats in one area will wage bloody war against

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>any stranger rat that arrives. This applies to New York

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>City as well, where I've read and I think we've

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before about how a native rat population

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tends to do a decent job of fighting off rat

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>invasions that come in on ships, etcetera. Um, so it's

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a perpetual turf war. But these turf wars, especially when

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you stir them up up by fighting back against the

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>rats too hard, potentially, Uh, those turf war wars spill

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>rat blood. They cause rats to urinate out of fear,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and so what we get is a mix of rat

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>blood and rat urine and rat gut contents, a real

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>witches brew. In fact, Kaylee Buyers of the Vancouver Rat

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Project points out that these brawls allow bacteria to converge,

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to mix and potentially create new diseases. Bacteria that wouldn't

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise interact with each other are pooled together swap genes

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>inform new diseases such as UH, methocillin resistant STAFF or

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>m r S. A. Oh wow, I didn't even think

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about that as a consequence of another thing we've talked

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about before, of course, horizontal gene transfer between single celled

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>organisms like bacteria. You know, if one acquires a useful

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>adaptation and say resisting a certain antibiotic, they can share

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that gene for that adaptation via a sort of analogy

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of bacterial sex. It's not sexual reproduction, but they can

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>take part of their genome and just put it in

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>another bacterium. Yeah. Yeah, So we have a situation where

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we disrupted the environment. Organism that thrives and disruption has

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>moved in, and then if we attempt to remove that organism,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we bring more disruption into the scenario. We bring more

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>more chaos. Uh So the idea of of fixing these

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>probably becomes more of a hard problem of dealing with

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>these rat infestations. Uh So. Anyway, not not to say

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that we shouldn't fight against rats and keep them from

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>living too high on the hog, but we got here

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>through disruption, so we shouldn't be surprised if there are

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>consequences for disrupting it further totally. And if you're going

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to fight a secret war against the ghouls, well then

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it's worth fighting. Uh, you know, at a perpetual stalemate,

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>right White turn a cold war into a hot war exactly.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>All right. I'm gonna have more about the war against

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>rats and potentially ghoules here in a second, but first

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>let's take an ad break here. All right, Hey, folks,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>did you know that socks are the number one most

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>requested clothing item in homeless shelters. Well, Bombas is on

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a mission to change that. They created the most comfortable

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>socks in the history of feet, and for every pair

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of socks purchased, Bombas donates a pair to someone in need.

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Designed with special comfort innovations, colors, patterns, links and styles,

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Bombas are perfect for the whole family. Get your hands

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on a pair of Bomba socks and your feet well,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Bombas has donated over twenty million pairs and counting.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>They're made from super soft natural cotton, and every pair

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is designed with art support, a seamless toe, and a

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>cushioned footbed that's supportive but not too thick. My new

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>favorites are their new Marino woolf socks, designed to be breathable, dry,

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and never itchy, with just the right amount of thickness,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>with tons of different colors, patterns, links, and styles. Bombas

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>also make the perfect gift for everyone on your list.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I'm wearing a pair of them right now.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm super excited to have the sesame Street the count.

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh how Halloween socks on my body right now. And

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they are super comfy. Yeah. They gave us a code

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>for some free socks to try out, and you know what,

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, they are mighty comfy. I've been enjoying

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>them all week. Yeah. And plus the philanthropic mission here

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool too. Yeah. So save on your first

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>purchase when you shop at Bombas dot com slash mind blown.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That's Bombas dot com slash mind blown to save Bombas

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash mind blown. All right, we're back to

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>city rats, the ghouls of the real world. Yeah, and

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>comparing it to that episode of Monsters far Below based

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on a beloved Google short story. Uh so, here's another

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thing to think about here. Uh. We've talked about how

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>rats spread with human civilization and they are such a

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>highly successful organism, and yet there are a few areas

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the world that have remained essentially rat free, the

0:20:55.280 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>most notable of which is the Canadian Province of Alberta. Uh,

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's virtually free of the Norway rat. Uh. Now, wild

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>rats do turn up from time to time, brought in

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>through traditional means, you know, they come in, you know,

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>on a ship ment or or so forth. But the

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>province has been very proactive in squashing these flare ups

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto that rat free championship that they've that

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they've earned. You know, I have been to Alberta, actually

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>have been to the city of Calgary and and driven

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>around in there, and I never noticed roving teams of

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>anti rat sorcerers, rat exorcists of any kind. So so

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the secret? Yeah, that's like everybody's next question. How

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>did they get rat free? What they do? What can

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I do to get that in my city? Well, basically

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they were just able to keep the rats out before

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>they moved in, which I think lines up rather nicely

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>with the story of far Below, the idea of keep

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the ghouls from boiling up into New York City because

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>once they're up, there's no getting rid of them. Announce

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Yeah, So

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>basically this is how it went went down. The Norway

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>rat arrived in North America. And roughly seventeen seventy five

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>keyports cities never had a chance. But from there they

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gradually spread across the continent and uh and that took

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>time for certain areas. The rats didn't enter eastern Saskatchewan

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>until the nineteen twenties, and according to Alberta's official website

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>on their history of rat control, the rats continued to

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>spread northwest at a rate of fifteen miles or twenty

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.719
<v Speaker 1>four kilometers per year. So they first reached the eastern

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>border of Alberta in nineteen fifty and that's where they

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>stopped them with rat control measures, keeping the province and

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>its cities free of the furry invaders. And uh and

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that also includes its largest city, Calgary. Basically, they realized

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the threat to all levels of human activities, especially agriculture,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, which there was a lot of, which is

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>why the Department of Agriculture did a lot of the

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>heavy lifting, especially early on. But legislation also mandated control

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of pest by quote every person and every level of

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>government like county clerks or yeah, well, I mean I

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>mean essentially like they basically they've spread the message to

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely everyone, and then every municipality had to have a

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pest control inspector. A control zone was established and and

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this is good far below hinges in part in the

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>idea that a bureaucratic outsider, uh you know, like most

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of the world has no idea about the Google threat.

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>The whole tale is his education into the reality of

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the struggle against the ghouls. And Alberta's efforts actually mirrored

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.239
<v Speaker 1>this in some to some degree. They had to. They

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sought to enlist the population against the rat threat, you know,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>to build up, you know, the public awareness. So they

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>had to educate the public about rats. Most people in

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Alberta had never seen a rat before. It's hard to imagine. Yeah,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>so Alberta's uh so, Alberta agriculture educators traveled around with

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>preserved rats specimens to inform the public. There's a fabulous

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>photocolor photograph that Alberta's website includes of these educators on

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a farm in Alberta with a bunch of preserved rats,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>not in a container, just laid out on the grass.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a child holding one up by the tail, and

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just saying, like, these are rats. This is why

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to be vigilant about. This is what you

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>need to look out for. It's like teaching New Zealanders

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>about squirrels. Yeah, I guess so, um and what better

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>way than the physical thing itself. But on top of that,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there were conferences, there were posters, there were pamphlets, you know,

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these like straight up propaganda posters about the

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>terror of the rat. They advocated the use of poisons

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to fight back. Uh. Though they also had to bring

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in outside experts to help them because again, most Alberta

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>residents had no experience with rats, and that includes experience

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>fighting them. Uh. So they were able to battle the

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>rat infestations along the eastern border and keep them mostly

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>within ten to twenty kilometers with a border and the

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>program continues today in an altered but still effective form.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's actually illegal to own a pet rat in the province.

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be a zoo, a university, or a

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>recognized research institution. Uh. There's also a rat hotline where

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you report rat and flare ups in case, you know

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they when they do occur. But one of the problems

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is that, again most Alberta residents don't have a good

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>eye for rats. Hello, and extremely tiny dog just ran

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>across my kitchen floor. Well, what happens if they end

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 1>up reporting muskrats, gophers, ground squirrels, and other similar organisms.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, the rat police come out to

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>check and they're like, oh, those are not rats, those

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>are muskrats. Uh. You know, we can't really do anything

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>about that. Uh. By the way, to come back to Monsters,

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the Anthology series if if you're wondering if there is

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>an episode of Monsters that expressly concerns rats, uh, there is.

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>There's one called Stressed Environment, in which a female scientist

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who spent twelve years raising rats in a stressed environment. Uh,

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the hopes of evolving their intelligence, faces

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the terrifying results of your experiment. It stars care Linley,

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and it has stop motion rats that end up using

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>spears against their human captors. Smart rats. Indeed, so this

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>whole thing from far Below about this team of bureaucratic

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.239
<v Speaker 1>professionals who work for the city who have to go

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>underground to fight the uh, the menace coming up from below.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Of course, in the story it's ghouls. You've got the

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>analogy to rats. But I can't help but think of

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the fat bergs. The people up above are completely oblivious

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that there are workers down beneath the streets,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>in the tunnels, in the darkness, waging battle against a

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>monster that lives down there. And of course the agglomerations

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of fats, oils, grease and wet wipes and various fibrous

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>substances that clog up kilometers of sewers, especially in places

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like England and or I guess the UK more broadly,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but also in US cities. It seems like another perfect

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>analogy for the wars being waged on our behalf below

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>our feet that we don't even think about. Yeah, you

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>create this vast, unnatural underworld and it's going to it's

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna end up potentially being populated by by opportunistic

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>organisms or you know, they're going to be situations where

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>things like fat burgs emerge and you need people to

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>go wage war against them. If you want to learn

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>more about fat birds, we have a whole episode about

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>them from earlier this year that you can check out.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>So that was Monsters. Monsters I think falls more in

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the category of fun but often kind

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit cheesy when it comes to horror

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>anthology shows. But again, some of the like one of

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the big names, so one of them the classier names

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in horror anthology is of course the classic Twilight Zone,

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>right uh. And so there there are so many great

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Twilight Zone that really do pose interesting

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>questions that still remain interesting today. I mean, there are

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some that also have kind of hokey premises that don't

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>hold up. But I want to talk about one that

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I really think does hold up and is still more

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and more mind blowing the more you think about it,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and yet at the same time has an incredibly simple premise. Us.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is a great example of a

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>story premise getting a lot of bang for its buck.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>And so this is one of my favorite episodes of

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>The Twilight Zone. Originally aired in nineteen fifty nine, and

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's called shadow Play. So in the beginning of this

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>episode of The Twilight Zone, a man named Adam Grant

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is awaiting the verdict after being put on trial for murder.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>The jurors return from deliberation and they proclaim him guilty,

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and then the judge sentences him to death by the

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>electric chair. But as he's being sentenced, Grant begins to

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>laugh hysterically, and in a fit of rage and frustration,

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he runs around the courtroom yelling at people, not again.

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't do it to me again. You'll all die. Uh.

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So in his jail cell, Grant starts talking with his

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>roommates about how this has all happened to him before

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the trial, the sentencing, the imprisonment, and the execution have

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all happened to him a thousand times, but not as reality,

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>always as a nightmare. Grant says, he's in a dream

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, and at the moment of his electrocution, he's

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>going to wake up screaming back in reality. And because

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's always been a dream in the past, this time

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it must be a dream too. So he tells everybody

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he can don't let them send me to the chair,

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>because when I die, I'll wake up, and when I

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>wake up, you'll all die because I'll stop dreaming you.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Then there's this newspaper reporter who was present at Grant's trial,

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and he starts to become a little worried that he is,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, maybe only being dreamed by Grant, and if

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Grant wakes up, he and everybody else in the world

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>will cease to exist. So he gets drunk and he

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>goes to the house of his friend who's the district

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>attorney who was in the courtroom also who presented the

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>case against Grant, And the newspaper reporter begins to beg

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the district attorney to stay the execution, and the d A,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, thinks this is preposterous obvious as Lee, But

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the More's friend talks to him about it, the more

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>doubts begin to creep in, however much he tries to

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>resist them. Doesn't the world ever feel just not quite real?

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it sometimes just too perfect or just too full

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of too many coincidences? I think most people can actually

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>identify with having this feeling every now and then about

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>their own lives. Yeah, yeah, I mean especially we've talked

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>before about some about coincidence, you know, and how we've

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>would devote a whole episode to it, I believe, and

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and how we can over interpret that or at least

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's some vast conspiracy of foot well. I mean,

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what led like Carl Young to believe in

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this concept of synchronicity, that there could be that there

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was a connecting principle in reality that was not based

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on physical causation but was based on like, based on

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning essentially that events could be not caused by one another,

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but connected to one another through meaning. And this is

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>why we have this feeling that there are too many

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>coincidences in our lives now. But anyway, so after this moment,

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the District Attorney agrees to go speak to Grant in

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the prison before the execution takes place. Grant expects him

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>before he arrives, and the d A tries to interrogate

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Grant on his theory. He tries to convince him that

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be true. It's not possible that you are

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>dreaming all this and we're just in your dream. The

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>d A says, like, what you mean to tell me

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that my family, my friends, everybody in this city, in

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this state, everybody in the world is just living inside

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>your dream? And Grant says, a dream builds its own world,

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and the d A asks, well, how can I be

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a part of your dream if I sleep and dream

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>myself every night? And then Grant says, in this great line,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you only sleep and dream because I dream you that way.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So Grant is then headed to the electric chair at midnight,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and the d A is faced with this choice. Should

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>he call the governor to get a stay of execution.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>But that would be ridiculous, wouldn't it. But he has doubts.

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna oil the ending beyond that, but I

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>will say my favorite part of this episode, aside from

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the great performance by Dennis Weaver as Adam Grant, is

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is in the middle part of the episode. It's the

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>part where the doubts begin to set in for the

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>reporter and the d A and the other prisoners on

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Grant's row. I feel like this story at once raises

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>several of the deepest, most challenging questions at the core

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of metaphysics, psychology, and the philosophy of mine. Questions like

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you know for sure that other people in

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the outside world are real? And how do you know

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>your current experience is real as opposed to a dream?

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>How do you know you're not dreaming right now? And

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>then I think that the most mind blowing question from it,

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that if you're one of these other

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>people in the story, like the d A or the reporter,

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.239
<v Speaker 1>how do you know that you're real? Could you, in

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>fact be an imaginary person in somebody else's dream. And

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, with that last question, you may think the

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>answer is just obviously self evidently. No, I think it's

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, but it might not be as cut

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and dry as we might hope. I want to come

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>back to that in a minute. Yeah, I watched this

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>episode this morning, and yeah, it's it's really good. It's

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the again, a lot of these Twilight

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Zone episodes, they they hold up so well, the shot

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and like stunning black and white. Uh. These you know,

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess at times the acting might feel a little

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>dated to what you might have today, but it's it's

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>all really solid. Also, this episode was adapted in the

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>revival of The Twilight Zone, starring Peter Coyote. Uh in thee. Yeah,

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't either, but but I looked it up and

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, yeah, there's Peter Coote. And then

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of course this episode was written by Charles Beaumont, who

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of like the legendary names of the Twilight Zone.

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>You have a number of killer episodes. Yeah, it's really

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>really good. Uh, it's a really tight, well told story. Um,

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and I highly recommended, and in fact, I was just

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I was watching it on Netflix. The Twilight Zones all

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix right now, so you can go look it

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>up if you've got a subscrib option, and it's also

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on Hulu, I believe if anyone wishes to to watch

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>them there. But there's tons of Twilight Zone awaiting you.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I always forget just how many episodes of the show

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they did. I think there's like thirty six episodes in

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the first season, and not all of them are great,

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>but a striking number of them are great. Yeah. Yeah, Well,

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should take a quick break and when we

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>come back, we can address these questions about dreams and

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>being thank all right, we awaken you from the dream

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of advertising and back into the reality of our episode.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I think we should deal with some

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of the questions I was just posing that are raised

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>by this episode of the Twilight Zone. Uh, And the

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>first one I think would be the most basic question,

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>how do you know that your entire life hasn't been

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a dream? How do you know that the people you

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>interact with aren't just figments of your imagination? I think

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we all assume that other people are real and independent,

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>or at least you probably should assume that the outside

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>world really exists. Will it will continue after I die?

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And so forth? But it's harder than you might expect

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to prove this with certainty. Uh though, I think almost

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>nobody actually holds this view. If you actually were to

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>believe that your mind is the only thing that exists

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in the rest of the outside world and all the

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>people of it, and they're just merely products of your

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>imagination or your dream or whatever, this is known as solipsism,

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and to be more specific, I think it would be

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical solipsism, metaphysical meaning this is how the world is,

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to something like methodological solipsism, which you might

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>say is one of the tools of Saint Descartes, who

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about in a minute, which would just mean

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like solipsism might be a useful philosophical tool for a moment.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, listeners who are fans of the

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>excellent sitcom The Good Place will recognize this is one

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:47.439
<v Speaker 1>of the philosophies that is currently being explored in season three.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, I haven't gotten there yet. I think

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I only did season one. Doesn't stay good? Oh yeah,

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it it just gets better. They do a really good

0:35:55.760 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>job of mixing it up and defying expectations. Uh yeah,

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but I do want to stress I think solipsism is

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those points of view. That especially can be

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>frustrating to normal people because you can point out that

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to disprove, and that can create the

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>false impression that, like, some philosophers actually believe this. I

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think any philosophers actually believe in solipsism, But it's

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one of those weird edge cases, right that everybody just

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of accepts that you have to leap over it

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with an axiomatic assumption. I can't prove it. I'll just

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>assume the outside world is real and other people are conscious, right,

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you give you if you were to believe this,

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>like things get pointless or silly or dangerous really quickly, right, Yeah,

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of course, I mean it's not a disprove But there's

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a funny implication of instability that follows from the assumption

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of metaphysical solipsis um uh. And it would go like this,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're actually a metaphysical solipsist, you believe nothing that

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you experience is real, none of the other people actually exist. Uh,

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 1>They're just figments of your imagination or something like that.

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.720
<v Speaker 1>What would be the point of telling anybody about it,

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>just like for your own amusement? Like would any of

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the imaginary people you interact with benefit from you explaining

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>why you think that solop sisum is true. Now for me,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess the two reasons to tell people come to mind, though,

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>though neither is really grounded in the reality of living

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>within a dream. On one hand, you know, what better

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>way to dismiss the stressors in your life than to

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>tell them there but figments of your imagination, right to

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>go just full Scrooge on them. But you'd also have

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell that to all the people you like and love,

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and and that though is actually more attractive than one

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>might think. I mean, this is essentially an exercise of detachment.

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Buddhist and Hindu teaching speak to the importance of freeing

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ourselves from the chains of attachment. Both chains of iron,

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, chains to two things that are less desirable,

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but also chains of gold uh change to the things

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in life that we love or or or give us,

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, stability and peace. We have to free ourselves

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>from our hates and our loves and connect with the

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>true underlying reality of brahmin and uh and and so

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, that feels a little on par with what

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here. So I think some of the

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>incarnations of this philosophy is realized in like Hinduism. I

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>think especially I recall them being even more radical than

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>sollipsism actually and saying, not only is the not only

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is all of the sense data of the outside world

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>potentially an illusion, but also the self is potentially an illusion.

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's not it's not that I am the only

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that exists, but maybe even I don't exist. Yeah,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're going to get into even more

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of this continue. But then again, since almost nobody who

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thinks about it seriously is tempted to believe in sollip sism,

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we can just like use the axiomatic pole

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>vault and jump over the question. Yeah, I mean, I

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>guess we don't even really follow into full blown sollip

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>sis um via social media, in which we all have like,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have a carefully maintained version of ourselves,

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>an unreal version of ourselves that interacts with real versions

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of other people, like it's just a bunch of masks,

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, I think if anything we're going

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to lead us to like this full blown solipsism, it

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>would be that Yeah, well, I mean, there's there are

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>plenty of ways the word solop sisum is used that

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>aren't exactly the same. I mean, I think one thing

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you're getting on there is like people often do behave

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>very solipsistic lee on on social media. But that's more

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of not necessarily not believing that other

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>minds exist or that the outside worlds exists, but just

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>acting as if you only care about yourself. True. Yeah, yeah,

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's beyond that. It's not just I'm the

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>only one that matters, or that everybody is that everybody

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>else only matters insofar as their attention to me. It's

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that they are not real. They are all figments of

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>my mind. They are all but a dream. All right.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna jump over this question. If somebody actually

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>holds metaphysical solipsism, I can't disprove them. I'm just gonna

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>push them in a ditch. Um, So we go onto

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the next thing, which is maybe a more vexing problem,

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the problem of Cartesian skepticism. How do you

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>know that your experience right now, in this very moment,

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is real and not a dream? In shadow Play, Grant

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly explores this question. He's looking for clues in the

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>opposite direction, trying to notice details about his environment that

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would tell him he's in a dream. He'll point out, Hey,

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing doesn't make sense. That must mean I'm in

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a dream. They wouldn't put that right there. They wouldn't

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>let you have this in there. They wouldn't, you know,

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this wouldn't be scheduled in this way. Why am I

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Why am I getting executed the same day I got sentence?

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make any sense. I must be in a dream.

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Why are steaks being cooked in the oven? That sort

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of thing. That's a good one. No, I think that's

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just the nineteen fifties. But yeah, nineteen fifties culinary culture

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>in America. It might be a largely bad dream. Uh

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so Uh. The seventeenth century French philosopher, scientists mathematician Renee

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>de Card, of course, was famously concerned with this question

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of his philosophical works, such as his

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Meditations on first philosophy. Uh, having doubts about philosophy that

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>gave primacy to the evidence of our senses. So like,

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>if I assume is a starting point that I'm sitting

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>in a chair in a studio talking into a microphone,

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I could turn out to be completely wrong, because I

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>already know there have been thousands of times in my

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>life when I was a hundred percent convinced that I

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>was really physically in my elementary school lunchline next to

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Foghorn Leghorn, or on a boat headed to Greenland wearing

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a I don't know, a Superman cape or something, only

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to wake up and realize that I was actually asleep

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in my bed dreaming. And I was totally convinced in

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Yeah, I mean, granted, it's it's it's a

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>reduced version of us to a certain extent, Like we

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there are things that were not picking up on that

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we would otherwise pick up on a lot of the times,

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but within the context of the dream, we buy it

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>as our reality. Well, yeah, that's one of the things.

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So you say that, and I agree with you. There

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>is a textural difference to dreams, Uh, dreams. You know,

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>our our waking reality doesn't feel like a dream, right.

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Dreams are hazy and ethereal and and absurd in ways

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that we don't notice in the moment. And my surroundings

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>right now feel very lucid and solid, right, and it

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's a qualitative difference, of course, until we

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>start really looking at how we observe the world right exactly, Yes,

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be a qualitative difference, But maybe

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>dreams only seem hazy and ethereal in comparison in retrospect,

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>because in the moment, doesn't a dream often feel exactly

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>as solid and lucid as real life. I've actually had

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of dreams I recall that almost became a

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 1>lucid dream, and the sequence goes pretty much like this.

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Every time in the dream, I think, wait a second,

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm dreaming, aren't I? And then I look around and

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I test my surroundings. Doesn't this seem like a dream?

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't anything seem out of place? Can I fly that

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing? And whenever this happens, I conclude, oh no,

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>everything around me is normal. I can't fly totally real

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and lucid. This must be real and not a dream.

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've ever had this experience. Mine

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is similar. But what happens with me is I'll realize

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a dream, and I'll be like this annoying, and

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>generally it's an annoying dream. It's something that's it's not

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a full blown nightmare. But it's like it's annoying. I

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.919
<v Speaker 1>realize it's a dream, and then I just fall back

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>into it anyway, like like as if it's just I

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know that, and that in itself is frustrating. It's like,

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I I woke from the dream, I could have why

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't I go lucid at that point? Now? Instead I

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of shrugged and went right back into the

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>same old crap. Well, this is one of the things

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that the studies of dreams have found is that our

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 1>critical reasoning abilities are extremely limited in dreams. Dreams suppress

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>certain kinds of brain function, especially the types of brain

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>function that cause us to question our surroundings and think

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:57.360
<v Speaker 1>critically about sense data, which of course inherently makes us

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a very prone to thinking dreams are reality even I

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, it's hard to know how real

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they really seem in the moment, except for the fact

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that we feel like they're real right like. Well, like

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one bit of sort of folk wisdom is often thrown

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>around is like, oh, well, letters are backwards and dreams.

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't read text in dreams, or you know, something

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:18.879
<v Speaker 1>like that. I don't think that's true. I don't think

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>so either. But I have had situations where I've been

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>reading something in a dream and it's difficult. But my

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>experience and then of that is like, this is difficult

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to read. I must be dreaming. It's more, this is

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>difficult to read. What's wrong? You know? I don't think

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about it about the dream answer being the solution, right.

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And so this whole dream problem is one way of

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 1>getting to the position sometimes known as Cartesian skepticism, named

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>after Descartes, and also affecting our our mailbot Carnie Uh.

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Since dreams and also hallucinations such as the kind generated

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>by this figure, Daycard imagines this evil demon who wants

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to deceive him with false visions of the world, since

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>they demonstrate that it's post sable for us to be

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>totally convinced of perceptions about the outside world while also

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>being a hundred percent wrong. Descartes thinks, you know, we

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>should doubt all of our perceptions unless we justify them

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in a logically airtight way. And of course, the Decart's

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimate justification for the evidence of it of his senses

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>invokes a benevolent God who wouldn't trick him. But is

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>there any non theological way to get around this, and

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>he tells or tests to separate dreaming life from waking life.

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>There have been philosophers who have looked into this and

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>tried to come up with here's how you tell the difference.

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>The English philosopher John Locke thought he had one. He

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>had one that was pain. Right. Locke said, you can't

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>feel pain in a dream like you can in waking life,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's your easy way to tell the difference. Right.

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So maybe if you think you're in a dream, I

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:50.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know, poke your finger with a needle and see

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>if it actually hurts, and if it does, you're awake,

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and if it doesn't, you're in a dream. But twentieth

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>century psychology research has found this is not true with

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>so this is where we get the whole pinch me situation.

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I think it may very well be. Yeah, yeah,

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. I hadn't thought about that. Yeah, pinch me

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>see if I'm dreaming. I think this would not actually

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>due to the research though, I think this would not

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>actually be a full proof test, because people do, in

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>fact sometimes report the impression that they have felt pain

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in dreams. Just one example is a nine study in

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the Journal Sleep by Nielsen at all uh and to

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>read a couple of quotes from them, uh quote. Some

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>studies indicate that pain is rare and it may be

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>beyond the representational capability of dreaming. However, the present study

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>describes experiences of dreamed pain that were reported incidentally in

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>experiments on the effects of somatosensory stimulation administered during rapid

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>eye movement sleep. The results indicate that although pain is

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>rare in dreams, it is nevertheless compatible with the representational

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>code of dreaming advantage Freddy Krueger. Right, And this actually

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>comes out comes through in shadow play. Right. There's a

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>part where, uh, where Grant talks about going to the

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>electric chair and how he doesn't want to be sent

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>there to die again, and somebody's arguing with them. They say,

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're just dreaming, you won't feel it, but he says, no, Wait,

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you dream something bad, doesn't it doesn't

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it terrify you? Doesn't it hurt when it happens in

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the dream? Yeah? I mean, I'm struggling to think of

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>examples from my own remember dreams in which I experienced

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>physical pain, But but yeah, it sounds completely possible. I'd

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>be interested to hear from any listeners who have had

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>dreams in which they have felt pain. Yeah, they also

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged that it might not be very common, but it

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 1>does appear to happen. So I think it looks like

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the scientific research disproved lock here. Now there was another

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>test I came across, and it was that the American

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 1>philosopher Norman Malcolm wrote a couple of influential works about

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>dreaming in the nineteen fifties in which he argued that

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>dreams could be put to the test of quote a

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 1>principle of coherence. So the ideas, do the events of

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>your present circumstances connect logically with the preceding events and

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your life? So if you are currently

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>having a sword fight with Christoph Lambert, why are you

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.879
<v Speaker 1>having that sword fight? How did you get there? Does

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the sequence of events make sense to you? Uh? And

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of similar to the test used in

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the movie Inception when you ask how did I get here? Right?

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The characters do that there to see if they're dreaming.

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>If you find you can't recall how you got where

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you are, this allows you to realize that the present

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:27.280
<v Speaker 1>moment does not connect coherently with the rest of your past,

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and thus you're probably dreaming. But then again, I'm not

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>sure this is a full proof test. It might be

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a sort of helpful test, but it doesn't get you

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to the right answer all the time. We know that

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the dreaming mind state, again, as we were saying earlier,

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>greatly reduces critical reasoning capacities, and it often seems to

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>short circuit logical inquiries with false answers. Right, So you

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>might ask a question that would be a good question

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>if you could really think it through to get to

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of whether you're dreaming or not. But in

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>your dreaming state, you don't think it through very well. Right,

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't have full control of your critical thinking. So

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a self reflective question like that might not be helpful. Right, So,

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, no one has introduced

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>an airtight test to tell the difference between a dream

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and reality. Waking life, of course, seems real enough. It

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel the way dreams feel in retrospect and our

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>memories of them, but that still doesn't help us achieve

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 1>certainty in the moment. And then this year gets us

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to one final thing, which I think is the weirdest

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 1>place we might go about dreams. This is the crazy

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>part of shadow play. Grant tells people around him that

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>if he sent to the electric chair, he's going to

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>wake up from his nightmare, and if he wakes up,

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the world will die, because this entire world

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is nothing more than his dream. And this is my

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite part of the episode. So on one hand, you

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>might think, well, what would it matter. You know the

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 1>people that you imagine in your dream are not conscious.

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there are many different ways to fear death,

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but one common neurosis here is the anxiety of being

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:03.399
<v Speaker 1>snuffed out right, of no longer existing, of their being

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a permanent end your conscious experience. And if the people

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in Grants dream are not conscious, there's nothing for them

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to be afraid of, no experience to exist in the

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:13.839
<v Speaker 1>first place, and thus nothing to come to an end.

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:17.439
<v Speaker 1>But in the story they do seem afraid. The ones

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:19.800
<v Speaker 1>who start to doubt their reality. They don't want to

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be snuffed out, and the story seems to imply that

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>they actually do have minds that they want to live on.

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to be blinked out of existence by

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>alterations in Grant's brain activity. And this is also the

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>only part of the story that's actually fantastical, because otherwise

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the story isn't even fantasy or science fiction. Like, it's

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just perfectly plausible, right, that a man has the same

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.879
<v Speaker 1>mayor over and over. Uh. And I want to take

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>this idea seriously for just a moment, could you the

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 1>conscious entity with a mind, the person you are now

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>actually be a person in someone else's dream to spare

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>some similarities to the simulation argument that we've discussed on

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the show in the past. Yeah, yeah, the idea that

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that the reality we're experiencing now is a simulation created

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>by a far future society that's currently just really excited

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:15.359
<v Speaker 1>about the idea of the twenty right, Um, that we

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>really want to simulate nineteen again, Oh thank god for that.

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Well look, I mean, look at our cycles of nostalgia, right,

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, look at some of our video

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>games simulated worlds that we get into going back to,

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like an Old West setting, or a hard

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:35.279
<v Speaker 1>boiled detective world, or or the nineteen eighties, etcetera. So

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not impossible. But but just as Grant argues

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that the perfection of one's life is an argument for

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>simulation like this is too perfect, it's it's too you know,

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong here. I believe there was a character

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in one of Ian M. Bank's culture novels who observed

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that the world is just too full of viciousness to

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be a simulation. That this must be the base reality,

0:51:56.719 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>because who would dream it up otherwise. Now, I suppose

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of interesting, uh, to think that that that

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 1>these are the thoughts attributed to a character within a

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>fictional sci fi novel. But still I think it's an

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting point. Right. But then again, like, what kind of

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>frame of reference do we have if we have no

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>memory or no understanding of the world outside of the simulation? Right?

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>But I mean thinking about one way to think about

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea of being a simulation in a computer program

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is that you are being dreamed by the computer. Uh. Now.

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>One hurdle to the simulation argument has always been is

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it possible for a computer to generate and host conscious minds?

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. It's impossible. It's often assumed to be possible,

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but we just don't really know. The only thing we

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>can be relatively certain works to generate and host consciousness

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is a brain. We know for sure they can do

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that because your brain is doing it right now, right.

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But here's where, in some respects the possibility of living

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in someone else's stream becomes more plausible, maybe than living

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>in a computer simulation. We know a brain can generate

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at least one conscious mind. Who says it can't generate

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>more than one. There have been a number of experiments

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in fact and observations and neuroscience too, especially throughout the

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, that have led some experts to believe it

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>might be possible to have at least two distinct conscious

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>minds occupying the same brain. One big example, of of course,

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is something we've covered on the show in the past.

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>We did I think a two part episode about it

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can look up, and it's the split brain experiments.

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:36.720
<v Speaker 1>These were originally experiments done by Roger's Ferry and Michael

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Gazaniga in the middle of the twentieth century, and they

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dealt with epilepsy patients, people who uh suffered really intense

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>seizures and no other treatment worked, and so the treatment

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that they eventually went in for was known as a

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 1>total corpus callisotomy, a severing of the corpus colossum, which

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is a bundle of nerve fiber that connects the two

0:53:57.640 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 1>hemispheres of the brain, and the procedure apparently worked pretty well.

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>When you sever that the corpus colosum, it does help

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to stave off these these horrible seizures. But there were

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting side effects that made the people

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>who underwent this procedure very valuable to neuroscience research. For example,

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to give a very short version, you could show in

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>some experiments that the part of the brain that talks,

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>which appears to be primarily in most people, the left

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere of the brain, which is capable of speech, could

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not explain what the right hemisphere was doing. And so

0:54:37.440 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if you show an image to only the part of

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the visual field that connects to the right hemisphere of

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the brain and controls only one of the hands, the

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>hand controlled mostly by that hemisphere of the brain could

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:55.880
<v Speaker 1>do things like select an object that was associated with

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the image displayed in that part of the visual field.

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>But then the person talking against speech is thought to

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>be mostly generated by the left hemisphere, couldn't explain in

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a logical way why that object was chosen, And that

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.319
<v Speaker 1>in many experiments like it, led some researchers to an

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:19.080
<v Speaker 1>obvious question. Is it possible that both hemispheres in split

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>brain patients are conscious but separately conscious within the same skull.

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>In some sense, could there be two conscious minds within

0:55:28.760 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>one brain? Yeah, it's one of the This is a

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 1>total like real life Twilight Zone scenario that we've we've

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>thought about before on the show, Like maybe by virtue

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of once being one, like there's still like each one

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 1>still thinks they are the one, but they are too. Yeah. Well,

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and another thing that would be very creepy is again

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the localization of speech function in the brain,

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe only one of these can really talk to the

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:57.799
<v Speaker 1>outside world and the other one just can't really. It

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 1>can still act with the body, but it can't generate

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>complex sentences or anything, which would be an obvious asymmetry

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in which one of the conscious minds within the brain

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>gets represented to the outside world. Well, one of them

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:13.279
<v Speaker 1>has no mouth and cannot scream. Now, I definitely want

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge that I think our picture of this has

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:18.880
<v Speaker 1>been somewhat complicated by more recent research. I think we

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do talk about the center split brain episodes if you

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.720
<v Speaker 1>want to go revisit those and and see more detail.

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But our picture on how information might or might not

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be shared between brain brain hemispheres, even in the cases

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of a full corpus calisotomy seems to have been complicated

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:36.959
<v Speaker 1>by recent studies. I remember there was one we talked

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about by researcher named I think a Ya or Pinto

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 1>who uh did research undercutting the idea that there could

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>be two conscious minds within the same brain. Um. I

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:48.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is an issue that that's not fully

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>settled and is still full of like weird mysteries. We

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what's going on. Another example from neuroscience

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:58.799
<v Speaker 1>case history that has been taken as possible evidence that

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there could be multiple conscious minds within the same brain

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is the the idea of alien hand syndrome, where you know,

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hands may interfere with one another's behaviors as if they're

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>guided by different wills. So one hand tries to button

0:57:13.920 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up a shirt, the other hand tries to unbutton the shirt. Now,

0:57:17.240 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to stress that there is by no means

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>proof or even necessarily strong evidence that there are multiple

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is within the same brain, because again, you can't

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>know for sure that there's consciousness anywhere unless somebody tells

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you that they have consciousness. Right. I mean, that's the

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>inherent problem leading back to the solve sism is you

0:57:34.720 --> 0:57:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to begin with right. But but then again I also

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have to to throw in you know, we we have

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to be careful about the idea of thinking about like

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the unity of self conscious Yes, yes, is it? Is it?

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the more you look at it, this idea

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that there is one central unchanging you in there is

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a fallacy and one that we we still have a

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble with when it seems like the more

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>reasonable planation is that first of all, you're an entity

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of perpetual change, but also there's kind of a chorus

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of of of of yourself in there. Yeah. And one

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>interpretation that that brings together a lot of the sceneoscience

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is the interpreter theory and interpretation is the interpreter theory.

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>The interpreter theory of Michael Kasanaga, one of the researchers

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>involved in in these split brain experiments, where he's got

0:58:24.600 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there's sort of a region of your

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>brain that's associated with the speech production parts of your

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 1>brain that is there to unify brain phenomena you know

0:58:34.840 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that are disparate in the beginning, and it's sort of

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 1>its job is to tell one unified, coherent story to

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you about what's happening throughout your brain. So it takes

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>all these disparate plot threads and says, here's how I'll

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 1>finish up the story. Uh, and then and that creates

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the sense of you. Your sense of self is generated

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>by this sort of like a concatenation process in the

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:58.800
<v Speaker 1>interpreter part of the brain. But to come back to

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of multible consciousness is in the same head

0:59:01.680 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the idea of being someone else's dream. I've

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>had this idea before. Again, this is not something that

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I would argue is strongly indicated by evidence, just a

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>very strange possibility that seems hard to rule out on

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the basis of any evidence I'm aware of. What if

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the process of imagining the workings of other minds involves

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the low resolution simulation of separate conscious minds. What if

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to understand somebody else's behavior, you trying

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand, you know, why did Jeff say what he said,

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and so you imagine his thought processes, Or when you're

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to write dialogue for a fictional character. What if,

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in cases like this you're practicing theory of mind, the

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 1>brain temporarily carves out a bit of its consciousness potential

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to devote to this imagined person in order to better

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>simulate their behavior. Interesting. Yeah, yeah, I mean in many

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.960
<v Speaker 1>cases it would, especially if it's a perceived enemy. Right,

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It's probably gonna be a rather simple model. You know,

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's you're you're reducing them to like, you know, cartoon

1:00:06.440 --> 1:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>villain levels of impulse and desire. But I mean there's

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>no limiting it. Just two enemies. I mean, in any case,

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>whenever you try to imagine somebody you don't know exactly

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>everything your brain is doing to create that simulation of

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>them within you. Right, Like, even the people we know

1:00:25.280 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they the best in our lives, say, for instance, for instance,

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>our you know, our our you know, uh, you know,

1:00:31.080 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>life partners, you know, or you know, loved ones, family members,

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>really close friends. We might have a more robust simulation

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of them in our theory vr theory of mind, but

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it is still just a model of how their mind

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>works and what they want and how they think. Yeah,

1:00:47.680 --> 1:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's our best, guess, it's our I mean, it's not

1:00:50.120 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>their brain. It's our brain trying to do it. And

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>if this were the case, you could be, in some

1:00:55.400 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sense creating separate conscious people in your head whenever you

1:01:01.160 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>try to analyze a friend's behavior, or write a scene

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for a character in a story, or dream about a

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>district attorney sitting across from you in a prison cell.

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you might say, well, if they're all generated by

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>your brain, they're all you. I mean, anatomically, they are

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>all you. They're all made by your body. The other

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>side of this, too, is like when you read a novel,

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly, I mean, in any time you imagine a person.

1:01:24.960 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if this is possible, if there's any validity

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to some of these alternative theories of dual consciousness. For example,

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, Michael Gazania's left brain interpreter theory. Perhaps

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the part of your brain that talks and interprets and

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to be in charge makes meaning of the self

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is not aware that the same brain is also generating

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>little conscious simulations of people partitioned from the interpreter and

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the self. Yeah, yeah, I mean it

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>makes me think. For instance, I've read a fair amount

1:01:58.160 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of Karl Sagan I love picking up a Carl say

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>In book and reading it. Uh you know, it gives

1:02:02.800 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>me comfort. And as as such, I do kind of

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have like a tiny Carl Sagan in my brain, like

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>an idea of Sagan that is kind of walking around

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in there or maybe summoned. But the really mind blowing ideas,

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what if that little Carl Sagan has an experience? What

1:02:18.920 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if there's something that it's like to be that simulated

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Carl Sagan. What if he gets into an argument with

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the little Terence McKenna in my head? Right, I mean,

1:02:27.240 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still your brain, it's still all the tissue in

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>your head. But what if there's something in there that's

1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a little Carl Sagan simulated by your mind sometimes that

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has its own wants, the desires, experiences. Now, again, I

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>recognize that this is way out there in speculative territory,

1:02:43.480 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and I do not claim that there is strong evidence

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>for this, but it is one of those strange things

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to think of reasons to rule it out,

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and I can't. Uh So, if this seemingly weird scenario

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>were the case, would there be any way to know

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure that you weren't a conscious low resolution simulation

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of a mind inside a brain ruled by the tyrannical

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>dictator mind that could blink you in and out of

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>existence by the whims of a dream or imagination. Well,

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:15.479
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a theological model there. Yeah. Fortunately again,

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any strong evidence this is the

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>case sleep tight. All right, Well, there you have it.

1:03:21.880 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>That is uh Anthology of Horror volume two. And if

1:03:25.560 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you loved it, you don't have to wait an entire year.

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You just have to wait a couple of days for

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the next installment, because we're gonna be back with Anthology

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of Horror Volume three, in which show will look at

1:03:36.720 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>an episode of The Outer Limits and an episode of

1:03:39.640 --> 1:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror. I can't wait. In the meantime,

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out other episodes of Stuff

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind, heading over to Stuff to Blow

1:03:46.480 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. That's where you will find them

1:03:49.200 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and see what else can you do? You can find

1:03:51.560 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the show wherever you find podcast, rate, interview, subscribe. That's

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a great way to help check out our other show, Invention. Uh.

1:03:58.240 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an Invention pod dot com and an is that

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it is available everywhere as well and If you want

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to interact with other fans of the show, you can

1:04:05.040 --> 1:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>go to our Facebook group that is the Stuff to

1:04:07.560 --> 1:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind discussion to watch a huge things As

1:04:10.200 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producer Death Nicholas Johnson. If

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you would like to get in touch with us with

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeart Radios. How Stuff Works. For more podcasts

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio is at the iHeart Radio app,

1:04:38.240 --> 1:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.