WEBVTT - Episode 6: The Overconfidence Game

0:00:15.276 --> 0:00:22.636
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. So our story actually begins a couple of decades

0:00:22.676 --> 0:00:25.956
<v Speaker 1>ago at a dinner party thrown by a really rich

0:00:25.996 --> 0:00:30.356
<v Speaker 1>guy in snowmass Colorado. He'd invited a bunch of his friends,

0:00:30.396 --> 0:00:34.196
<v Speaker 1>plus two younger women he didn't really know. One was

0:00:34.236 --> 0:00:37.516
<v Speaker 1>a writer who happened to be in town, Rebecca Sulman.

0:00:38.556 --> 0:00:41.676
<v Speaker 1>It was this glam house that looked like a Ralph laurentad,

0:00:41.756 --> 0:00:47.676
<v Speaker 1>with the chelims and woodburning stove and rusticity, some sort

0:00:47.676 --> 0:00:56.796
<v Speaker 1>of luxury roughing it fantasy vacation home. And it was

0:00:56.916 --> 0:01:01.036
<v Speaker 1>mostly older people, and clearly people who were wealthy and

0:01:01.116 --> 0:01:04.396
<v Speaker 1>powerful and thought of themselves as important. And we were

0:01:04.436 --> 0:01:07.956
<v Speaker 1>both about forty and were clearly like the young ingeneus

0:01:08.076 --> 0:01:12.396
<v Speaker 1>in the room. Rebecca had gone to Colorado to visit

0:01:12.476 --> 0:01:16.036
<v Speaker 1>her friend Sally. Sally had talked her into going to

0:01:16.116 --> 0:01:18.436
<v Speaker 1>this party, and the point of the party was to

0:01:18.476 --> 0:01:21.836
<v Speaker 1>make Rebecca feel ignored, at least that's how she felt.

0:01:22.396 --> 0:01:24.716
<v Speaker 1>The host hardly said a word to her until they

0:01:24.716 --> 0:01:28.316
<v Speaker 1>were about to leave, and then came over to us

0:01:28.676 --> 0:01:31.476
<v Speaker 1>and said to me, so, I hear you've written a

0:01:31.516 --> 0:01:34.156
<v Speaker 1>couple of books, And at that point, how many books

0:01:34.156 --> 0:01:38.836
<v Speaker 1>had you written? I think seven, which is not technically

0:01:38.836 --> 0:01:44.116
<v Speaker 1>a couple. And so I said several actually, and he said, oh,

0:01:44.116 --> 0:01:47.956
<v Speaker 1>and what are they about in this already intensely patronizing town.

0:01:48.316 --> 0:01:51.836
<v Speaker 1>My most recent one had been about Edward Moybridge at

0:01:51.996 --> 0:01:56.876
<v Speaker 1>Moybridge's transformation of photography into a technology that could capture motion.

0:01:57.916 --> 0:02:02.516
<v Speaker 1>And he interrupted me to tell me that I should

0:02:02.596 --> 0:02:05.596
<v Speaker 1>know about the very important Moybridge book that had just

0:02:05.716 --> 0:02:08.676
<v Speaker 1>come out, and he was about to explain to you

0:02:08.676 --> 0:02:13.996
<v Speaker 1>about Wood Moybridge. He did proceed to explain about the

0:02:14.116 --> 0:02:17.876
<v Speaker 1>very important Moybridge book I should know about. The host

0:02:17.916 --> 0:02:20.756
<v Speaker 1>went on and on and on about this book about

0:02:20.756 --> 0:02:24.596
<v Speaker 1>the British photographer that both women could tell he hadn't

0:02:24.596 --> 0:02:28.596
<v Speaker 1>actually read. They could tell this because Rebecca had written

0:02:28.636 --> 0:02:33.516
<v Speaker 1>the book River of Shadows, Edward Moybridge and the Technological

0:02:33.596 --> 0:02:37.956
<v Speaker 1>wild West. It took my friend Sally three or four

0:02:37.956 --> 0:02:41.276
<v Speaker 1>times of trying to interject that's her book before he

0:02:41.356 --> 0:02:44.476
<v Speaker 1>actually listened to her enough to shut the fuck up.

0:02:45.236 --> 0:02:49.996
<v Speaker 1>And so it's kind of glorious and horrific as a

0:02:50.076 --> 0:02:57.036
<v Speaker 1>pristine shining diamond example, a pristine shining diamond like example.

0:02:57.836 --> 0:03:01.876
<v Speaker 1>But of what the answer didn't leap instantly to Rebecca's mind,

0:03:02.596 --> 0:03:05.396
<v Speaker 1>she filed the rich guy away as an example of something.

0:03:05.916 --> 0:03:08.036
<v Speaker 1>It took her five years to find the words to

0:03:08.116 --> 0:03:11.756
<v Speaker 1>fully express what it had been an example of. But

0:03:11.836 --> 0:03:14.196
<v Speaker 1>then one morning she sat down and wrote a piece

0:03:15.156 --> 0:03:18.676
<v Speaker 1>Men Explain Things to Me, she called it. It was

0:03:18.716 --> 0:03:24.716
<v Speaker 1>an instant classic. I wrote the essay in two thousand

0:03:24.716 --> 0:03:28.516
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and some mysterious, unnamed person who had always

0:03:28.516 --> 0:03:31.636
<v Speaker 1>assumed as a woman coined the term man explaining in

0:03:31.756 --> 0:03:34.116
<v Speaker 1>response to it. And then the world was off and

0:03:34.236 --> 0:03:37.876
<v Speaker 1>running when you published the original essay. Did you get

0:03:37.916 --> 0:03:42.316
<v Speaker 1>any kind of backlash? Was there any hostility? I got

0:03:42.316 --> 0:03:45.476
<v Speaker 1>a very funny letter from a man who said he'd

0:03:45.516 --> 0:03:49.196
<v Speaker 1>never patronized a woman in his life, and I just

0:03:49.316 --> 0:03:52.596
<v Speaker 1>needed to get over my feelings of inferiority and speak up.

0:03:54.436 --> 0:03:58.476
<v Speaker 1>And he proceeded to patronize. Why. Yes, well, welcome to

0:03:58.556 --> 0:04:04.196
<v Speaker 1>my gender. Michael, you sound surprised. What Rebecca got next

0:04:04.436 --> 0:04:08.916
<v Speaker 1>was an avalanche of similar stories, all from women. There

0:04:09.196 --> 0:04:11.196
<v Speaker 1>is the woman who listened to a man explain how

0:04:11.236 --> 0:04:14.756
<v Speaker 1>to pronounce her own name. There was the female scientist

0:04:14.996 --> 0:04:17.676
<v Speaker 1>to whom a man explained the contents of her own

0:04:17.716 --> 0:04:23.076
<v Speaker 1>academic paper. There was a one about well, I shouldn't

0:04:23.076 --> 0:04:26.076
<v Speaker 1>really be the one telling you about this. Can you

0:04:26.316 --> 0:04:30.196
<v Speaker 1>walk me through a few of them? Somebody tweets a

0:04:30.236 --> 0:04:35.116
<v Speaker 1>photograph of a woman sharpshooter in last Summer's Olympics, and

0:04:35.236 --> 0:04:38.636
<v Speaker 1>a man explains that she's got the wrong stance, and

0:04:39.636 --> 0:04:43.756
<v Speaker 1>he's explaining she should hold it with both hands. He's wrong,

0:04:43.756 --> 0:04:47.676
<v Speaker 1>of course, men explaining sports to professional female athletes turned

0:04:47.676 --> 0:04:51.836
<v Speaker 1>out to be a whole subgenre of man's plaining. Molly Sidell,

0:04:52.476 --> 0:04:56.036
<v Speaker 1>who won a silver or bronze medal in track in

0:04:56.116 --> 0:04:59.956
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics a few years ago, tweeted, on my flight,

0:05:00.076 --> 0:05:01.876
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a guy next to me and

0:05:01.956 --> 0:05:04.436
<v Speaker 1>it came up that I run. He starts telling me

0:05:04.516 --> 0:05:07.156
<v Speaker 1>how I need to train high mileage and pulls up

0:05:07.196 --> 0:05:10.396
<v Speaker 1>an analysis he'd made a a pro runner's training on

0:05:10.436 --> 0:05:14.076
<v Speaker 1>his phone. The pro runner was me, it was my training.

0:05:14.556 --> 0:05:21.436
<v Speaker 1>Didn't have the heart to tell him, just as Rebecca

0:05:21.596 --> 0:05:23.396
<v Speaker 1>hadn't had the heart to tell the rich guy that

0:05:23.436 --> 0:05:26.196
<v Speaker 1>he was lecturing her about a book she herself had written.

0:05:26.836 --> 0:05:30.116
<v Speaker 1>She's obviously found the heart since can I just read

0:05:30.156 --> 0:05:34.836
<v Speaker 1>you one? I have an almost bottomless appetite. Here's a

0:05:34.876 --> 0:05:38.316
<v Speaker 1>woman named Eileen Mary O'Connell, who said on Twitter a

0:05:38.356 --> 0:05:41.116
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, thinking about the time that I said

0:05:41.156 --> 0:05:45.196
<v Speaker 1>I was distantly related to Marie Curie, and a man explained,

0:05:45.676 --> 0:05:57.156
<v Speaker 1>it's pronounced Mariah Carey. I'm Michael Lewis, pronounced Michael Lewis.

0:05:57.396 --> 0:06:00.276
<v Speaker 1>And this is against the rules where we explore on

0:06:00.436 --> 0:06:03.596
<v Speaker 1>fairness in American life by looking at what's happened to

0:06:03.676 --> 0:06:08.276
<v Speaker 1>various characters in American life. This season is about experts,

0:06:09.196 --> 0:06:12.556
<v Speaker 1>and this episode is about men, or any way about

0:06:12.596 --> 0:06:16.356
<v Speaker 1>this thing that men do because they really are naturally

0:06:16.396 --> 0:06:20.676
<v Speaker 1>superior to women at one thing, offering themselves up as

0:06:20.756 --> 0:06:32.596
<v Speaker 1>experts when they clearly are not. Now, I am, of

0:06:32.636 --> 0:06:36.716
<v Speaker 1>course a man, and as a man, I might offer

0:06:36.756 --> 0:06:39.996
<v Speaker 1>you with total confidence all kinds of theories about why

0:06:40.036 --> 0:06:43.436
<v Speaker 1>we are the way we are. I could explain until

0:06:43.516 --> 0:06:46.716
<v Speaker 1>every oxygen molecule is sucked out of the room why

0:06:46.796 --> 0:06:49.916
<v Speaker 1>men are so ready to explain things to people who

0:06:49.956 --> 0:06:53.476
<v Speaker 1>know more about those things than we do. But let

0:06:53.476 --> 0:06:56.356
<v Speaker 1>me turn instead to the journalists Claire Shipment and Katty

0:06:56.436 --> 0:06:59.756
<v Speaker 1>k because they wrote an entire book that offers up

0:06:59.956 --> 0:07:03.796
<v Speaker 1>one really plausible theory, and I actually read it. It's

0:07:03.836 --> 0:07:08.636
<v Speaker 1>called The confidence code. Columbia University has come up with

0:07:08.796 --> 0:07:13.956
<v Speaker 1>a phrase, which we love, is called honest overconfidence. That's

0:07:14.036 --> 0:07:17.956
<v Speaker 1>Caddy Kay and Columbia reckons that men tend to overestimate

0:07:17.996 --> 0:07:22.716
<v Speaker 1>their ability by something like thirty percent. Women tend to

0:07:22.916 --> 0:07:26.316
<v Speaker 1>underestimate their ability, but men tend to overestimate their ability.

0:07:26.316 --> 0:07:28.556
<v Speaker 1>And they call it honest over confidence because it's not

0:07:28.596 --> 0:07:32.956
<v Speaker 1>that they're pretending they know more. They actually believe they

0:07:32.956 --> 0:07:36.236
<v Speaker 1>are about thirty percent better than they are. Now we've

0:07:36.236 --> 0:07:38.796
<v Speaker 1>all learned to be skeptical about this sort of social science.

0:07:39.236 --> 0:07:42.956
<v Speaker 1>Some researcher discovers something shocking about human nature and then

0:07:42.996 --> 0:07:45.436
<v Speaker 1>it turns out to be not really true, or only

0:07:45.476 --> 0:07:49.236
<v Speaker 1>sort of true, or true only in certain circumstances. But

0:07:49.356 --> 0:07:52.836
<v Speaker 1>in the case of male over confidence, the findings are

0:07:52.876 --> 0:07:56.196
<v Speaker 1>totally solid. If you want to do a social science

0:07:56.236 --> 0:07:59.236
<v Speaker 1>test with a bunch of graduate students and you want

0:07:59.236 --> 0:08:02.116
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you know in advance what the answer

0:08:02.156 --> 0:08:03.596
<v Speaker 1>is going to be, you give a group of men

0:08:03.596 --> 0:08:07.396
<v Speaker 1>and women a scientific reasoning quiz, and the men will

0:08:07.436 --> 0:08:09.676
<v Speaker 1>nearly always say they're going to perform better than they

0:08:09.676 --> 0:08:12.876
<v Speaker 1>actually do, and the women will nearly always say they're

0:08:12.876 --> 0:08:17.156
<v Speaker 1>going to perform worse than they actually do. And why

0:08:17.316 --> 0:08:20.156
<v Speaker 1>is this? I know it's a hard question to answer,

0:08:20.276 --> 0:08:25.036
<v Speaker 1>but when does this first manifest itself in life? Do

0:08:25.196 --> 0:08:29.036
<v Speaker 1>little girls and little boys exhibit this tendency or does

0:08:29.076 --> 0:08:32.636
<v Speaker 1>it only happen later in life. This really starts to

0:08:32.676 --> 0:08:38.916
<v Speaker 1>manifest itself in middle school, around puberty. We commissioned a

0:08:38.996 --> 0:08:42.796
<v Speaker 1>survey for our book on Confidence and Girls that suggests

0:08:42.796 --> 0:08:47.836
<v Speaker 1>that between the ages of nine and about thirteen, girls

0:08:47.996 --> 0:08:50.916
<v Speaker 1>lose a third of their confidence and they never get

0:08:50.916 --> 0:08:54.916
<v Speaker 1>it back. Obviously, boys can grow up to be under

0:08:54.956 --> 0:08:58.316
<v Speaker 1>confident men, and girls can grow up to be confident women.

0:08:58.996 --> 0:09:01.636
<v Speaker 1>And obviously not every man longs to explain things that

0:09:01.636 --> 0:09:05.596
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't. But there's an undeniable pattern here men thinking

0:09:05.636 --> 0:09:08.716
<v Speaker 1>they have an expertise that they don't. You really don't

0:09:08.756 --> 0:09:10.836
<v Speaker 1>have to look any further than Wall Street for examples.

0:09:11.916 --> 0:09:17.116
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that you are an individual investor, maybe not that active,

0:09:17.156 --> 0:09:21.556
<v Speaker 1>but occasionally trading. That's Terry o'deane, a finance professor at

0:09:21.636 --> 0:09:24.996
<v Speaker 1>UC Berkeley. He and his colleague Brad Barber made what

0:09:25.196 --> 0:09:28.276
<v Speaker 1>might be the purest case study of mail over confidence.

0:09:29.196 --> 0:09:31.436
<v Speaker 1>But they set out to just look at how ordinary

0:09:31.436 --> 0:09:35.836
<v Speaker 1>people traded in the stock market. You open up the

0:09:35.916 --> 0:09:39.236
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal one morning, you read a paragraph about

0:09:39.276 --> 0:09:42.876
<v Speaker 1>some company. You say, Wow, that really sounds great. I

0:09:42.916 --> 0:09:47.996
<v Speaker 1>think I'll buy it. So you don't pause and say,

0:09:48.436 --> 0:09:52.516
<v Speaker 1>maybe professional investors already know this, It's already been incorporated

0:09:52.516 --> 0:09:55.036
<v Speaker 1>into price. You just say, sounds like a good idea,

0:09:55.116 --> 0:09:59.316
<v Speaker 1>I'll buy. Maybe another investor reads the same stuff, says

0:09:59.556 --> 0:10:04.436
<v Speaker 1>intriguing company. But I really don't know enough to place

0:10:04.476 --> 0:10:07.676
<v Speaker 1>a trade, and I gotta get to work. So what's

0:10:07.716 --> 0:10:09.956
<v Speaker 1>the difference between over confidence and confidence? I can see

0:10:09.956 --> 0:10:14.036
<v Speaker 1>how confidence is sort of what leads thought to action. Yes,

0:10:14.556 --> 0:10:16.796
<v Speaker 1>but what's the difference just confidence? Why is it over

0:10:16.836 --> 0:10:21.796
<v Speaker 1>confident systematically on the side of thinking you know more

0:10:21.836 --> 0:10:23.716
<v Speaker 1>than you do and that's what leads you to buy

0:10:23.756 --> 0:10:26.556
<v Speaker 1>the stock or sell the stock. Yes, I think it

0:10:26.596 --> 0:10:29.956
<v Speaker 1>takes a great deal of hubris to think you are

0:10:30.076 --> 0:10:33.996
<v Speaker 1>going to do part time if you have a regular job,

0:10:34.476 --> 0:10:38.956
<v Speaker 1>you are going to do what professional money managers struggle

0:10:39.076 --> 0:10:42.956
<v Speaker 1>to do, and many never succeed at. Unless you're trading

0:10:42.996 --> 0:10:46.676
<v Speaker 1>on inside information, which is illegal. When you make a

0:10:46.716 --> 0:10:49.676
<v Speaker 1>bet on the price of some stock, you're basically betting

0:10:49.676 --> 0:10:51.836
<v Speaker 1>on the flip of a coin, and you're paying a

0:10:51.836 --> 0:10:54.916
<v Speaker 1>commission each time you do it over and over. The

0:10:54.996 --> 0:10:58.956
<v Speaker 1>smartest professional investors fail to outperform the market by picking stocks.

0:11:00.236 --> 0:11:02.116
<v Speaker 1>For an amateur to even try, well, it's a lot

0:11:02.196 --> 0:11:06.156
<v Speaker 1>like man explaining, Terry Odeane thought so too. He wondered

0:11:06.156 --> 0:11:08.476
<v Speaker 1>whether there was any difference between how men and women

0:11:08.556 --> 0:11:11.836
<v Speaker 1>behaved in the market, So he and his colleague got

0:11:11.836 --> 0:11:15.476
<v Speaker 1>a hold of data from online brokerage accounts. They sorted

0:11:15.476 --> 0:11:18.956
<v Speaker 1>the money into three buckets, money managed by single men,

0:11:19.716 --> 0:11:23.636
<v Speaker 1>money managed by single women, and money managed by married couples.

0:11:25.196 --> 0:11:28.236
<v Speaker 1>Men did worse than women, and not just a little worse.

0:11:28.636 --> 0:11:32.396
<v Speaker 1>Both men and women underperformed to buy and hold approach,

0:11:32.676 --> 0:11:36.876
<v Speaker 1>but men underperformed by one percentage point more a year

0:11:37.116 --> 0:11:41.076
<v Speaker 1>on average than women. Single men by one point four

0:11:41.116 --> 0:11:44.676
<v Speaker 1>percentage points more a year on average than single women,

0:11:44.716 --> 0:11:47.996
<v Speaker 1>which is actually quite significant. Yes, it sounds like a

0:11:47.996 --> 0:11:52.356
<v Speaker 1>little but if you compound that over a lifetime. Even occasionally,

0:11:52.356 --> 0:11:55.516
<v Speaker 1>financial reporters will say, well does anyone really care about

0:11:55.556 --> 0:11:58.476
<v Speaker 1>one percent? And what I usually say is, next time

0:11:58.516 --> 0:12:01.996
<v Speaker 1>you're shopping for a mortgage, ask yourself that question, right,

0:12:02.436 --> 0:12:06.116
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a one percentage point difference in your mortgage

0:12:06.676 --> 0:12:09.636
<v Speaker 1>is going to add up to tens of thousands or

0:12:09.756 --> 0:12:11.996
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of dollars over the life of a

0:12:12.156 --> 0:12:15.676
<v Speaker 1>thirty year mortgage. Hearing this, you might conclude that it

0:12:15.716 --> 0:12:18.316
<v Speaker 1>would all be better off if Wall Street were overhauled

0:12:18.596 --> 0:12:21.156
<v Speaker 1>and women were put in charge of the financial risk taking.

0:12:21.996 --> 0:12:25.116
<v Speaker 1>But what we got instead was a world historic financial

0:12:25.156 --> 0:12:30.116
<v Speaker 1>crisis engineered by very confident men. Even that didn't cause

0:12:30.156 --> 0:12:32.436
<v Speaker 1>anyone to ask if leaving the financial risk taking to

0:12:32.516 --> 0:12:35.796
<v Speaker 1>men was a great idea, except in Iceland. In Iceland,

0:12:35.796 --> 0:12:38.196
<v Speaker 1>they actually figured it out. They replaced the men in

0:12:38.236 --> 0:12:40.836
<v Speaker 1>the banks with women, and the male prime minister with

0:12:40.876 --> 0:12:44.636
<v Speaker 1>a woman who promised never again to let icelandic men

0:12:45.076 --> 0:12:50.036
<v Speaker 1>touch her banks. Outside of Iceland, men still mostly decide

0:12:50.076 --> 0:12:53.116
<v Speaker 1>what to do with big piles of money. Terry o'deane's

0:12:53.156 --> 0:12:57.036
<v Speaker 1>findings have gone ignored. But has anybody ever called you

0:12:57.116 --> 0:13:00.436
<v Speaker 1>say thank you, Terry. I have my job managing the

0:13:00.476 --> 0:13:04.876
<v Speaker 1>stock portfolio because of your paper. That has never happened.

0:13:05.436 --> 0:13:08.516
<v Speaker 1>One thing did happen. I got a letter once. Shortly

0:13:08.556 --> 0:13:12.516
<v Speaker 1>after paper got, you know, some coverage in the popular press.

0:13:13.156 --> 0:13:16.716
<v Speaker 1>A woman wrote said, I want to thank you. She's

0:13:16.796 --> 0:13:22.036
<v Speaker 1>in her sixties, and she said, my husband has been

0:13:23.236 --> 0:13:28.476
<v Speaker 1>actively trading our savings and I've been very nervous about

0:13:28.476 --> 0:13:30.636
<v Speaker 1>it for the last few years. And then I read

0:13:30.676 --> 0:13:34.636
<v Speaker 1>about your paper and I told him to stop actively

0:13:34.676 --> 0:13:39.476
<v Speaker 1>trading my savings. So I thought, well, that feels good

0:13:43.596 --> 0:13:57.316
<v Speaker 1>against the rules, will be right back. Let's recap our

0:13:57.356 --> 0:14:01.436
<v Speaker 1>findings thus far. Men are especially capable of thinking they

0:14:01.476 --> 0:14:05.076
<v Speaker 1>know things they really don't. They feel a weird compulsion

0:14:05.156 --> 0:14:08.156
<v Speaker 1>to explain subjects to people who know more about those

0:14:08.156 --> 0:14:11.556
<v Speaker 1>subjects than they, and they are more likely than people

0:14:11.556 --> 0:14:14.076
<v Speaker 1>who are not men to think they know things that

0:14:14.156 --> 0:14:18.116
<v Speaker 1>are totally unknowable. Sometimes they even act on that belief

0:14:18.316 --> 0:14:21.796
<v Speaker 1>and lose huge piles of money. But it's not really

0:14:21.836 --> 0:14:24.476
<v Speaker 1>men's fault, or rather, it's not the fault of any

0:14:24.516 --> 0:14:28.356
<v Speaker 1>individual man. If a man is deluded into believing he

0:14:28.396 --> 0:14:32.036
<v Speaker 1>knows more than he actually does, it's because he's surrounded

0:14:32.036 --> 0:14:36.316
<v Speaker 1>by people who share his delusion, who encourage his over confidence.

0:14:37.596 --> 0:14:40.236
<v Speaker 1>The writer Maria Kanakova wrote a whole book about this,

0:14:41.036 --> 0:14:43.476
<v Speaker 1>The Confidence Game. It was called It was all about

0:14:43.516 --> 0:14:46.436
<v Speaker 1>con artists, but it is also about what con artists

0:14:46.436 --> 0:14:53.756
<v Speaker 1>tell us about our culture. Exhibit A was a man

0:14:53.876 --> 0:14:57.916
<v Speaker 1>named Ferdinand Waldo Damara, who had a gift for persuading

0:14:57.956 --> 0:15:01.636
<v Speaker 1>people that he knew stuff that he did not were

0:15:01.756 --> 0:15:05.756
<v Speaker 1>during the Korean War, and he decides that he's going

0:15:05.796 --> 0:15:08.796
<v Speaker 1>to steal the credentials of a doctor in Canada and

0:15:09.156 --> 0:15:12.636
<v Speaker 1>apply to be a doctor on a ship, a military doctor,

0:15:12.876 --> 0:15:16.796
<v Speaker 1>because he actually identifies a perfect opportunity. Why would he

0:15:16.836 --> 0:15:19.636
<v Speaker 1>even want to do that? Like, why would why would

0:15:19.636 --> 0:15:21.076
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a doctor on a ship? So

0:15:21.316 --> 0:15:27.516
<v Speaker 1>Damara is someone who is so narcissistic, so full of

0:15:27.596 --> 0:15:30.276
<v Speaker 1>himself that he thinks that he is the best person

0:15:30.316 --> 0:15:33.076
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and he loves more than anything else,

0:15:33.196 --> 0:15:36.076
<v Speaker 1>playing god. And what is the ultimate profession where you

0:15:36.156 --> 0:15:38.476
<v Speaker 1>really get to play god. It's being a surgeon. It's

0:15:38.476 --> 0:15:41.836
<v Speaker 1>actually having people's lives in your hands. So he falsified

0:15:41.876 --> 0:15:45.316
<v Speaker 1>his credentials, ended up getting an appointment, and ended up

0:15:45.356 --> 0:15:49.676
<v Speaker 1>being the sole physician aboard this ship heading to Korea

0:15:49.836 --> 0:15:53.236
<v Speaker 1>during the war. Not only that, but he then ended

0:15:53.316 --> 0:15:57.956
<v Speaker 1>up operating on a ship full of soldiers who had

0:15:57.996 --> 0:16:01.356
<v Speaker 1>been in an ambush. So he ended up operating on

0:16:01.476 --> 0:16:04.916
<v Speaker 1>all of them and, as he said, saving their lives.

0:16:04.916 --> 0:16:08.236
<v Speaker 1>But we don't actually know what happened you might see

0:16:08.236 --> 0:16:12.156
<v Speaker 1>this imposters an extreme example, but you might also see

0:16:12.196 --> 0:16:16.596
<v Speaker 1>them as a case in point. But this feels like

0:16:16.596 --> 0:16:19.756
<v Speaker 1>a very male thing. I have a very hard time

0:16:19.796 --> 0:16:22.556
<v Speaker 1>imagining a woman doing it. I agree, I agree, And

0:16:22.596 --> 0:16:24.636
<v Speaker 1>I think that those types of coins that's why we

0:16:24.676 --> 0:16:27.676
<v Speaker 1>don't really see we don't know any stories of women

0:16:27.756 --> 0:16:30.836
<v Speaker 1>pulling something like that off all of the female cons

0:16:30.836 --> 0:16:33.996
<v Speaker 1>that I was able to kind of unearth when I

0:16:34.156 --> 0:16:37.636
<v Speaker 1>was when I was researching the Confidence Game, where things like, oh,

0:16:37.756 --> 0:16:41.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pretend to be the daughter of Carnegie

0:16:42.036 --> 0:16:44.196
<v Speaker 1>so that I can get people to loan me lots

0:16:44.196 --> 0:16:46.596
<v Speaker 1>of money because they think that I'm going to come

0:16:46.636 --> 0:16:49.276
<v Speaker 1>into my inheritance or something like that. But it's not

0:16:49.316 --> 0:16:52.996
<v Speaker 1>a pretensive expertise. It's it's something very different. It's I'm

0:16:53.036 --> 0:16:55.276
<v Speaker 1>not who I say I am, but it's not and

0:16:55.516 --> 0:16:58.716
<v Speaker 1>I can do what I can't actually do. I am

0:16:58.756 --> 0:17:02.196
<v Speaker 1>heir to this fortune, I'm a socialite and I have

0:17:02.276 --> 0:17:06.876
<v Speaker 1>connections to royalty. I am part of the aristocracy. Why

0:17:06.956 --> 0:17:10.996
<v Speaker 1>is it you think women don't pretend to expertise. I

0:17:11.116 --> 0:17:14.076
<v Speaker 1>think that actually just because of the type of society

0:17:14.116 --> 0:17:15.876
<v Speaker 1>we're in, the fact that we are in a male

0:17:15.956 --> 0:17:19.676
<v Speaker 1>dominated world that female experts tend to be questioned more.

0:17:19.956 --> 0:17:22.476
<v Speaker 1>If a woman says I'm the best surgeon you've ever seen,

0:17:23.236 --> 0:17:28.196
<v Speaker 1>red flags are going to start waving. Con Artists pick

0:17:28.276 --> 0:17:31.676
<v Speaker 1>up on psychological cues. That's how they can us. The

0:17:31.796 --> 0:17:33.956
<v Speaker 1>cue here is that when we hear the word expert,

0:17:34.316 --> 0:17:37.396
<v Speaker 1>we form a picture in our head. And that picture

0:17:37.636 --> 0:17:40.556
<v Speaker 1>is of a man. My husband and I were on

0:17:40.636 --> 0:17:45.956
<v Speaker 1>a pretty long flight. Her name is Aminemogul, doctor Aminemogul,

0:17:46.636 --> 0:17:49.996
<v Speaker 1>and I was sitting it was like a triple seven jet,

0:17:50.036 --> 0:17:54.036
<v Speaker 1>So I was sitting close to the aisle and in

0:17:54.076 --> 0:17:57.756
<v Speaker 1>the middle section, and there was a gentleman who was

0:17:57.956 --> 0:18:01.996
<v Speaker 1>walking back from the restrooms who was seated just one

0:18:02.116 --> 0:18:07.596
<v Speaker 1>row behind me, to my left, and he just completely collapsed.

0:18:07.596 --> 0:18:12.156
<v Speaker 1>I mean he just fell down, face forward, and a

0:18:12.236 --> 0:18:16.476
<v Speaker 1>flight attendant immediately rushed over, and so she shouted to

0:18:16.476 --> 0:18:18.436
<v Speaker 1>find out if there was anyone who was a doctor

0:18:18.476 --> 0:18:22.516
<v Speaker 1>on the plane. Amina wasn't just any doctor. She was

0:18:22.556 --> 0:18:25.716
<v Speaker 1>a former army doctor who now worked as a general practitioner.

0:18:26.516 --> 0:18:30.316
<v Speaker 1>She'd been trained for battlefield emergencies. She was exactly the

0:18:30.396 --> 0:18:33.396
<v Speaker 1>kind of doctor you'd won in this moment, and she

0:18:33.596 --> 0:18:36.476
<v Speaker 1>was right there she'd seen it all. So I stood

0:18:36.556 --> 0:18:39.116
<v Speaker 1>up and I said, I'm a doctor. And right behind

0:18:39.196 --> 0:18:44.956
<v Speaker 1>this gentleman's row was a older male nurse. He identified

0:18:45.036 --> 0:18:48.076
<v Speaker 1>himself as a nurse. He was a Caucasian. I'm South Asian,

0:18:48.636 --> 0:18:51.716
<v Speaker 1>and he stepped up and the flight attendant kind of

0:18:51.796 --> 0:18:55.356
<v Speaker 1>completely ignored me. And my husband was seated next to me.

0:18:55.436 --> 0:19:00.796
<v Speaker 1>He's a pretty tall Caucasian guy, and he tried to

0:19:00.836 --> 0:19:03.396
<v Speaker 1>alert the flight attendant and said, hey, my wife is here.

0:19:03.436 --> 0:19:05.716
<v Speaker 1>She's a doctor. And she looked at me, and then

0:19:05.716 --> 0:19:07.236
<v Speaker 1>she looked at him and she said, we have the

0:19:07.276 --> 0:19:11.916
<v Speaker 1>help that we need. And and that was that. Do

0:19:11.956 --> 0:19:16.716
<v Speaker 1>you think she looked at you and thought not doctor autely? Absolutely?

0:19:17.636 --> 0:19:19.476
<v Speaker 1>And actually, you know what, now that I think about it,

0:19:19.476 --> 0:19:23.196
<v Speaker 1>I think she actually said, what you're a doctor, like

0:19:23.196 --> 0:19:26.676
<v Speaker 1>like it was somehow unbelievable. And my husband goes, yeah,

0:19:26.716 --> 0:19:28.556
<v Speaker 1>she's a doctor, and then she just looked at him

0:19:28.556 --> 0:19:30.556
<v Speaker 1>and said, oh okay, and then just kind of carried on.

0:19:31.116 --> 0:19:32.716
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at my husband and I looked at

0:19:32.716 --> 0:19:35.716
<v Speaker 1>each other and we were just like, well, that was bizarre. Meanwhile,

0:19:35.756 --> 0:19:37.556
<v Speaker 1>they were this man who might be dying on the

0:19:37.596 --> 0:19:40.636
<v Speaker 1>floor of the cot and I'm thinking to myself, Wow,

0:19:40.796 --> 0:19:46.636
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's okay. Unfortunately, it never occurred to the

0:19:46.676 --> 0:19:49.436
<v Speaker 1>male nurse or anyone else that they were in the

0:19:49.436 --> 0:19:51.716
<v Speaker 1>presence of someone who might know more than they did.

0:19:52.316 --> 0:19:54.596
<v Speaker 1>But the truth was that Ameda didn't give the episode

0:19:54.676 --> 0:19:58.036
<v Speaker 1>much thought until she stumbled upon a Facebook group of

0:19:58.116 --> 0:20:01.796
<v Speaker 1>female doctors in which another woman described how she'd just

0:20:01.876 --> 0:20:04.636
<v Speaker 1>come off a flight with some medical emergency and she

0:20:04.796 --> 0:20:07.436
<v Speaker 1>shouted that she was a doctor, and everyone had just

0:20:07.516 --> 0:20:10.876
<v Speaker 1>ignored her, and a lot of people just started chiming

0:20:10.916 --> 0:20:13.836
<v Speaker 1>in with their anecdotes, and there were a lot of them.

0:20:13.876 --> 0:20:16.836
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of them. I was kind of

0:20:16.836 --> 0:20:19.276
<v Speaker 1>shocked at how many other people had been through the

0:20:19.356 --> 0:20:23.396
<v Speaker 1>same thing. That's how doctor Amina Mogul found out that

0:20:23.436 --> 0:20:28.276
<v Speaker 1>this was actually a thing. Invisible female doctors on planes.

0:20:38.396 --> 0:20:40.716
<v Speaker 1>Not even a man wants to die on an airplane

0:20:40.756 --> 0:20:43.036
<v Speaker 1>because no one can see the female doctor in seat

0:20:43.116 --> 0:20:47.396
<v Speaker 1>eighteen B. It's clearly not healthy for any society to

0:20:47.436 --> 0:20:49.996
<v Speaker 1>treat men as if they know more than they actually

0:20:49.996 --> 0:20:54.636
<v Speaker 1>do and women as if they know less. It encourages

0:20:54.676 --> 0:20:58.916
<v Speaker 1>men to become imposters. It drags women with actual knowledge

0:20:59.556 --> 0:21:04.476
<v Speaker 1>into imposter syndrome. It cheats the entire society of expertise,

0:21:05.556 --> 0:21:08.476
<v Speaker 1>and so the obvious question is why does this happen?

0:21:13.436 --> 0:21:16.276
<v Speaker 1>Before you or I answer that question, let's describe, or

0:21:16.356 --> 0:21:21.356
<v Speaker 1>let's let Caddy K describe. One final science experiment done

0:21:21.356 --> 0:21:24.836
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago by an American psychologist named Zach Estes.

0:21:26.116 --> 0:21:29.676
<v Speaker 1>He sat a group of men and women and gave

0:21:29.716 --> 0:21:34.396
<v Speaker 1>them a spatial awareness test. It's a series of like

0:21:34.596 --> 0:21:37.356
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cube type puzzles on a computer screen, and you

0:21:37.396 --> 0:21:40.396
<v Speaker 1>have to solve these puzzles, and he gives them the

0:21:40.476 --> 0:21:44.156
<v Speaker 1>same test, and the women do significantly less well than

0:21:44.196 --> 0:21:47.196
<v Speaker 1>the men do. So Professor Estes goes back over the

0:21:47.236 --> 0:21:49.796
<v Speaker 1>results and he sees that what's happened is that the

0:21:49.956 --> 0:21:53.236
<v Speaker 1>women have skipped questions more often than the men have.

0:21:54.556 --> 0:21:57.796
<v Speaker 1>And he thought that was interesting. The women were basically

0:21:57.796 --> 0:22:00.196
<v Speaker 1>saying they didn't know the answer to a question a

0:22:00.276 --> 0:22:02.996
<v Speaker 1>lot more than the men, and it wasn't because the

0:22:03.036 --> 0:22:06.436
<v Speaker 1>men were more likely to know the answers. The next test,

0:22:06.556 --> 0:22:09.756
<v Speaker 1>he gives the same group another set and he says, okay,

0:22:09.876 --> 0:22:12.996
<v Speaker 1>now no one is allowed to skip anything. No omissions

0:22:13.116 --> 0:22:14.636
<v Speaker 1>is what he calls it. So no one's allowed to

0:22:14.636 --> 0:22:18.076
<v Speaker 1>skip anything, and guess what. On the test where the

0:22:18.116 --> 0:22:20.516
<v Speaker 1>women have to answer the questions, they do just as

0:22:20.516 --> 0:22:23.556
<v Speaker 1>well as the men. Sometimes it is better to think

0:22:23.596 --> 0:22:25.476
<v Speaker 1>you know the answer to the question when you don't,

0:22:25.796 --> 0:22:27.956
<v Speaker 1>because it leads you to answer the question rather than

0:22:27.996 --> 0:22:31.436
<v Speaker 1>just leave it blank. That's the joy of overconfidence. It pays,

0:22:31.836 --> 0:22:36.316
<v Speaker 1>and not just in a social science lab. In real life. Obviously,

0:22:36.356 --> 0:22:39.156
<v Speaker 1>no one knows your cards except for you, and all

0:22:39.196 --> 0:22:41.756
<v Speaker 1>they see is how you present yourself, right. The only

0:22:41.796 --> 0:22:46.636
<v Speaker 1>information that's available is how you play. After Maria Kannakova

0:22:46.676 --> 0:22:49.756
<v Speaker 1>wrote her a book about con artists, she stumbled upon

0:22:49.796 --> 0:22:51.956
<v Speaker 1>a book called The Theory of Games by a pair

0:22:51.996 --> 0:22:56.876
<v Speaker 1>of genius mathematicians named von Neumann and Morgenstern. Morgenstern had

0:22:56.916 --> 0:23:00.396
<v Speaker 1>gone looking for games that resembled real life. He had

0:23:00.436 --> 0:23:02.556
<v Speaker 1>this idea that if he could figure out the smartest

0:23:02.596 --> 0:23:05.316
<v Speaker 1>way to play certain games, he could also figure out

0:23:05.356 --> 0:23:07.436
<v Speaker 1>the smartest way to deal with a lot of situations

0:23:07.436 --> 0:23:10.876
<v Speaker 1>in real life. He has this whole passage where he

0:23:10.916 --> 0:23:14.476
<v Speaker 1>says that chess is boring, like chess is a bullshit game.

0:23:14.756 --> 0:23:17.396
<v Speaker 1>Don't have me play chess because I can solve it. Right,

0:23:17.516 --> 0:23:20.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm creating this thing that's going to become the computer.

0:23:20.516 --> 0:23:23.796
<v Speaker 1>Give me enough computing power and I tell you the

0:23:23.876 --> 0:23:26.276
<v Speaker 1>right move. That's not life. That doesn't help me make

0:23:26.276 --> 0:23:32.116
<v Speaker 1>decisions in life. How do I decide in a nuclear

0:23:32.196 --> 0:23:35.036
<v Speaker 1>war situation? He actually, you know, at that time he

0:23:35.076 --> 0:23:39.876
<v Speaker 1>was advising the National Security Council, so this was not abstract.

0:23:40.076 --> 0:23:42.476
<v Speaker 1>He said, you know, in roulette also total bullshit, because

0:23:42.516 --> 0:23:46.316
<v Speaker 1>that's just gambling, that's chance. So that's almost the you've

0:23:46.316 --> 0:23:47.796
<v Speaker 1>got the end of the spectrum. You can chess on

0:23:47.756 --> 0:23:50.036
<v Speaker 1>one of which is entirely rule based, and you can

0:23:50.036 --> 0:23:54.156
<v Speaker 1>solve with AI and coin flipping or roulette or total chance,

0:23:54.556 --> 0:23:58.556
<v Speaker 1>and somewhere in between is poker, and that's life too. Exactly.

0:23:58.796 --> 0:24:01.916
<v Speaker 1>Poker is the model for its decision making in life,

0:24:01.956 --> 0:24:04.836
<v Speaker 1>because both poker and life are games of incomplete information,

0:24:05.196 --> 0:24:07.556
<v Speaker 1>he said. In real life this is a quote from him,

0:24:07.916 --> 0:24:10.556
<v Speaker 1>which is one of my favorite quotes. He said, real

0:24:10.636 --> 0:24:14.876
<v Speaker 1>life consists of bluffing, of little tactics, of deception, of

0:24:14.916 --> 0:24:17.636
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what does this man think I

0:24:17.716 --> 0:24:22.716
<v Speaker 1>mean to do. Maria had never played poker and had

0:24:22.756 --> 0:24:24.916
<v Speaker 1>no clue how to act, but she set out to

0:24:24.956 --> 0:24:27.996
<v Speaker 1>become a professional poker player. The first thing she did

0:24:28.036 --> 0:24:31.956
<v Speaker 1>was hire a coach, a famous player, and you had

0:24:32.036 --> 0:24:34.796
<v Speaker 1>no idea of even the rules of the game. And

0:24:35.036 --> 0:24:37.196
<v Speaker 1>I told him that I didn't know much about poker.

0:24:37.476 --> 0:24:39.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that there are fifty four cards

0:24:39.436 --> 0:24:42.436
<v Speaker 1>in a duck and he just he said, wait, excuse me.

0:24:42.596 --> 0:24:45.156
<v Speaker 1>I just his face just changed and I said what

0:24:45.676 --> 0:24:47.436
<v Speaker 1>And he said how many cards are in a duck?

0:24:47.476 --> 0:24:49.636
<v Speaker 1>And now I start doubting myself a little. I said

0:24:49.676 --> 0:24:52.796
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and he's like, well, you know, theoretically with

0:24:52.836 --> 0:24:56.276
<v Speaker 1>the jokers, yes, but when we're doing odds calculations, it

0:24:56.276 --> 0:24:58.356
<v Speaker 1>would be better if you used fifty two, you know,

0:24:58.516 --> 0:25:03.156
<v Speaker 1>just to keep things a little simple. Is help me

0:25:03.196 --> 0:25:07.036
<v Speaker 1>list the ways pokers like life. One is that you're

0:25:07.076 --> 0:25:10.636
<v Speaker 1>never going to have or like life's dis making decisions

0:25:10.636 --> 0:25:13.756
<v Speaker 1>in life one is you you have incomplete information. You're

0:25:13.756 --> 0:25:16.956
<v Speaker 1>never gonna have perfect information. You know, you're never gonna

0:25:16.956 --> 0:25:21.716
<v Speaker 1>have perfect information, but you're getting more information, so you

0:25:22.076 --> 0:25:25.436
<v Speaker 1>have to update and respond to new information, which is

0:25:25.476 --> 0:25:29.476
<v Speaker 1>his own kind of skill. Right. And there are probabilities

0:25:29.476 --> 0:25:33.316
<v Speaker 1>that can be calculated, but they're only partially knowable, right,

0:25:33.716 --> 0:25:35.876
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong about that? Correct? This is all correct?

0:25:36.036 --> 0:25:37.796
<v Speaker 1>Anything can you think of anything else that goes on.

0:25:38.436 --> 0:25:41.636
<v Speaker 1>So then you have, I mean, the incomplete information works

0:25:41.636 --> 0:25:44.236
<v Speaker 1>in a way where no one knows what cards you have,

0:25:44.796 --> 0:25:47.236
<v Speaker 1>and the only thing they can see is how you

0:25:47.276 --> 0:25:49.996
<v Speaker 1>act right. And that's true of all the other people too.

0:25:50.436 --> 0:25:53.196
<v Speaker 1>But when she started out, Maria really didn't know how

0:25:53.196 --> 0:25:55.596
<v Speaker 1>to act at a poker table. I was in a

0:25:55.676 --> 0:26:00.436
<v Speaker 1>totally foreign environment. I was suffering from major impostor syndrome.

0:26:00.876 --> 0:26:04.036
<v Speaker 1>Professional pokers about ninety seven to ninety eight percent mail.

0:26:04.356 --> 0:26:07.276
<v Speaker 1>So this is something where you know you are often

0:26:07.316 --> 0:26:09.996
<v Speaker 1>the only woman at the table, And so I was

0:26:10.116 --> 0:26:12.556
<v Speaker 1>letting things like, oh, I don't want them to think

0:26:12.556 --> 0:26:15.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bitch guide my decisions, or oh, well, you

0:26:15.676 --> 0:26:17.676
<v Speaker 1>know you're raising so much here, you can just take

0:26:17.676 --> 0:26:19.676
<v Speaker 1>the pot. It's fine, I don't need to win every

0:26:19.676 --> 0:26:24.636
<v Speaker 1>single one. Here you go. This isn't the story of

0:26:24.676 --> 0:26:26.956
<v Speaker 1>Maria's career as a poker player. You can read that

0:26:26.996 --> 0:26:30.396
<v Speaker 1>in the book. She eventually wrote the biggest bluff. She'd

0:26:30.396 --> 0:26:36.396
<v Speaker 1>wind up winning hundreds of thousands of dollars. Five cots

0:26:36.676 --> 0:26:40.076
<v Speaker 1>and Lonnie can hit to eliminate Maria Knakova. He's pretty

0:26:40.076 --> 0:26:44.036
<v Speaker 1>good at hitting this. Nope, he misses on this occasion

0:26:44.116 --> 0:26:51.036
<v Speaker 1>and Maria Knakova survives. For my own purposes here, I'm

0:26:51.076 --> 0:26:55.036
<v Speaker 1>interested in a single little lesson she learned about over confidence.

0:26:55.556 --> 0:26:58.396
<v Speaker 1>So I had this conversation with my coach and he

0:26:58.556 --> 0:27:02.036
<v Speaker 1>told me something that, taken with my work on over confidence,

0:27:02.316 --> 0:27:05.236
<v Speaker 1>I think, really got to kind of the heart of

0:27:05.236 --> 0:27:09.436
<v Speaker 1>the issue of confidence versus over confidence at the poker table.

0:27:09.836 --> 0:27:11.636
<v Speaker 1>So what he told me was that people who start

0:27:11.636 --> 0:27:14.916
<v Speaker 1>out playing poker tend to fall into one of two camps.

0:27:15.476 --> 0:27:20.236
<v Speaker 1>Either they are way too cautious, That's what I was doing.

0:27:20.276 --> 0:27:23.276
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're scared and they play scared. Or they

0:27:23.316 --> 0:27:27.476
<v Speaker 1>are way too aggressive. They bluff way too much. Bluffing

0:27:27.556 --> 0:27:30.996
<v Speaker 1>is to poker what man splitting is, the conversation a

0:27:31.116 --> 0:27:33.876
<v Speaker 1>pretense that you know more or have more than you

0:27:33.916 --> 0:27:37.916
<v Speaker 1>really do. It didn't come naturally to Maria. She didn't bluff.

0:27:38.316 --> 0:27:41.436
<v Speaker 1>She was suckered by men who did. So were the

0:27:41.476 --> 0:27:44.796
<v Speaker 1>other men, because when you haven't seen the other person

0:27:44.916 --> 0:27:48.796
<v Speaker 1>play well, you judge them by how they seem. When

0:27:49.436 --> 0:27:53.236
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows who you are, people tend to, at least

0:27:53.236 --> 0:27:55.116
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, give you the benefit of the doubt.

0:27:55.836 --> 0:27:58.996
<v Speaker 1>So if you sit down at a new table and

0:27:59.276 --> 0:28:03.076
<v Speaker 1>you are incredibly aggressive. The first time you're incredibly aggressive,

0:28:03.076 --> 0:28:05.116
<v Speaker 1>people are probably going to assume you have a good

0:28:05.116 --> 0:28:07.716
<v Speaker 1>hand and they're going to fold. The second time, they'll

0:28:07.716 --> 0:28:10.156
<v Speaker 1>probably assume you have a good hand and they'll fold.

0:28:10.596 --> 0:28:12.796
<v Speaker 1>So he said, if you're going to pick one extreme,

0:28:12.876 --> 0:28:15.636
<v Speaker 1>you want to pick the aggressive extreme because aggressive players,

0:28:16.076 --> 0:28:19.396
<v Speaker 1>you know, they tend to win more often, because aggression

0:28:19.516 --> 0:28:22.036
<v Speaker 1>often pays off. So the first wave of washouts are

0:28:22.036 --> 0:28:24.436
<v Speaker 1>the cautious people. Yes, so I would have lost my

0:28:24.476 --> 0:28:28.316
<v Speaker 1>money long before the overconfident people. But also, when you're aggressive,

0:28:28.516 --> 0:28:32.436
<v Speaker 1>you put people in more difficult situations. So if you're passive,

0:28:32.516 --> 0:28:35.316
<v Speaker 1>you're easy to play against because other people can. Then

0:28:35.676 --> 0:28:37.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, they know that when you're betting, you're strong.

0:28:38.276 --> 0:28:40.476
<v Speaker 1>They know that when you're not betting, you're weak, and

0:28:40.596 --> 0:28:45.956
<v Speaker 1>you become predictable. In professional poker, this eventually works itself out.

0:28:46.436 --> 0:28:48.996
<v Speaker 1>You play thousands and thousands of hands with the same

0:28:49.036 --> 0:28:52.236
<v Speaker 1>person and you see their cards after they've bluffed, and

0:28:52.316 --> 0:28:54.436
<v Speaker 1>you learn not to take what they do at face value.

0:28:55.076 --> 0:28:57.596
<v Speaker 1>But in real life, we don't usually get to play

0:28:57.676 --> 0:29:00.476
<v Speaker 1>thousands of hands of the same game with the same people.

0:29:01.076 --> 0:29:03.636
<v Speaker 1>In real life, we go to a dinner party with

0:29:03.676 --> 0:29:07.996
<v Speaker 1>people we've never met. Real life is more like amateur poker.

0:29:09.116 --> 0:29:12.156
<v Speaker 1>When you're aggressive, it becomes much more difficult, especially if

0:29:12.196 --> 0:29:15.436
<v Speaker 1>you're smart. Aggressive that tends to win more money in

0:29:15.476 --> 0:29:21.436
<v Speaker 1>the short term because confidence, actually, you know, is something

0:29:21.556 --> 0:29:24.476
<v Speaker 1>at the poker table where confidence is part of the

0:29:24.516 --> 0:29:29.636
<v Speaker 1>information that other people have. Maria had set out to

0:29:29.676 --> 0:29:33.076
<v Speaker 1>see what poker could teach her about real life. One

0:29:33.156 --> 0:29:35.916
<v Speaker 1>big thing it taught her was the power of overconfidence

0:29:35.956 --> 0:29:40.116
<v Speaker 1>in all kinds of human interactions. Imagine two people coming

0:29:40.156 --> 0:29:43.116
<v Speaker 1>into an interview right and being asked the exact same question,

0:29:43.556 --> 0:29:46.516
<v Speaker 1>and someone asks me, okay, you know, do you know

0:29:46.556 --> 0:29:48.436
<v Speaker 1>how to do this? And I say, well, you know,

0:29:48.476 --> 0:29:50.476
<v Speaker 1>I haven't worked on it in the last five years,

0:29:50.516 --> 0:29:52.436
<v Speaker 1>but I can ramp up really quickly and I have

0:29:52.476 --> 0:29:56.596
<v Speaker 1>all these components skills. Other person comes in and says, yes, absolutely,

0:29:56.996 --> 0:29:59.316
<v Speaker 1>I could do it, no problem. Who's going to get

0:29:59.356 --> 0:30:02.756
<v Speaker 1>hired right to me? Who was who actually might know more?

0:30:03.116 --> 0:30:06.036
<v Speaker 1>Or the person who's like, yeah, totally, I know, I

0:30:06.076 --> 0:30:09.796
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what this is. That approach works. People who

0:30:09.836 --> 0:30:14.876
<v Speaker 1>are just overconfident oftentimes just get their way right right.

0:30:15.316 --> 0:30:17.756
<v Speaker 1>When you were learning, did you feel like, when you

0:30:17.796 --> 0:30:20.396
<v Speaker 1>were getting better, did you have a sense of yourself

0:30:20.836 --> 0:30:25.676
<v Speaker 1>masculinizing yourself. Yeah, that's a funny way of putting it,

0:30:25.716 --> 0:30:28.276
<v Speaker 1>but yeah I did. I had a conversation with my

0:30:28.356 --> 0:30:29.916
<v Speaker 1>husband at some point where I said I need to

0:30:30.036 --> 0:30:34.236
<v Speaker 1>grow bigger balls and he just looked at me like

0:30:34.396 --> 0:30:36.396
<v Speaker 1>I was totally insane, and I was like, you know,

0:30:36.436 --> 0:30:39.356
<v Speaker 1>I've just realized that I just I lack them completely

0:30:39.396 --> 0:30:41.916
<v Speaker 1>and that's not good. He's like, yes, you do lack,

0:30:43.316 --> 0:30:47.676
<v Speaker 1>and I'm okay with that. Here's the most unsettling thing

0:30:47.676 --> 0:30:50.996
<v Speaker 1>about man splaining, and also the most unsettling thing about

0:30:51.036 --> 0:30:54.156
<v Speaker 1>over confidence. Now that it's got a name, it just

0:30:54.196 --> 0:30:57.796
<v Speaker 1>seems pathetic when some old rich guy tries to tell

0:30:57.796 --> 0:31:01.236
<v Speaker 1>a famous female writer about her own book. We laugh,

0:31:02.916 --> 0:31:05.636
<v Speaker 1>but we missed the point. The point is that most

0:31:05.636 --> 0:31:08.276
<v Speaker 1>of the time he will leave that party feeling even

0:31:08.316 --> 0:31:26.316
<v Speaker 1>more confident than he did before. Against the Rules is

0:31:26.356 --> 0:31:29.076
<v Speaker 1>written and hosted by me Michael Lewis and produced by

0:31:29.116 --> 0:31:33.476
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Girardeau and Lydia Jean Cott. Julia Barton is our editor,

0:31:33.556 --> 0:31:36.996
<v Speaker 1>with additional editing by Audrey Dilling. Beth Johnson is our

0:31:37.036 --> 0:31:41.956
<v Speaker 1>fact checker and mil o'bell executive produces. Our music is

0:31:41.996 --> 0:31:45.836
<v Speaker 1>created by John Evans and Matthias Bossi, a Stellwagen stympanette.

0:31:46.476 --> 0:31:50.556
<v Speaker 1>We record our show at Berkeley Advanced Media Studios, expertly

0:31:50.596 --> 0:31:54.836
<v Speaker 1>helmed by Tofa Ruth. Thanks also to Jacob Weisberg, Heather Fame,

0:31:54.996 --> 0:32:00.116
<v Speaker 1>John Snars, Carl mcgilori, Christina Sullivan, Eric Sandler, Maggie Taylor,

0:32:00.636 --> 0:32:07.236
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Ratner, Nicole Morano, Royston Preserve, Daniella Lakhan, Mary Beth Smith,

0:32:07.556 --> 0:32:11.556
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Gambrel. Against the Rules is a production of

0:32:11.556 --> 0:32:14.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. If you love this show and others from

0:32:14.836 --> 0:32:19.236
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries, consider subscribing to Pushkin Plus. Pushkin Plus is

0:32:19.236 --> 0:32:23.836
<v Speaker 1>a podcast subscription that offers bonus content and uninterrupted listening

0:32:23.836 --> 0:32:26.836
<v Speaker 1>for four dollars and ninety nine cents a month. Look

0:32:26.836 --> 0:32:30.996
<v Speaker 1>for Pushkin Plus on Apple Podcasts subscriptions. Keep in touch,

0:32:31.356 --> 0:32:34.436
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Pushkin's newsletter at pushkin dot Fm, or

0:32:34.516 --> 0:32:39.196
<v Speaker 1>follow at Pushkin Pods. Define more Pushkin Podcasts, listen on

0:32:39.236 --> 0:32:44.036
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:32:50.516 --> 0:32:53.476
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of my Rebetta Stulnes right, which I

0:32:53.516 --> 0:32:56.276
<v Speaker 1>totally forgot hold on, hold on tofa Are you recording this?

0:32:56.916 --> 0:32:58.996
<v Speaker 1>I was at a party and I was talking to

0:32:58.996 --> 0:33:01.636
<v Speaker 1>a guy who worked in tech, and he was explaining

0:33:01.676 --> 0:33:04.836
<v Speaker 1>to me how the business of podcasting works, and the

0:33:04.836 --> 0:33:08.036
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is. I was genuinely listening to him,

0:33:08.116 --> 0:33:10.916
<v Speaker 1>thinking that maybe he could tell me something I didn't

0:33:10.956 --> 0:33:14.276
<v Speaker 1>know for some reason, like just silently letting him talk

0:33:14.316 --> 0:33:18.316
<v Speaker 1>for like so long that eventually another guy who had

0:33:18.356 --> 0:33:22.956
<v Speaker 1>been overhearing the conversation interrupted and said, are you seriously

0:33:23.036 --> 0:33:26.356
<v Speaker 1>explaining to a professional podcast or the business of podcasting?

0:33:26.956 --> 0:33:30.636
<v Speaker 1>And what did the guy do? Then he got embarrassed

0:33:30.636 --> 0:33:33.876
<v Speaker 1>and he stopped talking. Yes, but think how many times

0:33:33.876 --> 0:33:37.756
<v Speaker 1>that happens and nobody ever says anything. Yeah, well I

0:33:37.756 --> 0:33:38.636
<v Speaker 1>didn't say anything.