WEBVTT - Tesla’s Europe Sales Plummet, IBM and ServiceNow Beat Expectations

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>And Ed Ludlow live from New York and San Francisco.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. Service now jumps as

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 2>earnings results show resilience. Our conversation with the company's.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 3>CEO, plus Alphabet earnings looking to set the tone for

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>megacat Tech later today, and Tesla's sales.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>They slump in Europe again as it's overtaken by VW

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>as Europe's top ev seller. More on that this hour,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>But first we check in on the market and it

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>is hope that we might get some sort of reprieve

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 2>from the Federal Reserve. Maybe rates could move as soon

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>as June. So being hinted at by some key people,

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland president, for example, we're at one point eight percent.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Big Tech manages to rally again. This is a third

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>straight day of games on the Nastaq one hundred. We've

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>added a trillion dollars in market capitalization to that benchmark

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>in those three days. But I'm looking at bitcoin once again.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>The disconnect happening. In terms of stocks, we move in

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a different direction. Bitcoin maybe able a profit taking as

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 2>we hit ninety three thousand en what have you got?

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the companies that have reported earnings already. I

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people were surprised by the strength

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>of Texas Instruments resilient demand. These are the analog chips

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 3>that go into everything, more basic chips, and they seem

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>to do well. Later in the Albluem magazine, King will

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>break it down for us. Then there's IBM and Service Now,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>two CEOs that you spoke to, and we'll hear from

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Service now resilience of demand, winning government contracts. By contrast,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>IBM losing government contracts, strong profit numbers, but people are

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>worried about how they're interpreting the economy going forward. Again,

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>we'll hear from both those CEOs and your conversations. Then

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>there's what's to come alphabet parent of Google is after

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the bell and at the same time there's the news

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>flow out of the doj Antitrust Remedies trial pushing higher

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 3>at one point six percent. But this evening alphabet sets

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 3>the tone, as we just said, for megacaps to come,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 3>and we have a lot of questions about the mag

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 3>seven we do.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>We're anticipating what results of twelve percent increase in revenue,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>but the tone is going to really dictate big tech earnings.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, You've got so many risks, said rising taris

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>anti trustee that you just reference AI uncertainty. Raand Vastellac

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>has been writing about all of it in the stock

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>It's already been slammed so far this year. How anxious

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>are investors?

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Hey, thanks for having me, I say. There is so

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 4>much uncertainty surrounding Alphabet, a lot more than even some

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of the other MAGS seven names. It's true that Alphabet

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 4>has less direct exposure to tear us, but there is

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 4>still a lot of concern about the regulatory picture, about

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>the risk of competition within AI. All this stuff has

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 4>been really impacting the stop this year. That has some

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 4>people saying that it looks like an attractive bargain here,

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, the number of sort of

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 4>existential concerns. Is there going to be a breakup, Is

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 4>it going to lose its really dominant position with its

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 4>biggest market with his Internet search. All these questions really

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 4>have people wondering, how are they going to fare this quarter.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 4>What are they going to say about the economic backdrop

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 4>and outlook? It's really going to be meaningful for I

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 4>think the broader big tech.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Space Boombos, Ryan Fastelica, thank you very much. Let's turn

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 3>to IBM. The company beat first quarter expectations with fourteen

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>point five billion dollars in revenue, boosted by strong software sales,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>but shares falling today is the company warned of delayed

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>contracts due to economic uncertainty. IBM CEO Aarvin Krishna spoke

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>to Caroline and said, quote, it's a dynamic environment where

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 3>things are changing. We want to stay focused on the

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>business and there's still a lot of business to be had.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 3>People are going to remain invested in tech. Ana rag Rana,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>a Bloomberg Intelligence joins us with his analysis, and I

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 3>think about big blue right shift to software and consultancy.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 3>There's what they said and then there's weather. What they

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>said is reflected in the forecast. Does IBM really understand

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 3>how the economy is changing right now?

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 5>In a rag.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 6>See to be very frank, I was surprised that the

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 6>stocks down because you know, if you look at it,

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 6>their consulting business is extremely susceptible to downgrades or deceleration.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 6>And it was okay, I mean, and they held up guidance,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 6>But it seems to me that maybe going into the quarter,

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 6>investors were looking for maybe better commentary around software spending.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 6>Software did decelerate, which is what I mean, at least.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 7>I was expecting.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 6>But one of the comments I think that got me

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 6>my attention was that the company's guidance does not take

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 6>into account any material deterioration in economic climate or spending climate.

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's probably what's causing a little bit

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 6>of hiccup because you know, we all know that if

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 6>the tariff stocks don't, you know, hold true, and some

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 6>of these spendings will will hit really hardbreak that has

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 6>an impact on second half growth, not just for IBM,

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 6>but the entire services and the software sector.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Anna Agrana, Bloomberg Intelligence, the deep dive on IBM. We

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Let's go broader with earnings and the tech

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>market volatility. More broadly, Anna Rathman's with US Seedbiz Investment

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Advisory Services, Global Market Structures previously and joining us as

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>an investment strategist. Anna, I'm really interested as to what

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 2>we glean from say Arvin over at IBM, he's saying, look,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>he puts a low probability on negative global GDP, and

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>he's trying to say his business is resilient to any

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>macro headwinds here more broadly, but he's also telling us, look,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm worried about the implication of us the sentiment against

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>American businesses. How are you hearing that during this earning season.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think there is a lot of

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 8>uncertainty still. I mean the terriff, the tariff talk is

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 8>actually causing a lot more damage in terms of reallylationships.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's going to be the longer term uncertainty.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 8>Is even if we arrive at some kind of a

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 8>tariff situation where everyone agrees, what happens to all of

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 8>those negative feelings in terms of being able to trust

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 8>each other and to be able to do business together.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 8>I think this is going to be a longer term damage.

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>To be honest with you, You're damned if you do

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 3>and danned if you don't. If you think about what

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 3>Anaag was just saying about IBM, his thesis is that

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>they are not taking into account a deteriorating economic environment.

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 3>But say they had cut guidance. I mean, then what

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>would you do. I mean, what is it that you

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 3>think the investor wants to hear from the company right now?

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 3>A cut or adjustment to guidance, or just hold until

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>you've got more information.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'm not sure if you can give good guidance

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 8>at this point, because you know, the tariffs.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 9>I mean, that's one thing. It's unilateral.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 8>We're talking about it at like a thirty thousand foot level.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 8>How it actually trickles down to actual supply chains and

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 8>businesses and what choices management teams make in the face

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 8>of this headwind.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 9>That's the unknown.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 8>So in terms of negative GDP, maybe perhaps there might

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 8>be other alliances that are being made.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 9>We just don't know. But in terms of guidance, it's

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 9>almost difficult to know.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 8>And even if they were to give guidance, I think

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 8>we have to take with a huge grain of salt.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 8>So right now, I think investors, I think the best

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 8>bet is to just hold and watch.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>One interesting angle out of Texas Instruments earnings was the

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 3>idea that they had a good first three months of

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the year, but they said that was not necessarily reflective

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>of people front running tariffs. How do you interpret that

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>we had a lot of soft data from PC shipments,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>for example, smartphone shipments that very much told us in

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the world of technology, companies were front running tariffs in

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the first three months of the year.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think companies that that consumers did that,

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 8>and so really we don't have that much information because

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 8>Liberation Day wasn't even a month ago, right, So you know,

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 8>time this to the FED speek this morning about how

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 8>we may have some economic numbers by June to be

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 8>able to do something.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 9>I think that's too early.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a lot of distortion in the data

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 8>in terms of front running as well as just holding

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 8>and waiting and watching with baited breath. I don't think

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 8>there's going to be enough data for either investors or

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 8>policy makers to be able to do anything definitively.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So, Anna, if you're an investor and you haven't sold

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 2>out during prior to any of this turbulence, do you

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>just stay the course? Do you remain long the names

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>that you've been committed to prior to this, and just

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>hold steady until we come out the other side of

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>what is a very much self induced period of instability.

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think that the self induced is right. I

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 8>think US management can't make any real decisions at the

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 8>moment or give guidance. I think it's difficult for investors

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 8>to say either sell or buy.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 9>I think there it is very much a wait and see.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 8>Now if you're a long term investor, if your short term,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the choices are to just sit and wait.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 8>You're long term investor, I don't think any of the

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 8>propositions that.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 9>We have around AI, around tech and.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 8>Tech dominance is changing for you. So tech is still quality.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 9>They've got very good balance sheets.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 8>Tech is still utility in terms of the fact that

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 8>modern life just doesn't work without tech. So if you're

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 8>a long term investor, taking the course is not a

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 8>bad idea either.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Which corner of the technology market is going to come

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 3>hurtling out of whatever happens next? Anna give me one

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>specific area you're most excited about.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 8>You know, hardware has taken a lot of hit because

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 8>of not only terrorists, but because of the strained relationship

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 8>with China. But I think hardware is is actually maybe

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 8>over sold and maybe are still a good bed. You're

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 8>going to need hardware to develop software that's not going away,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 8>So I don't think there's anything bad to say necessarily

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 8>for the long term for hardware, I would say maybe

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 8>the bad news wouldn't hit hardware as much as it

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 8>may software, given that it has sold off so much.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 3>You're going to need hardware to develop software. As the

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 3>line that CEOs all over this planet are telling themselves

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 3>every day at the moment, and are AFTEN consulting local

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>market strategists.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 7>Thank you very much.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Service now shares surging best state since twenty thirteen after

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 2>earnings showed that the software demand looks pretty resilient despite

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the economic threat of tarists and the government's cost cutting efforts.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I spoke with the CEO a little McDermott about it's

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty rosy outlook.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 10>Why we're so well positioned for this moment is companies today.

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 10>You know, let's take auto industry as an example. You know,

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 10>tariffs are on the table and that industry is affected.

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 10>So these companies have to think about the marketplace very,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 10>very differently. They have to reorient their supply chains in

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 10>real time, and only AI can do that. And you say, well,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 10>why do I have to do that? There's thirty thousand

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 10>parts that go into manufacturing a single vehicle. They may

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 10>not be able to pass on the ten thousand dollars

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 10>increase to the consumer. So companies like Service Now can

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 10>get them to tier two and three suppliers, sign up

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 10>new suppliers in real time, and position these companies to win.

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 10>And this is true in every industry. It could be insurance,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 10>it could be pharma, it could be retail manufacturing. It's

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 10>all in the focus of Service Now to help these

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 10>companies innovate.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's go from private companies to the public sector. And

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I know that you've won a federal contract, but many

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of anxiety about what DOSEE meant for you.

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>You said, those loves you, but why would those love

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 2>you at this moment.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, we're laser focused on modernizing government and elevating how

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 10>it serves the American people in the US. And what's

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 10>really interesting about DOZE it has formed a standard that

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 10>other governments around the world are following. So our public

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 10>sector business was up thirty percent year on year. We

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 10>had six new public sector logos, including one large US

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 10>federal agency. We have eleven federal deals greater than a million,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 10>and two of them were greater than five million. And

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 10>this is net new software sales. So This is kind

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 10>of a big moment because we are the only software

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 10>platform I'm personally aware of that can take out billions

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 10>in cost in government around the world, and certainly the

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 10>United States is looking at that very closely, and we're excited.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, have you spoken to Elon about the work

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 2>that he's doing. How did you make sure that you

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>were protected in this moment to be able to bring

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the transformation, bring the efficiency.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, you have to remember the agencies are run by

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 10>amazing public servants and great leaders, and DOEGE is doing

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 10>the right thing. They obviously want to make good for

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 10>the American people, so the tax payers get their benefits.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 10>Our platform is front and center and helping them do that.

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 10>You know, there's systems like COBOL systems in there and

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 10>government entities since nineteen fifty nine, and then the twentieth

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 10>century architectures where all of these legacy systems were departmentally organized,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 10>and then there was Maverick buying over decades of different administrations.

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 10>We can come in there and consolidate all of these

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 10>spends onto the Service Now platform and replace hundreds of systems.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 7>And who wouldn't want to do that?

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Service Now CEO Bill McDermott. Let's dig in more. Brody

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Ford is with us, who's been busy covering all of

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 2>these earnings. Brody, we were all surprised by the resilience

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>versus the public sector. But more broadly, they're just showing

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>current remaining performance obligations are really strong.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 11>Exactly so yet meet right, it's been a kind of

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 11>funky moment for the economy. Everyone's wondered if you're a

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 11>software vendor, you're not impacted by tariffs, what does this

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 11>mean for you? And what Service Now has shown us

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 11>is maybe not a whole lot. The results were very solid.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 11>I mean, the stock was down like twenty some percent

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 11>headed in through the results, and so expectations were quite low,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 11>but they did surpass that and they were able to

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 11>show that, at least for the time being, not a

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 11>whole lot of impacts from all the economic kind of

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 11>chaos and fear we've been seeing out there.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Right, what he.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Had to say, Bill McDermott showed confidence. But actually we

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>probably should focus on the full year guidance because the

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 3>full year guidance definitely reflects the political uncertainty and perhaps

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>in caution Brady.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 11>Correct, Yeah, factor in the currency it was just the

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 11>slightest cut from their previous guidance in that environment. That's

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 11>pretty good. They say in their commentary that the guidance

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 11>reflected some caution that you know, they even though the

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 11>trends were good, that they gave a conservative guidance because

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 11>it allowed them to essentially, if things go a little

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 11>wrong later in the year, they won't have to cut again,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 11>because yeah, it's still an open question. I mean, if

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 11>we head into a true recession or if there's more

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.479
<v Speaker 11>aggressive federal cost cuts, Service now will not be immune.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>It was interesting Morgan Stanley's saying that they're de risking

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 2>their forward guidance, but Brody, they also highlight how strong

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>they've been in terms of generative AI. Are we back

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to talking about some of the efficiency that we've all

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 2>been promised some of the productivity.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 11>Yes, every company right now is singing the song of

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 11>our generative AI product is driving revenue. Not a ton

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 11>of them are breaking out super specifically what that means.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 11>Service now has given some numbers, some guides, but I

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 11>think still the generative AI uplift most analysts expect that

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 11>to come next year, even the year after in a

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 11>significant way, but still that's where the big growth bet

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 11>is for all these companies. In service Now's case, it

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 11>is a higher tier product that you would buy. You

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 11>would uplift your license to be able to access the

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 11>generative AI tools, and so certainly if you're a salesperson

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 11>there that is priority number one right now.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 3>The most Brady Ford terrific reporting, Thank you very much.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Alphabet's cloud unit is expected to show growth

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 3>off the back of the company's AI push. We'll discuss

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>what's expected from the Google parents' earnings. This is what

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>financial markets look like right now in the context of technology.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>So at the index level and as that one hundred,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the vast majority of names are in the green.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 5>It is the.

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 7>Megacaps that are pushing us higher.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Though it's interesting that this is kind of broad based

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 3>all corners of the tech market. You have software names,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 3>hardware names, social media names as well continuing to push higher.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 3>There is some reverberation of fear fe good. I would

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 3>say from those names that we just covered. The earnings

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 3>of Bitcoin is put off the gas a little bit

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 3>in the moment, ninety hundred US dollars per token back.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're four days into a week where we

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>talked about bitcoin every day having some momentum, behaving like gold.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot more to come in this hour. This

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>is Bloombog technology.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Google parent Alphabet. Well, it reports its earnings after the

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>market close today. Let's get more and what to expect

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>blooemeg Intelligence. As Man Deep singers here, there is a

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>whole host of headaches for Alphabet right now, but revenue

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>is still set to grow by twelve percent.

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, and search grew double digits last quarter, so I feel.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 5>The bar is high.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 12>And then I look at all the things that have

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 12>transferred since the last time they're reported earnings. I feel

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 12>on the margin it's gonna go down, and especially if

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 12>they miss on search. I mean, you know, overall print,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 12>no matter how strong cloud is or YouTube is, it's

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 12>not going to matter. So from a profitability perspective, it's

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 12>all about search. And I can't imagine, you know, how

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 12>they beat on the search revenue given all the stuff

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 12>you have heard about t machine and advertisers pulling back

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 12>even though they're ad pricing will be better than peers.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 12>But on the margin, I think I don't see them

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 12>beating consensus numbers.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 7>You know what's interesting, Man, deep.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 3>I've spoken to several CEOs in the supply chain for

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Data Center right and they're so confident that cat TO

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 3>expenditures will continue to rise on a multi year horizon.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 7>Google told us a number.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 3>How important is it or not that Google specifically sticks

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 3>with that spending plan for the rest of the magnetic

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 3>seven names that are to come.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, I think it's table stakes for someone like Google.

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 12>And you know, they don't have a choice but to

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 12>invest in their Gemini model because of the thread from

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 12>CHATGPT and all the LM search vendors. So right now,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 12>what's insulating them is none of these guys have an

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 12>AD platform. They're monetizing the engagement through subscriptions, but there

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 12>is no doubt that they are taking volume of the searches,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 12>and so from that perspective, Google will see the impact

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 12>in their volume. It's just if you're an online business,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 12>you have no way out but to spend your money

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 12>on Google. And even in a recessionary environment, what we

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 12>have seen is Google is the most insulated. That will

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 12>remain the case when it comes to the ads spend,

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 12>at least for now.

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 2>At least for now at the moment, there's a whole

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>host of anti trust issues, and I'm interested in just

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>whether you think we'll hear a lot of analyst calls

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and requests to know more about that. How they preserve

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the business model in the face of it.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 12>Oh, absolutely, the Chrome one is huge. I mean, I

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 12>think what they're going to do is with the Viz

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 12>acquisition really deploy AI inside Chrome. So losing Chrome will

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 12>be just catastrophic for Google. So from that perspective, that

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.239
<v Speaker 12>case is huge. I mean, they may have to do

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 12>some remedies. They've already talked about keeping the cookies and

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 12>all that, but at the end of the day, Chrome

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.959
<v Speaker 12>is how they have the distribution when it comes to

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 12>their Gemini two point five model, which is just getting

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 12>great review. So in the end, it comes down to

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 12>having distribution, and Google has that with Chrome as well

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 12>as the Android ecosystem, but Chrome is very important to

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 12>cut it across the iOS and all the other devices.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 3>The Duck Duck Go CEO testified in that case and

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 3>he put a fifty billion dollar or more value on Chrome,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 3>which I found fascinating. Same question I've asked you every

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 3>year since I've lived in America. Does the stop reflect

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 3>the antitrust risk that you continue to talk about and.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 12>Does I think right now Google is at the lowest

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 12>valuation when it comes to all the max seven names

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 12>in terms of multiples. So from that perspective, the chatchipt thread,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 12>the regulatory risks are reflected in the valuation. But like

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 12>I said, you know, if something happens to that search revenue,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 12>then suddenly all the earning estimates are going to get

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 12>revised lower. So from Google's perspective, you know, cloud is

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 12>not how they make their money. It's search, and that's

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 12>why it's all the more important to keep that intact.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 12>You know, when it comes to the regulatory risks that

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 12>are out there.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I bring it up because the DOJ is seeking divestment

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 3>of Chrome, which would be a big thing. Bloomberg Intelligence

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 3>is man deep saying terrific analysis.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 7>Thank you very much.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology and Karine Hide in New.

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 7>York and Amed love Loo in San Francisco.

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's got to check on these markets, said, because we

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>are once again in rebound mode. We're up for a

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>third straight day on the last like one hundred one

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 2>point nine percent. Let's call it a macro picture. We're

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>getting a few more dubvish tones coming from those fed

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>presidents today. Could we see a move as the macro

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>faces headwind of the headwind amid the tariff anxiety. We're

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 2>currently at one point eight percent. Is big tech really

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 2>leaves the charge? Drillian and I want to shine a

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>light on chips. You've talked about Texas Instruments so well,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 2>but the socks is having a wonderful day, having its

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>best day. The overall semiconductor index, well, we're seeing every

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 2>single company in the green. Notably we're looking ahead to

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 2>earnings of Intel. Is there going to be a pull

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 2>forward on Intel numbers in terms of the amount of

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>PCs that we've wanted to see in terms of inventory

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to get the head of tariffs, but we're likely

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to see overcall revenue on the downside. Texas Instruments really

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 2>smashed it though, ed, Yeah.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with Texas Instruments and bring in Bloomberg, see

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and King. This is a maker of the more simple chips,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>goes in everything from cars to electronics.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 7>What do we learn from their numbers?

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean they said everything essentially, everything is awesome.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 13>That's been the message so far for all TIP companies.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 13>Demand is good. It's coming back, just like we said

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 13>it was, crosshold markets, cross old geographies.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 7>Everything is really good.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 13>But with the giant butt.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the giant but being tariffs and uncertain trade policy.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 3>The other one that caught the eye of night was

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 3>sk heinez at a career key memory provider to Nvidia

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 3>in the context data center.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 7>What's the read through to the big picture?

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, the same thing there. Everything is awesome, right, everything,

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 13>the orders are coming in, selling a lot of chips.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 13>Demand fundamentally still strong.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 7>But tariffs.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>We want to thank you in King on all things chips.

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>But meanwhile, going back to broader stories, right now, there

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>are some breaking news that the US is set to

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>demand that Putin of Russia accepts that Ukraine has a

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 2>right to continue its military force. Now we go out

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to our Balance of Power co hosts Katie Lines, who

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 2>can bring us some of the details here. There is

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>an important meeting about to occur in Moscow, and this

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 2>is the line when it comes to what Russia must

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 2>accept in any sort of ceasefar Yeah, Bloomberg.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 14>According to sources familiar with the matter, Caroline is really

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 14>providing some light as to what exactly in terms of

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 14>concessions the US wants to ask of Russia after much

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 14>reporting over all of the concessions that have been asked

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 14>of Ukraine, and that does include a demand that Russia

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 14>essentially accepts that Ukraine will have its own military force

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 14>and defense industry as part of any deal. And our

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 14>understanding is this is going to be presented as an

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 14>issue when Steve Whitcoff, the US Special Envoy, meets with

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 14>Vladimir Putin next in Moscow, which is expected to happen tomorrow.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>And in additional demand.

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 14>Here as well, according to our reporting, is that Russia

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 14>returns control of the Zaparijia Power nuclear power plant in

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 14>Ukraine and that the US and theory would take over

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 14>the operations of that. Now, it's not clear whether or

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 14>not these are concessions that Vladimir Putin will be willing

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 14>to accept. Is at least when it comes to the

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 14>Ukrainian defense industry, that would mean Putin does not achieve

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 14>one of his stated war aims. When he invaded Ukraine,

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 14>he said part of the objective was to achieve the

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 14>demilitarization of Ukraine. Now, of course, there are other objectives

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 14>that based on our reporting on the deal, that had

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 14>been presented to Ukraine from the US. That would mean

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 14>Vladimir Putin would achieve including a commitment that Ukraine would

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 14>never be able to join NATO, as well as recognition

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 14>of Crimea, which Russia illegally annexed in twenty fourteen as Russian.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 14>That is something that ukrain and President Vladimir Zelinski has

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 14>said he could not accept in any deal because it

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 14>would violate the Ukrainian constitution, and of course President Trump

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 14>was upset with that statement. He said that it is

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 14>a deterrent or an impediment, if you will, to achieving peace,

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 14>though he also has expressed ir with Vladimir Putin. Today,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 14>in the aftermath of deadly strikes in Kiev over a

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 14>night which killed at least a dozen people and wounded

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 14>dozens more, he says that Vladimir.

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Putin must stop.

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 14>He says that the timing is very bad. It was

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 14>not necessary. He says he is not happy with the

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 14>Russian strikes on Kiev and it'll remain to be seen

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 14>if Russia is happy with this architecture of a deal that, again,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 14>based on our reporting, the US is preparing.

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 3>To present Balance and Power. Co host Katie Lynes thank

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Let's get back to technology earnings driving

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 3>stocks today IBM underwhelming investors despite posting a sales beat.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Vin Krishna expecting AI to continue to deve

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>a telling Caro AI business is six billion dollars. It's

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty big compared to most others, and we are very

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>happy people are using it to improve price, customer service,

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 3>customer experience for more. David Bunts and the Buns And

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Group chief investment officer joins us now is company seven

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 3>point one billion dollars of assets under management. You might

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 3>have heard Bloombergsy and King a moment ago, also speaking

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 3>in the context of the chip names, and in summary,

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 3>everything is awesome IBM. The market is sort of not

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 3>necessarily sharing the sentiment, but that start there. David, is

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 3>everything awesome for technology in corporate America?

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 15>Well, no, not everything is awesome in the sense of

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 15>technology is not immune at all from the uncertainty generated

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 15>by the tariffs and the questions as to what that

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 15>will mean both to the economy but then also to

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 15>actual policy and therefore expectations for corporate profits. So that

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 15>uncertainty lingers. But I think everything is certainly wonderful. So

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 15>far in terms of operating results that have been reported.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 15>We are holders of both Texas Instruments, which is upp

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.239
<v Speaker 15>today and IBM, which is down. But IBM has been

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 15>an absolutely unbelievable performer, and really the AI side was

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 15>good news. The stock would be down more today if

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 15>it were not.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 7>For the AI boost.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 15>It's the software growth was only nine percent quarter over

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 15>quarter when they had done eleven percent to the quarter before,

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 15>so some deceleration and what's been a very successful growth

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 15>in that hybrid cloud, the former red Hat business that

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 15>they acquired. IBM has executed very well and we're big

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 15>believers long term and what they're doing.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 5>That whole story.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of good news.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 15>In the technology sector, but you just simply can't overpay

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 15>for the good news.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>David. What's so interesting is, yes, maybe there's some profit

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 2>taking given the run up in IBM and its resiliency

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>amid the tariff uncertainty. But Avin Christa said, look, demand

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 2>signals are still unchanged. Is that what need to remain

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>the case? How much are we already basically paying for

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>inventory pulled forward by Texas Instruments and a resiliency consultancy

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>that might not withstand what could be a real slow

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 2>down in the economy.

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 15>Well, there is a very big difference in the answer

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 15>to that, from Texas Instruments to IBM, to other companies

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 15>that are part of this AI capex story.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Like let's say in Nvidia.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 15>Nobody's going to be immune if there's a system wide

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 15>demand slowdown and a recession that lasts more than a

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 15>few minutes. But there's uncertainty as to what exactly will happen.

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 15>I expect that there will be a slowdown, and again

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 15>we're not We don't own any company for the sake

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 15>of one quarter of results, so I think you could

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 15>very well see a slowdown that impacts fundamentals short term.

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 15>The question is who has the resilience, who has the

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 15>balance sheet? Who is the business model to most execute

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 15>through that? I have no doubt Texas Instruments and IBM

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 15>belong at the top of those lists. They're not dependent

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 15>on a somewhat unsustainable AI capex cycle let alone. Are

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 15>they relying on a pe ratio that has been totally

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 15>unsustainable to hold the stock price up?

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 7>Okay, who is at the top of that list for

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 7>you in the weeks to.

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 15>Come, Well, and video, I should go easy on them

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 15>because they've obviously had a tough time through this. But

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 15>I think when in Video is one hundred and fifty

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 15>dollars trading eighty times forward earnings now down here to

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 15>the lower hundreds, it's certainly cheaper, but it's very much

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 15>tether do a big story around AI capex and suffers

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 15>from law of large numbers. Just when you get to

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 15>that three trillion market cap, it's very difficult for people

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 15>to realize that a twenty percent gain, which is not

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 15>really what their shareholders want. They want something more than that,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 15>but the math of that requires it to add like

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 15>almost a trillion dollars of market capitalization. So it's just

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 15>very difficult to make money out of those valuations. So

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 15>in Video is a good example there. Look, we're givinging

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 15>growth investors, and so in Video is not a name

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 15>that we'd be looking at anyways. So I think IBM,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 15>if you look at the dividend on cost for people

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 15>that were buying IBM a number of years ago, we

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 15>entered the position about seven years ago. It's been unbelievable.

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 15>And everyone focuses on how well the stock price is done,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 15>and that's great, it makes us look good, but for me,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 15>it's a cash on cash story. Their dividend growth has

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 15>been remarkable.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>David, what about buybacks as well? Sorry to jump in there,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>but many expecting companies are going to make the most

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of that capital hall right now.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think that stock buybacks to us are at

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 15>best supplemental. Most technology companies don't use it as real

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 15>capital return. They use it as executive compensation to the

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 15>degree or at least buying back the shares that you

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 15>issued because of stock options and executive comp I think

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 15>that that's a very good thing as a capital return strategy.

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 15>We prefer it the second tier, not first, and IBM

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 15>is a good example.

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 7>David bunts into the buns and group. Thank you very much.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to get to a story I broke yesterday

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 3>with bloomboas jillion ten Lommus Neuralink is planning to raise

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>around five hundred million dollars at a pre money valuation

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 3>of eight point five billion dollars.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 7>That's, according to sources.

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 3>The brain implant company in clinical trials for its chip

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 3>that allows patients to control computers with their brains, and

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 3>a big jump in valuation. It was too now coming up,

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Ali Patovi an early investor in names like Facebook and Cusa,

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 3>joins us to talk about finding and cultivating tech leaders.

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 7>That's next. This is newbog technology.

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Ali Partovi, an early investor in Facebook, Airbnb, and drop Box,

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 3>has announced a new three hundred and twenty million dollar

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 3>fund from his company Neo to back early tech talent

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 3>through a scholars program for college students, an accelerator which

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 3>would compete with the likes of y Combinator. AI joins us. Now,

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 3>welcome to the show. Welcome to the studio. That's the debate, right,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 3>is what you do venture capital with an accelerator offering?

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 7>Or are you an accelerator?

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 16>I define us as a mentorship community. I'm so excited

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 16>to be here, Ed and Caroline. We've just raised three

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 16>hundred and twenty million dollars. But what I'm most excited

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 16>about is that we discover superstars earlier.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Than anybody else.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 16>I started this company eight years ago with the vision

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 16>that you can identify future billionaires when they're still in college,

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 16>right and mentor them and help them accomplish their potential.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 16>And it's just amazing to see what Neo Scholars have

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 16>gone on to do. Last year, all of open Aiy's

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 16>new grad hires were neo scholars, and some of them

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 16>go on to found you know, companies like Cognition and

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 16>Cursor that are worth billions and that we back.

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, let's look at the case study of

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>any sphere which makes Cursor such a hot product. You

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>found Michael before anyone else. You were the first check

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 2>in the fact that you've got such prior experience and wins.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Is there a method? Is there something that you see

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 2>in each founder?

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:14.239
<v Speaker 5>There is?

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 16>And honestly, when I started, I had a little bit

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 16>of insecurity of like, is it possible to build a machine,

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 16>build an institution that systematically identifies future you know, future

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 16>tech leaders when they're still sophomores in college and is

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 16>it or you know, do I just have anc or

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 16>can you do it systematically? And I feel pretty confident

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 16>we've not proven that you can do it institutionally. Michael

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 16>is a great example.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 16>I met him when he was a rising sophomore at

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 16>MIT and we helped mentor him not just towards becoming

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 16>a founder, but helped him get his first startup internship.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 16>His co founder Oman, who was also an MIT student,

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 16>We helped him get his first startup internship, and when

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 16>they were starting a startup, we mentor with them regularly

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 16>for almost a year before they raised funding.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 5>And they're not the only case.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 16>You know, I just mentioned Cognition co founder Walden Yan

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 16>was a NEO scholar. That's a billion dollar company.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing, right, all of these people and

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 3>their story is just at the core of Silicon Valley law.

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 7>Right, they are talented.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Where we are today is a discussion around how you

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 3>do not need to be a computer scientist. You don't

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 3>even need to learn to code anymore. What is the

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 3>talent that you actually need to identify? Is it like

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 3>a business acumen more than anything.

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 5>It's a really interesting question ed.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 16>And it's funny because I remember when I was starting Neo,

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 16>one of the top vcs in Silicon Valley said to me, Hm,

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 16>you're focusing on computer science. Is that really necessary?

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 5>Is that right? Maybe that doesn't make sense?

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 16>And I was like, you know what, I'm focusing on

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 16>computer science and the names I just mentioned are all

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 16>computer science students. I think computer science teaches you how

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 16>to You're probably correct that you may not need to.

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Know how to code.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 16>But your question, I would say, would you want people

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 16>to know how to write because writing can also be

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 16>done by AI, you know, but writing teaches you how

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 16>to think, you know. Yeah, And computer science. I still

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 16>we focus on computer science students because I think it

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 16>does give them business acumen and just gives them strategic

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 16>thinking abilities.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It's why you founded code dot org with your brother

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 2>all those years ago. Well, yeah, I'm going to get

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 2>personal for a minute, Ali, because you're an immigrant yourself

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and your family fled the Uranian regime years ago. We're

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 2>at a period where immigrants perhaps don't feel quite as

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>accepted in the United States right now. Does that impact

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 2>some of the founders that you're going to find?

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 16>Honestly, I think there's an emerging question, and I'm still

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 16>trying to figure out, you know, both how I feel

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 16>and where we're going to end up. I still believe

0:35:55.520 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 16>today the United States is the best haven for smart

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 16>people who want to build something out of their careers

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 16>and the and even immigrants. And you know, by the way,

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 16>I was not only an immigrant. I was deported when

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 16>I was very young and managed to come back.

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 5>So I definitely understand the fear.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 16>And there's some really terrible things about the US immigration system.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 5>But I still think that in terms of the.

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 16>Opportunity the US offers, it's better than any any other

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 16>place on Earth, and I'd like to think that our

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 16>immigration system will eventually get to where it makes more

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 16>sense as well.

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Ali was short in time, but I want to just

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 3>end by asking you what is the distinction or advantage

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 3>you have against the Y Combinator or against what Jason

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Calacanis is doing for example.

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 16>You know, I'd say there's a lot of incredible legacy

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 16>programs from the past decades that inspired us and on

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 16>whose shoulders we've built whose focus has been backing first

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 16>time founders or identifying college students and you know, convincing them,

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 16>you know, to start companies. And we today are the

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 16>best of these programs. We discover superstars earlier than anybody else.

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 16>And you know, if you look at the top AI,

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 16>Company's cursor right now is basically the top of that list.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 16>And it was started by somebody who was a NEO

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 16>scholar when he was a college student, and we were

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 16>their first investor.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Ali Potsov, CEO of Neo, thank you for joining us,

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 3>really appreciate your time.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Some news out of China, Chinese ev maker, Neo is

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 3>preparing to launch lower price models in Europe as it

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 3>expands beyond Asia.

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 7>Yesterday, CEO William.

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Lee spoke with Bloomberg about recent changes Neo's expansion strategy.

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 17>Well in the next three years, our focus will undoubtedly

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 17>remain on the Chinese market, as China is the world's

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 17>largest and fastest growing markets for smart electric vehicles, which

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 17>is also the most competitive. As a company founded in China,

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 17>we must secure a sufficient market share in our home

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 17>markets and achieve sustainable operations. This year, we have launched

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 17>nine new products. Our chips, for example, can increase our

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 17>gross margin by four to five percent. Additionally, we are

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 17>making significant efforts in managing sales expenses and enhancing the

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 17>efficiency of R and D costs. Therefore, we are very

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 17>confident in achieving profitability in the fourth quarter of this year.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 18>You're seeing that, so I know your new brand, Firefly,

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 18>You're going to be concentrated on Singapore and other markets

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 18>including Europe UK.

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 17>How are you.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 18>Going to change the model there? Because you did go

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 18>into five fairly expensive, largely Nordic countries in Europe and

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 18>you said you underestimated the cost structures there.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 7>So how are you going to.

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 18>Change that cost structure at a time when there are

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 18>tariffs as well.

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 17>The tariffs will indeed impact our overall business plan. However,

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 17>on the other hand, our new model Firefly is designed

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 17>specifically for small car users. From a product perspective, it's

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 17>very suitable for markets including Europe. The global market for

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:14.959
<v Speaker 17>small cars is approximately twenty million units. We will change

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 17>our ways of cooperation. In the past few years, we

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 17>have operated directly in five European countries. However, we will

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 17>now collaborate more with local partners. We will have one

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 17>partner in each country for long term cooperation, leveraging their

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.280
<v Speaker 17>capabilities to expand our presence.

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 18>How are you going to stand out in the domestic market?

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 18>You're doing the battery swapping technology with the Firefly. Are

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 18>you in active discussions with partners?

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I know you have talks with coatl.

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 18>But others who are going to be those who helped

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 18>solder the immense cost of spreading across all the provinces

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 18>in China.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 17>We have invested in three thy two hundred and seventy

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 17>five battery swap stations in China for the past few years.

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 17>This year we have an even more ambitious plan. We

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 17>aim to build battery swap stations in every county across

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 17>the twenty seven provincial level administrative regions in China. That

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 17>means adding at least one thousand more battery swap stations

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 17>this year. This will certainly be a significant capital expenditure FUS.

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 17>We changed our approach this year by working with local

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 17>partners in China which will handle the construction of those stations.

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 17>We have built partnership with more than a dozen companies.

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 17>We will then rent the battery swap stations from them,

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 17>which can help reduce our capital expenditure.

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>That was NEO CEO William Lee. European car sales rebounded

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 3>in March, with electric vehicle deliveries in particular surging twenty

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 3>four percent in the region, but that did not extend

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 3>to Tesla, which saw new registrations full twenty eight percent

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in Europe last month. I want to bring in Kristen Whole,

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 3>head of Near Impact Capital that holds some Tesla's share.

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 3>You sold out of client funds two years ago, but

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 3>you retain Tesla shares for the purposes of voting and

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 3>vocalizing your thoughts your.

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 7>Thesis on the stock. You are not bullish here.

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 19>No, we're not. No, And it's interesting because we have

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.919
<v Speaker 19>seen shares drop thirty three percent so far this year,

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 19>and yet there's a rally now even though we're seeing

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 19>I believe that they are short on earnings thirty four percent.

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's just disentangle some of the pushes and pulls Hill Kristen,

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 2>because many would say, oh, it's been production holts, or

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it's been a stale lineup, But how much are you

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 2>measuring what seems to be a brand damage story that's

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 2>particularly happened in Europe.

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 19>Well, thank you, Caroline, and we have to look at

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 19>everything here with this company because it's quite exceptional. There's

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 19>a dream of automobiles, and yet we're seeing twenty percent

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 19>drop in sales on the automobiles at Tesla. And what

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 19>isn't coming up in the earnings reports that is important

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 19>into investors is what is happening both to the brand

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 19>the damage there. We've seen sales dropping in their major

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 19>markets in both California and Europe, and with the alignment

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 19>of the CEO with the current administration, that doesn't vode

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 19>well for brand moving forward.

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 7>We're also oh, no, I just want to jump into

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 7>this point.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 7>I'll also be honest with the audience.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't hold any Tesla shares nor any shares of

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 3>any company, but I do drive a Tesla. I have

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.839
<v Speaker 3>a powerwell home. The technology is fantastic. But many would

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 3>say we welcome Elon Musk being a participant in the

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 3>government and Doge. What's your reaction to him pledging to

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>now come back to Tesla and dial back on the

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 3>time at Doge. Does that give you some more confidence?

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 19>No, not in this case where he's there talking about Doge,

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 19>which is specifically about efficiencies, we're not seeing him practice

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 19>that in his own company. And so what we're talking

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 19>about here with efficiencies are human capital management. And we've

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 19>seen so many, particularly top executives in charge of both

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:06.479
<v Speaker 19>engineering and safety leave the company, and they're also doing

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 19>some pretty significant layoffs. We want to see really strong

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 19>human capital management to be able to move this company forward.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Exactly what because thus far you have been since twenty

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 2>nineteen talking about human capital management needs to change, but

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 2>many of us is just ultimately haven't cad Kristen, and

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 2>the stock has continued to outperform give a take the

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>last six months.

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 19>That's right, Caroline, So We have been talking to Tesla

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 19>and engaging since twenty nineteen about some of the significant

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 19>issues for racial discrimination, and we're talking about really top

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 19>innovation being able to attract and retain top talent, and

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 19>that's an issue moving forward at Teslaine. I think we're

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 19>seeing that in both the ability to innovate. They don't

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 19>have their next lower price automobile out yet despite promises

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 19>for years at this point, so we are quite concerned.

0:43:58.160 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>We're pleased to say.

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.240
<v Speaker 19>That NIA has had a significant win and the board

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 19>has committed to substantially what we asked for as far

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 19>as oversight for human capital management and DEI programs at Tesla.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, they do remain committed to that rollout

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 2>of a more affordable vehicle by the first half of

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 2>this year and Indy. We haven't reported any more recent

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 2>headcount losses for the business. But Kristin Hull, it's always

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>a joy to have you on the show. Thank you,

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Chief investment officer for Near Impact Capital. Now that does

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology Ed Boy, It's

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 2>been a busy one and there's more to go.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think let's go back to some of the

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 3>top names we've been thinking about throughout the show. Then

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 3>as that one hundred is pushing higher and it's all

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.399
<v Speaker 3>corners of tech, right other than IBM. So IBM had

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 3>like strong profit in sales and investors are going like, yeah,

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.919
<v Speaker 3>it just wasn't enough for us. There's some concern about

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the economy. But the big one after the Bell Carro

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 3>is Alphabet, the parent of Google.

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Can they deliver that twelve percent increase in revenue? Don't

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 2>forget to check out our podcast too. You can find

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 2>it on the terminal as well as online on Apples, Spotify,

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 2>and I Hunt. This is technology.