WEBVTT - A Historic Disruption To The World's Wheat Supply

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey Isn't and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, I feel

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things that we do is just

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>keep revisiting old themes and sort of on this permanent rotation.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>And I literally think it was like, basically a year ago.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was exactly a year ago, we did

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>an episode on the rising price of grains, particularly corn,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>wheat and soy, and since then, let's just say, we

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>have to revisit that now. Yeah, well we were just

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, but I think a year ago, you know,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the theme was the weather hasn't been that good, crops

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't been that good. Food prices are rising, China is

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>buying a lot, and that's adding additional pressure on supply,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and now we have to throw Russia Ukraine into the mix,

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and it just seems like a pretty bad situation has

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly gone a whole lot worse, right, And so when

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>people think about the commodity effects of that of the war,

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>of that conflict, I think predominantly people think about oil

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>and gas, and of course we have seen upward pressure

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>on both, but Ukraine is also a massive export of wheat. Belarus,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>which has also come under sanctions, is a big exporter

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of fertilizer. And so we have had this already tight

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>market for commodities for grains for some of the conditions mentioned,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and they've just gotten a lot tighter. Yeah. And of course,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that I'm sure all lots listeners know

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>about the commodities market by now is that everything tends

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to be interconnected. So if you get a rise in

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the price of natural gas, for instance, that can end

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>up feeding through into the price of fertilizers. I saw

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>one news story right before we came on saying that

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>um Yarra, which is one of the big fertilizer producers

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in Norway, is curtailing its production of fertilizer because of

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the nat gas price surge. And then you have things

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that happen in the commodities market that feed through into

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>other commodities. So again another example here, the price of

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>wheat is expected to increase production of pork because of

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>course a lot of pigs in Europe in particular eat

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>wheat as their food grains. So everything is interconnected and

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it becomes really difficult to predict and track A lot

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of these movements and impacts exactly right. Well, you know,

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned that we talked about this year ago, and

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to bring back the guests we spoke

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to before and try to wrap our heads around what

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is going around now, because the one other difference is

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that anxiety about inflation overall much higher today than it

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't early one, even as we started to see these

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>prices rise. So complicated time, complicated situation. I'm very excited

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring back Scott Irwin. He's an agriculture economist at

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the University of Illinois. So Scott, thank you so much

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.399
<v Speaker 1>for coming back on odd Lots. My pleasure, really look

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>forward to it. Absolutely great to have you back. Let's

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>start with actually right before the invasion, just talk a

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how tight or how would you characterize

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the conditions in the grain markets. You know, sort of

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>early February, we were kind of scraping along. Prices were

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly elevated relative to historical averages. UH. The latest thing

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that the markets that are preserved was a less than

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>stellar growing season for South American soybeans. But we were

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>getting along anticipating a pretty good spring and big plantings

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of UH corn and soybeans here in the United States.

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That would probably help smooth that out. We're going to

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have some volatility, may be related to summer weather here

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but I wouldn't say that, you know,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we thought that anything was way out of bounds historically.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So how big a deal is Russia invading Ukraine from

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a grains or agricultural perspective, because on the one hand,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you hear a lot that the Ukraine in particular is

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, known as the bread basket of Europe. There's

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of production there. But on the other hand,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>farming is an industry that is familiar with supply shocks.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, things happen, there's, um, I guess, bad weather

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and pestilence as well. So how big a deal is this? Um?

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Couch it in historical terms? Sure, This is the way

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that I try to communicate just how big of a

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>whole this war is blowing in the global grain markets.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The Ukraine in recent years has planted about fifty nine

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>million acres of their top six crops wheat, sunflowers, soybeans, corn, barley,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and what they call rape scene. Um, So how big

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is that? And that's what's under threat of potentially not

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>being planted at all, uh this spring due to the war.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>That's almost exactly equal to the total planted area of

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>crops in Illinois and Iowa. So you're just blowing that right,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially out of the global markets. Imagine that now they're

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not as productive if those acres don't grow as

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>much as Iowa and Illinois do. But you know that

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>right there is about four billion bushels of production that

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially if it doesn't get planted, or the vast majority

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get planted. Uh, you're just taking that off. Uh

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. So that's just the immediate war impact then

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they have. On the other side, Russia, they're not going

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to but have you know, any problems growing their crops

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this year? The question is how much of it will

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be available to the world markets. Russia is the world's

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>largest exporter of wheat. And again, the way I try

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to put that into perspective, well, you know, with US production,

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>what um would it take for US wheat production to

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>replace what's lost potentially for Russia. Well, Kansas is our

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>biggest uh winter wheat producer here in the United States,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and it would take four million Kansas is to replace

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what was lost Wow, that's a that's quite a striking

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. You know, we're recording this in

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of March. Actually recording data is out March fourteen.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are we in the cycle? And so you talked

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about plantings in Ukraine right now? What needs to happen, like,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about in the couple of weeks where

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly as the timing of this. In the Ukraine and Russia,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>their biggest wheat crop is winter wheat, which was planted

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>last fall. It basically goes into hibernation in the winter

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and then it's plant and it's harvested in the early summer.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That that's already growing in both countries. Uh, then the

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>question is how much of it will be available to

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be harvested and moved into international markets in the Ukraine.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But the really big danger is the number one crop

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of volume in the Ukraine is actually corn,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>which the vast majority of it is exported uh internationally.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine exports now over a billion bushels of corn every year.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And the planting window in Ukraine for their spring crops

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it's almost the same as the United States. It's not

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>really very much different. They will be planting in April

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and early May, so they're really literally just a couple

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of weeks from going back, or they would intend normally

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the fields UH in a couple

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. So we've seen the price of wheat shoot

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>up really dramatically, and the price of corn has gone

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>up to but not as much as wheat. What exactly

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>accounts for the discrepancy there? Well, because combined the Ukraine

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and Russia is a significant component of the total exports

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of wheat in the world. UH number one, Russia's number one,

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ukraine. Off the top of my head, I think

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>their second. When we think about we where does it go?

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>What is the end destination of wheat look like? And

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Tracy mentioned something that in Europe the pigsy wheat and

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>how much is bread, how much is pasta, how much

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is feed? What is the ultimate distribute and what kind

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of substitute ability is there between grains such that if

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the price of wheat sores, then the end bire can

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe switched to a cheaper commodity for feeding animals, for

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>livestock feeding, there's a great deal of substitution. Basically, there's

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the potential for a substitution if you have those supplies.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Where there's real concerns is you know, the vast bulk

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>of wheat is actually used for human consumption, bread, pasta, crackers,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>things like that. This is potentially huge problems for lower

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>to middle income countries in North Africa and throughout the

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Middle East that have relied very heavily on the imports

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of wheat from this area and that's almost all for

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>human consumption. Egypt is kind of the prime example. You know,

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe mentioned the substitution effect, the idea of people, you know,

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe instead of we you use something else to feed

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>your pigs. But could you walk us through exactly what

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>happens when you get a price shock like this, Like

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>how does it filter through the broader market? So prices increase,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and then do pig farmers immediately start deciding to feed

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>their herds something else? Do farmers respond to the price

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>increase immediately by altering their planned crops? Like what exactly

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is the sequence of events that happens. Well, all of

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this is really going on at the same time, and

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the reasons why in this kind

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of circumstance you see just such incredible volatility or spiking

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of prices in week because of the nature what I

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would say is the natural inflexibility built into the consumptions

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>side of commodities like wheat, corn, and soybeans in a

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>very very short run. On the animal side, yes, there's

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>some short run a substitution in terms of feeding, but

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that takes some time and you know, the animals that

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are there have to be fed something. So this is

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the heart and soul of the source of what economists

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>called the short run in elasticity of demand for agricultural commodities.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So on the animal side, the animals have to be fed,

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and there's limited substantutability. You know, you have to get

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>different suppliers, commodities have to be moved around in terms

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of this substitution. It will happen, but it just takes time.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And then that's even harder on the human side, when

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>as we know, diets are relatively fixed, and you know,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>countries like Egypt will do everything they can to probably

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>try to increase subsidies and insulate their population from these

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>price increases. But if wheat is simply not available in

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a place like that, that's a huge problem. There's there's

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>really besides aid from other countries Uh, it's very difficult

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to change that diet in a matter of a few weeks. Okay,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so you walk through, we get this price surge, what

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>happens on the consumption side, what happens on the supply side?

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>What are a is there's still time for farmers in

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the US or anywhere else to change their choice of

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>crops or to reallocate acreage. And is there anything anyone,

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>whether in the US or elsewhere, can do to increase

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>supply overall in a short to medium period of time.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>What is the opportunity to replace the lost the lost?

0:12:55.200 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Weeat A great question. Uh. In wheat unfortunately kind of

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in a devilishly tight situation here because the biggest wheat

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>crop in the world, as I mentioned before, is winter wheat,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and for the Northern hemisphere that was already planted and

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there's just nothing you can do now in terms of

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>increasing the winter wheats supply in the northern hemisphere of

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the world because that planting window was last fall. Now,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the southern hemisphere can uh, you know, begin planting winter

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>wheat right now. Uh. And there are some large producers

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like Australia, but the Southern hemisphere doesn't tend to be

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that large of a wheat producer, so maybe

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll get some more out of that, but you know

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, six eight months down the line. So

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the short run on the wheat supply is all going

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>to be with spring wheat um and there is some

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>scope for the ability to expand production of spring wheat,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but springwheat tends to be grown in far northern areas

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Great Plains of the US and into Canada,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh so there'll be probably some increased production there,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but it can't show up until at the earliest September.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's the vice that the wheat market

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is in in the world, is that our ability to

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>basically really alter availability is through the channel of spring wheat,

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a relatively minor crop compared to the major crop,

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of which are wheat, So that makes it hard. You

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Russian winter wheat at the beginning, and of course

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you know that's expected to still grow and probably be

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>largely unimpacted by the events in Ukraine, but no one

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>can get to it, or fewer people can get to

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it because of the sanctions in place. What are the

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>chances that some of that is able to leak into

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the market. Well, that's going to be the great question

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because we know, first off, there's what economists called trade

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>diversion in these kinds of situations. Um, you know, not

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone is going to follow the sanctions. For example, we

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>expect that um, some of Russia's wheat exports will now

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>go to China so that they can use that to

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>feed their feed their animals and contribute to their diets.

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's trade diversion will happen. The big question in

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>my mind is always leakage that you know, um, not

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking to the morality of the situation, but we know

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that historically that large international commodity trading firms are experts

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at figuring ways uh semi legally is the way I

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>would put it around the sanctions and to move these

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>commodities around the world. Yet there's a cost of that.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You know that they'll only buy the wheat from Russia

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>deep discounts. It takes time for these alternative channels and

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>legalities to be worked out, and so inevitably, you know,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>trade diversion and leakage can't offset the full effect of

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions. And what you know, we're all trying to

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out, and that's what the market has to assess

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in real times. You know, well, what's that leakage and

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a trade diversion going to look like. So we mentioned

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it at the very beginning in the intro. But when

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we had you on a year ago, I think it

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was about a year ago, the story at the time

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be about very aggressive Chinese buying and building

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>up stocks, building a buffer stocks, and I think I

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>saw ustand recently I forget the number. I'm not sure

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>how many years worth of week trying to current he has.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Wait since you mentioned that China is likely to be

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>a destination for whatever wheat gets out of that market,

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>out of the Russian market, what is the state of

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese buying? Is it still in accumulation mode? Has it

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>balanced out the stocks? What kind of deficit or position

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is China in right now? I have to admit that

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all looking through the glass darkly in terms of

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>China's grain reserves, and that's an official state secret, and

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>so everybody just guesses at it. Uh So, my perception

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they have done quite a bit of reserve rebuilding,

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time they're in the phase of

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>rapidly rebuilding their animal herds and so in that race

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>between increasing consumption from their animal herds versus their rebuilding. Uh,

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody really knows, but I do know that they've been

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the grain market for US supplies in a

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>big way in the last couple of weeks, which everybody's expecting.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Of what we have seen for two before the Ukrainian

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>crisis was that China soybean buying was back to basically

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the trend they were on before our trade war, which

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>means it's huge. Uh. They weren't buying as much corn

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in two as they did in UM. It had backed

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>off some. Uh that I suspect that they'll be back

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>closer now in two now than they had planned because

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the lack of availability of Ukrainian supplies. But that story

0:18:49.359 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>remains to be written. This might be a very basic shan.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But if supply is constrained, and you know, everyone in

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the world presumably wants to keep wheat prices relatively low

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>so that the price of bread doesn't go up too much,

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>China is still buying um large amounts. How does existing

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>supply get allocated? Could we see a return or even

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>more sort of food supply nationalism and the idea that

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be keeping more of their own

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>crops closer to home. This is the great danger in

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>global grain markets right now, Tracy. This is what I'm

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>most concerned about, which history shows that when you get

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>in these huge scary price spikes, particularly for food commodity

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>like wheat, that there's a tendency for a bit of

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>panic to set in and countries begin shutting off exports

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to uh basically protect domestic supplies and protect domestic consumers,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and that really leaves importers, particularly importers in the not

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>rich countries, out in the cold. And we're already seeing

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that kind of bing bing bing beginning to happen. And

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so if you lock up supplies in some doesn't take

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>very many exporting countries, then that really makes prices for

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody else explode and puts more of the burden on

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>generally poorer importing countries. And that's where things politically get

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really explosive. And so that's that's a real concern that

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I have, because the market is going to do its job.

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The market's job is basically to the price of wheat

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>up high enough that you ration current demands enough so

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>that the globe has something left over at the end

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of the year the problem, you know, But in order

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>for the market to do that job, somebody has to

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>get priced out of the global market. And the job

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of trade is for the market to then spread around

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>available supplies to um to the highest bidder. And some

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>people that as a policy matter, that we probably don't

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>want priced out of the market can easily get priced

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the market as the market does its job.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's what happens in the very short run. And

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the market's job is to run

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the price up of wheat high enough that as we

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>can expand acreage and production to adjust to this that

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>supply response, and it will happen. It always does, but

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, can take a year or two for

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>this kind of shock to fully be absorbed and we

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>get the supply response in terms of expanded a creach

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and production around the world. So the shocks from this

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>are going to reverberate for some time. Yeah, there's so

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>many follow up questions I have to that, you know,

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But the first one when price of oil and also gas.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But when the praise of oil surges, it immediately becomes

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a political question and people start turning to elected leaders,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to do about this? What can

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we do to say, increase exploration or drilling in the

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>United States, or what can Germany do to cut off

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>its reliance from Russian gas, etcetera. Are there policy levers

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that countries, whether rich or poor, can pull here? But

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking in the United States, for example, is there

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>something equivalent is this? Is there something for the U

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>s d A Or the House to think about doing

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>during such a time of high prices and tight supplies. Well,

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>there is one that could be considered. In the United States.

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We have something that's called the Conservation Reserve program in

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States that currently contains twenty two million acres

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of previously cropped land that has been taken out of

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>production presumably because it's most environmentally sensitive in terms of

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>wind and water erosion, or it has bio diversity. Really

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it's for pheasant hunting. Uh, So there's

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that acreage that could be considered for maybe a special

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>one time exemption from the current long term contracts that

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are required to place acreage into that reserve. So we

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>have an acreage reserved something like the search Egic Petroleum

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Reserve that it's at least could be considered. UH. It's

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>very controversial, as I found out when I suggested it

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, But basically my argument is

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward, and you can hear it through the conversation

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>with Pad today. I believe this is the largest supply

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>shock of my lifetime UH in global grain markets. UH

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if the conflict continues and severely harms planting in the Ukraine,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and so we need to at least look at extraordinary

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>measures like this here in the US that you use.

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Ahead of us, they're already apparently making plans to make

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>their what they call set aside acreage available for production

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this year. And those policy means you might think, oh

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, you well you can plant this spring, but

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't get that until next fall. But the markets

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>will react to those move now, because the markets always

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>are in an anticipatory mode, and if they see that

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be somewhat more supply than they would

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>normally think, that will have an impact now. And so

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that's UH. In the EU and in here in the US,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>those those are pretty much the only policy levers that

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we have. No one has huge grain stocks piling up

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in warehouses anymore like we used to say in the

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. Nobody has those, So the only thing we

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>really can do is try to juice up acreage this spring. Wait,

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>could you walk us through exactly why this is so controversial,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>because I did see some people on Twitter who were

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>pushing back. And you know, initially, if someone says, well,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the price of wheat is going up a lot, there

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>might be food shortages. Let's increase acreage. It sounds like

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a very like good thing to do. But I imagine

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there are those environmental concerns and other issues with it.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So what are those exactly? Well, there's what I would

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>call a you know, they're the environmental concerns, and then

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>they're the practical pushback on that idea. The environmental is

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>these are supposed to be highly erodable acres and less

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>productive acres that are put into the conservation reserve. And

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that that is true, and so you're

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>not getting your your prime acres motors, productive acres put in.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And so if you took them out, people say it

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be that productive. My counter that that is the U.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>S d A has actually done some great work tracking

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>parcel by parcel. What happens to acres in the past

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>as they've come out of the conservation reserve, because it

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>turns over there's acres going in every year, there's acres

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out. Without getting into all the details, but over

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>time the acres that come out over go back into

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>crop production or some kind of annual crops, so it

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>can be used. So that's the one biggest is you know,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>these are supposedly our most environmentally sensitive acres, so why

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>would we want to um mess with them? And then

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the other point is you know that those acres have

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>biodiversity benefits in particular, as I said, for recreation and

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>animal biodiversity, and so those benefits are there. And in

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>my mind, probably the bigger concern is the practical It's

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>very very late in the calendar to for farmers to

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>adjust their plans to try to farm those acres. Um.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, if even if you do try to farm

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the CRP acres, you have to plow up something that

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is in grass, can you get the seed and fertilizer

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that you need even if you want to do this.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>So so there are some very significant practical concerns to

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>doing this. But I'm a big believer as an economist,

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there were ever incentives in place to

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 1>do what uh. One of my old professors at Purdue,

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Earl Butts, was famous for saying when he was Secretary

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of egg in the seventies and the Nixon administration, he

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was famous for when that price pike went so high

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that farmers would plant fence road defense row. And the

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>incentives are in place, uh to go fence row to

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>fence row, and um, you know, and the other is

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a policy consideration. You know, there will be differences of

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>opinions about this, but these are extraordinary conditions. And I think,

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>going towards what you said, Tracy, maybe we should consider

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>doing what we can, even if it's not our most

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>productive acres. Maybe if it won't make a huge difference,

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but why not do what we can to address these

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>supply issues, even if they're not going to make a

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. But you know, even a few hundred million

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>extra bushels of wheat in this country could go along ways,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.719
<v Speaker 1>uh to spanning the gap in places like Egypt potentially

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as we go through the next year. So that that's

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>my counter argument to those that criticize that idea. That

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>was great and uh, that was very interesting answer. I

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>want to continue on the supply side aspect of the

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>question because you mentioned okay, is the fertilizer going to

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>be there? And again it is something I think about,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say oil, which is that even if there were

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of you know, impulse to explore more oil,

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of tightness in labor markets. At the

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>oil padge. People talk about the shortage of steel pipes,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the shortage of fracts, and what are you know,

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>even prior to this crisis, how have shortages in general

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and tight labor markets, how are they affecting the farmers

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that you speak to in the grain area. And what

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of scarcity of other commodities in labor make the

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>supply side perhaps less rapid or how much of a

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge would that be to scaling up more production. Excellent question.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Farmers have been struggling on the labor side like everyone else,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't really heard that that would be a

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>significant constraint, you know, Uh, farmers being farmers, they'll just

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>work extra hours to get it if they have to.

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>The bigger concern is the availability of fertilizer and her

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>besides and pesticides that they need. I think farmers were

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>counting on all that working before the Ukraine crisis, and

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a reasonable position for the US

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because we don't actually import that large of a proportion

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of our fertilizer probably so, so I think that what

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we needed was probably in place in the United States,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but it was a little iffy. But right now, UM,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>when I talk to farmers, they're very nervous about just

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>getting their uh, chemical chemicals and fertilizer supplies. Now no

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one seems to be giving them firm answers on anything.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's that is what I'm hearing. I think the

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>supplies are there, but everything is just in such turmoil

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that uh. That's if there's a place for a bottleneck,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that is where it's going to show up this spring. Uh.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe that for the planned acreage that we had

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>before the Ukrainian crisis, that the vast majority of the

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>supplies are there and they will eventually get through. But

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes one a little, I think, a little sketchy

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>how much we can expand beyond that even with these

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>great prices. From what I'm hearing from farmers, what is

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the situation with fertilizers at the moment, because you know,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, it seems like it's difficult to get

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>information on supply potentially, But we have seen some impact

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market already, and even before Russia actually invaded Ukraine,

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of talk of tightness in that market.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh clearly. I mean we saw starting last fall that

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>nitrogen fertilizer prices just spiked, uh to um, you know,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary price levels, you know, more than double and and

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some of that is just demand side and natural gas

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>prices or spiking, which is the primary input for making

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>nitrogen fertilizer. So you know, we were already struggling with

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely large increases in production costs, particularly for corn here

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Uh So that was already a

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>major topic of conversation here in the in the corn belt.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there's two, at least a couple of

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>factors on the fertilizer side. There is the high cost

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of energy, and I think Tracy mentioned in the beginning

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that we saw some fertilizer companies in Europe just say

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to produce right now because it's not

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>economical given the high cost of natural gas and then

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>my understanding is that Belarus itself is a huge exporter

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of either fertilizer or one of the key ingredients to fertilizer.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe can you talk a little bit more about the

0:33:55.680 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>sources of constraints and particularly the Belarus angle. Well, right, um,

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Russia through Belarus is you know, they're a

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>huge at exporter of potash uh. You know, one of

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>those things that we never talked about. You know, again,

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for the United States, that's probably not a huge uh issue,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>even though if we would could lose ten or fifteen

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of your supplies, you know, that has an impact.

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's potentially next year a major issue for a

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>country like Brazil, which imports most of its fertilizer, and

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>so that's you know, the difference. I do not know

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the import percentages for for Europe, but I suspect they're

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>also very tightly tied to the Russian and Belarusian supplies,

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you know, and one of the things

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:58.439
<v Speaker 1>that I find terribly interesting little factoid about how this

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff filters in one of the Formula one Grand Prix

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>UH teams is actually or was sponsored by one of

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the largest Russian fertilizer companies and his son was a

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>driver on a Formula One team, and last week it

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was announced that Formula One kicked him out. Oh I

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>think I saw that headline. I didn't. I didn't make

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the connection of what was going on there. Yeah, they're

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they're one of those companies and they were sponsoring a

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Formula One team, the host team and uh, you know

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they've canceled the Russian Grand Prix uh and kick the

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>UH fertilizer sponsor from Russia out of out of the program.

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it doesn't have much to do with this,

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but it just showing how extraordinary and how fast moving

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>these events are. Right now, I want to go back

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to things that can be done about the situation. And

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>another thing that I've seen floated recently is this idea

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of maybe suspending incentives for renewable fuel production. So that

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would mean, you know, less corn being used for stuff

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>like ethanol and more of it going into actual food production.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>How feasible is that politically and practically? U super question

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and something that you know I've been talking about in

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the last week. UM, It's a little bit complicated, so

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to be really condensed in my answer. Short

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>answer is that waving the ethanol mandates here in the

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>United States I don't believe would have hardly any impact

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on the use of ethanol um in the United States,

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>which means that wouldn't have any savings in terms of

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>corn bushels. And the reason is that ethanol has now

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>become the cheapest source of octane available to gasoline blenders,

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and so without intending it to be, we ran an

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>experiment about waiving the mandates and what would happen to

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ethanol use in the Trump administration through something called small

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>refinery exemptions, and that was effectively waiving the mandate, and

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we didn't use any less ethanol. In fact, it grew

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit as we waived the ethanol mandates. So

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's that would have no impact on

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>corn usage. So the ethanol side of the equation in

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of our bio fused policy to me as a nonstarter.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't get us anywhere, and and it would have

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the follow on effect of likely raising the price of

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>gasoline a little bit at least and maybe noticeably. So

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I call that a robbing Peter to pay Paul uh

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 1>policy response that doesn't really get us anywhere where. It's

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>more interesting those ideas, and and doesn't get discussed enough

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>is on the advanced or biodiesel renewable diesel side. We

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>are currently going through a boom in world veg oil

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>prices through a boom and building what are called renewable

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>diesel UH plants. Long story, but even there, if we

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>waived those parts of our RFS mandates, it's not very

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>clear if it would have much impact because the largest

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>policy subsidy for renewable diesel is not coming through the

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>UM the RFS, our national policy. It's coming through the

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>local Urban Fuel standard in California. So to have really

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>any guarantees you want to take pressure off of world

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>veg oil markets, you have to waive the California Low

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Carbon Standard and the RFS at the same time. That

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem likely to happen, particularly the California. And can

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit about the effect of the

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>end consumer and so, you know, people don't eat wheat.

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Typically they eat bread or the pasta. And I'm seeing

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>some claims that you know, in the end like the

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>actual wheat hasn't got a huge source of the UH

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>cost of a loaf of bread or whatever it is,

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how much do these huge swings feed through to the

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>price of finished goods that consume wet Again critical point

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>to understand. Um uh. Here in the United States, on average,

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the cost of what a consumer bias in the grocery

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>store for food, only about fifteen per cent is represented

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>by the cost of the raw commodity. So if you

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>take a dollar food expenditure, fifteen cents is the raw commodity.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Even if that doubles, you know, you go from fifteen

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to thirty cents, that's fifteen cents on a dollar. You know,

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's noticeable, but it's not doubling because you have that

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>passed through effect. Um. You know, in terms of the

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>retail food price inflation, the number one factors are one,

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>price of fuel basically crude oil because uh, it's like

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to move all this food around from producers

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to consumers. And then number two wages because of all

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the processing that goes on. So those are the biggest

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>determinants of retail food price inflation. Although you are certainly

0:40:55.719 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna gonna be added cost push inflation from these raw

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>commodity price increases as well. But here in the US,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to see you know, fifty percent food

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>price inflation because the price of reed's gone for that reason.

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's not true in countries like Egypt, where those

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>those pass throughs are much closer to one for one.

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I have one last question, just based on that. Finally,

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like on this policy question, should rich countries think about

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>aid too poor? I mean that seems to be the

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>recurring theme that we keep coming back to. Is okay

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>US reasonably insulated. Yes, prices will rise, but obviously, as

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, there isn't anything close to a one

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to one passed through. We're probably not going to have

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>outright shortages in the US. But for poorer countries Egypt

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and elsewhere, food rise in food price is gonna have seriously,

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously devastating health consequences, devastating political cuntic quinces, consequences for

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>stability overall, From a policy perspective, should leaders in rich

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>countries be thinking about that, about what can be done

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with our own wealth, with our own stocks, to ameliorate

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the negative effects on the countries that can't

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>easily afford these price wings. Absolutely, and the number one

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>policy lever that should be pulled there is to the

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>degree possible to persuade exporting countries not to hoard their

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>supplies exactly when they're most needed on world grain markets.

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>That's number one. To try to stop that kind of

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>beggar thy neighbor dominoes falling, that's number one. Number two,

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.479
<v Speaker 1>if there are ways to increase food aid where we can,

0:42:56.120 --> 0:43:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that's important. And number three the this is a longer

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>term response, but we've we know that the best way

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is to continue supporting the growth of agriculture in these

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>poorer areas. That's the number one way for their economies

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to develop and to um become more self sustaining in

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>some of these key commodities areas. So support for their

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>domestic agricultural producers it's really important. For example, you know,

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be really careful. We've learned Joe that Okay, yeah,

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we have this emotional response and we want to really

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.479
<v Speaker 1>help poorer countries and so we kind of dump food

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>aid in there. In the short run, well, that just

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>destroys the livelihood of farmers in those countries. So it's

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not as easy as just give them a

0:43:56.200 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>lot more aid. Well, Scott Irwin always fascinating to catch

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>up with you, and like I said, said in the beginning,

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>it seems like infinitely more complex than the first time

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>we chatted. But thank you so much for coming back

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on Odd Lots. Yeah. I really always enjoy it and

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully added a little signal and not too much noise

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to the conversation. Absolutely, that was very useful and I

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot from it, So thank you. Yeah, that

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>was great, Scott. Thank you, Tracy. I always really like

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Scott. It does feel like something like a

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>wheat shortage here. We might look at a screen and

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>see arise and prices, but and this is a theme

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that comes elsewhere. There's sort of a very there's a

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>difference between arise and prices and then places just not

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>being able to get the actual commodity. Yeah. Absolutely, And

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is something that we actually wrote about

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Odd Lots newsletter recently, this idea of the

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>difference between the financial realm and the physical realm, which

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>is something that it feels like the world is very

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>much way king up to at the moment. But I

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>also like Scott's nuance on the point of wheat prices

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>in the US and the idea that well, if the

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>raw material goes up a lot that shouldn't necessarily translate

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>into higher prices for things like bread and pasta, because

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those are going to be driven by

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>larger input costs like labor and energy. Unfortunately, at the moment,

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>energy prices and perhaps labor as well are also going up, right,

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:32.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's not exactly much constellation necessarily that the price

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of bread isn't entirely determined by wheat, is just determined

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>by everything else in the price of all those things are.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting. Another theme that continues to emerge

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is how bifurcated or how fragmented a lot of these

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>markets are. And so, you know, a scout mentioned in

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the US, we might be in decent shape from a

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fertilizer perspective, It might be tight, it might be a

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more expensive, whereas for a country like Brazil,

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which he noted is extremely reliant on imported potash UH,

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that could be a totally different story. Of course, it

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>would all come back around and connect and then you'd

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have global prices. But it is interesting to think about,

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US relatively insulated on a number of

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>these things compared to UH, compared to lots of other countries,

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>whether they be producers or consumers of great well. Also

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the point about certain countries that rely a lot on

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>food imports um now being most vulnerable to all of us.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know Egypt is the one that was mentioned

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of times, but of course there are others,

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and when it comes to food price inflation, this is

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>something we've discussed again. But that is clearly a really

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>sensitive topic for for consumers and people who have to eat,

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's the kind of thing that tends to um

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 1>explode into the political sphere very quickly as well. So

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm very briefly mentioned the the egypt bread riots.

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that was back in two thousand and eight.

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean some people talk about those as a sort

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of prelude for the Arab spring entirely. So it's very

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:16.240
<v Speaker 1>easy to see food price pressures translate into political upheaval

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Last point though, it'll be interesting if the

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>White House does anything on those uh millions of acres

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that are currently held back. I didn't realize that previously

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have this equivalent of essentially, it's not quite

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a strategic patrol. It's not quite the equivalent of a

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>strategic patrollingm reserve because there's nothing to sell into the

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>market immediately, but to make them make those acres available

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for planting. I don't know. It doesn't feel like wheat politics,

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>uh create havoc for the White House the same way

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices do. But it will be interesting to see

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if that lever or something similar is pulled at some point. Well.

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Also Scott's point about you know, even if you just

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>did something relatively small, and it's probably not feasible that

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>releasing those reserved acres would suddenly lead to a big

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>boom and supply, but even something small can send a

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>price signal to the market and start bringing them down,

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly at a time when people, when countries are hoarding.

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if there's a lot of access buying because

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:23.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone is nervous and you're signaling to the market, okay,

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.240
<v Speaker 1>supply is going to come in September or whenever that comes.

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>That might ease some of the current hoarding now and

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to have have a response even before the

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>weed is actually or whatever grain it is is actually grown. Yeah,

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting one. Although maybe the pheasant hunters will

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>get upset. I don't know how how large is like

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the pheasant hunting lobby. It'll be really bad if we

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>have to like, like we're not going to do a

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>pheasant huntings. I mean, what if it gets to that

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>point we're like, well now we have to do a

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>pheasant hunting story. But we all know it's really bad

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>if that's where we have to keep keep keep going

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>down that route. Yeah, so we leave it. Let's leave

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it there. Okay. This has been another episode of the

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>guest Scott Irwin on Twitter. He's at Scott Irwin UI.

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Big thanks to our producers Magnus Hendrickson and Colin Tipton.

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg had a podcast Francesca Leaving at Francesci

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Today and check out all of our podcasts Bloomberg under

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the handle at Podcasts. Thanks for listening.