WEBVTT - Apple Products Should Be Made in America, Vincent Vittorio Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>In the nineteen seventies, about twenty million Americans earned their

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>paycheck from factory work. Well, today, about twelve and a

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>half million workers remain in the industry. Here to tell

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>us more about manufacturing in the United States and his movie,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>American Made Movie, is Vincent Vittorio. He is the director. Vincent.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being with us. Thanks so

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>much for having me on. Can you just start off

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>by telling us why did you decide to make this movie? Well,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but my co director and I both had kind of

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a connection to manufacturing. My wife's parents were from Detroit

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and work to many of the auto manufacturers there, and

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>then my business partners also was in Georgia, um a

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the plants there that end up closing down,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>and we started to realize that, you know, with the

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>power of documentary filmmaking, we can kind of get people

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to really understand that well, manufacturing isn't what it was,

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's still viable jobs for manufacturing, and so we

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>produced a film that talks about kind of that, you know, um,

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of manufacturing that we can awaken with with

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>encouraging people to buy from this country, from their community

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and their home state. Speak if you can about some

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the specifics, because we know a lot of work

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that might have been done by human beings is now

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>done by robots or is automated. But manufacturing employment, as

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>evidenced by your movie, you can still lead to a

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>positive economic outlook. No, definitely, you know there's a ripple

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>effect that happens when you have a UM, a line

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturing that's much different than what it was twenty

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I mean you think of the way that

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>things have advanced and the way that um A lot

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of these jobs are much more technology based, with having

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a background in technical education as opposed to being on

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a line where we're just putting apart together. And I

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>think you know that really goes to the education into things.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in your state of New York, there's a

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>great program the p Tech program that you know, really

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>get kids to understand kind of, um, the importance of

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a career pathway. And I think if we can have

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>more things like that across this country to get kids

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to really understand that, you know, we don't all have

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to graduate with a liberal arts degree, but we can

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have a job that gets us kind of a foot

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>forward with thinking about advanced manufacturing or careers um to

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of, I guess, respond to this skills gap. We're

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to see, well, a lot of manufacturers, indeed, the

0:02:54.440 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Manufacturers Association, National Association and manufacturers a big porter President

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. They speak about tax reform and how that

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>could spur infrastructure spending. Is that also part of the

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>picture when you know you made this movie, You've got

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to find what are the things that are going to

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>make manufacturing economically viable? You know? Well, to start with

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Trump side of things, I think that it's it's

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of those I don't know what it's

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna mean today versus tomorrow. I mean, so I think that, um,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where he's going to bring things, but

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think the tax reform can definitely incentivize people

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to make things here and to give them a reason

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to not feel like they can go overseas. Um. I

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I really think it takes a lot

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of bipartisanship to come together to actually approve that on

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>all sides. But what you do see is things like

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the fox con plant, you know in Wisconsin, and I mean,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a huge thing to see. The fox com

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that we always look at is being a foreign entity

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of sorts that is now going to be manufacturing things

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on you know, our home soil. And I think that's

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a beautiful thing. And you see that with a

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of auto manufacturers. So I think that we need

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to give them reasons that aren't just about the tax code,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>but about communities reaching out and making them feel like

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the ripple effect that's going to not only help the

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>state but help their their um. You know, they're they're

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing their brand, their their company. And as far as

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>examples in the movie, maybe just give people some idea. Well,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>one one really big company which which I've grown to

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>love through making the film Son Partly Bias is new balance.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So new balance sneakers. You know, they make sneakers in

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States, not all of them, but a good

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of them, and it's grown tremendously in time. It's

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually kind of ironic that, um, the people that

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>are buying the most America made sneakers are overseas, which

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that goes back to say something about what

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that brand of made an America means. You know, if

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>we can't look at that as we go to the

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>big box store and think that this is something important

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that we make things here but other countries are noticing it,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you know we need to take take interest in that.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But um, New Balance is a great exam up on

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the other one that's based in based in Brighton, right,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean they based in in Boston, home to Bloomberg

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one oh six one and Bloomberg. So that is certainly

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a feature of the sort of the made in America,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>made in the USA label, is it is prestigious outside

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States? What about making it prestigious inside the

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>United States? You know that takes a lot with the marketing.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean you've seen that the last two Super Bowls

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>where you see that made an America ad that comes up.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, if we can get people today to

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>realize kind of what it means to have a personal

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the product we buy or the brand. I

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think we can do something. I mean Lebron James great example, right,

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>He's getting paid millions of dollars to endorse anything and

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people are going to flock to it. I think if

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we can do that same thing with this Maid in

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>America brand. I mean, can you imagine if Robert Downey Jr.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Had like an Iron Man mask and he took it

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>off and gave a pitch for the idea that like

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this was made right here in the USA. I mean, like,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>those are the kind of things that we need really

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of do to to spark that because there's no

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>doubt we're not making you know, good quality stuff and

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go buy a desk at Ikea for a

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the price at the expensive furniture store, but

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the money you're paying it comes across with

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the product you're getting. Things in America are made um

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to last, and I think that's something that I think

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel very passionate about with everything that I purchase.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, But having having said that, do you find

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's a contradiction because if you go to a

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>big box retailer, you're looking for the best price. You're

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily going to put the item or the palette

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of items back on the shelf because it's made somewhere else.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And that is what has fueled a lot of innovation

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States in terms of let's say, retailing

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or even making consumer products affordable. No, you're right. I

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>mean it's very hard because we live in this kind

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of throwaway society where we don't plan on buying a

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>couch that's going to last us more than a couple

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of years. I mean, and I think that's kind of

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a deeper question about like we buy and the way

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>we buy. But I think that, um, ultimately it comes

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to supply and demand. If enough people are looking for

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>American made products, of enough people are kind of looking

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for that brand, um and making sure they look at

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the label, it can change things. I mean, it's happened

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with the organic food movement. I mean, can you imagine, um,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten years ago, if I would have said

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that organic foods would be like they are now, I

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you could never find them everywhere. And now I

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>mean you've got truck stops, you know, and they're filled

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>with healthy options. So I think it's because consumers demanded it.

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>And so if consumers can demand um with their purchase

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>power American made goods, then I think that the big

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>box stores could start to see more of those coming there.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>If you give you a fifteen seconds, is there one

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>product that you wish was made in the United States

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but isn't. Oh gosh, I mean, I think the Apple computer.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's a really big one because it

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was it was it was grown out of you know,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>my state of California, and with the the the engineering,

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the the prototypes, everything about it, we should make it here.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're making enough money with that. And I

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>know that something President Trump and even you know, for

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>President Obama was trying to do. I think that there's

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>certain things we should really try to make here, and

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's important. I want to thank you

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>very much for spending time with us. Vincent Victorio. He

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is the director of American Made Movie. All right, let's

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention now to investments and Mike Mulaney. Mike

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is joining us from Boston Partners. He is the director

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of Global Market Research. Mike, thanks very much for being

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with us. Uh, you know, I want if we get

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>start off with You've listed a couple of very important things.

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got things such as you know, the Trump bomp

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>issues having to do with oil the Japanese market. And

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if we could kind of look at Japan

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>first and work our way back to the United States

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>because the Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe has called an election,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, election, yes to us, it's reminiscent obviously of

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what Teresa May did in June, and yeah, you got

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. Now, this is a scheduled for October twenty two,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's been in power for about five years, which

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is pretty long if you're a Japanese prime minister. But

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be going against He's going to

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be opposed by the Party of Hope. Now, this is

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>this new conservative alliance which is led by the populist

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>mayor of Tokyo, Uriko koek and she has previously served

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>as Minister of Defense. And I'm wondering if you could

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>describe what would happen if indeed shinzo Abe was returned

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to power with a reduced majority, or indeed didn't even

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>make it past the post. Well, you have the question

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>once again, the progress of of abenamics or abenamics in

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>j general, if he was going to be able to

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>push through his reforms that he's been relatively successful for

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at both the economy uh and the

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>markets in general and Japan. So I think that would

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be the primary question mark whether or not he would

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>able to proceed with um with the same kind of

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>vigor that he's had up a failure last you know,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>two to three years that that's been in place. Right now,

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Japanese stock market in dollar terms, up

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about twelve and a quarter percent so far this year. Yeah,

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And the key with the you know, the Japanese market

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is that investors basically have been burned so many times

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in the past about Japan. There's still kind of that

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>weary eye about the market in general and the economy

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>in general because we've had not just one, but probably

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at least two decades of the you know, the lost decades,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>not just they lost decade as far as Japan's concern,

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that goes to the economy and more or less for

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the markets in general. So I think, you know, we

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to have a a proof statement coming from from

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this type of a snap election that we can can

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to see the improvement that we've seen, like I said,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>most recently from both the economy and the markets. Yeah, well,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I was even thinking. You know that Governor Karda of

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of Japan, his reappointment is scheduled for eighteen

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but that could change if we get a new leader

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, no question, and we you know, if we

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>were to air on both the Bank of Japan in

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Federal Reserve, we would like to see status quo,

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that being Karada staying in place as well as jon

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and staying in place. Just the stability of the market.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Karroda has done a magnificent job. He's probably

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>been the most uh do you want to call it aggressive,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just um, you know, more or less

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>creative of of the central bankers in the world. And

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.359
<v Speaker 1>once again it's done a good job of a stabilizing

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>asset prices and stabilize the economy in general. Well, you're

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>being diplomatic because some investors might say that he actually

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>fixes the prices of assets because what they have about

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty three of the j GB market and like three

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>quarters of all Japanese exchange traded funds that are owned

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>by the central Bank. That's why I use the word creative,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's something a little bit out of the norm

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen from other central bankers. But um, you know,

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little bit reminiscent of what Mario Draga said,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's whatever it takes, and I think Corona has basically

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>done that. Okay, so you help me circle back. We're

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to Europe now and Mario drag the European

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank tell me what you uh, what your thoughts

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are are there, because I know that later on in

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the week, I believe you know, we're going to get

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>some news from the Central Bank of Europe, but also

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get the Fed minutes. What are you what

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna take away from Europe? First? Well, Europe

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to be key, is that I think the

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty six I think is the meeting in Europe, and

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>once again the eyes are gonna be focused on exactly

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen with the balance sheet tapering program

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>from the e c B. What we're worry about once

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>again is that that's going to coincide with potentially the Fed,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, diminishing and dropping their balance sheet this

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>this month as well, So we're gonna have a two

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for for the month of October potentially. As far as

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet um retracement, I guess you could say is

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>concerns and we're leary about that because this is still

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a grand experiment, you know, on the way up, it

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was a grand experiment on the balance sheet explosions that

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen around the world, and we're a little bit

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>leary and that to think that we don't want to

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be naive to think there's not going to be some

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of symmetry between the the benefit of asset prices

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on the upside as balance sheets grew from the central

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>banks versus as they shrink them. Um, there will be

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>no impact. And I think that's where you know, people

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>might be a bit naive. Have you've heard this from

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>um Jamie diamond saying that you've got to watch this

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>given that it is the grand experiment as far as

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets A concerned all right, Well as someone I

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>know who's got a lot of experienced in fixed income

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>markets put that hat on and tell us what do

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you think about the balance sheet unwind? And that gives

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>us an opportunity to turn to the United States where

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think that's gonna do to yields? For example,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>we got the thirty year today basically on two point

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>eight nine, the tenure at two thirty five. Uh. To

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>two aspects of the yield story. So the first one

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would be, like you said, as far as the balance sheet, uh,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the FED owns. I believe it's of all

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed securities and also seventeen percent of all treasuries

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, so they have been obviously in most recent years,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the marginal buyer that's been out there for both the

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>treasury market and the mortgage back market. So as that unwind,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna have you're gonna have to find the next

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>marginal buyer. I don't know if it's gonna be Japan.

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna be China, but someone's

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to take up the slack that that is

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>going to become apparent from the lack of FED buying.

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's number one. Rates should be higher to attract

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that next marginal buyer. To once again, you've got to

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>go back to inflation. And you know, it's been a

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a quandary that the Janet Yellen has been talking about

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. We did see some pressure obviously

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on average hourly earnings that came in and the report

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on Friday backup at two point. The question becomes is

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to stick a not or is that once

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>again just a byproduct of the hurricanes that we saw

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>during the course of the September reporting period where lower

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>wage journers fell out of the survey and therefore biased

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the numbers upwards. So we've still got a month to

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out if it was just a temporary factor or not.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately it's going to be inflation that's going to

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>drive where interest rates go. Um. I don't think that

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED itself can get too aggressive as far as

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing up the overall structure of rates. Thanks very much,

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mullaney. He is the director of Global market Research

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for Boston Properties. We now call upon Nick Hayman of

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>William Blair Global Industrial Infrastructure Expert to tell us about

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a general electric Nick, always a pleasure. What do you

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>make of the moves by John Flannery taking the reins

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier from Jeffrey Immelt, A new CFO and four vice chairs,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>well three four if you count the CFO leaving the company. Yeah,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>We have obviously a lot of change being implemented in

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a very short time period by John Flannery and it

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>UH is leaving no stone unturned. But with regards to

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jeff Bornstein, the former CFO, and Beth Combstock

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and John Rice, I think that you know, John is

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is really trying to find, if you will, representatives of

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>what he sees perhaps is more of the initiatives he's

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>going to focus on going forward versus those that were

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>really UM stewards of Jeff Emil's former CEO and chairman.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, so what are some of the strategy points

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that John Flannery is into a rely on. Well, I mean,

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>very simplistically, he's very UH focused near term on being

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>able to help UM improve the cash flow from operating

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>activities UM that this year, you know, clearly have been

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>under pressure. We think UM they may not even reach

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the low end of their twelve to fourteen billion dollar target,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and that reflects stepped up UH restructuring on a cash

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>basis across all aspects of the company's operations. But I

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think that will lay out a clear plan to improve

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that by fifty or six percent by later this decade

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen to twenty billion dollars. G needs fifteen sixteen

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>billion on a normalized capital spend of two and a

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>half to three UH to be able to support HITS

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>operations and pay it's eight billion dividend. Let's just go

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>through some of the items, perhaps you know this a

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more detailed, maybe getting ready for that November

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth meeting. I believe that John Sinner is going to

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>addressing UH investors. Number One, you write, you talk about

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>operationally weaker end market demand for gepower, transportation, and oil

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and transportation, right, yeah, and the oil and gas so

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you have when you're looking to reset, which is one

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of the exercises, He'll go through the two dollar two

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen UM target by jeff eimilt Um. He'll look

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to operationally adjust that for the weaker end market conditions

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned. He's going to have some changes in

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the business portfolio, I'm sure for smaller businesses, but he's

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>also going to have a tremendously larger I think amount

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of costs out a three billion or more. And then

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>in turn he's going to reset the accounting so that

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>will include you know, the full impact of contract asset investments.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>As well as their pension costs. Okay, So that and

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're talking that would lead you right into your

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>second point, which is the portfolio pruning, getting rid of

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>businesses that don't necessarily meet their cost to capital. Yes. No,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely some peripheral businesses that I would call calls

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on the future him that in turn were funded under Jeff.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But under John, if you're not earning your cost to capital,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not on the team. These are not big

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of the company, but smaller adjunct businesses related to

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>their core um industrial operations. All right, and you also

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that you previously mentioned the accounting, So okay, is

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that Is there anything more we need to know there? No,

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean accounting obviously has been There's four different sets

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of earnings that he presents, and I think we're going

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>streamline this down to something on the order of, you know,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>gap accounting plus or minus um one time positive and

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>negative items for restructuring their games. But he's really got

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to focus on getting this cash flow from operating activities up,

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which includes reducing the capital spending to this normalized level

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of two and a half to three billion from three

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and a half to four This year, he's got to

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>narrow the focus of digital operation so that in turn

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that can reduce its um R and D and capital

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>spending intensity. He's got to take and reduce the contract

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>asset investments. And lastly, he's got to work to show

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>up the nineteen billion contractual portion of the company's thirty

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one billion pension deficit. Alright, given all that and your

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>outperform rating on the shares, is there a connection between

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>all of this activity and Nelson pelts ed Garden, UH

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and Try and Fund Management will Try and has been

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>involved for quite some time with GE and UM. I

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think at this point clearly UM giving them one of

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the seats on the board as uh Deer's former CEO

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>step down, UM gives them an opportunity to continue to

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>be a constructive partner in helping John accelerate the transformation

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of GEN. Alright, Having said that, though, Nick, what do

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you think that John would prefer to inherit in terms

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of how GE operates. I think he's trying to change

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what is not a broken company but a bloated company,

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and in turn trying to go across all aspects of

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the cost structure of the company, whether it's the new

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>headquarters building, whether it's planes, whether it's cars for their

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>management team, there's no stone left unturned PIM. And just

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to finally, Nick, you know, tell people how long you've

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>been covering ge and how you see the company coming

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>out from all of this. Well, we've been found for

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>about thirty four years, and UM, what we're seeing here

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is a dichotomy between perhaps um the focus on their

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings reset for cell side analysts typically versus on the

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>owners of the shares, a need to have visual improvement

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>for actionable steps to lift the cash flow so you

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>can sustain the dividend. And if they see that, I

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>think the investors are likely to ultimately um rerate the

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>yield from four currently to probably something like three over

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the next year. All right, well, we're gonna have to

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>wait and see what happens, and we're going to count

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on you. I know you're gonna probably be at that

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>November thirteenth meeting, get more details and we could check

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in with you then. Thanks very much, Nick Hayman from

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>William Blair Expert when it comes to global industrial infrastructure

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>shares u S economist Richard Taylor, one of the founding

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>fathers of behavioral economics has won this year's Nobel Prize

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for Economics, and here to tell us more about this

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>winner is Simon Kennedy. He is our editor for Brexit,

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>amongst other things. Simon, thanks for joining me here in

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the studio. What does it say about the state of

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>economics when the winner of this year's prize has this quote?

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Conventional conventional economics assumes that people are highly rational, superrational,

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and unemotional. They can calculate like a computer and have

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>no self control problems, meaning that that does not exist. Really,

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's taken until seventeen for people to get the stamp

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of approval that emotions are what drive markets as much

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>as markets. Well, I think we've seen some element in

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the past. Is Daniel Kannaman and Robert Shilow win in

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the PASTA but but I think it's very important for

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the behavioral economics field that Richard failure as one. He's

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.239
<v Speaker 1>been very much a cheerleader for that and and for

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time, as you you hint had,

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>behavior economics was kind of the the ugly member of

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the family. It was pushed to the side. A lot

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of people didn't buy it. People when you say a

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. You mean a lot of people in academia,

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>because certainly in markets, anyone who's an investor knows that

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>animal spirits and emotion played very crucial role. But I

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think in mainstream because you couldn't put it in a formula,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of rejected as a as not a

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as not it was a party trick, something that's interesting.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell someone a good story to dinner party. But

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't viewed as as important to the mainstream economics.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And now it quite liarly is. And it's been brought

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in by people a Richard Taylor, by people like Robert Shiller,

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 1>promoted by people like Mia the author and Limberview columnist

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis in his new book, It's very important, and

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so along with the fund stories that are accessible and

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>mean that this field of economics, it's perhaps more popular

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>parts more interesting. I start into one colleague today who

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>said his daughter was interested in it because the kind

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of free economics. I was just going to mention that, yes, indeed, well,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>his book, one of his many books, of Faylor's many

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>books that he co authored, this one with the Cass Sunstein,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is entitled Nudge Right improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that that had an influence on on

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Committee that would eventually give him the prize?

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>I think so in one way it's already influenced how

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we live our lives. If in the last decade, people

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>like Barack Obama in the White House, David Cameron in

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Downing Street in the UK have turned to this kind

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of theory, this theory that you can can do things,

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you can change, you make small incentives and you can

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>change how people behave, how vote, how consumers and voters behave.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you can do that in a time of

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a big budget deficits, when you haven't got the money

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to spend to incentivize them, you can you can quote

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>unquote nudge them into into doing things you're in. One

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>example in the UK, um they discovered that taxes were

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that were paid quicker. If you sent a letter to

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>two taxpayers saying everyone in your areal, a lot of

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>people in your area have already paid their taxes. Uh,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of clicked something intoone's brain. Now, what

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>if every if my neighbors have done so, I better

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get on that. And so they are sort of like

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>being in a classroom in elementary school and the teacher says,

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone else has cleaned up their desk, what about you. Yeah,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of guilt by by by association, And yeah,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I was actually talking about it this time my sons

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the other day. When you see a sign that says

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>police sir, I don't know if you see them in America,

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but in the UK you'll see these signs saying you're

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>entering a police traffic zone. Well, they might just have

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>spend money on the sign and that there's no police

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>coming up. But does anyone want to trust that they

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>want to they're going to slow down. So it's all

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about tricking the brain into behaving in a way that's

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>optimal for society. Does does the work of Richard Daylor

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Does it also include the idea that we have tricked

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>ourselves into believing that we are rational, that we make decisions,

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and then what we do is we go and find

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence to fit the decisions that we've made, not because

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it's true, but because it makes us feel good. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to explain why you've done in. One area

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of his work is on quiz shows, So there's a

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>quiz show called Deal or No Deal, and it turns

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>out that actually people are the further they go into

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the process, their behavior or the choices of which briefcase

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to open up is led by did they get lucky

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the in the thing. If they feel they're

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they're lucky earlier and they've got this what's called the

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>hot hand, they feel that they can continue, and so

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>they take risks based on what's happened before, even though

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the odds would suggest that they should have behaved. Does

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that Does that indicate in your mind that what has

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>happened is we've used statistics in a way that can't

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily predict the future, but we wish it did. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because you know, you say, well, all right,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the probability of something, but the probability of something is

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>always yes or no. It's you know, fifty fifty, but

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter how many times you flip the coin.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That's still the probability. But statistics will tell you something else. Yeah,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're One of the things that was used by

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this money is he's been in the big short film

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about c d os and this idea that that yeah,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that he he brings this idea that you can have

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a hot hand fallacy that that that you you become

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>more confident based on what's already well. I can also

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>lead to bad decisions and investments, because if you find

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a manager and you look at the track record and

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you say, well, the manager has done great for the

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, has nothing really to do with the

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>performance for the next year. And it doesn't necessarily mean

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you should drop that manager or add that manager is

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>past performance no longer an indgient future. Right, that goes

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>right with the police science, right, you know, the disclaimer.

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Last thing to you, if you were to take this

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>information and his body of work and try to apply

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it to the world of asset management, where would you

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>come out. What would you take away from this? Well,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's already he's he's spent a lot of

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>time on four oh one programs and how they can

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>can be incentivize, how people can can save you know,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously savings is a huge thing. We all talked about

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>getting our pension up in versus up exactly. So you say,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're a company, um, so traditionally the paper it

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>comes in, you're so busy and you never really opted

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in something time has taken. It's actually people. Obviously, pensions

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>are are good things for most people. So therefore, if

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to opt out, if you have to send

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the paperwork to get out of the pension, it's more

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>likely you'll be in the pensions. And do you have

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a copy of Nudge. I've a signed copy of a

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>signed copy of the joy that the joy of the

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize today was that that actually, I'm familiar with

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of economies work. There's someone who very familiar

0:28:59.920 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>with so we were able to write good stories on

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the basis that he's very accessible. This is someone who

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not he's not just for economists, all right. Thanks

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>very much, as Simon Kennedy, part of our Bloomberg Economics team,

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>much appreciated the author of Richard Taylor, the author of Nudge,

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>winner of the Nobel Prize of Economic Thanks for listening

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.