WEBVTT - Spotify: Starving Artists?

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I was eight or nine years old

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and my parents finally allowed me to use the record player,

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like all by myself, choose an album line up, the

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>needle pulled the little lever, watch as it slowly lands

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>on the spinning record, so satisfying. When I moved to

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>New York in my twenties, I poke around record stores

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>in the East Village near CBGB, but my go to

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>place for buying music was Tower Records on Broadway. Like

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It's spent an entire afternoon browsing for c ds, going

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>into listening booze, admiring the album art in the little

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>jewel cases. The experience, you know, it really brought music

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to life, and I certainly wasn't alone in CD revenue

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>made up most of the fourteen point five billion dollar

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>music industry. But of course change is the only constant,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and in two thousand and six Tower filed for bankruptcy.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a sign of the times. Websites like Napster

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and you torrent ushered in a new way to discover

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and share music. Each song could be duplicated and passed

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>along endlessly with no loss in quality. Physical music sales plummeted,

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and the music industry suffered a massive pay cut. Music

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>had moved to the Internet, where everything is free. Welcome

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to Calling bull Ship, the podcast about purpose washing, the

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>gap between what an organization says they stand for and

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>what they actually do, and what they would need to

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>change to practice what they preach. I'm your host time

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>onto you, and I've spent over a decade helping organizations

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>define what they stand for, their purpose and then help

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>them to use that purpose to drive transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>at a lot of institutions today, there's still a pretty

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>wide gap between word and deed. That gap has a

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>name bullshit. But, and this is important, bullshit is serious,

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a treatable condition. So when our bullshit

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>detector lights up, we're going to explore everything the organization

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>should do to fix it. The same year that Tower

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>wreck It's closed, Daniel Eck founded Spotify. He had been

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of u Torrent, a platform that allowed users

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to anonymously swap large media files. The program itself was legal,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but it ended up mostly being used to pirate music.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Pirate of music wasn't profitable, Labels and governments were cracking down,

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and X saw an opportunity. By working with labels and artists,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he could charge listeners for access to a massive digital

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>library and reclaimed the value of music. And so he

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>started Spotify with the mission to unlock the potential of

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>human creativity by giving a million creative artists the opportunity

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to live off their art and billions of fans the

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to enjoy and be inspired by it. Streaming now

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>makes up about eight of the music industries revenue, and

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Spotify is the most popular streaming service in the world,

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>with one eight million people paying for the premium subscription

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds of millions more listening for free on the

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>ad supported tier. But is it actually possible for artists

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a living with Spotify? Spotify positions themselves as

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>artist friendly their platforms. Spotify for Artists helps musicians get

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>stats on listeners and manage their profiles, and they launched

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Loud and Clear campaign in one to quote give

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>artists clarity about the economics of music streaming. How exactly

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do artists and songwriters get paid? Let's break it down first.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's important to know that Spotify does not pay artists

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or songwriters directly. Instead, Spotify pays the rights holders. So

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>who are they? These are typically record labels, distributors, aggregators,

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or collecting societies. Artists and songwriters choose their rights holders

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and make agreements on their music, including giving them permission

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to deliver it to Spotify. In return, Spotify pays these

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>rights holders and they then pay the artists and songwriters.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>As of Spotify has paid over twenty one billion euro

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and royalties to rights holders, including over one billion euro

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>every quarter of for a total of five billion euro

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>last year alone. That's a lot of cash, but in

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>only three percent of artists on Spotify made more than

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a thousand bucks. In fact, most artists make fractions of

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a penny per stream, and people like backup singers and

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>songwriters who aren't top build artists make even less. Back

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in the c D age, it was possible to make

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a middle class living as a professional musician. Today that's

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder. So where does all that cash go?

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Is Spotify's purpose, which they say is to give a

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>million creative artists the opportunity to live off their art

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>actually a core principle or is that just a song

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and dance? To help me further understand the relationship between

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and artists. I called up musician, producer, label owner,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and activist Blake Morrigan. Folks, I am very excited to

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>introduce entrepreneur, musician, activist, and all around busy person Blake Morgan. Blake,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being here and welcome to calling bullshit. Hey,

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me, um so for the folks at

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>home as it were. Would you mind just telling us

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your your background, how you got

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>into music, and and some of your adventures in it.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm a recording artist and songwriter and record producer and

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>label owner here in New York City, my beloved hometown.

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Grew up on the Lower East Side, and I've been

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.679
<v Speaker 1>making music my whole life. Both my parents are writers,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I grew up in an artistic household. I

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think if I'd i'd grown up to be a tax attorney,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that would have been more rebellious growing up to be

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a rock and roll musician as I have. So, you know,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you've gone on to have a very successful career. You've

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>recorded several of your own records and also started your

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>own label, E c R. What motivated you to make

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that leap to entrepreneurship, The cliche goes is a necessity

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is the mother of invention. But you know, so it's desperation.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And I've had a huge record deal with with still

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Ramon and his label and two K, which is Sony Red,

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was a great artistic experience, but

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it was terrible label. And I had to fight my

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>way out of my seven album deal. And I was,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, following sort of standard industry advice and showcasing

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to get other deals. And I was actually walking down

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>street with my mother and I said to her, you know,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>if I had any guts, what I would deal is

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I would just start my own label. All these demos

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm making and producing these EPs and pseudo records

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm making, you know, they could actually be real records.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I had any guts, you know that That's really what

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I would do. And my mother turned to me and

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>she was like, yeah, you know what, if you had

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>any guts, that is what you would do. Um And

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember stopping in the middle of Fifth Avenue in

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the Weaven Street and just putting my hands on my

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>knees and oh my god, this is now what I'm

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to do. And you know, John Milton said,

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's better to rule in hell than serve in heaven.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's turned out not to be hell at all.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It's turned out to be a heaven of its own.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It was more desperation even the necessity. It's like I

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>had simply gotten tired of handing music that I bled over,

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>tired of handing it over to people who then invariably

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>screwed it up. Um. And that still happens to this day.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But now that they when they screw it up, they

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with me. He was the president that

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you see our music group. And along the way you

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you have become an activist. You've been a critic of

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of streaming platforms in particular like Pandora and and Spotify.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if we could pivot and start to

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about Spotify. Um. You know, they're a company who

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>says their mission is to unlock the potential of human

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>creativity by giving a million creative artists the opportunity to

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.359
<v Speaker 1>live off their art and billions of fans the opportunity

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy it and be inspired by it. So what, what,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>if anything, do you take issue with in that statement.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just a statement that appears to have

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>words in English strung together. You know, thank God that

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that green logo and that company is here to unlock

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my creative potential because I didn't know what to do before.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't know what to do. Thank God for

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Daniel k. Thank God for Daniel Eck, the CEO of

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you Torrents, which then became in bit torn he's a pirate.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this statement would be like Philip Morris saying

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we're here to teach people to breathe more deeply. You know,

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, where do you even start with a

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sense like if it's so offensive? Yeah, so Hubris in

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that statement for sure. But the part that really gets

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>my attention is the by giving a million creative RC

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to live off their art. How true or untrue

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is that? It's just it's nonsense. You know. The thing

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about Spotify, Their free tier means that when I release

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a record, my record is available for free on every

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>phone in the world. Right, Okay, Now, this is not

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the case with Apple, This is not the case with Title,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not the case with Deezer. You know, I wrote

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>an op ed you huff in the post. It's started

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with I love streaming and I do you know but

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>there aren't all all all streaming platforms are not equal.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple pays twice as much to artists as Spotify. They

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>pay songwriters three times as much. They don't attack artists

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>when artists criticize the platform, and they reform their platform.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't work for Apple, and Apple is far from perfect.

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that all streaming services are the same

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is absurd. So let's let's follow that thread for just second,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and then I want to return to the money. You know,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>other more pro let's call them pro artists platforms have

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>been launched, title among them. It doesn't feel like those

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>platforms have gotten the traction that Spotify has though, you know,

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of sheer size and momentum. Why is that, Well,

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a narrative that Spotify has put out into the world.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's be clear about a couple of things. Spotify

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>has a free tier. Apple does not. So this is

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>where we run into a problem. Spotify has essentially a

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote legalized pirates platform, which is their free tier. Right,

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's the comparing Spotify to Apple titled Deezer and Amazon.

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same business model whatsoever. And the bind

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that Spotify is, and of course is that you know,

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Spotify actually thinks it's saved music. And I've dealt with

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>many executives of Spotify. One of the big parts of

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>my music advocacy is actually about big radio and the

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>music fairness at and so I deal with big radio

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>broadcasters all the time, and I liken the bullshit and

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the big radio broadcasters. They're sort of like big oil

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>or big tobacco in that they know that they're doing

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong and they almost kind of admit it, but they're

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>basically able to get away with it. So they're gonna

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>get away with it for however long they're going to

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get away with it, and then they'll move on. Spotify

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is very different. When you talk to executives that Spotify,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they are evangelistic about the platform. They really believe that

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they are saving music. So the bullshit in the statement

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that you read at the top of this part of

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the conversation isn't just offensive and ridiculous. They need it.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a really amazing phenomenon. I wonder if you could,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just because most people, myself included, don't really understand this,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>can you explain the relationship between Spotify, record labels and musicians, like,

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:12.479
<v Speaker 1>how do the royalties work in streaming? So Spotify pays

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>um sev of their revenue to right solders. Okay, this

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is a number that they tout constantly because they it

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds like an amazing number, Like, well, wait a minute,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem like that They're they're paying seventy of

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>revenue out to right solders? Right right. But again, even

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if we forget about the free tier for a moment,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and we remember that a subscription of Spotify its ten

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, So ten dollars a month is a

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>d twenty dollars a year, and over the course of

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that year, as a Spotify subscriber, you can listen to

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of songs, thousands of records. Right at

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of that year, all of those people who

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>made all of those records are splitting sevent a hundred

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and twenty dollars, which is eighty four dollars. So you

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just list into four thousand songs that year. All of

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the people, not just the artists, all the people who

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>made those records, all the people who worked on all

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the revenue that went into making all of those records,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>All of those people are splitting eighty four dollars, And

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's fundamentally the problem with streaming. They fundamentally undermined the

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ability of musicians to make a living at their at

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>their music. So that's how the money works, plain and simple,

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and we can get granular about different parts of it.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But seventy of a hundred and twenty dollars is eighty

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>four dollars after a year. Where does the other Here

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are some important numbers when it comes to you know again,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>how this breaks down. Where does the money go? Where

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>does spotifystent go? Right? So it takes an artist like me,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>uh or any artist on Spotify. It takes four hundred

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand streams a month for me to earn minimum wage

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify four hundred thousand streams a month to earn

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage. So the money where does that percent go?

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It goes to paying coders, It goes towards paying for

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Spotify is five and fifty million dollar offices here in

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>downtown Manhattan, year ground zero, and it goes towards paying

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan two hundred million dollars for his racist and

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>misogynistic and homophobic anti science podcast. So that's where your

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>money is going that's where goes. So of all the

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>artists on Spotify, how many of them get even four

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand streams? I mean, four hundred thousand streams is

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>not a superstar number, but it's a serious number because

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to do it every month, you know. So

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it's four million streams after ten months. That's a lot

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of streams. I would imagine that the amount of artists

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>getting four hundred thousand streams a month would be at

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>least in the single digit percentages, if not in the

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>like two percent, three percent, one percent kind of thing.

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's very very it's very few. Yeah, crazy. Let's pivot

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to to just talk about some of the things that

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you've been up to in terms of solutions. First of all,

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you started a movement called hashtag I Respect Music, and

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>as a part of that, you know, you've said that

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you were against the way streaming companies treat musicians, but

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not against streaming itself, and I wonder if you

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>could break that down for us. You know, I love streaming,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I love its convenience, I love making playlists, I love

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I love lots of things about it. But you know,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so how can I love streaming but be against the

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>way streaming is affecting musicians. Just because I'm saying that

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we should be paid fairly and unscrupulous, you know, corporations

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like Spotify should be reformed. That doesn't mean that I

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>think streaming is the problem. So who is getting it right?

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You've mentioned Apple? Is it sounds like better? Um? Are

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>there other services that you feel like are are doing

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a better job. All of the major dreaming services are

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>doing a better job than Spotify. Apple is better, far

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>from perfect, but they're better. Title far from perfect, better either,

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>actually maybe one of the best. Right. I was very

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>excited back in the day when Title launched, you know,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because it seemed like they had real some some very

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>famous artists backing and and the proposition appeared to be

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to create a service that was pro artist and try

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to get consumers of music to adopt that platform as

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a as a kind of rebellion against the way that

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 1>musicians are treated in the industry. But it doesn't appear

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that Title has has taken off. What what went wrong there?

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that they really had their hearts in the

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>right place, and I think they still do. Um, that's

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the platform you want to be on as a subscriber

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>if you really care about Audio's a really good example.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think that they really bundled their press conference

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>because the way that they came out is that they

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>had all of these mega stars at their press conference

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at their launch, and they were all talking about how

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they weren't paid enough. And it's true, they're not paid enough,

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>But the problem with that tack is that then what

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>listeners do is they see a press conference like like that,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, why do I care if Madonna isn't

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>getting enough money? She's got millions of dollars, Why don't care?

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Fiance is not. And what I wish that they had

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>done in their press conferences if they had had in

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a row on stage, if they'd had Madonna and to

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>her left a music teacher, and to the music teachers

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>left Jay Z and this is and the sound engineer

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and the carpenter who builds the recording student, and the

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who's driving the van, and the woman who's setting

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>up merch because all of those people are funded as

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>part of our music industry. So I think that's the

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mistake that they made. Um it was a pr mistake,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that their hearts are in the

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>right place, just following the thread of changes that that

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>need to be made. Are there legislative avenues to solve

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.479
<v Speaker 1>this problem? I think that legislation is one way to go.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I think digislation is going to be much more helpful

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the battle that we have with radio,

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which you know, some of your listeners may not even

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>know that artists don't get paid anything for radio airplay

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. The United States is the only

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>democratic country in the world where artists don't get paid

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for radio air That just blows me away. Has that

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>always been true? Always been true? The only countries in

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the world that share the distinction with the United States

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>or North Korea, Iran and China. Nice good company. You

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>meant yes, you mentioned I respect music, which is something

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of an homage to Aretha Franklin, because Aretha Franklin never

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>got paid one dime for for respect being on the

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>radio United States, which is insane. That's insane, It's completely insane.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's completely insane. And um That also impacts the streaming debate,

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and it impacts the struggle with Spotify, because what Spotify

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>says to musicians is, hey, listen, we don't pay you

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but you know what, it's better than nothing,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and you get nothing on radio. So if we can

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>close the loophole that big, big radio has enjoyed for

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years, that's going to actually really effects how

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we're able to propressure on streaming services, which we want

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to do. You know, it's interesting other parts of the

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>media business went through this after the music business and

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have recovered. Like there was a period of

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>time when there was a big there was a collapse

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of of many journalistic entities because people were getting their

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>news for free and didn't want to pay, And it

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>turns out that for the right outlet, people will pay

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Have we trained people at this point that

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>music should be free and is the problem untraining them? Yeah,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of you know, a major problem

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that Spotify has that I've talked about often is Spotify

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make anything. Do you see the motion picture industry

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or the television industry or actor's equity up in arms

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about Netflix or HBO or Apple? No, you know why,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>because Netflix makes things, They make stranger things, which employs

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>gaffers and carpenters and screenwriters and actually right, they make things.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Spotify doesn't make anything. So again, there are a distribution

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>platform and they take thirty of revenue. Why why are

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they taking to upload my my music to the magical interweb?

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's another thing that Spotify I could do that

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>would really change things, and in fact that this is

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>something Apple could do. All of the major streaming services

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have a payment model outside of Deezer. Deezer is the

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>one that's changed, and your listeners may not notice either.

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But you may think that I get paid a certain

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>fraction of a penny per stream when I'm streamed on

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Spotify or Apple, but I'm actually not. There's no streaming

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rate nor is Like if you have a ten dollar

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>subscription to a streaming service Spotify, Apple, something like that,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd think that the people you listen to are splitting

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the seven dollars of your ten dollars, like in other words,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that your seven dollars is going to the people that

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you listen to. But that's not the way it works

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.479
<v Speaker 1>at all. The major streaming come copanies outside of Deezer

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and SoundCloud has changed as well. They use a pro

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>radar system where all of the streams are put into

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a pool divided by the amount of streams, and then

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>you get paid by the amount of market share you

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have in that pool. Because Beyonce has a larger market

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>share than I do, it means that she's actually getting

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>paid more money from my streams than I am. It's

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not a listener centric model, obviously. The way it should

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>work the artist, the artist who gets listened to should

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>get paid, should get that s exactly. And what that

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>would do just the obvious thing of like, well, wait

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a minute, you don't even get paid for the streams

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that you're actually receiving. What that would do is that

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>would shore up local artists, niche artists, niche genres as

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the constant gravity pool of mainstream gigantic pop music.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>And it wouldn't cost them anything. It's the same seven dollars.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just going to the right people. So what what's

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it going to take? I saw that a bill has

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>been introduced uh the American Music Fairness Act. What's the

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>status of that? Would that begin to level the playing

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>field for artists? American Music Fairness Act would actually finally

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>close the loophole and and American broadcast radio would have

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay artists for radio play. Yes, just just like

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. Is it going to pass? Well,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we're really hopeful, and it was just introduced into the

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>United States Senate, so it has a lot of momentum

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>um and we find like this is the farthest that

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>this bill has ever gotten. There's been versions of this

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>bill earlier, but there's a different kind of ground swell now.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that listeners, music lovers, and music makers have

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>really come together with this bill and said, well, wait

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute, there's a lot of things that we can't fix,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is not one of those. This is easy

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to fix. To one, how does Spotify think about this? Um?

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You were you were part of a meeting with Spotify

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>execs uh with some artists a few years back, and

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it ended in a debate. But can you talk about

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>your experience in that meeting? Sure? So I was invited

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to this so called artists only meeting with Spotify about artists,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh. It turned out that it was kind of

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a trojan horse. They had several artists that nobody had

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>heard of on a panel, all just touting how wonderful

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Spotify is. And then people in the audience started raising

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>their hand and saying, excuse me, what the hell is

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>going on here? What what we were supposed to have

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a dialogue here, you're preaching to us about what your

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>whole platform is about. So it became very contentious, and

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as you would imagine, I was a vocal participant in

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the meeting and uh and afterwards, um, a bunch of

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>exects from the company sort of you know, surrounded me

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and we were talking and they're like, Blake, I just

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>don't understand where why do you say these things like

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>our product is so fantastic, it's the best product there is.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And another guy would say, Blake, I think if you

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>understood more about our product, like you realize that it's

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>just the greatest thing that's ever happened. But they get

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>really emotional, and I said, Fellas, you know, you keep

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>using this word product and I'm just curious, what do

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you think your product is? And the executives said, what

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>do you mean Our product is Spotify? And I said, no, Fellas,

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not Spotify. Your product is music. You're confusing the

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>word product with the word brand. And the guy I

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was talking to you went, you know, man, you're crazy. Man,

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy. It is our product is. And I had

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, you know, while we're at it. By

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the way, stop calling people users. They're not users their listeners.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>You're the user. You're using our music to monetize our

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>little listeners for your profit. That's what you're doing. And

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you really looked at me like I shot Santa Clause

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in the face. You know, But that's I think it's

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>an important story. It's it's it's funny, but you know,

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not what happens when you talk to broadcasters. It's

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>very specific with Spotify, and it's a really like religious

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere over there where you feel like you're talking to creepy,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>weird cult people. And I'm not having a go just

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to like be mean. It really just is like that,

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and that story kind of illustrates them. Yeah. Um, so

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to wrap up with with two questions. First

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>of all, um, if you were Daniel Eck, what are

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the things that you would do to change Spotify. I'll

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>give you three, all of which he could do by

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day today. The first is he

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>could do away with his free tier. Music should not

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be free. Okay, it's morally wrong, it's it's uh, it's

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a bad business practice. So he should do away with

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the free treat free tier number one, number two. As

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I outlined before, the people who get strained are the

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>people who should be paid. I should be paid for

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the streams eye garner. Other people shouldn't be paid for them.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It would save UM niche artists, It would save UH

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>fringe artists, It would it would be would be a

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>huge boon to jazz music, classical music, big band music,

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>blue ask music, and on and on and on. So

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the other thing. Switching to the listener centric model.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>He could do that by sundown doesn't cost Spotify anything.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the same seven dollars just going to the right people.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>And the third thing he could do he could do

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>away with the counter, the number next to all of

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the songs on Spotify that tell you how many times

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been streams. Interesting, what's the virtue of this number?

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I get that Tom Waits's music is not less valuable

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's been listened to less than Nickelback. Right, So

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the third that's the third thing he could do,

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And there are many others, but those three things he

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>could do by midnight tonight. Man, Yeah, I love that.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I love all three of those. Okay, last question on

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this show, Blake, we have a tool called the b

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>S Scale. It goes from zero to one hundred, zero

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>being the best zero bs, one hundred being the worst

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>total BS. So on that scale, what score would you

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>give Spotify? Okay, that was definitive, Blake. This has been

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic and illuminating conversation. I want to thank you

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the show today. Well, thanks so much

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for having me, folks. At this point, my BS detector

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is playing highway to the danger zone. The bottom line

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>here is that Spotify spends a lot of money on

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>their brand, but they don't fairly compensate the people who

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>actually create their product. After speaking with Blake, it's clear

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that the b S and the music industry extends way

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond Spotify. Blake was so demoralized by record labels that

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he was compelled to start his own. I also cannot

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>believe that every single radio station in the US plays

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>music without paying for it. I really can't believe that

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that's insane. The good news is there are real opportunities

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>here for Spotify to change their tune and better support

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the artists who's support them. So we've assembled a panel

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of industry experts to help them make that shift right

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>after the break clip the record check on the B side. Folks,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I am very excited to introduce two industry experts who

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to help us help Spotify better live their

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>stated purpose. Our first guest is two time Grammy winning

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>artist and executive producer Cadence. Cadence, Thanks for being here

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to calling bullshit. I'm happy to be here.

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me so, Cadence. I'd love it

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if you could just tell us a little bit about yourself.

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I started off as an artist and then I fell

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in love with songwriting. Once I decided to move out

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to l A. Um was when really things changed for me.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say like it was a very creative, but

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't thinking so much business. Uh So when I

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>came out to l A I really got uh slapped

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in the face with the reality of business. You know.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I've had some some really big records, thank You, Next

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Seven Rings, Black Parade, Um, to name a few, and

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you would think that I would be well off. Um. So,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, while they had a budget for this in

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the past before streaming really hit, there's not that now. Now.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like they expect these songwriters to just do

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it for free. So I hopped into executive producing. I

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>saw that you were on the board of an organization

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>called the Hundred per Centers. Can you talk more about

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what theer is all about. Sure, Yeah, we're all about

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>advocating for creative rights, UM, just sustainable income. We're just

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.959
<v Speaker 1>advocating for change all over the board. UM even to

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this day, like people, active listeners, consumers don't just don't

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>understand how music or streaming works. But I think if

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>people were more aware of the effects and you know,

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the the issues, that there would be a shift because

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more than just the artists. Like, yes, of

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>course the artist is a very major part of this,

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>but the the collaborators, the creatives behind the music, UM

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that are are hurting even more. Thank you.

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And we'll return to that theme a little bit later

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the show as well, Cadence, because we want to

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>dig into all of that. UM. But but I want

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to introduce our our next guest. Next up, we have

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>David Turner, who is the writer of a widely read

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>newsletter on music streaming called Penny Fractions. David, welcome to

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the show. I'm gonna say hey, hey, everybody, thank you

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for having me on today. So, David, could you tell

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about yourself in your background? Yeah,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>totally so. Yeah. So my day job is I a

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>strategy manager of SoundCloud, or i've been the last four years.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Prior to that, I was a music journalist where I

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of covered different parts of the music industry, did

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reviews, interviews, features, covered a lot of

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like viral trends. So, I mean, I've been a fan

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of music for most of my life. I like playing guitar.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I like thought about maybe could I DJ, but never

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really took it that seriously, don't have the talent, but

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm pretty good at writing. So that's

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing I sort of kept up, which I do

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>be in my news letter of Penny Fractions, which I've

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>been doing for almost five years, which yes, like you said,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>covered streaming, but also many parts of the music. This

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we get a little bit of history of of

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>different music companies. So yeah, it's something that I've been

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>really passionate about the last few years and been really

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>excited to like see where it's gone to take great well,

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel really lucky to have you both on the show. Uh,

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into it. Cadence, I'm gonna ask you

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to lead us off in two minute are less. What

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>would you tell CEO Daniel Eck to change at Spotify

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to better live their purpose, which, just to remind folks,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is to unlock the potential of human creativity by giving

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a million creative artists the ability to live off their

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>art and billions of fans the opportunity to enjoy and

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>be inspired by it. I would say, for one, I

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think right now the Spotify premium is um I think

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that can for one, be increased, as well as just

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>having transparency about where this money is going. I feel

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like they kind of just wipe their hands and say, hey, um,

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it's the label's fault. And I just think

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that in order for everyone to feel like this is

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fair and uh just understand how this is being distributed,

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that we just need transparency, we need we need receipts. Right. Yeah,

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So can you talk a little bit more about the

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>transparency part of your idea because that feels important to me.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>If your purpose is to help artists live off live

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>off their art, right, fans need to know how the

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>system actually works. And I don't think a lot of

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 1>fans really do. Right for right now, we know UH

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that we get penny's worth of a dollar for UH

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for streaming, but we don't necessarily as far as transparency.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the agreements are between the labels

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and Spotify, Spotify or any streaming platform for for that matter.

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, we don't know where half of

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>these funds are going to and like what we're actually

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>getting paid. It just feels messy, it feels secretive, and

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>so I think if we have a better understanding of

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>how that's that's happening. I mean, I'm looking at like,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>remember over the pandemic, I'm trying to think it was

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars that went to the labels that they

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>proudly spoke about openly, And I'm sitting here looking at

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>my statements and I'm like, whoa that it just doesn't

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>add up. Um, you know, like, how how is it

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that I have these songs and and my b and

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my statements even over the pandemic, Like I I could

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not even make rent for the next two months, Like

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that doesn't make sense. Yeah, that's crazy. David, do

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>you have any thoughts on on what Cadence has been

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about totally. So I'm going to say I think

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the first idea about increasing the amount of money that

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>subscription costs makes a lot of sense. That's an idea

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>that I think many folks across the music industry. What's

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the part and it's something that I know many folks

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>have been wanting to sort of get behind. I think

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the biggest issue is I think many people aren't sure

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>customers are willing to take that sort of increase on

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>their subscriptions, especially when there are a number of streaming

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>services out here. But it certainly I understand that the

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>need and sort of the import of increasing how much

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the subscription goes needs more money can go to songwriters

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and recording artists, So that totally makes a lot of

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. And then around the issue of transparency,

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>just to be real quick, is uh, I think that

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>one is also another one where like, yeah, a little

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more transparency and clarity around how money move and

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>money pay payments go I think would be helpful. I

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>do think that is something broadly speaking, is that like

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>every part of the industry sort of needs like step

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>up to sort of help with that. Not always all

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>on the DSP. It's not always I mean, I guess

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot quite a bit on the labels and

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the contracts you actually end up signing, so that actually

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is where a lot of that ends up resting. But

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it is something where like their needs to be some

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of sort of agreed upon way to try to

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>clear up some of this confusion. Yeah, I was reading

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>an article just on the price raies. Point like Rhapsody

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>charged ten bucks a month in two thousand and two

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and Spotify charges ten bucks a month in two and

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if you just adjust for inflation, Spotify should be charging

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this article said fifteen fifty and that's just just to break,

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, to stay even. And in that time Netflix

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>has gone from eight bucks to fifteen fifty a month.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, another thing that they do that I

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't aware of is they do a lot of discounting.

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>So they have a student plan that's like five bucks

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>a month, and they have a family plan, and all

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of that cuts into the amount of money that they

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>come they bring in and and therefore can distribute to artists.

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And so cleaning that up would be another aspect of

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of raising their price right to to help get more

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.919
<v Speaker 1>money to the artists. Okay, David, your turn in two

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>minutes or less? What advice would you give Daniel ac Oh?

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>They advice that out and kept act. I think would

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>be maybe a little bit less of advice and more

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of a question that I think could be sort of

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>turned into sort of broader advice. My question would be

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that if you're going to have a million artists sort

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of make a living on your platform, how do you

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 1>plan to actually sort of like support those million artists.

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>How many people are gonna be working at Spotify? How

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>many more tens of thousands of people do you need

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to like handle all of that? Are you gonna be

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>helping out with healthcare? It's all like there's a lot

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of like questions to me that when I sort of

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>see here that mission statement, I think and it's very

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 1>grandiose and and and aspires to a lot and on

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>one part of it, the sense of having a million

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a billion fans like Spotify as like hundreds of millions

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of listeners, so like they are like well on their

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>way to that, But as far as like a million

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>artists that are making a living, they're certainly not on

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the on the way to that. In the same in

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of subjectory. Just to what David said,

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a very strong question, especially for

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>artists that aren't signed to major labels, because major labels are,

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, technically the biggest shareholders of Spotify, so they

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>control most of it. They control those playlists, they control

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, their artists getting more plays in these indie artists.

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't see these indie artists invited to

0:38:55.000 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 1>these Spotify branches. I see major label a major artist. Um,

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so how are you really leveling the playing field so

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that you give these indie artists an equal chance? Yeah,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard that the way that that Spotify pays artists,

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and and this is I'm still trying to get my

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>head around this. Like I, as I understand it, you're

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not actually paid per stream even on Spotify as an artist.

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>The money goes to the rights owners, and then that

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>money then goes to the artists, and it's a portion

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>based on essentially averages, you know, the percentage of streams

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on the platform that belonged to Beyonce. Then Beyonce gets

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that percentage of money. But it means that Beyonce

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in one way, as I understand it, Beyonce is getting

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a percentage on lots of indie artists streams as well

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the way that they do the accounting. And

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>so I've seen people advocate for a more direct model

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>there that like you actually pay your money as a

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>listener because they know who you are and they know

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're paying them, that your money goes directly to

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the artists that that you're listening to. What do you

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 1>think about that? Yeah, so I'll just speak on the

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>recording side. Yes, what you said is correct, where it's

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like all the money is sort of accrudance is sort

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of a big pot they said in the industry is

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>called sort of the pro rottle model. So, for example,

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with Beyonce dropped her like this album and she had

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of total streams that week, she would she

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the folks on the album will

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>be seven percent of over of the overall pot of

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>revenue generating in that period of time. So yeah, so

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it does sort of work out where if you were

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>paying a Spotify subscription or an Apple Music or Amazon

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 1>subscription and you do not listen to Beyonce, you're some

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>seven some part of your money would still be going

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.919
<v Speaker 1>towards Beyonce and the work, the work that she did

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>on that on that release. And yes, the other thing

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that you're sort of hinting at with this thing called

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the use a centric model, which I guess it's been

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of mentioned by a number of companies like Deezer,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a French music fiom so can also title

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think of maybe years ago. And also it's SoundCloud.

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually in summer, SoundCloud announced a partnership with one Er

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Music Group where we actually we're now playing out artists

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>on one or one of the big three major labels

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on the eccentric model along with artist that directly distribute

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 1>through through the platform. So but again that is all

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>just on the recording side. On the publishing on the

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>songwriter side is slightly different, like the way that's handled

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>very yeah, very different. Uh, our money goes through the publishers,

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>so we get what we get and yeah, we have

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>no control over over it. We feel like the powerless

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>m hmm. Yeah, and so somebody needs to take the

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>artist's side. So why don't we use that as a

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>moment to pivot to my my idea and again be savage.

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a total rookie here. So what I take away

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is that Spotify actually is in like a vice or

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, another to four would be between a rock

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and a hard place, because all of their competitors also

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>charged ten bucks a month, and so Spotify as a

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>service is basically an undifferentiated commodity, and commodities have trouble

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 1>raising their prices to make matters worse. You know, two

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of their competitors are Apple and Amazon, and Apple and

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon can afford to lose money forever in music just

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>because uh, music isn't their main job. It's a side

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>hustle to them. And so to get out of this vice,

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Spotify has to innovate. And you've seen them trying, like

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they tried video and that didn't work. They've tried actually

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.760
<v Speaker 1>going around the rights holders by by you know, cutting

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>direct distribution deals with some artists, and that didn't work

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>because the labels pushed back. Now they're trying podcasting and

0:42:55.440 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>that led to the Joe Rogan debacle. And so as

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought about, like what they do have, they have

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>two things. They have a great artist centric purpose, this

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 1>idea that they want to take a million artists and

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>make it so they can live off their art, which

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I love and they have scale. They're big, um I

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think four hundred and six million monthly actives currently. So

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>my idea is for Spotify to become a laboratory for

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>artists centric innovation, to continue to innovate themselves. But also,

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this will be controversial, I don't know, but

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>also to look across the industry for other really good

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ideas that that other platforms are trying but maybe don't

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>have Spotify scale like Title, and adopt it to scale it.

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So to use their scale for good is the essence

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of my idea. And I'll continue to use Title because

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I was reading an article in a in a thing

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>called louder Sound, and I'll just read from this article.

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Title recently unveiled their direct artist pay up plan and

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>which sees ten percent of your subscription going directly to

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the artists that you listen to most. This initiative is

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>based on actual streaming activity of the fans versus the

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>industry accepted method of aggregating streams and allocating it to

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the most popular artists. According to Title, uh so this

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is a move. This is now the writer of this

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>article saying this is a move away from some other

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>payment plans and could cause a shift in the streaming industry.

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>And so what I'm advocating for is, let's use it

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to cause a shift in the industry. Let's Spotify adopt

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this as well as well as any other great artists

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>centric ideas across the industry and really deploy them at

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>scale to help fans support artists directly and take on

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the mantle of artists centricity, which is, you know, sits

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>at the center of their purpose. What do we think

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.839
<v Speaker 1>about that pipe dream possibility? In many ways, I think

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're sort of describing as kinds of me like Instagram.

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Soon It's like on Snatchat they took on the story

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>feature of Snapchat, and people are like, oh wait, Snapchat.

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I love Snapchat. But now all of a sudden, it's

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 1>it is it is what I'm describing. Yeah, but I'm

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to say for good because that that practice I

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think of as evil, like the whole Facebook empire. He

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg does this to put other companies out of business.

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm saying is, since Spotify has skill, maybe

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they could use it for good. Maybe Yeah, I don't know, Yeah, no,

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess I guess the reason why that immediately jumped

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to me with because I think of the perception of

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the users is that perception of users would probably immediately

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>go towards that doing this thing. I think because because

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>if you say that you're doing this because you want

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to help, but if it's just topping someone else, you're like, oh,

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.439
<v Speaker 1>well wait, why are you helping by copy it didn't

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have any of your own ideas. I think that maybe

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe sort of especially as like a

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:51.720
<v Speaker 1>user of different platforms, and when all of a sudden,

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>every platform to your point had the same price point

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden are the same features set,

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you get a little less excited to hop between them

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because you're like, oh, what if they're doubely different shape,

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of need for the bigger company to

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:07.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of have more actual innovation in an actual different differentiation.

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 1>But to the specifics I will actually say, I do

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>like that Tyle was saying this to someone yesterday, that

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 1>title actually has a number of really great features, Like

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>they actually highlight songwriters. They actually highlight producers of tracks,

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so you can actually search for a producer, starch first songwriter.

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of things that title does that

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>other platforms don't do. So I do think there is

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit actually there that that others could sort

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of take from sort of and sort of I and

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of maybe poke poke poke away. But I yeah, sorry,

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to rid a little because yeah, I

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't know. It's it's it's it's a great I I agree, yeah,

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think that would be great. Um,

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it would be scary, uh, too

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>scary for the labels. So while I love love that

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>idea and hope that they do it, I think it's

0:46:54.680 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>far fetched right now because it's just they're making so much. Yeah, absolutely,

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I mean they pretty much make the call

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.919
<v Speaker 1>on if anything changes. I think they think that they're

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>doing enough, at least for the songwriters. I mean, I

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>know you've seen they had secret genius before. Um they

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have notable now where they post your picture as a

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>songwriter or producer on a billboard and say, wow, look

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>at this person. Um. But and while that's great because

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 1>it gets you exposure, it still isn't enough. And I

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>mean to think of how much money they're spending to

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>do that, where that can really go towards other things

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>are helping helping us in a different way, like pay

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>our rent. That's the other thing about this that I

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>find hard to get my head around, and I assume

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>most casual music fans find they're hard to get their

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:04.919
<v Speaker 1>head around, is just how complex the environment is. It's

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 1>really hard to figure out how people get paid and

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>why they get paid, and even people in it are

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>confused by it, and people on the outside just I

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>think glaze over a little bit um, which is a

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>shame because I think, honestly, if fans really knew what

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>was going on, they would do you know, if they

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>knew that they could directly support the artists that they love,

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they would do it. You know, I I

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 1>really knew um. In this podcast, we do a single

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 1>guest up front for a kind of facts of the case,

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we do this roundtable, and our first guest

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was an artist named Blake Morgan. Blake had an idea

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:42.479
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to run by both of you, which

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is essentially get rid of the free layer at Spotify,

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because his perspective was, you can't say that you're trying

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to help artists make a living and give their music

0:48:55.840 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>away for free. Those two things just don't go together. Yeah, yeah,

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you agree with that. Oh yeah, yeah, I definitely understand

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of economic need for getting rid of the

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>free layer. As a consumer, I guess I started to

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>feel a little like, oh man, I kind of like

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to like just go find a song, but

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I won't listen to for free. But that's also something

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that like, hey, I remember before YouTube, so I do

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>remember what it was like before that was the case,

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and like it was fine. I don't know, there is

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.360
<v Speaker 1>something to be said about like music not being always

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>at once aingo tip, where the songs can sometimes have

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a sort of different life and a different residency in

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>your life rather than it's like, oh I always have

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 1>immediate access to this thing. So yeah, I feel like that.

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Um that era, the Lime Wire era, where it was

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like we were just able to download anything at any time. Um,

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we kind of got caught into that mindset of like,

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>well I could just listen to it somewhere else for free,

0:49:53.880 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and um, we're just not taking into consideration like the

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the people that it affects effects, you know, It's it's

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a hard thing. Once once a habit has taken hold

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>with people and that and like a habit, like oh yeah,

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.800
<v Speaker 1>music is free. It's really really hard to break that habit. Again.

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>That's happening sort of throughout the world. Not to get

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>too philosophical, but we live in the modern world in

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.719
<v Speaker 1>a way in which things are convenient and we do

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:26.400
<v Speaker 1>them because they're convenient and they're easy, and we're starting

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to learn that things that are convenient and easy aren't

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>necessarily good for the world. It's like, oh, I threw

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 1>away my water bottle because it was easy, but it

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:35.880
<v Speaker 1>wound up in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, and

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so paying artists for music should fall into the same category.

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like, free music has an impact on people's lives,

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. Maybe one thing that Spotify could do is

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just do a better job of educating people about that

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and really take an artist centric point of view on

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>making sure that people understand that there are implications for artists,

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and what those implications are. I mean, one

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the other questions I had for both of you,

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I was looking on there's a service called Music Gateway,

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and it allows you to compare what you would make

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for a set number of streams as an artist on Spotify,

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:18.919
<v Speaker 1>on a title on Pandora, on Amazon and Apple. So

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I did this math right? The bottom edge of what

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we consider to be the middle class in America is

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand dollars a year. I would say that's a

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>little stingy, but let's say thirty thousand dollars a year.

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>To make thirty thousand dollars a year on Spotify, you

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>would have to get about seven and a half million streams.

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Right now, fifty two thousand, six hundred artists are making

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars or more on the platform, so it's

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>not even thirty thousand. So they've got a long way

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to help. You know, a million artists make

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a living off the platform. But the other interesting thing

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was for the same number of stream on Apple, I

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>would make thirty seven thousand, five hundred dollars on Amazon

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the same on Title I would make ninety thousand bucks

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>off of seven million, five hundred thousand streams. So Title

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>stands out. So I guess the question there is why

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't Title do better? Uh? One, there's already the amount

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of conversation when titled, so to enter the space I

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>think it entered around um so Spotify had already existed.

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube YouTube have been around since the mid two thousands.

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Spotify had sort of come into the United States and

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in the early and it into the mobile platform in

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the mis um Apple Music it was also launching around then.

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You still had people that are using Pandora and higher amounts,

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and when titled only real again differentiation factor or more

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like sort of like aesthetic things of like again like

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty out producers and songwriters and stuff like that, that

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't not to differentiate it when it's overall content

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with the same content, it's basically every other platform and

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>title did try to have this clues an album for

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 1>like a very brief good of time in early and

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe in sen but they kind of moved

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>away from that when artists realized that putting your music

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>only on one platform really limits the audience potentially, right

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. One of the other observations that I have

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is like I have no context for what artist should

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be paid per play. It's like minimum wage raising the

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:30.399
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage. Everybody knows roughly what that means, and so like,

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do either of you have an opinion about, like what

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 1>is the right number per stream that artists should be

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>paid in order to create a more fair deal for them.

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would love to know, um, what the labels

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 1>are getting per per stream um. And that's what makes

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it hard. If if I could see those those receipts, yeah,

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I would be right. And back to this transparency issue, right,

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's all a big secret, like what's go went on? Um,

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that would be a thing that Spotify could advocate

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.839
<v Speaker 1>for that everybody know what everybody's making. Like that would

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>be a huge step forward, wouldn't it. Yeah, it was

0:54:11.239 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the only issue because I remember talking some about this

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 1>very recently, is that, like it wouldn't behoove the labels

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to have that that knowledge out there because then your

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>conversation undercut you or sort of undermine some of the

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you're trying to do. Yeah, no, it's hard, right,

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 1>they would definitely resist that. But but if there was

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>just like I like I've been saying, and even playing

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>field where the artists get what they get and it's

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>not it doesn't have to be a private negotiation, well

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe it could be. Yeah, it could be aggregated and anonymised. Right,

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So you don't know exactly what the deal between Sony

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and and X is, but you know that ultimately Sony

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is getting about this amount. Okay, my last question for

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for both of you. Spotify says its purpose is to

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>give a million artists the opportunity to live off their art.

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And as I said before, the fact is only fifty

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, six hundred artists generated ten thousand or more

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 1>last year on Spotify, so they've got a ways to

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>go before they get to a million artists. We have

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a tool on this show called the BS index, which

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:24.279
<v Speaker 1>measures the gap between word indeed, and it goes from

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>zero to one hundred, zero being the best, zero bs

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one being the worst total BS. What score would each

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of you give to Spotify? David, I'm gonna ask you

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to go first on this one. I think my answer

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to the original question on public I put slight into

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what I'm about to say, but it would have to

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be one D because having a million a million people

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>also ten thousand is not also like, that's not like,

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's not no, that's not making a living.

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 1>That's no, no, no, that's not I also want to

0:55:57.320 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like to be like I think it's kind of said

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>as earlier that like even thirty or party thousand, if

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 1>you're living in a major that's minimum ways. Yeah, yeah,

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that is more than likely a lot lot lower, so

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I would go, like a hundred. Okay, alright, I'm a

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent with you. It's it's on a hundred. I

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think they have plenty of ways to change this model,

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think they know their power and they're using

0:56:32.320 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the well what if what if we lose listeners? What

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 1>if we do this? I mean everyone I know uses Spotify, So, um,

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they know their power. I don't think the

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>consumers are going anywhere. I think using the fact that

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they can put more awareness out there and essentially become

0:56:55.320 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>an ally and if they can really be a voice

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for us, I think that would also translate into even

0:57:04.480 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>more consumers and more listeners and more supporters. Um so yeah,

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>m hm. This has been a fantastic conversation at David Cadence.

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you both for being here today.

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>It was wonderful to have you on the show. Thank

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you for having us, Thank you, thanks so much for

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>inviting Alright, folks, it's time to rate Spotify on the

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>B S scale. Spotify is certainly not giving a million

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:35.439
<v Speaker 1>artists the opportunity to live off their work. All three

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of our guests gave really high scores because of this,

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and to one hundreds and that perspective totally makes sense.

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Spotify has done little to provide artists with a living wage,

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and there is so much more they might do to

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>support artists in a meaningful way, for instance getting rid

0:57:55.960 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of their free tier or redistributing payment based on individuals

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:06.240
<v Speaker 1>actual listening habits. However, their tools do provide artists with

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>valuable audience metrics, and they have created a great platform

0:58:10.520 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to get traction if you're a musician. That's not nothing

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>far from it. So today I'm giving Spotify a seventy

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 1>two and Spotify CEO Daniel Eck if you'd like to

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 1>come on the show to talk about anything we've touched

0:58:28.840 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on today, Please know that you have an open invitation.

0:58:38.000 --> 0:58:41.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're thinking about starting a purpose led business or

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning the journey of transformation to become one, here are

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>three things you should take away from this episode. One,

0:58:49.520 --> 0:58:53.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure your purpose and your business model are aligned.

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Free is never free. I feel like I've said this before,

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:02.479
<v Speaker 1>it's still true. When you sign up for Spotify's free level,

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody pays, even if it's not you. In Spotify's case,

0:59:06.960 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the artists who you love and who Spotify claims

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to want to help make a living who paid the price.

0:59:14.200 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>If you are going to make your product free, make

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sure you're transparent about your business model and that it

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 1>aligns with your purpose. Two. Your purpose must drive action.

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:31.280
<v Speaker 1>If you can't make meaningful strides towards delivering on it,

0:59:31.480 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>then it's not your real purpose. If Spotify's hands are

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>actually tied by the record labels, as it seems like

0:59:38.160 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they may be, they need to figure out how to

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 1>advocate on behalf of the musicians they claim to care

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>about to change that situation or change their purpose to

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>accurately reflect what they really stand for. Three. Become a

0:59:55.280 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 1>force for transparency in your chosen industry. Transparency about your

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>own businesses table stakes. If your purpose led but purpose

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>led businesses are actually trying to make the whole world

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a better place, and better things happen in light than

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in shadow. In Spotify's case, it's actually super hard to

1:00:16.920 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>know how to help them help artists because it's very

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand where the money is going in the

1:00:22.720 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>music industry. They should try to fix that. And if

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode made you want to sing our praises, subscribe

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Calling Bullshit podcasts on the I Heart Radio, app,

1:00:40.120 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to people speaking to

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>your ears and friends. I'd like to ask for your help.

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy the Calling Bullshit Podcast, please take a

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>second to rate us on Apple Podcasts or on your

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>preferred platform. It helps more people find the show. Thank

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you to our guests today, Blake Morgan, Cadence and David Turner.

1:01:02.240 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Learn more about the I Respect Music campaign, the Centers

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and David's newsletter Penny Fractions in our show notes or

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at our website Calling Bullshit podcast dot com. And thanks

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to our production team Hannah Beale, Amanda Ginsburg, d s Moss, Hailey, Pascalites,

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Parker Silzer and Basil Soaper. A little bit of good news,

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we recently learned that we are now the eleventh most

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>popular business podcast in the world. Kick Ass Job Team.

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Calling Bullshit was created by co Collective and it's hosted

1:01:38.760 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>by me Time Montague. Thanks for listening.