WEBVTT - Listener Mail: The Memory of Trees

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. Listener mail.

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick, and today we're bringing you

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 3>some responses to recent episodes of the show. You all

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>have been writing in about squirrels. You've been writing in

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 3>about pretend play, you've been writing in about Christmas, trees

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 3>in the ocean, all kinds of things to get into.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 3>So Rob, unless you have any business to address right

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>here at the top, I say, let's jump right into

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the messages.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>No business here, let's do it, Okay.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm going to start with this message from

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Hugh in response to our sort of revival of the

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>squirrel topic. So refresher here if you don't recall. Many

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 3>years ago, we did a series of episodes on the brutal,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>largely unknown side of squirrels, including scientific observations of squirrels

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>eating the flesh of other animals scavenger, sometimes even killing

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 3>live prey, as well as legends of squirrel on squirrel castration,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>anecdotes of squirrel attacks on humans with varying levels of

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>evidence behind them, in plausibility etc. Then, just earlier this month,

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 3>we returned to the topic of squirrels because of a

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 3>newly published paper from December twenty twenty four. A lot

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>of you got in touch with us to let us

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>know about this, a paper that extensively documented a population

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 3>of California ground squirrels roughly northeast of the San Francisco area,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>systematically hunting and eating live adult voles, which seemed to

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>be related to a concurrent explosion in.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 2>The vole population. Vole meat got.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Cheap, essentially, so squirrels were like, why not, let's eat

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 3>them anyway. After covering this, we heard from many listeners

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>with thoughts about squirrels, sometimes about their surprising ferocity or

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 3>their lesser known tendency to eat meat. So, first of all,

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 3>this message from Hugh reads, Dear Robert and Joe and JJ,

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 3>happiest of New Year's toe you all. I have to

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 3>agree with Rob's view of squirrel kind. Rob, maybe you

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>can remind us what this view was after you hear

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 3>Hugh's thoughts. Hugh says, I once saw a big, furry

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 3>orange tomcat get hold of a gray squirrel in an open,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>sunny patch of lawn. I lost track of what was

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 3>happening for a few seconds due to the Looney Tunes

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 3>esque mailstrom obscuring the action. But when the dust and

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>fur had settled and a mostly orange rocket had disappeared

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>over the horizon, I could tell that the paradigm had

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>shifted for that cat. Squirrels are expletive metal. You're all

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>still doing a great job. I love your work, Hugh. Well,

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>thanks for the message, Hugh.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I've ever seen this particular thing happen,

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 3>like the squirrel sends the larger predator running, but I

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 3>can believe it. Rob, do you do you know which

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 3>of you of yours this is conforming to?

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>We had just that they're for a grappling hooks. They're fierce,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 2>their tree lions and matches up. We have the story

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 2>that I told about one chasing off a hawk in

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 2>my backyard, a girl doing squirrel business. A hawk moved

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in to interfere with that business in some manner or fashion,

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and the squirrel was having none of it, and the

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 2>hawk was like, okay, fair enough, I'll go pest or

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 2>something else.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense. Now you referred to them as grappling hooks. This,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of course is giving me the image of an expanded

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>movie Ninja tool Kit where the ninja from their belt

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>draws a squirrel on a line and makes you know,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>unthinkable use of it.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>There is a Marvel superhero named squirrel Girl. My kid

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>has several comic books of squirrel Girl. Very fun character,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's usually played up for cuteness I believe. I mean,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>she's fearce and strong in her own right. But I

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they completely embrace the unholy ferocity of

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the squirrel, because squirrel Girl could be very metal, and

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe she is very metal in some installments. If not,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I hope comic book artists out there embrace the beastly

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>nature of the squirrel at some point.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Rob, you want to do one of these

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 3>following messages?

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, here's one from Carl titled Squirrel's Return Dear Robin Joe.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Without intent, I've apparently created a squirrel paradise in my backyard,

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>which is great. Their acrobatics entertain and fascinate me and

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>my retriever Australian sheep dog Roxy. They are minimally destructive

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 2>while they go about their lives making families, building their nests, harvesting,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>hickory nuts and covorting in the woods outside my kitchen

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>window and off the deck. Of all the creatures there,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the squirrels and birds are the least destructive, paired with

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the chipmunks and rabbits that destroy plants and gardens. So

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed this episode. I haven't seen my squirrels

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>dining on other animals or insects, but they might. There

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 2>are plenty of them out there too. It would be

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>interesting and very useful if my squirrels would develop an

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>appetite for rabbit. Here's do a great new year, Carl.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Best of luck to you, Carl. I mean, I don't

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 2>think there's a way to engineer that. Maybe we wouldn't try,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>just leave it, let nature take its course there, because

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that sounds like the beginning of a horror story. You

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 2>remember old Carl there. Oh yeah, he tried to teach

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>his squirrels to eat rabbit meat. Now they only eat

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>manfold meat.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the backstory to Night of the Squirrels. Okay, on

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>to the next squirrel message. Two comments before reading this one.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>One of them is context for the message Rob when

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>we were I think, both in the original series and

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>in the follow up episode we talked about your story

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 3>of encountering aggressive squirrels at Grand Canyon National Park and

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>how this related to the people feeding the animals at

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>places where human and humans and wildlife interface. Do you

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 3>want to what were the deats on that?

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean it just gets into the basics of,

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, a fat animals, a dead animal. If you

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 2>feed any wild animals of you know, varying wildness and

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.239
<v Speaker 2>overt danger to humans, if they associate humans with food,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>then they'll just get closer, and the closer they are,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the more likely it is to end and bites, scratches

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. We want them to remain wild, wild

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and away from us. Yeah, that's right.

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 3>And your direct experience was that what did a squirrel

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>basically climb you or your wife trying to get food

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 3>out of your hands?

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, it's all a snack bar and made a

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 2>play for it and we had to essentially like swatt

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>it away with a hat. Wow. Okay, all right.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 3>And then the second comment before reading this is I

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>want to make absolutely clear that we are not advocating

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the behavior the list is about to describe in this message,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 3>but I did think it was worth sharing to discuss

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 3>and maybe get some feedback from people who work professionally

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>in parks and wildlife or other places where there's a

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of interface between humans and wild animals. So this

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>is from Ben, subject line trolling wildlife. Hello, gentlemen, your

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>recent episode on squirrels was fascinating and entertaining, as is

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 3>all your excellent content.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Ben.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 3>The discussion at the end of the episode around feeding

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 3>wildlife brought to mind the fun game I play with

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 3>excessively bold wildlife. When I encounter small animals that seem

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>to be accustomed to getting food from humans, I approach

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>them and mimic the action of giving them food. For

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>ducks at the local park, I toss pretend bread to them.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>For the finches at the Trailhead parking lot at a

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>nearby provincial park, I hold up a handful of imaginary

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>bird seed. For the squirrels that live in my town

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 3>home complex, I hold out a theoretical peanut. Then, when

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 3>the animal approaches to a closer distance than they reasonably

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 3>should get to a human, I jump and shout and

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 3>startle them. I like to believe I'm doing my part

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 3>to ruin the trust they have developed for humans. Thanks

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>for the Great show. Ben Okay, Ben, Well, thank you

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>for the message, and maybe you can see why I

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 3>wanted to read this but also wanted.

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>To caveat it.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>I see the reasoning here, like, of course, it's not

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 3>usually good for wild animals to be desensitized to the

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 3>presence of humans. We want them to avoid us, we

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>should avoid them. But part of me also does kind

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>of recoil at the idea of intentionally scaring wild animals.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So I want to be clear again that I'm not

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>recommending this as a good idea without knowing more. However,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 3>I know we have a lot of listeners who do

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>work in parks and wildlife for an animal conservation. I

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>would love to hear your thoughts those listeners about this

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing. Is this actually a good thing to do,

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>or is there a better strategy that accomplishes the same

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 3>goal without needlessly scaring wildlife. Is it best to just

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 3>avoid interacting with wildlife as much as possible, even if

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 3>the animals are brazenly approaching you for food.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Should you just run away? What should you do?

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't really know, but I would love to hear

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 3>from people who have professional expertise contact that stuff to

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>blow your mind dot com.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know that when it comes to things

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>like bears and parks, there will often be you know,

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>people in official capacity rangers doing things like you know,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 2>firing off a gun, creating a loud noise to scare

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>them away and try and you know, drive home the

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 2>idea that humans are scary and you shouldn't get too

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>close to them. So, like I said, I see both

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 2>sides of this. Yeah, what I'm cautious about would be

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the idea of engaging in both behaviors at the same time,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 2>of like mimicking bringing an animal in close only to

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 2>scare them away. I suspect, and I am no expert.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course, you're better off just going with the scare,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>like you're better off like leaving your home and just

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 2>scaring all wildlife that comes close to you. So like

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>when I go outside, if there's a squirrel too close

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 2>to me, I'll clap my hands, I will make a noise,

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and not because they're approaching me, but because like maybe

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 2>they're just a little they're lingering a little too long

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on the fence, and I'm like, I don't want you

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>any closer to me, you know, you furry shackle just

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and get on out of here. I don't

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>know that the mimicking the feeding is actually going to

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>be helpful in this scenario, but I could be wrong. Yeah.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>So once again, people whose job it is to study

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 3>how to protect wildlife and try to try to sever this,

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 3>this link or this desensitization, please write in let us

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 3>know your.

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Thoughts, all right. We also received more feedback about Hearts

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 2>and Fireplaces. That was a multi serious episode. We did

0:10:55.440 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 2>what in December holiday themed, But you can listen to

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>him any time of the year. I mean, it's hearts,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>it's fireplace, It's good winter listening for sure. This one

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 2>comes to us from Megan. Megan says, Hi, guys, your

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 2>episode on Hearts was intriguing and it made me think

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of a couple of personal experiences. You mentioned that some

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>animals used chimneys as habitat. My family moved houses a

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago in July, and the chimneys had

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>been left unused and clothes for a while. I noticed

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a tuneless squeaking in the living room ever so often,

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 2>which I assumed was air moving through a pipe. Well,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 2>did you ever see dark bat like birds swooping around

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 2>on a summer evening in an urban neighborhood and catching insects.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Those are chimney swifts, which are dependent on chimneys for

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>roosting and raising their young. They used cliff faces and

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>old trees before the arrival of Europeans. For about a month,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I listened to the chimney swift babies chirping loudly every

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>time their parents returned with food, and abruptly one day

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I realized that the chimney was silent the nestlings fledged.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 2>I never saw the nestlings, just the adult population darting

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>around the neighborhood, and then the adults and fledged juveniles migrated.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>They returned last July. By the way, I'm afraid of

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 2>opening up the chimney and discovering the old nests glued

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 2>with saliva to the brick walls and many years of

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>bird waste. But that's for a future professional cleaning. Maybe

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>you guys want to cover that topic in the show

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Animals and plants that have accidentally come to depend on

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>human settlements. Also, the description of hunter gatherers around a fire,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>telling stories and entering a different mental space resonated with me.

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I realize it's not the same thing as sitting around

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a fireplace, But it seems that bars and restaurants replicate

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>something of that social experience by turning the lights down

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and setting out candles or, in the case of a

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 2>sports bar, operating lots of glowing TVs. And indeed, it

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 2>may sound funny, but if you didn't listen to the

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>episodes we did talk about how the TV is essentially

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the modern hearth. So, yeah, I mean as personally annoying

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>as I find a whole bunch of glowing TVs in

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 2>a restaurant or bar. Yeah, it could be what they're

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>doing anyway, Megan continues, if I'm not getting tipsy and

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 2>experiencing lowered social inhibitions from drinking, I find that the

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>ambiance has a similar effect. Thank you as always for

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>keeping us engaged and entertained.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Megan. Yeah, interesting thoughts as to the last

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 3>thing about the lowered inhibitions and the different sort of

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 3>mental space you get in with different light regimes. That

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>is something we talked about, springboarding off of thoughts in

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 3>an anthropology paper we were looking at. Yeah, that did track,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 3>like how conversation was different in environments that were ruled

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>by firelight versus daylight versus electric light, and the firelight

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 3>conversations were noticeably different, at least within this example of

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 3>these one people. And so, yeah, I can definitely see

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 3>how the different light conditions can lead us to not

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 3>only think differently, but relate to other people differently. And

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 3>one thing we hypothesized was like, wonder if lower light

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 3>conditions make you less aware of being observed and also

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 3>make you less minutely observant of the kind of micro

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 3>expressions of other people, and there is something possibly disinhibiting

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>about that, But that was just kind of a.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Gas Yeah, and I'll had one more thought about multiple

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 2>bars and intelligence, multiple multiple TVs in a bar rather,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>is that one of the things we talked about is

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 2>like the hearth as this centerpiece, this this focal point

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>that draws in the attention of multiple individuals. And granted,

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>especially in a restaurant or bar, you could have multiple

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 2>focal points because you ultimately may have multiple different sort

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of social groups. But I wonder sometimes and with some

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>seating positions in a bar restaurant, there isn't there's that

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 2>it can be a struggle to find a focal point

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>because everywhere you look there is a tele vision you know,

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 2>everywhere you look it's a different or it's the same

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>football game or pharmaceutical commercial, and then you and it's

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>also maybe drawing each person at a given table off

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 2>in a different direction. There's no like central thing that

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>they're both vibing on.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm also not a huge fan of a lot

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 3>of TVs in a restaurant or bar. But one thing

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll say is, even though I don't follow sports, I

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>prefer sports to the other option, which is when people

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>have the news on in a restaurant.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing?

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 3>We're sitting here like trying to have tacos, and then

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>up on the screen there's like a body outline or

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 3>just like pictures of police cars with the lights on,

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Like what, I don't understand that.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not a fan of that. I'm also not

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a fan of it just being like a net like

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>open Netflix, like not playing anything but just the Netflix menu.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>It's like, fine, okay, if you're gonna play a movie

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>on Netflix, play a movie on Netflix, or they're you know,

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>there are four good choices on there these days, so

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>put one of those on. But yeah, oh well.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 3>The other option though, is playing old movies, which I

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there are places in Atlanta that are own

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 3>for they will project like Santo movies on the wall

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 3>or that's yeah, thumbs up, thumbs out to that.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 2>That's my preference. And I think Netflix has three or

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 2>four old movies. Maybe it's not to two. I'm not sure,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>but you know, there's still some good stuff they could

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 2>be playing. And I do realize that, you know, from

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>a business standpoint, most of these places do have to

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>have some televisions. Like it's enough, customers are going to

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>want that, you're going to need to have the sports.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 2>On that being said, you can overdo it.

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Seems like a reason to revive the old like smoking

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 3>non smoking division, except you just have a TV non

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>TV section of the restaurant.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I would be all up for it or

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the other way Santo non santo.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, anyway, thanks again, Megan, great email. Okay, this next

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 3>message is the first one for today that's going to

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 3>get into our episodes on Pretend Play and Imaginary Friends. Now,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>we got a bunch of response to that. We're not

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to cover them all today. I'm

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 3>sure that will extend into our next listener Mail episode

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 3>whenever that is. But this first message is from Liz.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Liz says, Dear Robert and Joe. I've been enjoying the

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>recent series on Play, especially this last episode about imaginary friends,

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>which as a child I called clear people.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, oh, I love that.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess I equated imaginary with invisible and invisible with

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 3>seathrough several years ago now, I read a short story

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 3>called A Day with Cyrus Mayer by Alex Pugsley, where

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the child narrator describes, quote the imaginary kid, a character

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>in my own private mythology who ran along the side

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>of the highway keeping pace with my family's car on

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 3>road trips, and I had this moment of recognition. I

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>used to imagine my clear people doing that, or sometimes

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 3>zipping along power lines on tiptoes to keep up looking

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 3>forward to the next episode. Liz, that's amazing, and I

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 3>want to come back to that. But Liz has a PS.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Also PS. I've been meaning to write with this weird

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 3>house cinema suggestion for years, ever since my mom, now

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in her sixties, told me about this bizarre movie she

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 3>watched at a sleepover in high school. It seems to

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 3>have gone by two different titles. That's I don't know

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at this, is that seven S's in a

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 3>row amazing title or four s's at the beginning snake.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea how difficult it would be to

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 3>stream or get your hands on a copy, but it

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>sounds nice and weird. Well, thank you so much, Liz, Yeah, great,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 3>great comments throughout. First of all, this is funny because

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 3>it's like this is making me question my own memories

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 3>of childhood. I don't recall ever really having an imaginary friend,

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>as I said in the episode. But when you talked

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 3>about the imaginary friend running outside along the highway to

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 3>keep up with the car or zipping along through the

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 3>air to keep up with the car, that that was

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 3>like a lightning bolt in my brain. It was like,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 3>I remember that, and yet I don't remember having an

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 3>imaginary friends. So I don't know what this is. Maybe

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 3>this is just spurring a false memory because of the

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>vividness of it. But this, yeah, I felt this rumbling

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>in my in my heart.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, vaguely stirs something in my recollection as well. Maybe

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 2>something going on early as we adjust to the weirdness

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 2>of writing and high speed vehicles and then we lose

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the novelty of it. As as we grow older. Now,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>as for yes, this is a this is a pretty

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 2>fun movie. There was a MSG three K treatment of

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 2>this many years back, and that's the only way I've

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 2>ever seen it, but I remember it within that context

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 2>is being pretty fun and it's got I think Red

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Brown's in it in a supporting role, so it's got

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that going for it. Perfect that snake man.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I've been thinking that at some point we need to

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 3>do like a month of Reb Brown, because you know,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 3>we've done themes before. We've done like tiny People movies

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 3>back to back, and I think we could do a

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Reb Brown theme. I've definitely been wanting to do one

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 3>of the non MCU Captain America movies, and one of

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 3>them stars Reb Brown.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>There's another.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Then there's the other one directed by Albert Payune in

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 3>like nineteen ninety or whatever. I've seen the latter, not

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 3>the former, but I want to talk about them both.

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're a number of Reb I don't we haven't

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 2>done a Reb Brown film, have we. I don't recall.

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he's just come up in Connections. But yeah,

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean so many strong, strong film choices there, including

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 2>of course Space Mutiny, You're the Hunter, from the Future.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 3>That's right, We've never covered it on the show, but

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 3>I know I've talked about Your Hunter from the Future

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 3>many times. I think it is my favorite leather diaper

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 3>barbarian movie. So it's got all the barbarian tropes. It's

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:04.959
<v Speaker 3>got him in the in the you know, speed out

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 3>in the leather speedo killing dinosaurs with a sword. But

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>it also is Star Wars. The villain of Your Hunter

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 3>from the Future is Darth Vader.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know is actually Red Brown's cinematic debut. Yeah,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy three amazing.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well I have to Okay, we're gonna watch it.

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Then.

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen the MST so I'll be coming and clean.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I vague clear, ma, I just remember the creature mostly.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, Rob, you want to read one of these

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 3>next messages on Pretend to Play. I think we got

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 3>a couple more here.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, here's one from David. David rides in and says,

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 2>dear Robin, Joe, I was listening with interest to your

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>episodes on Pretend Play. I am currently through part two.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>My kids are now young adults at college or working,

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 2>but my recollection of their Pretend Play. My older son

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>had a plushy that he would often have dance around.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 2>My younger son usually didn't engage in the type of

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>play that involved imaginary characters. During yourcussion of object substitution

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>play and fully pretend play, I remember it as type

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 2>of play storytelling we would do. That sort of fell

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>between the two. Since the two of you have kids,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I suspect you were aware of the Richard scary books.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yes, yeah, we have a number of those. We

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 3>have one that's very popular. I think it's called Look

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 3>What's Coming down the Road in Busy Town, and it's

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 3>an alphabet book about different types of cars coming down

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the road. So there's an apple mobile and a banana mobile.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Most of them are not real types of cars, but

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 3>some are. I think at this firetruck.

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the apple mobile's driven by worm, I believe. Yeah.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 3>And there's like a xylophone mobile.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Preposterous. Well, they continue For those who don't know, these

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 2>are mostly picture books filled with complex scenes, usually of

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>everyday life, such as shopping at a grocery store, workers

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>at a construction site, or driving on the freeway, but

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 2>with anthromorphized animals rabbits, bears, dogs instead of people. There

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>would be a sentence or two of story for ea scene,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 2>but also most of the things in a scene would

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>be labeled the common noun in courier font below the

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 2>object in the picture. A favorite bedtime activity was, instead

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of simply my reading them the story in the book,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>to make up a story about the various characters in

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the book, but using the scenes or objects shown in

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>the book. For example, I might ask where the animals

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 2>are going to go today, and one would say the

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>grocery store. So I would start by turning to a

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 2>page showing the cross section of a house, point to

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 2>an animal, say a dog shown sweeping in a bed,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and tell a story about dog getting out of bed,

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 2>taking a shower, going downstairs to have breakfast. Then I

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>turned to another page that had a picture of another animal,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>say a rabbit driving a car, and I'd say something like,

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 2>here's dog's friend, rabbit. He's a teenager, so he can

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 2>drive a car, and then describe rabbit driving the car

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 2>up to dog's house and dog getting in the car.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Then I might ask a question for them to help

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 2>form the story, like do they need to take the

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 2>freeway to get to the grocery store? And if yes,

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I turned to the picture of the freeway and talk

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>about them driving and some of the crazy things they'd see.

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I am interested in your reaction and thoughts here. It

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 2>is sort of like your toy lightsaber example, and that

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>there is a particular image of a thing, say the dog,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 2>that is part of the story, but then the activities

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 2>in the story need to be imagined more like the

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 2>fully pretend play. And as an even broader issue, did

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 2>you come across any discussion in your research about the

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 2>relationship of storytelling to theory of mine. I suspect that

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>listening to stories, hearing descriptions of other characters making decisions

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>based on their own emotions and own mental states would

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 2>help children develop a theory of mine. Thanks for the

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>great podcast and infotainment, David.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for the message, David. In response to your

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 3>later question about whether there's a link between storytelling and

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 3>theory of mind, we did talk about that sum in

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>at least one of the episodes in the series. I

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it was one of the ones you

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>hadn't heard yet, but my memory of this issue is

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 3>that essentially, yes, it does look based on so results

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>like there could be a link there, but the evidence

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 3>is sort of weak. So it's one of those things that, yeah,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 3>it's quite possible there's a link, but we shouldn't have

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 3>super high confidence about that. I recall one of the

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 3>things was just like a study actually not in children,

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>but in adults that tried to see if there was

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 3>any link between reading fiction and then better theory of

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 3>mind skills and adults. And this study found that they

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 3>at least thought that there was.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, but at any rate, I love this creative

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>storytelling exercise of you using the Richard Scary books or

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 2>anything like them to sort of come up with these

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:46.479
<v Speaker 2>little stories and decide what's happening. I recently granted this

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 2>is my child is twelve going on thirteen now, But

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 2>during the recent snow we busted out another one of

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>these puzzles by the Magic Puzzle Company. You can look

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 2>them up in the Magic Puzzle Company, and they have

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>these one wonderful puzzles that are just so it's custom

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 2>art work for the puzzle. It's not like some other

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 2>piece of work that's been adapted to the puzzle. So

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 2>they put a lot of effort into making sure that

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 2>almost every piece has something interesting going on to it.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Little pieces have cute little characters or mysterious little characters. Overall,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>very cute, very imaginative vibe, think like adventure time, that

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing, And they're a real joy to put

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 2>together because everything seems to have a story, there's a

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>big reveal that happens, and so you spend a lot

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 2>of time with your family, friends, or fellow puzzlers whoever

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>they happen to be not only piecing together the physical

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 2>jigsaw puzzle, but also piecing together whatever kind of magical

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 2>narrative seems to be happening. Who what are the factions here,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 2>what are they trying to do? Who is this guy?

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Who is this other guy? And so forth. So that

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>experience reminds me a little bit about what you're talking

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>about here. Well.

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also, David, I can say that we do

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 3>a similar thing in our household. I don't think we

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 3>get quite as elaborate with the you know, the the

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 3>jumping off storytelling as you're describing here, at least not yet.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 3>But we do a lot of embellishing as we read books.

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>So when I read a book to my daughter, I

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 3>will ask her questions about things that are not contained

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 3>in the story of the book. Is just like, oh,

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 3>are these two characters friends? What do they do together?

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 3>You know that kind of thing, And she does like

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 3>to embellish on that sort of thing usually, you know,

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 3>what do they do together?

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>They play? What do they play? Dinosaurs? All right, what

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 2>do we have next here? Oh, let's see.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 3>We got a message about pretend to play from frequent

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 3>correspondent Renata. Renata says, Hi, guys, the topic of play,

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 3>and particularly imaginative play, is near and dear to my heart.

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I could listen to ten stuff to blow your mind

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 3>episodes on this topic and write you ten letters, but

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I'll try to keep it brief for now. First of all,

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I had a bee friend. Oh yeah, Rob, we talked

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>about be friends. Ranada's befriend, She says. His name was Buzz. Basically,

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 3>any rotund, bumblebee I found hanging on the side of

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the house was Buzz. I don't remember having in depth

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 3>conversations with Buzz, but I acted as though he was

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>a single bee who remembered me and was my friend.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I also had a friend who was a ghost named Boo.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I was not very creative with naming my imaginary friends.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Apparently.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I am the youngest of four and fairly sure. I'm

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 3>the only one who had any imaginary friends. Incidentally, my father,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 3>in his sixties befriended a mouse he named Kluegie. My

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 3>dad insists he was friends with this mouse for seven

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 3>years and that he knew it was the same mouse

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>because of a kink in its tail for a period

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 3>of a couple of years. During this time, Kloogie did

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 3>live in a cage but got loose often. I think

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 3>that this gets at the blurriness you touched on concerning

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the subtle difference between a pet and an imaginary friend.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>In college, I spent a semester working with Pascal Boyer,

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 3>who is well known for his work in the anthropology

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>of religion, but at the time he was exploring children's

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 3>beliefs about what objects can have sentients and how that

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 3>relates to theory of mind. For example, why is the

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 3>idea of a sentient helicopter perfectly acceptable to children? What

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 3>can the sentient helicopter know and do that regular helicopters can't, And,

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 3>as you bring up in the episode, how close do

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 3>these pretend sentient objects come to being gods or spiritual beings?

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>A related topic I like to ponder is why do

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 3>children today love dinosaurs and vehicles like trucks and helicopters?

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Are they somehow easier to personify than other objects and animals?

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Before it was dinosaurs and trucks, What were kids obsessed with. Finally,

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering, if you're going to touch on pro wrestle,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe you still will. Ben has gotten me into wrestling,

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 3>which we see in Milwaukee a couple of times a year,

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 3>and we saw in Japan last summer. I find that

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>being at a wrestling event is one of the few

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>times as an adult that comes close to that feeling

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 3>of pretend play from childhood. You brought up other types

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 3>of adult play like theater and sports, and wrestling is

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 3>definitely those things, but it's also an invitation to the

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 3>audience to play and participate in the pretend That feels unique.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>My new favorite wrestler is Dan the Dad. His persona

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>is he is your dad. Yes, it gets weird, but

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 3>he probably got the most enthusiasm from the crowd at

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the last event we went to because he's a relatable character.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's the good guy. No one wants to

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 3>see their dad get punched anyway. Excited for the remainder

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 3>of the pretend play episodes, and I couldn't wait to

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 3>write in all the best renata m Rob, you're the

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 3>one with the wrestling knowledge.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know Dan the dad, but I'm vaguely aware. Yeah,

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen them perform, but yeah, there are a

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of kookie characters like this, especially in the ndie scene.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I mean you deal with something like wrestling,

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with that, you know, that willing suspension of disbelief,

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>which you know is obviously there in other mediums as well.

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly there in film, for example. But uh, yeah,

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess there is something about like the live wrestling

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>experience where the crowd is participating to a certain degree,

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 2>they are engaged in the k fabe reality. So yeah,

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that's probably worth thinking about. It does have its own

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of unique flavor that doesn't compare one to one

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>with anything else out there. I mean, that's why it's

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 2>so popular and it remains popular, and I think that's

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 2>also why you do find plenty of examples of it

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 2>sucking new people in. Like it's it's not just this

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 2>niche thing that you have to have grown up up

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>on it and be primed you know, I have no

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>numerous people who take in a show when they go

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>to say Mexico City, or they go to Tokyo or

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else in Japan, and you know, they have the

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to go to a live show and it's a

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun. So yeah, live pro wrestling is can

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>be pretty neat, so you know, shop around, but try

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 2>one out if you're interested.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people who are not into

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 3>it and then first sort of discover it as adults

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>are surprised to find how much drama there is in it,

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 3>like comedy and drama. Like they think of it primarily

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>just as the wrestling, the physical activity, you know, the

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 3>moves and the flips and all that, and don't realize

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 3>how much talking there is, and you know.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>That it's like a soap opera.

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 3>There are these relationships and sort of hyping and talking

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 3>up matches and establishing conflicts and that a lot of

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 3>it is very funny.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, honestly some of the I haven't done tons

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of live but of the shows I've been to, the

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>most fun I've found. The matches have all been like

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 2>lower card matches, so not you know, it's not some

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of like a main storyline, not a not any

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a championship match, not even like you know,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the top performers in a given promotion. But they're just

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 2>putting on a fun match. They're engaging with the crowd

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to a certain degree. They're throwing in some humor and

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 2>some stupid slapstick. And really those are the matches that

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I've enjoyed the most, far more than any of the

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 2>main events.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the lower card matches. Again, I don't have as

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 3>much wrestling experience as you, but they seem to me

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 3>often more like this is when you bring out the

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 3>zany characters, like the you know, the equivalent the wrestling

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 3>equivalent of the character in a Coen Brothers movie who

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 3>has six lines, but as hilarious and you remember them exactly.

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, here's another and this one is in response

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to our episodes on Sacred Trees. This was another one

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of our series in the latter half of the previous year.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>This one comes to us from Rodri. Rodri writes in

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and says, Hi, Robert, Joe, and JJ I've been a

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 2>listener since the stuff from the Science Lab days. That

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>was the original title of this podcast. This podcast feed

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 2>back in the very early days, back when you really

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 2>had to describe and explain what a podcast was to

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>everyone you knew they continue, but I've never had a

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 2>good enough reason to contribute to listener mail. That all

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 2>changed when I heard the episodes on Sacred Trees and

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 2>especially in light of Robert Trees and exploits in Wales.

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I live in Swansea in South Wales and grew up here.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 2>When we were kids, our dad often took my brother

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 2>and I to visit all kinds of natural and historical

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 2>places in South and West Wales. One of these places

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>of interest was a small eleventh century church in the

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 2>village of Nevern. Never In is situated in the west

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of Whales, in an area rich in historical and natural wonders.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Apart from the castles and dramatic landscapes, it is near

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to the site where the famous bluestones of Stonehenge were quarried.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 2>It is still something of a mystery how the two

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.919
<v Speaker 2>to five ton stone pillars were transported five thousand years

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>ago the one hundred and eighty miles from the Priscilli

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Hills to Stonehenge. The reason he took us there was

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to see the bleeding yew tree in Saint Brannock's Church.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>The tree is one of four gnarled and ancient ewes

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 2>lining the path to the church, each said to be

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred years old. The blood oozes from the sight

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.479
<v Speaker 2>of an amputated limb a dark red sap that leaves

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>vivid streaks down the trunk. You wood is red, but

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the sap is usually white. So there has been no

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>satisfactory explanation for the phenomenon. It has of corresponded many legends.

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 2>The most popular reason is that the tree started bleeding

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 2>in sympathy for Jesus as he was crucified. Sounds likely.

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably it. Continue. The church itself has

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 2>many other historic features, several inscriptions written within the church

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 2>written in Augham, the ancient Celtic writing system, and a

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 2>large stone cross decorated with intricate Celtic not designs. But

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 2>as the Never and Castle website laments quote, the church

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>has become a favorite on the tourist trail in West Wales.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 2>The numbers signing the visitor's book would suggest about fifteen

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 2>thousand a year. Unfortunately, their interest is drawn to the

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 2>so called bleeding you more than the Christian heritage and

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>relevance of the place. They're mad. Yeah, I mean, I

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 2>accept any blame that may be appropriate for being a

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 2>tourist in Wales, though I don't think I know we

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 2>did not get to see the bleeding YOUW tree. I

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>would have probably gone for it. Sorry. You trees are

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 2>commonly found in graveyards throughout the UK, Ireland and parts

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 2>of Europe, and the folklore surrounding the species is fascinating,

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 2>worthy of another episode in the Sacred Tree series. If

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 2>I may be so bold, you was doxically symbolic of

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 2>good and bad luck, of death or eternal life. The

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 2>U is one of Ireland's five magical trees, and there

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 2>are many suggestions why they are so often found in cemeteries.

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Norman churches were often located near the sites of older

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 2>sacred temples, and the U was imported to Druids, who

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>viewed it as an emblem of the soul's immortality. It

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 2>has been proposed that because you would was used to

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 2>make long bows, planting them could provide a supply to

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>protect the church and surrounding areas. Another idea is that

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 2>they were grown to discourage local farmers grazing their livestock

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 2>in the church grounds. According to Britain's Best Guides dot

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Org quote, there have been many practical reasons for planting

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 2>ewes near to dead bodies. U seeds, needles, and bark

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 2>carry an alkaloid poison called taxine that would kill cattle

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 2>that graze on them. According to one study, a dose

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 2>of one hundred grams of chopped leaves could kill an adult.

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a fine reason to keep cattle out of graveyards,

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 2>helping to preserve the ground and the bodies beneath. Some

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 2>people even believe that the ues produced these poisons from

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the vapors escaping from the graves. The toxicity was well known.

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>The witches in Shakespeare's Metbeth concoct a poisonous brew, including

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 2>slips of U silvered in the moon's eclipse. Really, rodri

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 2>here has done our research for us here. There's some

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>more material there sighting here. In her book The Folklore

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of Plants, Margaret Baker says, quote, Finnman believed that witches

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 2>sheltered under ues, and sensible people should avoid them. In Brittany,

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 2>a churchyard, U spread a root to the mouth of

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 2>every corpse buried there sprigs of you hang from Spanish

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 2>balconies against lightning and hebridine thatch against fire over the

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 2>kneading trough Easter gathered you prevents heavy bread. Hmm, hey,

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want that heavy bread. How Marie Trevelyan wrote in

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Folklore and Folk Stories of Whales in nineteen oh nine, quote,

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the U was regarded as the gentle guardian of the

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 2>dead and was formally revered so much in Wales that

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 2>to cut it down was considered an act of desecration,

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>while to burn any part of it was looked upon

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 2>as sacrilege. I could go on, but I'm in danger

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 2>of getting lost down this rabbit hole forever, so I'll

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 2>leave it there. Cheers Rodri.

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you so much, Rodri. Amazing message and full

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of interesting folklore there.

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 3>Actually I remember looking a bit at the U tree

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 3>when we were doing the Sacred Trees episode, but didn't

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 3>end up selecting that as my main research focus.

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 2>But we could absolutely come back to that, absolutely. Yeah,

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I too glanced at some of the sources on the you.

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Some of the sources I was looking at regarding the

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 2>trees we did cover like they also discussed the U.

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so yeah, all right, this next message comes to

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 3>us from Jeff. This is in response to a few

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 3>different things. One is our Christmas is an episode on

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Christmas Trees in the Deep in which we talked about

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the biology of various undersea organisms like certain tube worms

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 3>and seaweed which resemble or are named after Christmas decorations.

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 3>This one also touches on rock and roll, wolf and

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 3>other subjects. Jeff says subject line Easter eggs and Troubled Kids.

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Hey guys, just catching up on the holiday episodes. Your

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 3>episode on Sunken Christmas Trees reminded me of something I

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 3>saw regarding the harvesting of herring eggs in Sitka Sound

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 3>in Alaska, although this is done closer to Easter than Christmas.

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 3>When the herring spawn in the springtime, the locals will

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 3>submerge stuff such as kelp tree branches and sometimes entire

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 3>trees in the sound. The herring eggs will stick to

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 3>anything in the water, and when they're pulled up, they

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>look like they've been tinseled or maybe timpurud. With glistening

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 3>fish eggs. They look absolutely delicious and are considered quite

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the treat. Although I suppose it's also possible that it's

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 3>a super fishy acquired taste situation.

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 2>I hope to find out someday.

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 3>And then Rabbi looked up an image of this and

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 3>included it here in the outline. So this is somebody

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 3>who has submerged some tree branches, look like some spruce branches,

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 3>into the water and pulled them up. I perfectly described

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 3>to Jeff. They looked tempora battered and fried.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 2>They really did look delicious.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Making me hungry right now, crunchy. Then Jeff goes on

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 3>even more tangentially. In the Weird House episode on Rock

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 3>and Roll Wolf, you discussed the fairy tale of the

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Wolf and the Seven Kids. This is the fairy tale

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 3>that that movie was loosely based on. Jeff says, I

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 3>don't think this one is very popular in America, and

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 3>I certainly never heard of it when I was a kid.

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting how some oji Esop's fables and grim tails

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 3>resonate in some cultures but not others. Now, Jeff has

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 3>some other great stuff in this message, but I'm gonna

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 3>skip over it because it contained some spoilers for a

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Japanese novel. The novel is called The Lonely Castle in

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the Mirror by an author named Mizuki Sujimura, and apparently

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 3>there's also an anime film adaptation of this novel. I'm

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.959
<v Speaker 3>not familiar at all, but it sounds very interesting based

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 3>on Jeff's description, and apparently the fairy tale The Wolf

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 3>and Seven Goats plays a role in.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 2>The plot of this story.

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 3>But Jeff wraps up by saying, anyway, that was quite

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 3>the digression. But what I really meant to say was

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 3>thanks for all the mental stimulation you gift us with

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 3>every week looking forward to a new year of stuff. Jeff,

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much.

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Jeff. Yeah, awesome. I had to look up this manga

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 2>and film adaptation. I'm not familiar with these, but I'll

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 2>have to put it on the list. There's so many,

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 2>so much great Japanese media that I still need to

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>get to. I'm constantly adding new things. I just watched

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Cats on Park Avenue, though, so I'm one ahead on

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 2>all the great Japanese classics, especially in terms of cat

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 2>based musicals. I'm gonna have to check that one out.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 2>It's very sweet. If you want a what an eighties

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 2>musical that's all about street cats, It's it's really the

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 2>only film for you. Perfect all right, Let's go ahead

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and skip on to some Weird House cinema listener mail.

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 2>This one comes to us from Stephen. Steven says, Hey,

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe and Robert, I have to say your episode's on

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Weird House are so in depth, colorful, thorough and engaging

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 2>that I often don't feel a need to go watch

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the movies you discuss. Well, I don't know. It feels

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 2>like it's kind of a failure on our part. Then wait,

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 2>is it? You can watch them if you want to,

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>not if you don't, But I don't want to make it.

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, the situation where people like I don't need

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to watch that now because they watched it for me.

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's fine, But anyway, Stephen says, this is

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 2>because your journey through the movies is an artful form

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 2>of entertainment all on its own. I sometimes think watching

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the film would be a disappointment after the movie that's

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 2>played in my head listening to you guys discussing it.

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Steven, You're very kind. I guess I can imagine.

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 2>It does remind me, for instance, of the example of

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 2>growing up hearing other kids talk about horror movies that

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't seen. And you know what I ended up

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 2>in my building, up in my head was far more

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:20.320
<v Speaker 2>frightening than anything that was actually in most of these films.

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's true. I think we've discussed that before.

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, one thing I will say, playing off of

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Stephen's comment here, is that I think that how good

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 3>our weird house cinema episodes are is not necessarily related

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 3>to how good the movie is. You know, Like I

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 3>feel like some of my favorite episodes that we've done

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 3>have been about some of the Duller movies that we've covered.

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes they just are fun to talk about.

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I mean, in a great movie, it might

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 2>make for a really fun episode and that we really

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>get to gush about it, or maybe it has really

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting connections, or there's some sort of social commentary going on.

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of fun to discuss. But I don't know,

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>there are plenty of films and great weird films that

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 2>we haven't covered in part because it's like, well it's great,

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 2>we talk about how great it is. But I don't know,

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you have to find the right balance.

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't mean to suggest the inverse either.

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the worse a movie is the better

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 3>an episode.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 2>It makes.

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 3>It just feels like is kind of unrelated to the

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 3>quality of the film.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I agree, all right, Steven continues says, Anyway,

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I have to recommend a movie for you. I'm not

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 2>sure it's up to snuff for an episode, but I

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 2>do think it's so outlandish, derivative and not quite brilliant

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 2>that I have to at least tell you about it.

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It's called Revenge of the Radioactive Reporter nineteen ninety. I

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 2>watched it almost the whole way through, and every couple

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 2>of minutes some action or line of dialogue was so

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 2>stupid that I was surprised constantly and even laughed a

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 2>fair amount, probably an uncomfortable laugh, but laughter. Nonetheless, I'd

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.280
<v Speaker 2>caught it for free last year in English on YouTube,

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's been removed. I hope you can

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 2>find a decent copy of it, queue it up for someone,

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and enjoy the odd rid it offers. Thanks for so

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 2>many years of high quality edutainment on your show. Whenever

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 2>someone asked me what podcast I listened to, Yours is

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 2>the first I mentioned, Stephen, Are you not edutained? Well,

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I have never heard of this film. I'm looking at

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 2>it now, and I recognize no one involved in it,

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 2>so I am intrigued on that alone. Yeah, from the

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 2>director of nothing else that I've seen.

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for the recommendation, Stephen. We'll have to give

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 3>it a look. Oh, here's a very brief message from

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a different Stephen.

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Stephen All.

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 3>The message says is I recently watched Dracula's Dog aka

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Zoltan colon hound of Dracula and feel it would be

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 3>right up your guys, Ali, your guys Ali. And then

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 3>Stephen this difference even just attaches a poster where we

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 3>get Dracula's dog and kind of the oh, is that

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 3>a calligraphy font or is that in frocture perhaps you know,

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 3>it's something that looks like pen strokes. And then we

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 3>get Dracula standing in a big ball of fire and

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 3>he's got his arms outstretched and a head of a

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:24.919
<v Speaker 3>Doberman or something like that in the foreground, with pure

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 3>white eyes and fangs.

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 3>The the tagline is there's more to the legend than

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 3>meets the throat.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Very clever.

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 3>This has come up on the show several times. We

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 3>keep getting connections to Dracula's Dog.

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 2>How do we get there? I don't remember the exact connections,

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, it's come up a number of times. I

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 2>think I falsely referred to it as Zoltan Colon Dracula's

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 2>actual dog once, so that that alternative titles stuck in

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 2>my head. It's just such a ridiculous concept, and I

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 2>am intrigued. I love I love the Dracula adaptation, but

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I really love of Dracula adaptations that are multiple steps

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 2>removed from the source material.

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It's absurd, but it's also a logical progression because you

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 3>get right of Frankenstein, then you get son of Frankenstein,

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 3>daughter of Dracula. You kind of exhaust all of the

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 3>immediate family relations there, and so what's next. Are you

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna go uncle of Dracula, No, you go Dracula's dog.

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Plus, it also seems like it's maybe a crossover situation

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 2>here with this film, because it is definitely a vampire film,

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's also like a nineteen seventies doberman'sploitation picture, you know,

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there were a lot of scary Doberman's

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.919
<v Speaker 2>going on in nineteen seventies motion pictures. I guess I'm

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking mostly like the Boys from Brazil, but there are

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 2>multiple other examples that I feel like some chase James

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Bond a little later in the nineteen eighties, but.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 3>In Moonrakers Drags You'd played by Michael Lonsdale.

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 2>He's got a couple of killer dogs that in that.

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 3>I watched a lot of James Bond movies when I

0:48:57.960 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 3>was a kid. I don't know if that was a

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 3>good influencer not probably not. But one thing I really

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 3>remember being scary was that there's like a lady in

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 3>moon Breaker who the villain just like sicks his dogs

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 3>on to kill her.

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 2>It was horrifying. Yeah, Like growing up watching that and

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:16.759
<v Speaker 2>various other seventies pictures prepared me for the idea that

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Doberman's were scary monsters. And then when I think it

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:26.479
<v Speaker 2>was when I first started seeing my future wife, her

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 2>parents had I just completely terrifying Doberman to be clear,

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Like I think, you know a Doberman that had been

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 2>through a lot before it was adopted, you know, but

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 2>more afraid of people than I was of it. But

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I was pretty afraid of it because I found this

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Doberman rather terrifying, and it seemed to back up everything

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 2>that these films taught me. To believe about them. That

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 2>doberman eventually died and they got a new Doberman who

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 2>was very sweet, So that changed. That helped soothe my

0:49:57.239 --> 0:50:02.399
<v Speaker 2>understanding of the breed. Dracula's dog. However, Zultan does look

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.280
<v Speaker 2>like a complete nightmare. This is a bad dog. Yeah.

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 3>Does it not matter if you hold out your hand

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to let him sniff you first, all the etiquette fails.

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't invite him in. Oh here's another one, another

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 2>weird house when this one comes from Dick subject, didn't

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone's ancestors come over on the sandwich? There? Am I

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 2>missing something? Kudos on your excellent episode on Innerspace. I

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 2>never thought of it as a weird house type film,

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.439
<v Speaker 2>but there it was. Ride in plain sight this whole

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 2>time special thanks to David Streepy. Great job. Yeah, this

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 2>was a weird house episode where David Streepy friend and

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 2>fellow podcasts who joined me on the show to discuss

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 2>let him pick out a film. He picked Innerspace and yeah, Interspace,

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 2>whatever your memories of it are, it's a pretty weird film.

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty bonkers and has a one of the stranger

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 2>love trying I think ever committed to cinema.

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Is that the shrink and go inside a body movie

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 3>that's intentionally funny, or the one that's not intentionally fun.

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's it's intentionally funny. It's Joe Dante, so it

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:15.800
<v Speaker 2>does you know, it certainly doesn't reach Grimlins two heights

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:20.360
<v Speaker 2>of hilarity, but it goes for it. It's it's pretty

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 2>bonkers and just keeps laying, adding layer upon layer of bonkers.

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And the reference didn't Everyone's ancestors come over on the

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 2>sandwich that's from Futurama. We were talking about how we

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.880
<v Speaker 2>haven't really had a shrink movie in a while with

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 2>miniaturization and then insert into the human body, but over

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 2>in previous decades, and I guess this is several decades

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 2>back now. With a Futurama example, you did have that

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 2>episode where Fry gets intestinal worms from eating a sandwich

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 2>that he buys out of a I believe a bathroom

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 2>condom machine, and he gets the worms. The worms make

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 2>him super intelligent, and his friends have to go in

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and like take out the warm colony.

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, I was just trying to think of the name

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of this other movie. The other shrink can go inside

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 3>a body in a submarine movie. Is it Fantastic Voyage that's.

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Got rockel welch. Yes, Yeah, Fantastic Voyage is the big one,

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's the granddaddy of all miniaturization films. I was

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a huge fan of that one growing up. I read

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Isaac Asimov's novelization. Yeah, I mean that without Fantastic Voyage

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:30.919
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't have things like Innerspace obviously, but I haven't

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:34.399
<v Speaker 2>seen nineteen sixty six. Is Fantastic Voyage in quite a while?

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Probably merits a revision. Donald Pleasance is in it. That's right,

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 2>all right. Well, on that note, we're gonna ahead wrap

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:45.240
<v Speaker 2>up this episode of Stuff to Will Your Mind. Listener mail,

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back with a new core episode this Thursday.

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll I think you'll find it to be

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 2>a sweet selection. In the meantime, feel free to write

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in with other thoughts on any of the episodes we

0:52:58.040 --> 0:52:59.959
<v Speaker 2>talked about here, any of the topics we talked about

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 2>here past episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, Weird House, Artifact,

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Monster Fact, It's all fair game, as well as recommendations

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 2>or suggestions for future episodes films for Weird House. All

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 2>of it is fair game. Let's see a few links

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to throw out. We're on Instagram, STBYM Podcasts. You can

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 2>find us there. You can find us on multiple social

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 2>media accounts. We haven't added any new ones. I know

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:28.239
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of energy out there to sign up

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 2>for new things. I don't know that I have that

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 2>energy to sign up for new things, but the accounts

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 2>that exist are being updated. For Weird House Cinema, we

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 2>are on letterboxed. You can find us there. Our username

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 2>is weird House and that's a cool way to keep

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 2>up with what we're doing on the Weird House Cinema episodes.

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 2>We have an ongoing list of all the movies we've

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 2>covered over the years, as well as sometimes a peek

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 2>ahead at what's coming up next.

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh hey, and can we add While we're talking about

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 3>following accounts, it's a great thing to just subscribe to

0:53:58.160 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 3>our feed and get all the episodes right in your

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 3>podcast app if obviously, if you don't want to, you

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:04.799
<v Speaker 3>don't have to. But if you're an a la cart

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 3>listener and you like the show you want to help

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 3>us out, A good thing you could do would just

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 3>be subscribe. Make sure you're always getting new episodes when

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 3>they when they publish.

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 2>That's right. That's ultimately more important than all the social

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:15.640
<v Speaker 2>media nonsense.

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, huge, Thanks as always to our excellent audio producer

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:23.319
<v Speaker 3>JJ Posway. If you would like to get in touch

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:25.359
<v Speaker 3>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 3>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 3>say hello, you can email us at contact at stuff

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 3>to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.360
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.