Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Mark Moss Show,
Speaker 1: where we talk about the decentralized revolution that is sweeping
Speaker 1: the world right now. Of course, we always look at
Speaker 1: it through the lens of politics, finance, and technology, because
Speaker 1: those are the drivers of real change. And from a
Speaker 1: cycle's perspective, looking back through thousands of years of history,
Speaker 1: we can see that these are repeating cycles. On a
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty year timeframe, we have political revolutions,
Speaker 1: eighty year timeframe, financial revolutions, fifty year timeframe, technological revolutions,
Speaker 1: and all three are converging right now. Now. I've done
Speaker 1: a lot of talk about this, and it's understand it's
Speaker 1: important to understand this because it not only tells us
Speaker 1: how we got here, more importantly tells us what's going
Speaker 1: on right now. And even more importantly than that, it
Speaker 1: tells us where we're going, what we can expect in
Speaker 1: the future. And so it's important to look at that.
Speaker 1: And you know, over the last two years or so,
Speaker 1: I've done a lot of work on this, a lot
Speaker 1: of work on the cycles. I've been on numerous shows
Speaker 1: talking about the and so forth. I've even started writing
Speaker 1: a book that is still in its emphasy stage. But
Speaker 1: one of the topics that I really kind of go
Speaker 1: into and where I think this is headed is something
Speaker 1: I want to talk about today, and it's something really,
Speaker 1: really big, and I've framed it up in a few interviews.
Speaker 1: One of the best interviews I had it's on a
Speaker 1: podcast called What Bitcoin Did. You could just search Mark
Speaker 1: Moss What Bitcoin Did? And we've done a three part series.
Speaker 1: But the first one is the Battle for the fate
Speaker 1: of humanity. And I know this sounds like a really
Speaker 1: big hyperbolee, like come on, Mark, You're like, you're what
Speaker 1: are you talking about? But I believe that the battle
Speaker 1: for the fate of humanity will be fought over the
Speaker 1: next couple of years. And so what do I mean
Speaker 1: by that, Well, if you go back through thousands of
Speaker 1: years of history, you'll see that it's just a repeating
Speaker 1: cycle over and over and over where we have humans
Speaker 1: have freedom, and then a group of people comes and
Speaker 1: oppresses them, and eventually the oppression gets so bad that
Speaker 1: there's a revolution, and then there's freedom again, and then
Speaker 1: eventually another group comes in him oppresses him, oppression gets
Speaker 1: too big, and then eventually there's revolution and it just
Speaker 1: repeats over and over and over and over. Now it
Speaker 1: typically happens on about a two hundred forty year timeframe,
Speaker 1: and we can really look at on like an eighty
Speaker 1: year timeframe. So in an eighty an eighty four year timeframe,
Speaker 1: there's what we call a populist uprising or a regime
Speaker 1: change cycle. So about eighty four years ago was the
Speaker 1: end of World War Two. We had Hitler, we had
Speaker 1: Mussolini in the US, we had FDR's New Deal. About
Speaker 1: eighty four years before that, Karl Marx wrote the famous
Speaker 1: Communist Manifesto, which, by the way, I've written a rebuttal
Speaker 1: to that. It's called The Uncommunist Manifesto. Check it out
Speaker 1: on Amazon. Highly recommend that you read that book, The
Speaker 1: Uncommunist Manifesto. It came out on Amazon last August. Check
Speaker 1: it out. It's about an hour hour and read and
Speaker 1: leave me a comment if you do. But the car
Speaker 1: Marks wrote the Communist Manifesto, which led to the largest
Speaker 1: revolution in European history. So happens eighty four year times,
Speaker 1: but on two three times eighty four equals two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty two. That's the big ones. So two hundred
Speaker 1: fifty years ago was the American Revolution, the French Revolution.
Speaker 1: Two hundrety years before that was the Protestant Reformation. And
Speaker 1: so we see these massive revolutions that happen. But the
Speaker 1: problem that I see is that we can't just look
Speaker 1: at political revolutions on their own. We also have to
Speaker 1: look at financial and we also have to look at
Speaker 1: the technology. And the reason I have to look at
Speaker 1: the technology is because technology is what changes things. Technology
Speaker 1: changes humanity. It changes the way that we organize, change
Speaker 1: the way the communicate, change the way we do commerce,
Speaker 1: changes the way we do everything. And it really has
Speaker 1: this power to create centralization aspects or decentralization aspects. And
Speaker 1: so the technologies that were developed being right now, that
Speaker 1: are being used today and are becoming more and more prevalent,
Speaker 1: and over the next couple of years, I believe could
Speaker 1: achieve some sort of supremacy. I think these technologies could
Speaker 1: change or could end the cycles that have repeated for
Speaker 1: thousands of years. Instead of this, as I said this,
Speaker 1: thousands of years of history of oppression, revolution, freedom, oppression, revolution, freedom, impression, revolution, freedom,
Speaker 1: I think that cycle ends and we either end up
Speaker 1: in permanent slavery with no revolution in sight. Because technology
Speaker 1: will create a way to prevent any type of revolution
Speaker 1: or uprising from ever happening again, or or that doesn't work,
Speaker 1: or we win or we get rid of that and
Speaker 1: we never have to worry about that oppression ever again.
Speaker 1: That's the battle, and it's happening, and it will happen
Speaker 1: over the next couple years. It's happening right now, this
Speaker 1: very minute, and that's what we're gonna talk about today.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna break all of this down to show you
Speaker 1: where we're at right now and what the race is,
Speaker 1: what the battle is, and what's kind of happened over
Speaker 1: the next couple of years, so you can understand exactly
Speaker 1: what this is. I think this is the most important
Speaker 1: topic to talk about period, which of course is what
Speaker 1: I've been talking about it for two years. This is
Speaker 1: the most important topic because, as I said, I think
Speaker 1: this changes the cycle of humanity. So you know, for me,
Speaker 1: I'm good man, I'm good I got enough money, I'm
Speaker 1: old enough. I could just go ride this thing out right,
Speaker 1: I'll be dead, let other people deal with it. But
Speaker 1: that ain't cool because I got kids, and hopefully one
Speaker 1: day i'll have grandkids, and you probably have kids and
Speaker 1: hopefully we'll have grandkids one day, and I care about
Speaker 1: all of them. I care about the people that aren't
Speaker 1: even born yet. And I want to change this battle.
Speaker 1: I want to do my part to shift this power,
Speaker 1: this balance of power that's leading into this battle for
Speaker 1: the fate of humanity. So let's talk about this four minutes.
Speaker 1: So what am I talking about. Well, I'm talking about
Speaker 1: technology and how it reshapes society. And I'm talking about
Speaker 1: this technology that's going into place right now that could
Speaker 1: potentially put us into this matrix type world where we're
Speaker 1: never able to come out of it. So, for example,
Speaker 1: we know that Facebook has been using AI algorithms since
Speaker 1: two sixteen, maybe sooner, but we know at least twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen to change the way we think. Specifically, they've run
Speaker 1: lots of tests to change our emotions, to change our behaviors,
Speaker 1: to make us sad, to make us happy, to make
Speaker 1: us stressed out, whatever it is. And they've done lots
Speaker 1: of tests on this. And so they show you certain
Speaker 1: types of content and then waterfall that content to kind
Speaker 1: of build and build a build to get certain emotions
Speaker 1: out of you. So we know that we know they
Speaker 1: can manipulate our feelings, but they also manipulate the data
Speaker 1: that we see. So we know now. Mark Zuckerberg was
Speaker 1: on Joe Rogan talking about how the FBI was working
Speaker 1: with Facebook to censor information, so they don't want you
Speaker 1: to see certain information, or they do want you to
Speaker 1: see other information. We know that also the same thing
Speaker 1: happened on Twitter. I've talked about it extensively on this
Speaker 1: show with the Twitter file. Since Elon Musk has taken
Speaker 1: over Twitter, he's basically opened up, pulled back the curtains,
Speaker 1: and he's released tons and tons and tons of data
Speaker 1: of actual text messages, emails, etc. Of government officials coercing
Speaker 1: Twitter to change the way you think, to censor the
Speaker 1: information that you see, to control the narrative, to take
Speaker 1: people off that are saying things they don't want them
Speaker 1: to hear. And so the problem is is that as
Speaker 1: this technology grows, as we depend more and more on
Speaker 1: technologies like social media and we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: AI in a minute, as we depend more on these technologies,
Speaker 1: the people that control them have massive amounts of control.
Speaker 1: So how does oppression and then revolution happened. Well, people
Speaker 1: living under heavy oppression aren't happy and they start talking
Speaker 1: about it. They start seeing how other people are living
Speaker 1: or how people lived in the past, and they wish
Speaker 1: that they could have that themselves. If I could only
Speaker 1: have that, if we could only go back to that time.
Speaker 1: And then I start talking about it, and then those
Speaker 1: ideas spread, and then other people hear what I'm talking about,
Speaker 1: and then they also want to go back to that.
Speaker 1: And so if they could keep us from ever seeing
Speaker 1: how other people are living, if they could keep us
Speaker 1: from ever remembering how it was in the good old days,
Speaker 1: like changing history that they're doing now, if they could
Speaker 1: prevent us from communicating and sharing those ideas with others,
Speaker 1: they could prevent that revolution from ever happening again. And
Speaker 1: it's just getting started. Wait till you hear about the
Speaker 1: technology that's in place right now, already being used, and
Speaker 1: what the plans are for this. If you're just tuning in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Arms Show, we're talking about the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution, and I am shaping up what I am
Speaker 1: calling the battle for the fate of humanity. It's that big.
Speaker 1: And so I'm gonna break this down and explaining what
Speaker 1: I mean, and I'm gonna leave you with hope because
Speaker 1: I do believe that we win. I believe that we
Speaker 1: have the tools. However, it's not guaranteed. It's a big road.
Speaker 1: It's a long road ahead of us. And if we
Speaker 1: do the work, I think we'll win. We have the
Speaker 1: tools to do that. So I'm gonna break all of
Speaker 1: this down for you. It's a big show. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be talking fast. You don't want to miss any of this.
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna take a quick break, but don't go
Speaker 1: away because I'm gonna be right back with more in
Speaker 1: a second. Don't go away, all right, Welcome back. If
Speaker 1: you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show.
Speaker 1: We talk about the decentralized revolution. We look at it
Speaker 1: through lens of politics, finance, and technology, but today specifically,
Speaker 1: we're talking about what I am calling the battle for
Speaker 1: the fate of humanity. And that's big. It's really big,
Speaker 1: and I mean it and this is what I mean.
Speaker 1: And so I'm gonna break this down for you. So
Speaker 1: I was talking about before the break, how tech knowledgy
Speaker 1: is change you think and technology is at this place
Speaker 1: now where the people that control this technology could prevent us,
Speaker 1: the people, we the people from ever uprising against them.
Speaker 1: Ever again, so I've kind of broken it down. Let's
Speaker 1: let's talk about this. So we know I've talked about
Speaker 1: many times. Unless you've been living under a rock, you
Speaker 1: know this that China is a communist country. It's not controversial.
Speaker 1: It's in the name CCB stands the C stands for communist,
Speaker 1: and so of course you would expect them to have
Speaker 1: all types of surveillance and control, which of course they do.
Speaker 1: They have what's called a social credit score system, which
Speaker 1: I'm sure you're familiar with. I'm not going to go
Speaker 1: deep into that, but basically the real high level of
Speaker 1: view of that is that they give you, just like
Speaker 1: you have a credit score based off of how well
Speaker 1: you pay your bills and don't do pay your bills, etc.
Speaker 1: And they give your credit score, and then that credit
Speaker 1: scord determines whether you can do certain things like get
Speaker 1: a new credit card or buy a car. Well, they
Speaker 1: have what's called US credit score, and very similar to
Speaker 1: your regular credit score. It is a score that you
Speaker 1: get individually that allows you to either get access permission
Speaker 1: ability to do certain things. So for example, if I
Speaker 1: do things that they deem to be bad socially, like
Speaker 1: for example, I say mean things about the government, or
Speaker 1: I say mean things about somebody else, or I don't
Speaker 1: pay my electricity bill, all different types of categories they have.
Speaker 1: Of course, mostly it's socially, mostly against the government. If
Speaker 1: I do these types of things, my credit score, my
Speaker 1: social credit score gets deemed, and my social credit score
Speaker 1: could drop and drop and drop, and eventually it drops
Speaker 1: so low that I'm not allowed to get a train ticket,
Speaker 1: I'm not allowed to get a plane ticket, I'm not
Speaker 1: allowed to buy certain things, I'm not allowed to travel,
Speaker 1: I'm not allowed to do all types of things. Now,
Speaker 1: this isn't like eventually it drop so low that most
Speaker 1: people will ever drop that low. No, no, no, no no no.
Speaker 1: In twenty eighteen, I believe it was something like thirty
Speaker 1: five million people. And this is in twenty eighteen. Imagine
Speaker 1: where it's at today. Here we are in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: five years later. But in two thousand and eighteen, something
Speaker 1: like thirty five million Chinese people who had been restricted
Speaker 1: from buying a train ticket because their social credit score
Speaker 1: is too low. I would imagine that's hundreds of millions
Speaker 1: of people today. This isn't just like some little thing. No, no,
Speaker 1: this is really big. Now. They've been doing this for
Speaker 1: a long time, like I said, restricting people's every move
Speaker 1: based off of the social credit score. Now, of course,
Speaker 1: in order to get that social credit score, what do
Speaker 1: they have to do, Well, they have to collect every
Speaker 1: single piece of information on you. They need to know
Speaker 1: every single thing that you search for online, every article
Speaker 1: you read, everything that you look at, everything that you say,
Speaker 1: all your communication online on social media, what you post online,
Speaker 1: what you say between your friends, what you say via
Speaker 1: text message, phone call, all of that data has to
Speaker 1: be collected. Because, of course they don't collect the data,
Speaker 1: how can they give you a rating. So China is
Speaker 1: this giant surveillance state that collects all of this information
Speaker 1: and then of course weaponizes that information on you against you,
Speaker 1: and of course they do because they're a communist country. Now,
Speaker 1: if that sounds good to you, well, then you can
Speaker 1: just move to China. If it doesn't sound good to you,
Speaker 1: like it doesn't sound good to me, then I certainly
Speaker 1: don't want to be a Chinese citizen, And I certainly
Speaker 1: don't want that coming to the Land of the Free,
Speaker 1: to America, I certainly don't want that coming to anywhere
Speaker 1: else in the world. However, some of the most influential
Speaker 1: people in the world do like who well, like our
Speaker 1: good old buddy everybody's favorite, James Bond Villain Clout Schwab,
Speaker 1: head of the World Economic Forum. He said that he
Speaker 1: said that China has a quote very attractive model. He
Speaker 1: praises it. Klaus Schwab says that what China is doing,
Speaker 1: what their social credit core system doing, is amazing. He said,
Speaker 1: it's a model for the world to model for the world. Now,
Speaker 1: not just him, we have Justin Trudeau, the PM of Canada,
Speaker 1: which of course was trained under Klaus Schwab, with the
Speaker 1: world coming for him as one of the young global leaders,
Speaker 1: who has implanted in the government. Per Kloud Schwab's own words,
Speaker 1: that's what he said. And of course we have Justin
Speaker 1: Trudeau also praising China. He said that he said that
Speaker 1: I sometimes wish that we were communists because we would
Speaker 1: have so much more control. Well, of course we'd be
Speaker 1: able to do so much more good, is what he says. Right,
Speaker 1: So they want this, they like this and Kloud Schwab's
Speaker 1: quote a very attractive model. Now what is this model
Speaker 1: that they're talking about. Well, if we dig into this
Speaker 1: just a little bit China. We call it this panopticon,
Speaker 1: this digital panopticon, which is coming for the whole world,
Speaker 1: which is framing up this battle for the fate of humanity.
Speaker 1: And what China wants to do. And Jijingping, the President
Speaker 1: of China, they want to continue to build out this
Speaker 1: technological capability and specifically they want to use artificial intelligence
Speaker 1: to enhance the governments totalitarian control. And even better, they
Speaker 1: want to share it. They want to share it, they
Speaker 1: want to export it. They want to export this technology
Speaker 1: to regimes all around the world. Now they use all
Speaker 1: types of things, all types of what they would consider
Speaker 1: practical innovations, including IRIS, Irish recognition, including that's a retinal scanning,
Speaker 1: all types of cloud based speech synthesis, and all of
Speaker 1: this is spending off Chinese tech giants, AI startups and
Speaker 1: even their own army. Yeah, it's that bad. Now. President
Speaker 1: je has said that he wants China by the year's
Speaker 1: end to be competitive with the world's AI leaders. Now,
Speaker 1: some people might say that China might have already reached that.
Speaker 1: Other people say, no, you know, the US and the
Speaker 1: free world is way too far ahead. But President g
Speaker 1: has said no, this is our goal. This is where
Speaker 1: we're trying to be. And he wants China to achieve
Speaker 1: AI supremacy by twenty thirty. That's his goal. And not
Speaker 1: only do you want to develop it, not only does
Speaker 1: you want to test it, not only you want to
Speaker 1: use it on his own people. He wants to export
Speaker 1: it to a country near you. But it says he
Speaker 1: also wants to use AI's awesome analytical powers to push
Speaker 1: China to the cutting edge of surveillance. Of course, how
Speaker 1: do you control people if you don't survey him? You
Speaker 1: have to see every single move, every single thought, every
Speaker 1: single thought. Think about that, every single thought. Now, I'll
Speaker 1: bring your attention back to where this world that comic
Speaker 1: forums own Nothing and Be Happy came from. It came
Speaker 1: from an article written by I believe it, Ida Alkin,
Speaker 1: who is one of the top people at the WEF.
Speaker 1: And in the article, she opened it up by saying,
Speaker 1: the year is twenty thirty. I have no privacy, I
Speaker 1: own nothing, and I've never been happier, something to that effect.
Speaker 1: And in that she said she owns nothing and she's happy,
Speaker 1: But she also said she has no privacy. And if
Speaker 1: you go through to read that article, it talks about
Speaker 1: how even her dreams are being read, especially has no privacy,
Speaker 1: even her dreams, every single piece of communication, but even
Speaker 1: every thought is being read. And so without this ability
Speaker 1: to surveil, without the ability to see everything the panopticon,
Speaker 1: of course, how they can how can can they control that?
Speaker 1: So Z wants to use the analytical powers of AI
Speaker 1: to be the cutting edge of surveillance, building this all
Speaker 1: seeing digital system of social control patrolled by algorithms that
Speaker 1: identify potential dissenters in real time. Because that's the thing.
Speaker 1: If their ideas were so good, they wouldn't have to
Speaker 1: worry about dissenters. But they do, because of course nobody
Speaker 1: wants their ideas. If you're just tune in and listening
Speaker 1: to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about the battle
Speaker 1: for the fate of humanity that is shaping up over
Speaker 1: the next couple of years. You don't want to miss this.
Speaker 1: It's really big. I have a lot more to cover
Speaker 1: when I come back, so don't go away. I'll be
Speaker 1: right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're just tuning in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. Of course, we
Speaker 1: talk about the decentralized revolution, every week talking about the
Speaker 1: way the world is changing as we look at through
Speaker 1: the lens of politics, finance, and technology, and of course
Speaker 1: today is well we're talking about all three of those
Speaker 1: as we always do, we talk about the convergence of
Speaker 1: those three, and I'm talking about I guess some politics,
Speaker 1: mostly technology, and we're talking about the battle for the
Speaker 1: fate of humanity. If you've missed it, don't worry, I
Speaker 1: got your back. Go check it out on the podcast
Speaker 1: to search the Mark Mass Show, or you can find
Speaker 1: it on YouTube if you search Market Disruptors on YouTube.
Speaker 1: You can watch me and listen to me at the
Speaker 1: same time. But we're talking about china social credit card
Speaker 1: system and what gzping is doing to try to scale
Speaker 1: that and by using AI, this new AI wave that
Speaker 1: we're seeing now, China has this system already. They're trying
Speaker 1: to grow to be bigger and bigger. But China already
Speaker 1: has hundreds of millions, hundreds of millions of surveillance cameras
Speaker 1: everywhere watching every single thing. However, it's not enough. They
Speaker 1: have all these cameras and they need this AI technology
Speaker 1: to parse all this data and put together because what
Speaker 1: they want in the future is for every person who
Speaker 1: enters any space to be instantly identified by an AI
Speaker 1: that could match them to all of their personal data,
Speaker 1: including every text communication, their bodies, their gait, their walk,
Speaker 1: their stride, and even they're one of a kind protein
Speaker 1: construction schema. And it says that China is on is
Speaker 1: on the path to do this, they'll be able to
Speaker 1: string data points from a broad range of sources, including
Speaker 1: travel records, friends, associates, reading habits, purchase habits to predict
Speaker 1: what to predict political resistance before it happens. Pre crime.
Speaker 1: There was a movie from with Tom Cruise called Minority
Speaker 1: Report and it was all about this pre crime, and
Speaker 1: that's exactly what they're talking about. They want to predict
Speaker 1: political resistance before it happens. This is now. First of all,
Speaker 1: I'm reading some of this from this article on the Atlantic,
Speaker 1: and just just so you know, The Atlantic is no
Speaker 1: proponent of freedom. Let's just say that I would consider
Speaker 1: them to be a very very very far leaning left
Speaker 1: outlet news outlet, not a like I said, not a
Speaker 1: fan of freedom necessarily in my opinion, And so for
Speaker 1: them to write this, it's pretty bad. So what they're saying,
Speaker 1: if you're picking up on This is a couple things, right,
Speaker 1: So they want to use precog algorithms to identify potential dissenters,
Speaker 1: dissenters of what, dissenters of the state. Now, if people
Speaker 1: love the state because the state gave them so much value,
Speaker 1: why would they be dissenting from that? Of course, the
Speaker 1: answer is they wouldn't. And here it says to predict
Speaker 1: political resistance before it happens. Why are we dissenting? Why
Speaker 1: are we resisting the political system? Well, because they're forcing
Speaker 1: us to do things we don't want to do. Now,
Speaker 1: I can't speak for China, well I can. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're communists and they want total control, not you. In
Speaker 1: the United States, we the people are supposed to have
Speaker 1: the power. We the people, You and I. We are
Speaker 1: private citizens. That means that the government should know absolutely
Speaker 1: nothing about us zero because we are private citizens. The government, however,
Speaker 1: is public servants. That means they are there to be
Speaker 1: public servants meeting they're there to serve the best interests
Speaker 1: of us, the private sistants. So they should know zero
Speaker 1: about us, and we should know everything about them. We
Speaker 1: should know everything about them, Like how did Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: become the best wall street trader of all time. How
Speaker 1: do these politicians like Obama or Nancy Pelosi or any
Speaker 1: of the other hundreds of them, how do they enter
Speaker 1: public office broke and make one hundred thousand a year
Speaker 1: two hundred thousand a year and become worth ten twenty
Speaker 1: fifty hundred million dollars by the time they retire. How
Speaker 1: does that happen? I'd sure like to know, because I
Speaker 1: might like to do the same thing, would you? We
Speaker 1: should know that about them, But of course that's not
Speaker 1: the case. So China's government could soon, as says here,
Speaker 1: soon achieve an unprecedented political stranglehold on more than one
Speaker 1: billion people, one billion people, And like I said, as
Speaker 1: rations are to export this beyond the country's borders, in
Speaker 1: trenching the power of a whole generation of autocrats, in
Speaker 1: trenching this is what I'm talking about, the battle for
Speaker 1: the fad of demanding. If this gets put into place,
Speaker 1: in trenching the power, it says, this may never get repealed. Now,
Speaker 1: it says China's digital infrastructure could shift the balance of
Speaker 1: power between the individual and the state worldwide. So there's
Speaker 1: something about there's always returns, returns on your investment ROI.
Speaker 1: You've heard that there's returns on my energy, return on
Speaker 1: my time. There's also something known as a return on violence.
Speaker 1: So the state, all states, including the US government, has
Speaker 1: a monopoly on violence. They can use violence on you
Speaker 1: anytime they want. They can send the police officers to
Speaker 1: your house with guns. You can't use violence on other people, right,
Speaker 1: So the state has a monopoly on violence. And so
Speaker 1: that's the balance of power between the individual and the state.
Speaker 1: The problem is the return on violence. So a lot
Speaker 1: of people say, oh, the government's gonna come take all
Speaker 1: your bitcoin. So the government's gonna go house to house
Speaker 1: to house three hundred and thirty million plus people, house
Speaker 1: to house to house three hundred million times, and torture
Speaker 1: people until they give up a couple dollars for the bitcoin.
Speaker 1: Like the return on that violence is way too low.
Speaker 1: Like there's just there's no there's no way they can
Speaker 1: do that. And it's also why even in some of
Speaker 1: the most you know, more strict i'll say authoritarian regimes,
Speaker 1: there's actually a lot of freedom in those areas. And
Speaker 1: the reason why is because you know, maybe Mexico is
Speaker 1: actually their government's more restrictive than the United States, but
Speaker 1: because their economy is so poor, because their their technology
Speaker 1: is so poor, they can't really enforce it. So in
Speaker 1: most of the country people don't even know about the government.
Speaker 1: They don't even they know nothing, and so they can't
Speaker 1: enforce it. The return on violence would be too low.
Speaker 1: But if they can put this digital infrastructure in and
Speaker 1: now they don't need police officers and military people everywhere
Speaker 1: because now technology does that. Now the return on violence
Speaker 1: can get very high. That's this balance of power that
Speaker 1: we're talking about. But the one thing that we have
Speaker 1: is that for now, anyway, it looks like industry analysts
Speaker 1: expect America to retain its current AI lead for at
Speaker 1: least another decade. But it's not very much comforting because
Speaker 1: it says here China is already developing powerful new surveillance
Speaker 1: tools and exporting them to dozens of the world's actual
Speaker 1: and would be autocracies, And it says that an emergence
Speaker 1: of an AI pirate authoritarian block led by China could
Speaker 1: warp the geopolitics of this century. It could prevent billions
Speaker 1: of people, billions so huge percentages of the world across
Speaker 1: large swash of the globe, from ever securing any measure
Speaker 1: of political freedom. That's a big deal. It's a real
Speaker 1: big this is this is already in place, This is
Speaker 1: already growing. The tools that they need to institute this
Speaker 1: are own, are growing at a at a rapid rate.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, the rate at which AI
Speaker 1: is growing is astronomical, and it's growing so fast. And
Speaker 1: so they have the systems in place, they have the
Speaker 1: technology in place, and they have the aspirations to do it.
Speaker 1: Of course, which government doesn't want more control over their people.
Speaker 1: And so this is leading to a very scary place.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like George Orrel's nineteen eighty four on steroids.
Speaker 1: Now they have the you know, they have all these things,
Speaker 1: but who controls the AI, what's the purpose of the AI?
Speaker 1: And more more more specifically, I said that there's a
Speaker 1: battle for the fate of humanity that I think we
Speaker 1: can win. So how do we win in the face
Speaker 1: of all of this, that's a bigger question. And I
Speaker 1: think we have the tools to do it, and I
Speaker 1: think I don't think. I believe, I have hope. I hope.
Speaker 1: I have hope that we're going to do the hard work.
Speaker 1: I have hope that we're gonna be able to push
Speaker 1: back against this. I have hope that we're going to
Speaker 1: defeat this, and I have hope that my kids and
Speaker 1: your kids will live in a much freer world on
Speaker 1: the other side of this, on the other side of
Speaker 1: the Battle for the Fate of humanity. If you're just
Speaker 1: tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. We're
Speaker 1: talking about the battle for the Fate of humanity. We
Speaker 1: talk about every week the decentralized Revolution, which I think
Speaker 1: is going to overpower the battle for the Fate of humanity.
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about all that. I still got a
Speaker 1: lot more to cover when I come back. You don't
Speaker 1: want to miss this for the conclusion, what gives me
Speaker 1: hope and how we can win. Don't go away. I'm
Speaker 1: going to come back in a minute with more. I'll
Speaker 1: be right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just
Speaker 1: tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, where
Speaker 1: we talk about each and every week the decentralized Revolution,
Speaker 1: and today specifically, we are talking about what I'm calling
Speaker 1: the Battle for the Fate of Humanity. Yeah, it's a big, big,
Speaker 1: big topics, something I'm sup passionate about. Something I talk
Speaker 1: about indifferent pieces and segments all the time. But we're
Speaker 1: really seeing this come to the forefront now. AI Artificial
Speaker 1: intelligence has been in development at least since the seventies,
Speaker 1: you know, depends on what kind of development do you
Speaker 1: want to talk about there, But we've been working on
Speaker 1: for decades and decades and decades. But it really was
Speaker 1: thrust into the mainstream. I believe it was November thirtieth
Speaker 1: last year, twenty twenty two, so it's been about two
Speaker 1: and a half months, not even ninety days, that the
Speaker 1: public has gotten access to this AI. Of course, it
Speaker 1: was launched with this Open AI. You might have heard
Speaker 1: of that. I've talked about it before, Open AI, and
Speaker 1: it's leading to this massive revolution. They launched what's called
Speaker 1: chat GPT, and now chat GPT kind of gave everyday
Speaker 1: people like you and I access to the AI where
Speaker 1: now literally through a like a search bar command, I
Speaker 1: could type in all types of things like, um, you know,
Speaker 1: do some reef search for me, tell me the answer
Speaker 1: to this, take this article and summarize it, produce emails,
Speaker 1: give me sales copy, but also like righte code, write
Speaker 1: new programs commands, even ones that can create images and
Speaker 1: videos and all types of stuff, and so this is
Speaker 1: now really taking off. I've done a video on my
Speaker 1: main YouTube channel. If you want to go watch it,
Speaker 1: just search Mark Moss. It's my main channel, and I
Speaker 1: did a video kind of breaking down this AI. But
Speaker 1: now that we're seeing like not just private companies and
Speaker 1: governments using this, now we're seeing people using this. Now,
Speaker 1: this is going to find its way into everybody's everyday
Speaker 1: lives where you know, high schoolers, maybe middle schoolers, students,
Speaker 1: let's just call it. Students will be using this to
Speaker 1: like I said, do research for different topics, have them
Speaker 1: help help them write papers. Professionals will use this to
Speaker 1: write articles and blogs for their business. And with SEO optimization,
Speaker 1: you know, creative people will be using it too, like
Speaker 1: I said, create images and create videos and things like that.
Speaker 1: This will find its way into everyday writing code right,
Speaker 1: every way of life. Now, the AI isn't going to
Speaker 1: go change your toilet, and it's not going to go
Speaker 1: build a road or build a house. And so m
Speaker 1: AI is not going to replace every job. A lot
Speaker 1: of jobs we're still going to need humans for. Or's
Speaker 1: gonna need that, and LA's gonna need the creativity of humans.
Speaker 1: But I'm not gonna get into all that right now.
Speaker 1: But what I'm what I do want to say is
Speaker 1: that this AI one, it's it's been being used by
Speaker 1: governments and private co operations, but now it's being used
Speaker 1: by the people. So that's good, right because now the
Speaker 1: people have their own well not really because who controls
Speaker 1: it for the people? Now? We know that we can
Speaker 1: see that chat GPT. There's been all types of tests
Speaker 1: and it looks like there's a problem with chat GPT
Speaker 1: where it's very liberal biased. And of course, right an
Speaker 1: AI has to be trained. It's only as good as
Speaker 1: the data as the infration it's been fed. So who
Speaker 1: fed at the data and what data did they feed it.
Speaker 1: We can see a couple of tests that were done
Speaker 1: here and it was talking about doing some writing things
Speaker 1: like that, and they'd been doing some stress testing on it,
Speaker 1: and they noticed that how to liberal bias when they
Speaker 1: when they asked it to do certain things. I don't
Speaker 1: have the examples here in front of me, but basically
Speaker 1: they'd say, you know, write something critical of Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and it says, oh, I can't do that, and then say, oh,
Speaker 1: write something of Donald Trump and it can do that
Speaker 1: I want. I don't want to go into that. I
Speaker 1: don't want to go into the tip for tat on.
Speaker 1: This doesn't really matter for what I'm trying to talk about,
Speaker 1: which is the point is is now even if the people,
Speaker 1: even if we have it, but who controls it? Who
Speaker 1: fed it? It's a big problem. Now there's a video
Speaker 1: I watched with Peter Diamandis and he was interviewing the
Speaker 1: founder of stable Diffusion. His name is Immad Immad mystique
Speaker 1: if I'm saying that right. It was an amazing easy
Speaker 1: interview at how do you recommend it? Just go onto
Speaker 1: YouTube in search Peter Diamantis and Stable Diffusion, and in
Speaker 1: that they talk about how email it has started this
Speaker 1: new AI to basically rival or compete against open ai.
Speaker 1: Now the irony is that open ai isn't open. Open
Speaker 1: ai is actually a closed AI that they control, that
Speaker 1: they feed with the data they want, which returns answers
Speaker 1: that they want to give you. So how is this
Speaker 1: when everybody in the world, as I said, right from
Speaker 1: students to professionals to programmers and coders are trusting to
Speaker 1: get good information, but they're being fed only what this
Speaker 1: group of people who control it wants you to be fed.
Speaker 1: How does that start shifting and changing the course of humanity?
Speaker 1: How does that start to shift our collective intelligence, our communication, etc. Well,
Speaker 1: Stable Diffusion has started an AI that's an open source AI,
Speaker 1: and their goal is that all of us could have
Speaker 1: our own AI that's built and trained for us, as
Speaker 1: opposed to an AI that's controlled by somebody else. So
Speaker 1: we're getting these tools to help free us. It's decentralized.
Speaker 1: So why I talk about the decentralized revolution. We are
Speaker 1: moving into a world that used to be unipolar world
Speaker 1: where the United States was the global homogene and the
Speaker 1: US dollars the reserve currency of the entire world. And
Speaker 1: we're now moving into a multipolar world where we're going
Speaker 1: to have many competing governments. Of course we've already seen
Speaker 1: that with Russia and China and what's happening with that,
Speaker 1: but also competing monies. And we also have a technology
Speaker 1: now with bitcoin that's a decentralized technology, and so it
Speaker 1: allows us to decentralize all types of information and value.
Speaker 1: And so we have this technology and AI can be
Speaker 1: very centralizing in the aspect if we all use open
Speaker 1: ayes AI and who controls that, but we also have
Speaker 1: the tools to go against it. Now more specifically, I'm
Speaker 1: talking about the battle for the fate of humanity. So one,
Speaker 1: as entrepreneurs, we can continue to build new tools, just
Speaker 1: like what Imad's doing with stable diffusion. We can continue
Speaker 1: to build tools to fight back against this all right.
Speaker 1: But more importantly what we can do is we can
Speaker 1: realize that the source of all the state's power. When
Speaker 1: I say the state, the government's the US government, the
Speaker 1: Chinese CCP at, Chinese government, etc. The source of their
Speaker 1: power is the money printer, their ability to print money.
Speaker 1: With the United States right now is going through this
Speaker 1: debt sealing limit debate, which we go through every couple
Speaker 1: of years. We need more debt. We need more debt.
Speaker 1: We're adding more debt at a faster pace than we
Speaker 1: have anytime in society. And without that debt, the government
Speaker 1: can't continue to grow. We can't continue to fund all
Speaker 1: these new well one, all all the obligations that we
Speaker 1: already have to pay, and we can't continue to spend
Speaker 1: new obligations and pay pay for new favors. And so
Speaker 1: without the ability to continue to print more money, the
Speaker 1: states wither and die. The state would be a tiny
Speaker 1: little shell of itself. It doesn't get the money that
Speaker 1: it needs from tax revenue, It gets it from being
Speaker 1: able to print it. So if we could take away
Speaker 1: their ability, the state's ability to print money, then we
Speaker 1: could affect and limit the size of the government. They
Speaker 1: wouldn't have billions or hundreds of billions of dollars to
Speaker 1: dump into AI and social credit score system technologies. The
Speaker 1: US or whatever government would be happy to import this
Speaker 1: stuff from China if they could just go print a
Speaker 1: few hundred billion dollars and pay for it and bring
Speaker 1: it in. But what if they didn't have that money, Well,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't be able to do that, And that's how
Speaker 1: we win. We need to take away their ability to
Speaker 1: print money. And if we take away their ability to
Speaker 1: print money, then we cut them off at the source.
Speaker 1: They're not able to bring in this technology. They're not
Speaker 1: able to implement this technology. They're not able to build
Speaker 1: this digital panopticon that can put you and I and
Speaker 1: our kids and our grandkids into future prison for all eternity.
Speaker 1: That's where this battle is gonna be fought. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be fought over the money, which of course is why
Speaker 1: they're trying to rush in the final piece, which is
Speaker 1: the central bank digital currencies. They want to control the money,
Speaker 1: but we cannot let them. We have to retain control
Speaker 1: of over our money, and we do that with bitcoin.
Speaker 1: It's the only option. If not Bitcoin, then what It's
Speaker 1: not dodgecoin, it's not ethereum, They're not decentralized. It's only
Speaker 1: Bitcoin that is our tool that we can defeat the
Speaker 1: money printer. We can take away their ability to continue
Speaker 1: to grow. And if we can do that over the
Speaker 1: next couple of years this decade, then we can prevent
Speaker 1: this from happening, and we can win the battle for
Speaker 1: the fate of humanity and prevent them from ever getting
Speaker 1: the size they need to ever put us back into prison.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the markmas Show going on a rant
Speaker 1: here about the battle for the fate of humanity, talking
Speaker 1: about the decentralized revolution, like we talked about each and
Speaker 1: every week. If you missed any of it, catch me
Speaker 1: on the podcast at the Mark Moss Show, and that's
Speaker 1: what I got. Thanks so much for listening. Until next time.