WEBVTT - Judging Sam: Michael Lewis Talks Money with Matt Levine

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:20.716
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hey there, it's Michael Lewis. Before we get to

0:00:20.756 --> 0:00:22.636
<v Speaker 1>this episode, I want to let you know that you

0:00:22.636 --> 0:00:25.916
<v Speaker 1>can listen to each episode of Judging Sam The Trial

0:00:25.956 --> 0:00:29.476
<v Speaker 1>of Sam Bankman Freed ad free by becoming a Pushkin

0:00:29.556 --> 0:00:33.516
<v Speaker 1>Plus subscriber, and with your subscription you'll also get exclusive

0:00:33.516 --> 0:00:37.356
<v Speaker 1>access to ad free and early bingeable podcasts like Paul

0:00:37.436 --> 0:00:42.236
<v Speaker 1>McCartney's new podcast, McCartney A Life and Lyrics, Malcolm Gladwell's

0:00:42.236 --> 0:00:46.716
<v Speaker 1>revisionist history, The Happiness Lab from Doctor Lorie Santos, and

0:00:46.836 --> 0:00:49.956
<v Speaker 1>tons of other top shows from Pushkin. Sign up an

0:00:49.996 --> 0:00:55.596
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or at Pushkin, dot fm, Slash Plus. Welcome

0:00:55.636 --> 0:00:58.796
<v Speaker 1>to Judging Sam The Trial of Sam Bankman Freed. I'm

0:00:58.836 --> 0:01:02.676
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis, and we're recording this on October seventeenth today

0:01:02.716 --> 0:01:06.276
<v Speaker 1>on the show Matt Levine. Matt's a business columnist at

0:01:06.276 --> 0:01:10.116
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, where he writes the terrific newsletter Money Stuff.

0:01:11.276 --> 0:01:14.516
<v Speaker 1>He's covered SPF and FTX closely, and he knows more

0:01:14.556 --> 0:01:17.236
<v Speaker 1>about how crypto markets work than just about anybody else.

0:01:17.876 --> 0:01:19.596
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk to him about a lot of things,

0:01:19.596 --> 0:01:23.076
<v Speaker 1>among them how his early conversations with Sam might have

0:01:23.196 --> 0:01:26.916
<v Speaker 1>foreshadowed the FTX collapsed and where are the eight billion

0:01:26.996 --> 0:01:30.236
<v Speaker 1>dollars this whole trial is about actually went And I

0:01:30.276 --> 0:01:32.276
<v Speaker 1>also wanted to talk to him about how is reading

0:01:32.276 --> 0:01:34.396
<v Speaker 1>of the portrait I painted of Sam in my book

0:01:34.516 --> 0:01:39.556
<v Speaker 1>has changed now that Sam's on trial. I have a

0:01:39.636 --> 0:01:41.516
<v Speaker 1>question to you. I don't want to forget you were

0:01:41.556 --> 0:01:44.476
<v Speaker 1>bewildered by the response to the book, like it was

0:01:44.516 --> 0:01:47.556
<v Speaker 1>just weird the initial response to the book. Am I

0:01:47.596 --> 0:01:48.356
<v Speaker 1>misquoting you?

0:01:48.396 --> 0:01:49.876
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Like the days lying after the trial,

0:01:49.876 --> 0:01:51.956
<v Speaker 2>I think there was like a desire for people to

0:01:51.996 --> 0:01:55.836
<v Speaker 2>either be pro or anti SPF. And to be clear,

0:01:56.676 --> 0:01:58.836
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the world except for like his parents, is

0:01:58.836 --> 0:02:01.116
<v Speaker 2>anti SPF, and so it was sort of convenient for

0:02:01.156 --> 0:02:03.836
<v Speaker 2>you to be the pro SPF guy, even if he

0:02:03.956 --> 0:02:06.116
<v Speaker 2>were being like, yeah, I think this guy's innocently like,

0:02:06.356 --> 0:02:09.436
<v Speaker 2>is not that necessary to get mad at that, Like

0:02:09.636 --> 0:02:13.596
<v Speaker 2>it's okay, everyone thinks he guilty, but people were about it.

0:02:13.676 --> 0:02:16.276
<v Speaker 2>You for like kind of defending him.

0:02:16.596 --> 0:02:18.676
<v Speaker 1>But you said something interesting to me when I sent

0:02:18.716 --> 0:02:20.756
<v Speaker 1>you this note asking you to come on. You said

0:02:20.956 --> 0:02:24.996
<v Speaker 1>that when you finished the book, just on the basis

0:02:25.036 --> 0:02:28.756
<v Speaker 1>of the facts in the book, you thought, I don't

0:02:28.756 --> 0:02:31.276
<v Speaker 1>want to put words in your mouth, but it actually

0:02:31.316 --> 0:02:33.996
<v Speaker 1>sort of like convinced you even more of his guilt,

0:02:34.516 --> 0:02:37.596
<v Speaker 1>maybe slightly changed the way you felt about what he'd done.

0:02:38.476 --> 0:02:40.316
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there have been two narratives of this,

0:02:40.556 --> 0:02:45.716
<v Speaker 2>which are one his narrative, which is, I like made

0:02:45.756 --> 0:02:49.436
<v Speaker 2>a series of understandable mistakes and lost all that money,

0:02:49.796 --> 0:02:52.396
<v Speaker 2>and then everyone else's narrative, which is he's an evil

0:02:52.436 --> 0:02:55.836
<v Speaker 2>genius who stole all this money to spend on political

0:02:55.836 --> 0:02:59.876
<v Speaker 2>donations and Bahama's real estate and like, you know, cackled

0:02:59.876 --> 0:03:02.476
<v Speaker 2>gleefully as he stole the money. And neither of those

0:03:02.516 --> 0:03:05.156
<v Speaker 2>is that compelling. And like between those two his like, ah,

0:03:05.196 --> 0:03:08.396
<v Speaker 2>I'm just an innocent guy, you know, had had some legs.

0:03:08.556 --> 0:03:11.396
<v Speaker 2>But I think that like what came clear came clear

0:03:11.396 --> 0:03:12.956
<v Speaker 2>to me in the book, and like the somethings that

0:03:12.996 --> 0:03:14.796
<v Speaker 2>I should have known this already. He's sort of a

0:03:14.836 --> 0:03:19.116
<v Speaker 2>classic scammer figure in the sense of, like the core

0:03:19.196 --> 0:03:24.436
<v Speaker 2>thing he did was take ridiculous risks with his investors,

0:03:24.436 --> 0:03:30.796
<v Speaker 2>with his customers money while saying and probably believing himself

0:03:31.076 --> 0:03:33.916
<v Speaker 2>that he wasn't right. Like part of the problem is

0:03:33.916 --> 0:03:35.636
<v Speaker 2>that the guy loves taking risks, but part of the

0:03:35.636 --> 0:03:37.236
<v Speaker 2>problem is that like he can sort of like sit

0:03:37.236 --> 0:03:38.916
<v Speaker 2>down and look at you in the eye and say, oh, no,

0:03:38.996 --> 0:03:41.116
<v Speaker 2>I'm not taking risk. This was all totally safe and

0:03:41.156 --> 0:03:43.436
<v Speaker 2>like kind of believe it himself. And I think that's

0:03:43.476 --> 0:03:45.396
<v Speaker 2>like the what I got from the book is like

0:03:45.436 --> 0:03:46.916
<v Speaker 2>a real portrait of a guy who is like that,

0:03:46.996 --> 0:03:49.436
<v Speaker 2>who is a wild risk taker who sort of doesn't

0:03:49.476 --> 0:03:51.716
<v Speaker 2>perceive it that way. And like that's like a really

0:03:51.716 --> 0:03:54.556
<v Speaker 2>classic profile of someone doing a financial fraud, right, Like

0:03:54.596 --> 0:03:56.876
<v Speaker 2>that's that's kind of how everyone does it. And so

0:03:57.916 --> 0:04:00.196
<v Speaker 2>to me, reading the book like like sort of made

0:04:00.196 --> 0:04:02.156
<v Speaker 2>sense of what happened in a way that is like

0:04:02.236 --> 0:04:04.796
<v Speaker 2>less bad than like the worst story people tell about

0:04:04.796 --> 0:04:06.956
<v Speaker 2>Sam bekmunfreed, but also in a way that is like

0:04:07.196 --> 0:04:10.116
<v Speaker 2>fully sufficient to convict him of fraud, like and like

0:04:10.276 --> 0:04:12.236
<v Speaker 2>and is in fact the normal way forra it happens.

0:04:12.636 --> 0:04:14.876
<v Speaker 1>What was the emotional takeaway when you when you look

0:04:14.916 --> 0:04:16.716
<v Speaker 1>at what's happening now and you look at the likely

0:04:16.756 --> 0:04:18.356
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to go to jail for forty years

0:04:18.436 --> 0:04:21.396
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, how do you feel about it?

0:04:21.596 --> 0:04:24.116
<v Speaker 2>Look, I feel bad for everyone to whom bad things happen,

0:04:24.156 --> 0:04:27.196
<v Speaker 2>which includes you know, the people who lost money on

0:04:27.276 --> 0:04:28.916
<v Speaker 2>ft X and also him and his parents. You know,

0:04:28.956 --> 0:04:31.036
<v Speaker 2>like I think that, don't you know, it's it's sad

0:04:31.076 --> 0:04:33.556
<v Speaker 2>for anyone to go to prison. But that said, I

0:04:33.556 --> 0:04:35.596
<v Speaker 2>mean like it did like make like a little bit

0:04:35.676 --> 0:04:37.356
<v Speaker 2>make me a share in like the outrage that people

0:04:37.396 --> 0:04:40.076
<v Speaker 2>have at him, because like, you really can't do that.

0:04:40.876 --> 0:04:42.956
<v Speaker 2>You're not supposed to do that. You know. I've talked

0:04:42.956 --> 0:04:45.156
<v Speaker 2>to him, you know, not like this week, but in

0:04:45.436 --> 0:04:48.116
<v Speaker 2>the past, and I think that he he does like

0:04:48.156 --> 0:04:51.876
<v Speaker 2>really coherently and convincingly present this picture of like, oh no,

0:04:51.956 --> 0:04:54.356
<v Speaker 2>it all made sense. And I think that like having

0:04:54.356 --> 0:04:56.436
<v Speaker 2>the fuller portrait of like what he thought all made

0:04:56.476 --> 0:04:58.476
<v Speaker 2>sense makes me kind of mad and like, you know,

0:04:59.556 --> 0:05:03.116
<v Speaker 2>it didn't make sense. You just were you know, you

0:05:03.236 --> 0:05:05.996
<v Speaker 2>just you had like a blind spot in your mind

0:05:06.236 --> 0:05:09.356
<v Speaker 2>about like the risks you were taking and like and

0:05:09.396 --> 0:05:12.316
<v Speaker 2>like your own sort of status is a charmed person

0:05:12.316 --> 0:05:13.796
<v Speaker 2>who would definitely get all the money back and it

0:05:13.836 --> 0:05:15.356
<v Speaker 2>was no problem. I mean, the story in your book

0:05:15.356 --> 0:05:18.676
<v Speaker 2>that is so damning, I think is the thing about

0:05:19.036 --> 0:05:21.756
<v Speaker 2>the very early days of Alameda where they like, thank

0:05:21.836 --> 0:05:24.836
<v Speaker 2>he just placed some money, and he's like, oh, it's

0:05:24.876 --> 0:05:26.516
<v Speaker 2>like an eighty percent chance we'll get it back. It's

0:05:26.516 --> 0:05:27.756
<v Speaker 2>no problem. We don't have to tell you about it.

0:05:27.796 --> 0:05:29.036
<v Speaker 2>And then like they get it back and he's like,

0:05:29.036 --> 0:05:31.316
<v Speaker 2>ah see, I'm always right, and like that's like that's

0:05:31.316 --> 0:05:33.356
<v Speaker 2>like the worst possible lesson for him to learn, right,

0:05:33.516 --> 0:05:36.836
<v Speaker 2>Like had like had they never gotten the money back,

0:05:37.036 --> 0:05:39.356
<v Speaker 2>and like, had he been fired, that would have been it.

0:05:39.396 --> 0:05:40.956
<v Speaker 2>He would be like, go be a trader at Jane

0:05:40.956 --> 0:05:43.076
<v Speaker 2>Street orriever, right, Like he'd been fine, right, But instead

0:05:43.116 --> 0:05:45.636
<v Speaker 2>he's like, I can never mess up. And then he

0:05:45.716 --> 0:05:47.956
<v Speaker 2>lost like eight billion dollars instead of four million dollars,

0:05:48.036 --> 0:05:49.476
<v Speaker 2>and now he's like gonna go to job forever.

0:05:49.956 --> 0:05:52.916
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's exactly right. When people ask me

0:05:52.996 --> 0:05:55.756
<v Speaker 1>what chapter to if they're going to excerpt a chapter

0:05:55.836 --> 0:05:57.436
<v Speaker 1>or read a chapter, you get a feel I say

0:05:57.476 --> 0:06:00.476
<v Speaker 1>that chapter because that's the foreshadowing of what's going to happen.

0:06:00.756 --> 0:06:03.996
<v Speaker 1>And what also happened in that moment was, you know,

0:06:04.036 --> 0:06:06.836
<v Speaker 1>he had this pool of twenty effective altrus who were

0:06:06.876 --> 0:06:08.996
<v Speaker 1>working with him. Half of them decide he's like a

0:06:09.196 --> 0:06:12.596
<v Speaker 1>criminal or are so catastrophically sloppy that he might as

0:06:12.636 --> 0:06:15.196
<v Speaker 1>well be a criminal. But the half who stay in,

0:06:15.236 --> 0:06:18.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, including Caroline and his shot and Gary, they

0:06:18.476 --> 0:06:22.436
<v Speaker 1>become convinced to the narrative that like Sam's right all

0:06:22.476 --> 0:06:25.236
<v Speaker 1>the time, that becomes the new rule. So that that

0:06:25.316 --> 0:06:29.956
<v Speaker 1>creates kind of the psychology of FTX that it's it's

0:06:29.996 --> 0:06:34.476
<v Speaker 1>sort of like that Sam is beyond questioning, and that

0:06:34.996 --> 0:06:38.276
<v Speaker 1>obviously that leads to what it leads to. Anyway, you mentioned,

0:06:38.436 --> 0:06:40.756
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about your interactions with Sam bankman

0:06:40.836 --> 0:06:43.316
<v Speaker 1>Free for a bit. One of your actual interactions with

0:06:43.396 --> 0:06:45.556
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bcmanfree has become evidence in the trial. Can you

0:06:45.596 --> 0:06:49.036
<v Speaker 1>explain this interaction and can you explain how the prosecutors

0:06:49.036 --> 0:06:49.556
<v Speaker 1>have used it.

0:06:49.996 --> 0:06:54.836
<v Speaker 2>So I've done two Bloomberg podcasts with him, and the

0:06:54.916 --> 0:06:57.276
<v Speaker 2>first of them it was like maybe a little early

0:06:57.316 --> 0:06:59.476
<v Speaker 2>in his celebrity. I was twenty twenty one, I want

0:06:59.476 --> 0:07:01.796
<v Speaker 2>to say, and we just like we just have like

0:07:01.836 --> 0:07:04.836
<v Speaker 2>a very geeky conversation about crypto market structure, just like

0:07:05.636 --> 0:07:08.676
<v Speaker 2>how do these exchanges work? And I didn't really know anything,

0:07:08.716 --> 0:07:10.556
<v Speaker 2>but like I come from a sort of you know,

0:07:11.116 --> 0:07:14.516
<v Speaker 2>traditional finance equity market structure background, so we could have it.

0:07:14.556 --> 0:07:15.916
<v Speaker 2>And you know he does too, right, he came from

0:07:15.956 --> 0:07:18.516
<v Speaker 2>Chan Street, so we could have an interesting conversation about like,

0:07:18.956 --> 0:07:22.116
<v Speaker 2>you know, pre funding trades on exchanges, and like, you know,

0:07:23.596 --> 0:07:25.756
<v Speaker 2>one thing we talked about a lot was there had

0:07:25.796 --> 0:07:29.916
<v Speaker 2>been this epidemic of crypto exchanges blowing up, and like

0:07:29.956 --> 0:07:31.796
<v Speaker 2>one thing that FCX was promising is we have a

0:07:31.796 --> 0:07:36.876
<v Speaker 2>better sort of risk management system. And he, in his

0:07:37.436 --> 0:07:39.356
<v Speaker 2>role as sort of like an elder statesman of crypto,

0:07:39.476 --> 0:07:42.156
<v Speaker 2>like walked through all the bad ways that all the

0:07:42.196 --> 0:07:44.396
<v Speaker 2>other exchanges did it, which is basically like they didn't

0:07:44.436 --> 0:07:46.516
<v Speaker 2>have any system. They like blew people out of trades

0:07:46.556 --> 0:07:48.756
<v Speaker 2>sloppily and then lost a lot of money. They didn't

0:07:48.756 --> 0:07:50.596
<v Speaker 2>have any sort of insurance fund, and so they had

0:07:50.636 --> 0:07:53.876
<v Speaker 2>to like basically haircut winning traders in order to you know,

0:07:53.916 --> 0:07:57.396
<v Speaker 2>make up for losses by losing traders. And he was like,

0:07:57.436 --> 0:07:59.436
<v Speaker 2>and we have a different system. We have an intelligence

0:07:59.436 --> 0:08:01.996
<v Speaker 2>system for blowing people out. We don't just like put

0:08:02.036 --> 0:08:04.116
<v Speaker 2>in market orders to sell stuff on the exchange. We

0:08:04.196 --> 0:08:07.876
<v Speaker 2>like have liquidity providers who like step in, and we

0:08:07.916 --> 0:08:09.796
<v Speaker 2>have an insurance fund too, but we never really had

0:08:09.836 --> 0:08:11.636
<v Speaker 2>to draw on that. And so the interaction that gets

0:08:11.636 --> 0:08:14.476
<v Speaker 2>played at the trial is him saying we've never really

0:08:14.836 --> 0:08:16.756
<v Speaker 2>essentially says, we've never really had losses in a day,

0:08:16.836 --> 0:08:20.116
<v Speaker 2>like we've always been able to stop losing trades before

0:08:20.116 --> 0:08:23.636
<v Speaker 2>they cause any material loss to FTX, And what prosecutors

0:08:23.636 --> 0:08:25.636
<v Speaker 2>say is that that's not true, and they had a

0:08:25.636 --> 0:08:27.676
<v Speaker 2>big loss early on that sort of like ate away

0:08:27.716 --> 0:08:30.036
<v Speaker 2>at their entire insurance fund. This is in the context

0:08:30.076 --> 0:08:34.036
<v Speaker 2>of like also Gary Wan testifying that the insurance fund

0:08:34.156 --> 0:08:36.556
<v Speaker 2>was essentially a fake and that they like displayed on

0:08:36.596 --> 0:08:39.236
<v Speaker 2>their web page a fake number that was generated by

0:08:39.236 --> 0:08:41.516
<v Speaker 2>a random number generator to say, this is how much

0:08:41.556 --> 0:08:44.636
<v Speaker 2>money we have backing FTX trades. So the thing that

0:08:44.676 --> 0:08:47.996
<v Speaker 2>he told me about like ftx's risk management was in

0:08:48.036 --> 0:08:52.476
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution story essentially false, and it's like, you know,

0:08:52.556 --> 0:08:54.156
<v Speaker 2>that's like sort of the heart of the fraud is

0:08:54.556 --> 0:08:57.516
<v Speaker 2>that he was telling everyone not only are we like

0:08:57.556 --> 0:08:59.436
<v Speaker 2>not stealing the money, but we're like doing an extra

0:08:59.516 --> 0:09:02.356
<v Speaker 2>good job of risk management to make sure that your

0:09:02.356 --> 0:09:05.076
<v Speaker 2>money doesn't get lost. And in fact, it turns out

0:09:05.076 --> 0:09:06.636
<v Speaker 2>they were doing kind of an extra bad job.

0:09:07.676 --> 0:09:09.476
<v Speaker 1>You had this other interaction with it than that. It

0:09:09.516 --> 0:09:13.356
<v Speaker 1>gets repeated over and over and I think slightly misconstrued,

0:09:13.356 --> 0:09:16.796
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I'm wrong. Like our listeners if they if

0:09:16.836 --> 0:09:19.876
<v Speaker 1>they're loitering in the vicinity of this subject for very long?

0:09:20.116 --> 0:09:22.436
<v Speaker 1>Are going to run across this thing that you did

0:09:22.436 --> 0:09:24.076
<v Speaker 1>with him all night? It must have been the second

0:09:24.116 --> 0:09:26.916
<v Speaker 1>podcast interview you did, Yeah, exactly, and it was on

0:09:26.956 --> 0:09:29.556
<v Speaker 1>the odd Lots podcast, the Bloomberg on Lots podcast. Can

0:09:29.596 --> 0:09:32.436
<v Speaker 1>you explain what you were talking about and what he

0:09:32.556 --> 0:09:34.356
<v Speaker 1>said and how it's been misconstrued?

0:09:35.316 --> 0:09:37.596
<v Speaker 2>We had him on odd loads repeatedly because he would

0:09:37.676 --> 0:09:39.676
<v Speaker 2>just sort of like talk about whatever you wanted to

0:09:39.876 --> 0:09:42.276
<v Speaker 2>in like the crypto world, in a way that seemed

0:09:42.396 --> 0:09:45.676
<v Speaker 2>very like open and candidate and not always in his

0:09:45.716 --> 0:09:50.796
<v Speaker 2>best interests. Yes, in hindsight, it was not as open

0:09:50.796 --> 0:09:52.876
<v Speaker 2>and candidate as I thought, but it was even more

0:09:52.996 --> 0:09:55.076
<v Speaker 2>not in his best interest to me. I don't remember

0:09:55.116 --> 0:09:56.796
<v Speaker 2>what the topic of this. It was just like we

0:09:56.796 --> 0:10:00.196
<v Speaker 2>were like, hey, let's like, you know, talk about crypto stuff.

0:10:00.636 --> 0:10:02.836
<v Speaker 2>And so one thing that was on my mind at

0:10:02.836 --> 0:10:05.476
<v Speaker 2>the time was like a corner of decentralized finance called

0:10:05.796 --> 0:10:10.436
<v Speaker 2>yield farming, which is basically I mean, you can read

0:10:10.476 --> 0:10:12.436
<v Speaker 2>his explanation because it's famous now, but I was like,

0:10:12.556 --> 0:10:15.236
<v Speaker 2>explain to me yield farming, and he was like, well,

0:10:15.396 --> 0:10:18.196
<v Speaker 2>it's like you have a box and you have you

0:10:18.276 --> 0:10:20.196
<v Speaker 2>put some token, you get some money in the box.

0:10:20.236 --> 0:10:23.276
<v Speaker 2>Then you're just some tokens, and you say the box

0:10:23.356 --> 0:10:24.716
<v Speaker 2>is like the greatest thing in the world and it's

0:10:24.716 --> 0:10:26.836
<v Speaker 2>going to replace all banks. And then you sell the

0:10:26.836 --> 0:10:28.236
<v Speaker 2>tokens for a lot of money and you can put

0:10:28.276 --> 0:10:30.356
<v Speaker 2>more money in the box, and then like the tokens

0:10:30.356 --> 0:10:31.636
<v Speaker 2>go up and people are like, oh, I should buy

0:10:31.676 --> 0:10:33.236
<v Speaker 2>some more of this, and like that's the sort of

0:10:33.316 --> 0:10:35.356
<v Speaker 2>explanation of yield farming. And if you're like, that doesn't

0:10:35.356 --> 0:10:37.036
<v Speaker 2>make any sense, like that's what I said, and that's

0:10:37.036 --> 0:10:40.636
<v Speaker 2>what everyone said. I said to him something like you

0:10:40.716 --> 0:10:42.996
<v Speaker 2>just said I'm in the ponzi business and it's pretty good,

0:10:42.996 --> 0:10:44.676
<v Speaker 2>and he was like, yeah, I kind of what I

0:10:44.716 --> 0:10:46.876
<v Speaker 2>think that, Like people misinterpreted from that is like, if

0:10:46.916 --> 0:10:49.276
<v Speaker 2>you take that out of context, it sounds like I'm

0:10:49.316 --> 0:10:52.556
<v Speaker 2>saying to him, your business is a ponzi And he's like, yeah,

0:10:52.596 --> 0:10:54.756
<v Speaker 2>but that's not true at all. What he was saying

0:10:54.876 --> 0:10:58.396
<v Speaker 2>is that a lot of this, like yield farming, like

0:10:58.516 --> 0:11:02.116
<v Speaker 2>token stuff in crypto in like decentralized finance, is pretty

0:11:02.156 --> 0:11:04.996
<v Speaker 2>ponzi ish. Yeah, And when I said it sounds like

0:11:05.036 --> 0:11:06.916
<v Speaker 2>you're in the ponzi business, I just meant like he was,

0:11:07.516 --> 0:11:09.876
<v Speaker 2>you know, running in exchange where you could train those tokens.

0:11:10.316 --> 0:11:13.236
<v Speaker 2>But I think that at the time, when people listen

0:11:13.316 --> 0:11:16.676
<v Speaker 2>to this, when people who like are involved in crypto

0:11:16.756 --> 0:11:19.156
<v Speaker 2>listen to this, what they what they took away was

0:11:20.276 --> 0:11:24.636
<v Speaker 2>Sam Bankman Fried is trash talking his competition, right, Like

0:11:24.716 --> 0:11:28.276
<v Speaker 2>his competition in some sense is decentralized finance. Right, Like

0:11:28.276 --> 0:11:31.276
<v Speaker 2>he runs one of the biggest at the time centralized exchanges.

0:11:31.556 --> 0:11:33.836
<v Speaker 2>He wants people to trade with him rather than on

0:11:33.916 --> 0:11:36.436
<v Speaker 2>the blockchain and decentralized finance exchanges, which like at the

0:11:36.476 --> 0:11:40.476
<v Speaker 2>time seemed like a real competitor to the more traditional

0:11:40.596 --> 0:11:43.836
<v Speaker 2>financial system that he was kind of imitating at FDx.

0:11:44.196 --> 0:11:48.676
<v Speaker 2>And so he's saying all that stuff is like Ponzi stuff,

0:11:48.956 --> 0:11:51.396
<v Speaker 2>and I'll trade the tokens. But like, I don't, you know,

0:11:51.556 --> 0:11:55.196
<v Speaker 2>like he was not he was not putting it in

0:11:55.236 --> 0:11:57.716
<v Speaker 2>its best light. And I think people he wasn't confessing

0:11:57.756 --> 0:12:00.716
<v Speaker 2>to run now, he wasn't confessing, and he was being

0:12:00.796 --> 0:12:03.516
<v Speaker 2>very cynical about crypto, right, he was being cynical about

0:12:04.036 --> 0:12:07.196
<v Speaker 2>narrowly DeFi but more broadly like the philosophy of crypto

0:12:07.316 --> 0:12:09.316
<v Speaker 2>that made people in crypto mad but it all so

0:12:09.396 --> 0:12:12.076
<v Speaker 2>like it sort of explains why people like me found

0:12:12.116 --> 0:12:14.196
<v Speaker 2>him interesting, because he just never seemed like a crypto

0:12:14.316 --> 0:12:17.316
<v Speaker 2>true believer. He seemed like a guy from traditional finance

0:12:17.316 --> 0:12:19.636
<v Speaker 2>who's like, Wow, here's this huge pot of money that

0:12:19.676 --> 0:12:21.636
<v Speaker 2>I can make. He didn't like he was like, oh, yeah,

0:12:21.636 --> 0:12:23.156
<v Speaker 2>crypto is gonna change the world. He's like, yeah, it's

0:12:23.156 --> 0:12:24.836
<v Speaker 2>a box. You put money in the box. It's fine.

0:12:24.996 --> 0:12:28.716
<v Speaker 2>So I think that, Like it seemed at the time

0:12:28.836 --> 0:12:31.236
<v Speaker 2>like he had a sort of like charming and refreshing

0:12:31.316 --> 0:12:34.356
<v Speaker 2>level of cynicism, but then of course, in hindsight, like

0:12:34.916 --> 0:12:37.116
<v Speaker 2>not only did he have much more centicism, but also

0:12:37.236 --> 0:12:39.596
<v Speaker 2>like the trade he described, he ends up by being like,

0:12:39.596 --> 0:12:41.716
<v Speaker 2>you can put all that you can, like say, this

0:12:41.836 --> 0:12:44.316
<v Speaker 2>box has like a huge market value, and then you

0:12:44.316 --> 0:12:46.836
<v Speaker 2>can borrow against it, and then when you borrow against it,

0:12:46.876 --> 0:12:48.596
<v Speaker 2>you never have to pay the money back, and like

0:12:48.636 --> 0:12:51.196
<v Speaker 2>when the market value collapses, you have all the money

0:12:51.396 --> 0:12:53.196
<v Speaker 2>and someone else has left with the losses. And he

0:12:53.276 --> 0:12:57.236
<v Speaker 2>was like describing like a hypothetical trade and decentralized finance.

0:12:57.276 --> 0:12:59.516
<v Speaker 2>But of course he was also like precisely describing what

0:12:59.676 --> 0:13:02.676
<v Speaker 2>FTX and olimedia ended up doing, and so it is

0:13:02.716 --> 0:13:04.596
<v Speaker 2>in that sense, you know it was foreshadowing.

0:13:05.516 --> 0:13:15.636
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Welcome back to judging Sam the

0:13:15.716 --> 0:13:20.676
<v Speaker 1>trial of Sam Bankman freed. So you've taken I think

0:13:20.836 --> 0:13:24.356
<v Speaker 1>more of an interest in crypto finance as serious than

0:13:24.436 --> 0:13:27.236
<v Speaker 1>anybody in the world. You've described it better than anybody

0:13:27.276 --> 0:13:29.076
<v Speaker 1>in the world. You've written really well about crypto. You've

0:13:29.076 --> 0:13:33.276
<v Speaker 1>written sometimes kind of cynically about crypto. I'm curious when

0:13:33.316 --> 0:13:36.796
<v Speaker 1>you make crypto people angry with what you write. Are

0:13:36.796 --> 0:13:39.356
<v Speaker 1>they different from other groups who get angry with what

0:13:39.476 --> 0:13:41.956
<v Speaker 1>you write. Is there a different kind of tone around

0:13:41.996 --> 0:13:45.636
<v Speaker 1>crypto than there is around other parts of finance.

0:13:45.956 --> 0:13:49.396
<v Speaker 2>It's funny. My go to example for years of people

0:13:49.436 --> 0:13:52.196
<v Speaker 2>who get angriest about what I read are the people

0:13:52.236 --> 0:13:57.076
<v Speaker 2>who are mad about high frequency training. That's just true.

0:13:58.396 --> 0:14:00.676
<v Speaker 2>So that's like kind of your fault. It is kind

0:14:00.676 --> 0:14:02.596
<v Speaker 2>of Seriously, people get really mad at me about like

0:14:02.636 --> 0:14:05.596
<v Speaker 2>hiratingryto people. I don't know. I mean, like I definitely

0:14:05.716 --> 0:14:07.036
<v Speaker 2>mute a lot of people on Twitter, right, but like

0:14:07.076 --> 0:14:10.676
<v Speaker 2>I don't I wouldn't say that, like like contrary to stereotypes,

0:14:10.676 --> 0:14:12.196
<v Speaker 2>I would not say that I get a lot of

0:14:12.236 --> 0:14:15.316
<v Speaker 2>like weird or furious reactions When I write cynically about

0:14:15.316 --> 0:14:17.476
<v Speaker 2>critic I think that, you know, it's a big world

0:14:17.516 --> 0:14:19.036
<v Speaker 2>and there are a lot of people with different views.

0:14:19.036 --> 0:14:21.276
<v Speaker 2>But I think that like, broadly speaking, people in crypto

0:14:21.796 --> 0:14:24.236
<v Speaker 2>think of me as being fairly generous to them. Like,

0:14:25.316 --> 0:14:27.756
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's no there's no crypto like mindset, right,

0:14:27.756 --> 0:14:29.356
<v Speaker 2>Like crypto isn't a thing, right, It's just like a

0:14:29.396 --> 0:14:31.516
<v Speaker 2>collection of people, right, And so it is. I think

0:14:31.556 --> 0:14:34.276
<v Speaker 2>it's I think it's like really true and sociologically interesting

0:14:34.316 --> 0:14:37.556
<v Speaker 2>that like the beginning of crypto is really oppositional to

0:14:37.596 --> 0:14:41.076
<v Speaker 2>traditional finance, where like, you know, the openness of the

0:14:41.116 --> 0:14:45.636
<v Speaker 2>blockchain and storing your money yourself rather than at a

0:14:45.636 --> 0:14:47.636
<v Speaker 2>bank that's going to use it to make risky bets.

0:14:48.276 --> 0:14:50.556
<v Speaker 2>Is like those are the obvious appeals of crypto, and

0:14:50.596 --> 0:14:53.116
<v Speaker 2>then over time the numbers keep going up, and so

0:14:53.236 --> 0:14:56.276
<v Speaker 2>all these people flock into speculate and you have people

0:14:56.356 --> 0:14:58.556
<v Speaker 2>like Sam Bankman Freed who are like, I can make

0:14:59.116 --> 0:15:03.596
<v Speaker 2>a fortune arbitraging bitcoin prices between you know, Asia and America.

0:15:04.156 --> 0:15:06.916
<v Speaker 2>And when those people get into it, they just want

0:15:06.916 --> 0:15:09.076
<v Speaker 2>to make money, and they come from in many cases,

0:15:09.276 --> 0:15:11.556
<v Speaker 2>is like in his case, in three hours case, they

0:15:11.596 --> 0:15:15.076
<v Speaker 2>come from traditional financial firms where the way you make

0:15:15.116 --> 0:15:17.516
<v Speaker 2>money is like you spot an arbitrage and you lever

0:15:17.596 --> 0:15:20.236
<v Speaker 2>it up one hundred times, and it just looks exactly

0:15:20.396 --> 0:15:23.156
<v Speaker 2>like the sort of traditional financial system that blew up

0:15:23.196 --> 0:15:27.516
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and eight, except it's unregulated, it's offshore,

0:15:27.916 --> 0:15:30.676
<v Speaker 2>and you know it's taking money from retail speculators, and

0:15:30.836 --> 0:15:32.676
<v Speaker 2>it's like run by twenty eight year olds, and it

0:15:32.716 --> 0:15:34.636
<v Speaker 2>blows up like as terribly as you could hope for,

0:15:34.676 --> 0:15:37.036
<v Speaker 2>and like everyone goes to jail. Its shape is very

0:15:37.196 --> 0:15:38.476
<v Speaker 2>reminiscent of two thousand and eight.

0:15:38.596 --> 0:15:40.916
<v Speaker 1>Right, I want to swerve for a second and talk

0:15:40.956 --> 0:15:42.556
<v Speaker 1>a bit about your career, if that's all right, Can

0:15:42.596 --> 0:15:44.276
<v Speaker 1>we do that? Sure? I want to know where you

0:15:44.316 --> 0:15:46.396
<v Speaker 1>come from, Like where'd you grow up and how did

0:15:46.436 --> 0:15:48.716
<v Speaker 1>you end up getting into finance and then end up

0:15:48.716 --> 0:15:49.676
<v Speaker 1>writing about finance.

0:15:50.756 --> 0:15:53.836
<v Speaker 2>I grew up on my island. I precociously read Liar's

0:15:53.876 --> 0:15:57.156
<v Speaker 2>Poker as and I was like, this sounds fun. If

0:15:57.156 --> 0:15:58.796
<v Speaker 2>you had found me at some point, like in high school,

0:15:58.796 --> 0:16:02.916
<v Speaker 2>I would have been like Alvia, you know, Salid Brothers,

0:16:02.956 --> 0:16:05.036
<v Speaker 2>Bond Trader or whatever. But then I like got to

0:16:05.076 --> 0:16:08.636
<v Speaker 2>college and very much swerved and I was a classics

0:16:08.636 --> 0:16:12.116
<v Speaker 2>major and I did not take economics. I had friends

0:16:12.156 --> 0:16:14.436
<v Speaker 2>who took like X ten, the big economics class, and

0:16:14.436 --> 0:16:15.956
<v Speaker 2>I would like leave the lunch table when they were

0:16:15.956 --> 0:16:18.876
<v Speaker 2>talking about it was like this is boring, and like

0:16:18.916 --> 0:16:21.316
<v Speaker 2>there was you know, recruiting senior year when it's like, oh, like,

0:16:21.356 --> 0:16:22.916
<v Speaker 2>you go work at an investment bank, and I didn't

0:16:22.916 --> 0:16:25.676
<v Speaker 2>really do it. I graduated with no job. I was like,

0:16:25.956 --> 0:16:28.716
<v Speaker 2>she got a job, and I was able to use

0:16:28.716 --> 0:16:31.636
<v Speaker 2>connections to get a job teaching high school Latin for

0:16:31.676 --> 0:16:35.036
<v Speaker 2>a year. And I did what everyone in that situation

0:16:35.236 --> 0:16:37.356
<v Speaker 2>then does, which is I went to law school. And

0:16:37.436 --> 0:16:40.556
<v Speaker 2>in law school I sort of rediscovered my interest in like,

0:16:41.396 --> 0:16:44.236
<v Speaker 2>you know, financial markets and mergers and acquisitions and stuff.

0:16:44.236 --> 0:16:46.196
<v Speaker 2>And so then I became an M and a lawyer.

0:16:46.636 --> 0:16:48.716
<v Speaker 2>And in two thousand and seven, if you were an

0:16:48.796 --> 0:16:50.636
<v Speaker 2>M and a lawyer, what you wanted to be was

0:16:50.636 --> 0:16:52.876
<v Speaker 2>an investment banker. So then I became an investment banker.

0:16:53.036 --> 0:16:54.716
<v Speaker 2>And then I did that for a while, and then

0:16:55.156 --> 0:16:56.676
<v Speaker 2>I really didn't want to do that anymore, so I

0:16:56.716 --> 0:16:57.916
<v Speaker 2>became a writer on the internet.

0:16:58.076 --> 0:17:01.556
<v Speaker 1>So that transition, Why did you decide?

0:17:01.676 --> 0:17:03.716
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like liar's poker directly sent me to

0:17:03.796 --> 0:17:06.996
<v Speaker 2>investment banking, but like it did, like pave the way

0:17:07.036 --> 0:17:08.996
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, And I know that that's like you

0:17:09.236 --> 0:17:11.156
<v Speaker 2>regret that or whatever, but you know, it's fine.

0:17:11.636 --> 0:17:14.956
<v Speaker 1>Your path resembles my own path, Like I had this

0:17:15.036 --> 0:17:17.676
<v Speaker 1>hostility the economics department when I was in college and

0:17:19.196 --> 0:17:21.676
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a job when I graduated and all that. Anyway,

0:17:21.996 --> 0:17:25.316
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm curious about that transition out of investment banking

0:17:25.396 --> 0:17:28.996
<v Speaker 1>to writing. Why did you decide you didn't want to

0:17:28.996 --> 0:17:30.356
<v Speaker 1>be an investment banker anymore.

0:17:30.596 --> 0:17:32.876
<v Speaker 2>I started as an investment banker as like an associate

0:17:33.396 --> 0:17:36.596
<v Speaker 2>in a weird desk where I was like structuring stuff

0:17:36.956 --> 0:17:42.876
<v Speaker 2>and I was doing interesting stuff involving like math and

0:17:43.356 --> 0:17:46.836
<v Speaker 2>law and like getting into the guts of things. But

0:17:46.876 --> 0:17:48.836
<v Speaker 2>then as you get more senior, you know the job

0:17:48.916 --> 0:17:52.676
<v Speaker 2>is ultimately a sales job, and so I was spending

0:17:52.716 --> 0:17:57.596
<v Speaker 2>less time, you know, learning and understanding things, and more

0:17:57.636 --> 0:18:02.036
<v Speaker 2>time getting on planes to give clients updates. So I

0:18:02.076 --> 0:18:04.116
<v Speaker 2>was getting worse at it. I was enjoying it less,

0:18:04.196 --> 0:18:06.756
<v Speaker 2>and I vaguely imagined being a writer, and so like

0:18:06.796 --> 0:18:08.876
<v Speaker 2>the sort of you know, the lines crossed and it

0:18:08.876 --> 0:18:09.916
<v Speaker 2>became a good time to leave.

0:18:11.516 --> 0:18:13.476
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you a bit about there's

0:18:13.476 --> 0:18:16.996
<v Speaker 1>a there's a part of my book. I almost called you.

0:18:17.236 --> 0:18:20.436
<v Speaker 1>I called you. It's just just to clear the air here.

0:18:20.476 --> 0:18:22.436
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really funny that I was a

0:18:22.436 --> 0:18:24.916
<v Speaker 1>few months into like hanging around with Sam and I

0:18:24.996 --> 0:18:28.436
<v Speaker 1>was questioning whether this was the character I wanted to

0:18:28.476 --> 0:18:30.916
<v Speaker 1>be with. And I thought, I'll call Matt Levine and

0:18:30.956 --> 0:18:33.516
<v Speaker 1>ask him for advice. You remember this call, I said,

0:18:33.596 --> 0:18:35.556
<v Speaker 1>I called you, and I said, I said, I said,

0:18:35.756 --> 0:18:37.756
<v Speaker 1>if you were going to put me with any character

0:18:37.796 --> 0:18:39.996
<v Speaker 1>in Crypto, who would it be? And you said, we're

0:18:39.996 --> 0:18:42.876
<v Speaker 1>not even thinking about Sam Bay and Freed. And it

0:18:42.916 --> 0:18:44.756
<v Speaker 1>was one of those little things that gave me confidence

0:18:44.796 --> 0:18:46.516
<v Speaker 1>I was in the right place because I hadn't actually

0:18:46.516 --> 0:18:48.676
<v Speaker 1>been paying all that much attention to Crypto, and I

0:18:48.716 --> 0:18:50.836
<v Speaker 1>thought I was in the right place. But I didn't know.

0:18:50.956 --> 0:18:52.796
<v Speaker 2>And that's why you're giving me ten percent of the

0:18:52.836 --> 0:18:54.636
<v Speaker 2>movie though, right, did you.

0:18:54.596 --> 0:19:05.796
<v Speaker 1>Get the check yet? We'll be right back, welcome back.

0:19:06.796 --> 0:19:09.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm still wrestling with this. When I all blew up

0:19:09.916 --> 0:19:14.116
<v Speaker 1>and all right, there's some pile of money missing, it

0:19:14.156 --> 0:19:16.396
<v Speaker 1>was a little unclear how big that pile of money

0:19:16.916 --> 0:19:19.236
<v Speaker 1>missing was it seems to see it still be a

0:19:19.316 --> 0:19:20.116
<v Speaker 1>little unclear.

0:19:20.196 --> 0:19:22.516
<v Speaker 2>It's completely unclear to me. I have no idea, and.

0:19:22.436 --> 0:19:24.676
<v Speaker 1>So are you even watching if you've noticed that, Like

0:19:24.836 --> 0:19:27.636
<v Speaker 1>the bankruptcy people, the number they keep they say they

0:19:27.796 --> 0:19:30.916
<v Speaker 1>found keeps going up, and the last number was like

0:19:30.956 --> 0:19:33.836
<v Speaker 1>seven point three billion, and the customer deposits missing was

0:19:33.876 --> 0:19:36.836
<v Speaker 1>eight point six billion. What I'm wondering is to what

0:19:36.916 --> 0:19:40.156
<v Speaker 1>extent the money is lost, like lost in a bad trade,

0:19:40.516 --> 0:19:43.236
<v Speaker 1>and to what extent's lost like, oh, it's in some

0:19:43.356 --> 0:19:45.996
<v Speaker 1>exchange in South Korea or some bank they didn't pay

0:19:45.996 --> 0:19:49.356
<v Speaker 1>attention to. And I was just wondering whether you were

0:19:49.556 --> 0:19:52.036
<v Speaker 1>one following that doesn't sound like you're following that.

0:19:52.316 --> 0:19:53.516
<v Speaker 2>My sense is that there was a lot of money

0:19:53.556 --> 0:19:55.076
<v Speaker 2>lost on bad trades. I think that, like.

0:19:55.276 --> 0:19:58.276
<v Speaker 1>It's unclear what it's unclear what those bad trades were.

0:19:59.276 --> 0:19:59.676
<v Speaker 1>That's there.

0:19:59.796 --> 0:20:02.436
<v Speaker 2>I agree. I think that, like there are interesting theories

0:20:02.556 --> 0:20:05.196
<v Speaker 2>that Alameda was sort of a lost leader to get

0:20:05.236 --> 0:20:08.676
<v Speaker 2>people onto FTX, right, there's like a theory that Alameda

0:20:08.756 --> 0:20:12.516
<v Speaker 2>was sort of regularly losing money on trades, either because

0:20:12.516 --> 0:20:14.076
<v Speaker 2>it was a market maker that was not doing a

0:20:14.156 --> 0:20:16.036
<v Speaker 2>very good job of market making and so you would

0:20:16.076 --> 0:20:18.556
<v Speaker 2>always like get a good trade on FTX because Alameda

0:20:18.636 --> 0:20:20.996
<v Speaker 2>was always losing money on the other side, or because

0:20:21.396 --> 0:20:24.156
<v Speaker 2>Alameda was the sort of counterparty for a lot of liquidations,

0:20:24.196 --> 0:20:26.516
<v Speaker 2>and so if you got liquid on FTX, because the

0:20:26.516 --> 0:20:29.116
<v Speaker 2>trade moved against you, Alameda was on buying it, and

0:20:29.156 --> 0:20:32.356
<v Speaker 2>Alameda was constantly losing money by taking position by catching

0:20:32.396 --> 0:20:35.836
<v Speaker 2>falling knives. Basically, I think there's like probably some truth

0:20:35.876 --> 0:20:38.236
<v Speaker 2>to both of those theories, but not that much because

0:20:38.236 --> 0:20:40.876
<v Speaker 2>I don't think by the end when FTX was huge,

0:20:40.876 --> 0:20:43.556
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Alameda was a huge percentage of volume.

0:20:44.036 --> 0:20:47.396
<v Speaker 2>I think like the shape of those answers is probably

0:20:47.436 --> 0:20:49.036
<v Speaker 2>like a little bit true, but it's not, like it

0:20:49.076 --> 0:20:50.636
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really explain where a lot of the money went.

0:20:50.756 --> 0:20:54.596
<v Speaker 1>And in addition, if that were true, the prosecutors would

0:20:54.596 --> 0:20:56.196
<v Speaker 1>have teased us have Caroline.

0:20:55.836 --> 0:20:58.316
<v Speaker 2>Yes and no, because I like, to me that story

0:20:58.956 --> 0:21:02.036
<v Speaker 2>is like that story sounds like a Ponzi scheme, but

0:21:02.076 --> 0:21:04.676
<v Speaker 2>it's not intuitively obvious that it's a Ponzi scheme. Like

0:21:04.716 --> 0:21:07.116
<v Speaker 2>I think, like if you heard that story, you're like, oh,

0:21:07.596 --> 0:21:10.836
<v Speaker 2>like they were they lost money by doing trades that

0:21:10.876 --> 0:21:13.676
<v Speaker 2>were good for clients, and like that was good, and

0:21:13.796 --> 0:21:15.716
<v Speaker 2>like they were just on the losing side of trades

0:21:15.716 --> 0:21:17.796
<v Speaker 2>and that was innocent. Right, It's not that bad a

0:21:17.956 --> 0:21:20.516
<v Speaker 2>story intuitively. It's just like when you sort of trace

0:21:20.596 --> 0:21:22.796
<v Speaker 2>it through, you're like, oh, so it was a Ponzi scheme.

0:21:22.876 --> 0:21:25.436
<v Speaker 2>They were like giving investors money by taking it from

0:21:25.436 --> 0:21:26.076
<v Speaker 2>other investors.

0:21:26.756 --> 0:21:29.236
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other theories bouncing around? Oh?

0:21:29.276 --> 0:21:31.076
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like the standard theory is, like they spend

0:21:31.076 --> 0:21:32.676
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money on political donations, they spend a

0:21:32.716 --> 0:21:34.476
<v Speaker 2>lot of money on real estate. Like part of the answers,

0:21:34.516 --> 0:21:36.316
<v Speaker 2>they spent five hundred million dollars on a stake in

0:21:36.356 --> 0:21:39.436
<v Speaker 2>Anthropic that was like a great bet and it's now

0:21:39.436 --> 0:21:42.276
<v Speaker 2>worth probably billions of dollars, and so like, as like

0:21:42.316 --> 0:21:44.476
<v Speaker 2>a legal matter, you're not supposed to like take your

0:21:44.476 --> 0:21:47.636
<v Speaker 2>customer money and bet it on early stage AI startups,

0:21:47.676 --> 0:21:50.316
<v Speaker 2>but like that might have worked out, right, And like

0:21:50.356 --> 0:21:54.236
<v Speaker 2>the real estate stuff is like I don't really pretend

0:21:54.236 --> 0:21:56.516
<v Speaker 2>to understand the Bahamas real estate market, but presumably they

0:21:56.556 --> 0:21:59.436
<v Speaker 2>can sell those things for you know, like around what

0:21:59.476 --> 0:22:01.276
<v Speaker 2>they paid for. Right, So some of the money is

0:22:01.316 --> 0:22:04.676
<v Speaker 2>not gone in the sense of like flush down the toilet,

0:22:04.716 --> 0:22:05.076
<v Speaker 2>but it.

0:22:05.036 --> 0:22:06.916
<v Speaker 1>Is in the wrong place.

0:22:07.596 --> 0:22:10.076
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like it's like a lot of fraudsters like

0:22:10.196 --> 0:22:12.316
<v Speaker 2>take customer money and buy a mention for themselves and

0:22:12.356 --> 0:22:13.956
<v Speaker 2>then you can sell the mansion and give them money back.

0:22:13.956 --> 0:22:15.076
<v Speaker 2>But like it's still not okay.

0:22:15.236 --> 0:22:20.076
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I get that. So what questions remain in?

0:22:20.556 --> 0:22:22.916
<v Speaker 1>What questions are you still asking about this? Like to

0:22:22.956 --> 0:22:25.316
<v Speaker 1>what extent is your mind not come to rest on

0:22:25.356 --> 0:22:27.836
<v Speaker 1>the FTX story and you think there are things you

0:22:27.916 --> 0:22:28.596
<v Speaker 1>still want to know?

0:22:29.636 --> 0:22:33.676
<v Speaker 2>I I mean, honestly, the main answer is, I assume

0:22:33.716 --> 0:22:38.636
<v Speaker 2>that Sam will testify. I think that, like the public

0:22:38.716 --> 0:22:42.396
<v Speaker 2>perception of him is really down right now for obvious reasons.

0:22:42.676 --> 0:22:46.676
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that like he like made this

0:22:46.756 --> 0:22:48.916
<v Speaker 2>work for a while people were buying what he was selling.

0:22:49.276 --> 0:22:53.716
<v Speaker 2>And I think he was always a good talker, right,

0:22:53.716 --> 0:22:56.596
<v Speaker 2>And he always like gave you the impression of being

0:22:56.676 --> 0:22:59.476
<v Speaker 2>quite candid, right, And he always was, you know, sort

0:22:59.476 --> 0:23:02.676
<v Speaker 2>of like quick witted and like in his weird way personable.

0:23:03.116 --> 0:23:05.916
<v Speaker 2>I assume he will testify. I assume he will tell

0:23:05.956 --> 0:23:10.396
<v Speaker 2>a story that is like internally coherent. I assume that

0:23:10.796 --> 0:23:14.756
<v Speaker 2>when he's asked even moderately challenging questions, he will have

0:23:15.556 --> 0:23:19.196
<v Speaker 2>quick and like at least superficially reasonable sounding answers. Right,

0:23:19.276 --> 0:23:21.476
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested to see like how he frames the story

0:23:21.676 --> 0:23:25.596
<v Speaker 2>and how compelling it is to me and to everyone

0:23:25.596 --> 0:23:28.596
<v Speaker 2>else and to a jury. And the other class of

0:23:28.676 --> 0:23:30.796
<v Speaker 2>assets that we haven't talked about is the Bankercy estate

0:23:30.876 --> 0:23:33.116
<v Speaker 2>is trying to restart FTX. They're like, oh, we're gonna,

0:23:33.156 --> 0:23:35.676
<v Speaker 2>you know, probably rebrand it and start up an exchange

0:23:35.676 --> 0:23:38.156
<v Speaker 2>again and see what happens. You could imagine the government

0:23:38.196 --> 0:23:40.676
<v Speaker 2>saying like, you can never restart this again. All this

0:23:40.796 --> 0:23:43.076
<v Speaker 2>ip has to be thrown into the ocean, never speak

0:23:43.076 --> 0:23:44.796
<v Speaker 2>of FDIX again. But like they're not doing that. There's

0:23:44.836 --> 0:23:46.476
<v Speaker 2>on and so I don't I mean, there's some chance

0:23:46.516 --> 0:23:48.316
<v Speaker 2>that they'll get back more than like a penny, more

0:23:48.356 --> 0:23:50.596
<v Speaker 2>than the deposits. I don't think they'll do that before

0:23:51.516 --> 0:23:53.836
<v Speaker 2>sam sentencing. And I don't think that the you know,

0:23:53.876 --> 0:23:56.556
<v Speaker 2>the legal system sort of frowns upon like talking about that,

0:23:56.956 --> 0:23:59.316
<v Speaker 2>because like it feels like like a coin flip, right,

0:23:59.316 --> 0:24:01.716
<v Speaker 2>it feels like luck. Right, it feels like you did

0:24:02.196 --> 0:24:05.236
<v Speaker 2>the bad thing and you stole the customer money and

0:24:05.276 --> 0:24:07.236
<v Speaker 2>you put some of it into these lottery tickets and

0:24:07.276 --> 0:24:08.956
<v Speaker 2>then you put the rest of it into like private jet.

0:24:09.156 --> 0:24:11.556
<v Speaker 2>It's for yourself, and like the lottery, your tickets won.

0:24:11.836 --> 0:24:13.996
<v Speaker 2>But that's not like your that doesn't like go to

0:24:14.036 --> 0:24:16.636
<v Speaker 2>your moral guilt. It it's just like a you know,

0:24:16.676 --> 0:24:19.396
<v Speaker 2>you have to get lucky. But what's interesting is like,

0:24:19.756 --> 0:24:22.796
<v Speaker 2>you know, after the fact, like Sam was going around

0:24:22.916 --> 0:24:24.916
<v Speaker 2>trying to save the firm, right, He's trying to find

0:24:24.916 --> 0:24:27.836
<v Speaker 2>a buyer, and at the point when he was doing that,

0:24:28.476 --> 0:24:30.236
<v Speaker 2>it was like a little too late, you know, like

0:24:30.316 --> 0:24:34.556
<v Speaker 2>it was like a little you know, too obvious how

0:24:34.596 --> 0:24:36.676
<v Speaker 2>badly things had gone and how much rest of the

0:24:36.756 --> 0:24:40.516
<v Speaker 2>money was missing. And so I think that like one

0:24:40.556 --> 0:24:42.236
<v Speaker 2>story that Sam will tell is like if he had

0:24:42.276 --> 0:24:45.476
<v Speaker 2>only waited twelve hours before signing the bankruptcy papers, he

0:24:45.476 --> 0:24:47.556
<v Speaker 2>could have saved this whole thing, Right, I don't think

0:24:47.556 --> 0:24:50.516
<v Speaker 2>that's true, But if it turns out that the thing

0:24:50.516 --> 0:24:56.436
<v Speaker 2>has positive value, then he probably wouldn't be going to jail,

0:24:56.476 --> 0:24:57.996
<v Speaker 2>And he certainly wouldn't be going to jail for as

0:24:57.996 --> 0:25:00.436
<v Speaker 2>line as he's looking at here. I think that filing

0:25:00.436 --> 0:25:02.396
<v Speaker 2>for bankruptcy and then getting arrested and then getting the

0:25:02.436 --> 0:25:04.556
<v Speaker 2>money back is just like a terrible order of operations

0:25:04.556 --> 0:25:04.916
<v Speaker 2>for him.

0:25:05.276 --> 0:25:07.916
<v Speaker 1>That's right in addition to the story, Sam tells on

0:25:07.956 --> 0:25:09.756
<v Speaker 1>the stand, is there anything else you I'm looking for

0:25:10.236 --> 0:25:12.156
<v Speaker 1>out of this process? So do you feel like you

0:25:12.236 --> 0:25:15.636
<v Speaker 1>now more or less know what happened? And not much

0:25:15.676 --> 0:25:17.396
<v Speaker 1>that comes out is going to cause you to update

0:25:17.436 --> 0:25:18.236
<v Speaker 1>your understanding.

0:25:19.036 --> 0:25:22.236
<v Speaker 2>So I'm always curious, like how many people knew and like,

0:25:22.516 --> 0:25:25.956
<v Speaker 2>to the extent the number is small, how you could

0:25:26.036 --> 0:25:29.316
<v Speaker 2>keep it small? And I think that, Like, I feel

0:25:29.316 --> 0:25:31.956
<v Speaker 2>like I'm kind of getting satisfied with the answers to that, right,

0:25:31.996 --> 0:25:34.316
<v Speaker 2>Like it does seem like all of the inner circle

0:25:34.356 --> 0:25:36.756
<v Speaker 2>are testifying saying, yeah, we knew it was fraud, with

0:25:36.796 --> 0:25:39.596
<v Speaker 2>like Nishad being like I learned late that it.

0:25:39.596 --> 0:25:41.676
<v Speaker 1>Was fraud in September and.

0:25:42.276 --> 0:25:45.476
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is weird because he's sort of integral to

0:25:45.516 --> 0:25:47.156
<v Speaker 2>some of the coding of the fraud. But there is

0:25:47.236 --> 0:25:50.756
<v Speaker 2>kind of an explanation for how other people didn't know that, right,

0:25:51.116 --> 0:25:54.396
<v Speaker 2>which is like some combination of Garrio at.

0:25:54.356 --> 0:25:57.396
<v Speaker 1>Most of the code himself in shortand.

0:25:57.076 --> 0:26:00.676
<v Speaker 2>Sam was a weird passive aggressive manager. Yeah, nobody knew anything,

0:26:01.516 --> 0:26:03.316
<v Speaker 2>but it's still weird, right, I mean, it's still weird

0:26:03.356 --> 0:26:06.116
<v Speaker 2>that the accepted narrative is like five people knew it's

0:26:06.156 --> 0:26:08.956
<v Speaker 2>it's still puzzling to me, but I think that like

0:26:09.196 --> 0:26:10.756
<v Speaker 2>for sort of groping towards an answer on it.

0:26:11.756 --> 0:26:14.196
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for coming on. I really appreciate the time

0:26:14.596 --> 0:26:16.116
<v Speaker 1>and see you down the road. All right.

0:26:16.156 --> 0:26:16.396
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:26:17.316 --> 0:26:19.516
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in your feed soon with more expert

0:26:19.556 --> 0:26:23.476
<v Speaker 1>analysis and news from Sam Bangmanfreed's trial. Thanks for listening.

0:26:25.236 --> 0:26:28.556
<v Speaker 1>Lydia Gencott is our court reporter. Katherine Girardeau and Nisha

0:26:28.676 --> 0:26:32.556
<v Speaker 1>Venken produced this show. Sophie Crane is our editor. Our

0:26:32.636 --> 0:26:35.956
<v Speaker 1>music was composed by Matthias Bossi and John Evans of

0:26:36.036 --> 0:26:40.476
<v Speaker 1>stell Wagons. Symphonet Judging Sam is a production of Pushkin Industries.

0:26:40.876 --> 0:26:43.316
<v Speaker 1>Got a question or comment for me, There's a website

0:26:43.356 --> 0:26:50.476
<v Speaker 1>for that atr podcast dot com. That's atr podcast dot com.

0:26:50.676 --> 0:26:53.796
<v Speaker 1>To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen on the iHeartRadio app,

0:26:53.956 --> 0:26:58.076
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your podcasts. If

0:26:58.116 --> 0:27:01.436
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to access bonus episodes and listen ad free,

0:27:01.796 --> 0:27:04.196
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to sign up for a Pushkin Plus subscription

0:27:04.556 --> 0:27:08.036
<v Speaker 1>at pushkin dot fm, slash Plus, or on our Apple

0:27:08.116 --> 0:27:08.836
<v Speaker 1>show page.