1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside 2 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:06,920 Speaker 1: my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring 3 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along 4 00:00:11,520 --> 00:00:15,520 Speaker 1: with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast 5 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,439 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and 6 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:22,119 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. A couple of my 7 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:24,759 Speaker 1: favorite people just walking the studio. No, I mean it's 8 00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:27,280 Speaker 1: this is this is killer. I mean for Bloomberg Markets. 9 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:29,800 Speaker 1: I think this panel tops all panels that we've had 10 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:33,239 Speaker 1: in terms of I'm excited. We have Neil Grossman in 11 00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: the studio, one of my best friends, I'll say, and 12 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: also the co founder and former c IO of t 13 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:42,080 Speaker 1: k n G Capital Markets. Um, we've been talking about 14 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:47,080 Speaker 1: the FED and rates for I don't know twenty years now. Um. 15 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:50,519 Speaker 1: Daniel D. Martino Booth just uh walked in the studio 16 00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 1: from Quill Investment Strategy. He also used to uh sorry, 17 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:58,360 Speaker 1: Quill Intelligence. She also used to advise the Federal Bank 18 00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:01,680 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, and her book on the 19 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: FED is one of my favorite titles, called fed Up. Yes. 20 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:06,440 Speaker 1: So when you say we love the FED. We love 21 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 1: talking about the FED. We might not love the FED. 22 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:12,280 Speaker 1: We're not telling you how we feel personally emotionally about 23 00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve. And Priamisra. She was a long time 24 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:20,160 Speaker 1: UH guest, a regular guest on Bloomberg Rewind, which I'm 25 00:01:20,200 --> 00:01:22,760 Speaker 1: gonna say is probably one of the top three shows 26 00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: that Bloomberg has ever produced television shows, and it's great 27 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,199 Speaker 1: to have her here. She's the managing director and global 28 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:33,680 Speaker 1: head of rate strategy for t D Securities. All right, guys, um, 29 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:35,640 Speaker 1: what do we expect Danie? I'll start with you, what 30 00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:40,360 Speaker 1: do we expect from j Powell today? Obviously fifty basis points? 31 00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 1: But what is he gonna say about the path forward, 32 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,560 Speaker 1: um after after the rate decision. So I think what's 33 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:52,160 Speaker 1: critical to focus on is if Powell UH sites year 34 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:57,200 Speaker 1: over year inflation as opposed to the dissipation in monthly 35 00:01:57,320 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: increases in inflation, one of them is going to get 36 00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:04,960 Speaker 1: him license to say, we've got to get rates higher, 37 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 1: and we've got to keep and maintain them until we 38 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,080 Speaker 1: see this year over year pace come down. If he emphasizes, 39 00:02:11,240 --> 00:02:13,359 Speaker 1: you know the fact that he's seen in his core 40 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:18,800 Speaker 1: services X shelter absolutely favorite inflation metric that that itself 41 00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:21,280 Speaker 1: is coming down and coming down quickly over the last 42 00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 1: three months. I think markets will love him. I love it. 43 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,240 Speaker 1: You know, when you think about this Federal Reserve this year, 44 00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 1: you know, just been very aggressively raising rates. As you 45 00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:35,960 Speaker 1: look back on this year, what's your view of the Fed? 46 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 1: Have they gone far enough fast enough? Have they are 47 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,840 Speaker 1: they still behind? What have they done? What have they done? 48 00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 1: And when you talk to institutional clients, what do they 49 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:47,320 Speaker 1: tell you. I mean, there's a lot of frustration on 50 00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:50,519 Speaker 1: the FED. I think the reaction function changed multiple times 51 00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 1: this year. I mean I think that you know, was 52 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,919 Speaker 1: that a credibility issue with the Fed at the start 53 00:02:55,919 --> 00:02:58,360 Speaker 1: of the year, the start of the hiking cycle, and 54 00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 1: I know front looading was their favorite word for six months. 55 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,720 Speaker 1: I think it was a catch up trade um where 56 00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 1: they were, you know, really trying to catch up for 57 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:09,000 Speaker 1: the fact that they started late. I think the question 58 00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:11,880 Speaker 1: now is the threshold. The threshold to slow down the 59 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:15,400 Speaker 1: pace of hikes is different from the threshold to stop hiking, 60 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,400 Speaker 1: and it's very different from the threshold to ease. And 61 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,040 Speaker 1: the market is trying to figure out what these thresholds 62 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 1: are now to your question, have they gone too far? 63 00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 1: I think on rate hikes, our view is they may 64 00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:28,120 Speaker 1: actually go more than what the markets pricing in at 65 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:29,919 Speaker 1: the end of the day, because I think inflation is 66 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:32,560 Speaker 1: going to be particularly cost services a little sticky on 67 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 1: the way down. So I think they may have more 68 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:36,120 Speaker 1: to do. Where I think they've overdone it is on 69 00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 1: QT and they don't talk much about it, but it's 70 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 1: you know, it's the reason why long and real rates 71 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:44,200 Speaker 1: have risen. I think that's slowing the economy down. We 72 00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 1: think a recession is almost a done deal at this 73 00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 1: point in twenty three, so they've done a lot um. 74 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: I think they have a little bit more to do, 75 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:54,040 Speaker 1: and then it's going to be really tricky for them 76 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:55,760 Speaker 1: next year. So some of the frustration with the FAT 77 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 1: I think remains next year because we're gonna look for 78 00:03:58,240 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: the FAT two ease and I think they're going to 79 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,160 Speaker 1: struggling to ease with inflation still high. Next, speaking of 80 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 1: frustration with the FED, let me bring a Neil Grossman here, 81 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:09,360 Speaker 1: and first let me say you've got to differentiate between 82 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:11,760 Speaker 1: how you feel about the FED, with the FED should 83 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 1: be doing in your take, and what you expect the 84 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: fed actually to do. Oh, you're right, I am very 85 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:21,920 Speaker 1: fed up. And then a couple of things. First of all, 86 00:04:22,279 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 1: as you know, I don't think they've been hawkish. Um, 87 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:29,159 Speaker 1: they've barely done anything in the way they should have 88 00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:34,280 Speaker 1: because I call it, as you know, infinitesimal incrementalism. They 89 00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 1: haven't even done one Vulcan yet, as far as I'm concerned. 90 00:04:36,839 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 1: Paul Vulcan raised rates four inter meeting on a weekend. 91 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 1: That would have been something. And I'm sorry for you, 92 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:48,120 Speaker 1: but they don't. Haven't done quantitative tightening either. Letting something 93 00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 1: slowly drip drip away after they bought a hundred and 94 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 1: thirty billion a month for ten years is not tightening. 95 00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:58,920 Speaker 1: So I mean, yes, there are effects, but to be 96 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:01,400 Speaker 1: honest with you, I would stop tightening now and announced 97 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:04,800 Speaker 1: this afternoon that I'm going to start selling bonds at 98 00:05:04,800 --> 00:05:06,640 Speaker 1: a clip of fifty to a hundred billion a month. 99 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 1: That would be effective per se. Now, what what are 100 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:10,880 Speaker 1: they going to do or not? I'm not going to 101 00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:13,880 Speaker 1: disagree too much other than I think the thing you 102 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:18,719 Speaker 1: need to watch or consider is the liquidity. I think 103 00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 1: if he focuses on acknowledging financial liquidity is easier now 104 00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:26,799 Speaker 1: that I believe it was in March or very close 105 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:30,279 Speaker 1: to it. Leaving aside the housing market, but interest rates, 106 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:36,000 Speaker 1: the dollars weeken ten percent, stocks have risen. I mean, 107 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:39,559 Speaker 1: the risk here to me is we don't know where 108 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,200 Speaker 1: all this is going to come out of the back end. 109 00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:44,880 Speaker 1: Daniel last time we were on, said clearly, and I 110 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:47,800 Speaker 1: agree with her, that inflation is coming down. I thought 111 00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:49,840 Speaker 1: it was gonna come a little slower. She's been very right. 112 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 1: But at some point in the middle of next year, 113 00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:56,240 Speaker 1: the comparisons are going to start to become very easy, 114 00:05:56,360 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 1: and we will then settle into where the ambient inflation 115 00:05:59,760 --> 00:06:03,039 Speaker 1: ray is. And if it's three to five, we have 116 00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 1: a problem in and reflating now only raises the possibility 117 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:10,240 Speaker 1: or likelihood down the road. So I think that's what 118 00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:12,839 Speaker 1: I'd be focused. I'm going to push back as hard 119 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:16,839 Speaker 1: as I possibly can about quantitative tightening not taking place. Now. 120 00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:19,719 Speaker 1: There's something called the Employee Retention Credit. In the nine 121 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: months through November, it injected a plus billion dollars into 122 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 1: the economy. So there's still stimulus money running around out 123 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:30,599 Speaker 1: there that can't take away from the feds H eight 124 00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:34,159 Speaker 1: that's released every Friday, afternoon after the close. It shows 125 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:37,240 Speaker 1: you one of the broadest measures of money supply in 126 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:39,640 Speaker 1: a real time week to week on a real time 127 00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:41,719 Speaker 1: week to week basis, because we don't get money supply 128 00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:45,239 Speaker 1: indicators very often and they're lagged. And we've seen six 129 00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:48,960 Speaker 1: consecutive weeks of year over year declines in what we 130 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:53,680 Speaker 1: call other deposits liabilities. Never, never in the history of 131 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:56,599 Speaker 1: the United States have we seen six consecutive weeks of 132 00:06:56,680 --> 00:06:59,600 Speaker 1: year over year declines. Try pricing a commercial mortgage back 133 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:02,680 Speaker 1: secure a spot plus six forty. A lot of things 134 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 1: are screeching to a halt in terms of financing that 135 00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:08,360 Speaker 1: are beyond residential real estate, but there are other sources 136 00:07:08,360 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 1: of liquidity that, of course make it appear that it's 137 00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 1: as abundant as it is. Quantitative tightening is working. I'm 138 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:16,200 Speaker 1: crossing fingers the second time I've said it public Adday 139 00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:19,280 Speaker 1: Mike McKee asked him if he is going to increase 140 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:22,040 Speaker 1: treasury roll off to make up for the fact that 141 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: they're so far behind schedule with mortgage backed securities. I 142 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 1: do look at the FED balance sheet on the Bloomberg 143 00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 1: and it really hasn't come down that much. I know 144 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:32,600 Speaker 1: you're talking about uh F E D SPACE b A 145 00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:35,280 Speaker 1: l GO, FED boal GO. I know you're talking about 146 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:38,480 Speaker 1: broader measures, but in terms of the balance sheet, they've 147 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 1: gone from eight and a half trillion to eight point 148 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,760 Speaker 1: two trillion. It's not a lot, but if you think 149 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:48,600 Speaker 1: about they're only fifteen billion dollars ten years ago, we're 150 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 1: going to be at eight more than eight trillion dollars. 151 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:53,400 Speaker 1: You would have said, no way, we just did that 152 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:55,880 Speaker 1: for the Great Financial Crisis. We're not gonna do that again. Right. 153 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:58,240 Speaker 1: We're looking at a stock versus flow thing here, and 154 00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:00,000 Speaker 1: the fact is we're doing it at a much more 155 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:03,240 Speaker 1: aggressive pace then we've even attempted in two thousand eighteen. 156 00:08:03,280 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: I'd love to hear thought on this pre you jump in, 157 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 1: so you know, I think they are doing qt they 158 00:08:11,760 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 1: you know, meaning that the balance sheet is slowing, it's 159 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: declining slowly. I mean they've only ramped up in September 160 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,640 Speaker 1: to the full balance sheet gaps on treasuries. I agree 161 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:24,320 Speaker 1: mortgages are not running off as fast because they're not preeping, 162 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:27,000 Speaker 1: but look at the mortgage market, look at the housing market. 163 00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:29,520 Speaker 1: I don't think they can sell mbs as a market 164 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:32,719 Speaker 1: functioning issue. I think there's a market functioning issue in treasuries, 165 00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:37,320 Speaker 1: so extend increasing QT and treasuries will worsen the liquidity 166 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 1: in the treasury market, which you know, we need this 167 00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 1: market to function if the fixed income market has to 168 00:08:43,840 --> 00:08:47,240 Speaker 1: exist and and price and we have to find price discovery. 169 00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:49,680 Speaker 1: So I think they're doing the max in terms of QT. 170 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:53,240 Speaker 1: I struggle a little bit in terms of how do 171 00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:55,599 Speaker 1: they think of the two tools that they have to 172 00:08:55,679 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 1: tighten policy between QT and rate hikes. We haven't heard 173 00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:01,320 Speaker 1: much from the Fed on this front, like what is 174 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: x billion in QT worth? And it's a nonlinear response, 175 00:09:05,040 --> 00:09:07,040 Speaker 1: meaning the early part of QT I think is not 176 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,480 Speaker 1: a big deal because the liquidity was there was enough liquidity. 177 00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,520 Speaker 1: Going down a live from very excess to excess is 178 00:09:13,520 --> 00:09:16,120 Speaker 1: not a big deal. As you start getting to scarce 179 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:18,959 Speaker 1: level of reserves, which I think we're six months away from, 180 00:09:19,200 --> 00:09:22,960 Speaker 1: but we're getting there, and as the supply starts to uh, 181 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 1: you know, increase. There's no martial buyer of duration in 182 00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 1: the US, not with an inverted curve, not with the 183 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:31,960 Speaker 1: fact that may still have to keep raising rates. I 184 00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 1: think that's the issue on the supply front. And you know, 185 00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 1: we talked about the data is okay right now, but 186 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,000 Speaker 1: there are I mean, we've all talked about these long 187 00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 1: and variable lags. I just struggle, Like the middle of 188 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:46,600 Speaker 1: next year, the savings buffer goes down, and now QT 189 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:49,520 Speaker 1: is starting to have an impact. Level of rates is 190 00:09:49,559 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 1: starting to have an impact when the economy slows down. 191 00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 1: How quickly can the FED turn? Do they stop QUT? 192 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't think they stop QUT until they 193 00:09:57,559 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 1: start to cut rates and that inflation and if it 194 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 1: starts to get to me, I'm a little nervous when 195 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:05,439 Speaker 1: I hear four or five percent. We were thinking three percent, 196 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:08,800 Speaker 1: even three is well north of you know that two 197 00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:12,520 Speaker 1: percent target, and the FED respond and we've been used 198 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:15,280 Speaker 1: to Every market has been used to the FED responding 199 00:10:15,400 --> 00:10:18,800 Speaker 1: to slow down, and I just think this time around 200 00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 1: the FED might have to be resolute in their words. 201 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:24,400 Speaker 1: And then how does the market respond to that we 202 00:10:24,679 --> 00:10:26,840 Speaker 1: need no monetary help, but no fie still help by 203 00:10:26,880 --> 00:10:28,680 Speaker 1: the pre Let me step in a couple of things. 204 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:33,640 Speaker 1: Of having traded an enormous amount of treasuries over generations. Um, 205 00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:35,880 Speaker 1: the only reason liquidity is so bad is you have 206 00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:38,080 Speaker 1: a central bank that destroyed the system at the end 207 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:41,760 Speaker 1: of the day and the curve and its representation is 208 00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 1: in large part due to the fact that they own everything. 209 00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:47,680 Speaker 1: If you really want liquidity and markets, tell them to 210 00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:50,080 Speaker 1: sell the entire balance sheet. You'll get a quick adjustment 211 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:52,880 Speaker 1: and then there will be plenty of bonds around to 212 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:55,400 Speaker 1: play with and do what you need to do. But 213 00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:57,600 Speaker 1: if you're going to ask somebody to, as you said, 214 00:10:57,720 --> 00:10:59,720 Speaker 1: you know, nobody wants to buy the ration. Nobody wants 215 00:10:59,720 --> 00:11:01,640 Speaker 1: to buy ration because a three and a half percent 216 00:11:01,720 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: long bond and seven or eight or eight percent inflation 217 00:11:06,360 --> 00:11:10,160 Speaker 1: rate is, to be honest with you, stupidity. Long long bonds. 218 00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:12,000 Speaker 1: If they were where they should have been relative to 219 00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:16,400 Speaker 1: FED funds, everyone would be buying them. Let's wait. You 220 00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:19,440 Speaker 1: know what did Daniel Mark did? Did you work with Priya? 221 00:11:19,520 --> 00:11:22,839 Speaker 1: Did you guys? Were you freshmen together? Yeah? I was 222 00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 1: saying this during the break, Pria that when we were 223 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:26,520 Speaker 1: when we were both starting out in the industry, when 224 00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 1: we were teenagers and you were a Bank of America 225 00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:30,680 Speaker 1: and I was at the FED, that you were one 226 00:11:30,720 --> 00:11:33,920 Speaker 1: of my my closest contacts. So it could be on 227 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:37,280 Speaker 1: with you. I've enjoyed lots of FED conversations with Danielle. 228 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:39,920 Speaker 1: So let me Priya ask you about something that Danielle 229 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 1: mentioned during the break which I wasn't really thinking about. 230 00:11:43,440 --> 00:11:46,560 Speaker 1: But all of the big hawks on this FED are 231 00:11:46,679 --> 00:11:51,280 Speaker 1: rotating out and they're gonna be replaced with either doves 232 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:55,000 Speaker 1: or cash kry and like who knows which way he's 233 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,400 Speaker 1: gonna go depending on the politics. But um, what do 234 00:11:58,440 --> 00:12:01,880 Speaker 1: you think that means for February one? Are we gonna 235 00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:05,319 Speaker 1: see another fifty basis point hike after this or are 236 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 1: they gonna step down? A? Yeah? And the market I 237 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:12,840 Speaker 1: think was like it was about fift priced for it. 238 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:16,840 Speaker 1: I think it's actually fair because we've had two CPI misses. 239 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:19,280 Speaker 1: So if we get another week cp another point two 240 00:12:19,360 --> 00:12:21,760 Speaker 1: or point three, I think they can step down. I 241 00:12:21,800 --> 00:12:23,920 Speaker 1: do think then they can keep going at twenty five 242 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:26,760 Speaker 1: for a few more meetings. But it's interesting. I think 243 00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:30,520 Speaker 1: the divisions at the FED will sound they will sound 244 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:33,720 Speaker 1: less unified. Um. And whether it's because of the rotating 245 00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:36,200 Speaker 1: members to your point, or the fact that I think 246 00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:39,280 Speaker 1: inflation and growth will point in different directions next year 247 00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:41,280 Speaker 1: much more than this year. This year it was one 248 00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:44,800 Speaker 1: trade high inflation, so they were all very unified. But 249 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:47,400 Speaker 1: next year as inflation goes down but not all the 250 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:49,800 Speaker 1: way to two percent, and growth starts to slow down 251 00:12:49,840 --> 00:12:53,040 Speaker 1: and the labor market more importantly starts to weaken, I 252 00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:56,040 Speaker 1: think you'll see the FED sounding a lot more divided, 253 00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:58,719 Speaker 1: and the voting members won't help either. So yeah, I 254 00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:00,840 Speaker 1: think it's going to become a odd harder to call 255 00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:03,280 Speaker 1: the FED next year. When do they stop? When do 256 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: the ease? What happens to QT? And the Fed will 257 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:11,839 Speaker 1: sound I think more divided on this, Daniel, We've got 258 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:14,160 Speaker 1: a function on the Bloomberg terminal d O t s 259 00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:16,640 Speaker 1: the whole dot plot thing, Madging. I don't know what 260 00:13:16,679 --> 00:13:18,959 Speaker 1: the heck it means, but um, it looks like it's 261 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:21,960 Speaker 1: going down starting in twenty three. Is that? Does that 262 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:24,079 Speaker 1: make sense to you? And and again as you raise 263 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:27,480 Speaker 1: the issue of the makeup of the FED, does that 264 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:31,320 Speaker 1: make sense to you? Hang on the dots median rises 265 00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:33,640 Speaker 1: in twenty three, There are a lot of settings on 266 00:13:33,679 --> 00:13:38,320 Speaker 1: your Oh yeah, after three then it goes down to yeah. 267 00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:40,600 Speaker 1: And I think what you can actually see today in 268 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:43,160 Speaker 1: the dot plot is that some some of those dots 269 00:13:43,240 --> 00:13:46,440 Speaker 1: might move down in twenty three, So you might see 270 00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:48,679 Speaker 1: a shift onto the devas spectrum. In fact, what I'll 271 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 1: be looking for today is maybe the widest disparity that 272 00:13:51,480 --> 00:13:53,960 Speaker 1: we've ever seen to pre as point, it's going to 273 00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:57,520 Speaker 1: be much more more contentious. I think that Powell is 274 00:13:57,559 --> 00:14:00,640 Speaker 1: going to be facing multiple descents. One of the things 275 00:14:00,720 --> 00:14:02,840 Speaker 1: that has been on his side, which has been surprising 276 00:14:02,840 --> 00:14:05,719 Speaker 1: to me, given John Williams came from the San Francisco 277 00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:08,960 Speaker 1: FED and has traditionally been adove, is that John Williams 278 00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:12,520 Speaker 1: has been so loyal to Powell throughout this and I 279 00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:15,959 Speaker 1: think that's gonna be critical next year because between between 280 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:22,000 Speaker 1: bar Bar being one of them, uh Williams, Powell, and Waller, 281 00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:25,480 Speaker 1: He's not going to have that many more voters in 282 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:29,560 Speaker 1: his camp. We forget that Powell suffered full blown mutiny 283 00:14:29,880 --> 00:14:31,880 Speaker 1: in the very end with not a single person until 284 00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:34,560 Speaker 1: Wayne Angel changed his vote back years and years ago. 285 00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:35,920 Speaker 1: But I think it's going to be a much more 286 00:14:35,920 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 1: contentious FED, and I think the dot plots are going 287 00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 1: to widen out a lot. I think I'm looking at 288 00:14:44,120 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: four sixty two right now on the dot plot, so 289 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:50,560 Speaker 1: basically four seventy five is the upper range, and I'm 290 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:52,280 Speaker 1: gonna take the other side of that that Danielle I 291 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:55,160 Speaker 1: think they're going to for eight or five. Well, I 292 00:14:55,200 --> 00:14:57,560 Speaker 1: think that's possible. But I think the other interesting question 293 00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:00,800 Speaker 1: is going to become again it's the lower the ultimate 294 00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 1: peak rate, the longer I think they're gonna end up 295 00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:06,800 Speaker 1: having to maintain that level, because I think again it's 296 00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:09,080 Speaker 1: going to become a question of of of sort of 297 00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 1: tug of war between the stimulative effects of not doing 298 00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:15,960 Speaker 1: enough and the potential impact on prices and their ability 299 00:15:16,040 --> 00:15:20,120 Speaker 1: to ultimately push prices down low enough. You know, again, 300 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:22,160 Speaker 1: one of the things you might ask yourself, as we 301 00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 1: just went through two years, well, as of next month 302 00:15:24,680 --> 00:15:27,200 Speaker 1: will have gone through two years over seven percent inflation. 303 00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:30,200 Speaker 1: So we've already started a you know, sort of a 304 00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:34,720 Speaker 1: process of of of of of wave process of pushing 305 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 1: the consequences out. And so if it's going to take you, 306 00:15:38,680 --> 00:15:40,600 Speaker 1: for example, you're here're hearing people talking we'll get to 307 00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:42,440 Speaker 1: two percent at the end of next year, I find 308 00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 1: that hard to believe. But if it takes five years 309 00:15:44,840 --> 00:15:46,480 Speaker 1: or eight years to get you to two percent, it's 310 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:48,320 Speaker 1: very different than if you can get the two percent, 311 00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:50,160 Speaker 1: say and two and a half years. And keep in mind, 312 00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:54,200 Speaker 1: Mr Volker, even with rates it took it functionally took 313 00:15:54,200 --> 00:15:57,840 Speaker 1: a generation to get to an ambient level has been done. 314 00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:01,560 Speaker 1: I mean, I mean I put together a four and 315 00:16:01,640 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: f one fifty and I'm looking at ninety dollars for 316 00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:07,240 Speaker 1: an American pickup truck. That's just not that's the most 317 00:16:07,280 --> 00:16:10,040 Speaker 1: repossessed vehicle in America. And it's the twenty one and 318 00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:13,280 Speaker 1: twenty two models that they're repossessing the most quickly mats 319 00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:16,120 Speaker 1: because everybody has big payments and they got a friend 320 00:16:16,120 --> 00:16:18,760 Speaker 1: who goes to auction. If you're ever interested, yeah, I'm 321 00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 1: definitely interested, So I'll tag along. What do you think? 322 00:16:22,200 --> 00:16:26,000 Speaker 1: I mean the terminal rate, I guess is important. And 323 00:16:26,040 --> 00:16:27,760 Speaker 1: I think Neil brings up a great point. If they 324 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 1: don't get higher quick enough, they're going to have to 325 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 1: be stuck at their relatively lowly rate for longer, right. 326 00:16:36,120 --> 00:16:40,160 Speaker 1: And I do think that next year, despite the market 327 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 1: really begging for the fair two ease, I think they're 328 00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:45,880 Speaker 1: going to sound very resolute and not ease or even 329 00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:48,240 Speaker 1: pushback again some of the market pricing of cuts. And 330 00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 1: I wonder I hope Jepal was asked about that. If 331 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:53,720 Speaker 1: you can lobby in a question too to Mr McKee 332 00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:56,440 Speaker 1: to ask about the rate cuts is the market in 333 00:16:56,520 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: the last month has priced in a lot more rate 334 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:02,520 Speaker 1: cuts in late twenty three twenty four. And while I 335 00:17:02,560 --> 00:17:04,320 Speaker 1: think they're going to have to cut in twenty four 336 00:17:04,320 --> 00:17:07,000 Speaker 1: because the unemployment rate will rise a lot, I struggled 337 00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:09,359 Speaker 1: with the cuts in twenty three. Now on the dots, 338 00:17:09,440 --> 00:17:11,439 Speaker 1: I think the median is going to move up for 339 00:17:11,600 --> 00:17:14,679 Speaker 1: twenty three. It's a fair point that, you know, I 340 00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:16,679 Speaker 1: wish we had a mid twenty three dots because I 341 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:20,800 Speaker 1: would be a clear median or or clear estimate of terminal. 342 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:22,880 Speaker 1: But we don't have a mid twenty three. I don't 343 00:17:22,880 --> 00:17:25,399 Speaker 1: think the FED wants to signal that they might get 344 00:17:25,440 --> 00:17:27,440 Speaker 1: to terminal by the middle of the year and then 345 00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:29,520 Speaker 1: cut rates. So I'm going to be looking at that 346 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:34,080 Speaker 1: end twenty three as their estimate of terminal, and importantly 347 00:17:34,119 --> 00:17:36,439 Speaker 1: the distribution of those dots, because the medium might be 348 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:38,360 Speaker 1: at five, but if you have a bunch of FED 349 00:17:38,359 --> 00:17:40,440 Speaker 1: officials at five and a quarter or five and a half, 350 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:43,080 Speaker 1: the market is not priced for that. And this risk 351 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:46,919 Speaker 1: rally that's pricing in the FED terminal around five or 352 00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:50,480 Speaker 1: below and then the FED quickly cutting rates. I think 353 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 1: that is at risk. If the distribution of dots in 354 00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:56,080 Speaker 1: twenty three is high, and then twenty four. I think 355 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:58,000 Speaker 1: the market, the FED can keep saying that they're not 356 00:17:58,040 --> 00:17:59,879 Speaker 1: going to cut too much, the market is going to 357 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:01,960 Speaker 1: all their bluff on it because the market is now 358 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:05,280 Speaker 1: increasingly pricing in a recession as the base case for 359 00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:08,320 Speaker 1: the end of twenty three twenty four, and then if 360 00:18:08,359 --> 00:18:12,760 Speaker 1: inflation comes down, the FED can justify some rate cuts. 361 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:15,240 Speaker 1: But we know if they got hundred, the next hundred 362 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 1: it looks a lot easier, and if unemployment goes up, 363 00:18:17,800 --> 00:18:20,080 Speaker 1: they're going to have to I mean, does any of 364 00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:23,800 Speaker 1: us really feel that the FED is independent? Danielle, Who 365 00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 1: did you work with in Dallas? I worked with Richard 366 00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:30,920 Speaker 1: Fisher and he was He was different than most works. Okay, 367 00:18:30,920 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 1: but this fan was congenial and reluctant to descent. If 368 00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:37,359 Speaker 1: we get five five and a half percent, if we 369 00:18:37,400 --> 00:18:39,840 Speaker 1: get six percent unemployment, if we get people who can't 370 00:18:39,840 --> 00:18:42,680 Speaker 1: put food on their families tables, I think this feed 371 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:45,719 Speaker 1: is really going to have resolved. And that's that's your question. 372 00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:50,560 Speaker 1: We're seeing um small business closing. There's a website called 373 00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:53,800 Speaker 1: daily job cuts dot com. At the fastest pace I 374 00:18:53,800 --> 00:18:56,119 Speaker 1: spoke to the person who runs this website at the 375 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,760 Speaker 1: fastest pace since two thousand and nine. There's there's actual 376 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 1: pain out there in the economy, and there's a reason 377 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:06,040 Speaker 1: that you're seeing such disparity between the establishment and the 378 00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:09,080 Speaker 1: household surveys in the in the jobs data, and that's 379 00:19:09,119 --> 00:19:11,399 Speaker 1: because one of them is not telling you the true 380 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:14,439 Speaker 1: state of unemployment in America. One's playing catch up to 381 00:19:14,480 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: the other. The thing is, again going back, the FED 382 00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:22,080 Speaker 1: has a dual mandate, which is price stability basically zero, 383 00:19:22,280 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 1: and full employment. And it's a two factory zero, right, 384 00:19:25,359 --> 00:19:28,320 Speaker 1: I mean, I guess they've decided it's two percent, and 385 00:19:28,359 --> 00:19:30,080 Speaker 1: now some of them are thinking it could be three 386 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:31,919 Speaker 1: or four. But there's a reason for it. Well, now 387 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:34,680 Speaker 1: three for four a different issue, but the two percent, 388 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:36,919 Speaker 1: and I think it should they had it lower than 389 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:39,080 Speaker 1: that with low low unemployment. But the bottom line is 390 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:42,919 Speaker 1: it's a two factor optimization because as as as unemployment 391 00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:46,040 Speaker 1: drops too low, price pressures rise. At five and a 392 00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:48,760 Speaker 1: half to six percent, the optimization model will give them 393 00:19:48,800 --> 00:19:52,560 Speaker 1: plenty of room if they really feel that they have 394 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:54,760 Speaker 1: to cut depending on inflation, but a three and a 395 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:58,040 Speaker 1: half percent inflation rate with six percent unemployments is going 396 00:19:58,080 --> 00:20:01,680 Speaker 1: to give them room three and a six unemployment rate 397 00:20:01,920 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 1: with six or seven percent on flip inflation, which is 398 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:07,880 Speaker 1: basically stagflation at that point. Now they have a problem. 399 00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:11,679 Speaker 1: All right, guys, great stuff. Really appreciate it. Uh, this 400 00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:14,520 Speaker 1: was a historic get together, some smart people kind of 401 00:20:14,520 --> 00:20:17,080 Speaker 1: previewing what we might hear from our federal reserve today later. 402 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:20,000 Speaker 1: Dana Washington d C, Neil Grossman, former c I O 403 00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:24,119 Speaker 1: at t k n G Capital, and Daniel D. Martimo Booth, 404 00:20:24,160 --> 00:20:27,840 Speaker 1: a CEO and Chief Strategist at Quill Intelligence, joining us 405 00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:30,240 Speaker 1: here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio and on the phone, 406 00:20:30,240 --> 00:20:34,520 Speaker 1: Priam Isra, global head of Rate Strategy Managing director with 407 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:37,119 Speaker 1: t D Security has given a sense of what we 408 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:39,920 Speaker 1: may hear later this afternoon. Of course, Michael McKee is 409 00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:42,320 Speaker 1: Dana Washington d C. He'll have live reporting and the 410 00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:45,560 Speaker 1: Bloomerk Surveillance team will have their show at one thirty 411 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:52,800 Speaker 1: Wall Street time. Million ways to go with our next 412 00:20:52,840 --> 00:20:56,000 Speaker 1: guest here, George Ferguson. He's a senior aerospace, defense and 413 00:20:56,040 --> 00:21:00,879 Speaker 1: airline analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. UH Penn State graduate, former 414 00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:03,000 Speaker 1: military intelligence officer in the U. S Army, So we 415 00:21:03,040 --> 00:21:06,359 Speaker 1: thank them as always for his service. George, There's a 416 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:08,600 Speaker 1: lot of stuff going on in your space here today. 417 00:21:08,680 --> 00:21:11,359 Speaker 1: We I want to start just with the airline's real quick, 418 00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:13,199 Speaker 1: because just in the last couple of days, we had 419 00:21:13,200 --> 00:21:16,520 Speaker 1: Delta take some numbers up that kind of surprised me. Uh. 420 00:21:16,600 --> 00:21:18,720 Speaker 1: Number two, we had United saying they're gonna buy a 421 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: bunch of Boeing jets. Uh, that sounds pretty positive to me. 422 00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:26,879 Speaker 1: Just give us the state of the airline business today. 423 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:31,399 Speaker 1: Where are we? Kind of visa VI Yeah, so thanks 424 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:35,040 Speaker 1: for me on, thanks for kind words. Um, where are we? 425 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 1: So we actually just published a report this morning on airfares, 426 00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:44,480 Speaker 1: and I think where we are is that the markets 427 00:21:44,520 --> 00:21:47,680 Speaker 1: that have been opened the longest, which are going to 428 00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 1: be domestic US I'm talking to US carriers, and uh, 429 00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:57,320 Speaker 1: Latin America routes were starting to see fair start to 430 00:21:57,400 --> 00:22:01,440 Speaker 1: tick over, meaning they're they're um, they're starting to fall, 431 00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:06,639 Speaker 1: especially we compare them to levels. And the markets that 432 00:22:06,720 --> 00:22:11,679 Speaker 1: are just reopening are still seeing this, uh you know, 433 00:22:11,760 --> 00:22:18,040 Speaker 1: this increased demand and and fair increases and so Europe 434 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:23,120 Speaker 1: is in that is in that class, Canada and then 435 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:26,080 Speaker 1: and Asia, and so I think you know, I think 436 00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 1: Delta and United will obviously they have bigger international footprints 437 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,920 Speaker 1: and internationals what's opening. So I think that's gonna be 438 00:22:34,960 --> 00:22:38,280 Speaker 1: a bit of a tail one for them into but 439 00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:40,280 Speaker 1: you are going to see I think the domestic market 440 00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:44,480 Speaker 1: cool off for the carriers. I think that's a little 441 00:22:44,480 --> 00:22:48,040 Speaker 1: bit again behind United going for all these seven eight sevens. 442 00:22:48,080 --> 00:22:50,840 Speaker 1: I think they probably got a really nice price from Boeing. 443 00:22:51,000 --> 00:22:55,040 Speaker 1: Right now, Bowing really needs to rebuild some backlogs, and 444 00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:56,879 Speaker 1: I think they're looking forward and seeing some of that 445 00:22:56,960 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 1: strength in international markets. They have the old seven six 446 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:02,840 Speaker 1: D seven fleet out there forty five and then they're 447 00:23:02,840 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 1: twenty plus years old. They gotta go anyways, and so 448 00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:08,480 Speaker 1: I think they said, look a good time, we'll get 449 00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:11,320 Speaker 1: some good prices on seven eight seven has been a 450 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:14,080 Speaker 1: really strong performer for Boeing. I should add that's a 451 00:23:14,240 --> 00:23:16,439 Speaker 1: great airplane. By the way, love flight and that thing. 452 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:20,320 Speaker 1: I mean it's coming off, you know, being um waiting 453 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:22,840 Speaker 1: on f A approval for a fix on it, which meant, 454 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:25,400 Speaker 1: you know, deliveries have been stacking up and not going 455 00:23:25,440 --> 00:23:29,160 Speaker 1: out to customers, and Boeing still printed this order. I'm 456 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:30,960 Speaker 1: sure they looked at the three fifty as well, So 457 00:23:31,000 --> 00:23:33,560 Speaker 1: I think it was it was a nice endorsement for 458 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:36,920 Speaker 1: that seven. But again I think International will look better 459 00:23:36,960 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 1: in but I think it will tap out two a 460 00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:44,920 Speaker 1: little bit. And George, in terms of fairs, um, we've 461 00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:49,560 Speaker 1: seen obviously a lot of fluctuation throughout the pandemic. What 462 00:23:49,640 --> 00:23:53,240 Speaker 1: about when you look at fairs, you know, the averaged 463 00:23:53,280 --> 00:23:56,880 Speaker 1: out I guess, you know, remove the pandemic outlier compared 464 00:23:56,920 --> 00:23:58,880 Speaker 1: to ten years ago or twenty years ago, had they 465 00:23:58,920 --> 00:24:02,240 Speaker 1: really been able to increase prices as much as they 466 00:24:02,520 --> 00:24:06,679 Speaker 1: you know, have seen costs rise. So I'll tell you 467 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:09,720 Speaker 1: that's really really hard to do, right, because you always 468 00:24:09,760 --> 00:24:15,000 Speaker 1: have to adjust fares by the underlying fuel prices. We 469 00:24:15,119 --> 00:24:17,960 Speaker 1: built a model that looked at this for a while. 470 00:24:18,320 --> 00:24:22,160 Speaker 1: You know, it's called we called it a pricing power model, right, 471 00:24:22,160 --> 00:24:24,480 Speaker 1: And so you either want to be not giving back 472 00:24:24,480 --> 00:24:27,520 Speaker 1: as much as lower fuel prices are giving you, or 473 00:24:28,040 --> 00:24:31,680 Speaker 1: taking more than fuel prices are are taking from you. Uh, 474 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:33,840 Speaker 1: and and we find it really hard. And so that 475 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:37,159 Speaker 1: the fairs I was I was just quoting to you, 476 00:24:37,520 --> 00:24:39,960 Speaker 1: we're based off at twenty nineteen levels, so we're watching 477 00:24:39,960 --> 00:24:42,359 Speaker 1: twenty nineteen levels closely. And I think one of the 478 00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:46,879 Speaker 1: interesting things. You know, Delta's talking their their performers today 479 00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:51,720 Speaker 1: talking three today, UM telling telling us how strong the businesses. 480 00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:55,200 Speaker 1: But if you can't give me twenty nineteen level margins 481 00:24:55,480 --> 00:24:57,280 Speaker 1: and the best margins we saw in this business, we're 482 00:24:57,280 --> 00:25:01,720 Speaker 1: probably actually you can't give me twenty nineteen level margins. 483 00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:03,720 Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you the business isn't as strong 484 00:25:03,760 --> 00:25:07,520 Speaker 1: as you're telling me it is, George we Earlier this morning, 485 00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:10,160 Speaker 1: Tom Key and I were talking to Mary Schlangenstein. She 486 00:25:10,160 --> 00:25:12,760 Speaker 1: she's an airlines reporter for Bloomberg News based in Dallas, 487 00:25:12,800 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 1: and she was saying, the companies are still having real 488 00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:19,680 Speaker 1: problems with getting pilots. I mean a baggage handlers. Yeah, 489 00:25:19,680 --> 00:25:22,840 Speaker 1: that's that's an issue of gated tendants. Okay, but pilots 490 00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:25,240 Speaker 1: is still an issue. Can you explain what's going on there? 491 00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:28,639 Speaker 1: Why don't we have enough pilots? Yeah? I mean so, 492 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:33,280 Speaker 1: you know, for years, I think we've US airlines have 493 00:25:33,359 --> 00:25:37,240 Speaker 1: enjoyed taking some of those pilots out of the U. S. Military. 494 00:25:37,520 --> 00:25:40,640 Speaker 1: UM military is training less and less pilots and they're 495 00:25:40,640 --> 00:25:43,760 Speaker 1: having a problem I think staffing reading rooms as well. 496 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 1: So a little bit of that. I think it is, 497 00:25:46,359 --> 00:25:49,919 Speaker 1: you know, less training there. Uh. What we've seen is 498 00:25:49,960 --> 00:25:52,840 Speaker 1: during times of high oil prices, there's just less training, 499 00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:56,800 Speaker 1: uh you know going on in the civilian side. Uh. 500 00:25:56,840 --> 00:25:59,000 Speaker 1: And there was just a big bulge of pilots in 501 00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:02,479 Speaker 1: the system that uh, you know, we're Vietnam War trained, 502 00:26:02,680 --> 00:26:06,800 Speaker 1: military trained. They're aging out at six. But I'll tell 503 00:26:06,800 --> 00:26:09,880 Speaker 1: you the noise. So the noise we're here and um, 504 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:13,760 Speaker 1: you know from like Southwest had investor day last week 505 00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:17,280 Speaker 1: and Southwest said, look, we don't have a problem getting 506 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:21,920 Speaker 1: pilots right now, we have a problem getting them through training. Right. 507 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:24,359 Speaker 1: So training is a bottleneck. It's going to be the 508 00:26:24,359 --> 00:26:27,640 Speaker 1: same for Delta American. The place where we're seeing pilots 509 00:26:27,960 --> 00:26:30,520 Speaker 1: absolutely run away from uh A is gonna have a 510 00:26:30,520 --> 00:26:32,800 Speaker 1: big problem next year is gonna be the regional airlines. 511 00:26:33,119 --> 00:26:37,000 Speaker 1: But it's training, that's that's the choke point. But Southwest 512 00:26:37,040 --> 00:26:40,200 Speaker 1: said they're having a problem getting employees across the board. 513 00:26:40,600 --> 00:26:44,040 Speaker 1: They're finally feeling staff they're a bit overstaffed. Now they're 514 00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:46,639 Speaker 1: get to get people trained because they're inefficient. Right, these 515 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:49,360 Speaker 1: are people new to the industry. UM, so I think 516 00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:51,520 Speaker 1: training is going to be the biggest year across the board, 517 00:26:51,680 --> 00:26:53,840 Speaker 1: and pilots again are gonna come in with a nice 518 00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:58,200 Speaker 1: a increase. Right. We saw Delta pilots in the first year, 519 00:26:58,240 --> 00:27:01,280 Speaker 1: I think it was five percent tem present right away 520 00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:05,159 Speaker 1: gains and you know, salary in the first year, and 521 00:27:05,160 --> 00:27:07,800 Speaker 1: then it got a four and a four. They're gonna 522 00:27:07,840 --> 00:27:09,960 Speaker 1: have to build this into their cost structure. That's going 523 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:13,199 Speaker 1: to make margins. That's gonna pressure margins as well. A George, 524 00:27:13,200 --> 00:27:15,119 Speaker 1: I want to switch gears because you also cover the 525 00:27:15,160 --> 00:27:17,600 Speaker 1: defense space, and I haven't heard that much about it, 526 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:19,760 Speaker 1: but we've got a bunch of bills in front of 527 00:27:19,800 --> 00:27:22,639 Speaker 1: Congress here. What's the foot view on some of the 528 00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:26,840 Speaker 1: defense contractors you follow? Yeah, so, I mean, you know, defense, 529 00:27:26,880 --> 00:27:30,359 Speaker 1: it sounds like there's a lot of support for higher 530 00:27:30,400 --> 00:27:33,840 Speaker 1: defense spend right the threat environment, as we say, you know, 531 00:27:33,960 --> 00:27:36,080 Speaker 1: it is heightened right now. So so you can see 532 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:39,040 Speaker 1: that there's some wrangling going on in Congress right now. 533 00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:41,679 Speaker 1: Right we're still in a contending resolution that makes it 534 00:27:41,720 --> 00:27:44,800 Speaker 1: really hard for the defense companies to get money rout 535 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:49,280 Speaker 1: into their newer programs um and so there's some wrangling 536 00:27:49,320 --> 00:27:51,639 Speaker 1: going on now here. Year end as they look at 537 00:27:51,680 --> 00:27:54,840 Speaker 1: lifting the government debt feeling and everything. Uh, they're talking 538 00:27:54,840 --> 00:27:59,400 Speaker 1: about how much money we spend on the domestic side 539 00:27:59,440 --> 00:28:02,240 Speaker 1: as well, and and there's always that, right, and so 540 00:28:02,760 --> 00:28:04,480 Speaker 1: I think that's going to be a challenge going forward 541 00:28:04,520 --> 00:28:06,760 Speaker 1: as we try to go to higher defense budgets. There's 542 00:28:06,760 --> 00:28:08,520 Speaker 1: always gonna be that side of Congress is gonna want 543 00:28:08,560 --> 00:28:11,680 Speaker 1: more money spent for domestic initiatives as well. Hey, as 544 00:28:11,720 --> 00:28:16,080 Speaker 1: an aside, who makes the Patriot missile? Patriots think is 545 00:28:16,359 --> 00:28:19,560 Speaker 1: gonna be a Lockheed and raceeon. I believe that's correct, 546 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:22,359 Speaker 1: because we're sending some of those over to Ukraine. So 547 00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:25,520 Speaker 1: that's interesting, all right. George Ferguson the fourth, by the way, 548 00:28:25,640 --> 00:28:29,280 Speaker 1: so there's three before him. He gets George Ferguson, senior Aerospace, 549 00:28:29,359 --> 00:28:32,720 Speaker 1: Defense and Airline analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He falls that 550 00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:35,840 Speaker 1: entire space there for Bloomberg Intelligence to be doing that 551 00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:38,920 Speaker 1: for decades, and appreciate getting his thoughts here. And it 552 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:42,640 Speaker 1: seems like, I don't know, every plan I'm on is packed, Um, 553 00:28:42,680 --> 00:28:44,680 Speaker 1: you know, so I don't know, But I guess the 554 00:28:44,720 --> 00:28:48,080 Speaker 1: real question mat is like business travel, where are we there? 555 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:50,400 Speaker 1: You know? Is that coming back? I think people here traveling. 556 00:28:50,440 --> 00:28:53,280 Speaker 1: I'm sure I think business travel is coming back. Um, 557 00:28:53,280 --> 00:28:55,880 Speaker 1: it just took a little bit longer than leisure travel. 558 00:28:56,600 --> 00:28:59,200 Speaker 1: But the question I always have is about fairs. You know, 559 00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:02,400 Speaker 1: can they continue you to get pricing power? Yeah, and 560 00:29:02,440 --> 00:29:04,840 Speaker 1: again George Ferguson had that research report on b I 561 00:29:04,920 --> 00:29:07,360 Speaker 1: go out this morning saying and a lot of the U. 562 00:29:07,440 --> 00:29:10,760 Speaker 1: S markets fairs are starting to come down. Uh. So 563 00:29:10,800 --> 00:29:12,560 Speaker 1: that's good news for those of us looking to book. 564 00:29:12,600 --> 00:29:18,680 Speaker 1: Some bad news for investors. You know, we got these 565 00:29:18,760 --> 00:29:21,640 Speaker 1: Bloomberg's opinion column things beat then they think about with 566 00:29:21,680 --> 00:29:25,120 Speaker 1: some really good stuff bo you know, Bloomberg Opinion O 567 00:29:25,240 --> 00:29:27,000 Speaker 1: p I n go O p I n go and 568 00:29:27,000 --> 00:29:31,320 Speaker 1: then Bloomberg dot com slash opinion on uh, you know, 569 00:29:31,440 --> 00:29:34,320 Speaker 1: on that intraweb thing that works pretty well. So let's 570 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:37,000 Speaker 1: bring in editor in chief Emeritus Matt Winkler to talk 571 00:29:37,040 --> 00:29:40,840 Speaker 1: about his latest column. Um, the headline companies thrive where 572 00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:45,600 Speaker 1: abortion is protected and no offense. But I would say 573 00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:47,360 Speaker 1: this is n I N S S. I mean, it 574 00:29:47,400 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 1: makes perfect and that is what obvious sense. I can't 575 00:29:51,720 --> 00:29:55,000 Speaker 1: give you the meaning of the acronym, but it's clear 576 00:29:55,240 --> 00:29:58,280 Speaker 1: right that women are gonna want to work in states 577 00:29:58,320 --> 00:30:02,760 Speaker 1: where they have uh the ability to make their own 578 00:30:02,880 --> 00:30:08,360 Speaker 1: choices concerning their health. Always great to be with you, 579 00:30:08,480 --> 00:30:15,680 Speaker 1: Matt and Paul Um. Yes, Uh. Intuition is a wonderful thing. 580 00:30:16,600 --> 00:30:21,320 Speaker 1: But here at Bloomberg, it's always about the data. And 581 00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:24,880 Speaker 1: this is a subject that is so if you will, 582 00:30:24,960 --> 00:30:33,080 Speaker 1: clouded by opinion. UM. Interestingly enough people's opinion and very 583 00:30:33,160 --> 00:30:38,000 Speaker 1: little about UM the data that relates to economic performance. 584 00:30:38,000 --> 00:30:42,120 Speaker 1: And so what my colleague schinpay and I decided to do, say, 585 00:30:42,320 --> 00:30:45,560 Speaker 1: all right, UH, let's try to see what the data 586 00:30:45,600 --> 00:30:50,080 Speaker 1: shows us about companies that are based in states that 587 00:30:50,160 --> 00:30:55,160 Speaker 1: have criminalized abortions. Now this is interesting because Texas is 588 00:30:55,160 --> 00:30:58,880 Speaker 1: a big state and it's one of them. Uh and UH. 589 00:30:59,040 --> 00:31:03,280 Speaker 1: It turns out that the states that since two thousand 590 00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:09,040 Speaker 1: and twenty have UH guaranteed reproductive rights anticipating the repeal 591 00:31:09,040 --> 00:31:14,040 Speaker 1: of Roe v. Wade have outperformed. The companies have outperformed 592 00:31:14,280 --> 00:31:17,360 Speaker 1: in those states, not only the national average. And we're 593 00:31:17,360 --> 00:31:19,760 Speaker 1: looking at the Russell three thousand group of companies, So 594 00:31:19,760 --> 00:31:24,000 Speaker 1: this is big companies and small companies alike. They've outperformed 595 00:31:24,080 --> 00:31:30,760 Speaker 1: in numerous ways. UH. If you like total return, profitability, UH, 596 00:31:30,800 --> 00:31:35,160 Speaker 1: employee per sales, those kinds of measures of performance, they're 597 00:31:35,160 --> 00:31:40,360 Speaker 1: obviously more diverse as you would expect, more women in 598 00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:46,160 Speaker 1: these companies and management positions, more women employees. Um. And 599 00:31:46,280 --> 00:31:48,840 Speaker 1: if you put it all together, it just says that 600 00:31:49,040 --> 00:31:53,959 Speaker 1: economically speaking, we're better off. Companies are better off. Corporate 601 00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:59,160 Speaker 1: America is better off where reproductive rights are guaranteed. Corporate 602 00:31:59,360 --> 00:32:05,160 Speaker 1: corporate Rica has an inferior performance where reproductive rights are 603 00:32:05,440 --> 00:32:10,160 Speaker 1: limited or negligent or non existent. Somebody, I know you, uh, 604 00:32:10,800 --> 00:32:12,400 Speaker 1: you know some of this is you spoke with Common 605 00:32:12,480 --> 00:32:15,880 Speaker 1: Secretary Gina Romundo. Uh, and that she knows that businesses 606 00:32:15,920 --> 00:32:18,480 Speaker 1: are performing states where we put up to rights of preserve. 607 00:32:18,520 --> 00:32:20,000 Speaker 1: Tell us how that when and what are some of 608 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:21,520 Speaker 1: her views? Well, she's glad to get a look at 609 00:32:21,520 --> 00:32:23,480 Speaker 1: the data as well, right, she said she wishes she 610 00:32:23,520 --> 00:32:25,960 Speaker 1: had it when she was governor. Well, I mean she 611 00:32:26,040 --> 00:32:29,320 Speaker 1: actually is very well aware of this. Maybe she hasn't 612 00:32:29,400 --> 00:32:33,640 Speaker 1: gone to compile it the way we have. But don't 613 00:32:33,640 --> 00:32:38,360 Speaker 1: forget Gina Romundo, if you will, comes right out of 614 00:32:38,640 --> 00:32:42,560 Speaker 1: corporate America in the sense that after being a Rhodes 615 00:32:42,560 --> 00:32:46,280 Speaker 1: scholar and economist with degrees from Harvard, Yale and Oxford 616 00:32:46,520 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 1: and a law degree from Yale University. Uh. She worked 617 00:32:50,800 --> 00:32:54,800 Speaker 1: actually um in the inner city UM, and then became 618 00:32:54,840 --> 00:32:59,200 Speaker 1: the first ventured capitalist in Rhode Island. And because of 619 00:32:59,280 --> 00:33:04,960 Speaker 1: Rhode island failing fiscal outlook, she became treasurer, was elected 620 00:33:04,960 --> 00:33:07,480 Speaker 1: treasure and did something nobody was able to do, which 621 00:33:07,560 --> 00:33:10,280 Speaker 1: is fixed a broken pension system, and then did a 622 00:33:10,280 --> 00:33:13,600 Speaker 1: lot of other things to fix the infrastructure of Rhode Island, 623 00:33:13,880 --> 00:33:17,920 Speaker 1: but more important fix uh the well being of Rhode Island. 624 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:23,960 Speaker 1: And that meant doing things like pre k kindergarten uh, 625 00:33:24,000 --> 00:33:30,040 Speaker 1: you know everywhere um and improving the outlook for young 626 00:33:30,120 --> 00:33:35,320 Speaker 1: people by forgiving students in deadness. UM. So now she's 627 00:33:35,360 --> 00:33:37,760 Speaker 1: the Secretary of Commerce, and she, by the way, took 628 00:33:37,800 --> 00:33:41,360 Speaker 1: her state from being one of the laggards in the 629 00:33:41,440 --> 00:33:44,920 Speaker 1: US economically to one of the better performers. Now she's 630 00:33:44,920 --> 00:33:47,880 Speaker 1: Secretary of Commerce, she knows a thing or two about 631 00:33:48,240 --> 00:33:52,040 Speaker 1: how economies work, what gets c e o s to 632 00:33:52,160 --> 00:33:54,840 Speaker 1: do their best work. And so she knows c e 633 00:33:54,960 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 1: o s in particular because she recruited something like thirty 634 00:33:57,560 --> 00:34:00,360 Speaker 1: of them to Rhode Island. So when she sees this data, 635 00:34:00,640 --> 00:34:03,880 Speaker 1: she isn't surprised at all. Actually, she says it may. 636 00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 1: It does make sense because she says, the best CEOs 637 00:34:07,840 --> 00:34:11,480 Speaker 1: who recruit and developed talent are making all kinds of 638 00:34:11,520 --> 00:34:15,960 Speaker 1: other decisions that are equally beneficial to their bottom line. 639 00:34:16,719 --> 00:34:20,080 Speaker 1: UM well being is obviously front and center. If you 640 00:34:20,120 --> 00:34:27,080 Speaker 1: have a workforce that is is liberated, UM, that workforce 641 00:34:27,160 --> 00:34:29,719 Speaker 1: is probably going to do better. I imagine if you, 642 00:34:29,920 --> 00:34:32,480 Speaker 1: I mean, you could extrapolated out to a number of 643 00:34:32,480 --> 00:34:36,640 Speaker 1: other health issues, for example, maternity leave. If a company 644 00:34:36,719 --> 00:34:40,080 Speaker 1: offers better maternity leave, aren't they likely to attract better 645 00:34:40,120 --> 00:34:43,319 Speaker 1: talent if a company offers childcare or some kind of 646 00:34:43,360 --> 00:34:46,320 Speaker 1: fixed to that very expensive. So here's your answer, Matt. 647 00:34:46,400 --> 00:34:52,520 Speaker 1: You know, our profession has repeatedly belittled California for its 648 00:34:52,600 --> 00:34:57,200 Speaker 1: high taxes and high regulation. California is precisely the state 649 00:34:57,560 --> 00:35:00,600 Speaker 1: that does more for women and men. Are these then 650 00:35:00,640 --> 00:35:05,160 Speaker 1: probably any other and corporate California over two years, five years, 651 00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:09,560 Speaker 1: ten years, pick any period you like, crushes the performance 652 00:35:09,640 --> 00:35:14,319 Speaker 1: of corporate Texas or any other state, because corporate California 653 00:35:14,440 --> 00:35:18,359 Speaker 1: itself is more diverse and inclusive than anywhere else. So 654 00:35:18,400 --> 00:35:21,400 Speaker 1: that's your answer. That's why you know we're seeing the 655 00:35:21,480 --> 00:35:24,719 Speaker 1: data that we're seeing by the way on Texas. Um, 656 00:35:24,760 --> 00:35:27,520 Speaker 1: it's interesting because Gina Amando talks about going to other 657 00:35:27,560 --> 00:35:29,960 Speaker 1: states and like trying to recruit because she has this 658 00:35:30,080 --> 00:35:35,560 Speaker 1: data now and um, clearly, states uh that offer choice 659 00:35:35,680 --> 00:35:41,719 Speaker 1: also have better performance economically. Does it look like Texas though, 660 00:35:41,800 --> 00:35:43,560 Speaker 1: could be one of those states that goes from red 661 00:35:43,600 --> 00:35:46,320 Speaker 1: to blue? I mean, as more companies moved to Austin, 662 00:35:46,400 --> 00:35:50,160 Speaker 1: Austin becomes a much more progressive city. Uh, well, it's 663 00:35:50,200 --> 00:35:55,160 Speaker 1: too early to say. And Texas is jerrymandered. Um. If 664 00:35:55,200 --> 00:36:01,520 Speaker 1: you like Democrats out of political position to gain any 665 00:36:01,520 --> 00:36:07,200 Speaker 1: time soon in the legislature for one thing. Um, And uh, 666 00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:10,279 Speaker 1: you know that's a that's a prevailing problem. Um. As 667 00:36:10,360 --> 00:36:13,239 Speaker 1: for you know what the makeup of corporate Texas is, 668 00:36:13,360 --> 00:36:18,920 Speaker 1: it's still something like two thirds in the ground. Um. 669 00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:21,880 Speaker 1: What comes out of corporate Texas is two thirds in 670 00:36:21,880 --> 00:36:26,280 Speaker 1: the ground. It's fossil fuel. They're making strides with alternative energy. 671 00:36:26,880 --> 00:36:29,839 Speaker 1: But it's a very twentieth century or nineteenth century state 672 00:36:29,880 --> 00:36:33,600 Speaker 1: in that respect. Corporate California, two thirds of corporate California 673 00:36:33,760 --> 00:36:36,960 Speaker 1: is between your ears, So it's very much twenty one century. 674 00:36:37,400 --> 00:36:40,239 Speaker 1: All right, Matt, good stuff as always Matt Winkler. He's 675 00:36:40,239 --> 00:36:44,560 Speaker 1: an editor in chief emeritus uh founder of Bloomberg News 676 00:36:44,640 --> 00:36:46,960 Speaker 1: back in the day. We appreciate getting to check in 677 00:36:47,000 --> 00:36:48,880 Speaker 1: with him. You can find his columns and all the 678 00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:52,720 Speaker 1: other good Bloomberg opinion stuff on the bloom Bloomberg terminal 679 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:56,239 Speaker 1: O p I n go is uh the ticker, and 680 00:36:56,320 --> 00:36:58,360 Speaker 1: you can do it on that intra web thing Bloomberg 681 00:36:58,440 --> 00:37:00,919 Speaker 1: dot com slash Opinion that they've got all that stuff 682 00:37:01,000 --> 00:37:03,439 Speaker 1: up there as well, So we appreciate getting that from 683 00:37:03,440 --> 00:37:08,800 Speaker 1: Matt Energy. You know, I'm looking at w T A 684 00:37:08,880 --> 00:37:11,399 Speaker 1: crude oil. It's up a couple of bucks. It's still 685 00:37:11,400 --> 00:37:14,560 Speaker 1: at seventy seven dollars. My gasoline prices three. That's crazy 686 00:37:15,160 --> 00:37:18,200 Speaker 1: because w T I was trading for seventy dollars on 687 00:37:18,239 --> 00:37:20,799 Speaker 1: Monday morning. I know it's moving all around. Because let's 688 00:37:20,800 --> 00:37:23,760 Speaker 1: talk energy. Let's round table this thing. Jonathan Maxwell, CEO 689 00:37:23,840 --> 00:37:27,760 Speaker 1: and co founder of Sustainable Development Capital and Jay Halfields, 690 00:37:27,800 --> 00:37:30,160 Speaker 1: CEO of Infrastructure Capital Management. They joined us both here 691 00:37:30,160 --> 00:37:32,919 Speaker 1: in a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio two for two. How 692 00:37:32,920 --> 00:37:36,279 Speaker 1: good is that the world is coming back? Baby? Um So, John, 693 00:37:36,440 --> 00:37:40,440 Speaker 1: let's start with you. I think first time talking to you, right, yes, okay, 694 00:37:40,440 --> 00:37:42,920 Speaker 1: so tell us about what you guys are doing at 695 00:37:42,960 --> 00:37:44,920 Speaker 1: your fund. Yeah, well thanks for having me on. So 696 00:37:45,200 --> 00:37:48,480 Speaker 1: we um, we're in the middle of a global energy crisis. 697 00:37:49,000 --> 00:37:51,080 Speaker 1: But for the last ten fifteen years, we we had 698 00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:55,680 Speaker 1: st Seattle Sustainable Development Capital has been developing an investing 699 00:37:55,719 --> 00:38:01,080 Speaker 1: institutions to save energy. UM the Lawrence Living More National Laboratory, 700 00:38:01,520 --> 00:38:06,520 Speaker 1: famous as an institution, even more famous yesterday for I 701 00:38:06,560 --> 00:38:08,960 Speaker 1: want to ask you about that stuff coming on, but 702 00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:11,640 Speaker 1: actually going back to the seventies, have been calculating how 703 00:38:11,680 --> 00:38:15,400 Speaker 1: much energy is wasted in the United States. About seventy 704 00:38:15,960 --> 00:38:20,480 Speaker 1: gets lost through extraction, conversion, and generation and transmission and distributions. 705 00:38:20,560 --> 00:38:22,320 Speaker 1: Just wonder why I see the flames burning out and 706 00:38:22,360 --> 00:38:24,799 Speaker 1: the you know, the oil refineries and stuff like that 707 00:38:24,880 --> 00:38:27,279 Speaker 1: isn't what's going on. It's one of the features. So 708 00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:31,360 Speaker 1: we've we've designs and investment strategy that invests in solutions 709 00:38:31,360 --> 00:38:35,160 Speaker 1: to that problem. And that's so effectively delivering energy, lower costs, 710 00:38:35,160 --> 00:38:38,920 Speaker 1: more reliable, another carbon straight to the end user and 711 00:38:38,960 --> 00:38:43,040 Speaker 1: also helping end users seventy of energies in buildings, industry, 712 00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:45,840 Speaker 1: and transport, so helping those end users reduce the amount 713 00:38:45,840 --> 00:38:47,879 Speaker 1: of energy that they need to do the same job. 714 00:38:48,560 --> 00:38:51,600 Speaker 1: So you know, J J J. You're an investor, right, 715 00:38:51,640 --> 00:38:55,040 Speaker 1: so what you do is focused on obviously making money, 716 00:38:55,080 --> 00:38:59,000 Speaker 1: but you're also in the energy space and to some 717 00:38:59,120 --> 00:39:05,880 Speaker 1: extent um interested in sustainability. Correct. Yes, so I was 718 00:39:05,920 --> 00:39:11,560 Speaker 1: actually the first investment banker to do renewables, which doesn't 719 00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:13,239 Speaker 1: really get you much because I was thirty years ago 720 00:39:13,239 --> 00:39:16,040 Speaker 1: so at the head of my time. But um, so 721 00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:18,440 Speaker 1: I've always been an environmentalist. But now we do have 722 00:39:18,480 --> 00:39:21,919 Speaker 1: a pipeline fund, which I think is an environmental fund 723 00:39:21,920 --> 00:39:24,000 Speaker 1: because we have natural gas which is the plant's coal, 724 00:39:24,080 --> 00:39:28,400 Speaker 1: which is really the the near term way to reduce submissions. 725 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:31,040 Speaker 1: So we have a pipeline et F. So that's and 726 00:39:31,080 --> 00:39:34,840 Speaker 1: also co founded an energy company and based in Oklahoma 727 00:39:34,920 --> 00:39:38,160 Speaker 1: that my friend my Crumble runs. All right, So, Jonathan, 728 00:39:38,200 --> 00:39:40,480 Speaker 1: you mentioned this fusion thing. Um, I kind of read 729 00:39:40,480 --> 00:39:42,160 Speaker 1: about it a little bit over the last couple of days, 730 00:39:42,520 --> 00:39:45,120 Speaker 1: but I'm still putting regular unleaded in my in my car, 731 00:39:45,160 --> 00:39:47,520 Speaker 1: so I'm not really sure what happened that it's not 732 00:39:47,560 --> 00:39:52,560 Speaker 1: a flux capacitator exactly what happened at the little More facility. 733 00:39:53,040 --> 00:39:59,280 Speaker 1: So I'm for years, the idea of fusion has been 734 00:40:00,280 --> 00:40:04,160 Speaker 1: a long way away. I think what happened yesterday was 735 00:40:04,200 --> 00:40:06,000 Speaker 1: that you can get more energy out of fusion than 736 00:40:06,120 --> 00:40:08,719 Speaker 1: it takes then you put into it. And this is 737 00:40:08,760 --> 00:40:12,279 Speaker 1: a major, major breakthrough. The idea really is that at 738 00:40:12,280 --> 00:40:15,080 Speaker 1: some point over the next ten thirty years, were able 739 00:40:15,160 --> 00:40:20,520 Speaker 1: to generate energy, largely electricity, in much the same way frankly, 740 00:40:20,560 --> 00:40:23,480 Speaker 1: that the Sun does. So this is the breakthrough, the 741 00:40:23,520 --> 00:40:27,240 Speaker 1: technological breakthrough. I think the challenge with it and many 742 00:40:27,280 --> 00:40:31,320 Speaker 1: other ways of adding new energy into the system is 743 00:40:31,360 --> 00:40:34,640 Speaker 1: it takes a lot of time, and you know well, 744 00:40:34,680 --> 00:40:38,640 Speaker 1: and also because we already have a Sun and we 745 00:40:38,680 --> 00:40:40,600 Speaker 1: don't have to put any energy into it and it 746 00:40:40,680 --> 00:40:44,400 Speaker 1: constantly gives us energy back, we just need to harness that. Yeah, 747 00:40:44,440 --> 00:40:46,200 Speaker 1: there are ways of harnessing it today, and I think 748 00:40:46,200 --> 00:40:48,560 Speaker 1: the two ways that we look at fundamentally is making 749 00:40:48,600 --> 00:40:50,600 Speaker 1: sure that we don't waste most of the energy in 750 00:40:50,640 --> 00:40:53,080 Speaker 1: the system in the first place, which is frankly how 751 00:40:53,400 --> 00:40:56,200 Speaker 1: Europe and North America is operating today. And then second 752 00:40:56,239 --> 00:40:58,479 Speaker 1: of all, exactly the point you just made, actually using 753 00:40:58,719 --> 00:41:03,560 Speaker 1: technologies have made up absolutely today like solar solar power 754 00:41:03,600 --> 00:41:07,120 Speaker 1: installed directly on your roof, on the ground, connected to buildings. 755 00:41:07,400 --> 00:41:10,360 Speaker 1: These are the types of technologies that we can deploy 756 00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:13,279 Speaker 1: today if you decide, if you decide to go ahead today, 757 00:41:13,320 --> 00:41:15,560 Speaker 1: you could probably have it implemented within a year or so. 758 00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:19,120 Speaker 1: And it's that speed of execution over the course of 759 00:41:19,120 --> 00:41:21,359 Speaker 1: the twenties twenties which is going to be crucial for 760 00:41:21,360 --> 00:41:24,760 Speaker 1: for three reasons, one of which is energy security, second 761 00:41:24,760 --> 00:41:28,600 Speaker 1: of which is decobanization rapidly. We can't wait until until 762 00:41:28,600 --> 00:41:31,320 Speaker 1: a lot of these new technologies are available at scale. 763 00:41:31,719 --> 00:41:33,799 Speaker 1: And then the third is energy cost. Energy costs are 764 00:41:33,840 --> 00:41:36,080 Speaker 1: incredibly high where I come from. They've gone up three, 765 00:41:36,080 --> 00:41:39,400 Speaker 1: four or five times in the UK, in Europe, that's 766 00:41:39,520 --> 00:41:43,160 Speaker 1: a feature of what's happening in the global commodities market. Russia, 767 00:41:43,239 --> 00:41:47,399 Speaker 1: Ukraine hasn't helped that. But unfortunately the United States now 768 00:41:47,520 --> 00:41:51,320 Speaker 1: energy independence since is still going to be subject to 769 00:41:51,360 --> 00:41:54,400 Speaker 1: global markets and energy. So energy costs are high and 770 00:41:54,440 --> 00:41:56,640 Speaker 1: are rising in the United States. So for those three 771 00:41:56,680 --> 00:42:01,360 Speaker 1: reasons cost carbon and and and an energy secure getting 772 00:42:01,440 --> 00:42:04,799 Speaker 1: this stuff done on site generation, stopping wasting so much 773 00:42:04,920 --> 00:42:07,960 Speaker 1: energy in the system, being more productive, that's exactly what 774 00:42:08,040 --> 00:42:09,600 Speaker 1: we need to be doing. That one kill a lot 775 00:42:09,640 --> 00:42:14,960 Speaker 1: hour at tea time on Monday in London was two thousand, 776 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:20,680 Speaker 1: six hundred pounds. That is just nuts, um je, what 777 00:42:20,719 --> 00:42:23,719 Speaker 1: do you think we need to be doing here now 778 00:42:24,239 --> 00:42:27,920 Speaker 1: in order to make sure that doesn't happen to us? Well, 779 00:42:29,239 --> 00:42:33,080 Speaker 1: electricity prices are driven almost directly by natural gas prices, 780 00:42:33,880 --> 00:42:36,880 Speaker 1: and so natural gas can go to kind of infinity 781 00:42:36,920 --> 00:42:40,480 Speaker 1: because there's an infinite demand for electricity in this modern economy. 782 00:42:40,600 --> 00:42:42,880 Speaker 1: So the United in the United States, we kind of 783 00:42:42,880 --> 00:42:46,560 Speaker 1: solved the problem just by being lucky because we have 784 00:42:46,880 --> 00:42:49,200 Speaker 1: the most natural gas by far, and we can drill 785 00:42:49,239 --> 00:42:51,440 Speaker 1: for way more than we're drilling right now. We do 786 00:42:51,520 --> 00:42:57,239 Speaker 1: need pipelines, which the administration is apparently not in favor of. 787 00:42:57,560 --> 00:43:03,120 Speaker 1: For instance, um gas in what's called Waha Hub, Western 788 00:43:03,160 --> 00:43:07,600 Speaker 1: Texas is trading for zero, but while in California it's 789 00:43:07,640 --> 00:43:11,560 Speaker 1: spiking to you know, to unsustainably high levels because there's 790 00:43:11,560 --> 00:43:15,560 Speaker 1: no pipeline from Waha to California. So, um we do 791 00:43:15,680 --> 00:43:17,600 Speaker 1: need to develop our infrastructure a little bit. But we 792 00:43:17,719 --> 00:43:21,719 Speaker 1: have tremendous natural gas resources and that's why we have 793 00:43:21,760 --> 00:43:25,680 Speaker 1: a cost advantage on natural gas. So our natural gas 794 00:43:25,800 --> 00:43:29,080 Speaker 1: right now is is right around six dollars. In Europe, 795 00:43:29,239 --> 00:43:32,279 Speaker 1: as you were indicating to let high electricity prices, it's 796 00:43:32,320 --> 00:43:35,440 Speaker 1: forty dollars, you know, So it's whatever that multiple is 797 00:43:35,440 --> 00:43:38,920 Speaker 1: about eight times and forty dollars, as we discussed before, 798 00:43:39,080 --> 00:43:42,560 Speaker 1: is two fifty dollars equivalent of oil. So it's just 799 00:43:42,680 --> 00:43:45,600 Speaker 1: uneconomic and terrible. So but in the US we have 800 00:43:45,760 --> 00:43:48,160 Speaker 1: the natural resources. We can drill for it. We just 801 00:43:48,200 --> 00:43:49,799 Speaker 1: have to make sure we can. But you see that 802 00:43:49,960 --> 00:43:53,319 Speaker 1: you see natural gas as a stop gap solution, not 803 00:43:54,200 --> 00:43:58,120 Speaker 1: six month stop gap solution, but maybe what a six 804 00:43:58,200 --> 00:44:02,000 Speaker 1: year stop gas? So I think that's the tragedy of 805 00:44:02,080 --> 00:44:08,000 Speaker 1: extreme environmentalist um policy is we've restricted natural gas and 806 00:44:08,040 --> 00:44:10,800 Speaker 1: so we haven't have it. For instance, there's a shortage 807 00:44:10,800 --> 00:44:13,799 Speaker 1: in Boston, so we burn fuel oil, which is dirty. Year. 808 00:44:14,239 --> 00:44:16,319 Speaker 1: We should in the next five years get rid of 809 00:44:16,360 --> 00:44:19,000 Speaker 1: all of our coal. We could subsidize people who need 810 00:44:19,040 --> 00:44:23,279 Speaker 1: to be subsidized through carbon tax or other taxes, but 811 00:44:23,520 --> 00:44:25,239 Speaker 1: we need to get rid of all the coal right away, 812 00:44:25,320 --> 00:44:28,880 Speaker 1: not just for carbon. It's just an abomination. Coal plants 813 00:44:28,960 --> 00:44:31,799 Speaker 1: are just horrendous if you ever been to one, And 814 00:44:34,120 --> 00:44:39,240 Speaker 1: because it's not just carbon, it socks knocks, ash ash pits. 815 00:44:39,960 --> 00:44:42,239 Speaker 1: It's just really and also we're breathing it in here 816 00:44:42,320 --> 00:44:44,800 Speaker 1: because we're on the east coast, so we get them 817 00:44:45,120 --> 00:44:48,640 Speaker 1: that comes to our way. So it's hugely economic to 818 00:44:48,719 --> 00:44:51,640 Speaker 1: do that in the short run. And so really which 819 00:44:51,640 --> 00:44:54,200 Speaker 1: you need is a carbon tax, which would really make 820 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:58,000 Speaker 1: coal have a huge disadvantage and natural gas would naturally 821 00:44:58,040 --> 00:44:59,640 Speaker 1: take its place in the short run, and then in 822 00:44:59,680 --> 00:45:02,279 Speaker 1: the long your term, you can get renewable as they're 823 00:45:02,320 --> 00:45:05,759 Speaker 1: slow to be developed, as indicated by my thirty two 824 00:45:05,840 --> 00:45:09,520 Speaker 1: years of experience of doing it, and still not that big. So, Jonathan, 825 00:45:09,560 --> 00:45:12,600 Speaker 1: what do you think about I mean, in extreme environmentalist 826 00:45:12,719 --> 00:45:17,040 Speaker 1: j says have made perfect the enemy of good. I 827 00:45:17,080 --> 00:45:19,800 Speaker 1: think it's important not to make a sacrifice good on 828 00:45:19,840 --> 00:45:22,200 Speaker 1: the altar of the perfect. But let's try. That's that's 829 00:45:22,280 --> 00:45:24,680 Speaker 1: chart the journey at the molecule. This is what the 830 00:45:24,719 --> 00:45:28,560 Speaker 1: Lawrence Live a more national poetry also does. Around ten 831 00:45:28,600 --> 00:45:32,279 Speaker 1: percent of molecules that's gas or crude is lost in 832 00:45:32,360 --> 00:45:36,080 Speaker 1: converting it once it's in. When it gets the generation 833 00:45:36,160 --> 00:45:40,719 Speaker 1: systems typically large turbines, about of the primary energy, and 834 00:45:40,760 --> 00:45:44,200 Speaker 1: that molecule is lost through heat. Another ten percent is 835 00:45:44,239 --> 00:45:46,719 Speaker 1: lost through transmission and distribution. So if we're going to 836 00:45:46,800 --> 00:45:49,080 Speaker 1: use natural gas, let's use it which we need to. 837 00:45:49,440 --> 00:45:52,000 Speaker 1: Let's use it efficiently. Let's make sure that we capture 838 00:45:52,000 --> 00:45:54,640 Speaker 1: the heat that means generating energy close or right at 839 00:45:54,719 --> 00:45:57,480 Speaker 1: the point where you where you use it. You can 840 00:45:57,560 --> 00:45:59,840 Speaker 1: use the rejected heat instead of dumping it, which is 841 00:45:59,840 --> 00:46:01,719 Speaker 1: what happening by a large to day. You can use 842 00:46:01,760 --> 00:46:05,160 Speaker 1: it for heating hot water steam. So this is the 843 00:46:05,560 --> 00:46:07,640 Speaker 1: if you like the transition on the revolution that we 844 00:46:07,680 --> 00:46:10,839 Speaker 1: need to see. It's actually about decentralization on the one hand, 845 00:46:10,840 --> 00:46:13,040 Speaker 1: bringing energy close to the point of views, and the 846 00:46:13,120 --> 00:46:16,839 Speaker 1: second point is making sure it's not wasted. Your beautiful building, Hey, 847 00:46:16,880 --> 00:46:21,520 Speaker 1: I use LED lights, censors, heating, ventilation, air conditioning. Most buildings, industry, 848 00:46:21,560 --> 00:46:25,200 Speaker 1: and transport systems waste of the energy that they use. 849 00:46:26,000 --> 00:46:28,719 Speaker 1: The energy transition, it's not gonna be measured in months 850 00:46:28,760 --> 00:46:31,560 Speaker 1: or even years, but many, many years probably. So we 851 00:46:31,640 --> 00:46:33,719 Speaker 1: always like to get back to that story with our 852 00:46:33,800 --> 00:46:36,600 Speaker 1: energy discussion. We did that today with Jonathan Maxwell, CEO 853 00:46:36,680 --> 00:46:40,280 Speaker 1: and co found or Sustainable Development Capital and j Halfel's 854 00:46:40,280 --> 00:46:45,120 Speaker 1: CEO of Infrastructure Capital Management managing the transition to a 855 00:46:45,239 --> 00:46:48,080 Speaker 1: greener energy grid. We're gonna more on all of that. 856 00:46:50,560 --> 00:46:56,920 Speaker 1: Let's hoplead the good idea, good idea. Why not Anthony Conniglio, 857 00:46:57,080 --> 00:46:59,600 Speaker 1: he's the CEO of New Lake Capital Partners Are this 858 00:46:59,640 --> 00:47:03,400 Speaker 1: thing is a read real estate investment trust. I didn't 859 00:47:03,400 --> 00:47:06,719 Speaker 1: know there was a weed real estate investment trust thing 860 00:47:06,800 --> 00:47:09,120 Speaker 1: out there. So Anthony, you got to give us the 861 00:47:09,120 --> 00:47:12,600 Speaker 1: thirty foot level. Why am I doing a reat on 862 00:47:13,080 --> 00:47:16,560 Speaker 1: the cannabis business? Well, thank you so much for having me. Um. 863 00:47:16,840 --> 00:47:19,960 Speaker 1: Because cannabis is illegal at the federal level. It's a 864 00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:23,600 Speaker 1: state regulated industry, and companies that operate in the cannabis 865 00:47:23,680 --> 00:47:27,280 Speaker 1: industry need to replicate their infrastructure from state to state 866 00:47:27,320 --> 00:47:30,160 Speaker 1: because you can't transport across state lines. Wow, I never 867 00:47:30,160 --> 00:47:32,959 Speaker 1: thought of that. So, for instance, if you grow like 868 00:47:33,280 --> 00:47:36,920 Speaker 1: the kindest bud in Humble County, you can't sell it 869 00:47:36,960 --> 00:47:39,680 Speaker 1: in New York. No, you cannot, even though it's legal 870 00:47:39,840 --> 00:47:43,440 Speaker 1: in California and New York. Correct federal law or restricts 871 00:47:43,520 --> 00:47:46,560 Speaker 1: interstate commerce by weed in New York. It's got to 872 00:47:46,600 --> 00:47:49,200 Speaker 1: be a New York grown correct New York weeds not 873 00:47:49,239 --> 00:47:51,040 Speaker 1: as good as California. Not that I know anything about this, 874 00:47:51,760 --> 00:47:54,880 Speaker 1: but is there are certain states by the WAUL doesn't 875 00:47:54,960 --> 00:47:58,000 Speaker 1: know anything about this. Yeah, I don't so, um, but 876 00:47:58,040 --> 00:47:59,160 Speaker 1: you put a t does in front of me, were 877 00:47:59,160 --> 00:48:02,640 Speaker 1: in good shape? But so is there different quality and 878 00:48:02,680 --> 00:48:06,680 Speaker 1: states whether there there's different quality in each state regulates 879 00:48:06,719 --> 00:48:09,000 Speaker 1: the industry a little bit differently. So you will have 880 00:48:09,040 --> 00:48:12,040 Speaker 1: some states that restrict the form factor, so they may 881 00:48:12,080 --> 00:48:14,439 Speaker 1: say that no edibles are allowed, or they may say 882 00:48:14,480 --> 00:48:19,040 Speaker 1: no flowers allowed. Some states restrict th HC content. Um, 883 00:48:19,120 --> 00:48:21,719 Speaker 1: So this industry really does vary state by state and 884 00:48:21,760 --> 00:48:25,680 Speaker 1: requires you to understand the dynamics that exists in each 885 00:48:25,680 --> 00:48:28,440 Speaker 1: one of those states. But also, I mean when we 886 00:48:28,440 --> 00:48:32,680 Speaker 1: were kids, um, it was all about the sun and 887 00:48:32,760 --> 00:48:37,399 Speaker 1: the earth. Now I assume most big grow ups are 888 00:48:37,480 --> 00:48:42,040 Speaker 1: hydroponic and you know, controlled in greenhouses, so you can 889 00:48:42,200 --> 00:48:47,360 Speaker 1: easily replicate you know whatever tie stick or Maui gold 890 00:48:47,600 --> 00:48:51,040 Speaker 1: in upstate New York. Dating you're you're absolutely right. And 891 00:48:51,080 --> 00:48:53,720 Speaker 1: as you would think about it, Um, if you're selling 892 00:48:53,719 --> 00:48:56,080 Speaker 1: in Michigan or you're selling in Pennsylvania, you wouldn't have 893 00:48:56,120 --> 00:48:59,000 Speaker 1: the growing conditions you may have in California. And so 894 00:48:59,040 --> 00:49:00,680 Speaker 1: if you look at our property is we own thirty 895 00:49:00,680 --> 00:49:04,080 Speaker 1: two properties. Half of them are cultivation facilities and these 896 00:49:04,120 --> 00:49:08,040 Speaker 1: are indoor facilities that are highly complex, often medical grade 897 00:49:08,080 --> 00:49:13,200 Speaker 1: facilities with light, humidity control, temperature control that allow the 898 00:49:13,280 --> 00:49:18,080 Speaker 1: operators to control the environment and grow high quality product, 899 00:49:18,120 --> 00:49:21,080 Speaker 1: but also allows them to turn the crop quicker. So 900 00:49:21,120 --> 00:49:24,160 Speaker 1: you can get six turns in an indoor facility, whereas 901 00:49:24,160 --> 00:49:26,160 Speaker 1: in an outdoor you mainly get two turns a year. 902 00:49:26,280 --> 00:49:28,440 Speaker 1: So this all sounds I've never even thought of. This 903 00:49:28,480 --> 00:49:33,680 Speaker 1: all sounds great, But let me ask how hard it 904 00:49:33,760 --> 00:49:37,239 Speaker 1: is to do business. I mean, you're not just a 905 00:49:37,280 --> 00:49:40,560 Speaker 1: New York company just to California company, Right, You've got 906 00:49:40,560 --> 00:49:44,480 Speaker 1: to do business across state lines. Um, You've got investors 907 00:49:44,560 --> 00:49:47,439 Speaker 1: all over the country, probably all over the world. Um, 908 00:49:47,719 --> 00:49:51,560 Speaker 1: how hard is that with the current federal legislation. Yeah, 909 00:49:51,600 --> 00:49:54,799 Speaker 1: it's very difficult because of the current federal legislation. And 910 00:49:54,800 --> 00:49:57,759 Speaker 1: we do own thirty two properties across twelve states with 911 00:49:57,840 --> 00:50:01,399 Speaker 1: thirteen tenants, and so managing those state rules and making 912 00:50:01,440 --> 00:50:05,440 Speaker 1: sure we understand everything that's going on in those particular states, um, 913 00:50:05,480 --> 00:50:08,600 Speaker 1: requires a lot of focus. And from an investor perspective, 914 00:50:08,640 --> 00:50:11,839 Speaker 1: the biggest issue for us where a public company at 915 00:50:11,840 --> 00:50:15,080 Speaker 1: New Lake, and the biggest issue for US is custody 916 00:50:15,120 --> 00:50:18,400 Speaker 1: because of the banking laws, and because of the federal classification, 917 00:50:18,880 --> 00:50:22,200 Speaker 1: many of the prime brokers and custody agents won't custody 918 00:50:22,200 --> 00:50:24,560 Speaker 1: the asset um and so that puts a chill on 919 00:50:24,600 --> 00:50:28,080 Speaker 1: the ability for institutional investors to invest in the space. 920 00:50:28,160 --> 00:50:32,319 Speaker 1: So how do you deal with that? And um, are 921 00:50:32,360 --> 00:50:35,280 Speaker 1: you you know, banding together with others in the industry 922 00:50:35,280 --> 00:50:40,279 Speaker 1: to send real funded lobbyists to Washington, d c. To 923 00:50:40,440 --> 00:50:43,560 Speaker 1: buy us some legislation. So the drama going on right 924 00:50:43,560 --> 00:50:46,319 Speaker 1: now in Washington is all around the Safe Banking Bill. 925 00:50:46,680 --> 00:50:49,120 Speaker 1: This is legislation that has passed the House a couple 926 00:50:49,160 --> 00:50:51,919 Speaker 1: of times and continuously stalls in the Senate. And so yes, 927 00:50:52,160 --> 00:50:55,080 Speaker 1: there is a significant industry push to get the Safe 928 00:50:55,080 --> 00:50:58,400 Speaker 1: Banking Bill passed so that we could ease the burden 929 00:50:58,480 --> 00:51:01,759 Speaker 1: upon operators but also hopefully open up the ability for 930 00:51:01,840 --> 00:51:05,200 Speaker 1: banks to custody um those that are public and custody 931 00:51:05,239 --> 00:51:07,560 Speaker 1: investments in the stuff. So how do you handicap that? 932 00:51:07,640 --> 00:51:11,440 Speaker 1: I mean, is it six chance that it passes? Um? 933 00:51:11,480 --> 00:51:13,759 Speaker 1: You know, we've got a lame duck Congress where it 934 00:51:13,760 --> 00:51:17,560 Speaker 1: could possibly go through, But it looks like time is 935 00:51:17,640 --> 00:51:20,960 Speaker 1: ticking away. It certainly is. I'm an optimist By nature. 936 00:51:21,239 --> 00:51:23,319 Speaker 1: But I'm a pessimist on safe being able to bank 937 00:51:23,719 --> 00:51:26,000 Speaker 1: to pass in the lame duck. I just don't think 938 00:51:26,040 --> 00:51:30,440 Speaker 1: that this is an important, important enough topic UM in 939 00:51:30,480 --> 00:51:33,200 Speaker 1: the Senate for enough Senators to be able to get 940 00:51:33,239 --> 00:51:35,520 Speaker 1: this across the finish line. I hope it passes. It 941 00:51:35,520 --> 00:51:38,520 Speaker 1: would be terrific for the industry. UM, I'm just not 942 00:51:38,640 --> 00:51:40,960 Speaker 1: optimistic it will. So where are we in terms of 943 00:51:41,000 --> 00:51:44,000 Speaker 1: the number of states that have legalized of what's next 944 00:51:44,120 --> 00:51:47,120 Speaker 1: up in terms of maybe some more states of note, Yeah, 945 00:51:47,160 --> 00:51:49,920 Speaker 1: this is fascinating. Break it down into three segments. There 946 00:51:49,920 --> 00:51:52,719 Speaker 1: are the states that don't have any real legalized program. 947 00:51:52,760 --> 00:51:55,439 Speaker 1: Those are small, roughly handful of states don't have any 948 00:51:55,480 --> 00:51:59,040 Speaker 1: medical or recreational segment. Two would be the medical states, 949 00:51:59,080 --> 00:52:01,840 Speaker 1: those are buying large red states at this point in time. 950 00:52:02,040 --> 00:52:05,239 Speaker 1: And the first category, which is the recreational states, which 951 00:52:05,320 --> 00:52:09,200 Speaker 1: now number around twenty r I think New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, 952 00:52:09,239 --> 00:52:11,920 Speaker 1: a lot of the East Coast states including California and Colorado, 953 00:52:12,320 --> 00:52:14,680 Speaker 1: and so all of the recreational states tend to be 954 00:52:14,800 --> 00:52:17,719 Speaker 1: more democratic leaning. So the easy stuff has happened, But 955 00:52:17,760 --> 00:52:19,680 Speaker 1: we're pretty excited about what we're seeing in the red 956 00:52:19,719 --> 00:52:22,839 Speaker 1: states to convert medical markets to recreational So what are 957 00:52:22,880 --> 00:52:25,839 Speaker 1: your facilities primarily in those blue states where you can 958 00:52:25,880 --> 00:52:29,759 Speaker 1: get on the recreational it's a mixture. In fact, we've 959 00:52:29,760 --> 00:52:32,880 Speaker 1: got a property and two properties in Missouri with great tenants, 960 00:52:33,080 --> 00:52:35,840 Speaker 1: and Missouri at the ballot box on November eight recently 961 00:52:35,840 --> 00:52:38,680 Speaker 1: approved converting that medical market to an adult use market. 962 00:52:38,719 --> 00:52:41,919 Speaker 1: So again that's a red state that UM just within 963 00:52:41,920 --> 00:52:46,240 Speaker 1: the last month or two approved converting to a recreational market. 964 00:52:46,360 --> 00:52:48,600 Speaker 1: And do you I mean as a recreational business better 965 00:52:48,640 --> 00:52:51,920 Speaker 1: for you. I can imagine a medical grow up is 966 00:52:52,360 --> 00:52:54,640 Speaker 1: a little bit different than a recreation I'll grow up 967 00:52:54,680 --> 00:52:58,759 Speaker 1: because they've got to get things exactly right with the content. Yeah. 968 00:52:58,960 --> 00:53:01,439 Speaker 1: Like like all things cannabis, it comes back to the state. 969 00:53:01,480 --> 00:53:03,399 Speaker 1: As you've heard me say a couple of times, there 970 00:53:03,400 --> 00:53:07,000 Speaker 1: are some recreational states that are not very good states 971 00:53:07,280 --> 00:53:11,040 Speaker 1: from our perspective for for the operator. Too much competition, 972 00:53:11,560 --> 00:53:15,920 Speaker 1: pricing compression, significant pricing compression, like a California or like 973 00:53:16,040 --> 00:53:19,440 Speaker 1: a Michigan. UM. But the stare are some controlled states 974 00:53:19,480 --> 00:53:22,799 Speaker 1: like uh, like a Pennsylvania or a Massachusetts where the 975 00:53:22,840 --> 00:53:25,240 Speaker 1: licenses are more limited. And that's where we like to focus. 976 00:53:25,400 --> 00:53:29,000 Speaker 1: It's a better operating environment for the operator. Um better 977 00:53:29,080 --> 00:53:32,239 Speaker 1: origins and better cash flow means better credit quality because again, 978 00:53:32,239 --> 00:53:34,279 Speaker 1: as a reap, it's good to do deals, but we 979 00:53:34,320 --> 00:53:36,040 Speaker 1: need to be able to collect rent. How do you 980 00:53:36,320 --> 00:53:38,760 Speaker 1: where do you get your I see your publicly traded companies. 981 00:53:38,760 --> 00:53:41,960 Speaker 1: You have some publicly available equity and LCP is the 982 00:53:42,000 --> 00:53:45,080 Speaker 1: ticker New Lake Capital Partners. Yes, and how about on 983 00:53:45,120 --> 00:53:48,200 Speaker 1: the debt side, how do you access debt capital? We 984 00:53:48,320 --> 00:53:51,280 Speaker 1: recently announced that we closed on a ninety million dollar 985 00:53:51,280 --> 00:53:55,200 Speaker 1: credit facility with a couple and a few national banks UM, 986 00:53:55,320 --> 00:53:57,400 Speaker 1: and so that's where we can go to source capital 987 00:53:57,480 --> 00:53:59,920 Speaker 1: right now. Obviously, we can issue capital. We I p 988 00:54:00,000 --> 00:54:03,560 Speaker 1: owed in auguste and raised a hundred million dollars. We've 989 00:54:03,600 --> 00:54:06,920 Speaker 1: deployed that capital with the ninety million dollar credit facility 990 00:54:06,920 --> 00:54:09,360 Speaker 1: and some generate internally generate cash, we have about a 991 00:54:09,400 --> 00:54:11,719 Speaker 1: hundred million dollars to put to work, which we think 992 00:54:11,760 --> 00:54:13,960 Speaker 1: will serve us well for the next six to twelve months, 993 00:54:14,080 --> 00:54:16,640 Speaker 1: and then we'll look to evaluate if we raise more debt. 994 00:54:16,680 --> 00:54:19,640 Speaker 1: We're unlevered today and so you know it's very unusual 995 00:54:19,680 --> 00:54:23,359 Speaker 1: to have a read that's unlevered um like we are today, 996 00:54:23,400 --> 00:54:25,120 Speaker 1: so we have a lot of runway to add some 997 00:54:25,160 --> 00:54:27,880 Speaker 1: debt capacity. One of the next states, UM to go. 998 00:54:27,960 --> 00:54:29,719 Speaker 1: I mean, do you like to try and find a 999 00:54:29,760 --> 00:54:34,400 Speaker 1: property in a state just before it switches to legal um. Again, 1000 00:54:34,400 --> 00:54:37,120 Speaker 1: that's very state specific. Certainly, when we made our investments 1001 00:54:37,120 --> 00:54:39,799 Speaker 1: in Missouri, we were optimistic that it would pass and 1002 00:54:39,840 --> 00:54:42,520 Speaker 1: we spend a lot of time analyzing that legal construct 1003 00:54:42,880 --> 00:54:46,239 Speaker 1: ten Jack that yes, thank you for that, UM. But 1004 00:54:46,360 --> 00:54:48,719 Speaker 1: we also look to a lot of the states that 1005 00:54:48,760 --> 00:54:51,120 Speaker 1: are very, very large, that are fledgling, and maybe you 1006 00:54:51,120 --> 00:54:53,200 Speaker 1: could find a good operator in those states. I'll give 1007 00:54:53,200 --> 00:54:55,640 Speaker 1: you an example. Georgia would be an example as a 1008 00:54:55,680 --> 00:54:57,840 Speaker 1: state that we think has a bright future. Of Texas 1009 00:54:57,880 --> 00:55:00,200 Speaker 1: as a state that will have a bright future. User 1010 00:55:00,200 --> 00:55:02,920 Speaker 1: states where the market is really really small today. UM. 1011 00:55:02,920 --> 00:55:05,600 Speaker 1: We're also looking at Connecticut. Connecticut is expected to go 1012 00:55:05,719 --> 00:55:08,160 Speaker 1: recreation with their first sales in the next month or two, 1013 00:55:08,480 --> 00:55:11,239 Speaker 1: and there's a lot of opportunity with companies getting into 1014 00:55:11,239 --> 00:55:13,600 Speaker 1: that state and building up all right, great stuff. Really 1015 00:55:13,600 --> 00:55:17,080 Speaker 1: appreciate your stopping by Anthony Conniglio. He's the CEO of 1016 00:55:17,120 --> 00:55:19,600 Speaker 1: New Lake Capital Partners that is a reet in the 1017 00:55:19,600 --> 00:55:22,759 Speaker 1: facility side of the cannabis business as we find out 1018 00:55:22,800 --> 00:55:25,640 Speaker 1: more and more about this business that continues to grow 1019 00:55:25,680 --> 00:55:33,279 Speaker 1: across the US. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. 1020 00:55:33,680 --> 00:55:36,880 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts 1021 00:55:37,000 --> 00:55:40,919 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm 1022 00:55:40,960 --> 00:55:45,160 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Matt Miller. P On Fall Sweeney I'm 1023 00:55:45,160 --> 00:55:47,799 Speaker 1: on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can 1024 00:55:47,840 --> 00:55:50,040 Speaker 1: always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.