WEBVTT - Broken ADP Players 0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:04.080 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.560 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, 0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:14.240 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, 0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.960 and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now, 0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.560 here's your host, Paul Hey, it's Fantasy Football Weekly. I 0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.760 am Paul Charchi and my co host today Scott Fish. 0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.840 I'm here. It's it's been a while, it has it 0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.720 really has been well, I got I got to do 0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.159 this show more. I agree, you need to do the 0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.280 show more. You'll be in heavy rotation during the season, 0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.520 of course. Of course, yeah, we've been. You know, we've 0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.279 we've managed to get together a few times, which has 0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.239 been great. Um, this is the slowest part of the 0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.720 NFL calendar all year is right now, but that doesn't 0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.760 mean that people aren't already drafting or thinking about their drafts. 0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.200 And we were looking through the average Draft position the 0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.680 a DP for the drafts that are already happening, and 0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:03.840 there are thousands of rafts have already happened. So he's 0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.920 pretty rigorous at this point. But man, there's some big 0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.080 mistakes there are there. There There are players they're too 0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.839 high players they are too low. I expect to correct 0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.759 themselves by August, but for right now, you can catch 0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.320 it by either avoiding players we think are going too 0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.800 high or nabbing players that are going too low. And 0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:26.280 we're going to talk about five guys for me, five 0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.800 for you that we believe are being misdrafted, either too 0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.360 high or too low. Yep. Side note, five guys is 0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.640 the worst strip mall burger joint in the world. Side note, 0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.039 I've never had it. I don't think. I don't think 0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.360 I've ever had it. You're not missing anything I've had 0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:45.800 in and Out and I can tell you I am 0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.200 not missing anything there. I'm with you on that. That 0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.280 is that is the most overrated. West Coasters love it, 0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:53.800 and all it tells me is they haven't been to 0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.320 good Hamburger restaurants. If if you love it, yeah, I 0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.160 love the premise of in and out, which is no freezers, 0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.360 everything's fresh. I love that part of it. But the 0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:09.160 fact that they've been meticulous with their expansion, really slow expansion, 0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.240 family owned, you know, haven't tried to like go across America. Whatever. 0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.839 They're parts of that that I love, But man, that's 0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.880 a boring burger. It really is like. The people who 0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.040 love it I've found are the ones that have a 0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.280 ton of topplings or an in crazy mix of toppings, 0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.320 And I'm like, you love the toppings, you don't love 0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:33.360 the burger plays five guys has the soggiest, greasiest fries 0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.760 you've ever had. If you like your fry where you 0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:41.000 pick it up and it just droops straight down, five guys, 0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:46.600 it's your place. Crispy, yes, yes, thank you, and the 0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:53.040 least amount of potato as possible, less less potatoes. If 0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.440 what you're suggesting is that you don't like your fries 0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.680 to taste like like a wedge fry, where it's like 0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.160 I don't like and you know it's like favor I 0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.880 don't like the wedge. I don't either. Till this time, 0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.360 I didn't think that you and I were quite this 0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.000 sampatico on fries. Apparently we are. The McDonald's fries obviously excellent. 0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.360 Everybody thinks that's very good. Wendy's has had a hole 0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.000 a whole ad campaign that ran for two months about 0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.480 their new fries. I tried them one time. They were great. 0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.079 The yeah, they yeah, they're they're very good. We get 0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.400 them with the sea salt instead of regular Delicious. It 0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.440 is the new Wendy's fries are very consolutely smash Burger 0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.520 isn't everywhere, but it's it is at least in the Midwest. 0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.640 I think that their corporate headquarters is Denver and that's Uh. 0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.960 Smash Burger has very good, thin crispy fries. Have to 0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.320 check that out. I think you should give me an 0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.560 up to update on Scott Fish Bowl twelve. Yeah, we 0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.120 got live drafts going around the country. We got about 0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.720 not yet, not yet, we have about seven or eight places, uh, 0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.920 you know, location cities confirmed for We're gonna have like 0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.120 three thousand people in it this year. Unbelievable. I remember, like, 0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.520 I don't know if we can handle seven hun every year. 0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.200 I don't think I can do it. But every year 0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.840 I get it done on I get more help or whatever. 0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.360 I just make sure it gets done. That's the answer. 0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.200 We don't want to growing because the cause is so good, um, 0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.400 and it just it just can't all be you doing 0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.799 the heavy lifting. So are there still methods by which 0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.719 people can join, either like the original Scott Fish Bowl 0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.000 or one of the satellites. Yeah, Scott Fish Bols. What 0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.360 should people do? Yeah, Scott. Fishbowl dot Com is where 0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.440 you can sign up, and there's still like a thousand 0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.400 invites yet to be sent, so there's there's lots of 0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.599 rooms still. Um. I will say like thirty one thou 0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.560 people have signed up for a fish Bowl this year, 0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.760 which is insane. Um, so one intent get in basically 0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.599 with the three thou limits. Have you announced this year's theme, Yeah, 0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.520 it's it's it's basically cities were it's we're just doing 0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.719 cities and there's gonna be a whole bunch of regular cities. 0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.040 There's gonna be a whole bunch of fictional cities just 0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.719 for fun. Give me an example of a fictional city. 0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.920 I mean, like Springfield or Gotham, like you know, just 0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.400 your bas there's uh. I think I'm going to be 0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.120 in the letter Kenny division because that that shows amazing. 0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.839 I haven't seen Oh sure as he's out now too, 0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.840 which is the spinoff of it. They're both so good. 0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.799 You gotta get on that chart services it on Hulu. 0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:20.560 They're both on Okay, I've had Hulu, but I didn't 0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.800 get it. Then I should. I'll go back. All right, 0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:27.039 that's a deal, all right, So it's gonna be cities. Um, 0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:32.240 what have you announced this year's Oddball scoring variation? Nope, 0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.600 In fact, this I'm I can't think of one. Usually 0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.400 I have one down by now, but I my the 0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.800 one that I was running with was should I nerve 0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.080 QB rushing? You know, because that's talked about? Yeah. That 0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.880 So that has been the one that's been petering back 0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.280 there in the back of my mind, and I just 0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.200 haven't pulled the trigger on it because it really puts 0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.720 the whole quarterback position up on its end, and somebody 0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.479 like Kirk Cousins becomes a lot more interesting and that 0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.720 would be Yeah, that's I think that would be fascinating. 0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.200 At the last f s g A, both Mike Right 0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.479 and Jason Moore we're trying to convince me that was 0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.120 the like I had thought about him for years, but 0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.440 they were like, you should do this and you'll hate 0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.440 it the reason, Oh I like it. You should do that, 0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.440 all right. Last piece of business before we get to 0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.040 our five guys that have broken a DP s, it's 0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.479 our broken ADP podcast. Guillotine leaks and by the time 0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.840 you hear this it may be open. Um. We for 0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.120 this coming season. We're down to the nitty gritty. I 0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.000 think I said the same thing last week and we 0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.720 ended up needing a little more time. Guillotine Leaks dot 0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.320 com opening very very soon, if not already. When you 0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.280 hear this, all right, I'm gonna let you go first. 0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.400 I will defer to you're not really the guest to 0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.479 guess your in my kitchen, but you know in that regard, 0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.000 you my guest. Talk to me about the first broken 0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.240 a DP player. I think the first one I want 0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.160 to start with is a guy who I think has 0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.800 top twenty four wide receiver potential this year, and he 0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.680 is currently going as wide receiver thirty nine, and I 0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:10.880 fully expect this to correct. Um. It's it's Rashade Bateman. 0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.760 They lost Hollywood Brown. They didn't really add anything. The 0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.120 starting wide receivers for the Ravens at this point are 0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:22.400 Rashade Bateman, Devin Duverna, and James proche Like. It's not 0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.120 good there, um, but mostly look at wide receiver thirty nine. 0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.239 He's going as he missed the first five games this season, 0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.119 so in the final twelve games he was wide receiver 0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.920 forty three and then lost Hollywood Brown. He had sixty 0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.280 eight targets. He's gonna have a hundred plus this year. 0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.520 He was basically this a DP last year in his 0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.640 rookie season, missing games, and now he's got so much 0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.840 more opportunity for targets. I think his hundred and ten, 0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.520 hundred and twenty targets is borderline. His floor wide receiver 0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.000 thirty nine is just is just ridiculous to me. It's 0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.520 a six two two three nine forty guy who owns 0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.920 the ball when it's in the yea he did in college. 0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.040 This is my only hesitation on Bateman is and I 0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.080 went back for a previous podcast maybe a month ago. 0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.200 I went back and watched through several late season Raven 0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.600 games an NFL game pass, just to get back up 0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.520 to speed on Bateman. I just never saw like the 0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.400 I never saw the special things that I saw at 0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.320 Minnesota in college. I'm hoping that comes together near two. 0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.199 We've said it many many times. He changed his number 0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.400 to number seven. I believe that's from twelve to seven. 0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.680 That's right there. We've said it many times. Opportunity is 0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.199 more important than talent in Fantasy. Two plus targets walked 0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.960 out the door and didn't come back in. It's it's 0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.280 an it's a perfect opportunity for Bateman. Okay, my first 0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:56.320 broken a DP player is also a wide receiver. Mike Williams. Now, 0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.120 this is my this is this is the guy I 0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.960 think is the least broken out of the give the 0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.760 players want to give you. I think are massively broken 0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:06.120 by several rounds off in ADP. Mike Williams is current 0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.400 ADP as wide receiver twenty five. Um, I've got him 0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.440 as uh his I've got him his wide receiver thirty one, 0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.320 So not a lot lower, maybe one or two rounds lower. 0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:22.480 But I just want to talk philosophically. Everybody else you're 0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.200 gonna hear it's gonna be a lot more broken than this. Um. 0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.120 I worry about any player who has posted his only 0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:33.280 one really good season in his contract here. Yeah, and 0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.319 that's Mike Williams. Last year you got his most game 0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.920 play games played, He nearly doubled his previous high in receptions, 0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.480 he doubled his previous year's touchdown output, and he said 0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.959 a career high in receiving yards all in his contract here. Um. 0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.120 Before that, he has been an injury plagued player who 0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.360 has been questionable so many times. As you know, Scott 0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.800 and the question will take he placed through it so 0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.080 times doesn't always play well in those questionable games, and 0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.160 then you're always battling all week. I don't know if 0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.160 I'm gonna be able to use him or not. He's questionable, 0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.800 and you know, I hope I'm wrong. This is the 0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.160 guy that I hope I'm I really hope I'm wrong 0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.560 about is it's I adore Justin Herbert. The upside is 0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.320 every bit as high as it was last year, and 0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.480 I'm not as down. I'm not totally down on him, 0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.520 but wide receiver to me feels a little bit rich 0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.640 for Mike Williams. Yeah. It also doesn't help that remember 0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.160 his start last year, he had like six touchdowns in 0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.280 the first five games four games, so his last ten 0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.440 games or so, he had three touchdowns all year. There, 0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.280 there's some credence to you know, maybe it was you know, 0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.240 front loaded a lot of his stats last year. All right, 0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.560 let's go to your next broken a DP player. I 0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.400 will go to Rashad Penny. Who's going to arb you 0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:55.319 only are they here? Um, if some of these name 0:10:55.440 --> 0:11:02.000 changes come through, yes that they will be. Yes, he's 0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.320 going as the top one player. He's already been injured 0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.040 in O t A s in his time. He misses 0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.800 games constantly. I know he's track record. His sample size 0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.880 of like what six or seven games when he gets 0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.280 four teen plus touches is great, he's really good. But 0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.560 that's about the amount of full games he's ever played 0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.840 in his three four year career. Now, Um, it's it's 0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.920 mostly because I'm a Walker fan, I'm a Ken Walker fan. 0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.439 I think he's perfect for that offense. I think he's 0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.240 perfect for what Pete Carroll wants to do. Um, And 0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.320 I just can't trust the injuries Walker. You know what 0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.680 his injuries have been. He missed part of it. He 0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.720 missed one game with an ankle injury once in his 0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.199 collegiate career, Like that's his He missed games some games 0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.199 with COVID, but I'm not going to count that his injury. 0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.599 So yeah, and I'm with you, you know, and Penny. 0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.560 So we've got the We've got a lot, We've seen 0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.400 a lot of pennies five. This is his fifth year. 0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.640 I believe in the league. He's had one good month 0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.480 and I know it's the last month, but man, everybody 0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.560 tends to just project last December into the next year. 0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.880 All the time, and I'm just I'm just not ready 0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.079 to forgive Rashad Penny for all of the broken dreams 0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:21.160 that he's had since being a first round And if 0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.840 you're the end, you look at what the team did, 0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.440 if they loved Penny and really believed in him. No 0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.439 way does a rebuilding team put that kind of capital, 0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:35.560 you know, the running back position. About the next broken 0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:41.839 a DP player. Zach ertz Arizona tight end going off 0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.320 the board is tight end twelve. What I've got him 0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.839 his tight end seven. He was tight end five after 0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.400 joining the Cardinals in Week seven last year. Tight end 0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.040 five and PPR his average game as a Cardinal, a 0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.559 team he joined at the bye, By the way, a 0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:04.000 very alids seven targets, five receptions fifty two yards. So 0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.600 five receptions fifty two yards. There's ten PPR points right there. 0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.320 He scored a third of a touchdown a game that's, 0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:17.360 by tight end standards reliable, just reliable reliability. Ten points 0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.320 is automatically puts you into the tight ends seven territory 0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:26.200 on a per game average. The Cardinals lost the second 0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.679 most targets in the off season. Scott two hundred fifty 0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:35.640 eight vacated targets same, counting the DeAndre Hopkins for six games. 0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.040 I hadn't even thought about that, right, He's got six 0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:42.720 games with great point um. And yes they added in 0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.200 Marquis Brown. He'll soak up some of the two, but 0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.200 not all of the two, not even close. So you know, 0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.920 zach Ertz gonna get a ton of usage. And unlike 0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.480 either tight ends that are going on around that same 0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.280 area that he's going in, he doesn't have the touchdown dependency, right, 0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.959 that guy's like Hunter, Henry and Pat Fryarmouth have had, yes, 0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.840 especially Henry. Yeah, that's it's a very safe it's it's 0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.880 it's not difficult to get into the top twelve tight ends. 0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.080 But when you can see a guy who's safe and gets, 0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.560 you know, a touchdown every three games, that's almost a lock. 0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.440 There's zach Ertz. Yeah right there, All right, let's do 0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.520 one more before we take a break. Who's the next 0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.400 broken a player? You know, only because you brought up 0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.560 zach ERTs, I'm gonna go a new different spot on 0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.960 my list and stay at the tight end position. Since 0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.200 we're talking tight end stat lines and gold colke Met 0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.040 he's currently going his tight end seventeen hundred sixty three 0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.440 over also way late in your draft usually. Um that's 0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.400 I mean thirteenth round fourteen, your double digit rounds by then. Um, 0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.440 so he's my second tight end in many cases. Yes, yeah, 0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.120 he's your second tight end of it. I think he 0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.960 could easily finish as a top twelve tight end, much 0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:55.680 like zach ERT's probably on the tail end of that 0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.720 top twelve. But listen, this ninety three targets last year 0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.320 at the tight end position was even. Yeah, that's a lot. 0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.960 That's a lot. Tied with Darren Waller six among tight 0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.400 ends in target share for his team, seventeen percent of 0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.600 his team's targets. Uh. He had sixty catches, which was 0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.680 tied for twelve. He had six hundred and twelve yards, 0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.480 which was also twelve. He's top twelve in a lot 0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.680 of statistics tar targets. He did not score a touchdown 0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.880 last year. He did not despite being seventh in red 0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.200 zone targets among tight or twelve in rend zone targets 0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.800 among tight ends. This tells you plenty about where Justin 0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.640 Fields was as a passer last year, and Nick Foles 0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:36.240 and right and and Dalton. That team just couldn't get 0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.880 quality throws his way, which is why you see the 0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.120 high targets, but the lower receptions, why you see the 0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.120 red zone targets, but you don't see. So where you 0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.520 were going with zach Ertz, You're just mentioned he was 0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:51.680 like five fifty after after the buy uh Cole Comet, 0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.320 he barely was in the offense in the first five games. 0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.600 His numbers are like two targets, one target, almost nothing. 0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.000 In his last twelve games he was at Jean six 0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.720 targets and forty five yards a game. All right. He 0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.359 was all in there. So I think if that continues 0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.720 with a new a new coaching staff, with Justin Fields 0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:12.880 at the helm all year and improving because he's not 0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:17.160 a rookie anymore, I think he might scoreboard the zero touchdoubts. 0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.120 Wouldn't that be nuts? He'll be more than He'll be 0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.720 more than zero without a doubt. Cole commit the there's 0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.280 gonna be a bad offense. I believe the good news 0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.800 is there's they didn't add anybody to direct passes away 0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.960 from Cold commit nobody. So negative game scripts, negative game 0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.760 scripts gonna helps him to agreed. So I'm with you, 0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.120 it's it's not Cold Comet is going to be tight 0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.800 end five. It's cold comets going at tight end seventeen 0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.120 and he has every opportunity to draft him weight and 0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.080 him being one of the guys that you're like, he's 0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.440 the top twelve guy. Now. Yeah, So it's if he's 0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:54.000 going and say the seventeenth round, well, tight end seventeen, 0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.320 he could outperform that by five rounds. Yeah, and nobody'd 0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.960 be surprised. That's a great value. When we come back, 0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.560 we'll get to the second half of our broken a 0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:22.679 DP players on Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, 0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.600 segment number two. Paul Charging and Scott Fish with you. 0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.480 We're going through our broken A DP players. We've already 0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:34.600 identified five and now the next five. James Robinson, Jaguars 0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.160 running back to me has a broken ADP. His current 0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.320 ADP is running back thirty six. That is round number eight. 0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:45.000 I have him is running back fifty five zero, twelve 0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:49.639 running backs later. There's a tangible and intangible reasons for 0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.879 concern over Robinson. Scott, let me hit the tangible first. 0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.920 While we're optimistic that Cam Akers will be the first 0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:01.280 ever running back to make a meaningful successful return from 0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.439 a torn achilles, we don't even know if that's going 0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:08.000 to happen, and Acres looked totally mundane last January when 0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.879 he tried to come back from his torn achilles. Robinson 0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.720 has the entire history of the NFL working against him, 0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:22.480 as really, no NFL running back has ever recovered to 0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:27.120 become a meaningful performer, fantasy performer, real life performer off 0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.960 of an achilles injury. And maybe medicine has changed to 0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.000 the point that it's maybe medicines changed to the point 0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.440 that Acres will be good and James Robinson will be good, 0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.439 But we don't know that, and do I want to 0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:48.480 bet on that? And when will he be recovered week one? Right? Okay, 0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.439 you know we don't know. I mean, cam Akers came 0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.040 back really really fast, but didn't look good when he 0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.119 did come back. So even when he's available, will James 0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:01.439 Robinson be at resembling close to what he was? But 0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.960 even then, yeah, and this is where it gets a 0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.360 little bit mean, and he were going to go into 0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:10.680 untanned intangible areas. To my eyes, James Robinson was an 0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:15.000 NFL average back whose fantasy success was largely predicated on 0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.480 volume and getting almost all the carries and all the 0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.880 goal line carries first team high high share of the offense. 0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.560 If you're going to take an NFL average talent and 0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:31.920 then say just sap ten tow of his explosiveness, that's 0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.879 the problem. I'm worried about what's left. James Robinson was 0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.399 one of those guys that he was good and he 0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.400 was okay, high volume, and every once in a while 0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.679 he'd make a play like a leaping over someone or 0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.680 just breaking through and scorting through, escorting through like two 0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.639 a couple of he'd make some plays and be like, 0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.600 there's there's the flash. But it happens so infrequently, and 0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.199 because of this injury, maybe that that's what's God, that 0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.120 tiny little bit is gone. That's the worry. That's the worry. 0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.280 So I'm not touching James Robinson um. And that's you know. 0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.280 And I think I looked at Travis Etienne. I think 0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.160 he's going about where he should go. So I didn't 0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.120 flip this over and go, well, you should take at 0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.520 in earlier, although I I do like him a little 0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.920 bit more than his average draft position. But I'm really 0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.200 down on Robinson. You don't think thirty six, you think 0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.160 you don't think you should take Eten earlier than where 0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:25.440 he's going, earlier than going okay, thank you in front 0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.000 of you. I think I have him his running back 0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.520 nineteen Okay, yeah, I was in that area that might. 0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.239 I love him, and I think he might have him 0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.359 higher than me. Now I have to I don't know. 0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.240 I could be wrong. I don't have my rankings in 0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.520 front of me. I kind of love Trevor Lawrence, who 0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.520 throw so many of those throws, even with like Treadwell 0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.119 and Agnew and what are so short, so many his throws. 0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.840 I'm just loving the potential of et and his college, 0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.160 you know, outlet being in that position. All right, give 0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.080 me another broken a DP player. I am gonna stay 0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.480 with the Bears because before the break I did Cole commet, 0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.280 because stay with that offense who did in very little. 0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.520 I mean, they brought in Equinamius say Brown, they brought 0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:08.880 in Byron pengle Um. I'm going with Darren Mooney. He's 0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.639 wide receiver thirty sixty two overall, which is I suppose 0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.640 it could be. This is almost a Mike Williams type 0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.239 ding up broken because I have him, I have him. 0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.760 I believes my wide receiver right now, she's got him 0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.960 a little a little higher. I think he's I think 0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.240 he's got a ceiling in that top two, you know, 0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.080 top twenty four wide receivers. Um. We know that the 0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:35.560 target percentage could be extremely high for Darknell Mooney. Yeah, 0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.480 it absolutely could. He did have a really high percentage 0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.119 uh um last year as well. But last year he 0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.320 went with Ellen Robinson there. He was wide receiver twenty three. 0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:52.320 Already with with Allen Robinson there, with having to deal 0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:57.520 with the Fulls, the Dalton Fields, the other coach, the 0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.520 you know, the old coaching staff, he had to deal 0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.720 with all that, and he was wide receiver twenty three 0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.760 and he's currently going worse than that, even though his 0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.200 situation improved. So that's why I feel like he's currently 0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.639 being a slightly under drafted. UM. I don't know how 0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.280 much more targets he can get though I think he had. 0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.600 I think he had a lot like hundred forty Yeah, hopefully, 0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.920 but better targets, right, so we don't need we don't 0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.720 need to advance on a hundred forty targets. That is 0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.800 a lot, but if you can get higher quality targets. 0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.840 This is also the cold Comet story again, better passing, 0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.320 better efficiency in the hundred forty, then you can get 0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.000 far better results out of Darnell Mooney. Um that And 0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.719 and who do you think is the other starter opposite him? Right, 0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:39.960