WEBVTT - Rep. Mike Lawler Talks SALT Cap, Trump Meeting

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Republicans in Congress gearing up to negotiate an extension of

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump's twenty seventeen tax cuts. A group of House

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Republicans we're invited to meet with Trump this weekend at

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Mari Laco and are expected to push to include an

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 2>expansion of salt tax deductions in Congress's upcoming package. A

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>place to say that joining us now is one of

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>those House Republicans. Congressman Michael Awner of New York Congressman Fantastical,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>catch up with you once again, sir. I just want

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to know, from your perspective, how many friends you have

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>outside of New York in the House that would be

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>on board with this effort.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot more than people realize.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Obviously New York, New Jersey, and California three of the

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 3>high tax states where this has most acutely impacted. Certainly

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>we have a coalition, and given our small majority in

0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the House, it's certainly a powerful coalition. But there's other

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 3>states and members across the country in which, you know,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>over the last seven years they've seen their own taxes

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 3>rise up against that ten thousand dollars cap. So quietly

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 3>there's a few more members than.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>People would realize, but would realize.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 3>Look, the cap on salt was a pay for for

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the twenty seventeen tax Cuts in Jobs Act.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>It was used as a pay for to pay for

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>other provisions within the tax bill. The ten thousand dollars

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 3>cap is woefully insufficient. It's had a negative impact on

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 3>states like New York. Now we can get into how

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 3>New York excessively spends. They've increased their state budget by

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 3>sixty one billion dollars in the last four years, for instance.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>That needs to change.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 3>But taxpayers should not be penalized by living in a

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>high tax state.

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>This is double taxation.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 3>And for those of my colleagues that say this is

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>somehow a subsidy, the fact is New York contributes more

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 3>to the federal government than it receives, and more than

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>some of these states in which you know my colleagues

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 3>will claim that they don't want their taxpayers subsidizing New York,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 3>but the reality is it's the other way around.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Congressman, you certainly don't have a friend though, And someone

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>like Lindsey Graham, the center of South Carolina, who said,

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 4>why should I from South Carolina pay for what's going

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 4>on in some of these blue states. And he's pushing

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 4>for this one big sorry for the two bill approach

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 4>because he doesn't want to talk about taxes, he thinks

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 4>it's going to take too long, and he doesn't frankly

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>want to sign up for salt. How are you going

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 4>to convince the President this weekend that you should do

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 4>one bill together and make sure salts included.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, Respectfully, South Carolina is one of those states that

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 3>gets more back, certainly percentage wise than New York does.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, if we want to talk about subsidies,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>we can go after and burst through everybody's subsidies that

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 3>they get. Look with respect to one versus too. The

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>President has already made clear he is moving forward on

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 3>one big bill. We need to deal with taxes, the border,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 3>energy debt, among other issues. And the fact is, given

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 3>our small margin in the House, we're going to need

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 3>everybody's vote and everybody on board.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Two track bills are going to make that harder.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>So while it may take a little bit more time

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to get one bill negotiated, it is necessary if we're

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>going to get all of these issues addressed. And I

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>think the President understands SID. I think that's why the

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>President made clear last week one bill, and that's how

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>we are proceeding forward.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>In the House.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 3>And look, ultimately, our Senate and House Republican majorities are

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>going to have to work together. Nobody's going to get

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>everything they want out of this. There's going to have

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to be a good faith negotiation if we have any

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 3>chance of passing a reconciliation bill.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 4>I was one of those individuals who watched your festivus

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 4>airing of grievances during the Christmas week and you did

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a wink at your potential future

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe becoming the governor of New York to make sure

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>you could potentially go down that path, do you need

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to secure a higher salt tax break.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Look, regardless of whether or not I run for governor,

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 3>this was a promise of mine and it's a top

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 3>priority for my district. I represent one of the highest

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>tax districts in the country, inclusive of Westchester and Rockland

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 3>Counties number one and number two highest property tax counties

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 3>in America. So this is critically important. To lift the

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 3>cap on salt. Ten thousand dollars is woefully insufficient, and

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 3>this is something that I said I would deliver on,

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to as part of this reconciliation bill.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Long term for New York, this is critical. We lead

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the nation in out migration. Our tax base is eroding,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>in large part because of the disastrous policies of Cappy

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Hokel and Albany Democrats. One party rule in Albany has

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>been an abject disaster, whether you're talking about the affordability

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>crisis or public safety. People being burned alive on subways,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 3>pushed in front of oncoming subway trains. Kappy Hochl now

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 3>scamming New Yorkers out of twenty five hundred dollars a

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 3>year just for the privilege of driving to work, while

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>spending billions of dollars of taxpayer money on free housing, clothing, food, education,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and healthcare for illegal immigrants. New York needs change, there's

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>no question about that. But from a federal perspective, we

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>should not be penalizing New York taxpayers because of the

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 3>disastrous decisions of Cappy HOCl and Albany Democrats.

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 4>And just to be clear, comes to the salt cap,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 4>how high are you looking for it to be raised?

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Look, I've introduced legislation.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, my marriage penalty elimination bill reintroduced to raise

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.799
<v Speaker 3>it to one hundred thousand dollars for individuals two hundred

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars for married couples.

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a negotiation.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 3>My colleagues and I are looking forward to sitting down

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 3>with the President having a discussion about it, hearing obviously

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 3>what his priorities are as part of the tax bill,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>and working to a consensus. At the end of the day,

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>my objective is to provide tax relief to hard working Americans.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 3>It's incumbent upon everybody to negotiate in good faith because

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>here's the reality. If we do not pass a tax

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 3>bill number one, salt comes back unlimited, but it is

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>accompanied by the largest tax increase in American history. So

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 3>it is important that we actually negotiate a fair tax

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>deal for the American people in August.

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I just want to end on this. You are one

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 4>of these individuals that wrote a letter to the Speaker

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.119
<v Speaker 4>talking about that you didn't want the repeal of energy

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>tax credits with the IRA. This is something that president

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>like Donald Trump wants. Are you going to be trying

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 4>to assuage him of your view over this weekend in

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 4>mar Lago.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Look, many provisions of the IRA absolutely need to be repealed.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 3>What we signed on to a letter is that we

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 3>were not going to just sign off on a wholesale repeal.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>There needed to be a discussion and again a negotiation.

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Companies make decisions based on tax provisions, and they need certainty.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>And there's already been significant investment, including in New York,

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>based on some of these energy tax credits, and so

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>we want to make sure that any changes are done

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 3>smartly and not just wholesale repeal. So that'll be part

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>of the discussion and conversation as we move forward. And again,

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the key here is to come up with

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 3>a reconciliation bill that increases domestic production of energy, ensures

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the American people have a good, smart tax bill to

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 3>reduce their taxes, reduce the cost of living here in

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the US, and ultimately secures our border.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Important issues that have to be included in this reconciliation bill.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>It's going to require negotiation, and it's going to ultimately

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>require every Republican supporting the final product.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>A Congressman, as we speak, Bonyold of climbing and We've

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>seen quite a significant move since September when the Federal

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 2>Reserve standing its rate cutting effort. We've moved one hundred

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 2>basis points. And I certainly don't expect you to follow

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the ins and outs of fixed income on any given day,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 2>but I wonder whether you and your colleagues are sensitive

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to some of the pressure that is starting to build

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>in the US dept market.

0:08:55.280 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>No question, Look, our tet at thirty six trillion dollars

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>total and counting, is a major problem. And this is

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>something that everybody in the Republican Conference is in agreement on.

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to tackle our debt.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>We have to reduce our deficit spending, we have to

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 3>right size the federal government.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Spending is out of control.

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden's disastrous first two years gave us record inflation

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 3>it spite the cost of living.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And we have to unwind a lot of this.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 3>You look at a state like New York, it is

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 3>floundering because of some of the economic pressures.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And just think about this.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 3>The MTA has more debt than eighty percent of the

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>states in the country. So debt is a major problem.

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>It's something that we have to deal with across the board.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 3>We cannot continue to print and borrow money at the levels.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>That we have.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we can and afford to extend CCJA,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 2>which baseline is something like four to five trillion? Do

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you think we can afford to include an expansion of

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>cell tax deductions? And Congressman, I wouldn't push back against

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 2>anything you said about the effort that needs to take

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 2>place elsewear, I'm just wondering how much fiscal space you

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and your colleagues believe we actually have at the moment.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Look, tax policy is critical to economic growth, but it's

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 3>one part. We need to increase domestic production of energy,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 3>which will help generate more revenues. Energy policy is also critical,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 3>not just domestically for cost, but for national security. You

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 3>were talking obviously about the threats to Europe from Russia.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Europe is still buying gas from Russia. It's idiotic. It

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 3>makes no sense that they're helping fund the very war

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to stop. So there is a lot that

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 3>has to be done here, including reigning in federal spending. Obviously,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>as we work through the tax cuts, we will look

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 3>to help offset some of the cost through spending reduction.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is going to be a comprehensive approach to

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 3>how we right size the American economy. I do think

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 3>it's possible. It's going to be one of the most

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 3>critical things any of us ever do in our careers

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>in government. And so we all have to be committed

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 3>to the final cause here and.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>We're certainly looking forward to continue in the conversation with you, sir,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.599
<v Speaker 2>in your current capacity and maybe in the future. Is

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the next government of the great State of New York.

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Mike Lauda there, Congressman, thank you, sir, appreciate it.