Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom Hug. The Amy Cony Barrett
Speaker 1: hearings are underway today. Democrats so far have got nothing.
Speaker 1: Plus a Trump supporter shot in Denver by an alleged
Speaker 1: security guard. Could Governor Cuomo be Biden's attorney general? And
Speaker 1: the truth about Columbus Day. This is the Buck Sexon Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a
Speaker 1: great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a
Speaker 1: great guy. No welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: We are twenty two days out from the election, and
Speaker 1: in some ways it really doesn't feel like it, does
Speaker 1: it not nearly the same kind of frenzy of political
Speaker 1: activity out on the streets. We don't have lawns in
Speaker 1: New York City, so I can't speak to lawn signs.
Speaker 1: But everyone's still locked up inside. Things are getting colder.
Speaker 1: People are worried about COVID, and this week we're going
Speaker 1: to spend really on a Supreme Court nomination battle. There's
Speaker 1: going to be something of a rest spit from the
Speaker 1: main effort of the election for a few days. And
Speaker 1: we've already seen what the opposition to Amy Coney Barrett
Speaker 1: looks like so far, and the answer is it is
Speaker 1: unbelievably weak. I mean, it's really quite pathetic. You saw
Speaker 1: this over the weekend. You had a number of prominent
Speaker 1: news sites that started doing one of two things. They
Speaker 1: either changed the definition of court packing to include this right,
Speaker 1: which is filling a Supreme Court seat. No, that's court packing. No,
Speaker 1: that's called filling a seat. That's not packing. Or they
Speaker 1: started to use this phrase de politicize the court, depoliticize
Speaker 1: Supreme Court dominations. What the heck does that even mean? Well,
Speaker 1: it's what you do when you don't have a real argument,
Speaker 1: It's what you do when you're flailing. And clearly the
Speaker 1: Democrats are at this point, what are they going to
Speaker 1: say the incredibly brilliant, universally beloved mother of seven who
Speaker 1: adopted two black children from Haiti and has already been
Speaker 1: through a Senate confirmation process to be an Appeals Court
Speaker 1: judge and was just pushed through without really any issue
Speaker 1: other than being asked, does the dogma? The dogma lives
Speaker 1: loudly within you? Which was great for Conservatives, Catholics and
Speaker 1: Republicans that that question was out there, but she's already
Speaker 1: been confirmed to that. Why would she not be confirmed here?
Speaker 1: They have no argument, friends lost. This is nothing but
Speaker 1: sour grapes, sore loserism from Democrats. That's all it is.
Speaker 1: They have no other argument. History is with the Republicans
Speaker 1: filling this seat. Common sense, basic politics. Elections have consequences,
Speaker 1: the single truest and most useful phrase that Barack Obama
Speaker 1: ever uttered. I think, at least as president, elections do
Speaker 1: have consequences, and we are seeing right now what that
Speaker 1: can mean. So far, it has been pretty pathetic watching
Speaker 1: Democrats dance around the full on assault on Amy Coney
Speaker 1: Barrett's character that we all kind of know is coming.
Speaker 1: We all believe that they'll do something completely disgraceful or
Speaker 1: disreputable here. That's their only option. What else are they
Speaker 1: going to say? ACB and I refer to her that
Speaker 1: way because it's convenient, but also because it really triggers
Speaker 1: the lives they hate that she's no RBG. Correct, she's not,
Speaker 1: and for the purposes of a constitutionalist on the Court,
Speaker 1: that's a great thing. That's a great thing. But they're
Speaker 1: going after everything around this moment. So far, they're trying
Speaker 1: to set the stage and set the narrative. You had Democrats.
Speaker 1: Senators spend the day talking about how important the Affordable
Speaker 1: Care Act is. Senators talking about how Donald Trump has
Speaker 1: done a terrible job on COVID. These things have nothing
Speaker 1: to do with ACB. Nothing. This is all about. It's
Speaker 1: supposed to be about deciding whether or not this woman,
Speaker 1: who is eminently qualified to sit on the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: is in fact going to sit on the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: That's it. There's nothing else, which is why all along
Speaker 1: I've held out that we should have just had the GOP,
Speaker 1: should have called for I vote, Have it done and
Speaker 1: over with, Allow her to be a vote on this,
Speaker 1: get it in the books, get her put in that seat, Dunzo,
Speaker 1: move on to the next challenge. That's it. But no,
Speaker 1: senators can't help but want to take every opportunity to
Speaker 1: give speeches in front of the American people to a
Speaker 1: national television audience about how much they love the Constitution,
Speaker 1: or about how much Republicans and Donald Trump hate America,
Speaker 1: or whatever it is that they're going to say. You're
Speaker 1: hearing a variation of a political stump speech. For most
Speaker 1: of these senators, nothing particularly worthwhile or interesting for many
Speaker 1: of them. Senator Ben Sass of Nebraska gave a Civics
Speaker 1: one oh one lesson today. I suppose some people seem
Speaker 1: to like it. Other people felt like it was kind
Speaker 1: of a waste of everyone's time. Senator Dick Durbin also
Speaker 1: did much of the same, going off on some lengthy
Speaker 1: speech about the need to protect pre existing conditions and
Speaker 1: how the Supreme Court is supposed to be this sacred body,
Speaker 1: and none of it really adds up to anything other
Speaker 1: than they are upset that they're not getting their way. Now.
Speaker 1: I know Sasa is a Republican. I didn't mean to
Speaker 1: throw him in there with Durban, but I don't trust him.
Speaker 1: It's gonna say, I don't trust the guy as a
Speaker 1: Republican at all. I think he's more about Sass than
Speaker 1: he is about the GOP, that's for sure. Some of
Speaker 1: you can disagree with me, and that's fine. But onto
Speaker 1: what they're going to do. Now, they've tried so hard,
Speaker 1: they've they've they've tested and then thrown out. They're all
Speaker 1: these different narratives. They're still clinging to the weakest of
Speaker 1: all I think, which is it was it was Rbg's
Speaker 1: last wish. I do not care, neither does any other Republican.
Speaker 1: It's not it doesn't matter. Rbg's last wish is not
Speaker 1: meaningful for a government proceeding that is representative of what
Speaker 1: is best for three hundred and thirty million people. Okay,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter the same way that the Democrats pretend. It
Speaker 1: does not matter that RBG was on the record and
Speaker 1: explicitly against packing the court. So who was it that
Speaker 1: tried to pack the court? Just it's it's worth taking
Speaker 1: a moment to look back in time for a second.
Speaker 1: Who was it? It was? FDR wasn't oh a big Democrat,
Speaker 1: the Democrat who ushered in really the overreaching federal government authority,
Speaker 1: the enormous fissures and breaks in the Constitution. So it
Speaker 1: was in fact the Democrats who once again, as part
Speaker 1: of their will to power, tried to push through court packing.
Speaker 1: They don't get their way and they want to change things.
Speaker 1: It's back in nineteen thirty seven, so it stayed at
Speaker 1: nine back then. But that was also because the composition
Speaker 1: of the court changed enough and the decisions changed enough
Speaker 1: to Roosevelt's liking. What was it about the not the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal? Oh, but New Deal legislation. So let's
Speaker 1: understand this as we have democrats today lecturing us about
Speaker 1: precedent and history and making it up as they go along.
Speaker 1: That FDR, perhaps the big government patron saints. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you want to call him a saint, but
Speaker 1: you know, the big government exemplar of the twentieth century
Speaker 1: couldn't get the Supreme Court then to agree that some
Speaker 1: of his New Deal actions were in fact constitutional. So
Speaker 1: what did he do change the people making the decisions
Speaker 1: about the constitutionality? A very Olynskyite approach. Now that's what
Speaker 1: he wanted to do. It was not successful, obviously in
Speaker 1: the judges stayed at nine, but it was that same impulse.
Speaker 1: We have power, we want to do things. We are collectivists,
Speaker 1: and we believe in state authority. So we're just going
Speaker 1: to go for it. It doesn't matter that there's a
Speaker 1: founding document that we're all supposed to adhere to that
Speaker 1: creates the basis for all of these government actions known
Speaker 1: as the Constitution. It's not supposed to matter. And then
Speaker 1: you have this other, this media. It's really amazing, this
Speaker 1: media effort where it is almost like and I say
Speaker 1: almost because it is like Actually, I'd be willing to
Speaker 1: bet that if you were able to track down the emails,
Speaker 1: you'd find out that there were members of the media
Speaker 1: who are getting emails from Democrat list serves and Democrat
Speaker 1: email lists and things telling them to start referring to
Speaker 1: the de politicization of the court and also just say
Speaker 1: that it's the Republicans who are court packing. This is
Speaker 1: classic gaslighting, and that's exactly what they're doing. Now. They
Speaker 1: do something, or try to do something. In this case,
Speaker 1: they haven't done it yet, thankfully, but they try to
Speaker 1: push through a court packing scheme and when it doesn't
Speaker 1: work out for them, when they public or at least
Speaker 1: the institutions that are watching over this thing, say look,
Speaker 1: you guys, they're allowed to do this. You can just
Speaker 1: wine and wine. They say, well, yeah, well you're the
Speaker 1: ones who are packing the court. What. Yeah, you're the
Speaker 1: ones who are doing it. You cheated. This is the
Speaker 1: logic of an eight year old who stole a piece
Speaker 1: of birthday cake, knows he's about to get and so
Speaker 1: he blames his six year old sister. She did it,
Speaker 1: Cast dispersions on the other side, undermine them, and hope
Speaker 1: that your side is able to get what they want
Speaker 1: out of the equation. That's what's happening here. Democrats, in
Speaker 1: so many ways do act like a spoiled eight year old.
Speaker 1: That's really the central id, the central ethos of the party.
Speaker 1: I want, therefore, I demand, I want, therefore I should get.
Speaker 1: Constitution can't be an impediment to it, the rule of
Speaker 1: law can't be an impediment to it. And even the
Speaker 1: stellar credentials of ACB and the fact that here we
Speaker 1: have a truly obviously decent, kind, ethical, brilliant person who's
Speaker 1: going to be in a role where she will make
Speaker 1: good decisions and stay in her lane. She's not going
Speaker 1: to be a super legislator. She will at some point,
Speaker 1: i'm sure, disappoint conservatives because she won't do things that
Speaker 1: are outside of the constitutional scope of a Supreme Court justice.
Speaker 1: It's the left, it's the liberals who want something very different.
Speaker 1: They want a super legislature that is not accountable to
Speaker 1: the people, and that will give them at the key
Speaker 1: moments in the courts decision making process, will give them
Speaker 1: the laws and the political victories that they want. This
Speaker 1: is for all of us to see. It's quite obvious.
Speaker 1: It's quite apparent and for all the smarmy lib lawyers
Speaker 1: out there with their much heralded credentials because they went
Speaker 1: to some institution that is now just churning out erudite
Speaker 1: leftists as fast as possible, who have who have bad judgment,
Speaker 1: but unfortunately have strong enough legal credentials that they now
Speaker 1: largely control the legal profession. I mean, the left has
Speaker 1: overtaken not just undergrad programs, but law schools. Speak to
Speaker 1: somebody who's gone to law school in the last ten
Speaker 1: or fifteen years. There every bid is down with BLM
Speaker 1: and social justice and you know, Occupy Wall Street and
Speaker 1: all this stuff, you name it, big corporate law firms.
Speaker 1: It'd be shocking if Americans actually really understood how far
Speaker 1: this leftist ideological rot has extended throughout the legal profession.
Speaker 1: But ACB's going to withstand all of that. And here's
Speaker 1: my prediction for the week. And this is one of
Speaker 1: these predictions where I hope I'm wrong. You will recall
Speaker 1: that Brett Kavanaugh was also sailing through stellar credentials, perfectly situated,
Speaker 1: gold plated resume for a Supreme Court justice. Nothing about
Speaker 1: the guy didn't add up to, yeah, he should be
Speaker 1: voted through and that's the way the beginning of those
Speaker 1: hearings went till all of a sudden we knew that
Speaker 1: there was this allegation that surfaced, and then this woman
Speaker 1: showed up, and it was all just run through the
Speaker 1: Democrat apparatus. You had very powerful figures prepping and assisting
Speaker 1: and pushing for blasi Ford. And then of course two
Speaker 1: other women came forward, each one less credible than the
Speaker 1: next with their allegations. And there are a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of allegations of people that made their way to the
Speaker 1: Senate that didn't actually make their way under the Senate
Speaker 1: floor because they were so absurd that even the shameless
Speaker 1: and disgraceful Kamala Harris and the rest of the Senate
Speaker 1: Democrats on the Judiciary weren't willing to use because their
Speaker 1: allegations from women who, it was demonstrable, had never even
Speaker 1: been in the same state as Kavanaugh, never mind had
Speaker 1: actually been the victim of some attack by his hand.
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh was a manifestly innocent person and a good man,
Speaker 1: and perfectly suited to be a Supreme Court justice. Amy
Speaker 1: Coney Barrett is a good woman and also perfectly suited
Speaker 1: for the role We're going to go through a few
Speaker 1: days here where it'll seem like everything is just fine,
Speaker 1: and then at the very last moment, as we were
Speaker 1: just a few weeks away from an election, I think
Speaker 1: Democrats will spring the trap. I don't know what it is.
Speaker 1: It may be a process thing, it may be blocking
Speaker 1: access to Capitol Hill. It may be someone coming forward
Speaker 1: who claims that they heard Amy Tony Barrett saying anti
Speaker 1: LGBT slurs thirty years ago, with no proof and no nothing,
Speaker 1: but something along those lines. They're gonna try, and it's
Speaker 1: going to be ugly. That's my prediction. So just get
Speaker 1: ready for it. We're gonna I think we're gonna go
Speaker 1: through a few days of pretty smooth sailing Democrats flailing,
Speaker 1: looking weak, looking absurd. But I know, I know this
Speaker 1: left wing mentality. I know what this Democrat Party has become,
Speaker 1: and they're going to try something ugly and disgusting in
Speaker 1: the next forty eight hours or so. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom und This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well,
Speaker 1: I can tell you that we're getting this question. It's
Speaker 1: a common question being asked because American people who have
Speaker 1: watched the Republicans pack in the Court of the last
Speaker 1: three and a half years, and they brag about it.
Speaker 1: They've taken every vacancy and filled it. Did you know
Speaker 1: that they've sent to us and we have approved only
Speaker 1: with their votes? That might add ten people who have
Speaker 1: been judged unanimously unqualified by the American Bar Association. Do
Speaker 1: you know how many judicial nominees came from Obama who
Speaker 1: were judged unanimously unqualified? None? So we are dealing with
Speaker 1: people on the court packed into the court with little
Speaker 1: or no qualification, who are going to be there for
Speaker 1: a long time. So it's understandable the Republicans raised the
Speaker 1: issue of court packing, changing the definition. That's Dick Durbin
Speaker 1: on the Senate Judiciary Committee changing the definition of court
Speaker 1: packing in real time. That is not what court packing is.
Speaker 1: You can say I don't like their nominations, you can
Speaker 1: say a lot of things, but you can't say that
Speaker 1: that's court packing, which is what they're doing. They're claiming
Speaker 1: right now that the words that we are using to
Speaker 1: talk about this nomination process don't actually have a specific meaning,
Speaker 1: that they can change the meaning of those words in
Speaker 1: real time. What is that reminiscent of? There's a great
Speaker 1: irony in all this isn't there then, at a time
Speaker 1: when we're talking about who should sit on the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: somebody who believes the Constitution is a document that has
Speaker 1: meaning and that the words have implications that are not
Speaker 1: subject to whims and interpretations not rooted in the actual text. Right,
Speaker 1: you have textualists and you have living constitution people. Right,
Speaker 1: it's just whatever I want it to be whenever I
Speaker 1: want it to be. That we'll look at what the
Speaker 1: Democrats are doing right now with court packing. Court Packing
Speaker 1: isn't that thing that we've all agreed it is for
Speaker 1: as long as we've been using the term. It's some
Speaker 1: other thing, it's some other concept. Let me now, let
Speaker 1: me now shift into that conversation. It's stunning, it's disgusting,
Speaker 1: it's unfair. But that's where we are. That's where we are.
Speaker 1: Depoliticizing is the other term we're using. The Associated Press
Speaker 1: has heard it a talk about and this was the
Speaker 1: quote from the weekend. Bullock said that if Coney Barrett
Speaker 1: was confirmed, he would be open to measures to depoliticize
Speaker 1: the word, including adding judges to the bench, a practice
Speaker 1: critics have dubbed packing. Oh so now, we're gonna see.
Speaker 1: This is why I always tell you watch the words
Speaker 1: the Democrats use. From a legal alien to a legal immigrant,
Speaker 1: to undocumented immigrant to undocumented period, just given documents, then
Speaker 1: they're just American like everybody else, right, the same thing
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Look at that. There are so many instances
Speaker 1: of this. Oh, pro choice, women's health, women's health rights.
Speaker 1: Say abortion, guys, you're talking about abortion. No one has
Speaker 1: any problem with any other women's quote health rights. But
Speaker 1: they can't use the actual language that we all agree
Speaker 1: mean something, because then they'll lose the debate. So what
Speaker 1: do they do to change the terms of the debate
Speaker 1: when they're not deep platforming, as you can see, when
Speaker 1: they're not shutting you down, silencing you, what do they do?
Speaker 1: Change the way that you can use the platform, change
Speaker 1: the words that are acceptable, change the definition, at least
Speaker 1: in the public mind, so that now they can say
Speaker 1: whatever they want about a thing. Deep politicizing. Oh okay, sure,
Speaker 1: isn't that so? Isn't that so quaint? We all know
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do here, We all understand what's happening.
Speaker 1: But you're seeing the fundamental dishonesty of the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: on full display for all right now, whether it's on
Speaker 1: changing the terms of our discussion over the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: vacancy that will hopefully soon be filled by Amy Coney Barrett,
Speaker 1: or saying that Joe Biden, you know that there is
Speaker 1: no right for the people to know there is no
Speaker 1: reason for the people to know if Biden would even
Speaker 1: engage in court packing. Fundamental dishonesty from all quarters. That's
Speaker 1: your Democrat Party in twenty twenty. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Church Bird,
Speaker 1: your nomination for a life time appointment to the highest
Speaker 1: court in the land comes before us under a cloud.
Speaker 1: You've been nominated by a president who shows contempt for
Speaker 1: the Constitution but does not hesitate to tell his loyal
Speaker 1: followers that you are being sent to the bench to
Speaker 1: do his political chores, abolish the ACA ruling, his favor
Speaker 1: on any election kind of test. And even more, you
Speaker 1: cannot feel good about a president cheapening this historic moment,
Speaker 1: the future, the affordable character, and so many other issues
Speaker 1: hanging into balance. Voting rights, civil rights, the right to
Speaker 1: privacy and choice, environmental protection, gun safety laws, marriage equality, dreamers,
Speaker 1: work protection. These are the stakes. If we wait just
Speaker 1: a few more days, we'll know what the American people
Speaker 1: have to say. Yeah, Dick Durban is wasting everybody's time
Speaker 1: with this nonsense. But that's what he's been doing for
Speaker 1: decades in public office. So no surprise. Why is it
Speaker 1: Amy Coney Barrett's fault that Democrats don't like Trump? She's
Speaker 1: just been appointed by, Yes, the actual sitting president. Sorry, libs,
Speaker 1: it's true, not my president, not my President. I can't wait.
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope I get the opportunity to hear
Speaker 1: those chants again on November fourth this year, just like
Speaker 1: last time, day after the election, right through the Flat
Speaker 1: Iron district of Manhattan on Broadway, Hundreds and hundreds of
Speaker 1: people on a cold, rainy night, too, marching through the streets.
Speaker 1: Not my president's like, Well, unfortunately not true. You can
Speaker 1: say not my president as much as you like. It
Speaker 1: doesn't actually change the reality. But Democrats like to live
Speaker 1: in fantasy lands of their own creation, and then they
Speaker 1: watch MSNBC where they see that expounded upon it gets
Speaker 1: even more attention. So what Dick Durban here is saying
Speaker 1: that there's a cloud under this is just Look, it's
Speaker 1: also obvious, right, But the problem is that we have
Speaker 1: to smash even the dumbest arguments the Democrats use, because
Speaker 1: otherwise it stands out there and they'll say, see, they
Speaker 1: have no response, they have no way of telling the
Speaker 1: truth about this one. It's also completely inaccurate. Amy klobaschar Oh,
Speaker 1: she's outing on the Midwest and she's gonna tall you know,
Speaker 1: I was gonna be president. Oh, unbelievable. I do think
Speaker 1: she probably would have been better on that stage than
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris. But you know, she kind of has a
Speaker 1: voice that the registers up around here. Sometimes. Here's Amy
Speaker 1: saying that the way to deal with this is to
Speaker 1: call out the most psycho libs possible, call them up
Speaker 1: and have them harass every Republican member of the Senate.
Speaker 1: You know, go go outside, you, Mitch McConnell's house, and
Speaker 1: just bang a bunch of pots and pants together. Here
Speaker 1: she is clobishar seventeen. Let me tell you a political secret.
Speaker 1: I doubt that we will be a brilliant cross examination
Speaker 1: that's going to change this judge's trajectory this week. No,
Speaker 1: it is you, it is you calling Republican senators and
Speaker 1: telling them enough is enough, telling them it is personal,
Speaker 1: telling them they have their priorities wrong, So do it.
Speaker 1: And it is you voting, even when they try to
Speaker 1: do everything to stop you. It is you making your
Speaker 1: own blueprint for the future instead of crying defeat. So
Speaker 1: do it. This isn't Donald Trump's country, it is yours.
Speaker 1: This shouldn't be Donald Trump's judge, it should be yours. Well. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: unfortunately for miss Clovish, are Senator clobush Ar, I'm sure
Speaker 1: she would want to be called that the president is
Speaker 1: the duly elected commander in chief and executive who gets
Speaker 1: to make determinations about who will be on the Supreme
Speaker 1: courtin next and it looks like it's going to be
Speaker 1: Amy Coney Barrett. And there's a big political problem that
Speaker 1: this poses for the Democrats. You'll recall back in twenty sixteen, right,
Speaker 1: take it, take a step back, or take a trip
Speaker 1: down memory, laying with me here. Back in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: there was a pretty widespread concern among the political experts
Speaker 1: such as they are, and the polsters and all the
Speaker 1: rest of them, that this was going to be a
Speaker 1: very difficult sell, that Donald Trump was going to be
Speaker 1: a very difficult pitch for Evangelicals and for more traditional Christians, right,
Speaker 1: not pro choice, left wing socialist Catholics. I don't know
Speaker 1: what's wrong with my fellow Catholics out there. Sometimes a
Speaker 1: lot of them, a lot of lib Catholics running around
Speaker 1: who think that having the state in place of God
Speaker 1: is a good thing somehow for their faith. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I think it's pretty unfortunate, but that's where we are.
Speaker 1: But you'll remember that there were people very understandably concerned
Speaker 1: about whether Donald Trump, who is a thrice married billionaire
Speaker 1: from New York. Those are just the fact and not
Speaker 1: a man who anybody would think of as chaste in
Speaker 1: his personal behavior. Again, not judging, but just speaking facts.
Speaker 1: Whether Evangelicals and other more traditional morality based Christians, including
Speaker 1: a lot of Catholics and conservative and Orthodox Jews, you know,
Speaker 1: whether they would be able to come forward and vote
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump knowing that he had lived his life
Speaker 1: as a more let's say, in a more libertine way.
Speaker 1: But the decision that they made was, well, it's not
Speaker 1: about Trump personally, it's about the policies, and it's about
Speaker 1: what he will pursue in the truth is, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has been among the most, if not the most pro
Speaker 1: life presidents in history, based on his statements, his appearance
Speaker 1: at the March for Life rally in DC, and everything
Speaker 1: that he has tried to do, as well as the
Speaker 1: appointment of judges, which is what we're really going to
Speaker 1: get into now for a second. As we're heading into
Speaker 1: this reelection, and there will be there, right, there'll be
Speaker 1: the two conversations about independence and swing voters and base
Speaker 1: turnout well for base turnout purposes, Evangelicals and other Christians
Speaker 1: on the right have to look at Trump's record and
Speaker 1: what he's actually done in office and feel pretty darn
Speaker 1: good about the whole thing that their bargain that they
Speaker 1: made in twenty sixteen. I'm gonna vote for this guy,
Speaker 1: knowing he's imperfect. Of course, some would say, Buck, we're
Speaker 1: all imperfect. Knowing he's imperfect from the perspective of Christian
Speaker 1: teaching and morality, as again we all are. But what
Speaker 1: will he represent as the president of the United States,
Speaker 1: What will he be pushing for, and what kind of judges?
Speaker 1: Most notably, and this ties into everything, ties into Roe v. Wade,
Speaker 1: It ties into gay marriage. It ties into all these
Speaker 1: different social issues and social justice issues that will come
Speaker 1: before the Supreme Court and continue to well. Neil Gorsich,
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh, and soon to be any Coney Barrett, three
Speaker 1: of nine judges on the Supreme Court will soon again,
Speaker 1: assuming that ACB's nomination goes through, just fine, We'll soon
Speaker 1: go through. And once they've gone through, that will mean
Speaker 1: or rather once the final one goes through, the President
Speaker 1: will have had quite a hand in the federal judiciary.
Speaker 1: You add to that all the federal judges. I keep
Speaker 1: telling you, Mitch McConnell, Cocaine, Mitch ain't playing no games.
Speaker 1: He fills those federal judge seats, doesn't care, just just
Speaker 1: keeps the machinery going. Okay, Harry Reid wanted to play hardball,
Speaker 1: get rid of the filibuster for judicial nominees. Guess what
Speaker 1: shoes on the other foot. As we warned them, it
Speaker 1: would be. And Mitch McConnell has been taken this sport
Speaker 1: car for a ride. Man. He's having a good time
Speaker 1: getting as many constitutionalists as possible onto the federal judiciary,
Speaker 1: and he'll have a Trump in his first four years.
Speaker 1: Is setting records with this so you're getting judges who
Speaker 1: are constitutionalists. But also if you are a Christian and
Speaker 1: you believe in religious freedom, if you believe in free speech,
Speaker 1: and if you believe in the right to life, Trump
Speaker 1: has had a profound impact in his first four years
Speaker 1: on those issues with the judicial appointments alone. And to
Speaker 1: really put this into stark contrast for everybody thinking about this,
Speaker 1: and this will affect I think, and this should I
Speaker 1: hope reach some people, because the show is now completely
Speaker 1: coast to coast and we're in so many states and
Speaker 1: large metro areas that you know, we're very thankful for
Speaker 1: how many people get to hear the show. But one
Speaker 1: thing that I'm hoping some of you listening to this
Speaker 1: will take from it is imagine for a moment, if
Speaker 1: Donald Trump had not defeated Hillary Clinton, which I don't
Speaker 1: think any other Republican would have been able to do
Speaker 1: from that field in twenty sixteen. Look, I don't think
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz would have beaten her. I don't and I
Speaker 1: was very favorable to Ted in the early days of
Speaker 1: the primary. But you know, I thought he had a
Speaker 1: really good shot. But I was wrong. And Donald Trump
Speaker 1: doesn't become president of the United States, Hillary Clinton, does
Speaker 1: you have three not even, not even people of Ginsberg's
Speaker 1: intellectual and judicial caliber. I mean, I disagree with Ginsburg.
Speaker 1: I think she was a very smart lady and she
Speaker 1: understood the law. She also used her position to advance
Speaker 1: left wing agenda items. But she was a talented lawyer. Right,
Speaker 1: this is this is just calling it what calling it
Speaker 1: what it is here. But some of the other picks
Speaker 1: that you've seen, I mean, Soda Mayor, her decisions, it
Speaker 1: reads like somebody who should who spends all their time,
Speaker 1: you know, weeding through comments on msnbcman Soda Mayor on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is just a judicial travesty. The decisions make.
Speaker 1: I mean, we all know. It's just it's just having
Speaker 1: a left wing activist, not a particularly keen understanding of
Speaker 1: the law, not particularly well versed in our history and judgment.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, sodomy Or is a disaster. You would
Speaker 1: have had three Sodomyor like judges on the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: In terms of their philosophy, which is just a straightforward hey, sorry,
Speaker 1: we want this thing, no matter what the issue is
Speaker 1: that the left wants it. Sodomiyor basically signs on for it.
Speaker 1: No matter what it is. And if you look at Ginsburg,
Speaker 1: I think in Citizens United she was within I think
Speaker 1: that one was nine. Oh, but I mean, you know
Speaker 1: there were times when there was a civil libertarian component
Speaker 1: of Ginsburg. And again I think that she was wrong
Speaker 1: and a lot of stuff. But I'm just saying it's
Speaker 1: there's wrong, and then there's just not even pretending the
Speaker 1: law matters. And I think that's what you get with Sotomayor.
Speaker 1: So you see what has Donald Trump done in his
Speaker 1: first four years in office. He often talks about the economy,
Speaker 1: but his most successful and unchanged by COVID, his most
Speaker 1: successful record to point to is on judicial nominations and
Speaker 1: the decades long, generations long impact that this president has
Speaker 1: already had or will have. I mean, he's already put
Speaker 1: this into place. A lot of people that voted from
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen who are like, look, we've just got
Speaker 1: to at least get conservative judges. We can have Hillary
Speaker 1: in charge. They've got to be not only pleasantly surprised,
Speaker 1: they've got to think to themselves, we want more of this.
Speaker 1: We are, as Trump used to say, not tired of
Speaker 1: winning when it comes to judicial nominations. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. We've
Speaker 1: taken a different path at times, Bort Thomas, Alito Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: I hope we don't take that path with Judge Barrett.
Speaker 1: She doesn't deserve that. I don't think it makes this
Speaker 1: hearing any better. In the American people, I believe would
Speaker 1: not deserve a repeat of those episodes and the Senate
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee's history. To my Democratic colleagues, I respect you all.
Speaker 1: We've done some things together, and we've had some fights
Speaker 1: in this committee. I've tried to give you the time
Speaker 1: you need to make your case, and you have every
Speaker 1: right in the world to make your case. I think
Speaker 1: I know how the vote's going to come out, but
Speaker 1: I think Judge Barrett is required for the good of
Speaker 1: the nation to submit to your questions in hours. This
Speaker 1: is going to be a long, contentious week. I would
Speaker 1: just ask one thing of the committee, to the extent possible,
Speaker 1: Let's make it respectful. Let's make it challenging. Let's remember
Speaker 1: the world is watching. It's not going to be respectful.
Speaker 1: I think we know that much. It's always interesting too,
Speaker 1: when you see members of our elected bodies, like the
Speaker 1: Senates not even just in the Congress, who are trying
Speaker 1: to go after somebody who is just intellectually more adept
Speaker 1: and quite honestly more capable than they are. Tony Barrett
Speaker 1: is a better legal mind than almost any of the
Speaker 1: Senate Judiciary members that will be questioning are, and perhaps
Speaker 1: at the same level as all of them. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think that you probably is right up there with
Speaker 1: someone like a Ted Cruz. I think she is right
Speaker 1: up there with someone like a Mike Lee. And I
Speaker 1: would bet that they would tell you that that's true.
Speaker 1: You know, she's and perhaps even they would say, you know,
Speaker 1: in a rare moment of humility for United States Center
Speaker 1: or that she actually exceeds their legal knowledge and capability.
Speaker 1: So they're gonna be people that are attacking her, and
Speaker 1: it's just gonna be pathetic but also upsetting. And I remember, look,
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham, you guys know I gave him a hard
Speaker 1: time sometimes because of his you know, I'm gonna get answers.
Speaker 1: I'm appearing on Fox tonight and we're gonna get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of Russia. Colue. I'm always like, look, lindsay,
Speaker 1: come on, you're not There's no Durham report there. You know,
Speaker 1: this is the whole I'm gonna get answers. Let me
Speaker 1: go on Fox News now. Thing it does, it does
Speaker 1: get old after a while. And I just gotta say
Speaker 1: what he did in the Kavanaugh hearing though he's kind
Speaker 1: of for he's kind of forgotta forever, you know, get
Speaker 1: out of jail free card me. I mean that was important.
Speaker 1: We were watching the Democrats and they didn't realize it
Speaker 1: at the time. Radicalizing the Democrats during the Kavanaugh hearing
Speaker 1: radicalized millions of conservatives into wartime conservatives, people who understood
Speaker 1: what the ideological battle in this country had shifted to
Speaker 1: what it had become. That's what really occurred here, That's
Speaker 1: what was really going on. But in the moment, Lindsey
Speaker 1: Graham was the one who stood up there and finally
Speaker 1: gave voice to those of us at home who wanted
Speaker 1: to scream through our television sets. This woman, Blasi Ford
Speaker 1: is a liar. This is disgusting. The other women are lying.
Speaker 1: It's gross. They have no evidence, they have no support
Speaker 1: for their allegations whatsoever. It's all very conveniently timed, isn't it.
Speaker 1: That's full of holes. And Emmy Coney, I mean, sorry,
Speaker 1: Christine Blasi Fords. These three names get confused in my head.
Speaker 1: Blasi Ford said that she couldn't fly and so she
Speaker 1: had to drive as a delay tactic, they get more
Speaker 1: time to prap and have people, you know, work on
Speaker 1: her image and all this stuff. And then we find
Speaker 1: out that she used to travel for fun, for vacations
Speaker 1: all the time flying. Yeah, she lied. It's a liar. Oh,
Speaker 1: she needed two doors installed in her house because she
Speaker 1: was so scared about what Kavanaugh did thirty years ago,
Speaker 1: which he didn't do. And she couldn't even prove that
Speaker 1: she'd ever met him, even in the same building as him.
Speaker 1: Couldn't prove it, not even a little bit. I'm gonna say,
Speaker 1: prove it. No corroboration, nothing, just an allegation out of
Speaker 1: thin air. So Lindsey Graham stood up and he threw
Speaker 1: a punch when we needed someone to stand up and
Speaker 1: throw a punch at the bullies on the other side.
Speaker 1: And I will always be thankful for what he did there.
Speaker 1: So that's why I always kind of hold my fire
Speaker 1: a little bit, even though I think that on other stuff,
Speaker 1: I'm not a big not a big fan of some
Speaker 1: of what Grahams were doing. But like I said, get
Speaker 1: out of jail free card. So what else are they
Speaker 1: going to try this week? I wish I could tell
Speaker 1: you I knew they're just gonna say a lot of
Speaker 1: this for sure. Play three. When Justice Scalia died in
Speaker 1: February of two sixteen, Senate Republicans refused to consider a
Speaker 1: replacement for his seat until after the election. At the time,
Speaker 1: Senator McConnell said the American people should have a voice
Speaker 1: in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice. When
Speaker 1: asked in October twenty eighteen if Republicans intended to honor
Speaker 1: their own rule if an opening were to come up
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, Chairman Graham promised, quote, if an opening
Speaker 1: comes in the last year a President Trump's term and
Speaker 1: the primary process has started, will wait till after the
Speaker 1: next election. Republicans should honor this word for their promise
Speaker 1: and let the American people be heard. Simply put, I
Speaker 1: believe we should not be moving forward on this nomination,
Speaker 1: not until the election has ended and the next president
Speaker 1: has taken office. Nope, too bad. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts.
Speaker 1: The iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. But
Speaker 1: these are nonetheless the consequences of her stated views on
Speaker 1: the law prevailed on the Supreme Court. And if Republicans
Speaker 1: are successful in filling this vacancy prior to November tenth,
Speaker 1: well then we know these ullers will almost certainly prevail.
Speaker 1: So that's what's at stake here, That's what weighs heavily
Speaker 1: on me as we beginning these here. He's also weighs
Speaker 1: heavily in the minds of the remonters I represent. I've
Speaker 1: heard from them off and then lovely since Justice Skins
Speaker 1: breaks past, and they're scared, Judge Barrett. They're scared that
Speaker 1: your confirmation would live the gary healthcare protections the millions
Speaker 1: of Americans that ought to maintain and which Congress has
Speaker 1: repeatedly projected limited. They're scared that the clock will be
Speaker 1: turned back to the time when women had no right
Speaker 1: to control their old bodies and when it was acceptable
Speaker 1: to discriminate against women in the workplace. Sure's your cold
Speaker 1: pasture of glay here. Yeah, maybe it's time now do
Speaker 1: some oil painting in the backyard. Was the grandkids? Did
Speaker 1: these guys ever stop you know how we have an
Speaker 1: age requirement for certain offices, right, you have to be
Speaker 1: a certain age to be president. You have a certain
Speaker 1: age to be in the United States Senate, and a
Speaker 1: certain age for the House. You know how we have that.
Speaker 1: I think we also at a point now where we
Speaker 1: need to consider an upper limit for elected office because
Speaker 1: people's egos are overtaking their ability to think fairly and
Speaker 1: rationally about whether they are in fact the most energetic,
Speaker 1: the most mentally acute, and best representative for the people
Speaker 1: in their place, because they just look people want to
Speaker 1: be important. You see this in the media all the time.
Speaker 1: You see people get addicted to being important and having
Speaker 1: other people listen to them and having power and just
Speaker 1: being a normal person is terrifying to folks who have
Speaker 1: been in that role, have been a senator or for
Speaker 1: forty years. Look at Joe Biden, right, look at look
Speaker 1: at Lahey, and look at Nancy Pelosi. And you know
Speaker 1: I'm telling you honestly, I mean, I think Trump is agewise,
Speaker 1: at the upper limit of what somebody should be to
Speaker 1: be the president. And Trump is also somebody who has
Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of energy and vitality for his age
Speaker 1: and is in very good health. In vaccines, we're speaking
Speaker 1: about the president's health. He said that he's here. We are, folks,
Speaker 1: it's Monday. I said, we gotta wait till monday to
Speaker 1: know for sure. The media is not going to focus
Speaker 1: on this. I'm just taking take a little break from
Speaker 1: the judge stuff for a second. Here Trump's saying he's right,
Speaker 1: good to go back in action. Seventy four year old
Speaker 1: or maybe three, but seventy plus year old Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: with some concern over some additional aggravating factors, got COVID
Speaker 1: beat it in three four days. He's telling you himself.
Speaker 1: You say he's fine. Doesn't even happen anymore. Play fourteen.
Speaker 1: The note that you have revealed from your doctor which
Speaker 1: says you are no longer considered a transmission risk. Does
Speaker 1: this suggest you no longer have COVID? Sir, Yes, And
Speaker 1: not only that, it seems like I'm immune, so I
Speaker 1: can go way out of abasement, to which I would
Speaker 1: have done anyway, and which I did, because you have
Speaker 1: to run a country. You have to get out of
Speaker 1: the basement. And it looks like I'm immune for I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe a long time, and maybe a short time.
Speaker 1: It could be a lifetime. Nobody really knows. But I'm immune.
Speaker 1: So the president is in very good shape. Here we are, folks,
Speaker 1: I'm ament of celebration that the media will just ignore president.
Speaker 1: It's fine. It wasn't just a stunt. It wasn't just
Speaker 1: oh he wanted that shot outside the White House after
Speaker 1: he had been released from Walter Reed where he took
Speaker 1: off his mask and they were all saying he's Musolini,
Speaker 1: because they're psychos, because they're crazy. Another president beat this thing.
Speaker 1: And now, really, you see the two narratives. You can
Speaker 1: beat Joe Biden. You can be a h gotta wear
Speaker 1: the mask all the time, and I gotta be you know,
Speaker 1: hey man, I'm a mask mania. And you can avoid
Speaker 1: people and stay in your basement. And look, I have
Speaker 1: never said that anyone shouldn't. You know, that's freedom. You
Speaker 1: want to stay in your basement, you want to not
Speaker 1: live your life, fine, but Trump now shows us that no,
Speaker 1: you can. You should be able to make the decision
Speaker 1: to live your life knowing that there is some risk
Speaker 1: that you could get COVID nineteen and yes, knowing that
Speaker 1: that means you could in fact transmit the disease to
Speaker 1: other people as well, not intentionally, But this is the
Speaker 1: world we live in. Viruses are in the air, Viruses
Speaker 1: are all over us, actually all the time. People don't
Speaker 1: ever talk about that, but it's true. It's really just
Speaker 1: a question of your immune system. There's a constant, ongoing
Speaker 1: battle between your immune system and microbes. But we don't
Speaker 1: think about that very much. But the president beat it.
Speaker 1: And there's a study out of Harvard just today that
Speaker 1: says that looks like at least four months they think,
Speaker 1: according to the study out of Harvard, Harvard Medical School,
Speaker 1: will give you protection. So that means Trump is fine.
Speaker 1: Trump can go out there and he can shake hands
Speaker 1: and high five and kiss babies and all. He's good.
Speaker 1: Based on what we know about epidemiology, based upon what
Speaker 1: we know of the virus, no reason, no reasonablieve otherwise,
Speaker 1: certainly up until the election, and probably deep into twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one. So who made the better decision? Really? Remember
Speaker 1: they were all jumping on the president and saying, look
Speaker 1: at a reckless he is. He got it, yeah, And
Speaker 1: they were saying he deserved it, and they were saying
Speaker 1: they hope he had a bad, bad outcome. And the
Speaker 1: president responded with, Look, I'm the president. I gotta be
Speaker 1: out there. I gotta do things. I've got to represent
Speaker 1: my people, and that means that there's going to be
Speaker 1: some risk. There is risk to the president every time
Speaker 1: he goes to any even that's why he's got the
Speaker 1: Secret Service with him. Right. This is not a risk
Speaker 1: free job, as a number of US presidents from our
Speaker 1: past unfortunately can't attest too. But if you look at
Speaker 1: the history books and as recently as Ronald Reagan, it
Speaker 1: was very apparent to presidents that there are risks with
Speaker 1: that job. It is not risk free. There are risks
Speaker 1: from bad people, there are risks from bad diseases. That's
Speaker 1: just the reality. And now we have a president who
Speaker 1: has recovered from the virus and is fine and is
Speaker 1: a symboled to so many other folks. If seventy four
Speaker 1: year old Donald Trump, now, look, I understand he got
Speaker 1: very good care, but they use drugs on him that
Speaker 1: they use on other people as well. But Donald Trump, yes,
Speaker 1: he got in there early because he was being tested frequently.
Speaker 1: But you know, first of all, forty percent of people
Speaker 1: they tell us are asymptomatic entirely. So even if you
Speaker 1: get this the chances are that there's a good chance
Speaker 1: I should say that you will have no symptoms, and
Speaker 1: the chances are very high that you'll have very minimal symptoms.
Speaker 1: I oh, who is even paying attention to the fact
Speaker 1: that the World Health or Organization one of its top
Speaker 1: officials over the weekend. Now, look, I know we were
Speaker 1: bashing the WHO because it was way too China friendly
Speaker 1: with this Wuhan coronavirus stuff in the beginning. Fine, but
Speaker 1: they do look at this issue, and we were told
Speaker 1: that we should listen to them, and that it was
Speaker 1: only just some kind of a Trump conspiracy to even
Speaker 1: question the WHO. WHO officials come out and said, look,
Speaker 1: we should we should not have lockdowns as the go
Speaker 1: to policy. Just said it, just like, look, we should
Speaker 1: not do this. This does not make sense. It's too damaging,
Speaker 1: it's too costly to society. Stop using lockdowns as the
Speaker 1: primary the primary move here. But you know, look, there's
Speaker 1: a reason, friends, that the long lockdowns we're seeing were
Speaker 1: never considered the wise response to a pandemic in all
Speaker 1: the policy and academic literature written on this, and there
Speaker 1: was a lot of it before twenty twenty. Actually until
Speaker 1: April of this year, the media and our expert class
Speaker 1: have failed us. They're never going to admit their catastrophic errors.
Speaker 1: But that's what has happened here, that's the truth of
Speaker 1: our fight against COVID nineteen. Lockdowns did not work and
Speaker 1: exacted a terrible toll on society, one that we can't
Speaker 1: even really begin to calculate. A tremendous amount of dress
Speaker 1: and stress put on people all across the country. And
Speaker 1: if you look at the country by country breakdown, you
Speaker 1: know what one of the look one of the single
Speaker 1: biggest differentiators here between countries with really bad outcomes and
Speaker 1: countries that were pretty okay with this has to do
Speaker 1: with the percentage of the population that had serious health
Speaker 1: problems before COVID nineteen. That's just the facts. This is
Speaker 1: just data and numbers. You know, you look at South Korea,
Speaker 1: look at Japan. They have far less diabetes and far
Speaker 1: less obesity than we do. And so when you're and
Speaker 1: also when you add that to the way that we
Speaker 1: calculate COVID deaths, where there are now clear examples right
Speaker 1: bright red line kind of examples of someone who dies
Speaker 1: from an accident to our self harm, but they test
Speaker 1: in the person has COVID nineteen. They say it's a
Speaker 1: COVID death, I mean, Dave. And there are incentives in
Speaker 1: the system for doctors because you get federal money for
Speaker 1: the hospital. There are there are incentives for coding it
Speaker 1: as a COVID death. And no one's going to challenge
Speaker 1: you or be upseted you for saying it's a COVID
Speaker 1: death in the in the sort of consensus media democrat world,
Speaker 1: they're going to say, see, this is a person who's
Speaker 1: taking the disease seriously. That's what they'll say. It's pretty stunning.
Speaker 1: So we continue to see this pretty stunning. Indeed, you're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Mundy. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. So we are now beginning the fastest economic
Speaker 1: recovery and history. We created a record eleven point four
Speaker 1: million jobs just in the last four months. That's the
Speaker 1: fastest ever. The US has seen the smallest economic contraction
Speaker 1: of any major nation anywhere in the world. So we've
Speaker 1: seen the smallest going down. If you look at it,
Speaker 1: that's an incredible statement. Our opponents will crush to come
Speaker 1: back with unscientific lockdowns. They want to lock everything down.
Speaker 1: Here we go again. They want to lock it down
Speaker 1: now we're not gonna let it happen. We're not gonna
Speaker 1: let it happen. So important you get out in vote.
Speaker 1: You got to get out in votes. Not going to
Speaker 1: be a second lockdown, music to my ears, at least
Speaker 1: at the federal level, especially as I have to sit
Speaker 1: here and worry about what they're going to do in
Speaker 1: New York, where I believe we are going to go
Speaker 1: into an extended lockdown again in New York City, at
Speaker 1: least where I'm currently doing the show. I remember when
Speaker 1: I spoke to the President in May and I was
Speaker 1: in the Oval office with them, spent forty five minutes
Speaker 1: or so close to an hour, I think, sitting there
Speaker 1: just talking about everything, just the two of us, nobody
Speaker 1: else in the room, and one thing that I really
Speaker 1: wanted to hammer home, and he completely agreed with me.
Speaker 1: To his credit, he completely agreed with me on this.
Speaker 1: I just said, Sarah, we can't do a second lockdown.
Speaker 1: This is madness. And he said, Buck, there's not going
Speaker 1: to be a second lockdown. We're going to put out
Speaker 1: the fires as they come up, but there's not going
Speaker 1: to be a second lockdown. It was, you know, that
Speaker 1: was a one time thing to get us prepared because
Speaker 1: we were caught off guard by this. You know, we
Speaker 1: didn't have the you know, the ppe and the ventilators
Speaker 1: and all these things that everyone said that they were
Speaker 1: going to need so badly. So so far, the President
Speaker 1: has kept his promise on that one. And I asked him, said,
Speaker 1: promised me, You're not going to do that, Sara. He said,
Speaker 1: We're not going to do that. So that's a promise
Speaker 1: so far that has been kept. And I'm happy that
Speaker 1: the President understands why that would be such a bad idea.
Speaker 1: But I'm also deeply concerned because with Democrats, this is
Speaker 1: this is now an article of faith. They're going to
Speaker 1: want to have a lockdown and then have Biden bring
Speaker 1: us out of it, and in his own good time,
Speaker 1: federal mask mandate. He's saying this, And I keep asking people,
Speaker 1: if we're gonna federal mask mandate, why not have a
Speaker 1: federal mask and goggles mandate? I mean, why not really
Speaker 1: go all in, right? Why not we could make enough
Speaker 1: goggles for everybody. Shouldn't we all to wear goggles and
Speaker 1: a mask? And then shouldn't we just do a full
Speaker 1: hooded ventilator system so that you really are actually getting
Speaker 1: protect that works, whether that would protect you from the virus,
Speaker 1: But why too expensive? Too much? I thought this was
Speaker 1: about saving lives. Notice how the way that they the
Speaker 1: way that they argue with people like me who will say,
Speaker 1: masks probably have some effect. I don't know how big
Speaker 1: it is. I I don't deny that it is helpful
Speaker 1: in some circumstances, in some ways, but it's minimal, it's insufficient.
Speaker 1: It's not enough to stop this thing. Obviously, it wasn't
Speaker 1: enough to stop the Spanish influenza pandemic of nineteen eighteen,
Speaker 1: when they had mask policies in cities by the way,
Speaker 1: and people were dying and numa's were Trust me, nobody
Speaker 1: was like saying, hey, you know, I'm just gonna go
Speaker 1: out there. I shouldn't say nobody. There's always people, but
Speaker 1: you know, people were wearing masks, folks, And I'm sure
Speaker 1: the people that stopped wearing them in nineteen eighteen were
Speaker 1: the ones who said, this isn't saving us, so what
Speaker 1: are we even doing? But anyway, I just note that
Speaker 1: the Biden campaign has made this a huge, a huge
Speaker 1: virtue signal, which we all know, which is why I
Speaker 1: don't think I've seen a photo of Joe Biden out
Speaker 1: without a mask on. I don't even know in how
Speaker 1: many months other than at the debate obviously, who knows
Speaker 1: that they're even going to be a second debate. But
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this. I rode on an Amtrak train
Speaker 1: yesterday and I just have to kind of laugh. Here's
Speaker 1: what here's the little window into the future of what
Speaker 1: you get if you allow democrat status types to determine
Speaker 1: how we're going to respond to this pandemic. For the future,
Speaker 1: this is what your life is going to be like,
Speaker 1: not just for all of next year, maybe deep into
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. You're going to have policies like I
Speaker 1: sat sat there on amtrack dealing with this where you
Speaker 1: have no one's allowed to sit next to you. Now,
Speaker 1: I think maybe if you're of the same it's same household,
Speaker 1: but who even knows. With that, you'll see these experts
Speaker 1: that are right, hey, when you're having you know, special
Speaker 1: fun fun time with the your significant other, well, you
Speaker 1: gotta make sure you wear that surgical mask to protect
Speaker 1: the protect them from COVID. That's a real thing. I
Speaker 1: know you're some of you are giggling. That's a real thing.
Speaker 1: Got to wear the mask for special fun fun time. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the craziest thing, I think, I mean, how much
Speaker 1: and then take the mask off while you sleep next
Speaker 1: to each other in the same room, in the same
Speaker 1: bed for the rest of the night. Right, But you know,
Speaker 1: a husband and wife doesn't matter. Gotta protect each other.
Speaker 1: It's absurd, it's stupid. We all know it's stupid. But
Speaker 1: I just point out all the stupid policies and people
Speaker 1: get mad at me, and I say, well, are we
Speaker 1: just supposed to all do dumb things because some people
Speaker 1: are scared and so they get to make all the
Speaker 1: decisions for all the rest of us. You know, you
Speaker 1: could go swimming in the ocean and get eaten by
Speaker 1: a shark tomorrow. It can happen. In fact, I think
Speaker 1: the most commonplaces in the country for sure. I think
Speaker 1: the most commonplace in the world for shark attack might
Speaker 1: even be on the coast of Florida. I think it's
Speaker 1: what's right up there. It's coast of Florida, east coast
Speaker 1: of Australia and off South Africa. That's where you have
Speaker 1: the most certainly the most shark attacks in total. I
Speaker 1: think the most fatal shark attacks too. Now, why am
Speaker 1: I talking about shark attacks? Because if I ran around
Speaker 1: telling everybody who's going into the ocean, what are you doing?
Speaker 1: You could be eaten by a shark. Technically true, but
Speaker 1: I think people should be allowed to swim. Now, I
Speaker 1: understand they're far more people getting COVID shark attacks, but
Speaker 1: I'm just saying that when it comes to day to
Speaker 1: day risk mitigation or our own lives, people should be
Speaker 1: allowed to make their own decisions. And for people who
Speaker 1: say things like, oh, well, look what about seatbelt laws, buck,
Speaker 1: I'd say, yeah, plenty of people don't wear their seat belts.
Speaker 1: I got news for you. Plenty of people still don't
Speaker 1: do it, still don't do it. And also the fine
Speaker 1: for now wearing a seatbelt isn't fifteen hundred dollars or
Speaker 1: prison time. It's like a fifty dollars. Who cares? And
Speaker 1: you know that's also just acting you, that's not affecting
Speaker 1: anybody else, And it's it's such a minor inconvenience that
Speaker 1: even I think some libertarians say, all, I mean, you
Speaker 1: know whatever, wearing a mask, it's not a minor inconvenience.
Speaker 1: It's I'm really annoying it's oppressive, it's psychologically deleterious. I
Speaker 1: really have I believe that I'm gonna go to the
Speaker 1: gym today. I'm gonna be doing deadlifts with a fricking
Speaker 1: mask on, like an idiot, alone because no one else
Speaker 1: will even go to the gym because they're so scared.
Speaker 1: Where I am alone in you know, a room that's
Speaker 1: probably fifteen hundred square feet with the windows open, But
Speaker 1: got to wear that mask while I'm deadlifting. It's it's insane, right.
Speaker 1: But so back to the Amtrak. So I'm on the
Speaker 1: Amtrak where you know, blue collar Joe takes it. You
Speaker 1: know how long the Amtrak Acela is from Delaware to
Speaker 1: to DC to Capitol Hill. It's actually like the greatest
Speaker 1: commute imaginable in a lot of ways, at forty five minutes.
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe it's forty five minutes to Baltimore,
Speaker 1: but anyway, it's like an hour. It's like an hour.
Speaker 1: It's quick. And that's what Joe Biden was doing, you know,
Speaker 1: once or twice a week or something. It wasn't even
Speaker 1: that often. It's crazy, But I'm on the a sell up.
Speaker 1: They won't let somebody sitting next to you, but you
Speaker 1: have people mandating because it's a sign seating now sit
Speaker 1: in front of you and behind you. And I was
Speaker 1: sitting across from somebody, and I kid you not. She
Speaker 1: had she had a little mask on, and she pulled
Speaker 1: the classic Biden maneuver. Remember when Biden pulled down his
Speaker 1: mask to cough into his hand and then pulled his
Speaker 1: mask bask back up again. She had a coughing fit,
Speaker 1: you know, coughing right, you know, right next to me,
Speaker 1: pulled her mask off for the coughing fit. So just like,
Speaker 1: you know, based on what we're all told, just like virus,
Speaker 1: virus everywhere, right, all kinds of whatever. She's got, just
Speaker 1: coughing all over the place, and then pulled her mask
Speaker 1: back up. And I'm sitting here like, oh gee, thanks,
Speaker 1: So I got the coughing, which is actually expelling the virus,
Speaker 1: you know, fifteen feet or whatever it is. But but
Speaker 1: the mask wearing, you know, when you're breathing. It's so dumb, folks.
Speaker 1: And then I sit around people who are you're eating
Speaker 1: a bagel of cream cheese no mask on for you know,
Speaker 1: thirty or forty minutes, but for the last twenty minutes
Speaker 1: of the trip. I put that mask back on because
Speaker 1: that's going to protect us. It's idiocy. You know it's idiocy.
Speaker 1: It makes no sense. Don't listen to the lockdown libs
Speaker 1: who judge you and mask shame you. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It
Speaker 1: is Columbus Day. It is not Indigenous People's Day. It
Speaker 1: is Columbus Day, name for Christopher Columbus, the Italian explorer
Speaker 1: who on behalf of the Spanish crown, discovered the New
Speaker 1: World change global history, and is somebody who for this accomplishment,
Speaker 1: we celebrate him, right. We don't celebrate him because he
Speaker 1: was a nice guy, because he was just a big
Speaker 1: old cuddle bear. We celebrate Christopher Columbus because he's somebody
Speaker 1: who changed the course of history and brought about a
Speaker 1: change in the historical trajectory that resulted in a system,
Speaker 1: the American system, that then spread around the world that
Speaker 1: has resulted in more people living longer, healthier, better lives.
Speaker 1: More people pulled out of poverty in the twentieth century
Speaker 1: into the twenty first century alone than at any other
Speaker 1: time in human history, and probably all of the rest
Speaker 1: of human history added together. I know that sounds mind boggling,
Speaker 1: but it's true. Here's a proclamation on Columbus Day from
Speaker 1: the White House. More than five hundred years ago, Christopher Columbus,
Speaker 1: in trepid voyage to the New World, ushered in a
Speaker 1: new era of exploration and discovery. His travels led to
Speaker 1: European contact with the Americas, and a century later, the
Speaker 1: first settlements on the shores of the modern day United States. Today,
Speaker 1: we celebrate Columbus Day to commemorate the great Italian who
Speaker 1: opened a new chapter in world history, and to appreciate
Speaker 1: his enduring significance to the Western Hemisphere. When Christopher Columbus
Speaker 1: and his crew sailed across the Atlantic Ocean on the
Speaker 1: Nina Pinta and Santa Maria, it marked the beginning of
Speaker 1: a new era in human history. For Italian Americans, Christopher
Speaker 1: Columbus represents one of the first of many immeasurable contributions
Speaker 1: of Italy to American history. As a native of Genoa,
Speaker 1: Columbus inspired early immigrants to carry forth their rich Italian
Speaker 1: heritage to the New World. Today, the United States benefits
Speaker 1: from the warmth and generosity of nearly seventeen million Italian Americans,
Speaker 1: whose love of family and country strengthen the fabric of
Speaker 1: our nation for our beautiful Italian American communities and Americans
Speaker 1: of every background, Columbus remains a legendary figure. Sadly, in
Speaker 1: recent years, radical activists have sought to undermine Christopher Columbus's legacy.
Speaker 1: These extremists seek to replace discussion of his vast contributions
Speaker 1: with talk of failings with discoveries of atrocities, and his
Speaker 1: achievements with transgressions. Rather learn from our history. Rather than
Speaker 1: learn from our history, this radical ideology and its adherents
Speaker 1: seek to revise it, deprived of any splendor and market
Speaker 1: as inherently sinister, they seek to squash any descent from
Speaker 1: their orthodoxy. We must not give into these tactics or
Speaker 1: consent to such a bleak view of our history. We
Speaker 1: much teach. We must teach future generations about our storied heritage,
Speaker 1: starting with the protection of monuments to our intrepid heroes
Speaker 1: like Columbus. This June I signed an executive order to
Speaker 1: ensure that any person or group destroying or vandalizing a
Speaker 1: Federal monument memorial or statue is prosecuted to the fullest
Speaker 1: extent of the law. I've also taken steps to ensure
Speaker 1: that we preserve our nation's history and promote patriotic education.
Speaker 1: On this Columbus Day, we embraced the same optimism that
Speaker 1: led Christopher Columbus to discover the new world. We inherit
Speaker 1: that optimism, along with the legacy of American heroes who
Speaker 1: blaze the trails, settle the continent, tame the wilderness, and
Speaker 1: built the single greatest nation the world has ever seen.
Speaker 1: In commemoration of Christopher Columbus's historic voyage, the Congress, by
Speaker 1: joint resolution of April thirtieth, nineteen thirty four, requested the
Speaker 1: President proclaimed the second Monday of October each year as
Speaker 1: Columbus Day. Now, Therefore, I Donald Trump, President of the
Speaker 1: United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested
Speaker 1: in me by the Constitution and the Laws of the
Speaker 1: United States, do hereby proclaim October twelfth, twenty twenty as
Speaker 1: Columbus Day. I call upon the people of the United
Speaker 1: States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Speaker 1: I direct that the flag of the United States be
Speaker 1: displayed on all public buildings on the appointed day in
Speaker 1: honor of our diverse history and all who have contributed
Speaker 1: to shaping this nation. In witness here of I've here
Speaker 1: unto set my hand this ninth day of October and
Speaker 1: the year of our Lord two twenty and of the
Speaker 1: independence of the United States of America, the two hundred
Speaker 1: and forty fifth Donald Trump. That's just one thing that
Speaker 1: if Joe Biden becomes your president, you can kiss all
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff goodbye. Joe Biden will be showing
Speaker 1: up talking about Indigenous People's Day. You know, it's fascinating,
Speaker 1: isn't it. For BLM Democrats war Kente ploth scarfs you
Speaker 1: remember that. I mean it was Nancy Pelosi Kent take
Speaker 1: cloth scarf? Right? What such a shameless pandering, such demagoguery,
Speaker 1: and among many others Chuck Schumer. Yeah, because they're really
Speaker 1: all about They're really all about, you know, African history.
Speaker 1: I mean, but Joe Biden, you know, I might show
Speaker 1: up on Indigenous People's Day. What I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: know was he gonna wear it, wear a a feathered
Speaker 1: headdress or something, or is that is that? No, that's
Speaker 1: not allowed. Kent take cloth is allowed, but Native American
Speaker 1: garb or anything like that not allowed, seems to who
Speaker 1: knows where the rules are different from the left than
Speaker 1: on the right, that's for sure. But all of this,
Speaker 1: this talk of American optimism and the brilliance of Columbus
Speaker 1: and what he did, that will all be entirely forgotten.
Speaker 1: And there's another part of this history that's forgotten as well,
Speaker 1: and that's Columbus as as a as a point of pride.
Speaker 1: And one would think if they really looked back, and
Speaker 1: I think if more people knew this history, particularly if Democrats,
Speaker 1: by the way, don't know his They know a little
Speaker 1: snippets of history that are useful for the socialist left
Speaker 1: narrative of control today, but they don't actually know history
Speaker 1: as as just a broad thing. They generally have no
Speaker 1: idea what the heck they're talking about. And I mean
Speaker 1: the ones that are making these arguments. I mean, I
Speaker 1: mean the sixteen nineteen project, which now people are calling
Speaker 1: for it to be stripped of its pulitzer, which will
Speaker 1: never happen, even though it's it's changed its mission statement.
Speaker 1: That's how that's how fraudulent that whole thing was. They've
Speaker 1: said it was about establishing a new day for the
Speaker 1: American founding. And now they're saying, no, it's not about that.
Speaker 1: We've we've scrubbed that. Not not true. Oh interesting, But
Speaker 1: people forget the struggles. You know, there have been waves
Speaker 1: of immigration into this country in the past, and the
Speaker 1: struggles that different immigrant groups had, notably Italian Americans who
Speaker 1: did face real discrimination. And I know people hear this
Speaker 1: now and they think, come on, Italian, we got you know,
Speaker 1: Cuomo is the governor of New York and you know
Speaker 1: Rudy Julia Annie was the America's most famous mayor. You
Speaker 1: think of all these Italian Americans who have big political
Speaker 1: names and have become so well known. But if you
Speaker 1: go back into history a little bit, there were some
Speaker 1: very ugly incidents of bigotry against Italian immigrants in this country.
Speaker 1: And Columbus Columbus Day was was a thing that they
Speaker 1: drive tremendous pride in because the Italian Americans were generally
Speaker 1: doing menial jobs when they got he or didn't speak
Speaker 1: the language were and especially for those who were more
Speaker 1: Sicilian and from you know, further south and more central
Speaker 1: in the Mediterranean Sea, they were known to be usually
Speaker 1: a little bit darker, and so there was there was
Speaker 1: a racial component that would come out to the anti
Speaker 1: Italian rhetoric of the time. And I know now it's
Speaker 1: it's like talking about anti Irish bigotry. Irish were banned
Speaker 1: from or barred from jobs, Irish need not apply. Irish
Speaker 1: weren't allowed to where Irish were thought of as criminals.
Speaker 1: Irish were thought of as as as thugs, thieves, untrustworthy.
Speaker 1: Now then the Irish became you know, they went from
Speaker 1: being the quote thieves to then becoming the cops in
Speaker 1: pretty much every major American city and then running you know,
Speaker 1: the political machinery, and now you know, they're all over
Speaker 1: the place, right And I'm basically half Irish by by heritage,
Speaker 1: roughly roughly fifty percent Irish, and of that stock, my
Speaker 1: ancestors came over on one side during the Potato famine
Speaker 1: in eighteen forty and settled in Brooklyn, New York, just
Speaker 1: got right off the dock, and this is where they were,
Speaker 1: and that's why I've got I've got very long roots
Speaker 1: here in New York City. But the Italians, there's one
Speaker 1: incident that comes to mind. I mean, there were eleven
Speaker 1: Italian Americans who were lynched. Also another thing, lynching was
Speaker 1: a terrible crime that was done mostly but not exclusively,
Speaker 1: against African Americans from around eighteen called eighteen seventy, getting
Speaker 1: into about reconstruct era into the nineteen twenties or so,
Speaker 1: you had a few thousand people in the United States
Speaker 1: who were lynched, and about two out of three were
Speaker 1: African American, but there was about a third of the
Speaker 1: lynchings that occurred were not the horrible crimes perpetrated against
Speaker 1: African Americans. There were. There were terrible crimes against against
Speaker 1: other people, including whites who were trying to push for
Speaker 1: black rights in the South. There were a whole number
Speaker 1: of them who were lynched, and immigrants, different immigrants were
Speaker 1: lynched in eighteen ninety one. I don't even know how
Speaker 1: many of you would would know this this story. New
Speaker 1: Orleans one of my favorite cities in America. I love
Speaker 1: New Orleans. It's such a fun place and it's such
Speaker 1: such a cool mix of different cultures. But it wasn't
Speaker 1: always a happy place with regard to how those cultures
Speaker 1: interacted with each other. That's and that's putting it mildly.
Speaker 1: I'm depending on the time in history, you can obviously
Speaker 1: point to a whole lot of problems there, but there were.
Speaker 1: There was an assassination, effectively. I believe it was the
Speaker 1: police chief. It might have been the mayor of New Orleans.
Speaker 1: I have to go check. I think it was the
Speaker 1: police chief, and he was killed. And they believed that
Speaker 1: it was the Italian American population. This was eighteen ninety
Speaker 1: one in New Orleans. They thought it was the Italian
Speaker 1: American population. There already was this sense of mafia ties
Speaker 1: and criminal activity with the Italians, and they and they
Speaker 1: had already had a number of people tried and acquitted,
Speaker 1: and they were still being held in the jail for
Speaker 1: some reason, and others were still awaiting trial. And a
Speaker 1: mob formed broke in and murdered, murdered, hanged and mutilated.
Speaker 1: So they shot them, and then some of them they
Speaker 1: hang and they ripped apart the bodies. They took body
Speaker 1: parts as trophies. Eleven Italian Americans killed in eighteen ninety
Speaker 1: one in New Orleans for I mean maybe one person,
Speaker 1: and I would be willing to bet a whole lot
Speaker 1: of money it wasn't one of the eleven. From what
Speaker 1: one person did to the to an official of the
Speaker 1: city of New Orleans, eleven lynchings all at once. So
Speaker 1: there was a dark there was a dark history here
Speaker 1: of discrimination against against immigrant groups, including Italian Americans. And
Speaker 1: Christopher Columbus is part of the the pride, and that's
Speaker 1: why they'll talk about the pride the Italian American community fields.
Speaker 1: But hey, you know, we were early contributors to this
Speaker 1: American project, right it was it was an Italian who
Speaker 1: even discovered this place. It's an Italian a Metago Vespucci,
Speaker 1: for whom this country is named. And so that's all
Speaker 1: part of you know, it's interesting the left sees this
Speaker 1: need for other groups to have heroes elevated, and and
Speaker 1: they're right in many cases about the heroes that they're choosing, right,
Speaker 1: you know, they're they're a right to want to elevate um,
Speaker 1: you know, people from the Latino and the African American
Speaker 1: community who have contributed to this country throughout its history
Speaker 1: and ways. Absolutely, and I'm all for that, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: I think that you could you could argue that, you know,
Speaker 1: Frederick Uglas is one of the true founding fathers in
Speaker 1: many ways in this country. But with Italian Americans it's
Speaker 1: considered it's all a sacrifice to wokeness now and that's why.
Speaker 1: Not far from where I'm doing the show is the
Speaker 1: large statue of Christopher Columbus in Columbus Circle, named for him,
Speaker 1: where I used to avoid the area because that's where
Speaker 1: CNN's headquarters were and I didn't want to bump into
Speaker 1: bump into Zucker and challenge him to a breakdancing battle.
Speaker 1: That would have been good Instagram content. But now it's
Speaker 1: Christopher Columbus statue there has to be guarded by the
Speaker 1: police because they know they're going it's going to be defaced.
Speaker 1: It's going to be defaced because the Left is decided
Speaker 1: that the history of this country is really a history
Speaker 1: of exploitation, rape, genocide, imperialism, murder, theft, and exploitation. And
Speaker 1: what's interesting is that, I mean, depending upon how they're
Speaker 1: going to set up their parameters for how they would
Speaker 1: judge any country, you could say that about any great civilization.
Speaker 1: There's always violent, there's always wars, there's always internet scenes, struggle,
Speaker 1: there's always all of these things. But is that the majority,
Speaker 1: Is that what most of the history really was, or
Speaker 1: did it create a society where people overwhelmingly lived in
Speaker 1: peace prosperity and some degree of happiness. America is the
Speaker 1: greatest nation state that has ever been the greatest force
Speaker 1: for good in the world, and it's only possible because
Speaker 1: of people who are willing to take risks and willing
Speaker 1: to be leaders. Christopher Columbus certainly played a large role
Speaker 1: in all of that. And Columbus is somebody who I
Speaker 1: think we are right to honor for the accomplishment and
Speaker 1: that is it for the discovery. No one is saying
Speaker 1: that everything he did was great, or that he was
Speaker 1: a perfect or wonderful man, or just saying this guy
Speaker 1: made it. It's like he won a big race and
Speaker 1: we are giving him the trophy for the race. And
Speaker 1: that's it. You're in the Freedom, hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. I think this is a perfect
Speaker 1: time to tell you all that we already have the
Speaker 1: next Shield's High episode done and we're going to I've
Speaker 1: been talking to producer Mark. We're going to create a
Speaker 1: series of them, so I have a bunch to release
Speaker 1: in succession on a predetermined schedule at once. But that's
Speaker 1: for those of you who are listening to the radio
Speaker 1: show right now on a radio. One of our wonderful
Speaker 1: affiliates across the country. This is another reason why we
Speaker 1: really need you to subscribe to the podcast of The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show, because this is not going to air
Speaker 1: on the terrestrial station. It's only gonna be a podcast extra.
Speaker 1: Already have one done the First Siege of Malta. There's
Speaker 1: gonna be two Siege of Malta podcasts. I think there's
Speaker 1: gonna be two Lepanto podcasts, which will be different from
Speaker 1: the one I did years ago for a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of reasons. And I'm also considering, just as a little
Speaker 1: special gift to producer Mark, doing a Dracula history podcast
Speaker 1: or release this year on Halloween. I'm thinking about it,
Speaker 1: so we might that one I might not have time
Speaker 1: to get to, but the other ones are already happening.
Speaker 1: So just please do subscribe to The Buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: the iHeart app. You can also subscribe in the Apple
Speaker 1: Podcast Store or on Spotify, which is very easy. I
Speaker 1: know they're a bunch of libs who are trying to
Speaker 1: get rid of Joe Rogan or censor him or whatever,
Speaker 1: but they also paid him one hundred million dollars, so
Speaker 1: there's that. But Spotify is a very easy interface once
Speaker 1: you start using it. I was skeptical of it at first,
Speaker 1: and I've got to say I use it all the
Speaker 1: time now. So quite as great as the Guy Heart
Speaker 1: Radio app. Though no, no, the IR radio app is
Speaker 1: way better obviously. But I'm just trying to give people options.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna give people options, and so we'll do that.
Speaker 1: That's the plan. But we already have one in the can,
Speaker 1: so Producer Mark, and he's got it. Producer Mark, can
Speaker 1: you confirm receipts? Everybody knows I'm not just blown smoke.
Speaker 1: I will give you this one. He did actually record
Speaker 1: a podcast. There you go, the history the first Shields Hype,
Speaker 1: not the first one, the most recent shield Ties in
Speaker 1: the can. I'm gonna have another one done and we're
Speaker 1: thinking we're gonna start releasing them in November, take it
Speaker 1: into December, and then people have some fun stuff to
Speaker 1: listen to over the holiday period if they didn't get
Speaker 1: to it during the weeks. So we released them, you
Speaker 1: can listen them all in succession, and that's that's the plan.
Speaker 1: And all this Columbus they talked too has got me.
Speaker 1: I mean, I want you guys to understand, Wait, why
Speaker 1: was Columbus trying to find the new world. We always
Speaker 1: hear he wanted to find the route to the spice
Speaker 1: markets and the riches of the far east of South
Speaker 1: Asia and what is and China. But also they wanted
Speaker 1: to do an end run on the Muslims on the
Speaker 1: Ottoman Empire. They wanted to get around them because they
Speaker 1: knew that with a stranglehold on trade, the Ottomans were
Speaker 1: so wealthy, so influential and powerful, especially once they took
Speaker 1: out the Mamok the mam Looks in Egypt and then
Speaker 1: added the Barbary the Barbary coast to their empire that
Speaker 1: they needed to find a way around this or else
Speaker 1: they would not be able to economically keep up and
Speaker 1: the Ottoman conquest would cane and just take in all
Speaker 1: of Europe. So Columbus and his voyage in fourteen ninety
Speaker 1: two plays directly into that and the period that I'm
Speaker 1: talking about with the Siege of Malta, and really part
Speaker 1: one is what leads up to the Siege of Malta.
Speaker 1: Would you be basically the first half of the sixteenth century.
Speaker 1: I know we're nerding out a little bit here, but
Speaker 1: you're gonna love it. The Buck Sexton Show. Subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast Shields High episodes coming. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The bus Sexton Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. A
Speaker 1: Navy veteran and Trump supporter murdered in cold blood over
Speaker 1: the weekend at a protest. Why isn't this a bigger
Speaker 1: news story? You're probably asking, Well, I think we all
Speaker 1: know why. Lee Keltner, who had been a long time
Speaker 1: hat maker in the Denver area. Lee Keltner was attending
Speaker 1: a protest, according to his why, to show his support
Speaker 1: for police and Robert Matthew. Robert Doloff was contracted as
Speaker 1: a security guard for I nine News, some local news
Speaker 1: outfit in Denver, and theyre ins on video. There's photo
Speaker 1: of this exchange too. You have Keltner. It looks like
Speaker 1: they exchanged words in the video. There's different photos and
Speaker 1: videos out there. They exchanged some words, I'm sure you know,
Speaker 1: hostile ones. I think Keltner slapped Dolof across the face
Speaker 1: and then at a distance of what looks to be
Speaker 1: about ten or fifteen feet, sprayed some mace out in
Speaker 1: the air. There's big photos of this all over the internet,
Speaker 1: and Doloff just drew his weapon and dropped the guy
Speaker 1: right there, shot him right in the forehead, killed him instantly.
Speaker 1: How he could think he was in any kind of
Speaker 1: real peril from somebody's bringing mace from ten feet away
Speaker 1: at a protest? Remember their police all over the place.
Speaker 1: This is broad daylight. There's a protest. This guy Dolof
Speaker 1: just pulled and shot, shot him right in the forehead.
Speaker 1: Also tell you this, generally law enforcement, you know, you
Speaker 1: shoot for somebody in the head, very easy to miss
Speaker 1: even a close distance. This guy doesn't have any law
Speaker 1: enforcement training, has no law enforcement background. In fact, Doloff,
Speaker 1: who is currently being held on first degree murder charges
Speaker 1: as he should be, Doloff is somebody who doesn't even
Speaker 1: have an active license on file or no license at
Speaker 1: any point to be a private security contractor. Now I'm
Speaker 1: nine News is saying they went through the Pinkerton Security
Speaker 1: Agency to get this armed guard. Why would I nine
Speaker 1: need an armed guard at a protest where there's police present.
Speaker 1: It's interesting, isn't it. You're gonna have an armed guard
Speaker 1: with you. I thought these were peaceful protests. Let's just
Speaker 1: start with that. That's where we've been told so many
Speaker 1: times it's all about peaceful protests, but local news reporters
Speaker 1: think they need somebody who's strapped, who's just with them
Speaker 1: all the time. Wait. I thought that the journals don't
Speaker 1: like guns. I thought that gun ownership is bad. This guy,
Speaker 1: dole Off had a concealed carry permit, no special no
Speaker 1: professional training with a fire and whatsoever. So he's just
Speaker 1: a guy with a gun. And Pinkerton, a security agency,
Speaker 1: didn't know this. There's something fishy here, folks. Something is rotten.
Speaker 1: There's something we're not being told. And based on the
Speaker 1: political back and forth over this, I have some ideas.
Speaker 1: I have some ideas about it. For one, this was
Speaker 1: initially reported as a shooting by an Antifa member, and
Speaker 1: then people like me said, well just wait this week,
Speaker 1: we'll be told over and over again that the right
Speaker 1: wing is responsible for all violence. And they said, see,
Speaker 1: it's not an Antifa guy, And I said, I don't,
Speaker 1: I don't. They're still gonna say that the rights are
Speaker 1: responsible for all the violence. Doesn't It doesn't change anything.
Speaker 1: And I've said, and okay, well, what do we know
Speaker 1: about Dolof? How does a guy with no security training
Speaker 1: or background, become a private security contractor for a local
Speaker 1: news organization in Denver. Well, what comes to my mind is,
Speaker 1: you know, there are times when, for example, in a
Speaker 1: country that's in the midst of some kind of a
Speaker 1: civil war, you'll pay off one member of the militia
Speaker 1: or a couple of members of a militia to provide
Speaker 1: security for you. Sometimes you'll actually contract with the bad
Speaker 1: guys to protect you, so to speak, right, that's the
Speaker 1: safest thing to do. You know, if you're going to
Speaker 1: go into parts of Lebanon, you know you asked for
Speaker 1: permission Hezbollah. So I have to wonder here, and this
Speaker 1: is again this is analysis. I am piecing this together.
Speaker 1: I have to wonder if this was a situation where
Speaker 1: the best they thought, the best protection for I nine
Speaker 1: was to have a guy who Antifa knew and didn't
Speaker 1: have a problem with. Now they're gonna say he's not
Speaker 1: a member of Antifa. They don't know, and already it's
Speaker 1: come out online. Guess what this guy Doloff who drew
Speaker 1: his weapon and shot a guy in the in the head,
Speaker 1: who posed no mortal threat to him whatsoever. He's in
Speaker 1: a Supremember, he's in a security guard role. He knows
Speaker 1: he's strapped. He's supposed to be de escalating. He's supposed
Speaker 1: to walk away from this conflict, not a law enforcement officer,
Speaker 1: not affecting an arrest. And what we find out about
Speaker 1: him is that he who wants to guess, is Doloff,
Speaker 1: Robert Matthew Robert Dolof who's in custody. Is he an
Speaker 1: Antifa guy? M Is he a radical left wing guy
Speaker 1: who loves the protesters who are doing all the antifa stuff? Yes,
Speaker 1: he is all over social media, So we are to
Speaker 1: believe it is a coincidence. That's some some you know,
Speaker 1: scraggly looking, skinny guy with no military or law enforcement
Speaker 1: or even private security training whatsoever, just happened to be
Speaker 1: the armed guard contracted to protect a local news station.
Speaker 1: That I'm sure he's very favorable to all the BLM protests,
Speaker 1: because Denver is overrun by leftist lunatics except for the
Speaker 1: wonderful folks, for example, who listened to this show on
Speaker 1: ninety three seven, one of our favorite affiliates. But we're
Speaker 1: told this is a coincidence. It just so happened that
Speaker 1: this guy has photos of himself at Occupy Wall Street
Speaker 1: protests in the past, is supportive of BLM and is
Speaker 1: effectively in his public pronouncements online a left wing radical. So,
Speaker 1: a left wing radical gets contracted to be the security
Speaker 1: provider for a local news station murders a pro police
Speaker 1: Trump supporter in cold blood, and we're supposed to think, oh,
Speaker 1: it was just a bad security guy. No, this was
Speaker 1: a leftist. This goes on their Ledger friends, this goes
Speaker 1: on their side of the body count from political violence.
Speaker 1: This guy's a leftist. That he was contracted as a
Speaker 1: private security guard doesn't mean anything. He's a Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: loving ANTIFA supporting BLM, social virtue signaling leftist. And he
Speaker 1: pulled a gun and he shot a guy because he
Speaker 1: got heated. That's it really not very different. And he
Speaker 1: was what he was doing was criminal, by the way,
Speaker 1: to be posing as a security that's actually a criminal
Speaker 1: violation in Denver. Can't do that. Can't be a security
Speaker 1: guard for somebody who's really just actually a guy who
Speaker 1: has a gun for reasons like this. And they're going
Speaker 1: to tell you that this has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: the left, nothing to do with the Democrat Party. You know,
Speaker 1: I guess he was just killed by an idea. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the media working very hard to make sure that this
Speaker 1: guy is not considered a leftist who murdered a Trump supporter,
Speaker 1: and the anti Trump anarchists who are planning to kid
Speaker 1: nap Governor Whitmer are treated like they're all run around
Speaker 1: in MAGA shirts. In reality, they say Trump is an
Speaker 1: evil tyrant who won't do what they want, and they
Speaker 1: want to bring down all of society. They're anarchists. But
Speaker 1: somehow this is on the right. That's what they'll tell us.
Speaker 1: That's what all the news reporting has said, even though
Speaker 1: there's video of these guys saying how much they at
Speaker 1: least one of the guys, one of the ring leaders,
Speaker 1: saying how much they hate Trump. You know, this is
Speaker 1: another one of these instants where you say why is
Speaker 1: it that when oh, you know who organizes rally was
Speaker 1: John Tegan Tigg from Thirteen Hours the movie, who was
Speaker 1: a contract or, one of those contractors that was defending
Speaker 1: Americans against the terrorist attack in Benghazi, who was very
Speaker 1: very severely wounded, if memory serves, fighting to defend the facilities,
Speaker 1: those US facilities, the annex and that special Consulate compound
Speaker 1: or whatever it was where they had Ambassador Stevens so
Speaker 1: tig pulled this together. This it was a patriot rally
Speaker 1: and there was a Antifa soup drive they called it.
Speaker 1: That had to go there a counter protest. Do you
Speaker 1: know why they're doing these counter protests? You won't often
Speaker 1: hear there's from people. I think it's important that we
Speaker 1: all get this on the record. The counter protests are
Speaker 1: meant to intimidate. They're meant to shut down speech that
Speaker 1: they don't like. There's no point in why why hold
Speaker 1: a counter protest for you know, fifty or one hundred
Speaker 1: patriots gathering in downtown Denver to say they backed the
Speaker 1: police and they support Trump and their patriots. What's that?
Speaker 1: What's the harm in that no Antifa shows up to
Speaker 1: menace them, to say, see, we can get one hundred
Speaker 1: with a two hundred people here and the moment the
Speaker 1: cops aren't looking, we're gonna hit you in the head
Speaker 1: with a lead pipe, and then say we're mostly peaceful.
Speaker 1: We're mostly peaceful. You should see the mug shots. One
Speaker 1: hundred percent of them white, one hundred percent of them
Speaker 1: look like exactly what you would think Antifa losers look like.
Speaker 1: Over the weekend in Portland that that were arrested. These
Speaker 1: are white libs who think they're fighting some war on
Speaker 1: behalf of BLM against the authorities in Portland who were
Speaker 1: all Democrats. But it's amazing. You look at these photos
Speaker 1: and they all they all look like Antifa. You look
Speaker 1: at them and go, yep, that's what Antifa looks like.
Speaker 1: Who are just kind of crazy looking eyes and sort
Speaker 1: of scraggly, and you know the whole thing. This guy
Speaker 1: dole Off looks like somebody who would be an Antifa.
Speaker 1: He looks like an Antifa guy. Amazing, anybody would think
Speaker 1: he's a good security guard. Although I'm sure he probably
Speaker 1: told them guy, I know an you know, don't worry.
Speaker 1: I know these groups, and that's what we're gonna find out.
Speaker 1: By the time we find that out, though, people are
Speaker 1: forgotten about this one. And that's that's how he was
Speaker 1: able to get in here. Oh, I know this gang,
Speaker 1: I'm cool with them, don't worry about it. You'll be
Speaker 1: safe from Antifa. That's probably the protection that he was providing, right, trust,
Speaker 1: how often do you think I'm wrong about these kinds
Speaker 1: of things? Rarely? So we'll see if a Denver p
Speaker 1: least I don't even know how left wing they are
Speaker 1: and how willing I'm when I say the police, I'm
Speaker 1: talking about the brass. I'm talking about the people running
Speaker 1: running the department, whether they're willing to get to the
Speaker 1: truth here or not. They are holding him on a
Speaker 1: murder one charge. It looks like he's in a whole
Speaker 1: lot of trouble. This is this is not a justifiable
Speaker 1: use of force. If Keltner had jumped on top of
Speaker 1: him and was you know, pounding his head into the pavement,
Speaker 1: or had a gun on him and drew for it.
Speaker 1: And you're a security guard, you're in that professional role.
Speaker 1: You're arm somebody else isn't, and you know you're getting
Speaker 1: rowdy with them. And if you see there was a
Speaker 1: guy I think he's a producer from my Nights I
Speaker 1: nine saying horrible stuff to Keltner. On those around him,
Speaker 1: you know they looked there was an instigation here. Political
Speaker 1: violence comes from the left once again, because the right
Speaker 1: doesn't believe in this stuff. It is not a mainstream
Speaker 1: geopee believe that if you're upset, if you're angry, you're
Speaker 1: allowed to hurt people and destroy things. It is a
Speaker 1: mainstream Democrat belief absolutely and supported by our cowardly, disgusting
Speaker 1: enemy of the people, mainstream media, for whom you should
Speaker 1: have nothing but utter contempt at this point. Contempt. Don't
Speaker 1: watch them, don't listen to them. Get your news elsewhere.
Speaker 1: That's the only way to do it. You're in the freedom.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, speaking of
Speaker 1: psycho libs, which I think we do every day. He's back, folks,
Speaker 1: a guy who's absurd pseudo intellectual grandiloquence is really unsurpassed
Speaker 1: to this day. It's a combination of the talking points
Speaker 1: from HuffPo mixed with somebody's crib notes over Shakespeare. Right.
Speaker 1: But here he is Keith Olberman talking about how we
Speaker 1: must get rid of all of these people from society
Speaker 1: place to have it. Let us brace ourselves, ask is twofold?
Speaker 1: The terrorist Trump must be defeated, must be destroyed, must
Speaker 1: be devoured at the ballot box. And then he and
Speaker 1: his enablers and his supporters and his collaborators, and the
Speaker 1: Mike Lees and the William Bars and the Sean Hannity's
Speaker 1: and the Mike Pences and the Rudy Giulianis and the
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouses and the Amy Coney Barretts must be prosecuted
Speaker 1: and convicted and remove from our society while we try
Speaker 1: to rebuild it, and to rebuild the world Trump has
Speaker 1: nearly destroyed by turning it over to a virus, remember it,
Speaker 1: even as we dream of a return to reality and
Speaker 1: safety and the country for which our forefathers died. That
Speaker 1: the fight is not just to win an election, but
Speaker 1: to win it by enough to chase at least for
Speaker 1: a moment Trump and the maggots off the stage, and
Speaker 1: then try to clean up what they left. Lock them up,
Speaker 1: lock them up, ACP, clear them out from our society, prison, prosecute. Look,
Speaker 1: the problem that Keith Olberman's going to have is that
Speaker 1: his I'm insane routine that he always does is really
Speaker 1: not that far off from the Democrat mainstream. Now, I mean,
Speaker 1: chardon Nancy has like says the craziest stuff, even crazier
Speaker 1: than Alberman every day. You know, Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: they've they've gone way further left since Keith was doing
Speaker 1: his thing over at MSNBC. I just note he was
Speaker 1: their biggest name, folks. He was their biggest name at
Speaker 1: MSNBC for years and was paid ten million dollars a
Speaker 1: year by al Gore's current TV network to have never
Speaker 1: more than a few thousand viewers at a time, So
Speaker 1: he didn't have that MSNBC platform. Nobody cared anymore. But
Speaker 1: this is who the left chooses to elevate. But it's
Speaker 1: worth noting that these are the kind of lunatics who
Speaker 1: you'll be hearing a lot more from if Biden does
Speaker 1: end up winning this election. Speaking of Biden, this is great.
Speaker 1: I've eve been talking about the changing of the definitions
Speaker 1: of court packing and what the Libs have been up
Speaker 1: to with that. Here's when Joe Biden is asked by
Speaker 1: a local reporter about court packing. This is amazing. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's just saying stuff. Now you go, what does he
Speaker 1: think he's doing? Play one, sir, I've got to ask
Speaker 1: me about packing the courts. And I know that he
Speaker 1: said yesterday you aren't going to answer the question until
Speaker 1: after the election. But this is the number one thing
Speaker 1: that I've been asked about from viewers in the past
Speaker 1: couple of days. Well, you've been asked by the viewers
Speaker 1: who are probably Republicans who don't want me continuing to
Speaker 1: talk about what they're doing to the court right now. Well, sir,
Speaker 1: don't the voters deserve to know I'm not going to
Speaker 1: play his game. He'd love me to talk about and
Speaker 1: I've already said something on court pack He'd loved that
Speaker 1: to be the discussion instead of what he's doing now.
Speaker 1: He's about he's about to make a pick in the
Speaker 1: middle of the election. First time it's ever been done,
Speaker 1: first time in history, it's ever been done. It's just lies, evasions.
Speaker 1: It's absurd. This is the guy who wants to be president.
Speaker 1: Was there ever anything where Trump was asked what he
Speaker 1: would do if he became president in twenty sixteen, He goes,
Speaker 1: that would be a really big story. But I'm not
Speaker 1: going to answer it because it would be a big story.
Speaker 1: Liberals heads would have exploded and they would have been right.
Speaker 1: Biden is telling you straight up, No, you don't deserve.
Speaker 1: You don't deserve to know the answer on this, because
Speaker 1: this will help the other side. Me telling the other
Speaker 1: side what I would do would help them. Therefore, me
Speaker 1: telling the American people. Therefore, I have no obligation. I
Speaker 1: have an obligation to be evasive, to lie, to be
Speaker 1: untrustworthy to the American people. Oh, I'm so glad. This
Speaker 1: is so funny too. What they're doing right now is
Speaker 1: packing the court. See Biden get the talking points, the
Speaker 1: media gets their talking points. Just conflate everything, pretend like
Speaker 1: words have no meaning. This is court packing. That's court packing.
Speaker 1: Everything is court packing. Muddy the waters make it hard
Speaker 1: to discern what's actually happening and what's true for people
Speaker 1: who are just casually trying to observe politics and governance
Speaker 1: in America, and by changing the way that they use
Speaker 1: these words, that's what ends up happening. It's very difficult
Speaker 1: to separate it out. So that's what we see here.
Speaker 1: Oh they don't you don't have a right to know,
Speaker 1: You're all right to know. And then there's Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: just letting you know that this is straight up transactional
Speaker 1: and this is really just about politics. For the Democrats
Speaker 1: play for the Republicans are rushing this through. As you know,
Speaker 1: it's totally different. Critical that will be a second theme
Speaker 1: we will mention today after they held back Marthal and
Speaker 1: eight months before a presidential election, and we know why
Speaker 1: they're doing it. The number one reason is to get
Speaker 1: someone on the bench who will undo so many of
Speaker 1: the things people need and turn the clock back. They
Speaker 1: can't do it themselves. They're afraid to do it themselves.
Speaker 1: Although a lot of these Republicans voted eight or nine
Speaker 1: times to repeal ACA, and so they'd get trying to
Speaker 1: get the courts to do it, and I think it'll
Speaker 1: be American people will look very unkindly on it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: political stuff. Chuck Schumer's telling you that's that's what the
Speaker 1: real draw is here. That's the real reason for all
Speaker 1: of us. Everything else is just bla bla bla bla blather.
Speaker 1: It is sheer an income poopery. They have no process argument,
Speaker 1: no constitutional, no legal argument against this. So they're just
Speaker 1: gonna throw everything everything they've got at the wall. See
Speaker 1: what sticks. And let's just all get ready for this,
Speaker 1: Amy Coney Barrett, Oh my, it's gonna be quite a
Speaker 1: sight when the Democrat Party wait his all out war
Speaker 1: on this eminently qualified, brilliant, deeply impressive mother of seven.
Speaker 1: But it's the party of feminism, they tell you, folks,
Speaker 1: Sure it is. Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Ain't no party like
Speaker 1: a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we got Bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call. Roll call it is. Let us get to
Speaker 1: a friends Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton Team Buck
Speaker 1: at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to send us
Speaker 1: an email and uh yeah, and on Instagram, just send
Speaker 1: send a direct message to Buck Sexton. Oh yeah, there
Speaker 1: you go, Michael writes, gut your book in the mail.
Speaker 1: Buck can't wait to dive right in hope to get
Speaker 1: you to sign this one. You're a phenomenal patriot on
Speaker 1: my personal hero shield time my friend. Well, Michael, that
Speaker 1: is very kind of you. I am humbled that you
Speaker 1: would say such nice things. It does mean a lot.
Speaker 1: I do really appreciate it, and I'm glad you are
Speaker 1: enjoying the Socialism Survival Guide and eight radical predictions that
Speaker 1: will come true after the election. You can get a
Speaker 1: bucksextonbook dot com. And I think we're actually gonna do
Speaker 1: an additional promotion with my friends at Stansbury Research coming
Speaker 1: up soon here, so we can really get this thing
Speaker 1: out to the masses far and wide. But I remember,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you about stuff that's happening, not just right
Speaker 1: now and leading up to the election. I'm saying, Look,
Speaker 1: this is what you're facing after the election. These are
Speaker 1: the big structural political problems. And I hope that everyone
Speaker 1: understands that each chapter of the eight predictions and eight
Speaker 1: chapters in the book, and it's meant to be very readable,
Speaker 1: very quick, two hundred and twenty pages, you can always
Speaker 1: refer back to. It's really understand at least as I
Speaker 1: make the argument about immigration, about the debt, about statism,
Speaker 1: about socialism, about all these things. Bryce, Right, could it
Speaker 1: be that Nancy's newfound interest in the twenty fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: is meant to smooth commalis transition to becoming president? So Bryce,
Speaker 1: I think I might have mentioned this last week, although
Speaker 1: maybe it was on a different show. I've heard this
Speaker 1: this theory and a few times from a few places,
Speaker 1: and I don't think that it's I don't think it's
Speaker 1: likely true. I can't say it's definitely not true, because's crazy,
Speaker 1: and that's it's crazy. But I think it's very unlikely
Speaker 1: that it's the case. Here's why everyone expects that Biden's
Speaker 1: not going to finish out. And I think I mean
Speaker 1: I've heard Democrats say this too. There he's not going
Speaker 1: to finish out a second term. The guy's going to
Speaker 1: be uh in his mid eighties. It's gonna be one
Speaker 1: hundred year old president. I mean, this is crazy. So,
Speaker 1: you know, there's nothing wrong. It's great to be in
Speaker 1: your eighties. But a lot of people show that the
Speaker 1: happiness indexes for people. You know a lot of people's
Speaker 1: happiest parts of life are are in there in their
Speaker 1: senior years when they've you know, they've had they've accomplished
Speaker 1: so much and they can, you know, think more about
Speaker 1: family and what really matters, and you know all that stuff.
Speaker 1: So I just don't think that somebody necessarily should put
Speaker 1: the pressure and stress on themselves that it's not good
Speaker 1: for any of us to be president in their mid eighties.
Speaker 1: I think that's that's asking a lot. But Biden, No
Speaker 1: one's going to need to do a twenty fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: thing with Biden when the when the Democrat Party, when
Speaker 1: the apparatus tells him, hey, you step down now for
Speaker 1: health reasons, and you will be the name Biden will
Speaker 1: be a forever protected just like Kennedy. We're a lot
Speaker 1: of scummy, bad Kennedy's right, either Teddy Kennedy, right, guy
Speaker 1: drown a woman, philandering, alcoholic nut job? Right? But did
Speaker 1: the Democrats bidding? And here's a ly another shot at
Speaker 1: Tenney Kennedy. So Yo Shaw Walter, I always think of
Speaker 1: a what is the chief? Is it? Proucer Mark? Is
Speaker 1: the Chief Wigham from the Simpsons? Yes, Chief Wigham. He's
Speaker 1: got kind of a boshed an accid, Right, you did
Speaker 1: sound like him for a moment there yet, right, he's
Speaker 1: got sort of that you know, yoda ick been I blena. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So anyway, wait, is that Chief Wigham? Is that the mayor?
Speaker 1: Am I getting the mayor confused with the mayor? And
Speaker 1: just now you did, but you're doing a different voice there.
Speaker 1: Roy's superintendent whatever his name is, of the schools from
Speaker 1: the I'm thinking of. There's either the mayor of Chief Wigham,
Speaker 1: who clearly has like a Kennedy esque Boston accent. It's
Speaker 1: one of them. A lot of them have similar accents,
Speaker 1: fair enough. So anyway, Teddy Kennedy was was completely protected
Speaker 1: by the lib establishment media. And uh, you know there's
Speaker 1: also you know, there's also the reality here of Biden
Speaker 1: recognizing that for his future generations. He's gonna want to
Speaker 1: have as much of the Democrat apparatus support as possible.
Speaker 1: So anyway, point is he can step down, be a
Speaker 1: hero of Democrats always in forever, not have to really
Speaker 1: do anything as president, and he will be the one
Speaker 1: who delivered the Democrats from Donald Trump for four more years.
Speaker 1: So they're gonna love him forever. I mean, he will
Speaker 1: go down. Biden's children's children's children will get into Harvard
Speaker 1: even if they're morons, doesn't matter. They'll they'll pay. They'll
Speaker 1: be able to write books about just being Biden, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, all this stuff will be you know, there's
Speaker 1: so much incentive for him, and all he has to
Speaker 1: do is step down and no one's gonna care about it. No,
Speaker 1: they're not going to have to push him out. I
Speaker 1: don't even think Joe Biden really I think he wants
Speaker 1: to win the presidency. I don't know if he really
Speaker 1: wants to be president. I think he wants to play
Speaker 1: golf and make a lot of money. Honestly, I don't
Speaker 1: think this is a guy who would see it as
Speaker 1: a big downgrade. Gets to be president for two years,
Speaker 1: so he will be president, you know, the so the
Speaker 1: ego is all covered here's the guy's obviously got a
Speaker 1: massive ego. The egos all gonna be egos are gonna
Speaker 1: be covered up. But he gets to uh, right off
Speaker 1: into the sunset of hero. Who doesn't want that? Right?
Speaker 1: It's kind of like Michael Jordan, you want to retire
Speaker 1: at the absolute peak of your game or you want
Speaker 1: to come back at the you know, they will do
Speaker 1: the Washington Wizards thing and everyone's like, wait, he's not
Speaker 1: really Michael Jordan in the same way, and you know, no, no,
Speaker 1: so we'll see. But yeah, no, I don't think the
Speaker 1: twenty fifth Amendment. I think it's all just meant to
Speaker 1: troll to troll Trump. Oh here we got the president
Speaker 1: actually weighing. You know that. Why don't we Why don't
Speaker 1: we hear from him? Mark play fifteen for me. Well,
Speaker 1: I think she's talking about Joe Biden, because, to be
Speaker 1: honest with you, he's the one that's got the problem,
Speaker 1: and obviously it's obvious to anybody that watches him speak.
Speaker 1: He's the one that got that has the problem. And
Speaker 1: they want to put a super radical left person in
Speaker 1: like Kamala who's worse than who's further left than Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: and you know that whole thing is breaking up now
Speaker 1: because the Left isn't getting what they want. All of
Speaker 1: a sudden, they're back into fracking and all the things
Speaker 1: that they talked about they wouldn't do, and now they're
Speaker 1: saying they're going to do them. And yeah, twenty fifth, ammon,
Speaker 1: it's all a big ploy. It's a game. It's trolling
Speaker 1: the present. We're all quite aware of it. More roll
Speaker 1: call here Buck on Life Attorney. This is from Adam
Speaker 1: on Life Attorneys normal. What I will miss the most
Speaker 1: is not having to wear pants shields high. Adam. I
Speaker 1: love sweatpants now and it is very what I have
Speaker 1: to put on adult, like normal person pants, which I've
Speaker 1: had to do occasionally. It's like, what are these? You
Speaker 1: know you don't like them. I've gotten really used to
Speaker 1: wearing sweatpants all the time. Sweatpants are great. You know,
Speaker 1: I could wear them in black or navy blue, so
Speaker 1: they dress up a little bit. But I don't know.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, is that your goal? Are you a sweatpat?
Speaker 1: I could? I could picture you being a robe guy.
Speaker 1: I am not. I am a hotel as a rope guy.
Speaker 1: But Linley Quarantine it's been sweatpants pretty much every day.
Speaker 1: I think five times since March I've had to put
Speaker 1: on jeans. Well, when you think about it, sweatpants are
Speaker 1: the most comfortable garment for your lower your lower half.
Speaker 1: So why aren't we making more of a thing of
Speaker 1: wearing sweatpants more. You know, Well, they're not the most
Speaker 1: functional when you're out. Yeah, yeah, that's true. Like I
Speaker 1: like a little pocket, you know, I'm not going to
Speaker 1: ride the subway and have someone pickpocket me because I'm
Speaker 1: wearing sweatpants. Well, there are different kinds of sweatpants now.
Speaker 1: They make these stretchy fabrics and things where they can
Speaker 1: look like they can look like dress pants but feel
Speaker 1: like sweatpants. I think that's the move. Oh those sound great,
Speaker 1: an get me something. Oh they're great. I can send
Speaker 1: you some. They're good stuff. But yeah, no, Adam, I
Speaker 1: agree with you. The ability to continue to dressed down
Speaker 1: and relax maximum relaxing is is fantastic. So I'm all
Speaker 1: about that. I agree. Uh, Susan, Susie. When a couple
Speaker 1: of guys they were up to no goods started making
Speaker 1: trouble in my neighborhood, I got a one little fight
Speaker 1: and my mom got scared. She said, you're moving with
Speaker 1: your auntie and uncle to Bellair? Remember then, Yes, everyone does.
Speaker 1: But what does that have to do with Susie? Um,
Speaker 1: I forgot, I got into it. Oh, maximum relaxing, that's why. Ah.
Speaker 1: Remember I'm just saying, if you can't recite the Fresh
Speaker 1: Prince theme song, are you really in nineties? Person? No,
Speaker 1: I watched The Fresh Prince all the time. I actually
Speaker 1: watch Martin, which I believe is the proper way the
Speaker 1: show was pronounced Martin all the time. Martin Lawrence's show.
Speaker 1: I think that was before my time. Yeah, probably a
Speaker 1: little bit, dude. He was great. Bad Boys is I
Speaker 1: think an underrated The Bad Boys the original is an
Speaker 1: underrated movie. It really holds up. Yeah, it does. It's
Speaker 1: a good action flick good. It's so much better than
Speaker 1: the Miami Vice remake that was done years later with
Speaker 1: Colin Farrell because yeah, let's have an Irish guy play
Speaker 1: Crockett what are we doing America? And Jamie Fox as Tubbs,
Speaker 1: who was better as Tubbs. But I mean the Crockett
Speaker 1: Colin Farrell, he had like this ridiculous blonde mullet. It
Speaker 1: was horrible, horrible movie I've seen it a few times. Anyway, Susie,
Speaker 1: let's get to what you have to think and say.
Speaker 1: I think Trump should set up his own debate without
Speaker 1: the CPD, with Biden, with two moderators, one the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign picks and the Biden campaign picks. Perhaps that way
Speaker 1: we could get balanced questions and the moderators could keep
Speaker 1: each other in check instead of turning it into a
Speaker 1: two on one debate. It could be outside and social distance,
Speaker 1: following current scientific research for protection for in person events.
Speaker 1: I also think a timers should be added where the
Speaker 1: audience see how long the Canada has been speaking when
Speaker 1: the moderator tries to cut in. It seemed like Pence
Speaker 1: was getting cut off the moment he was getting momentum
Speaker 1: regardless of his speaking time. If rules are rules, let's
Speaker 1: show everyone is held to them equally. Well, Susie, the
Speaker 1: Biden campaign just doesn't want to They don't want to
Speaker 1: do this again. They don't want to go into another
Speaker 1: debate situation. I think that they believe these I mean,
Speaker 1: these polls are nuts. I'm seeing poles. Biden had seven points,
Speaker 1: eleven points. You know that they're they're preparing the Democrats
Speaker 1: for I think a huge disappointment, which God only knows
Speaker 1: how they're going to react to that, because there's no
Speaker 1: way Joe Biden's winning this election by first of all,
Speaker 1: that winning it by double digits as fantasy land stuff.
Speaker 1: It's going to be one or two percentage of the
Speaker 1: electorate that determines this probably one percent of the electorate
Speaker 1: that determines this whole thing. So that's that's what all
Speaker 1: the polls should show. But Democrats, it's kind of like
Speaker 1: the media, they don't even understand their own biased They
Speaker 1: don't even understand how they may be missing this one
Speaker 1: or why it is that the polls are over sampling Democrats.
Speaker 1: So we'll see. But yeah, Susie, I don't think. I
Speaker 1: don't even think there's gonna be really a I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't think there's gonna be another debate. I've been
Speaker 1: saying all summer there's gonna be one. I think you'll
Speaker 1: get one, and that's probably it. And I think that's
Speaker 1: where we are. You're in the freedom, hud. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sex and Show Podcast. Back into Roll Call.
Speaker 1: Remember if you want to be a part of this fun,
Speaker 1: send us an email team Bucket. iHeartMedia Dot com Matt
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, Mike Pence did a fantastic job crushing Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris in the debate. Honestly, it got me excited for
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four because I think that Pence is a
Speaker 1: strong presidential candidate. Likewise, in the same way that Pence
Speaker 1: is gentlemanly styled compliments Trump's boisterous attitude. I think that
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan's take no prisoners approach would mesh well with Pence.
Speaker 1: A Pence Jordan twenty twenty four is my hope. And
Speaker 1: as a bonus, Ted is for United States Attorney General.
Speaker 1: Keep up a solid work, Buck YouTube producer Mark, thank
Speaker 1: you so much, Matt, I appreciate it. And Pence is
Speaker 1: a presidential Candidate's interesting. He hasn't gotten that much early
Speaker 1: attention for that, but let's really think about I mean,
Speaker 1: I would take Pence way ahead of Nicky Haley and
Speaker 1: some of these other people that have already been raised
Speaker 1: as the next, you know, the next round of Republican candidates.
Speaker 1: So I think Pence would be a very very solid choice.
Speaker 1: You know, the guy brings that Midwestern russ Belt Republican
Speaker 1: you know, working class support to the table. Would have
Speaker 1: been a vice president for eight years under President Trump.
Speaker 1: Zero scandals, zero personal you know, personal shortcomings that would
Speaker 1: prevent him from being the president. I don't know how
Speaker 1: much that stuff even really well, it matters if you're
Speaker 1: a Republican. It doesn't matter if you're a Democrat, of course,
Speaker 1: But I think that's he's he'd be a very serious candidate.
Speaker 1: But he's also the kind of guy who doesn't you're
Speaker 1: not going to hear about that. So you're really deep
Speaker 1: into the Trump second term because he's he's doing his
Speaker 1: job and he like, he appreciate he's the number two men,
Speaker 1: and he's good with that, and that's what this is
Speaker 1: all about. So but I think you're right, Matt. I
Speaker 1: think he would be strong and Jim Jordan as his veep.
Speaker 1: I'd want to see Christy Nome. I think Christy Nome
Speaker 1: is fantastic governor South Dakota. I think she's just doing
Speaker 1: a great job and has really showed people what real
Speaker 1: executive leadership looks like during the COVID pandemic. And she's
Speaker 1: she's one to watch. Folks to see her as a
Speaker 1: as a vice bybe even a presidential contender herself. Mike
Speaker 1: isn't it an also interesting before I get to Mike,
Speaker 1: Republicans tend to want governor's people in executive roles in
Speaker 1: the past to run for president. Democrats always have a senator,
Speaker 1: always kind of have somebody who's from within that bureaucratic body.
Speaker 1: Just a little bit of if you look, if you
Speaker 1: look at the path, that tends to be the way.
Speaker 1: It is just a difference difference there right right, John
Speaker 1: Carey Senator, Hillary Clinton, Senator, um Joe Biden, Senator. We
Speaker 1: like governors Ronald Reagan, governor, George W. Bush governor? Right,
Speaker 1: wasn't he Governor Texas? I'm not making that up? I
Speaker 1: might yeah, so yes, indeed, uh oh, Mitt Romney, I know,
Speaker 1: I know, boo, but whatever, Massachusetts Governor Mike Buck, did
Speaker 1: you happen to watch the Ladies French Open final? This
Speaker 1: phenomen is likely to dominate for the foreseeable future, barring injury, Mike,
Speaker 1: I missed all of the French Open, which I'm very
Speaker 1: sad about. I saw Rafa nadal One, one of the
Speaker 1: one of the three greatest of all time. I'm here
Speaker 1: and some people argue they think that he's tech. He
Speaker 1: should be considered the greatest tennis player of all time,
Speaker 1: even ahead of Federer. Now that's a that's a tough one.
Speaker 1: That is a tough one. I did see. I did
Speaker 1: see that the NBA Finals happened, and I asked producer
Speaker 1: Mark about this, because the ratings were down huge, hugely
Speaker 1: from the last NBA final seventy percent. But Mark had
Speaker 1: a very important context for this, Mark, what was the
Speaker 1: why were the ratings down so much in your opinion,
Speaker 1: or what's one What are some of the reasons for it?
Speaker 1: In my opinion, it would be well, first of all,
Speaker 1: the game was a blowout from the very beginning. It
Speaker 1: was like a twenty thirty point game the whole time,
Speaker 1: and it was competing with Sunday night football playoff baseball.
Speaker 1: I think there was some tennis yesterday, and I mean
Speaker 1: NBA Finals aren't normally in the middle of October. So yeah,
Speaker 1: so a lot of a lot of changes on that one.
Speaker 1: Buck writes in Love the Show. Perhaps it's the name.
Speaker 1: I like that Buck, great name. I think the twenty
Speaker 1: fifth Amendment thing actually has nothing to do with Trump
Speaker 1: but rather one percent and warning to Biden if he
Speaker 1: doesn't stick to all the liberal crazy horse hockey he's
Speaker 1: agreed to keep the information flowing shields high. Well, Buck,
Speaker 1: despite your brilliant name, I don't know, if I look,
Speaker 1: you could be right, You could be right on that.
Speaker 1: I don't see it that way. I feel like if
Speaker 1: it was time for Biden to go, he'd and the
Speaker 1: people in you know, Pelosian Schumer sat down with Biadam
Speaker 1: or Lek. Look, we're gonna take care of you. We
Speaker 1: got we got board seats, set up a few Biden's
Speaker 1: greedy folks. Look at his Look at what his hunter
Speaker 1: Biden has done. Look what Biden's done since he left office.
Speaker 1: This guy wants to be super super rich. He doesn't
Speaker 1: have that much time. You think he really wants to
Speaker 1: be president for eight years. This guy gets to be
Speaker 1: president for two years. The best deal for him is
Speaker 1: to beat Trump, be president for two years, handed over
Speaker 1: to Kamala right after the mid terms, and then walk
Speaker 1: away as a timeless hero of the Democrat left. And
Speaker 1: so look, that's if I were Biden's you know, personal
Speaker 1: life coach, I'd tell him that's the move, buddy. What
Speaker 1: he want to get dragged into another economic recession, perhaps
Speaker 1: a war with China? You know who knows what's gonna happen?
Speaker 1: You want to go through all that in your mid eighties.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't think so. Friends, that's the show
Speaker 1: for today. Please pass the buck. Get somebody new in
Speaker 1: this election season to listen to Buck Sexton Show. Best
Speaker 1: way to do it is just send them an email
Speaker 1: or a text message with a link to the podcast.
Speaker 1: We'll put it out on social media until tomorrow. Shields
Speaker 1: High