WEBVTT - Democrats Have Nothing On ACB 0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:15.720 You are entering the Freedom Hug. The Amy Cony Barrett 0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.640 hearings are underway today. Democrats so far have got nothing. 0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.239 Plus a Trump supporter shot in Denver by an alleged 0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:28.880 security guard. Could Governor Cuomo be Biden's attorney general? And 0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.400 the truth about Columbus Day. This is the Buck Sexon Show, 0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.520 where the mission or mission is to decode what really 0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:43.280 matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a 0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:49.879 great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a 0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:55.520 great guy. No welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. 0:00:55.560 --> 0:01:00.040 We are twenty two days out from the election, and 0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.680 in some ways it really doesn't feel like it, does 0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.560 it not nearly the same kind of frenzy of political 0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.560 activity out on the streets. We don't have lawns in 0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.080 New York City, so I can't speak to lawn signs. 0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.880 But everyone's still locked up inside. Things are getting colder. 0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.720 People are worried about COVID, and this week we're going 0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:26.080 to spend really on a Supreme Court nomination battle. There's 0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.360 going to be something of a rest spit from the 0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:33.080 main effort of the election for a few days. And 0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.360 we've already seen what the opposition to Amy Coney Barrett 0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.600 looks like so far, and the answer is it is 0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.880 unbelievably weak. I mean, it's really quite pathetic. You saw 0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:49.480 this over the weekend. You had a number of prominent 0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.800 news sites that started doing one of two things. They 0:01:54.920 --> 0:02:01.560 either changed the definition of court packing to include this right, 0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.080 which is filling a Supreme Court seat. No, that's court packing. No, 0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.360 that's called filling a seat. That's not packing. Or they 0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:15.760 started to use this phrase de politicize the court, depoliticize 0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.880 Supreme Court dominations. What the heck does that even mean? Well, 0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:22.799 it's what you do when you don't have a real argument, 0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.880 It's what you do when you're flailing. And clearly the 0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.280 Democrats are at this point, what are they going to 0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.280 say the incredibly brilliant, universally beloved mother of seven who 0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:37.400 adopted two black children from Haiti and has already been 0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.600 through a Senate confirmation process to be an Appeals Court 0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.320 judge and was just pushed through without really any issue 0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.679 other than being asked, does the dogma? The dogma lives 0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:52.040 loudly within you? Which was great for Conservatives, Catholics and 0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.560 Republicans that that question was out there, but she's already 0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.760 been confirmed to that. Why would she not be confirmed here? 0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.320 They have no argument, friends lost. This is nothing but 0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.440 sour grapes, sore loserism from Democrats. That's all it is. 0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.840 They have no other argument. History is with the Republicans 0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:17.399 filling this seat. Common sense, basic politics. Elections have consequences, 0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.320 the single truest and most useful phrase that Barack Obama 0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.320 ever uttered. I think, at least as president, elections do 0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.960 have consequences, and we are seeing right now what that 0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.240 can mean. So far, it has been pretty pathetic watching 0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:37.360 Democrats dance around the full on assault on Amy Coney 0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.080 Barrett's character that we all kind of know is coming. 0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:45.040 We all believe that they'll do something completely disgraceful or 0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.080 disreputable here. That's their only option. What else are they 0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.440 going to say? ACB and I refer to her that 0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.360 way because it's convenient, but also because it really triggers 0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.720 the lives they hate that she's no RBG. Correct, she's not, 0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.880 and for the purposes of a constitutionalist on the Court, 0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:11.320 that's a great thing. That's a great thing. But they're 0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.200 going after everything around this moment. So far, they're trying 0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.040 to set the stage and set the narrative. You had Democrats. 0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.680 Senators spend the day talking about how important the Affordable 0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.920 Care Act is. Senators talking about how Donald Trump has 0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.320 done a terrible job on COVID. These things have nothing 0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:34.480 to do with ACB. Nothing. This is all about. It's 0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.320 supposed to be about deciding whether or not this woman, 0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.799 who is eminently qualified to sit on the Supreme Court 0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.200 is in fact going to sit on the Supreme Court. 0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.720 That's it. There's nothing else, which is why all along 0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.280 I've held out that we should have just had the GOP, 0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:55.160 should have called for I vote, Have it done and 0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.240 over with, Allow her to be a vote on this, 0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.120 get it in the books, get her put in that seat, Dunzo, 0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.320 move on to the next challenge. That's it. But no, 0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.039 senators can't help but want to take every opportunity to 0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.240 give speeches in front of the American people to a 0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.880 national television audience about how much they love the Constitution, 0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.680 or about how much Republicans and Donald Trump hate America, 0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.479 or whatever it is that they're going to say. You're 0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.039 hearing a variation of a political stump speech. For most 0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.360 of these senators, nothing particularly worthwhile or interesting for many 0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:33.280 of them. Senator Ben Sass of Nebraska gave a Civics 0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.080 one oh one lesson today. I suppose some people seem 0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.520 to like it. Other people felt like it was kind 0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.800 of a waste of everyone's time. Senator Dick Durbin also 0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.240 did much of the same, going off on some lengthy 0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:49.920 speech about the need to protect pre existing conditions and 0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.599 how the Supreme Court is supposed to be this sacred body, 0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.360 and none of it really adds up to anything other 0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:02.080 than they are upset that they're not getting their way. Now. 0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.719 I know Sasa is a Republican. I didn't mean to 0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.080 throw him in there with Durban, but I don't trust him. 0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.080 It's gonna say, I don't trust the guy as a 0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.200 Republican at all. I think he's more about Sass than 0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.479 he is about the GOP, that's for sure. Some of 0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.640 you can disagree with me, and that's fine. But onto 0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.359 what they're going to do. Now, they've tried so hard, 0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.839 they've they've they've tested and then thrown out. They're all 0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.560 these different narratives. They're still clinging to the weakest of 0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.040 all I think, which is it was it was Rbg's 0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.480 last wish. I do not care, neither does any other Republican. 0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.880 It's not it doesn't matter. Rbg's last wish is not 0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:42.080 meaningful for a government proceeding that is representative of what 0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.719 is best for three hundred and thirty million people. Okay, 0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.840 doesn't matter the same way that the Democrats pretend. It 0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.599 does not matter that RBG was on the record and 0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.320 explicitly against packing the court. So who was it that 0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.799 tried to pack the court? Just it's it's worth taking 0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.360 a moment to look back in time for a second. 0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:07.320 Who was it? It was? FDR wasn't oh a big Democrat, 0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:14.480 the Democrat who ushered in really the overreaching federal government authority, 0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:20.440 the enormous fissures and breaks in the Constitution. So it 0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.000 was in fact the Democrats who once again, as part 0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.560 of their will to power, tried to push through court packing. 0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.920 They don't get their way and they want to change things. 0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:39.760 It's back in nineteen thirty seven, so it stayed at 0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.480 nine back then. But that was also because the composition 0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.400 of the court changed enough and the decisions changed enough 0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.400 to Roosevelt's liking. What was it about the not the 0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.360 Green New Deal? Oh, but New Deal legislation. So let's 0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.360 understand this as we have democrats today lecturing us about 0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.040 precedent and history and making it up as they go along. 0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:05.360 That FDR, perhaps the big government patron saints. I don't 0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:06.640 know if you want to call him a saint, but 0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.280 you know, the big government exemplar of the twentieth century 0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.800 couldn't get the Supreme Court then to agree that some 0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.800 of his New Deal actions were in fact constitutional. So 0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.520 what did he do change the people making the decisions 0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:25.040 about the constitutionality? A very Olynskyite approach. Now that's what 0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.280 he wanted to do. It was not successful, obviously in 0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.560 the judges stayed at nine, but it was that same impulse. 0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:35.000 We have power, we want to do things. We are collectivists, 0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.880 and we believe in state authority. So we're just going 0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.160 to go for it. It doesn't matter that there's a 0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.080 founding document that we're all supposed to adhere to that 0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.880 creates the basis for all of these government actions known 0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.480 as the Constitution. It's not supposed to matter. And then 0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.480 you have this other, this media. It's really amazing, this 0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.640 media effort where it is almost like and I say 0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.880 almost because it is like Actually, I'd be willing to 0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.760 bet that if you were able to track down the emails, 0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.920 you'd find out that there were members of the media 0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.600 who are getting emails from Democrat list serves and Democrat 0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.760 email lists and things telling them to start referring to 0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.240 the de politicization of the court and also just say 0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.600 that it's the Republicans who are court packing. This is 0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:26.520 classic gaslighting, and that's exactly what they're doing. Now. They 0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.280 do something, or try to do something. In this case, 0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.080 they haven't done it yet, thankfully, but they try to 0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.800 push through a court packing scheme and when it doesn't 0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.640 work out for them, when they public or at least 0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.360 the institutions that are watching over this thing, say look, 0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.440 you guys, they're allowed to do this. You can just 0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.880 wine and wine. They say, well, yeah, well you're the 0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:52.560 ones who are packing the court. What. Yeah, you're the 0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.520 ones who are doing it. You cheated. This is the 0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.840 logic of an eight year old who stole a piece 0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.679 of birthday cake, knows he's about to get and so 0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.520 he blames his six year old sister. She did it, 0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.480 Cast dispersions on the other side, undermine them, and hope 0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.880 that your side is able to get what they want 0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.840 out of the equation. That's what's happening here. Democrats, in 0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.280 so many ways do act like a spoiled eight year old. 0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.880 That's really the central id, the central ethos of the party. 0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.600 I want, therefore, I demand, I want, therefore I should get. 0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.360 Constitution can't be an impediment to it, the rule of 0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.400 law can't be an impediment to it. And even the 0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.560 stellar credentials of ACB and the fact that here we 0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:40.280 have a truly obviously decent, kind, ethical, brilliant person who's 0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.000 going to be in a role where she will make 0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.640 good decisions and stay in her lane. She's not going 0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.320 to be a super legislator. She will at some point, 0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.600 i'm sure, disappoint conservatives because she won't do things that 0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.800 are outside of the constitutional scope of a Supreme Court justice. 0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.400 It's the left, it's the liberals who want something very different. 0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.680 They want a super legislature that is not accountable to 0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.280 the people, and that will give them at the key 0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.880 moments in the courts decision making process, will give them 0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.040 the laws and the political victories that they want. This 0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.600 is for all of us to see. It's quite obvious. 0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.520 It's quite apparent and for all the smarmy lib lawyers 0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.000 out there with their much heralded credentials because they went 0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.160 to some institution that is now just churning out erudite 0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.920 leftists as fast as possible, who have who have bad judgment, 0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.800 but unfortunately have strong enough legal credentials that they now 0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.720 largely control the legal profession. I mean, the left has 0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.320 overtaken not just undergrad programs, but law schools. Speak to 0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.200 somebody who's gone to law school in the last ten 0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.800 or fifteen years. There every bid is down with BLM 0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.559 and social justice and you know, Occupy Wall Street and 0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.280 all this stuff, you name it, big corporate law firms. 0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.079 It'd be shocking if Americans actually really understood how far 0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.400 this leftist ideological rot has extended throughout the legal profession. 0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.880 But ACB's going to withstand all of that. And here's 0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.960 my prediction for the week. And this is one of 0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.280 these predictions where I hope I'm wrong. You will recall 0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:21.439 that Brett Kavanaugh was also sailing through stellar credentials, perfectly situated, 0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.800 gold plated resume for a Supreme Court justice. Nothing about 0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.160 the guy didn't add up to, yeah, he should be 0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.000 voted through and that's the way the beginning of those 0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.400 hearings went till all of a sudden we knew that 0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:39.240 there was this allegation that surfaced, and then this woman 0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.840 showed up, and it was all just run through the 0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:47.319 Democrat apparatus. You had very powerful figures prepping and assisting 0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.520 and pushing for blasi Ford. And then of course two 0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.200 other women came forward, each one less credible than the 0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.880 next with their allegations. And there are a whole bunch 0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.000 of allegations of people that made their way to the 0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.080 Senate that didn't actually make their way under the Senate 0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.760 floor because they were so absurd that even the shameless 0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.520 and disgraceful Kamala Harris and the rest of the Senate 0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.160 Democrats on the Judiciary weren't willing to use because their 0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.920 allegations from women who, it was demonstrable, had never even 0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.360 been in the same state as Kavanaugh, never mind had 0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.000 actually been the victim of some attack by his hand. 0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.240 Brett Kavanaugh was a manifestly innocent person and a good man, 0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.640 and perfectly suited to be a Supreme Court justice. Amy 0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.240 Coney Barrett is a good woman and also perfectly suited 0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.839 for the role We're going to go through a few 0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.640 days here where it'll seem like everything is just fine, 0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.560 and then at the very last moment, as we were 0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.640 just a few weeks away from an election, I think 0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.000 Democrats will spring the trap. I don't know what it is. 0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.760 It may be a process thing, it may be blocking 0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.559 access to Capitol Hill. It may be someone coming forward 0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.760 who claims that they heard Amy Tony Barrett saying anti 0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:07.600 LGBT slurs thirty years ago, with no proof and no nothing, 0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:13.440 but something along those lines. They're gonna try, and it's 0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.200 going to be ugly. That's my prediction. So just get 0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:17.720 ready for it. We're gonna I think we're gonna go 0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.480 through a few days of pretty smooth sailing Democrats flailing, 0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.600 looking weak, looking absurd. But I know, I know this 0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.240 left wing mentality. I know what this Democrat Party has become, 0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.480 and they're going to try something ugly and disgusting in 0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:37.400 the next forty eight hours or so. You're in the 0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:44.800 Freedom und This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well, 0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.640 I can tell you that we're getting this question. It's 0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.520 a common question being asked because American people who have 0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.600 watched the Republicans pack in the Court of the last 0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.480 three and a half years, and they brag about it. 0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.280 They've taken every vacancy and filled it. Did you know 0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.760 that they've sent to us and we have approved only 0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.280 with their votes? That might add ten people who have 0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:07.480 been judged unanimously unqualified by the American Bar Association. Do 0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.120 you know how many judicial nominees came from Obama who 0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:14.360 were judged unanimously unqualified? None? So we are dealing with 0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.200 people on the court packed into the court with little 0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.880 or no qualification, who are going to be there for 0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.880 a long time. So it's understandable the Republicans raised the 0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.960 issue of court packing, changing the definition. That's Dick Durbin 0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.840 on the Senate Judiciary Committee changing the definition of court 0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.400 packing in real time. That is not what court packing is. 0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.560 You can say I don't like their nominations, you can 0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.040 say a lot of things, but you can't say that 0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.200 that's court packing, which is what they're doing. They're claiming 0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.600 right now that the words that we are using to 0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.880 talk about this nomination process don't actually have a specific meaning, 0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.440 that they can change the meaning of those words in 0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.320 real time. What is that reminiscent of? There's a great 0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.680 irony in all this isn't there then, at a time 0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.920 when we're talking about who should sit on the Supreme Court, 0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.680 somebody who believes the Constitution is a document that has 0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.600 meaning and that the words have implications that are not 0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:12.640 subject to whims and interpretations not rooted in the actual text. Right, 0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.320 you have textualists and you have living constitution people. Right, 0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.000 it's just whatever I want it to be whenever I 0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.480 want it to be. That we'll look at what the 0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.280 Democrats are doing right now with court packing. Court Packing 0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.120 isn't that thing that we've all agreed it is for 0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.360 as long as we've been using the term. It's some 0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:33.080 other thing, it's some other concept. Let me now, let 0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:39.440 me now shift into that conversation. It's stunning, it's disgusting, 0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:45.480 it's unfair. But that's where we are. That's where we are. 0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.440 Depoliticizing is the other term we're using. The Associated Press 0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.240 has heard it a talk about and this was the 0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.880 quote from the weekend. Bullock said that if Coney Barrett 0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.640 was confirmed, he would be open to measures to depoliticize 0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.400 the word, including adding judges to the bench, a practice 0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.639 critics have dubbed packing. Oh so now, we're gonna see. 0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.000 This is why I always tell you watch the words 0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.920 the Democrats use. From a legal alien to a legal immigrant, 0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.919 to undocumented immigrant to undocumented period, just given documents, then 0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.880 they're just American like everybody else, right, the same thing 0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:25.520 doesn't matter. Look at that. There are so many instances 0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:31.880 of this. Oh, pro choice, women's health, women's health rights. 0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.800 Say abortion, guys, you're talking about abortion. No one has 0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.960 any problem with any other women's quote health rights. But 0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.880 they can't use the actual language that we all agree 0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.359 mean something, because then they'll lose the debate. So what 0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.280 do they do to change the terms of the debate 0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.359 when they're not deep platforming, as you can see, when 0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.720 they're not shutting you down, silencing you, what do they do? 0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.720 Change the way that you can use the platform, change 0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:01.200 the words that are acceptable, change the definition, at least 0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.760 in the public mind, so that now they can say 0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.560 whatever they want about a thing. Deep politicizing. Oh okay, sure, 0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.959 isn't that so? Isn't that so quaint? We all know 0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.440 what they're trying to do here, We all understand what's happening. 0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.720 But you're seeing the fundamental dishonesty of the Democrat Party 0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.880 on full display for all right now, whether it's on 0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.280 changing the terms of our discussion over the Supreme Court 0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.760 vacancy that will hopefully soon be filled by Amy Coney Barrett, 0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.600 or saying that Joe Biden, you know that there is 0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.960 no right for the people to know there is no 0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.560 reason for the people to know if Biden would even 0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.680 engage in court packing. Fundamental dishonesty from all quarters. That's 0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.000 your Democrat Party in twenty twenty. Thanks for listening to 0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.600 the show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the 0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:56.359 iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Church Bird, 0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.080 your nomination for a life time appointment to the highest 0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.240 court in the land comes before us under a cloud. 0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.159 You've been nominated by a president who shows contempt for 0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.560 the Constitution but does not hesitate to tell his loyal 0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.240 followers that you are being sent to the bench to 0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.240 do his political chores, abolish the ACA ruling, his favor 0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.080 on any election kind of test. And even more, you 0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.639 cannot feel good about a president cheapening this historic moment, 0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.359 the future, the affordable character, and so many other issues 0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.560 hanging into balance. Voting rights, civil rights, the right to 0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:33.760 privacy and choice, environmental protection, gun safety laws, marriage equality, dreamers, 0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.199 work protection. These are the stakes. If we wait just 0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.320 a few more days, we'll know what the American people 0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.360 have to say. Yeah, Dick Durban is wasting everybody's time 0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.239 with this nonsense. But that's what he's been doing for 0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.680 decades in public office. So no surprise. Why is it 0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.920 Amy Coney Barrett's fault that Democrats don't like Trump? She's 0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.639 just been appointed by, Yes, the actual sitting president. Sorry, libs, 0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:01.359 it's true, not my president, not my President. I can't wait. 0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.160 I hope, I hope I get the opportunity to hear 0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.879 those chants again on November fourth this year, just like 0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:13.480 last time, day after the election, right through the Flat 0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.560 Iron district of Manhattan on Broadway, Hundreds and hundreds of 0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.840 people on a cold, rainy night, too, marching through the streets. 0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:26.320 Not my president's like, Well, unfortunately not true. You can 0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.159 say not my president as much as you like. It 0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.160 doesn't actually change the reality. But Democrats like to live 0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.439 in fantasy lands of their own creation, and then they 0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.880 watch MSNBC where they see that expounded upon it gets 0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:42.119 even more attention. So what Dick Durban here is saying 0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.400 that there's a cloud under this is just Look, it's 0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.719 also obvious, right, But the problem is that we have 0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.040 to smash even the dumbest arguments the Democrats use, because 0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.159 otherwise it stands out there and they'll say, see, they 0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.240 have no response, they have no way of telling the 0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:06.679 truth about this one. It's also completely inaccurate. Amy klobaschar Oh, 0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:11.520 she's outing on the Midwest and she's gonna tall you know, 0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.960 I was gonna be president. Oh, unbelievable. I do think 0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.600 she probably would have been better on that stage than 0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.120 Kamala Harris. But you know, she kind of has a 0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:26.359 voice that the registers up around here. Sometimes. Here's Amy 0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.280 saying that the way to deal with this is to 0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.720 call out the most psycho libs possible, call them up 0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.920 and have them harass every Republican member of the Senate. 0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.240 You know, go go outside, you, Mitch McConnell's house, and 0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.440 just bang a bunch of pots and pants together. Here 0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:51.400 she is clobishar seventeen. Let me tell you a political secret. 0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.080 I doubt that we will be a brilliant cross examination 0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.680 that's going to change this judge's trajectory this week. No, 0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.359 it is you, it is you calling Republican senators and 0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.440 telling them enough is enough, telling them it is personal, 0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.919 telling them they have their priorities wrong, So do it. 0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.080 And it is you voting, even when they try to 0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.800 do everything to stop you. It is you making your 0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:21.560 own blueprint for the future instead of crying defeat. So 0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:26.640 do it. This isn't Donald Trump's country, it is yours. 0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:34.240 This shouldn't be Donald Trump's judge, it should be yours. Well. Unfortunately, 0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:41.320 unfortunately for miss Clovish, are Senator clobush Ar, I'm sure 0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.600 she would want to be called that the president is 0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:49.920 the duly elected commander in chief and executive who gets 0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.760 to make determinations about who will be on the Supreme 0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.359 courtin next and it looks like it's going to be 0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.440 Amy Coney Barrett. And there's a big political problem that 0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:04.679 this poses for the Democrats. You'll recall back in twenty sixteen, right, 0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.840 take it, take a step back, or take a trip 0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.520 down memory, laying with me here. Back in twenty sixteen, 0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:14.879 there was a pretty widespread concern among the political experts 0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.760 such as they are, and the polsters and all the 0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:22.800 rest of them, that this was going to be a 0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.000 very difficult sell, that Donald Trump was going to be 0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:31.480 a very difficult pitch for Evangelicals and for more traditional Christians, right, 0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.600 not pro choice, left wing socialist Catholics. I don't know 0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.359 what's wrong with my fellow Catholics out there. Sometimes a 0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.120 lot of them, a lot of lib Catholics running around 0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.840 who think that having the state in place of God 0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.000 is a good thing somehow for their faith. I don't know. 0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.440 I think it's pretty unfortunate, but that's where we are. 0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.919 But you'll remember that there were people very understandably concerned 0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.720 about whether Donald Trump, who is a thrice married billionaire 0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.359 from New York. Those are just the fact and not 0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.040 a man who anybody would think of as chaste in 0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:09.080 his personal behavior. Again, not judging, but just speaking facts. 0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:17.400 Whether Evangelicals and other more traditional morality based Christians, including 0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:22.000 a lot of Catholics and conservative and Orthodox Jews, you know, 0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:23.840 whether they would be able to come forward and vote 0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.639 for Donald Trump knowing that he had lived his life 0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.480 as a more let's say, in a more libertine way. 0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.439 But the decision that they made was, well, it's not 0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.240 about Trump personally, it's about the policies, and it's about 0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.960 what he will pursue in the truth is, Donald Trump 0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.399 has been among the most, if not the most pro 0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.800 life presidents in history, based on his statements, his appearance 0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.120 at the March for Life rally in DC, and everything 0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:54.760