WEBVTT - Are We Doing Decarbonization Totally the Wrong Way?

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jolle Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alaway.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, here's something that really frustrates me, or I find

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of weird.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I see these charts a lot of times. They get

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>posted on Twitter and it's like, oh, look at the

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>incredible like plunge in solar production costs or the incredible

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>advance in you know, how much cheaper it is getting

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to install solar. And then I see these charts where

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like more and more of our energy is coming

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>from solar.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>So it's like, why do you hate environmentalism?

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't say something I'm not saying, but if

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 2>the thing is getting cheaper and the volume of it

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>is growing, why aren't electricity bills like down ninety percent?

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Why is the electricity not gotten a new chuaber?

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So you know, I have that house in Connecticut,

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>which means that I follow ever source news quite closely.

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 3>And eversource raised their rates because they said they needed

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>to make more investment into renewable energy, and then just

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 3>recently they said they're actually pulling back on some of

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 3>their renewable energy investments. But unsurprisingly, perhaps rates aren't actually

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>going down. But I think it's a frustration that a

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of people share, and one that probably says a

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 3>lot about the way renewable energy currently works.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 2>By the way, on that thing is like, oh, we

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>have to raise prices because you're making these investments. That

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>was actually a really interesting nugget that I had forgotten

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>about from our recent episode when we went to Mount

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 2>Airy and we talked to the CEO of Unified, the

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 2>textile company, and there was a line in there where

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>he said, Yeah, energy is obviously a big component of

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>our costs, and it's gone up because the utility is

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>making all these renewable energy investments. So like, there's something

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>weird about this right for energy, in which here you

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>have this thing that's getting cheaper and cheaper, there's more

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and more of it. Obviously we know that decarbonization or

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>electrification and decarbonization are major priorities, So it's like, what's

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>happening Why. I just like, like it's hard for me

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>to wrap my head around, Like when are we going

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to see the fruits of all this?

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it feels like the natural path of capitalism here,

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>or technological adoption where you would expect, you know, as

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>this particular technology becomes more popular, more efficient, more useful,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 3>prices would come down and it would start to proliferate.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't really seem to be happening quite that way.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, we need you know, we need that like

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the kool aid man to jump through the window and

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 2>bring up Jevin's paradox here. It's like, aha, you made

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the fallacy of thinking that is energy comes down and

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>gets cheaper.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Where's the where's the paradox collects? And that's what we

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 3>need the airhorn to go off.

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So obviously especially in the US right now, but I

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>think globally and the doing some similar things in Europe,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>but certainly in the US. We have the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and you hear a lot about like these, like the

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>public private partnerships, and we're going to unleash the power

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism, and we're going to unleash market forces. And

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>because capitalism does something really well, which is like drive

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>for cheapness and efficiency and all this, you know, that's

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the sort of idea and we're going to nudge it

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>along with subsidies and tax credits et cetera. We're going

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>to sort of have these like powerful capitalist actors come

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and deliver us this world of cheap, clean electrified energy.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I do feel like things are changing a

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit on that front. And you mentioned the IRA

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>just then, but yes, you're absolutely right. At least in

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 3>the States and you know, large parts of the West,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the renewable energy transition is still this

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>like kind of weird half measure where it's like private

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>capital meets for the most part government subsidies.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, So the question is like, are we doing it wrong?

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>What is the role of private capital? Do we need

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>private capital to invest in all this? Can the sort

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of the things that capitalism good at deliver us cheap

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 2>clean energy? I'm very excited. We have the perfect guest today.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be speaking with Brett Christophers. He's a

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>professor of geography at Uppsalo University in Sweden, and he

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>is the author of a book that came out this year,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 2>The Price is Wrong, Why Capitalism Won't Save the Planet,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 2>and it's a deep dive into how these energy markets work. So, Brett,

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming on.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Odd lots, thanks for having me.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 4>It's great to be with you.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you just start by telling us the basic

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 2>thesis of your book, which seems to be, you know,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you say why capitalism won't save the planet, or why

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 2>why market forces won't save the planet, why it won't

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 2>deliver us that world of abundant, decarbonized energy.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Sure, the basic thesis of the book is as following,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 4>but it's important to preface it with two kind of

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 4>bits of contextual information that are really really important to understand.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 4>So the first of those is how the world is

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 4>approaching the job of electricity sector decalanization in economic terms,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 4>And what I mean by that is to say that

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 4>for the most part, we are relying on the private

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 4>sector to do this. So governments, accepting certain important places

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>like China, are keeping out of this in terms of

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 4>the actual role of energy investment and ownership and operation.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 4>They're expecting the private sector to drive this forwards, but

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>with the helping hand from government in various different ways,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>which we can talk about, and the Inflation Reduction Act

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 4>is obviously a very important example of that. So the

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 4>private sector is being expected to do it. The second

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>thing it's important to say by context is what the

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 4>private sector is being expected to do, and for the

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 4>most part, solar and wind are the key things that

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>the future, i guess is being hung on. So yes,

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 4>there will continue to be a role for things like

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 4>nuclear and hydro, and that will vary to different degrees

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>in different countries, but for the most part, we're kind

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 4>of betting the house on solar and wind. Coming to

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 4>our aid now, with those two bits of information said,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 4>the basic argument of the book is that in so

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 4>far as we're relying on a private sector, and in

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 4>so far as we're focusing on solar and wind, that's

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 4>a problem because solar and wind, and I'm not talking

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 4>here about the manufacturing side of it, I'm talking about

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 4>the deployment side. Building the solar and wind farms, owning them,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 4>selling the electricity they generate is a pretty uncertain and

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 4>actually relatively unattractive proposition in investment terms, and specifically in

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 4>terms of profitability. It's very volatile in profitability terms, and

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the returns are actually not great in general. And so

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 4>in so far as that's true, that's a problem because

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 4>we're relying on the private sector to do this, and

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 4>obviously the private sector is led by profit motivations, and

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 4>if it's not a great prospect in profit terms, then

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 4>we're in trouble.

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 3>So I want to get more into why solar and

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>wind might not be the best investment opportunity. But before

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.039
<v Speaker 3>we do, I feel like we need to define some

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 3>of your terms. And you make a big distinction between

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 3>price cost versus profit in the book. Can you maybe

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 3>explain that a little bit more, because I think a

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of people will hear the word profit and then

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>they'll hear a price cost and they'll be like, well,

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the difference between price and cost is the profit, and

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that those two things are interconnected. But you make a

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>very important distinction.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So I'm sure almost all your listeners will have

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 4>heard about one of the things that you guys were

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 4>talking about earlier, which is the fact that the cost

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 4>price of renewable energy, which is essentially the cost of

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>generating power through solar or wind, has come down hugely

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 4>over the past ten to fifteen years. In particular, it

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 4>has come down a lot, and you would imagine intuitively

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 4>that if the price of generating it comes down, then

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 4>the profit that can be obtained from selling it would

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 4>be going up, so that as the price comes down,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 4>it inherently becomes more profitable. But one of the arguments

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 4>I make in the book, I mean, in a way

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 4>the central argument is that for all sorts of interesting

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 4>and important reasons, they are kind of nerdy reasons. You

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 4>have to get into the thickets to understand them. That's

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 4>just absolutely not necessarily the case. There are all sorts

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 4>of reasons why A does not lead inevitably to B.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 4>And my argument is that the focus on price, the

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 4>focus both on the left and right in understanding these things,

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>relentlessly on this what's referred to as the levelized cost

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 4>of energy, and lots of people will have seen this

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 4>chart with the declining price. The focus on that has

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 4>been misleading when it comes to understanding the economics of renewables.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 4>And the argument is that we should be thinking on

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 4>specifically about profit because that's what drives investment decisions.

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Great, well, then let's get right into this. So there

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of solar firms in the US. There's

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 2>more and more installation happening all the time, like and

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 2>at a piece that many people would not have guessed.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 2>So a solar installation, even prior to the IRA was

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>deployed at a rate faster than expected there's still more

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the IRA maybe accelerating it at further before we even

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>get to the whole grander decarbonization thing. Tell us about

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a business model of a solar farm and why it's

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>not that great of a business.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, So I think the best way to approach

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 4>this is to think about what needs to be done

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 4>to get a solar wind farm development off the ground,

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 4>and there are basically three or four crucial things you

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 4>need to do. So the first of those is you

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 4>need the technology, right, so you need in the case

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 4>of wind, you need the turbines, in the case of solar,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 4>you need the solar sales and the solar modules. You

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 4>need the stuff that's going to help you to generate

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 4>the electricity. The second thing, and all of these are

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 4>really really important. The second thing is you need somewhere

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 4>to put it. So in the case of solar and

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 4>onshore wind, you need land, and you need lots of it,

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 4>which is a really important thing to understand. I would

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 4>say that as a geographer, but it's actually true that

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 4>you need lots and lots of land. And in the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 4>case of on shore, you can either lease that land

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 4>or you can buy that land. So land is the

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 4>second thing you need, or in the case of offshore wind,

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 4>you need rights to ocean and sea floor. Essentially that

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 4>gets auctioned off by the state, so that's the second

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>thing you need. Third thing you need typically is a

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 4>grid connection, So you need to be able to connect

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 4>your generating facility to the transmission grid in order that

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 4>that electricity that you produce can be delivered to the

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 4>entities that consume that electricity, households and businesses. There are

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 4>some exceptions to that, so some you get some off

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 4>grid developments that are literally connected directly to whoever it is,

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 4>might be a big corporation like a Google or something

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 4>that's going to consume that electricity. But in almost always

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 4>you need a connection to the grid. And then the

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 4>fourth and final thing, but actually by far the most

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 4>important thing. And I say that because if a project

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 4>is not going to proceed, if a project is going

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 4>to fall down, this is in the vast majority of

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 4>cases where it falls down, it's in not getting a

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 4>grid connection. It's not in not getting land, it's in

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 4>getting finance. And so this is the really important thing

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 4>to say, which is to say that I thought I

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 4>was writing a book about electricity and I did write

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 4>a book about electricity just as much it's a book

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 4>about finance. And so, whoever you are, whatever type of

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 4>renewable energy developer you are, you typically will be looking

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean it varies a bit across time and space,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 4>but typically you're looking to finance your development in large

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 4>part with debt. So somewhere between sixty and ninety percent

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 4>is the typical range that is debt rather than equity financed.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 4>And obviously the key thing to understand here is what

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 4>type of economic business this And again it's really really

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 4>important to understand this.

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 5>So with a sonar and wind.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Power plant rather than a conventional power plant, the key

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 4>economic characteristic of it is that essentially all the costs

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 4>getting curred up front, So you have your cost of

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 4>getting the grid connection, getting the land, buying the technology.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 4>But once it's up and running kind of free. You know,

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 4>occasionally a rotor will stop turning, you need to get

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 4>an engineer to come out with a screwdriver and get

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 4>the road to turning again, but basically it's free. So

0:11:57.960 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 4>well over ninety percent of the costs are incurd up

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 4>front that it's very different from a conventional power plant

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 4>where you're buying the gas or cold to keep the

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>power plant running. So if you let's put it this way,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>if you are a renewable energy developing and you've done

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 4>those first three things and now or you've got the

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 4>kit on order, and you now say, right, I need

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 4>to raise the finance. If you go to you and

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 4>you'll basically go to a bank and you'll say I

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 4>need two hundred million dollars to develop this solar farm,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 4>and your bank manager will say, okay, you know I

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 4>want to invest in green stuff. Green stuff's cool. I

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>definitely want to do that. How are you going to

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 4>pay that loan back? And how long is it going

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 4>to take you to pay it back? And you'll say, well,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe ten to twelve years. The kit will last for

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 4>thirty but hopefully within ten to twelve I'll be able

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 4>to pay it back and I'll pay you the interest

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 4>all the time. And the bank manager will look at

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>you and say, well that sounds great. How are you

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 4>going to make the money And you say, I'm going

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 4>to sell the electrics and they say what price you're

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 4>going to sell the electricity for? And you say, I

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 4>have absolutely no idea. And the reason you have no

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 4>idea is electricity price is unbelievably volatile in places where

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 4>you have deregulated electricity markets, which in the US isn't

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 4>about two thirds of the country by population, and they're

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 4>very volatile at all time scales, short, medium, and long

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 4>time scales.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 5>And here's the thing.

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Nobody can reliably predict wholesale electricity market prices a week,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 4>two weeks, let alone a month or a year or

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 4>five years in as the bank manager will say, well,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 4>I can't lend you that money because you have no

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 4>idea what the price you're going to be to sell

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 4>the electricity at. And so some mechanism has to be

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 4>found to stabilize those prices so that the bank manager

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 4>can be confident that you will be able to pay

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 4>that deep back. So that's the basic way the business works.

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Once you've raised the finance, you're off to the races.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So low returns, at least initially, coupled with the difficulty

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>of predicting how much you're going to sell the power

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 3>for or the volatility of electricity prices, yeah, I can

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 3>understand how that would be a bad mix if you're

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 3>a bank manager. This is something that has come up

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>before when We've spoken with Jiggershaw from the Department of Energy,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 3>the Loan Program's office there, where he talks about the

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>lack of expertise in banks when it comes to renewables,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and also just the reluctance to take on this particular

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 3>risk even when you have like many mandates both internally

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>and externally that are saying you should throw money at renewables.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of difficult to overcome. One of the reasons

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>we wanted to talk to you is because in your

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>book you do a lot of one on one interviews

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 3>with people in this industry, So I'm curious, can you

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.359
<v Speaker 3>tell us, like what bank managers say specifically about underwriting

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 3>this kind of risk. Are there any like particular stories

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>or anecdotes that stand out to you?

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 4>So, I think one of the things that came through

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 4>very clearly to me when I talk to people in

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 4>this business is that they want to invest in this space.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 4>And so I often hear people, you know, colleagues, a

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 4>man on the left who, like you know, esg is

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 4>all just greenwashing. I don't actually believe that. I think

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of people out there in the

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 4>industry who want to support these types of developments, and

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 4>there are also lots of renewable energy developers who are

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 4>actually maybe not the big guys like the Next Era

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 4>energies and the Black Rocks, but the smaller guys, and

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 4>there's tens of thousands of them out there, you know what,

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 4>They're actually prepared to take on the risk. In many

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 4>cases they're like, well, we will do this even if

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 4>the profit prospects are not necessarily great. And so it

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 4>tends not to be them that are making the decisions

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 4>not to invest if the profits don't look particularly appetizing.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 4>It's the financial institutions that are doing that. And of

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 4>course that makes sense. If you are advancing two hundred

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 4>million dollars that's not going to be paid back over

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 4>to ten to twelve years, you want to be very

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>very sure that you're going to get that money paid back,

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and so that they will emphasize relentlessly and repeatedly that

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 4>having some form of certainty over the price which the

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 4>electricity is going to be sold is the key thing.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Now here's where it gets really interesting, which is the

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 4>difference between the US and say Europe, Because the thing

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 4>about the way the US has approached this, which is

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 4>through renewables tax credits, both historically and with under the

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Inflation Reduction Act. They subsidize electricity investment and generation, but

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 4>they don't stabilize it. And now that's very different from

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the types of mechanisms that governments have typically used in Europe,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 4>which do both. So some people might have heard of

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 4>what are called feed in tariffs, which has been historically

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the main way in which this is supported in Europe,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 4>and in China historically as well, and in lots of

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 4>other countries India included, And what they do is essentially

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 4>the government itself or a government back dentity will provide

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 4>a long term contract of say twelve years to buy

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the electricity produced by a renewal developer at a fixed price.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 4>And the IRA doesn't do that. So what's really interesting

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 4>about the US is that tax credits are enough. So

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 4>you need tax credits plus something else.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>There is some guaranteed right in the Inflation Reduction it's

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>some like guaranteed something per kilo or.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 4>So that's a supplement, okay, to the market price. So yes,

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 4>you get a supplement, but if the market price is

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 4>in the toilet, you're still in the toilet, but just

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 4>less in the toilet, so to speak. And so in

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the US you need something else. And so there have

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 4>been two main things historically that do that, and that

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, talking to bank bank investors, this is what

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 4>they look for. So either there are some form of

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 4>financial hedging instrument so banks will do other parts of

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the same, or a different bank will provide swap or

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 4>futures contracts in order to synthetically stabilize the electricity price essentially,

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 4>or and again lots of listeners will have heard of these,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 4>particularly recently because they've been in the news a lot recently.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 4>It's what's called corporate power purchase agreements where instead of

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the generator having to sell their electricity into the volatile

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 4>spot market, but Google or an Amazon or a Microsoft

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 4>will come along and say, hey, we're going to build

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>a new data center. Because of everything that's going on

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 4>with AI, we want to secure as much of that

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 4>electricity in renewably as we can because it's good for

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 4>our pr Obviously that's the most the most important thing

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 4>for them, and so they will enter a direct agreement

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 4>of our purchase contract with the renewable developer and say, look,

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 4>if you build this facility, we commit to buying often

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 4>all your electricity, sometimes fifty percent of the electricity you generate,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 4>and we'll do that at a fixed price for the

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 4>next twelve years. And the renewables developer then takes that commitment,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 4>goes back to the bank and says, here's what you're

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 4>looking for, Now give me the money. And so they've

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 4>become a really important way of rendering renewables projects bankable.

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 2>I want to give back to some of these market

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 2>structure questions with electricity, but you know, you lay out

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a very compelling argument that in theory there are some

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 2>real problems that the way we deploy solar and wind,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and on the other hand, in practice we are deploying

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of stuff.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 5>We are so for all.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 2>These things, whether it's the uncertainty about the ultimate price

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>you get, the cost of land, the coins of interest rates,

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in practice there is a lot more and there's more

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 2>solar on the grid in California every day, and there's

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.239
<v Speaker 2>more battery stores to augment that solar, to deal with

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>some of the variability that naturally comes out of solar.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>So like, why is that not an undercutting point the

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>fact that, yes, in theory it shouldn't work, but in

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>practice it's getting built.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it is getting built, which is great. But

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 4>a it's getting built because the renewables industry globally remains

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 4>fundamentally buttressed by subsidy and support. So any way you

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 4>look in the world, where governments have tried to remove

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 4>those support mechanisms or even substantially attenuate them, investment collapses.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 4>So that's important to understand. And that's fine in a way.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, of course, the fossil fuel sectory is underwritten

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 4>by subsidy globally as well, so it's not like renewables

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 4>are alone in this. That's the first thing to say.

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 4>The second thing to say is that you know, I

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 4>often like in this to people who look at things

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 4>through a glass half full or a glass half empty, right,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 4>which is, you look at the pace of growth of

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 4>renewables investment, and you look at the pace of growth

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 4>of generation from renewables, and it's sharply upwards. Fantastic. However,

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 4>electricity generation from fossil fuels is also still going up,

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 4>so greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation are also going up.

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 4>So as I see it, it's very hard, it would

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 4>be very difficult and in my view, not really acceptable.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 4>To say we are succeeding while you know, twenty or

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 4>thirty years into this, in terms of renewables deployment, we

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 4>are still growing the amount of power we generate from

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 4>fossil fuels. So the basic point is that, yes, renewables

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 4>have been growing strongly, but that renewables growth has proven

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 4>purely supplemental too, rather than substitutive of fossil fuel generated power.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Just to go in sort of the opposite direction to

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Joe's question, but why not? I mean, if we recognize

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>that this isn't a particularly profitable business model, that private

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>capital is perhaps reluctant to underwrit and at the same

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 3>time we agree that decarbonization is an important goal for humanity,

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 3>then why not just nationalize everything?

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So that's kind of the argument that I'm broadly

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>sympathetic to. But as anyone who's read the book will know,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>what I don't do is come out with a kind

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 4>of full throated positing of that argument. And the reason

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 4>I do that is that I don't feel that I

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 4>know enough about how that might look to actually go

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 4>down that road. But it's definitely one argument that's out there.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that was kind of like central to the

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 4>original Green New Deal as it was articulated on both

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 4>sides of the Atlantic. So that's one possible argument. I mean,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 4>I think you've asked that question. I think it's actually

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 4>useful to kind of lay out what the possible kind

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 4>of routs out of this are as they are seen

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 4>by those who acknowledge that we have a problem. And

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 4>so the first and not surprising you, those different answers

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 4>are kind of associated with different constituencies, so that the

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 4>first of those is the argument that you get from

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 4>I guess what I would call orthodox energy economists, so

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 4>economists who are focused on energy and trained in the

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 4>neoclassical tradition, and their basic argument is that our reliance

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 4>on the private sector and markets to do this is

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 4>not the problem. The problem is that we haven't got

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 4>the market design right. So that's their argument, is that,

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 4>and it's always their argument, frankly, whatever, whether you're talking

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 4>about energy or anything else. But the basic argument there

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 4>is that the problems not markets. The problem is that

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 4>we haven't got the markets right, and we need more

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 4>markets or better markets are optimized markets. And actually I

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 4>have some tympathy to that argument because what they say,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 4>and they're right is that, look, the types of markets

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 4>that we have now for the trading of electricity, whether

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the wholesale and or retail, are ones that were designed

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 4>in and for a fossil fuel world, and actually those

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 4>markets remain largely unreformed, which is true. So they say

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 4>we need to rethink markets and optimize them for the

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 4>new mix of electricity sources that we're living. Fair enough, However,

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 4>you look at any specific design that has been suggested,

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 4>and all of them have their own drawbacks as well

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 4>as potential advantages. So I am sympathetic to that argument,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 4>but not convinced by it. The second argument is the

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 4>one you hear from industry, who they agree with the

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 4>mainstream economists that the problem is not that we're relying

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 4>on the private sector of markets. But what they say

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>is the existing market design's fine, we just need more subsidy.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 4>And so that's kind of how you end up with

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 4>the Inflation Reduction Act, which is for several years now,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 4>the industry's been telling the administration, look, you've been reducing

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 4>these subsidies over time, which is what had been happening

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 4>in the US. You can see the results of that

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 4>investment is beginning to stagnate, the rates of growth are

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 4>not good enough. You need to bump up those subsidies again,

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and that's what happened with the Inflation Reduction Act. Now, unfortunately,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 4>at the same time as that was happening, you had

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 4>increases in supply chain and you had increases in financing costs.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 4>So there's a very open question as to whether the

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 4>I array is enough. Maybe it needs to be even more.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 4>But that's basically the industry's answer. Everything's fine, but just

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 4>more subsidy so that returns go up from say five

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 4>to eight percent, which is where they're typically at now,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 4>to ten plus percent, and eventually to a point where

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 4>and here's the key thing, maybe even the big fossil

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 4>fuel companies might begin to get interested if returns in

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 4>renewables get closer to the kind of fifteen plus percent

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 4>that they're used to in their upstream oil and gas business.

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 4>But right now, of course, they're not interested to million

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 4>miles away from the types of returns they're used to.

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 4>So that's the second answer, more subsidy, more support, and

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm not unsympathetic to that argument either. The third answer

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 4>is the one where you where you started, Tracy, which

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 4>is the answer you typically hear from large parts of

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 4>the left, which is to say, look, we've tried the

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 4>private sector in markets. That's what we've been doing for

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five years. It's still not working. And I've

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 4>explained why. I think that's absolutely true. Even though the

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 4>industry is completely buttressed by subsidy internationally, and even though

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 4>the costs of generation have come down as much as

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 4>they have so something there is telling us that maybe

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 4>that's not the right approach after all, and therefore we

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 4>should try the kind of massive public sector financing ownership operation.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 4>And again I'm sympathetic to that argument too. However, one

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 4>thing I would say about this, and I think this is,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, arguably to my mind, the most important thing

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I can say, which is that you know, the credibility

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 4>of that argument depends massively in what part of the

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 4>world you're talking about. I mean, I know there's lots

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 4>of kind of concerns about levels of public debt in

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 4>various rich countries around the world, including the US, UK,

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Germany and so on and so forth. But at least

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>in those countries, it remains the case that the state

0:25:54.200 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 4>could conceivably borrow to invest in revenue generating things, which

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 4>is what renewable assets are at a reasonable rate, probably

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 4>even cheaper than the private sector without being massively punished

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 4>by by the bomb market. But now if you are

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 4>a government in a very very poor country with you know,

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 4>crippling levels of debt, servicing obligations as it is, then

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 4>frankly their idea of a kind of a big green

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 4>state investing in and owning in those that is is

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>very very far fetched.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 2>And this is where all the demand's coming from for electricity.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 2>These un rigual.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 4>And this is that, you know, when we were sitting

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 4>in New York and where I'm based in Europe, we

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 4>often think kind of a bit too much about those

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 4>parts of the world. But frankly, if you think about

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 4>the power sector and the future of greenhouse gas emissions

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 4>and the future of the planet, frankly, what happens in

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 4>North America and Europe is not completely incidental, but it's

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 4>almost incidental to future emissions tractories. And there are two

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 4>reasons for that this is really important. First is that

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 4>actually large parts of the Europe and of the global

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 4>North in general are actually quite far down the decarbonization

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 4>path of the power sexual already where I am in Sweden,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.959
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent of electricity is generated carbon free. But there

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 4>are other parts of the world where power generation remains

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 4>hugely dependent on fossiphyr. South Africa ninety percent is coal,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 4>India seventy five percent coal, China sixty five percent coal.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 4>A those are the parts of the world where future

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 4>growth in energy consumption is expected to be concentrated as

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 4>you get further urbanization and industrialization and modernization and b

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 4>China arguably accepted. But those are the parts of the

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 4>world where the financial challenges our greatest.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>So Tracy asked you the question of Okay, why not nationalized?

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.719
<v Speaker 2>But there's another solution, the theoretically or another answer, which is,

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 2>if we accept the premise that, whether it's through subsidies

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 2>or direct ownership or whatever, that the government balance sheet

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 2>should play a much bigger role in this, why not

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>skip solar and wind and just do what France did

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>and build a ton of nuclear. And it's like, maybe

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>the French nuclear plants like didn't end up being that

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>economical and I think they had some excess or whatever,

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>but they have a what eighty percent decarbonized grid. They're

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the nuclear So if we're going to spend all the

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 2>money when I just skip the solar and wind and

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 2>just build more nuclear plants.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, you know, I again, that's an argument

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm sympathetic to. France is the great example of that,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 4>and certainly there are lots of very compelling voices out

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 4>there who argue exactly that. I think probably the Breakthrough

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Institute here in the US would be one of the

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 4>best examples of that, And I personally don't take a

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 4>particular position on that. I'm not sitting here saying we

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 4>should focus exclusively or even larger and renewables. The reason

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 4>I focus on renewables in the book, just it's worth

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 4>spelling that out, is that that's what the world is doing.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 4>So yes, I think there's been a of a mini

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>nuclear renaissance in the last couple of years.

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Certainly a lot of podcasts about it.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you know, I think the likelihood if you

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 4>look at what governments are doing around the world is

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 4>that nuclears so nuclear is currently at about ten percent

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 4>overall of global electric electricity generation. There might go up

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 4>a bit, but it's not where the focus is. But

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 4>you're right, it could be where more of the focus is.

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that the reason. I think there's

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.479
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of reasons why that's not where the focus

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 4>is in most countries. So one is cost. It definitely is,

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 4>and so you look at those levelized cost charts, and yes,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 4>while the cost of generating electricity from renewables is now

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 4>comparable too and in some places lower than from colon

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 4>elateral gas, nuclear is a lot more expensive, and a

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of that's due to regulatory costs, So partly it's cost.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 4>I think the second thing is timescale. So once you've

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 4>got the grid permits and so on all sorted out

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 4>and the financing, you can put up a solo farmer

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 4>or an onshore wind farm in six to twelve months.

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 4>It's really quick. Nuclear is not quick. Nuclear is like

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 4>five to ten years at best, and everything's kind of

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 4>urgent now. So I think that's the second reason for

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 4>the focus on renews. And then the third one is

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 4>just is public perception. Despite the fact that nuclear is

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 4>very very safe statistically, it's still represents something somewhat forbidding

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 4>in the public consciousness in many parts of the world,

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 4>and Germany is obviously the best example of that.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Since we're talking about things that could possibly work. You know,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned power purchase contracts earlier, and we've seen so

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 3>many headlines recently about big tech companies, players and AI

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 3>teaming up in one way or another with energy companies

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to secure power and make those big off take agreements.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that something that like maybe could be helpful here

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 3>by providing you know, there is a lot of money

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 3>flowing into AI. I'm not entirely sure whether or not

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 3>that business is very profitable yet, but there's certainly a

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of enthusiasm for it in the market. Could you

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe borrow from the AI world some of that enthusiasm,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the promise of profitability perhaps and use that to funnel

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 3>more money into renewable energy.

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think it has been and will

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 4>continue to play a really important role. And as I said,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 4>the key thing here is that the agreements from the

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 4>big AI developers, the big the Amazons and so on

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 4>are what enable a lot of renewables projects to get

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 4>off the ground that might not otherwise get off the

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 4>ground because they're offering long term fixed prices. And actually,

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 4>if you read what a lot of policymakers have been saying,

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 4>not just in the last few months, but actually the

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 4>last few years, they in many cases regard those power

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 4>purchase agreements as kind of an almost an alternative to

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 4>government subsidy and government support.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 5>So the argument there is that.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 4>The market will perform the role that governments have historically

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 4>by rendering projects bankable through those power purchase agreements. And

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I think all I would say about that is two things.

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 4>So the first is that it will play a role,

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 4>and it is play a role, and it will continue

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 4>to play a role, but it's a limited role. So

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 4>it will help with bankability to a certain extent, but

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>it will only ever do that in a limited way

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 4>because there are unfortunately only a kind of limited number

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 4>of credible off takers out there who can perform that

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 4>role of providing bankability. So if Amazon comes along and

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 4>says we'll buy your power for twelve years, the bank

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 4>behind the renewable developer will be like, fine, we're pretty

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 4>confident Amazon is going to still be in business in

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 4>twelve years and it's going to honor that agreement. But

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 4>most other types of entities that might try to do

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 4>that then they're not considered credible enough, So there's only

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 4>limited market out there. The second thing flows from that,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 4>which is that because there's only a limited number of

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 4>players out there, they have a lot of power in

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 4>this market. So the Amazons and the Googles and code

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 4>because there aren't that many of them, when they negotiate

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 4>with renewed boost developers the price at which they will

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 4>buy that electricity for the next twelve years, they have

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 4>all the leverage. There's thousands of developers scurrying around to

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 4>get this sort after contract from an Amazon, and Amazon says, okay,

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 4>we'll we'll exploit that and we'll push down the agreed

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 4>power price, limiting renewables developers profits.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting. So, by the way, we're recording

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>this May seventh, just six days ago May first, Microsoft

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>in Brookfield signing the biggest ever clean power deal. It's

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>going to be like a ten point five billion dollar deal.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So one of these massive agreements. But I think actually

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 2>now thinking about it, it actually speaks to the point

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that if you want renewables, whether it's the government or

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a private company, what's important is that guaranteed.

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Off take one hundred percent.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so in a way it almost like, yes,

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 2>technically this is a market arrangement, but as you noted,

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 2>there's probably a lot of pr or maybe sort of

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>ESG requirements that encourage them, so in a way, it

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 2>still sort of backstops the basic loge of the government

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 2>needing to be either the buyer or the price center.

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Per So, just going back to the financing side of things,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 3>So one thing that we've seen in Europe in particular

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 3>is an effort to maybe tweak regulatory capital requirements for

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 3>environmentally friendly or renewable energy related financing. I'd love to

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 3>get your views on the efficacy of that. And then secondly,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 3>my understanding is that as part of the IRA money

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, I mentioned Jiggershaw and the DOE earlier and

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>their loan Program's office, a lot of what they're doing

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 3>is extending financing in lieu of the banks. So trying

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 3>to get over that hurdle of if you are a

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 3>loan officer at a large bank, you do not want

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 3>to underwrite this particular business because of the combination of

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 3>low returns and volatility difficult to forecast electricity prices. So

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 3>how how effective are those types of policies like attacking

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 3>it from the financing set.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that has been and almost certainly

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 4>will continue to be a really a really important way

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 4>of attacking it to you know, to use your word

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 4>and I think, you know, probably probably the best example

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 4>of that right now is China. So if you look

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 4>at what's been happening in China, so about a year

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 4>or two ago, I can't remember the exact details, China

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 4>actually withdrew a lot of the legacy mechanisms for subsidizing

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 4>renewables development in China, which which feed in tariffs. At

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 4>least it's centric, it's at least the feeding tarifts provided Beijing.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 4>And there was lots of concern at that time that

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 4>renewables investment would collapse in China. Obviously didn't happen, and

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 4>one of the main reasons that it didn't happen is

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 4>that the Chinese Central Bank now plays a really really

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 4>important role in subsidizing the capital cost for renewables development.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>By I mean it does it indirectly rather than directly,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 4>so it basically provides a capital subsidy to the lenders

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 4>who then lend directly to the renewables developers, and it's

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 4>doing that on a massive scale. So that's exactly the

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 4>type of thing you're talking about. And of course the

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 4>other sorts of entities that are doing this in a

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 4>really big scale, but on a scale which is not

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 4>remotely big enough is the big development finance institutions. Because

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 4>and here's the thing, right, if finance is the big obstacle,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 4>or one of the big obstacles, which I think it

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 4>clearly is that obstacle is far greater in the global South,

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 4>where the perception of risk among private lenders is so

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 4>much higher. So instead of lending at say four or

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 4>five percent, which they might have been doing in recent years,

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 4>in the global North, they will be lending at twelve

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 4>to fifteen percent, which means that projects have no chance

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 4>of getting off the ground unless a development finance institution,

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 4>a World Bank, or some philanthropic financier comes in and says,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 4>we will effectively subsidize that finance in some way, you know,

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 4>And that's what you know, lots of listeners will have

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 4>heard about blended finance and all these sorts of thing.

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 4>That's what's going on there is that essentially, in order

0:36:59.920 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 4>to bring private capital to the table, some sort of

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 4>either public capital or quasi public capital also has to

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 4>come to the table, essentially to subsidize that private capital

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.439
<v Speaker 4>and to make things attractive in profitability terms for them.

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 4>So I think finance has to and will continue to

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 4>play a huge role in this. And it's interesting that

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 4>China is doing that, you know, much more effectively and

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 4>aggressively than the rest of the world.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Sweden where you live now, I see coined

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the various websites and clicking on somewhere between seventy and

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 2>ninety five percent, depending on how measure renewables. How did

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>they get there?

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Two main answers to that. So it's not primarily a

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 4>solar and wind story, not as it only a primary

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 4>solar story. Not surprisingly hydro, oh, very good hydro resources, however,

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 4>also nuclear. So hydro is about thirty percent of electricity

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 4>production in Sweden, much high in Norway, and nuclear is

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 4>about thirty percent.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>We aren't damns. I love hope, I love dams. And

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 2>there used to be, seriously, there used to be a

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 2>time in this country in which I was reading one

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 2>of those books. You know, we're like the Bureau of

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Land Management and the Army Corps of Engineer like competing

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 2>against each other just so you could build more dams.

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Is there more room for hydro?

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's so. The reason I mean This goes

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 4>back to what we were going about nuclear. The reason I

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 4>think that the world is not expecting massive growth in

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 4>hydro in the future, and as instead is kind of

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 4>betting the house on so and when a primarily twofold

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 4>or threefold one is the time thing light nuclear takes

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 4>a heck of a long time. Second thing is that

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 4>and again I think lots of people will be aware

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of this, but the negative social in many cases environmental

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 4>implications of damn development, you know, displacing hundreds of thousands

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of people have become more obvious and more problematic in

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 4>large parts of the world. That's the second the second

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 4>thing I think, and the third thing is that, as

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I understand, a lot of the kind of low hanging

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 4>fruit in terms of hydro development has already been kind

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 4>of plucked, and actually literally the geophysical potential for it

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 4>is more constrained than it was, you know, twenty or

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 4>thirsty years ago.

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I have just one more question, which is you know,

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 3>reading your book, you're very explicit about what the goal

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>of it is, and you know it's focused on solar

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>and wind. It's about explaining why the business model doesn't

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 3>really work. It's not about policy prescriptions, and you make

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 3>that very clear. What's your next book? Is it a

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 3>continuation two.

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Books a year? Yeah? Well, yeah, I've been I've been

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 4>quite productive recently. I'm going to give the honest answer

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 4>to that question. I have no idea. However, I moved

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 4>recently within Upside University to an Institute of Housing and

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 4>Urban Research, and I've done a lot of work historically

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 4>on housing stuff, and I'm pretty sure that moving back

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 4>towards house, you know, another area where the world is nothing,

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 4>if not in crisis, is probably going to be what

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm focusing on going forward.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you could do a history of nimbiism and nuclear

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 3>power plants on no. I think that'd be interesting, you

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 3>could tie the two together.

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 2>We definitely will have you back for a housing episode

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 2>because there's never enough demand for housing.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 5>And I have one last question.

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 2>So it's just a theory that I have and if

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you think it's complete nonsense, then feel free to shoot

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 2>it down. But you mentioned that the world has made

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>this bed on solar and wind, that these are the

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 2>two war courses that we expect for decarbonization. But it

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>raises the question of why there's it nuclear as a

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 2>part of the story the environmental movement. In my lifetime,

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>when I was younger, the environmental movement meant like literal

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 2>green forests and preservation and conservation and clean water, et cetera.

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And today the environmental movement is almost synonymous with climate,

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>although there's still other issues. Is it like a solar

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and wind or bucolic and we associate it with just

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 2>green because get under you from sun and the wind?

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Like it sounds, Is that like, explain in part why

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 2>there is so much attachment to these forms of energy.

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know a definitive answer to.

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 5>That right people's minds, but I would be.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 4>Astonished if that's not at least partly true. I think

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 4>that for sure that must be partly true, the idea

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 4>that you can that there's this kind of free resource

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 4>that you can capture cleanly in a way that doesn't

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 4>have any at least any downstream environmental implications. There are

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 4>certainly upstream implications in terms of you know, the copper

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 4>and the lithium and everything.

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 3>That is needed and the whales. To go back to

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 3>nineties environmentalism and the wind power generations.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, but no, for sure it fits with that

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of bucolic image, which is still part of the

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 4>environmental movement broadly conceived absolutely.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Bred Christopherus, thank you so much for coming on our block.

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating conversation.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for having me, Tracy.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed that conversation. It was nice to hear

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>like the sort of like yeah, just like a very

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 2>clear spelling out of what the sort of like financial

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and just other constraints are to further expansion of the production.

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that's right. I think intuitively, a lot of

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 3>people have the sense that the current model isn't necessarily

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 3>working because of the reason that you mentioned in the intro.

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, like cost of producing renewable energy is going down,

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 3>but like the rates for people aren't necessarily going down

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 3>as much, and it still feels like a lot of

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 3>the burden of investment is on electricity users versus like

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the investors. So I think intuitively it feels like it

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of encapsulates that tension. I did find it really

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 3>interesting the emphasis on off take yes and having a

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 3>reliable source of demand, because this seems to be a

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 3>key difference between the US model and some European models,

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 3>and also it seems to be a thing where we

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 3>are seeing some momentum in terms of the IRA, you

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 3>know a little bit, not that much, but also in

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 3>terms of private players, like say a Microsoft who wants

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 3>to strike a big deal to take renewable energy from

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 3>an energy company and like underwrite that investment permanently into

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the future. That's kind of interesting.

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I agree, And I think that was like a light

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 2>bulb moment for me because you know, we've talked to Jiggershawn.

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Jiggershaw talks a lot about off take and the need

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 2>for this, but that basically that, yes, if Microsoft and

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 2>Brookfield do a deal, that is two market players coming

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to a free market agreement. But it sort of validates

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the underlying logic. And Microsoft isn't going to pay for

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 2>more energy than it consumes. It's not going to pay

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 2>for other people's energy, so that it sort of validates

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 2>this underlying logic, which is if you want to not

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 2>just ad solar but actually add renewables to the scale

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 2>that you can then cut back on fossil fuels based

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 2>energy that you actually need to like that off take

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 2>has to be part of it, you know, across the space.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that was interesting, and I think we're

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna do another episode on electricity market soon is you know.

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Brett described why the volatility of electricity markets hamper renewables

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 2>because you're the price is so uncertain, et cetera. The

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:29.320
<v Speaker 2>nuclear people don't like electricity markets either, and their argument

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.319
<v Speaker 2>is like, well, we have such big costs and it's

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 2>so difficult to turn on and turn off nuclear. It's

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 2>not like other forms like gas that during these periods

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 2>when everything is cheap, we lose a lot of money.

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>And so it feels like there are a lot of

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 2>players that find electricity markets to be not conducive to

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the best energy system.

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, we should do a episode on the

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 3>history of unbundling of energy.

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I think I think we may have one in the work.

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, excellent, because I still don't underst down how

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 3>it happens.

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I think we may even be recording one

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow for Thursday.

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, there's an insight into the Odlots prep process where

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anything about what we're going to talk

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 3>about until the day of Okay, shall we leave it there.

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.879
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Audlots podcast. I'm

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Check out the book of our guest Brett Christopher's The

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Price Is Wrong Why Capitalism Won't Save the Planet, put

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 2>out by Verso Books at Verso Books. Follow our producers

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Carmen Rodriguez at Carman Ermann dash, Ol Bennett at Dashbot

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and Kilbrooks at Keilbrooks. Thank you to our producer Moses On.

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>For more Oddlots content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 2>odd Lots. We have transcripts, a blog, and a newsletter,

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and you can chat about all of these topics twenty

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>four to seven in the discord where we have an

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>energy room and a climate room Discord dot gg slash

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>odd lots. You can talk about it with fellow listeners,

0:45:58.400 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and if.

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 3>You enjoy addlots, if you want us to do that

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 3>history of energy market unbundling, which it sounds like we're

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 3>going to do anyway, but please leave us a positive review,

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 3>nevertheless on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 3>are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 3>our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to do

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 3>is connect your Bloomberg account with Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.