WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Visa Lawsuit, Climate Week

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul Sweeny.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 4>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 3>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 5>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 4>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinehl and Paulsweeny on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele and I'm Bailey Lepschotz filling in for

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 4>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 4>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 4>It is Climate Week, and today we look at how

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 4>oil and gas are playing into the energy transition.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Plus we'll discuss how the resulting emissions from wildfires are

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>threatening to make global warming worse.

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 4>But first we dive into that anti trust space. This week,

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 4>the US Justice Department suit the world's second largest card

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 4>payment organization, Visa, over an anti trust matter.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 3>The case was filed in federal court in Manhattan on

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday or tild. The US Anti trust enforces have been

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>preparing a case accusing Visa of taking steps to keep

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>rivals from challenging its dominance in the debit card market.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 6>And for more.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Guest host Jess Menton and I were joined by Justin Teresi,

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence, Anti trust litigation and policy analysts. We first

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>asked Justin whether this week's news surprised him at all.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 7>The following itself wasn't too surprising. We know that DOJ

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 7>opened an investigation in twenty twenty one related to Visa

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 7>and its deepit card practices, so we thought something might

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 7>be coming. The timing before the election makes sense, we'd

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 7>see it now rather than later on this year. The

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 7>complaint itself, it seems fairly strong, as the Attorney General

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 7>said in his press conference. Basically, they're alleging that after

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.559
<v Speaker 7>Dodd Frank and rules came into place about being able

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 7>to route debit transactions over more than one network. Visa

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 7>entered a series of contracts with merchants and banks that

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 7>allowed it to favor its own network over those of

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 7>its competitors. Seems like some true antitrust activity here that

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 7>DOJ's alleging.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>When you're thinking about and especially when you were talking

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about the current administration and the election coming up, do

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you think a new administration would be able to potentially

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>amend a settlement here.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 7>There's a couple of things to consider here, the first

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 7>being that is that this is not Visa's first time

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 7>at the antitrust.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 8>Rodeo, if you will.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 7>The company was back in two thousand and one when

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 7>it was still linked together with MasterCard before I went public,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 7>and that case ended in a settlement. In twenty ten,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 7>there was a similar anti trust suit related to credit

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 7>card fees. That case also ed in a settlement. So

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 7>there is some history here of these cases tending to settle,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 7>and while there or not a new administration might be

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 7>amenable to that, it really remains to be seen. But

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 7>I think settlement is certainly something that's on the table.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 7>And important to remember in all of this too, is

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 7>that the DOJ is really after some behavioral changes with

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 7>regard to these agreements. Right, We're not talking about some

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 7>kind of a structural change in Visa as a result

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 7>of this litigation most likely.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 4>Right, So then what does that look like? So they

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 4>can't pay Apple anymore, et cetera. So Apple loses money,

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 4>and then what does Visa do?

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, it's it's a really a great question,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 7>and I think one that that really goes to the

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 7>heart of Visa's debit business here. You know, DJ is

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 7>alleging that as a result of one hundred and eighty

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 7>of the largest of these contracts that Visa has, they've

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 7>been able to shield themselves from competition on seventy five

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 7>percent of the debit volume that's going through its network.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 7>So this is a big money maker for Visa. It's

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 7>something to really keep our eye on here because it

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 7>could result in a chalk of its business going away

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 7>if these contracts were to also go away. So that's

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 7>really I think what we have to scratch our heads

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 7>a bad and wonder you know, is that the ultimate

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 7>remedy that we see from DJ.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 8>But lots of time too, you know.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 7>Give you an example the Google Search case from filing

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 7>to trial that was a three year time span before

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 7>we got there, So this is going to be something

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 7>that's around for quite a while.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there any way that Visa could argue that the

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>complaint fails to account for increasing competition from alternative payment

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>methods if you're thinking about account to account transfers.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and I think that's exactly where we could see

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 7>Visa go in its motion to dismiss arguments or later

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 7>on down the line. You're right, we're seeing this increase

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 7>in competition from things like Venmo or cash app, right,

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 7>But the complaint is basically alleging that those forums haven't

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 7>been able to scale up to be as large as

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 7>they really could be because of deals.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 8>They have with Visa.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 7>But you know, the reality is, as you and I

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 7>both know, folks are using those platforms and the marketplace

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 7>is changing.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's probably going to.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 7>Be part of parish parcel to what we see VISA

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 7>saying in its defense here.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 4>How long does something like this take, particularly as Jess

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 4>was pointing out, we might have a change in administration.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, again, you know, really these slow moving cases here,

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.119
<v Speaker 7>I think we really this is going to be something

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 7>that's around, I would say, for the next two or

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:05.559
<v Speaker 7>three years.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 8>At a minimum, we're going to get through a ton

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 8>of motion.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 7>To dismiss practice next year likely get over that and

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 7>find ourselves in a discovery phase.

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 4>So, so is this like an overhang on the stock

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 4>then until then?

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 7>I would say so, I mean, you know, how the

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 7>stock reacts is how the stock reacts, but the overhang

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 7>is something that it is a long term risk.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 8>I would say that's absolutely accurate.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>In what ways do you think it would impact visus

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>earnings and revenue outlook?

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 7>Again, you know, I think we really have to go

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 7>to the heart of the question here with you know,

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 7>the actual percentage of debit transactions that Visa has been

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 7>able to shield itself from competition on. Again, the complaint

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 7>if it's correct, and again you know, the government's best

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 7>day is always the day they file their complaint because

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 7>no one's really responded to it yet. But if the

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 7>government's correct that Visas shield itself from competition on seventy

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 7>five percent of its transactions from these largest contracts, that's

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 7>a significant part of visas actual debit revenue. So that

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 7>I think is where the concern is coming in. You know,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 7>it really goes the heart of Visa's debit business, and

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 7>we'll have to see what plays out over the next

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 7>couple of years here with regard to possible remedies or

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 7>a settlement.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Justin Teresi, Bloomberg Intelligence, Anti trust, litigation

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and policy analyst.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 4>One story from the Bloomberg terminal this week that caught

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 4>our eye was about.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Colleges skyrocketing tuition costs. COVID and fewer high school graduates

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>have been straining the survival of smaller American colleges, leading

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 3>many to shut down. Now some are joining a surprising

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>path mergers and acquisitions.

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 4>Northeastern University, once known as a Boston commuter school, has

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 4>even formed a dedicated mergers and acquisitions team with the

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 4>mission of getting big in a hurry.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>It's the subject of a Bloomberg Big Take story titled

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>a college taps Wall Street playbook to rival Ivy's on admissions.

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Guests host Jess Menton and I were joined by one

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 4>of the authors, Francesca Maglioni, Bloomberg Personal Finance and Higher

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 4>education reporter and mean first asked Francesca to walk us

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 4>through the legs of the story.

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 9>Northeastern University has been known for years as a commuter

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.799
<v Speaker 9>school mostly attended by low students, and since twenty eleven

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 9>they've kind of been expanding their brand. They now have

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 9>fourteen campuses across the world, with three campuses abroad. What

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 9>we thought was interesting is that since twenty nineteen they've

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 9>been buying up other struggling schools, kind of tapping in

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 9>that private equity playbook and get M and A. Yeah,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 9>like they've been merging with They've merged with three different

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 9>schools so far and kind of embedded the North Eastern

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 9>brand on these schools and now can offer to students like, hey,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 9>you can study for a semester in California, you can

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 9>do a semester in New York. And this is very

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 9>different from those schools like Princeton and Harvard, which just

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 9>want to stay small and delete. They want to expand

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 9>their brand as much as they can.

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Because there's a lot of schools, especially in the South

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>where I'm from, where you had a lot of magnet

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>schools and then satellite schools, whether it was like the

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>University of Texas or Texas A and M, so you'd

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have not just the main campuses, say in Austin, Texas,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you had ones in say Dallas and outside of that.

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering is this is there a particular playbook

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to kind of like the M and

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a type of feel it comes to something like this,

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>or is there different not apples and apples.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 6>I guess yeah, I guess.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 9>What's interesting with the Northeastern is that High D is

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 9>going through a very hard time. There's a lot of

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 9>smaller schools that are closing all over the US, and

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 9>so Northeastern is growing at a time when all these

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 9>other colleges are shrinking. Colleges are competing for students. The

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 9>number of students across the US is going to drop

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 9>by ten percent, the number of students going to college.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So why what's the driver there?

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 6>It's just a demographic cliff and.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The costs and it's.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Extremely expensive as well.

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 9>COVID was really bad for the college enrollment numbers as well.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 9>And so Northeastern is kind of growing at a time

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 9>when all these other schools are shrinking. And when looking

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 9>for schools, they want valuable real estate. The latest acquisition

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 9>that they have is in New York. Now they have

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 9>three buildings in Manhattan.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Do they buy Marymount or was this part of yes,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 4>they don't call it buying because still has its own brand.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 9>They just like swallow their liabilities and their assets. There's

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 9>no exchange of money that changes hands.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 10>Interesting, is it working?

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 4>Like yeah, is this playbook actually helping Northeastern?

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's working.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 9>Northeastern last year had almost one hundred thousand students apply

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 9>to their university. They've seen their enrollment increase by fifteen

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 9>percent since twenty nineteen, and they've gone from being just

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 9>a local, little known brand to being known worldwide.

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>But part of the college thing is like the experience, right,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Like you go there and you live there, like maybe

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 4>you take a semester abroad or something, but like you

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 4>stay there and it feels a little weird and disjointed,

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 4>and then all of a sudden be like you're here,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 4>and then you're there, and then you're there.

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, for sure.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 9>That's one of the things that Northeastern will say is

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 9>changing within higher ed and that's why they've been successful

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 9>in this moment. They think that students no longer or

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 9>some students no longer want to, you know, spend four

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 9>years in one place with a small community, and they're

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 9>looking to get new experiences and be more practical in

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 9>terms of their four years. How can this translate into

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 9>career after college and things like that.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 6>So that's another way that they're different from other colleges.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Are there other potential universities or colleges that are eyeing

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this type of model and they may try to do

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and replicate something similar.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, for sure.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 9>Northeastern's told us that they've heard from almost fifty schools

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 9>that have reached out, kind of interested and either merging

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 9>with them or learning about their business model. We saw

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 9>that Vanderbilt has now a campus in Florida that's kind

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 9>of a school that's trying to do something a little similar,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 9>not at the scale that Northeastern is doing it, but

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of schools watching what they're doing right now.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so is what they're doing also, though different from

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 4>that Marymount thing, Like I can still go to Marymount here,

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 4>say in New York City versus Northeastern, and then I

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 4>go spend a semester in California.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so Marymount is part of their whole plan. Okay,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 6>so that is part Right now.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 9>They're still Marymount because the merger was just announced, but

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 9>eventually it'll be Marymount at Northeastern or whatever brand they

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 9>decide to go with ye.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 4>So then I can go to Northeastern and then be

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 4>like I'm gonna spend a year in New York going

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 4>in to Marymount, yes Hice, Okay, yeah, yeah, that's just

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 4>so interesting. It's just a different college experience when like

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 4>I would think that you go to college, you learn

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 4>how to like be by yourself, do launder by yourself,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 4>get your debt by yourself, beer by yourself, and then

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 4>like that's it, not like jet setting off to different locations.

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Francesca Maglioni, Bloomberg Personal Finance and Higher

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Education reporter.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Coming up a conversation with Robbie men In, Singapore's Climate

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Action Ambassador on sustainable financing in Southeast Asia.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 3>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 3>b I go on the terminal. I'm Baby Lipschals and.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 4>I'm Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Playing and

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts are what just Live on YouTube.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele and I'm Baby Liftals filling in for

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeny.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg BNEF previously

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 4>known as New Energy Finance. They're the team at Bloomberg

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 4>that tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 4>and agricultural sectors.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 3>This week, we looked at how oil and gas play

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 3>into the energy transition.

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Guest host Normal Linda and I were joined by David Doherty,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 4>head of Oil and Renewables Fuels Research, and we first

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>asked him to discuss some of the trends that he's

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 4>noticed over the past year.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 12>I mean, if you think of the players in the

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 12>oil market, they're the energy pros in the world, right.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 12>They've got the balance sheet, they've got the skills, they've

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 12>got the technology, and they're already established, right, so they've

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 12>got interest in seeing how this develops, how fast it goes,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 12>how it impacts their bottom line.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 10>Basically, what are the main hold ups in terms of

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 10>the transition, What are some of the headwinds.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 12>I mean, capital is obviously raising capital smarts people in

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 12>the right jobs in the right place, push back both

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 12>political and from people.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 12>People love the idea, but as soon as it costs money,

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 12>that's quite a difficult to swallow, especially now in like

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 12>inflationary times.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Right, is the conversation that evs will eventually supplant internal

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 4>combustion engines and get rid of gas demand. Is that

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 4>still something that you guys are working with in modeling

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 4>or has that conversation evolved?

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 12>It's evolved, I mean that is kind of the trend though. Yeah,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 12>when you look at things when they're cheaper upfront, right,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 12>consumers tend to shift towards that. If it's cheaper day

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 12>one for buying an EV versus an internal combustion engine car,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 12>and all else is equally, you're probably going to see

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 12>a shift towards that.

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 4>So we're really though US centric here and we don't

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 4>see that in the same way.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 10>But elsewhere, is that truly what's happening?

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you are.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 12>You're seeing a big uptick in Europe and in China

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 12>for example, and even here in the US California for example,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 12>behave it's much more like a European economy. When we

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 12>think about the transition to evs, we've seen really high

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 12>rates of penetration there.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 10>What are some of the main themes in market dynamics

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 10>that your team is focused on right now?

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Like, the rate of this change is interesting. What's

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 12>happening in different markets? What responses. If you take the

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 12>US for example, it's a it's a mature market. So

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 12>when these evs come into the market, you're seeing a

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 12>decline in gasoline sales versus saying in China where it's

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 12>like what could have been doesn't necessarily manifest, right, So

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 12>that turns into then power in your pocket. Right, You're

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 12>seeing the cost of gasoline isn't coming down even though

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 12>you're expecting it to a less gasoline being consumed. There's

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 12>so many more dynamics in just a four wheels on

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 12>the road situation, right, And.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 10>How are all these things impacting the consumer?

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, if you think about costs in your

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 12>pocket when it comes to driving your card, that's a

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 12>big thing, particularly here in the US, particularly in an

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 12>election year. You know, it trickles down into inflation. You

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 12>get something delivered to your house, the cost of diesel

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 12>impacts all of these things, so your consumers are super

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 12>sensitive of anything to do a cost at the moment,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 12>and probably the biggest development here in the US it's

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 12>been interesting is less consumptional gasoline hasn't turned into less

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 12>prices at it. You know, a lower price at the pump.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 10>Why do you think that.

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 12>Is Well, this is key. This is something we have

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 12>to think about as you go towards transition. If you

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 12>pull supply in any scenario, you're going to see a

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 12>price spike. In the US, we're seeing less refinery production

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 12>then we have a few years ago. So you're seeing

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 12>over a million baros per day cut in the last

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 12>two three years alone. And when you have a less

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 12>supply of something, even if you have less demand, it

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 12>really depends on which one goes first and HASP deduct changes.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 10>And so what are people thinking when will this all

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 10>shake out?

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 12>I mean it's shaking out already. It's already checking out

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 12>in the fore court when people are buying the car.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 12>You're seeing the response some refiners, for example, some big

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 12>refineries like P sixty six are switching some of their

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 12>facilities to make things like renewable diesel or sustainable aviation fuel.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 12>So people are posturing. Companies are posting for the next five, six,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 12>seven years, right, which.

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Is such a great point because I guess the question

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 4>then becomes, if we're posturing for the seven or eight years,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 4>what does the landscape in your world look like then?

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean everyone seems to say it's a yes, and

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 4>we need everything above all, And is that how you

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 4>model it?

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 12>That is how we model it. In our sort of

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 12>standard outlook twenty twenty nine, we see peak oil consumption globally,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 12>so that's still pretty far out. There's still a lot

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 12>of growth left.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Also, peak doesn't mean the then it goes to zero.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 4>I feel like that's something we need to also wraprimind around,

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 4>like just because it's not increasing, it doesn't mean it's

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 4>rapidly decreasing.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're totally right.

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 12>Even in like a net zero world, in our modeling,

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 12>you get about twenty five million boos per day of oil,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 12>So you know net zero doesn't mean zero oil.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 10>So what does the growth outlook here?

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 12>You're looking at about four or five million boos per

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 12>day upside in our inner base case scenario. But lots

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 12>of things can change that, right. Policies are the main

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 12>thing to look at, particularly in big markets like the US. Right,

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 12>the US consumers is about one in every five bowels globally,

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 12>so if something changes here, the whole market can change.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 12>The dynamic is really upended.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 4>When we take a look at say China and India,

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>large consumers of energy, obviously, are they jumping from coal

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 4>to what.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, gases of transition fuel? We're see seeing them

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 12>shift towards I was just in Beijing last week, and

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 12>there's a very different way of looking at the oil

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 12>market versus if you're down in Texas, Right, it's what's

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 12>the displacement? Because they need more and more energy, right,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 12>they don't want to import that energy, So what can

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 12>you do domestically In the case of power, that's coal.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 12>But we're also seeing in the case of evs, right,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 12>LNG trucks, even electric trucks. So we have a lot

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 12>we can learn from them. But they're just different, very

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 12>different markets.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 4>And how did they get there? Is it because of subsidies?

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Is it because they were so dependent on coal? Like

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 4>what leads that transition there differently than say in the US.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, I think it's dependency on imports. For

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 12>one example, they've got a lot of national champions, and

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 12>to be honest, when they say they're going to do something,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 12>they do it in Europe and in the US you

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 12>got to get it through parliament, you got to get

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 12>it through votes. It's a lot slow over process, and

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 12>there's less domestic manufacturers like Tesla's a big, big player here,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 12>but it's kind of it in China. You've got a

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 12>lot of big producers, a lot of big industrial champions, right,

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 12>and they're encouraged by the States and by the city

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 12>and by incentives.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 10>So how do we fit into the bigger international ecosystem.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, for the US, one of the most important things

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 12>is it's sort of gasoline production. Machines send a lot

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 12>of gasoline abroad South America, Europe. Even so there's a

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 12>change coming along for US refiners basically, and you're starting

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 12>to see how they just their positioning in a sort

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 12>of a market leading way.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I think our Thanks to David Doherty, head of Oil

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and Renewable Fuels Research, this.

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Week, Bloomberg Intelligence broadcasted live from the earth Shot Summit

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 4>at the Plaza Hotel in New York City.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 3>The summit celebrated innovators who are trailblazing solutions to repair

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 3>our Planet and the event was co hosted by Bloomberg Philanthropies.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Guest host Damien Sassaur and I were joined by Robi Menon,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Singapore's Ambassador for climate Change.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 3>He discussed the global impact of central bank policies and

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 3>also sustainable finance in Southeast Asia.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I first asked Rabbi to reflect on his former role

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 4>as Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, I've been a bit removed from that scene for

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 11>quite a while now, so, but if I were to

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 11>reflect back two years ago when we were all facing

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 11>a surge in inflation globally, and the conventional view at

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 11>that time, which I subscribed to also was that given

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 11>how low interest rates were and how easy and accommodative

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 11>monetary policies have been for ten years, the catch up

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 11>to tie rates to bring down this inflation is going

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 11>to be unprecedented. And indeed there are heights in rates

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 11>and the tightening of monetary policy, including in Singapore through

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 11>the exchange rate, was quite significant, and I thought this

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 11>was going to come at the cost of a severe

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 11>slowdown in economic growth and rise in unemployment. I'm talking

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 11>globally right, and this has been the case in all

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 11>previous instances. I think looking back, we've done not too badly.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 11>We've avoided major recession in the major economies. There hasn't

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 11>been any sizeable increase in unemployment, the labor market has

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 11>been quite resilient, and surely, but surely, you know, we've

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 11>been bringing down inflation. I think this is a credit

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 11>to many of my ex colleagues in the central banking world.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.959
<v Speaker 11>I will not comment on specific policy moves such as

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 11>the one they made recently, but I think we should

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 11>step back and see we actually did not do badly.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 11>It could have been much worse to be able to

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 11>ease this early, but that itself is the right move.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 11>I would not come in, but the fact that we

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 11>were even having this conversation about easing about stimulus, when

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 11>not too long ago we were fighting inflation. It has

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 11>come down, so I think this has been quite remarkable.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 4>And this also brings sort of the question of climate

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 4>action and financing that part of the market as well,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 4>because part of the conversation here in the US with

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 4>the Inflation Reduction Act is that that in essence is inflationary,

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 4>and that the more money that every country spends on

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 4>greeting stuff, the more you're going to create sort of

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 4>an inflation bubble.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 5>Is that true?

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 11>From where you sit, I think that that is going

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 11>to be at best quite short term. Some stimulus through

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 11>any new investments going into an area of scarcity will

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 11>create some price pressures and demand pressures against limited supply.

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 11>But the objective of the Inflation Reduction Act as it is,

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 11>as is the objective of similar packages in every other country,

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 11>is to expand the supply capacity. Is to expand the

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 11>supply capacity for renewables, for cleaner technologies and so on.

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 11>So yes, in the short term that capacity has not increased,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 11>you will get momentary increase in inflation and price pressures

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 11>as you put in demand. But when the supply capacity increases,

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 11>that stabilized. So as with any industrial transformation or restructuring,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 11>there will be short term price effects, but that should

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 11>even out once a supply and.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Demanded back in.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 11>So I don't think there's anything inherently inflationary in these packages.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 13>In Singapore's key position along the Malacostrait, it sits between

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 13>two of the largest polluting countries on the planet, that

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 13>being China and India. Talk to us about your location

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 13>in the world, your geostrategic location. How are you addressing

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 13>those two nations their capability to enact climate change.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 11>I think both China and India have huge potential to

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 11>address a climate challenge, particularly with respect to mitigation and

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 11>renewable energy. The countries are large. We often forget that

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 11>China is installing more renewable capacity each year than the

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 11>rest of the world put together. India is a close second.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 11>So these two countries, in terms of their geography, are

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 11>well endowed to deploy clean energy, but they're going to

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 11>take time because what we forget is that energy demand

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 11>in these countries is also increasing rapidly. The energy consumption

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 11>per capita in China and India is a fraction of

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 11>that in the West, and there are still many villages

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 11>without access to electricity. So even as they install solar capacity,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 11>they're having to build cold plants and keep their fossil

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 11>fuel plants running to meet that, which is why they're

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 11>going to take longer. But surely they will get there

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 11>because of the inherent capacity for renewable energy. Actually, where

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 11>more is Southeast Asia because similar situation, rapid growth and

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 11>energy demand, rise of middle class urbanization, people having access

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 11>to electricity.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 5>You mean Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 11>Yes, all the countries around US, including US, we are

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 11>in many ways alternative energy disadvantaged single pore, particularly so

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 11>because we're a small island city state. Imagine New York,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 11>you know, deploys clean energy entirely within the city. But

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 11>even in the countries that are relatively well endowed, they

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 11>do have challenges with great for instance, is forested mountainous.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 11>Laying those transmission lines is not easy, not straightforward, and

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 11>the distribution of renewable energy capacity is very uneven geographically

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 11>across Southeast Asia. So I think that's a very bigger challenge.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Might be what about financing? We have like thirty seconds left.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 4>What's the biggest hurdle to financing all of this?

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Right now?

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 11>There is enough private capital in the world to solve

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 11>the climate crisis. There is enough financing if you look

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 11>at the annual flows of financial assets well in excess

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 11>of the funding gap. The problem is you need to

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 11>find bankable projects at appropriate risk return metrics. And this

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 11>is why you need blended finance with public capital coming

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 11>in to catalyze private capital. That synergistic combination is what

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 11>we need and that will be enough to solve this

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 11>all right.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Ravi men On, Singapore's Ambassador for Climate Change.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Coming up on the program, a look at policies in

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 4>the European Green Deal that look to make the European

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Union climate neutral by twenty fifty.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 3>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Bigo on the terminal.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Bailey Liptoles and I'm Alex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 2>weekdays and ten Eastern on applecar Play and Android Auto

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen live

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 2>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steel and I'm Bailey Lipschaltz filling in for

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeny.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 4>We continue with conversations from our broadcast at the earth

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Shot Summit at the Plaza Hotel in New York City.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 3>The summit celebrated innovators who are trailblazing solutions to repair

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 3>our planet, and the event was co hosted by Bloomberg Philanthropies.

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 4>At the event, we looked at the European Green Deal.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 4>In the Deal, there is a set of policies that

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 4>look to make the European Union climate neutral by twenty fifty.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 3>To achieve this, the European Commission has pledged to mobilize

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>at least one trillion euros in sustainable finance Investing.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Guest host Damien Sassaur and I were joined by Nania Calvino,

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 4>president of the European Investment Bank, and she talked about

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 4>the bank's role in the European Green Deal. We first

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 4>asked Nadia whether the bank is meeting its targets.

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 14>Yes, well, it's going well, it's going well. We are

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 14>on track to meet the target of one trillion euros

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 14>in investment green finance. More than fifty percent of our

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 14>annual investments go to the climate transition to the green finance,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 14>so as to make it a success, a European success,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 14>a global success for all of us.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 4>But why do I keep hearing then that Europe has

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 4>more at the stick approach and the US has the

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 4>carrot approach with the IRA, How did they differ.

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think that we have a shared endeavor, you know,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 14>which is to ensure that we do this green transition,

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 14>that we move to a net zero economy, and that

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 14>this is profitable.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 15>Well, my side of things is the carrots.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 14>Actually I am the investor, so we are probably we

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 14>are the largest multilateral development bank in the world. Maybe

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 14>people don't know. With a six hundred billion balance sheet.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 14>Ninety percent of the investments are done in the EU,

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 14>where we are the largest investor in renewables. We're probably

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 14>one of the largest investors in renewables in the in

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 14>the whole world.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Well not yet.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 13>I mean renewables is a very broad topic, solar, wind, water, nuclear,

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 13>Talk to us about where you're deploying your balance sheet.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, six hundred billions, a lot of money, well.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 14>More than fifty percent, as I said, is going to

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 14>climate finance, and this is sustainable infrastructures, This is sustainable transport.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 14>This is also renewables, wind energy, greeds, solar, and also

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 14>new fuels, the fuels of the future, for example green hydrogen.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 14>We're supporting very innovative, large projects, also large traditional infrastructures,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 14>and dynamic startups that are really going to be the

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 14>ones finding the technologies, the breakthrough technologies for all of us.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean we've seen with hydrogen though that it's hard.

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 4>That green hydrogen particular is quite hard. I mean Germany

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 4>had a sort of backtrack from that in particular with

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 4>the war in Ukraine. In addition, like Oorsid dropped and

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 4>had to ditch out on a hydrogen project. Can you

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 4>do hydrogen profitably?

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 15>And how do you do that?

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 14>But we have to, we have to because it is

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 14>can right now, well we are right now. We're investing

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.239
<v Speaker 14>in a number of projects in Europe which are more

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 14>having to do with industry hubs. So we are greening

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 14>industry highly polluting, highly energy intensive, so like a cement

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 14>industry that yes, still you know, all these large industry

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 14>so we are.

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 16>We're seeing, for example, close to port to Report in

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 16>the south of Portugal, we're going to have a green

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 16>hydrogen hub, so that's very close to traditional industries and

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 16>we're helping them become green and also profitable.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 15>Likewise in other parts of Europe.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 14>You know, we are at the early stages of these

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 14>new technologies and it is only normal you know that

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 14>some projects fail, that some projects are succeeding, and that's

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 14>that's why we are the European Investment Bank is a

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 14>public investment bank to take the risk, to make sure

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 14>that patient capital, long term investors are taking those risks,

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 14>so that also we mobilize private capital and we make

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 14>this a success.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 13>Well, you know, other multi level finance institutions, I mean

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 13>development banks out for example China, Korea, et cetera, have

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 13>had a very poor track record of deploying capital profitably.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 13>And you know, I know the IIB is different. I

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 13>know the World Bank Group is very very different. And

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 13>I know we're talking about perpetual capital, perpetual investments.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 5>But the end of the day, you do have to

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 5>get a return on your investment.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 13>So talk to us about which set within the broader

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 13>renewable space, within the border climate space carry the highest

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 13>return on investment from your perspective.

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 15>Well, actually, we are very profitable. Let me be very clear.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 14>The fact that we're a public bank doesn't mean that

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 14>I don't have to deliver for ashholders.

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 15>So around two billion euros we had in profit last year.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 15>We've been profitable since the bank, since its inception.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 14>We have a very low return very low level of

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 14>non performing assets. When I say very low, I mean

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 14>like zero point four percent.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Of our assets.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 13>Huh.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 15>So it is a very profitable bank.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 14>And what we have is a very large balance sheet

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 14>and very balanced portfolio with large infrastructures, traditional infrastructures which

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 14>are very profitable, lower risk and also highly risky endeavors

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 14>like innovative startups or large investments into new green technologies.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 14>And that's what's allowing us, I think, to make a

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 14>difference in making projects bankable at the end of the day.

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 4>So what have you noticed in terms of if you

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 4>support a project, does it bring in private investors and

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 4>private capital at.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 15>The end of the day, it does?

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 14>You know, the European Investment Bank is considered to be

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 14>a reference in terms of technical expertise in some areas

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 14>for example green for example health. So once the EiV

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 14>says yes, I'm going to invest in this project, immediately

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 14>a number of investors say I.

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Join, naddie. I'd love to ask you a question.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 13>I mean, in my world, the emerging market space, there

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 13>has been an absolute explosion of sustainable finance vehicles and mechanisms,

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 13>you know, green bonds, clean bonds, you name it.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm curious to hear your thoughts about a lot of that.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 13>I mean a lot of sovereign nations, a lot of

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 13>countries are issuing that under this green bond umbrella.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, do you believe in that?

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 13>Do you think they're just green washing or are they

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 13>really deploying that capital in a clean and efficient way.

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 14>We have to ensure, indeed that the green bond standards

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 14>around the world are not green washing, and that that

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 14>should be a top priority. Otherwise, you know, once you

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 14>lose the credibility, then you lose everything in capital markets.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 15>I don't have to explain it to you.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 14>So that's why I think we have a very important

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 14>shared interest in having global standards, you know, the taxonomies

0:30:58.000 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 14>that are being developed in different parts of the world.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 14>Europe has been a pioneer in that area. Also, the

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 14>European Investment Bank, by the way, has pioneered green bonds,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 14>and we have to make sure that those standards are

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 14>met and that green investments are really green, so that

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 14>we make sure that this is providing sufficient finance to

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 14>close the investment gap.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 4>How do you offset your risk? Sorry, how do you

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 4>offset risk when you're taking on riskier projects?

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 14>Well, we have a capital base. But generally what we

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 14>do is that we have riskier and less risky projects,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 14>and we mobilize our capital in a very wise manner.

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 14>You know, sometimes our shareholders and say you should take

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 14>on more risk because that's what your.

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 15>Capital is for.

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 14>But I think that we have a relatively good balance

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 14>in terms of can you give me.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 4>A balance on that, Like what would be considered a

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 4>low risk project, what we considered a high risk For example, well.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 14>An infrastructure in a European country, that is a low

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 14>risk project. When we're building trains or rolling stock or

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 14>or a metro or port. I mean this is a

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 14>I mean we are lending to a sovereign state which

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 14>has a very high rating, and this is our shareholders.

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 14>So investments within the EU are considered to be generally

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 14>lower risk. Or for example, we do also through the

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 14>financial sector, we do lending to SMEs in.

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 15>Europe that is very profitable, lower risk.

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 14>Then if we are investing in a very large project

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 14>one billion, two billion project in green hydrogen, as you

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 14>were single, you know.

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 5>I'd like to take a variation on that question.

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 13>That's important because you're right, it's a lot of these small,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 13>medium enterprises. They're the ones who are actually proactively, you know,

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 13>taking risk in the market. What sort of risk hedges,

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 13>transmission vehicles, carbon credits, offsets can they take advantage of,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 13>I mean, what's available to them to help offset their

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 13>risk in the space.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 14>But what we do is we provide guarantees and portfolio

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 14>guarantees or other sort of financial support to the banks

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 14>so that they can lend to SMEs with lower interest rates.

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 15>That's basically what we do and.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 14>Again that allows us to reach a large share of

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 14>Europeans means and there, for example now investing in green technologies,

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 14>energy efficiency thanks to the support of the European Investment Bank.

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 14>I don't know if many of them know it, you know,

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 14>because they go to a bank, a commercial.

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 15>Bank, but you know, although they are.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 14>They have to signal in their loans that this is

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 14>supported by.

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 15>The European Investment Bank. I don't know if they always do.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 14>But the fact of the matter is the EiV is

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 14>one of the key elements that he's driving the European economy.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Nadia Calvino, President of the European Investment Bank.

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Staying on climate, we also focus on a Bloomberg big

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 4>take story this week titled climate change is so bad

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 4>even the Arctic is on fire. Guest host Damien Sassara

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 4>and I were joined by one of the reporters on

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 4>the story, Kyle Kim Bloomberg, data visualization reporter. We first

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 4>asked Kyle to walk us through the story and what

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 4>he learned.

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 17>Climate change, you know, is making wildfire is more common

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 17>and intense, and that may not be the new part,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 17>because that's, you know, been in the news for a while,

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 17>but it's also causing fires and places that a lot

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 17>of people normally wouldn't expect, like the Arctic and the

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 17>wetlands in Brazil and Indonesia. And what's really unique about

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 17>these fires is that they tend to move underground and

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 17>smolder below the surface, and it could be for months

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 17>that this is happening. And these underground fires are basically

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 17>burning through prehistoric vegetation called peat and just releasing enormous

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 17>amounts of carbon. And these peak materials they only cover

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 17>about three to four percent of the Earth's surface, but

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 17>they hold up to a third of the world's soil carbon.

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 17>So it means that these fires are having an outsized

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 17>impact on climate change and causing a lot of negative feedback.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 17>We're saying that carbon from the burning peat is causing

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.959
<v Speaker 17>emissions from the Arctic Circle to skyrocket, and it's accelerating

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 17>the thawing of permafrost there, which is this always frozen

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 17>layer in the ground, and when it melts, it releases

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 17>things like carbon and methane, and it's making the architect

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 17>even hotter.

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 4>How do you prevent that? Like I appreciate that we

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 4>all need to tackle climate change, et cetera, but this specifically,

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 4>because it's even hard to see, how do you manage it?

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, well, even the professionals, you know, it's it's fighting

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 17>fire in general is a hard task, right, but fighting

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 17>them underground it's very difficult because it is not visible.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 17>So they you know, look for smoke coming from the ground.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 17>And for example, in places in Indonesia, firefighters are using

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 17>fire suppression holes. They're basically injecting water into the ground

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 17>and it's hard to tell really if it's fully extinguished

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 17>or not. And it's you know, this is a very

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 17>understudied and not well understood yet, and so there's still

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.399
<v Speaker 17>a lot to learn and how to combat these kinds

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 17>of fires. And for now, you know better monitoring for

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 17>carbon emissions, but at least help to understand the scope

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 17>of the problem.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, Kyle, here's the interesting thing about it. You make

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 13>a great point. You know, the permafrost cover. I mean,

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 13>this is a real risk black carbon.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 5>We know what the risk is. But isn't a lot

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 5>of that taking place in Russia? I mean, is Russia

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 5>even aware of this? And do they even care?

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 17>Yes, they definitely are aware. You know, scientists project as

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 17>much as a third of the permafrost in the northern

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 17>Hemisphere is gonna receive by the end of the century,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 17>and a lot of that is in Russia. A lot

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 17>of the permafrost now that's going to be gone by then,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 17>and the climate experts are already identifying the eastern region

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 17>of Russia has seen the largest growth amongst Arctic wildfires

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.439
<v Speaker 17>since the early two thousands, So they're aware that it's,

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 17>you know, going to be more and more of a problem.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 12>All right.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Kyle can Bloomberg Data Visualization Recorder.

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 2>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 2>The iHeart Radio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Journal

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>M