WEBVTT - Fantasy Football Weekly 7

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Here time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on k f

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a N presented by Devani's, your weekly source for the

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Fantasy Football Weekly is

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>also brought to you by Green Belt Premium No name

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Butcher Quality meets Honda, town Hall Family, Luther Hunt, and

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>by The Park Tavern. Now Now, along with Fanball and

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>League Saves, Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson, here's Paul Charchy in.

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>We never get it right. They never both here at

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time. Today it is Matt Harrison, No, Brian Johnson,

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish with me. Hello, guys, Hey, how's it going?

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>We do We just need to cut a new generic

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>open that just says it's Paul Churchy and and two

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>dudes who decided to do the show this week. Come

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not to shot at you. Yeah, I'm sure it is.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like four shows you're gonna do this year.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>It's on vacation in Nashville above the other ten shows

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>before that. I was on vacation and some other locale.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a world traveler. We gotta we gotta get Brian credit.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>He did twelve shows in a row so far this season. Yeah,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's um He's like, it's pretty good and you only

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>put some like three hundred short of me. But yeah,

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good. What are you going to take one off?

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I never never, just you're the cal Ripken of Uh, yeah,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>there's something to that. I am. I am the bell

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>cow of this show. Yeah. Um, hopefully not like Jay

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Gies the bell cow for Miami, because that's uh, that

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be good. We're gonna try to do a little

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>better than that. We're optimistic, um coming up on the show,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>all the good stuff that you know and love. We're

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna break down every game fantasy style. We'll bring you

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>five hot questions, take a chance on me, premature speculation,

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and lightning round. And because we have six teams on

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>by for the only time this year, that means we're

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have some We're gonna have some extra time are calls.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe. I think it's going to happen. Then again,

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we do tent When we know we've got extra time,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we tend to go long and pontificate and all that

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>other stuff that ends up screwing up our clock. Anyway,

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out lots of pregnant pauses. Yeah, that could be.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's dive right into the matchups, beginning with Falcons at Jets.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Scott Falcons offensive problems are well chronicled. Now they get

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Does this say get right moment for the Falcons?

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think so. Now the Jets are bottom ten

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>versus every position quarterbacks and runing backs, wide receivers ten

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ends their their bottom ten against all of those, So

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely a get right game from Matt Ryan.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>The Jets allowing the most touchdown passes this season and

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns and four straight games. I have an A

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>grade on Ryan. I have an A grade on Julio

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Jones as well. Hit The Jets have allowed five touchdowns

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this year to number one wide receivers scored last week.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it gets in again like nice two in

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a row after getting shut out for the first six

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the season, no kidding. Finally saw that end

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>uh snook back last week saw ten targets and he's

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the slot against bust buster screen.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Great matchup. I give him a B grade. Is that

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>baby Mohammed Sanu or Mohammed Sanu sr? Are we sure?

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I think it's going to be the senior.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna be the baby. The baby

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>could have a decent game against Busters. That is actually possible.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the screen door effect. Is we like any any

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed Sanu? We are We are already vamping more than often.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, unusual Austin Hooper. Uh. Over the last three games,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jets have allowed four touchdowns and they're allowing six

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>catches per game. In that span, Hooper has been hot

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and cold. Three games over forty five yards and three

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>games under ten yards. I'm very Amari Cooper like that.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the it's the volume problem for him. Yeah, he's

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>hot and cold, but you know this is a great matchup,

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving him a C grade. Maybe he's more

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>hot than cold this week. Uh, DeVonta Freeman giving him

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. He's got at least seventy hold of yards.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>In five straight weeks. Jets are allowing a hundred fifty

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>total yards per game. A grade there B grade for Coleman.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Bad game last week, averaging under four yards per carry.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But the Jets are allowing five and a half receptions

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and over fifty yards per game to to running backs

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>receiving I think I think Coleman can shine there. I

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right. I mean, you know that it seemed

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>like a great matchup for him last week and needed nothing.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Another strong matchup pays off this time. Yeah. On the

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Jet side, Josh McCown, the Falcons are allowing two thirty

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>yards and one and a half touchdowns per game to quarterbacks,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady really inflated those numbers. Otherwise,

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it's actually much worse. The Falcons are doing really well

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in that area. McCown does have multiple touchdown passes in

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks, but I'm giving him a C grade here.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the matchup. I'm giving both of his

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>receiver se grades as well. It's it's uh, it's yeah.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess they could both get secrets. They both scored

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>last week five five targets per game for Curse, six

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>targets per game for Anderson. There's a little volume. There

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>slight edge to Anderson. He's led the team and targets

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks. Given Safarian Jenkins a B grade the Jets.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons are allowing over eight targets and over fifty

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>six yards per game to tight ends and Safarian Jenkins

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.119
<v Speaker 1>has been productive. I think he can be productive again

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>here against a pretty decent matchup for tight ends. And

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.239
<v Speaker 1>he did score against Atlanta week one of last season

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>while he was a member of the Buccaneers. Nice little

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>added bonus there for Austin Safarian Jenkins. And onto the

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>running game. Falcons are bottom ten versus the run, allowing

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred fifty total yards per game to running backs.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But when fourteen Powell both played together this season, they're

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>only averaging twenty total touches between them, and they're splitting them.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Last week, I think they had eleven and thirteen. They're

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not getting a lot of volume. I know they both

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>had eight yards last week. Uh Fourtes had eight yards

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>two weeks in a row. And Atlantic is a little

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit susceptible to pass catching backs. They both catch passes.

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of volume though. I'm giving them both

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>C grades. But I'm a little worried about the us.

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I don't know that I can start

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you the one. Yeah, it's it's it's a shaky seat

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for me. Between four tem Pow Bears take ONWN the Saints,

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt and the Bears offense it's been all running all

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>day and no passing whatsoever. Do you think they loosen

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit on Mitch Drabinsky. Well, you're gonna

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>really like the way that I structured this matchup then,

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>because I gave an aid to Jordan Howard's averaging touches

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>per game over the last five weeks, and the Saints

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>are allowing four point seven yards per carry to opposing

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>backs this season. That seems like at least a hundred

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>yards to me in this game for Jordan Howard and

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>probably their best chance at a touchdown the entire passing game,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>including Tarik cohen Is on the bench, has to be

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Robinsky literally through only seven passes last week and sixteen

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the week before. He's only completed twelve passes in the

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, and they've won both games and they

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>want so there's not a mandate to change it, unfortunately. Yeah,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And the Saints defense actually not as bad as we

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>might think. Um, they've given up three touchdown passes to

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>each Tom Brady, Sam Bradford and Matthew Stafford this year,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but in the other three games against Jay Cutler, Cam

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Newton and Brett Hunley, they did not give up a

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>passing score at all, so I think Mitch Truebiski is

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>more of column B than column A there, so he's

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely more huntly than Brady. On the saint side, I

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.119
<v Speaker 1>got mark Ingram getting an a averaging twenty eight touches

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>per game since Adrian left Town has had back to

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>back a hundred yard games and three total touchdowns, and

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have allowed the ninth most rushing touchdowns in

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the league this season. Yeah, and by the way, the

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's uh I calculated twenty nine touches per game, but

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>either way, it's too much for mark Ingram and I

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think Camara is gonna start siphoning some of those offer

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>nine is is not what it mark Ingram is all about. Yeah,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and I have Kamara as a C start too. He's

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had thirteen and fourteen touches since the a P deal,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's a decent flex play. Opposing backs are also

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>averaging seven catches per game against the Bears over the

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>past three weeks, so I think he's in playing PPR

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Drew Brees I gotta be on. He's had

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>five eight games of either three hundred yards passing or

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns. Chicago has only allowed eight touchdown passes this season.

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The defense has been pretty solid, but four of them

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>were to Aaron Rodgers, so in the other five games

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they've given up one or zero. Michael Thomas, I'm still

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>giving a B grade two though He's had double digit

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>targets and three of his last five and has had

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 1>at least eighty yards and four of his last five.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But he hasn't topped the hundred yards this season and

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns only two touchdowns. Yeah, he'll face off mostly

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>against Prince Amukamar. Though held Kevin Helvin Benjamin to three

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>catches for sixty five yards last week. He's been pretty good. Uh.

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Ted Gin given a C grade to Ted Gin. Gain's

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>only seen the field for fifty two of the snaps

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Saints last two weeks, but he had sixty

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>six yards in a touchdown two weeks ago and seven

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>catches for a hundred and forty one yards last week.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So he's making a lot of hay with the limited

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of snaps that he's on the field, and he's

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>their deep threat. And I am a little bit worried

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that the return of Willie Snead, now healthy, will will

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>eat into at least a few of his reps as well. Well.

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's mention Willie Sneed. Sneed was a finally a full

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>participant in practice on Friday. He's been dealing with a

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury basically since his suspension ended. The slot wide

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver is the best matchup and Snead kind of goes

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>into that a little bit there, and Brandon Coleman kind

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of does as well. And Coleman actually had a nice

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>little game last week as well. So I think it's

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>probably split time between Sneed and Coleman, so I have

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>both of them on the bench, and Kobe Fleaner we're

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>off the Fleaner mobile where we're far off the Fleaner

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>mobile was only playing the snaps since the Saints became

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a running team, and and he's he's just not on

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the on the field at also not Thatch agreed. Uh.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>The early morning game tomorrow is Vikings versus Browns in London,

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I I always like getting the London games. I

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't get this solve. That's because I like to do

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the British that entire time, and like I need some

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I need some British accent out of you. Let's go. Yeah,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's gonna happen. Um, you will get

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>some new news out of me. This uh, this news

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just coming down the down, down the wire. As they say,

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the Browns players had to evacuate it as if is it?

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>What else could go round for the Browns? Right? The

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Browns players had to evacuate their team hotel at five

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. Here they're trying to castle. By the way,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>gas leak in the hotel. Um, here they're trying trying

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to just adjust to the time zone change, right, and

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to make up the six hour time zone

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>change and everything else, and gas leak in the hotel

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>has everybody standing outside for an hour at in the morning. Crikey, blindy,

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just beastly, is it? There? Uh so there's your

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there's your your latest Browns update. Let's talk about that.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Got common UK expressions pulled up on thank you? You

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>can do some insert those whenever you want. All right,

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>go for it. I'm gonna start with the running game.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's tim be tempting to chase Latavius Murray's a big

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>game from last week, but I wouldn't do it. The

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing the Browns do really well stuff the run

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>they are giving up a league best two point nine

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. I'll also remind people that prior to

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>last week, Lottavias Murray was averaging two point three yards

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>per carry um. They've Browns have only a looted two

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing scores, and none of those were in the last month.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>No back his top sixty six yards against Cleveland last week.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>DeMarco Murray and Derrick Henry two very good runners and

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, two runners that are probably better than Latavius

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Murray and Jerick McKinnon combined for just seventy two yards scoreless.

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Seventy two scoreless yards against the Browns, So see grades

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 1>on Lottavias Murray and Jerick McKinnon. Let's go to the

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>passing offense, where we believe Stefan Diggs will return. It

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>increasingly looks like he's gonna play. You seem very chuffed

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. I don't want him to play in this game.

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I am chuffed something. No, I'm not pleased about it

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as a Viking fan. I was a fantasy fan, great

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>as a Viking fan more so. No, because they don't

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>need him to win this game against the Browns, and

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they've got a buy wee coming if if the groin

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is anything less than one, I wish they wouldn't play him,

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like he's gonna go in this one

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>full practices this week. He has done the full Monty

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of practices this week. Yeah. Uh. The Browns may attack

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>him with solid corner Jason mccordy, who's sometimes shadows. That

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>would be a negative for him. Um, if they don't shadow,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>then he'll get some positive matchups against Jamar Taylor. But

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for sure which way that's gonna go.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going see great on Stefan Diggs in part because

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>groin injury injuries get re injured, get aggravated a lot,

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and if it goes blow out, they may decide to

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>sit Diggs as well, just to rest the groin. So

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I would be done backed if that happened. I bet

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you would. Adam feeling over the By the way, see

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>great on Steph Diggs if I didn't say so. Adam

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Clan also a C grade over the last two weeks

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>without Diggs targeted twelve and thirteen times. I like that.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>But Diggs comes back now, so now he's I think

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get targeted less and most importantly, he draws

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the better slot cornerbacks in the NFL, former

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>golfer Brian Body Calhoun, who ranks seventh overall among all

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks by Pro Football Focus. Only A C grade for Theeling,

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>only off your trolley. I am off my trolley the

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>h He has given up three touchdowns of slot receivers,

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>but Theeland hasn't scored a touchdown this year, so I

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if that's gonna be a factor. C

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>grade on Theeling. A grade for Kyle Rudolph. Targets have

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been way up over the last three weeks without digs.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that comes back to earth a little bit here,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but the Browns have struggled mightily against tight ends for

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the season. Big games have gone to

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Jesse James two touchdowns, Benjamin Watson yards, Tyler Croft too touchdowns,

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Austin Severian Jenkins one should have been two touchdowns, Delaney

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Walker sixty three yards and seven receptions last week. So

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cal Rudolph A grade. I've got keen Um on the bench.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>He has thrown zero or one touchdowns in five of

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>six games, and the Browns have allowed the second most

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns and multiple touchdowns and five of seven games.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>But they just shut down Marcus Mariota last week, so

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>who's to say that this is gonna be It seems

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like a dog's bollocks matchup for case Keenum on the

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:14.239
<v Speaker 1>brown side. There's no startable plays here, including Duke Johnson,

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>who is usually a solid contributor through the air. But

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>listening with the Vikings have done to good pass catching

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>backs this year. Alvin Kamara twenty yards, Levy on Bell

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>these are these are the receiving yards. That's all we

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>care about. Duke h Levy on Bell four yards, theoretic

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, Tarik Cohen negative six yards, Tie Montgomery three yards,

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Bunk Allen twenty nine yards. That's it. Who you thought

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>bunk Ellen would be the best of those? Yeah, that's right.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't think Johnson's full of beans and ready to

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>go get him? I don't link so the beans for

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>breakfast in England. That's not cool. Isaiah Crowles on the bench.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't scored yet. He's averaging three point two yards

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>per carry, Vikings allowing just three point two yards per carry,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So that means if he's going to continue to get

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three point two y it's per carry on his average

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>often carries. That's a forty one yard game and he's

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Yeah, that's rubbish. And we're gonna put

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole passing game on the bench as well. You

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>don't even need me to really expand on this. This

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is uh Kaiser comes back. But it doesn't matter in

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's probably works against this team. So that's it.

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Vikings Browns. Let's take a break when we come back,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Nine players not normally in

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>your starting lineup, many of them available on the waiver wire.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Will tell you who they are when we return. Welcome

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the show, Fantasy Weekly. I'm a fan. Paul Charchi,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison, Scott Fish with you. Yeah, I far better

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>than last weeks. I can tell you that which one

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was last hit Monks the worst. I'd be glad I

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>missed it. Yeah, you are glad you've missed Hi, You've

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you've suffered through it before you have you've paid your dues.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally in your starting line up. Let's

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>begin with quarterback positions. Scott Tyrod Taylor. He's far better

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>at home, throwing nearly seventy five yards per game. More,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>five of his seven touchdowns have come in his in

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>his three home games. Yea and Oakland's allowing tune in

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards per game over their last five, including

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>three multi touchdown games. They The last time they went

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>east to West, they played Kirk Cousins, who threw for

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>three forty two and three. Not to mention Tyrod Taylor's

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>averaging nearly eight rush attempts at home. He can get

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you some points on the ground there too, gets Jordan

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Matthews back as well. Matt who you got? I have

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers And I admit that this one's a little

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of low hanging from Yeah, he's my number five

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback this week. He's uh, he's sev owned in ESPN leagues,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so that means he's available in thirty and he faces

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots defense that's allowed the most passing yards and

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the most passing touchdowns. There's not really that much more

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be said about Philip Brown. No, I

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mind a little choky as well, but not as choky

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as that Andy Dalton. It's where for an offense to

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>take a page from the Jaguars. But the Bengals should

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>follow the Jaguars game plan last week against the Colts

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>basically to the letter. Blake Bortles put a three hundred

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards last week against the Colts, and this is

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>a very good opportunity for Dalton going up against the

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty first rank Indianapolis past defense. Only DeShawn Kiser has

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>failed to throw for two hundred nine five yards against Indy.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running back position, Scott, Yeah, I

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have to make a late switch here, but I'm going

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with James White. He's averaging nearly seven targets per game,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>over five targets per five receptions per game, and forty

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. He's getting seventy per cent in the

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>New England running back targets. I like him a lot

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this week. Okay, I made a late swap as well.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I went with Rex Burkhead. He'stalied only six carries last time,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's averaged over five yards per carry with those touches,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>something he also didn't Week one, and last week was

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>his first game back after an injury, so they were

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>just working him into the offense little by little. He's

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>only on this field for thirteen snaps last week, but

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he had a touch and seven of them. That's over

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the touches per snap. I don't know why you would

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>play any other New England running chart. Who you side

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Rex Burkhead. I like that you guys have conspired against

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got Dian Lewis. What WHOA? I know that's hard

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to believe. Uh, you guys have already hit all the

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>sale talking points against the Chargers. I will mention this

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about Dan Lewis though, averaging five point three yards per carry,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the most on the team, almost two yards per carry

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>more than Mike gillies Lee, who nobody even mentioned. And

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 1>he's a plausible start here as well. If we had

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a fourth person, we'd be mentioning Mike Gillies l Uh.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Lewis's rushing attempts have increased in five straight games.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Go to the wide receiver. We did hatch that plan

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the office last We thought it would be pretty fun,

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty good later. I'm sticking with Josh Jackson. If you

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>picked him up from mature speculation last week for me,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope you still have him. He plus started and

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>played the snaps last week, most snaps of the season

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for him. He gets a bottom six Dallas defense against

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. They've allowed the fourth fourth most touchdowns the

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. I like docs in this week, I went

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>with Tyrrell Williams of the Los Angeles Clippers nine different

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers of top seventy five yards against New England

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this season. The Pats have allowed the most receptions in

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the second most yards to opposing wide receivers this season.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>And he's completely due after becoming somewhat of an afterthought

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>since Mike Williams has decoyed his way into the lineup

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for like one in two targets per week. It's time

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to feed Tyrrell. Uh. But Benny Fowler's role will increase

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>again this week with Emmanuel Sanders out again. Last week

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he set season and career highs with five catches. This week,

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he draws one of the worst slot corners in the league,

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Philip Gaines, who ranks dead last at his position by

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Profoball Focus one hundred ninth. Benny Fowler is your final

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on meat player. Lewis is the best player.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>He is the best. UH. Let's move on to our matchups,

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 1>including Panthers taking on the Bucks. We know the bit

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on Cam Newton at this point that it's very clear

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>against bottom tier past defenses, he's dynamite. Against anybody else,

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he's awful. This is a bottom to your past defense. Yeah.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned last week the same thing with Newton, that

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>he's become a matchup play and he does bring them up.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Though the Bucks are terrible. They allow over three yards

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns per game to quarterbacks, and in weeks

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>four through six, when Newton had all those great matchups,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what he was getting. So I expect an a

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>A grade out of Newton this week. His top guy,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin A grade as well. They're the Bucks are second

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>worst against wide receivers. They have allowed ten different wide

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>receivers to hit seventy five yards or score touchdown. I

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I like him to do either or both of those things, agreed,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Vin Foncious. He had successful days against Detroit, New England.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He disappeared for some others. He's averaging over eight targets

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>per game, which is great since Greg Alson went out,

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But over the last couple of weeks he's only caught

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of those. That's not a fluke. He caught less than

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of his past his last last year. I don't know

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that that's on him. Though as much as it is

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on Newton. I don't fantasy numbers though, right. I don't

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's a good player, but I think he has

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup. I'm giving him a C grade, but

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if he falls on his face, I wouldn't be surprised either, honestly, Uh, Dixon,

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm benching He's question about Tampa Bay is pretty decent

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>against tight end. He's been the last couple of weeks.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Stewart. I'm not just benching. I'm handcuffing him to

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the bench and hiding his helmet. He is. He's averaged

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just three yards percarried. Is looking for it for him? Yes?

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And one point six yards percary over the last three weeks.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He's just terrible right now. Uh McCaffrey, I'm going to

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>give a B grade to it. Wouldn't surprised me if

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he does better than that. Even the Buckner's are allowing

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>five or more catches to four running backs this year,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of those guys scored or had sixty yards.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey's getting over eight targets and over six catches per

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>game and half ppr PPR. That's where you're gonna be

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>able to start him on the buck side, Winston. He's

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>facing a top ten Panthers defense. That's I mean, just

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred yards per game. It is a tough matchup.

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But in his last four full healthy games, yeah, three

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>multi touchdown games for three hundred yard games. I give

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>him a B here. I think he might be able

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>to rise above the matchup. I'm giving Evans a B

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's he has yet to crack a hundred yards.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I get that the Panthers have not allowed a hundred

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>yard receiver yet. He probably gets a lot of James Bradbury,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>which is a tough matchup. It is tough, but he

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>does get eight targets a game. Winston goes to him

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in contested catches anyway he gets that is true. Winston

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care. Yeah, ten plus three times. I'm still giving

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade here. I'm giving him. I'm given

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>d Jacks a shake year B grade. He still gets

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>seven plus targets per game. He's got that tough matchup

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as well against Carolina, but he does have seventy yards

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or a score in three straight weeks. And when he

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>does catch the ball, he's taking him for sixteen yards

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>of clips. So it doesn't need doesn't need a lot

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of volume, and he gets Darryl Worley instead of James

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Bradberry and all probability, and so that certainly helps him great.

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay is throwing for the most yards and touchdowns

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends. Brad At a four game touchdown streak

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that came to an end last week when O. J.

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Howard blew up. But Howard hasn't had more than two

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>catches in any other game this year. I'm benching Howard.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Braid a C grade because Carolina is top

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>five against tight ends, only Grunk with over thirty yards

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>against them. It's even a shaky C grade. I'm a

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>little worried there. Doug Martin Carolina top five against running backs.

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>No running back over seventy yards against Carolina against Carolina

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. But Martin his carries keep increasing fifteen plus

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a game on average. He might get there on volume.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a C grade. All right? Uh, Matt

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Raiders take on the Bills. No Marshawn Lynch in this one.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people on Twitter, with all with this

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>being the six team by week, are looking at starting

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Richard or maybe even Washington. What do you think

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>about the Oakland Runners in this game? I got them

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench. Only one back has topped sixty

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>yards against the Bills so far this season, and they've

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed only three touchdowns in six games to the position.

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Although the bright spot is they just traded defensive tackle

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Marcel Darius to the Jaguars yesterday. I think Washington gets

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the primary carries. It's probably a sixty split. Yeah, Richard

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is more of the ppr angle, but the Bills have

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one back to top thirty five yards receiving

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>this season, and no running backs have scored through the air.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>That's why I got them both on the bench. Passing game,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I got a lot of bees

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Derek Carr with a B. Jameis Winston was

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the first quarterback to throw for multiple touchdowns against the

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Bills of the season, and he went off last week

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and the prior five games they had only allowed to

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>total touchdown pass s is. But Buffalo is going to

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>be without starting corner e J. Gaines and starting safety

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's Poyer and cars obviously coming off the huge game

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>last week and appears to be fully healthy. Mark Cooper

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>also had a huge game last week. He's getting a B.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Had to ten and two touchdowns last week against Kansas City,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>but only had eighty four total yards and no scores

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>in the prior five games. That's why I'm giving him

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the B instead of the A. He's also never scored

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown and back to back games in his entire career.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so so he's due for a goose egg

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of a touchdown this week unless he's gonna bring the

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>trend um. The Bills have given up big games in

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks to a J. Green and Mike

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Evans both scored in both top to eight yards. They

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>also gave up five catches to seventy three yards to

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Seawan Jackson last week, which means Michael Crabtree also

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. He scored in each of his last

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>three since returning from an injury, and Jared Cook I

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>got a C grade for him. He's coming off a

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>season high hundred and seven yards last week against Kansas City,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and this Bill's defense just got torched by the Tampa

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>tight ends last week. Uh they come bind for twelve catches,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty eight yards and two touchdowns last week.

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think Cook is uh gotta. He's probably a B

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think I think I'm not. I'm not

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>as optimistic, but we'll see alright. And then over on

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the bill side, it's the Lashawn McCoy show. He's got

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>an A. The Raiders have allowed at least eighty five

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>total yards to a lead running back in each of

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the last six weeks, and are allowing one five rushing

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, which is eighth most in the NFL.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>McCoy has had over twenty touches in four straight games,

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>had twenty eight last week, five of those being receptions

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to go along with his two rushing touchdowns. I'll interject

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that this show urged you to pick up and trade

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>four Leshan McCoy two weeks ago when he was on

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>his by and you could get him cheap, knowing that

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this series of games was coming. Very favorable matchup last

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>week and another very favorable matchup this week all season

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>right and like no hard matchups left. Scott talked about

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Taylor a little bit. He was just take a

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>chance on the quarterback. So I'll go to the rest

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the receiving game. I got all the wide receivers

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Their wide receivers are complete disaster, and

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>with Charles Clay out this week with a knee injury,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Nick Leary, Yeah, he's kind of a deep, deep desperation

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>play if you're really hurting for a tight end. He's

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>been on the field for of the plays the last

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>two weeks since Clay has been out, and the Raiders

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have allowed three touchdowns to tight ends in the last

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, four tight ends of top fifty eight yards

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders of the season. So a super deep

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>degrade for Nicko Weary. When we come back, Colts take

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Bengals. Will tell you if there's any Bengals

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to play when we return. You're distinctive.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, Welcome back to the

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>show Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm a fan. You're number twenty three.

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Archie and Matt Harrison and Scott Fish with you,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>um Twitter follower. Paul notes, we can't bench all these players.

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, the bench when six teams are on by,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and I get that. You know we can't make them

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>score more points because six teams are on by, But

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know it does loosen up a little bit. Of

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we what I consider you know what

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what considers a a C grade A little bit for me,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but just starts to start all your Patriots running backs.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Is the gist of the story. Yeah, that was that

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for taking from taking chance of me. That was more

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>than the gist of it. That was the whole story.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Colts take on the Bengals in this game

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, not this game this week. Let's just go

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in a game this week. A grade for Joe Mixon,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a potential breakout workhorse. Are you Bell Kyle Game concerned

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about the lack of any carries in the second half

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>last week? Yes, I am, as a matter of fact,

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but not so much that I'm I'm even conmoly considering

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>not starting mixing. I think he goes right back to

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the vast majority of the work here. Bengals should

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>be ahead throughout the game. That means the game flow

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on the ground largely. He draws

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a Colts defense that ranks twenty six and run defense.

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>They've surrendered the most total touchdowns to opposing backs. I

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>love mixing in this game. In a pinch, you could

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>go maybe Jeremy Hill or Giovanni Bernard if you have to,

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if maybe Twitter Twitter follower Paul looking for somebody on

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the six team by week uh in the theory being

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Bengals could have had so much that they

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>go to their backup runners. Maybe it's gonna work that way.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish nailed and Chris Ivory big game two weeks

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>ago into that theory, so maybe it works out that way.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the passing game. Andy Dalton

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is an A grade. He was might take a chance

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on the quarterback A J Green obvious A grade, My

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.239
<v Speaker 1>top ranked wide receiver this week. What about some other

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>guys he could throw to, like Tyler Croft, who I

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like in this game with a big aide. He's caught

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns in the last four weeks. This is his

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>strongest matchup of the year against the Colts. They have

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>bottomed bottom ten tight end rankings in receiving yards and

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns allowed. Tyler Croft available in a lot of leagues. Still,

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you can go get him, pick him up. Lastly, Brandon

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>LaFell Indianapolis ranks thirty feet in yardage to wide receivers.

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Last week against Jacksonville, Indie allowed the Jaguars wide outs.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars white outs two hundred thirty seven yards to

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the group, so there's enough room to go around. Can

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I throw one more in there? Just for Paul, no

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one else, listen, just Paul, this is John Ross. It

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>might be a sneaky play. He's gonna be He's supposed

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to be, supposed to be significantly involved. Four to two forty.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>The Colts have allowed forty pass plays of twenty or

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>more yards. That's the most in the league by ten.

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>He might get a big play. He really is possible.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>John Ross remember first round raft picked by the Bengals,

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and he is all speed baby. So yeah, in the pitch,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you could. You could go to him. I'd

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>rather I'd rather go but in John Ross and is

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what should be his first meaningful game. It would be

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a dark throw, but you could do it all right,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis side, I've got starting grades on two players, but

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>just c grades. We begin with the running game. Marlon

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Mack gets a seat. He'll get passing down work in

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a game that should be one sided. So they're gonna

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have to throw a lot. So I'd like Mac Cincinnati

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable through the air, giving him nearly seven receptions per

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>games to running backs. They just gave up one two

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>total yards to Lavy on Belt, a lot good chunk

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of that coming through the air, So Marlon Mack with

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Gore's on the bench, though, because they're

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be behind, he's losing snaps to Mac. The game

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>flow should go away from Gore in this one. No

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>running back has found the end zone against Cincinnati since

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Week one, So I'll roll all that together and Gore's

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. The only wide receiver you're gonna want

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to touch here is t Y Hilton. Cincinnati is a

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>very solid secondary, but has shown some vulnerability to opposing

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>number one wide outs, who have cashed in four touchdowns

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the bengals last four games. He'll see more snaps

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>from the right side of the field in an effort

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to match him up against Drake Kirkpatrick, who looks like

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's on his last legs and ranks ninety second among

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback cornerbacks by Pro Football Focus. So they can start

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>hilting every other part of the passing game is on

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the bench. The Bengals are the number three pass defense overall.

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up just one eight passing yards per game.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Four of the bengals six opposing quarterbacks zero or one touchdowns.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>The guys who didn't were Aaron Rodgers and Ben Roethlisberger

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jacoby Brissette. Is a long long way from those

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>guys every other part of the passing game on the bench.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Next matchup forty Niners taking on the Eagles. In this game,

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Pierre Garth Stones got a juicy matchup Scott. He hasn't

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>scored yet. Are you gonna be bold and predict the

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>first touched out of the year for Pierre Garden? Sure,

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>let's do it, alright. Sure y'all pushed me in. I

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>took all the drama out of it, right. No, it's

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a tough call. I mean this is this is

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup, starting with the quarterback. Though c J

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>bat Third last week he had a good matchup tuning

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of that rushing touchdown that saved your fantasy day

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was not great. Are you saying CJ got beat hard?

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I am like it, but he gets the bottom five

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Philly d that's allowing just under three yards per game

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and four multi touchdown games this year. I'm giving him

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, but it's a shaky one. I probably

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't start. I mean there's probably a better option, Uh,

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Pierre Garsan, I'm giving an a minus grade. Bryan Johnson

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>allows that, right, No, as great, He's still get nine

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>targets a game. Yeah, you have to score a touchdown

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>based top ten and targets, receptions yards. It's a great matchup.

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So the Eagles receivers allowing fifty yards or scored a

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve different receive evers this year. I'll give him an

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a minus. Uh over to Kittle. But over to Kittle,

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia has allowed the third most receptions, the fifth most yards,

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth most touchdowns to tight ends. Terrible, terrible.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a great matchup. But his snaps, oddly, his

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>snap percentage dropped to the whole Iowa connection or whatever Iowa.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I blew that call Iowa Iowa connection. What happened? Yeah,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>his snap percentage nearly cut in half and they fell

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>way behind and he wasn't involved, only saw two targets

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>when they fell behind. They'll fall behind here, So I

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>see grade because of the matchup. But man, that's tough.

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hyde at least seventy five yards in five of

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>his six games, but he gets the top five run

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 1>defense in the Eagles. I wonder how much of that

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is because everyone can pass. On the Eagles. They're allowing

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.240
<v Speaker 1>six receptions per game to running backs. Carlos Hide averaging

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>five targets per game, and he's already hit tied his

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>career his career record for season receptions to when he's seven,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>so he might be able to make it up there.

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>B grade for him. On the Eagle side, Wentz and

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Earths are A grades. I I don't know that I

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>need to go into it. They're they're just eight. I

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>don't need to exactly the league leader in touchdown passes,

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and zach Ertz has the most fantasy points for any

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Absolutely absolutely, yep. Weirdly, Jeffrey is not showing up.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Even though Wentz is on fire, he doesn't have He's

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>under seventy five yards for five straight games, only one

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that span. I'm only giving him a B

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>grade even though the four nis are a bottom ten

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>past defense elite opportunity, Yeah, great opportunity for him. B grade.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>He might he might show up today. What about revenge

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>game for Tory Smith? They didn't want him? I see

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with revenge very big with revenge only Brian, I have

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench, all right. I don't blame you, Nels.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him an A grade Quarterbacks. Quarterbacks throw into

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the slot against the forty nine hundred, forty two point

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>nine passer rating four touchdowns. There you go, Twitter follower Paul,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he was my he was my original take a chance

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to me wide receiver, and then I went, aglar is

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a little too obvious. So you know that's when I

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>brought it down to Benny Fowler. So yeah, I love

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>giving him an A all right, onto the running game.

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I am weirdly splitting these two, Blunt and small Wood.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him both B grades. It's a great matchup

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>against a bottom two run defense bottom too, yes, exactly. Well,

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the category you're looking at. But Blunt

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is only averaging fourteen carries per week over the last

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, and the four ns are only giving up

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>three point nine yards per carries. So even if Blunt's

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot of carries, he's not involved in

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the passing game just just to make up a great day.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But he might get it. So I'm giving him a

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.439
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Small Wood, I love though forty niners ranked

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>dead last in receiving yards, receptions and receiving touchdowns to

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs. That's where small Wood. That's where small Wood lives.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>He was going to be one of our original take

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me players near seven receptions the game

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. That's all small would be great for him.

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Love him this week. Now I've got small with it

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>running back number. That's how much I like him. Final

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup of this segment and Matt, Yeah, if you're slow

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about it, we're not gonna get to our callers, So

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to You're gonna have to find a

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>way to plow through a lot of guys to talk

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 1>about in the Chargers and Patriots matchup. Well, let's start

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Patriots running game, which we pretty much covered

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and detailed him depth, and take a chance. Mike gillis

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Lee was the only guy we didn't cover. I gotta

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>see start for him. It's worth noting that his touch

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>totals have declined from twelve to ten to eight over

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks, but he still remains the goal

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>line back and probably the guy who has the best

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>chance of scoring a touchdown. No fumble goes unpunished by

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichi. That's true, Tom Brady, I gotta be grade on.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>No quarterback is top two two yards against the Chargers

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, although I expect Brady to do so. But

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a legit Chargers past defense. That's why Brady gets

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a B instead of an A. Brandon Cooks also getting

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a B. Cooks is averaging a career high nineteen point

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>two yards per catch in his top eighty five yards

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are scored in each of the last three weeks. He's

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>doing great. He's still be Chris Hogan has topped seventy

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>yards or scored in five of the last six. He

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>gets a B as well. They run at the two

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>best corners. Cooks and Hogan run at the two best

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>corners the Chargers have in Casey Hayward and Trevor Williams.

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Though Danny Amondola practicing through a knee injury. I'm giving

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>him a CE because he gets the easiest draw against

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>slot corner Desmond King. Chargers defense is top ten and

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>yards allowed to wide receivers, but have allowed the third

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>most touchdowns to the wide receiver position nine and seven games,

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>so there's gonna be some touchdowns had by the wide receivers. Gronk,

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be the tight end is never scored a

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown against the Los Angeles Chargers. Never, never, There you go,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So there we go. They did hold told Travis Kelsey

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to one catch for one yard earlier this year, but

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz ding them for five catches in eighty one yards.

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit more of the Travis

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>or zach Ertz games. Now. This is the only this

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is the only B grade I've given Gronk all year. Yeah,

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think so. So then we can flip on over

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Charger side. Melvin Gordon. I have an a

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Gordon still has the questionable tag next to his name,

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but he practiced in full on Friday, which leaves back

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>up Austin Ekeler on your bench despite him being a

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sneaky handcuff grab grab five seven years. This season, yeah,

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon's averaging twenty point six touches per game and the

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Pats are allowing a jaw dropping four point eight yards

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>per carry this season. I talked about Philip Rivers, he was,

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance to me quarterback. I talked about

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyrrell Williams, he was, might take a chance to me

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Keenan Allen getting an a in this. Uh,

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>don't have to say too much because the Patriots are

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so bad against wide receivers. I'll say this though, I

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think Malcolm Butler is just gonna fall shadow him. Okay,

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and Stephan Gilmour may again may miss another game, and

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's an opportunity. I think there's an

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Keenan Allen to have a a worse than

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>expected game and for the other receivers to you all right,

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't scored since Week one, nine targets in six

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or six or seven of his games this season, so

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the quantity is there. Travis Benjamin I got on the bench.

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's truly scored twice last week. One was a punt return,

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the other was his loan target in the game. So

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not following that. But Hunter Henry, I have a

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>be on Henry's top. Seventy yards are scored in four

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks, and the Pats are bottom ten in both

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>catches and yards allowed to the tight end position this year.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some calls. Yeah, we should. Um. If it

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>turns out Stephane Gilmour can't go, Johnson Batamosi will be

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you're starting. Johnson BATAMOSEI is actually played really well for

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots this year. If you check the metrics on it,

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>he's he's probably been their best corner. I just like

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to say it's fun to Johnson Batamosi. Yeah, read in Michigan. Hello, Hey,

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>how's it going good? Thank you? We love read in Michigan.

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while. Yeah, I've been laid up for

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>a while anyway. My question is in a full point

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>PPR Hogan or Smallwood in my spot. I I like

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>small Wood. I really like Yeah, I really like small Wood.

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>This week, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets five

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>or six catches to go along with the rushing to

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>receive yards. Were all, we're all over, We're all over Smallwood. Hey,

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>would you drop Martevius Bryant to pick up the Shawn Jackson? Oh? Yes, ye,

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you could just stop at the first half of that.

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Would you drop Martevis Bryant? Correct? Yes, you know there's

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody else available in your league that you'd rather have.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, can you just leave me on hold and

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I can hang up at lightning? You round? Sure this works? Uh?

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>If Reid is laid up isn't it easier if he's

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>been laid up? Isn't it easier to call in? I

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>think so? Ben, Hello, if his fingers don't work very well? Now?

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this the Ben in Portland who often calls? Is

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>this the Ben in Portland who often calls in? No,

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, this is Milwaukee. Oh, Hi Ben, Milwaukee. Should

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we take this call? Yes? I'll be quick actually, because

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything else is already I can't do anything

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>else with the bye week, so I'm saying really good

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason I picked about ex mrs week and

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>uh that was in free agency. Um, and really the

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>only question is Hunter Henry. I gave him the PPR

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>as the full point. Do you play him or Kyle Rudolph.

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of already have Henry and and I didn't

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hear what you guys said about Yeah, I've got him

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>ranked number two and number four, so I like both

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of them a lot. Which one did you have I have?

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I have Henry actually two spots higher. I have Henry

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>two as well. Yeah, so we're all on Henry. Thanks Ben, Bye, bye,

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you, it's working one more e Hello, Hi, good morning, guys,

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you do it good. Thank you. With all the letters

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have thrown out today, a's, b's, and c's,

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we have not yet thrown out an your first even

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I throw out a D two. Yeah, there we go. Awesome.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, I'm gonna make this real quick if I

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can get a couple of our questions up. I have

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>de Shaun Watson and Jameis Winston uh and looking towards

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>uh setups, looking uh looking forward to it. Who should

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I start? Being that Watton has to play San Francisco, Jacksonville,

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and pitt and then Winston has some play Detroit, Atlanta

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina. I'm looking to trade one of those two,

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>but with Winston's shoulder kind of scares me to trade

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>either one of them. I don't. I don't. I wouldn't

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>trade either one. Play the matchups in your playoffs with

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>those two now, then wait till after this weekend, see

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>if Watson truly is matchup proof. Okay, And the only

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>reason why is that I'm actually rolling with Alvin Kamara

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think uh Lean's Dark Wall and Johnson Stewart,

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to kind of get rid of John Stewart,

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 1>but I got Devin Tovin Coleman. So that's the only

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:54.879
<v Speaker 1>reason why I wanted to trade one of those guys. Yeah,

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>well we all we all think you should stand Pat.

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's you get a really significant deal. Uh, we need

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to We need to take our break for the top

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of the hour. When we come back. Five hot questions,

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>see if you can play a lot, see if you

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>can go five and oh with our panel of experts

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>when we return. You're distinct of Fantasy Football Weekly on

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fan. Welcome back to the show. Oh you just

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>started me talking about our decade long sponsored grain Belt Premium,

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the official beer Fantasy Football at a reminder to play

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the crush Charts challenge at grain belt dot Com. Last

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>week's winner, Joel, I love it when you have to

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>try to figure. I gotta face all these guys at

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Manny's in a couple of months, so I gotta I

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta give it a best effort. Okay Schlewitz laywitzzwz. Joe

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Slaywitz is our week seven winner. Many thanks as always

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to our friends at the Brewery, Shaan, Ryan, Ted and

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Jody Marty for all their all their support for the show,

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>which is fantastic and by the way, so is Grainbell Premium.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 1>It was so fun to end that show from the

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Brewery this year. That was Oh yeah, that was a

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun and you got to meet Ted and Jody.

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Great people. Hot question number one, Carson Palmer's gone on

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>i R effectively ending his season. Can we drop all

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals receivers. No. I think Fitzgerald is still gonna

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be flexible. He's still gonna get the volume. Although with

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>stan In he's only top fifty yards once, so it's

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not looking good. But I think he's at least still

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>flex of Okay, yeah, I'm kind of on the same thing.

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you can drop everybody, but Larry Fitzgerald, um

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>blame Gabbert might be slightly better than Drew Stanton and

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>might get a chance at some point along the way,

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's the little hope there. I think he's still

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver three or flex in most leagues, but

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine he has any value on the trade

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>market right now. But he's one of those guys that

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Church might say right here, that is a sabotage drop

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>in your league, and he's a guy that would be

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>picked up and held on roster. So if you have

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a strong wide receiver corps, you could go with the

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:35.479
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop of Larry Fitzgerald. Of that when I wrote

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the question before, before I knew the answer, you know,

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>which is mostly how I worked this is I try

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to find questions that I'm honestly not sure about, and

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I thought the answer was going to

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be sabotage, drop Larry and drop everybody else. But then

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I went through the schedule and I thought about, really, what,

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I are there gonna be any scenarios left from starting Fitzgerald,

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's going to be probably another five times when

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get a C grade the rest of the way.

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like, I can't quite drop Larry Fitzgerald. Hot

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Question number two, what's the appropriate level of panic for

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>those fantasy owners holding Green Bay receivers? Mild moderate internal

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>distress or a fistfull of prozac level of panic. I

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're so talented that I'm just moderately worried, but

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not not too much right now. Some moderate internal distress

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I related more like to to lane in bed, and

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 1>you hear some noises, and let's give it a week

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>or two to check it out. See if you see,

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 1>if you know some mouse droppings. Maybe it was maybe

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it was the wind. Maybe it is some mice in

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the walls. But I'm not I'm not too worried yet.

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I need to see a little bit more of Honey

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>before let's let's give it a week or two to

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 1>see if there's mice. No, I'm talking. I'm talking about

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 1>let's see a week or two more of Huntley before

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we get really scared. Okay, let's R E L A X.

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you're taking mile, I said in internal distress,

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's moderate intestinal distresses. Moderate people remember our old

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>bit on Fantasy football almost daily. I went with a

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>cute panic panic. Yes. Um, the completion percentage for Hunley

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>is just awful. He's thrown for one touchdown so far,

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>four picks and about seven quarters of work. Jordi had

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>only four targets last week, Adams had only five. They

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:27.800
<v Speaker 1>combined for three catches and twenty five yards against the

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Saints at home. It's possible that he's just really this bad,

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to rely on Aaron Jones and the

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>defense to try to Chicago Bears a few wins until

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers gets back. So I'm super panicked about the

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay wide receivers, you should be The appropriate level

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of panic is the prozac level. There's just no coding

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>how bad Brett Hunley looked last week. I'd I'd like

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to I'd like to say that there was and there's

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>he he will get better, but he needs to get

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot better. I mean right now. You always were

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:58.359
<v Speaker 1>in the past where it will just start your pack

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>or receivers, you don't care even about the matchups are

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>now we got a drill down on matchups, we got

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>a drill down on opponents, and the schedules bad they

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>got by this week. They get a neutral matchup with

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit next week. And by the way, Cobb is probably

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the bench, Davante Adams maybe on the

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>bench next week because he's gonna get the sleigh ride

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>next week in Detroit, So that's a worry. Then after that,

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>deeply negative matchups coming Chicago, Baltimore, Pittsburgh. That is the

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>number fourteen, number five, and the number one wide receiver

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 1>defenses by yards allowed. In fact, there's only one particularly

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 1>positive matchup on the schedule for these receivers, and that's

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Week thirteen against Nampa. So your level of distress should

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>be high hot. Question number three. Can fantasy owners just

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>drop j Gi Matt? Uh No, they can't because he

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>already played this week and he's locked in your lineup

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or on your bench, or well here's the time, I'm Monday. Um,

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging twenty five rushing yards or rushing attempts per

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>game prior to heading into that Thursday night or last

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>week where they lost forty to nothing and game flow

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just went away from j j I. So I'm throwing

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that one out the window. The touches will maintain. The

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are really missing that bye week that they sorely needed,

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>which would have been next week for them. Uh Gi,

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you still got the knee and elbow injuries that he's

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>working through. I'm not dropping him, but he's probably going

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a flex or a bench for me the

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way. All right, Scott, pretty much everything

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt said I agree with. He gets too much volume

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to drop. Plus he does look good on a lot

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of runs. Still, it's just that line is giving him

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>no room to breathe. I'm not dropping him yet. I'm

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna flex him a lot probably. Yeah. The temptation

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to drop him as high and I understand that, but

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he's still starting running back in the NFL with the

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>fourth most carries in the NFL, and if the offensive

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 1>line can give him anything to work with, j J

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I can still be good. Devanny's hot question Number four

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>going forward is Alex Collins in RB one, in RB

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>two flex or bench Scott. I'm gonna go with r

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>B two. His schedule isn't great. He only has to

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>two defenses that he'll play that our bottom half of

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the league, otherwise their top half defenses all the way

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>through the rest of the season. But he's gonna start

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>gaining a lot more volume. Mean, his five plus yards

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>per carry is really really good. And then I think

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he showed last week that he can handle the load.

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel that way at all. Um. I like

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that The yards per carry have certainly been there so

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>far this year. The problem is the rushing attempts have

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>not been consistent. And if you believe that a Joe

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Flacco is a good quarterback, be Joe Flacco is a

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>healthy quarterback or see they can win games forty two nothing.

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it favors the running game for the Ravens.

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably a flex player the rest of

0:51:59.880 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, and he's gonna teeter between flex and bench

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 1>if they can find a good matchup. He is a

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 1>flex player the rest of the way for the reasons

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that Matt just elusive hot question number five after this

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>week's by is Sterling Shepherd. A wide receiver one, a

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to a flex or a bench. Matt. I

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 1>went into this one pretty negative, but once I dug

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in uh, I figured out that despite how bad the

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Giants have been, Eli Manning is still twelfth in the

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 1>NFL and passing yards and thirteen in the NFL and

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns. Then there's Shepherd and Evan Ingram as the

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.320
<v Speaker 1>only people he can really throw the ball to, and

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's about it. People forget that he also put up

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>eight touchdowns last year and had over a hundred targets,

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and he was significantly downgraded in drafts this year because

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the addition of Brandon Marshall. Well, Brandon Marshall's gone, and

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>so is Odell Beckham. So I think he's at least

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>worthy of a wide receiver too in most twelve team weeks.

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm going a little more than that, but

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I can see your point. I'm going with flex just

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>because he's gonna get so much volume for the rest

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Every matchup he faces is a top

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>thirteen past defense except for two, and the two of

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>those two San Francisco and Arizona. He might get Patrick

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Peterson if he's the number one wide receiver when they

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>play Arizona. I hate the man, I hate the schedule,

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but he a lot of passes. He's gonna get a

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of volume. I'm giving him a nice flex play.

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He has a wide receiver to Sterling Shepherd is and

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the It's funny because I looked at the schedule and

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:30.760
<v Speaker 1>found it to be mostly favorable, including three straight startable

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in the next four weeks. Rams Niners Chiefs. He's

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:38.880
<v Speaker 1>got by this week, then rams Niners Chiefs. Those are

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the number seventeen, twenty four, and twenty eight ranked defenses

0:53:42.880 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 1>by wide receiver yards allowed. So I saw the schedules

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 1>are positive. Well, you touched him. That I think really

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>deserves more um time on is whether or not the

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Giants are gonna take Sterling Shepherd out of the slot

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and bump him outside. I think that they will, and

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that they should because us next year they need a

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:06.760
<v Speaker 1>replacement for Brandon Marshall on the outside opposite Odell Beckham.

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a great opportunity to get Sterling Shepard Reps

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>on the outside. He's their best receiver the slot. It's

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>not like you can't be an effective receiver from the slot.

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you can be, but you can't. It's hard to

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be an elite number one receiver when you are playing

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 1>from the slot position. So I think they're gonna bump

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 1>him outside, and to your point, that means he's going

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to draw guys like Josh Norman and Patrick Peterson, two

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>players too, tough tough corners that are on the schedule,

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but those are the only two shutdown corners on the schedule.

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Those too. I bet they just move him around a

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 1>lot that could happen as well, which would make sense,

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and try to find favorable matchups. So there we go. Hey,

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I went five for five. Nicely done. You're only one.

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>You're only one short of the all time record for five.

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Last two get the six for five. I'm I'm really

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to the extra credits. My matchups for him

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>were based Don Sharp Warren Sharp, so like um, A

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of things I want to know before we move

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on to our our next set of matchups. Weather issues

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 1>brewing on the East coast. The Jets game. Uh, it's

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:19.319
<v Speaker 1>all rain, by the way, and but potentially very heavy rain.

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna want to pay attention to this. How cold

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>will it be? Um? Not very cold? There's enough for No,

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:30.759
<v Speaker 1>don't no, not yet, save it, save it. It's coming. No.

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 1>We almost had it here. We almost had conditions here yesterday. Uh.

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Jets game, potential of rain, Eagles game at home rain

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the uh oh. And the last one is the Washington

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Redskins game. Rain, So watch those. Even the Bills are

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:50.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna get light rain, but that shouldn't be as bad

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:53.799
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of New York. So that's those

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:56.400
<v Speaker 1>are ones you want to pay some attention to before

0:55:56.640 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>before kickoff. They the Redskins game is an evening, so

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 1>that one's gonna be a little bit trickier. By and large, though,

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't let rain change my opinions on on things

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>unless it's really really severe. Um. For the most part,

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't let that that stop me. But there there's

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a chance it is going to be pretty severe rain.

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we could talk more about the Redskins and

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>why don't we right to that. Right now, Redskins take

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.399
<v Speaker 1>on the Cowboys and Matt, I understand there could be rain, yes,

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be well above thirty two wish degrees.

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're from there. There is that. Fortunately, it's my matchup. Now.

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You're sorry because you brought it up. I assumed it

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 1>was yours. I was just trying to help you out.

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. Thank you. Well done. Redskins running game.

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson has been a fantastic find and he's He's

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>really Kirk Cousin's most reliable option in the entire passing

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:51.400
<v Speaker 1>game at all positions. He's now gone for one hundred

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:53.440
<v Speaker 1>total yards and or a touchdown in five of the

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:57.960
<v Speaker 1>last six games. Another favorable matchup this week against the Cowboys,

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>who give up four and a half it's per carried.

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>They've given up eight or more targets two running backs

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in four different games this year. So Chris Thompson keep

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the good times of rolling baby. He also leads the

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Redskins in rushing and receiving, so that too, um and

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, Rob Kelly's on the bench. Soma p

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan clearly on the bench as well. Kelly only had

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seven rushes last Monday, and that was a close game.

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>If this one isn't close, to be potentially even worse.

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So I don't, I don't, I'm not. I'm not interested

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in Rob Kelly at this stage. Let's go to the

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Kirk Cousins gets to be Dallas currently ranks

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth against the past and passing touchdowns allowed, and Cousins

0:57:37.200 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>smoked the Cowboys in the two games last year. Is

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 1>average game against the Cowboys last year three hundred seventy

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:48.760
<v Speaker 1>five yards and two and a half touchdowns. Cousins has

0:57:48.800 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>thrown multiple touchdowns and three straight games. And the benching

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of Terrell Prior is an addition by subtraction, he's on

0:57:55.560 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the bench as well. What the heck happened? By the way?

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Drop her ble outright, just dropped, just dropped Terrell. There's

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a touch of sabotage drop in that one, just

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Jamison Crowder is the guy that earlier

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in the year I said is gonna bounce around rosters

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and every team's gonna have him once and try him.

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench here. He's working out of the

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>slot that matches him up against solid cornerback Orlando Scandrick

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Crowder hasn't found the end zone this year, hasn't topped

0:58:19.880 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty receiving yards all year. And the funny thing is

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>last year he was good. He was startable in spots.

0:58:25.600 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 1>He was maybe the best receiver at times. Last year.

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Nothing out of Crowder this year. He's got to be

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Unfortunately, Josh Dockson was Scott Fish's take

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance on the wide receiver. He's got a C

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>grade for me. Jordan Reid's got to see he broke

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>out last week and now he goes up against the

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense that he lit up for ten catches, ninety

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>five yards and two scores of Week twelve in Week

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve of last season. But they've been really good against

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 1>tight ends this year, averaging just four catches per game.

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:55.760
<v Speaker 1>They've only given up one tight end touchdown. And Jordan

0:58:55.800 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Reid was awful in every game besides the one last week.

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't trust him enough to move him ahead

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of a C grade. Let's go to the Dallas side.

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott obvious A grade. He's my number two ranked

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:10.320
<v Speaker 1>running back overall this year. Even though Washington is a

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 1>good run defense, He's still obviously somebody you're gonna start

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in all situations. In the passing game, Dak Prescott's quietly

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>having an elite fantasy year with multiple passing touchdowns in

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 1>every game since the opener. The Redskins secondary has slumped

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>without Josh Norman, but it looks like he will return. Here.

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Washington had fallen to twentieth against the past thirty feet

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>against quarterback rushing, and here's Prescott averaging twenty two rushing

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>yards per game against Washington last year. He scored a

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdown on the ground in both games against Washington last year.

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So Dak Prescott a grade. Des Bryant remains in a grade.

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Even with Josh Norman coming back, he probably is not

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:56.240
<v Speaker 1>playing it close to full strength here. Brian has found

0:59:56.280 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to put up solid fantasy numbers despite great coverage

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of good corner backs, including Patrick Peterson

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>got a touchdown of that game, and so there's a

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of good operat plus the Josh Norman does Bryant

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>cute trash talk commercials. I never seen it. I never

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>seen need to see that. Gross. He has scored in

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>four the past five games last year against Norman, does

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>put up. These are combined put up a hundred two

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>yards and seventy two yards in the two games, but

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>did not score. I've still got an a grade on

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>des Bryant, b great on Jason Witten. The Redskins rank

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>dead last in receiving yards to opposing tight ends eight

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>seven per game. Meanwhile, wins fourth among tight ends and

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>receptions and touchdowns. And if she have no problem getting

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>open against a defense that's been particularly hard hit against

1:00:42.120 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>elite tight ends. Cole beasily is on the slot. It

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>runs from the slot. He's on the bench against Kendall Fuller,

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a good slot corner. Let's take a break when we

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>come back. Final set of matchups. We've got lightning round looming,

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation, plenty more to get to when we return

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan. You're distinctive Fantasy

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on the Fan. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Fan. We've got a handful of matchups to

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>get through here and then we'll get to premature speculation.

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Lightning round. We begin with the Texans going to the Seahawks.

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>The highest scoring quarterback in many fantasy leagues has been

1:01:33.640 --> 1:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to Shawn Watson, and now Scott he travels to Seattle

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for a brutal matchup. What do you think does he

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>keep the hot street going or does he cool off here?

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to tell. He did tear up New England,

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, Tennessee, and Cleveland, who were all bottomed defense

1:01:54.040 --> 1:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time. But Seattle is only allowing just over

1:01:56.440 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>two yards to quarterbacks and five touchdowns on the season.

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's unreal. Watson, however, second NFL touchdown passes,

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but he leads in points per game or you know,

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game, so that's that might be where

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he can make up some of the ground. I'll mention this,

1:02:13.600 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is not giving up a quarterback rushing touchdown in

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>fourteen games. I thought you're gonna say, like fourteen years.

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>That Actually when I when I when I did the

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>stat I thought it was gonna be like I looked

1:02:25.400 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it up and it was fourteen. But it's still a lot.

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big Watson fans. I'm giving him a partly

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>biased B grade to think that he can rise a

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit above the matchup, but be grade for him,

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be great for Hopkins. He's probably gonna get Sherman hopefully

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they move him around a little bit. But literally, did

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he get on the plane today? Yeah? Or any of

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Texans even gonna bother playing? Yeah, exactly, that's the

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>next question. Well, if he does show up and the

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Texans do play, it doesn't really matter where he lines up.

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>That defense it's really solid. They've only allowed three touchdowns

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers this year, but that eleven targets per game.

1:02:57.720 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>He gets fed so many. How many people are gonna

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:07.479
<v Speaker 1>show up to the Seattle game wearing like the orange jumpsuit? Wouldn't? Yeah,

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>man could be sorry, continue grade Hopkins will fuller C grade.

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I I don't even like it, but I can't deny

1:03:17.520 --> 1:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that it keeps scoring. How is he doing it? Five

1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns on just fourteen targets. That's not sustainable, It's not

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. But I guess I'm gonna ride that horse

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>until she bucks me, and I'm I'm gonna throw him

1:03:28.760 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in there with a C grade just in case he

1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>keeps scoring. Watson seems to like him there, So now

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna ride this horse until it poops in a wall. No, No,

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's only for the mice man. You're not going

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to ride a mouse either right, it sounds like a

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really weird country song. It does a mouse, maybe a

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of mouse, mice in the shape of craps. Thank you,

1:03:51.400 --> 1:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Griffin giving it at tight end, giving him

1:03:56.280 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Uhas are allowing him about sixty yards

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>per game in the tight end, which is not that good.

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And Griffin's getting six targets a game over the last four.

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a matchup opportunity there. I don't love it, but

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a C grade. For Lamar Miller, uh,

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's top five against the run allowed the fewest receptions

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. But Lamar Miller has over eight yards

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and three straight games and he's he's touching the ball

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen times every single game. I'm giving him a C

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>grade just on just on the opportunity of volume there.

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm benching Foreman. He's been too and consistent with his touches.

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Over on the Seahawks side, I'm giving Wilson in a

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>grade like a don't say you're gonna get in trouble.

1:04:37.440 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I almost said noe A grade. Uh it's a shaky one. Though.

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The Texans were lit up by Tom Brady and Alex Smith,

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and they held down Bordles, Dalton, Hogan and that Mariotta

1:04:49.560 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Castle Combo. So I think Wilson's closer to the other two,

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So I like him, giving him an A grade here. Baldwin, Uh,

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>favorable match up against Kream accs in, but just five

1:05:01.440 --> 1:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers have over sixty yards against the Texans. That's

1:05:04.640 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>probably Baldwin. He's probably the only one that's gonna do that,

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging eight and a half targets per game. The Texans

1:05:10.280 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>secondary ravaged by injury before the bye week, now presumably

1:05:13.640 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of it, I think they're much much better shape. Yeah,

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that and for that reason, I'm benching Richardson and Lockett

1:05:18.960 --> 1:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>two inconsistent with their targets. Uh. Jimmy Graham, I'm giving

1:05:22.880 --> 1:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade. Kelsey and Gronk tore up the Texans. Uh,

1:05:26.960 --> 1:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham scored in two straight. He's getting eight targets

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>per game. You know, of the he's dropping like half

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, it feels like at this point. But he's

1:05:34.080 --> 1:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot of a lot of opportunity to

1:05:36.120 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>make production here. Rawl's Lacey process mckiss. I'm I'm benching

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>them all. Texans Top five against the run. No running

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>back with under twenty five carries his top sixty yards.

1:05:46.400 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's getting twenty five carries for that backfield and I agree.

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Let's go to our next matchup, Steelers taking

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Lions. Lions past defense can be awfully good.

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben roethlis time spen Roethlisberger, of course, always a shaky

1:06:02.920 --> 1:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>start on the road. What do you think about this

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup for the passing game? Well, Big Ben happens to

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like Ford Field because it's the site of his victory

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve years ago. Story. Yes, Uh, he's not. I'm not

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>afraid of Detroit's defense. Though, three of the last four

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks to face the lines of thrown for multiple touchdowns.

1:06:21.800 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>The one that didn't was case Keenum. Uh so I

1:06:24.400 --> 1:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have Ben Roethlisberger is a B grade in this game, easy,

1:06:27.800 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>A grade to Antonio Brown and Levy on Bell. Don't

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have to talk much more about them, Juju Smith Schuster.

1:06:33.200 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting him a C grade to The Steelers will

1:06:37.080 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be without Mark Tavis Bryant, who's on the scout team. Now,

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know NFL teams had Scott teams, and I

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think they do up just for him scout team

1:06:47.600 --> 1:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and then man the taxi squad. Maybe Vance McDonald's also

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>out of this game, so Juju gets a little bit

1:06:53.880 --> 1:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of a bump. He's scored in three of his last

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>six games. He will not draw the sleigh ride. He's

1:06:58.520 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slay is expected to go on Antonio Brownell game

1:07:02.360 --> 1:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>because Vance McDonald's out. Some might think Jesse James, but

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>he's still on the bench. He hasn't topped fifty yards

1:07:07.800 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this season and he's caught zero point zero balls in

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, so he's on the bench. Over

1:07:15.160 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Detroit side, a Mere Abdullah gets a B grade.

1:07:18.120 --> 1:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon was averaging almost seven yards per carry against

1:07:21.720 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers in the first half last week. Yeah, until

1:07:24.720 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>then they didn't hand in the ball in the second half.

1:07:27.840 --> 1:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. Kareem Hunt, Leo for Nette, Jordan Howard,

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Alex Collins buck Allen Combo each topped one

1:07:34.240 --> 1:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred total yards against the Steelers this season, So I

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think a Mere Dula is a solid B. Matthew Stafford's

1:07:40.280 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>getting a C grade, but he's closer to a bench grade.

1:07:42.880 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>For me. No quarterback has topped two hundred forty six

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>yards against the Steelers this season. In fact, they've had

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>more quarterbacks throw for less than two hundred yards than

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>more than two hundred yards. It's four to three right now,

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>so they've been very good against the pass. Plus, Golden

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Tate has a sprained a C joint and he was

1:08:02.520 --> 1:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>limited in practice all week, and I think I'm gonna

1:08:05.360 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>put him on the bench just because this is a

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night game. Yeah, you don't know risk it. You

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know completely if he's going to go. If you're

1:08:13.000 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely desperate to have Golden Tate in your lineup, I

1:08:15.960 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think you think you have to have Juju Smith Schuster

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>as your backup. Maybe, but he's been rostered everywhere now.

1:08:21.360 --> 1:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones or Benny Fowler, Churches Guy Ben That those

1:08:27.360 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are the three guys that I think you have to

1:08:28.960 --> 1:08:30.599
<v Speaker 1>have on the bench if you're planning on putting Tate

1:08:30.640 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup. For now, Marvin Jones is on the

1:08:33.400 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>bench to Kenny Golladay is actually hurt as he had

1:08:36.800 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a setback. I don't think he's gonna go. Um he's

1:08:39.320 --> 1:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out and uh Eric Ebron has failed the

1:08:41.840 --> 1:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>top ten yards in four of six can we just stop,

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>We just never bring up his name on the show again. Done?

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, good, thank you. When premature speculation, we'll give

1:08:52.920 --> 1:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys to pick up one week before the rest

1:08:54.800 --> 1:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of your league Lightning Round in our final match up

1:08:56.920 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Monday Night or Kansas City taking on Denver. Fit

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is Fantasy Football Weekly presented man Final Thing that Fantasy

1:09:16.479 --> 1:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Paul Charge and Matt Harrison Scott fished with you.

1:09:22.439 --> 1:09:24.759
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't already checked out fan Ball, we encourage

1:09:24.800 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you to do it. You can play against me at

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>no cost. We have a special We have a special

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>contest called the Great Charch Chase. That was the Chase

1:09:33.120 --> 1:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Charch Challenge. No no, no, there's the there's the Great

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Ball Premium, the Crushed Charch Crush Charch Challenge. This is

1:09:40.200 --> 1:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the Great Charch Chase, which is similar but different. There's

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>no Manni's about the Great cha No no, no no,

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that's specifically not the Great Chatcha. Just go to fanball

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chart, put in a lineup. If you

1:09:54.200 --> 1:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>end up beating me, you get in any week you

1:09:57.040 --> 1:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get a free entry to our week seven Week seven

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>teen contest against me with a fifteen thousand dollar prize

1:10:04.080 --> 1:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>pool and that is free to play fambill dot com

1:10:06.760 --> 1:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>slash chart and you'll start getting your fan ball number scored,

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>which is great. Yeah, that's always fun too. Chiefs take

1:10:14.520 --> 1:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on the well, let's do premature speculation. We've done so many. Yeah,

1:10:18.840 --> 1:10:21.759
<v Speaker 1>let's premature speculation again. These are guys that we encourage

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you to pick up now that we think are gonna

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:26.519
<v Speaker 1>be hot waiver wire targets next week, and you'll already

1:10:26.520 --> 1:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>have him on your team. Scott, I'm going with D. D. Westbrook,

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jaguars wide receiver. He had a couple hundred yard

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>games in the preseason. Uh, he's a big play threat.

1:10:35.800 --> 1:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Had three catches for over thirty yards in the preseason.

1:10:38.520 --> 1:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>He's been on I R. He comes back after the bye. Uh.

1:10:42.640 --> 1:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>No one for Jacksonville is really stepping up and they're

1:10:45.240 --> 1:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>hurt a lot. So I don't think it's a good

1:10:47.360 --> 1:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>offense for passing very much. But you know it's it's

1:10:50.320 --> 1:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>a nice dart throw there. That is a dart throw,

1:10:52.760 --> 1:10:55.519
<v Speaker 1>all right. That was very tepid that really he didn't

1:10:55.520 --> 1:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>well portals is still his quarters. Yeah, I have a

1:11:00.160 --> 1:11:02.599
<v Speaker 1>guy who's not exciting as well. But I am excited

1:11:02.640 --> 1:11:06.719
<v Speaker 1>about an aspect of his matchup next week. It's Tyler Higbee.

1:11:07.080 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're in need of a tight end next week, alright,

1:11:10.160 --> 1:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>because next week there's a handful of really good tight

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:16.599
<v Speaker 1>ends on by Gronk Hunter, Henry and Antonio Gates, Kyle Rudolph,

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and if you're in a deep league, David and Joku.

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>They're all on by next week. Tyler Higgbee gets the

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Giants next week, and the Giants fable defense has given

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>up a touchdown to a tight end eight times in

1:11:29.439 --> 1:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>seven games this season. So avoid the rush and pick

1:11:33.080 --> 1:11:36.519
<v Speaker 1>up the take a chance on me end week, Tyler,

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna take full credit next week, alright. My

1:11:42.520 --> 1:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation is first round rookie receiver Corey Davis for Tennessee,

1:11:47.360 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>who has missed every game since Week one. Uh and

1:11:50.040 --> 1:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in that game targeted ten times in that game, not

1:11:54.200 --> 1:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>nine times, nine times, principal, principle, not get that skinner, principal,

1:12:02.640 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>look it up for me. All year, no other Titans

1:12:05.120 --> 1:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver has been targeted more than the ten times that

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis got in Week one. He's been languishing with

1:12:10.320 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>his hamstring injury, but will resume practicing next week, and

1:12:13.439 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>ESPN is reporting that he will play next week against Baltimore.

1:12:17.280 --> 1:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>So you need to pick him up this week. Ed Rooney,

1:12:20.200 --> 1:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Ed Rooney Principal, Ed Rooney, Absolutely, that is exactly what

1:12:24.080 --> 1:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>it is. And is the guy the actor who played

1:12:28.560 --> 1:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>out of jail jail. I think he's still in jail.

1:12:32.680 --> 1:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>The Titans have gotten almost nothing from their receivers. They

1:12:35.320 --> 1:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>need Corey Davis and especially is big play pop So

1:12:40.040 --> 1:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis premature speculation a great Ed Rooney quote. Yes, please.

1:12:45.120 --> 1:12:47.519
<v Speaker 1>I did not achieve this position in life by having

1:12:47.640 --> 1:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>some snot nosed punk leave my cheese out in the wind.

1:12:51.000 --> 1:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Leave my cheese out in the wind. What Let's go

1:12:56.240 --> 1:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to Chiefs Broncos. This is at Broncos. Kareem Hunt scoreless streak,

1:13:01.040 --> 1:13:04.639
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is four games for Kareem Hunt. Drop

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a hell of its advantageding your own team. It will

1:13:11.880 --> 1:13:14.639
<v Speaker 1>not get any easier against the Broncos, who have yet

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to allow a running back rushing touchdown this year. Now

1:13:19.120 --> 1:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>they have given up two receiving scores, and Hunt obviously

1:13:22.479 --> 1:13:25.519
<v Speaker 1>is a very capable pass catcher. Uh He's managed at

1:13:25.560 --> 1:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>least three receptions and six of his seven games to

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>this point. B grade for Kareem Hunt. Let's go to

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Alex Smith has never posted a three

1:13:35.680 --> 1:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard game against Denver home or away. He's also

1:13:39.800 --> 1:13:45.639
<v Speaker 1>his three straight one touchdown games against Denver. Denver secondary

1:13:45.680 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>has been a little more touchdown friendly this year. They've

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:50.479
<v Speaker 1>given up multiple scoring strikes in four or six games,

1:13:50.520 --> 1:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but no quarterbacks top two fifty yards against them. They're

1:13:53.400 --> 1:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the sixth best in yardage allowed and third best in

1:13:56.400 --> 1:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rushing yards allowed. So I see a middling performance

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>here about for Alex Smith in the two hundred twenty

1:14:04.360 --> 1:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>five yard one and a half touchdown range. And that's

1:14:06.880 --> 1:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>similar what he did against Pittsburgh two weeks ago where

1:14:09.400 --> 1:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he had two six and one. Yeah, very similar probably

1:14:12.360 --> 1:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you yes, against another very good past defense. Uh.

1:14:16.040 --> 1:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>That means Tyreek Hill also a C grade. He did

1:14:18.400 --> 1:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>score both of last season's games with the Broncos, although

1:14:21.160 --> 1:14:23.439
<v Speaker 1>one of them was a rushing touchdown. Um, you're gonna

1:14:23.439 --> 1:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have the banking and finding the end zone for fantasy relevance.

1:14:26.200 --> 1:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Denver has given up six wide receiver touchdowns, but no

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>whiteout is topped even sixty five yards against Denver all

1:14:32.320 --> 1:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>year they ranked second best and wide receiver yardage allowed,

1:14:36.280 --> 1:14:39.759
<v Speaker 1>so it's a tough matchup for Tyreek Hill. Travis Kelsey

1:14:39.840 --> 1:14:43.479
<v Speaker 1>though a grade here. It's so hard to beat Denver

1:14:43.720 --> 1:14:46.559
<v Speaker 1>along the perimeter, along the edges, with the great corners,

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:48.479
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of teams will used the tight end

1:14:48.560 --> 1:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for that. Tight ends are getting a six catches seventy

1:14:52.160 --> 1:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>six yards per game against the Broncos since the season opener,

1:14:55.439 --> 1:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's almost exactly what Kelsey averages. He's six and seventies,

1:14:58.280 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>so we can pretty much count on that better. Better still,

1:15:01.479 --> 1:15:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey obliterated the Broncos last just torched them nineteen catches

1:15:05.640 --> 1:15:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in the two games, both of them one hundred yard

1:15:10.520 --> 1:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>performances against Denver last year. Denver is gonna watch the

1:15:14.439 --> 1:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tape and they're gonna want to take it away, but

1:15:15.840 --> 1:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that they can. A grade Travis Kelsey.

1:15:20.120 --> 1:15:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Denver side. We'll start with the

1:15:22.560 --> 1:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>running game. I've just got a C grade on C. J. Anderson,

1:15:24.920 --> 1:15:28.479
<v Speaker 1>who's deeply disappointed me the last two weeks, squandering two

1:15:28.760 --> 1:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>primo opportunities to hammer the Giants and the Chargers struggling

1:15:32.840 --> 1:15:36.439
<v Speaker 1>run defenses. You only got nineteen carries in those two games,

1:15:36.520 --> 1:15:39.679
<v Speaker 1>so I want to give him a stronger recommendation. Here

1:15:40.000 --> 1:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he goes up against the Chiefs run defense that's giving

1:15:42.080 --> 1:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a four point seven yards per carry. But these are

1:15:44.920 --> 1:15:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the same quality of opportunities he's had the last two weeks. Ah,

1:15:50.600 --> 1:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to get his yardage on the ground because

1:15:52.400 --> 1:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs of Stemy deposing runners through the air, giving

1:15:55.160 --> 1:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>up just twenty five scoreless yards per game to running back.

1:15:59.320 --> 1:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So Cjmerson just to see grade here, let's go to

1:16:02.000 --> 1:16:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the let's go to the passing game. Trevor Simeon takes

1:16:05.000 --> 1:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>his four games slide into arrowhead. No wait, this is

1:16:08.240 --> 1:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a This is not a narrowhood. This is in uh.

1:16:10.080 --> 1:16:13.479
<v Speaker 1>This is in Denver. Sorry, um seeming through for three

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty eight yards and three touchdowns in UH in

1:16:16.840 --> 1:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>this matchup last year in Denver, Kansas Snow He didn't. Uh,

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:23.639
<v Speaker 1>yeah he did. Kansas City is allowed eleven touchdowns versus

1:16:23.720 --> 1:16:25.439
<v Speaker 1>one pick through the air, and it's past four outing.

1:16:25.479 --> 1:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up the third most passing yards and six

1:16:27.320 --> 1:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>months passing scores overall. C grade for Simeon. It's a

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>nice matchup, but I don't trust him to exploit it.

1:16:33.640 --> 1:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>D Marius Thomas, though, does get an A grade that

1:16:35.960 --> 1:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one is an arrowhead, Church is an arrowhead, thank you

1:16:38.400 --> 1:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>very much. So how did I end up with this

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in Broncos that Broncos. I don't know. Sorry, I will

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>blame you. Actually, I think it was because I think

1:16:46.400 --> 1:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>very well you think backwards in our in our matchup list,

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it is on you. Kansas City's twenty eight

1:16:51.600 --> 1:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and wide receiver yardage allowed. They've given up nearly three

1:16:54.080 --> 1:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>scores per game to the position. Thomas obviously is a

1:16:58.160 --> 1:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>very good receiver, but you don't even have to be

1:17:00.080 --> 1:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>very good to score in the Chiefs this year. Danny Amondola,

1:17:02.960 --> 1:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Travis Benjamin will Fuller, Terrell Prior scored so all big

1:17:07.920 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>games there for those guys I like to marry as

1:17:09.800 --> 1:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Thomas and Bennie Fowler was my take a chance on

1:17:12.880 --> 1:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver, and I think he is a really nice,

1:17:15.760 --> 1:17:21.559
<v Speaker 1>sneaky start. It's time for lightning round, my favorite lightning

1:17:21.680 --> 1:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>round of the year. It is our favorite lightning round

1:17:24.360 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the year, the spookiest one great answer like vampires. No,

1:17:32.840 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>you know how this works? It is one question and

1:17:35.640 --> 1:17:43.559
<v Speaker 1>one question only between two players, and only two players,

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know the ground rules. Let's go. Peter, you

1:17:47.520 --> 1:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are first? Hello? Hi? Uh DeAndre Hopkins or Brandon and

1:17:52.680 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Cook Hopkins or Cooks. Wow, I think I'm going with

1:17:58.320 --> 1:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Cooks. I like his match a little

1:18:00.360 --> 1:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>bit better. Okay, John your next? Yeah? Or James White?

1:18:09.040 --> 1:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Non video? You can't start, No, you can't. Brutal, brutal match.

1:18:14.240 --> 1:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably drop. It's almost that bad, it really is. Matt

1:18:18.040 --> 1:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>your next, Matt whom Matt, your cell phone's cutting out.

1:18:28.240 --> 1:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, man, we can't hear you. Head. You're next? Yeah.

1:18:31.920 --> 1:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering about Breeze or Cousins. I got Drew Breese

1:18:36.200 --> 1:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>up at number two or no, sorry, number four at

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position. It's a home game for Breeze. Over

1:18:41.479 --> 1:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, his average home game three hundred

1:18:45.640 --> 1:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty three yards and two and a half touchdowns. So

1:18:48.280 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take Breeze. Fill your next, guys, think Fuller

1:18:52.560 --> 1:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or Fowler. Wow. I don't like Fuller's matchup, and he's

1:18:57.240 --> 1:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not actually getting that many targets per game. I

1:18:59.479 --> 1:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think I'm gonna go to take a chance on me.

1:19:01.439 --> 1:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Fowler in this name Fowler. How about that? That's bold

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Kent You're next, Yeah, PPR, League Gain Jr. Or Smallwood?

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Who is again? Or Smallwood? You bet you put the

1:19:13.960 --> 1:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>junior and just so you knew it wasn't Ted Kain's father,

1:19:16.320 --> 1:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Yeah, I'm gonna go Smallwood, all right? Uh? Dan,

1:19:21.520 --> 1:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you are next on the fan? Hello halfpoint gprula or

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin. Thank you. Yeah, I'm gonna take Abdulla in

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the easier matchup. The problem broadly with Doug Martin this

1:19:32.960 --> 1:19:35.559
<v Speaker 1>year has been a defense is so bad they can't

1:19:35.600 --> 1:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>run the ball in the second half of games. And

1:19:37.920 --> 1:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that changesn't despite more carries, his

1:19:40.160 --> 1:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards are going down each week, which is troubling

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. John, You're next, bether or Simeon Bethard. I

1:19:48.439 --> 1:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think your time about c J Bethard or Trevor Simeon. Yeah,

1:19:51.520 --> 1:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>probably Simeon against Kansas City. I think Ryan You're next,

1:19:57.920 --> 1:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>non PPR. James White towards Gat non PPR. Yeah, that's that.

1:20:03.840 --> 1:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's helplessly when it's non PPR, he's got

1:20:06.400 --> 1:20:08.559
<v Speaker 1>the better chance of the touchdowntown and so to Phil.

1:20:08.680 --> 1:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Your next Cars Watson or car uh Cars playing Buffalo. Yeah,

1:20:17.280 --> 1:20:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I've actually got him. I've got him right, very similarly

1:20:19.600 --> 1:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>tenth and twelve, but I've got Car a little bit higher.

1:20:22.000 --> 1:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>The Bill's pass defense will just run through by Jameis

1:20:25.720 --> 1:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Winston and E. J. Gaines. Their cornerback is gonna be

1:20:28.280 --> 1:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>out for this game. Spin. It says Spin as your name,

1:20:33.080 --> 1:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but maybe that's not right. I don't know, Hello, Spin,

1:20:36.080 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing standard Fleck, Sponge or Hogan. I'm

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Hogan. I think Funchess has the better matchup,

1:20:44.280 --> 1:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but I can't trust him. Yeah, good, Mark, you're on

1:20:48.400 --> 1:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the fan Casey's defense against Denver or Newer New Orleans

1:20:54.120 --> 1:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>against Chicagoan. I'm going to take Kansas City's defense at

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>home against Trevor Simeon. Arthur your next, yeah, Big or Smith. See,

1:21:10.479 --> 1:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous about Diggs, you know, I you know, there's

1:21:12.760 --> 1:21:15.599
<v Speaker 1>so many scenarios where this thing could go ugly for Diggs, including,

1:21:15.640 --> 1:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, potentially very good coverage from McCarty, but

1:21:18.760 --> 1:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>also the reinjury factor for a groin is always significant.

1:21:23.280 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact they have a bye week looming, the Vikings

1:21:25.320 --> 1:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>could get ahead against the Windlass Browns and then rest Diggs.

1:21:28.720 --> 1:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried. There's a lot of scenarios where this thing

1:21:30.720 --> 1:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>could go bad, badly for days. Luckily, you'll know if

1:21:33.200 --> 1:21:36.559
<v Speaker 1>he's active very early, very early. We'll know if he's

1:21:36.560 --> 1:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>active sometime around seven am. Barry, You're next, or yeah,

1:21:46.240 --> 1:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what happens when six teams are on by

1:21:50.640 --> 1:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna go with Simeon on this one. It's

1:21:54.240 --> 1:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really I'd go with McCown and in my mind,

1:21:57.120 --> 1:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd at least take the guy who's playing well. Elkins

1:21:59.120 --> 1:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>matchup is better and he's playing good, So I don't

1:22:01.760 --> 1:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>think the best stuff that's better. LaVey, You're next, Ted

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Gain are the lifted as questionable? Emmanuel Sanders. I don't

1:22:13.120 --> 1:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>think Sanders is Bennit's that pretty easy answer that to be, really,

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>because especially since the Monday night game, you gotta go

1:22:19.640 --> 1:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a game unless you're packing up Fowler. Yeah, that ye back,

1:22:22.800 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and I could do that if you wanted to. But

1:22:24.360 --> 1:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I just start in and simplify. Mike your next,

1:22:29.400 --> 1:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr or Jameis Winston. Uh, I got him ranked

1:22:34.400 --> 1:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>tenth and eleven, but I've got car one spot higher.

1:22:37.479 --> 1:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go with him. Kevin, You're next, Uh, Jenks

1:22:41.880 --> 1:22:47.599
<v Speaker 1>or GPS right? Wow? Uh? I think I'm gonna leave

1:22:47.680 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith against Detroit's I think he's got a better

1:22:50.520 --> 1:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>cornerback matchup as well. Let me mention this r gonna

1:22:53.360 --> 1:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>be just to know all my player rankings and the

1:22:55.760 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>full explanations available at fanball and so you and see

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:02.519
<v Speaker 1>what went into the grading, and then you can decide

1:23:02.600 --> 1:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself you agree or don't agree with how we've got

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>our guys rank So we encourage you to check that

1:23:06.920 --> 1:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>out and it's totally free at fanball dot com. Brian,

1:23:09.760 --> 1:23:15.519
<v Speaker 1>You're next? What's that Diggs or Schuster? Smith? Smith? Schuster's

1:23:15.520 --> 1:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>always said, I think that's what we said. I forget

1:23:19.120 --> 1:23:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it out, but I think it might be Matt. Much

1:23:21.400 --> 1:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like Charge said, I think we're pretty nervous about Diggs,

1:23:24.120 --> 1:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think Juju SMI Juju in this matchup. Tom

1:23:28.479 --> 1:23:33.559
<v Speaker 1>your next, Matt Ryan or Alex Smith? Um, Matt Ryan.

1:23:33.640 --> 1:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the Alex Smith matchup in uh AT

1:23:36.840 --> 1:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>against Denver in Arrowhead, Jeff, you're next, Watson or Winston.

1:23:44.560 --> 1:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I think I will lead Winston on that one. I

1:23:46.560 --> 1:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>love Watson of that matchup in Seattle's tough. Agreed, Chris,

1:23:51.600 --> 1:23:56.559
<v Speaker 1>you're next, Hey, guys, show Carson Wentz, Uell. It's got

1:23:56.680 --> 1:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to be Carson Wentz. The matchup is good, he's at home,

1:23:59.320 --> 1:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been stellar. You can't you can't bench him at

1:24:02.280 --> 1:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>this point. He's my number one. He's my number one

1:24:05.560 --> 1:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ranked quarterback for this week as Carson Wentz. And we're

1:24:08.200 --> 1:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not even it's not even chasing the last three weeks

1:24:11.000 --> 1:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of awesome box scores. And once it is put up,

1:24:12.760 --> 1:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the forty niners. Let's see. Yeah, how did you?

1:24:17.760 --> 1:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>How did I lock a call? Hang on here, I

1:24:21.240 --> 1:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>don't normally lock my calls. It's weird. Fanball dot com

1:24:25.320 --> 1:24:28.599
<v Speaker 1>slash news. By the way, we'll get you very very

1:24:28.720 --> 1:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>close to the chart rankings and all of the great

1:24:31.600 --> 1:24:34.479
<v Speaker 1>articles at fan ball. Yeah, there's a ton of great

1:24:34.520 --> 1:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>free content at fanball, not just my rankings. Jeremy, you're next.

1:24:38.960 --> 1:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for locking me. I got a Dan Lewis or

1:24:44.000 --> 1:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Austinian Jenkins in a PPR league, I'm gonna go Dion Lewis.

1:24:48.439 --> 1:24:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm I I don't know why. I just don't trust

1:24:51.680 --> 1:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Austin Seferian Jenkins. I just don't. I don't. I'm Dean

1:24:56.520 --> 1:24:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Lewis and PPR league. Dan Lewis isn't catching me passes anymore,

1:25:00.360 --> 1:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>so I would go I'd go Severian Jens That's just

1:25:02.800 --> 1:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>me right, You're next, Okay, full Point PPR Buller or Curse. Uh.

1:25:12.280 --> 1:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't like Fuller's matchup at all, so I think

1:25:14.720 --> 1:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm and I don't like the volume, so I'm gonna

1:25:16.840 --> 1:25:19.519
<v Speaker 1>go curse here. It's feels weird to say it, but

1:25:19.840 --> 1:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna go curse. Dave You're next. Yeah, Hi,

1:25:23.960 --> 1:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta drop a running back and make room for

1:25:26.600 --> 1:25:29.599
<v Speaker 1>a wider sever for next week? Would you drop Tarik

1:25:29.680 --> 1:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Cohen or I did Rollo? I think I dropped Crowl both.

1:25:35.560 --> 1:25:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean I dropped them both honestly, but kroll probably

1:25:38.840 --> 1:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>are those two. Yeah. If you need a tight end

1:25:40.720 --> 1:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>next week, pick up Tyler Higbee. Jason you're next. Yeah.

1:25:51.160 --> 1:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Not only is your phone breaking up, but I think

1:25:52.960 --> 1:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I heard the phrase two out of three and we

1:25:55.640 --> 1:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>don't do that here. Uh. Bill, you're on the fan? Yeah,

1:26:00.840 --> 1:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for a quarterback? I have River and Carson Wentz

1:26:07.040 --> 1:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>my number one quarterback of the week, and I like

1:26:09.160 --> 1:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I love revers and number five, but you can't top

1:26:12.160 --> 1:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Wents his matchup this week. Bryan, you're on the fan.

1:26:16.320 --> 1:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>They I got knead or big non PPR. Same same

1:26:21.520 --> 1:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thing we've said about Dig's I think going to be

1:26:25.080 --> 1:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>healthy being the same category. I think he's finally going

1:26:28.880 --> 1:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to play this week though he's been practicing. He played

1:26:31.280 --> 1:26:33.519
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, played twenty two snaps two weeks ago.

1:26:33.760 --> 1:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm pretty nervous about the injury and the fact

1:26:37.760 --> 1:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that they could get really, really up in this game

1:26:40.160 --> 1:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and just put Sneat on the bench too. So I'm

1:26:42.240 --> 1:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>nervous about Sneet as well. We we highly chance any follower.

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:48.559
<v Speaker 1>I like Benny followers better than it is a tough

1:26:48.720 --> 1:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Chicago defense. D your next hire or Car Breeze or

1:26:56.960 --> 1:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>car I got Breeze. He's at home, he's against Chicago.

1:27:01.200 --> 1:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not thinking about that too much. All right, Peter,

1:27:04.320 --> 1:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you're on the fan, Hey, guys, Tyrod Taylor later in

1:27:08.680 --> 1:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback mich Te Tyrod Taylor against arguably the worst

1:27:12.320 --> 1:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>past defense in the NFL will be the selection, will

1:27:15.200 --> 1:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>make their case. Keenum for whatever he's you know, he's

1:27:18.000 --> 1:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>winning games of vikings, but zero or one touchdown passing

1:27:20.920 --> 1:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>every game but one. Chris, you're next. I got a

1:27:25.479 --> 1:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>three quarterback? My god, Dak Cracot wrote the Wilkin or

1:27:29.320 --> 1:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback but one we started. I'm starting Dak Prescott's uh,

1:27:34.600 --> 1:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>he's just the most consistent. He snuck a third guy

1:27:37.520 --> 1:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in there. Yeah, that's why I went like that, Bill

1:27:41.240 --> 1:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>You're next. Yeah, non PPR, crab Tree or Hogan. I'm

1:27:47.320 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go Crabtree, Casey you're next, deeven front or games

1:27:54.479 --> 1:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one of PPR. I'd go James White, juicy matchup. We'll

1:27:58.720 --> 1:28:04.599
<v Speaker 1>go for the volume play Aco. Hey there, PPR Hogan

1:28:04.800 --> 1:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>or Funchs Hogan. Didn't we do a Hogan that one?

1:28:12.080 --> 1:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the first one we book ended

1:28:13.880 --> 1:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it with a Hogan Funcius. Our final call of the

1:28:16.680 --> 1:28:20.559
<v Speaker 1>day is Jason, Hello, Hey, I got a non PPR

1:28:20.680 --> 1:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>black Sam Abdullah or Mohammed definitely a Mirabdulah in my mind,

1:28:26.439 --> 1:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like that a lot better. This is the one. This

1:28:28.479 --> 1:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is the only matchup I felt pretty good about Ada

1:28:31.000 --> 1:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Abdullah in all the year. Yeah, and actually he's running great.

1:28:34.400 --> 1:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>You know you see him runs actually running the ball

1:28:36.760 --> 1:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>really really well. The problem is when they want to throw.

1:28:39.160 --> 1:28:40.759
<v Speaker 1>They don't throw to him. They throw it a theoretic

1:28:40.840 --> 1:28:42.599
<v Speaker 1>when they have a touch on opportunity, they don't give

1:28:42.640 --> 1:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>him the ball inside five. So that's your continual problem.

1:28:47.680 --> 1:28:51.439
<v Speaker 1>The theoretically throw it to a Meerbdulan. I like that.

1:28:51.880 --> 1:28:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Uh all right, thank you very much

1:28:55.520 --> 1:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening everybody. If you miss any part of the show,

1:28:57.160 --> 1:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>check out the podcast cafan Fan on Demand. Also really

1:29:00.120 --> 1:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>appreciate people to take the time to leave reviews, rankings

1:29:02.800 --> 1:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for the show because we had to basically restart that

1:29:05.880 --> 1:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>whole process this year with our new feed. Coming up next,

1:29:10.160 --> 1:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the best of, best of, Bye Bye at Center

1:29:13.880 --> 1:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Point Energy always says it's better to call eight one

1:29:16.840 --> 1:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>one now than nine one one later, So before I

1:29:19.880 --> 1:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do any digging in my yard, I call eight one

1:29:22.080 --> 1:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one to have utility.