WEBVTT - Draft Show: A Closer Look At Tight End, D-Line & More

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Cowboys,

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm your war room for incenter news and draft analysis

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>from deep within the confines of Cowboys headquarters at the

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Star in for School Dallas Cowboys Select. And now your

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>hosts Dane Brugler, David Hellman, and Brian brought us Well. Well,

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the Draft Show for our weekly addition.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing over there, David Hellman, I'm just

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>filming some social media coming and our social media users.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>There you go, you're good. Yeah, that's David Hellman doubling

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>as the geographer, scout, whatever you want to call him.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>The man if many hats man many hats to my right,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best scouts in the league my opinion.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Dane Brugler, what's up there, big timer? How about putting

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that mic in front of your Are we doing? Hey?

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, look, please help me out with this, Okay.

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I heard a rumor that before Layton vander Esh picked

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>out his jersey, he saw your senior video when you're

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>running out of the field and saw fifty five and said,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I am number fifty five for the Dallas count Double fives.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Baby about that? Shouts out too that's the rumor. That's

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the rumor. Yeah, if you don't know what Dane's talking about,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted it out a picture Bobby Belt from the

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>NFL Network. Quas always comes up with some really cool content.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Rare footage of Brian brought us senor Senior night nineteen

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty six in Baton rouge Me following Roland Barbee. One

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the good players we had on that team that

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>day was that Dan Bourne in the background, Like, has

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>he been doing it that long? I honestly don't know. No,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that uh, the the announcer, it's about the PA. Yeah, no,

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think number fifty five. Somebody is Dallas, Texas T W. White. Yeah,

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, Yeah, you're close. But yeah, it was kind

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of Garrison. We got it on the old TV Garrison there,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I am. Look at this fifty five. Look at that

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>guy with hair? How about that squareness? To me? Didn't

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a better ball security? Yeah, my dad in the background.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Dad's lost a lot of weight since that day. Bill

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Larens Barker shaking my hand. Though, when the last time

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you saw that video or did you ever see it?

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I never knew it existed. I never It's probably one

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of those Cox Cable things, Dave. You know Baton Rouge.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, they film it in Nate like every big

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>name program. Yeah, you can find the craziest stuff online.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, people just archive their games. I went, which

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I went? I spent like thirty minutes watching the Tennessee

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Florida State National title game a couple of nights ago.

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I just know a Taylor Stern gave it the great nickname.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the the Great Time Machine, yep, and that you know.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I tried to explain to my son how great of

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a frontman Freddie Mercury was and I had to show

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>him live aid in you know, nineteen eighty five. Good stuff.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, um, I appreciate you guys mentioned it. And no,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Layton Vanderish as the rumor. I think

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Layton Vanderish would have a zone on this one though.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a better player than you. Yeah, thank you.

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get in some fun things today with the

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Draft show. I do want to, uh, Dave, I want

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you to kind of run through a in the second

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>half of the show. Yeah, we've got to tell me more,

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>not tell me where it's give me a Twitter on

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty coming up at twenty. Want to get to

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>all your questions. We only if we can take some

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>calls today too. I'd like that eight eight eight eight

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>five five two two ninety seven is the number we

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>can do that. I love the interaction we have. Kent

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Gerson is executive producing, and you're gonna You're gonna love

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>our listeners are gonna love this would you rather? Segments

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you put together? Because I'm going down in this list.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We're basically gonna break down. I would say half of

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the hot names that people are yeah, this is, this is, yeah,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, would you rather? Is? We're gonna just gonna

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Dame brug and I are gonna go back and forth

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't heard these names yet. Oh yeah, yeah.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>This will be fun because these guys, a lot of

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys are really close within the position and would

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you rather? And we're gonna get We're gonna try and

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>give some quick reasons why one or the other, you know,

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see if we can do that. But you

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>know what, I want to get to guys. The opening

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this show, though, Scouts are you know, I'm starting out

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have breakfasts. The Scouts are here at the star are

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they're getting ready for the combine and all that. Though,

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dane and Dave when they dig in, when

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they really dig in, now, you know they've got their areas,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got their areas that their response before, and they'll

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have their cross checks and things like that. Though what

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>are they what are they going to experience? What are

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they What's something that's going to be surprising to them

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>about this draft? You know, again, they might be in

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>their region of the country in the southeast, but what

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are they going to be surprised about this draft? And

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe that question is there is there some type of

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>is there a myth to this draft? You know what

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, is there something that you know, we're already

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking that, oh, people have kind of got

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it going this way, but you know, but that's that's

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a myth. There's something else. But what are these scouts

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as they get in and they start digging, Because Dane,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you've you've really you've dug in, You're you've got this

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>scene pretty covered sure well, and scouts around the country.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to catch up to you, and I want

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to know, is is there something that we're you're hearing now?

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's really a myth about this draft. Well, I

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.239
<v Speaker 1>think first and foremost, or the players in this draft.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>First and foremost, you're trying to catch up to the underclassmen, right,

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know you did the bulk of your work

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was done on the seniors throughout the throughout the year,

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the juniors you knew who were coming out, right,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But there's always surprisers, there's always I mean, this year

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we had one hundred and thirty five juniors come out underclassmen.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>First time ever we've come close to that number. Um,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think twelve more than last year or something like that.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's, uh, it's a case where you're

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>playing a little bit of catch up. Even when you

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you know you had an area and you know the

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>player from the season, you're just playing a little bit

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of catch up to make sure you know everything about

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the guy background so there's no surprises at the combine.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you do go to the combine, you know

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the right questions to ask during the interviews, you have

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a full understanding who the player is, and you're not

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>surprised by anything. In terms of a myth, you know,

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think when we when you stack the positions, because

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what I mean. All teams do it differently in

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>terms of draft board and when they actually do it.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of teams will stack their draft board before

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the combine, right, Yeah, we used to do that green Bay.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.679
<v Speaker 1>We used to do We used to do the skill

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>guys we did after. So we did the skill positions

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>after the combine because then we knew the forty times.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>But then we would do offense and defensive linemen before

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>we actually went to the combines. So we would start

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to set our board before we went to the combine. Again.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is nineteen ninety two through nineteen ninety six,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'm sure that John Dorsey and those

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>guys who came from the Green Bay system probably do

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same thing. But what are some

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things they're strugg they're gonna struggle with. What

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>are some of those things? Is there's something, as you know,

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are are there positions that these guys are to come

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in and feel like they can draft at all day?

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Well and the other ones you're gonna say, whoa, whoa, whoa.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say it's a myth, but I

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder if maybe it's overblown because we've even we've talked

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about it here and it's a logical talking point just

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the top of the board that ever,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a defense heavy draft. There's no

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the common line of thing. He's like, well,

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.559
<v Speaker 1>there's no offensive players in this draft, nobody worth getting

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about. But like that's never true, you know, Well,

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially like you go down one through two

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty six, like they're gonna be players. We're putting together

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a very enticing looking list of wide receivers. Talk plenty

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about some of these running backs. Y'all keep telling me

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a very deep tight end class. So clearly

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>both of those things can't be true. And maybe, you know,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe eight of the first ten picks are going to

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be defense. Maybe you won't see a wide receiver off

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the board until the twenties or the thirties or the forties.

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that those there aren't talented players

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to be found. Or we could see a surprise and

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>see a wide receiver go top ten like we did

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>two years ago when Corey Davis, Mike Williams, John Ross

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>All went to top ten. Was a surprise. Yeah, no

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>one expected three wide receivers are go in the top ten.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You think that you think that might happen this, I

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>mean three, No, way right, I can't find the first

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>round wide receiver right now. The thing is is DK

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf and Marquis guys. Yeah, we're talking about high upside guys. Yeah,

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a team that is missing an explosive element

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on offense and you know Marquis Brown could potentially fill that. Yeah,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf has huge upside as a number one receiver

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in this league. You just have to you know, get

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>him there, you know, in terms of developing him as

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>a runner, as a finisher, keeping him in the football field.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So there are I can make a strong case why

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be in the top ten. But when you

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>break down just the physical freak that he is, the

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>high upside that he offers, you know, if he can

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>be a true number one in this league, then you

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>know it's gonna be enticing. I think an interesting question

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>will be, and this is a question for both of you,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who will be the first running back, wide receiver, tight end,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just of those three positions, who will be the first

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>drafted I'm gonna well, I'm not I saw you talking

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about this on Twitter this morning, so I know your answer,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are you well, yes, yeah, I'm not sure it's my

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure, guests, but I think there's a strong chance.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's good tight end. He thinks the old hawkeyets. Yeah,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, absolutely, absolutely, yeah. I mean, no, ILL tell

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you what though that context? Right? Oh no, I love

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Alabama running back. Let's put that in context. When

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was the last time and I have no idea when

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was the last time that happened? When was the last time?

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>The first Vernon Davis probably? Yeah? What ten? He went

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>like fifth oh five to San Francisco. Yeah, gosh, yeah,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>went like nine? He wasn't was he nine? Was he

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>top ten? But even Eric Ebron went behind Sammy Watkins

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Evans? Yeah yeah, yeah, oh no, you'd have to

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>do some research. I think Vernon Davis might be it. Jeez.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Any there's no chance that Jacobs gets taken before that, right,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the Alabama running back? Absolutely it could. I mean, look,

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Harmon at wide receiver, would he be? What's the ceiling

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on metcalf? You think? So? I don't like that. Look

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you just gave me about Harman well in the receiver.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina state right in the talking about him being

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first of those three positions drafted. That would

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>surprise me. Yeah. I like Harmon, but that would surprise

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>me if he's the first um. Who is the first

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver on your board? I'm going with Metcalf. Okay,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>just because of the high upside. Now, I wouldn't take

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>him top ten, but late first round. Yeah, that's where

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>him and Marky's Brown. I haven't seen a tight end

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to go before the late first round. Probably

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, tight en keep going the top ten. Detroit

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>at eight, Buffalo, Detroit again, and oh my god. And

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then they're hey, they're they were right about the guy

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>who played well at Indianapolis this year. Buffalo at nine.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Help out your young quarterback, Green Bay. Let me ask

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you this or the tight ends in this draft? Okay,

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>here comes the myth. Here is this? The myth? Are

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends and the are the wide receivers better

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>than the tight ends in this draft? That's a that

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a myth, wouldn't it. Well, I think that

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes I don't want to say it's a myth,

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but that kind of goes to my point. When I

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the Cowboy. I said it the wrong way

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>there Boys, something we did. When I look at the Cowboys,

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like I I trust that a receiver you who are

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to find at fifty eight is more likely to

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>contribute early than a tight end that you find at

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight. That's just that's just NFL trends more so

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>than this specific class. So, you know, Hockinson and Fan

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are like argue. I mean, if you could get those guys,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be great. And I'm far more intrigued by

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys than Marquise Brown. But that's from the Cowboys perspective.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That's about about two about two of the smallest explosive

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>players on the same club at Oklahoma with that quarterback,

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, and this wide receiver well in the Kyler

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Murray discussion, that's and that running back they have. If

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have a medical issue, he'd be considered pretty

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>highly too. I think, yeah, I don't know if you

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>can make it in the first but yeah, he'd be

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>probably fifty type of guy. Yeah. Yeah. When I finished

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>his report, watching his tape, you just saw a lot

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of James Connor, which that big body, but the ability

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, have the patience to read his blocks,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>take strong cuts. Um, yeah, I think you see a

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of that. Okay, medicals would be big for him.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>What position you think then it's going to be the

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest reach. It's always quarterback. It's always gonna be a quarterback.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe not all take take this year, take take okay,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. It is absolutely okay. I don't think there's

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a even even Dwayne Haskins, who is the top quarterback

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for me, and I think the favorite too. So any

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks is taking the first round other than Haskins to

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>you is probably our reach in my opinion. Yes, wow,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that that that's just that's terrifle. I mean Kyler Murray's

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the wild card just because like I like him better

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>than I like Lamar Jackson last year and I have

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. I think Raid is my thirty two best player.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think I'll have a first roun on

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>great on Kyler, but I like them better than the

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>more Jackson as a prospect, and I'll probably have him

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>ready hire. Could he rise on your board, like like

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the kid at Kansas City did Mahomes? You kind of

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>started off Mahomes at fifty Yeah, and then you have

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to talked about this before. It's just it's hard with

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>these quarterbacks because it's one thing to study them on

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>tape and see what they can do, but it's such

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a mental position, right and without and especially the guys

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Big twelve. Yeah, and if you can't don't

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to sit down with them, break down

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>plays and coverages on a whiteboard with them, Yeah, it's

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to really understand where they are mensely in their development,

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>how much they know, how much they don't know, uh,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's such a big part of the quarterback evaluation.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's we're just on the outside looking in. We're

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>at a disadvantage with these quarterbacks, and especially with a

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>guy like Kyler Murray. I never get that right. It's

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's tough. It's it's you watch the tape.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>That's what you can go on. Give me a position, though, Guys,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you could draft that all day. I mean,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned tighten, but it didn't get there. Verds. I

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>love the edge rushers in the first two rounds. Can

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I just cheat and say defensive line? I mean yeah,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>although I will say I don't think the defensive tackle

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>class is as steep as it was last year. Yeah,

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or as as much as we talked, we talked about

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>being like or not we but people talked about the

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle class being, you know, the clearly the best

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>position group in this draft. I don't think it's the

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>top three and if you include see now that I

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>was that that is a widely perceived thing in this

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>draft classes. Why did I feel like that I could

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>get a fourth round defensive tackle. Oh, you probably can,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but I mean a guy that could help you. Sure, No,

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair. I mean, you get a Daylon

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Mac from Texas A and M sure. Yeah. But in

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of this defensive tackle class being historic, would you

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>call it an accurate It seems top heavy to me?

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Like there's definitely five or six really intriguing prospects in

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the maybe the first two rounds. Yeah, after that, and

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, I think the edge rushers are more top

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>p well, I think the edg rushers are more top

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>heavy plus deeper because with edge rushers, you know, I

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>feel Rosa Allan sweat Farrell feel great about Bosta. Best

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>player in this draft easily. Yeah, And that's gonna make

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that mistakes after that. Josh Allen from Kentucky who I

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have some issues with some of the stuff. Yeah, I

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like him. I'm not sure he's the clear cut number

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>two pick some people think, but I like him. Cleveland Farrell,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>did Chi Polite, who I like better than you. Yeah, Polite.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>People reach out to me about Polite because they are like,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>why why do you not like Polite? And I trust me,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>if whatever your gut feeling is on Polite is probably

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>right as opposed to get no, And I mean I

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>got wrong with you know, I just I see a

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>two hundred forty nine pound guy. That's what I mean.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I kind of you're not wrong. And but but I

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like Sweat who's two fifty two. So what kind of

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>logic is that? What's a better run the lodder? Yeah,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so what's a better run defender? Did Chi Polite, who

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it was two hundred and seventy pounds

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>when he got there. Yeah, now a boy, Yeah, but

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he was a subpackage, you guy, he wasn't asked to

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be a contribute as a run defender on a consistent basis.

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, these guys, there's a lot of potential there,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>whereas with defensive tackle. You know, QUINNI Williams the best

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle in his draft. Jeffrey Simmons shortly after that. Yeah,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got Christian Wilkoms and Oliver m So

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair to call it top heavy because

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>then it falls off. I think a little bit um,

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, once you get past that, and you think

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in a little trouble if you have to get

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker in this draft. I mean, I haven't done

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>them all, haven't studied them all, but you think you're

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in a little trouble. Not a great group for linebackers.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But okay, I'll put it this way. Linebackers are safeties.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Which one which the first few linebackers drafted last year?

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>How many we saw Edmunds, um, Georgia Evans, Edmunds, sorry

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not Evans, vander esh Rashaun Evans, Oh yeah, I got,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I got. I'm not crazy, Yeah, I got the draft

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>right here. So so those four linebackers right there, would

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you take any of these linebackers ahead of those four?

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Was that Roquan Smith was at eight just I'm just

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna go through it again, and then Tremaine Edmunds sixteen sixteen,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>good job? Yeah, And then you had Vanderesh at nineteen,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 1>it's Evans at twenty two. Tennessee. It's so hard not

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>to think about their production, rookie production when you're answering

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it is because like, right right, you take any one

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of these guys in the last draft over these guys

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, That's what I'm asking. Yeah, yes, but of yeah,

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>of Devin White. I don't know. I'm like Jack Wilson,

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>those guys. I might take Devin White over Evans, but

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the top three it's tough. Yeah, Edmonds, you would take

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>him out or you would take him out. If I

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>hadn't seen all these guys play as rookies, I might

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have different opinions, like, yeah, I'd take Devin White over

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a couple of those guys. I think back to like

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>how not sold. A lot of people were on Layton

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>vander Esh at the time, and then you got Devin White,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who just annihilated everything in the SEC for like three years.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it sounds stupid. You watch the guy put

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>together a Rookie of the Year type season, but it

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been a crazy conversation a year ago, you know.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean we're so high on Roquan Smith.

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't, I don't, I don't think.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anybody at linebacker I'm gonna talk

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>about like him. No, no, no. But also selfishly, you know,

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>my job is to provide the Cowboys perspective, like, yeah,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. We don't have to worry about it.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's somebody else's problem. And you have to drive

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>linebacker class. I mean, like Devin White, I think it's

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the first round linebacker. I love Devin Bush, Love Devin Bush. Yeah,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>short though, Yeah, that's the thing. It's the length is

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what worries me. Yeah. Mack Wilson from Alabama, I think

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>has upside. You know, I think he could be a

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 1>three down player in the NFL. But really run you

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>really worry about the consistency. Um My boy from Hawaii

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to Vye could buy you need to watch sleep folks,

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>don't Yeah, don't sleep on the If you find Hawaii tape,

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Um. Jermaine Pratt from NC State to

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>von Koni from these I need to see these guys

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from Stanford. I saw him at the Senior Bowl. I

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>think there was a more. I mean I think Pratt's

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>probably maybe might get in the second round. But Coney

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>um Okareki he's a third round guy. So yeah, I

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>think it does drop off pretty quickly. And the top

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>guys aren't guys that you really get excited about like

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yeah I was. I was more excited about

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the group last year. I think I took time during

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>this segment to look at Dane's two round mock that

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he just put up on the Athletic a little while ago.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Um So, like I said, defense heavy at the top

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of this thing, right, He's got eighteen defenders going in

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the first round, and four of his offensive picks or quarterbacks.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So and you know quarterbacks are always their own category,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think another five are offensive linement. Yes, well

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you've only I think Markus Brown. I think and and

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson are the only skill players you have. Oh and

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs and Fat made it at the end of four. Yeah. Four,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not many. It's not a lot. So it's just gonna

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be so the first night of draft, we're gonna be

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>all talking in the draft twenty twenty two of the

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty seventy seven days away. By the way, on the draft,

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>there you go, they're gonna give me anxiety. Yeah, twenty

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty two of the thirty two defenders and quarterbacks. That's crazy. Yeah,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to go look at the breakdown for other years.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's but that's my point though, is Okay, that's

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the first round, but there there's value to be had.

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>It's like I said, I don't want to call it

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a myth, but it is a talking point that's going

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to be beaten into the ground. All right, we're going

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to take our first break of the day. We would

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>come back, We'll hit some Twitter on the twenty you

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are You have the Draft Show from the S to

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>BBC Mortgage Studios, presented by Miller Litte. Will be right back.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Has been helping Cowboys fans seed better since nineteen seventy

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>two so they don't miss a moment on the field.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Get glasses with slurs best vision, clarity and protection with

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ultimate Lens Package, three innovative technologies in one lens

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for a limited time. You can double your lenses for

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>free when you purchase the Ultimate Lens Package and get

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a second pair of frames. Find up participating I Care

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Professional and details by visiting SLOR USA dot com. That's

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>USA dot com Terms and conditions applying. You want the

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>most interesting, up to the minute Dallas Cowboys news straight

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Star in Frisco. How about exclusive and on command.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right news and nuggets you can't find anywhere else.

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>With our exclusive Cowboys content on Alexa, you can have

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>all the answers, secrets, stories and more. What's Stephen Jones

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking during a game? What's Joe Looney's favorite pregame? Neal?

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>We take your questions to Cowboys players and coaches and

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you can hear the answers directly back to you. Just

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa open Dallas Cowboys. If you're like me and

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you love I mean, if you have a thing, then

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting the chord is scary. But then I found out

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I could switch it or ACTV now and still get

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the live sports I love. No satellite needed, no polky hardware,

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>no annual contract, just that the live sports you love.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Tried direct tv now for ten dollars a month for

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>three months. Visit DirecTV now dot com direct tv now

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>more for your thing. That's our thing us called real deal,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>limited time price or a little page three months when

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>he's monthday a full prices currently minimum forty dollars and

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>less cancer. The prices may change. We subcribers on cancel

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>any time. Content varies by package and maybe limited stricts.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>In the play a man's steps and doesn't just protect

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>him from lifeze it projects an unstoppable and legendary spirit,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>just like the men wearing silver and navy on the

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>field every Sunday Sends eighteen sixty five. Stets and Hats

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>are American made with pride right here in Texas. They

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>are still the official crown of all self prospecting Cowboys,

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Find Steps and Hats in the pro shop

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>or at Stetson dot Com. Today, Doctor Pepper is the

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one you crave, But how do you explain that craving?

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Imagine being shipwrecked on a desert island alone, glass like

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>curls of self bound the shore with Doctor Pepper colored waves,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by desire, but you can't drink its because it's

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the ocean fish and even there, the only thing you

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>want is Doctor Pepper and you can't have it. Now,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that is it, Doctor Pepper? Craving Doctor Pepper? The one

0:22:55.080 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you crave is that Dallas Cowboys dot Com rap back

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>here with the draft show from the SWBC Mortgage Studios.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Brian broad Us, Dame Brugler, David Helmet, K. Garrison, Executive Producing,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Excited to have everybody with us once again. I'm really

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>happy about the following that we have on periscope as well.

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you folks a kind of a neat way.

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I've I've kind of grown accustomed to following that way.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>You love it. I love Periscope. I love the interaction.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I love how you're able to kind of uh talk

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to people quickly and you can kind of scroll down

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and see something. So we do appreciate all that. Uh.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I also want to uh thank at K. Hill for

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this because it's one of my favorite segments that we

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do every week. It is. I'll turn it over to

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>David Helmet, go ahead, David got some good ones today, Yeah,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I have. Have you been talking about this on Twitter?

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of people in the mentions talking

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>about trading into a round one and it just sounds

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like a very broadest. That's something I love to do. Yeah, exactly.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a very brought us uh idea. I had somebody

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>asked me what it would take to trade to Marcus

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence what what could you do to get you know,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>could you trade to Marcus Lawrence to get back in

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the first round? Probably? Serious? Why would you do that? Though? Well,

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying no, I mean there's there's you know,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>people you're gonna draft. That's yeah, that's what we're talking about.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Rudin get out of here. No, No, we were talking

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>about those defensive ends and stuff like that. But you know,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I let me ask you this, if

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you had if you had the similar situation to what

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you have now with Layton Vanderesh and also with h

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with also with Jalen Smith and You're and you're it's

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>like with Sean Lee, if you if you had that

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of situation where you had an established player but

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you had to two guys that you felt really really

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>good about. See, people don't feel good about Taco and

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't and they really don't trust and they really

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>don't trust Randy Gregory right now. But if they did

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if either one of those, if that doesn't exist, though

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>there there's no if because that's not the case. No,

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>but if okay, if that, but they do have it

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>at linebacker, they're gonna make a move at linebacker I'm

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>aut defensive end though. I'm just telling you, though, if

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you felt good about these that they drafted guys too,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>but eventually try and take over, didn't they. Why are

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you trying to get me to fight you right now? Non? No,

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>literally no. Marcus Lawrence is the centerpiece of the line

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is a very What could you get for

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>him right now? Probably a decent amount. Could you get

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the same Hall you got from Chicago day? Um? Probably not? Yeah,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably not quite as much. Could you get one

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>in the three out of it? I'd be shocked if

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't. Ye, I would like to think you could. Okay,

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>shocked if okay, one on three? Okay, that's how you

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>get back in this draft? Gross? Which all right, well here,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's actually take No. I'm just saying, if

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that's you know you want that, you look, you look

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>at options, you franchise him, and then you trade. It

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be I don't send good players away from your team.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>We worked okay for the Raiders, right it was a good,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>awesome idea, and then John Gruden got up there after

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>every game we just can't get to the quarterback. Let's

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>see who they pick Okay, I'm not trying to defend Gruden.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you you guys see, we shouldn't be

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>close minded about options. We're not closed minded about getting

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>into the ring closed mind. It's fine, we'll talk about it. Okay,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it. Boom, No, it's no longer an option.

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough. What's your question? This is a good one

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>from Facy. This is the type of advanced thinking I like.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I liked your question. I favored it. I think Round

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>two has traditionally been around that the front office is

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>willing to take a risk on players, whether medical or

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>character reasons. With no first round pick this year, that

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>changes things. So what's more likely taking a risk with

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that pick or trading up? Because I do agree that

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this is your first pick of the

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>draft kind of takes away some of your what it's

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>flexibility right with who you want to pick there. It

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>makes you have second thoughts about packaging two and a

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>three to go up and get somebody, because if you

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>pack you your two and three, you're only getting into

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like the now. You got a compensatory fourth now too,

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're only getting into like the forties. It's not

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like we're talking about trading a second or third and

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>getting into the late first round. If you trade your

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>second in your third, you're only getting up, okay a

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit, if you're gonna go up to get to

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the forties. And and I had this question asked me

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>last night about Adderly, the safety. I don't think they

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 1>would trade up for a safety. But we last year

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about Sutton and how we were gonna

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>get to Indianapolis at forty and draft a wide receiver. Yeah,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about that, Cortland Sutton, Yeah, from SMU.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But okay, who who do you have in mind? Who

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>would you trade up? What would you trade up for

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in this draft? Which is another's that we actually Yeah,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're gonna take. I don't think they're

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a medical risk player. I don't I don't

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna take that. And I don't think they're

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a characterist guy at fifty eight. Answer to

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>answer her question, not having the first round pick, you

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have that leniency this year, like this guy needs

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to contribute right right away. Yeah, and so I think

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they would be as willing to do that. Um,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so you don't think they go for more of an

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>upside player. You think they need someone that's going to

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>contribute your one, absolutely, I mean yeah, I know, okay.

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>They everybody keeps saying your first round picks Amari Cooper,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but like what do we always say, like

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>your first, second, and third round pick should be able

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to play a role. Yeah, even that's different than all

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I said was contribute. I didn't say he had to

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be a pro bowler. No, no, no, But I think

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. Like, for instance, in my two round mark

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I gave Renell Wren. Yeah he's raw. Yeah, but he's

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that you project him forward and you think

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a contributor, but he might not

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>start for you as a rookie. Will he play? Yeah,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean he will. I just need him to. Yeah,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. That's especially with Rod Marinelli. Like a first

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>round pick isn't gonna just play all the snaps on

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the defensive line, right, So that doesn't bother me, all right,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>take they wouldn't take a first round tackle anyway, We've

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>learned that or lesson about that, haven't, which I'm curious

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about that is, like, since this is their first pick

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. You know, do they apply that us

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and didn't take it? Yeah? No, do they

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:15.959
<v Speaker 1>know they're like, well, we can't use our first pick

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>on a d tackle, especially considering you know, Christi Shard.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>How much say does he have in terms of that

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>great segue, Dave. I love it because Jason says, of

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the popular needs to address at fifty eight D tackle

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>safety receivers, tight end, who can the Cowboys most afford

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to wait on? Meaning he's saying, you know, he thinks

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that wide receiver in tight end you can get value

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on day three. Yeah, YadA, YadA. I think, so what

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>do y'all think? Wide receivers? Probably any it's easier to

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>find wide receivers on day three than it is any

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>other position, especially we're talking about contributing early um and

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a deep wide receiver class. Yeah, so I

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think that would probably be the easy answer. Like a

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of these tight ends you like, but we're talking

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>about you know, Dalton Schultz situation. You know, guys, fourth round,

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean we had better grand I mean he was

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>taken in the fifth right, fourth round, that's right, because yeah,

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, to me, the kid Sternburger makes a lot

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of sense here Texas, Texas A and M. But you

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have to take him at fifty eight. I think I

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna be there, and you're with your

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>late third, let alone the fourth. I didn't get to

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>take him at fifty eight. You see him as a

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>second round player, you see him as a late too

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>early three. Yes, late too early three. Okay, I think

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I see him at the top seventy five pick. Okay,

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta love with that, all right. So let me

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you this, would you rather move up in the

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>third round or move up in the second round? You know,

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it depends who's there. If I'm moving up, the only

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>way I'm moving up is this for a guy that

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a high grade on that's fall Like if IRV.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Smith from Alabama somehow he falls to pick forty two,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I will go I will trade my second, my third

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to go up and get IRF. Smith. I would feel

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>okay doing that. Yeah. So what you sort of just

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>said right there is they kind of need to pull

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the trigger on a defensive tackle if they can sooner

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than later. Yeah, I mean I think so, um,

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think I thinks among those positions. I think

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver would be the easier one to fall or

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of stretch. I think wide receivers will stretch,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no question, especially if if what they're looking for

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is a slot slot receiver. I mean, not to take

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>anything away from those guys, it is the easiest position

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of the wide receivers. Talking about an X, Y or Z.

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It is easier to find that why that slot receiver

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>later in the draft compared to an X or a

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Z or some of the other positions. Yeah, you gotta

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Dane Brugler special for you? What not? Really, he didn't.

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>He didn't play at Division three or anything. He played

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC. But Sam Sam is one of about

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>six people that asked me about Georgia tight end Isaac Naa.

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Isaac not a not a bad player. Ah. David Hellman

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it, I really do. Kind of like the rest

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of George's offense, the receivers Ridley and Icole, Hardman and

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Holliman underused, underutilized. Um. But he's he was the top

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end coming out three years ago as a recruit.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And you see why. A really good sized kid. He

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can run UM. He's reliable at the catch point. I

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>think he had the best catch rate of any tight

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>end in this group. Um, I think thirty five targets,

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty receptions something like that. So not a lot of usage.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, the sample size isn't there, but you think

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>there's more. You can get more out of him, similar

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to the way you think there's more and Riley Ridley. Uh,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just sample size isn't great. So I to me, when

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at these tight ends, him Smith, IERF Smith

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>easy to top three tight ends, you're not going to

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>change for you. No, it's that's the top tier Hawkinson fan.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And you even said this about this tight ends that

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>even if even if fan has a better workout, yeah

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>than as a kid. No, you're not going to change that.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Trust part part of it. Oh he's gonna trust a tape.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason you like fans because he is

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a great athlete. Yeah. So if he doesn't perform well,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then that's a fred flag. But if he does perform well, okay,

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what you expected. The same thing with DK Metcalf.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>When DK Metcalf at six four and two hundred and

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty pounds goes out and runs a you know, four

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to four four, it shouldn't skyrocket upboards because that's what

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you're up. He'll be talked about. That'll be the buzz,

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>although I'm he probably's not gonna work out of the combine.

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. He was medically clear, but I don't know

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>if he's ready. Yeah. Well, I'll get more inful one

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that later. Um, But okay, the top three tight ends

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Hawkinson Fan Smith, to me, those are the top three

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. And then you have a group of Sternberger, Nada, Cayden, Smith,

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Docks and Knox Dawson Knox. Those guys are in that

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>second to fourth round range where you know you maybe

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have to trade up for a tight end. No, no,

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe my idea of going up and getting one of

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>those guys, or you talked about IRV Smith, I would

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>trade up for IRF Smith is Again I think he's

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>well how close he did? I need to watch the

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Kid obviously, but how close is the Georgia kid too?

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Is he? Him? And Sternburger. I've got a for Sternburger's

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 1>four among the tight ends and not as five for me.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>There you go, So I think I've got a told

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>me I don't have to trade up for a tight end. Well,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to. But the thing, the thing that

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you always have to keep in mind is like that

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they could feel completely differently, like they could be like, well,

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>if sternburgers there, that would be great. We're not a

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds really good. They're not taken not Yeah, but for

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, they won't like him. I think another thing,

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason they won't like it. But that's just the

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>way this works. I'm not saying that specifically. Another thing

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for fans to keep in mind though, is tight end

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>traditionally is one of the positions where we don't see

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rookie success and boom and thank you

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Dane and a big reasactly. A big reason for that

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is because, you know, for the similar reasons we don't

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of rookie receivers have instant success is

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>because of chemistry. Rot running is tougher cover. The coverage

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>j C in the NFL is night and day. The

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>coverage it's on. I'm waiting for that guy at Tampa

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to show upward. Yeah, and with tight ends, not only

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you factor in the route running and being a proficient receiver,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but the blocking Titans have to I was wrong about

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schultz. I was way too optimistic by him coming

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in here and starting, oh yeah, that was stupid on

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>my part. And you're right, you're you're not wrong about that.

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you see I saw this tweet last night in

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen. Twenty thirteen saw Tyler Eifert, zach Ertz, Vance McDonald,

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey, and Jordan Reid all get drafted. Is that good?

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys drafted Gavin Escobar and just I'm scarred, I'm scarred

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at this by this position. Like Blake Jarwin came on strong,

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Schultz is gonna get better as he gets stronger and works,

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I just, I'm not trying to since you're a

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>cowboy expert on this panel. You're a cowboy expert. You

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>know some things. No, but I'm just saying, since you're

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the expert, that's why we have you here, among other things.

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel better about the coaching situation now that

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe that this guy, that maybe that Doug Nussmer has

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a way of getting guys ready and maybe the evaluation

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the position will be a little bit better and

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe that you know, we saw improvement from those guys, well,

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and well that's does that give you a little hope

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to make the mistakes that they made

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in the past. That's what gives me hope that I

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't need to press the panic button at tight end honestly,

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not trying to pretend like their pro bowlers.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But we saw they approved all. Both of those guys

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>make some pretty big strides and they certainly weren't liabilities.

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 1>As I mean, Jarwin especially was a big contributor toward

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the playoff push. And it's got It's got nothing to

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do with their ability to evaluate tight ends or nuss

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Myer's ability to coach them. It's just a hard position

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to acclimate to, especially when half the offenses in college

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>are like the tight end position is completely different, like

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that you might as well be playing a different sport.

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with he just said about the evaluation

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the coaching of the position in terms us tight end specifically,

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, yeah, I mean, well we look at I

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>think that has something to do with it. I think

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got to evaluate these guys the right way, David,

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>what you talk about before you pick them. Yeah, we

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>had the same evaluation. Is that you love Schultz, I know,

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like they made a mistake picking the guy. No,

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just saying though, I'm just trying to figure

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out I think I think I'm more confident about the

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>group net are the way they're evaluating them now than

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I was four or five years ago. Oh, if you

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>want to go back that, well, yeah, everything they do

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>now it seems proven track record a little being better.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I think the Cowboys are drafting. I mean,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the top five organizations in the league

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of hitting in the draft overleap five or

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>six years. Yeah, I mean, any history says that's that's

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty accurate because I mean they've had some mixed results

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>on Day two, but Day one, except for really just Taco,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the last few years has been lights out. It's been

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of why this team is a playoffs. Their

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Day two results look a hell of a lot better

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen than they have recently. Jalen Randy Gregory's

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>playing pretty well. So who's you, yeah, Geeto, Yeah, yeah,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>no question, But I think I mean, really, besides Gavin Escobar,

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they've really missed on the tight

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 1>end position. Well, they've gotten rid of a good one. Yeah,

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean Bennette Martellis that was more about Garrett's brother

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>coaching him, messing him up. No, and blame him. I

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>think it would be lunacy. It would be lunacy to

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>assume that, you know, they can't find a good tight

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>end this year because of Gavin Escobar or Martellis Bennett

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or Anthony Fasano or any of that stuff, like that's

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>ancient history. If they don't draft a tight end second

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>or third round, is there a point in drafting a

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tight end? And on Day three exactly because we gotta

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>be so. We gotta be so. Like on day through

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the draft, when when we start getting close to their

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>pick and we're start talking about best players on the board,

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>are you guys gonna keep pushing the tight end? They

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 1>don't take one? Not pushing a tight end. Who once

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you get to the fourth, fifth round, sixth round, seventh round,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>who are you looking at? That is an upgrade over

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>who you have on the roster already. I'm not sure

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there is. If I was in charge of this thing,

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I would sign a moderately priced free agent. It could

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be Jeff Swame, it could be somebody else's tight end,

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and I would worry about tight end next year when

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a first round pick. There you go, that's me,

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That's just me. Thanks for all the questions. So we're

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna take our final break. When we come back, we're

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna play what day game we got for you to play?

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather? Would you rather? Next? If you're like

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>me and you love I mean, if you have a thing,

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then cutting the chord is scary. But then I found

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 1>out I could switch to direct TV Now and still

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get the live sports I love. No satellite needed, no

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>bulky hardware, no annual contract, just that the live sports

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you love. Tried direct TV Now for ten dollars a

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>month for three months. Visit DirecTV now dot com direct

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>tv now more for your thing. That's our thing us

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>called real deal, limited time price a litle little page

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>if three months when he's monthday at full price currently

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>mad aimum forty dollars and less cancer. Prices may change

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you Subscribers on cancel any time. Content varies by package

0:39:57.520 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and maybe limited districts. The plot it's time for tail

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.919
<v Speaker 1>gating with the auterbox boys, the autobox that builds those

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy protective phonecases. Yep, and now they're changing the side

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>dish game with the Auterbox Trooper soft cooler, lightweight mobile,

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and leakproof. Trooper is perfect for blitzing a crowded parking

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>lot with a freedopie. Amazing. Hey you think I could

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>fit my seven layer salmon salad into the Trooper cooler. Yep,

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but please don't And that's been tailgating with the autobox Boys.

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Learn more about the Trooper soft coolers at auterbox dot com.

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>While a player can look good on paper, it's when

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he's out on the field that you really find out

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>what he's made of. That's why the Cowboys rely on

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>more than just stats and scouting reports when building their team.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>When picking the tractor, it's why you should rely on

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>more than just specs and features. You've got to take

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it out and put it to the test. The Cowboys

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>did when they name John Deer their official tractor experience

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one for yourself. Visit my John Deer Dealer dot com

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>slash football. It can be hard to find the right

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>resource for learning about important financial matters. You search how

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to build savings, you end up reading about the one

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller that's

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>why Bank of America build Better Moneyhabits dot Com a

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>safe little corner of the Internet for answering your financial questions.

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money Habits can

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>show you how to make the most of your money

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>without resorting to random searches that always seem to lead

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up. To learn more,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>visit Better Money Habits dot com. SLOR has been helping

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fans seed better since nineteen seventy two, so they

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>don't miss a moment on the field. Get classes with slurs,

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 1>best vision, clarity and protection with the Ultimate Lens Package,

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>three innovative technologies in one lens for a limited time.

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You can double your lenses for free when you purchase

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ultimate Lens Package and get a second pair of frames.

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Find up participating I Care professional and details by visiting

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>SLOR USA dot com. That's USA dot com terms and

0:41:55.600 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>conditions applying. This is the Dallas Cowboy dot Com Draft.

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 1>We're back here at the Draft show from the s

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 1>TOWBC Mortgage Studios, presented by Miller Lights, Brian Broadest, Dane Burgler,

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>David Hellman, Kin Garrison Executive Producing once again, we thank

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys for hanging out with us, uh this morning

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.399
<v Speaker 1>or this evening wherever you might be in the world.

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate all you very much and UH look forward

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to always doing these shows every week. We've got to

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>combine coverage coming up at the end of the month,

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll be there the whole entire week with shows. Should

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.919
<v Speaker 1>have a list, official invite list coming out here next

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>today or tomorrow should be Yeah, so make sure you

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>check out. You know, it's kind of Burgler or before

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we know it, David Hellman's account Hellman DC or Dane

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>will definitely have it before me. Okay, Scott, we'll have

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 1>snubs and surprises and yeah, a couple read that snubs list,

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay, anybody, Yeah, yeah, well I take a long

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the snubs list. I started on my this

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>snubs list this morning because I've heard a few including

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>like Darwin Thompson from Uta State, um, Michael Dogbe from

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Temple a few others. But um, there's last year there

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>were thirty eight players drafted who weren't at the Combine.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>So just because a guy doesn't get a Combine invite, right,

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>not mean that he's you know, not gonna get drafted.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So thirty eight players. That's I think fifteen percent of

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the draft. It's a pretty high percentage to get drafted

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and not be at the comment. Yeah, and next week

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>when we have our show, we'll probably get into those

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the what's the flip side of that, like how

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>many guys that get invited to Combine don't get drafted?

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably like sixty I've got it right here. Um, last

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>year Combine invites to go undrafted one hundred and eighteen players,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So one hundred and eighteen guys that got invited to

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the Combine didn't get drafted, correct, Holy crap, that's a

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>poor job at the league. There were three hundred and

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty six players invited last year. That's almost that's a

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 1>third of your talent's thirty five point one percent. That's insane.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Two hundred and eighteen player the three hundred and thirty

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>six are invited, two hundred and eighteen percent or two

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighteen players were drafted sixty four point nine percent,

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eighteen were undrafted thirty five point one percent.

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not good, thank you, Jason, And I mean that's

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty consistent. I did the last five years. Get a

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sample set, run through that real quick um combine invites

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to go undrafted. Last year was one hundred and eighteen

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>year before one oh five, year before one hundred and seventeen,

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>year before that, one hundred and eight year before that

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eleven. So every year it's been pretty consistent.

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, about a third, just over a third of

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your draft pool. Wow, I know, I mean, ay, it's

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a hard target to hit, but I gotta believe you

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>could get it up toward eighty percent. Yeah, we need it.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>We will get into that next week. Okay, get to

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thee These would you rather? Would you rather? And would

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you rather? Is players within a position, within a round.

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>These are these are the guys you have done a

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>good job with this. These are all guys that I

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hear getting mentioned in the Okay, Brad, well, Okay, we

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>got fifteen minutes to kind of get through this list,

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>so let's give it a little longer. Would you rather?

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Iwa State running back David Montgomery or Memphis running back

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Henderson. That's a good one. I like that a

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>lot because that's two guys I have rated very similar,

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but they offered different things. One's more home run threat,

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one's more, you know, tougher between the tackles. Um I

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>would prefer I would take Montgomery for IA State because

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gives me a little more value as

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a three down player, a little more reliable. But Henderson's

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a home run threat. Yeah, this is where this is

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the one. I mean, I I love Henderson, I like

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>them both, but Henderson at Memphis it's just it's five

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a one ninety nine. But you know, to me, I

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just saw a guy that was an explosive player. I mean,

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, another guy was just more of

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>a kind of you know, just a pounder, bad weather back,

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of a running between the tackles, and

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, one's a grinder one exactly. And

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I think with me, with Henderson, I just didn't feel

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:14.280
<v Speaker 1>like that he needed much room to make something big happen.

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think the other guy needs more room. I

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>really do not. And again I'm not trying to, you know,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you gave me a choice, I'm taking Henderson myself.

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's I think Montgomery is if you

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>want to if you want a tough guy that catches

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and you know who to pick up on

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the blitz and all that stuff. He's he's got some

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 1>complete back to him. But I didn't see a guy

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that really had the speed to turn the corner and

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. But no, there's nothing special about him

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>as an athlete, right, He's just a steady, steady player.

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>But I give me the explosive guy in this case,

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>my player comparison for Henderson. Yeah, Dalvin Cook, I think

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of similar all right, swerving in

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and out there you go. I worry a little bit

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about that offense. I mean that offense opened up some

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>huge holes for him. Yeah, but it's gonna be about

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:09.479
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback there, Dalvin Cook. Darius Geics, like history says

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty good running back is gonna be there

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Cowboys range. How many running backs you have

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Henderson on your board so far? Let me

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you Jacobs. Jacobs is really the only one. Okay,

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 1>actually actually actually take that back, Uh, I have I

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like Trey Williams, and I like Singletary ahead of yeah,

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Henderson, tray ViOn Williams. Williams. Yeah from a

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>m Yeah, I agree with you on those. The only

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 1>other guy, I would add, is I like Damian Harris.

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Damon Harrison's Damon Harris is like seventy five percent version

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of Zeke. That's who he is. Yeah. Yeah, he's not

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent Zeke. He's not Zeke, but he's like

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent Zeke. All right, I gotta speed y'all up? Yeah? Sorry? Uh?

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather Hakeem Butler wide receiver Iowa State or

0:47:55.560 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Texas his own Jordan Humphrey? Mmmm? It kind of depends

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on what you want, a slot or an outside stretch guy,

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what you know, what do you really

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 1>need in your offense? Because little Jordan Humphrey is that big,

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:14.319
<v Speaker 1>oversized slot receiver who can find those open zones, help

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you on crossers, strong at the catch point. He's gonna

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>high point well. And meanwhile, Butler is more of the

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>downfield threat where jump balls and you know he's gonna

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey makes some place down the field. Yeah yeah, but

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying. So I mean, I guess

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I take probably, and I feel better about little Jordan

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey in terms of what I'm getting. I feel better

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about understanding what I'm getting. But Butler's got more. I

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think more upside because of those big play potential that

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 1>he has. Could could how they run be the factor?

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And who's taken first. I don't think either is gonna

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>run very well. That's what I'm saying, though. Yeah, I

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>mean if one runs better, if one train's better, it

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>happens to run better than the other. Are we going

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to see a guy go one over the Butler's probably

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna run like a four or five six and Humphrey's

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna run like a four six one? Yeah, something like that,

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and everybody's not gonna like him. And then

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you watch the tape and they both make plays down

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I means ran a four or five eight, Yeah, it's

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>not Michael Thomas ran a four five seven. Yeah. Wide

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>receiver is a technical position. I'd take Humphrey over this guy. Yes,

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree. All right, here's glad you had an answer. Well,

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but I do like Humphrey a lot. This

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is one cowboy fans will like this one. Um Stanford

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end, Cayden Smith or a and M's Jay Sternburger.

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Who would you rather? I'm taking Sternburger. Sternburger. I'm surprised

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you didn't like Katon Smith that much. I just struggled.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I like him a lot better than Dalton Schultz was

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>lash year. It was Brian's guy. Yeah, Dalton Schultz he

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>hates all of a sudden. No, I don't hate him.

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate him. I just I it was disappointed

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in him. Not mad. I disappointed. No, it's disappointed because

0:49:58.000 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I felt like that he was. I felt like he

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>was gonna come in and start. It's got three more

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>years on his kind, I know, but I just felt

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, the Stanford. I fell in love

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Stanford. You just like David Show. So now

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you're overcompensating the other way, disliking Cayton Smith got burned

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit by Dalton. So now you're I don't

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a guy with much after catch. Here

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with this guy, all these tight ends, I watched, everybody's

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 1>doing something after catch that Kayton Smith does not. It

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:30.320
<v Speaker 1>does nothing after the catch, did Jason Winton except for

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that one time without Yeah, I'm saying I just don't

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.879
<v Speaker 1>see a guy that extends routes and stuff like that. Well,

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you want a big time playmaker at tight end, or

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you'd love yes, that'd be great. But in the third

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>round where you're probably gonna get surer can make plays.

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>It gets We were live watching this guy do well,

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I think he's a Sturnburger. If you

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>want him, you have to take him in the second

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 1>round where Cayton Smith I think he could be there

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in the third round. Okay, I think those two players

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are your day two options for the Cowboys at tight

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>end in a second to be Sternberger and the third

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>by Katon Smith. And they're different. Kane Smith's a chain mover,

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's gonna give you more as a blocker. Um,

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>he did you see a guy got much movement though,

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what Bobby Kane Smith. Yeah, he's not an overpowering guy,

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't lose a lot either. I mean he's

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a sustained guy or you know, he's more of a

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>stalemate guy, not an overpower guy. Okay, so Sternberger. Sternberger

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is the answer. He fumbled in overtime for he did

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, bad bad fumbled. The box score didn't

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>say that it did. It should have Mississippi State defensive

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 1>tackle Jeffrey Simmons or Simmons and done unless you say

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Quinn and Williams, well Clemson Christian Wilkins, who we already

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 1>know Dan doesn't like. No, No, I like Christian Wilkins. Okay,

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:41.840
<v Speaker 1>do it to flip it the other way. Oh you

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like Lawrence. I'm sorry, yea flip I flip it

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the other way. Quinn, Yeah, go Quinnon Williams with that guy.

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go Quinnon. Simmons is great, but Quinn and

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Williams actually gives you are people gonna like Simmons just

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>as much you think no, Williams gives you a better

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>pass rush value. I mean, Simmons can get to the

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with that power, but Williams is such a better

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher. And if you can create an interior, yeah,

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that's a difference maker. See. I think Quinnon

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Williams is one of the best players in this draft.

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>He's a number two players in this draft. I think

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>easy does could Simmons could? And maybe not? Like right away, like,

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:15.320
<v Speaker 1>could could he play on the edge? Does he have

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.240
<v Speaker 1>any type of flex like that? He just he doesn't

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>seem like he's built like most defensive tackles. Like he

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>looks leaning six three three eleven. I think he's I

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mean his calves are huge. Yeah, like he's he's really

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>really he's just a grown wa talk about him. And

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>those are two physical players. Oh yeah, I mean that's

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you watch. I mean they how you judge defensive tackles.

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>If you could see their number in their name the

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>whole time, you know, yeah, if they're not getting turned

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and washed and stuff like that, they're pretty good. These guys.

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You you you you see ninety four and you know

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you see those numbers. I think Simmons and Wilkins, that's

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a good one because I think they they offer something

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a little different. Simmons is more of the grown man.

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>He's got more power at the point of attack. Got

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>some off the field stuff too, right, he does. And

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be and that's gonna be a really interesting

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>storyline with him because it's not as bad as I think.

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You see defensive tackles fall before because of injury and sure,

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>yeah things sure with Christian wilpon Allen, Yeah, definitely with

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Christian Wilkins, you're getting a guy that's more of an

0:53:18.280 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>upfield penetrator. Um, you know, the flexible hips, the way

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get through gaps, um talking to people at

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>clumpson they rave about him. They one guy said that

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the only, uh, only player they've had that was better

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from a leadership, maturity integral standpoint was Deshaun Watson. So

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty high praise Christian Balkins. So, I mean, that's

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:41.760
<v Speaker 1>why Christian what they're both gonna be top fifteen guys.

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Simmons is a monster though Simmons is rated just ahead

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of Wilkins for men, who who would you rather? We're

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna separate the two Devons who we already talked about,

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but arguable. I mean, if you're looking for a linebacker,

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>your best two bets LSU's Devin White and Michigan's Devin Bush.

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>If Bush were just two inches, you're gonna say this

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>if ifs we're a fifth, we'd all be drunk. Dane, Yes,

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I like that. It's just it's tough because

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's not something that we're just getting hung up on,

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:15.919
<v Speaker 1>like arm length and numbers. You see it on tape

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>where oh you do you know he's whether it's getting

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>off blocks or finishing tackles. But he's such a powerful player.

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:27.200
<v Speaker 1>He's such a rangy player. Yes, so smart I love

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so much about Devin Bush. I just the length is

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going to lead to some negative plays here and there,

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and you got to live with that. And I think

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you will live with that. But I think that Devin

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 1>wits the answer. I'll tell you what though, man for

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a shorter guy, he can hold his ground. Yeah, I mean,

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you're danger right though, you do see some time. But

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy's got a real nose for the ball. He's

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:48.919
<v Speaker 1>a smart guy. I mean he sees stuff and he's gone.

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>He's running, I mean sideline to sideline player, he get

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>through the trash phills, gaps. He's short. That's that. He

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is a five eleven guy, and he might not he

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:00.760
<v Speaker 1>might not be five eve I'd be five to eleven.

0:55:01.960 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 1>In my two round mock draft I did this week,

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I the Packers going jechipool in the two rounds jichipool.

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh Noah fant Devin Bush loved what they got in

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that draft. I think that'd be a home trying to

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:14.799
<v Speaker 1>get a job with the Packers. What do you got

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>going there? If that worked out, it'd be grateful. How

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:19.439
<v Speaker 1>close would I mean, I know we kind of touched

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>on this. How close would you stack Devin White to

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Roquan Smith. I think there's a big difference in instincts there. Yeah,

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I do too. Roquan was a stud what though they

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>both create turnovers. Though Devin White well and when he

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 1>can he can, he's got I feel a lot better

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about Roquan Smith and coverage too. Yeah, Like I think

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 1>he's just a lot more natural in that area. Devin

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>White really wasn't asked to do that a lot. He

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>did some spot dropping and you see the range, but

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>he's just more of a C bowl get ball guy

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>where Roquan I think you said a little more instinctual anticipation,

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. All right, we got two more

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to do in three minutes, to do it rapid fire

0:55:55.440 --> 0:56:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Clemson corner, Trayvon Mullen, Vandy corner, Joe Juan Williams. That's

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a good one. I like that one. Yeah, I'm not

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 1>done pretty good so far. Give you credit. Their their

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tags are touching for me right now based on Brian

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:12.880
<v Speaker 1>loves that. He loves to hear that. I love to

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>hear that, you know, because there's but's this, what's the

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>where's what's the round? What's the projection here? By mid

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:21.920
<v Speaker 1>second second? Yeah, for sure. I mean they're both tall,

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 1>bright guys. Maybe before Dallas picks Joe one. Williams is

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most physically impressive. Just when you look

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>at him, he's so physically impressive for a corner you

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 1>would swear, you would swear it's he'd make Jalen Rams

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you look like his little brother. Yeah. Wow, Like he's

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just he's so physically Yeah, he's he's really really but

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>good looking kids. He's more of a four five five athlete.

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get beat with speed. Uh, you know you

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:48.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about that. And with Mullen again, he's tall, long rangey,

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>but doesn't have a great fuel with the back to

0:56:50.840 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I mean you could poke holes in both

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys. They just both look really good at in

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.759
<v Speaker 1>there uh in pads and they run really well. So

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who I Mullin slightly ahead of Williams

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>right now, but again tags are touching, you know. I

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I give me Williams from Vanderbilt and I'm just gonna

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, again, they're both tall guys. I love when

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian finds his notes on a guy, but like his

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 1>face lights No, no, no, I'm just looking at Mullin's

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>notes and stuff like that, and you know, I just

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that he play, Yeah, he does. He plays

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>with more of a burst. Mullin plays with a burst,

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but he tends to float. You know, you watch me coverage,

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he floats and that bothers me about him. All Right,

0:57:33.920 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you like Williams, I'm cutting out off. Yeah. Thanks, two

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that Cowboys fans. I have been enamored with safety

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor rap out of Washington and Jonathan Abram out of

0:57:47.080 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi State. Another one where I have him rated pretty closely. Um,

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so you had Abram going the pick after the Cowboys

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I did to the Colts. Uh. He's more of your

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>traditional strong safety. Um. He has arranged to hold up

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, but that's not what he does best. He's physical.

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I love the energy that he brings to the field

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's kind of like an old soul type of guy.

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>He's married or he as a kid, but he brings

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it every single time he's on the field. Taylor Raps

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar where it's it's a lot of intelligence,

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of understanding angles. Neither are great athletes

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:24.919
<v Speaker 1>where you consider them as like a true center field

0:58:24.960 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 1>single high type, but they're versatile. They could do a

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of different things. I would go rap, but I

0:58:29.760 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>have them Raps, my number three safety abras, my number

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 1>four safety. I'll tell you what it give me rap

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean. And I appreciate what he's saying about the

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi State kid because I don't think he's wrong about that.

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But with Rap I had my notes were so good

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on him about time and blitzes, ability to run and close,

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a quickness of his feet, stays in coverage, He's not

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:54.160
<v Speaker 1>afraid to stick his nose in there. He doesn't miss tackles.

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 1>He's just a tough guy. And I if you're gonna

0:58:57.760 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want me to have a safety, give me

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>guy that can play near the line, play back noses, assignments,

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make mistakes. But I'll tell you they're both really,

0:59:06.160 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>really good players. But I would I would draft Rot

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>before I would the other kid. I agree, And so

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a rat. It is a rap I will. I'm curious,

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, safety being a need. Obviously, we'll see how

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it changes. Yeah, I know Christoph Shard was here last year,

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm still fascinated by the impact that he could

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:23.919
<v Speaker 1>have in He's still gonna have a big impact yet, right, yeah,

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>get ready, I mean the Cam Chancellor. Yeah, they Let's

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>see what happens round Pitts. Let's see what happens in

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>free agency too with that safety position. Let's see what

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of recruiter Chris raher Shard is. See we can

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>get one of his former players. If not, we're talking

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about Taylor rapping on the movie ET before I have

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>him ET come Home. Man. I like that, Oh, I

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:48.479
<v Speaker 1>like it? All right, Well, that is all the time

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have for the Draft Show today. I just

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 1>want to thank everybody involved, Dane Burglar, David Hilman, Garrison,

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the executi producer. We want to thank you guys out

0:59:56.120 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>there for hanging out with us, whether you hang out

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>with us live or later on, we do appreciate every

1:00:01.800 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>single one of you. We'll see you next week with

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities to investigate and educate. You got the Draft

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Show from s NBBC Mortgage Studios, presented by mill of LTE.

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Have a good week, guys,