WEBVTT - Police Drones and You

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to it could happen here. I'm Garrison Davis. Now,

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>last week I spent a few days in Las Vegas

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Consumer Electronics Showcase. Most of the time of

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the convention, I was just walking around the show floor

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at various new types of surveillance equipment, AI products,

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and various other bullshit that was being pedled to many

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>industry attendees of CEES. But I was also able to

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>go to a few panels. Now, panels are really interesting

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because you get to hear people who are working inside

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>industries talk about stuff that they don't usually really publicly

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>talk about very much. And on the first day of

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the convention, I went to a panel about drone technology.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Half of the panel was about how Walmart is launching

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>new delivery drones in Dallas, Texas. The other half was

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>about police drones. And that's what we're going to be

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about here today, how the police are using dr zones,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>why they're using drones, and how you can probably expect

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to be seeing a lot more drones up in the

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sky piloted by either an AI or a police officer.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's get started. Cheula Vista is the southernmost kind

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of medium sized city in California with the population of

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy eight thousand people. Cheulavista has a

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>police force of two hundred and eighty nine sworn officers

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as one hundred and twenty civilian employees. On

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>top of their nearly three hundred officers, they operate a

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>drone fleet ten hours a day, seven days a week,

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>launching high deff camera mounted drones from four locations throughout

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>their small city. I'm going to quote from an article

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>from the MIT Technology Review, which did a deep dive

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>onto Cheullavista's police drones back in February of twenty twenty three. Quote.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Cheulavista uses these drones to extend the power of its

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>workforce in a number of ways. For example, if only

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>one officer is available, when two calls come in, one

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for an armed suspect and another for shoplifting, an officer

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>will respond to the first one. But now cvpd's public

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Information Officer, Sergeant Anthony Molina, says that dispatchers can send

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a drone to surreptitiously trail the suspected shoplifter. Quote, and

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this really gets at the heart of how these drones

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to get used. They exist to funnel more

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>people into the criminal justice system. Instead of having to

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>choose between two calls, one of which actually could relate

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to saving someone's life, the other just a petty crime.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Now the police can easily follow someone doing a petty

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>crime while responding to other calls and eventually catch up.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a way to just expand the amount of people

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that can be arrested and thrown into jail. Nowadays, drones

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>are pretty common tools for police. Over one thy five

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred departments currently use drones, usually for special occasions though,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like search and rescue, crime scene documentation, protest surveillance, and

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes tracking suspects. But at the moment, only about a

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>dozen police departments regularly dispatched drones in response to nine

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to one one calls, the first of which was Chew

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>La Vista PD, who launched their quote drone as first

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Responder program back in twenty eighteen. Would the goal of

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>having an unmanned aerial system or drone be proactively deployed

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>before an officer is on scene. Now we'll hear from

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Chief Roxanna Kennedy of the Cheu La Vista Police Department

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>talking on the drone technology panel at CS We are.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Seven miles from the Mexico border, and we are the

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 2>second largest city in San Diego County. So we have

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>about two hundred and ninety officers and we serve a

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>community of about three hundred thousand. Because of the close

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>proximity to the door, we have a lot of people

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that have traveled back and forth. We have a drone

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>program that I'm awfully proud of. We are responding proactively

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>to calls for service in our community, and so we

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>have drone station from fortifuent locations throughout our city. We

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>have pilots in command that are on the rooftop, and

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>then we have a operation center where we have smart

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>officers that are part one to seven pilots that fly

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 2>the drones. So we are responding now to calls for

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>service on average, and an officer on seeing a drone

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>on scene that's sharing information with our officers light streaming

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>that information on our cell phones or in our computers

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that we're siving information about the call within ninety seconds

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>on average. And so what it's doing for us in

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>sure Vista and for our community is we are providing

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 2>information rapidly, real time information to officers so that they

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 2>can make better decisions so that everyone goes home safely.

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 2>We say, the community safer, the officers are safer, and

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 2>the subjects that we encounter are safer, so we're offully

0:04:57.960 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>proud of what we're doing.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The way police are able to deploy drones used to

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more limited. The use of drones is

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>regulated by the FFA, the Federal Aviation Administration. In most cases,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the FFA requires that both hobbyists and police departments only

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>fly drones within the operator's own line of sight. But

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>starting back in twenty nineteen, agencies and vendors could start

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>applying for a beyond visual line of sight or bev

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>LOOSS waiver from the FFA to fly drones remotely, allowing

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for much longer flights in restricted airspace. Chula Vista Pedi

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was the first department to get a BEVLOST waiver. The

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>MIT Tech Review estimated last year that roughly two hundred

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five more departments now have one as well.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Another thing that I always talk about, because I think

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>it's critical, is the concept of why we're using drones,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 2>what the benefit is to the community with the use

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 2>of our drones, And I truly believe them. And my

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>officers can pick up their cell phone before they even

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>respond to the call, and they can look and see

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 2>the scene, what's happening, where the individual is. If the

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>person's facing in the middle of the park, there are

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>no children around, and there are noo, there's nobody that's

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>within the reach of this individual harmy, you might not

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 2>have to rush into that scene so quickly officers can

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>de escalate, make better decisions. And I mean, this is

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>just a game changer for law enforcement. And right now,

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, we were the first agent agency to be

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 2>involved in the integrated Pilot program with the FAA. We're

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>very proud of that that they trusted us enough for

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>us to be the organization that brought forward all these

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>these ideas that are now being utilized in law enforcements. Now.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I've watched a lot of videos of police talking about

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>why they're using drones, of drone training companies talking about

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>why police drones are so important. In one video on

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>their website, this guy from Skyfire Consulting was talking about

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how how police may not have had to kill Tameror

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Rice if they simply had a drone watching beforehand so

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they could see that it was a toy gun, which

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is a ridiculous thing to say, because in the nine

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one call that jump started this entire police interaction, it

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was expressed that the caller thought the gun was probably

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a toy. And this notion that is simply if police

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have more ability to surveil, they'll be able to respond

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>safer and apply less deadly force, I think is a

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty suspect premise. Now, the effectiveness of drone technology in

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement is challenging to verify and quantify. The MIT

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech review cannot find any third party studies showing that

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>drones reduce crime, even after interviewing CVPD officers as well

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as drone vendors and researchers quote, nor could anyone provide

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>statistics on how many additional arrests or convictions came from

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>using drone technology. I was able to find some on

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>cvpd's website talking about how many drone initiated interactions resulted

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in arrests, but quantifying additional arrests seems to be a

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>little challenging. Now, if you look at Cheulavista PD's own

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>drone response to stats, the vast majority of deployments I

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>estimate around seventy percent are for what the director of

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>investigations for the privacy rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>refers to as quote crimes of poverty unquote, which he

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>believes will be the target of most drone policing as

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>opposed to violent crime. Nearly thirty percent of Cheulavista's drone

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>deployments are for what's categorized as disturbances. Almost fifteen percent

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are for psychological evaluations, ten percent are for quote, check

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the area and information, over seven percent are for welfare checks,

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>six point five percent is for quote, unknown problem, and

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>over six percent is for suspicious person and another six

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>percent for traffic accidents. Now, some drone of deployments do

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>result in patrol units not having to be dispatched, but

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>CVPD also says that drones have assisted in thousands of arrests.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really not sure if having a drone following

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>someone around is the best thing for a fifty one

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to fifty psych evaluation. The presence of a police officer

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always make the situations better either, but I don't

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>see having a drone be a really calming presence if

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you think someone needs mental help. Funding a whole fleet

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of heavy duty surveillance drones and paying dedicated operators costs money. Now,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear to me how many drones to LEVISTAPD currently has,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and on their website they list ten different drone models

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>currently being in their fleet, most of them really expensive

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.599
<v Speaker 1>DGI drones like the DGI Matrix, the DGI Inspire, the

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>DGA Phantom, the dj Maverick, as well as drones from

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a few other random companies. But nevertheless, Chief Kennedy is

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>very grateful for their local police Foundation for heading up

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the funding for their DFR drone first Responder program. Let's

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>hear from her.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if anyone here is in law enforcement,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>but many agencies use drunes and there are all different

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 2>types of drones that are available. I call them reactive

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>drums or ones that are like the tactical drunes that

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you can use to go in on a hostage situation

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 2>or a missing person to check in the canyon areas,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>or you know, interior drones. We have drums that go

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>underneath bands, go inside addicts, all types of different drones,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 2>and many organizations have drones like that, But a DFR

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 2>drone is very unique and different because these drones are flying.

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 2>As you can imagine, eighteen thousand missions, it puts a

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of wear and tear on But that is one

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest challenges beyond the fact of funding. So

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>we don't have huge budgets that are allotted for drone programs,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 2>and so we've had to be very, very creative in

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>our police department, and we were very blessed to have

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a police Foundation that has taken on the responsibility to

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>help us really start our drone program and continue going forward.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>So funding is always going to be a challenge and

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>dependent upon the drone that you use. There are some

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 2>drones that you can't get any as you can't use

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>for assets seizure funding, nor can you get grants for

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>because sometimes when it comes to foreign drones there are

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>many challenges as well. So you have to think of

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that and then we deal with legislation. Right now, that's

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the new challenge that we all have. We have to

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 2>fite some bals. Like I said, I'm agnostic. I want

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>to use what's the best drum out there and protect

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the information and we do that with encrypted software programs

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 2>that are on private servers. But you'll see that there's

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of discussion about drones and what drones we

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>should be using right now.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll get back to the chief's offhanded mention of legal

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>battles in a bit here, but Chula Vista's budgetary situation

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>may not be as dire as the Chief makes it

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>out to be, on top of their current fifty five

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>million dollar operating budget. Back in twenty twenty, the Loprenza

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>newspaper revealed that departments in San Diego County had secretly

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>been getting hundreds of millions of dollars in high tech

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>police equipment, including armored vehicles, facial recognition and phone breaking software,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>license plate readers, drones, riot gear, among other miscellaneous technology,

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as a part of a DHS grant program. Due to

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>their close proximity to the US Mexico border, Cheula Vista

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was one such department, and as of twenty twenty, so

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>four years ago, they had already received over one million

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars in grant funds from this DHS program, titled the

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>quote Urban Area Security Initiative. Considering Chief Kennedy's budgetary concerns,

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>drones actually have a lot of upsides financially, as they

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are often a lot cheaper than alternative surveillance methods, as

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>well as being relatively easy to deploy remotely, either with

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a joystick or just by clicking a point on a

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>map from a comfy office building. Issues around this ease

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of use was pointed out by Dave Moss, the director

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of investigations for the privacy rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>who was quoted in the MIT article saying, quote, up

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>until the last like five to ten years, there was

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>this unspoken check and balance on law enforcement power money.

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>You cannot have a police officer standing on every corner

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of every street. You can't have a helicopter flying twenty

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>four seven because of fuel and insurance is really expensive.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But with all these new technologies, we don't have that

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>check and balance anymore. That's just going to result in

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>more people being pulled through the criminal justice system.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 2>My officers constantly are on the air now is U

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>as one available? Is US one available? Because it's giving

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>them more information. Think about the fact that you can

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>look at your cell phone. I could be anywhere in

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the world and I can look at kit lets me

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>know whenever there's a drone flock, and I can walk.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I can have visual awareness, aial overlay of what's happening

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>in my community, no matter where I am.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Advancements in technology are leading to further normalization of police surveillance.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Ten years ago, would people react to news of a

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour police drone program the same way they

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>would now. What was once the threat of big Brother

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>has since become a very sought after, unfetishized nanny state.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>In the v for Veneta graphic novel, anarchist writer Alan

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Moore imagined a fascist Britain characterized by surveillance cameras around

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>every corner, and now cities around the country are setting

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>up their own street mounted cameras, linked to private security

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>cameras and ring doorbell cameras to create a network of

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>life coverage around a whole city which is instantly accessible

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to police. The more widespread consumer adoption of new technologies

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like small camera mounted drones and doorbell cameras, the more

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>acceptable it seems for police to add such technology to

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>their arsenal of surveillance tools. It almost becomes expected to

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>LAVISTIPEDI has routinely declined to answer why their drones are

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>always recording both to and from the scene, and the

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>department has put in a lot of effort into managing

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the backlash against their expanding drone program.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'll tell you one thing. Even some of the

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 2>day after this, they were very concerned about drones in

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the sense of privacy. What are you doing with these drones?

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>As you're responding, you're trying to gather data and information

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>to spy on us, right, And we had to go

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of detail and explaining that as our

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>drone lits off, it is immediately it is recording because

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 2>that's the information gatherer for us. As that drone responds,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the camera is already going almost three miles down the

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>roads where the scene is and giving us vital information

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>as the officers are responding. But one of the criticism was, well,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>on the way back, is your drone just going in

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>my backyard? What if we're spoking marijuana in our backyard?

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And I said, you're in California, it doesn't really matter.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>But what we let that way go, right, But we said, okay,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>we gave your concern. And so what we did was

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 2>we worked with the software company that we were with,

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and they created an automatic so that as a drone returns,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 2>it automatically tilts to the horizon. So we're not recording anything.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>If another call came out, we can immediately we'll go

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>back a flight mapping for us and it will share

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 2>that information later on. But the goal is to listen

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>to your community as well.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Chief Kennedy's claim here is difficult to back up because

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>CVPD have refused to show the public any of the

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>drone footage they routinely collect. But if we take the

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Chief at her word here anyway, she admits that the

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>drone goes back to recording at street level as soon

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as there's another nine one one call, as they record

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>everything on the way to a scene. And the way

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>she phrases this whole tilt feature is quite misleading because

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the camera never actually stops recording. She just claims that

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it tilts slightly upwards in between nine one one calls,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's still capturing footage up to three miles away

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire time it's in the air. Police in Cheulavista

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have flown over eighteen thousand missions with their drowns. That's

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of footage. When talking about the privacy concerns

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>had by some residents of Cheulavista, Chief Kennedy really emphasized

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>how much her in the department really care about listening

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to community feedback and how data transparency is so important

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to CVPD.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Community engagement is essential, especially in law enforcement because there

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>is there are so many challenges when it comes to

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 2>misinformation that's out there, and whenever you're a part of

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>what's deemed as a government, everyone thinks that you have

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 2>some ulterior motive when you're involved with any type of technology,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and so we have worked really hard to build very

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 2>strong relationships with every aspect of our community. So it

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>was about in twenty fifteen when we started talking about

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the concept and the possibility of drones and a laugh

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 2>with Chancel, said George Jensen, because that's my story that

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I used to and I love it because I made

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>fun of my guys when they said that we want

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to fly drunes. I said, oh, come on, now, what

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 2>are we in me? George jetson blind the cars, and

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 2>then I saw today they talked about a blind car.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So it happens. It happens, right, And so with the community,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 2>we started having these conversations. We created a working group,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 2>we started doing community forums. We started asking the community

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 2>about what would you think if we were able to

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>do something like this. We even went to some of

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 2>the organizations that may not always be so supportive of

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 2>these types of groups. We worked with the ASL you

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and asked for their input on our policy. So before

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we ever flew a drune, we call it the krawl

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 2>walk run base. We're still at the very end of crawl.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 2>We're not into lock yet and we've been doing it

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>again also for five years. So you have to make

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>certain that you're transparent and we provided all types of

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>information that are available. If you go to all you

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 2>have put in is jobs to place drums and it'll

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>come up with us and you can look at all

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the things that we do, all the information that we share,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 2>the flight maps that we share. I mean, it's just

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>super important to have those community forums. Every year. We

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>do a community forum twice a year where we ask

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 2>for from our community.

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Later on in the panel, Chief Kennedy said that CVPD

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is quote unquote extremely transparent about their flight data and

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote have nothing to hide relating to their use

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of surveillance drones, which is a curious claim considering the

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that CVPD has historically kept all drone footage hidden

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>from the public and has fought in court to do so,

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>despite the chief's emphasis on the police's commitment to transparency

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and the importance of listening to community feedback, even going

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as to consult the ACLU when developing their

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>drone program. For years now, the Cheulvista Police Department has

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>denied all FOYA and public records requests for any drone footage.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>In response, are Turno Castanares, a Teu Livista resident and

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>owner of the local bilingual newspaper Loprenza, filed a lawsuit

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>against the city. CVPD argued that all drone footage should

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be categorically exempt from the public records requests on the

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>basis that the footage could be used for a future investigation.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Just last December, only a few weeks before Cees, the

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>California Fourth District Court of Appeals ruled that this blanket

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>exemption is invalid and that not all drone first responder

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>footage could be classified as part of appending or ongoing

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigation, pointing to examples such as nine oh one

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>calls about a roaming mountain lion or a stranded motorist.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And police were not happy about this ruling. I'll talk

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>about their reaction at the end of the episode, but

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>controlling the narrative about the drone first Responder program has

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>been of the utmost importance to Trulavista Police. As the

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>chief herself expressed at the panel, feel good about telling

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>our story.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>If you don't tell your own story in law enforcement,

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 2>other people will tell it for it and it might

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 2>not be the right story. So we've gotten really good

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>at sharing on our social media and through YouTube channels

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and everything success stories of what we're doing.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>That is quite the claim there, to paraphrase the Electronic

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Frontier Foundation. Without public access to their drone footage, it

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>makes it very difficult to assess how much privacy you

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>have in Cheula Vista and whether police are even following

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>their own rules about when and whether they record sensitive

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>places like people's homes, backyards, or public protests. And that's

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>why this recent ruling and the legal precedent it sets

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>is a huge win for actual transparency and marks the

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>first step towards the public finally getting a look at

0:22:53.720 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>how these drones are being used in Scheula Vista. With

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>drone first responder programs is spreading to police departments across

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the country, modeled after the one in Chula Vesta. Combined

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with the increasing presence of stationary street level cameras, the

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ability for police to be watching everywhere without the need

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for on the ground officers creates what the eff refers

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to as quote, a fundamental change in strategy with police

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>responding to a much much larger number of situations with drones,

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>resulting in pervasive, if not persistent, surveillance of communities unquote.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of persistent surveillance, near the end of the panel,

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the chief announced that to Lavesta, PD is planning to

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>expand their ten hour a day drone first responder program

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to a constant twenty four hour a day drone surveillance program,

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>more than doubling the department's capaccy need to have eyes

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sky would mean a lot more work hours

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>for drone operators, as well as a large increase in

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the amount of video files being stored indefinitely, But Chief

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy claimed that they're looking into offsetting costs by replacing

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the drone piloting team with AI assisted piloting

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and autonomous devices.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 2>You've clearly been a leader with thrones's first responder and technology.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Looking forward, what is the future hole for the Department.

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I assume you're spending a lot of time telling others

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 2>about the program edition using drones, but beyond that, what's

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 2>it at Well, my hope is that we'll be moving

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>towards twenty four hour operations. Right now, we're from sunrise

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>to sunset. We go till close to ten o'clock at night,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 2>which goes a little bit beyond that. And then one

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>of the challenges, and I know you're only getting like

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a little piece of the information about exactly how we're

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 2>doing this, but from the four different locations that we

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>fly on each of the rooftops, we have what's called

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>piloting command, and that piloting command is contracted through a

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 2>company and we and they just have visual awareness of

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the sky and they work in coordination with our drone

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>pilot that's inside our operations center. But that's a huge

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 2>expense for us to pay lead for each site. Right now,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 2>with the operations that we have, we paint about one

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand dollars per year, So that's four hundred thousand

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 2>dollars for four locations. Beyond all the other proces associating

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and so if you get expensive, my hope is that

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and we keep hearing about it. We've seen some of

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>the testing and we've been testing it as well in

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>our area. Are what's called drone in the box or

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 2>there's some of the systems that are out there right

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>now that organizations are using that are autonomous, and so

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>we're getting there, but we're not quite there because it's

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 2>very different when you're dealing with flying over people and

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 2>you're flying into areas where the drone was to drop

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the sky and harkey a community. That could

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 2>create tremendous challenges for a silver Barry. As I mentioned

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>the crawl things.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So to explain how these AI autonomous drones would work,

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially this box about the size of a truck

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bed that can either be mounted in like a police

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>pickup truck or be stored on various rooftops around the city,

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and someone just needs to point at a place on

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a map and the drone will fly in pilot itself

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>around obstacles and basically circle around an area to do

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>surveillance and you can call it back when you're done.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>This would require a whole bunch of drones to just

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be launching and being piloted by themselves. You wouldn't have

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to train random police officers to become FAA licensed pilots,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and you could just have the whole thing in the box,

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's called drone in the box. And these are

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>only going to become more common and cheaper. Imagine having

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>ten of these throw out a city, launching from like

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>ten different rooftops, being able to fly around by themselves,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>constantly going around in communities, constantly going to GPS coordinates

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>linked to the nine one one calls, creating a whole

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>wealth of footage instantly available to police, live streamed from

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the air. Matt Sloane, the founder of Skyfire Consulting, a

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>company here in Atlanta that trains law enforcement agencies on

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the use of drones and DFR programs, thinks that we'll

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>start seeing autonomous deployment of police drones within the next

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>year or two, as police budgets increase and become allocated

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>for unmanned aerial systems. He referred to the state of

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>drone use by police as quote rapidly escalating. Chula Vista

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>likes to market itself as a pioneer of this smart

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>city movement, which consequently makes them able to receive a

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of grant funding. Now, the idea of the

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>smart city is built around having a massive amount of

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>data to automate certain city services. So for this idea

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to work, there needs to be a way to collect

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that data, and these drones are a major part of that.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The website for the City of Tula Vista also lists

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>projects like electronic transportation, adaptive traffic signals in app for

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>non emergency city services, as well as quote crime mapping

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and police dispatch modernization unquote as also being smart city initiatives.

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 2>We have what's called by nine one one one and

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>that allows my officers to hear incoming nine more one

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>calls before dispatchally even puts it into the system. They

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>can hear what's going on there, and that is tremendously

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in valuable to them. We have so many different layers

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 2>of technology that have really showcase the value.

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Live nine one one is a new piece of software

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that allows patrol officers to listen to live stream to

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>nine one one calls directly and pinpoints the location of

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the caller via GPS. Now, I don't even have time

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to get into the many reasons that this could be

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea, but simply but police do not need

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to respond to every call that goes into nine one one,

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>let alone be giving random cops this ability to self

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>dispatch on their own. It just seems like that could

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have many, many consequences. But anyway, back to drones. According

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to a twenty twenty article in the newspaper Loprenza, cities

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego County like Chula Vista have received equipment

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>such as tethered drones used for stationary surveillance, poll cameras,

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>license plate readers, and cell phone cracking technology used to

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>circumvent passwords from the Urban Area Security Initiative DHS grant program.

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these technologies have use in the Smart

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>City Idyllic plan for data collection to automate city services.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>After the drone panel was over and I was walking

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>around the show floor at CEES, I couldn't help but

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>notice all of the smart cameras and AI image recognition

0:29:55.320 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>systems being advertised for law enforcement applications. Software that can

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>almost instantaneously scan through a wealth of footage and track

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>people's movements, run facial recognition, and identify every article of clothing.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Versions of this type of software are already in use

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>by many police departments, and they will only get better, cheaper,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and more common. In effect, what this does is remove

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the detective legwork. Instead of having to

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>manually map someone's movements and track down what niche etsy

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>shirt someone's wearing, these aisystems can now do this all automatically.

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>To quote the MIT Tech Review article on cvpd's dfr

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>drone program, quote, As the technology continues to spread, privacy

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and civil liberty groups are raising the question of what

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>happens when drones are combined with license plate readers, networks

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of fixed cameras, and new real time command centers that

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>digest and sort through video evidence. This digital dragnet could

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>dramatically expand surveillance capabilities and lead to even more police

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>interactions demographics that have historically suffered from over policing. Unquote.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Pedro Rios, a human rights advocate with the American Friends

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Service Committee and a member of Chula Vista's Community Tech Council,

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was quoted in the MIT article saying, quote, people in

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the community have no awareness of what images are captured,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>how the footage is retained, and who has access. It's

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a big red flag for a city that says it's

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront of the smart city movement.

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Unquote, these drawns, they're revolutionizing the world. You I mean

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>people who are not taking drawn seriously right now, who

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 2>will be left behind. We have flown eighteen one hundred

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and fifty missions. You can go on a web page,

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>you can see the flight dream. We're extremely transparent. We

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>share all that with our community. We have no need

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to hide. We are in the business of saving wise

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and I believe drones are one of the best estories.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>She folds them.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>If they truly have nothing to hide and are extremely

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>transparent about the use of their camera mounted drones, I

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder why they've spent years in court fighting to keep

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>every second of drone footage from being seen by the public. Luckily,

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>after Chief Kennedy talked for like thirty minutes about how

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>much they care about community engagement and how transparent they

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are with their flight data, I was able to ask

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chief how their commitment to transparency relates to the

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>recent lawsuit she just lost over hiding drone footage. And

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I also threw in a question about drones at protests.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a question for the chief.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 3>So I know you talked about the importance of like

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 3>listening to the community and community engagement. And I'm not

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 3>sure this is the case for your department, but other

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 3>departments who've kind of followed suit, for your example, have

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 3>been using drones to surveil first time in activity stuff.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 3>And i know you recently lost a court case regarding

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>the availability of drone footage, so I'm curious about kind

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 3>of what the rationale for that footage is and how

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 3>that plays into this idea of trying to be transparent

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>with the community for how these drones are being used.

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be going to be a little bit

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>difficult for me to answer because the court case is

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>still moving forward. It's an active case. If you read it,

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>we didn't lose the case. It was recommended to go

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 2>to a lower core to go back for some clarification

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 2>under three categories.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Now this is either a straight upply or a huge

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>cope and a gross mischaracterization. But more on that in

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a sec I think.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>It's really important. As I mentioned, there are ethics involved

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>in The ethical responsibility that you have as a law

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>enforcement agency is super important. So how you utilize your

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 2>drones and how you do outreach with your community is

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally important, and so we don't use our drones for

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 2>if there was a protest, we would not use our

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>drones if there was if it turned into a riot.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>So if people were out there and they have the

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 2>ability to to speak freely, to share their concerns, and

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's in opposition, our goal is to make sure

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 2>that we keep it safe for all parties involved on

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 2>either side. So my hope is that other people look

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 2>at it the same way that we do, and hopefully

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I've been able to answer it as much as I

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 2>leave me. I'm dying to give you more than I can't. Okay,

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 2>thank you for those questions. Folks were out of time.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there could be questions after the session.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there were no more questions after mine. I

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of shut down that possibility anyway. Okay. So, first

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, the line between a protest and a riot

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is meaningless. Police can declare a riot for any reason

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they see fit, including people being in a road marching.

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this happen and times, nearly hundreds of times actually,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>So just moving on from that immediately, let's go back

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the court case. The city of Cheulavista did lose

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the argument that they were trying to make. They did

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>lose the case. The Fourth District Court of Appeals ruled

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>that claiming exemption from the Public Records Act was unlawful

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and sent the case back to trial court to hammer

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the details of how much footage is subject to public

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>disclosure and figure out a process for standardizing the release

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of the footage. Now. The same day I attended this

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>panel in Las Vegas, January ninth, the city of Chula

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Vista requested an appeal to the California Supreme Court to

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>prevent the release of their aerial video footage. There is

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a sixty day waiting period where the High Court will

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>decide whether or not to take the case, and if

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>they decline finally, it will go back to trial court

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to decide on the process of how selected drone footage

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>shall be made publicly available. The police US are now

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>currently claiming that making DFI footage adhere to the Public

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Records Act would violate the privacy of Chula Vista residents

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>captured in the videos, which perhaps demonstrates that the aerial

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>videos should have never been captured in the first place.

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to read a press release from the city's

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>communication manager. Quote, the city declined to provide the copies

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because doing so might have violated individual privacy rights. The

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>city would have to manually review and redact every video

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>recording to protect information considered personal, such as the images

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of faces, license plates, backyards, and more unquote. So the

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>city is both trying to argue that having to manually

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>review each requested file to determine if the video in

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>question is related to a pending investigation, as well as

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>redacting personal information captured on camera, would be way too

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>costly and time consuming. City officials claim that reviewing and

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>redacting videos from one month to obscure faces, license plates,

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and backyards would take a full time employee around two

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty days. I'm going to read a little

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more from the city's recent statement.

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>While the city takes very seriously its obligation to provide

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the public access to public records, the city is concerned

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Court of Appeal's opinion may compromise significant privacy

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 1>concerns of members of the public in this case or

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in future requests unquote. Somehow, the city is missing the

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>point that this is the very reason the drone footage

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is being requested. To learn the actual nature of this

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>highly influential drone first responder program that's being adopted across

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the country. If the existence of this footage is such

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a massive privacy violation, that implies that the recording of

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>said footage itself implicitly violates people's privacy, And the harder

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>police fight to hide their sweeping collection of aerial footage

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>wi all the more suspicious this entire program seems. So

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that is what I have to say about Chula Vista's

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>drone first responder program. In about a month and a half,

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court of California will make their decision on

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're going to hear this case. If

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they decline, then the president will be set statewide against

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this exemption of the Public Records Act by hiding drone footage.

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>So that will be really cool, And then hopefully within

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the next year we'll finally be able to see what

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>some of this footage actually looks like, how good their

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>cameras are, how much they can zoom in all of

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the details of how much of the city they're capturing,

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>all this kind of stuff, how often the drones are

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the air, all of those types of things that

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>it will be easier to highlight once we can actually

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the footage. And I assume that

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>going through and releasing requested files for one month will

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 1>probably end up not taking two hundred and thirty days.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do know how the police love to love

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to stretch out these public records requests for as long

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>as they can. As the request that this lawsuit stems from.

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It's all the way back to April of twenty twenty one,

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully, hopefully more than three years later, we'll finally

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>get a look. Special thanks to Loprenza for starting this

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit and doing all of the hard work to actually

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>force the police to be transparent. And if you want

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to read more, I'd recommend checking out their website to

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Loprensa dot org, as well as the MIT tech review piece,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>which provided some really really useful information to fill in

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the gaps between my own research. So yeah, thank you

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>for listening to It could happen here. It certainly could

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>happen here in terms of seeing more of these little

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fuckers flying around in the air. It could happen here

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as a production of cool Zone Media. For more podcasts

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 1>from cool Zone Media, visitor our website coolzonemedia dot com,

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.240
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, you can find sources

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>for It could happen here, Updated monthly at coolzonemedia dot

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>com slash sources. Thanks for listening.