WEBVTT - Former UK Ambassador To Qatar Talks Israel Strike  On Doha

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>European leaders denouncing the strike against Hamas leaders in Doha.

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now is a former UK ambassador to Kuta

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 2>and a number of other countries, Nicholas Hopton, who is

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 2>non resident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council. Nicholas, good morning,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and thank you for being with us. I wonder whether

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 2>we could start with your thoughts on how much of

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>an escalation you believe this is on Israel's part.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. I think this is a significant development and

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>looks like a major escalation taken by the government of Israel.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>The arguments they have put forward yesterday to justify the attack,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the assassination of Hamas leaders obviously a terrorist organization, but

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they were sitting in a sovereign country which has a

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>right not to be attacked, and it's also a great

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>ally of the Western Powers, particularly the United States. So

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the arguments put forward yesterday to justify the attack, while

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>in line with perhaps premise Netanya, who's stated war objectives

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>from the word go to destroy Hamas, are actually failing

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to justify under international law what has happened and to

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>explain why they felt it was necessary to do this

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>violating Katar's sovereignty and also without informing their ally the

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>United States as well.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Bureau chief Ethan Bonner that we were just speaking to

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's is Well Buia chief. We're saying that other Gulf

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>states want to be rid of Hamas, and so you know,

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>other countries may actually not be that sorry that this

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>is what Israel is doing.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Your view, well, there's a big difference between having a

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>policy and how you carry it out. And I think

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's true that country across the Arab world, including in

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the Gulf, and in Europe and elsewhere in the world,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>see Hamas as a terrorist organization which committed appalling atrocities

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on the seventh of October against Israeli citizens, and they

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be held accountable and brought to justice for that.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's a difference between having a policy of doing

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that and then breaking international law as a country to

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>carry it out, and that seems to be what Israel

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>has decided to do and which puts it on the

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong side of the international community, all of whom, almost

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>without exception, including the United States, Israel's main remaining ally

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in their way, they're prosecuting the war in Gaza has

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>They've all come out and unequivocally condemned what Israel did yesterday.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Nicholas, you talked about the US's role in defending Cutter.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>It has its biggest military base in the Middle East

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>in Doha. Does it appear to you that Trump has

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>lost control of Benjamin Nettinya who here? Should we be

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>worried that perhaps Netanya who would next target Turkey for example,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>where it's thought that how mass leadership is as well well.

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a deeply embarrassing moment for the

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>White House. And it was interesting that after a few hours,

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the White House and then Donald Trump himself came out

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and were very clear that they were unhappy and disagreed

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>with what Primeister nessenya Who had done. I think that

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>was a decisive move. It's the most most critical statement

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from the US administration under Donald Trump of

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Israel's prosecution of the conflict in Gaza and elsewhere in

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the West Bank. And I think the question now is

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>how does the US follow this up with Israel. Apparently

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a conversation between Donald Trump and Benjaminyatu Netahu yesterday.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that would have been a difficult conversation. But

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do those critical words turn into a new American engagement

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which tries to bring about a meaningful negotiation towards a

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>ceasefire and the release of the hostages, which seems to

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be very far away at this point. I think all

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the questions at the moment are how does the White

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>House and the US administration now act following this military

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>strike by Israel.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>What's your view on the UK's position in all of this?

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Obviously quite distant, but the Prime Minister putting a post

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>on x Kiirs Darmer saying condemning the Israeli strike on Doha,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>saying that it violates Qatar's sovereignty and risk further escalation

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>across the region, is that it from the UK government?

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Is what's the UK government's position going to be here? Well?

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think both Kirs Starmer and President Macron France led

0:04:55.760 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the European reaction yesterday in condem what it seems to

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be a clear violation of international law. And the next step,

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, is something that has already been scheduled, which

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is a meeting in New York in the United Nations

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>General Assembly coming up in the next ten days, and

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>at that meeting. Britain, France and Canada and maybe others

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>have said they will recognize Palestine as an independent sovereign state.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Now that may be just to politics in the eyes

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of some, but it is a significant step, and I

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>think so far Kirstanmer's resolved to do that will have

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been strengthened by what happened yesterday.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I do just want to come back to the Turkey point,

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>because the US complained that they hadn't been given enough

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 3>warning of this attack before it took place. What are

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on whether the US had no knowledge of

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the attack and whether we should expect more like this

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 3>in the future.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, briefly on Turkey, it is of course a NATO

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>member state and therefore covered by Article five of mutual

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>defense if attacked. It's a different situation. Should Israel decide

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>to attack Turkey and hamas targets there as opposed to

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>attacking Katar, which is not a member of NATO, I

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.559
<v Speaker 1>think that would be an even more significant escalation. Also

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because of course Kata is a Turkey is a much

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>more significant global security player than Katar, and Turkey has

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, still the biggest standing army in Europe. So

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that the Israeli Prime Minister will think

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>twice before doing that. As for your second, part of

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the question was on the US.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 3>And whether they had any knowledge of the attack or

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>enough knowledge. Do you believe that they had no knowledge

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 3>of the attack before it took place?

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've seen different analyses. Frank Gardner, the bb very

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>respected security correspondent, was clear yesterday that this attack could

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not have taken place without the American military having been

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in many ways complicit to that. At the same time,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we should take serious note of what the

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>White House has made clear and the US spokespeople that

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have advanced warning, or if they did, then

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it was very not enough in order to stop the attack.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also further confusion in this position because the catteries,

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the cateri primes to shake. Mohammad yesterday, in his press statement,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>said that the catteries were only warned about the military

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>strike ten minutes after it happened.