WEBVTT - Why Deaths Seem to Drop as Cases Rise

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Prognosis. I'm Laura Carlson. It's day one, twelve

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>since coronavirus was declared a global pandemic. Our main story.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Even as the infection rates surges around the United States,

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>some have pointed to lower death rates as proof that

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this stage of the outbreak isn't as bad as it seems.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But a close look at the numbers shows it may

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be too early to declare that fatalities are really declining.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But first, here's what happened in virus news today. As

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the alarming coronavirus surge continues in dozens of U S states,

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City postponed a planned return to indoor dining

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>next week. Mayor Build a Blasio side rising cases in Florida, California,

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and Texas after some of those states reopened restaurants. The

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>city had planned to allow restaurants to have a limited

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>number of available tables indoors starting this Sunday. Instead, it

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>will now help restaurants expand operations outdoors on sidewalks and

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in curbside parking spaces. He said. Some large US companies

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are also reevaluating their plans to ramp up normal operations.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Google is pushing back a plan to reopen its u

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>S offices. In a memo to employees, the company said

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all US offices will remain closed until September seven, at

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the earliest. An experimental coronavirus vaccine is showing promise. In

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>an early trial, fiser and bio n text treatment has

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>been shown to be safe. It also successfully prompted patients

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to produce and bodies against the virus that has kept

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it at the front of the pack in the race

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to develop a vaccine. Finally, Europe may be starting to

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>see a tenuous economic recovery following months of coronavirus shutdowns,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 1>but the road ahead will be long. European Central Bank

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>President Christine Lagarde renewed her warning at a United Nations

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>event that the hardest times are yet to come. She

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>said the recovery would be uncertain and uneven, and would

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>lead to arise in inequality and unemployment that will leave

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the most vulnerable in difficult conditions. And now for our

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>main story, the coronavirus continues it's terrifying rampage of large

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>swaths of the country, but the Trump administration has made

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a point of mentioning that even while cases are rising

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>deaths are declining. That disconnect is Trump says, proof that

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen pandemic is under control. But the mismatch

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>could be an anomaly caused by quirks in how death

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>data is collected and reported. It could also be that

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a greater number of younger people are catching the virus

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily assigned. The coronavirus is becoming less lethal or

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to treat. Robert Langre and Emma Court report that

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>medical experts say it's too soon to know for sure

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that deaths are still declining in recent days. In recent

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks here in the US, we have been seeing case

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>counts rise pretty much across the board, particularly in the

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sun belt in the South and the West. And yet

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>one interesting thing about these developments we've been seeing is

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that even as the case counts rise, the corresponding mortality rate,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the death rate does not seem to be climbing with

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the same rates. And I was wondering if you could

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>unpack that for us, what are we seeing here? One

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>thing to be really aware of it is sort of

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that that death rates in this for COVID are kind

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the ultimate lacking indicator. We don't really know yet

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what the death rate is going to be for this

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>current rise in case counts. And that's because some of

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the cases in the States are reported rather quickly. But

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, deaths really do take a while to come

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>roll in. Once you diagnose with COVID, even a bad case,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it may take the people that do die, it may take,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, two or three weeks for them to die,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to die. And then these these death

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers that come in, they aren't the deaths that occurred yesterday.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>These are deaths that may have been occurred a week

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>or two weeks or even three weeks ago. That that is,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.119
<v Speaker 1>after once someone dies, it can take a while days,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>even weeks or dr filling the death certificate, turn it

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>in for the state authorities to kind of adjudicate and

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>verify it, and then reported out to two people so

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the world. To some of these

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>these death numbers coming are quite you know, quite delayed,

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and it just takes several weeks corresponding to the cases

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we're still seeing now. Is the first thing to be

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>very aware of. We don't really know yet, you know,

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what the death rate is going to be for this

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>current wave of cases. But there are several reasons also

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to believe to suspect that the death rate, you know,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>when we have the numbers will actually be lower. We're

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>now six months into this into this pandemic. I mean,

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is it a question with regards to the death rates

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that were simply treating COVID nineteen more successfully. For months,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>medical providers have been you know, learning about how to

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>treat this virus, sharing best practices. And I think the

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes. You know, we still don't have all

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the information we'd like to have. Doctors still don't have

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, a perfect treatment for this condition.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We definitely don't have any vaccines right now, except experimental

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ones that are still being tested. You know, It's true

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've learned a lot and doctors have better practices

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>now and um, and you know, I think we are

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing that payoff. But it's not totally clear how all

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of these factors break down in terms of what we're

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>seeing right We think, you know, the death rate lagging

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe one factor. Another factor is this friend towards younger patients,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, better treatments. Another potential factor is maybe the

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>virus is just not transmitting as well in the summer.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was sort of hypothesized that the summer

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>might make for less virus transmission because that hot air,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, pushing the virus kind of down out out

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of kind of the path of transmission. But you know,

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear that that's happening. But it's possible that

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a weaker form of the virus is being transmitted

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>people aren't getting as sick. There's also been a pretty

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>high profile theory that the virus is getting sort of

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>weaker in and of itself as it applicates around the world,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's been pretty roundly criticized. It's not totally clear

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening, but there's a variety of explanations here.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We just we just don't really know. Unfortunately, it does

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to be a lot more complicated or perhaps even

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lengthy process in recording the death count. And I

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was wondering if maybe you could go into some of

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the different kinds of factors that go into potentially delaying

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the recording of a death due to COVID nineteen. If

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you look a few days ago, there's a huge spike

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of death just like three or four days ago, and

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>almost all of that was new to New Jersey suddenly

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>adding probable COVID nineteen deaths and we're in its account before.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And those weren't deaths that occurred in the last few days.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>There was their deaths that went way back this you know,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>county of deak Is a is. It just takes a

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>while for the death to roll in. Often, for example,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, one of the researchers of follows Is showed

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>me when some of the deaths occurred. And so for

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the deaths reported in the weekending June fourteenth in Arizona

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>due to COVID, So it turns out only half of

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>those deaths reported that week we're from that week, and

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>fully fifty were from two or three or even more

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks before. That's when they actually happens. That that's an

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>example just how the lag can be. And that's from

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>when the death actually happens to whether it's reported as

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a death due to COVID. That doesn't even count the

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, you get sick, you got a

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>case so to take, you know, and it takes two

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to three weeks for that to play out, and you

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>either to get better or not. Deaths lag not just

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>because It takes time when someone gets COVID to die, um,

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the disease, to succumb to the disease.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But but then afterwards there's these official processes that takes

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>some time. Right. It takes time for you know, the

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>health officials to adjudicate the death. It takes time, you know,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>doctors have to decide did this person die of COVID nineteen.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if they you know, had COVID nineteen and

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>then seemed to recover a little bit and then ended

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>up dying, you know, was that a death from COVID

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen or not? There there are some questions about you know,

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the squish nous of of these subjects, right, And during

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this time, everyone wants to rely on the data, right.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>They put all this trust in the numbers that are

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the states and the numbers that we

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>see about testing on the federal level too. But you know,

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>importantly this data is not infallible, right, I mean, especially

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the fact that you know, in

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of diagnoses, the only cases that we know we

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>only know about cases that actually get diagnosed. We only

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>know about people who test positive because they got a test.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>There are likely many more people who are not getting

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>tested for these symptoms, for instance. So you know, these

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>are official counts, but that's important to remember. These are

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the official numbers, right and there are probably a lot

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of numbers that aren't getting captured in these data even now.

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's also important when you think about deaths.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, there has been some back and forth even

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the pandemic about whether all of the death

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from COVID nineteen were actually being counted, you know, as

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>health to partments got overwhelmed and things like that. So

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>these are the official numbers, but do they tell the

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>complete and full and completely thorough story, Like we probably

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>won't know that for some time, you know, if at all.

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>What should we be looking at or taking away from

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the numbers as they stand right now, and what should

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we be preparing for. You know, we don't know exactly

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen in two or three weeks from now,

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and that would be very very interesting to watch because

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>we do have in some of these southern states increased hospitalizations,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>increased numbers of people in I c u s. You know,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what does that translate into. So some of the research

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked to in Arizona said that what they would

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>expect might be, you know, leveling off of this decline

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in depths and you know, somewhat at an increase again,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, and maybe not a huge spike like we

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>had before in April when the in New York, when

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.359
<v Speaker 1>this disease is totally new, when we were kind of unprepared.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Hospitals are better prepared and there are some treatments and

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>they have some better strategies. So be very very interesting,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, to watch. And then I have four or

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>five or six weeks from now, the deaths, you know,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone up at all, and despite lots of people

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>in the hospital of I see you, that will be

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>an indication you know, we've gotten there's something's changed a

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>little about the the the virus, or you've gotten better

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>treating it, or somehow you know, we've kept it out

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of the older, most vulnerable people. One of those you

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.599
<v Speaker 1>know three things. I think also an important part of

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>this is to understand the different kinds of data and

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>how they trickle in, right, I mean, public health officials

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>can't wait for deaths to spike to take action to

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>control an outbreak, right, they have to start relying on

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>earlier forms of data like case counts and especially hospitalizations.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the earliest data that we have coming

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in our case counts, and that doesn't present the fullest

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>possible picture of an outbreak, but it is the earliest

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>indicator we have. And an expert I spoke with at

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins put this really well. He said, Basically, you know,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago when the case cases were

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>spiking in some of these states like Arizona and Texas

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and Florida, which we now know, you know, are having

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>problems in terms of the outbreak in their communities. He's

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is early data in terms of the

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>case counts rising, but it's important to act on early

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>data because by the time you get more thorough data,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more final data, you get hospitalization spiking, you get death

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>god forbid spiking. You know, that may be too late,

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think that sensitivity towards the mechanism of these

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers is important for public health officials to be eyeing.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, waiting for the deaths to rise is not

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the most productive tack here. Right by the time deaths rise,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you maybe four or five weeks behind something that's happening

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>in a state or a local area. That was Robert

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Lang and Emma Cord. And that's it for our show today.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>For coverage of the outbreak from one bureaus around the world,

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>visit Bloomberg dot com slash Coronavirus and if you like

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the show, please leave us a review and a rating

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It's the best way to

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>help more listeners find our global reporting. The Prognosis Daily

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>edition is produced by Top for foreheads Jordan gas Pure,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson and me Laura Carlson. Today's main story was

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>reported by Robert Langrath and Emma Court. Original music by

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Leo Sidran. Our editors are Rick Shine and Francesco Levi.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Francesco Levi is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. Thanks for listening.