WEBVTT - Preseason Week #3 - Draft Days

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot com, here's

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>America's longest running fantasy football show, Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Charchy and from fanball dot Com. My

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>cohorts today are Christian Peterson and Brian Johnson. Hello, guys, Well, yeah,

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>talking football. It's that we're really in the heart of

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>draft season now right, it gets game on. You know,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the drafts will be next two weekends.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You know this weekend, next weekend will be the vast

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>majority of drafts. So we're right in the thick of everything.

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>And over the course of this show, we're gonna help

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you figure out which teammates are the right ones to draft.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times there are two teammates at the

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>same position that you could draft. For example, would you

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>rather Mike Evans in the second round or Chris Godwin

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth round? Will help you decide which guy

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to draft in a shared uh in a shared situation

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. Also, you're about to execute your first draft

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year. We've executed dozens of drafts already, and

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>there are always these guys that you look back and go, well,

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I never ended up with him, never ended up with him.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Did twelve drafts? Haven't ended up with that guy a

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of time. It's not even that it's that you

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>don't it's not even that you hate that guy, but

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't end up with them. Will tell you which

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>players we've blacklisted from existence, jettison into a black hole

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy disinterest. Then we'll talk about the highlights from

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the preseason action from this week. We'll answer some tough questions.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You get to play. Along with those tough questions, we'll

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>reveal our latest round of sleepers, and we'll talk about

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the freaky upside that comes with rushing quarterbacks and who

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you could potentially target in your draft if you want

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to take on the risk that comes with them. It's

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a little early for his freaky sound effects. It's not

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Halloween time quite yet now would have worked well for

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the freaky. The freaky I have any I don't have

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>any freaky sound effects here. Yeah, I've got uh, yeah,

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I've got a vulture. I've got a sad drombone. How's

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it going. I've got I got a happy trombone. Do

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>you have the air horn? No? No, don't horn. I

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know where the air horn. We had an air

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>horn at one point, you got you got Drew Peacock

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in there, though, don't you We know? No Drew Peacock.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But man, do we miss Drew Peacock at least come

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>back to the NFL Drew Peacock. Let's begin with this

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>potential impending signing of Ezekiel Elliott. Maybe even depending on

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>when you're listening to this, he has already signed. If

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you believe the media reports. It looks like a signing

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe immanent. So let's start here, assuming he has signed,

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>when people go to their draft, where does he slot

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in as a signed player for the Cowboys? I mean,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's just he's right back where he would

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>have been, which is within the top three or four

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>picks in the entire draft. More specific, where do you

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>want him in the top four night? I think I

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>think most people would. I would take him third. I

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>would take se Kwan and McCaffrey ahead of him, But

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but I would have before all along. Okay, if nothing

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>has changed for me about about Elliott. I was CMC

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in Kamara top two. That was Zeke three before all

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this madness. But I gotta keep him at the tail.

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And now the four, I take Barkley over Zeke. But

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was taking David Johnson before Zeke. I'm still

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fence a little bit. But no, I guess

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>if he signed today or tomorrow or very soon, I

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>would put him at number four. All right, So what

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about people that are in limball. Let's say he hasn't

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Zeke hasn't signed yet, but they're working on the same

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>information we are right now as we record this, which

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it appears that they're you know, he's close to us signing.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say all these reports are coming from like

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>very biased cowboy accounts and I won't name name, but

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they bleed they bleed silver and blue or whatever the

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>colors they call in Dallas. I mean, well, this is

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what they want to say. They're not connected to the cowboys,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and they would know. I don't know. It's it's wishful

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking that we all right, So are you saying then

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't believe it? And I think it's a

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>coin flip. Now for whatever, it's okay, So where would

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you take him right now based on the knowledge I don't.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't take him at all. No, there's no scenario

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>eight round is available. You're taking no realistic scenario. He's

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>going late first now I'm seeing him fall too. But

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>where give me the round where you're taking? Where you're

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>taking Zeke? If he's on sign and we all you

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have to go on his media reports of optimism, which

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you obviously don't don't care about. Third, third round. I

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>would go second, I think early second. I don't. I

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think I would. I would use my late first

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>rounder if I don't know that he's going to be there,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but by the second round you know the risk is

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>worth it. What is it? What is this do about

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard? Pollard's look good? Has Pollard shown enough that

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's worked his way into a rotation the likes of

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>which we've never seen with Ezekiel Ellid? He's never shared

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.679
<v Speaker 1>meaningful carries, but he's also never had a competent backup either.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Tony Pollard has looked good enough that

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he will eat into a significant number of carries and touches?

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean fifty fifty, but more like seventy, which he's

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>never had to put up with in the past. Hill

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>factor on third down when Zeke's back. Whenever Zeke comes back,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a better receiver. Thanks great. Tony. Pollard excels receiving

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the football, I mean catching the football, and uh, he's

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>shown that he can run as well. I see touches

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>going to Pollard with Zeke and full tip. So that's

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>my pa. I think that's fair too. I think Pollard

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>has has shown enough this preseason to warrant being being

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup more so Pollard, even even if Zeke

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>is drafted, is Pollard more than just a handcuff. So

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>let's say Ryan draft Zeke, Christian, are you are you

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>drafting Polo? Are you drafting Polo? At any point in time?

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>If Zeke is signed and he's on another team and

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, he's not not even your handcuff, No, I

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's getting enough. I don't think he'll get

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>enough playing time, enough touches to be considered a standalone

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>valuable fantasy player. So the only the only way that

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I would take him is if I also have Zeke.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>On Thursday night, Cam Newton got knocked out of the

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>game Friday. He's wearing a walking boot. The team, at

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>least as of this recording, is not giving us any

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>firm information about this this either foot or ankle injury. Now,

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he had surgery on the foot, so this is not

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the first time that that this foot has been an

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>issue for him. What again, if if the team comes

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>out and gives definitive information, then listeners probably know that already.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But given that we the team may very well be

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>coy about this and we don't know, We've got in

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Cam what do you do right now? Cam Newton and

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>potentially drafting him? And I'm going to the Cam Newton desk.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Christian Peterson no bigger apologist for the fantasy value of

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton than you. What would you do? Yeah? This

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>one hurts. I mean there have been preliminary reports that

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not as serious as maybe it looked last night,

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and that he could be back, Sorry, he could be

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>back as soon as week one. We still don't know

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But in my mind, the biggest issue is

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that this is a foot injury. They're talking about a

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>midfoot sprain kind of deal, and as we know, Cam

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Newton drives a lot of his fantasy value from his

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ability to run and a sprain, you know, something like that,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>especially if they're going to rush him back maybe for

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>week one. I don't like the sound of that. If

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to be able to run as much

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>as he usually does, or if this thing just lingers

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>all year long, if it just never gets right, which

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>could be the case. Yeah, so there's I don't think

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>there's any choice but to knock him down a couple

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of rungs on your on your cheat sheet. I wouldn't

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>go crazy and like put him put him in the

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>black on your blacklist, on your vortex of irrelevancy, Yes,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>but but I would knock them down a spot or two.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So if if this foot injury really does take the

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>wheels off Cam Newton and all your most you know,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, all you're going to get are

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>his passing numbers. You've got quarterback twenty five on your roster.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That's probably about right. You know, You're you're looking at

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a Sam donald Ish. You know, frankly, Donald's passing might

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be better. Although I will say if if if the

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>injury is to that point, I don't think the Panthers

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>would would try him out there if he couldn't do

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that make him such a good player,

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, like go Will Will Greer

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, Kyle Allen. I think that they'll put

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the best passer they have on the field, don't you

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think I do. I think they would Anyway, Well, that'll

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>hopefully still be Cam the shoulders, much better than it's

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>been the past and direct. I'm very sad. We'll talk

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more about d J. Moore and critics. Samuel It's it.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>This is potentially tricky on them, obviously, if if if

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna play with Cams not in his mobility

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>opens up things for them, extends plays, sure, plenty of things.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's look at some of the preseason games

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with some notable events, beginning with the Giants and the Bengals.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Brian Johnson's previous favorite team and now his

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>current favorite team playing each other in a heated preseason duel,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly a potential Super Bowl preview as well. Giants Bengals.

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I got my money on that Vegas. Noah started with

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Giant side, Eli didn't fully implode, looked sort of sharp.

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>He will be a Week one starter and beyond and

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>before we mentioned Daniel Jones Eli ran a lead block

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on a play for Wayne Gallard, ran about thirty two

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>yards on it. Um not with the ball, of course,

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that was impressive considering thirty two yards is what he

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>averages rushing over his career every years. Never been much

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of a helper there, Eli, Hey speaking speaking of which, Um,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>who is you know for those people that want to

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>handcuff Barkley? Is it Gallman or Park or just neither?

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Just just just don't do period, don't do it, all right,

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a case where hopefully doesn't. Anyway, it

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>was Barkley. Yeah, whoever steps in for Barkley is not

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a waste of fab. Don't even go there if

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that comes to it. If it comes to that. Um.

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones O came in after Eli. He looked very

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>good again. Uh nine for eleven forty one yards, took

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a big hit, got back up, dropped a dime to

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the one yard line. But he's played against the reserves

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>all preseason long. People are he looks goodseason? You know

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>a week one he well, he he started the game

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>week one, but he was also playing against reserved, So

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're right. But he will usurp Eli at

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>some point. Just a guy to keep your eye in

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and Dynasty and super Flex for him. That's definitely not

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback leagues this year. The only other giant worth

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioning was Evan Ingram, who called his loom target for

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>nine yards. But outside of that, there was no Barkley,

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>no Golden Tate, no Sterling Shepherds. Still he's injured. It

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>should be ready for week one. We shall see. But

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>um he's going off the board practically free. It's he's

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>if you got a spot to burns. He'll be a

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>factor when he when he's healthy. For since no Joe Mixon,

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>no Tyler Effort, Andy Dalton did look sharp, went seven

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>for ten for a hundred and four yards through a

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>beautiful yard touchdown to my boy the uzy C g

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>C j use Olma, who also had another catch of

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty five plus yards, which was impressive. So if Effort

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt, muse Alma is going to be a factor

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>again in the tight end wasteland when I get hurt

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>when and uh, of course no A J. Green Tyler

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Boyd only played a couple of series. One guy to

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>keep your eye on his Damien Willis, wide receiver who

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>had three catches for fifty five yards in the touchdown.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Because John Ross is not good, who currently is slated

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>as the other starting wide receiver. This Damien Willis could

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>become a factor, and so could rookie running back Rodney

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Anderson from U c l A, who was the first

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>round that's the first blew out his knee in the

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>first game for U c l A. Dropped to late

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>third day in the draft, but he looked really good.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And people always say Geo Bernard would be the backup

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>if something happened to mixing, but Bernardo's kindding that Darryl

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Henderson threw down role. To me, Rodney Anderson is the handcuff.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He could be your first two down guy if something

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>did happen to mix it up. So something. If you're

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gett handcuff mixing, it's not Geo, it is Anderson. That's

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it for this game. Let's go to Baltimore in Philadelphia.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That's Brian, Sorry I'm wrong, Washington and sorry, Washington in Atlanta,

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Really not a lot to talk about in

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this game. On the Washington side, the debut debut of

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Darius Guys so that's exciting. First time on the on

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the field and game action since he blew out his

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>A c L last preseason, and he was very involved.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>He got four touches on the very first drive, eleven

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>touches overall, and did okay with it four yards, So

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>really just nice to see him back on the field.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He looked like an explosive player, just like we thought

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we were getting last year before the injury. Of course,

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>his fantasy situation is still pretty clouded with Adrian Peterson

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there and Chris Thompson there. But again, good to see

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>guys back on the field. Not so good news for

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reid. Removed from the game in the concussion protocol.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>This is I believe, his seventh concussion of his career,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's on top of all sorts of other injuries.

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody, you know, beat writers, people were liking

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>what they saw of Jordan Reid in the preseason and

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in training camp and he was looking like maybe one

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of their only legitimate receivers and now probably not so much.

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So bad news for Jordan Reid. Case Keenum was bad,

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins was maybe even worse. This is this is bad.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>They have they have no wide receivers. Their top receivers

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't even play in this one. Josh Dockson might be

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>traded or cut. It's a their passing game as a

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>total disaster. On the Atlanta side, not really a lot

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here. Matt Ryan did start and played

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but Julio Jones didn't play. Davonta Freeman

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just played one series. He did give way to Edo Smith,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>who has now established himself as the backup that you want. There.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I played seventeen snaps, had five carries and a touchdown.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That is all that is worth talking about in this game. Okay,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Carolina took on New England. We already talked about the

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>only really sailing part of Carolina the Cam Newton injury here. Uh.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>If he can't go, Kyle Allen expected replacement. Uh, and

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>let's hope it doesn't come to that in Week one

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or beyond. On the New England side, there were a

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>variety of things to talk about. Sony Michelle looking fast

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and elusive, much more so than last year. Remember last

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>year came off of injury, was injured throughout that season,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and looked like he didn't look anything like the guy

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw Georgia, he looked plotting and slow. Not so

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>much here. I thought he looked really good. The box

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>score won't show some of his best plays that came

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>back in penalty as well, So don't just look at

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the box score, and Sony Michelle, trust me that he

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>looked good. It's still a very convoluted in deep backfield,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but he looks like the best player in it. Ben

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Watson got some first team reps and he's got a

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>little sneaker, sneaky tight end to him. Philip Dorsett got

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a long look, including starting the game, but with Josh

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Gordon's return coming, I don't think he's going to hold

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that job as a starter. And I'll note that Julian

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Edelman still not playing. Don't forget Ben Watson suspended though

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for his four games. Great point, yeah, thank you, thank you,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But after that's certainly gonna be viable this season, Darling.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Myers had another big game Patriots as well, although

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he did he got some looks from Tom Brady and

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was oh for three on the targets from Brady, and

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Brady was seen sort of be rating him on the

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sidelines a little bit. So uh, Myers has been a

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>guy maybe worth looking at in Dynasty format, but probably

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>too far down the depth chart for others. The much

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>anticipated Baltimore Philadelphia game, now let's get to that one.

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>This one will be much quicker. Wentz did not play

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for Philly, has an all preseason, but he should be

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ready to go a week one, he will be ready

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to go, or so they say. Zacker has caught a

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>past for thirteen yards, but this game was all about

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>j j Arthega Whiteside baby Jaws Risen call him Jaws here.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's way easier. Eight catches a hundred and four yards,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>including a nice grab in the corner of the end zone.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Looks a little Andre Johnson ish easily a fair Compton,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams in l A. He's uh, he looks fantastic.

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He looks really Dynasty Sky's the limit redraft. It's a

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of there's a lot of targets to be shared

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in Philip. So that's the thing we're actually we're gonna

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about it later in the show. But you know,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the things I like about Carson Wentz

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is you don't have to guess which which is now

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>suddenly plethora of quality target options is going to be

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the guy in any given week. That's it for Philly Baltimore.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot here. Lamar Jackson did not play. Kind

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of a bummer. Not a lot of players didn't play

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in these week preseason Week three used to be the

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>bonanza of all the starters. It's not. It's not not anymore.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ingham didn't play either. In rising rookie Justin Hill

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>did not wow in this one. Only sixteen combo yards

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on nine touches. The only thing really worth mentioning is

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>um Miles Boykin did make his first appearance at the preseason.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>He was a first round pick, second round, second second

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>round pick. Uh. He did what he was drafted to do.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Had one catch for forty four yards on two targets.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna be a deep threat for l Jacks

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. The third round pick, Miles Boykin. All right,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Green Bay and Oakland. What a disaster.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>This game was just a total disaster. On they're playing

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>an eight yard feet so they played. They played in Canada,

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and in Canada on Canadian Football League fields, the uprights

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are in the middle of the end zones, so they

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to remove those, but then the field was just

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a mess in the end zone, so they had to

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>shorten it and the ten yard line became the end zone.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And when that happened, green Bay said, well, we're gonna

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>bench our thirty three best players. What a disaster, and

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the players that they did decide to play,

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>including Equanimius st. Brown, you know, potentially fantasy. When I

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>saw that injury, I'm like, the season over career enders

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>saw off his foot right now, it looks bad. The

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting part was when you first looked at the hit,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what you saw was the vicious head to head, you know,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>helmet to helmet action. And then it turns out he

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>also blew up his ankle, blew up his leg in

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>some way, carted off the field out. They're saying it's

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>only a severe high ankle sprain. I know, I was like,

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's it's over. Uh fortunately, not not quite as bad

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as that anything else from no. I mean, Oakland didn't

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>even bring the twenty four of their players to the game,

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and then because of the field they be so literally

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing that's talking about. Let's let's move on to our

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>last preseason game that we're going to talk about, Jacksonville

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>taking out Miami. There are actually a number of things.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like an absolute dog game, but there was

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>There was actually some good things to come out of it.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>From a fantasy standpoint. For Jacksonville, Leonard for Nett got

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>some work. Look pretty good. Heavily involved in the passing game,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>which has been a recurring theme of the preseason. In

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the training camp for him. D D. Westbrook looks great

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and they targeted him constantly. Scored a touchdown. He remains

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>highly underdrafted and that's um. I think he's somebody that's

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that needs to move up cheat sheets. He's going to

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>be a target high here Miami. The offensive line was

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the big stories here. It's brutal. Poor ste

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Beard was on the run. Cons and Lee look shaky,

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>got pressured, got hit. Uh, but it wasn't Stu Bird's fault.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course. No, of course that he looks you give him.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He's a leasive machine. Um. The offensive line is bad.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>They made rookie Josh Allen for for Jacksonville look like

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a potential defensive Rookie of the Year candidate. And by

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, he might be a potential defense over the

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Year candidate Rookie of the year. Let's go to it

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>while we're down. The passing game still here a little

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>bit electrifying. Rookie Preston Williams ran with the first team

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in the first series. I think they might just be

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ready to see you know, they know where they're rebuilding.

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Why not give Preston Williams a bunch of reps. He is,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, the only receiver I'm interested in drafting

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>out of that whole group. I'm done with the Kenny

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Stills of the world and DeVante Parker's the world. I

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>think Preston Williams is the guy. And find out if

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you got lightning in a bottle. Albert Wilson is intriguing,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>though in PPR you can have him. Caitlin Balage had

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>nowhere to run offensive line again, terrible, no ability, and

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not good, no ability to make his own yards.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So you give him no. You can't give him a

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>giant hole to run through. He gives you nothing. Draft

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake instead. Drake has dropped two full rounds of

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a DP over the last three weeks as he's been

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>nursing a foot injury, and Calin Bellage is beginning all

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>this work. I'm telling you blage stinks to add real

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>quick right quill Armstead, I hope I pronounce the first.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>He looked good against the Miami starting defense. He's the

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>true handcuff behind it. I think it is too and

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there are there are people that are on the blue thing.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't get screwed by blue absolutely uh everything. Charge

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that's me available at famble dot com. By going to

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>fambile dot com slash chart, you get instant access to

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>my free cheat sheet, my free five thousand dollar week

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>one contest, all our podcast. It's your portal to guillotine

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>leagues again famble dot com slash Charge Coming up next.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at teams with two viable fantasy starters at

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the same position. Which one is the right one, particularly

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>when you factor in their raft position. You're listening to

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly Fantasy Football Weekly Returns. I am Paul

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Archie and my co hosts are Brian Johnson Christian Peterson. Guys,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the teammates who are competing for a

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>spot on your roster and kind of against each other.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>These are teammates who play the same position. They're both

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>draftable guys, But which one do you take? Especially when

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you factor in average draft position. I want to begin here,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Christian Philip Lindsay, who's going in round five, or Royce Freeman,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who's going in around eight. What do you think? Yeah,

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>So Lindsay last year was the number thirteen fantasy running

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>back depending on your scoring system, but in a PPR

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>system he was. He was about twelve in fantasy points

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>last year. And Freeman was was there and Freeman was

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>taking some of the goal line looks last year, and

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>all throughout training camp people were saying Freeman was the guy.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>And then it turned out Philip Lindsay was just a

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>dramatically better player during the year. And now this offseason

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they had changed the coaching staff a little bit, and

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the new coaching staff came in and they said they

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get Royce Freeman more involved. They went out

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and they picked up Theo Riddick in the preseason, maybe

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to take some pass catching away from Philip Lindsay. But

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>now Riddick is injured. He fractured his shoulder in his

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>first game, so he's out sort of indefinitely right now.

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, I don't see what's changed this year versus

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. And Lindsay right now is the running back

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>off the board. So to me, all of these factors

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>about Freeman maybe already being uh taking taking some of

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the looks, it's already factored into his ADP. And I

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think the upside is still there for him to finish

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>within the top fifteen. So I'm not buying Freeman just

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like just like I had last year. And I think

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay is the guy, so I would I would rather

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>have him in round five than Freeman even three rounds earlier. Um,

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Royce Freeman had this in the second preseason game.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He had this untouched fifty yard run in which he

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was caught from behind easily. And I'm looking at that going,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay's gone gone. You give Philip Lindsay that whole touchdown,

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's like an eight yard touchdown. I just I don't

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>think it was really good. They're fantasy experts who absolutely

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>love Freeman, yeah, and believe that Royce Freeman is gonna,

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, catch and surpass Lindsay, And I just I

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>never see it with my own two eyes. They can't

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>get past the draft. They can't get That's exactly Rice.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the right, it's the it's the Penny situation all

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>over again. Just like Seattle, people can't get past where

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>where Penny was drafted as a first rounder, despite the

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that Chris Carson is so much better, and they're

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>convincing everybody that Philip Lindsay is a fifth rounder when

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in fact he's should be a probably a third rounder. Lindsay,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that's right. We're already getting the discount on Lindsay. Brian

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones late first round or Calvin Ridley in the

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>fifth round. Which team made you have taken? I want both,

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, but if you got to

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>pick one, let's break it down, starting with Julio. His

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand receiving yards the most by any player in

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>any five year span in his in history of the NFL. Unbelievable. Unbelievable.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Injuries used to be a knock for Julio if you

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>recall in the pastor but he's missed three starts during

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that same five year span. The last started he missed

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>was in twenty sixteen, so he's been fully healthy the

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>last two years. Red zone targets used to be an

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>issue for Julio Jones. He had just three in the

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>first eight games last year, and they all came in

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the opener. Yeah. After that though, Atlanta got their their

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>s together. I saw fourteen red zone targets over the

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>final nine games. Only Travis Kelsey saw more. He had fifteen,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so and we all saw it happened. Touchdowns came for

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Julio wide receiver one Sarkisian anyway, right, and Dirk Cutter

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, coming back. Very familiar with Julio and

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, which is an offensive when it comes to fantasy. Anyway,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>over to Calvin Ridley, a lot to love to. Here's

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the list of rookies with ten plus receiving touchdowns over

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty five years. Randy Moss, Odell Beckham, Mike Evans, Gronk,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, the Tampa Bay one from the mid Austin,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and Calvin Ridley. That's that's good company, right, that's good company.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Aside from Mike Williams, I'm sorry he flamed out. I

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>loved him and Madden too. By anyway, Calvin Ridley, half

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of those ten touchdowns came into two game span though

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>from weeks three to four. Yeah, and starting in Week five,

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>he only saw red zone targets in two games for

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of the season, Julio, will you take them?

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Why can't they throw to both of them? Though? That's

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>what I wann't know. But anyway, three of those targets

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>went for to total touchdowns. Long story short, Ridley is

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna make strides and be a bona fide wide receiver two.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But Julio is going around wide receiver five six. He

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>could be wide receiver one. I gotta I gotta pull

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the triggered on Julio over Ridley. But I love them

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>both understandable, and I think there is a great case

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this is This could be the rare situation where you

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>could take two wide receivers from the same team and

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>start them and then draft Matt Ryan and go all in.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I said that training camp last week. It's one of

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the few teams that would do this with because you

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>can get both. You get the quarterback after both wide receivers,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's a good sign. That is a good sign.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Rams running back situation. Todd Gurley

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>still going in the second round of fantasy drafts, or

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>rookie Darryl Henderson who's going in the seventh round. Yeah,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think people know what the

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>situation is here, right. We thought at the end of

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.239
<v Speaker 1>last year when Gurley sort of mysteriously towards the end

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year started getting sat down and then C. J.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Anderson stepped in and went berserk, and the Rams didn't

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really admit that anything was wrong, but what we saw

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on the field made it obvious that there was especially

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with again with Anderson going bonkers and and Gurly doing

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing for a team that had that had Super Bowl aspirations, clearly,

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's continued into the off season. He missed the

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>offseason workouts, he isn't practice sing every day in training camp,

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to play in the preseason, so this

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is kind of interesting. I went back and looked at

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>his ADP. Before mid June, he was at about eleventh overall,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so people had kind of priced in some of this uncertainty,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but he was still being a first rounder. Then on

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>June eight, they came out and finally admitted that he

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>has this arthritic condition and his arthritic and since then,

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>so as ADP now drops to eighth overall, so really

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>only only seven spots. But he's now to the point

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>where you're getting him clearly in the second round into

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the second round. But I just can't

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>get over this uncertainty. I just think there's no way

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that you can afford to completely whip on your second

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>round draft pick. And during the off season the Rams

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>actions speak a lot louder than their words. They matched

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the three point to five million dollar offer sheet to

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>back up Malcolm Brown, and then they went out and

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>got Henderson, who, by all accounts everybody loves and is

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an explosive player. I would you know, there's risk in

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Henderson as well, but I'd rather with on my seventh

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>rounder than on my second rounder. So I'm taking Henderson

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in Round seven. Couldn't agree more with everything you said.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I think about this, Listeners, It's a Wednesday injury report

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>drops Todd Gurley knee every week, every damn week. It's

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna read just like that, and you're gonna have no

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>way of knowing what's coming. Is it gonna be two touches,

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be twelve touches, Is it gonna be

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty two touches? God only knows. You're not going to

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>all year long. You're gonna be doing that chronically arthritic

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>knee I don't like to chronically do things I enjoy.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to chronically have sex. You know, chronic

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 1>arthritic k me forget it. I'm totally out on that.

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>No interest in investing in a chronically arthritic knee. Last

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>set of teammates that we want to break apart before

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we take our our next, our, next pause. Mike Evans

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going in the second round or Chris Godwin going in

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the fourth. Brian, this is kind of another King Solomon

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>situation in here. I gotta love both of these guys,

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>especially with DeShawn Jackson and um Adam Humphries leaving that

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>VAK its thirty eight percent of Tampa based target shares

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and the only wide receiver they bring is Brashad perrim

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bright. He does not count. He does not count

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as a football player. So let's start with Evans. Actually

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is a quad injury right now, probably gonna miss the

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of preseason, sort of questionable for Week one. That's

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not good, but let's assume he's good to go. He

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>should be. We know what we get with Evans. He's

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a bona fide wide receiver one has overall wide receiver

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>one potential since Evans has more yards and Beckham Jr.

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>More touchdowns, and Davante Adams and more catches and t

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton. He's just he's in the top tier of

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers or the one beat here at least, but

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin could get there coming at a couple rounds

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>later in drafts. Only saw ninety five targets last year.

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That's how many targets Willie Sneed saw. Very much easy,

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>still pretty good, It's not bad, but there's twenty five

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to thirty more targets on the horizon for god When,

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>who finished with eighty two yards and seven touchdowns last year.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>He did see the fourth most targets from inside the

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>ten yard line last year with the Levin for comparisons sake,

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Evans only saw six and uh Bruce Arians indicated Godwin

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can be a hundred catch guy running primarily out of

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the slot, by the way, is what he'll do. And

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>guys like Hines Ward, Reggie Wayne, uh Larry Fitzgerald obviously

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. Yeah, these are a hundred catch guys under

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Arians offense. So I'm going god When with the value

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>over Evans, even though I love them both. Again, Yeah,

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's um Godwin's got freaky upside, freaky upside. You know

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Evans does too, but you're you're paying that. You know

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you're paying a two round differential. I think that I

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think that can make some sense. Godwin easily one of

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the most hyped players of this summer. We've had so

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>much fun with this debate between players. Let's keep it rolling.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll keep slicing up teammates and telling you which one

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to target in your draft or your auction. And you've

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>heard us talking about the Guillotine League, the hottest new

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>format and fantasy sports. Seventeen teams. In each week, the

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>low scoring team gets cut from the league and their

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>entire roster goes to the waiver wire. It makes for

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>insane waiver why are runs? You can learn more and

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>even join a Guillotine League by going to guillote leagues

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com powered by fanball dot Com. Coming up next,

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we will get back to teammates. Who should you take,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>especially when you factor in the average draft position. It

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is Fantasy Football Weekly. You are listening to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charchy In. My co hosts are Brian

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Christian Peterson. You can follow us on Twitter

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if you'd like, I am at Paul Charchy and you'll

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out how to spelled at him. I

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>even tell you how to spell it right now. Nobody's

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna remember all the letters Paul Charchy and Brian is

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>easier at b t x J. I don't know how

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you can misspill Church, and I think most people will

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>come to spell it out. You shouldn't hear the telemarketers.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>God butchery chart chain is all the time. Church Ian.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's easy. Well, of course, I think it's easy Christian

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>at Cooler Heads twenty nine comes from uh. My favorite

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>player at the University of Minnesota Duluth hockey team when

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up in Duluth, Minnesota was Brett Hull.

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>He worked there, you go. He's no Steve Isser. You

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can hear us over the air on many stations around

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the country, and this show is also a podcast available

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>every Friday on all major podcasting platforms, including the number

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>one destination for podcasts, the I Heart Radio app. Guys,

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's return to our discussion about draftable teammates. These are

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>two guys who played the same position on the same team,

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but based on their average draft position, who would you

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>rather choose Christian. We begin with you and Melvin Gordon

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>verse and going in by the way, we should mention

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>going in roughly the early third round, late second round,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler in the sixth round, or Justin Jackson buried

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>way down in like round eleven. Which guy should we

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on? Yeah, Gordon's ADP is going the wrong way here.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>He's the middle of round three, maybe even getting worse

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>here as there is unlike the Ezekiel Elliott situation, where

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a ray of hope, there appears no end in

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>sight for Melvin Gordon. The Chargers have dug in on

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this one in part because they do have such a

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>capable backup in Ekeler, who has averaged over five point

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>two yards per carry in his first two NFL seasons,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and last year, even with Gordon handling the vast majority

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of the load, Ekeler had nine and sixty combined rushing

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and receiving yards and six touchdowns and a five yard

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>per carry average. Charger five. Chargers seem to have the

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>leverage here, but you know so, Ekeler in round six

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like a good value. But Gordon still could return.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He has to come back by halfway through the year. Yeah,

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>week ten, in order to crew another year towards free agency,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>which he absolutely would want to do. So Gordon's coming

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>back at some point. So are you investing around six

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>pick in Eckler or both a round three and around

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>six just to lock up that backfield? That seems like

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot so scenario. I'm actually going with Justin Jackson here.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with the dart throw. He was actually pretty

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>good late last year. He had over three combined rushing

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and receiving yards and two touchdowns in a five game

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>stretch to close out the year last year. And Ekeler

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>actually had a couple of games late last year where

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he was the starter and supposedly the bell cow. He

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>did not perform very well in those two games. So

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>if and when Gordon misses a few games earlier in

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the year, Justin Jackson is going to be involved. So

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm more intrigued by him as a as a lotto

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>ticket in the round in round eleven than either of

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>these other guys in round three or round so. Right,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So you can just flush that pick and it doesn't

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't materially hurt your team. If you got to just

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>cut him out right. What resonates with me is the

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>first preseason game Eckler fumbled from the two yard line

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and then later Jackson had a violent touchdown. I think

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the goal line duty. You know, if if Gordon is

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>not their goal line duty is going to Justin Jackson.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'll mention being a goal line duty. Melvin Gordon

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>has the second most touchdowns from inside the five since

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>he entered the league. So that's amazing because he didn't

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdowns rookie year. Whenever that he got blank

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. Let's go to uh, let's go to the

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>situation in Carolina between DJ Moore currently going in the

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fifth round and Curtis Samuel was a seventh round average

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>draft position. Which teammate do you like better? Another win

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>win situation really outside of this Cam Newton news, but

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>we won't we won't touch on that. Let's just pretend

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Cam's gonna be okay or let's hope. So starting with

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>DJ Moore as a rookie last year, he led all

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>players with at least fifty catches and yards after the

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>catch on a per reception basis, and became just one

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of seventeen receivers to post six receiving yards at twenty

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>one years old, he joined a list that includes Randy Moss,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Amari Coope, Mike Evans, Keenan, Allen Juju, DeAndre Hopkins, and

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gordon to be nice company to and UH now

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>over to Samuel's side and his second pro season last year.

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>He didn't become a regular starter until Week eight and

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he missed the last games due to injury, but he

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>looked really good when given the opportunity UH, including rushing

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball. He had two rushing touchdowns in addition to

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>what he did catching the ball. UH. He's no gimmick player,

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>though he has the making of number one as well,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and to see that you just look at his red

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>zone usage. In his limited UH game action, he had

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>more touchdowns in the red zone than George Kittle, Jarvis Langy,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis, Allen Robinson, and Jimmy Graham. Three of his

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>four red zone receptions went for touchdowns, which is very efficient.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And while four red zone receptions doesn't seem like a lot,

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>if you extracts it's not a lot. It's not. But

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>only fifteen wide receivers at double digit red zone receptions

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, and most of them are under fifteen on

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that list, So I'm sorry Samuel very much in that

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>company over a full season's work. This is a tough one.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>This is really tough one for me because I know,

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I know you love d J. Moore. I do, and

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I love Curtis Samuel, and really they're almost the same player.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And in that case, I just got to take the

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>cheaper one here and go Curtis Samuel. But man, this

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>is an instance. If I knew Cam was fully healthy,

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd be comfortable owning both of these guys and Cam

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on one team. I think Samuel is stronger, and I

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's more elusive. I think he's I think he's

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the I think he's more dangerous. If you asked me

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna score one of these who's gonna score from

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, sixty yards and breaking two tackles to get there?

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's Curtis sam Don't don't

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>slouch on more after the catch, though, he's he's tough

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring down. We'll find out, and I'm with you.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you got I think you identified the right guy.

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Al right. Next, let's go back to Christian Odell Beckham

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going in the late first round or Jarvis Landry going

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in the sixth round for Cleveland. Which receiver do you

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>prefer at his average draft position? Yeah, so Beckham, like

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, he has a late first round or the

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>fourth wide receiver off the board right now, behind DeAndre Hopkins,

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, Michael Thomas. We know his upside is as

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the number one overall fantasy wide receiver. We've seen what

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>he can do. Charge I believe you have him listed

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>as you're had move down. I'm moving down to five

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>just because he's already hurt, and you know, just the

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>freaky upside for Odell beck And he could easily be

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the top scoring He's never had a quarterback as good

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>as Baker Mayfield's going to be this year ever in

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 1>his whole career. Yeah, there's no the upside is unquestioned.

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But I mean you're buying him at his upside in

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the first round. You can't buy him any any earlier

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>than you are. Right Well, the only I'm buying is

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting late first round instead of mid instead of

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>first wide receiver off the board at at five or six.

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So contrast that, however, to Landry, who has had the

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>following career Fantasy finishes in PPR formats wide receiver nineteen

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>last year, that was his worst year. Wide receiver, four,

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.439
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver thirteen, Wide receiver eleven. He's never had fewer

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred and twelve targets in a season. He's

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>always been playing in significantly worse offenses than what he's

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>playing in now. And despite all of that, despite all

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>those elite level finishes from Landry, right now, he's the

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver off the board. I don't understand it. I mean,

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield is fantastic. They have all of these weapons

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>around them. Their new offensive coordinator, Todd Mounkan got seventies,

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>six catches and five touchdowns out of Adam Humphries. Landry

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>plays out of the slot and he's significantly better than

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphries. So, as you can probably tell, I would

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>prefer to have Javis Landry way down in the sixth

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>round then Beckham in round one. I was all I was.

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I was totally in on Beckham before you gave that

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Ratchean now or Jarvis Landry, and now I'm I'm I'm

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you flipped my you flipped my opinion on all right,

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you changed my mind too, because the road is Landry

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>burned people last year and I was one of them.

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, Beckham, You're just like, it's not gonna get

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>any better. But it might. It might get better. It

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>might get better because Odell Beckham's away from him and

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, there's a lot of reasons where I

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>could get better for Jarvis Landry this year. Back to Brian,

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Let's go to San Francisco and one

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the murky ist wide receiver situations. Do you like

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Dante Pettis in the eighth round or Deebo Samuel rookie

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the fourteen Alright, let's start with Dante at

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a quote unquote peak Pettis last year. You know, he's

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>six game stretch towards the end of the year where

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he totally went off. He never saw more than se

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>seven targets or had more, and he just had five

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>catches twice during that span. So there wasn't a ton

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of volume for Pettis there. He did have success in

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the red zone on paper, but he didn't see just

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one target from inside the ten yard line. He's not

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a big end zone end zone threat. That's really George

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Kittle's territory territory. But uh, I don't see a bumping

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>targets coming for Pettis when you consider Kittle. Of course,

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they want Trent Taylor to factor out of the slot.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He should be ready by week one. Mark He's Goodwin

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is back. Jalen heard this rookie is turning in. And

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's Deebo Samuel who they drafted in the second round,

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>who's looked great this preseason. And really, Deebo is a

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>very similar player to Um Pettison. He's he's about an

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>inch in height. They both round four equally as fast. Yeah,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but Deebo's got like twenty pounds of muscle on Pettis,

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that makes him more of a factor

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>after the catch, more of a factor in the red zone.

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>He can muscle defenders much more easily than Pettis, who

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the height to separate as well. So I'm

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>taking Deebo at a discount. I know you're gonna hate it,

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>charge because you're a big Pettis guy like Pettis, but

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go value here and I'm gonna go Deebo.

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You know there. Uh, Pettis has managed to get his

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 1>head coach Kyle Shanahan to call him out publicly about

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's got a step up and stuff, blah

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. I think that's, you know, I just think

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a motivational talk. I think that's him trying to

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>light a fire under a kid that maybe got a

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>little too full of himself with the success he had

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.879
<v Speaker 1>from last year. He listens to the show Pettis does,

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and he heard me talking about how great he is

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>uh in previous versions of Fantasy Football Weekly. I think

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that went to his head a little bit. Um. All

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that said, Deebo Samuel's practically free in the fourteenth round,

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and I feel as good about him getting playing time

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>as I do anybody in this offense. So as much

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:03.479
<v Speaker 1>as I as much as optimistic as I am about

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Dante Pettis, I'm kind of with you on Deebo Samuel's

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the right pick here, factoring in the average draft position.

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to another thorny one and one that's it's

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's shifting sands constantly Kansas City's backfield. Damian Williams, you

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta pay a end of second round price for or

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Darwin Thompson in round twelve, yeah, I mean, I mean,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a point before training camp opened when Damian

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Williams was approaching like first round. Yes he was. That's

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>how excited people were about this guy after the last year.

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>What we saw at the end of last year. You

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>can't blame him. Eight touchdowns games in the final five

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>games of last year. It was running back four after

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Cream Hunt left the team. Four. Clearly, that's very compelling.

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But he also in his previous four seasons average three

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards per carry, never received more than

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>forty six carries or twenty two receptions in a season.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>He's twenties seven years old. He's a journeyman. Nobody wanted him, like,

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no precedent for this, for a guy coming

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in and spending the first four years on the bench

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and then turning into a fantasy superstar. But anyways, preseason starts,

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>training camp starts all of a sudden. The sixth row

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on rookie Darwin Thompson looks incredible, really explosive. He played

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at a small college, but he has a lot of

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>very good physical traits. He's fast, he's strong, he's elusive,

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and he's shown it in the preseason. So I'm not

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>a believer in Damian Williams. I think there's too much risk,

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the second round and even in the third round.

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather take the dark throw on Darwin Thompson in

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth. Coming up next, let's answer three tough questions.

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You can play along. Answer the tough questions, see if

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you can go a perfect three and oh on Fantasy

0:43:45.080 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. You you don't, you don't. Don't you don't

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>don't don't you don't don't, don't don't you don't if

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't, don't don't you don't know. You don't don't

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't don't. You don't know. You don't if you don't,

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>don't don't you don't know, No, no, no, don't. You

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You don't know. You don't know what you

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Don't know. You don't know. If you don't

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't, don't, don't don't. It is Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm pul Charchi and Koner fanball dot Com. My cohorts.

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:53.479
<v Speaker 1>My co hosts are Brian Johnson and Christian Peterson. Guys,

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's time to get into the grinder with three tough questions. Listeners,

0:44:57.680 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you can play along, see if you can go three

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and oh it's a themed version this week we don't

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>normally have. Normally they're just sort of scattershot random three

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>tough questions. This is a theme. We begin with tough

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>question number one. Who is this year's biggest risk reward quarterbacks?

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is the quarterback that will provide the highest

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>upside and downside among all the available quarterbacks. Who do

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you got, Brian? I'm gonna go with Deshaun Watson, who

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>right now is going as a late fifth round pick.

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Really quarterback to in most most drafts. I've seen the

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>good with the Shawn. He's got DeAndre Hopkins into arguably

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one in all of the world. Uh, hop

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>um Sorry. Watson also very mobile, third among quarterbacks and

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards and touchdowns last season. Has a new o

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 1>C offensive coordinator, Tim Miller, who is highly regarded. Uh.

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>He plays great with Will Fuller Watson that is levin

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and eleven games when they're on the field together.

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Fuller coming off in a c L reports are somewhat encouraging,

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but uh, that leads me to the bad um. Without

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the proven durability of his secondary receivers will will Fuller,

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:06.439
<v Speaker 1>who has missed fifteen games over the last two years,

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and Kiki Qtie who missed eleven games last year already

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>injured his ankle this preseason. It's all that's been all

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins and the rushing behind an awful offensive line that

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>was forced to sign Matt Khalil of all people who

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>might be their left tackle. They didn't forced to sign,

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they just chose to sign. I don't know who does that,

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, front office does it. I guess No. GM

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty one sacks in twenty three games for Watson. I'm

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just afraid history is gonna repeat itself because last year

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he was going to off his quarterback to three, finished

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback twelve. That's too much of a gap for me,

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and nothing has really changed. I don't trust will Fuller

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy coming off the A c L. The old

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>line is still very wobbly. So he's way too high

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>risk high reward for me. All right, who is this

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 1>year's biggest risk reward quarterback? Christian My initial thought when

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I when I got this assignment was Kyler Murray because

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of the massive upside. But you're really not risking much

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with him. A tenth rounder, So instead I went with

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. He's currently the QB four right now by

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a DP somewhere in round seven, round eight ish. The

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>upside is obvious. We've already talked a little bit about it.

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But based on his performance from last year, especially in

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the eight games after Freddie Kitchens took over last year, Mayfield,

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>through nineteen touchdowns, completed over sixty percent of his passes.

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Really thrived when he started throwing the ball deep down field.

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And then in the off season they go out in

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the add Odell Beckham clearly one of the best deep

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>threats in the game. They've got emerging young players all

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>over the place here. We talked about Jarvis Landry, David

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end, David Najoku, running back, Nick Chubb, maybe later

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in the year, Kareem hot So everything is set up

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for success here. But yeah, we don't really know. It's

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>all it's all conjecture. It's all based on what we

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>saw in half a season of work. We don't really

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>know about Beckham. He could, you know, mess things up

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in the locker room. We've seen him be a divisive force.

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're having to take Baker Mayfield is the fourth

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.799
<v Speaker 1>quarterback off the board ahead of Andrew Luck, Matt Ryan,

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, a lot of much more established players. So

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think there's their significant risk here as well.

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You gets touched on the two finalists that I chose,

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>although it did not ultimately select Kyler. Murray was in

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that conversation until I saw exactly what you did the

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>tenth round ADP. I'm not risking enough to Shaun Watson.

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about him later. I think there is

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of risk there. But what about the correct answer.

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers going off the board as quarterback three in

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>fan among all fantasy players, and to get him you

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta go around six. That's not a trivial that's not

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a trivial draft pick. Everything could go right for Aaron Rodgers.

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it really was all Mike McCarthy's fault. And maybe

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>now he's set up with a coach who has been

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 1>a great quarterback advisor, at least was with the Rams.

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Didn't get anything of Marcus Mariota um and that now

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with Davante Adams, you've got young receivers who look like

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be a lot better in your number

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>two and in Doronto Allison and Marquees Valdez Scantling. Maybe

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it all comes together, or maybe Matt Lafleur is in

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>way over his head. He wasn't ready to coach yet,

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't able to get Marcus Mariota there. Maybe Aaron

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is going to steamroll this guy and try to

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>run the team like he did at the end of

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 1>last year after they fired McCarthy, and this thing's gonna

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tank badly. Remember last season, Aaron Rodgers the most scoring systems,

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but somewhere between quarterback twelve and eighteen, he was bad, bad,

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's a chance that you still have with

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. Let's move on to tough question number two.

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Who is the biggest risk reward running back this year?

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Christian you get to have the honors to go first. Yeah.

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I went back to Cleveland on this one with Nick

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Chubb in part because I've seen him in drafts recently

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>being taken as high as number four or number five. Overall,

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>people love Nick Chubb right now. It's partially because as

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>soon as the Browns traded Duke Johnson away, it became

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>clear that they were probably gonna pass a little bit

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.359
<v Speaker 1>more to Chubb, and that was maybe the one part

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of his game that he was missing or that we

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't see last year. But we saw how good Chub

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>could be last year at the same time Baker Mayfield exploded,

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>so did Chub. So I get what I get the

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>upside here, and it's tantalizing. What I hate is the

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 1>fact that Kareem Hunt could be back, that could be back,

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>will be, We'll be back by week nine. And Kareem

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Hunt was one of you know, the top two or three,

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>four or five or whatever top fantasy running back uh

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in in every every season that we've seen, So you

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>might be cruising along with the overall number one running

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>back all season long for the first eight weeks. But

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens when Hunt comes back. I mean maybe in

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of weeks they just kind of work

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>him in a little bit here and there. But Hunt

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is just so talented that I think he's gonna have

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a significant role after he comes back. And that's a

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:49.839
<v Speaker 1>risk that I'm not willing to take. All Right, Brian,

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>who is the biggest risk reward running back on the

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>board for fantasy drafters. I'm gonna stay close to home

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>here in Minneapolis and say Dalvin Cook, who right now

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is going in mid second in most drafts, I've seen

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>him go in the first and some and that's because

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of this guy is the limit in a bell cow

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>role that he should take on this year coming off

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the a c L suffered in Week four last year,

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>had the shoulder injuries in college, but makes some little

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 1>injury prone. That's really the only concern for Cook himself

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is the injuries. If he stays healthy, he has RB

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>one potential with the Vikings. But what makes him risk

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>here outside of the injuries is he's a guy you

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 1>probably want a handcuff. But who are you going to

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>handcuff him too? Is it Mike Boone or is it

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Madison? You know, everybody, everybody close to this team

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.479
<v Speaker 1>says it's Madison. I think that's been the draft capital. Again,

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the same, it's the draft capital bit. You gotta

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>They picked him in the third round. But Boone has looked,

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you're closer to the team than I am. Charching. Uh,

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I see, I'm I I kind of like Boone. But

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody close to the team tells me that it's it's Madison. Well,

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not the run with the first team offense in

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>every preseason game. I'd like to have at least a

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>clear cut handcuff if I'm forced to handcuff of stud

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>running back, and that's it's not quite evident there, So

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook and when you're when you your league this year,

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But he could lose it if he does get injured.

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'm crossing my fingers. I'm all in on him, though,

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's go. This year's biggest risk reward running back

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is Leonard four Nett. At this time a year ago,

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>four Nette was coming off the board at the end

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of the first round because he was coming off a

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>season in which he was RB eight in Fantasy points,

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the eighth highest scoring fantasy player. But last year, as

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you all know, disaster because of the soft tissue injuries

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and a horrible offensive line that was riddled with injuries.

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:32.799
<v Speaker 1>His running was tentative. He just wasn't himself all year.

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And maybe all that repeats himself. Maybe it's he set

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>up for another year of soft tissue injuries. Maybe, but

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line got improved in the off season. It's

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>healthy now and he's got the upside four net does

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of a top five player. He's the rare workhorse in

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a league that has very few workhorses. There's no competition

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for carries here at all. He'll get all of those.

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>He's enjoying the best quarterbacking of his career, of his

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:02.880
<v Speaker 1>career with Nick Foles, and you figure offensive line improved

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and better, and then all the pass catching they've they've

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 1>thrown him in the preseason training camp O t a

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>s it looks like he's sitting on a much improved

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 1>PPR production as well, which has when one of the

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 1>few things that seld him back. Leonard four Nette could

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>be a top five fantasy player, or we could miss

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole season with ongoing growing injuries. So who's to

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>say Letard four net the biggest risk reward running back.

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to tough question number three. Who is

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the year's biggest risk reward wide receiver? Back? To Brian,

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>who you got? I couldn't help myself. It's Antonio Brown

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>going uh ninth pick in the second round. Since in

0:53:44.320 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>reverse order, among players who qualify with the most receiving touchdowns,

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it goes like this. Davante Adams thirty nine, Mike Evans forty,

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham forty four, DeAndre Hopkins forty five, Antonio Brown nine.

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>We know the upside, uh, but he's on a whole

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>new team. We all know that as well. And Derek

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Carr is not Ben Roethlisberger. And I'm gonna go to

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>my boy Graham Barfield with the stat on a deep

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>ball accuracy attempt by season, and these are passes of

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five plus yards. Uh. Roethlisberger in sixteen he was

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate, seen, the most accurate. Last year, the

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ninth most accurate. Derek Carr the second lowest. Banner year eighteen,

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>last year fourth lowest. So, outside of the cerebral issues

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that may exist with Antonio Brown, the quarterbacking and just

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the team in general makes him incredibly volatile, but there

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is certainly a high ceiling if all the cards fall

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the right way with him. All Right, Christian, I too

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 1>went with Antonio Brown the number one, two or three

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:50.800
<v Speaker 1>fantasy wide receiver five years in a row. I'll pile

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>on a little bit about the difference between Pittsburgh and Oakland.

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Oakland eighty fewer passing yards per game, a

0:54:56.760 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty fewer pass attempts throughout the season, uh.

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>In terms of points scored per game, Pittsburgh scored the

0:55:03.480 --> 0:55:06.760
<v Speaker 1>fifth most points in the league. Oakland scored most points

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the league. That's eight and a half points per

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 1>game less. And yeah, I mean, we know what the

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>upside is, but how's it gonna go for Antonio Brown

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when the Raiders start inevitably start losing this year? This

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 1>guy is a diva. You have no idea what's going

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to happen. So I agree Antonio Brown. Yeah, uh, this

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:26.800
<v Speaker 1>one was a layup. It is Antonio Brown highest ri

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 1>screw ward. He could be the you know, maybe he

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>ends up his wide receiver one again because he's done

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:35.839
<v Speaker 1>it before, or maybe Oakland's crappy offensive line doesn't give

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr even the time to set up on those

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>deep passes that Antonio Brown is how so many times

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>when he was with Pittsburgh. And then I think you

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 1>raised one of the great points that nobody's talking about.

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He's used to winning at a high level for his

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 1>whole career. Last year was the first time he wasn't

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on a particularly successful playoff bound Steelers team. And what happened,

0:55:57.719 --> 0:55:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he had to leave the team. They

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 1>got rid of him, what happens when the Raiders start

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one and six? Oh god, I can't tell you for

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that at some point the team doesn't ask him

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to leave this year. That's a real possibility that Mayock

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and Gruden just tell him to leave. That's you know,

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:18.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing could end in a grievance somewhere, you know,

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a you know, sitting in court. Who knows.

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>There's so much weird risk with Antonio Brown. It was

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 1>an easy answer. You all got it right. Hopefully the

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>listeners went three and oh. Let me ask you this.

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's take my three answers. As for the high risk,

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>high reward guys, how would you feel about coming out

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of your draft with all three high risk, high reward

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>guys and just taking in saying to yourself, you know what,

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, all these guys come with a certain discount

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 1>because of the risk. And I want to roll the dice.

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got your It's it's Leonard four Nett you can

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 1>get in the late second round, early third round, it's

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers in the sixth round, and it's Antonio Brown,

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.360
<v Speaker 1>whose ADP I think is where you can say, second

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:04.479
<v Speaker 1>third pick, you get four net Brown at the turn second. Okay,

0:57:04.480 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 1>there you go. That's fair. Is would you feel comfortable

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 1>with that draft strategy? Of course not. I mean I

0:57:13.200 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>generally don't mind the high risk, high rewards sort of

0:57:16.920 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 1>draft strategy. I mean, rather than finishing sixth or seventh

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>place in my league, I'd rather just go for it,

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 1>right I want. I want to win a championship. Sometimes

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to. Sometimes I might just be horrible and

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>finished near dead last. So I like that. I like that.

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But what I don't like are the players. I mean,

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 1>four Net and Rogers just don't do anything for me that.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the risks far away the reward on Brown.

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't do it with those. I could live

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with Fournet, Rodgers. It's Brown that's scared, especially where he's

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 1>going in a lot of drafts right now. It's to me,

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I my risk profile, my draft. I want the risk

0:57:52.240 --> 0:57:54.560
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom of my draft, not the top middle

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of my draft. So I couldn't. I couldn't stomach having

0:57:57.440 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that much risk coming in my rounds three and four,

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in five and six too early. We've done dozens of drafts,

0:58:05.080 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and sometimes you look back at least I do,

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and you realize there are guys I never drafted. We

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>will look at the guys that are in the black

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hole of fantasy. Find out our blacklist, the guys we

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>never draft. Coming up next on Fantasy Football Weekly. It

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is a pre season addition of Fantasy Football Weekly. I

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>am Paul Charchy, and you know you're seeing. Your draft

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is about picking the right players, you know, but it's

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 1>also about avoiding the wrong players. That's half the battle, right.

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We talk all the time about the players we want

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to take, but we don't always talk about the players

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that we don't plan to draft. Often it's not always

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of just like I don't like that guy,

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I would never draft him under any circumstances. We're gonna

0:59:06.960 --> 0:59:09.760
<v Speaker 1>break down three quarterbacks, three running backs, and three wide

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers we never draft. You know, all the mock drafts

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we've done, the real drafts that we've done, the guillotine

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>league drafts, all the things. No matter the format, the

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>scoring system, the situation, these are guys we never end

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:26.000
<v Speaker 1>up with. Will begin at the quarterback position. Brian Johnson,

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>who you got? I got? Andrew Luck and uh and all. Honestly,

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd look before the injury concerns that have popped up

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks or the last week

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:38.479
<v Speaker 1>or so. Um, he was going a quarterback three before

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the injury news. Now he's more like quarterback six, going

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>roughly the first pick in the eighth round. Yeah, he's

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>my number seven quarterback. I might cheat, And in general,

0:59:46.480 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a weight on a quarterback guy in one

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:50.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leagues, which just put some way out of my

0:59:50.600 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>purview already. But I'm even fading him in two quarterback formats.

0:59:53.560 --> 0:59:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not playing this injury game with Luck. We've

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>seen a couple of years ago. Granted it's an ankle now,

0:59:58.280 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>not not his shoulder, which in cold bodes better for

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback I suppose. But Jacoby Brissette might be the

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>best backup in the NFL, and Indies like shopping him

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>or if someone wants him, they got to give up

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a means he's not going anywhere, and right now you

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't you know. They're not moving set at all right now,

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and they have confidence in him going into the season,

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's no rush to bring Luck back. And when

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they do, we saw it already last year. He used

1:00:22.880 --> 1:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball a fair amount and it's four

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like full seasons, four full healthy seasons. He was averaging

1:00:28.400 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>well over sixty rushing rushing attempts for for the year.

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It has just forty six rushing atemps last year, so

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that was a significant drop. It's gonna drop further behind

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a great old line with a strong running game and

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a good defense that they don't need Luck to be

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>running the ball around, especially Hurt. So I'm just all

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>out on Andrew Luck not touching him. I don't care

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>if it drops to quarterback ten. I mean, I'm increasingly

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>interested in Luck because he's becoming so cheap that if

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's only going to cost me, you know, instead of

1:00:54.120 --> 1:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>costing me the fifth rounder that he was three weeks ago,

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's now going to cost me an eighth or ninth

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>rounder and I can just go him up with somebody

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>else later. That's starting to get more palatable to me.

1:01:04.280 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm more interested in him, all right, Christian, who do

1:01:06.840 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you have as your blacklist quarterback the guy you never

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>end up drafting. I've got Patrick mahomes Um, and believe

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it or not, he is my number one quarterback. That's

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>not the issue. But his ADP right now is twenty

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>three overall, So that's late second round. You know, all

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is you can google Patrick Mahomes

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and regression and you will find all sorts of articles

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that talk about how he most likely can't possibly repeat

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>his historically good season from last year. Nobody's ever done

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it before, nobody, nobody's ever So I'll just you know,

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to list out all of those reasons.

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's the one that I like the best that I found.

1:01:43.200 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Since there have been thirteen seasons in which a quarterback

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>through forty or more touchdowns in a season. This list

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>includes Tom Brady, Peyton Manning several times, Dan Marino, Drew Brees,

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, all time grades in in the following year,

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>those quarterbacks average sixteen and a half fewer touchdown passes.

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And even if if you factor out things like Tom

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Brady missed an entire season, if you go to the

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>next season after that, even if you factor an injury,

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>then it's still is thirteen fewer touchdowns the following years.

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So I just can't justify spending a second rounder on

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. You're basically paying for another record setting historical

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>season at that price. The next quarterback off the board

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>right now is the Shaun Watson forty spots later. Yeah,

1:02:32.160 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So I just I can't risk a second rounder and

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when I can just get a perfectly good quarterback a

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot later on. But there's this with Mahomes other than

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>history telling us it's very unlikely. Name a reason. I mean,

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the problem, right He looks so good and

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so incredible and kills back all of this talent there

1:02:54.400 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and Andy Reid's offense, and there are a lot of

1:02:56.920 --> 1:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>reasons why it couldn't happen. It couldn't buck the trend.

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's the other thing about Patrick Mahomes that makes him

1:03:03.840 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to me still enticing Fantasy football is about having fun.

1:03:09.440 --> 1:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And when he goes back to pass and you see

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>him launching that sixty yard pass behind the back, or

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that the sixty yard or it's at its apex of

1:03:21.640 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>its arc, and so are you off the couch. You're

1:03:24.120 --> 1:03:26.439
<v Speaker 1>spilling the popcorn and the beer all over the place.

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You were jumping off the couch to see if it's

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be resting in the arms of Tyreek Hill

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>on the other end, and it might be. He's so

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>exciting and so fun to have on your team. Everybody

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>who didn't have him last year. Wants Patrick Mahomes this

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>year because you were watching those highlights and just going oh,

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I could have had him in the tenth round last year,

1:03:50.720 --> 1:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and I passed on him, and I dive. That's the

1:03:54.720 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>thing about Patrick Mahomes. But the regression is probably coming.

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got to Shawn Watson. Bran already broke down a

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of Deshaun Watson. While he's nervous about him, I

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>am too. He is my one of my highest rated quarterbacks.

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He's my number three quarterback. So you know, much like

1:04:09.080 --> 1:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you with Patrick Mahomes, I like him a lot. I'm

1:04:10.880 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>not paying my six round a DP on Deshaun Watson.

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>U there's certainly upside. He can run, his run and

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pass his way to points, and I love that. But

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I can find other quarterbacks who can run and pass

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>their way to points for a lot less and not

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pay the six round a DP. I can

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>get Baker Mayfield with some mobility in the eighth round.

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I can get Russell Wilson in the tenth round, Lamar

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson and the eleventh round, Dak Prescott in the twelfth round,

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and they give me run pass options and I don't

1:04:36.400 --> 1:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have to pay anywhere near that much. And I'll remind

1:04:38.680 --> 1:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you Watson suffered sixty two spine shattering sacks last year,

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty two. The fact that he played every game was

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a miracle. He's like thirty years old, now, that's right.

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>They they they've sacked him into an early and early grave.

1:04:56.240 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>If he if I told you he was going to

1:04:57.760 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>absorb another sixty two sacks behind Pro Football Focus is

1:05:01.920 --> 1:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty first ranked offensive line. Would you tell me he's

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna play sixteen games? It's not. It's not promising. That's

1:05:10.040 --> 1:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>why I can't take Deshaun Watson. Let's continue on with

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>our blacklist. These are the guys that we never find

1:05:15.840 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ourselves drafting. We begin now with the running back position.

1:05:19.320 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian who This guy is sure to disappoint all those

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the black hole. It's Josh Jacobs. No, thank you, sir,

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs. By the way, the famed backup to Damien

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Harris at their time at Alabama didn't even start. Only

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders would take the backup over the starter. And

1:05:35.720 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that's really does it. Uh. I don't trust anything that

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Oakland does. They're carrying four running backs into the season.

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way. That doesn't bode well for Josh Jacobs

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen Richard is going to own the third down

1:05:45.960 --> 1:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>work regardless of Jacobs or Doug Martin getting the majority

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of the carries. It will be Jacobs to start the season,

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>but again they're running behind a really bad old line

1:05:54.440 --> 1:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ranks twenty six by Pro Football Focus. When you have

1:05:57.160 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to go out and sign Richie Incognito for depth, that's

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not so Jacob's in the early fourth I'm just fully

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out on this. I don't I don't see him returning

1:06:08.400 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>even RB two value throughout the season. He's FLEXI play

1:06:11.520 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>at best in my mind. Okay, Christian your black list

1:06:15.480 --> 1:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>running back. I will go with Todd Gurley and let

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>me tell you a few things about degenerative knee arthritis.

1:06:23.400 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>A right good at first. You may notice pain in

1:06:25.720 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the morning or after you've been inactive for a while.

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Your knees may hurt when you climb stairs, stand up

1:06:31.360 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>from a sitting position, or Neil, well, wait, does he

1:06:33.680 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ever have to stand up from a sitting position? Todd curling. Never.

1:06:37.160 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It may hurt just to go for a walk. You

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>may also feel pain when you're simply sitting down. Some

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>people with arthritis say that damp weather or other changes

1:06:47.280 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in the weather can bring on pain. Well is in

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>l a so you don't have to sweat that that.

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Some people with arthritis say that when multiple three pound

1:06:54.520 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>men are constantly attempting to bash, crush, and generally grind

1:06:57.800 --> 1:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>your body into a million tiny pieces, that may also

1:07:00.920 --> 1:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>bring on pain. Over time, your knee muscles weaken and

1:07:04.560 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire joint structure becomes unstable. Overall, weakness in the

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>knee can cause it to give way or buckle. The

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>joint can also stick or lock up so that you

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can't bend or straighten it out. Eventually. You may feel

1:07:17.560 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a grinding sensation in your knees as you move. I'm

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>filling one right now. Just listening to you might even

1:07:22.440 --> 1:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>hear cracking or popping sounds coming from your knees. Arthritis

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>can make it increasingly challenging for your knee joints to

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>glide as they should, making previously simple movements difficult or

1:07:32.160 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>even impossible. You're most likely to notice a restricted range

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of motion when you climb stairs or participate in athletic

1:07:39.560 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>activities like football. May you may have trouble walking without

1:07:45.840 --> 1:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a cane or a walker for all of these reasons.

1:07:49.200 --> 1:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Time out on Todd Gurley and his chronically arthritic knee. Yes,

1:07:53.680 --> 1:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got James Conner currently going off the board is

1:07:56.160 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the last pick of the first round, and what a

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>mistake that's going to be. I think for people now

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in some cases we're saying we love Patrick Mahomes, but

1:08:03.800 --> 1:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't take him. I liked to Shaun Watson, but

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I wouldn't take him where he's going.

1:08:07.920 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want I don't want any to do with

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>James Conner at this price. Every single person who has

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>commented about the backfield in Pittsburgh that has a reason

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to know says it's going to be a time share.

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>James Connor called it a time share. Jalen Samuels called

1:08:19.840 --> 1:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it a time share. The coaches called it a time share.

1:08:22.120 --> 1:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>In the second half of last season, Connor regressed badly.

1:08:26.960 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>His touches per game dropped by a third, his yards

1:08:30.720 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>per game dropped in half, his touchdowns per game dropped

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in half, his yards per carry went from almost five

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>down to four, and after missing zero games in the

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>first half of last year, Connor missed three in the

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>second half. Everything trended the wrong way at the end

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of last year. So then there's Jalen Samuel's. In the

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>second half of last season, when Jalen Samuels started getting work,

1:08:56.280 --> 1:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>he averaged two more touches than Connor did. He averaged

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty two more yards than Connor did. He averaged an

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>additional one point two yards per carry. I told you

1:09:06.080 --> 1:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>connors average per carry dropped a lot. Samuel's was better,

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and as a converted tight end, Samuel's receiving numbers were

1:09:13.800 --> 1:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>better than Connors, and Connors were also solid, but Samuels

1:09:16.320 --> 1:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>were even better. Connors also got to overcome his own position, coach,

1:09:21.280 --> 1:09:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Faulkner, who coached Samuel's at North Carolina State. While together,

1:09:26.479 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Samuels was a workhorse for Eddie Faulkner, setting the school's

1:09:29.640 --> 1:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>all time reception record with two two catches and earning

1:09:33.360 --> 1:09:36.599
<v Speaker 1>All a CEC honors twice. That's his own coach. Now

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Steelers man, that's a lot to overcome for

1:09:40.040 --> 1:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>James Conner and a lot of worry for me. All Right,

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go. Let's go to our final position on our blacklist,

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:49.519
<v Speaker 1>and that's the wide receiver position, and Brian Johnson. We'll

1:09:49.520 --> 1:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>stay with the same team, and I'm going Juju. I'm

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>not drafting Juju really going the last pick in the

1:09:55.439 --> 1:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>first round, very early second. So my receiver three to

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>six depending on those rankings you're looking at, where do

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you have them charged? They're higher on Juju than O.

1:10:03.240 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I love. Juju's my number two receiver. We're gonna hate

1:10:05.760 --> 1:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this one. Well, I'm not drafting Juju. A hundred sixty

1:10:08.120 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>eight targets vacated by Antonio Brown. Juju is not going

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to absorb really any of those. He already had a

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>very prominent role in this offense. Unlikely to change running

1:10:16.640 --> 1:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>out the slot. All the vacated targets are gonna be

1:10:19.040 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>dispersed among DNTE Moncrief, James Washington, Vance McDonald, maybe some

1:10:22.560 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuel's even Uh, none of those guys are Antonio Brown.

1:10:25.600 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you put them all together and not not Antonio Brown.

1:10:28.600 --> 1:10:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I think Juju is gonna draw a lot more attention,

1:10:31.160 --> 1:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>uh than last year. That's not too far fetched to

1:10:33.000 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's clearly the number one threat in the receiving

1:10:35.160 --> 1:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>game now. Uh. The Steelers are consensus bottom twelve in

1:10:38.160 --> 1:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of wide receiver strength of schedule. I like him

1:10:40.720 --> 1:10:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to be a top ten wide receiver. I like him

1:10:42.520 --> 1:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to repeat his performance of last year, but I just

1:10:45.400 --> 1:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see him best seeing the likes of Julio Jones

1:10:48.960 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and Tyreek Kill guys who are going in that same range,

1:10:51.080 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and I honestly would take those two ten out of

1:10:52.880 --> 1:10:56.639
<v Speaker 1>ten times over Juju. But that is just to me. Yeah,

1:10:56.920 --> 1:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, there are thing parts that I agree

1:10:58.800 --> 1:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>with you. There isn't a lot of room for him

1:11:00.960 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to grow, but you do doesn't even have to grow.

1:11:02.920 --> 1:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>He was great last year, and even if he just

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>increments up by ten percent, I think he's you know,

1:11:07.040 --> 1:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he could be wide shaver. One. I went with Antonio

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown here and we've kind of we've kind of beat

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that one to death Therety. I will say just just

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one additional thing about it is that the fact that

1:11:16.280 --> 1:11:18.799
<v Speaker 1>he scored so many touchdowns last year kind of masked

1:11:18.880 --> 1:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that his numbers have been decreasing now for

1:11:21.760 --> 1:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the last four or five years in terms of catch percentage. Uh,

1:11:25.880 --> 1:11:28.519
<v Speaker 1>last year he caught only sixty of the passes thrown

1:11:28.600 --> 1:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>his way. That's a career low since he became a starter. Yeah,

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>just four years earlier that was at and the touchdown.

1:11:35.120 --> 1:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>The touchdown receiving from last year is just unsustainable. He

1:11:38.160 --> 1:11:41.639
<v Speaker 1>scored fourteen on fourteen point four percent of his catches

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>last year. His career average before that was just over

1:11:44.640 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, so almost double. So a lot of reasons

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Antonio Brown this year. My blacklist wide receivers.

1:11:50.800 --> 1:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay currently going in the fourth round. And it's

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not that he's not a good player. He he is

1:11:55.960 --> 1:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a good player, and he's, by the way, terrific matchup

1:11:58.280 --> 1:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>coming in Week one. It gets the Cardinal and darry

1:12:00.360 --> 1:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>missing its top two cornerbacks. He's setting it on potentially

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>great Week one. But the Lions are a running team.

1:12:07.360 --> 1:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It started last year and it's going to expand this year.

1:12:10.600 --> 1:12:13.519
<v Speaker 1>This is the quote from Lions offensive coordinator Darryl Bubble.

1:12:14.320 --> 1:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Will always be about running the football. We want to

1:12:16.760 --> 1:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>be a tough, hard nosed, physical football team. We want

1:12:19.479 --> 1:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to exert our will on our opponents.

1:12:22.960 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's true. Matt Patricia grew up in the Patriots system,

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>including acting as the team's defensive coordinator for five years.

1:12:29.479 --> 1:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Six years. During his tenure, the Patriots ran the ball

1:12:32.240 --> 1:12:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the six most times. Despite having Tom Brady at quarterback,

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they ran the ball the six most times, and obviously

1:12:38.000 --> 1:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it worked out for the Patriots multiple championships under Matt Patricia.

1:12:41.720 --> 1:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>In the year before Patricia arrived, the Lions ran the

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>second fewest times. Last year, in Patricia's first year, they

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that went all the way from thirty one to eighteen,

1:12:53.640 --> 1:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the pack. Now this year

1:12:57.560 --> 1:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they bring in Daryl Bebble to run the ball more.

1:13:01.760 --> 1:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>As offensive coordinator for twelve years, Darryl Bevil's teams ran

1:13:07.040 --> 1:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the second most times in the NFL. There's just too

1:13:10.439 --> 1:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>much running. Darryl Bevil's averages thirty runs per game thirty.

1:13:16.680 --> 1:13:19.799
<v Speaker 1>There's just gonna be games, so the targets just aren't

1:13:20.000 --> 1:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>there for Kenny Golladay, and I think you're gonna have

1:13:23.040 --> 1:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>an inconsistent season beginning in week two after he houses

1:13:27.080 --> 1:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals in Week one, Hi after Week one. If

1:13:30.680 --> 1:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna draft Kenny Golladay, for sure, our final topics

1:13:35.160 --> 1:13:37.519
<v Speaker 1>are had. When we look at the upside and the

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>downside of rushing quarterbacks. Can you put your team in

1:13:41.439 --> 1:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the hands of a quarterback who needs to run you

1:13:43.400 --> 1:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to victory? And as always we end the show by

1:13:46.320 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>revealing our favorite sleepers. You can download my cheat sheet

1:13:50.040 --> 1:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for free by going to famble dot com slash and

1:13:52.320 --> 1:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>chart famble dot com slash charg It is Fantasy Football

1:13:57.320 --> 1:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Weekly final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. I Am All

1:14:24.360 --> 1:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>charged in. You can get all things charts related at

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:29.839
<v Speaker 1>fambile dot com slash charts. That's a free five thousand

1:14:29.880 --> 1:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar contest for week one and by the way, in

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that contest, it also gives you a chance to get

1:14:35.000 --> 1:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to our win a ticket, an entry into our week

1:14:37.920 --> 1:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ten dollar championship game. And all you have to

1:14:42.200 --> 1:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>do to do that is beat your lineup, so it

1:14:45.520 --> 1:14:47.479
<v Speaker 1>is very low beat my my line up in a

1:14:47.560 --> 1:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>salary cap format. It is the crush Chart Championship. You

1:14:52.720 --> 1:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>can do that for free Family dot com slash charts. Also,

1:14:55.120 --> 1:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>my cheat sheet is available there as well. Also for

1:14:57.560 --> 1:15:00.759
<v Speaker 1>free Family dot Com slash Chart. We'll break down Fantasy

1:15:00.760 --> 1:15:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Football's rushing quarterbacks in a few moments, but first, every

1:15:04.680 --> 1:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>week we give out one sleeper a piece. Now we've

1:15:09.439 --> 1:15:14.879
<v Speaker 1>already used Jalen Samuel's, Curtis Samuel, donte Moncrief, c J Anderson,

1:15:14.920 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller, Latavius Murray, Peyton Barber, Tyler Eifford, Robbie Anderson,

1:15:19.560 --> 1:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Humphries. Let's see who we're going to add.

1:15:22.000 --> 1:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are in previous shows. Let's see you we're gonna

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>add to the list this time, Christian, I'll let you

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>go first. Yeah, I've got I've got Darwin Thompson, who

1:15:30.160 --> 1:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we we touched on earlier in this show. Just a

1:15:32.880 --> 1:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sixth round draft pick. Guy wasn't even invited to the combine.

1:15:36.160 --> 1:15:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Usually that's a bad sign. But if we look at

1:15:38.600 --> 1:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>his pro day measurements and extrapolate those to the people

1:15:42.040 --> 1:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that did participate in the combine, he would have been

1:15:44.280 --> 1:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>third among all running backs in the vertical fifth in

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the broad jump, second in the bench press. He ran

1:15:49.720 --> 1:15:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the forty and four point four seven, which isn't not bad,

1:15:53.720 --> 1:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's fast. Pro Football Focus has a measurement that

1:15:57.360 --> 1:16:00.759
<v Speaker 1>they call Elusive rating where they measure running back. Thompson

1:16:00.880 --> 1:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ranked first among all college backs in that rating. Last year.

1:16:04.479 --> 1:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was Montgomery was first, all right, That's

1:16:06.920 --> 1:16:12.439
<v Speaker 1>what I what I found, right, okay? Um, And so

1:16:12.560 --> 1:16:14.479
<v Speaker 1>physically part of the problem, part of the reason he

1:16:14.560 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fell to the sixth round is because he's all of

1:16:17.439 --> 1:16:22.599
<v Speaker 1>five short, right, So, but he's comparable to to Tarik Cone,

1:16:22.680 --> 1:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay, Matt Brada, who have all had a lot

1:16:24.880 --> 1:16:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of success over the last couple of years. In fact, Lindsay,

1:16:27.680 --> 1:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is a great comparison here. That guy was

1:16:30.240 --> 1:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't get invited to the Combine either undrafted, came from

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere in the preseason, kind of like Thompson is.

1:16:35.840 --> 1:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe in Damian Williams. I think this job

1:16:38.280 --> 1:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be turned over to Darwin Thompson, who's

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>already mixing in with the first team. He's already taking

1:16:43.120 --> 1:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some red zone looks in in training camp. So I

1:16:46.320 --> 1:16:48.479
<v Speaker 1>think this is a potential league winner. And right now

1:16:48.520 --> 1:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you only have to spend an eleventh or twelfth rounder.

1:16:50.439 --> 1:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, who is your sleeper for this week?

1:16:53.200 --> 1:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Real quick? Just attack on? I laugh and anyone just

1:16:56.240 --> 1:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>spills the notion that Thompson can use Sir Williams because

1:16:59.200 --> 1:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a sixth round right, Williams was undrafted, there's no

1:17:03.720 --> 1:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>capital in him. But for Williams Williams defense, there are

1:17:07.360 --> 1:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>character issues and stuff on talent alone, Williams would have

1:17:11.280 --> 1:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely been drafted and probably like day two, so there

1:17:14.960 --> 1:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>was that. And also Williams languished in Miami with the

1:17:18.160 --> 1:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>terrible teams, and you know, Miami's done plenty of had

1:17:20.680 --> 1:17:23.519
<v Speaker 1>plenty of mistakes, so you know, he was never a

1:17:23.600 --> 1:17:26.519
<v Speaker 1>big part of what Miami did. But it takes takes

1:17:26.600 --> 1:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>some people four years to get to get there at

1:17:30.680 --> 1:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the time. Maybe in some cases that's the case. How

1:17:33.040 --> 1:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>come you don't give Lamar Miller the benefit of the

1:17:34.920 --> 1:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>doubt for the years he stunk on two teams. That's

1:17:39.680 --> 1:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>why that Texans line is not good. We've come all right. Well,

1:17:43.360 --> 1:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>my sleeper is not Lamar Miller. Um, it's a guy

1:17:45.760 --> 1:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>who if I were allowed to play in the Crush

1:17:47.760 --> 1:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Charts Championship with the one thousand dollar prize for his

1:17:51.240 --> 1:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>place for free, I would target Matt Stafford, whose bottom

1:17:54.720 --> 1:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>five and pricing on Fanball in week one. By the way,

1:17:57.439 --> 1:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>uh And it really this speaks to maybe the Cam

1:17:59.400 --> 1:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Newton Andrew Luck owners out there who might need a

1:18:01.520 --> 1:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>replacement to come week one. Well, you might have a

1:18:03.840 --> 1:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>solid replacement for the first four weeks. Now, this is

1:18:06.240 --> 1:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a little contradictory, contradictory to your blacklist. Kenny Golladay call

1:18:10.479 --> 1:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>saying Detroit wants to run the ball a lot, and yes,

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they've gone out and said that, but Detroit has also

1:18:14.120 --> 1:18:16.559
<v Speaker 1>wanted to win playoff games or go to the playoffs

1:18:17.560 --> 1:18:21.519
<v Speaker 1>since they've been in existence. That never really came to fruition,

1:18:21.560 --> 1:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe once or twice. But so let's just let's just

1:18:24.200 --> 1:18:26.479
<v Speaker 1>look at the matchups for Stafford on paper. Starting it

1:18:26.600 --> 1:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>at Arizona, who will be without both starting cornerbacks Patrick

1:18:29.680 --> 1:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Peterson and Robert Alfred will miss this game. Great matchup there, UH.

1:18:34.080 --> 1:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>In Week two at home against the Chargers, who just

1:18:36.760 --> 1:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>lost Derwin James, all Pro safety easily the lynchpin of

1:18:40.720 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that secondary, arguably the whole defense, so that's a huge

1:18:44.000 --> 1:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ding for them. Then at Philly, who allowed the second

1:18:47.040 --> 1:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>most passing yards last year, always a pretty good uh

1:18:49.800 --> 1:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup for quarterbacks and wide receivers. And then in Week

1:18:52.240 --> 1:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>four they have Kansas City at home, always shoot out potential.

1:18:55.400 --> 1:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs allowed the fifth most passing touchdowns in the

1:18:57.680 --> 1:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>most passing yards last year. So Matt's Stafford, who really

1:19:01.400 --> 1:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>getting undrafted maybe in one quarterback leagues, could be a

1:19:04.560 --> 1:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>viable plug in play for first four weeks. So I

1:19:07.720 --> 1:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>likes you know, combo there with Stafford and Galada. Yeah,

1:19:13.840 --> 1:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that could be What about this idea? So we talked

1:19:16.040 --> 1:19:18.559
<v Speaker 1>earlier Andrew Luck is now going at a discount because

1:19:18.720 --> 1:19:21.519
<v Speaker 1>so everybody's worried about him, you know, but nobody thinks

1:19:21.520 --> 1:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be available like October. So if he's

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss a handful of games, you could make Matth Stafford,

1:19:27.080 --> 1:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>matth Stafford the last pick of your draft and handcuffed

1:19:30.200 --> 1:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, put those two together and then you know,

1:19:32.080 --> 1:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>go to war. You could there's gonna be soone enticing

1:19:34.680 --> 1:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the eighth round. Though, that's going back to my

1:19:36.439 --> 1:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Luck blacklist call. That's why it depends. It all depends.

1:19:38.880 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's certainly a viable strategy without a doubt.

1:19:41.280 --> 1:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>My sleeper this week is another quarterback, Carson Wentz. A

1:19:44.840 --> 1:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>DP is the tenth round for Carson Wentz. We alluded

1:19:48.400 --> 1:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to this earlier. Look at the plethora of targets available

1:19:52.400 --> 1:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to him. Not only does he have the returning guys

1:19:55.040 --> 1:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>all Sean Jeffrey's very good, Zach Ertz very good, a

1:19:58.960 --> 1:20:02.519
<v Speaker 1>number of receivers, receiving running backs who can all catch passes.

1:20:03.000 --> 1:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We have Dallas Goddard, who has shined in the preseason

1:20:05.640 --> 1:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and as a former first rounder or second rounder for Dallas.

1:20:09.040 --> 1:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Goddard don't quite recall they add in the off season

1:20:12.479 --> 1:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to Sean Jackson for a deep ball threat that Carson

1:20:15.360 --> 1:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Wentz has never had even with the big arm. And

1:20:17.760 --> 1:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>then rookie j j Arthega Whiteside, who looks awesome so far.

1:20:26.640 --> 1:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, by the way, true story. You know

1:20:28.880 --> 1:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're you're teaching your kid all the animals, sounds

1:20:30.840 --> 1:20:34.519
<v Speaker 1>like every parent does, right. You know, Kyle goes right.

1:20:34.800 --> 1:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You know all that shark goes. I did that. I

1:20:37.320 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>taught her shark right. She doesn't have any idea, but

1:20:40.640 --> 1:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I go shark goes dat dot dot dot. She didn't

1:20:45.960 --> 1:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>know what she's doing, but I had a ton of

1:20:47.320 --> 1:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>fun with it. The Eagles have Pro Football focuses number

1:20:51.240 --> 1:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>one offensive line, so you know Wentz is going to

1:20:53.960 --> 1:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be well protected. Remember the last time he was fully

1:20:56.880 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy seen he was charging to the NFL MVP Award

1:21:01.360 --> 1:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and at the time of his his a c L injury,

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was the second highest scoring fantasy quarterback, second highest scoring

1:21:08.160 --> 1:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>fantasy quarterback as a sophomore in the NFL. Now another

1:21:12.479 --> 1:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you're removed from that a c L injury, it's a

1:21:15.120 --> 1:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's an incredibly promising situation for Carson Wentz, who I

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think has the potential to be the NFL m v

1:21:21.400 --> 1:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>P again because I think the Eagles are going to

1:21:23.160 --> 1:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be a fantastic team. ADP tenth round for Carson Wentz.

1:21:28.200 --> 1:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried at all about the back the back

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>injury that knocked him out last year? And and and

1:21:33.240 --> 1:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I find it a little worrisome that they're not playing

1:21:36.840 --> 1:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>them at all in the preseason like this. This is

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a young guy in the prime of his career and

1:21:41.240 --> 1:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they're already having him. Are they so worried starters? The

1:21:48.800 --> 1:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Raiders aren't playing their starters for Pete's sake. I don't

1:21:51.840 --> 1:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think that says anything about his health or ability. To

1:21:54.400 --> 1:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be honest, and you touched on it earlier, CP. You're

1:21:57.720 --> 1:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to guess week in and week out, week out,

1:22:00.040 --> 1:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be the hot Philly receiver. Who's going

1:22:02.760 --> 1:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to succeed with all of those targets just draft I

1:22:06.840 --> 1:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. I don't care who's catching the ball.

1:22:08.960 --> 1:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>All I know all I got is the trigger man. Now, um,

1:22:12.400 --> 1:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we've heard Brian Johnson in previous weeks make the same

1:22:15.080 --> 1:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the same argument for Jared Goff. I don't have to

1:22:18.320 --> 1:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>guess if it's gonna be Woods or Cook or or Cup.

1:22:22.720 --> 1:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>What got Jared Goff? You don't have to worry about it.

1:22:24.640 --> 1:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>That's part of why I love Carson Wentz. Let's talk

1:22:27.360 --> 1:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about So there's your three sleepers for this week. Let's

1:22:29.880 --> 1:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about rushing quarterbacks. I've done a lot of a

1:22:34.000 --> 1:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of analysis on the Russia. It's the deepest year

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>ever for rushing quarterbacks. There are so many right now,

1:22:40.120 --> 1:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're so game changing. I've identified eight returning quarterbacks

1:22:45.400 --> 1:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>who I qualify as a rushing quarterback. Here's kind of

1:22:49.640 --> 1:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>my criteria. The average at least twenty four rushing yards

1:22:52.439 --> 1:22:56.519
<v Speaker 1>per game, half a touchdown most leagues point wise. Yeah,

1:22:56.560 --> 1:23:01.519
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Um. Or you're Dak Prescott who got nineteen

1:23:01.640 --> 1:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game but also ran in six touchdowns,

1:23:04.120 --> 1:23:06.519
<v Speaker 1>So I'm lumping him in there too, um, and I'm

1:23:06.600 --> 1:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>throwing out Blake Bortles. That gives me my eight guys

1:23:09.720 --> 1:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>who are now Dak Prescott. Do I mentioned Russell Wilson,

1:23:13.720 --> 1:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota, Mitch Rubisky, Deshaun Watson, Cam Newton, Josh Allen,

1:23:19.240 --> 1:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and then by a huge margin, Lamar Jackson, who's get

1:23:22.040 --> 1:23:23.759
<v Speaker 1>off the charts on the rush. I'm a little surprised

1:23:23.800 --> 1:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Mariota made that list. I didn't either, but he was.

1:23:27.560 --> 1:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>He was in the he was in the ballpark for

1:23:29.560 --> 1:23:32.599
<v Speaker 1>this um. And then the rookie class adds another guy

1:23:32.720 --> 1:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure, Kyler Murray absolutely in right, potentially on a

1:23:36.160 --> 1:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson like level. Correct, yes, he's on a Vic

1:23:40.160 --> 1:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Jackson like potential for his rushing ability. So that gives

1:23:44.439 --> 1:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>us nine. And I got nine rushing quarterbacks in here,

1:23:47.080 --> 1:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, let's throw out Barrio because not

1:23:48.960 --> 1:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>even want him. I think he's the first quarterback to

1:23:50.479 --> 1:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>get bench. Let's go back and eight eight rushing quarterbacks

1:23:53.680 --> 1:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in your draft. Why does rushing matter? Those eight players?

1:23:58.080 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Last year, none of them ranked lower than fourteenth, and

1:24:01.479 --> 1:24:05.559
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points per game, none of the eight ranked lower

1:24:05.600 --> 1:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>than fourteen. Yet an average draft position today, five of

1:24:10.840 --> 1:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>them are more than fourteen, and as a group, their

1:24:14.720 --> 1:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>average rank in Fantasy points last year was eight. As

1:24:17.920 --> 1:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a group, those eight guys, they averaged QB eight This

1:24:21.479 --> 1:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>year on average, they're going at QB fourteen in drafts

1:24:25.240 --> 1:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. There's so much value in these rushing quarterbacks

1:24:28.720 --> 1:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and people aren't recognizing it. And we're here to talk

1:24:30.960 --> 1:24:34.519
<v Speaker 1>about that delta that people are missing between the the

1:24:34.920 --> 1:24:38.599
<v Speaker 1>production we had last year and where they're being drafted now. Well,

1:24:38.640 --> 1:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I thank you obviously, Lamar Jackson and Josh Allen. Allen

1:24:41.439 --> 1:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pump up those numbers for the rushing quarterbacks. Those guys

1:24:43.800 --> 1:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't see significant playing time until the second half of

1:24:46.160 --> 1:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the season. To so imagine that season would be absolutely

1:24:51.080 --> 1:24:54.799
<v Speaker 1>from some examples of great value coming for these players.

1:24:55.160 --> 1:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson right now is QB fifteen, Dak Prescott is

1:24:59.479 --> 1:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>QB eight, team, Mitch Trubisky's QB twenty, and Josh Allen

1:25:03.280 --> 1:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is QB twenty three off the board right now. An

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>average draft position, you know, pure passing quarterbacks need to

1:25:10.240 --> 1:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>have super human performances to equal what a top rushing

1:25:15.600 --> 1:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback will give you when they run just reasonably

1:25:19.560 --> 1:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>well that's it. You know, mahomes can give you those

1:25:22.840 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>superhuman efforts, but most guys can't. Let's take a look

1:25:25.200 --> 1:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at it, and here's why. Let's say your quarterback runs

1:25:27.800 --> 1:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>for forty rushing yards, it's a reasonable amount and wouldn't

1:25:30.760 --> 1:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>shock anybody, right. In most leagues, that's the equivalent of

1:25:34.240 --> 1:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred twenty passing yards a multiple of three passing yards.

1:25:39.080 --> 1:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>That means those forty rushing yards would turn a two

1:25:42.400 --> 1:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty yard passing day into a three forty yard

1:25:47.800 --> 1:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>passing day with the rushing numbers as an example. So

1:25:52.040 --> 1:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>your rushing quarterback, you know, pick a guy Dak Prescott.

1:25:55.200 --> 1:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>If he runs for forty and he throws for two twenty,

1:25:57.920 --> 1:26:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the equivalent of three or forty passing yards, and

1:26:00.240 --> 1:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a great day by any measure. A rushing touchdowns

1:26:03.520 --> 1:26:05.759
<v Speaker 1>worth one and a half passing touchdowns in most scoring

1:26:05.800 --> 1:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>systems roughly, So that means you're forgettable. One passing touchdown

1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>game turns into a nearly three or one passing or

1:26:12.280 --> 1:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>one rushing touch you're forgettable. One passing touchdown game turns

1:26:15.760 --> 1:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>into a nearly three passing touchdown game if you also

1:26:18.160 --> 1:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>have a rushing touchdown, a one passing games, a one

1:26:20.520 --> 1:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>watching game. So you roll that together and you just

1:26:24.360 --> 1:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>got freaky upside, freaking upside. Now, the downside with the

1:26:27.840 --> 1:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing quarterbacks, if they don't run, they don't rush for

1:26:30.760 --> 1:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the forty inconsistent. Now you're in trouble. Right. So if

1:26:34.960 --> 1:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you get the two yard passing game and the one

1:26:38.040 --> 1:26:41.599
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass and they don't run in and anything meaningful,

1:26:42.320 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>now you've got that. Part of the problem is it's

1:26:44.479 --> 1:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>very hard to predict that. So I say this as

1:26:47.400 --> 1:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a longtime owner of Cam Newton over many many years, like,

1:26:50.840 --> 1:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You can't get into a situation where you're

1:26:52.880 --> 1:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to predict it and you're benching them or starting

1:26:54.760 --> 1:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>them based on matchups because you never know when they're

1:26:56.840 --> 1:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>going to go off for two rushing touchdowns, and so

1:26:59.439 --> 1:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to be willing to just

1:27:01.080 --> 1:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of stick them in your lineup and take take

1:27:03.360 --> 1:27:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the good with the bad. That's right. We visited, revisited

1:27:06.520 --> 1:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the freakiest upside of a rushing quarterback in Michael Vick

1:27:09.640 --> 1:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the game when he's with the Eagles, and I'll

1:27:13.280 --> 1:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>never forget that game. Three thirty and four through the

1:27:16.080 --> 1:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>air and like eight yards and two touchdowns on the ground. Unbelievable.

1:27:19.280 --> 1:27:22.559
<v Speaker 1>The best, the best fantasy performance by I think any

1:27:22.640 --> 1:27:25.599
<v Speaker 1>player ever history of fantasy was that way. It's up there.

1:27:25.800 --> 1:27:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Now here's one of the strategies I love. In two

1:27:30.560 --> 1:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leagues or QB flex leagues, you draft two rushing quarterbacks.

1:27:35.280 --> 1:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>We talked about how you can get Lamar Jackson late

1:27:37.640 --> 1:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and Mitch Drabinsky and Dak Prescott and Josh Allen late.

1:27:40.720 --> 1:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You put two of them in knowing that the likelihood

1:27:43.600 --> 1:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that they both flop in the same week is very low,

1:27:47.160 --> 1:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and what they both give you the freaky upside. So

1:27:50.840 --> 1:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of that? What do you think

1:27:52.080 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of that strategy? And QB flex do you take two

1:27:55.040 --> 1:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of the rushing quarterbacks. You don't have to spend it.

1:27:58.160 --> 1:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You're mitigating your risk a little bit there, and so

1:28:00.920 --> 1:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you're more likely to go into a season where

1:28:03.120 --> 1:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you have you have multiple of these sort of up

1:28:06.160 --> 1:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and down risky Russian quarterbacks because you can just play

1:28:08.760 --> 1:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>them both all the time. You can play them both

1:28:10.439 --> 1:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's the that's the beauty of it. You don't

1:28:12.800 --> 1:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have to guess if this is going to be the

1:28:14.240 --> 1:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>game where Josh Allen, you know, ends up scrambling out

1:28:16.960 --> 1:28:20.599
<v Speaker 1>of a pocket and running down field. And by the way,

1:28:20.680 --> 1:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to your earlier point about Mahomes, it's kind of fun

1:28:23.479 --> 1:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>to have Lamar Jackson and you know that you might

1:28:25.720 --> 1:28:28.559
<v Speaker 1>break a fifty yard touchdown run at at any moment

1:28:28.600 --> 1:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in time. That's a great point, a great point um.

1:28:31.760 --> 1:28:33.519
<v Speaker 1>If you love this show, go to famible dot com

1:28:33.600 --> 1:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>slash charts for my free cheet chet, my free five

1:28:36.400 --> 1:28:39.519
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar week one contest, ski team leads podcasts, and more.

1:28:39.720 --> 1:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And thank you for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. We

1:28:42.200 --> 1:28:45.519
<v Speaker 1>are here every weekend, both on the air and via podcast.

1:28:45.640 --> 1:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>We especially recommend that you listened by the I Part app.

1:28:48.600 --> 1:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's number one for podcasts for a very good reason,

1:28:51.560 --> 1:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and many thanks to everyone who takes the time to

1:28:54.080 --> 1:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>rank and review the show on your podcasting platform of choice.

1:28:57.760 --> 1:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. To pluck

1:29:00.200 --> 1:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you next week, Everybody,