1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:32,319 Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well, 7 00:00:32,360 --> 00:00:36,760 Speaker 1: today we got housing starts data that was kind of mixed. Frankly, 8 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 1: we saw an increase in the number of housing starts 9 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: UH to housing starts the fast pace in about decade, 10 00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:47,919 Speaker 1: but the number of applications for permits declined. Joining us 11 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:50,720 Speaker 1: now to talk about the state of the US housing 12 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 1: market is Aaron Terrazas. He is a Zillo Xenior Senior 13 00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 1: Economist Zillo Senior Economists. UM, thank you so much for 14 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 1: being here. Aaron, So, whoops your take on this sort 15 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 1: of mixed data. You're right, it was a mixed report, 16 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:06,440 Speaker 1: but I think there was good news and that we 17 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:09,840 Speaker 1: are seeing a single family starts steadily rebound. There there 18 00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 1: nowhere near what we would expect at this point in 19 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:14,920 Speaker 1: the business cycle. Multi family starts have actually been a 20 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:19,200 Speaker 1: bright spot. Um. Those apartments five plus unit buildings UM. 21 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:21,399 Speaker 1: They dropped a little bit in twenty seventeen, but have 22 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:26,280 Speaker 1: been up over the past year unexpectedly, still strong. What 23 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: accounts for that strength up seven and a half percent? 24 00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 1: That's right, you know, I think there's a couple of 25 00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:35,399 Speaker 1: factors driving that strength UM. First, as rent affordability really 26 00:01:35,400 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: began to deteriorate two or three years ago, UH cities, 27 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:42,360 Speaker 1: particularly high press high price cities, began to invest in 28 00:01:42,440 --> 00:01:46,040 Speaker 1: easing the regulatory process UM, and now to three years later, 29 00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 1: we're starting to see the fruit of that kind of 30 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:52,520 Speaker 1: regulatory easing. Really, although I thought that the big gains 31 00:01:52,520 --> 00:01:55,480 Speaker 1: were really in the Midwest and some cities where perhaps 32 00:01:55,520 --> 00:01:57,440 Speaker 1: that wasn't as much of an issue. You're right, So 33 00:01:57,440 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: so the Midwest has seen the most recent month and 34 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:01,400 Speaker 1: month gains, but you're looking over the past year, kind 35 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:04,440 Speaker 1: of the West and the Northeast have still seen strong 36 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:08,040 Speaker 1: multifamily starts. Have you seen any effects because of the 37 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:12,120 Speaker 1: rise and lumber prices, tariffs on imported lumber from Canada, 38 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:15,040 Speaker 1: for example, You're right. In the single family space, the 39 00:02:15,240 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 1: single family construction in particular, tariffs and and kind of 40 00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:22,600 Speaker 1: recent trade actions have increased costs for builders. I heard 41 00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:25,359 Speaker 1: an estimate of about nine thousand dollars at home, right, 42 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:27,560 Speaker 1: so that's kind of in line my estimates attend to 43 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 1: fifteen tho dollars for your median new home. UM. That adds, 44 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:33,679 Speaker 1: but it's important remember it's not just softwood. Softwood is 45 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 1: the biggest particular component that's been tariffed, but things like cedar, 46 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:41,840 Speaker 1: shingles um have also kind of received teriffs. UM, Things 47 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:44,800 Speaker 1: like aluminum and and still are about three percent of 48 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:47,400 Speaker 1: the diciplical costs of your single family home, not too 49 00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 1: much of consumer appliances like washing machines and dishwashers. So, 50 00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 1: you know, just to pick up on on that that 51 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 1: important point. The cost of the actual materials has been increasing, 52 00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:57,359 Speaker 1: but so have the costs of the labor because there's 53 00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: been a real shortage there. How much has that contributed 54 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:03,400 Speaker 1: to an increase in home prices as well? You're right 55 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:05,840 Speaker 1: number two of the rising cost the headwinds and builders 56 00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: are facing. Residential construction wages are up five percent over 57 00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:12,120 Speaker 1: the past year compared to a liver two percent for 58 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:14,959 Speaker 1: overall wages. We're seeing double the pace of wage growth 59 00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 1: in in kind of for those residential construction workers. That's 60 00:03:17,919 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 1: a clear sign of any that that builders are facing 61 00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 1: labor shortages. So at what point will these increased costs 62 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,239 Speaker 1: materially slow housing starts. I'm not sure they're gonna they're 63 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,720 Speaker 1: slow housing starts. What they are doing is they're pushing 64 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:32,680 Speaker 1: up UM, the price point that that builders are targeting. 65 00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 1: So you know, we are seeing that that median price 66 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 1: point of new construction rise UM and UM and you know, 67 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:41,640 Speaker 1: and kind of a little bit of is that is 68 00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:43,880 Speaker 1: what we're not seeing I said before at this point 69 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 1: in the business cycle, we should be seeing more housing starts. Okay, 70 00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 1: this is what confuses me. The biggest earth of housing 71 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 1: right now is sort of smaller starter homes. It's the 72 00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:55,360 Speaker 1: affordable homes that people want to buy. If you have 73 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: builders basically having a disincentive to go out and buy 74 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: and and create these homes, you know, is there enough 75 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:03,880 Speaker 1: of a market at the high end, first of all, 76 00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 1: to absorb what the builders want to build and can 77 00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:09,480 Speaker 1: they afford to build what is actually needed? I think 78 00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:11,880 Speaker 1: builders builders have that that same concern that that's one 79 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:14,280 Speaker 1: of the reasons there the remaining cautious If you look 80 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:18,040 Speaker 1: at UM new home sales, about a third of new 81 00:04:18,080 --> 00:04:21,920 Speaker 1: homes are sold before they even started. That's up from 82 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:25,880 Speaker 1: historically about means builders are offloading this risk that they're 83 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:28,479 Speaker 1: carrying UM rather than wait for a couple of months 84 00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:31,799 Speaker 1: of appreciation while construction finishes. I think kind of builders 85 00:04:31,800 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 1: today are do have that scars of what happened a 86 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:37,479 Speaker 1: decade ago and are being conservative UM, not wanting to 87 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:40,719 Speaker 1: overbuild UM. They know there's demand at that more affordable 88 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:43,240 Speaker 1: price point. The math doesn't work out for them there 89 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:47,320 Speaker 1: new home sales. Just to get more color on that topic, 90 00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 1: what's your outlook? So our outlook new home sales data 91 00:04:50,920 --> 00:04:54,640 Speaker 1: will release next week. Are our forecast suggests? I think 92 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:57,280 Speaker 1: a small decline. You know there is some month to 93 00:04:57,320 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 1: month volatility in that series. I think the more important 94 00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:02,520 Speaker 1: point that I'm looking at um next week next week's 95 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:05,919 Speaker 1: data is that that medium price point. Last month in 96 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:08,440 Speaker 1: the provisional April data, we saw a big drop in 97 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:10,480 Speaker 1: that medium price point. I think that's gonna be revised upward. 98 00:05:10,839 --> 00:05:12,600 Speaker 1: One thing that really struck me there was a story 99 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg Today looking at a Harvard study that 100 00:05:15,680 --> 00:05:18,640 Speaker 1: found that US homes are a lot cheaper than they look. 101 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:22,400 Speaker 1: And they looked at an inflation adjusted basis, The monthly 102 00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:24,920 Speaker 1: payments that people are making now in their homes are 103 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:28,600 Speaker 1: actually blow what they would be in seven This is 104 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 1: all thanks to low interest rates. So you know how 105 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:36,680 Speaker 1: much does that factor into people's equations right now? Lock 106 00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 1: in the low interest rates while they are where they are, 107 00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:41,480 Speaker 1: and that will actually mean a cheaper home now, even 108 00:05:41,480 --> 00:05:44,640 Speaker 1: if prices are pretty high. Nation Wide, home affordability looks 109 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:46,920 Speaker 1: great right now. You know it's it's in the low twenties. 110 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:50,680 Speaker 1: Your your your your typical mortgaged income ratio. So much 111 00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 1: of that is driven by interest rates. As interest rates rise, 112 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 1: that's gonna kind of push that in abruptard. But you know, 113 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:58,359 Speaker 1: if you look at that historical average share of income 114 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:01,239 Speaker 1: that goes to a mortgage, that's that's assuming an average 115 00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 1: historical mortgage rate of eight percent. I'm not sure that 116 00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:06,320 Speaker 1: mortgage rates are going to get up to eight percent, 117 00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:09,599 Speaker 1: even at their highest point the cycle. Just to go 118 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:13,599 Speaker 1: back to this idea of rent affordability, looking at specific 119 00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 1: cities where it is affordable to rent, Pittsburgh number one. St. Louis, 120 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:23,479 Speaker 1: number two, Oklahoma City, followed by Raleigh, Birmingham, and so on. 121 00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:26,159 Speaker 1: What do you see in terms of any trends for 122 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:28,800 Speaker 1: big cities. Yeah, so so. Rent affordability is almost the 123 00:06:28,800 --> 00:06:31,599 Speaker 1: opposite of the mortgage affordability story. It is at historic 124 00:06:31,680 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 1: highs um particularly in in those high priced cities. In 125 00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:36,919 Speaker 1: a place like San Francisco, l A. People are spending 126 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 1: kind of almost fifty of their income on rent. That's 127 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: at the median for a bottom a bottom third renter, 128 00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 1: kind of renting a bottom foot house. It's it's which 129 00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:49,040 Speaker 1: is just just not realistic, But you're right. Kind of 130 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: there are kind of those more affordable cities, um where 131 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: there has been more supply and you know, more importantly 132 00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:57,919 Speaker 1: kind of less demanding that rental market because it is 133 00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:01,239 Speaker 1: still affordable to buy in places like like Lahoma City. Um, 134 00:07:01,279 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: you know, people in those markets tend to buy as 135 00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:05,560 Speaker 1: soon as they can. Thanks very much for being with us. 136 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:10,600 Speaker 1: Aaron Rossis, he is the senior economist for ZELLO, talking 137 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: about new housing starts and the housing market. China is 138 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:33,480 Speaker 1: planning to act quote forcefully on Trump's two hundred billion 139 00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 1: dollar tariff threat. President Trump's administration is drawing up a 140 00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: list of perhaps new tariffs to impose on China to 141 00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:46,000 Speaker 1: retaliate for the retaliation to the retaliation to the retaliation. 142 00:07:46,200 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 1: Here we are in this cycle, and here to explain 143 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:50,360 Speaker 1: to us how to strip out what we should be 144 00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:53,920 Speaker 1: paying attention to from the noise. Patrick Chauvinik Chavannic. He 145 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 1: is chief strategist of Silver Silver Crust Asset Management. Patrick, 146 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,960 Speaker 1: you know, when you talk to a lot of traders, 147 00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: they say, there's a lot of noise, there's a lot 148 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:11,680 Speaker 1: of threats, but the actual economic impact so far is 149 00:08:12,040 --> 00:08:16,920 Speaker 1: fairly minimal. At what point should people take up their 150 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:19,600 Speaker 1: their pens and say, wait a seconds, something here is 151 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 1: vastly different. So there is a steady march from words 152 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: to actions, and we are starting to see more and 153 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:32,600 Speaker 1: more of these words translated into actions. Um, it's incremental, 154 00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:37,240 Speaker 1: You're right, Um, but UH, you know, I look at it. 155 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 1: There there two sets of effects. There's the short term 156 00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:44,839 Speaker 1: effects UM that may affect uh this market cycle or 157 00:08:45,559 --> 00:08:48,880 Speaker 1: how stocks perform in the near future, and that is 158 00:08:49,160 --> 00:08:55,120 Speaker 1: UH the potential impact of of inflationary shock from more 159 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:59,000 Speaker 1: expensive inputs like from steel. UH. And then also the 160 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:04,560 Speaker 1: retaliatory impacts measures that are meant to target specific companies 161 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:07,320 Speaker 1: or specific industries in the United States and hit their earnings. 162 00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 1: But there's also a longer term impact, which is the 163 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 1: erosion and the undermining of these trade rules, which, however 164 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 1: imperfect that they may be, have created a lot of opportunity, 165 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,760 Speaker 1: not just for American companies but from for companies around 166 00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:22,160 Speaker 1: the world. And you know, there's something going on right 167 00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:24,880 Speaker 1: now at w t O where the United States is 168 00:09:25,280 --> 00:09:30,440 Speaker 1: refusing to allow new judges to take up their roles 169 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 1: at w t O, and very soon we're gonna get 170 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:35,439 Speaker 1: down to where there's only three judges, which is the 171 00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:38,679 Speaker 1: minimum required um to have any kind of ruling, and 172 00:09:38,760 --> 00:09:40,480 Speaker 1: then we'll go to two and they won't be able 173 00:09:40,520 --> 00:09:43,560 Speaker 1: to rule on anything. So you have countries like Canada 174 00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:46,640 Speaker 1: or your European Union who say, well, we don't like 175 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 1: what the U s is doing, we're gonna take it 176 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:50,839 Speaker 1: to w t OH. If they can't take it to 177 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:53,640 Speaker 1: w t O because the US is blocking that, they're 178 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:59,160 Speaker 1: going to be adopting more unilateral actions. And this what 179 00:09:59,520 --> 00:10:01,640 Speaker 1: we're seeing here is a situation where the temperature just 180 00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:05,840 Speaker 1: keeps rising and rising and rising, and the actual economic 181 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:10,480 Speaker 1: impacts start to accumulate. Patrick. Let's say you get a 182 00:10:10,559 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 1: call from a client and they say, look, you know 183 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:20,240 Speaker 1: you taught at a university in Beijing, shin Khua University. Also, 184 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:24,880 Speaker 1: you've worked in private equity. You worked for John Bayner 185 00:10:25,040 --> 00:10:30,400 Speaker 1: because you've got a political acumen there, and you also 186 00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:35,440 Speaker 1: have worked in public policy. Where do we put our 187 00:10:35,480 --> 00:10:38,199 Speaker 1: money today? How can we take advantage of people following 188 00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:41,680 Speaker 1: headlines going in one direction? Maybe that's a head fake. 189 00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:44,599 Speaker 1: Let's assume that that's how we see it. Where do 190 00:10:44,679 --> 00:10:48,080 Speaker 1: you put your money? If you bet that the demographics 191 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:52,679 Speaker 1: of emerging markets, particularly in Asia can be your friend. Okay, well, 192 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:55,599 Speaker 1: you raise a bigger question about sort of globally, you 193 00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:57,319 Speaker 1: know where growth is going to come from. Let me 194 00:10:57,520 --> 00:11:00,679 Speaker 1: let me answer the immediate question that that people are 195 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:05,439 Speaker 1: asking me about about all this kind of trade headlines. 196 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:08,360 Speaker 1: And the thing that I've been saying is, look, there 197 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 1: are there We're already seeing in markets, um a disparity 198 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:16,240 Speaker 1: and performance between the smaller caps and more technology focus 199 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:20,199 Speaker 1: firms which are not exposed to uh these sort of 200 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 1: trade disputes, and the larger caps. Many people ask me, 201 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:27,640 Speaker 1: they say, when is when are these trade issues going 202 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 1: to start affecting the markets? I'd say they've affected the 203 00:11:30,200 --> 00:11:34,520 Speaker 1: markets throughout the year. We've had excellent economic numbers. Um, 204 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:37,440 Speaker 1: we had a great earning season. In the first quarter, 205 00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:42,920 Speaker 1: we had six in May we had retail sales were 206 00:11:42,960 --> 00:11:46,559 Speaker 1: up six percent year on year. And and in the 207 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:49,520 Speaker 1: face of all this though, we've got flat markets, particularly 208 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,040 Speaker 1: in large caps. So you're making the argument of small 209 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 1: caps versus large caps, and the small caps have outperformed 210 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:58,040 Speaker 1: by more than twice the large caps. The question is, 211 00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:02,240 Speaker 1: and a lot of people will argue this is uh messy, 212 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:05,800 Speaker 1: a messy analogy, and that you know, small caps will 213 00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:09,360 Speaker 1: eventually feel the brunt of any economic downdraft that the 214 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:13,800 Speaker 1: large caps are reflecting. Yes, so, so there are the 215 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:17,400 Speaker 1: broader concerns that you know, if we have inflationary pressure rising, 216 00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:20,559 Speaker 1: if we have retaliation that doesn't just target a few 217 00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:23,960 Speaker 1: companies that actually has a broader economic impact, everyone's going 218 00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:26,880 Speaker 1: to feel that. But for the moment, right there is 219 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 1: that disparity between We can't ignore the good economic news. 220 00:12:30,160 --> 00:12:33,000 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm as alarmed at the headlines and the 221 00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:36,559 Speaker 1: potential impact that they might have as anyone else, But 222 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:41,120 Speaker 1: I also look at numbers that the market on a 223 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:43,599 Speaker 1: bad day like this tends to ignore, which is that 224 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:47,959 Speaker 1: retail sales up six per year on year expectations of 225 00:12:48,080 --> 00:12:50,959 Speaker 1: three to anywhere from three to five GDP growth in 226 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:54,079 Speaker 1: the second quarter, and you can't ignore that either. So 227 00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:55,959 Speaker 1: where are you going to pick up? Where are you 228 00:12:56,000 --> 00:12:58,760 Speaker 1: going to maximize your exposure to that good news and 229 00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 1: minimize your exposure your to those potential risks. So you're 230 00:13:02,160 --> 00:13:05,400 Speaker 1: buying small caps on a day like today, Uh? I 231 00:13:05,480 --> 00:13:08,559 Speaker 1: would I mean, we manage whole portfolios. So what I 232 00:13:08,600 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 1: would say is you want to have that in mind 233 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:14,439 Speaker 1: when you're thinking about your asset allocation. All right, I 234 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:16,400 Speaker 1: do want to get a sense of your take on 235 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:19,280 Speaker 1: China strategy here, giving your intimate knowledge with the Chinese 236 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:22,200 Speaker 1: government and how they approach things, it seems as if 237 00:13:22,320 --> 00:13:26,960 Speaker 1: there is a very deliberate targeting of areas that voted 238 00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:30,839 Speaker 1: for President Trump. This is the sort of farm belt, uh, 239 00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:33,640 Speaker 1: and sort of the steel country. This is where you're 240 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 1: seeing the tariffs. Put first, Does this matter to markets 241 00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:40,160 Speaker 1: or in other words, this definitely has sort of political 242 00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:43,400 Speaker 1: overtones with respect to what the midterm elections might look like. 243 00:13:43,559 --> 00:13:46,840 Speaker 1: If China is effective, does it? Do you care from 244 00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:50,800 Speaker 1: a market perspective? Sure, because you know it's it's not 245 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:52,800 Speaker 1: a stock market, it's a market of stocks, and so 246 00:13:52,920 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 1: you want to be aware that these retaliatory measures are 247 00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:00,959 Speaker 1: going to be targeted at specific company some specific industries. 248 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: And it's not just China, by the way, uh it 249 00:14:03,400 --> 00:14:07,680 Speaker 1: is also the EU, Canada, Mexico. They're all crafting their 250 00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:12,160 Speaker 1: retaliatory strategies to try to maximize the political lever. So, 251 00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:16,920 Speaker 1: for instance, Mexico is putting a big tariff on cheese 252 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,640 Speaker 1: exports from the United States, about four million dollars worth. 253 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:24,720 Speaker 1: So if you're an investor, you have to, you know, 254 00:14:24,880 --> 00:14:28,160 Speaker 1: go bullow this. We're not passive investors, were active investors, 255 00:14:28,240 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 1: So we're not looking at the index. We're not just 256 00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:33,600 Speaker 1: looking at how the market overall is doing. We want 257 00:14:33,600 --> 00:14:36,480 Speaker 1: to go and look at specific companies, specific industries and 258 00:14:36,600 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 1: what their exposure is to these kinds of risks. Give 259 00:14:40,360 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 1: you twenty seconds, if you could get on a plane 260 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:45,520 Speaker 1: and go anywhere to go investigate a potential investment in 261 00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:49,560 Speaker 1: an emerging economy, where would it be? I go everywhere 262 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:53,560 Speaker 1: all the time. I just got you get to go 263 00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:57,160 Speaker 1: once in Europe, Eastern Europe. Most most interesting me. That 264 00:14:57,200 --> 00:15:00,400 Speaker 1: doesn't mean that I'm bullish on it. I just it's 265 00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 1: I'm most curious about it all right, Well done, thanks 266 00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:06,960 Speaker 1: very much for being with us. UH. Patrick Chavannic. He 267 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:11,640 Speaker 1: is managing Director, Chief a Strategist of Silvercrest Asset Management 268 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 1: and you can follow him on Twitter at p R Shelvanic. 269 00:15:16,800 --> 00:15:36,840 Speaker 1: That's h O V A n EC Right now. I 270 00:15:36,920 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 1: am very excited that we have David Carrington with us. 271 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:43,480 Speaker 1: He is Jefferson County Commissioner UH and he joins us 272 00:15:43,520 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 1: here in our eleven three oh studios. David, I want 273 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:50,320 Speaker 1: to start with a little trip down memory lane. Jefferson 274 00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:53,440 Speaker 1: County is known in the bond world for its two 275 00:15:53,520 --> 00:15:55,880 Speaker 1: thousand and eleven bankruptcy, one of the biggest in the 276 00:15:55,920 --> 00:16:00,200 Speaker 1: minicipal bond markets history in the US. I'm wonder rink 277 00:16:00,280 --> 00:16:03,480 Speaker 1: today as we see some of the struggles with Illinois 278 00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:07,880 Speaker 1: and Connecticut, would you recommend that they go down the 279 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:12,640 Speaker 1: same path that Jefferson County ultimately had to pursue. Well, 280 00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:15,560 Speaker 1: it's surely a last resort. It's not something that you 281 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 1: want to do flippantly. UM. I continue to say that 282 00:16:20,120 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 1: after a year in negotiations, we had three gallons of 283 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:24,600 Speaker 1: water and a one gallon bucket, and it didn't look 284 00:16:24,640 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 1: like we were going to go a larger bucket, and 285 00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:30,000 Speaker 1: we couldn't reduce the water, so we had to do it. UM. 286 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:35,880 Speaker 1: The financial situation was one that was apparently unsolvable. With 287 00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:42,240 Speaker 1: that said, before I municipality entertains Chapter nine bankruptcy, they 288 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:45,920 Speaker 1: have to first seriously try to negotiate their way out. 289 00:16:46,600 --> 00:16:49,040 Speaker 1: They need to recognize it's very costly. In our case, 290 00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:52,200 Speaker 1: it was a million dollars a month. We were projecting 291 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:55,040 Speaker 1: thirty six to forty eight months. It actually we were 292 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:58,360 Speaker 1: able to exit in twenty five months. You have to 293 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:01,920 Speaker 1: be sure that the elected officials have the political will 294 00:17:02,120 --> 00:17:04,560 Speaker 1: to make the decisions that have to be made in 295 00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 1: order to restructure UM the organization, and so UM I 296 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: would not recommend a community do this unless they have 297 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:18,280 Speaker 1: an elected UH a group of commissioners or counselors or 298 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:23,280 Speaker 1: senators that are willing to take the political heat. I 299 00:17:23,400 --> 00:17:27,040 Speaker 1: was told UH that if I UH file for Chapter 300 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:30,920 Speaker 1: nine bankruptcy, my political career would be toast. And my 301 00:17:31,040 --> 00:17:34,680 Speaker 1: answer to that was, I didn't run to get re elected. 302 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:37,480 Speaker 1: I ran to fix the problem. So you almost have 303 00:17:37,640 --> 00:17:40,560 Speaker 1: to have a mindset that this is UH something that 304 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 1: you don't want to do, but you have to do 305 00:17:43,040 --> 00:17:46,879 Speaker 1: in order to make the community sustainable going forward, and 306 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:50,040 Speaker 1: just a quickly side of recap. In Jefferson County, Alabama, 307 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:53,440 Speaker 1: this goes back to there was a consent decree having 308 00:17:53,520 --> 00:17:56,680 Speaker 1: to do with the city sewer systems. They needed to 309 00:17:56,760 --> 00:18:01,120 Speaker 1: finance the revamp of the sewer system. They issued. Then 310 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:05,200 Speaker 1: it got really bad and there were lawsuits and several 311 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 1: people went to jail, and it was none of which 312 00:18:08,600 --> 00:18:10,879 Speaker 1: you are associated. And that's that's true. The day I 313 00:18:10,960 --> 00:18:14,760 Speaker 1: walked in the office was November the tenth of two ten. 314 00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 1: We had three point two billion of sewer deet in default. 315 00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:20,320 Speaker 1: We had a sewer receiver appointed by the court, so 316 00:18:20,320 --> 00:18:22,480 Speaker 1: that was gonna double rates and then double them again 317 00:18:22,800 --> 00:18:26,040 Speaker 1: or g that was in default. Our audits were three 318 00:18:26,119 --> 00:18:29,359 Speaker 1: years past due. We had an indigent care hospital losing 319 00:18:29,440 --> 00:18:31,680 Speaker 1: ten to fifteen million dollars a year, a county home 320 00:18:31,760 --> 00:18:34,240 Speaker 1: losing two to three million dollars a year. So to 321 00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:36,600 Speaker 1: say it was a mass is sort of an understatement. 322 00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:39,399 Speaker 1: And uh then on our twenty second day in office, 323 00:18:40,119 --> 00:18:43,399 Speaker 1: a circuit court judge ruled that a tax that had 324 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,320 Speaker 1: been passed for the county's general fund was passed illegally 325 00:18:46,359 --> 00:18:49,920 Speaker 1: by the state legislature, and we lost twenty of our revenue. 326 00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:52,960 Speaker 1: So that was our twenty second day. And then on 327 00:18:53,040 --> 00:18:55,159 Speaker 1: the last day of our first year in office, we 328 00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:58,719 Speaker 1: followed what was at the time the largest municipal bankruptcy 329 00:18:58,760 --> 00:19:02,479 Speaker 1: in US history. A year or two later, Detroit rallied 330 00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:05,280 Speaker 1: and surpassed us. And I've always been thankful for Detroit 331 00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:09,600 Speaker 1: for doing that. I'm sure that UH Detroit says you're welcome. 332 00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:11,720 Speaker 1: I want to switch gears a little bit because fast 333 00:19:11,720 --> 00:19:15,879 Speaker 1: forwards today and Birmingham is actually attracting some businesses from 334 00:19:15,960 --> 00:19:20,040 Speaker 1: places like New York and UH, New Jersey and Connecticut 335 00:19:20,080 --> 00:19:23,520 Speaker 1: and higher tax states. Um, to what degree have you 336 00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:26,280 Speaker 1: seen these businesses come? And UH, you know, are you 337 00:19:26,320 --> 00:19:31,520 Speaker 1: seeing it accelerate? Yes? Uh in the last seventeen months, 338 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:37,199 Speaker 1: uh one to three, four or five, six, seven, eight nine, Well, 339 00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:42,600 Speaker 1: there's been eleven companies relocate into our community. And of 340 00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:45,560 Speaker 1: course the states doing well too, with the recent announcement 341 00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:49,159 Speaker 1: of Toyota in the Huntsville area. We have Airbus in 342 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,320 Speaker 1: the last several years in Mobile, UH the Birmingham metro 343 00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:57,480 Speaker 1: area actually, in a recent Forbes report, UH has pays 344 00:19:57,520 --> 00:20:00,560 Speaker 1: the highest salaries in the guide states. Well might shock 345 00:20:00,680 --> 00:20:03,080 Speaker 1: people in New York, but when you combine our salary 346 00:20:03,160 --> 00:20:05,760 Speaker 1: plus our cost of a living, the dollar buys a 347 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:09,040 Speaker 1: lot more in Alabama. And so we're a low tax 348 00:20:09,160 --> 00:20:13,520 Speaker 1: state with a high work ethic, and we have not 349 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 1: suffered as we were suggested with the bankruptcy. We now 350 00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:20,760 Speaker 1: have investment grade ratings on our GEO debt UH, and 351 00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:23,240 Speaker 1: we were told that would never happen. We just refunded 352 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:27,200 Speaker 1: some debt in the last week last month at two 353 00:20:27,280 --> 00:20:32,920 Speaker 1: point five saving the citizens fourteen million dollars. And we 354 00:20:33,240 --> 00:20:36,760 Speaker 1: have redeployed that capital because we have a thousand fewer 355 00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:39,159 Speaker 1: employees today than the day I walked into the office, 356 00:20:39,560 --> 00:20:42,440 Speaker 1: so our expense structure is a lot lower. We've allocated 357 00:20:42,480 --> 00:20:45,320 Speaker 1: twenty five million dollars a year for infrastructure so we 358 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:48,760 Speaker 1: can attract it, eighteen million dollars a year more for 359 00:20:48,880 --> 00:20:51,639 Speaker 1: our public schools, and ten million dollars a year UH 360 00:20:51,760 --> 00:20:55,240 Speaker 1: for economic development. So on top of tax in centers 361 00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:58,359 Speaker 1: which most people used to recruit businesses, we also have 362 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:03,119 Speaker 1: a bundle of catsh that we can invest. We just 363 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:08,879 Speaker 1: UH opened a truck manufacturer. It's a custom truck UH 364 00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:13,040 Speaker 1: seven fifty jobs and we needed about a million and 365 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:15,960 Speaker 1: a half dollars for some infrastructure work. So instead of 366 00:21:16,040 --> 00:21:19,560 Speaker 1: borrowing the money, we now have a pool of assets 367 00:21:19,680 --> 00:21:22,160 Speaker 1: that we can use to do that. Like I said, 368 00:21:22,160 --> 00:21:24,000 Speaker 1: it's ten million dollars a year. It's a twenty five 369 00:21:24,359 --> 00:21:26,840 Speaker 1: twenty five year attack. So we've got a quarter of 370 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:29,920 Speaker 1: a billion dollars to recruit and when we need a 371 00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:34,439 Speaker 1: little bit more, be it for a road or a bridge, 372 00:21:34,480 --> 00:21:36,480 Speaker 1: we can do that. Thank you very much for being 373 00:21:36,520 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 1: with us. Looking forward to having you again on the program. 374 00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:43,760 Speaker 1: Very interesting topics and thanks for your participation. David Carrington, 375 00:21:44,040 --> 00:22:04,360 Speaker 1: Commissioner of Jefferson County, Alabama. Rebates and drug Pricing. Here 376 00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 1: to tell us more about the industry is Michael Ray. 377 00:22:07,119 --> 00:22:10,760 Speaker 1: He is the chief executive officer of our X Savings Solutions. 378 00:22:11,119 --> 00:22:13,639 Speaker 1: They're based in Overland Park, Kansas, but he joins us 379 00:22:13,640 --> 00:22:16,280 Speaker 1: here in our eleven three OHD studios. Michael, always a pleasure, 380 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:18,680 Speaker 1: thanks for being here. Explained to people that may not 381 00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:22,000 Speaker 1: be familiar with the use of rebates when it comes 382 00:22:22,080 --> 00:22:26,520 Speaker 1: to purchasing drugs and how it has changed. Yeah, so 383 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:31,160 Speaker 1: rebates kind of think of them like a kickback of sorts. 384 00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:33,720 Speaker 1: You pay a hundred dollars for the drug. Uh, the 385 00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:37,399 Speaker 1: negotiated price might be eighty uh, and there might be 386 00:22:37,480 --> 00:22:40,520 Speaker 1: a twenty twenty rebate on top of it, so that 387 00:22:40,680 --> 00:22:44,600 Speaker 1: the actual total costs in that scenario is is sixty dollars. 388 00:22:44,680 --> 00:22:47,680 Speaker 1: It's kind of this, uh, like I said, kickback of 389 00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:50,880 Speaker 1: sorts that that goes back to a pair. Why does 390 00:22:50,960 --> 00:22:54,520 Speaker 1: this exist? That's a great question. We live in a 391 00:22:54,640 --> 00:22:57,600 Speaker 1: very complicated world when it comes to drug pricing, and 392 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:01,680 Speaker 1: the mechanics of how money moves has gotten more complex 393 00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:06,240 Speaker 1: over time. It originally, uh, you know, was a way 394 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:10,680 Speaker 1: to give an additional discount to the payer, but what's 395 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:14,680 Speaker 1: happened is it's been manipulated over time and profits have 396 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:19,239 Speaker 1: have gone up extraordinarily for certain folks in the supply chain. Well, 397 00:23:19,320 --> 00:23:21,919 Speaker 1: we certainly, Uh. One of the reasons why we've been 398 00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:25,160 Speaker 1: paying closer and closer attention to this is because it's 399 00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:28,440 Speaker 1: become a political issue. And then the administration has said 400 00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:31,240 Speaker 1: we're going to reduce drug prices, and in response, some 401 00:23:31,359 --> 00:23:35,159 Speaker 1: of the shares of these big pharmaceutical companies declined. What 402 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:38,200 Speaker 1: is the latest with respect to the administration's policy to 403 00:23:38,280 --> 00:23:43,000 Speaker 1: try to lower drug policy prices? Yeah, I haven't seen anything, 404 00:23:44,040 --> 00:23:47,359 Speaker 1: you know, really interesting since the you know, the announcement 405 00:23:47,359 --> 00:23:51,600 Speaker 1: by President Trump probably four weeks or so ago. I 406 00:23:51,680 --> 00:23:54,560 Speaker 1: did hear some or excuse me, see some testimony from 407 00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:59,160 Speaker 1: Secretary is Our last week that was focused on getting 408 00:23:59,240 --> 00:24:01,399 Speaker 1: rid of rebates. And I think if there is a 409 00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:06,119 Speaker 1: single thing that can happen to lower drug prices, elimination 410 00:24:06,200 --> 00:24:08,879 Speaker 1: of rebates is that thing. It is that important. And 411 00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:12,720 Speaker 1: there is a tremendous amount of money changing hands. So 412 00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:16,760 Speaker 1: just how much would that hurt pharmaceutical companies? I mean, 413 00:24:16,800 --> 00:24:19,639 Speaker 1: clearly they're I'm assuming they're the ones that are pushing 414 00:24:19,680 --> 00:24:22,359 Speaker 1: to keep these rebates correct. Yeah, you know, I actually 415 00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:26,080 Speaker 1: think that that pharma could come out better off if 416 00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:29,080 Speaker 1: these rebates go away. I actually, uh am of the 417 00:24:29,119 --> 00:24:31,720 Speaker 1: belief that they should be the ones proposing this. They 418 00:24:31,760 --> 00:24:34,160 Speaker 1: should be uh they should join together as a trade 419 00:24:34,200 --> 00:24:38,680 Speaker 1: group and say we're not going to participate because the benefit, 420 00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:42,760 Speaker 1: financial benefit that they received at the beginning has been 421 00:24:42,840 --> 00:24:46,600 Speaker 1: taken away. And I actually think that more competition would 422 00:24:46,680 --> 00:24:49,359 Speaker 1: would yield a better result. Can you give us an 423 00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:51,960 Speaker 1: update on what is going on with generic drug pricing? 424 00:24:52,240 --> 00:24:55,080 Speaker 1: Because there was a list that the FDA put out 425 00:24:55,600 --> 00:24:59,200 Speaker 1: that side of a variety of pharmaceutical companies saying that 426 00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:01,520 Speaker 1: they were doing just about anything they could in order 427 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:05,760 Speaker 1: to avoid giving the information necessary to other companies to 428 00:25:05,880 --> 00:25:09,960 Speaker 1: produce generic versions of their patented or their branded drugs. 429 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:12,920 Speaker 1: And yet it seems as though generic drug prices have 430 00:25:13,040 --> 00:25:16,080 Speaker 1: been increasing, not decreasing. It's a it's a tail to 431 00:25:16,440 --> 00:25:20,360 Speaker 1: two situations. You've got you've got some pharma companies blocking, 432 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:22,480 Speaker 1: like you said on the on the patent piece, so 433 00:25:22,600 --> 00:25:25,840 Speaker 1: that generics cannot be made, the first generic cannot be made. 434 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:28,280 Speaker 1: And then you've got other products in the market where 435 00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:32,280 Speaker 1: you know, a hundred ten different manufacturers make a specific 436 00:25:32,359 --> 00:25:36,520 Speaker 1: generic drug. In those situations, you're seeing more and more 437 00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:40,240 Speaker 1: you're seeing consumer prices go up, but generic drug maker 438 00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:43,879 Speaker 1: stock prices go down, and there's this mysterious pot of 439 00:25:43,960 --> 00:25:45,960 Speaker 1: money in the middle that no one seems to know 440 00:25:46,040 --> 00:25:50,359 Speaker 1: where it goes. So you know, lower lower, lower stock prices, 441 00:25:50,400 --> 00:25:54,360 Speaker 1: lower profits, but higher cost to the consumer. So I'm wondering, 442 00:25:54,560 --> 00:25:58,119 Speaker 1: especially given some of the focus on generic drug prices 443 00:25:58,200 --> 00:26:00,639 Speaker 1: and how they've been going up, I'm wondering this year's 444 00:26:00,960 --> 00:26:04,040 Speaker 1: record pace of pharmaceutical mergers and acquisitions is going to 445 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:05,800 Speaker 1: play into drug pricing. I mean, is this going to 446 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:09,720 Speaker 1: end up uh leading to more price increases because you're 447 00:26:09,720 --> 00:26:13,200 Speaker 1: getting consolidation of specifical sectors of the industry or do 448 00:26:13,280 --> 00:26:17,119 Speaker 1: you think that it might absolutely? Um, depending on the 449 00:26:17,240 --> 00:26:20,840 Speaker 1: products right. So um, you know, if there's three or 450 00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:24,240 Speaker 1: more competitors in a class, you're gonna get you know, 451 00:26:24,280 --> 00:26:28,120 Speaker 1: you're gonna get a pretty efficient market. If you've got 452 00:26:28,320 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 1: manufacturers emerging that you know, have the two products on 453 00:26:32,080 --> 00:26:34,919 Speaker 1: the market and they emerge into be the single single company, 454 00:26:35,480 --> 00:26:37,520 Speaker 1: that's not going to bode well for payers and consumers 455 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:39,920 Speaker 1: in this country. Are there specific drugs that you're starting 456 00:26:39,960 --> 00:26:45,000 Speaker 1: to see inch up in price because of consolidations? Nothing yet? 457 00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:48,680 Speaker 1: And I just just only because I have attracted you know, 458 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:51,720 Speaker 1: uh in looking at what you're doing at r X 459 00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:55,240 Speaker 1: Saving Solutions, I'm wondering if you just give us an example. 460 00:26:56,040 --> 00:26:58,679 Speaker 1: I know, for example, you work with the State of Kansas. 461 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:01,879 Speaker 1: They've got their employee health benefits plan. What do you 462 00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:04,639 Speaker 1: do for them? And what has been the result? What 463 00:27:04,840 --> 00:27:07,800 Speaker 1: why are they using you? Yeah? So um, you know, 464 00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:09,440 Speaker 1: to give you a kind of an example, think of 465 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 1: a patient with high blood pressure and they go into 466 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:15,919 Speaker 1: the doctor. The doctor diagnoses it and says, we need 467 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:19,320 Speaker 1: to put you on this therapy um right now. They're 468 00:27:19,400 --> 00:27:21,360 Speaker 1: choosing and they're kind of shooting in the dark. It's 469 00:27:21,520 --> 00:27:23,760 Speaker 1: you know, there's forty choices, and they pick one, and 470 00:27:23,760 --> 00:27:25,159 Speaker 1: they don't know if that's a high cost one or 471 00:27:25,160 --> 00:27:27,760 Speaker 1: a low cost one. What we do is present all 472 00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:30,880 Speaker 1: of the information to the consumer and the doctor to say, 473 00:27:30,920 --> 00:27:33,680 Speaker 1: here are your forty choices, and here's every price that 474 00:27:33,760 --> 00:27:37,880 Speaker 1: goes with it. That allows a consumeristic decision to be made, 475 00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:40,679 Speaker 1: and it allows a consumer to take hold and consume 476 00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:43,240 Speaker 1: a real efficient market to take hold and drive down 477 00:27:43,359 --> 00:27:46,399 Speaker 1: costs while increasing outcomes because that patient actually has a 478 00:27:46,440 --> 00:27:48,480 Speaker 1: drug they can afford and they can fill and they 479 00:27:48,520 --> 00:27:51,480 Speaker 1: get healthier. So they brought us into lower prices and 480 00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:53,719 Speaker 1: that's what we've done for them. Thank you so much 481 00:27:53,760 --> 00:27:56,199 Speaker 1: for joining us. Always eliminated to speak with you. Michael Ray, 482 00:27:56,480 --> 00:28:00,600 Speaker 1: chief executive officer of our ex Savings Solutions, talking about 483 00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:04,840 Speaker 1: the latest in UH the effort to lower drug prices. 484 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:07,160 Speaker 1: Really interesting about the rebates and a really interesting point 485 00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:11,280 Speaker 1: Pim that Michael thinks that if you do get rid 486 00:28:11,320 --> 00:28:13,880 Speaker 1: of the rebates, that actually end up ends up being 487 00:28:14,000 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 1: beneficial for the pharmaceutical companies. Well, maybe if you simplified 488 00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:22,040 Speaker 1: things and didn't create all these tangled webs, you'd actually 489 00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:24,080 Speaker 1: be able to see what you can pay for a drug, 490 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:26,480 Speaker 1: and you wouldn't have to have a million intermediaries trying 491 00:28:26,480 --> 00:28:29,920 Speaker 1: to figure it all out. Oh you mean that's common sense. 492 00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:36,640 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. 493 00:28:37,040 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 494 00:28:41,040 --> 00:28:44,480 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm 495 00:28:44,560 --> 00:28:48,560 Speaker 1: on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. 496 00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:51,240 Speaker 1: It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us 497 00:28:51,320 --> 00:28:52,840 Speaker 1: worldwide on Bloomberg Radio