1 00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff 2 00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:14,040 Speaker 1: Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. 3 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:16,440 Speaker 1: My name is Robert Lamb and my name is Julie Douglas, 4 00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:21,000 Speaker 1: and we're continuing our discussion on personhood. That's right. Last 5 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:25,079 Speaker 1: week we covered the foundation of what personhood is, and 6 00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: this week we are going to continue the conversation and 7 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:31,760 Speaker 1: you'll hear a bit more about personhood as it relates 8 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:34,800 Speaker 1: to animals and robots. All right, So we have talked 9 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:38,600 Speaker 1: about personhood in in this idea of our past selves, 10 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 1: our future selves. Um, personhood as as a corporate metaphysical entity. 11 00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:47,840 Speaker 1: And now animals in personhood. Oh yeah, yeah, I guess 12 00:00:47,880 --> 00:00:49,879 Speaker 1: we're kind of taking a step backwards because they were 13 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:52,040 Speaker 1: here before us. That they we don't talk about until 14 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:55,760 Speaker 1: we're done with corporations. Sorry, but the corporations have more money, 15 00:00:55,880 --> 00:01:00,160 Speaker 1: uh than do the dolphins. Um. The dolphins are certainly 16 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 1: one of the animals you hear about the most when 17 00:01:03,040 --> 00:01:06,840 Speaker 1: it comes to personhood and the great apes. Um, you know, 18 00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: but it's the idea that you have, you have creatures 19 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:14,600 Speaker 1: that they are not really all that useful to us. Yes, 20 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:17,520 Speaker 1: we can eat grillas and dolphins but they're not that. 21 00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:22,800 Speaker 1: Um and uh, and in that sense, they are beyond 22 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:28,000 Speaker 1: use by humans, although great apes or sometimes he used 23 00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:31,560 Speaker 1: this bush meat, and Jane Goodall is certainly someone who 24 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:35,200 Speaker 1: is an advocate of personhood for great apes, for instance, 25 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:37,959 Speaker 1: so that they, you know, don't become extinct, so that 26 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,760 Speaker 1: they are not hunted for bush meat. Yeah. Well, like 27 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:43,120 Speaker 1: I'm gonna throw a quick quote here. Um, this is 28 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:45,760 Speaker 1: where I got there. Beyond use a bit there, And 29 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 1: this is from Thomas I. White, who is uh. He 30 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:54,320 Speaker 1: has the Conrad In Hilton Chair of Business Ethics at 31 00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 1: Loyola Marymont University in Los Angeles, and he says, quote, 32 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:03,600 Speaker 1: the evidence for cognitive and effective sophistication, currently most strongly 33 00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 1: documented in dolphins, supports the claim that these cetaceans are 34 00:02:08,240 --> 00:02:12,800 Speaker 1: non human persons, said White. As a result, cetaceans should 35 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 1: be seen as beyond use by humans and have moral 36 00:02:16,400 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 1: standings as individuals. It is therefore ethically indefensible to kill, 37 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: injured or keep these beings captive for human purposes. So 38 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 1: that's that's what White had to say about the matter, 39 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:30,919 Speaker 1: pointing to the the level at which the individual's mind 40 00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:35,000 Speaker 1: is operating and the the limited extent to which they're 41 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 1: useful to humans. Yeah, and I think non human persons 42 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:40,679 Speaker 1: is the key wording here, because he's not saying like, 43 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:42,720 Speaker 1: let's give them a right to vote or set on injuries, 44 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 1: but he is saying that they are exhibiting, you know, consciousness, 45 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:51,200 Speaker 1: They are exhibiting um, you know, language ability, higher cognition 46 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:56,240 Speaker 1: like abstract thinking, um, both for great apes and for dolphins. 47 00:02:57,160 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 1: So he's saying that in these in this case, we 48 00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:02,760 Speaker 1: really need to try to figure out what self awareness 49 00:03:02,840 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 1: means on this level. Yeah. You see the mirror tests 50 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:12,160 Speaker 1: thrown out a lot of times in dealing with with 51 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:16,040 Speaker 1: with personhood with animals, and this is simply if shown 52 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,880 Speaker 1: a mirror, can the does the animal recognize itself in 53 00:03:18,919 --> 00:03:21,919 Speaker 1: the mirror? So you often see these used with great apes, 54 00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:24,440 Speaker 1: but it should be mentioned that other animals can pull 55 00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:26,640 Speaker 1: it off as well, like the magpie, a little bird 56 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:30,240 Speaker 1: can do it. Uh. And also worth noting that human 57 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:33,679 Speaker 1: beings with face blindness, uh, they may not be able 58 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 1: to do it. So it's not there's not it's such 59 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 1: a simple test. It's guaranteed to not actually be an 60 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:46,760 Speaker 1: effective gauge of personhood. But but yeah, you get into 61 00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:51,080 Speaker 1: these these questions to what extent are some, if not 62 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:56,720 Speaker 1: many animals UM worthy of a personhood status, Like is 63 00:03:56,760 --> 00:04:00,440 Speaker 1: a like a beloved pet? Just I mean does quite 64 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:03,760 Speaker 1: have personhood status? But a beloved pet has more rights 65 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:08,800 Speaker 1: in this country than say, like a wild coyote or 66 00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: protected species has more has more rights than a non 67 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:14,560 Speaker 1: protected species. So I mean there are there are varying 68 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:17,120 Speaker 1: levels of protection and play, like if you kill somebody's pet, 69 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:22,680 Speaker 1: you're in more trouble than if you kill obviously a cockroach. Well, 70 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,400 Speaker 1: there was something that I read, and I wish that 71 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 1: I could remember the person um and attribute this to 72 00:04:28,400 --> 00:04:30,800 Speaker 1: that person. But what they were basically saying is that 73 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:32,840 Speaker 1: we are at a point in science now that we 74 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 1: understand much better the way that animals think, they socialize, uh, 75 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:41,200 Speaker 1: their ability to feel pain, to express themselves, um, and 76 00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:45,720 Speaker 1: animals like dolphins and great apes, uh that they there's 77 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 1: a sentient quality to them. And we're not saying this 78 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,719 Speaker 1: is apples and apples. They're not humans, obviously, but he 79 00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:53,400 Speaker 1: is saying that we're at a point where we should 80 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,280 Speaker 1: probably step back in knowing what we know, what science 81 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:59,840 Speaker 1: has has borne out in terms of their intelligence, we 82 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:03,839 Speaker 1: should begin to redefine how we treat them or we 83 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 1: look at them, um, and what personhood might mean in 84 00:05:07,080 --> 00:05:12,080 Speaker 1: that situation, like in a in a certain sense personhood 85 00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:15,920 Speaker 1: like like as far as personhood and people goes it 86 00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 1: like it boils down to this realization that oh, it's 87 00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: not just me versus the rest of the world. There 88 00:05:22,200 --> 00:05:24,200 Speaker 1: are other people that are on my side. And you 89 00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:27,400 Speaker 1: eventually reached the point where we realize, well, actually, most 90 00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:29,839 Speaker 1: if not all, of humanity is on my side. We 91 00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:33,719 Speaker 1: are all people, we all have personhood status. And then 92 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: extending that out, well, are there other things in the 93 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:41,680 Speaker 1: world that, um are worthy of my consideration as a 94 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:44,680 Speaker 1: person or or just well just remobe the person from 95 00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:47,880 Speaker 1: that that's and it's just worthy of my consideration. So 96 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:51,120 Speaker 1: the dolphins, should I maybe think about it in in 97 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:54,000 Speaker 1: a way that's more meaningful as that bump that my 98 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:57,480 Speaker 1: my jet ski just hit, you know? Or should I 99 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,440 Speaker 1: should I think of of this guerrilla as as something 100 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:04,720 Speaker 1: more than just my my next meal in the bush? Well? 101 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 1: And then this is the problem with the way that 102 00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:09,120 Speaker 1: we view animals. And one of the books that I'm 103 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 1: rereading this summer is some we eat, some we love, 104 00:06:12,240 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 1: and some we kill and and uh he talks about 105 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 1: the author talks about this idea that we really are 106 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 1: sort of butt over teakettle when it comes to this. 107 00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:22,440 Speaker 1: We can't really think straight. So you know, why would 108 00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:25,280 Speaker 1: we look into the eyes of dogs? Some cultures look 109 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 1: into the eyes of a dog and see that dopey 110 00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:29,599 Speaker 1: stair and just fall in love. And and now that 111 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:32,680 Speaker 1: we know about oxytocin and this exchange of this feel 112 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:37,280 Speaker 1: good hormone between these two species, um, you know, and 113 00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:40,800 Speaker 1: then you know, elevate this relationship we have with this 114 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 1: dog in this culture, Why would we do that and 115 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 1: not necessarily with another creature? So, yeah, it messes you up. 116 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: Like I had to tell a work with a kitten 117 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 1: in that house yesterday and you know, you keep good. 118 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:53,440 Speaker 1: You're like, maybe I should go look at it again, 119 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:55,160 Speaker 1: and I'm like, I'm getting kind of stressed about this. 120 00:06:55,279 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 1: Articles you probably hold that kitten and then you look 121 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:00,200 Speaker 1: at it and then toys with you like say you 122 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:01,839 Speaker 1: could you could drop a bank with one. Well, this 123 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:03,599 Speaker 1: is this is a kitten that you guys just rescued, 124 00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:07,040 Speaker 1: and so you know you're tapping into your empathy. There's 125 00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:09,080 Speaker 1: good stuff. On that note, We're going to take a 126 00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:15,120 Speaker 1: quick break, but we'll be right back in just one minute, 127 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 1: and we're back speaking of empathy. Uh though, uh, the 128 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: final level of personhood that we're gonna talk about the day. 129 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:30,400 Speaker 1: At what point do we consider an artificial intelligence at 130 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:34,520 Speaker 1: least a an artificial person. Okay, okay, So now they 131 00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: can create, create art, as we've talked about in perhaps 132 00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 1: even create new thoughts. Okay. Um, And there's this idea 133 00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 1: that has always been circulating that eventually we're going to 134 00:07:46,400 --> 00:07:50,480 Speaker 1: program machines and robots to the extent that they are sentient, 135 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 1: that they do feel pain because they're programmed that way 136 00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 1: for whatever reason, perhaps for their I mean, yeah, you 137 00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 1: get into a lot of weird area when you talk 138 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 1: about this, because we we mentioned in the other podcast 139 00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:06,840 Speaker 1: the Artists Young Robot, we mentioned the creativity machine. Um, 140 00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,240 Speaker 1: if you unplug the creativity machine, it doesn't die, it 141 00:08:10,280 --> 00:08:13,200 Speaker 1: doesn't feel pain, and you don't go to jail. All. 142 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 1: Some of those things do not apply when you unplug 143 00:08:17,320 --> 00:08:22,560 Speaker 1: a person in a hospital. And and yeah, so you 144 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 1: get to the point like, at what point have we 145 00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: given a program enough of a semblance of consciousness and 146 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:36,880 Speaker 1: a semblance of of self awareness that it deserves rights 147 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:40,280 Speaker 1: like if you did create say you did create this 148 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:42,679 Speaker 1: program or this is say there are a virtual person 149 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 1: in a virtual world that feels pain, then you know 150 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 1: and for whatever sadistic reasons you created that program aside, 151 00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:52,679 Speaker 1: then if you go in and you administer pain to 152 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,440 Speaker 1: that AI, are you really doing something horrible, something morally 153 00:08:56,480 --> 00:09:01,160 Speaker 1: reprehensible and should that virtual person be protected by law? Well, 154 00:09:01,320 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: especially when you look at the creativity machine, which Steven 155 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:06,920 Speaker 1: Fuller is is saying that it has the ability to learn, 156 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 1: it has ability to produce new thoughts. So you know, 157 00:09:10,400 --> 00:09:14,719 Speaker 1: the extrapolation is that somewhat down the road, this this 158 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,680 Speaker 1: becomes its own thing, right, it may even maybe even 159 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:21,600 Speaker 1: has its own consciousness if we can never really figure 160 00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:24,960 Speaker 1: out what consciousness is. But we're trying to do that, right. 161 00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:28,120 Speaker 1: We've talked about the Blue Brain Project, which is this 162 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:31,080 Speaker 1: reverse engineering of a hundred billion neurons in our own 163 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:34,840 Speaker 1: brains and trying to figure out what consciousness is, uh 164 00:09:34,840 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 1: and how that's happening. And then we've talked about this 165 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:43,200 Speaker 1: idea of virtual immortality, where someday we're going to just 166 00:09:43,400 --> 00:09:46,480 Speaker 1: download a bunch of code from our brain that is 167 00:09:46,520 --> 00:09:49,480 Speaker 1: representing who we are who we think we are, this personhood, 168 00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:52,720 Speaker 1: and we're probably going to throw it into a machine 169 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:55,760 Speaker 1: or to a robot, and then at what point, you know, 170 00:09:55,880 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 1: that's probably when we get really concerned about this idea 171 00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 1: of of robots or AI having personhood, because now this 172 00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:07,199 Speaker 1: thing is containing us or this idea. It's one thing 173 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:11,679 Speaker 1: to worry of guerrilla has personhood. But if you know that, 174 00:10:11,679 --> 00:10:13,880 Speaker 1: if you see that guerrilla wearing your T shirt and 175 00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:17,520 Speaker 1: reading your favorite novel, then you're like, whoa, that gorilla 176 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:19,520 Speaker 1: kind of looks like me. Now I feel really bad 177 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:22,959 Speaker 1: about eating it. And likewise, yeah, if you if we 178 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:26,240 Speaker 1: do whatever extent we create the AI in our own image, 179 00:10:26,240 --> 00:10:30,000 Speaker 1: if we actually attribute it with some of our individual characteristics, 180 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:34,080 Speaker 1: then dad what extent as a person or the characteristics 181 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:38,160 Speaker 1: of of other beings or unreal And there's this idea 182 00:10:38,200 --> 00:10:41,000 Speaker 1: too that it survives us and then it makes independent 183 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,960 Speaker 1: decisions based on our own thought processes. So in the 184 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:47,480 Speaker 1: future do we do we say, like, somehow I want 185 00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:50,760 Speaker 1: to legislate that my future me that is now being 186 00:10:50,840 --> 00:10:59,280 Speaker 1: carried out through this AI is somehow still influencing the world. Uh, 187 00:10:59,320 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 1: you know, especially if I'm have some sort of corporate ties. 188 00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 1: It's an interesting idea. Yeah. And the one thing that 189 00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:08,679 Speaker 1: I also wondered about two and this is you get 190 00:11:08,720 --> 00:11:12,120 Speaker 1: into the idea of first order desires and second order desires. 191 00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:15,880 Speaker 1: Like a first order desire is something like I want 192 00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:18,440 Speaker 1: to eat a candy bar, or me want candy bar, 193 00:11:18,640 --> 00:11:21,280 Speaker 1: or even I can has candy bar. These are all 194 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:25,520 Speaker 1: examples of first order desires, and it doesn't take much 195 00:11:25,559 --> 00:11:29,480 Speaker 1: to have them. You know, insect wants food, insect wants 196 00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:32,720 Speaker 1: candy bar, but it doesn't mean that it is a person. Uh. 197 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:36,760 Speaker 1: But a second order desire is the realization that you 198 00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:40,840 Speaker 1: wish you didn't want a candy bar. Okay, So this 199 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:42,839 Speaker 1: is this idea that you're thinking about your future self 200 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:45,280 Speaker 1: and you're saying, I wish I didn't want that, because 201 00:11:45,280 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 1: I really don't. I really will regret having eaten that 202 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:53,760 Speaker 1: candy bar, or even having both of those ideas in 203 00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:57,160 Speaker 1: your mind simultaneously to be like I hate candy bars, 204 00:11:57,200 --> 00:12:01,360 Speaker 1: I love candy bars. That kind of cognitive dissonance, yes, 205 00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:05,160 Speaker 1: Or like an Odysseus contract where one you know where, 206 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: where Odysseus straps himself to the mass of the ship 207 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:11,960 Speaker 1: so that he won't be um one over by the 208 00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:16,880 Speaker 1: Sirens song. He knows that future Odysseus um is a 209 00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 1: horn dog and we'll just be dragged to his death 210 00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 1: outo sirens. So current Odysseus straps himself to the mass. Yeah. 211 00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:28,319 Speaker 1: So I'm thinking back now to the other podcast that 212 00:12:28,360 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: we just recorded about robots and art and the one 213 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:36,840 Speaker 1: part about how they're teaching Macbeth to the machines in 214 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 1: order to get these nuances and understand problem solving. So 215 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,720 Speaker 1: why not just run this the same code through um? 216 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:48,200 Speaker 1: You know, this Odysseus, this pact through machines. Do you 217 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:51,400 Speaker 1: think that by virtue of carrying out the code that 218 00:12:51,480 --> 00:12:54,160 Speaker 1: it becomes the thing, that it becomes real, that that's 219 00:12:54,280 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: understanding of of nuance and cognitive dissonance could manifests itself 220 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:06,040 Speaker 1: in the machine. No, yeah, it's an open question. I mean, 221 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:07,800 Speaker 1: certainly it's the domain of some of a lot of 222 00:13:07,840 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 1: scientific work, you know, not scientific science, fictional work. Rather, um, 223 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:15,160 Speaker 1: you know, in the future, will ais have rights? Will 224 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,120 Speaker 1: they have will they be liable for this that or 225 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:22,560 Speaker 1: the other? Um? Richard K. Morrigan's u Altered Carbon novel. 226 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:25,200 Speaker 1: In that one, I remember that they had they were 227 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:29,080 Speaker 1: aies and he specifically mentioned that AIS had the same 228 00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:33,440 Speaker 1: level of personhood as corporations, so which which would make 229 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:37,079 Speaker 1: sense because an AI is immortal, it doesn't it doesn't 230 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:42,120 Speaker 1: necessarily have a body um and uh and and it 231 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:44,520 Speaker 1: has but it does have interest in the world and 232 00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:48,000 Speaker 1: uh and it could conceivably need to be protected from 233 00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:51,120 Speaker 1: other entities. Well, and I should mention too that again, 234 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:54,080 Speaker 1: this personhood, this idea, especially in the legal terms, is 235 00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:57,440 Speaker 1: something that can be interpreted many different ways and has 236 00:13:57,480 --> 00:14:01,160 Speaker 1: been by the law. So sometimes operations have been more 237 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:06,000 Speaker 1: personhoodie than than than others, particularly right now, So when 238 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:08,000 Speaker 1: we talk about AI, we know that there probably would 239 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:11,520 Speaker 1: be a particular set um that will be unique to 240 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:16,520 Speaker 1: AI personhood if that in fact comes um into the discussion. 241 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 1: How about this, how about personhood for fictional characters? Do 242 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 1: you think could could you have personhood status for say 243 00:14:26,040 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 1: Sherlock Holmes. I can see a number of of of 244 00:14:33,520 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 1: corporations or lawyers who might really like that because it's 245 00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:39,360 Speaker 1: sort of an extension of trademarking. Right yeah, But but 246 00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:41,440 Speaker 1: like if you reach the point where not only is 247 00:14:41,480 --> 00:14:43,560 Speaker 1: it not only is it a brand, and you see 248 00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: a certain amount of this because I remember, Um, I 249 00:14:46,520 --> 00:14:50,720 Speaker 1: remember reading about how there was some parody movie that 250 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: ended up using Darth Vader and they had full cooperation 251 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:57,640 Speaker 1: from Lucas uh. And so they had a guy in 252 00:14:57,640 --> 00:14:59,840 Speaker 1: a Darth Vader suit on set from from Lucas Is 253 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,520 Speaker 1: through and they also had an adviser there that was 254 00:15:02,560 --> 00:15:06,040 Speaker 1: there to shoot down any ideas regarding things that Darth 255 00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:10,400 Speaker 1: Vader would not say or do. Um and UM, I 256 00:15:10,400 --> 00:15:12,080 Speaker 1: think it was like Night the Museum two or something. 257 00:15:12,160 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 1: I didn't see it, but but uh, but I kind 258 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:19,040 Speaker 1: of love that idea because it's the idea that kind 259 00:15:19,040 --> 00:15:21,520 Speaker 1: of hints at this idea of a fictional character is 260 00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:25,640 Speaker 1: something that exists outside of human influence anymore. Like the 261 00:15:25,760 --> 00:15:28,400 Speaker 1: character is this thing that has certain rights and it 262 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:33,280 Speaker 1: shouldn't be stepped upon. So I'm I'm getting this is 263 00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:35,760 Speaker 1: a far fetched and just sort of an open question 264 00:15:35,880 --> 00:15:38,200 Speaker 1: just to get everyone thinking. But but yeah, what if 265 00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:40,080 Speaker 1: you did reach an idea where and certainly if you 266 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:42,280 Speaker 1: did through AI as well. So, like, what if we 267 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 1: took everything that we knew about Sherlock Holmes from the 268 00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:46,760 Speaker 1: work of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and some of the 269 00:15:46,800 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 1: more um uh cannon and accepted visions of Sherlock Holmes 270 00:15:52,840 --> 00:15:55,600 Speaker 1: in in cinema and what have you, and we use 271 00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:59,239 Speaker 1: that to generate an AI that then was the spokesman 272 00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:04,160 Speaker 1: and defender of Sherlock Holmes person of it. That would 273 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:07,600 Speaker 1: be yeah, and then what have you? What if Sherlock 274 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:13,280 Speaker 1: Holmes the AI slash fictional character personhood thing then ran 275 00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:22,320 Speaker 1: for public office and impression but I can't. Yeah, it's 276 00:16:22,360 --> 00:16:24,360 Speaker 1: kind of fun. You've gotta have a lot of there's 277 00:16:24,360 --> 00:16:28,520 Speaker 1: a lot of flesh involved in the head there. So anyway, 278 00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:30,280 Speaker 1: those are just some open questions there at the end 279 00:16:30,880 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 1: to get everyone thinking a little more about personhood. Uh. 280 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:40,080 Speaker 1: It's it's a fascinating, elusive, deeply philosophical question. Uh. That 281 00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:43,040 Speaker 1: is not going to be going away anytime. So uh 282 00:16:43,080 --> 00:16:45,120 Speaker 1: and thank you too to everybody who wrote in about it, 283 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:48,280 Speaker 1: especially Kelly um gave it some really good things to 284 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:51,200 Speaker 1: think about. Um. I should mention just a real quick 285 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 1: if you do a quick search for personhood corporations on 286 00:16:54,720 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 1: the House Stuff Works website, you'll find an article from 287 00:16:57,640 --> 00:17:00,800 Speaker 1: Josh Clark of stuff you should know he did an 288 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:03,760 Speaker 1: article on that is pretty cool. And uh. I also 289 00:17:03,800 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 1: found a Scientific American blog entry by Eric Michael Johnson 290 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:12,200 Speaker 1: really interesting. It's called non human Personhood Rights and Wrongs, 291 00:17:12,480 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 1: and a lot of that focuses in on grade eights 292 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 1: because that's a Johnson's area of study, but he gets 293 00:17:18,040 --> 00:17:20,600 Speaker 1: into issues of AI as well, and which it's a 294 00:17:20,600 --> 00:17:23,560 Speaker 1: fascinating read. All right, do you have time to bring 295 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,119 Speaker 1: over the robot? Yeah? I think we have time for 296 00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:31,640 Speaker 1: a quick one. The robot here does not have personhood status. 297 00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:35,000 Speaker 1: He has applied for it. We are reviewing it. All right. 298 00:17:35,040 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 1: Here's a little bit of listener mail from Sarah. Sarah 299 00:17:37,359 --> 00:17:40,159 Speaker 1: writes in and says, dear Robert and Julie, after hearing 300 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:44,440 Speaker 1: my fellow a taku anime junkies tell you about Dino 301 00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:45,840 Speaker 1: I coil. I don't know if we ever got the 302 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 1: pronunciation on that right. Yeah, um, I thought I would 303 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:55,119 Speaker 1: tell you about the anime Um planetes Or, which is 304 00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:58,800 Speaker 1: felt p l a in et e s, which is 305 00:17:58,800 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 1: a sci fi anime about astronauts whose job it is 306 00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:05,000 Speaker 1: to pick up space debris in order to make space 307 00:18:05,080 --> 00:18:08,399 Speaker 1: safer for flight. There are stringent laws about leaving anything 308 00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 1: out there, and the show deals with the dangers of space, 309 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:15,040 Speaker 1: including space madness, as well as a little romance. Uh, 310 00:18:15,440 --> 00:18:18,080 Speaker 1: got to go, but definitely check it out. Sarah. So, 311 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 1: I looked this up. I haven't watched it, but it 312 00:18:21,600 --> 00:18:23,600 Speaker 1: does look really interesting. It's like just the idea that 313 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:26,040 Speaker 1: this is a it's like a TV series. It's essentially 314 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:30,359 Speaker 1: about about space junk, you know, and about the about 315 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:32,600 Speaker 1: dealing with space junk, and you know, in the various 316 00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:35,199 Speaker 1: important narrative levels. Well that's good, right, I mean, just 317 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:38,320 Speaker 1: that's hope for me that maybe it's starting to get 318 00:18:38,359 --> 00:18:40,320 Speaker 1: into the mainstream somewhat. I don't know if you could 319 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:42,720 Speaker 1: say that the mainstream, but at least it's getting into 320 00:18:42,760 --> 00:18:45,959 Speaker 1: the conversation. Yeah. And it's it's an interesting reminder too 321 00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:49,679 Speaker 1: about how rich anime can be because I'm not I mean, 322 00:18:49,720 --> 00:18:52,359 Speaker 1: I've seen some of the iconic anime flips, you know, 323 00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:55,320 Speaker 1: like you know, I've seen a Cure, you know, I've 324 00:18:55,359 --> 00:18:59,600 Speaker 1: I've seen um and certainly I've watched like them the 325 00:18:59,680 --> 00:19:03,159 Speaker 1: AZA films and uh for some of the what's the 326 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:06,679 Speaker 1: other really a Ghost in the Machine? I've seen so 327 00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:08,679 Speaker 1: some of those. But there's a whole lot of anime 328 00:19:08,800 --> 00:19:10,480 Speaker 1: that I'm I just don't even know what's going on 329 00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:12,879 Speaker 1: with And it's easy to fall into the trap of 330 00:19:12,960 --> 00:19:16,760 Speaker 1: just thinking of anime as you know, as as whatever 331 00:19:16,840 --> 00:19:21,280 Speaker 1: the most uh visible thing happens to be at the time, 332 00:19:21,520 --> 00:19:24,120 Speaker 1: you know. But but there's really a lot of diverse 333 00:19:24,960 --> 00:19:27,440 Speaker 1: but you know, a lot of times fantastic storytelling going 334 00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:30,040 Speaker 1: on there that's certainly worth looking at. So I think 335 00:19:30,040 --> 00:19:32,160 Speaker 1: it's really awesome that that somebody out there has has 336 00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:35,560 Speaker 1: has managed to to produce a show that it is 337 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:37,800 Speaker 1: based on a more or lesson on on on the 338 00:19:37,840 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 1: skeleton of a space junk uh theme. Um. And then 339 00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:47,160 Speaker 1: we also heard from our listener Murphy Murphy right sences high, 340 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:49,560 Speaker 1: Robert and Julie. My name is Murphy having from Hawaii. 341 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:52,479 Speaker 1: But that is irrelevant. I just finished listening to your 342 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:55,560 Speaker 1: podcast about the Higgs particle. Pretty cool. Remember that joke 343 00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:58,920 Speaker 1: about the Higgs particle. I've electronically arrived to point out 344 00:19:58,920 --> 00:20:01,960 Speaker 1: that this is the only humorous Higgs joke because of 345 00:20:02,040 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 1: it's clever and commonly overlooks double entendre. Not only can 346 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:08,879 Speaker 1: you not have mass like church mass without the Higgs 347 00:20:08,880 --> 00:20:11,719 Speaker 1: particle because of the Higgs particle gives stuff mass like 348 00:20:11,880 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 1: stuff mass, but also because you cannot have church mass 349 00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 1: without the God particle. I've always been looking for some 350 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:23,280 Speaker 1: recent topic to chip in about. I listen to your 351 00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:27,399 Speaker 1: podcast retroactively, so usually my two cents have are so 352 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:29,640 Speaker 1: usually my two cents or a couple of years overdue. 353 00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:31,919 Speaker 1: I love, love, love the podcast. I still have a 354 00:20:31,920 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 1: few hundred more to listen to, so I have to 355 00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:39,440 Speaker 1: go Aloha Murphy, Murphy. Yeah. I keep forgetting that we've 356 00:20:39,480 --> 00:20:43,639 Speaker 1: done that many but yeah, apparently we have to a week. Yeah, 357 00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,480 Speaker 1: and um, I've got time for one more, uh listener 358 00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:49,960 Speaker 1: mail here, uh listener. Matt writeson and says, hey, guys, 359 00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:52,639 Speaker 1: I'm slowly working my way through your older March April 360 00:20:52,640 --> 00:20:56,440 Speaker 1: May two twelve podcasts, and you're talking about space exploration, tech, 361 00:20:56,640 --> 00:20:59,440 Speaker 1: living in micro g environment, and the tech of Prometheus. 362 00:20:59,800 --> 00:21:01,920 Speaker 1: In regards to these podcasts, you have to check out 363 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:05,439 Speaker 1: the movie Pandoram. It goes further into the detrimental mental 364 00:21:05,480 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 1: problems long term space travel can take on the human species. 365 00:21:09,520 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 1: I don't think I'm giving away too much of a 366 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:13,280 Speaker 1: spoiler when I tell you that three of the finer 367 00:21:13,320 --> 00:21:16,720 Speaker 1: points in the movie take a look at psychotic episodes, 368 00:21:16,880 --> 00:21:20,440 Speaker 1: cabin ship fever, memory loss due to extended hyper sleep, 369 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:23,639 Speaker 1: and biological evolution brought on by trying to adapt to 370 00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:26,480 Speaker 1: a spaceship environment. While it didn't play out very well 371 00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 1: in the box office, it is certainly worth while to 372 00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:31,600 Speaker 1: DVR on Sci Fi or Netflix if you don't want 373 00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:35,160 Speaker 1: the commercials. I also wrote a long time ago about 374 00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:37,520 Speaker 1: thinking as a kid that mirrors were not just a 375 00:21:37,520 --> 00:21:41,199 Speaker 1: reflective surface, but a window into the nearest adjacent multiverse. 376 00:21:41,640 --> 00:21:45,200 Speaker 1: My reflection was really just another me who happened to 377 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:47,800 Speaker 1: check out the mirror at the same time, and that 378 00:21:47,880 --> 00:21:50,920 Speaker 1: at any time I might turn a corner and run 379 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 1: into my doppelganger. Well, I finally did meet him. His 380 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:56,800 Speaker 1: name is Nega Matt and he's pretty cool dude. We 381 00:21:56,800 --> 00:21:59,840 Speaker 1: exchange numbers and are scheduled to meet for Brunched next Saturday. 382 00:22:00,160 --> 00:22:02,639 Speaker 1: Thank you again for the great show, Matt. Well, it 383 00:22:02,760 --> 00:22:06,560 Speaker 1: was a fun email. Certainly the mirror thing. It's that 384 00:22:06,720 --> 00:22:09,720 Speaker 1: universe is just like ours, except they spell everything backwards 385 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:15,920 Speaker 1: and um and certainly Prometheus uh not Prometheus Pandorum Uh 386 00:22:16,240 --> 00:22:17,919 Speaker 1: is a film that I have know people who just 387 00:22:17,960 --> 00:22:21,720 Speaker 1: seemed to hate it, but but I really enjoyed Uh Pandorum. 388 00:22:21,760 --> 00:22:24,120 Speaker 1: I thought it was it was a really fun kind 389 00:22:24,119 --> 00:22:27,240 Speaker 1: of space horror of like a German US co production, 390 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:30,440 Speaker 1: I believe, uh some good performances in it. A lot 391 00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:33,200 Speaker 1: of money went into the the set design and the creatures, 392 00:22:33,240 --> 00:22:35,960 Speaker 1: and there a number of cool little scientific ideas going on, 393 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 1: you know, and including the three that Matt mentions here. So, 394 00:22:39,320 --> 00:22:42,840 Speaker 1: but do they have the space punis? No, no space punis. 395 00:22:42,960 --> 00:22:46,159 Speaker 1: But but but it does involve a scenario. Okay, what 396 00:22:46,240 --> 00:22:48,240 Speaker 1: if what if you have colonists on a seed ship 397 00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:53,320 Speaker 1: and uh, and you have genetically engineered them to rapidly advanced, 398 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:56,560 Speaker 1: rapidly adapt to a new environment so that when they 399 00:22:56,640 --> 00:23:00,439 Speaker 1: land on an exoplanet um they can get out, they 400 00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:03,159 Speaker 1: can rapidly advance this environment. But then what if that 401 00:23:03,240 --> 00:23:07,520 Speaker 1: ship doesn't make it to its destination and what if 402 00:23:07,520 --> 00:23:10,280 Speaker 1: the crew members come out and then they rapidly adapt 403 00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:14,040 Speaker 1: to the environment of the ship. What would that look like? 404 00:23:14,320 --> 00:23:17,000 Speaker 1: So that's one of the fun ideas that this film has. 405 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:19,280 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, don't go into it expecting two 406 00:23:19,320 --> 00:23:21,600 Speaker 1: thousand and one. But as we've discussed in the past, 407 00:23:21,600 --> 00:23:23,760 Speaker 1: if you go into any movie expecting two thousand woman 408 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 1: isn't two thousand and one, You're gonna be a bit 409 00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:29,440 Speaker 1: discipline so so thank you guys for all that wonderful 410 00:23:29,480 --> 00:23:31,200 Speaker 1: listener mail. We get a lot of it. I wish 411 00:23:31,240 --> 00:23:34,280 Speaker 1: we had time to to personally respond to all of 412 00:23:34,280 --> 00:23:37,720 Speaker 1: it and or read all of it, but uh, it's 413 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:40,760 Speaker 1: just hard and and sometimes I mean to read something 414 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:42,520 Speaker 1: and then I print it out and then I forget it, 415 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 1: So some of it is useder air on my part. Yeah. So, uh, 416 00:23:48,080 --> 00:23:52,080 Speaker 1: let us know what you think about personhood, our corporations, people, 417 00:23:52,480 --> 00:23:57,120 Speaker 1: our plants, Our plants people are our animals, people, our dolphins, 418 00:23:57,160 --> 00:24:01,600 Speaker 1: people are artificial intelligence? Is pol um? How about that 419 00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:04,040 Speaker 1: guy that you just shot in that video game? What 420 00:24:04,160 --> 00:24:06,719 Speaker 1: about that blade of grass that just got cut and released? 421 00:24:06,760 --> 00:24:10,600 Speaker 1: Green leaf volatiles screening for help? Yeah, all these all 422 00:24:10,640 --> 00:24:13,040 Speaker 1: these questions on the board, so let us know what 423 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: you think. You can find us on Facebook where we 424 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:17,800 Speaker 1: are stuff to Blow your Mind, and you can find 425 00:24:17,840 --> 00:24:19,760 Speaker 1: us on Twitter where our handle is blow the Mind, 426 00:24:19,920 --> 00:24:22,200 Speaker 1: and you can always email us at blow the Mind 427 00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:31,320 Speaker 1: at discovery dot com for more on this and thousands 428 00:24:31,359 --> 00:24:38,320 Speaker 1: of other topics. Is it how Stuff Works dot com