Speaker 1: I thanks Scott chan An Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn our number
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: We have a problem, and that is the Democrats. What
Speaker 1: they cannot get done electorally at the ballot box, that
Speaker 1: they can't get done legislatively, they run to liberal courts
Speaker 1: and they hope to enact their agenda, install Trump's agenda.
Speaker 1: The agenda, which by the way, is like an eighty
Speaker 1: twenty issue at this point, which is the deportation of
Speaker 1: known criminals that we have inside the country. It's not
Speaker 1: a complicated issue. And anyway, it has now become a
Speaker 1: battle within the courts, and it is it's successful. I mean,
Speaker 1: the president has been successful. But anyway, the administration deported
Speaker 1: nearly three hundred members of the Trend de Aragua gang
Speaker 1: under what's called the Alien Enemies Act. And you have
Speaker 1: a federal judge trying to blow because it hasn't been used,
Speaker 1: you know, in a couple of hundred years, but it's
Speaker 1: still on the books.
Speaker 2: It is still the law of the land.
Speaker 1: And we have one congressman that and has now moved
Speaker 1: forward with an effort to move forward and impeach the
Speaker 1: judge involved in this. Pam bondis slamming this DC trial
Speaker 1: judge who blocked Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act
Speaker 1: to deport Trenda or Ragwag gang members. And you know
Speaker 1: the reason. You know that the judges is giving here
Speaker 1: this delay makes absolutely no sense at all, and it
Speaker 1: is basically the history of the federal judiciary system. And
Speaker 1: this is this is where liberals go when they can't
Speaker 1: win at the battle box. This is where they can't win.
Speaker 1: What they do when they can't win any other way.
Speaker 1: Do I think in the end that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: going to win? I do, And we'll have to see,
Speaker 1: you know, how this plays out over time. But in
Speaker 1: the meantime, we're kind of stuck with where we are.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the President did thank the President
Speaker 1: of l Salvador for taking gang members that were deported.
Speaker 1: And we know that Elon Musk and Congress and elected
Speaker 1: officials have asked for the impeachment of this judge that
Speaker 1: that scuttle Trump's order. El Salvador's Trump friendly president, you know,
Speaker 1: mocks this. This US judges deportation pause. And you've got
Speaker 1: Jasmine Crockett along with as they discussed in the last hour,
Speaker 1: AOC now leading the Democratic Party as they try to
Speaker 1: I guess oppose Chucky Schumer anyway, Crockett attacking the Trump
Speaker 1: administration for deporting members of trenda Ragua, tell me how
Speaker 1: that makes any sense. And anyway, it's driving down immigration.
Speaker 1: And we'll see how this plays out in the courts.
Speaker 1: It's it's going to be interesting. I think that in
Speaker 1: the end that Trump people win. Anyway. President Trump defended
Speaker 1: the use of the l Enemies Act. And this is
Speaker 1: what he said.
Speaker 3: This isn't that alien Enemies actors as making in both
Speaker 3: three other times they were all during time of the war.
Speaker 3: You feel that you're using it appropriately.
Speaker 4: Right now, this is a time of war.
Speaker 5: Chris Biden allowed millions of people, many of them criminals,
Speaker 5: many of them at the highest level. They empty jails
Speaker 5: out of the Nation's emptied their jails into the United States.
Speaker 5: It's an invasion. And these are criminals, many many criminals, murderers,
Speaker 5: drug dealers at the highest level, drug lords, now people
Speaker 5: from mental institutions. That's an invasion. They invaded our country.
Speaker 6: So this isn't in.
Speaker 2: That sense, and this is war now.
Speaker 1: Tom Homan responded to our reporter about the President using
Speaker 1: the Alien Enemies Act.
Speaker 2: Here is what he said.
Speaker 3: You say to those who claimed you're using a two
Speaker 3: hundred year old law to circumvent you presents no law.
Speaker 7: He's not as old as Constitution.
Speaker 4: We still pay attention to that, don't we?
Speaker 1: Oh ouch anyway that he will further one on this
Speaker 1: say he doesn't care if Judge's rule his actions are illegal.
Speaker 2: He's not going to stop anyway.
Speaker 1: David shown, former Council for President Trump's Civil Liberties attorney
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal analysts, bestselling author.
Speaker 2: Welcome both the view to the program. David, We'll start
Speaker 2: with you.
Speaker 1: I think they are on solid ground in their argument,
Speaker 1: and I think the President was very clear why Democrats
Speaker 1: want to die on this hill. To put the rights
Speaker 1: of the illegals over the safety of Americans is inexplicable
Speaker 1: to me. But I'm having a hard time understanding that
Speaker 1: party right now.
Speaker 8: One way or.
Speaker 7: Another, they are going to be deportable, whether it's under
Speaker 7: the Alien Enemies Act or some other statutory basis. There
Speaker 7: are some easier ways to go. By the way, it's
Speaker 7: clear under a Statute eight USC. Twelve twenty seven that
Speaker 7: these people are deportable, period, end of story. Why because
Speaker 7: that statute tracks eight USC. Eleven eighty two, which makes
Speaker 7: them inadmissible in the first place. And so, by the
Speaker 7: way credit and Trump, it should be noted, has meant
Speaker 7: as already categorize this gang as a foreign terrorist organization.
Speaker 6: Clearly under these provisions.
Speaker 7: Of these statutes, they're deportable. He decided to go with
Speaker 7: the Alien Enemies Act, one would think because the president
Speaker 7: has great authority under that act. There's even a question
Speaker 7: from the nineteen forty eight case whether the Accords should intervene.
Speaker 7: There hasn't been any formal declaration of war here, but
Speaker 7: President Trump has said, as the commander in chief, that
Speaker 7: this is the irregular warfare that they've engaged in through
Speaker 7: their invasion.
Speaker 6: These are criminals, so.
Speaker 7: There should be any constituency for keeping them in the country.
Speaker 6: He will win one way or another.
Speaker 2: I agree with that. What's your assessment, Greg Jarrett?
Speaker 8: One hundred percent agree with both you and David. And
Speaker 8: this is another lesson in why you should pay no
Speaker 8: attention to the mainstream media. They would have you believe
Speaker 8: that Trump has commandeered an obscure law to wrongfully deport
Speaker 8: these violent gang members who are terrorists. The truth is
Speaker 8: the law is not obscure. It's not being wrongfully used.
Speaker 8: The Alien Enemies Act was passed by Congress, signed in
Speaker 8: the law in seventeen ninety eight. It is well established.
Speaker 8: It's never been repealed. It has been reviewed by courts
Speaker 8: numerous times. Four different presidents have invoked it, three of
Speaker 8: them Democrats in the twentieth century. And the Act is
Speaker 8: not limited to wartime authority, is some of the media claim. Now.
Speaker 8: Woodrow Wilson and Harriet Truman both used the Acts well
Speaker 8: after both World wars ended. It permits the president to
Speaker 8: remove without a hearing, what he designates to be alien
Speaker 8: enemies whenever there is a declared war or a predatory incursion. Now,
Speaker 8: what does that mean? A predatory incursion is broadly defined
Speaker 8: in the law as entry into the US for purposes
Speaker 8: contrary to the nation's interests or law, and that language
Speaker 8: gives President Trump broad latitude to protect the safety and
Speaker 8: security of its citizens. David mentioned in the nineteen forty
Speaker 8: eight case US Supreme Court upheld Harry Truman's use of
Speaker 8: the act, rule that it is completely constitutional in the
Speaker 8: name of the case is liticky versus Watkins. And this
Speaker 8: is the important part. The High Court stated that a
Speaker 8: president's decision under the Act, and I'm quoting here precludes
Speaker 8: judicial review of them of the order. So, in other words,
Speaker 8: a judge cannot second guess the president.
Speaker 1: So would that then allow the president to move forward
Speaker 1: regardless of what this judge's ruling says it does?
Speaker 8: Now they have filed for a stay in the DC
Speaker 8: Circuit Court of Appeals pending a hearing, and you know,
Speaker 8: I think if they're going to follow Supreme Court precedent,
Speaker 8: the DC Circuit Court will reverse what Judge James Bosberg did.
Speaker 8: You know, Federal district court judges, even pellet judges, cannot
Speaker 8: make new laws. And as the Supreme Court said in
Speaker 8: nineteen forty eight, this is the law of the land
Speaker 8: and it must be followed. You cannot, as a lowly
Speaker 8: court judge, decide you're smarter and better than the Supreme Court.
Speaker 8: And so, you know, Bosberg didn't care what the Supreme
Speaker 8: Court had previously ruled. I think he's been influenced by
Speaker 8: his political views and perhaps personal animus toward Trump, and
Speaker 8: he is not following the dictates of the law.
Speaker 1: So if we look at you know, the adverse rulings
Speaker 1: against the Trump agenda so far. It is in keeping
Speaker 1: with the history of what Democrats do when they lose
Speaker 1: at the ballot box, what they can't get done legislatively,
Speaker 1: they go to the liberal courts. And there have been
Speaker 1: fifteen injunctions so far on the Trump agenda. Caroline Levitt
Speaker 1: spoke out about this late last week. Instead fighting back
Speaker 1: by appealing, fighting back by using the full weight to
Speaker 1: the White House Council's Office and our lawyers at the
Speaker 1: federal government who believed that this injunction is entirely unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: It seems like this is now the strategy of choice,
Speaker 1: David Chohan that the left has taken on.
Speaker 6: Yeah, there's no question.
Speaker 7: Look, we all believe, you believe certainly in the idea
Speaker 7: of judicial with you. We have a three party system,
Speaker 7: three part system, and that's appropriate. But it should not
Speaker 7: go unnoticed that the court of choice generally with these
Speaker 7: things is the District Court in DC. We have decisions
Speaker 7: coming the same judges who you know, clearly, if the
Speaker 7: name Trump was in a case presented to Judge Beryl
Speaker 7: Howe for Examp in the DC District Court, you know
Speaker 7: the result before you hear any of the evidence all
Speaker 7: that that's in a perversion of our system. It can
Speaker 7: be that all of these decisions by the judges are
Speaker 7: then made on political grounds. Then we don't have a
Speaker 7: three part system working properly. That's not really judicial review.
Speaker 7: So for sure that's the choice here. You know, you're
Speaker 7: going to see they don't have the numbers in Congress,
Speaker 7: or you would have seen an impeachment movement already afoot
Speaker 7: from AOC and that crowd. Yeah, we're going to keep
Speaker 7: seeing this all throughout the administration.
Speaker 6: You can be sure.
Speaker 1: This activist judge, it is a US district judge actually
Speaker 1: added in his ruling that any plane containing suspected members
Speaker 1: of Trende Arragua that was planning to take offer that
Speaker 1: was already in the air needed to be returned to
Speaker 1: the US. The White House blasted the judge and said, well,
Speaker 1: they're out of the US airspace at this point, we
Speaker 1: have no control over it. Would that be a fair interpretation,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 8: Yeah, it absolutely is. And what secure is Bosberg? Let
Speaker 8: it be known that he wanted those planes carrying the
Speaker 8: TDA terrorists to turn around mid air return to the US,
Speaker 8: but he didn't put that in his final written order.
Speaker 8: Now why well, because he surely realized no judge has
Speaker 8: the power to issue an order redirecting flights that are
Speaker 8: beyond US soil and airspace airspace. But you know, his
Speaker 8: willingness to verbalize such a lawless desire as a really
Speaker 8: really a window into the thinking of this activist judge.
Speaker 8: And there are several troubling aspects of his tro I mean,
Speaker 8: the judge acted without bothering to hear from the government.
Speaker 8: Second of all, you know there are five named plaintiffs
Speaker 8: in the aclused petition. Well where are they? They're in
Speaker 8: Texas or a DC. Judge has no jurisdiction. And third,
Speaker 8: the exclusive remedy is a habeas corpus petition, it's not
Speaker 8: a temporary restraining order. And you know, finally, this judge
Speaker 8: sort of magically transforms the entire case into a class action,
Speaker 8: extending his restraining order to all non citizens that might
Speaker 8: be affected by Trump's invocation of the AEA. I mean,
Speaker 8: that is judicial activism.
Speaker 2: Run a mock click break.
Speaker 1: Right back more with Greg Jared David Schoan on the
Speaker 1: other side. Eight one hundred and ninety four one Shawn
Speaker 1: is number. We'll get to your calls coming up in
Speaker 1: mere moments as we continue. Let's go to our busy phones.
Speaker 1: Let's say hi to Jeremy and Missouri. Jeremy, how are
Speaker 1: you glad you called?
Speaker 8: Hey?
Speaker 6: Som how are you doing? I got a great age?
Speaker 2: What's going on?
Speaker 9: Yeah?
Speaker 6: Boy? Oh great?
Speaker 2: What's that?
Speaker 7: So?
Speaker 6: I was thinking maybe you Trump and Elon could all
Speaker 6: sign the dash in a paint ten kind of personal
Speaker 6: line to give away.
Speaker 1: It's a great idea. I mean I'd have to get
Speaker 1: them to agree to it. I'm obviously I would be
Speaker 1: the easy one to get to sign it. But it's
Speaker 1: a great idea. It would add value to it in
Speaker 1: my opinion, don't you think absolutely?
Speaker 6: I mean, you guys should do it in red, white
Speaker 6: and blue too. You know all American car and you
Speaker 6: know the new American president is doing the great things
Speaker 6: that he's doing. I'm all for it. I think it'd
Speaker 6: be amazing.
Speaker 1: I think it'd be amazing too. Let me let me
Speaker 1: ponder that idea and see if I might be able
Speaker 1: to somehow pull that off. It means i'd have to
Speaker 1: like ship it to DC, ship it to the White House,
Speaker 1: get it in there at a time when Elon and
Speaker 1: the President are there, ask them to go out and
Speaker 1: sign it and then have it shipped to Florida. Then
Speaker 1: I'd have to sign it and then ship it to
Speaker 1: wherever the winter happens to be, so there might be
Speaker 1: a lot of shipping. I'm I'm willing to do it
Speaker 1: if I can pull it off though. That's a great idea. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Jeremy appreciate you call. Let's say, how to Morgan in
Speaker 1: my free state of Florida. Morgan, how are you glad
Speaker 1: you called? I'm good? What's going on?
Speaker 9: Great? I have a short and sweet and non political questions.
Speaker 2: I love it.
Speaker 9: I know that you do too. So my question is
Speaker 9: what is your go to favorite recipe to make for dinner?
Speaker 1: Okay, I am very very basic for do you're specifically
Speaker 1: asking about dinner? Most nights I have meat with a
Speaker 1: lot of grilled onions and sometimes a light vegetable and
Speaker 1: that's basically it. So it's either it's either steak or
Speaker 1: chicken or a burger or pork ribs or pork chop.
Speaker 2: That's pretty much my staple.
Speaker 9: All right, So no favorite recipes?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean yeah, I mean if I could cook
Speaker 1: like and eat like I used to eat, and I
Speaker 1: really don't have a desire to do it. Usually when
Speaker 1: I get seafood, I will get seafood out rather than
Speaker 1: cook it in.
Speaker 2: But I I mean I I could whip up a
Speaker 2: steak in no time. I get.
Speaker 1: I mean, I do it like it's and with chef
Speaker 1: I q sents forget it, it's even easier.
Speaker 2: What's your favorite.
Speaker 9: Meal in Florida? I say seafood all the way.
Speaker 2: Okay, so what's your favorite seafood?
Speaker 9: Probably scallops I've been trying to master, all right, that's
Speaker 9: not hard to master.
Speaker 1: It's easy to master. I like seered scallops. I like
Speaker 1: shrimp either. I like grilled shrimp, and I like I'll
Speaker 1: take a shrimp cocktail occasionally. I like lobster tel I
Speaker 1: like crab legs, and I like crab claws. Those That's
Speaker 1: about what I eat seafood wise, and I will eat
Speaker 1: an occasional salmon or halib it.
Speaker 9: There you go. Well, my go to also is crabcakes.
Speaker 9: That's one of my favorites.
Speaker 1: Right, well, okay, add that to my list. I like
Speaker 1: crabcakes too, but I don't eat them very often. And
Speaker 1: I can make a really mean crabcake too.
Speaker 9: Oh yeah, me too. I have a cookoff next time
Speaker 9: you're down in Palm Coast.
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you, Morgan, God bless you. Glad you're out there.
Speaker 1: Angela West, Virginia, Sean Hannity Show, Hi.
Speaker 3: Hi Sean. How are you today?
Speaker 2: I'm good? How are you this Monday? What's going on?
Speaker 3: I'm great. I'm just chiming in today to discuss further,
Speaker 3: like you did last week, whether or not you should
Speaker 3: go on the View. And I think I speak for
Speaker 3: many many Americans to say absolutely not. I think by
Speaker 3: going on that show, you legitimize the show. Nobody cares.
Speaker 3: They're irrelevant. No one cares what celebrities think anymore and
Speaker 3: what they say, and they speak vile things about our
Speaker 3: president when he's trying to do the best possible job,
Speaker 3: and all they do is tear down. I'd like to
Speaker 3: take it a step further and ask that the executives
Speaker 3: of Fox News stop telling us what they said today,
Speaker 3: because we don't care what the View says.
Speaker 1: They well, sometimes it is entertaining to watch them bubble
Speaker 1: them fizz like Alca Saltz. So we do play an
Speaker 1: occasional clip for kicks and giggles and entertainment purposes only,
Speaker 1: So we definitely do that.
Speaker 3: I'm hoping that they'll just go away silently and no
Speaker 3: one will.
Speaker 1: Ever know that they Oh, they're definitely on, definitely on
Speaker 1: cancelation Watch, like so many other shows, just like Chucky
Speaker 1: Schumer's now on you know, cancelation watches, the Senate Minority Leader,
Speaker 1: just like all these late night comedy shows. They're on
Speaker 1: official cancelation Watch too. And just like a lot of
Speaker 1: news programs on fake News CNN MSDNC. You saw the
Speaker 1: bloodbath at msdn C. I mean, they're all on official
Speaker 1: cancelation watch, right. No, it's in many ways, it's kind
Speaker 1: of been miraculous. I'm in my twenty ninth year at
Speaker 1: Fox and have out, you know, in spite of a
Speaker 1: lot of people that would have predicted otherwise, maybe in
Speaker 1: the beginning rightly, so my demise and wanting my demise,
Speaker 1: I've outlasted all of them, and I've got a lot
Speaker 1: in me and I'm continuing now for a good while.
Speaker 1: I'm not going anywhere anytime soon that I know of.
Speaker 3: That's great, that's wonderful. That's what we want to hear.
Speaker 3: And you know, I'm from this great state of West
Speaker 3: virgin and West Virginia carried every single county for president.
Speaker 2: Amazing this pastime.
Speaker 3: This was wonderful. Yes, because years ago we used to
Speaker 3: be democratic and that's that's we've come a long way.
Speaker 2: Not anymore.
Speaker 1: You made the you made the full transition, like Florida
Speaker 1: and like Ohio and like a lot of other states.
Speaker 1: And if we can convert a few more, I'd like
Speaker 1: to see Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, UH become reliable, reliably
Speaker 1: red states. And if that happens, then, you know what,
Speaker 1: the country will be given a lot better shape. On
Speaker 1: the issue of the view that that poll is now
Speaker 1: officially shut down. I won fifty to forty nine. It
Speaker 1: was a very very close vote that almost forced me
Speaker 1: onto that show. Thank goodness for all of you that
Speaker 1: voted no.
Speaker 2: Thank you. I think Linda was trying to stack the
Speaker 2: stack the deck.
Speaker 3: There, Thank goodness, because we don't want their ratings to
Speaker 3: go up because you're on it, you know what I mean,
Speaker 3: their ratings would because people would you.
Speaker 1: It was sort of a I'm in a no win
Speaker 1: situation in that in that environment, here's the problem, and
Speaker 1: whether whether I would have invited them on my show,
Speaker 1: or I go on their show. Here's the problem is
Speaker 1: they're going to lash out with their their their trumped arrangement.
Speaker 1: They're going to say false things, and then I'm in
Speaker 1: a position that I'd be never ending, non interruptive, which
Speaker 1: my audience does not like. And they've communicated that loudly
Speaker 1: to me over the years. Or I let them talk
Speaker 1: and then people are mad at me. Why didn't you
Speaker 1: fix that? Why didn't you correct them? Why didn't you
Speaker 1: Because it's every other word I'll have to correct. So
Speaker 1: it's it's to me. It doesn't lend itself to really
Speaker 1: good television, if that makes sense. I mean I tried
Speaker 1: to have a discussion the last time with James Carvel
Speaker 1: and he's just fewing out things that are false, and
Speaker 1: he said, fact check me, fact check me.
Speaker 2: So the next night I've fact checked them right.
Speaker 3: And you know, you don't want to have to just
Speaker 3: be defense mode the whole time because they don't listen
Speaker 3: to reason. There, they don't real irrational totally.
Speaker 1: There are not many Democrats right now. They're in their
Speaker 1: right mind. We must have pity on them. Anyway, I
Speaker 1: do appreciate the call.
Speaker 2: Thank you. So much for being with us Angela checking anytime? Mark?
Speaker 2: And Ohio, what's up? Mark? How are you glad you called?
Speaker 7: Hey?
Speaker 4: Sean?
Speaker 2: What's going on?
Speaker 10: Hey? So I'm in Connecticut.
Speaker 2: Sorry, Hey.
Speaker 10: I always wanting to talk about these protests because I've
Speaker 10: seen a ton of it, and for the regular person watching,
Speaker 10: you really, you know, you just can't understand why they're
Speaker 10: there and what they're doing there. But I just saw
Speaker 10: yesterday between indeed and I forget the other one. You know,
Speaker 10: the big job board that they have online, there's seven
Speaker 10: hundred and sixty two advertisements for paid protesting just in
Speaker 10: New York City alone. So for everybody that's watching it,
Speaker 10: that says, how do these people think that this is okay?
Speaker 10: Or that's okay whatever the cause is for the day,
Speaker 10: It's all nothing.
Speaker 6: To do with what they're thinking.
Speaker 2: It's all they're getting paid, okay.
Speaker 1: Now, we have exposed this in the past, and that
Speaker 1: is that there are groups that are organizing and they're
Speaker 1: paying people, and they're moving people in, and there are
Speaker 1: groups that are even handing out talking points and the questions,
Speaker 1: and they're trying to sabotage Republican town halls to create
Speaker 1: a false impression that Republicans are not being liked right
Speaker 1: now when all the polls are to the contrary, And
Speaker 1: if this is the democratic tactic, let them continue, because
Speaker 1: you know, we have now three polls consecutively that show
Speaker 1: their approval rating in the twenties, the lowest that's been
Speaker 1: in decades and decades. So if that's what they want
Speaker 1: to do, I'm okay with it. But if you're an
Speaker 1: elected official, you do need to be on the lookout
Speaker 1: a little bit and understand that these are paid protesters
Speaker 1: and they're showing up to make you look bad.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: Look, the reasons are just so many why the left
Speaker 1: is losing touch with the American people and they're pulling
Speaker 1: at all time lows. You know, there are a couple
Speaker 1: of people that are recognizing it. One is Bill Maher.
Speaker 1: Here's him pointing out how the Democrats have funneled all
Speaker 1: this money to environmentalism after Biden lost Any skeptical of
Speaker 1: saving the Department of Education. Oh maybe there is a
Speaker 1: little intellectual curiosity on the left.
Speaker 4: Listen, The question, though, really is is the Department of
Speaker 4: Education doing that? Is that now? They probably are doing
Speaker 4: some good work. I'm sure they are, right what is
Speaker 4: their budget, like two hundred billion dollars or something. But
Speaker 4: it also looks like some of these places are just
Speaker 4: funneling money to people who are not solving the problem.
Speaker 4: I mean, I saw that story about the twenty billion
Speaker 4: that went out the door after Biden lost the EPA.
Speaker 4: It wasn't the EPA or was it the EPA, but
Speaker 4: there was twenty billion dollars that they shoveled to because
Speaker 4: Trump was coming in then they were going to reverse
Speaker 4: all this stuff and supposedly environmental groups and they were
Speaker 4: not really environmental groups and they had no experience in
Speaker 4: doing it. Like I said before, I care about the plastics?
Speaker 2: Did they think?
Speaker 4: Do I think this money was going to get rid
Speaker 4: of the plastics? In my brain, I do not. So
Speaker 4: I am skeptical of the Department of Education, and I
Speaker 4: think every Democrat who runs really needs to take on
Speaker 4: this issue because that's your portfolio education. You've owned it
Speaker 4: and the results aren't good.
Speaker 2: And he's right.
Speaker 1: I mean, use my example about the Department of Education.
Speaker 1: Ten families even thirty thousand per student, good luck, they're
Speaker 1: going to have one teacher for every five kids. Secretary
Speaker 1: of State Mark or Rubio sparring with Margaret Brennan over
Speaker 1: revoking you know, Mahmood Khalil's visa. Okay, be the party
Speaker 1: of Mangioni and Khalil. That's what the Democrats are now becoming.
Speaker 11: And if you tell us when you apply for a visa,
Speaker 11: I'm coming to the US to participate in Prohamas events,
Speaker 11: that runs counter to the foreign policy interest to the
Speaker 11: United States of America. It's that simple.
Speaker 2: So you lied, you came.
Speaker 11: If you had told us that you were going to
Speaker 11: do that, we never would have.
Speaker 4: Given you the visa.
Speaker 11: Now you're here, Now you do it. You lied to us,
Speaker 11: You're out. It's that simple.
Speaker 8: But is there any but is there any evidence of
Speaker 8: a link to terrorism or is it just his your
Speaker 8: point of view?
Speaker 11: Yeah, they take over I mean do you not. I
Speaker 11: mean you should watch the news. These guys take over
Speaker 11: entire buildings. We vandalized college, they shut down.
Speaker 6: I'm asking you about.
Speaker 2: This justification for the revocation of his visa.
Speaker 3: Was there any.
Speaker 11: Evidential so was the negotiator on it, negotiating on behalf
Speaker 11: of people that took over a campus, that vandalize buildings,
Speaker 11: negotiating over what that's a crime in and of itself
Speaker 11: that they're involved in being the negotiator of the spokesperson, this, that,
Speaker 11: and the other.
Speaker 6: We don't want it.
Speaker 11: We don't need these people in our country that we
Speaker 11: never should have allowed him in the.
Speaker 1: First and that is their radicalism. And this leads us
Speaker 1: to Byron Donald's discussing standing strong for our constitution and
Speaker 1: for liberty and pushing back against the radical left. He
Speaker 1: was on enough a Fox News channel on Sunday.
Speaker 12: Yeah, I mean, look, people here, not just in Southwest Florida,
Speaker 12: but in the entire state of Florida have come to
Speaker 12: know me as a conservative who's focused on leading on
Speaker 12: all the issues that really matter for the future of
Speaker 12: our country. And so it doesn't matter what the issue
Speaker 12: said's been, I'm there standing strong to defend the constitution,
Speaker 12: defend the principles of liberty, and really push back on
Speaker 12: the radical left and these narratives that have been really
Speaker 12: hurting the conservative movement and a Republican party in politics
Speaker 12: in the entire country. And so, you know, I'm really
Speaker 12: honored that people have supported me throughout the years, and
Speaker 12: that support has grown here in the Sunshine State, and
Speaker 12: I'm really just honored to have their support, but most
Speaker 12: importantly the endorsement of President Trump to be the next
Speaker 12: governor of Florida. Joe Biden added two trillion dollars worth
Speaker 12: of regulations in just four years. Donald Trump wants to
Speaker 12: slash those regulations. And if you talk to business owners
Speaker 12: like I do, like the President does so many of
Speaker 12: my colleagues, if you're going to talk about what matters,
Speaker 12: more tariffs or cutting the regulatory bureaucracy in Washington, they
Speaker 12: will tell you cut the regulations because they're killing us.
Speaker 12: They have no plan, they have no strategy of how
Speaker 12: to make the lives of the American people. What I'm
Speaker 12: focused on is securing our boarder. The Democrats failed. What
Speaker 12: I really care about is sending people back to their
Speaker 12: home countries.
Speaker 2: They failed.
Speaker 12: Actually getting out of wars on the glow on the
Speaker 12: world stage. They failed. Donald Trump is doing that. He
Speaker 12: is focused on the American people. If they want to
Speaker 12: get up and walk out, that's their business. It'll demonstrate
Speaker 12: how childish they are and how serious they have not
Speaker 12: been about the business of America. God would tell any
Speaker 12: Democrat that wants to come out there a national turf
Speaker 12: from my town hall, bring it, because we're going to
Speaker 12: talk to truth. We're going to talk about what's really
Speaker 12: going on. I'm not afraid of you. It's about time
Speaker 12: we get down the business here in DC.
Speaker 1: All right, Congressman Byron Donald's will join us. Next, we'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls coming up as well. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one Sean as we continue