WEBVTT - A Wounded Lion or a Beaten Mule: HF, TSLA, FOTSBA

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast. You're a weekly podcast where we

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levin and

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I write The Money Stuff COLMN for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Katy, you know what my man career aspiration is, tell

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>me still lose a billion.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Dollars and come out better for it.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Well you can't not. Yeah, well it's not the best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>possible career move. But up there, surprisingly I up there

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on the list of career moves that you can make

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is losing a billion dollars if you're a hedge fund

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>trader or bank trader, because like, there's just got to

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be something special about you. If you use a billion dollars, well.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>You know what I always say, A wounded lion is

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>still a lion.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So The Shank Kumar has a great story about how

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hedgehund traders who lose money are in high demand and

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>hopping among multi strategy hedgehunds, and it does feature a

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>quote from a hedgehund re creator named Jason Kennedy who

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>says even a wounded lion is still a lion, and

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the lion isn't mortally wounded, he will heal, and when

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>he's fully back, that lion is worth a lot more money.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 4>I do love it.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Like by the end of the metaphrase like also there's money,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>He's like.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Wait, let me tie this back into what we're talking about.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>That's an incredible quote. Sometimes you read an article and

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 2>you come across a passage that just makes you pause.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>That was this for me.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I would definitely rather be a wounded lion than

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>a beaten mule, which is a callback to our mailback episode.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm the title of our episode.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Jason Kennedy has a very optimistic take on this, that

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the lion will heal. Sometimes lions do get wounded and

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>then they just die or they're never the same.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in sort of an efficient markets world.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I find it fascinating how quaint confident people are that

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they can identify investing skill. Clearly, people believe it and

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>like they have good reason to believe it.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>These are like large, successful firms that for many years

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>produce good returns, but just fascinating to me that you

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can be like, Wow, this guy who lost a billion dollars,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>he's great, he's so skilled. You know, we'll get him

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on the on the downswing.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 3>And get him at a discount.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll get him at a discount and it'll be great, right, Yeah,

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to like the regime has changed, or he

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was lucky before or something, and now he's not a

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>winded line. He's just the guy who loses money.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 3>He's a gazelle.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of recent examples of this happening, basically,

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>these battered former stars getting picked up, perhaps at a discount.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I was struggling to find a success story. It felt

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 3>like this article.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Named a lot of bad examples or how this could

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>go wrong. I wonder if this ever works out.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's weird, like you probably don't hear about the ones

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that work out, because like they're not going around bragging

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about how they lost a lot of money at their

0:02:59.040 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>previous firms.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>They're back to just being lions.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>They're back to just being lions. But right, the other

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is that this has always been a thing that happens, Like, yeah,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely there's been an uptick in it recently,

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just because there's been such a talent war among the

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>big multi strategy hedge funds, and so there are all

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>these people on very large compensation packages that are moving

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>around between these firms. And if you run these firms,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the people you can pick off from your competitors are

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>often the people who have lost money. That's partly because

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like they're out of favor or whatever. Some of them,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially been fired, right because like traditionally these firms,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have a big draw down, you get fired.

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Although the article mentions some of these people are stars

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>who like that doesn't happen to like they have a

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>big draw down and it's like, oh, it's okay, you

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>can stay here, but they get picked off anyway. The

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>other reason they're attractive is because they have to leave. Like,

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>if you lose money, even if you don't get fired,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you're now like below your high water mark, and so

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to earn back all the money you lost

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>before you can get a big bonus again, you know,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more or less traditionally, and so if that's the case,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it's very tempting to quit and started a new firm

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>where your high water mark is resent back to zero.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're not in the penalty box.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, the article points out that it's

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>not great for investors, like particularly if you're in multiple firms,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>like and people are just moving around to like reset

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>their high watermarks, Like you're not getting the benefit of

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the high water mark.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>That's true to that point. There was a quote from

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 2>a woman who now is a performance coach. She used

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>to be the ex head of a Georgia bank unit

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 2>that linked investors with hedge funds, saying that after a

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>bad year, the pitch is simple, check clean, sight, chill

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and let's be honest. Some of these deals are the

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>definition of an offer you can't refuse. So it makes

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>sense psychologically.

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder about chill, right, Like what are your

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>incentives at your new firm? On the one hand, you

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>want to prove that you still got.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 3>It, you're still lying.

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, one thing the article points out is,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like you get one of these, you can't continually lose

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars. So if you lose a billion dollars,

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like you did great. You like took a lot

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of risk, You've learned from your mistakes, You move on,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>You got a new firm, it's great, but you lose

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it again that you're done, so like you haven't sentives

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to be more conservative at your new firm.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Well to that point, we already have an example. There

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>is this man, his name is Rob Banham. He was

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 2>at point seventy two, then he moved to Citadel. He's

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 2>already been let go after making tens of millions of

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>dollars of more losses. So I guess he found his

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>second strike right.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Again, this is not would be classy, but it is

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>possible that you lost a lot of money because you're

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>really talented at losing money. Yeah, but no, I love

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I love the like edgehun compensation structure of like like,

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people would like to be

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>able to find a system where if you lose money,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's your problem, right, Not so much in multi strategy funds,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but I've said about this before with single manager hedge funds,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>where if they lose a lot of money for their

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>investors and they're below their high water mark, they will

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>shut down the fund and spend like six months doing

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>penance on a beach, and then they'll like start a

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>new fund with a new name, and the investors would

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be like, what the hell, Yeah, you got to earn

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.119
<v Speaker 1>back your high water work. And every so often people

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>will be like, I'm going to indenture myself for years

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to my old investors and just earn back every penny

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of my how outter remark and not take and right

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like people do that, but not everyone does that. I

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think limited partners would love to have some incentive structure,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>some compstructure, some contract where they could make the losses

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fully the hedgemand manager's problem. But it's hard to do.

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to do. No one's quite cracked the good.

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I stud point out is after I

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote about this, I learned of a paper by Maury L.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Say If a Duke called hedge fund Incentives, risk taking

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and asset prices. What I wrote about is like the

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>hedgehend managers like including a multi shred firms have like

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>incentives to optimize their b and their high water mark.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So what that means is like, if it's getting to

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 1>be the end of the year and you're up a lot,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you like chill because you don't want to lose all

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the games you've made because those games provide your bonus. Right,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're down a little bit, you have a lot

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of incentive to take big risks because if you're down

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit or flat, you don't get a big bonus.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you're up a lot, you got a big bonus.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you're down a lot, you don't do any

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>worse than if you're down a little bit, So you

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>might as well take big risks. And what else say

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if he finds is that one that's true? And two

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you can see it in asset prices where like basically

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>more hi beta, more volatile stocks go up when a

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of hedgehunes are below their high water mark because

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gambling on redemption. And so like you actually see

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>stock prices react to the year end of bonus structures

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of hedgelong managers.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Man, so I'm gonna I'm going to borrow this paper

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>for when I'm on television at the end of the

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>year and things are going bananas. I'm just going to say, well,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess a lot of heat.

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anything that happens in the year, it's like probably

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>someone like optimizing their bonus.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I use it all the time, month end, quarter ends. Well,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>it looks like things are just weird today. I can't

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>explain this tick in this stock.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But right, I think that, as we've said on this podcast,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the market is a conversation among four hedge funds. I'm like,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they need their.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Bonus's, it is time to talk about Elon Musk.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>It's been what at least at.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Least a week, at least a single.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Week, has it only been want to make anyway? Yeah,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is back in the news this week.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well actually last Friday Friday. Yeah, you famously don't

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>publish on Fridays.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It's does the crafting email for this?

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it takes hours. So Elon Moss one trillion dollars.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I really don't like this framing.

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Everyone says this, everyone does.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is the CEO of Tesla and the techno

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>king of Tesla. There's also, controversially, let's say he's the

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>founder of Tesla.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 3>That is a controversial statement.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>He didn't found Tesla, but he's the founder of Tesla,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>right for sure. For theoretical purposes, he's the founder of Tesla,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and so like many founder CEOs, he's a big shareholder

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla and depends how you can because of like

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the weird option stuff, but he owns like twelve to

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of Tesla.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 3>It's not enough.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not enough, but it's a lot, right, And you

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of like these big tech companies

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that are run by their more or less founders. They

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>don't get huge compensation packages, and they don't get huge

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>compensation packages because like it's just assumed that, like they

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>profit from the upside in the company by owning a

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the company. So like Jeff Bezos rand Amazon,

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Mark Zuckerberg runs Meta, Like these people

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>don't get paid hundreds of billions of dollars. They just

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>own hundreds of billions of dollars of stock, and like

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>when they do good stuff, the stock goes up. And

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, Elon Musk is not like that for reasons,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and he instead gets huge compensation packages. And the board

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or Tessa's ass shareholders to vote on a new package

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that targets growing Tesla from the day about a trillion

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar company into a eight point five trillion dollar.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Company, which is two in videos, two.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>In videos, yeah, right, more two in videos now, yeah,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>who knows what year, But if he succeeds in growing

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Tesla to an eight point five trillion dollar company, they

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>will give him a trillion dollars worth of stock, which

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is great, but like, also he will have a trillion

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of stock anyway, Like, he already owns a

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of stock, and if he eight point five times

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the company, then the stock will be worth a trillion dollars.

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So like, it's not like they sat down and thought,

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>if we give elan musk at trillion dollars, he will

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>turn this into an eight point five trillion dollar company.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like, if we give another trillion dollars on top

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the trillion dollars he already get for that, then

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll turn it into an eight point five trillion dollar company.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not a trillion dollar it's like whatever, it's if

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he does this, he would have a trillion dollars anyway,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because he's a big shelter. This is all in the

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>shadow of like he had this comp package that Adella

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>reports strike down, and like the judge at the time wrote,

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like the board did not analyze whether it was necessary

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to give him all of this given that he's a

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>huge shareholder anyway, and like the comp set, the Zuckerbergs

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world don't get, you know, trillion dollar Paybay

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just they benefit from their share ownership. Once again, the

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>board does not think that Elon Musk gets much incentive

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>effect from the shares he already owns. Yeah, they're just

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>like he needs more shares, and it's like clearly not

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>true that he is being incentivized by a trillion dollars.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>What's happening here is that Elon Musk wants to own

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of the company, and so the board

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is like, how do we get him twenty five percent

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the company, And they just give him twenty five

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>percent of the company. They'd be like, well, if we

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>don't give him twenty five percent of the company, you'd quit.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>So here it is right, but that like looks really bad.

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Even to a Texas court, that would look bad. So

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is they're saying, oh, we have like

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>these super ambitious performance calls, and if he meets these goals,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then we'll give them a trillion dollars. It's probably a

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>reasonable solution. But it's so like he's owned like twenty

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>five percent of Tesla, then he sold down like by

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and stuff. It's very strange that he just he

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>thinks he deserves to perpetually own twenty five percent of

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and the board is like, well you have to

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>give it to m.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, people have tried to stop him from what from

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>owning that much or I don't know, you think about

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the twenty eighteen experience, Yeah.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, I think that. You know. Elan mess says, the

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>funniest thought comes the most likely, Like you could sue.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You could takes us to stop this. Everyone assumes you

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would lose, but anyone really knows that's true. I am

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>really what if someone sued in one? Wouldn't that be funny?

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 2>That wouldn't be funny. Maybe not the funniest thing though,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 2>so it probably won't happen.

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>He'd be so mad that I think it'd be pretty.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Funny, but whatever, Okay, I am curious to see what

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 2>happens over the next decade. Obviously, because eight point five

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars, I mean, the first you think about the

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 2>incentive structure that was put in place the first time around.

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 2>That was very ambitious as well.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And he did it when he got his twenty eighteen package,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the idea of making Tesla a trillion dollar company,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>which is not exactly the target, but like yeah, which

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>he did would have seemed kind of absurd, and then

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 1>he did it in fairly short order. Yeah, I don't know,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a decade, a long time.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that you mentioned in your column

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>is that Elon Musk the world's richest man that briefly

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>became not true this that's right, Larry Elson briefly became.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 3>The world's richest man.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Now they're I don't know, I think like a billion

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 2>dollars separates them at this exact moment. But you think

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 2>about the future, I think the exact think one.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Or both of them is like watching the chart as

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the lens crossed.

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I would like to think that both of them are.

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>But in any case, obviously Oracle had insane earnings and

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>had an insane outlook.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh like flatish earnings on insane look.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, well that's it's mostly out.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you think about the billings growth and whatever

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>and where the future is going to go. It really

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>just underscored why Elon wants to turn Tesla into an

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 2>AI company, because, Okay, maybe evs still are the future.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>They don't feel as immediately the future as AI is

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, right, I mean you can point to your billings,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>your like potential future sales as a DA company to your.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Three hundred billion dollars worth of contracts that you signed

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 2>with open Ai.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, it's sort of worth that much in

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>market cup, right. That's why Elon Musk is turning his

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>focus to AI, and it's also why Tesla needs to

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>pay up to keep him, right, because there are more

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>obvious AI players like his AI company. Also in the

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Tesla proxy, yeah, there's a shareholder proposal to invest in Xai.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because like there's some business rationale for

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Tesla to invest in XI companies put the chat out

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on the dashboard.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Which they've done I think talk to your car.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But so like there's some business case. There's a

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a very big, like Elon Musk personal business case,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which is that Tesla is not the most obvious AI company, right,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to capture the public imagination the way

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>like Oracle is. But then like Xai, which is a

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>more obvious AI play, plays are very expensive and it

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>needs money, and Tesla has money, so like it does

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>make sense for Elon Musk to like merge them or

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like take some Tesla money and give a TEXTI or whatever.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But even in the current situation. Even in Texas, it

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem a little hard for Tesla to just decide

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on the CEO's whim to invest billions or dollars in

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the CEO's other company. But if the cherlders.

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Asked for it, yeah, that's true.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And then it's funny because like someone tweeted about it

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and Elon Musk was like, it's not up to me.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The shareolders have to ask far and so like some

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>chrelder duly like went and proposed exactly and then like

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the shareholders overwhelming the button favor and then

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the word are like that did they give surely what

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they want? Well, we're going to give Elan his money,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and then someone will negotiate it. It's not how one

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>normally runs a company, but it's like it's happening.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 4>It's runs a company, all right, Eric Adams, thank you

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 4>to Front of the Show Bill Ackman, the actual Bill Ackman,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 4>for teeing us up for this too delating conversation.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Friend of the Show by Lackman went on Twitter to

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>try to persuade Eric Adams to drop out of the

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>New York City mayoral race, which is a for our purposes.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's say three way race between Zori Mundanni.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Who's you know, fan favorite.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Odd lots cast, betting market favorite, polling favorite, Zora Mundannie,

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and then there's Andrew who's heard of him Bill Ackman

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite yep. And then there's Area Adams is the current

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>mayor and seems to have no shot. But so like

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a prediction market, the polymarket has zorround at like eighty percent,

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>odds Cuomo like eighteen percent, and then like you know,

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Adams like one or two percent or something like that.

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>And so Bill Ackman went on Twitter to be like,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Arian Adams drop out, because I'm Donnie, seems to have

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a plurality, and so like if everyone else drops out,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>then like maybe a Cuomo consolidate's enough support to win.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So if Aria Adams drops out, that like really materially

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>improves Cuomo's chances. And so Acman went on Twitter to

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>be like, er Adams drop out. But he also said,

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and to fund your future, you could place a large

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bet on Andrew Cuomo and then announce your withdrawal from

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the race. There is no insider trading on polymarket.

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 3>What a crazy thing to say. I mean, God, plus,

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 3>he's not even wrong.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>He's wrong in the sense that he says you could

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>place a large bet on uncoma. I don't think that's true. Like,

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the liquidity in these markets is enough

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for like, Like one thing we know about Eric Adams

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is that he enjoys like playing trips. Yes, I don't

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>think you could make a ton of money betting on

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>anentercroma some liquidity. But like, as a general proposition, is

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this a thing that will become popular in politics, which

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is betting against yourself and then dropping out of the race.

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would like to see that world that future actualized.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be funny and it would provide

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fodder for this podcast.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh yeah, right, I mean, because like traditionally

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not you're not supposed to pay people to drop

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>out of political races. Seems a little it seems a

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>little bribby. But then like the prediction markets are sort

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of like a distributed way for dropping out of your race.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 2>And I mean trading, and Bi Lackman didn't say I

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>will be on the other side of this trade, so

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that was good, right.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, one thing I wrote about this is that

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>there's not a ton of liquidity. Eric Adams couldn't make

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money by doing this unless someone where

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to step in and be on the other side of

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the trade, which again he didn't offer, but like would

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have been you know, it would be the logical next step.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But then the other question is is he right about

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>there being no insider trading and nobody really knows.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's like don't know until you try.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Or for years afterwards. So, by the way, another independent

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>reason that Eric Adams couldn't do that is because no

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>one believes it's still illegal to trade on Pollymarket if

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you're a US person, Like poly Market is not available

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US.

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>No one ever talks about that ever.

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Talks about like they used to chuckle about it, like

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't you know, like Probly marks like advertising all

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>over New York and everyone's like, oh, you can't trade

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on Pollymarket in the US. But like everyone did. If

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to their website now they're like, Polymarket is

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>coming home. The website actually has a little eagle, so good. No,

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's just like, you know, it looks like

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a Trump Sun designed it. But anyway,

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Polymarket is coming home. Polymarket will soon be available for

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>US traders the website right, but it's not now right,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>so you can't do it, but so right now, Like

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to trade prediction markets in the US,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you can trade on CALCI. What should talk about all

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the time because you can predict sporting events on calshy,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and CALSHI has insider trading rules, quite strict insider trading rules,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can't trade if you have material on public

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>information or if you can influence the outcome of the event.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Polymarkets rules are less clear, and I imagine that when

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>polymarket is available in the US, it will look more

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like real commodities exchanges, which don't say you can't trade

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on material on public information, because that's not how commodities

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>markets work. I quoted Carolyn fam who's the acting Commissioner

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at the CFTC. You talked about the special characteristics of

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the derivative markets, where end users necessarily trade on the

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>basis of their own proprietary information in order to hedge

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>their risks. You're an oil company trading oil futures. You

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>know something about oil production that other people don't know,

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and you're totally allowed to trade it. So in US

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>regulated commodities markets, you're not allowed to trade with misappropriated information.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you work at an oil company and you

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>trade for your personal account based on the oil companies

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>production plans, that's probably insider trading. That's probably not allowed

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because you're misappropriating that information. You have some duty to

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>keep that confidential, right, But like the oil company itself

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>can trade commodities, And if you like, read that through

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to election markets, which are not commodities, none of this

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>makes any sense in election markets, but you know they

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>are treated as commodities. If you read it through to

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>election markets, then it's like, well, if Eric Adams is

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>campaign manager place an insider bet, that would be bad

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to be misappropriation for sure, eric Adoms does it himself.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's fun. So I really don't know. I really

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the sort of like future rules around

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>insider trading prediction markets will be, because like there are

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, include like Calshi and the people

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>who got Calshi to be a regulated US Torovators exchange,

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who are like, that's

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>icky and unfair, and we do not want to have

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the trouble that would come with allowing insider trading, right,

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but there are a lot of people who are, like,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of prediction markets is insider trading. The

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>whole point of prediction markets is to get accurate predictions

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>by like incentivizing insiders to bet on stuff they know.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Like that's like when economists set up prediction markets, right,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the whole point. Yeah, And so Kelshi has spent

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>years trying to become a regulated exchange, and like wanted

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to conservative regulators. We don't live at a

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>time where people are that conservative insider trading anymore. So

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't really know what's gonna happen.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>You could build a case that Eric Adams did listen

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>to Bill Ackman, which I find tickling about this story.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't dropped out yet, right, he.

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Hasn't dropped out yet.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 2>But this is Thursday, und Yes, on September fifth, Eric

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Adams had a press conference I believe that was Friday.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 2>He said that he's staying in New York City's mayoral race.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>He also said that Andrew Cuomo is a snake and

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 2>a liar. That's a direct quote. So on Friday of

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 2>last week, he was very committed to staying In September

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>six is when we got the Bill Lackman tweet, which

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 2>was awesome. And then today, on Thursday, the eleventh of September,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News reported that New York City Mayor Eric Adams

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 2>did tell a group of civic and business leaders that

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 2>he's conducting his own polling to decide the future of

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 2>his re election campaign. This is according to people who

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 2>attended the meeting. So he's at least thinking about it.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>He's still making money. Like that's like, I just love

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the tell the political matter. Billman would like him drop

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>out the financial matter, believans like you can make a

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of money by dropping in. I don't think it's true,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but it would be funny if it was true.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's thinking about it. Who knows, I'm not.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You know you're buying enter Cromo contracts.

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm certainly not. I don't know if we can man

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 3>step away from the mic first.

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>No, as I said, I don't think there's a lot

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>of money to be made at it, and there's a

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of unpleasantness, right, But maybe it's like the market

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is discounting this right, Like, yeah, the market is aware

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of Bill.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Ackrans streets like that's true.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Is like three percent?

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Coma's chances would go have that much

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if Adams chopped out, But I don't know.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll say I was going to say, we've still got

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a long way to go, but there's not that much

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 2>longer time marchers still on.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well we've collectively sighed, So I think I

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>think that's the end.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the final side. Yeah, And that was the Money

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm Matt Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 2>on the Clothes between three and five pm Eastern.

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>email to your money Pop at Bloomberg dot net, ask

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>us a question and we might answer it on the air.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakas and

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Roses Honda.

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Amy Keen is our executive producer.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 2>And Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Money Stuff podcast. We'll be

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>back next to week with more stuff