WEBVTT - Louisiana Prepares For Climate-Linked Flooding, Moving Thousands: Flavelle

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Well,

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>let's sa turn our attention now to climate change and

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>its real world implications. Christopher Flavel is our climate policy

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg, and Christopher, thank you for being with me.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell us the story about those people who live in

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>certain areas of Louisiana. They're packing up because of the

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>changes wrought by climate change. Yeah, and thanks for me

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Pin. Louise Ana has for a few

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>years been the leader in the US in terms of

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with climate change, not because it wants to, because

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it has to. It's land is sinking faster than anywhere

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>else in the country, and so their force with these

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>really in some cases radical ideas. There's a huge swath

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of Louisiana around the delta of the Mississippi River where

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>land is sinking so fast and the sea is rising

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so fast that people have to struggle with flooding almost

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 1>all the time. As a result, the state is trying

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how and when to move people out

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of those areas, and even more radical, and no one

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>else doing this, how to figure out to ensure that

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>no one else moves back in. No one, no other

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>state that I'm aware of, is trying anything like this.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the money that's involved, because so we'll

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>get to the individual stories in a second. But this

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>costs money to do, and where does the money come from?

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think the approach in Louisiana is

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out their strategy first and then worry about money

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's a long term problem. And I think their

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>idea is the cost of inaction would be huge as well,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So the assumptions they'll find the money, I think that's

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>probably true. There'll be a mix of federal funding. It's

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>federal funding that that started the program that I was

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>writing about, the l A Safe program. They're also getting

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>money still from the BP oil spill. And look, Luisa's

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an argument is is they get so much federal disaster

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>money from FEMA after hurricanes and from HUD that instead

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>of using that money to keep on trying to rebuild

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>people's lives where they are, it makes more sense to

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>move them out of harm's way. That's a that's sort

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of a cliche. You hear that all around the country,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>especially after this year's hurricane season. Louisiana is really trying

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to make good on that, and say, what would it

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>mean on a broad scale? Uh, not just rebuilding in

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the neighborhood, but really rebuilding miles away

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>from where you were and emptying out entire swaths of

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the state. How many people would uh this effect? You

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have any idea? Yeah, I put that question to the

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>state officials behind this program. The amount of land they're

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at is is enormous. It's it's bigger than Delaware

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and Rhode Island. Uh. And the number of people who

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>live on that land, they guess is about sixty people.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Now they are only looking, at least right now, at

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to move those who live outside of the levee system.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And they don't know what share of that wouldn't be

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in that category will be outside of the levees. It

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>could be it could be a few thousand, it could

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>be tens of thousands. Um, but you know what, no

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>one has tried anything on that scale. So even if

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just a thousand people, that would be just a

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>groundbreaking idea. And the big question is going to be

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>how much pushback will they get where But they get

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the pushback from the individuals, the people who are actually

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be displaced. To my great surprise, being down

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there a few days this week and talking to people

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in these areas, I got a pretty strong sense the

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>people who who the state is trying to help, they

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>realize what's going on. They are not in denial. They

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>know that the flooding risk is so bad they're going

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to have to move eventually. Hate the pushback might come

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>from developers who probably are aware likewise that in Louisiana's

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is real, but might be concerned about a precedent. It's

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.679
<v Speaker 1>one thing if Louisiana does this. If other states facing

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>similar flood risk and is a lot of them start

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>saying which parts of our geography should we declare off

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>limits to new development, that could be a real issue

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for developers, for realtors, for for commercial industries that want

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to locate here. So I think they'll be wondering, like

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us. How far will this go? Christopher

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is the is the unintended consequence of hurricanes and flooding

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that people become more aware of whatever the reason for

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>these catastrophes, their catastrophies that are going to ruin their lives,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>their property, and as a result, they are more inclined

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to go along with the idea to move out. Yeah.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I think definitely there's a there's some sort of relationship

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>between people being repeatedly hit by these disasters and being

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>open to more and more um far reaching solutions. It's

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not a straight line. Often after one big event, people

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>will say it happened once, it probably won't happen again.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But after enough repeated disasters, my reporting says there's a

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>real shift and what people are willing to accept and

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in what local officials are willing to endorse. A plan

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that might work in Louisiana would for the moment, be

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a really really tough sell in California or Maryland, or

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Virginia or New York State. But as time goes on

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and Louisiana looks less like an outlier uh and more

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like our future, I think there'll be more appetite to say,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is it working there? In Louisiana, and if it is,

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>should we try it where we are? Christopher, isn't there

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a federal designation that would allow people to apply for

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>federal assistance if there was some kind of natural disaster,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and that if that's taken away, that's just another push

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of leaving. Yeah, there's there. There's a

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>designation um called the Under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that was meant to protect areas that haven't been developed

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>along the coast and keep them undeveloped. Louisiana saying let's

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>apply that to areas that already have homes on them,

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a really radical idea, and it would say

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we are not going to help you if you're in trouble,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so you better leave because if you don't, you'll be

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on your own. It's it's a really a very strong

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>push for people to get out of these areas. Thanks

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>very much, Christopher Flavelle, our climate policy reporter for Bloomberg,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>on how Louisiana is moving people out of areas that

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are ravaged by climate change. We've got something perhaps more

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>were important, which is food. You can't exist without that.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>And Alan Stillman knows a lot about food and serving people.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He is a restaurateur, is also the founder of Quality

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Branded Partners, and he may be better known as the

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>founder of Smith and Wilenski, but he's also the founder

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of t G I. Friday's. Alan, thank you very much

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for coming into the studio. Let I want you to

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>begin by telling the story of how you started in

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the business with t G I Friday's. Yeah. My relationship

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to the restaurant business walls exactly zero. But my relationship

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to having a beer on the way home was at

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>least once a week. And us called our First Avenue

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in sixty three Street in Manhattan, had a bullet hole

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the window, typical first avenue bar, And while drinking

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about beer, I said to the bartender, you know, there's

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot of young people that live in this area.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got stewardess as, you've got models, you've got pilots.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you put some sort of on the

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>floor and hung some Tiffany lights, would all those people

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>come in here? And he said yeah, hey, yeah, and

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I walked away and walked out. I came back about

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ten days later and he said, hey, aren't you the

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that wanted to hang tipp and I said, I

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hang anything. I suggested it to you

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and he said, well, you ought to do it. I said,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean. He said, well, why don't you

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>do it? And I said, yeah, it's not a bad idea.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, who was the owner of this corner place?

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>He said, that's me, And fifteen minutes later I owned

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the bar and it was called the Good Tavern, and

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I immediately said, in my mind, I now need a name.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And the name turned out to be t g I Fridays.

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And the rest of the story is as it is

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for about twelve units around the world today. And it's

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not as if this particular venture was your last, obviously,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because you sold t g I Fridays and you decided

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you liked the business so much you're gonna expand even more.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about how that went, like, actually expanded it

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>while it was around in New York City, and I

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>built uh ten or twelve of them around the country.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But I also built Sundays, Monday's, Tuesdays, Wednesday. I was

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, you have an affinity for days of the week,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and yeah. Then then I got out of the business

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for a while and left those I still owned it,

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted I lived over the South France and

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that was great. Six months I had gotten married and

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I had our four year old with us, and we

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>had a very good time. But I also then learned

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>about food and wine, and coming back to New York City,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I put the two together because I didn't know that

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>much about the food end of it, but I did

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>learn a lot about wine. And I discovered that all

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the steakhouses in New York City were terrific steakhouses, and

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they were the best in the world, but none of

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>them had wine lists. You'd walk in and they'd say,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>what would you like red or white? And it would

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>come into tumbler and I said, you know, it doesn't

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really fit for a glass of great red wine they had.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't change that. So I just I was going to

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>open up baby steakhouse, and luckily enough, there was a

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>big recession. I bought the corner of forty nine Street

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and Third Avenue, and we still in the corner of

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and third Avenue and Smith. Wilenski is now

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>forty years old this year. Happy birthday, congratulators. Much forty

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>year old restaurants don't exist very often it's a good

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>thing to have and went from there. What do you

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>believe to be one of the biggest differences from when

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you started Smith of Wilenski's and the way it operates now. Well,

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly wine, because almost every great steakhouse has a good

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to great wine list, and I believe that people associate

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>great red wine with great red meat, and that never happened.

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Forty years ago, there was no such thing. So I

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's a very very big difference. And I didn't

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you start National Wine Week? Yes? I did National And

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was a story about you actually transporting

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>something like a million dollars worth of line in a

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brinx armored truck. Yes, we did that too. Well, we

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we We kind of have a lot of fun with

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. I mean, the restaurant business is one of

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult businesses in the world, and it's not

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>only difficult to make money, but it's difficult just to

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>stay open. So you need to come out with ideas

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and with all sorts of public relation and marketing gimmicks,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>if you will, in order to keep people interested in

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>who you are what you are. And about a year

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>after we opened, uh Smith of Lensky. We discovered somebody

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>who was trying to sell a wine collection, which we bought,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and after we've spent the billion dollars on the wine collection,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we decided, well, why don't we transported by Brinks truck

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to the front of Smith and Lensky, which worked, and

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we got a couple of million dollars worth of publicity

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for it, along with the million dollars worth of wine.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>That whole idea of being a showman and an entertainer

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and a host that has become a much more important factor,

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems in the restaurant industry. I'm not sure that

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that's true anymore. It was going back before all of

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the new technology. The new technology has taken away a

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>lot from the showmanship of the restaurant business, because the

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>methodology of putting it together a restaurant, to making a reservation,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to how you get a reservation, to getting into restaurants

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>has taken away quite a bit from the showmanship of restaurateuring.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't taken away from the showmanship of cheffing. The

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>chefs still rule the market, and that is quite interesting

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there sort of the artists of the food world. Tell

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>us about your son Michael, and why did he decide

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to follow in your footsteps or did you not not

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>able to dissuade him from entering. No, it's actually the opposite.

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>There was no there was no persuasion involved. Michael graduated

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>from Brown University and is looking around for something autistic

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to do, and he was definitely not interested in the

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>restaurant business. And a couple of years later he came

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to me and he said, you don't beginning to think

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a little bit of art form in the

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>restaurant business. And I said, well, if you don't have

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>any art form, the restaurant business will not be in it,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because we're in the high end of the restaurant business.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And Michael decided he wanted to come on in. I

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>then turned to my good friend Danny Myers and said,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Danny put him to work for a year or so,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>which he did. Michael then came with us. He traveled

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>around the United States opening up Smith of Wilenski's, and

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for the last ten years he has run a restaurant

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>company that he sort of transferred from what we had

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>into the Quality Restaurant Group and he's opening his own

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>take on high end restaurants Quality meets quality Italian and

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he is also running around the country. He's opened in Denver,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He's about to open up in Chicago. So uh, he

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>did it by mistake, as I did it by mistake,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and so far it's worked out wonderfully. He loves what

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he's doing and he's fantastic at it. Well, you're getting

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>us ready for lunch, thanks very much. Alan Stillman is

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a restaurants whore, of course, a founder, Quality branded partner,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>founder of Smith and Wilinski's, founder of t g I Friday's.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He knows all about the restaurant industry. Well, we want

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to know the real intentions of Bowing and whether they

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>will be acquiring Ember Air. Here to help us understand

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the situation is George Ferguson, our senior Aerospace and Defense

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and Airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. George always a pleasure.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Why would Boeing be interested in acquiring this Brazilian manufacturer

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of aircraft? Hey, Pam, Yeah, So as we look at it,

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we think that the Bombardier air bus uh sort of

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>tie up with the C series earlier this year would

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be the reason. You know, So if you recall Bombardier

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>face with tariffs and bringing the C series into into

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the US. Basically, you know, gave the program to Airbus,

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and now Airbus can go out and market airplanes to

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>airlines from about a hundred forty to just over two

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred seats. That's there, and they can offer the C series,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which which an airline can use for a hundred forty seats.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>We think that you know, what what Boeing might be

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>doing here is looking to blunt Airbus' ability to market

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>two airplanes like that. You know, if they had to

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>tie up with embry Are, they could they can market

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>two airlines and airplanes, two airplanes, one two families, I

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>should say, one that would go from to about a

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten fifteen seats and another that could go

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>from a hundred and thirty up to you know, two hundreds.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So we think it gives them sort of the same

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>product palette as as Airbus. Okay, we would that be

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like the in terms of products we're talking about what

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the ember air one, the different variants of that, and

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>then maybe even the smaller the one s. Yeah, I

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>mean any thing about embry Are is that Embry's um

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>their primary airplane, the E jet has the one seventy five,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like you said to the one in the middle of

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>refreshing it. So they're putting new engines on it and

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>making it slightly larger. And yeah, that that airplane can

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>can operate from seats two hundred and thirty. The other

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really neat thing about it is that one seventy five

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is very very successful selling into regional airlines in the

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>United States. They buy the majority of airplanes I would

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>say that are less than a hundred and thirty seats.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>They can only operate airplanes that are seventy six seats

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are less due to clauses in the pilot contracts that

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the main airlines that they fly four and so that

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>airplane the one that is very successful because of its

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>its product placement, and that would be potentially in Boeing

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>lineup to market the airlines well Air Canada Express, I

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think they all they fly as just one example, the

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>ember Air one seventy five. Does Boeing really need this

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>deal because I thought that Boeing was putting a lot

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of effort behind the new seven three seven, the Max

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and the focus has been on not just the aircraft

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>but on making it more fuel efficient and reducing the

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>cost of operating the actual aircraft. Agreed, you know, agreed

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>on that's what the focus has been. It's interesting. I

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't think this would have been this interesting to Boeing. So,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, really what we've seen demand in the marketplace

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>has been that airlines have been looking to fly larger airplanes.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Pilot salary salaries have been going up, and they'd like

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, um, expense it over more seats in

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the airplane. That's one of the ways they're sort of

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>combating rising expenses. And so we've seen airlines again moving

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to larger and larger airplanes. We haven't seen a lot

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of orders for airplanes from a hundred to a hundred

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and thirty seats, So it kind of looks like a

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>market to us that is betwixt and between. It's not

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there yet maybe yeah, And you know, but they keep

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>stretching the size of the seven and eight three twenties, right,

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the latest iterations of those two narrow bodies that Boeing

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and Airbus are larger than their predecessors, and therefore the

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>efficiency um, you know, the efficiency point gets pushed higher.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>So this might be a response to sort of that

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>continuing increase of seven thirty seven and eight three twenty airlines.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>May you know if they're if they're running to less

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dense markets, they may really need something more efficient underneath

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that hundred and fifty seat point and in the Embry

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>air and the C Series one three hundred could be

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that answer. So I think Boeing might be looking a

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>little further down the road than you know. We we

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>see evidence in order is at you know, the ability

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to compete in that space and offer a product. Okay,

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta give me your thoughts though on the fact

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Brazilian government is still involved in ember Air.

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It started as a government financed company military contracts. For example,

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the government of Brazil is said already, at least according

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to one Brazilian newspaper, that majority control from Boeing not

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to happen. Yeah, I think this is going

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a really hard deal to put together, and

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to look like a wholesale takeover by anybody.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's if it gets done, it will look like a venture.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly that. The reason you know it's uh

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Embry is Brazil's most important defense contractor they're they're aerospace

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>national champion. The Brazilian government does have a golden share

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>in it, so they can decide, you know, what the

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>fate of the company is, and you know, they want

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it for high tech aerospace jobs. They want to foster

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>high tech aerospace jobs in Brazil. Obviously, letting Boeing buy

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing and take it home isn't going to

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>help them much. I don't think Bowing wants to take

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it home anyways. Um, I think it's going to be

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always a lot of politics around defense

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>contractors and things like that. The defense business doesn't make

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, and Embry are also as a

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bust business that doesn't make a lot of money, and

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Bowing really wants those businesses. So I

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>think this has to become sort of some sort of

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>complex structure that might get the Brazilian government the aims

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they want out of this company and give Boeing the

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to market the Embry air you know aircraft. Well,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much, it makes a lot of sense, and

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for keeping an eye on this topic, and we

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>know we're going to come to you in the future

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>about it. Much appreciated. George Ferguson is our senior Aerospace,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Defense and Airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Well, here to

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>help us understand what's going on in the housing market

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to the tax overhaul bill that the

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>President has just signed is Jonathan Miller. He is the

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>president and chief executive of Miller Samuel Jonathan. Great to

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. What do you make what do

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you make of the future for the UH? Well, let's

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>start with the high end, high cost markets such as Manhattan,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Westchester County and also other areas around the country, whether

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they be in Connecticut or in the state of Massachusetts

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or California high cost property. What's going to happen as

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a result of this tax overhaul plan? So I think

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll be downward pressure on housing prices, UH, as you

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>stew higher in price across the US. The basic theme

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of this bill as it relates to housing favors being

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a landlord over HOMEO worship in general. And you know,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the way to think of it

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is that, um, you know, someone that's buying a home

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>has a certain safe financial footprint in terms of that

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they can afford as a payment. And so if you

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>could just think of it is that you're adding some

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>additional costs, meaning reduced UM deductions in the context of

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>mortgage interest of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars of ten

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar cap on real pay taxes, those sort of

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>creep into that payment as a share, and we reduces

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>principle and interest. UM. I don't think it's catastrophic in

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of I don't mean to exaggerate it, but it

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly applies downward pressure to these higher end housing markets

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>far more than it would say in the middle in

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Midwest, where you know a home price might be

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred seventy five thousand dollars Jonathan, Will that pressure

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>actually turn into lower prices or will it just be

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a argaining chip when it comes to negotiations. So it's

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting because one of the things that came out of

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the discussions on the tax bill was at the yet,

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the higher cost markets, you know that the

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>higher cost of housing would be offset by the uh,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the bigger tax cuts and UM. And you know, human

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>beings or homeowners don't think that way in the sense

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that they don't look at all their their net worth

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>in one bucket and say, you know, because I'm getting

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>a tax cut, I can overpay for my home. Because

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen is, you know, there's a saying

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that housing prices are sticky on the downside, and and

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens is there's some sort of change, the prices

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>draw declined slowly simply because transactions, uh slow down because sellers,

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>um uh, you know, buyers are immediately adaptable to changes

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that favor them. Sellers tend to take a year or two.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think what we're really looking at over the

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>next year, year and a half is this sort of

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>figuring out between buyer and seller what the actual new

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>value is in these markets. So this puts the buyer

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in a better position. It absolutely does, because it's just

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that they may not their demand may not be satiated

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>initially simply because the sellers, you know, you know, this

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is a you know, a hundred years of homeownership as

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of the federal um, the federal push in this

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>whole American dream concept. High cost housing markets on the

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>East and West Coast are more impacted by this, and

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a year or two for the

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>two parties to sort of figure it out. Um. You know,

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this is sort of like literally what we

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>just went through. The last couple of years we've had

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at the high end of the market or higher cost markets,

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sellers have had a phenomenon that I've called aspirational pricing,

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>where that they're asking way more than what the buyers

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>are willing to come up with. And just only in

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen we've started to see equilibery in between expectations.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Now we have this new factor that will you know,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>undergo a period of a couple of years of testing

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>out before it settles in. Could this be a positive

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>in the for the long term that people will not

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be burdened with mortgages that they cannot afford that would

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be so linked to their income. Hey, I absolutely in

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the law in the long term certainly. Uh, you know,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that made of sort of runaway high

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>end housing prices. We did see some reining in of

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that I called two thousand fourteen nationally peak luxury and uh,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and since then we've seen a correction

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>at the very high end of the market generally overall affordability.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, one small benefit in the New York metro

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>area that whose economy is heavily dependent on Wall Street

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>accounting for about of the wages. Is higher. Bonus comp

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with tax cuts is a is you know, maybe a

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>modest improvement or help for the high end, but I

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really see it as anywhere is significant with the

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>regulatory overlay that we didn't when you compare it against

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of pre financial crisis. Got it. Thank you very much.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Miller is the president and the chief executive of

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Miller Samuel talking about how it is going to be,

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at least for now, going to be a buyer's market.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Abramo wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.